All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 26, 2021 - Clif High
51:09
never bring an ideology to a woo fight - Explorers' Guide to SciFi World

trump, language, war, more war, more language, 2022

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello humans.
Hello humans.
26th of December.
All kinds of stuff going on.
As we all know, things have been escalating and ratcheting up.
I've been getting a bunch of emails from people that still don't really grasp what I was saying about what Trump was saying.
i'll go through that real real quick my point with that is not his individual words but um his hang on a second let me Let me shut that off.
OK, so you have to look at what is the response.
All right, so Trump is speaking strategically.
So he says the vax is good, get the vax.
This is the same thing that Biden is saying.
This is going to cause cognitive dissonance in both the liberals and the conservatives.
Conservatives are going to say, eh, what the fuck?
We know the vax is bad.
Why are you saying this?
And it will break through any kind of conditioning in your head about what's going on.
The liberals are going to say, Trump saying vax is good, and then they're going to question it, right?
Just as we saw back in 2020, we saw Kamala Harris saying, no vax for me.
I ain't taking the Trump vax before it had come on out when he had just started his big push, right?
All of these liberals say, they ain't taking that Trump vax.
Then the vax comes out.
They're nominally in power.
And then they're all rah, rah, rah, vax, vax, vax.
Okay, and then we know all of the problems from the vax, vax, vax.
So you can ask yourself why Trump is doing this.
And there are certain conclusions that you can arrive at that are likely valid, but I don't think that they're inclusive.
I don't think that their scope is large enough to include all of the different ramifications as to why he's saying these things as he is saying them.
All right?
And so if it's bugging you that Trump is saying these kind of things, then acknowledge this.
As a conservative kind of a guy, as a Trump supporter or whoever, I find that most of the people that are getting really bent out of shape that are contacting me are the Trump supporters, okay?
And so I ask them to acknowledge a couple of things.
And so when you get these feelings of, oh my God, what's going on?
You know, is Trump crazy?
You know, what's happened?
Is the world shifted?
Is Trump a sellout?
Is he a deep state shill?
All of these kind of things, then ask yourself some of the following questions and answer them.
Is Trump crazy?
Well, no.
Demonstrably no.
Is he stupid?
Certainly not.
Has he acted in any of these past years as a deep state shill or a deep state agent, right?
You could say at various different times that certain moves that he made appeared that way, but if you just waited a few months, things would look differently from that perspective of a few months.
You know, who he hired, who he fired, how he let certain things occur.
None of these things that happened during the Trump presidency, none of the things that have happened from the time that we had Trump running for his presidency were entirely of his own making.
Bear in mind, he's playing a role in a much larger operation, okay, and his role is hugely important, gigantically important, right?
But the operation is global.
It's not just the United States.
This takedown is a global effort.
So Trump will be doing things that, on the face of it, don't make sense, right?
But that doesn't mean that it makes anti-sense in the meaning of that does not mean that what he is saying should be taken at face value as him having altered his opinion of things, as him behaving in a different way, or any of that sort of thing, right?
You have to understand he's at war.
It really, World War II, it really pissed General Patton off that he was not allowed to attack the Germans with all of his tanks and stuff and instead was relegated to walking around Scotland in a bunch of fake in basically a fake army,
you know, amongst planes and all of this kind of stuff in order to direct the Germans' attention to this fake invasion that theoretically was a real invasion that he was planning, right?
Because the Germans could not understand.
They did not grasp the idea that Eisenhower would be willing to sideline his best fucking general in the largest battle ever.
And so they kept looking at because they knew it was a trick, right?
It looked too obvious.
It looked too much of a hoax.
So it had to be a trick within a trick within a trick kind of a thing.
So the Germans kept looking at Scotland this whole time that they were preparing all the battles, you know, all the troops and everything for the invasion of Normandy.
Anyway, so you have to understand that we're in a war and nothing can be taken at face value.
All right, so prima facie is gone unless you're dealing with legal issues where that kind of language where that kind of description and impression matter.
So at this point, I'm not defending my understanding of what Trump is saying.
