Consider what someone’s agenda may mean within the Ontological perspective. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit clifhigh.substack.com
There's all kinds of uh things uh demanding my attention as well as cleanup.
So I've got uh I've been washing windows and I've got a ton more to do.
The uh the rains are settling in on us here, the uh fall weather is is moving in.
I'm having to I'm shifting all of the uh uh book two stuff to another machine, and we'll begin uh re-begin production on that.
It's easiest for me to write in uh when we're socked in by the weather, right?
Uh not a lot of distractions that way.
This year is going to be a little different because of the distractions everywhere.
So a few things here, all right.
Um horrific weekend.
Um everybody's emotions are churned up, but you'll notice that the vast majority of people, it's a release emotion, right?
They're releasing their grief.
Anyway, um the and actually, I won't go into that.
Anyway, uh, so um this is uh gonna examine this little talk here, is going to examine a couple of things and and um then head towards the I uh the idea of a projection of what's going to be coming out of our event stream in a broad fashion.
It's not possible for me to do my old-style reports, I can't get any detail because of the intrusion of AI and the government, censorship, and all of this kind of stuff, right?
All I can do is the broad trends anymore.
Um those are being done at an emotional uh content level, not a um, not a uh meme specific or thought-specific kind of content.
So it's much more about the uh rising and falling emotional tension.
Um in anyway, so uh I had some data from last year that I ran and uh collected data all the way up through January, end of January, and uh ran some projections, put a um series of charts together.
I put one out on uh X recently, and uh something that it always I'd always wondered about when I saw this back uh pre-April, because the charts were done in March, I I think late February or early March, I'd have to go back and check the file date.
Um that I kind of wondered about was this big spike that uh in uh building tension that begins on the first of October.
Made no sense, right?
Uh if it was gonna be financial or whatever, it should be a little bit into the first week, but not on the first.
Um unless coincidentally the first happened to line up with specific days and other events, which it did not.
And so uh so I couldn't really figure it out.
The jump was quite sizable, much larger than we've seen in the past in terms of the emotional tension numbers than had occurred around um financial stuff.
So it didn't really look to be 100% financial.
I figured, well, it could be political, it could be any number of things.
This is not that far off at the moment, and I'm actually thinking it relates to the uh three eye atlas and the idea of aliens, and I'll get into that in a minute.
Um, so uh to set up a perspective here, let me note some things.
Okay, we have people like myself saying we live in an ontology.
We have people saying we live in a simulation, and then we have uh the vast majority of people that are saying we live in a gritology.
The idea of the gritology is that if all consciousness goes away, the dirt remains, you know.
In um in either the ontology or the simulation theory, that's not true.
If all consciousness departs from this universe, the universe collapses and disappears in total, right?
Because in both of these Ideas, our universe is constructed within a mind, within a consciousness, if you will, right?
And so in the ontology, that is the supreme, which is just our way of saying El Bigo, El Grande, Supreme Consciousness, right.
And a supreme consciousness can easily be understood as God.
I have no problem with that.
However, your definition of God is, you have to include some of the ideas that make up the actual functioning.
I'm approaching this from a functional viewpoint.
So not a religious viewpoint, not a worship viewpoint, none of that, just you know, mechanistic.
How does this shit work?
And entirely forthright saying it's it's for personal reasons, right?
I'm not trying to take over the universe or any of that.
I want a little floaty RB, so I can go truck around and see what's in Antarctica and go visit some people in Switzerland and stuff, right?
And I hate road trips.
Um in any event, those.
So you can easily see the ontology is supreme consciousness, it is supreme consciousness, however you want to define that, right?
In a simulation theory, it is essentially the same thing.
The simulation theory, on the other hand, believes this is being done within some form of a machine, some form of a mechanism, and um that within the simulation uh there is a real reality on the other side of the simulation.
Sort of like a bunch of people sitting in a room drinking their coffee, you know, uh their stomachs are churning and they're watching computer programs, fiddling with keys and stuff, and we live in the computer program that those guys are monitoring.
That's the simulation theory.
I don't give it much credence, but most all of the stuff they're attributing to the idea of the simulation theory, really, in my opinion, is pointing to their seeing the more mechanistic aspects of how the ontology is running, how the Supreme Collegist, uh Supreme Consciousness is running this ontology.
