All Episodes
Previous Next
July 5, 2021 - Clif High
46:01
dead Q Woo - Explorers' Guide to SciFi World

dead Q - nope not click bait, important perspective on it.

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello.
So this is the dead Q woo.
Let's sharpen our marker.
Ooh, getting kind of beat up.
I first became aware of Q through my predictive linguistics, actually, ahead of appearance.
Just as I became aware of, sorry about that, hunting for a marker here.
Just as I became aware of Bitcoin early.
So Bitcoin appears in 2009 with the white paper.
And I started talking about this emerging financial system problem stuff.
That was around 2003.
And by 2005, I had identified that whatever was coming here.
Hang on, let me get a better image there.
That whatever was coming was going to be a supplanting technology, a supplanting something.
So in 2003, I got hints, mainly because I was significantly concentrating on the financial stuff, right?
And so I get some hints that there's monetary problems at a huge level, which I knew anyway.
But you never can tell how long they can prolong them.
And then you get these hiccups and they put the system back and so on.
So at that point, I wasn't really that concerned about the overall complete degradation of the money, although I knew we were in an ongoing situation where it wasn't good for currencies, etc.
We didn't have sound money.
In 2005, in the predictive linguistics, there was a pointer to something that was going to appear.
And so this was a, I'd already been running the reports a couple of years and had been developing the software since 1993 actually was when the light dawned and I started working on it.
Anyway though, so I got the idea that, okay, so I went through the data and there was actually one of these rare occurrences where you get basically like a variable and a pointer to the future and another pointer over to a linguistic set that is describing a general area.
So in this case, the general area was currencies and the pointer was to something unknown that was going to be appearing and there was a prediction that it would appear in the near term.
That is to say within the next four or five years.
It was not a long, long, long term forecast.
It wasn't saying something's going to happen in 20 years or anything like that.
So when Bitcoin came along, it fit the bill, right?
It met all the criteria and so on.
And so in that sense, I was aware of Bitcoin long before I knew what it was going to be called, what its name was, who would produce it, how it would come about.
So basically what I had was a view of the future with a variable, a placeholder, that would presumably be filled at some point.
And so therefore I was looking for something to fill that placeholder arising out of reality.
If I had been of a particular mindset, I might have decided to use that foreknowledge, scrap my WebBot project, and work on something that would have been a that would have fit that bill myself, right?
Not because I would not have known about Bitcoin or the structure, the distributed ledger approach.
I mean, I sort of was aware of that since the 1960s work with mainframe stuff, but in any event, so but I would not have derived and created Bitcoin myself.
But I would have known that there was going to be somebody that was going to come out that was going to create this new financial product system and was going to be globally famous, all of this kind of stuff.
So when I went into this work, I never, ever, ever, it never occurred to me at any point along the way to try and put myself in any of these roles that I saw being forecast, okay?
With one exception, which I'll get into later on.
But I just saw this shit being forecast in the data, and so I come along and it never dawned on me to actually try and slot myself in there.
But I was peering out in the wild, so to speak, and saw the arrival of Bitcoin and got in early because I was prepared, right?
A prepared mind is favored by universe.
And so because you're observant, you're looking for something, you can make the pieces fit.
You don't have to go and sort of backfill, right?
That was the same situation with Q. I knew Q was going to come along.
Q in the WebBot data was labeled as the poet.
And that was the poet of Amrev2, okay?
the american revolution too um so boy okay so i knew that that q was going to come along without knowing the name of the person without knowing the identity without knowing um any of the particulars about how it would arise
But I knew, of course, it would be floated out on the internet.
But I knew in 2009, in 2009, at the same time that Bitcoin was arising, I started getting these data sets about the poet.
Now, the nature of the way in which the data arose was identical for the poet information as for this currency thing within the data set.
It was exactly the same kind of structure.
There was a forecast being made where explicitly the way the data presented it to me tells me, because usually there's just forecasts being made, and it's a forecast like blondes on boats.
So I get a forecast about the Costa Concordia.
