All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 31, 2021 - Clif High
44:03
Lost in the Woo

Say, what year is it? No, really?!? Happy Woo Year!! Codex Oera Linda = https://oeralinda.nl/

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello humans, hello humans.
We're back again, it's the 31st.
We're assuming that you're getting your vitamin D up towards 90 nanograms per milliliter, and you're taking 22 micrograms of uh per pound of vitamin C a day in a liposomal form just to stay healthy these days.
Okay, so this is about uh being lost in the woo, because we've lost something.
All humans have lost something.
We've lost our history.
Um for sure we've lost at least one thousand years, maybe more, um, of Western history.
Chinese have lost more than that, and so on.
So everybody's losing history or has lost history at an actual alarming rate.
The reason that this is pertinent is that uh that we're under attack by the bug, by these um uh inhuman forces that are insisting on a power pyramid with themselves at the top, and it basically is a power pyramid with a little tiny bit of a pyramid shape, and then all the rest of us like that.
And so that's more their model, right?
They've got a few intermediaries between themselves and the and the masses.
We think of it as this, but it's nowhere near this this uh uh equidistantly spred in terms of benefits and and risks and so on.
Very much this shape.
Anyway, uh so we're at war with these guys with this inhuman um uh approach to things, this power pyramid approach, and one of the things that uh the way you you win against them consistently is to maintain purity of culture, okay?
So that would be a POC, not a person of color, but uh uh purity of culture.
And so it's it's important that you recognize that's why they at the bug and its minions attack your culture in order to destroy its purity, and the first uh attack on it is through your history.
Okay, so that you and that's why they destroy the statues, and that's why they declare all these people racist, and that's the reason to take away the statues and this kind of thing, right?
Um and note how they're doing this.
The the beast um uh the bug uh guys are doing this through um social mechanisms to erode uh the not only erode the teaching of history, but erode the the external support for the teaching of history, that is to say those artifacts of history itself.
And we see this happening all the time.
And so the the um uh the bug's minions, the cult, what I call this 6,000-year-old death cult, uh, is in power and out of power, out of power, and then in power.
When it's in power, it's the state, and as uh as a state, it does things that leave trails in history, um, but as the state, it will also do things within its power while it's in power to scrub its history when it's out of power.
And so this is the way that this that this business goes.
That's why these old um uh encyclopedias are valuable.
Okay, so you can go and here's it just as an example, you can go and look up um this odd organization called the odd fellows, and you get uh one set of history online.
You'll find out that they're a benevolent order, etc., etc.
They're a quote secret society, they got a secret handshake and they do these things, right?
And you go and you read about it online and you get one set of, or you get a uh a paradigm-structured uh set of words that provide you with a particular understanding, and they leave out very key little bits, okay?
And so um, but if you if you go to the old uh dictionaries, this is the volume um 19, uh MUN to ODD, um uh published in 19 uh 11.
Um, and then you look at it here, it talks about all the same sort of mundane history where they met, all of this, what they did, you know, how the lodges worked, how everybody had to ante up a penny when you came in there, etc.
Right.
But then there's these little lines here that you don't see on the online versions because the state is in power, right?
They control all of this.
And bear in mind that this encyclopedia britannica was prepared as a tool to educate the minion class uh for the British royals, so that they would have an proper understanding of the world and their role in it, which was to arrange and order uh order the world for the British royals.
Okay, so that's that's the whole function of the entire British government was to make the uh world orderly for the for the British royalty.
Anyway, here um uh it says here towards the end of the century, 1800s, um, the uh oddfellows' lodges were broken up by state prosecutions on the suspicion that their purposes were seditious.
Um then they put seditious in quotes, okay.
Uh but the society continued to exist as the Union Order of Oddfellows until 1809.
Now, um this is from a British perspective, and the in the language in here is from the uh perspective of the minions, talking about how uh they had uh pursued um the oddfellows in Britain as being a point of sedition.
During the period of time in the um uh uh was that the 1700s, at the end of the 1700s, yeah, excuse me, the end of the 1700s, uh the early 1800s, uh up until 1809.
