Changes
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit clifhigh.substack.com
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit clifhigh.substack.com
| Time | Text |
|---|---|
| Hello humans. | |
| Hello humans. | |
| It's 13th of August. | |
| It's a very poor 13. | |
| And we're going to talk about some stuff here. | |
| So this morning I get up, I find out Trump has, you know, we knew that he was clamping down on Washington, D.C. Now he's informed Smithsonian, which is the place that steals all of the heritage of the American people and hides it underground for their own purposes. | |
| And he's informed them that he's going to come and basically take over, right? | |
| And kick butt. | |
| And that he's out there. | |
| They're going to trying to adjust the sound here a bit. | |
| And they're going to take over all these tunnels that exist between the Capitol and all these other buildings. | |
| And the question arises, is this a manifestation of the secrets revealed part that had been forecast back in 2003 relative to Maryland, Delaware, and at the time, a particular description in which, and the idea was, but the net result was that there would be a trickle and then a pretty good flow and then a huge flood of secrets revealed. | |
| We're obviously in the secrets of revealed time. | |
| Trump is talking about all of this stuff. | |
| You know, we've got drones. | |
| We're on the cutting edge of the sci-fi world manifesting all around us. | |
| And I thought I would explain to people how some of how we think time works and how my process worked, okay? | |
| So that we can get around some bad understandings that are causing or that are contributing to people making wrong choices. | |
| Okay, so it's early in the morning. | |
| It's the 13th. | |
| It's 7.58 a.m. | |
| And here's our setup, okay? | |
| So if we are to understand the event stream from a personal level, we can do things to cause, because we're consciousness, to cause that event stream to react to what we're doing. | |
| We can extract stuff out of it, that kind of thing, right? | |
| We can extract, it's a probability field, and so we can cause by our consciousness certain aspects of that probability to come together and produce what we want. | |
| This is the rule of assumption or what they call the law of attraction. | |
| And there's rules about how all this stuff operates. | |
| Now, so you could see, because you're consciousness, that if you're doing psychic forecasting in any way, shape, or form, prophecy like Bo Polney, any of these kind of things, right? | |
| Where you have a prophetic vision that's coming through a human where their mind is involved, their mind may be putting out projections that they're attempting to cause to emerge out of the event stream. | |
| And so as an example, Bo Polny gets this idea that there's going to be millions of people dying. | |
| And he tells everybody for months and months and months there's going to be millions of people dying. | |
| And he picks a particular date because of his numerology and his old book association, right? | |
| He believes this book, and that's his religion. | |
| And so he takes numerology out of the book. | |
| We know the book is faked. | |
| It doesn't matter. | |
| He takes a numerology. | |
| He picks a particular day. | |
| And he said, all these millions of people are going to start dying on that day. | |
| Doesn't happen, right? | |
| Okay, he had been projecting into Or attempting to draw out of the event stream something that his mind had had in there. | |
| So it wasn't prophecy. | |
| All prophecy is like that, but it's because they're putting their minds out there. | |
| They think they see this stuff, right? | |
| Now, my process begun in 1993 doesn't use an individual human mind. | |
| What it does is it aggregates and collects all of these little leaks that come out of everybody on the internet, and then I go through and I interpret those using set-theoretic mathematics. | |
| Now, that's where the rub comes in, right? | |
| Because my mind is doing the interpretation. | |
| But unlike a situation where I'm actually looking into the event stream only through the filter of my mind, where I could be projecting on it, not seeing what's coming, this is really, in my opinion, a better way to do things using the mass aggregation of the leaks through a computer system to present you with an image of what's out in the event stream, right? | |
| And thus, and then you can pick what seems to be likely to emerge out of the melee that is this giant, huge engine of change. | |
| Bear in mind that the event stream, that's all it is, is a giant change state, a change of every fucking thing constantly. | |
| And we stand out here looking at this thing. | |
| Now, I stood in a situation back here in the early 2000s looking at the event stream. | |
| And I have no qualifiers. | |
