All Episodes
Previous Next
July 11, 2021 - Clif High
01:13:43
Empire Woo - Explorers' Guide to SciFi World

hyperinflation bites

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
All right, I'll buy that.
Okay, oops, all right.
Hello humans.
Today is the 10th of July.
It's all about empire and empire woo, the things that are hidden from us while we're in empire.
Usually it's easy to see the woo that affects things when you're external to that, right?
This is true of any observation.
Very few observers are good at observing and noting while within the focus of that observation.
Thus we see history is always written from people that aren't living through it.
You know, it's several centuries after it all happened and went down.
That's when some guy says, oh yeah, look at this insight I've got about thus and so and that and so, right?
Which is about what I'm going to talk about anyway.
Okay, so this is all about empire woo.
And empires share lots of characteristics, lots and lots and lots of characteristics.
They can be plotted.
People in academia make careers out of writing books that nobody reads mostly about what happened in this empire and why it happened, why that person thinks it happened.
And frequently, if one were to read these books, you'll see that they're examining that empire in isolation, okay, as though it were a study.
So somebody comes along and they decide, okay, I'm going to have a look at the Ottoman Turk Empire.
And they write a book on it, and they're really cool.
They like the people, they like the food, they get all immersed in it, and they write a book about it, and then they start writing sequels.
They make all kinds of interesting conclusions, and they have various and sundry insights, and they miss a staggering essential fundamental conclusion.
And they miss dozens of them, of these conclusions, simply because they're examining that empire, the Ottoman Turk Empire, in isolation as though they were doing a single study.
So somebody does a study of ivermectin versus COVID.
And their study of ivermectin versus COVID has the parameters that they don't administer the ivermectin until you're gasping, until you're coughing up blood, and then they only give you one milligram of the shit, right?
And so, obviously, if you were to look at that study, ivermectin is no good for COVID.
But, you know, we know that that's not the case.
So an individual examination that way, while valuable and can have all kinds of insight, even giving one milligram, you know, when they're coughing up blood, could perhaps provide some medical insight about how ivermectin works.
But the point being that even at that point, you are limited to the range of an individual study.
So a better way to do these things, in my opinion, a more accurate way, a more empirical way, is to examine lots of studies.
They call these meta-studies, right?
Because then you examine all the studies that have ever examined ivermectin against COVID, and you see that, oh, geez, every one of the studies that, you know, this is statistically skewed, such that if you give enough ivermectin at six milligrams for a child or 12 milligrams for an adult or 16, 18 milligrams for a heavy adult, then you find, and you give it early, then you find that you don't get any coughing up of the blood.
Ergo, ivermectin is very effective, and you derive this from looking at the meta-study that saw all of the studies at all the various different dosing levels.
And so you have to be careful about studies.
Double-blind, all of this means squat, does not mean shit because it is actually the worst level of scientific analysis because all of that effort goes to a whole series of assumptions and quantifications that are unique to that study.
And unless you see a broad range of things, you can't, a broad range of things that are hidden from you, the woo of this study, so to speak.
You can't understand what is the context of that study within the greater materium that we find ourselves.
And it is that and that only that provides you with the ability to think appropriately about what's in front of you.
So if you're thinking about that single study and you see nothing else and blah, blah, blah, you're excluding everything.
Your thinking is so narrowly parameterized that yes, it's double blind, but it is fucking blind because it's not seeing anything else.
And it's all the other stuff that tells you that that study is flawed within the greater materium and that the item indeed is effective, right?
And so if we examine the Ottoman Turk Empire in one way, you find all of these various different kinds of insights.
But if you step out and you examine the Ottoman Turk Empire with a bunch of other empires, you find that there is one huge thing that you overlooked, that the Ottoman Turk Empire, like all these other empires, died because of hyperinflation.
and hyperinflation turns out to be an empire killer.
Not the only empire killer, because we can actually cite other empires that have not been killed by hyperinflation.
So, oh, geez.
Hang on a second, guys.
Okay.
So, for instance, we see that the empires in the Americas, right, the Inca Empire, the Aztec Empire, the Olmecs, the other empires within the Americas over time, none of them had hyperinflation as their cause for their end.
And they were not, as we understand it, monetized.
They were empires that functioned on other than an economic underpinning or base.
There was no, they had an allegiance, so the individuals within the empire had allegiances to the empire that were not derived from a monetary currency specie kind of basis.
But they, nonetheless, they all collapse as well.
But these empires, along with the Mongolian Empire, for instance, the Mongolian Empire was, while it was monetized, while it had a circulating base rate currency and all of this sort of thing, was not, it did not die from hyperinflation.
The Mongolian Empire died from other causes, basically built on confidence within the ruling clan.
And we can just say it that way.
They did have hyperinflation at times.
The era of, I won't go into some of the details there, but they have had hyperinflation, but it was not the hyperinflation that was the root cause of their collapse, which is the case here of all of these empires leading up to our empire right here.
And that is that we're dealing with hyperinflation.
Sparta had hyperinflation, and basically at that time it meant doing everything you could to dilute the silver, right, and spread it around.
So they had real problems.
Athens had, over the course of three separate empires, had basically all discovering different caches of silver in the ground that they could mine.
They got to the point where the empire uses money, diluted money, flattened coins, not to specifications, not to wait, and eventually everybody loses confidence in it, and that is a form of hyperinflation.
So we have hyperinflation.
They don't do anything to the actual currency, which we never even see anymore, really.
We're just dealing with digits in a computer.
But they nonetheless hyperinflate them.
In previous ages, when non-digital ages, they would actually do things to the coinage.
So Rome collapsed, and Rome collapsed by the process of shaving the coins, officially shaving the coins.
They started off at 2%, oddly enough, the same number that the Fed picks, right?
And they went and took all the, as the coins came back through circulation and were collected in taxes, they were peeled.
The edges were shaved off in a very mechanized system.
That shaving was then melted down to create more coins.
Now, bear in mind, their coins were not all that precise anyway.
It was difficult to see.
And in terms of the precision, it's difficult to see if you had a, A wonky coin was still acceptable, so to speak.
I've got ancient coins where the copper was so pure that it's malleable, ancient Roman coins at the beginning of the Roman Empire.
