Clif High - What are we missing?

Sept. 12, 2024 - Clif High

47:01

What are we missing?

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit clifhigh.substack.com

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello, humans.
	Hello, humans.
	September 12, 2.10 p.m.
	Gorgeous afternoon here.
	It was sort of an overcast morning cleared up around 11.
	We're into 66 degrees, a lot of sun, although I'm hearing chemtrail jets overhead.
	Anyway, I wanted to ramble on for uh a few minutes here because of a confluence and convergence of a bunch of thoughts and queries.
	So I just finished uh watching uh Carrie Cassidy's appearance on uh Jean-Claude's BeyondMystic.net channel on Rumble.
	It was very, very interesting.
	Uh I have I have particular predictable bitches about Carrie Cassidy's sources and her reliance on them.
	But you know, I have no animosity towards Carrie.
	Uh now, some of the things that have been occurring to me, though, sort of intrude or they reflect some of the issues that Carrie Cassidy has.
	So I'm just going to use her as an example for humanity in general, right?
	Because we have to apply a metric that same we have to apply that same metric to humanity that we might apply to her.
	Okay, so here I am questioning her reliance on Mark Richards and Charlie Ward and uh Phil Do Godlusky.
	Okay, because I find them all to be not credible at all, right?
	For various different reasons.
	And uh, and I I then have to ask myself, why doesn't she see in those individuals what I see in those individuals?
	Why is she not questioning them long in the same lines that I am basically because I'm assuming that my thought process is both uh correct and logical, and not necessarily the correct part, but the logic part should mean that she would also uh follow some of that same level of thinking, right?
	But that's neither here nor there.
	But it also dawned on me to take a step back.
	And this is um uh from this personal view to actually widen my personal view simply because of running into some issues here with uh our physical reality trying to tell me something.
	So part of the uh point of uh Japanese yoga, uh Shenshinsu Do, and I did a variant uh for 40 years, Shinshin Soitsu Aikido, but part of the point there is to learn to listen to universe.
	And so when universe slaps me upside the head with a bunch of linguistic clues, I uh usually will pay attention, or when I pay attention, because I can't really say usually because it's not I'm not able to determine those times when I didn't.
	But when I do pay attention and investigate, it's always uh very worthwhile.
	This is one of those periods of time.
	Uh so I've enlarged my view, and I'm applying the same metric to humanity and to myself that I'm applying to Carrie in terms of uh her of my criticism of her sources.
	And and basically I can say that my criticism of her sources comes down to uh what is she missing, and that is a sort of a translation of why doesn't she see what I see, right?
	And so uh so it's like what is she missing that she's not catching on to the fact that it or to the to my view, uh and I believe it to be factual, that uh Mark Richards was not a captain, he's a convicted manipulative murderer, and that's as far as it goes, and everything else is horseshit that he's doing just for his own amusement in the confinements of life in prison.
	And he's playing her because he can play her, and he doesn't have many other playmates.
	Uh you know, so so I'm saying, What is she missing there?
	Now I'm turning it back on myself, and I've enlarged my view, and then I've so I've been thinking about what I've been missing.
	And it's and it's dawned on me uh as a result of things that universe has brought to my attention in the form of Stephen Greer, um, his disclosure project uh database and a bunch of other things, uh, that it's possible that we're all missing things on a very large level.
	All right, so uh I dispute that uh Stephen Greer's statement that all aliens are beneficial, okay.
	And uh I would state that we have no receipts of that for that that viewpoint.
	We have no proof of that whatsoever, and that his statement that we don't have any evidence of of evil aliens is not factual at all, and that in so stating, he's denying the actual literal history and the literal translation of all different kinds of ancient literature.
	Hang on a second.
	We've got fighter jets.
	Okay, sorry about that.
	Um it's 2.17 on September 12th, 217 p.m. here on the coast.
	There were a couple of fighter jets doing um uh dogfight maneuvers overhead.
	I went in and uh watched them for a few seconds, maybe 15 seconds, came in to get the camera, and they've moved out of visual range.