| I don't know what I'm seeing. | |
| So, in terms of time, right? | |
| So, I don't have a calendar that runs out underneath the event stream to tell me when any of this stuff is going to happen. | |
| So, I chose to use these things called TMs, right? | |
| Temporal markers. | |
| So, and it was a situation of in a temporal marker, the item number one and item number two and item number three would all be in the same set and they would appear out here. | |
| So, when we saw item number one appear, then the likelihood of two and three also appearing in that temporal bounds rose. | |
| But it didn't have to happen that way. | |
| It's not chiseled in stone. | |
| This is not prophecy. | |
| This is an analysis of a large language model picking up on what I had defined as prescient words. | |
| I had defined them, right? | |
| So, there's no authority or any of this shit in this. | |
| That this has produced what it has produced over these last 30 years is due to a continuing evolution of an understanding of the event stream in our reality, right? | |
| So, there's a lot of things that is curious, but not necessarily that meaningful. | |
| So, let me get into it here then. | |
| So, in 2003, I started seeing this stuff in the event stream and these leaks that I defined by the label that the set seems to provide, and that was new money. | |
| Well, I didn't have any real target date as to when the new money would emerge. | |
| I knew there were certain conditions around it that I could describe by association of other sets within the giant large language model. | |
| But, well, the new money, hey, that turns out to be cryptos, right? | |
| And that pops off 2009-ish, something like that, with the release of the white paper. | |
| So, that came out, right? | |
| So, we had new money emerge. | |
| And so, item number one comes up, right? | |
| Well, in those same sets, we have $600 silver. | |
| Now, okay, so let's get into this $600 silver. | |
| In the same understanding of the new money, so item number two, $600 silver, seen from back before 2003, projecting into a future in which we didn't know timeframe, the mind at that time said, well, how could this be, right? | |
| And so, you look around all of the other leaks in the event stream here that's coming out that are in the set around $600 silver, and you see the rioting, all of these kind of things that we've been through these past few years. | |
| So, they were associated with the $600 silver. | |
| And so in looking at that back in 2003, I very definitely got the impression, I don't want to live in that world because nothing seemed to function. | |
| It was all going to hell. | |
| It was not good. | |
| And because of the association of those words and the impression that this gave, it made sense then in 2003 to say to ourselves, in what kind of situation could there be $600 silver? | |
| And so we project, we come up with a hypothesis that under those kinds of conditions, riots and all this other shit going on, you know, the sun disease, all of these sorts of things, which turned out to be COVID, as well as the powers that be trying to tell us the sun is causing, or that, you know, the planet's climate is sick, all of that kind of stuff, right? | |
| Okay, so at that time, the only world that made sense that you would have $600 silver meant basically the collapse of the currency and stuff. | |
| And we were going to have new money. | |
| And there were also sets in there about the dollar being basically fucked, right? | |
| The Federal Reserve note, not the USA dollar, but the Federal Reserve note, being basically fucked. | |
| We're at the end of the system, blah, blah, blah. | |
| Okay, so it all makes sense that we're going to get into this world where people would have to trade real money, silver, silver coins, for goods. | |
| Okay, but at the time that I was seeing this stuff in the data, the other sets around it said we had diminishing supply chains, we had a big die-off, all of which has happened, right? | |
| But that's now in our past. | |
| That's now in memory. | |
| It's not currently emerging out of the event string. | |
| Nor do I think that scenario is going to. | |
| So my supposition is that there is still a possibility for $600 silver. | |
| Bear in mind that just because it is seen at a particular stage does not mean it's bound to emerge. | |
| And it may certainly emerge in ways other than we anticipate. | |
| In fact, it'll never come out the way we anticipated. | |
| It just doesn't work that way. | |
| So there are scenarios developing now that will support the idea of $600 silver, but it's not going to be trading silver coins to each other to buy goods. | |
| It's not going to be the collapse of the currency. | |
| That phase of things seems to be behind us, as though we're not going to have that kind of future. | |