And I've got other coins that are older or more recent and are harder, and the copper had been polluted with all different kinds of other metals, and they actually crack over time.
They become more brittle over time.
Anyway, so we see that this the empires start off with seizing other countries' gold.
Usually it's silver.
Usually, by the way, silver is the medium of exchange within the empire, and gold is the store of wealth.
It doesn't matter if it's the Incas and all this kind of stuff.
The Incas didn't have silver as a medium of exchange.
They did use precious metals or semi-precious stones and other conveyances for credit, so to speak, for food.
They also collected gold, but we don't have any indication that they monetized the gold, so to speak, right?
They used it for other purposes.
In Western empires, gold was the storehouse of wealth, where silver was the medium by which one did business in a day-to-day basis.
And a man's worth was measured, work, a non-slave in the Roman Empire was paid a denarius worth a dime's worth of silver a day, right?
That was at the height of the value of the Roman dinar.
And it is from that dinar that we get the dollar.
Anyway, so we're talking about empires, and we're talking about things that are empiric.
And so we can look at, let's look at the definition here first off for empires or empiric.
There's empiric means to the first definition that comes to mind is that it means an evidence-based approach, okay?
And so an evidence-based approach is, oh, there's rain outside the front door, and I go and look in the back door, there's rain outside there.
Ergo, I can make the assumption that from the evidence that there's rain all around the house.
You know, that kind of thing, an evidence-based approach.
There's also the reverse of that, curiously.
And that is that you can say someone is behaving as an empiric garage mechanic, okay?
And that would be a charlatan.
That would be someone who is who, because empiric means based on evidence rather than any kind of precepts, any kind of foundations or principles of thinking, just based on solid evidence.
So you can also get to this side where evidence-based thinking can be wrong.
So you can say to yourself that you can look at something and you can choose evidence from it that does not, that suits your point, but is not necessarily valid.
So you can have a little short pencil, right?
A little short number two pencil that you sharpen and thus you take waste off in order to keep a sharp point.
And over time, the pencil grows, it goes from there and it keeps shrinking and shrinking and shrinking.
And as you note, as this pencil ages, not only does the wood leach out more of the oils as you remove more of it, but it's shorter, therefore it's not as flexible as initially, and you're not at risk of breaking it, and you think of it as harder, right?
And so you could come to the evidence-based conclusion that older things are tougher and harder than newer things, because you're missing the point that it's actually the leverage that allows you to break a new pencil easily and the softness of the wood.
And in that sense, you're cluing into the fact that indeed the wood does become more dense as it ages, but the primary thing that's preventing that pencil from breaking is that it's short and you don't have the leverage against it.
So we have to be careful about evidence-based thinking in assuming that it's always right because there's many different aspects to world, to materium, and thus you've got to know within the wu what you're looking at, right?
And you can't fixate on one thing because you're missing the other woo.
You're missing the other parts that inform that thinking.
And so wu thinking is to know that there's shit you're not seeing and to be aware of that, to be paranoid about that, and not be empiric in the first sense of the meaning, which is to be evidence-based only, right?
You want first principles.
You want good thinking about it.
And then you also want to not be empiric in the number two sense of the thinking, which is to be a charlatan, somebody who makes a bad conclusion from evidence and then goes off, right?
So many of the health people, right, that are in the woo-woo land are exactly number two thinkers.
They are now what we would call charlatans, but they did not necessarily start off that way.
And you can actually follow a train of logic.
where they discover something.
Let's talk about, you know, I'll get some people pissed off.
But, okay, so you can look at, I've got big bottles of the shit here.
Chlorine dioxide, what they call MMS, right?
And you can use that to sterilize surfaces really fucking well.
And so someone does that.
And then they notice, oh, hey, that skin infection I had up here, which was likely a fungus, is gone simply because they accidentally got chlorine dioxide on the surface of their skin.
And then they think, aha, evidence.
Okay, so we have evidence that chlorine dioxide kills fungus.
And they'll just make the assumption and tack on in the human body, because it was true, the fungus was in the human body.
But they don't recognize that that fungus was really external to the human body and was only attached to the epidermis, was not in any way an integral, you know, that sort of thing, right?
So, hang on a second, screwy software.
Anyway, so they make an assumption that is accurate up to one point based on evidence, but then becomes the second meaning of empirical, charlatanized, as they then make the assumption that you can put MMS inside you and achieve that same effect on internal infections, which, you know, that shit don't work that way.
There's principles involved with internal pathways of disinfecting and so on, and you can't disinfect the human body.
You have to detoxify it, and MMS itself is a toxin.
So you can't, it doesn't work to put a toxin in you to detoxify.
That's like, you know, the guy that says, well, I'm going to, you know, go to war with you to stop you from fighting.
You know, it doesn't work that way, right?
If you're going to war with someone, you want to fight with them.
So anyway, though, so we have to be careful about that.
Now, the third meaning of empirical is of an empire.
Of empiric, it means doing something in a fashion of an empire, which usually is brutal and hard and so on, which we also associate with the first meaning, which is evidence-based, right?
No time for precepts, no time for finer thinkings and nuances and examination of the woo all around us to see if we're actually really focusing our minds on what we should be focusing on, right?
And are not being derailed by somebody around trying to game us or whatever.
Okay, so we get to this point then where we have empiric thinking all the way through.
All of these things are descriptive of empires and empires mostly, and this is the cool part, it's not always, I hate absolutes because there's always exceptions, but mostly they always die from hyperinflation.
And we're in the process of that right now.
This is the point of discussing this because we're seeing all of these kinds of effects from the hyperinflation.
Now, they're hyperinflating the petrodollar.
They're not hyperinflating the digital dollar.
You notice we're not walking around with giant wheelbarrow loads.
You don't have to put bales of currency into the back of the minivan to go buy a gallon of milk.
You have it all in your little plastic card, which is so much easier for them to hyperinflate.
All right, so their thinking, and I've been, all right, so we can just acknowledge that, let me just finish this real quick so I can get rid of it.
China went through hyperinflation and collapsed three empires that I can argue, and it was all hyperinflation.
Rome did it.
You could also argue that Rome did it twice and then converted itself over to the Byzantine Empire, and that saved it from doing it a third time.