Okay, this is where we find that the British are just about to engage in war here in the uh with the United colonies again, you know, the United States at that point, uh, the war of 1812, but also the Brits were under all kinds of economic pressures and their own internal pressures, also relative to food, that ultimately leads to, quote, the Irish famine and the expo um and the mass immigration of Irish people uh away from uh British tyranny, right?
The royalty tyranny.
So this is the end of the 1700s into the 1800s, and uh they find that this Oddfellows group is seditious.
However, if you go to the trouble of tracking down the individuals and the places that are named here, and you go back and read their history, in these same volumes, you will find that at one point the Bugs Minions,
out of power at that point, with a strong um uh Republican bent towards um things going on in Europe, uh they're out of power, and they're using the oddfellows as well as other secret societies in exactly that seditious activities.
So uh so basically, uh in a backhanded way, they're saying, hey, we know that we used to use the odd fellows uh for our own sedition, so at the end of the 1700s, we in power then uh in Britain uh prosecuted the odd fellows and broke them up, right?
And so that's just the way it goes.
We find an analog to this in the late 1800s in the United States with the prosecution uh and the form of the prosecution of the Masons and the form formation of the anti-Masonic party in in what are now the Northeast states.
In that instance, I don't remember the date exactly, but there was a there was a murder.
Um The murder was committed by a guy who was out of a particular Masonic lodge.
Now, the story is a little bit confused.
We don't know if the murderer was the father or if the father was some other person within the lodge that had this Masonic brother go and do the murder.
So we don't know if the murderer was his own agent in that sense or acting for another.
But the story is that this guy killed this man for uh trying to protect his daughter from being trafficked by the Masonic lodges in the New York state, okay, or daughters.
That's also a little bit uh open to question.
Anyway, so the guy, the father tries to protect his children, and he gets killed.
The guy who kills him is uh is a Mason.
He's a well-known Mason.
Masons are open in the Northeast at that point.
Masons are in all levels of power.
One of the oaths that you take as a Mason under those structure there in these Scottish rights and all of this, was that you will not suffer another Mason to go to jail for a crime, even no matter whether they committed it or not.
You you, if you're in a jury, you've got to vote them not guilty.
And that's what happened.
They have a trial, it's pretty much a uh show trial because the prosecutor is a Mason.
And so they just blow the whole case against this uh murderer, and the murderer goes free.
Uh all of the people on the jury are not Masons, though, okay.
Enough were that there was a majority, but and the and I and the pressure was on all of them to vote.
Um the guy gets free from the jury's action, but some of the jurors spill the beans on what's going on, and it spreads like wildfire through New York State, and it incites this thing called the anti-Masonic movement.
And the anti-Masonic uh political party arises from there, because the they discovered that the entire social structure of the Northeast states had been captured by uh the Masonic Lodge,
in the sense of all the judges, all the the heads of all the schools, all the prosecutors, uh chief of police, in fact, a lot of the police organizations, Boston among others, in the Northeast, still bear the symbols of the Masons on them now.
They wear the little uh black and white uh squares, right, on their hats or on their um collars or in little badges uh you know on the badges, etc.
They this brands them as being of that Masonic tradition when the time when the Masons owned all of the police structure throughout the Northeast Northeastern states.
The further west you went, the further into the Ohio frontier, um you know, and and beyond, uh the less the Masonic influence.
However, so there's a big upheaval in the United States in the late 1800s, uh formation of the anti-Masonic Party, giant voting blocks vote out all of these people.
Um justice is done for the murderers and so on, and much dirt is is heaved up about the Masons as an organization, all of their oaths and all of this kind of stuff, because one of the things was that if you betrayed the Masonic Lodge, you know, uh you in your oaths you acknowledge that they're gonna come and kill your ass, right?
So they're really a tough organization.
We would think of them as biker gang without the bikes.
You know, you don't rat out the brothers, this sort of thing.
Even if they're you know they're committing crimes, even if they're committing capital crimes, you don't rat out a brother, even if they up to the point of treason.
Thus, the whole issue of sedition.
