Clif High - WTF? Eh? 7/15

June 25, 2024 - Clif High

26:10

WTF? Eh? 7/15

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit clifhigh.substack.com

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello humans, hello humans.
	Still the 25th of June.
	Hang on a second, I'll get the sound controlled here.
	It's hot.
	Had to have the windows down.
	There we go.
	Okay, so still the 25th of June, heading back out.
	Many hours later, the other side of noon here.
	Um, so we have a bunch of data.
	Uh the data shows a big spike in emotional tension uh hitting us um uh on the 15th, early in the morning on the 15th that runs through all the whole day, and it keeps building uh tension until about 1.15 in the morning on uh the 16th.
	Okay, so now these times and stuff, all of the timing is all uh and truly an artifact of the way that I have defined these words and their um emotional um impact on humans.
	So some words have an emotional impact that lasts three days, some words have an emotional impact that lasts three weeks, others have some that last three months, etc.
	etc.
	And so that gives us the um the gesstimate as to uh when and how long the um uh tension values that are associated with that word would be impacting on humans, right?
	So now our data on the 15th shows that it's very much uh USA centered.
	Okay, so we have a lot more USA language than we do, like you know uh EU or or individual countries in Europe or you know, even more than Israel.
	There's a lot a lot of language now about Israel, as you can imagine, and it pretty much dominates at a geographic level.
	Um but we don't have a whole lot of pointers to something on the 15th happening in a specific place.
	Uh now the RB guys, the remote viewing guys, uh Dick Algyer's group, right?
	Uh future forecasting.
	Uh I've worked with them, they're very accurate.
	Uh Dick Algyre scares the absolute crap out of me in terms of the ability of stuff that he's able to, or his ability to pull stuff out of the ether.
	And so I have a tendency to take their um descriptions as being very um uh shading towards accurate, right?
	So uh always, always you're gonna interpret it, your mind's going to interpret it ahead of the event, and so you will put on stuff that will simply not manifest, even if you get the majority of it correct, right?
	It's just the way that our minds work.
	But the uh the future forecasting group, they've got a protocol, they've got um you know, double blind kind of crud going on, so there's you know, not a really a chance for uh a lot of front loading of your mind before you do this, and so the stuff that pops in does show up.
	I mean, statistically, just in dealing with these guys, it's very very accurate.
	So um, so from my viewpoint, I get some level of uh confirmation in the details that the future forecasting guys have come up with that points towards some of the linguistic stuff that I've got.
	Okay, so my linguistic stuff I have to I have to do it in kind of a binary fashion.
	Is it this or is it that that kind of a deal, right?
	So you look at one aspect of it and you follow those cross links all the way down, and then you come back and you look at the other aspect, follow those cross links, and um uh see where you're at.
	Now I have data sets that show that this building tension uh will involve um UFOs or aliens or whatever the fuck we want to call it to some degree.
	Um I'm gonna have to turn on my air here.
	Let's drop that.
	Okay.
	Okay, so um uh okay, so I got a lot of language around UFOs for all of July and uh shading into August.
	It was pretty uh decent for June, but it really ramps up in July.
	There is some suggestion in the data sets that what we're looking at uh for the event in July will have a UFO component, but there's this weird part of it, okay.
	The event that it's showing up in July has a uh a bunch of sets that are associated with it about a questioning, okay, not a debate.
	Um debating has a a judge and rules and all of that, right?
	And and what we're what we're getting into is not an argument, it's not being defined that way, but we could look at it as a questioning, okay, a questioning of what had happened.
	So this is a way that it lays out in the data that there isn't an event, some kind of a weirdness that occurs on the 15th.
	Now, my data sets are pegging it for the 15th, could be on the 10th, could be on the 18th, right?
	The data sets themselves, the the centric uh nature of the time being on the 15th, is is not an absolute.
	The relationship between what happens on the 15th and what happens on the 16th is very solid.
	Um, and so I expect that one would flow into the other, but it might happen as I say on the 10th, or it could happen on the 18th, that kind of thing, right?
	So timing is a real bitch in this.
	However, okay, so there is this questioning.
	The the description for the questioning comes down to basically uh describing a uh our situation of having had an event, people having seen the event, as well as all kinds of crap in terms of you know,
	satellites, um cam phones, uh, you know, security cams, cams on buses, maybe I don't know where, but but it's saying that there is a ton of stuff uh capturing the event.
