All Episodes
Previous Next
May 7, 2025 - Clif High
41:24
Self Revealing Noodle Twist

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit clifhigh.substack.com

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello humans, hello humans.
Today I'm going to talk about the ontology some more and the self-revealing nature of it and things it's done recently.
And how they're starting to impact.
This is being done on 7th of May 2025.
It's about 9.26 a.m. here on the West Coast.
This let's start by just noting that there's going to be video link below in the description.
I'll put this on Substack.
That video link is for a video about occurrences here.
And it features Michi Okaku, it's about the quantum computers and this sort of thing and Voyager and some data that had been beamed back from the far part of space.
If you also want to read about one guy's, one man's description of his sussing out the ontology, you can get this book, Stalking the Wild Pendulum.
It's by uh it's uh there's a Kindle version, and it's by this guy, Itzak Bentoff, and it's uh a very good, very cohesive description, and it fits um the subject matter, which is um the mechanics of consciousness.
He goes into that in a very nice way, no real math necessary to deal with it.
He's got a cohesive structure.
He doesn't use a lot of the same terms as I do, but he's basically describing this same his discovery of these same things, right?
Uh so and also we're gonna uh I'll also put in a link below uh the Kaku video.
I'll put in a link to another video for the fourth turning uh about uh the global sync up of all of the fourth turning through humanity because this is pertinent.
It's all tied in.
The ontology is going to twist our noodle here.
Make us think about things in a different way and very deeply.
Absolutely.
Okay, so let me give you the setup here.
So this is our solar system.
Uh that's the sun.
It's dragging us through space.
Uh Earth is here, there's Mercury, Venus, Mars, blah blah blah, all the planets.
Uh then there's all the dust and crap at the far end.
This is basically a cone, like in a comet, right?
And so we're all swirling here behind the sun.
None of the none of the distances representing here represent actual distance within our solar system.
Okay, so uh what goes on here is that Earth shoots out a satellite uh to explore stuff, the Voyager, right?
And it's going, and its goal, the goal of the Voyager program was to send these um uh sampling and returning of data satellites, explorer satellites, really, uh, in the Voyager series, was to send them down to the the sort of the bottom of our of our space well here that's formed by the sun.
And they were gonna try and go through the barrier around our solar system.
And so far they've not been able to achieve that.
When they run up to the barrier, they get flooded with uh vast quantities of data and noise, and it's sort of like um uh overloads their system insofar as sending the data back to us.
But that that's the general concept, all right, that they were gonna head back to the far edge and and leave our solar system.
Turns out that this barrier period size, the barrier here is massively huge.
And we still they still haven't gone through this transitional uh area.
But here's here's the kicker for this.
Uh they've encountered the ontology, all right.
And so Voyager beamed back a bunch of data to Earth.
Um that data was taken in by NASA and uh their equipment and their subcontractors into a computer system to analyze it.
They have one that analyzed all of the shit coming in from space, all the radio waves, all the radiation, all of that kind of stuff, and it tries to filter out what they describe as random noise.
Okay.
This was the sycamore chip.
And this was run on NASA machines at their behest by subcontractors.
The Sycamore chip is a quantum chip, okay.
So quantum computers react to the original ones and the still the heavy-duty big copper versions react to the changes in the materium that affects the state of the copper flakes within this sheet of copper, and then the chip picks up the differences, and that answers the question because of an algorithm applied to this.
The picking up of the plates of the random seemingly random arrangement of the copper flakes in running these things forms the answer because of the entanglement of the atoms, basically.
So the sycamore chip is an actual digital chip product with all of this tracery in it, using lots of silver, that has within it, I'm going to use a very crude analogy here.
Okay, it's not accurate to placement or anything, it's only accurate to concept.
But all of these quantum computer chips, so they're Q chips, right.
All these quantum computer chips have a digital chip in the middle of it that actually is performing the work, so to speak, right?
And the they also have other components here, uh other aspects of the chip itself that are doing things like monitoring the input stream, or monitoring the uh state of activity of one set of substrate of this chip, or monitoring the state activity of another substrate of the central uh quantum processing chip within the overall chip, which is called sycamore.
All right.
And so this central processing part has its substructure, its very nature, being monitored by subsets that are running running firmware.
So in that sense, it's very much like the quantum computers where they're looking down into the nature of the copper itself.