| And the dystopian future, okay, so here's another thing. | |
| So my system, way the hell back throughout the whole process, depends on one extreme point of vulnerability, and that's everybody's mind. | |
| Okay. | |
| So we got all of the massive normies out here, you know, regular society, regular humans that don't give a shit about any of this stuff. | |
| You know, they're playing their games, they're eating their bad food in their little apartments, all of that kind of shit, just basically trying to survive. | |
| And this is the mass of our reality. | |
| Well, my data set samples that, my process. | |
| It samples their language. | |
| Our problem is that this language was deliberately polluted. | |
| And it's been deliberately polluted since way the fuck back when, but actively since 1937, the powers that be in the Elohim worship cult has been deliberately polluting the imagery and the mental attitudes of all of the normies. | |
| It's the Elohim worship cult that has created within the vast amount of normies a dystopian vision because that's what the Elohim worship cult wants to emerge out of the event string because they figured they'll be on top, right? | |
| And so they're trying to engineer this. | |
| So they're doing it. | |
| We've got smoke out here like you wouldn't believe. | |
| Even the seals coming up are coughing. | |
| Anyway, so they're attempting to engineer this dystopian vision in order to create it to emerge out of the event string. | |
| So that polluted all of my data throughout this entire time. | |
| And it was only in like maybe 2015 I got a real sense of that, that it was an artificial construct overlaid on the minds of the masses that then filtered out into their language. | |
| And that to a great degree, it could be disregarded. | |
| All right, so pole shifts, ultimate cataclysms. | |
| There's all kinds of evidence on this planet for ultimate kind of cataclysms. | |
| None for pole shifts. | |
| Absolutely none. | |
| It's a misinterpretation of what they're looking at, deliberately applied to produce this dystopian thing. | |
| The Elohim worship cult, because of the Talmud and their mystical aspects of things, because of how that works, they spread out the dystopian vision as many ways as they can and keep reinforcing it to try and glom it all together to produce the actual outcome. | |
| All right, so from, so all of my data always had that in it. | |
| So no wonder when I saw $600 silver and started talking about it, that was in the data itself, that we would get this idea that there had to be some kind of a dystopian thing that would require us to be trading silver coins, you know, to buy milk and that kind of thing, right? | |
| I don't believe that's going to happen. | |
| So Heidi went and did Astro on something. | |
| Maybe it was an exchange. | |
| I can't remember at the moment. | |
| And so she said, well, you know, there might be big money for silver, $600, but it'd be 2041. | |
| Now, bear in mind, I've never had timeframe within this understanding of the event stream because the event stream doesn't give a shit about our calendars. | |
| It doesn't care about days or anything like that. | |
| It's not a, we don't live in an actual time. | |
| Time is a construction in our brain. | |
| We live in an eternal now. | |
| Anyway, so she said that, you know, under these circumstances, that exchange or whatever she looked at, it's Astro said that we might have a big silver pop in 2041. | |
| And that may well be the case. | |
| I don't know. | |
| However, here's the thing. | |
| We do now have, and it was always part of sci-fi world, the emergence of these new electrics. | |
| Okay. | |
| So in the same sets that had all the new money, we get the new electrics, which are now emerging. | |
| These are new ways, you know, they're actually coming out now with phones that are perpetual. | |
| They'll never need to be recharged. | |
| You can throw it in your car and let it heat up to 500 degrees in the summer, and it's not going to damage it. | |
| It's not going to explode. | |
| It's not going to hurt the battery. | |
| The battery and these things are little tiny, which means the phone can get either add more shit for the same size or get very much smaller. | |
| All different kinds of things based on this new understanding of electricity. | |
| And it's rippling. | |
| The Common Oric effect that was spoken about in the data in 2003 and earlier, but started to crystallize in 2003, which was my, that marked the point where I had most of the active English language within the data set defined. | |
| Okay, so I took a big leap in production then. | |
| In any event, though, so that was an artifact of my work. | |
| Anyway, so the new electrics show up. | |
| Well, hey, the new electrics are very dependent on silver. | |
