Clif High - Wide view Woo...

Oct. 25, 2023 - Clif High

31:54

Wide view Woo...

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit clifhigh.substack.com

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello humans, hello humans.
	October 25.
	It's uh almost nine.
	Getting a late start this morning, heading inland.
	Groans
	Anyway.
	Yeah, no, no, no, don't do that.
	Cancel.
	My car is trying to do shit on my phone.
	Anyway, um.
	So a rough morning.
	I mean, we've had a had the shit kicked out of us by wonky electricity, fried our heat system, and then um we've had seriously cold weather, we're gonna get uh supposed to be down to freezing on the beach, so they're on uh this weekend.
	So they're thinking maybe Saturday or Sunday we might get this um effect of uh ice crystals in the surf.
	But you know, uh it's still cold though.
	I mean it's 30 36 this morning up uh on the bluff where we live, and it's 34 down on the beach itself.
	Anyway, heading into town.
	Um like I say, it was kind of a rough morning because the first thing out the gate doing my email were a lot of emails about uh people freaking out.
	They were um losing it over um some stuff that uh Penny Kelly and uh and uh Joe J Snip 4 had said last night on uh JC's Beyond Mystic Um I think that it's a wacky woo or whatever.
	Anyway, so people were freaking out about Penny Kelly saying there's gonna be a micro nova in 10 years time, and that you know the sun's swelling and the and the moon didn't cover it in the eclipse.
	Well, she's making all kinds of assumptions that are not valid, okay.
	I think it's worth shit.
	Uh there's no evidence ever anywhere of a micronova.
	Uh this is a um uh there is stuff that is claimed as an evidence by David Dubine, but he's got all kinds of assumptions about that stuff that make him think this.
	Those assumptions are not valid.
	So um neither is the um catastrophe cycles that uh we see with um that he he talks about and some of these other people talk about.
	A lot of the things that they are saying are cyclic, uh are incidents that happened that are separated in time, but they don't have any clue as to what caused those incidents, right?
	And so um uh you could say, oh well the the younger Dryas um uh ice age, mini ice age, was um uh shut down, it was it was stopped, it was undone by a couple of meteors coming in, right?
	About 12,000 years ago.
	And uh and they seem to have a 12,000 year cycle on some of the site on the some of these disasters.
	But the problem is uh you don't know what caused those meteors to come in 12,000 years ago, and they coincidentally uh happened at the same time that we get a uh destruction of this island that used to exist, and this island was like the size of the UK, like the size of um uh England and Scotland, right?
	And part of Ireland, this is a big fucking island, and it used to exist between South America and Antarctica, and it kept Antarctica warm by funneling warm air down.
	And when it was removed, which it was, we see this island all over scattered all over the bottom of the ocean down there, and when it was removed, it it allowed um winds to form at latitude 40 that circle endlessly and they they create a wind wall that isolates Antarctica and causes it to be frozen.
	Okay, without that wind wall, Antarctica it would be uh tropical, as it was.
	Um this we think that this shit happened uh after or further back than 12,000 years ago, but it might have happened as as long ago as uh 250,000 Years.
	We just don't know time frames on some of this stuff, right?
	And it's impossible for us to judge.
	So uh so David Dubine has influenced Penny Kelly because Penny Kelly is obviously listened to him and is talking micronovas.
	Well, there's no evidence whatsoever of micronova, and so Penny Kelly is wrong, and she's wrong in her assumptions.
	So she's saying, oh, because the sun stuck out like a um uh a white wall tire around the moon, the sun is swollen.
	Well, what if the moon has shrunk?
	Right?
	The moon's a projection in any event, right?
	It is not as she thinks, it is not a sphere, it is not a um a planetoid, right?
	It is a an object, a device, a construction, and so it's under intelligent control, so there's no natural consequences involved in the moon.
	It's under intelligent control.
	Anyway, so there's not gonna be a micro nova of the sun in ten years.
	Penny Kelly is is hugely wrong.
	Um I do not have a um uh okay, so there's not a lot of evidence that any of her forecasts are accurate, all right.
	Any of the stuff from the guides and all of this sort of thing from her books, none of that shit has appeared.
	There's she was saying apparently that there's battles on the moon and the bad guys have been been defeated.
	Well, the moon is a device, there's no battles going on top of it, there's no battles going in in it, there's no evidence of any of that at all, and so she's getting this information out of her mind, making this shit up.