Okay, so this is also encapsulated in many religious traditions.
You can go back to the Ethiopian Jews, you can go back to the Hindus, you can go back to people in the uh isolated regions of the South Pacific who had um very little direct contact as far as we know with um other religions and developed a uh basically an ontology religion.
And uh so, and you see it in uh Shinto, you see it in uh Zen's not a religion in my opinion, it's um uh uh a process and uh and that kind of thing, but you see it in Taoism, you see it in the ancient Chinese text, the uh pre Confucian, as well as to a great extent in Confucian Confucianism, right?
So it's the idea is all over, all right.
They phrase it differently and so on.
Uh, Western religions have a tendency to understand the idea, but they say that that they they see it more like a simulation where our reality is out here, and there is a supreme consciousness or a god that is external to that reality, right?
And in a sense, that's accurate, uh, but we are internal in the ontological or the simulation idea, we are internal to the supreme consciousness.
And uh in the Hindus had this idea that Brahma, their ultimate god, he'd go and take a nap, there's nothing going on, right?
He's a little bored, he goes, he takes a nap, he dreams, and all of us come into existence, whole ages, you know, infinite time comes into existence in the form of his dream, and then at some point, uh episodically, periodically, Brahma wakes up, the dream goes away, we all disappear, and then he lays back down, and we and and they and redreams a new existence and in to coming into existence, right?
A new reality coming into existence.
So that was that idea.
Alright.
So the point of this is that absent the gratology view, uh, which was adopted by the Jews, and informs uh their religion, and to some great extent also informs Mohammedism with this restricted view of the gratology.
Um anyway, so uh absent that basically all of these other approaches are encapsulations of some of the idea of the ontology, including the simulation theory.
And I can debunk the simulation idea in a lot of different ways and point uh to stuff that points really directs it back to an ontology.
Okay, now the point of all of that is that um from an ontological viewpoint, uh if you take that as your jumping off, which I do, right?
So I don't take gratology, I don't take the gratology view, solid matter, any of that as my my stepping off point for thinking about anything.
I take the ontology view, right?
And so, in that view, um there are no accidents, and there's no meaningless coincidences.
So there's every coincidence has vast ripples of meaning, depending on who is seeing it and so on and when.
And so you might read about a coinc a coincidence that occurs and find great meaning in it 60, 80 hundred years later, that sort of thing, right?
And lots of lots of conspiracy theories are crafted around uh coincidence that people find meaningful.
And sometimes they're able to um suss out other material.
They craft a conspiracy theory, and it ends up having meaning for the rest of us as well.
And it was all because they found these coincidences to be not random, to be interrelated, etc.
People are now dealing with this with the recent events and the unraveling of all of the story, uh, you know, um the disparate threads of the thinking on it, all of that kind of stuff.
I don't I don't involve myself at that level because there's nothing in there for me.
I find it to be a distraction, especially at this particular time.
Uh not deliberate, right?
We live in an ontology, so this is this was this is a part, you know, everything is a part of everything else within the ontology, and everything is uh springboarding on everything else in the process of creating more and more complexity.
Okay, so um now what I want to talk about is the changes that have occurred uh relative to space aliens, three eye atlas and all of that.
And I'm seeing this from an ontological viewpoint, which is why I bring it up, because I will dispute a lot of the stuff that people have from a gratology viewpoint.
Even if I agree with what their uh their main premise is, I will dispute their conclusions because they will have a tendency, and I'm talking astrophysicists, etc., uh, very knowledgeable researchers, they will have a tendency to fall back into the gratology viewpoint and dismiss a lot of things where I'm going to accept those things and add them to a um uh uh continually forming, continually refining picture of what's going on without putting any emotional attachment to them, right?
So uh so I'm not going to try and build a narrative and add emotional attachment to it.
I'm going to try and build a narrative description of what's happening now.
And then as items come in or um are proven to not be accurate in my interpretation of them at that moment, I'll let them fall off and see what else comes in, right?
I'm I'm egalitarian.
I'm open to what is actually uh materially manifesting in this regard.