I'm just saying that anything being done as an analysis of what he is saying in this moment needs to have a longer perspective in order to be able to judge.
So if you come up with a hot take on it right now, that hot take is going to cool off over time and it will probably flip based on what happens, right?
So as an example, for four and a half fucking years, everybody said Durham's not doing anything.
And now Durham's doing shit.
So, and there's going to be more shit to follow, right?
Huge amounts of it.
So there are things that are visible, things that are evident, and then most everything else is hidden in the WOO.
And understand that we won't know.
We can't understand.
It's not good for us to know what the fuck he's doing at this stage because if we knew that kind of strategy, it would have been too obvious, etc.
And, you know, you'd be telling your friends, but you're also telling your enemies.
So just understand that when you get these feelings, you have to ask yourself the questions.
Is Trump stupid?
Is he a deep state shill?
There's absolutely no evidence for either of those things.
And there's contra indications for both of those things.
So you can show that he's not stupid and that he's not showing for the deep state.
A lot of people attempt to make that claim.
There's a lot of the enemy class out there trying to whip up this brouhaha within the within the war to demoralize all of the Trump supporters, etc., right?
All of the patriots and so on.
It's not particularly working, but it's agitating some people.
Anyway, so I get this email and I went and checked it out.
And it's about this article here from the proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences at the United States of America.
It's like, eh, I'm not a big fan of academics, not a big fan of their research in general in terms of their conclusions.
This one is interesting, not because of its conclusions, because those are not particularly pertinent, but it's interesting because of the nature of what they did.
The rise and fall of rationality and language is their research.
What they did was to analyze all of the books that have been digitized in the Google Books and analyze the language there since basically 1850.
And they discovered some things.
There's patterns and so on, which I've got illustrated up here behind me, and we'll go into it here.
But what they've done is interesting because I've mapped it up to some other.
It's a very good article.
And you should read it because it really details what they've got, the frequencies of change, how change in language occurs.
But you also have to understand that the way that they did this, it's not going to be very inclusive.
It was just done on a simple matching basis.
They had some predisposed conclusions for words that represented rationality as opposed to words that represented a move towards emotionalism.
And they lost, they missed so much else because they didn't really know how to define the language for emotion.
But it's a good idea.
But they did it in non-fiction as well as fiction.
They found that the same thing was there, that it represented a true trend within the social order and not merely an artifact or something of the technology of the time and that sort of thing, right?
The trend accelerated around 2007, and curiously we see that there's all kinds of things we can align to these trends here.
So they began in 1850.
I've read lots of books that were from the 1600s all the way up into the 1800s and I know that this trend for emotionality or reference to emotion existed before the 1600s.
So it represented a response, I think, to what we would think of as the Dark Ages and also the time of the plagues.
So the much more emphasis on individuality and emotion at the time.
And then we get, as they note in the article, we get into this period from the 1850s where words of rationality rise and they peak around 1980.
And now I didn't draw the rest of the lines here, but so this line would swoop down and then the next one would also swoop down.
I didn't draw those because we're not concerned about, at this stage, about the decline of that language of rationality being replaced by a rise in the language of emotion.
But we just needed to show that there were these changes.
And if we looked at it a biorhythm, we would see that these periods were dominated by the rising.
And it's the rising energies that are interesting because I've maintained also that we've had since the early 2000s these strange energies from space, right?
I can also go back and see in Boscovich's writing, he published in here his Theoria Naturalis, in his writing descriptions that in that period of time go to the changing of the environment, which I can also put down to these strange energies.
So I think that those strange energies from space are coincident with an individual appreciation for experience that is not seen in periods like this.
Now note up here we've got periods where we've got UFO activity.
Now the UFO activity begins back, you know, pre-history, and we had a period of UFO activity that ran right up into the 1830s.
And that was the peak of this thing of emotionality.
It really, it's indicated right here as running into the 1860s, which is when we had the Civil War, right?
But its peak in terms of the amount of language showing was in the 1830s, which we can say was typified by the global utopian movement that came out there.