	Her mind is making this stuff up in order to fulfill her wishes, and her wishes are that she know some information about the moon, and it has no information, but it's quite happy to make it up for her.
	Um, you know, there are no battles going on on the moon that way.
	There's all kinds of freaky geeky shit going on in the moon, okay.
	And this is another thing.
	Okay, so um I don't know that Penny Kelly has a process, okay.
	Uh she there's no formalized method, she doesn't go into it in terms of she just uh puts the results out.
	Um unlike say Dick Algyre, right?
	His his remote viewing crew, they've got this uh defined process, they work it continuously, they've been working it for years, it is repeatable, it it produces repeatable results that are able to be validated in less than a month or so because they're doing these things with these one-month look-aheads.
	If we if we examine Penny Kelly's one-month look-aheads, she's not very accurate at all.
	And um uh, unlike Dick Algyre, where they don't know what they're sketching, they don't know what is the proximate cause for a lot of this stuff, but they have the um the headline, right?
	So they have the the view that we'll all get in the um uh what we laughingly call the news, and um, and so they can be validated and they're validated on a monthly process.
	Ah, crud.
	We got some kind of major road shit going on here.
	Just what we need.
	Anyway, so um uh anyway, so uh Dick Algyre's process is repeatable, alright?
	They know what they're fucking doing, and they um uh do it uh repetitiously, and you have a validation on that uh repetition that is uh able to be checked over time.
	So Hang on, I gotta do some tricky driving road work, tree work, power guys, uh you're telling me to go slow, he's too close to that exit area there.
	Anyway, um geez, giant low boys, they're bringing in heavy equipment for something.
	Oh like maybe waterline or something or sewer.
	Anyway, um so uh Dick Algyre's stuff uh I find to have some validity, uh, but mostly I discount uh Penny Kelly's stuff, right?
	And this is also the same with Joe's dreams.
	Okay, so anybody can have accurate dream states that are forecasting near immediate future events.
	All right, this is an understood kind of a thing.
	But it's entirely subjective, how you interpret it and so on, what you think you saw in the dream.
	And the repetition of the dreams successfully is not there.
	And even if you have a dream journal and you're keeping track of all of this, you will have a tendency of a bias, of a known bias, to make yourself valid in your dreams.
	And so you'll reinterpret at the time of the events.
	Unlike Dick Allgaier's stuff where they sketch it out, they draw it out, and you can clearly see where they are correct or not.
	And also there's the issue of timing.
	but leaving the timing aside, what freaked people out was that we're at like 33 34000 on Bitcoin and um Joe is saying sell everything at when when it hits 38000 sell everything you got and wait for the crash and then buy it back cheap and I think he's full of shit.
	I think that dream of his is fixated in his mind and has no validity relative to that statement that he's making.
	And he's thinking that gold and silver are going to crash in price.
	And then he's going to buy Tether, which is tied to the U.S. dollar, which is losing its purchasing power by the moment.
	So none of that makes a lot of sense, guys.
	waiting to see if he does it to see if he when it hits 38000 if he if he sells everything because it could be in a world of hurt um my expectation is that we will still have the 100 thousand dollar uh bitcoin price parties and at this rate it might be you know we're if we're picking up 20% in seven days and uh that trend even cut in half uh held up we'd have 100,000
	Bitcoin prices by Christmas, maybe into January.
	The dollar is dying, so there is no reason to suspect that there's going to be a crash in anything relative to dollar terms.
	Why should anything fall in the value of a dollar when the inflation is pushing this hard on the dollar?
	And my data is showing that January, February, somewhere in there, we're going to get into some serious double-digit inflation because because of this shit the Fed's gonna try and do to support all of the Biden regime shit.
	Biden wants another $100 billion to give to Israel, Taiwan, and Ukraine.
	Okay, so how does that benefit the United States?
	It does not.
	How does it hurt the United States?
	It takes all of our resources and sends them overseas.
	And it creates a vast quantity, a tranche of money that will be coming back here and causing further fucking inflation.
	And so if you have further fucking inflation, why buy into the dollar?
	Why sell anything and go into the dollar?
	So anyway, so I think Joe's wrong.
	I think Penny Kelly is wrong.
	I think that Penny Kelly's process is not to be trusted.
	And I don't trust prophetic dreams to continue.
	Okay, because dreams are a function.
	Dreams are highly complex.
	They don't just happen.
	No matter how much you want to have a dream, no matter how much you ask your spirit guides to give you a prophetic dream, yeah, you'll dream, but is it meaningful?
	Not necessarily.