The French did a, okay, so the French at the time of the 1789 in their French Revolution, the kingdom collapsed because of hyperinflation.
Let them eat cake.
You know, bread became too expensive to eat because it was the beginning of the Industrial Revolution.
They had started dealing with debt.
They were financing factories with debt.
The kings were financing wars with debt.
The Rothschilds were loaning money to these people in serious ways.
They were becoming indebted, and the only way to deal with the debt was to try and extract more money out of a very stable and static surf-based population.
Then they convert the initial population over to Industrial Revolution, and during that period of time, they have their first burst of really bad hyperinflation.
And the ordinary French housewife discovers that the ordinary French housewife was really poor compared to anything here that any person listening to me will have experienced on this planet.
They were actually much poorer, much more poor than people that might live on very isolated agrarian societies today or even jungle societies today, because those people are still in a position where they only had to work three hours a day to take care of all of their needs.
It was estimated that in 1789, at that point, French men and women, le Miserable, the miserable ones, were having to work.
They could not work enough hours in a day to provide enough money for food for that day for themselves, let alone anybody else.
So it had been that in a traditional surf society, the man and the woman, primarily the man, supported the family through external labor in the fields and, you know, this kind of thing, right?
As they were starting to industrialize, it got to the point where everything went wonky, and both the man and the woman had to work in the factory.
And then with the kids, everybody had to work just to get enough money to buy their own food that day.
And they had starvation in the street as a result of the hyperinflation.
And that's what led to the revolution.
The women just said, we're not having it anymore.
We just can't deal with this.
It's better that we all die than to suffer this way.
And if we're going to die, those fuckers are going to die first.
And you will note that in the French Revolution, it was what they called the horror of the guillotine and so on, hauling the royals out and chopping their heads off.
That was led by women.
They went absolutely crazy in that collapse in hyperinflation.
And it was extremely brutal because all the societal bounds had snapped.
And then they rebuilt themselves, created a French Republic, which went on to become empire under the Napoleons.
And the empire collapsed once again by hyperinflation.
They had hyperinflation taxing all of their colonies and everything to death, trying to pay for the more acquisition of more colonies.
So it just went crazy.
The British had hyperinflation in their battles with China over the tea and opium trade, what we call the opium wars, which is all about trying to get their silver back from China because they were spending too much silver to China to get tea in order to fuel their Industrial Revolution because they needed drugs to get the sleepy British peasant to work more than three hours a day in a factory.
They were not motivated by the money alone.
They had to do things in order to structure the society to create the avenues for wealth at that level.
So both of these empires, back as far as the 16 and 1700s, had oligarchies, the monarchies, that were trying to structure their societies to drive us to this point, that they could get bigger and bigger and bigger wealth.
They were actually engineering conditions within their social order to drive, to socially support the drive into industrialization.
And one of those things was getting into currencies, getting into lending, getting into fiat currencies, fractional reserve lending, all of this kind of thing, dilution of money.
And it all leads up to the point where the British had multiple losing wars, extensive global colonies that required a lot of fucking money to support.
And then they had a giant administrative class of people, which, you know, a big fucking government is expensive and it costs more and more.
And so basically the British oligarchy, the monarchy, and the colonization of the planet that they had done consumed the producing British public, drove them down to the state of abject poverty, and the British Empire collapsed as the pound sterling collapsed.
The same thing basically happened to the USSR.
That was engineered, though.
Okay, so Charlie's War, whatever the guy's name was.
They bought legitimate, they figured out, okay, so the Russians were smart.
The communists were smart.
Stalin and these other guys said, well, they put their best economists to thinking on it.
Why does the West collapse?
Well, the West's always collapsed.
They always go through hyperinflation and this crackup boom in their economies.
And they know this, and so how do we guard against it?
Well, the economist said, never let the ruble, you know, guard your currency.
Keep your currency 100% controlled.
Never let the ruble outside your control.
And you won't have any problems.
In other words, don't let your currency be traded or affected by other countries do.
And they set up a really good system.
They had tight controls on the production.
It was very difficult to counterfeit them at the time.
And it was very difficult to get your hands on them.
But then there were avenues that opened up.
Certain people were made corrupt by the globalists.
And the USSR, the communists, which was a brutal regime killing millions per year, gulag, archipelago, slaughtering people like mad.
It was just repressive and terrible.
Got into the thing of thinking, oh, well, we're hot, hot shit here.
And so they started trying to colonize places.
So the USSR tried to colonize, you know, South America, Cuba, leading all the way up to Afghanistan.
They get involved in a huge, horrific war in Afghanistan that sucks all of their wealth.
They need to do things.
And then they start discovering that, oh, geez, there'd been a back door into their system for a number of years.
And somebody had bought huge amounts of rubles and that was now flooding them back into circulation and causing hyperinflation with ruble return.
And so the USSR collapsed basically at that point because not only because of the dual effect of drag on the system from the sense of non-productive external wear and tear on your currency and foreign wars,
and at the same time, someone coming back in and flooding the system with, although they were legitimate, they'd been held outside the system, not taken account of, and hyperinflated the ruble to the point where it collapsed and the citizenry had no confidence in it.
And all of the USSR collapsed.
They had a tough, tough one anyway, because they had 12 damn time zones to try and keep together as a unified nation.
Really rough, you know.
And China, again, China, if we figure the CCP, they're down here with the petrodollar.
They're tied in with the globalists, so they're going to go with the petrodollar.
And their death knell here is going to be hyperinflation, as we're encountering here within the U.S., and it's going to get even worse and be much more slapped in our face over these next few weeks.
Now, just a couple of days from now, we're going to see an admission of hyperinflation to some degree by the actions, if not the words, of the Biden regime, the Bidom regime.
They're going to have to acknowledge that we've got hyperinflation and they won't use the words.
They'll start using weasel words ahead of it.
They'll start trying to deflect.
They'll start trying to blame it on people.
Anything other than accept blame.
No politician wants to accept blame.
But what we're going to discover is that we're running at, for instance, let's say energy key for everything is running at 40% or greater.
Reports are going to come out.
This will be July 13th, supposedly.
The Bureau of Labor and Statistics is going to release the report for June.