	So they're back towards the Olympic Mountains, not towards the ocean where I'd have perfectly good view of them.
	Uh anyway, they were extremely low and and um not running on afterburners, uh, but they were doing some weird maneuvers that cause some strange noise here.
	Anyway, so getting back to what I was saying.
	What am I missing, right?
	What are we all missing?
	And so it's come to the and then Stephen Greer.
	So Stephen Greer is missing the idea that they just because I think that he's basing his aliens are beneficial idea on the uh presumed fact that they have yet to attack us, okay, and even though we're doing evil things to them.
	Uh and I don't know that that then that's certainly not factual.
	That's not a good way to think.
	Okay, so A, do we know we're not being attacked?
	Would we recognize it if we were being attacked by space aliens?
	I I have to say that there's a big chunk of uh certainty that we would not, that there's a big big potential that we would not know we were being attacked.
	In other words, uh he's talking about scalar weapons and all this kind of stuff, right?
	But how do we know that we're we're not under attack by weapons that we don't recognize as weapons?
	All right.
	So uh there was this one uh instance in one of these ancient literature things that my old farts group had gotten into, and I think it was I it was Avastan.
	I don't think it was Sanskrit, but but it was so long ago I can't can't say for sure at the moment.
	Um and the groups disbanded because of the uh situation with Russia, and all the uh they all got kicked out.
	Um in any event, so uh the uh the ancient literature had an instance uh that we we debated for I don't know, a couple of weeks as to what we were actually reading in terms of the translation here.
	And it seems very probable that we were reading a translation in which these people were recording having been attacked by a weapon that produced sneezing.
	Constant, continuous sneezing that if you were in the area of it, and that's how they referred to it, so it it it may have been a beam weapon, it may have been um uh you know a stationary field weapon, who knows.
	Uh, but the people that recorded the description said that if you were in the in this uh uh proximity of it too long, you would uh uh your your brain basically would cease operations because of the continual sneezing and you would dehydrate and and die.
	And that people were sneezing even though they were unconscious, uh, made unconscious by the this weapon.
	So um, or by this the state.
	Now even in this literature, the people that were experiencing it did not recognize that it was a weapon.
	That's what what was the debate with with us.
	Were they reporting um uh through the our transliteration and translation, etc., etc.?
	And see, it's very rare to get body uh functions like that uh dwelt on in ancient literature.
	You know, they're mainly all hymns and shit and and tainted by religious thinking, uh, but um even so it's quite rare.
	Uh and here they went on for some number of of what we would think of as pages uh describing the the issue with the sneezing.
	And were they being attacked by a weapon?
	Uh and our issue at the time we were discussing it was um were they describing it as being attacked by a weapon, which is of course where my my mind leapt to, uh, or were they describing it as being like a natural phenomenon?
	Uh it was it was ambiguous given the transliteration, or or excuse me, it was possible to ease easily possible to have contractions that were uh opposite of each other that that disagreed on that point.
	And so there was sort of support for both sides of that.
	In any way, so uh this this got me thinking about the idea of the alien intervention.
	If we if we take our minds up high enough, if we get a big enough view, we're we have and consider it all from history and don't get lost in the minutiae, we have to ask ourselves, what what are we missing?
	And then from there, what do we think is going on?
	And then from there, we have to ask ourselves, why do we think that?
	And if we have receipts that make us think that, then why do we think those receipts are valid?
	And what supporting receipts do we have suggest that those were indeed valid, right?
	And then down that next layer, are these valid?
	Because we're dealing with um uh potentially highly sophisticated uh mentition on the part of uh our, let's just say, on the part of the intervenors, okay, because we're we're suffering an intervention.
	It's been ongoing for thousands of years, and as I was saying about Stephen Greer, he denies history.
	Even the Bible is replete with nothing but uh horror stories.
	The Torah, uh, also the horror stories of the Elohim uh feasting on uh the um uh stupid human, the stupid human herd, demanding that they kill their their children so that they could be consumed, uh all of this kind of stuff, right?