Lots of language, new religions being formed, new cults, utopian societies being set up all over this sort of thing, right?
Then we have this gap really in this period of time here.
There's just not a whole lot of UFO reports.
Then picking up in the 1850s, we start getting the airship phenomena that runs through until the 1920s.
Within that period of time, it morphs from airships to this unknown, not quite defined, not quite quantifiable, from about World War I to the 1920s.
So about 1911-ish to 1920s, it morphed from airships to, we're not really sure what this is, because in the 1890s, everybody conceived of the UFOs as like super fast dirigibles or something that didn't need gas to float or could be electric.
We didn't really know.
They were conceived of having like even balconies running all around them like humans might build on a cruise ship because we kept thinking we were hearing voices come down from on high from these things and so on and so on, right?
So we get the airship phenomena in here and then from 1947 we're fully on into UFOs, mechanical hard kind of UFOs.
Only now we're into this period of time here.
Let's just say that we crossed over in the 90s and we're getting into, here we've got nuts and bolts, UFOs, but here we're starting to get into, you know, interdimensional and the wackadoodle, right?
The wacky stuff.
You know, people saying, I'm a space alien walk-in, or, you know, I've been contacted by 19 space alien races, or people saying, you know, I've been serving in the secret space program and I have no proof for it whatsoever, but I've been into the future three times and regressed and they rebuild my body all this time, all these other wacky stories without any kind of evidence whatsoever really taken off since this period of time.
And we see that that's coincident with yet another rise in the emotionality language.
We also can note that in 1860 here we get Marxism and communism arising.
And along with that, during this period of time that we can say is our period of the maximum amount of rationality words, we also get things like the UN being formed, you know,
all these NGOs, the ramp up of GovFash, you know, where we've got government and corporations in an acknowledged global fascism, all of that kind of stuff, begins really ramping up in this period of time here.
And now it's actually, even though the bug is attempting to use the rise of emotion and so on against us and is weaponizing emotionality, we see that it's under attack.
Okay, so the whole big structures, all of this kind of stuff, collectivism, collectivism is under attack in these periods of time.
And if we actually look here, we see that there's a sort of a coincidence in the 1830s, we see the rise of a collectivism in the form of the utopian project.
And these are all global, right?
The utopian projects really started in the 1820s, but we get a really visible sign of it in the 1830s.
And it's my contention that the utopian things provided the seed for a collectivism in terms of the language, right?
It was good to be a collectivist insofar as the utopians were concerned.
Up until that period of time, collectivism was not thought of as good.
You can understand why, too, because we'd come out of these plague years where it was a bad thing to be collectivizing with anybody you didn't know and getting much outside of your sphere of influence because you would come in contact with people and would succumb perhaps to some of these diseases.
All right, so the language is very important here, but it shows during this period of time that when we moved into the collectives, that the peak in the collectivism was probably in the 80s with the Reagan years, right?
And then thereafter, we start seeing the rise of the individual emotional experience kind of language.
So you'll see that in younger generations, it shifts over from sacrifice and contribution to the culture to the me, me, me, my experience triumphs everything, my truth is above your truth, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, right?
And so we see that shift in the language here.
We did not have that form of expression for the emotional language back here, but we see back here that kind of expression, that kind of underlying theme of my personal experience is triumphant as we see the rise or the battle between individualism and the collectivism insofar as the church is concerned in Western society.
So here we get the schisms, you know, Lutherism bubbling up in the 1500s, and then takes a bunch of time and we have all these battles between those that are individually dealing with their religion as opposed to those that wish to impose it on you, authoritarianism.
And then collectivism here, the rise of Marxism and communism is just that authoritarianism from the church, the bug-like thinking coming back to us in a different form and a different name.
They want you to accept it.
It's very much a sociopathic kind of a thing.
These abusers need you to acquiesce to being abused, right?
So if you don't, if you don't comply, if you don't acquiesce, their power is reduced because they need willing victims.
They don't want confrontation.
Anyway, so we note that in some of these shift periods here that we end up with wars that coincide with activity in other areas.