Now, uh three eye atlas is changing.
It's like nothing we've ever seen.
Uh assuming, okay, now there is that one caveat, right?
And that is that we have to believe, we have to accept that the instrumentation that is available is indeed reporting this shit as it has been uh uh fed out to us.
I have a tendency to think that there is some truth to that, that the information is had been coming out accurately.
This this idea of mine is reinforced at this moment because now a lot of the observatories are being locked down on what they can report about 3i Atlas.
And by the way, we've got this uh new comet, Swan 25 that just popped in.
So there's various reports about three I Atlas that are now interesting to say the least, okay.
Uh they're saying it changed color, that's significant, uh, because of what happened and how rapidly change of color.
There's now reports that there are uh between three and five uh objects that appear to be orbiting it as it's moving.
There's reports of uh three objects, orbs or whatever the fuck, over Mars that are now forming themselves in a triangle and maintaining that triangular relationship in the sky.
Uh I think this would be the fourth day they're reporting that.
All right.
There's uh reports of um three eye atlas changing change in direction, which uh theoretically is going to put it closer to Mars.
And uh some people are saying could potentially impact.
Okay.
It's also had changes, oops, change in speed, which means and that change in speed seems to indicate it's slowing down.
And also you'll see some people that are saying that um the change in direction is going to take it back to Earth.
I don't know that that's the case.
Uh I don't have an observatory, I haven't seen the plots.
Uh I could discern that if I thought that the information was accurate and real, I'd go ahead and um uh and would be able to see like holder that a bit uh to um well that didn't help much, and there we go.
Okay.
Um I'd be able to ascertain whether or not that that appeared to be the case, right?
That that indeed was it a uh situation of uh deviating apparently towards Mars, but with the idea of hooking around back towards Earth on our next uh revolution, which would be next uh next year uh in this area, uh in this area of space, right?
So um, what else was there?
All right, so we can't uh we can't validate the objects that are um uh theoretically orbiting it.
We can't validate, well, we can't validate any of it because we don't have any of this gear, right?
We have to rely on officialdom for this.
All right, so let's say that um uh now I'm taking this from an ontological viewpoint.
Um I take some of this stuff seriously, in the sense that um our um our universe is designed, in my opinion, to test the idea through through uh to test the idea of novelty.
Can novelty exist, and that the way that it's approaching it is through a um an increasing level of complexity.
And thus, in my opinion, in my thinking, uh things like three eye atlas are there to push along in those uh main themes, so to speak, right?
So it seems perfectly logical under this understanding that three eye atlas is uh non-human intelligence, that it is uh directed, controlled, right?
Uh not necessarily inhabited.
It could be uh what we think of as AI controlled.
In fact, that makes a lot more sense if we assume that it's uh presumed trajectory is accurate, right?
It's so long in transit from Sagittarius B that the idea is absurd that there would be living creatures in there, that any any individuated living creature would would deliberately put itself in um a container and shoot itself in all of its uh future generations uh towards Earth, right?
It doesn't make any sense at all.
There's no validation for it.
You could see it if the um if you if you allowed for the space aliens being under extremists, you know, they had to evacuate, right?
Their planet was going to explode or whatever the fuck.
Or they were you know they were being invaded and they all had to leave, and it's a remnant of their civilization.
One of these like really uh extreme situations, you could see that sort of thing, but but the idea that any civilization or species would survive that kind of long haul is absurd.
I mean, they're really risking it, right?
So we might get three-eye atlas here, it might be filled with a bunch of dead aliens, as far as we know, on it in a rocket or in a um uh interstellar device that is um under AI control.
That last part I actually expect to be more valid, uh more potentially true than any other aspect.
So if we find out that if officialdom ends up, and I don't who knows if officialdom is going to do this, if uh officialdom allows that this three-eye atlas is factual, it's real, it's um uh not a comet, it's some form of a device.
If that is the case, then there's all kinds of thinking, you know, it's a device that from a blown-up civilization all the way down to a device deliberately sent to destroy all humans because our radio chatter annoys them, who knows, right?
Or for whatever reason.
So we could think of it as malevolent, but we we don't have to.
Um but I would certainly figure that uh if the uh that basically, no matter where it came from, it's going to be under automated control.