	The the um uh throwing them in the in the fire for ball, all of these kind of things.
	This is not uh organic uh mental aberration arising in humans of a natural uh uh kind of of any stated reason.
	It is uh accurate reporting, as much as we can get from distorted books, but it's accurate reporting of visitation by space aliens and abuse of humanity by those same space aliens.
	Dog oh, hang on.
	Hang on.
	Sorry about that.
	I think the uh planes uh set her off.
	Um anyway, so getting back to the idea of what are we missing and would we know we were being attacked and all of this kind of stuff, right?
	We're dealing if we're dealing in fact with with um uh space aliens, it doesn't matter if they're a th, you know, if their civilization is a million years older than ours or not, they're not gonna have any more advanced consciousness, you can't assume they're beneficial, and if they're not beneficial, we cannot assume that just because we don't recognize the weapon that we're not being attacked.
	And so let me give you a particular um instance, right?
	Uh you see chemtrails every day, you look up in the sky, you see the chemtrails.
	How do you know they're not being put up there by space aliens?
	How do you know that that is not the attack?
	Just because you think you're seeing an airplane deliver those those chemtrails, are you really?
	How about if that's the psyop?
	How about if the space aliens are simply projecting an airplane up there in order that you not think that they're they're spraying you, that you would really freak out if you thought that the space aliens were spraying the whole herd of of humans and there was not shit we could do about it, right?
	Uh so they make you think it's between you and your government and your government's doing it for a stupid reason, like like supposed anthropo uh or human-caused uh climate change, right?
	And so that is a very sophisticated form of a psyop that would work perfectly and in fact may be working perfectly because who the hell knows of any chemtrail spraying base?
	Uh so uh Jeff Berwick, um the anarcho-capitalist guy out of uh Mexico made a statement once about if there were too many chemtrails or something like this and in the area.
	I'm I'm loosely uh mangling and paraphras in paraphrasing his words, but basically he was saying if there were a chemtrail base around here and it was giving him shit and he knew that he was living under this crap all the time, uh, that he would get together with some of his other uh anarchy kind of fellows, locals, and they would put together a mercenary team and go take out that base.
	And it's like, well, Jeff, you know, I'm all for it.
	I'd love to see it done, but where the fuck are these bases?
	Given the amount of spring, this is something I get into is always doing energy calculations and resource analysis, right?
	Because I did that for government for years.
	I automated all of that stuff at a technical level, wrote all these algorithms for calculating how many board feet of lumber grow per year in this kind of terrain, etc., etc., how many fishes come back, what influences the different kinds of fishes, how commercially viable they are, all that sort of shit.
	In order to write the code, I had to learn the nature of these kinds of um analyses of these resources.
	So my mind goes back that way.
	And so I'm saying right now that uh we do not have enough military airports, and I'm assuming a military airport, because they could use some level of restriction uh on uh the airspace around them to prevent people from noticing.
	But we don't have enough military airports uh nor commercial jet fleet to support the chemtrail spraying that's going on at this moment.
	Uh so you know all the problems with Boeing, why aren't we having these problems with the chemtrail planes, right?
	Hmm, you know, all the shots given out, supposedly the uh people that maintain the chemtrail planes would be impacted by the shots or the DEI or any of this kind of stuff.
	Why don't we see the same sorts of effects?
	Why are there not chemtrail planes crashing all to Helengon?
	I'm just asking questions and letting you think about some of these ideas, because we need to ask ourselves, we need to say this is an intervention.
	It's obvious.
	We can we've seen the evidence of it going way back in history and and even in modern history.
	And this intervention is happening for an unknown reason.
	That people like Stephen uh Greer and others would put a uh let's help humanity uh, you know, save your external savior face on it, does not make it so.
	It's an intervention of an unknown nature for an unknown purpose that we have no participation in, other than being the um target of the intervention.
	The complexity of the intervention can't even be uh adequately framed because of the pollution of our mentition about the nature of the intervention going back for decades.