But what's really interesting is that if we look at the CCP in China, we see that the China inflation, their PPI, is greater than 13% now.
That's the producer price index.
That's a better metric than most, but it is small in its assessment of the total spread.
So the PPI doesn't take into account so many things that, in my way of thinking, you can basically extend that and double it, maybe even triple it because of the various ways it does not track inflation.
Inflation can be ultimately to the consumer, it's the price that they pay.
but to the society at large, it's also the price being paid by the individual consumer at the lowest possible level within the social order, but also the flow of the money through that system.
So you can't have hyperinflation unless you have a big flow of money.
The two go hand in hand.
The flow of money can be affected by the velocity.
So if it's going through the system so quick, you don't notice it, then to a certain extent you can dampen hyperinflationary tendencies.
This is why the Chinese want to have the digital won that depreciates within a couple of months.
So they pay you 100 won now, but you've got to spend that the next 21 days for it to get 100 won value out of it.
If you don't spend that in the next 21 days and you've got any won left over, each and every one of those won is less than one won and is now won less.
And so you might lose 10% per week or per day, some number that they set.
Maybe it's indeterminate, maybe you don't know.
Maybe there's a hazard in the sense it could all go real quick on certain days.
So in other words, you know, any accumulated savings you have in your savings account on the 15th of every third month just disappears.
You know, whatever.
They can do it that way.
And the idea is that they'll introduce the money into one part of the system where they're feeding the hyperinflation, but they'll have some drain here, a digital drain that they can bleed it off so that they don't have to eat it at the back end of the system when the actual conversion of currency to value should be happening.
And that's what they're trying here in the West with what they call modern monetary theory, which means more money today as well.
Anyway, so on the 13th of this month, we're going to get a report that's going to start us off in a challenging situation relative to inflation and the politics.
And the aware observer will be able to see that the effects of the hyperinflation by the globalists, because it's not just the USA, it's the USA dollar.
The petro dollar is being hyperinflated.
So this affects basically the entire Western structure of any nation that had traded oil in dollars.
Everybody's affected.
The further out you are from that, the more you're going to be affected because of the sloshing.
You know, it's harder to slosh the middle of the ocean up, easier to slosh big waves on the edge.
And so like Ecuador, any of these countries that are tied to the dollar are going to have their currencies just ravaged as we go forward because the dollar is being hyperinflated and it's going to be worth less to the point where it's worthless.
And we're rapidly approaching that.
How rapidly, I don't know.
Now, we have to discuss this in a meaningful fashion, though, because there's two kinds of dollars here.
We have the dollar, which is the physical dollar used in the USA, and then we have the petrodollar, which is run by the globalists and is this digital thing with all these giant derivatives on it.
As they hyperinflate this, we'll see costs rise in all sectors, energy, food, and so on.
They're going to put extra pressure on food.
They're going to try and kill even more people, even more than they have with the VAX.
And the impact on all of the sectors that we have to pay will be felt down here within the USA use of the dollar, digital dollars.
But at some point, that effect will start to become moderated in cash.
So we will get to a point where you'll start seeing discounts for cash at a big level over the use of a card.
And this will be because of the monkeying around on the card level, on the petrol dollar level, on the software level, hitting the businesses that they don't face with cash.
So if I pay you a dollar, you've been paid.
But if I use that card and swipe it through, then you might be looking at first, you think, you know, you're promised two days settlement, two days goes into your account as a business owner.
And then maybe you discover, hmm, it's taken five and six days.
Then the next thing you know, you go and you read your terms of service, and oh shit, they changed that to 30 days.
So they don't have to credit your account for 30 days, fraud clearing or something, right?
And so it'll keep going like this.
As they attempt to deal with the hyperinflation and the fact that people are spending, they'll try and slow the system down, to slow the processing down all the way through so that they don't contribute with the velocity of the money being floated through.
We don't have any current analogies with software and with digital stuff to the effect on the people within the German society in 1922 and 23 of actually having to handle wheelbarrow loads full of money in order to do business.
There was a certain amount of grim, you know, death's door humor in handling it for all these Germans.
But also there was an open acknowledgement that this shit is no good.
This doesn't work.
You know, it affected everybody at a very visceral level, just seeing the mountains of cash they had to deal with.
And you know when you're getting to that point that it isn't going to last much longer.
Getting to that absolute crack point.
Now what they're trying to do, there, the Fed, the bad guys in this scenario, the globalists, what they're trying to do is to bleed off hyperinflation through as many different mechanisms as they can so that it doesn't really hit here because here is where their political base is.
And as I've said in previous Wu discussions, we've got a big, we've got global political problems at the moment relative to the petrodollar because the Chinese are tied to the petrodollar.
The CCP is.
Xi is under attack, Xi Jinping, the head of the CCP.
And he may not last very much longer.
I thought back, and I've said this repeatedly, way back in December of 2019, January of 2020, probably repeatedly through 2020.
I mean, I know I've said it more than once.
I think they released COVID to fuck Xi, right?
Internally, the Chinese, the CCP, has a faction that wants him out.
So one part of the criminal gang wants to kick out the head of the criminal gang and take it over and kick out those people that are in allegiance with him.
And they released the COVID to do just that.
Now, Xi may be part of a plan to release the COVID anyway, but the way it was released fucked Xi over in the CCP land.
And then it goes on to fuck over the whole world, and it fucked Xi over as the representative of China throughout the whole world as well, because look at all the shit that China's getting now, and a lot of it is focused on him.
But in any event, the CCP is tied in to the globalists deeply.
They're battling them, but they're battling them for supremacy within the crime family, right?
So it's an inner family kind of a fight, not a with the, although the globalists don't realize it, it is a war of attrition and 100% dominance.
The CCP must dominate the whole world or it ceases to exist because we'll fight back and kick the shit out of it because it's a horrid evil thing.
And globalists are dumb fucks.
They really don't get what they're involved with.
But anyway, so there's these battles going on.
And right at the moment, we're at the point of increasing hyperinflationary pressure on the dollar.
The petrodollar.
This is going to cause all different kinds of effects, which is the point of discussing empire woo.
Because as we note, all these empires fail because of hyperinflation.