	So we record the absolute hell out of this, right?
	So, whatever the event is, there is a um a capture to data component of it that makes the nature of the event having happened an absolute certainty.
	So we're not debating that.
	We're not we're not uh discussing or arguing whether the event occurred.
	We all acknowledge that it did occur, but that there is some level of discussion about what it was, not in terms of uh, you know, uh, was there an orca involved or was there a moose involved, right?
	Not like that, uh, because the recording of it will be able to say, well, there was this there, this happened, this happened, and so on.
	But rather, what does it mean?
	Okay, so what does this mean for humans?
	And so that's what's coming across in um in relation to this event that I've got pegged on the 15th and the 16th.
	Now, the data sets, if we if we look at this numerically, we're looking at a um building tension value, and I'm just gonna use round numbers, these are not the actual digits that I get because those would be meaningless to everybody else, but I just want to show a comparison here, okay.
	And so we're gonna say that over the course of the uh the 15th, from the morning of the 15th until uh around 115 in the morning on the 16th, so a little bit longer, so 25 hours and some odd minute kind of a thing.
	Um we have building tension, and then on the 16th, we have release tension.
	The building tension, if we say it went to a thousand, then the release tension values only go back down about six or seven hundred out of that thousand to return or to leave us with a residual of over 300 in a um a numeric value for this, okay.
	So again, the values are are just relative to each other, there's no uh definitive um metric for the individual value itself, okay.
	I'm just using these as uh to get you an idea.
	So we have this residual that's about a third of the buildup.
	This residual carries forward uh from the 16th, and it keeps going all through the rest of the Year because we get into more building tension, more release, building tension, and so on, right?
	So the it's a constant up and down, up and down, up and down kind of a thing.
	This is very unusual that we have a day on the 15th where building tension so dominates uh that it looks like a giant spike straight up because usually these things are very fuzzy, you know, you got a little bit of building tension and a lot of release, and then a little bit of real uh building tension and a lot more release, or the opposite, it just goes up and down, up and down all the time.
	Uh, this was a very unusual occurrence.
	I've I've determined that it's not an artifact of the data, that is to say, or the data processing, so it's not a screw up on the part of the processing, so it really is in the data, and it really does come across this way as a very large run-up and then a very large drop, and then a residual that keeps on going.
	The data sets themselves, the actual um sets of the language, um, build over time from the 16th on, adding more and more language.
	A lot of this appears to be uh as a result of the the gain of the language appears to be as a result of the discussions, not necessarily um any kind of a resolution of those discussions, nor is there anything in the data sets yet far, yet this far that would show that um we have another occurrence or anything, right?
	So the fact that we're still discussing this months later, so we'll still be discussing this in December, even though it happens in July.
	So five months later, we'll still be um working through this and we'll still be discussing this business in 2025.
	Uh the sets that are involved in those discussions build over time, so apparently we really get into this.
	Uh it's intriguing enough at whatever a level that it starts involving more and more minds out of humanity, and so there is a uh hint in the data that uh we will have about 10% of humanity involved in thinking about this, dealing with it, reacting to it, or whatever uh by the end of the year.
	Um there's also stuff in the data that suggests uh we're gonna get a formal response, um, you know, in the sense of like uh officialdom that will decide, okay, uh, you know, we're gonna hire people and pay them to think about this, whatever the fuck it is, right?
	And and the data is just too diverse, too crammed with all of the anxiety and the um the worries and the fears, etc.
	that have been put out on us uh by the Elohim worship cult for me to be able to filter through it to get a better idea of what's coming.
	So it is my supposition that if we didn't, if we weren't being worked over by the fear porn coming out of the uh rabbinical councils all over the planet, if we weren't being pushed on by the um uh linguistically by the uh uh uh fears and the anxiety and all of this kind of horseshit from uh the Jewish community,
	that it would be easier to do this work, and I'd be able to get more out of it because I wouldn't have so much um fluff in the way, wouldn't have so much uh foam out there, right?
	Useless, uh not really factual or not really developing uh kind of fears that are put on us by the by the rabbinical councils.
	They design them, they craft them, they put it out there, just like the Department of Defense put out the flat Earth meme back in the year 2000, um, and then really pushed it with money all the way up through 2004.