And I would doubt very much uh that there was any life form in it that would be uh recognizable as life uh to us, um, you know, in terms of individual individuated um, you know, self-determining blah blah blah.
Okay, so um you could postulate that uh it is inimicable, it's uh bad for humans in a number of different ways.
It could be a bomb or any number of things.
It could uh arrive here and open up a giant portal and then the Draco reptilians pour through and they, you know, come and come and eat you and and um and roast your liver, that kind of thing, right?
Eh, you know, there's not a lot of there is not a lot to suggest that any of that kind of shit is factual.
Now, there are some things we have to worry about, in my opinion, right?
Regardless of whether or not it is intended, uh, it might, okay, assuming that three eye atlas is indeed some form of a device, I would think that we would have to worry about such things as EMF, right?
Whether uh deliberate or accental, uh the they the thing could have EMF in the process of slowing down, and that EMF could distort our minds.
Okay, we've recently seen that the government is um experimenting, or okay, so the conspiracy guys are saying that the government is experimenting with uh memory and mind distorting EMF in um concerts for young people, that they're wiping their their recent memories and stuff when they go in into these concerts.
And I have no reason to doubt it.
I know that there was um a lot of a flurry of investigation into the idea of electromagnetic uh pulsed energy coming through your skull and distorting your memory, right?
Disconnecting the uh the function of the and the contents even of um uh hormone-producing glands um uh uh I won't go in that tie you to memory.
Okay, so that's how they're doing it was with the pulse stuff.
Now, the supposition, the suggestion that this is happening as a test case in concerts, seems to be reported or supported by um reports on the internet after some of these concerts that kids are saying, wow, I don't remember fuck all, right?
Not for the last two weeks.
And it's and it's not in the one, you know, they're saying basically, oh, this must be what headbangers feel like, right?
And uh it may be indeed what headbangers feel like, and it also may be quite deliberate uh on the part of um uh parties for whatever fucking reason.
You know, why don't they stop the chemtrails?
You know, uh so they don't want to stop the chemtrails.
You know, where who the fuck owns the giant drones that can hover for five days not need refueling and stand there absolutely stock still, you know, uh 800 feet up in a hundred mile an hour winds.
Hmm.
And then they don't tell us shit about this.
So this reality that we're in, in spite of the fact that it's an ontology, is polluted by the gratology people that are trying to fuck us all over.
The grotology people, in my opinion, Are very desperately afraid.
That's why they're doing a lot of this stuff, right?
Because their understanding and their control system is breaking down as a result of all of these different kinds of things, none of which they can stop, but they think they can because their views are so limited.
Their understanding of our reality is so limited, they think they have far more power than they actually do.
In any event, okay, so we have to watch out for EMF from 3I Atlas passing through, whether or not it decelerates, right?
So as of October 3rd, um it's no longer visible uh to us.
And uh if the recent course corrections and uh speed changes were to be projected as being uh part of a whole series of maneuvers of of its trajectory, then you can postulate that it's gonna slow down on October 21 on the other side of the sun when it's closest to Mars.
That's interesting.
We have all the cameras and shit at Mars, supposedly, so we'll see what they get.
Anyway, things are picking up, right?
And we'll see a lot more of this.
Um a lot more information about this, okay.
So we have to also bear in mind that one thing we have to worry about at this stage, I mean humans, we have to worry about government, okay?
Because, in my opinion, um all of the three eye atlas stuff, and now the um atlas and Swan.
Swan 25 something, 25b or G or something, um uh all of that stuff is uh is easily manipulated by government um for control purposes.
And uh we are seeing a cross-government, like many governments are uh are now dealing with their uh science institutions freaking out about and leaking information out about three i atlas.
We haven't seen much about Swan yet, but that's that's just coming out, it's just appeared.
So we'll see how these things go.
Um I'm expecting actually, all right.
So there's a possibility that we'll see a social umatic shift.
Okay, I don't know what language to really use for it.
But uh leftists are getting all kinds of shit now, as they rightly should for us uh for celebrating assassination.
That's going to continue, the success of it is gonna pile on with itself, it's not going to be that short-lived.