I get a forecast about a big-ass boat that's going to sink as a result of a blonde being where she should not be.
A female human adult woman with blonde hair being where she should not be.
And then a bunch of other descriptors about the boat.
And so it was making a forecast, and I think I got that maybe eight months out.
And I wrote it up maybe five months out, something like that, because it took a long time to do the data processing and work it.
And my fingers are arthritic from too many years in the resource industries and doing things, boat building and stuff with them.
And so it was difficult to do all of this, right?
And there was a time lag.
All right, so, but occasionally, three or four or five times, I would get these data sets in which basically the data set is saying, yo, dude, there's something coming that I don't know what it is, but it affects this.
And so that was the way it was with the Bitcoin.
Okay, I had something coming about money and currency and so forth, not related to the silver, had nothing to do with the silver.
So I knew that there was going to be a replacement to the current currency system developing long before it was called cryptocurrencies or Bitcoin or any of that.
And when Bitcoin came along and it was solid enough and it met certain criteria, then I started shouting my lungs out about it to everybody and their cousin, anybody that would listen, right?
Because it was a fantastic opportunity.
And the day that Bitcoin went up to a dollar, had parity with the U.S. dollar, when that happened, which was late at night here in the Pacific Northwest, I was absolutely ecstatic and I shouted my lungs off even more, right?
Because I was correct.
That was the last final peg to tell me that cryptocurrencies were indeed the thing that had been seen there, right?
Okay, so we progress forward.
Now, that was in 2009 that that was occurring.
And while that was going on, I was running reports in 2009 and picking up data about this poet character.
And poet was an interesting place-holding variable because there were referents.
Okay, so this is all linguistically done.
You've got to be really careful with this work because stuff can show up that is unbidden and commercial.
So there was, for instance, a software called Poet that was an abstraction off of small talk, as I recall.
And it made sort of a little splash in a small tiny niche.
But if it had been a big poet software and, you know, Microsoft had used the term or so on, then I would have to be careful that the allusions to Poet within my data set were being accurately understood.
In this case, I understood, because of the linguistic supporting values and aspects and attributes of the set poet, I understood that poet was lyrical, you know, would have an interesting style of speaking, would be scientific.
Okay, there's a, in the ether world, scientists are called poets of the ether, okay, because only a poet understands things linguistically.
You know, words, poets are assumed to be masters of linguistics.
In the ether, we have a form of linguistics, and they refer to the people that deal with this as poets.
So poet's also another word coming back from the Byzantine Empire and going all the way back into the philosophers, a natural poet is another way of saying a scientist.
So we could just put natural over here.
So a natural poet is a scientist.
Someone who understands the ether and understands nature to the point that they are scientific about it, right?
Analytical.
And so a poet is an analyst.
Now a poet is also a leader, a thought shaper.
And so we had all of these aspects here.
Okay, so now, so I become aware on October 31, 2017, of the first of the Q post.
And instantly it's like, ooh, these big ears are out there flapping around thinking, hmm, hmm, is this my poet?
Because it was very interesting lyrically, you know, linguistically in terms of how things are arranged.
It was clearly a coded message, clearly multi-layered, clearly the beginning of something.
Perhaps, you know, it would fade off real quick or whatever, but on that particular day, that was really, really interesting.
And then I ran into a real problem because I could not, at this stage, identify the poet as equaling Q. So the poet in my descriptor set might have been an individual who could have,
for all I know, had Q as a source for whatever thought-provoking, thought-shaping, social consciousness-altering, or social awareness-altering missives they might write or put out there, right?
So as far as I knew at that early stage, back from 2019 all the way to 2017, poet was a person, was not a group.
But I was uncertain.
There were things in there that made me think that, well, it could have, because there were aspects of this, you don't have a leader unless you have a group of followers.
So there was all different kinds of muddied stuff in there.
And I didn't know until 2017.
And then, boom, I thought, oh, okay, this is cool.
This is really interesting.
Here it comes.
I start looking at it on October 31.