	It could be that you're dreaming as a result of the spices in the pizza or something else that you took that.
	day that affects your uh mental um processes okay so this is the problem with with woo that if you don't have a scientific approach to your psychicness then you basically have no approach to it and you're either believing it all the time or you're not and and that's really what it comes down to um It's it's really complicated.
	You can go into it if you read uh Ingo Swan's stuff, uh uh his books on ESP, he specifically warns against uh body processes uh attachment.
	Okay, so um to a certain extent, this also affects like Dick Algyre.
	Okay, so Dick Algyre uses a body processes attachment in order to come up with uh forecasts, and so what he'll do is he'll get a vision, right?
	And so uh he's described this to me repeatedly, and uh what they do is they he gets the the RV, the remote viewing vision, and he says, uh, oh, it looks like um you know uh there's this kind of uh explosion or something, and there's all these woods, and uh there's a stream here, and uh and uh over there is a dam.
	All right.
	Now, so he's got an explosion, it's happening out in the woods somewhere, and there is a dam, like you know, a water water damm up a river somewhere that's in reasonable proximity to where the explosion is going to take place.
	Now, as far as Dick Algyre's RV visions and all of his people, Daz and all these other guys, I trust that, right?
	That's a pretty good uh description of an upcoming event.
	Although we don't have magnitude, we don't have location, we don't have timing.
	And so then what he does is he'll make these little squiggles, so he'll make like four little squiggles, and one little squiggle will be labeled winter, one spring, one uh summer, and one fall, and then he'll look at his vision and then he'll go touch the little squiggle that says spring, and then he'll look at his vision and he'll his drawing, and then he'll touch the one that says winter, and then fall, um, etc.
	Right in summer.
	And whichever one, quote, feels appropriate, then that's how he determines uh what timing to apply to it.
	And so he's using a body processes.
	Now uh you know, what if he was taking blood pressure medicine, and maybe he had low blood pressure and he took his high blood pressure his medicine to raise his blood pressure, and so maybe that makes him his body respond to this body processes.
	So Ingo Swan was not a fan of body processes um mechanisms that are unchecked.
	Okay, so he had uh it wasn't like Ingo didn't use these, but he had multiple uh systemic or systematic and um strategic approaches to these processes.
	So he would never trust a single one.
	Uh so he might do that same kind of squiggle thing that Dick Algeyer does, but he's gonna use three or four other techniques to validate that because you can't trust your body.
	Now, especially body responses, especially these days, where we've got chemtrails, we've got polluted food, you got 50,000 chemicals that didn't used to exist in our food.
	Um all different kinds of shit.
	We got electromagnetic radiation.
	Um, by the way, I just found a 5G um light system uh about a mile and a half from my um uh my house out here on the coast.
	So they're creeping out along here as well.
	Um anyway, though, so um so Ingo had this this multiplicity of effects, and even so he would many times in his writings you you see that he's talking about um he did not trust this particular body processes,
	and he and this turns out to be uh valid because later on this XYZ happened and it showed that if he had trusted it, he would have been wrong, and he actually had the psychic intuition to not trust the processes.
	So he would sort of rely on his body up to a certain extent, and then if he got that psychic impression that uh oh, this ain't going right, then he would just ignore it.
	So he always came back to the mental processes that he had um in place and was refining over all of that time.
	Um anyway, so I don't know that Penny Kelly does any of this, right?
	And I know Joe doesn't.
	Joe has a um routine of writing his dreams down in a journal, and that's basically it.
	And then he goes back and he validates, but uh it's just like with my stuff, matching words uh for events is really difficult.
	That's why I really like uh the remote viewing that um Dick Allgyer and his group uh do is because they have the processes that is visual that is recorded at the time uh by their sketches and filling in the little grids and their in their um uh or filling in the little cells in their grid process that allows them to define all the characteristics and to explore the remote viewing vision.
	So I really do think that that um remote viewing is is highly accurate and very worthwhile, but it's also not mechanistic, and and you can uh lead yourself into trouble by not having these sorts of processes.
	So, as I say, will Joe sell everything at 38?
	In my opinion, he'd be a fool.
	If he sold BTC at 38,000, he's gonna be an idiot because he won't be able to buy it back, it won't crash, right?
	Um uh, you know, so in any event though, so I don't think his dream is valid.
	And and if he does, then he'll sell everything at 38 and he will suffer the consequences.
	Um, so now like I've got the the reason I'm on to this is I got so many damn emails and so many people freaking out because we're so close to 38,000, they want to know, am I gonna sell?