	And we can we could frame it, we can get into the Elohim worship cult and all their reasons for doing so, the the dark uh military projects, you know, special access projects, all of this kind of shit, and their reasons for obscuring it all.
	But the fact is that it is an intervention, and um uh we are its target and its purpose is unknown.
	I have to make the assumption, because of the ancient history, of humanity being abused by the Elohim, the Anunnaki, the Devas, uh all of the pantheon of gods in Greece, Rome, Germany, everywhere, except very few spots in the northern hemisphere, and including all of the pantheon of gods in the southern hemisphere, all of who were abusers of humanity, none of them helped us.
	Uh and they're farming us.
	That's my my position that I have to start with that basis.
	Because that's something I didn't miss was that in ancient history, humans were farmed, and they discussed uh the farming aspect of humans in very serious ways.
	And they may have used things on us, like I say, this sneezing field or whatever the hell it was, um, just the way we would use uh electric cattle prods, right?
	It doesn't kill the cow or anything, and would the cow even consider it to be a weapon or just some form of um a natural obstacle that exists around humans so that it can't go bash the human that's given it shit and that it has to uh to respond to it.
	So the cow doesn't see itself being attacked by the human uh with the with the electric cattle prod.
	It is just responding to the um the uh irritating impulse of the electricity coming through its its skin.
	And the it's not putting a why to the uh other side of it, it just goes the way that that thing is not, right?
	So it's just responding in a natural fashion, going where that cattle prod is not.
	Are we also being handled this way?
	I presume so.
	And we have to ask ourselves, what are we missing about that, right?
	Um, especially relative to weapons, and especially relative to people like Stephen Greer.
	Now, I like Stephen Greer, okay?
	Uh I'm not I'm not dissing him at all.
	I'm just saying I don't think his vision is wide enough, and I find this concerning as a paranoid, and as a uh martial artist, but I find this concerning that he's advising government about such things and will undoubtedly give government uh persons the impression uh that it is a fact that all aliens are are um benign.
	And uh and I think that we need to let them know that that's his opinion, and he may think he has receipts and and proof of that, but that the algorithm does not support that.
	He's denying history, and the algorithm would basically be saying don't uh miss on widening your view to take in all of the circumstances that are going on.
	So now I think we're actually being attacked by aliens, and I think it's escalating and it's been going out of um uh at us for a serious number of years.
	Um I do find it credible a lot of the things that that Greer is saying about uh space alien and abductions and this sort of thing.
	None of that shit ever made sense as to what the fuck they would want uh to abduct us for.
	You know, uh nothing you can state that they would want us for, like DNA.
	No, they don't need to do that, right?
	They don't it's it's a waste to fuck with the animal that way in order to get DNA.
	We don't do that.
	We get a swab and and hit the the cow, we don't abduct it.
	Uh so um a lot of the stuff I agree with him.
	And I do think that a lot of the alien abductions are military personnel, although I don't know that it's all for psyop, okay.
	I think there are other things going on, like in terms of this uh um intervention, the intervening aliens could very easily collect their DNA samples by way of our military in order not to be seen uh addressing management of the herd.
	As long as it's just one human on another human, then we're not looking outside of humanity uh for the controllers that uh are managing our herd, right?
	Us guys.
	Um just a couple of an aside.
	Uh I happened to see uh Greer in a uh an interview.
	He was talking about scalar weapons, and this brought up the um my criticism of these EE systems guys and their supposed putting out of scalar waves.
	If indeed they were putting out scalar waves, they would be arrested as soon as they took these machines active near within like 50 or 60 miles of any airport.
	And um if it were indeed scalar at all, uh the DOD would come and shut them down.
	So they're bogus.
	You can tell right there that they are indeed bogus, uh, just by our reality.
	Okay, so um uh there was this uh uh the all right, so as we see in the woo world out and about, all these people concerned with uh UFOs and uh such uh you know uh occurrences,
	phenomena, there's also a corresponding movement or group or not group, but but a corresponding wave that is going through uh liberal and progressives.