Now, this is the same um issue that goes to purity of culture.
Okay, so the Masonic Lodge is uh okay, so the Masonic craft, the thing that they are supposedly studying within that particular secret society, as opposed to the odd fellows which have their own traditions, which only go back in a couple of hundred years.
Um they they claim going back to some Jewish temple in the time of the Crusades or earlier or something, but that's bogus, they all know it.
Their real actual history only goes back a few hundred years.
In any event, though, So the Freemasons do go back a fucking long time.
And the Freemasons, though, are like all other secret societies.
They are a closed group that denies outside contact.
So you're inside the interior culture.
And here is the greater social culture on the outside.
And so here is their real problem.
No matter what the traditions, no matter, and in fact, the more esoteric, the more internal the traditions, the easier it is for this to happen.
These inside culture secret societies always get captured.
Alright?
Because you're not supposed to betray anything you learn in here.
What happens in the lodge stays in the lodge.
And so thus you build up this culture of walling out knowledge to the greater social culture of what's going on inside.
Therefore, it's a perfect plum for some person with an evil intent to get in.
And here's what happens.
In the 1860s, before the bust out of the Masonic Lodges and the anti-Mason party and all of that, Before it, by almost 30 years, there was another instance where the one that happened in the in the Northeast was sort of like the end of a building trend.
A few 30 years earlier or more, there was a so right about the time of the Civil War, there was a uh dirty secret about the um uh underground railroad to Canada, okay,
and that is that part of that underground railroad was being run through secret societies, again in New York State, uh, that uh were free uh Masonic based, and that culture had been kidnapped, uh, captured, just like we have captured institutions here in the United States today.
That was a captured institution, and it was captured by paedophiles.
And what they were doing was taking uh slave families, separating the children, selling the children, and and who knows what happened to the adults, right?
And so it was something of a horror uh that was going on because these families were uh putting themselves at risk to get out of the South in the in the civil war anyway, trusting these people inadvisedly, and uh they were polluting the whole underground railroad um uh movement, right?
So, and and you never found out about it because they were inside a culture that was inside uh its own wall of secrecy relative to the greater social culture.
So priority of or purity of culture means that you must put a priority on transparency in order to maintain that culture in a pure state.
You can't have secret societies with their own internal culture that may be at odds with the greater social culture.
The the deep state, when it's in power recognizes this.
That's why they persecute the former societies that they used to get into power.
Same thing with Mao Zedong and the rise of the CCP.
The secret societies that were set up and enabling the revolution in uh China at that time were viciously prosecuted and everybody was killed once it got once all those people that were had captured the culture became the the dominant element starting setting the tone, they went through and and uh took out their former infrastructure because they knew how dangerous it was and how that was the conduit that got them into power.
So um, so you know, so the secret societies, uh the Masons, the Rosicrucians, all of them, doesn't matter what it is, all of them, the fact that they're secret makes them vulnerable to this infiltration and um capture.
So you can't trust it.
Uh so you have to maintain purity of culture in order to defeat the bug.
The bug is doing everything it can to destroy your culture such that uh you have no Point of reference for its activities as being uh good or bad.
Okay, so the the purity of culture sets a uh moral tone and the bug comes on in and doesn't want you to have morals at all.
It wants to be able to do anything it wants to eat human flesh, whatever.
Doesn't matter, right?
Uh you know, drink adrenochrome, you know, kill children to get it, doesn't matter.
That's all acceptable to the bug and to the bug's minions.
But if it and if it's against your culture, then your culture has to go.
A couple of the ways that it does this is through the uh secret societies infiltrating you and running their own inside culture with walls of secrecy that allow things to occur that pollute your your the purity of the culture on the outside of the wall, and they don't get um uh consequences for it because of the secrecy.
Another way it does it is through the destruction of your history.
In order to have purity of culture, you've got to know what your culture is.
You've got to know what your history is.
And so they destroy your monuments, they upend all of the history, they try and destroy your language to destroy the purity of culture to allow them to take over the greater social culture from their point of um of uh disembarkation from inside the secret societies.
So Antifa is not an open transparent organization.