	Um so we have the event, it keeps growing in terms of its impact on humanity, more and more people start becoming intrigued by it or aware of it or whatever, and it grows over time.
	There's a lot about the event itself that's completely hidden from us, okay, that we won't see that isn't isn't visible to us.
	Um, a lot of those sets that have um obscured or hidden or references to a hidden uh function or hidden aspect of this, uh, also have uh either directly held or via crosslinks, uh, lots of UFO references.
	So it's my supposition that there's going to be some hidden level or not discussed or invisible component of this that will involve the UFOs.
	Now the interesting part about this though is that even though it's being described as being hidden and invisible, we're gonna know about it.
	Alright, so even though we won't see the UFO necessarily, we will in some way know it was there.
	So I'm suspecting, you know, satellite cameras or you know, whatever, right?
	Catches it on somebody's you know uh doorbell cam or something.
	Who the hell?
	You know, it just we just don't know what's how it's going to develop, but the data sets are are very clear that it is unseen, but it is known.
	It's it's um uh invisible, uh, we could not look at it and see it, yet we have all this information about it.
	So it very much a real strangeness here in terms of uh the particulars within the data sets, and it'll be very interesting to see what actually manifests, if anything, on the 15th.
	Now I say if anything, but I'm actually pretty calm about the idea that there will be something just because of the way that the data lays out and the weirdness of the particular point where we're at right now.
	Uh, you know, Julian Assange being released is gonna whip up all kinds of stuff that'll build over the course of the month, and you know, and we've got all this other bullshit going, and you know, the degradation of the money and the degradation of the um Biden regime and so on and so on.
	So it will be an event-filled time.
	This much is pretty certain.
	Um the data is just pointing to an event that is uh at this stage anyway.
	While the event itself is predictable, the component, the aspects, the attributes of it are not.
	Uh, you know, we just know approximately when it'll appear, and approximately the emotional impact value it will have and the duration from that, and then quite literally tens of thousands of words about uh what may be involved in the event.
	So um so it's it's um really a strange fucking time, guys.
	Um if I had any more information about uh what might occur, I'd let you know.
	So uh the remote viewing guys show some kind of uh an object falling, maybe it's a missile or a rocket, um, so maybe it's like you know, a SpaceX rocket breaks up and and you know falls down and hits a McDonald's in Florida or something.
	Alright, so they're showing a crash, you know, smoke coming up, the silhouette of a city, and so on.
	And I suspect that those things actually will manifest and will get a good visual that looks just like that uh because of the nature of the skills of the uh RV group, right?
	And um uh so I do suspect that there will be an event and it will be um at least spectacular enough to get our attention at the time that it occurs or very shortly thereafter.
	Thank you.
	Now the um I got another damn detour.
	Uh it's terrible when they destroy the roads out here.
	You know, it's a 70-mile trip, and I don't need to add another 30 miles because of their damn detours, right?
	Um, just because they're taking culverts up so that you know Orca can swim inland and eat salmon.
	I don't know what their rationale is, it's bullshit anyway, uh, put on them by the Elohim worship cult and their uh insistence that we have climate and in ecological crises.
	Um was I there?
	Okay, so our uh emergence into this new situation post-event is a lot more described in terms of the emotional impacts than uh I get around the event itself.
	So that that is also a little bit uh atypical in terms of uh the way that the uh programming usually rolls out the data for me.
	I still have some of these data sets to process.
	I think there's maybe about three-quarters of a terabyte, and I'll set off another round of processing when I get back here.
	But it'll be days before that gets done.
	I've got all different kinds of stuff to do.
	The machines out there have to be put to other uses, so I can't use them as um processing servers that uh for a couple of days I've got to do some other work on them and so on.
	Uh so it'll be a while, and maybe I'll do another one of these in a week or two and say, okay, this is what I've come across, or maybe I'll write something up about it.
	I don't expect that it'll change much.
	There may be some level of uh clarification in some of the data sets, but even that it's it's uh you know, I'm not expecting that.
	So that it's just the uh state of where we're at here.
	It the further we get into the data processing without uh major alterations, the more it hesitancy to just keep piling on, so to speak.
	Alright, so there's that.