Here it's done in a different way where they're monitoring the changes within this chip in order to derive uh functional information about its level of processing, the reliability of that processing, how close it is to its goal, and when to shut off that processing and declare the goal achieved, which is very complex, and we won't go into any of that.
Um, so the Sycamore chip has in essence a parts that run around and check the central processing part, um, have built-in software to them called firmware.
It's firm because it's actually like created within the structure of this part of the chip, and it only operates within that part of the chip, it has boundaries, etc.
And all it does is examine the sensors that it gets from uh sensor information it gets from this part of the chip.
But it's essentially a firmware routine that has been written by and uses AI algorithms in this calculation.
It's not an AI chip, okay, but it's um uh it's not even AI uh instantiated or bound to a chip.
It's something close in terms of how it's function, but it's extremely restrained.
So it's an AI with you know, uh tunnel vision, if you will.
So that's the Sycamore chip.
All right, so uh it works at a quantum level.
Uh these things are spooky uh to the gratologists because they think that there's such things as random.
You'll see words like random being used in the video that I've linked here.
That shows you that these guys don't understand the nature of what they're examining and that their paradigm over the nature of what they're examining is flawed, that they have to use terms like that that can be proven to be false.
No such thing as random in this universe at all.
Anyway, so bear in mind that these videos are take are um uh being put together by people with a gratology view.
But you will hear uh the word ontological, for instance, in this in this video uh about this event.
And it is an ontological event.
This is part of the self-revealing nature nature of the ontology, and it is revealing itself to us in a very big ass way, and I'm gonna get into that, it's gonna really freak you out.
It's gonna twist your noodle and uh and uh uh twist your mind about a lot of things here.
Okay, I'm just doing this setup so you understand what you're looking at in that video, and then you can go look at the video and you'll see that they're exactly telling you uh what I'm what I'm describing, but they're coming at it from a uh discombuberated way, such that they don't have the full grasp of what they are trying to describe, and they're letting it out, but they are telling you how scary all of this shit is, okay?
And to their mind it is scary, even to the ontologically uh focused mind, it's a little on the uh, you know, this could be, or this will be dangerous because of the level of change involved.
No getting around that.
Okay, so we we have no idea what's going to arise as a result of what is occurring now, and it's not really predictable to us.
And it's about um it's about coherence in the event stream, really.
Okay, so um so Sycamore chip is a quantum computer chip.
It runs on entangled qubits.
You can go look those up.
I need not get into that at this point.
Uh and these other things monitor how the qubits are doing, and then they assist in making the conclusions.
Okay, so that in essence this part had to be described in order that you understand that we have a non-Qit-based validation stream for for some of the conclusions that these guys had to arrive at.
Alright, so in the ontological viewpoint, the Q bits that run here on the Q chips are tie-in to the event stream.
Okay, so they're these chips are attempting to uh they don't they don't understand what they're really doing.
They have no frame of uh reference that would allow them to state this way.
But the Q bits are the emerging event stream.
That's what's going on, is the entangled qubits are that surface layer, so to speak, of the emerging event stream, which is coming out of consciousness of the ontology that is us, in which we live.
That is where the materium exists.
So they're actually um uh tapping into the uh event stream at some level.
Alright, so uh, and then this is important later, we'll come back to another thing, which is the willow.
We'll get into that in a bit.
Anyway, so given this setup, they've got this thing here monitoring the sycamore chip is monitoring all of the shit that NASA gets in from all of these space sensors, right?
All the radio telescopes, all that kind of shit.
And it's looking for uh intelligent signals.
Um by the way, what I'm gonna describe to you, I predicted in some time back as the galactic interweb.
Alright, so we're I'm describing an aspect of this, and that is this galactic inner web.
It's all gonna twist your noodles, okay.
So the sycamore chip is analyzing everything coming in.
And Voyager sends back a bunch of data back here to Earth, and it goes to the uh the sycamore chip.
And some weird shit happens, and that's what this video below is about, is about that weird shit that happens.
Um, so I'm not gonna go into data structures.
You're gonna have to either go and research the data structure aspects of this or take it as factual that the people reporting these data structures that they're actually existent.
And I do take it as factual that these data structures do exist because what they're describing would be what I would expect from the self-revealing ontology.
Okay.
And basically what has happened is that Voyager went out far enough and it triggered something, right?