| And now we know that Trump, he's talked about it, and the DOD have also been talking about space and weapons and super weapons and maybe earthquake weapons or who the fuck knows. | |
| And we've got the people out there with the drones and the UFOs and so on, all of which require silver. | |
| Now there's suggestions that even back when, all right, so even in early 2000s, the $600 silver was a muddy set, right? | |
| There was no real causal connection that could be made relative to the temporal marker, all right? | |
| It was at that time the $600 for silver was temporally within the production of the data set on the other side of the big secrets revealed that supposedly or that had been identified as coming out of Maryland and Delaware, Fort Dietrich and Fort Lee in that area, something, right? | |
| In that area, somewhere in the border area between Delaware and Maryland. | |
| Anyway, so we were going to have riots. | |
| They seemed to be food riots at the time in 2003, which didn't make any sense. | |
| Now it would seem that maybe it's going to be an ICE kind of a thing. | |
| Who knows? | |
| Maybe it's associated now with Trump and the Smithsonian. | |
| So see, the details of all of this stuff is not known. | |
| The sets that describe it may be describing something that's on its way to manifesting and will come out entirely differently, right? | |
| So it's possible that we're going to have, at some point in the future, governments say that we can't own silver as an investment, that it's too valuable for the new electrics. | |
| And so what they will do in order to do that is they'll start buying investment-grade silver through all of these various different forms at as low a price as they can get, and then keep going and keep going. | |
| And then at some point, they'll make it where there's legislative penalties to owning it if they need it that bad. | |
| That would produce the $600 silver without the dystopia that the Elohim worship cult was trying to engineer. | |
| And I think that's the world we're headed to. | |
| So I think to some degree, I've suspected this since maybe 2013 or 14, that there was someone out there that was doing some level of what we could call engineering, okay, in the event stream and attempting to elicit and extract certain things in particular ways and times and stuff, right? | |
| There seems to be an influence, okay? | |
| Not manipulation, because you can't do that, but an influence on it that is indeed producing things, right? | |
| And so now we're in the world where we've had the gap between, so I stopped doing the reports in 2018. | |
| There was that one in 2019 off of 2018 data, and that was it. | |
| I've still messed around with the data. | |
| I still do stuff, but I haven't done any reports off of it. | |
| It's too far too tedious, far too much work. | |
| Pain in the ass. | |
| I have to restructure everything. | |
| But I look occasionally, right? | |
| I'm still curious. | |
| So here we are now in our current reality. | |
| We've got the Smithsonian, which may indeed turn out to be a major part of the secrets revealed. | |
| This secrets revealed thing was a label over a broad period of time. | |
| And we have to acknowledge that since that we're actually in it, right? | |
| Since like 2009, the conspiracies have really been coming out. | |
| Crypto is manifesting was a big boost to that. | |
| We've had all the conspiracies about Trump right up to the election. | |
| 2016, now all of the actual conspiracies that were done against him are coming out. | |
| And so we're in a great secrets revealed period, right? | |
| And so it's a label over this area of time that extends out some way. | |
| If at some point in that, the data sets back in 2005 or 6 or something had talked about this period of time and the revealing of a big cache of documents and items, which is how it was described. | |
| Items, materiel, right? | |
| Stuff, physical stuff. | |
| There's a lot of other language in there, but anyway, that was basically it. | |
| So this would fit for the Smithsonian. | |
| And so we need not have, and there may indeed in the Smithsonian be a connection to the border area between Maryland and Delaware. | |
| You know, I just don't know how it's going to manifest. | |
| But it does appear that that aspect of it may indeed be in the process of emerging right now in front of our eyes relative to the secrets revealed in the Smithsonian. | |
| Within the secrets revealed, there was all kinds of data about the Smithsonian and about how that would be taken over and the information liberated and that it would take 50, 80 years for this stuff in the Smithsonian to be just brought out, let alone integrated into our understanding of our reality. | |
| So massive amount of work there, right? | |
| Real fun, I imagine, too. | |
| Anyway, so, okay, so here we are. | |
| We're in this time and we have a bunch of confluences that had been predicted way the fuck back when. | |