Note that.
They're a secret society, they've got their own cult-like uh rituals and uh cult of personality shit going on.
Um they're they're not nice guys, and they're trying to be used, they're being used now to try and take over the greater social culture, right?
And so it is important that you understand that history matters.
Now, we we've got people that have been researching and have found out just how much the bug has been fucking with histories.
Uh it's it's we've lost, so we've lost at least a thousand years uh of history.
That is to say, they have made up a thousand years and inserted it in our historical record and put in all different kinds of shit in order to obfuscate what's going on.
So if you want to see what I'm talking about, go to Mars Anomalies on YouTube, okay?
Mars Anomalies um YouTube channel.
In there, he looks at official photographs uh of Mars and the moon and and media uh uh comets uh and other objects, asteroids that that NASA takes official photographs, and then he starts lifting up the layers of uh obscuring information that they put on the photograph so that you won't see the real truth.
So who knows how many people they've got doing this stuff, obscuring things so that you won't see what's in those photos that you're paying for.
Plus, it can't happen that you know the history of what's going on now or the history of what's going on in the past.
So the current stuff about history on Mars, you can't know that, right?
They don't want you to know that because that strengthens your culture relative to a bunch of different points.
So you're not allowed to know this sort of thing.
Uh so what they do is they create time because what they what the thing is, if you don't have an accurate chronology, you cannot have an accurate history.
Um thus we find some weird things like the Middle Ages.
Nothing happened in the Middle Ages.
Eight, nine hundred years, no inventions, no nothing, no major personalities, and and what few personalities we have look a lot like personalities that were taken from about 800 years before that, their names were changed, but their life stories were just plopped into place.
And we got people that um like these mathematicians, um, Anatoly uh Fomenko.
Uh he's been writing about this subject for decade, decades.
And here is uh Florin um uh disu, diasu, uh the lost millennium.
Okay, this is a discussion of Fomenko's work and and how it is so valid that we examine it, right?
Because there are big damn soft, squishy spots in our history, and there shouldn't be.
And uh even more than that, even if we have uh squishy spots in our history because you know all of the chroniclers were killed and the libraries were burned down, like that kind of stuff, like that story about Alexandrian library, right?
Um, even if that were the case, we still should have an accurate hard chronology, which we do not, and because we can't plot a whole lot of stuff to specific years, and we don't have a uh cross-cultural uh chronology to where we can plot um uh uh our history and things that happen relative to you know the emperors in China or Japan or something of this to get a basis to compare our chronologies.
We don't have that.
And it's because the the bug through the minions and the secret societies has to degrade uh your cultural perspective in order for you to go along with the bullshit that it wants to put out that degrades the whole social order that lets it puts the put the communists in charge, bearing in mind that the the communism is not a natural thing from humans, it was a paid-for construct um by this weird um mind in the 1800s.
So it's over 200 years old, and we're supposed to accept it as uh as the way to go forward.
No, it's a you know, the the bug's minions are persistent uh even if stupid.
Okay, so if you get into the history thing, you find out that lots of our history is bogus, um repetitiously bogus as well, and it is just a morass.
There are at least a thousand years lost in our current history, and in terms of you know, modern history, um, that is to say, um uh everything from year zero, uh, so we're probably not in uh 2021.
In my right uh way of reckoning, we're probably somewhere in eight or nine hundred AD up to maybe eleven to twelve hundred AD.
Umwhere in there.
And the there's suppositions in here from Florent that we're maybe up into the 1700s, okay, that that maybe there's been an actual 300-year discrepancy.
I think that that it's much uh closer to a thousand-year discrepancy completely, which would put us in the 1100s.
You can you can back that up.
You can take a um an approach uh that looks at uh things like the Codex Oralinda, okay?
So this book covers from 300 um BC up to 1100 uh AD, right?
Um and it has uh realistic matching for those years uh to chronologies that were available at the time that the foundation did this.
Now they don't have a day by day by day kind of description of all of that, nor even year by year, or nor decade by decade.