So in 1947 we get the big push on the UFOs, but they really started coming in in the 20s.
We start seeing UFOs being viewed more as a mechanical thing, especially with the defeat of the Germans and then the rise of aviation and the German and French pilots that were experiencing problems with the early airplanes when flying over the southern and Saxony regions of Germany.
Nobody ever explained it, right?
But this is before World War II, and it was thought that there was some kind of magnetic ray that was coming out would shut these planes down.
They would fly over this area, and it didn't matter which direction they were flying from, but when they flew over this area, their engines would cut out.
The magnetos and other electrical components of their airplane engines would cut out, and they would have to land.
And if they flew off in certain directions, they could get out of it and their planes would restart.
So there was something going on.
It wasn't constant.
It was intermittent.
Sometimes it was further away than others, closer to these little towns.
Lots of reports of this.
It was never, ever, ever solved.
World War II comes along, everybody forgot about it.
But I think it was a precursor to a lot of these magnetic EMP kind of experiments.
And it's also coincidental that in this same region of Germany is where we, the Allies, find the first magnetic tape we encountered.
They came across bunkers that had loudspeakers and radio broadcasts and all of that.
They would assault these cement bunkers only to find that there was nobody in there.
It was just a big loop of magnetic tape playing the message, right?
And some of these magnetic tapes were massive and they could go for literally days.
So they would fight for days to get into this otherwise sealed bunker only to discover, I mean, the first time they did it, they understood what they were dealing with thereafter, that there weren't necessarily any humans in there.
So there's all this kind of stuff, right?
These are the innovation cycles.
We see that there's innovation cycles here that are coincident with the rise of emotionalism.
There's an innovation cycle that took place from 1890 that peaked in the 1920s with Tesla and went into 1940s.
Now I've deliberately excluded those areas that have war on them insofar as the innovation cycle is concerned because that usually diverts innovation into areas that you're not able to track, right?
Especially these days it's all classified, so you just don't know what's going on.
So you don't know where you are in any of these innovation cycles.
Started in the 1940s for sure, but in the 1860s we even had classified projects not in the sense of the government funding them, but the government classifying them and making them unavailable after the fact, after they became aware of them.
And there's all kinds of woo reports of strange things being invented during this period of time and disappearing.
And we know that in this period of time we find the precursor to and then the Smithsonian itself becoming active and disappearing things from our social order.
So I find that part of the authoritarian aspect of control.
Now we're in a battle at the moment.
We're in this war at the moment.
This war is heating up and we're going to go into some much more active, much more dynamic.
There's going to be different personalities arising on the social scene, on the war scene.
It's an information warfare battleground.
So the changes will be informational.
The changes for the new personalities coming on out will be because of the information they're delivering or because the information about them.
This will be over these next few months.
It'll start involving some of these themes we've seen in the past here.
We're going to see this play out again.
We're going to see battles in this war here that will deal with the climate.
And of course the VAGs.
Next up, though, is going to be the central banks.
Okay, and so this is going to be a big key one.
We're going to see battles here very soon over UFOs.
Those will start really surfacing.
And then we're going to get into the open warfare against the deep state later in the year.
It's already open warfare.
The deep state knows there's lots of us that are out there fighting it.
The next up is going to be the central banks.
This is going to be really interesting because it presents us with a number of problems relative to the functioning both of the enemy class and ourselves.
So as this goes through, a lot of the normies are going to just be like blindsided.
You know, they should be paying attention that shit ain't normal, right?
That the economy isn't functioning, that, you know, COVID clamping down, the lockdowns, the authoritarian government going batshit.
All of these things are not normal.
So it's stupid, it's unaware to think that the continuation of those things is preordained, is foreordained.
So we're going to get into this situation here.
We're in it now, and it's starting in Turkey.
Okay, so we're going to start over here in Turkey, and you can see that, okay?
And this is going to go up through Europe, and that's going to come across to the United States.
And what's happening is an impact on the banks of the currency problems.
And the currency problems are related to the central banks being at the end of their cycle and not having their war.