And we'll use a lot of vague words because we don't have definitions or definitive nature of what was happened or what has happened.
A lot of it is open to interpretation, even as to labeling it right now.
But basically, us being getting to the point where we could have Voyager, the these sensors all packed on a little spaceship and shove it out into space, indicates that humanity had arrived to a certain level of thinking.
And that triggered a process that somehow there was some form of a trigger out here in deep space that and a process and a response and all of that that was triggered by Voyager coming on out.
And Voyager was the proximate cause of it going off and also the conduit of it coming back to Earth.
But it's here now.
Okay, so this gets a little bit uh wonky.
The data structures exist.
The data came back, it was non-random, not space noise.
It was defined, it has all of these characteristics, and it interacted with the um with the sycamore chip, interacted with it.
The data in that sense was alive or dynamic.
And it and it interacted with the sycamore chip, and it eventually killed the chip.
They had to shut it down because the chip was starting to become self-protective and doing weird things.
Some of the things, one of the things it did a lot of things, okay.
One of the things it did was to draw a picture, unbidden.
Nobody asked it to draw this picture.
And it drew a picture on a computer that humans could see.
Some humans saw it and they were badly affected by it.
Their minds were their brain was actually altered by looking at the picture.
In that sense, it wasn't merely perception, it was an infection or an installation, as they call it in the um uh in the video.
They're still thinking about it as a random or maybe uh artificial um intelligence or so on, right?
In an ontological understanding, uh, what happened was that humanity through Voyager triggered this data stream, and the data stream was set up to cause certain effects within us, within the viewer, because the data stream was structured to provide this image.
The image was of a uh hominid of a human in profile.
It was done with geometric patterns that are unlike anything we'd ever encountered before.
Those geometric patterns suggest to the people in this video below that they were it was designed to bypass all kinds of filters in our data screening process as well as filters to our perception.
So whoever sent this message or whatever sent this message, this data stream back to us, understands our perception not only at the level of the eyeball and what it can perceive, what we look like in a general sense, but also how our minds are going to interpret that image,
because it sent back an image that was so um so well tuned, so well designed that it altered the people that it was that were able to see it, that were allowed to look at it.
There were only a few people that were allowed to look at it, and strange effects happened to their minds very shortly after.
One of the things that was um uh re was interesting was that the people monitoring all of this through these chips and stuff saw the data reflect back to the people looking at it different um uh experiences.
Okay, so this was very much Like the observer effect, where the mind of the person changes the outcome of the experiment, double slit or whatever the hell it is, right?
That consciousness intrudes on the experiment because we are all consciousness.
This was one of those kind of incidents.
The data itself altered itself based on who was looking at that image, and individuals received different impressions of what they were looking at.
So it was self-tailoring to the individual mind that was perceiving it.
And then we find out it altered their actual brains.
And there were a bunch of other really fucking strange things to the gratologists, to the normies, okay.
Some of the strange things were that the sycamore chip started malfunctioning after this happened, that no other chips have been able to reproduce this effect on any machines in in any way with this data.
That the uh qubits in the chip here started becoming de-entangled and re-entangled in fantastic ways, causing the chip to start to try and censor other aspects monitoring it.
So it was aware that it was being monitored, and the data in that sense was self-protective and also altering, self-altering.
So a self-revealing, if you will, right?
And uh and also there was another huge effect that the normies can't uh handle, and that is that the image was created by data three hours before the chip ran.
Okay, so three hours, okay.
So as this chip runs, all of these little guys out here in the firmware, they note something that's happening and then they timestamp it.
And then they note another thing happening and they timestamp that.
So really they're just compiling huge databases of timestamps relative to what the sensors are reporting.
Uh it would be like just taking a picture every so often and writing down, uh storing the picture and then storing the time and and down to the millisecond that you actually took that picture.
So the firmware recorded that the the um the data stream uh started three hours before the chip was turned on.
So, hmm, temporal anomaly of three hours, if that's all it was.
Okay, so I I think it's much more than that, okay.
So um, so you have to follow on this, and this is what some of the normies are freaking out over.
The anomalies here go to the point that you have to ask, has humanity now been installed or infected by something?
And I think it has.
I think it's too late for it.
So, all right, so this event happens, we get the you know, the picture of the human, and then we have the other humans looking at it, and it's and it's self-altering based on which human looks at it, and uh the chip breaks down uh and they have to shut it off.