And then it was like the next day or the day after that, up pop a couple of personalities.
And so it's like, oh, crap, maybe it's one of these fuckers.
Well, one of those fuckers was a guy by the name of Jordan Sather.
And Jordan Sather was one of the more focused on the Q stuff without being, and he was getting traction with his discussion of it.
And so he could have been the poet, right?
He was one of those people that was more focused on it without being truly batshit crazy.
Okay, so Jordan Sather is a personality.
You can go look him up.
They've kicked him off of YouTube so many times.
You probably won't find him there.
He's on BitChute and Rumble and stuff.
He ends up, he goes on later to get connected with Corey Good, the butthead who's suing me.
And that's a long, long side bend and several shafts down in this rabbit hole that we need not follow at this point, okay?
Because my point is about Q and about other things.
I'm going to fold into this.
So in my opinion, I now know that Q was the poet of Amrev II, is the poet of Amrev II.
I say dead Q because Q is successful.
Q has ceased to function in that sense.
Q has done its work.
Q was a psychological operation.
In my opinion, okay, so when I first came in contact with Q, in that first period of time from October 31st up until January of 2018, there was an interesting set of occurrences that happened that brought us a discord within the developing Q community, which developed very rapidly.
It was a real appeal for it.
It, you know, a psychological operation, so it fit right into a psychological hole.
And so I followed.
It was interesting.
There was nothing there for me to report on, right?
Because I didn't want to get involved in my work as I saw it was to forecast this shit, not get involved in the details of it when it arose.
So my work in the cryptocurrencies was to forecast it, tell people out there, get your shit ready, here it comes.
Oh, by the way, here's some look good just from my analytical skills writing software for all these fuckers for all these years.
And then that's it.
I'm not going to live in cryptocurrency world.
It's not, that was never my point.
So I'm not going to pull off in any of these things that are relatively cul-de-sacs in a generalized progression forward into the future.
I'm much more fascinated with the poetic, the scientific aspects of time, nature, ether, this sort of thing, to get involved in much in any of this other shit.
These are just stopping places, another roadside attraction.
It's a really good book and you should read it as you go forward, right?
Anyway, so we get to the point where now we know for sure that Q is the poet or the poet is Q. But it's not an individual.
Because I had determined that there was a change in voice.
So you can tell if you go back and you look at the original Q post, you see that there are a series.
It's actually a grouping of different voices doing the production of the material.
So it's clear that there were at least four individuals that were actually authors of this.
And now each of those four could have been a small group themselves as opposed to an individual, right?
But they expressed themselves in each of these segments as we went over the Q material.
It was expressed in cohesive linguistic voice in the sense of the big V for like the voice in a story, right?
Okay, so there were trip codes that identified the postings on the chans where we begin our Q story.
These changed, there were some monkeying around, this kind of thing.
So I always thought that there was a battle and that this battle had become settled by January 31st, 2018.
Now, I don't know if it was a battle or an accident.
From the outside, you couldn't tell in the sense that it could have been a couple of groups battling over the trip code and the Q identity.
Or it could have just been a case of someone losing a passcode and having to restart the fucker as an operation because that's really what appeared to happen.
So there was a definitive voice that lasted from October 31 to January 31.
It seemed to sort of that you could make a claim that it was like closer to January 18th that it changed.
But nonetheless, by January 31, it was clearly a different voice operating the queue.
And the poet was speaking in a different meter.
And yet again, it goes for a long time in that meter, and then we see the cadence change, the linguistics alter, and we get this expansion.
And from that point on, I see, oh, okay, we've had another change in the poet's output.
Now, bear in mind, this thing is growing all the time and getting really weird.
You get all these people that are hangers on and pull stuff in, their own, you know, Charlie Ward scam kind of shit, you know, Simon Parks scam kind of stuff.
Backpedaling when they say, oh, yeah, I know Q and all this kind of shit.
I've had people try and introduce me to Q. And it's like, you know, I always get really pissed.
I should just refuse because I know they're all numb-nuts and it'll never happen.
