Clif High - mother WEFfing Earth Changes

May 25, 2023 - Clif High

19:24

mother WEFfing Earth Changes

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit clifhigh.substack.com

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello humans.
	Hello, humans.
	25th of May.
	839, something like that in the morning, probably like maybe 845, sitting out taking some sun.
	And in a second, no dog, leave my coffee alone.
	She discovered she liked coffee.
	Probably it's just the cream and sugar.
	Well, I don't know.
	Maybe she likes coffee.
	Anyway, um, so taking a break for going in and doing some work in the greenhouse, getting a bit of morning sun, and I thought to talk about um my data process and how things work and some interesting conclusions I've come to recently.
	So I'm old, I'm retired.
	I don't, you know, I'm in the no fucks given uh phase of life, and so I got interested in where my process went wonky and why.
	Okay, I put a lot of time in it over these years.
	It was productive, it was um extremely accurate in things like Bitcoin, uh those sorts of things.
	I've got no reason to complain uh about it at all.
	It's well, okay, so uh I've got a lot a lot of reasons to complain about it as a shitload of work, but nonetheless, it was accurate in many regards and extremely accurate in a lot of different ways, but then it went wonky in other ways that it should not have, right?
	Um it's like if you use the a chunk of code to add a big column of figures, and while the figures changed every time you did the the addition of them, say maybe there's you know just 30 30 numbers, you're you're gonna use a little software routine and you're gonna add these 30 numbers and come up with a conclusion.
	And it works repeatedly, and every time you do an addition here, uh you throw away that column and you get a new column of numbers.
	And just because the numbers themselves change, the process of the addition does not.
	And the and the size of the sum should change.
	Uh, but and that's an expected part of the process, but the process should not um become inaccurate for any reason relative to the actual addition part.
	And yet that's what seemingly was going on within uh my software over these past 30 plus years.
	Uh, and I blamed a lot of it on censorship as it as it became apparent in like 2007 that we were entering into a controlled language environment.
	I I started thinking that it was a censorship that was causing some of these issues, and um an unexpected variance between uh uh timing results and emotional uh values on results, okay.
	And I can get into the details uh at some point.
	It's I find it interesting, but probably most people won't, but nonetheless, here's the issue.
	Uh there were times when I had spectacular hits on um earth uh kind of you know uh um changes, right?
	Like um uh manifest uh things like volcanoes and this sort of shit, right?
	One spectacular one, uh whatever the cause of the earthquake uh was both the timing and the res and the result of the um banda achi earthquake.
	Okay, that was way the fuck back when that year, before that uh earthquake um happened, which was at the very end of the year, uh boxing day, um, December 26th.
	Um before that earthquake happened, at the very beginning of that year, I had a forecast that described this earthquake, its damage level, 300,000 people, uh, killed a uh nation knocked back to a previous age, cities scraped clean, all this kind of stuff accurately describing the earthquake, and I was doing that almost a year ahead of time.
	It was in January and February that I was doing the data run that provided that information about that earthquake.
	Now it got a little wonky because there was another earthquake that year that had a uh celebrity component, so it had the um this uh uh uh heightened emotional Impact and my data set could not discriminate between these two earthquakes, which happened in the same year, separated by like eight months, right?
	So I think it was maybe May of uh that year uh that we had the Scott Peterson trial in California, during which there was an earthquake that caused the courtroom to be emptied by people jumping out of windows and shit, right?
	And that was in my um that was in my data sets, all these descriptors of people freaking out and jumping out of windows, and celebrities being involved, all this kind of thing.
	So I got that earthquake correct, but there was no 300,000 dead, there was no nation knocked back to a previous age, none of that.
	And I thought, and say, like I said, and so this is like me.
	And I thought, okay, this is really goofy, you know.
	Here it is so accurate in this, why not the rest?
	And is it and I naturally assume it was my own uh uh screw up in interpreting the data.
	Hang on a second, a lot of pollen out here.
	Anyway, and so in interpreting the data, I just assumed I'd made a mistake.
	I didn't didn't have the concept then of what's what we now called data masking, where an event looms so large in one faction, in this case the emotional intensity around the celebrity aspect of the Scott Peterson trial, uh, that it has a tendency to blend into and mask um the difference in time between it and some other event within that same um data run forecast period.
	And so I know that now I could probably uh uh I would have written it into the um algorithm to discriminate against that, so that wouldn't have had that kind of an issue.
	But at the time I didn't.
	Um second there.
	Okay.