So now, the central banks wanted to have 2016 through 2020 occupied with war.
Okay.
They wanted to have the defeat of the United States.
They wanted to kill off about 200 to 300 million people minimum globally.
They wanted to kill off a lot of people in North Korea.
They wanted to kill off lots of people in China and lots of people here in the United States.
They wanted to kill about 100 million Americans or more.
They needed to get that many reduced so that they could invade, have the Chinese invade us.
This is the globalists that are organizing all of this.
This was supposed to occur, but it did not.
And so that's thrown their plans for a loop, right?
This means that they don't have that war to cover the crash of the central bank's currency at this point.
And you'll notice in here, in our other war cycles, that here we have a currency crash.
Let me get something a little bit more dramatic, okay?
So in this war cycle here, we have a currency crash.
That was the crash of the Dixie banks, whole the Louisiana banking crisis, right?
And here we have a crash of the global reserve currencies.
Actually, it started in on the 20s.
Let's just go back to the 20s because we had the giant depression.
And so here we have another crash of the currencies.
And this started with the breakup of the British Empire and the acquiescence of the globe to American dominance, at least economically, and then the failure of the Federal Reserve Bank that brings us into the war period, right, in 1947 here, or in 1940s.
So each of these periods here, 2006, well, we're in war here.
We're in this silent war from this point on.
And during this silent war, we're also having economic problems.
And so the economic problems are going to be exacerbated, and they're going to be visible because we don't have a nuclear war destroying cities in the United States, thus acting as a proximate cause for hyperinflation or whatever the fuck's going to happen relative to the currency, right?
So now the central bank just has to do this stuff because they've got no choice.
They can't not do it the minute that they stop not doing their plan, pushing on towards their plan.
Even though there's no war there, they're still pushing on their plan.
Once they stop, the whole thing crashes instantly and they're left totally exposed.
Now, this is going to create problems for all of us because the global system is breaking down.
We're seeing it in Turkey.
So now, Turkey is a very Canary in a coal mine kind of place, only it's not a canary, right?
Turkey represents a joining, all right?
It represents a confluence, NATO and a confluence of the Islamic world.
It represents a economic confluence of the NATO economic power and the Islamic population power, right?
And so there's all of these different things going on within Turkey, the country, that are affecting its currency ahead of ours.
So they are the indicator, a big flashing buoy, that there's a tsunami coming.
This tsunami is hyperinflation.
And it's going to hit the United States here probably over this next month.
I would say within the next three weeks, we'll see giant rises, if you can get them, in the cost of goods as we get into this period of time where the money starts, the dollars start, the digital dollars start trying to come back to the United States because no one wants them.
And Turkey is this giant indicator.
And we know that we've crossed the threshold because Turkey has gone to cryptocurrencies.
They're presenting a, we're going to use cryptocurrencies, we're going to allow cryptocurrencies bill law to their legislature tomorrow morning and on the 27th, I think.
Anyway, so they're going to go from there on, right?
El Salvador is a reasonably, they've already done this, but they're a reasonably small country.
Their impact is trivial.
Turkey's going to be huge because they're a wedge into NATO.
They're a wedge into the Western republics, the prototypical big camel snout under the edge of the tent.
And they're also the funnel into the Islamic world.
So you're going to be getting a twofer, right?
So because they're going to have this bill in Turkey that will allow the Turkish citizens to get at this, you're going to get an entree to all of those Turks that are in Germany and in France and in England, all the building class of people, the people that go out and work, they're going to start moving into cryptos in a big way in spite of whatever the local nationalistic government says.
Hang on, we've got snow on the roads and I've got to watch for things.
Anyway, we're also going to get a push of legitimacy for cryptocurrencies into the Islamic world.
And it'll start overcoming the adoption hurdles there.
So this is going to be, so Turkey is a big deal.
So it's Turkey Day tomorrow.
And it's a big deal for the central banks.
And they're going to have real problems as a result of this.
Problems are going to keep coming.
They're going to keep being placed in an appropriate position for all of us to view by universe as it starts, continues to snowball here as we get into this period of time from 2022 onward.