We're there now, and we can watch it occurring.
But us little guys, the people that are actually dealing in the smallest denomination of the currency, are the ones that collapse empires.
So Biden, even Trump, Xi, all these people at the top, they don't collapse empires.
It's us guys, right?
If we lose confidence in the USA dollar and we just don't use it anymore, then they can't collect taxes in it.
They can't pay their employees in it.
Their employees can't buy shit.
If somebody works for the deep state comes on in and wants to buy a cup of coffee at Starbucks and they offer some dollars or a credit card that's denominated in dollars and Starbucks says, fuck that, you know, we only take Litecoin or ETH, then, you know, or silver, then what's the deep state going to do, right?
And then if the deep state goes to you and says, you know, you're a business owner and you make manila folders, you know, and they've got to have a lot of manila folders to put your files in, you know, of all the people they're going to shaft.
So they need manila folders.
And if you don't sell them manila folders for dollars, and you're perfectly happy to sell them manila folders, but they've got to get some real fucking currency and give you some silver for your manila folders that you worked hard to acquire.
Well, hey, then what are they going to do?
And it's happening right now.
And so we're seeing this happen right now in government acquisition contracts.
So the government's really a funny thing because I spent a lot of my life as a software engineer aiding state, local, and federal government in the process of digitizing records and putting them on the Internet for better management, lower costs, and all the transparency and all of those kind of good things, right?
And it was a good effort for life doing digital shit.
But in the process, you learn things.
And so you learn things about like the federal register and all of the federal contracts and state contracts and so on and how they're run and how they're structured.
And we find ourselves in an interesting situation where now federal, especially federal contracts, have this, a lot of them have this writer for cost plus, and then they have the descriptor for shipping.
And this is from a software basis, from an algorithm basis.
And I'm just abstracting these into little conceptual boxes, right?
So this is the cost plus, and that's what they're going to have to pay.
And it's going to also the cost plus shipping, and then plus what we would think of as handling or overhead, all right?
So usually written as CSO.
So C plus S and overhead equals the amount that they have to have in their contract to cover these goods.
Now there's parameters.
So there's parameters as you're doing software on this.
So you have a whole bunch of rules as you write your algorithms that describe each and every one of these categories here, right?
And what's really interesting is many, many, many, many, many federal and state and other contracts have shipping and overhead overrides that are figured as a percentage.
So, for instance, we are now experiencing shortages within federal, state, and as far as I know, just only federal and state.
I don't know that it goes down to local, but many of the locals are buying through the state, so probably does.
But we're experiencing shortages because lots and lots and lots of the algos refuse to process anything in there without a special override where the shipping is greater than a certain percentage of the cost.
You know, so that used to be a point of graft and a lot of, because you'd have shipping contracts, and so you'd buy something as a state government fellow and you'd buy it from so-and-so and you'd arrange for your brother-in-law to haul it.
And your brother-in-law made a shitload of money putting the shit on a truck and driving it 20 miles and dropping it off at an office for you.
And so the state and local governments, in order to get around to discover draft and stuff, a lot of it was put into the software to put limits on this.
And so for shipping, many of them would say if it was over 19% more than the cost of the goods, no, it had to get a special override.
If it was over 30% over the cost of the goods, it wouldn't process.
We had all different kinds of structures there.
Now they can change these numbers at any time.
But knowing the nature of software, many of them don't do it.
And a lot of them are also legislatively enforced, mandated, or policy-mandated.
So they can't change them willy-nilly.
And so now we're running into a situation where if you go and look for lots of different resources, especially those that are, how do I want to say it, base-level things you need all the time for government.
So, okay, so state government here in Washington state has a budget for a state government greenhouse.
And it has a budget for state government to do road improvements to maintain the roads right up to the point where they run into the vast quantities of homeless people that the democratic regime has inured on our society living along the edges of the freeways, right?
But the state government is still required to do all of their stuff on the, you know, the Department of Transportation is still doing all this stuff on the side of the freeway and roads.
This is the federal government as well.
The federal government participates in that by paying the states to do this.
But there's a real problem.
They need to buy things.
So they need to like buy, for the state greenhouse, they need to buy one gallon plastic pots, black plastic pots to grow the plants in that they then put into the state greenhouse that they then farm out to all of the state offices.
And so now they've got a problem because a one gallon plastic pot is $2.22.
Well, it used to be that that one gallon plastic pot was, they were buying it at 17 cents and then recently 52 cents and then 78 cents.
Now it's up to $2.22, all right?
So that's really a huge damn increase.
And so over the course of this last six months, we've had giant increases in some things because of the, and last year because of the COVID shit, right?
And then plastic is now starting to get into a condition not only of hyperinflation, but also availability.
And so what do we have now?
Well, damn.
And this is for a huge quantity.
Okay, that's $2.22 on buying in quantity, buying in bulk.
And the hell of it is that now it's costing sometimes as much as $2 to ship that quantity that you've just bought.
So the quantity has now way exceeded the metrics that are built in, the constraints that are built into the software for the contracts.
And so they can't buy it.
And so they have to start getting, they can buy it.
They have to go to a lot of fucking trouble, and the trouble starts escalating as we go forward in this.
And now they're at that point where they're never going to be able to catch up because the hyperinflation will escalate faster than any correction that they can make in the software.
So are they going to have to be hit with these issues?
Do we now allow shipping to be as much as the goods?
Do we now allow it to be twice the cost of the goods, three times, four times?
Because bear in mind, we've got energy costs that are escalating.
Along with energy costs, you've got real availability for labor costs.
It's hard to find people to work.
Those people that do work are working, and so you can't, they're not open to taking new jobs.
Lots of people don't want to work because of the, you know, they're thinking they're going to get the minimum basic income or their minds have been destroyed by the schooling they've had, whatever their cause, they're not working.
And so our labor participation rate is falling through the floor.
A lot of that has to do with confidence in the empire.
So there's this idea in empires that we have an overwriting, and they try and keep it that way.
The British Empire worked it really, really well with the primitive, we think of them as primitive anyway, propaganda tools of the time to have a British ethos, a British central writing, you know, national purpose kind of thing or empiric purpose.
The British people were proud of their empire.