They do have a lot of um key things relative to centuries that support this being a very long description of the Frisian and the Saxon and the other cultures in the uh northern Europe.
And if you were to take this book and then to plot it against uh Famenko's work, um, or even the more abbreviated uh version, because Famenko's got, I think he's up to seven volumes now, big volume.
He's a mathematician, and he's pouring over this stuff intensely, and he's got a big foundation behind him.
Uh he's also part of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
Anyway, but if you match up this you can actually pick up near the end of the Frisian tales in the Codex Orlinda, you can match uh personalities uh that uh you can find in the Russian people.
And so there are um correlations there to recent Russian history that that does pick it up.
But the putting it to any particular date part of that is just really dodgy at this stage, because the bug's been in there screwing around so much that we just don't know anymore.
Um we can do serious um chronology work via uh only via um uh astronomy and the uh position of constellations relative to positions on earth and we can plot those and we can know from this particular point when they happened.
That is to say, from this point, we know that this particular constellation had to have occurred 1200 years in the past, or 600 years or whatever, right?
So whatever year we are at now, that particular constellation occurred 600 years past.
And so we can plot things like the Mondur minimum, two specific constellations and know how many years in the past it occurred.
What's really curious is that if you start looking at the hint, the clues, not hints, but the clues of um that Fomenko and all these people are right, that we don't have accurate history, and then you start looking at the clues that are presented here,
you find that we don't have any support for the uh TV or movie version of the Roman Empire where they wore um cotton togas kind of thing, right?
We have a lot of support for Earth being a lot colder and for everybody dressing in what we think of as medieval garb in the ancient past, and we uh what we think of as ancient past, such that it may be that that the thousand years that's been inserted into our history that bumps us up from something that may have been relatively recent uh to our current 2021,
um they may have inserted those years in the in the far ancient past as well as uh what we think of as the medieval years, right?
The Middle Ages.
And so disease rates, um skeletons, and so on.
So for instance, if we look at this uh uh realistically, we find some interesting things.
Uh we find that the Naghamadi scriptures, um, in spite of their bad translations, uh have some good clues as to timing in them.
And these were a bunch of things that were found in in uh mphori in the desert, and they're they're basically a conflicting version of books in the Bible plus some other books, right?
And uh the the so the writers of this spent a lot of time bitching and moaning about the um Talmudians, these were the Coptics, supposedly.
Uh supposedly the writers of this, the Naghamadi were the Coptics, um, which is a form of the Gnostics, and uh they spent a lot of time in there bitching about um the early Christians and the um uh Talmudians, right?
Talmudarians.
Uh and to some extent they were bitching about the general Israelites.
Uh they're not bitching per se about uh Judaism or or Jews.
They were bitching about the Talmudarians uh being a captured group uh in this sense, uh, with all these secret rituals, pedophilia, all of this kind of stuff going on.
And they were also referencing that to certain Christian sects that were a royal pain.
Now, the Nag Hamadi, there's a lot of stuff I bitch about relative to its translation.
So it translates the word Archon ARCHON to mean authorities.
Uh and it also translates it to other alternative close to meaning uh uh close to that meaning words, and it does not mean authorities.
In my opinion, Archon needs to be taken as a label, very much like um Elohim needs to be taken as the plural of the label Eloha, and neither word means God, and the the uh Jewish traditions use that to describe the beings that they chose to enslave themselves to.
So the so if you read through the Jewish tradition through its actual language, it is not that they are the chosen ones, it is those are the they are the ones who chose.
So you just have to uh understand what they did with the language there.
Um and they chose a particular Eloha to um align with, and that was this guy um Adonai, which he's referenced in other books as either being the fourth or the ninth most powerful of the aloha, the term aloha, we don't know what it means, okay?
It has no meaning to us, so we say the aloha came down from the sky in ships.
These ships we called Rach, okay.
These were Ruch or Holy Spirits because they could glide across water.
They floated across water.
And that's what the term Holy Spirit translates to in the original text words of the Bible.
Okay, I've got a uh in in the sense that I follow um uh uh Biglino, the um the translator has been working on this stuff, and he says, you know, that all this stuff has been badly translated, that the word for um uh holy spirit is rauch.