| Let's take one at the moment, populace, okay? | |
| So Nico's got populous. | |
| Populous was created in the heyday of the, it's a cryptocurrency, created in the heyday of the cryptos, and then faded away, right? | |
| Who knows? | |
| I don't know about any of the circumstances, nor do I care. | |
| That's not my issue, right? | |
| I do not have an allegiance to any of these cryptocurrencies. | |
| And so I'll get into some of this stuff real quick just to shed a disabuse you of ideas about the time. | |
| So just because populace is back doesn't mean it's going to be successful just because it appears at this time. | |
| It had been forecast at being at this time. | |
| And so way the hell back then, we might have presumed it would be a very successful coin now, but it had a gap. | |
| It died for a while. | |
| And so it's not a very successful coin now, yet it is here now. | |
| Okay, so Litecoin. | |
| Okay, so Litecoin had a forecast way back when, that Litecoin would rise to a specific ratio relative to Bitcoin, five to one, et cetera, et cetera. | |
| First off, by the way, unless you hear me say it on a video, don't believe what people are saying I said, because they get it wrong all the time, even if they're not deliberately lying for their own ends. | |
| They get it wrong all the time. | |
| They don't listen for content, okay? | |
| So anyway, so Litecoin. | |
| Litecoin was going to have a one to five ratio that would be holding. | |
| At the time that that was the forecast, there were very few other cryptos, and that was the case as it appeared in those data sets. | |
| Doesn't mean it's chiseled in stone. | |
| It's not a prophecy from God. | |
| It was the situation of the leaks that are coming out of everybody's mind at that time. | |
| Well, things change. | |
| All the event stream is, is change. | |
| So now, I don't think Litecoin is going to reach that level. | |
| I don't think Litecoin is even necessarily sustainable. | |
| There's all kinds of things going on, and I can be disproved on that by the manifestations coming out of the event stream. | |
| It's still possible that Litecoin can have that level of value, but the circumstances, as it had originally been forecast, are no longer pertinent, right? | |
| Because that was a little tiny snapshot of the event stream, which is constant change. | |
| Same thing with Veritasium, okay? | |
| So Veritasium and all of these structures that were within the sets around Veritasium existed at that time. | |
| They don't exist now. | |
| There's no impetus now. | |
| And Reggie Middleton's efforts are seemingly now in the past, okay? | |
| Because he was relying on a patent. | |
| A patent is simply, it doesn't mean it works or anything like that. | |
| It's just government saying we don't have this idea in our database at this point. | |
| And a patent is, in a sense, makes it slightly easier to sue someone, right? | |
| But it's no guarantee of anything. | |
| And because he has patents, they become prior art very rapidly. | |
| As soon as someone comes up with a new wrinkle on your idea, your idea is in the past. | |
| And so that's the way it is with Reggie's patents. | |
| They're there, they're reasonably valuable, but they're prior art. | |
| They've been left in the dust of all of the changes that have existed in this period of time. | |
| So, and, okay, and so we had the issue, the descriptions of government coming to talk to Reggie. | |
| Well, they did. | |
| Not in a good way, though, right? | |
| So that would have been a misinterpretation of those circumstances, but those circumstances manifested because the SEC came and they, or yeah, SEC came and they stomped all over Reggie for a while, right? | |
| And so we have the issue of the interpretation, the manifestations changing, and so you cannot take these things as being chiseled in rock. | |
| That kind of stuff is not going to manifest. | |
| So I do not expect that we're going to be trading silver coins with each other for goods. | |
| You know, we may indeed get $600 silver, and we may indeed get the government attempting to buy it in order to support the new electrics. | |
| And it'll be a different structure. | |
| It'll be a different setup. | |
| So it's not going to be that dystopian situation. | |
| And the dystopian situation was forced on us by the manipulation on the mass amount of people by the Elohim worship cult. | |
| And just because we have a set of three or four or five items and we see some number of those manifesting does not mean that the others are going to manifest. | |
| And if they do manifest, it doesn't mean it's going to be in our understanding of a temporal nearness to each other. | |
| So, you know, so this stuff is very complex and should not be interpreted at simplistic levels that way. | |
| So I'm not selling my silver, but I don't, you know, I don't need it. | |