They were proud of being part of an empire because it made them prosperous in the initial part.
It was only later in the empire that they ended up being bled to death to pay for it.
This is after the empire was breaking up and involved in wars, trying to sustain itself because it had been bleeding the colonies.
You know, basically, it's these rentiers at the top that don't ever work and expect to get all these millions that bleed the society into a point of hyperinflation that destroys the empires.
That happens in every one of the empires.
Maybe it happened in their own fashion in Inca and Aztec and Olmec empires here in the Americas.
We just don't have any written records that would indicate or quantifiable records that would indicate that was the case.
And so here we are with getting into the death of our petro-dollar empire.
And so there are things going on that you can say to yourself.
So now that you know that we're dying of hyperinflation, this is the route to go.
You can take your own precautions.
You can buy those things that you're going to need next year because they're not going to be available next year when you need to buy them at any reasonable price.
So you can buy them now and store them.
And so you're going to get good at storing.
You're going to go and talk to your prepper relatives or neighbors on how to do this shit because now is the time to do it, right?
Because we're at the death of an empire and we're in a global war.
It's an information war.
It's an entirely different kind of a war, all right?
But it is war nonetheless.
In this war, the goal is to capture minds with truth and bring them over to your side, not to kill your enemy.
You went much better to convert your enemy to be one of your assets to join you.
And it's awful hard for the bad guys to win in this because it's hard to convert people to a demented criminal vision that doesn't involve vast quantities of bribery.
And it's going to be awful difficult to bribe people as you get into hyperinflation.
That's something that is consistent throughout all of these empires.
In the collapse of the French kingdom and later on in the collapse of the French Republic, in both cases, we had situations where the collapse of the money and the ability to bribe people resulted in truth coming out.
And when the truth comes out, this is one of those silver bags.
I don't know if we can see it.
The silverback gorillas from the Congo.
Very pretty coin.
I got these sometime back.
I think from Miles Franklin.
I deal with Andy Schuckman there.
Andy's a nice guy.
They've always, Miles Franklin is first rate to deal with.
I've been dealing with him for years.
You call them up and they make arrangements and they send you silver.
They're really nice guys about it, right?
And they're still taking petrodollars.
So, hey, that's really good.
So every one of these things that you get converts a petrodollar.
Even every one of these things converts a petrodollar as well.
And this is the point of the All Cash Fridays meme, right?
And that idea is really, really brilliant.
And it's Catherine Austin Fitz.
And it not only protects you by getting more, it makes them print more dollars, basically.
And in printing more dollars, they have to become more responsible because there's more actual physical currency in circulation.
They don't like physical currency because they can't bleed it out of the system as fast as the digital currency.
And then this also protects you because it gets more physical material in your hands for trading after the petrodollars collapse.
And we will use a resurgent USA dollar for some time after the petrodollar collapse.
I don't know how many years we will continue to use these kind of dollars.
These old dollars will be accepted for maybe 10 or 20 years, and then they'll fade away the way of the old Confederate dollars, right?
You know, just into museums, that sort of thing.
And maybe we'll have something called the continental.
We'll have a new form of a currency that will be used for trading within the borders of the United States.
And we won't have a petrodollar empire anymore, and our currency won't be affected by what's going on on the globe.
And we will be able to build sound money.
And sound money is going to change the nature of our social order in a way that communism and stuff never can.
That can never ever change the social order, and it always collapses.
Sound money always brings prosperity and long life, health, all the good shit, right?
And so sound money equals good.
Fiat currency ends up equaling communism, which is bad, because they just keep printing that shit, and that's what the communists want to do all the time.
So basically, communists and globalists are the same thing.
And we're fighting them in this information war.
And this info war is progressing, and we're winning because there are more of us, many, many, many, many more of us.
And all we have to do is to wake the normies up and say, hey, dude, look over there.
And then look over there.
Ah, you know, and hey, here's what's going on.
Okay, so we're at that point now.
We're going to have a weird fucking situation here with hyperinflation at the same time that we have a giant deflationary pressure, which is all of these people dying off and being ill from the vaccines over the course of this next year.
Probably there will be a giant wave of this over the next year.
It won't involve politicians because they didn't get the vaccine.
They got no-shot or a saline solution.
Let's see.
Hang on just a second.
There was just a lot of stuff to go over here.
Okay, so the hyperinflation is going to kill the CCP as well.
And it's going to kill the Fed regime here in the United States.
So in the West, a lot of the West, so I live in an area where there's very, very, very few houses, very few people.
And it's because the federal government claims they own all these giant areas of land.
They don't do anything with it.
They're keeping it as a wild preserve and then using it for military exercises and that sort of thing.
And that's about it.
And they don't ever live out here.
People need the resources.
We need to reexamine our relationship with the federal government, owning 80% of the land and claiming ownership on 80% of the land in some of these counties in our states out here along in the West.
And so this will come about.
All of this stuff's going to come about because the federal government is collapsing.
The regime itself is not going to be able to pay for things.
They won't be able to pay for door-to-door vaccination, gestapo.
those people won't be available they the money that they're going to be trying to offer won't get them to do the work especially after they've gone through their first 101 you know 100 door encounters right uh i i would hope i would be like number in the in the upper 80s or 90s so by the time they got here they were pretty worn down and i could push them over the edge verbally
because these people are going to be the the most red-pilled people on the planet because you come to my door i'm going to take the opportunity to tell you what a fucktard you are in what you're doing and and why what you're doing is wrong and i'm going to have all of this stuff assembled ahead of time literature to hand you and the whole fucking thing right So you're going to run into the culture war at a serious level.
So these people are going to be frontline culture warriors, the ones that the Bidem regime would be hiring.
And they're just not going to survive.
They won't make it.
These people are really stupid.
The ones that the vaxed people are numb nuts anyway and getting into sponge brain.
So there are rumors that Xi won't be in control of China very much longer.
There's reasons to suspect this because of the huge levels of the PPI increase that they're admitting to.
And so the Chinese may actually be running, some people are saying it's as high as 39% hyperinflation on their PPI.
And this is important to us because the CCP is nominally in control of production in China.
And as they break down, the whole system is going to break down.
So goods from China already having difficulties are going to have greater difficulties.