	You know, this kind of stuff.
	It's like sell, get dollars for Bitcoin?
	Fuck no, who wants dollars?
	Who wants to buy into the Biden regime?
	And that's what you're doing.
	You're buying into the Fed, you're buying into the deep state if you sell for dollars or tether.
	Tether's a fucking, but I won't go into that.
	And XRP, okay.
	So the only customer for XRP are the banks, and the banks are failing.
	39 banks are laying people off right now.
	39 banks will be closed by the time we get to Christmas.
	All right, that's gonna take a big chunk out of the USA banking infrastructure.
	So where tether, where XRP, both of these fuckers are tied to banks.
	Tether is a stable coin that's tied to your inflation to the US dollar.
	And so, in my opinion, anybody buying tether is an idiot.
	Same thing with XRP, right?
	There is no validation, no use for XRP.
	There's no limit on it, they can create as much as they want.
	It's a Fed scheme, it is a central bank digital currency that is owned by the central banks.
	Don't be deceived by them having been sued by the SEC.
	All right, anyway, so um, anyway, like I say, it really pissed me off to have to get into that shit uh first thing in the morning with all these emails.
	And thought I was thinking, what what?
	And see, I didn't watch all that.
	I came in late last night on the on the stream, I was there for a few minutes uh while I was making dinner, and that was it.
	I missed most of what everybody said.
	But I bitched and moaned about him while I was there because I heard Joe say he was gonna sell at 38,000.
	It's like, boy, you're gonna freak a lot of people out.
	A lot of people don't understand digital currencies, they don't understand what's going on with it.
	They're acting on faith and trust, and so if you're gonna talk, in my opinion, if you're a woo person and you're gonna talk about cryptos, you have a big fucking responsibility.
	You note I don't say shit about what cryptos I might buy or not buy.
	I don't give trading advice, I don't get into that.
	I will never ever ever contact any of you people by a telegram offering you an uh you know trading information or get into my trading group or any of that shit.
	Those are all scammers.
	Okay, so um so uh okay, so now one last thing here, and my last little bit into town here.
	Um I'm not working as much as I I like Dick Algyre as much as I like Daz and the and the crew.
	I am not working with Dick Algyre's remote viewing groups anymore.
	Okay.
	Um this this results uh directly uh because of the actions of Dick Algyre's handler, his tasker.
	Uh so I I I'm not gonna get into the details, it's not pertinent at the moment.
	Uh, and they're really screwy, and you gotta understand the temporality of everything that was going on.
	But I had worked a um uh recent remote viewing target uh through Mike, who is the tasker for Dick Algyre's group, and uh I was very very very dissatisfied, in my opinion, uh there's something flaky going on,
	and Mike, even if it's even if he's honest, okay, even if he's not being duplicitous, uh his assumptions about reality are so skewed that they impact um the targets, and I have proof in my last RB session with these guys.
	So I'm not gonna be working with them anymore.
	Uh I had 40 emails and a lot of discussions with Mike, and uh it was not it didn't resolve well.
	So, you know, I have no hard feelings about uh uh Dick or Daz or any of the guys, they do great work.
	Uh they're gonna continue to do great work.
	Um, but me personally, I'm not gonna I'm not gonna interact with Mike and put a target out there for this guy to you to do the tasking on because of his process and because of the uh universal view that he has that in my opinion is skewing everything that he does.
	So just to let you know, um I won't be interacting with them anymore.
	I mean, Dick and I still send emails to each other, that kind of thing.
	Uh there's Dick is still doing great work, still showing up stuff a month ahead in detail and all of this sort of thing, right?
	Uh but these um selected targets uh where Mike uh is um uh intimately involved in the association uh for the target itself, um uh in my experience, they've gone wonky uh twice.
	And so I don't want to have a third repetition, especially with the negative um actions that came from this last time.
	Uh it was just a uh it was a screwed-up mess, guys, and it and it kind of like uh I want to say it's it brought some crap on my head, okay, and it and it may develop that this um uh uh that this last RV target uh is gonna be end up um uh participating in stuff in the future.
	I'll get into that at some point.
	Anyway, though, so just to let you know, I won't be doing stuff with Dick, but Dick's stuff is is quite trustworthy.
	Uh I really like their monthly uh reports of what's coming up in the next month.
	And in any event, so uh here we are.
	I'm sort of sort of done with my bitching and moaning about the woo people, um, but we're coming up into some very, very, very serious times.