	They they think, of course, that the whole world is doomed to climate change and uh, you know, all of this horseshit that the WEF has been shoveling out, yeah, overpopulation and all these kind of things, and their vision is uh obscured by a lot of that.
	They think the WEF's numbers for climate change and all of the overpopulation and stuff are factual.
	They don't know that they're being played relative to that.
	But what's interesting though is that they are coming to the same conclusions relative to the intervention, that that there's something going on, we don't know what the fuck it is, and we better start paying attention, and it is not beneficial simply because we we know that we have a fact, we have proof of that in that these people that are these beings that are intervening are not honest and forthright uh with their contact to humanity.
	They're duplicitous, they're uh surreptitious, they're doing it in the shadows and all of this.
	This means by nature that they are not our friends.
	Uh so am I gonna go and um uh uh and I can't take of another, I can't think of an uh an analogy within humans, but you don't go and um help someone by hiding the fact that you're by hiding all of your uh input to the whole situation, right?
	Uh if you're gonna go and do something, you're forthright, because otherwise it really does intrude on on personal choice, karma, and all of this kind of stuff.
	So we know that these beings that are here with this intervention are not beneficial.
	At some level, they're running their own game on us.
	Uh that they have not yet attacked us simply means they have not yet attacked us with things that we recognize as weapons.
	And nothing more.
	And we can't take Stephen Greer's emotionally backed position as being an analytical one.
	Just as we can't take many or most of Carrie Cassidy's emotionally backed positions on the things that that her whistleblowers say as being any kind of an analysis or fact-based.
	It's just not so in either case.
	In both cases, these individuals are allowing their conclusions to take root in their mind without question, and thereafter they build upon those conclusions as though they were a solid foundation, which they are not.
	So the um the intervention being here for its own purposes places us in kind of a um a quandary, uh, a serious quandary, and then many, many, many thousands of millions of questions that uh about that quandary, right?
	We have to ponder all of this, and then we also have to come up with our own reasoned response, not an emotional one that says, you know, oh, all aliens are good, or because they, you know, they're not an octopus sucking out my eyes, they're they're benign.
	Um but uh we also have to, in my opinion, we have to examine ourselves at a very significantly uh deep level.
	And that is how we uh okay, so in the intervention, uh one thing that that I want to ask is what are the aliens getting out of it?
	Okay, so I'm not assuming altruism on anybody's part.
	I'm assuming that they're entirely self-interested.
	And if they are altruistic, then I would like to know again, what are they getting out of it?
	Because with humans, it's a particular emotional uh complex that produces that level of response or that level of of action behavior that we call altruism.
	Uh with the space aliens, you know, us thinking they're benign and they're gonna help us and all of this kind of stuff, how what are they getting out of it?
	Where do they benefit?
	Uh there you can say uh some things about about it in a negative fashion, like they benefit because we're gonna stop blowing up nuclear weapons, which cause problems in the materium.
	And I would buy that to some extent, but I don't know that that is enough of a motivation for them to create an intervention and then hide all of their intent presence, et cetera.
	And again, I'm still not convinced that we're not being attacked by them continuously with weapons that we do not recognize as weapons, but because we have not expanded our vision.
	So one of the things I wanted to discuss was to point out that there's parts of humanity, of being human, that we never ever, ever, ever think about.
	We think about the adrenochrome, we think about the adrenaline oxidization, we think about the uh you know exploitation for uh you know sexual purposes and so on.
	Um but um we don't consider ourselves in relation to this larger picture of of humanity in a farm.
	We also think of ourselves as uh discrete individuals that are uh cooperating in these various uh levels of uh abstract uh social interaction, or or not abstract, but social interaction uh uh frequently around abstract concepts, you know, like political parties, right?
	They don't exist except in your mind.
	Okay, but here's something that it all goes back to is the human mind in that regard.
	And um humans are are not as most people are going to consider them, all right.
	Most of the the okay, so uh you can go and look me back uh or prove me wrong on this, right?
	But most of the information we collect from our senses goes directly into a part of our mind and goes through um into our subconscious.