In any event, though, so Q is dead, but because it's a success, because Q was an approach to change the Wu.
All right, so Q was a promoter of Wu.
And Q promoted Wu.
And Wu is all things that are hidden from us by officialdom or whoever, whatever, circumstance, our own minds.
And Q promoted Wu.
Q told you to dive into the Wu.
Q provided you linguistic hints, other clues in your Wu exploration.
And so Q is deep in the Wu, right?
And this is a weird subject.
I mean, it is difficult to discuss this anyway.
Not that I have to worry about YouTube or any of that kind of shit.
But Q's point was to actually gen up Amrev II, was to provide a psychological counterpoint to the leftist domination of media.
And so we have the commies eating the institutions from inside because all of the commies and the globalists are all the same fuckers.
Okay, and so the commies and the globalists have eaten the media and we needed a counterpoint.
In 1776, we had the pamphleteers.
And actually long before that, I think it was, I think you have to double check me on this, but I think it was something like 1759.
You see the very first, no, no, maybe it was 17, yeah, maybe it was 1759.
Anyway, you see the very first of the pamphlets, okay, that the social discourse is interrupted by private printers putting out information against the power elite, in this case King George.
And so we get the pamphlet pamphleteers coming on out, the pinnacle of which, insofar as our understanding at a casual high school level, turns out to be Benjamin, where is it?
Thomas Paine did some too.
Anyway, okay, so I won't get involved in the personalities there, okay?
Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Paine both had their hands in the pamphleteer aspect, and they were both pinnacles of thought.
Franklin put out more pamphlets, produced more.
He was a more energetic person in that sense.
Paine was more intellectual and analytical in his thought.
But they both contributed to the pamphleteer effort.
That was the equivalent of Q. So Q at the time was these pamphleteers.
These guys would put these things out and they'd drop them off.
People would read them and get all incensed because they'd never heard such things before.
Their minds were blown.
And of course, the end result was 1776 and treason against the king, right?
So it was good stuff.
So pamphlets worked.
Well, hey, Q worked as well.
And so Q is dead because Q was successful.
Pamphleteers, you don't see them around anymore.
They were successful.
They did their job, 1776.
Q is the modern pamphleteer.
Much more easy, easier distributed.
You know, you don't have to tack them up.
You're not getting shot at by authorities for tacking these things up on trees, that sort of thing.
So a lot easier on the wear and tear on the body.
Also, it had the same effect, right?
The pamphleteers, once one person did it, someone else got a thought, and then he had started spreading.
And then they would pay the printers, or they would go in at night and use them.
So just like that with Q, you've got Q with the initial stuff.
Everybody digs into the information provided by Q, and then they start coming up with conclusions.
But the point is the digging, because in digging, you unearth all different kinds of other stuff that you also did not know was there, even though you're looking for something, right?
So one could deliberately bury something quite deep, point a hint to that point, and the whole idea, you know, I'm put a hint out there: hey, there's this pile of gold buried down at the bottom of this particular trench.
And then everybody could dig the trench up and, oh, hey, really, the point was for everybody digging up the trench to find out all the people had been killed and buried there.
So, you know, it's a way of getting people to dig up skeletons on their own, and they really believe it when they dig those skeletons up on their own as opposed to being told.
There's this aspect of it: you know, your mind has a real intimate connection to your eye and your hands, the brain-eye-hand connection thing.
And so, if you write something, physically write something, you remember it longer than if you type it.
Because each and every one of the typings, although you're hitting the letter, is not causing the same kind of action in the brain as the actual writing.
And cursive writing is better for that brain activity than printed writing.
And a real so if you were good at cursive writing, so you're good at writing in English, then go and try and write cursive in any other alphabet.
So, the Cyrillic alphabet, the Greek alphabet, neither of those are known for speed reading or writing, by the way.
Sanskrit, Pali, Arabic.
And so, feel how when you do it, when you learn, when you teach yourself cursive writing in these other scripts, pay attention to how your brain feels as a result of that, because you'll actually be creating new neural pathways.