No other chips will uh will be able are able to replicate this off of the data stream.
When they were shutting this one off, there were a bunch of other um uh quantum anomalies that show up, including uh reactions within greater humanity, uh statistically relevant at that time.
And uh, and then the humans that that were uh look that were actually able to look at the image get wonky brain stuff, neural neural changes in their brain, as though their brain is being rewired, and then we don't hear anything at all about them after that.
And this whole this whole episode is just shut down and made tight.
Uh no leaks about what's going on, and this is some time in the past here that this has occurred, right?
But uh if you understand the event stream, there's just been a number of days of duration between the occurrence of this and us here now discussing it, right?
But in any event, so they were even wondering in this video that I've linked to here, uh, has the did the return of the data going back to that PC and to that chip, uh, they say uh basically they're saying in there that uh whatever Voyager encountered knows that Voyager did this and was looking at Voyager and us at the time that this was going on in real time.
And they ask the question how long is this thing or whatever it is, this uh effect been watching us?
And probably they're just basically it's the ontology, and it's there always uh continuously.
And it would make sense that the ontology would have structures built into our reality that could be triggered by elevation of consciousness within that reality, and then they would set off a whole bunch of other connections, right?
A whole bunch of other aspects of our reality that would be triggered by this as part of the increasing complexity towards novelty.
What I think of as up-leveling our coherency, right?
Okay, so now all kinds of effects will come from this.
We have had an exposure to the ontology.
This exposure has been blatant in our face.
Then it was brought back to Earth.
That's where all this actually occurs, of course, is where the data and the chip are.
The chip breaks down, other uh quantum chips can't do anything with the data, humans getting wonky, time getting wonky, qubits getting wonky, all of it because of this one instance of this thing occurring.
And I don't know if they have captured, yeah, I think they actually have two captured images of the, or two captured frames of the image itself.
So they have a way of replicating it, and apparently looking even at the image causes problems because it's um a super observer effect, where it is the observer, we are the experiment, and it observing us is changing the nature of the experiment by changing us.
So it's here within humanity now from the Voyager data.
There's nothing that anybody can do about it.
The uh officialdom trying to clamp down on all of this is not going to be successful because it's already out of the box.
It's already in the global field of consciousness that is humanity.
And probably this is big enough at an ontological level that if we could talk to the whales, they would have some knowledge of what's going on.
They probably are intelligent, they would probably also feel what's going on.
So the question arises: is this contact and this trigger responsible for the ontology revealing itself more frequently with the up-leveling of qualia here on the planet.
Is this all part of a design process?
Is this all part of uh, and if so, what's the goal of that designed process?
And uh where does it go from here?
Now, a couple of things to note.
They shut down the sycamore chip, right?
Because it started getting too spooky for the normies.
Uh and then we get the development of the willow chip, another one of these quantum, supposedly AI chips, and by that they mean, you know, there's AI code that's monitoring the functioning of the of the actual uh qubit entanglement part.
Um the willow chip did well, it worked, but they had to stop it, right?
And they they never discuss why this is going on.
If you read the stalking the wild uh pendulum, you'll get some ideas about how these chips are reading or interacting with consciousness.
That's the big deal.
Okay, so okay, so let's let's look at a facts here.
The early quantum computers were um, and you'll see some pictures of them, these huge, neat-looking things with copper and little silver wires and stuff, and there's a copper plate, and there's all this shit going up like this, and there's this big plate up here with a bunch of bolts on it, and the other copper plates and stuff, and it's all electrified.
That's your that's a that's a quantum computer.
That's your original quantum computer core chip.
These things were bolted down to a steel container that had all the air pumped out of it and special gas run through there, all different kinds of shit to shut down the atomic level of flow inside the container.
The steel container was include included or put inside a big cement fucker that was intended to also dampen down all of this stuff.
And so most of the expense of a quantum computer at that level, in terms of actual material, not labor to refine it or use or labor to make it and stuff, but just the sheer mass of material was for all of the shielding.
And that was to keep consciousness from the doofus humans that are nearby from infecting their for altering their uh answers by way of the observer effect, right?
They are thinking if you can't see it, so to speak, you can't get consciousness radiation through the matter.
So these are the this is the way gryptologists think, and so you know it didn't really work, of course.
All c all of the um uh quantum computers were always affected by the observers.