And we're hearing rumors that I believe to be factual that there's rational, sane, middle-level management people in the People's Liberation Army of China that are saying, they're saying we, the People's Liberation Army of China, is fucked if we try and invade Taiwan.
And then they list all of these reasons.
Now, these rumors are not getting out very far out of China itself, but it shows that there's a level of trepidation on potential military adventures being foisted on the People's Liberation Army, which you've got to understand what that structure is, that organization is, in order to really grasp.
It's not an army as we understand it, right?
It has all these social obligations and its own, got criminal gangs in it and its own organization corruption and so on.
So they've got real, real, real problems.
And a lot of their problems relate to the hyperinflation problems.
So they may have a situation, and I suspect this to be the case, where they've got observational dilemma, ABDI, where the people at the top think that are told they've got some number.
We'll just say 100 regiments of fully trained PLA special ops guys ready to hit the ground and go, right?
And, you know, there's a lot of Chinese, so 100 regiments wouldn't be out of line.
And so that's what they're told.
And so they make plans about that.
This is what's happening to globalists all over.
And they're doing that shit right now here in the United States over in Sun Valley in Idaho with all of our globalists all getting together with the CIA, head of CIA, and all of these people and Zuckerberg and these guys are all in the same situation as the CCP, operating in an observational dilemma bubble.
The CCP has a situation where they're trying to tell the PLA to go and do thus and so.
And the top dogs in the PLA are saying, sure, yeah, we got 100 regiments ready to do it.
And then the guys down the chain, right, the top dog colonels, the sergeants who actually really have to get shit to happen, they're saying, oh, hang on a second, guys.
Boy, out of that 100 regiments, there's like, you know, 62 of them that don't have tires on their jeeps, you know, or can't get gasoline or whatever it is.
So their operational readiness is way the fuck lower than what is being portrayed to the outside and necessarily to the globalists who thus then have to sell it to the outside, right?
So they don't tell the globalists how fucked the PLA army is.
Their point is to try and pretend to be strong when essentially very effectively weak.
And also something you have to understand.
Chinese are not good in spite of all of the production stuff, all the factories we get out of them and all of that kind of stuff.
The Chinese as a nation, China has never, ever, as an empire, never been good at logistics outside of their borders.
So they've never been able to effectively, they can do what's known as border creep.
And so when China takes over Tibet, China bulges out like that.
Tibet's down here.
They just sort of bulge around them and, you know, absorb them like an amoeba.
But trying to do things logistic-wise, where you have to maintain supply chains to troops that are in foreign countries and across oceans and this shit, even the small amount of oceans of the Formosa Straits, as it used to be called, on the island of Formosa, which we now call Taiwan, even that's going to be a real strain on the PLA's ability to do that and their regular shit, because the PLA runs a lot of China.
And if you've got all these people that now have to do military shit instead of this really running commercial operations, it's going to affect everything within the Chinese structure.
The PLA is also in charge of a lot of the agriculture.
So they've got their hands on all different kinds of shit in there.
So it's kind of like a giant quasi-corporation.
And so it's kind of like saying to, you know, Google or McDonald's or somebody, okay, you know, time to get all your employees together and go and invade, you know, Jamaica.
So, okay.
Actually, McDonald's, with all the kids there, they'd say, yeah, party on.
But anyway, but the Chinese are not saying party on about invading Taiwan because the Taiwanese are really tough bastards.
You don't want to fuck with them.
Anyway, though, so there's rumors about Xi that way, right?
That he's in real trouble because of all of the stuff going on there and his external adventures are coming to naught, as we will actually have to acknowledge that all of our external adventures on behalf of the globalists fighting all these foreign wars, just like the poor British people fighting all of the foreign wars for the British monarchy, just like all of the German people fighting all the foreign wars for the Kaiser, you know, the Spaniards fighting all of the foreign wars in the Americas for their king, etc., etc.
It's all a bunch of horseshit and we shouldn't be doing that.
And it has yielded nothing, right?
We would be so much further along.
We would be conquering other fucking galaxies if we didn't do that kind of crap to ourselves.
And so I think we're at that point now that we're in the age of Aquarius that we're not going to do that to ourselves anymore.
This would be really good.
Now, I want to talk about some of the woo parts of this, right?
So in this time of hyperinflation, the empire woo is going to be coming out.
So that's all the shit that's been hidden by empire for its own purpose of trying to gin together a single conceptual view to power that empire forward.
So it's ever so much easier to run an empire if all of the citizens in the base state that runs that empire all have an allegiance in some general sense to a common unifying vision.
And so that's what makes a nation, right?
So what makes, so a common unifying vision for the United States would be the Constitution.
We would all agree that this is our social contract and we can all live with these terms and that we're going to defend this constitution because it keeps us all peaceful and stuff, right?
And so that would be us having a unifying vision.
Now, our unifying vision is not the petrodollar, you know, is not supporting Saudi Arabia.
You can't get all of us to say, oh, okay, we're going to go and live, breathe, and die for Saudi Arabian oil or, you know, something like that.
You know, that's not a good thing.
So empires have a real hard time for that.
So they have to come up with these abstracts.
The British government did it really well in promoting British Empire.
We sort of fell into globalist empire and they've tried and tried and tried to get a overriding vision.
And now the latest one is this Klaus Schwab crap of, you know, you will own nothing and be happy with our empire.
And we're not having it.
We're like the French housewives.
You know, we've got to have the money to buy the fucking baguettes to put onion soup on the table, right?
We can't be doing this horseshit with these globalists anymore.
It's come to naught.
The United States is rebelling.
We're having a culture war.
The culture is rebelling like the French housewives because of the hyperinflation that is affecting our empire.
And it's affecting it at the very base level, all of this level where all of us spend, right?
It's all us little guys.
We're the ones that are going to do the wooden shoes.
So we're calling clown shoes on the empire, right?
Just like the French people, they said clown shoes to this horse shit and they did sabotage, right?
Sabos were the wooden shoes they wore, like the Dutch, because that's what shoes were for the peasants.
You could get a tree and you could hew something that would fit your feet, but you couldn't afford to slaughter an animal and take its skin to make leather, right?
Only the rich could do that.