They may um I'm expecting it not necessarily organized, but a natural response on the part of people that are endangered by that their previous language and so on, who can see them writing on the wall, those that are not um vaxxed out of their ability to think.
Uh I expect those people to actually get a little bit paranoid, and it would be, it would make sense that some of them would um uh pile on to the three eye atlas equals aliens or the three-ei Atlas Swan equals aliens or something like that, right?
Just as a diversionary thing.
Don't think about me, think about the aliens, right?
Don't think about what a shit I am, think about the aliens.
And so that may indeed be uh a part of what's going to be coming on up.
Therefore, there would also be a legitimate counter-reaction on the part of people on the right, saying, oh, it's a diversionary tactic, don't pay any attention to 3i Atlas or any of this other shit.
And we also would know that that would suit government because they seem to be shutting down seem to.
We don't have a whole lot of confirmatory things, but we we uh the data stream about 3i Atlas is drying up very rapidly from official them.
And so there seems to be some level of um caution.
I don't know if it's concern or whatever, okay.
However, so government though can use the the idea of three eye atlas and all kinds of weird shit in space, uh, all the way down to the impact on the you know, from the uh Voyager series and so on.
They can use all of This to their uh advantage, and I expect them to uh in 2026 as a control mechanism, right?
I expect that um uh we will have these kind of responses from government about something in space, which none of us guys will be able to validate, but there does appear to be independently if you really research it, and that's a lot of work, so most people won't.
There does appear to be factual uh things happening independent of each other.
Now it doesn't mean that we're not, it doesn't mean it's all uh that it's not organized, that it's not a psyop, okay?
It could easily be a PSYOP and the government's on the other side of it, and the CIA is tweaking the data so it goes into the machines and makes these people think that kind of thing, right?
Or not the CIA, but whoever the fuck, right?
Uh so so they could be receiving data, they're just looking at data coming in on screens.
They don't actually have binoculars looking at the fucker, right?
So there it's not like anybody seeing it with their the naked eye.
And so we have to trust um the data, which these days the word trust, you know, it doesn't exist in in regards to uh uh me and any anybody out of any institution.
I don't give a shit whether the institution claims not to be government or not, right?
It can not be government and still 100% uh funded and controlled by them.
And I can't tell the difference, so eh, screw it.
I'm concentrating on a few things from an ontological perspective.
From this ontological perspective, some things make sense.
That because of the nature of the growth of because of the nature of the way complexity grows into greater complexity, I'm expecting that 3i Atlas is really factually not a rock, not accidental, not um uh a meteor, none of that shit.
That everything that we seem to uh take uh that it seems to be doing, from which we take the idea that it's intelligently controlled, I think that's factual.
I think it is intelligently controlled.
Um I do not think that there's aliens in it, uh, but obviously if it's intelligently controlled and constructed, it wasn't done so by humans, as far as we know, we can't be that easily deceived in terms of this kind of stuff.
So uh it would be extra solar system outside of our solar system that it was constructed.
You could, there's a couple of scenarios I've seen where they say that, you know, where they the uh astrophysicists are saying that you know, if it came from the far side of Jupiter at this particular time, it could come around and make us think that it was coming out of uh galactic center, but still very difficult to do.
And there would be some levels of residuals in the solar system that would tell us.
Okay, not like uh waves or anything, but sort of like distortions that could be used.
Okay, so um, so the so I'm expecting government in 2026, uh, and maybe early 2026 to uh start using this kind of stuff for their agenda, right?
For the hidden agenda, all of that kind of chemtrail, you know, mind warping, all of that kind of stupid shit that they're doing.
And that's because these guys are working from a perspective of the gratology, it dominates their thinking, therefore they don't see their own actions participating in their own uh problems now and in future lives, okay?
So they they don't have a concept of themselves outside of their meat sack, and that makes these guys stupid and dangerous, and they do stuff, okay.
So I think that they will use these for their own agenda.
I see it as happening in 2026.
There's a big problem in 2027 that is energetically comes in, well, probably at the very last days of 2026, but it occupies uh January and February in 2027.
Then there's a slight lull, and then we pick it up again in uh June of 2027.
Those are those uh months out there in my system from data that was at the end of 2020 4 and into 2025.