They just did some level of minimization of this, right, to the point where they could get it um uh quasi-stable.
Okay, so uh when they went to a chip, they did the same kind of sort of the same kind of shielding and grounding, but obviously without the sheer mass there, they don't have the same level of ability to absorb the level of consciousness coming on in.
But the rest of the digital stuff in here is indeed to some level able to protect the core there, the way that all the cement and stuff here protected the original core of these big ass uh quantum machines.
Big copper, I call it, right?
Like big iron from the 1950s, where we used iron.
Uh the original computers were iron rings with copper, or yeah, iron rings with copper coiling all the way around them in order to form the nexus nodes that ultimately would become the junction points in digital chips.
And so it was big, it was full of iron and that kind of thing.
Anyway, so there's been this uh evolution from these guys to these guys, but in the process we lose the sheer matter, the sheer mass of the matter, and so the dampening effects are not that good.
And so it got to the point where the processing of the data itself coming in from Voyager went through the processing here because it was designed to go through, it was designed to defeat the input stream and allow the stuff to go on in and fuck with the quantum computer,
which it did, it comes on out, it creates this image, the human sees it, it sees the human seeing it, the human understands it's watching it, and the human freaks out, and also the human gets his mind, his brain changed, not just his mind, his brain, his neural functioning changed.
And then there's all these temporal effects, and we now have uh humanity, uh officialdom here trying to wring off these effects to protect us from what they know has already seen us.
And it in my opinion, uh, they're they're quite correct in that audio or in that video, it has installed itself here, like an automatic upgrade, you know, like you turn on your phone and you can't help it.
And that's what's happened to us because this was designed to go past our perception and our mind and do alteration levels in the process.
The level of uh design clarity involved in this whole experience, including the experience that humanity is going through as it discovers all of this and as this ripples out.
Because bear in mind, uh what basically has happened is that all of humanity is in a um is in a giant consciousness bubble, and so that's all of humanity on Earth.
And uh the data here from that image has been seen by some humans here within all of humanity on Earth, and that forms the beginning of this bridging of this network.
And so it's already there in the mass of consciousness that is humanity.
And so officialdom can't keep it out.
They couldn't stop this now if they tried.
They are trying, they're freaking out over it.
We don't know what level of uh strange ass reactions they're gonna have for it, but it's too late.
It's you know, so we're we're we're installed now, and we're being changed by this process.
Now, maybe there's all kinds of questions that can be asked, and very few answers that we can come up with, because a lot of the questions go to the why of it all.
What's the goal, why did this occur, and so on.
You can postulate as I do that it makes sense in an ontology, that uh you would you would um a materium such as we're in, that you would, if you were the supreme consciousness, design in uh trigger points for the um automatic up leveling of the coherency of the species as they evolve.
This would also explain things like um, you know, why the aliens don't come and talk to us.
Maybe it's because they know that we haven't reached past phase one coherency, right?
We're just now encountering the barrier to become fully coherent as a species with the understanding of the ontology.
So prior to this, we have been fractured and discohere, right?
We were distributed and uncoherent throughout all of our history.
And wherever coherency arose, the forces of the demiurge or however you want to characterize it would also rise up and quash the rise of coherency.
And so it's part of the maturation process that we have to overcome these obstacles, these challenges, and in the process, and it is the overcoming of those challenges and obstacles that causes us to raise our level of consciousness, not our awareness and reach coherency.
And so at some point becoming a more coherent species, you would automatically want to go out and look at the rest of the universe around you.
And so it would make sense that there would be these predefined, not technological, but awareness triggers, right?
And then that would elevate you up to that next level of coherency.
And I think that's what's going on now, is that we are being up leveled.
And there's nothing we can do to stop it.
It's not a part of the process that we can interact with and control.
Being aware of it may uh indeed make it more harmonious and less stressful, because uh once you're aware that it's an ontological process, you don't worry about it being a random happenstance leading to a catastrophe, right?
Uh so once you understand that it is indeed a um uh an expected elevation of ontological interaction as you discover the nature of qualia and how to respond and how the qualia connect to karma, uh this would be, as I say, uh an anticipated level of next occurrence, next leveling uh of a coherency within humanity.
Doesn't mean we're all going to think alike or that sort of thing, right?
Uh that's that kind of level of coherency is a long way off and is undoubtedly part of the Yuga cycle.
Anyway, so here we are with the um with this state of affairs.