And so we don't know where our innovation cycle is going to be.
I suspect that we've been nailed because of financing, because of the corporate fascist takeover.
We've really damped down on innovation this entire time since about 2006.
It's due to bust out, right?
We're due for another one of these, coincident with the rise of the emotional language.
These are usually, these kind of innovation cycles, when they wind down and peak out, are usually globally humanity affecting.
So I'm suspecting that we're due for an innovation cycle that will be humanity affecting from this point forward.
I suspect that on 2041 is going to be the hard edge of the ice age, to where from that point on, almost everything humans do will have to take into account some aspect of the ice age hitting us, right?
So it's going to get really tough as we go in towards this is all sci-fi world.
We have to discover it.
It's all out on the woo.
We've got to figure out what's going on.
And it's going to be just an interesting period of time as our social order changes.
And now, we're seeing, as we see from 1860 onward, a battle here between what I like to call, or between communism and Marxism, right?
And then what I like to call basically regular humans.
All right, so we'll just put down here is the humans.
The humans have a tendency, and as I look through time, and the social orders, humans have a tendency to organize themselves in small collectives, tribes, and so on.
And then we ultimately come up in, so a republic is a natural evolution.
A democracy is not.
Democracy is just simply a mob, and whoever can get that mob to do their will is in charge.
And so that's a bug-like approach to things.
So humanity is a collective of councils that merge up until a nation level.
So we're now fighting this battle between Marxism, the authoritarianism, and humans and tribalism, right?
Or clanism, clans, however you want to think about it.
We've had some bug-like activities that have been pressed in on us.
And so there's been a bug-like activity to demonize white people.
Not only to demonize white people, but to demonize being white to the point where we now see an attempt to create the self-hating white person the same way that there are self-hating Jews.
Now, not being a Jew, I never really grasped this concept.
I knew that it was inculcated into the Jewish writings about this idea of a self-hating Jew.
I never really read a lot of that stuff.
It never appealed to me.
So I never really got into it, never really examined it, right?
But I understand from critical race theory, now called social education learning, that they want to create self-hating white people.
And so I see that the mechanism for creating self-hating white people via CRT is exactly the same kind of mechanism that was used to create self-hating Jews via a Talmudic understanding of things.
So I've been reading through the Talmud.
I've got the version in English that's the Babylonian Talmud, right?
And there's those people that are getting on my case.
You wouldn't believe what a stink this has caused, just that I got this thing.
But in any event, so I see in reading through, just skimming through it at a metadata level, that I can see where the idea of a self-hating Jew comes from relative to the Talmud.
I haven't read into the Torah or any of that, so I don't know if there's anything in there that would also add to that.
But the metadata level reading of this, I see the same kind of imprint from the Talmud as I see from critical race theory.
Now, it could be that critical race theory arises from Talmudarian design, plot, whatever, right?
And so that could be that they've impressed that.
They're projecting that, the self-hating aspect of things and trying to get it to take on whiteness.
I don't think it's going to go over so much, right?
They're getting all kinds of pushback on this shit.
There's too many people.
It's an aspect of the bug stuff that's dying off because of where we are here.
You could maybe get through it, maybe push that stuff out in terms of collectivism.
Now, here's the good and the bad of this.
They're trying to push out all this self-hating thing when we're in a period of time where individualism is rising.
So the individual is not going to feel built into a collective that would protect them from this self-hating language that they're trying to get the people to absorb, right?
So individuals are more weak to mind control than when they're supported in a group.
So it would be better in a collective period of time to be able to resist this in a sense.
However, it is also working against the people that are trying to press this mind control out because during this period of time, we're disputing their sources.
They're getting much more pushback from individuals that are saying, my individual experience says, hey, try that and see what the fuck happens, right?
And this kind of thing.
And so that's just really roiling their whole plan, their whole plot and plan.
Now, so bear in mind that from the 1860s is when we get the Albert Pike era of Masonry.
Masonry is very much Talmudic, okay?
There's a lot in the Freemason literature that is basically just Talmudic in its nature, or Talmudarian almost.