So relatively current uh that data suggests that we're gonna have um a huge emotional impact in this period of time, right?
Uh The sag down here is still at levels that are far over what we see in 2026 and are far over what we've got in 2025.
So we're on an escalating emotional tension curve that I would say would suit would fit if aliens were appearing.
There are some things that you can predict about aliens, right?
Appearing, right?
That the government is going to freak out about them regardless of whatever the situation, they don't want humans to interact with them.
We've seen that for 60 plus, 70 plus years in the in the current officialdom.
So you can make all these projections projections of a past behavior by these people as to their future response.
So should such a thing occur as, you know, provable non-human intelligence design devices appearing.
There's so much out in the woo world that does prove all of this that it's like, eh, you know, I'm I'm non-plus, but it's like, eh, I don't care.
You know, it's gonna, unless they're acting, Heidi says, you know, unless they're showing up for dinner, and she can actually see them, she's not gonna take them into her thinking.
And I agree with her at that level, right?
Uh but the the thing for me is I am certain that government is gonna freak out at some point.
Uh I think it'll occur in 2026.
Um, and I think that, and they'll freak out because they will they will come to the understanding that 3i Atlas is non-human and it's a device.
Uh, and so therefore could have beings in it or whatever the fuck, right?
Something will make government freak out, and they will um uh use the presence of three eye atlas or their their reactions will will show that they are reacting to its presence.
And they're gonna really uh lose their minds uh because uh aliens means no control.
So um humans will naturally, in my opinion, uh act with each other against an outside species threat.
Let's say 90% of the humans would um would come together around their political differences and their religious differences to react to an outside threat.
But uh government's intrusion in that process is gonna be quite complicated, okay.
Not complex, but complicated.
And there's a there's a big difference because they're gonna pile on shit that need not be there, and it's gonna make the life of government, the short life of government um uh more difficult than it need be, right?
And uh without their piling on these comp uh complications, the complexity in which they're involved would be a little bit easier to get out of.
I think it's gonna be very difficult for government to get out of this complex uh the complexity issues.
Their thinking is gonna be quite odd and off relative what's actually going on.
And but of course they have to.
Okay, so if they're space aliens, government can't have uh open interaction between you and space aliens for any number of reasons.
Um, you know, disease, mind disease, uh warping the human mind, who the fuck knows, right?
So they would say that if um Cash Patel was walking down the street with his bodyguards, and everybody was suddenly confronted with a space alien, Cash Patel and all those bodyguards would have to be isolated.
Okay.
The mere fact that that space alien got within six feet, ten feet or something of them means in government's mind, in government's paranoid mind, he's contaminated, his mind's been changed.
They came down and they altered his thinking.
So no matter what Cash Patel said after that, he would it would be suspect.
This is the kind of shit we're gonna get into because of the way that government has to think about these things, because the first and foremost rule of government is self-pre uh preservation.
And that self-preservation frequently means they have to do nasty things to the citizens in order that the government itself will prevail.
And that's the that's what they figure is their their prime and best um uh use of their time in this existence is keeping government there.
Okay, they see it as this great thing.
Anyway, so so government's gonna have this freak out at a contamination level.
And I think it's gonna reach the uh contamination level of the mind, right?
So they're gonna be worried about the uh space aliens altering human thinking, uh specifically your thinking.
And what are you gonna do?
Holy fuck, right?
You're no longer under human control.
And in fact, you might be contaminated.
And so, you know, maybe we'd better put you into the contaminated by aliens camps.
Who knows how extreme it's going to be, but they will seriously freak out.
They will also amplify their freak out because there will be so many agendas being run by so many different subsets of government for their own purposes.
You know, waste of time, in my opinion, and stuff, but anyway, so um, so this is kind of what I'm expecting over the uh next little period of time.
Um we'll know a lot more about the shape of this and which of these various different uh threads uh may pop off, and we'll know that uh for sure, uh, early part of December, right?
When they think that uh 3i Atlas should be making its appearance around and so on, and there's any number of things that could be going on.
I wanted to note something though, that um some of the things are actually some of the things being reported, and they're reported as as meaningless or not um easily found meaning within them by the mainstream.