	And then our thought processes uh go through uh more complex, so in other words, what you see and you know, memory and of what you've seen and so on, and your associations with the emotions at the time you see it constitute the memory of that particular uh event or instance or whatever, right?
	And it is usually the emotions or uh other people, uh and sometimes locations, but usually emotions or other people that were involved in the incident that allow you uh to retrieve it, and they're used as sort of an index in that retrieval uh process.
	Now, those thoughts and and um that you think about that instance and what you were thinking at that time go through a different process to become stored in memory.
	And that process is part of the differentiation within the mind that has those thoughts, for instance, going through the hippocampus, and where they are thought of as declarative.
	This is why hypnosis works.
	This is why auto hypnosis works, because you basically declare to your brain you are hypnotized, and it becomes hypnotized uh because it goes through the hippocampus is not discriminated uh in any way.
	There's no discernment uh put against it uh to see if it's true or false or whatever, and it's just stored uh in that form as a declarative statement that went through the hippocampus.
	The process that does that is separate from and uses different pathways and stuff from the process by which uh we store our metadata, okay, and that's what I'm calling it.
	It's just like computer metadata.
	So when I would go and do uh web scraping, I always had to have, you know, the time it was scraped, how it got there in terms of the IP uh address chain, uh the date, the time, the amount of volume, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
	All this detail stuff about each and every one of these, so that I would have it in an appropriate context for later on analysis.
	We have to do that ourselves on all of this data, even though it's all being done in a subconscious level, we don't ever think about it.
	We're storing all these kinds of indices on this data in order to be able to retrieve it as memory.
	Those metadata uh things are our storage mechanism.
	Um it's estimated that some 90 plus percent of all of the things you perceive that Are stored are not your thoughts about that stuff, but it is in fact the metadata and the images and so on, right?
	Um it's still unknown how these are stored, where they're stored, there's all these uh theories and so forth.
	Uh it appears to me that the most logical um theory is that they're not stored in the human body, uh, that that simply is a pointer system to memories that are stored out in the ether, uh, which is also what the word um akasha means is the ether.
	And so the akashic records are the etheric records.
	And you know, anyway, so um so if we examine ourselves in that fashion, thinking of ourselves as basically uh walking around sensor arrays where 90 plus percent of the information we get uh that we store is simply our location and what's going on with us and so on as we walk around and see this shit,
	then uh one must wonder what is the other 10% thinking is, you know, what is that about relative to both the storage of it, how does how that occurs, and so on, but also of these two levels of our mentition are either involved in or attractive to uh or participating in the intervention.
	So I bring this up because of the frequent claims, and I don't buy it because uh I do believe that Stephen Greer is correct, and a lot of these um supposed alien abductions were just uh horseshit uh, you know, psyop theater by the CIA et al.
	But um the it it is for certain in my mind that we're dealing with uh space aliens uh that are aware of psychic aspects of humanity.
	We know this from ancient literature and the discussions about the mind to machine interface.
	If we're correct with that, we could be absolutely bullshit mad with that, you know, totally screwed, uh totally wrong, totally off on all of these um mistransliterations and misinterpretations of the stuff, but I don't believe so.
	If we were correct, then these space aliens know about our psychic capabilities and they exploit them through what's known as the circulating melanin system uh within our bodies.
	And they tap into and um have their mind a machine interface through aspects of our brain that deeply involve smell.
	And that one of the the reason we came across this uh sneezing thing was that it was presented by one guy uh and we noted that they had um uh prohibitions or cautions uh relative to uh air,
	dust, all this kind of stuff, and the and the humans on the other side of the man-to-machine interface, and that the language was such that it seemed to be suggesting that you wanted to keep these environments dust-free so that your human didn't sneeze because sneezing so disrupts the mind.
	And particularly that one of those uh points at which the mind-to-machine interface connected, which was the uh activity uh in the part of the brain that's that's uh affected by and control smell, which is the hippocampus.
	Oh no, hypothalamus, sorry, uh hypothalamus.