I mean, a willing adoption of certain principles from the Talmud.
Anyway, from that period of time here in the 1860s, we get the rise of Freemasonry to the point where Freemasonry becomes such a problem to the United States that it is openly discussed as having caused murders, corruption, and judges, and so on.
And we get the very first of the anti-Freemason parties in the Northeast forming up in the 1890s.
Again, coincident with the rise in the airship stuff, and a lot of that was focused towards the Northeast.
So who knows how it relates, right?
But it's just coincident.
Okay, so the authoritarianism, which is another form of the Freemasonry, would fit in authoritarianism.
It's not a tribal thing.
It's not a clan thing.
It's not an individual experience thing.
It wants you to conform to their mandates, dictates, and ideologies, right?
They're bringing an ideology to a Wu fight.
We're in a Wu fight in this period of time.
The Wu is rising here.
The paradigm is crumbling.
They're no longer, this collective thinking about things has broken.
It's way reduced, and we're way up in emotional language, which started rising rapidly in 2007.
And in my opinion, the censorship aided that.
The censorship ballooned that.
We're in this period of no truth, right?
And what they mean by that when they say that in these articles is that there is not a collective consensus truth around which we will all agree whether or not we actually accept it as factual.
So in other words, lots of people would happily go in and fight for Christendom in the Crusades, and they never really believed in Christ per se or any of that sort of thing, right?
It was because they were part of the collective of Christendom and they believed in the social order that they would go and do these things, not because they as an individual had any real meaningful experience in Christ consciousness, if that makes sense, right?
So the Crusades aside, that was a political movement.
It was run by the bankers.
It was an attempt to harvest vast, it was an attempt to create wars between the Christian society and the Muslim society in order to divert and harvest wealth out of it.
And again, it was another one of these banker war things.
So now we're in the Wu wars.
We're in the Wu period of time where all the wars are going to be exposed at all these different levels.
And it's going to get really freaky because not only are you going to have to pick, everybody says, oh, pick a side.
You know, I saw Catherine Austin Fitz say this, and I've seen a lot of the liberal people say this now.
And I've seen other people, and they're saying, you know, pick a side.
And they're usually talking in a binary sense.
And that, you know, so they want to say, you know, human versus non-human, human versus transhumanism.
Or, you know, in some way, they'll say Republican versus Democrat or whatever, right?
And so they're thinking about it in a binary sense, as though we are in a binary period of time.
And it is not.
So you could pick a side and pick Republican, and you could be pro-vax.
So it's going to get really interesting as everybody decides where they are on all these issues in an individual level, which defeats the collectivism that's attempting to be pushed out on all of us by the, which I'm going to refer to as the Talmudarian mindset.
I actually think personally that Jewish people may be one of the most mind-controlled people ever on the planet if they are actually not, and they don't even have to accept it, but if they just the act of studying these oral traditions that are now written down in the Talmud show you from an initiatory kind of a perspective, if you've been through that, you understand this.
Oh, this is an initiatory process.
It's intended to change your mind.
It's intended to actually not change your opinion, but alter your thinking.
Change your thinking so you can no longer think the way you used to.
No longer examine ideas the way you used to.
And so I think personally that if people are following the Talmud, that I must be wary of them because their minds have been, in my opinion, exposed to a level of corruption that they may not be aware of.
Now, see, I'm not reading this in a sense of believing it or getting involved in the minutiae of it or any of that.
I'm reading this as a metadata.
If this had been digitized, I would just examine it through software and never even have to bother reading it.
But I can read it and get the metadata as I go along.
And so I'm of the opinion that, one, that Talmudarianism predates Judaism.
All right.
Two, there are elements in Talmudarianism that go directly to authoritarianism and nowhere else.
And it is an attempt, in my opinion, to inculcate authoritarianism into humanity that is basically not authoritarianism focused or particularly bent.
We're not particularly bent.
It's not an arising thing for us.
If you see humans out and about in the wild, and I've lived with tribal people, so I can claim to have some knowledge of that, they don't express authoritarianism natively or naturally.