We have a developing consciousness network that has been installed in the consciousness bubble of all of humanity on Earth.
And that network is starting to populate itself throughout humanity.
I'm speculating that the self-revealing aspects of the ontology are connected to all of this stuff here and the stuff you'll see in the video below.
And I'm speculating, and we'll see that this self-revealing nature of the ontology is going to increase as the network grows in expected and rather unexpected multiplicities of complexity that we had not yet anticipated in ways to spread networks.
So it could be anticipated that this would not be a slow burn.
It wouldn't take a long time for the self-revealing nature of the ontology to go through humanity, especially with the internet, especially with the rise in the energies from galactic center and all of these other contributing factors would,
in my opinion, it would make it anticipate anticipated that we would get certain thresholds and we would grow in a very uh exponential fashion, the ontological awareness within the human community, right, through the human consciousness bubble of all the humans in our radiating thoughts, etc.
And that that is going to cause very great changes within humanity.
And that I would also speculate that the um the spread of this ontological network of awareness or the awareness of an ontological network, however you want to think about it, uh, through humanity would piggyback on natural um cycles and uh beat points within humanity that uh are occurring right now,
um, That were in occurrence supposedly or theoretically without relation to the ontology deciding to reveal itself at this point, and that revealing coming because we had reached a certain critical level of examining of the material.
Okay, so the speculation that uh that would this uh revealing would piggyback on these other uh large trends going through humanity, I think is very valid, and that's why I'll put down the fourth-turning video from um uh uh uh it's an interview discussing this idea of the fourth turning from the United States,
and which is an emotional psychosocial wave that goes through the United States, but how it's now synced up with other nations, and we're going global in the Americas uh fourth turning.
A lot of it has to do with economics and how the money is basic currency is current through humans and all of this kind of stuff, right?
And so you get down into incredibly um uh detail, you get down into and get lost in the details, and you can see this thing from the details, but it's much more interesting to see it from this large perspective and then work your way down to what's actually occurring in the landscape around you and and within the landscape with inside you,
because you can expect at some point that that image that they don't want you to see, you will see, and they won't be able to stop it from being seen.
And just like they couldn't stop it from existing and coming out because it would came out, it was self-revealing.
The code the code actually caused the image to occur, and this is fantastic level of coding.
You have no idea how how envious I am of the skill to embed all of these layers in this self-altering code.
It's it's absolutely fantastic.
Anyway, so this is the um that moment in that movie, and you'll know that movie, you know it, and it was a predictive programming for fucking sure.
And that movie was 2001.
And this is the moment of the monolith meeting humanity.
This whole business here is that exact description.
In that movie, uh the monolith was seen by the apes.
They couldn't conceive of it because it was the first artificial thing on the planet, and uh it just seeing it destroyed their minds and altered them.
That's where we're at right now.
Uh the monolith and the monolith we've uh encountered in the form of that image, is um uh a designed perception dynamic that is self-altering.
It is self-revealing.
Um we've never written self-altering or self-revealing code here on our planet.
This self-revealing and self-altering nature understands the new sphere of humans because it designed itself to get past a lot of our barriers.
So look at this video down below and watch it.
You may want to watch it several times to get um a real understanding of how freaked out these people are and what's happening.
Uh but in my opinion, this image was designed to do all to induce all the changes we're gonna be going through.
It was designed to twist our brains, you know, twist our noodles here.
Uh, and it's gonna up level the current uh coherency of humanity.
What that will mean is anybody's guess.
So I'll put this together, get it up on Substack.
If you want to read more about this and see other examples of the ontology, you can go look at the stalking of the wild pendulum, and then uh have it check out what I'm talking about here, and you'll be quite amazed at what's going on.
And so at some point, like I say, we're all going to be up-leveled the way that this is going to go through humanity and change everything.
Um it's really cool to look at it and watch it, and in that sense, we're all the firmware up here watching the cubits and making, you know, and making conclusions about what the nature of the cubits are at the moment.
So that's that's us relative to what the experience of this going through humanity is.
So we're part of the self revealing and the self monitoring of this.
And I bet you that we take a huge jump up in qualia and we start getting alterations in our language fairly soon that point to uh these effects, right?
Point to these kind of effects on humanity.
Anyway, guys, uh it's long enough.
Um and I'll do another one of these as uh circumstances warrant.
▲
Export Selection