That's the word that's been transliterated as Holy Spirit, and that was wrong.
It was done specifically at this particular time by a captured institution, which was the Catholic Church, in order to have this vision of things come out that they could use to manipulate people.
If the if they actually said, well, hey, you know, uh there's aloha and there's this other aloha, and they've got a rauch, and so it's not the father's son and the holy ghost or the holy spirit, it's um this space alien and that space alien, and the Holy Spirit word is their spaceship that'll float across water like we've seen, nothing we've ever seen.
Uh you're gonna get a different kind of a religion that develops, right?
And so um the whole purity of culture thing keeps coming back in terms of being captured and the alteration of the language.
So the Nag Hammadi, for whatever reason, is translating these words, in my opinion, that should be descriptors as um uh or should be labels as descriptors.
And so they're not really, but you still get clues uh back and forth that we're living in a in a world where they've shoved in a bunch of years in order to pollute the chronology in order that they may be able to pollute the purity of culture and alter the uh social order through that point.
Uh this is why, okay, so we are at an age of an extreme age where there's a lot of extreme extreme things popping up because we're in a transition period from uh the age of Pisces into the age of queries, right?
And so as we do so, uh as we transition into a new age, we get into an extreme state, and sort of like we peak, and then that should fade out over time.
But we see a response to the purity of culture thing everywhere.
So right now in China, there's a Han cultural revival.
And you've got a lot of Chinese kids dressing in traditional Han Chinese costumes all day long.
They're not using American business suits and all of that, and there's a um, or not what American, but Western, there's a repudiation, a a um a distinct disdain and uh rebuff, a rejection of uh Western dress because they want this uh this revival, this Han revival.
And you'll notice that the CCP is supporting it.
It's not it's not stamping it out at all.
It doesn't consider this to be seditious and it supports their particular aim and so on, right?
So they're going back on a purity of culture thing for their own purposes within the um within China.
They're trying to gen up a whole big nationalist thing, and within that nationalist thing, because the Han Chinese are attacking a lot of the other racial groups in China, uh, 160 more or less, I think, of them.
I mean the 160 racial groups, um, and the CCP is harvesting a lot of them.
The CCP is 99% Han, and what they want to do is to have this uh Han supremacy wave go through, right, uh in order to support the nationalism.
Uh so they're they're pumping up all of the racism and that sort of stuff officially.
And we're in one of these periods of time as we go into all of this.
But um we're also in a period of time like the end of the 1800s where the secret uh societies and that kind of stuff is all gonna bust up.
And we're getting people examining what they've done, uh coming up with real timelines and stuff that's closer to the actual truth of our situation at this point.
Um such things even as carbon 14 dating.
You have to understand that that the scientist said that, oh, this squiggle mark here in our graph, uh in our carbon um 14 analysis, C14 analysis, this squiggle mark right here came out of a tree, and and we've counted the tree rings, and we think that that tree ring is or the tree is um uh 500 years old, right?
And so they divide uh and so they know that this marker is thought to be 500 years old.
What they do though is that they then apply this kind of logic relative to carbon 14 across a much broader band that might go into um centuries, and they do so erroneously, because we don't know.
We it's just they're plotting um, so they then would go to a chunk of marble, right?
Um not marble, but uh say a chunk of um uh wood from uh um a structure.
And so they say, we know that this structure was built in um 300 uh BC in Italy.
And so when we do a carbon dating on it, we get this kind of a squiggle that is this high, so that we know that that squiggle represents um 200 uh uh 400 years, so 2400 years, 2400 years of carbon-14 degradation in our current modern era.
And so that's how fast that carbon-14 degrades over the 2400 years produces this particular line.
Problem is we don't know for a fact that that building really was built in 300 BC because all of our uh timeline, our chronology is really screwed up.
What if, instead of 300 BC, what if that thing was actually only built uh uh 1300 years ago instead of 2400 years ago?
Well, that cuts this thing way the hell down in terms of the amount of time it supposedly covers.
That means that all the carbon-14 or other radiographic ID of even things like um ice core samples is way off.