	And so um anyway, so we had that had that uh period of like eight months where I thought that it had failed, and then we had the Banda Achi earthquake, and it's like, ah, okay, this this stuff makes sense.
	Now, I'm thinking, you know, years on, decades on, why did this occur?
	Why were there so many failed predictions timing-wise and everything else relative to um uh earth kind of stuff, right?
	Earth changes kind of stuff, when it was so spectacular in the early days with those uh kinds of results, and results I'd been getting in um uh you know, 2000 for 2001, 1997 for 98, that kind of thing.
	We're really, really, really accurate.
	I thought I was really on to something, and then it faded.
	I couldn't figure out why it was.
	And I cast around for a lot of different reasons, but now, as I say, decades on, we now have the benefit of hindsight, and it's like, oh, I understand what was going on.
	So at the time I was developing my algorithms and uh doing the actual uh data analysis, I was totally pig ignorant of the WEF and what they were doing.
	I wasn't paying any attention to the social order in any event.
	You know, I'm I'm isolated, I've got my head down in tech under the best of circumstances.
	I um I had some interest in markets and this kind of thing, but again, from a tech viewpoint, I wasn't really interested in the uh greater social um movements at large uh within the society at that time, and so I was like basically blindsided, right?
	I didn't know the WEF was out there doing these things.
	The WEF was out there deliberately polluting language relative to earth changes that we might get to this point where they're uh you know their global climate crisis, and after having gone through the you know, uh global warming, ice ages, you know,
	the peak oil, all of these various different kinds of languages were a deliberate propaganda attempt to influence the body politic, in influence the um normies, and it did, it had a great influence on the normies and all the fringe people, and so they were always popping up with all these earth changes things, right?
	Everything from Michael Scallion all the way through to uh to anybody that was predicting all of this stuff, right?
	And a lot of guys had early hits up until about maybe 2003, 2005, something like that.
	And then everything really started getting bad relative to their the psychic's ability to pull stuff out of the um manifesting um stew, the spew that is that is our future, uh, you know, ahead of those events coming in.
	They were really accurate up to a certain point, and then everything goes to hell.
	And it's in my opinion, it's because of the uh influence of the WEF at that point, and how they had to seriously ramp everything up to get to the point where we're at now.
	And so I I'd already pegged 2005 as being a year in which I thought I saw manifestations within the uh Khazarians that they started to freak out, that there was something going on that was driving them to a level that had not been seen in my lifetime.
	I sort of was aware of them, sort of monitored them.
	I didn't know they were active in the sense of uh I had never been one of those people that knew all the names of all the organizations and all the the 13 families and all of the 300 families in this committee and all of that, right?
	I just didn't really give a rat's ass about the the nature of my enemy at that detail level because I didn't envision that it would become necessary for me to you know go and hunt the buggers down, that kind of thing.
	It was not it was uh information I just didn't need to know.
	Um that didn't influence my thinking.
	I had a very much higher level view of it, and I could monitor things at that higher level, and but uh in doing so and monitoring things at that higher level, as I was working on my own stuff, um, I missed the fact that the WEF um or that the Khazarians had become active through all of their organizations in this huge attempt to shift the social order globally,
	and uh uh because it was so uh low level, it was uh uh operating at a level that it influenced my process because it you know, all the information they were putting out in all of these um uh in their effort to do climate, for instance.
	Okay, so imagine what they had to go through.
	There's a whole lot, there's a whole cadre right now.
	They needed a a uh a layer of academia that was um graduate and could be an expert in what they call climate science, such that this these people in academia could stand up as experts uh for the normies to influence the normies.
	So they knew this.
	So the WEF knew they needed this whole group of clients uh climate scientists now that are not really scientists, these are pseudo-science people that are that are only coming from the uh leftist proposition that the climate is uh out to kill everybody, right?
	Or that earth uh that humanity's out to kill Earth, and and neither neither of these propositions are true, and um, but they're coming only from this basis that we are the cause of the problem.
	So they have this inherent uh bent.
	In order for these climate scientists who are now in their 20s, 30s, and 40s uh to be here, the WEF had to start uh even earlier.
	So they had to start 20, 30, 40 years ago on this stuff.
	And in fact, they had to inculcate two previous generations in order to be able to graduate this uh class of climate scientists that have fueled the climate extremists of this point now.
	So if we look, they've been uh operating this uh proposition that that climate is the ultimate evil or humans are the ultimate evil relative to climate and and um we must have munchhausen's by proxy and protect baby planet Earth uh from all the evil human doings.