| I don't need to sell it to convert to ferns. | |
| But I'm not particularly in a situation where I'm putting any emotional investment and counting on it to produce anything in a near term, right? | |
| Under the circumstances, if we're going to get to that position where $600 silver exists because of the new electrics, we're years away from that, okay? | |
| Because it'll take us a number of years to build out the infrastructure and use up all of the available supply on the silver that's now being mined, right? | |
| Which is happening. | |
| So we're using silver faster than we can mine it. | |
| But there's still a bunch of silver above ground and so on. | |
| And before they'll get into investment-grade silver for this, we will have to go through a lot of that. | |
| We'll have to use up a lot of the silver that's in the system. | |
| I suspect, for my own reasons, that we're going to see an industrial, new electrics and new industry, analog AI, all of this kind of stuff really emerge in 2027, okay? | |
| But I'm not thinking that there's even going to be at that time $600 silver, even though they'll need much more silver for that than we have now. | |
| Now, it could be that there's stuff in some of these devices that needs silver at a level that is beyond solder, okay, or beyond the silver oxides and the silver salts needed in the production of the chips. | |
| And in which case, maybe you need a small pool of it. | |
| It's got to be liquid. | |
| Who the hell knows, right? | |
| In any event, though, so that could alter the situation. | |
| But again, it's not going to be an immediate. | |
| It's not going to be an overnight, et cetera, et cetera. | |
| So, and also, these things, okay, so I don't want to say that. | |
| All right, so we can get it. | |
| We do have a situation for years now where I would say stuff in my reports and Boll Polney, you know, who I've spoken with, you know, he's a butthead, right? | |
| I mean, I've talked to the guy. | |
| He's a schnook. | |
| Anyway, we do have situations where people like Bo will take my language and they'll forecast and they'll put a spin on it within their religious stuff and it gets all hyped up in their mind and in all their religious stuff. | |
| And then they get all of their prophecy addicts to pile on. | |
| And so we get a building trend on things. | |
| It doesn't mean it's going to pull this shit out of the event stream that way at all. | |
| The way the event stream works, you can never, it's stupid and fruitless to worry about how a particular situation is going to emerge if there's an attempt to have that situation emerge. | |
| If your end goal is this, and how it's going to come out of the event stream is not your concern. | |
| You just maintain the energy on the rule of assumption about that end goal, and you just don't worry about how the universe is going to make it come out. | |
| Thus, we can have all different kinds of things appear ahead of the desired state of manifestation or the predicted state of manifestation that will alter our ability to see that manifestation both ahead of time because it obscures our understanding of the language, but also when it is manifesting, we'll never ever know exactly how it's going to come out. | |
| This is a requirement of the event stream. | |
| This is a necessary component of it, an aspect of it that cannot be removed from that because the event stream is there to try and create novelty. | |
| And so thus it'll never be anywhere close, really. | |
| It'll be rarely close to what we're imagining in detail form coming out of the manifestations. | |
| Does that make sense? | |
| I mean, it's necessary that these things be designed this way and operate this way. | |
| Most of these ideas and stuff, we didn't know in 2003 when I'm starting to work the language and so on, right? | |
| A lot of this was obscured. | |
| I know ever so much more about it now. | |
| And now I can see clearly, oh yeah, you know, that this interpretation should have always, all of the interpretation should have been said to have a finite existence within the eternal now. | |
| So if they don't appear within the eternal now as you understand seeing them, then they're not going to appear. | |
| And so there's no, it's not like prophecy where they say, your God says this and it's going to happen, right? | |
| And by the way, that never happens. | |
| Just that they say that, but it never ever happens. | |
| Kim Clement has a worse prophecy fulfillment record than Bo Polney, all right? | |
| Hard to imagine, but when you run him through both Grok and chat, that's the case. | |
| All of his projections and so on were so poor that even Bol Polny, with one out of 27 as his accuracy rate, is better than Kim Clement. | |
| And so here you have Bo Polney relying on Kim Clement. | |
| Oh my God. | |