It hasn't been thousands and thousands and thousands of years in the top part, so we cannot take the supposed thousands of years range of that top inch and apply it to the many other inches in that tube, because we don't know for sure.
In fact, there we know for sure that we don't know that it's polluted.
Uh anyway, so uh all of our history is upended.
We're in, we are actually in the lost millennium because we don't know what fucking millennium we're rowing in, right?
Uh we don't know the name of the boat that we're pulling on here.
We don't know if we're in 2021, if we're in the 1300s, or where it's kind of immaterial.
We can put any digit on the year we want, go from there, but it would be nice to know relative to other stuff.
And so you can do that with astronomy, and there are people that are doing that now, especially within the fomento stuff, and they're finding some really interesting correlations.
Uh the best we've got is gonna be the um uh the Sanskrit.
A lot of Sanskrit texts have uh self-ID'd by the constellations that were uh active at the time that the text was written.
So uh it is a generalized statement that more books written in Sanskrit, the vast majority of which have not been translated into any other language, um, but more books written in Sanskrit that we have translated have ID markers put there deliberately by the authors to identify the time at which they were written, and those ID markers are relative to astronomy.
So this is a great help, right?
So we can look at the Hindu text and say it says in there basically in the first few um bits of writing there that you know we, the authors, produced this in under this particular constellation at this particular uh time of that year, when the constellation was, you know, right here.
So we can go back, run our software, find out what year that was done at.
And then we have a peg for that particular volume.
We don't have such things in the Western literature by and large.
Um we need to start including that now for future generations, should there be another uh bug infestation through secret societies after you know a couple of hundred years from now, and then they start fucking with things again.
Um Because they will.
They'll the bug is gonna it's persistent, it'll keep trying this and so on until it um uh gets there.
Uh I've got to get some stuff done, so this is the end of this.
A few things in terms of housekeeping.
I'm only on BitChute, Telegram, and Twitter, the Twitter as long as it lasts.
Um if we get a generalized uh shutdown, I will try and update things through the half past human if I have HapPasthuman.com website if I have the ability to uh get online.
So um so there's that.
Um I'm gonna be doing some stuff relative to sound money and uh other videos relative to sound money and how it will affect younger generations and what you might be able to do uh to position yourself now for uh economic events that will unfold over these next uh probably five or ten years.
Um one other thing is that you must bear in mind, okay.
So you're gonna have a lot of people uh talk about language relative to UFOs.
Uh and so that's fine.
Everybody's got their opinion of it and so on.
We're gonna see a lot more UFO language pop up from the deep state as it goes through these uh, you know, it's its own agendas trying to control everything.
But here's something to note that every single uh one of the actual UFOs that we see that even the military is now recording and saying, yeah, they're real, it's not a hoax, we're not denying anymore.
Every single one of those things is operating on an energy system that we do not have.
All right.
So basically, uh every single uh UFO is pointing to free energy, it's pointing to uh the ether existing, it uh the recent tic tacs and all of those are pointing to uh magnetic forms of travel and um uh pollution less, no pollution, um, no output forms of motion.
Okay, so we know that that technology exists.
Somebody's got it, and we're getting close to having some of that um revealed uh in spite of or maybe even by it may be strategic by some of these people here trying to still get ahead of or get on top of things that they know are gonna be coming out anyway.
Um so I guess that's it.
That's uh yeah, that's it for today.
Um anyway, so bear in mind purity of culture.
So, you know, if you're European or whatever, uh check out this book.
It has a fairly, it's not like an easy read, it's not a novel or any of that.
Uh, but uh it has a fairly comprehensive uh historical view of what's been going on for uh that period of time, whether or not it's actually situated in those years.
So anyway, uh this is our problem, guys.
We're lost in the woo.
And uh it's gonna take some really deep thinking on a part of a lot of people to get us out of being lost in the woo to be able to take a pig somewhere and drive it into something solid and say, this is this time, and from this point we can plot all this other stuff.
So it's goofy, but we don't know where you are now and which new year it actually is.
▲
Export Selection