	Now given the um the nature of what the RV guys have come up with, it seems less likely uh that we're dealing with a strictly financial event, okay, on the 15th and the 16th, because the uh de Galgeyers group are are you know showing this missile or whatever falling down, some explosion, big smoke and that kind of stuff rolling over the city, you know, mile-long column of smoke in the air, that sort of a thing, right?
	Um and of course, they don't have a uh a geographic location for it either.
	So that part didn't aid us anything in in that regard, but um the all right, so this is a this sort of a weird way to say this,
	but the the nature of the RV stuff, uh the remote viewing that Dick Algeyer's group has produced has uh led me to to think that okay, it's not going to be a strictly financial event, that there will be some level of um uh physical motion kinetic activity that's associated with this.
	Now that does not mean that there won't be a financial event, it just means that this financial event will not be uh be it 100%.
	It won't be um the end all and be all of this particular building tension, and and this is um reasonable for me, okay.
	So this makes sense to me because uh financial stuff, no matter how fast it happens, is not going to have the same emotional impact that we have with uh something that's kinetic, like you know, a missile falling or you know, a rocket coming out of the sky, something like that.
	That's gonna cause all kinds of uh emotional impact that you're just not gonna get with the financial stuff.
	And so the building tension and the and the uh remainder, the release language only going back to and leaving us with the remainder there, all of this makes sense uh if it's not a uh financial event, right?
	If it's um uh bigger than that, and so uh so that has density to reinforce um the fact that the RB guys got the uh signs of a kinetic activity has a tendency to reinforce in my mind that we're not dealing with a strictly uh financial event, although there are all kinds of sets about a very terrible financial uh or or a series of financial events between now and then.
	That was another aspect of this.
	Uh crud pilot cars, you know, road closed up here, all of that kind of stuff, lots of traffic too, tourists everywhere.
	Um, so if we had had a uh uh a strictly financial event, we would not have had the building tension nor the release in this manner in the way that we've got it at the moment.
	And so I suspect that that the kinetic event is going to propel that, but that that it's going to um overlay or or drape over, perhaps even pause everybody's um anxiety about the financial crap.
	Uh so if we have a big financial crash, or there's a you know, um I I'm expecting a stock market uh absolute puke out.
	And uh it's gonna hit bonds, it's gonna hit all the 401ks are gonna take a giant hit, all of this kind of shit, right?
	Uh because the money management is just gonna go bluey, just gonna the guys that are managing the currency are just um uh not able to maintain uh anything going forward, and we're gonna see a lot of these activities over June in the first part of July.
	This was another thing that made me think that that whatever happens on the 15th is not financial because we'd had a bunch of financial stuff show up uh indicating it's gonna appear earlier in the month.
	And then that's really about it, I think.
	That's about all I can say about the uh event on the 15th and uh the release on the 16th.
	Um that it okay, so there is a tendency after the 16th for more and more people to examine the event, get in get intrigued by it, and uh keep pursuing it.
	And such that we end up with a large segment of the population of uh the planet uh being um uh you know actively involved, at least in terms of thinking about it, discussing it, and so on, uh, you know, five and six and seven months later.
	And that that keeps growing over time.
	Again, not you know, I mean, yeah, uh the financial stuff will do that, but uh uh at one point once the dollar reaches a certain threshold, I'm willing uh I would say that it'd be much more likely that uh a third of humanity would be uh aware of what's going on, right?
	That it would impact a third of humanity when the dollar dies, like right away that day kind of a thing, right?
	Um as opposed to this uh a tenth of humanity uh being whipped up about this particular event, again, whatever the nature of it.
	I think that's about it, guys.
	I think that's about as much as I've got.
	I provide further details in terms of the language as I get into it.
	Uh I don't think it's gonna be particularly meaningful or give us any kind of a um uh uh a different uh view in terms of a heads up or any actionable language.
	So uh we're just gonna basically have to go through these next uh couple of weeks of uh political and financial um uproar and chaos and so on, uh, because bear in mind the Julian Assange stuff will impact banks, right?
	It'll it'll do so because of the um showing how dirty uh all of the bank owners and the Federal Reserve and all of that.
	Uh how dirty all of that is.
	And that's going to also muddy up everybody's feelings and emotions about the money as it is dying.
	Okay.
	Alright.
	Um I guess that's it.
	Okay, and I'll talk to you later.

▲