And one of these things has been the recent color change in three-eye atlas to this um particular shade of green.
And human eye sees green better than any other color.
Okay, we've got more receptors for discriminating on green shades because it's necessary for us because we eat vegetables, right?
And we live in a in a world populated by plants, many of whom, many of the plants can cause you problems, you know, either skin irritations or outright poisoning.
So, and also many predators hide within the dense green stuff.
So our eyes are very well attuned to green.
Uh, green is also shown or discussed in uh books in like the 19 late 1950s out of the Soviets, when this particular guy um was doing some work uh with uh various different uh concepts for space.
He'd been in jail, he'd been um thrown in jail, and he uh came up with this idea that oh, well, if you were a civilization and you were gonna do things across space, it would have to be automated.
He had no concept.
This is 19 um even actually uh late 1940s, he started thinking about this, writing it down.
And this is um uh uh Kozirev, and he's doing some thinking about these things, and he was an astrophysicist, and he says, well, um, you know, going from star to star is a long long haul, so you'd send a machine.
They were getting into robotics and that kind of stuff early then.
And he was saying you'd send a machine, and how would you do it?
And then one of the things he came up with was the idea of a reversible process impulse engine.
And in his mind, it would use cyanide because of the complexity of the cyanide molecule, would allow you to disassemble the, or at the beginning, you'd fire off from whatever your planet with this big pile of stuff that you would then uh use in your impulse engine, and the molecular bonds would be ripped apart, the energy would be liberated, and you would be left with this material, which was uh hydrogen, carbon, and nitrogen in such a way that it became cyanide.
And you just have this, and his idea was you just push this cyanide gas, the excess in your process of creating your your energy, you'd push it out to the outside of your spaceship, let it freeze.
And it would be a protective barrier against all kinds of things.
And you'd only have to run your impulse engines, say the first third of your journey, and you'd run them really fast at the beginning, and then they would slowly fade out, and then you wouldn't worry about it.
You've got your speed, and you just go with this automated device, and then at the end, some form of automation, he tied it to um uh uh calendar clocks, would fire up and it would use this the um Cyanide gas,
the frozen cyanide ice vapor, and it would suck that back in and use it up, use it to fire up the impulse engine, uh tearing those molecules apart to reproduce the original stock of material you started with, uh, hydrogen, carbon, and nitrogen, and uh it would tear those um uh chemical bonds apart and reduce the amount of cyanide around you, which had been your barrier against all these micrometeorites and shit.
And in the process, you would glow brilliant green, okay, because of the uh cyanide gas.
Okay, it would just illuminate everything.
Uh the process would be in the core in your device, but the light from that process of the destruction of the uh or or the releasing of the energy via the molecular bonds would cause this great uh amount of light which would go through the cyanide gas and would reveal spectrographically, but also to the visual eye, that it was being um consumed in this process, right?
And we see this.
I've done welding, okay, and so you see this when you're doing welding.
You'll see the the hues of the various gases and so on.
You gotta wear breathing apparatus and this kind of shit for these various different kinds of advanced welding.
I was just uh doing uh boat welding for my own purposes, but I got really deep into it because it was fun stuff to mess with.
Uh the electric arc, I was not a big flame guy.
Um anyway, so uh just that, right?
I think it it could be that it's using an impulse engine if that's the case.
There's any number of um uh tells that we might even be able to see, even though it's on the other side of the sun.
And then of course, you now you're left with the idea of okay, let's speculate as to the why.
You know, why are they coming here?
What do they want, etc., etc.?
And uh that's when humans are gonna go bad shit.
Trying to work all of that stuff out, right?
Um anyway, guys, so uh just this little bit of thinking.
Uh we've got ourselves uh a funny situation here, and I'm quite sure it's gonna get funnier as we go along.
Now, three I atlas may pass through our solar system, just like a Muamua, uh which was definitely a device because it left the solar system faster than gravity could uh alone, solar gravity gravitational sling uh could account for.
And so it was definitely powered.
Um, in my opinion, right?
Not that anybody gives a shit.
Uh anyway, so it could pass right through the solar system, and then we're gonna be wondering, okay, what the fuck was that all about?