	Um, which is a weird kind of an organ, it's a weird kind of a little gland, these sloshy pools of um uh hormones that are uh really ephemeral and and it's really cool, and the there's a lot of discussion of that particular part of the brain,
	and it's in the middle of the or it's in the uh uh it's in the image of the eye of Thoris that we see going back to ancient Egypt, but there's also analogs for that in Mesoamerica.
	And you know, we presume that um ancient Egypt and Mesoamerica communicated, they they had contact and so on.
	So uh I'm not presuming in anything other than that, because we do have all of those uh Egyptian artifacts and stella that were found in North America.
	Anyway, so um it's like what are we missing here?
	We have to think and put our minds out at a broader level and and deal with our contention and a much more uh all encompassing uh holistic kind of uh uh an understanding, right?
	So it would help us greatly to be able to derive uh what the fuck the intervening guys are getting out of this, right?
	What's their motivation?
	Uh that's much more important than what shape they are.
	Uh, you know, uh, and a lot of that what shape are they, you know, are they a tall white, a gray, uh, you know, any of this kind of shit.
	That's gonna blind us by putting in uh preconceptions into our brain based on the I based on the shapes and stuff, because that's how our brains are designed to work.
	It's actually better for us to just think about uh them as an amorphous mass and then say, what does what are the intervening uh agents here getting out of this?
	What's their motivation?
	And then we can also uh start drilling in on how are they operating their intervention and what could and then rather than get in my opinion, uh it'd be better not to get hung up on the details of what do they get out of this particular uh you know,
	visitation, this particular um episode with a UFO or whatever, but rather approach it at a at a much broader level and not get bound up in the details, because it is there, getting bound up in the details that we start making all of these wrong conclusions,
	that we lose our level of discrimination and uh discernment uh uh as to the um situation in which we are finding ourselves because once you start looking at the details of the situation, you're no longer looking at them with yourself in that that picture.
	You're only seeing the detail part of the picture without taking into account your own presence there and how that affects everything.
	So, you know, this is this is one of my bitches that you know uh Carrie Cassidy gets involved in the details that these supposed whistleblowers uh bring to her and has no understanding of the metadata story around those um or or uh around the the information brought to her, nor the metadata around the personalities and identity of the people that are bringing her those stories and their possible motivation for lying.
	Now, I actually think she's had some uh good witnesses, right?
	Um George Green and some of these guys from NATO that you can validate their uh actual experience there and so on.
	And I've talked to uh uh Art Neumann, right?
	Um they called him Henry Deacon, and he's a squirrel squirrely little mm motherfucker.
	Uh but he's um uh in that regard, in the paradigm and uh in the role that he was presented in that paradigm of disclosure, you know, uh he is as he says he is.
	So, you know, so he was in my mind, he was legit in that that sense.
	Doesn't mean any of the stuff that he told Kerry was legit, because he could have been a plant just there to disrupt things, right?
	Uh in any event, so uh as a paranoid, I always look at a lot of this stuff.
	Now I've got a bigger uh picture of it, and I'm starting to think, well, you know, I can see some now that I'm elevating my my vision outward to include all of us in that vision while this is all happening.
	It's like, wow, there are some interesting things being revealed here.
	And of course it gives you a much broader uh historical perspective.
	Oh shit, 39 minutes.
	Okay, so um that's enough for this.
	Um a second, let me look at my notes.
	Uh so a couple of things.
	Uh the aliens are undoubtedly using this uh alternative physics, the other physics they call it.
	And uh I would like to know their um their paradigm in which that that physics is placed, how they their view of universe and the mechanisms by which it operates, not only at the physics level, but also how they're their how they think of themselves within universe, right?
	What is their position in universe?
	Do they have um no, uh so there's all different kinds of things relative to their biology that can intrude on their thinking.
	And so their shape at that level matters, in the sense that uh, you know, uh like if they have if they have a reproductive process that does not involve anything that we would understand as sex, that's going to uh provide them with a different perspective on reality than we have.
	Uh so the insectoids that would would be dealing with us uh being um uh egg layers and all of that kind of stuff would be uh those kind of beings.