	And so um the consequences of making statements about the future for especially for things like cryptos, uh, for us woo guys are gonna escalate very rapidly.
	All right, so you gotta be if you're a woo-guy, you gotta be really fucking careful.
	Uh so you know, uh what if Joe gets up there and says, you know, hey, I sold everything at 38,500 or whatever the fuck it is, right?
	Uh by the way, resistance is 38,889.
	So I think you'd have to wait after that to see if there's gonna be any kind of a crash.
	Nonetheless, what if he says I sold everything at 35 or 38,500?
	Boy, I'm happy now.
	I got got all these tethers.
	Uh and then uh what if he says that in such a way that other people think that he's urging them to sell as well, and uh then they sell and they find themselves in the same predicament as him, which is that you're gonna have to spend more money to buy back what you used to have because there is not gonna be that crash because the mechanism does not exist for there to be a resurgence in value in the dollar that would cause such a crash to occur.
	You can't have a an effective crash in in uh solid assets, okay?
	Gold, silver, bitcoin, uh, ethereum, uh, a few other coins.
	They won't will will not crash as long as the dollar is uh becoming weaker and weaker and weaker every day with this massive excessive printing.
	And so um, under those circumstances, to think that that there is so basically uh if Joe had that dream, and if we had uh moves to have the dollar backed by gold or something like that, I could say, yeah, there's actually a mechanism whereby this could occur.
	But right now, there is not no mechanism that way.
	The dollar is not going to get any stronger.
	So you're not gonna get silver down at six dollars, you're not ever gonna be able to buy that again.
	And right now, China's thinking about doing a bump where they would deliberately increase the price of silver, cause all kinds of problems through all kinds of industries, but they desperately need this, and I'll get into that at some other point, but they desperately need that for their high-tech industry, specifically solar panels.
	Uh, they've got uh China's got a world of hurt in their economy, and they are the CCP's top dog um financier people are desperate to find ways out, and they're trying all of this shit that had been tried in the previous depression in the 1930s, just prior to that.
	None of it's gonna work, of course, right.
	So uh, so you're not gonna get a crash in any solid asset.
	Uh, we are not seeing crashes in uh pricing for solid assets like um uh buildings and stuff like that and and land.
	What we are seeing is a reduction in price as the debt attached to those is uh becomes so excessive it has to be laid off one way or another.
	And so we've got houses out here that had been listed at like six and seven million dollars, big fucking houses, you know, six thousand square feet kind of shit, right?
	They didn't sell, didn't sell for like more than a fucking year, and so they put them up on auction, and so they then they sell in auction because the debt's gonna go 100% bad.
	The house would have to be foreclosed if the lenders didn't agree to do this auction reduction, and that's basically what it is.
	And so that house that was listed at six some odd millions of dollars, I think it was six point five million.
	That house has sold in auction for something less than half.
	Okay, I think it's uh we think I've talked to some people, we think it's about um uh 2.5 million, and so it would have uh been less than 50, so 50% of the debt would have been removed.
	Now, that's not a pri uh it's not a crash in the house price.
	That is the uh debt restructuring that we're gonna go through every fucking place, all over the fucking planet, uh, as a result of the dollar dying.
	All this debt has to go away and be restructured, and so we will go through periods of that, but that's not a crash.
	Uh it'll be a quote crash in solid prices uh for solid things relative to debt-based material.
	So here's a good example.
	Uh recently, uh just because uh I won't go into the details, but I've got to have a I we have to come to some conclusions about our house and do some stuff here.
	Um I was looking at housing and just was interested in it.
	Uh, and so I was looking and I found a house uh that just came up because of the way I worded the search, and this house was like I think it was 1.75 million, you know.
	Uh these numbers really freaked me out, but I understand that you know it's the debt level, it's the degradation of the dollar that causes those numbers to be uh attached to this house, right?
	Anyway, and so uh this house at 1.75 million had been on the market for like 180 days or something like that.
	And uh at the time that I came across it, I I wasn't really that interested, but there was some aspects of it.
	I talked to my real estate agent friend here, and he provided me with some information on it, and I snooped around on the house because of some other ancillary things like the guy who built it, right?
	Uh I wanted to maybe contact him, etc.
	etc.
	Anyway, though, um so this house at one one and three quarters millions uh ended up selling and they sold for bitcoin okay it was not a dollar transaction how they've done this with the registering of it and all of that I have no idea didn't look into that but when the house sold the 1.75 million uh value uh was uh basically

▲