And if you're sensitive enough, you can feel those being created.
And it's like, ooh, weird.
Anyway, though, so getting back to Q here.
Like I say, Q is successful.
Q created MREV 2, which we're in right at the moment, right?
I saw Amrev 2 out here on my beach last night, American Revolution 2.
And it's not a shooting revolution, it's a cultural revolution, entirely different.
So I am living through a cultural revolution, and hooray, but it's not the cultural revolution of the commies.
It's a cultural revolution that's anti-comm, anti-woke, anti-buddhead, anti-stupid, anti-political correctness, you know, anti-manipulation of language in order to distort the mind.
This is a true cultural revolution, and this is much more powerful than the first revolution.
So, in my opinion, this revolution that we're living through right now, all of us guys, is ever so much more powerful.
Because if we think about it, in 1776, they estimate that 8% of the populace was involved in that revolution.
It started off at 3% when the time of the pamphleteers, and it got to 8% by the time the shooting started.
But that 8% took a long time to grow through the process of a very brutal fight.
Now we've got Amrev 2 where we've got 80%.
So in 2021, we've got 80% of the population involved in our revolution because it's a cultural revolution.
And hopefully, there will only have been one hopefully the number of martyrs that we have to this revolution is minimal.
And then we won't add to that on either side, right?
And so it's not necessary that in a cultural revolution that you kill your enemies.
You're going to subsume them by taking over the culture, by taking the culture back.
They've been working for realistically at least since 72, okay?
The blending when we started getting the bushes over in China.
At that point, Mao is dead, and China's opened up, and the oligarchies are blending.
And our bastards sold us out in 72 and shipped over all the jobs.
I witnessed it in my life.
I think I will live long enough to witness those jobs reappearing here and the nation restructure itself because I'm actually living in the middle of a giant, giant American revolution.
Now, this revolution was also seen in my data.
And I called it Amrev 2, but I also called it in some of the other reports this resurgence of Americana.
And we'd go back to Americana historical kind of stuff, and we'd look into our own history.
What have we been doing with Q?
And both recent and ancient.
And part of the Americana thing is going all the way back.
And it goes into the Americana, the resurgence of pride in America, the resurgence of an Americana initiative or movement is the leading edge of this giant wave that comes to us in learning.
real human history, okay?
Because this American revolution here will bring adults back to the table insofar as the discourse, the public discourse.
And we will speak frankly and profanely because it is a profane planet we live on, a profane materium we exist in.
And we will speak intelligently and adultly.
We'll speak as adults about our real history.
And there's no, you know, we're going to go through shit, real tough emotional shit, right?
But we'll come through it because we're tough and we'll be tougher as a result of coming through it.
And that real tough shit is just now beginning, but it has really solid positive benefits.
And so this Americana wave, this momentum wave, I experienced here last night, okay, because I live on the beach.
In my state, you can't be shooting off major kind of fireworks in cities.
So everybody and their three dogs, two cousins, aunt and uncle, head to the beach to do it.
And it lasts for days, days and days and days.
Even three years ago, there would be all of the latter half of the third, all of the fourth, and then the first part of the fifth, and we'd get a lot of fireworks.
And it was nothing compared to last night.
So, and the day before, you know, I haven't been sleeping for a couple of days because the fireworks, they start a couple hours after I really go to bed, but no, they've been starting in the afternoon, going on all day long.
My poor dogs are all jittery and stuff because we're, you know, a few hundred yards at most from some major things, and we're up high, so all these fuckers explode right at our level.
It's really cool to look at.
My wife got some good video of it.
But I was shocked by the sheer number of people.
And so I feel good about that, that we're seeing this cultural revolution explode all over.
This is good.
So the cultural revolution is a certainty now.
There's so many people involved.
It's not stoppable.
It's going to get real ugly as the power elite freak out and try and take it back and dampen it down or shut it off or do anything they can to derail it because they know the end result is not good for them.
Globalists are going to be kicked the fuck out.
You know, we're going to take everything back.