In any event, though, so in this silent war that we're in from here on until the defeat of the bug, which will, I think this will extend beyond 2041, the war that we're in.
It'll bust out here in 2022 into the open, and we'll have big discussions about it for the next 10 or 20 years, bringing up all kinds of nasty shit.
But we'll work through it.
Oh, there is actually somebody over there.
Anyway, so the next big thing, as I was saying, is the crash of authoritarianism into the destruction, the crashing of authoritarianism as the destruction of the central bank emerges.
This destruction of the central bank is self-impreated by the lifespan of their currency and all of this other stuff, but it's going to be a big blow to the organizers of all of this.
And it's going to be global.
We're seeing it start in Turkey.
There's banks closing all over the place already as a result of what's going on in China.
So this bond crisis is unraveling around us or is forming all around us.
Most people are just not going to see it until it slaps the value of the cash right out of their hands.
And that'll be their big first wake-up call as we get into the silent war here.
Because we are actually in a silent war.
Their planned destruction of humanity war did not happen.
And that'll get back to Trump for just a second.
And that is that he, in my opinion, playing his role, he shouldn't get every damn actor award ever granted for him doing this.
He played his role so well that he stopped a war.
And then he's telling people with his talk about vaccines how we stopped and derailed the plans of the bug, he doesn't term it that way, but of authoritarianism to kill off hundreds of millions of people via lockdowns over 10 years and then give them a vaccine and kill off hundreds of millions more in a much more shorter period of time.
At that point, they would have just given vaccines door to door to door and just left a lot of dead people in a lot of houses and kept a certain number alive and no one would ever know, right?
Oh, no, somebody died from the disease.
You know, they just died in their house from the disease.
How would you ever know, right?
And if it just happened to hundreds of millions, you would think that was a true aspect of a pandemic.
Pandemics, by the way, last 18 months.
Plagues last 18 months.
And so if you go and you look historically through any literature about these diseases going through humanity and places being shut down, self-isolating relative to plagues and disease, you find in fictional literature and journals of the time, it lasts about 18 months.
So we're due to have this thing be over anyway, the COVID thing be over anyway.
It looks like the Omicron really is providing natural immunity for everybody, including those people that are vaxed, to the spike protein and into the virus.
So this is a nice turning point anyway, right?
That it's all coincident with where we're at here.
But so we're going to shift.
Okay, so we're going to shift out of the health crises into the health of the banking system crises.
And at the end of that crises, we'll be moving into UFOs briefly, and then it'll be open warfare with the deep state.
I expect that all of this will happen in 2022 and will be in adult language from that point on.
But you won't like adult language.
I'm not kidding you.
You won't like it.
So anyway, Don't bring an ideology to a Wu fight.
It will not do you any good.
And we're going to get into our Wu fights very seriously with the Turkish parliament getting into their discussions about cryptocurrencies and whether or not to adopt them and allow their citizens to adopt them.
And once they do that, because they have no alternative, then everything changes.
Economically, everything changes in the social order relative to the destruction of the financial system and the rise of the economy, because we'll have a global economy arising as the finance system becomes degraded and stagnates, and then big chunks of it just sort of fall off.
That'll be coming up over this year.
There's some hope that it'll be self-managing because we have the outflow of cryptos.
So the previous Great Depression, we didn't have that escape valve to take wealth from the old system into the new system, and they shut that off with gold and silver.
So the authoritarians in the 1930s had a big lock on it.
And they crushed a lot in doing that.
They don't have that lock now.
And so it'll be very interesting to see how it develops as our silent war progresses and becomes less silent and more visible.
And at the same time that the activities of the central bank roll more into focus.
So, all right, so imagine over this next year, 2022, all of humans will put as much attention into central bank and the currencies as we've put into COVID and the disease over these last two years.
And that's what's going to happen to the central banks and the authorities.
Not a good time for them.
It's going to be a fun time for us, though.
Well, it won't be fun, but it'll be interesting for all the Wu people because as conspiracy scientists, we'll be proven right yet again.
▲
Export Selection