So they did sabotage, which is to throw the wooden shoes into the machinery so that they would break the Industrial Revolution.
And that's what was part of the whole thing, was they broke the back of the French government through their actions when they couldn't afford the baguettes.
They couldn't even afford the crumbs of wheat to make a gruel.
And so they said, well, fuck it, I'm starving.
So I might as well go, as the French still to this day say, and eat the rich.
And they did.
And so we're at that point now because we're basically dealing with the rich as poor managers for all of us guys that live down at this level.
Now, I've got a lot of linguistic clues that tell me that we're going to triumph, that these guys are going to spend our dollars, we're going to spend our silver, we're going to be living in sound money and all of this, but we're going to go through a really horrific time here, a very ugly time over these next couple of years.
This ugly time is going to, at an abstract level, is going to coincide with a die-off.
The die-off is going to affect the social politics of all of the Western world because the people that are going to be dying off are the true believers and the absolute normies that support the empire.
So the empire gave the die-off shot not to the people that are constantly irritating it, but in their own low-information, stupid view of the planet, they ended up giving the shot to all of their true believers, and all of these people are going to die off.
And so they're going to be the natural consequences of that.
You can project all different kinds of things that are going to happen as a result of this die-off coming.
It's going to affect hyperinflation.
We're going to move from hyperinflation into stagflation as a result of the die-off.
As a result of the die-off, we'll then go into, from stagflation, we'll move into deflation.
The deflation will finish the banks off and will do away with the central banking world that has dominated us.
It may be killed politically before we get there, but we'll get to the die-off of the central banks, I would think, at the end of 2022 and into 2023 as a result of the restructuring of our society because so many people have died.
Now, if the die-off numbers projected by the people using their computer models, which I do not trust because they can't feed in all of the variables that I can foresee that could arise, but if they were to even be half accurate, then we would have to bury about a billion people on this planet over this next year.
And so we would be burying one seventh of humanity.
This is going to have dire consequences, and it will be major deflationary event because one out of every seven people will not be around to want to buy a hamburger or want to get into a house or want to use a car or buy gas or this sort of thing.
So this deflationary event, you can plan for coming along.
It's a horrific thing, but you should take that into account as you do things, okay?
Because that level of die-off will affect the rest of the social order.
So we may have so many people die off that we don't have mail deliveries as we understand them now.
Maybe we'll have to have central collection points and you go and pick up your mail if people are still doing physical mail.
Packages may have to be physically picked up.
We may have factories shut down in one area because they simply can't get enough employees because there's physically not enough people with willing to work doing that job in that area.
This will be the kind of thing that will occur.
And so it's going to be sporadic in terms of how it affects, or rather the nature of the things that affect any given individual will be related to where they are as this goes forward.
But every individual on the planet will be affected by this.
So we're having a planet-wide disaster, catastrophe, engineered by humans, and we'll probably sort that out as we go forward.
No need to dwell on that.
But it will indeed occur.
Now, will we lose a billion people?
There's just simply no way of saying.
But we're losing a lot now to these vaccines.
And they're covering up the amount.
I suspect that it will be worse than we could hope.
And I would think that if even at 10%, we'd still be losing 200 million people.
And that's going to affect the social order, especially since a lot of those people will be pilots.
A lot of them will be in key jobs.
And so there will be a major reorganization of the social order, just as we get in here in the United States to the fourth turning generationally.
And so we're going to have to have this new generation step up.
People are going to have to retrain themselves to take over and do key jobs in areas because it may be necessary.
We may have to be like some small towns where everybody has two or three jobs just such that things get done, right?
So the guy who runs the hotel does the post office at the hotel and also does newspaper distribution for the guy down the block who prints newspapers for that county, that sort of thing, right?
So we're sort of at that level now.
We can start thinking about that.
The rebuilding part of it, we can plan as the rest of it is collapsing.
So there were people that were planning in the Byzantine Empire to transfer knowledge to keep it preserved.
And so from the Byzantine Empire perspective, they didn't worry about dark ages because they were transferring the height of all of their knowledge forward.
And so they did it through, maybe unwisely, through what turns out to end up putting it in the hands of the Jesuits.
But nonetheless, they did it deliberately and so on as an aspect of the degradation of their society.
So they were planning for the continuation.
And that's what we have to do: we have to plan for the continuation.
We're here at this point where we're going to have a death of the petrodollar and we're going to have a resurgence of the USA dollar.
And it may not be, it will not be a Federal Reserve note, although we may use these guys, and we may just take those buggers and come along and, you know, in red or something, we may just say constitutional.
And so that would be a constitutional dollar, right?
Because not backed by the Federal Reserve, because at the point we get to there, the Fed's gone.
And we're just dealing with the physical notes that we've got and a new government and a new structure and so on.
And we're trying to rebuild jobs in this country, rebuild factories in this country, rebuild an organization of our social order and so on.
So this is the fun part, guys.
So the death of the old petrodollar empire is not something that we need to take on ourselves.
I had no allegiance to it.
I didn't do shit for Nixon or with Nixon in getting the petrodollar to exist in 1972.
I didn't think that any of that shit that they were doing was good, right?
I have no allegiance to all of the crap going and fighting foreign wars or any of that kind of stuff.
I don't give a shit about an American empire at all.
I like our Constitution.
I want us to be a constitutional republic and not fuck with other people and let them go to hell or prosper on their own as they choose as their karma shall deliver to them.
And for the rest of us guys to go ahead and get real and get serious about the Wu because we've got great things hidden in our Wu and I want us to dig them out.
So as I say, here we are, way too long, way too long.
But, you know, get your constitutionals, Constitutional Fridays, get your constitutionals out and use them and spend them.
Force the Federal Reserve to feed us as it's dying.
And make sure that you convert as much of your digital to real stuff as you can.
So I like these gorillas.
You know, they're silverbacks, right?
I'm not yet silverback, but I'll get there soon enough.
Okay, guys, I've got to go and do tractor work, which will be fun.
And by the way, it's not fuck all hot here.
It's cold.
We've got cold out there.
It's 57 degrees.
And it was 14 miles an hour winds on the beach.
Almost winter.
Live long and prosper.
Live long and prosper.
▲
Export Selection