We've already destroyed the media.
The media is gone.
No one gives a shit about what anybody in media says anymore and you just don't release information that way.
Why talk to a reporter when you can just put it out on Twitter?
So, especially when you know that the reporters aren't journalists and are going to distort what you say.
So anyway, here we are with Dead Q. Now, there's a fellow out there that is, okay, so part of the report stuff that I had done at the time in here had noted the appearance of socks.
Self-organizing collectives.
These would be people that would be coming together, not tribes.
And that implies something different.
Although these guys have tribal aspects like shared value systems and so on.
But these socks were forecast way back here as arising during this period of time and being very important to us.
And so I think, even though it's a military operation, even though Q is a giant psychological operation, I think Q is an example of a SOC.
I think there was a group of people that came together and decided that shit needed to change.
It was going to change anyway.
They wanted to change it for the better as opposed to let it drift along on its natural course.
Because we've seen this play before.
We don't have to sit through the boring parts.
We can get right to the cool end.
And so they organized stuff, and one of the things they organized was Q. And I think that they organized it around this understanding.
Okay.
I love big books, big damn books.
Right.
Big, thick books that are not fiction, that have solid information in them.
So, you know, so I'm, as everybody knows, I'm a big fan of Boscovich.
This happens to be the large edition because the print is very small, but it is also solidly packed.
There's graphs and geometric designs and stuff, but it's no pictures, no fiction, 100% solid information, right?
And so minds that prefer this sort of stuff also may want to understand that we'll be going into this in a fairly deep deep dive.
And, you know, and I laugh, it's going to be ugly.
We have to acknowledge the ugliness, though.
We've got to deal with it.
So as an adult, as an adult, we all have to, especially males, okay?
So in this sense, more so as males, because it's up to the males to, at a deep, intuitive, cellular, instinctive life force level to sacrifice and die in order to protect the next generation.
And everything short of that, okay?
And so we're in a period of time that is short of that.
Although some people may have to die because they did terrible things.
But for males and everybody that thinks of themselves as an adult, we're going to have to look at some really ugly stuff.
But we have to do it in an adult fashion to know we're going to look at ugly stuff, to harden your mind before you get there to it, to understand it's going to be ugly and that it must be done.
Okay, so I'm going to get back and wrap it up here.
Reality is ugly.
Life is ugly.
Every day, death occurs.
Every day, you could dwell in ugliness if you wanted, but it's not helpful and it's not healthy.
And you don't get anywhere.
It doesn't age you, drives you into depression and makes you into an anti-thaw, right?
All they've got is hate.
I've seen them, right?
I've seen their mask, and all you see is their eyes.
I've run into them.
Even without their clothing on, you can see all they've got is hate.
They hate everybody for whatever fucking twisted reason that they've been made to hate everybody.
Some of them are probably redeemable because they've simply been conditioned to it.
Others may be damaged chemically or psychologically.
In any event, though, our particular battle with ugliness is upcoming.
So harden your mind to it.
You're going to learn things that are not good.
You're going to see images that are not good.
And at some point, you should make the decision and say to yourself, I don't need to look at that.
I know it's factual, but I've seen enough.
I don't need to look at that.
And that's an adult way of dealing with it, of saying, yes, the trend is now established.
I don't have to wallow in it, right?
And yes, the ugliness is here.
And so there are going to be a lot of opportunities for that kind of ugliness to be examined over these next few years, and we're going to have to resolve them.
But this is a rite of passage, not only of us as Americans dealing with our own sins, the sins of our forefathers, the sins of the current generation, generations that are here, and the wonkiness that we live in, and having let ourselves been living in this wonkiness, we're going to have to totally restructure as a result of this cultural revolution, AMREV 2.
In all revolutions, there is ugly.
Now, we get to decide how we deal with that, okay?
And so, once again, I'm going to point to this as a structure for dealing in an adult fashion with ugliness.
And so, as we get into this, the caution is that as individuals, compassionate, caring humans, we will find ourselves in emotional turmoil that will be without precedent in our lives.