	They would have nothing in which they could identify, they would find nothing in humans relative to our sexual drives, etc., with which they could identify.
	And we would need uh if we understood that we were fighting insectoids, we would need to understand that, even if they were intelligent, that they had a viewpoint that we could not reach across and and grasp because none of none of humanity lived that way.
	We don't have an analog.
	And so this kind of thing I think is important.
	Um here.
	And then how do the um I want to s I would love to know how, or rather, if we can make some deductions as to how the aliens think about time, right?
	The physical aspects uh and manifestation of time and energy within our universe, and what is their understanding of it.
	Because that'll also give us really a lot of clues as to what their motivation is for the intervention.
	I do not buy that they are beneficent, uh benign, or beneficial for humans.
	Okay.
	In fact, I think I see evidence that the deep state believes that the intervention is about seizing control of the herd.
	And so one way to characterize it, and so I believe that that's the case.
	I believe that the deep state believes that, and there's evidence that I would think would support their view that the intervention is to seize control of all of humanity and planet Earth to maintain a large amount of humans here in a workforce to provide resources for the interveners.
	That would be a very simplistic way of looking at what may be occurring.
	But I think that that is a view that uh many in the deep state have.
	I think that that view is uh tainted uh by many people within the deep state having um particular religious views in which they frame this as uh the uh good or evil, whether they're supporting the interveners or against them, whether they believe the interveners are uh Luciferian or not, does not matter.
	But I think there's many people that do see this through a religious viewpoint, which is, as Stephen Greer notes, uh he didn't say it this way, really fucking up our response and our understanding of it and our analysis of it even.
	So I do think that the uh there are large or there are um people within the deep state at a high enough level that their actions cause ripples that could be discerned if you were looking closely in terms of you know uh policy changes, that kind of thing.
	And so I think that the these people in the deep state at a high enough level are concerned about the intervention and the goal and and that they think that the goal of the intervention is the uh complete takeover of humanity for some purpose, which they believe somehow to be as a workforce or you know, miners, mine gold, who the fuck knows, right?
	But as a resource for the interveners.
	Now I okay, so in my understanding, I don't see any evidence that those people that in the deep state that think this, that believe this.
	I don't see any evidence that these guys are seeing the picture with humanity in it.
	Okay, so I think that they too are responding to the details of the intervention itself, and and instantly are going into this mindset of us against them without seeing ourselves uh without seeing humanity in the um in the midst of this picture.
	The reason that I think that these people do that is that these people are the um inheritors of the management class for the herd, and that these people inherently think of themselves As not being part of the herd of humanity, as being apart from it.
	And so therefore they're not so they they therefore see the herd in relation to uh the space aliens and the intervention and the potential for that intervention to be about taking over the herd and managing it at a different level.
	Uh, but they don't see themselves in that picture, right?
	They don't see their own participation in everything that's going on.
	This is this is my conclusion based on my observer uh my observations.
	Uh so in conclusion, uh I'll wrap it up here.
	Um it's my opinion that we're not looking at this in the right way.
	That uh there's no discussion or any of that kind of stuff about the intervention at a level that is uh species level and at a wide enough view uh to place ourselves within the um uh context.
	Where are we, what are we doing?
	Are we doing things correctly relative to this context of the intervention?
	And uh we're gonna be in this intervention for who knows how many thousands of years.
	We've already been in it for thousands of years.
	We're in a uh uptick in activity in it, and it would behoove us to just have a more adult view of what's going on.
	And the only way you can get there is through this um hardcore analysis with yourself in the picture and your own and looking at your own thoughts, actions, uh positions, uh biases, and so on, and how they predispose you to basically be played uh during the process of this intervention.
	And yes, I do think we're being attacked, I do think it's ongoing, I think it's active, and I'm certain that they're attacking us at the mental level.
	And uh we're unaware of it.
	We don't see it as a weapon.
	Anyway, uh more about this as we uh go forward here in the future.
	I've got to go do chores.
	So, yeah.
	Uh, you know.

▲