	Uh they must that in order for that to occur, they had to have been working this in the 1950s.
	Uh so um so no wonder I was picking up erroneous information because it was all part of their scam.
	None of it was uh a factual representation, none of it was organic um understanding of the of the body uh politic from which I was seeking prescient language leaking out.
	Uh all of that was engineered unwittingly and unknowingly on those people by the way in which the mother wefers were changing the language even back 40 and 50 and 60 years ago that they may arrive to this point today.
	So anyway, so it's not a uh yeah, I'm I'm uh I'm interested in how the my stuff fucked up.
	Uh so this is sort of a maya culpa.
	I was guilty, right?
	I didn't see this, this has happened.
	I was trying to tune my software uh around the fact that not only was my uh summation of stuff being altered by the WEF, but the uh data sources were being altered by the WEF in ways I did not understand, by the Kazarians, right?
	And actually, in this case, probably in the last 20 years, very much so by the WEF as an actual organization, which it's cool to see they're going downhill uh greatly, and you know, and all these uh organizations are failing, etc.
	As we move forward here, this is all very gratifying.
	But now it makes sense as to why some of the accuracy in the early days and then everything failed so miserably as we enter into a period of like 2005 onward, and that's because when every that was when everything really ramped up relative to the Khazarians and their attempt to get us to force us to this point here.
	Um anyway, so um, insofar as ALTA reports and um earth changes and stuff, we've gone back.
	My my guy Igor and myself, there were a few instances where I really wanted to know, okay.
	And so I went back and I re-ran all the the existing uh data sets at that time off of the um uh Fukushima incident, right?
	And uh Fukushima was predicted, it happened.
	Uh it was a global coastal event, but you know, it's a global coastal event that's 120 years in the making, because it could take that long for Fukushima to affect all the coasts.
	Um, but at that same day, we had a uh earthquake up here that caused bridge damage that caused trucks to be held up, that caused cities to be isolated, all of this kind of stuff, although it was reasonably minor.
	Uh so under the circumstances, it didn't meet the emotional um parameters of the intensity that had been projected.
	And now scrubbing that for WEF language, I would not have made that prediction the way I did.
	It would have been uh basically a non-event.
	Uh uh, I don't even know that it would have risen to the point that I would have included it in any of the uh report.
	Uh so uh there's that aspect of it.
	So I suspect that this is true of everybody out there saying that, oh, you know, there's gonna be uh this giant um uh uh ca catastrophe, this giant uh set of changes, it's gonna kill most of the planet, all of that.
	I suspect all of that information uh going back 60 plus years, uh, in my in my mind right now is polluted and deliberately so uh because it takes so long to shift perceptions this way, um, and cause these effects of that the mother wefers are desirous of uh that and they've been working at it this long.
	Uh so in any event, so no, I don't think I know there's no like Naibiru and you know there's not gonna be any um Planet X and all of this sort of crud, right?
	This is all engineered bullshit uh coming from the um uh the wefers deliberately because they put out a lot of these ideas, but also uh tangentially, because the idea is in effect the thinking of those people that think themselves to be psychic and are relying on their minds uh not to be polluted and not to trick them.
	Okay.
	So a lot of these psychic guys, uh they they don't have process, they just have feelings, okay.
	And so they would have a feeling about something, and it's oh oh, I got this feeling about something.
	Well, that feeling's been engineered, dude.
	Uh just like it was an engineered reaction in my data, and I was unaware of the engineering going on, and so I kept trying to tune it out, kept trying to figure out what was happening uh to the timing and stuff.
	Eventually I did get to the point where I understood, oh, and this is like I say, about 2008 maybe, uh, censorship really ramped up, and I thought, oh shit, that's what I'm dealing with.
	And so it was sort of a uh a mis application, a missed uh missed target, because it was not really the censorship in 2008 that was causing my problems.
	Me thinking that that censorship had been rolling out since like 2005 in a serious way and affecting the data sets, but it was rather that the my data sets were polluted before I began my very first run.
	That unbeknownst to me, the WEF had infiltrated the school system.
	They had decided back uh probably 45 years or more uh that it was gonna be baby planet Earth as the um uh the target of the Munchhausens by proxy in order to get the normies to conform and kill themselves, uh, you know, to save the poor baby planet Earth for some uh some reason, you know.
	Anyway, so uh just a quick uh little discussion about that aspect of the process.
	And maybe I'll get into some of the other stuff I've learned as a result of going through the wef's language now at some other point.
	But I gotta go in and do greenhouse chores.
	The dog and the bugs are saying, get your ass get your ass to work.

▲