I don't care how old you are.
No, okay, excuse me.
If you've been, if you were a concentration camp survivor, you know, you're exempted.
You know, or if you were through Pol Pots extermination, right, you're exempted.
But everybody else, this is going to be new to them.
They're not going to have a grasp of an understanding of what's going on.
And so they will be destroyed.
Quite literally, their emotional balance will be destroyed.
And many of these individuals will act out inappropriately, not only because they're vaccinated and their minds are going, but also because even the non-vaccinated people, their minds will be going because of the sheer ugliness of the stuff that we're going to be getting into here.
So as a result of that, we have those adults around us, those of us that are adult and those have to watch out for those that are around us, and gently guide them back to the path of sanity, saying it is ugly, so don't do denial, okay?
But it was known.
There's a way to deal with it.
There are structures.
There's protocols, formula.
And you, as an individual, need not act on any of your emotions.
The best thing you can do is to simply calm yourself as much as you can, have reassurance that people have thought of this and have worked this stuff out before.
You hear people talk about Nuremberg trials, right?
They went through some heavy shit there.
So that kind of understanding is going to be what's going to be required going forward.
The good news is we're not going to have this huge giant shooting war here in the United States of that sort of thing.
We are going to have a collapse of the United States as global empire.
So we're going to have a collapse of the American dollar globalist empire.
And we have to be prepared for that.
So if you want some examples, see if you can find independent journals of people that lived through the period of time where England lost their global empire and the pound sterling was no longer the reserve currency of the planet.
Because we're going to be going through something similar to that.
Now, I think we're going to come out of it really cool because we've got a good poet, right?
People have been prepped.
They've gotten out there, they've done their work.
And so, you know, they're going to have the mainstream media saying, oh, the horrid Q followers, these, you know, these slathering cultists.
You know, bullshit.
Q is an intellectual movement.
Q is not an emotional movement.
Q is not, you know, Nazism.
It's not anything predicated on trying to get a shared emotional response directly, right?
All Q is trying to do was to get a shared common understanding and let you make your own conclusions from that.
And so you will see the bullshit coming out of the way used to be the mainstream media about this shit, you know, the legacy media.
And you don't have to fall for it.
We've seen it.
We know it's going to come through.
There's already been pre-acknowledgement, if you want to think of it that way, in my work that's been printed and is out there.
There's a pre-acknowledgement that Q is successful because Q's point was basically to gen up the cultural revolution that I labeled in those reports as this wave of Americana resurgence or Amrev II, the American Revolution II.
Now, GO is global, so we're looking at something that probably will be continuing on long after I'm dead because it's going to take a long time to get to everybody to get the elite off of them.
It may happen very rapidly.
I don't know.
You know, we could have a basic level of surrender because there's so many people involved, you know, and the whole population is against you of the whole planet and there's nowhere to run.
You know, it doesn't do a lot of good to try and fight nor run.
So anyway, anyway, I wanted to get this out, 5th of July here.
Traditional Pacific Northwest, 5th of July, two layers, and a coat if I've gone outside.
That's about it.
That's about it.
Q is dead, but Q should be dead.
The poet of the revolution is only needed until the revolution takes off.
Once the revolution takes off, it's too chaotic to direct.
It has to be programmed in at its inception, and it has to be a self-organizing collective from that point on.
So I'm not particularly expecting the resurgence of Q. I think Q, as a psychological operation, was finished, and as a result of success, they probably put everything into a little box, tied it up with a ribbon, and put it in the files, and have gone on to other work.
So, like I say, but, you know, don't be surprised to hear that you've been resurrected as an angry mob, you know, a giant angry mob raging across the Americas here, you know.
You know, you've got to wonder, really, truly, you got to wonder about these people putting out these articles about this.
Do they really believe that shit?
Or do they really not have any contact with reality, have never investigated anything, and weren't aware of any of this, and now they've got to write articles of the great terrible Q threat.
Sorry, guys.
I find things very humorous after.
▲
Export Selection