| Anyway, so this is the way of our reality, that the event stream is this constant mass of change, and so it can't be predicted because it's intended to not be predicted. | |
| We can get into some of that aspect of this stuff later because it does impact how these things function, right? | |
| How the event stream, the eternal now, and the ontology actually function in this material reality in which we find ourselves. | |
| Now, so basically what I'm saying is, you know, you may get $600 silver in your lifetime, right? | |
| We may get these giant secrets revealed from the Smithsonian. | |
| Because the Smithsonian set or the giant secrets revealed set was temporally close to the $600 silver does not mean it's going to manifest that way, nor does it mean that $600 silver has to manifest at all. | |
| It may or may not, given our developing interaction with the event stream as we go forward. | |
| Basically, that's it, guys, that our old world is collapsing. | |
| In order for the new world to take shape, they have to have this sort of like synchronicity of collapse. | |
| So don't get trapped in thinking that collapsing, by the way, includes us standing on the old world, looking at the new world. | |
| So we're in a situation where we're on a platform that's collapsing, and this is our reality of this moment. | |
| Reality of this moment, this instant of the eternal now, and what we're looking at is a reality that's rising. | |
| And this is the reality of the event stream manifesting. | |
| And we're seeing it from our perspective here, and there is a necessary distortion in our view here, such that by the time there's a duration gap here, by the time we find ourselves here with that part of the event stream that we had foreseen, it's not going to look like what we had foreseen from back here because everything will be changed angle-wise, because this is nothing but change. | |
| So, you know, it remains unchiseled in stone, right? | |
| It remains amorphous, unresolved, and expectant. | |
| So that's really what we've got here, right? | |
| Is the expectation. | |
| That's what future is, anticipation. | |
| And so our expectations shape that. | |
| And at an individual level, we can manifest, cause things to manifest out of the reality by the collapse of the probability fields. | |
| This also affects our understanding of things, right? | |
| So in my opinion, Joe, JSNP4, his view of a giant crypto crash is horseshit, right? | |
| That he conflated the actual crash of his airplane with the giant crypto crash temporally. | |
| The crash of his airplane happened. | |
| There was a minor temporary little tiny dip in cryptos shortly thereafter, and that was it, right? | |
| And that it was his interpretation that the crash of the cryptos would be huge and he'd be able to buy, you know, 20 cent XRP or whatever it was he was after. | |
| I don't think that's going to occur. | |
| I think that the system or the situation we've got now is not as we would have interpreted it back when. | |
| This is nobody's fault. | |
| You know, we do the best possible job we can. | |
| I was doing it with an aggregation of lots of leaks from tens of millions of people. | |
| So I was more accurate and I did not have my own personal mind involved in the extraction of information from the event stream. | |
| My interpretation issues came in when I was interpreting others' extraction of information, which we know to be polluted by the Elohim worship cult and all these other factors. | |
| So again, my system is never going to be 100% accurate. | |
| It could never ever be that way. | |
| I'm quite convinced that the closer you get to accuracy, the more the universe is going to screw you up because it cannot have this stuff be able to be forecast down to the gnat's ass because that eliminates the idea of novelty. | |
| Anyway, I guess that's it. | |
| Okay, so I guess that's it for this one. | |
| We'll see how the Smithsonian stuff works out and everything else, right? | |
| It's all unresolved, and that's the way it's supposed to be. | |
| That's the way that this future or this manifestation of the event stream is supposed to be. | |
| Giantly unresolved, but with the ability for us to reach in there and cause probabilities to collapse because we are consciousness. | |
| So much to learn here, so much to do. | |
| Anyway, though, so that's it for now, and it should be a very, very, very eventful August. | |
| And we have giant masses of more change that are forecast to emerge out of all this stuff in September and October. | |
| And I'm certain that that's going to be the case, that the changes are compiling. | |
| The whole system is now becoming more energized, feeding in on itself. | |
| There's all these feedback loops, and it's getting much more amped up. | |
| Anyway, so take care and be with me. | |
| You know, watch with amazement. | |
| It's always cool as hell. |