All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 13, 2020 - Clif High
49:59
critical thinking - covid 19 - what (may) work & why
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello, good morning.
It's February 13, 2020.
It's 7.31 a.m.
This is another video about the COVID-19 situation.
And we'll just jump right into it.
There's a bunch of new information that's emerged.
And we can examine what's coming up.
The idea today is to settle off on what works and why.
It's important that we discuss the why as well.
Okay, so Hubei Officialdom, the people that run the province of Wu, in which we find Wuhan, the city, in that area, are saying and as a, so what we're going to talk about is official responses at the moment.
And the city people there are saying that this is the numbers they have.
They don't say they're not lying, but they come really close to that.
And then they say, here are the things they know they don't know, which is very nice of them.
Okay, very straightforward, very adult.
So they tell you, you know, there's 40,000 confirmed cases.
There's 1,300 confirmed deaths.
There's 3,800 confirmed recoveries, okay?
And they have pretty strict criteria for how they judge recovery.
So under the circumstances, I'm willing to accept that there have been 3,800 people that have recovered.
This is, in a way, though, not very good, okay, because stacked up against the duration of the illness and the number of people that have it now, we see that it is a very long-lasting condition and that it's as difficult to be judged recovered as it was initially to be judged actually having the coronavirus.
Anyway, so we continue here and there's just more to discuss in terms of the Hubei numbers.
So it's disturbing that there's only 3,800 that have recovered out of the nearly 50,000 confirmed cases.
It's disturbing that the death toll keeps rising.
It's nice to know, it's not unsettling, it's very nice to know that the Hubei province officialdom is acknowledging that they obviously can't record as a coronavirus death people that are not within their system as having had coronavirus.
So if someone dies on the street of coronavirus, it'll never be ascertained that that's why they died.
They'll simply just be handled as a dead person in these days because coronavirus is so prevalent, they're taking extreme measures and usual death practices are not being followed.
So there's going to be a lot of people's deaths and illnesses that are not recorded.
Also, the Hubei people officialdom acknowledges that individuals that are ill with coronavirus that are that don't present themselves at hospitals to be confirmed with the coronavirus also are not on any of the numbers.
And then this leads to some troubling extrapolations on a two-fold level.
Okay, so the extrapolations are, if we were to go to USA medical sources, NCIB, the national informational databases for National Institute of Health, for CDC, and these kind of things, you'll find articles in there that say that discuss pandemics and the spread.
You can find lots of information about how pandemics spread.
And a couple of these articles in the database also discuss informational discrepancies during the spread of such pandemics, although they only do so obliquely.
It's interesting to note that the lowest possible number in a usual pandemic would be three times higher than officialdom reports, both in infection rates and death rates.
However, the disturbing part of this is that we should also have three times higher levels of reported recoveries.
And here's how that works.
Okay.
The reason that we get to a situation where you have a sudden spring up in the number of people officially listed as recovering, usually in a pandemic, is because the people that get it but don't report to hospitals and stuff will tough it out.
They'll start to recover.
They'll get antibodies.
They'll start to build back up.
And then they'll present to the hospital.
Then they'll get diagnosed.
But then they'll already be on their way to self-cure, their body having taken care of it.
And so there'll be a jump in the reported number of recovered cases.
And that's so consistent with pandemics that public health officials that study this at that level know about this effect, the springback effect, they call it, and discount it just because it can't be taken as an indication that the virus is being beaten.
All right, so we need to watch out for that, the springback effect.
And it's actually data pollution is what it amounts to, because these people were never reported initially in that cohort of being infected.
Otherwise, that cohort would be very much larger, and we would have a proportionate level of recovered people.
But the equally disturbing part is that we don't have a springback effect showing up at all, which seems to imply, or I am inferring, means that the virus is very long-lived in the population such that if it takes three weeks to get ill, you might be ill with it for three weeks.
And thus the lag time reporting all of these numbers becomes significant because it crosses monthly boundaries, and that influences how data is collected because government collects data on monthly, predictable kind of basis, right?
And that's how they like to, that's how all of their statistical analysis is done is usually on a monthly situation over time.
So, sorry, there's small bugs in here coming up from the beach.
Okay, so it should be three to nine times higher, all right?
Nine is the expected rate in a virulent disease.
I've seen nine times higher than reported listed for pandemics that even go into forestry.
So I ran across a thing about certain forest pandemics, viral kind of attacks on trees.
And if they're aware of it, the forest ranger kind of guys are figuring there's nine trees with it for every tree that they see.
So that just gives you an idea that this number seems to be replicated throughout pandemics across all kinds of species.
Okay, so the Hubei officialdom says that they know that there's many unknowns out there.
As an official response, they're starting to intrude in their own number process with weasel words.
Initially, they're saying, we've got it, we know, certainty, we'll have it done by this date, certainty, we'll have it done by this date.
Now, they're admitting that there's a lot of unknowns snowballing on them.
They're reacting in a human way and saying things, and they're attempting to get the message across that things are uncertain without implying that things are totally out of control.
So that's something to consider, that the words themselves, the way in which the officialdom is presenting them and the truthfulness is a good sign for us as adults dealing with this, but it is a bad omen for what's actually going on on the ground.
It's probably very, very, very scary.
Okay, so it's hard to know where to begin.
Okay, well, staying on officialdom out of Hubai, there's videos circulating, and I've retweeted it after a friend of mine did an analysis on it.
This video appears to show people in Anti-contamination garb, anti-contamination suits, blue and white suits with automatic weapons, with Chinese government-issued weapons or weapons of those type, killing people in Wuhan.
This video was dated February 1st.
I don't know if the video is 100% legitimate.
When I came across the video, I was horrified, and then I took a moment and I sent it to a friend of mine who is a retired military police, a detective, you'd have to call him.
He was an officer in the United States Army, and he's retired military police.
And he had 25 years as military police.
As far as I know, that's the only job he ever had in the military.
And he made it to where he was a detective.
And he analyzed it.
And the issue for me was, was I hearing it correctly?
In other words, I heard gunshots.
I think those gunshots aligned with the visuals that are being presented.
But I don't shoot guns enough to be able to tell intuitively.
This friend of mine, he does.
He lives in the South.
He hunts.
And he's been a military policeman all his life.
So he was required to shoot continually throughout his career.
And also, he knows how to analyze gunshots, especially in videos.
That was one of the things he'd done.
And he came back and he told me that we cannot falsify this.
So he can't say that this video is as it presents itself.
He can't say it's valid or true in that sense.
What he can say is that the sound quality of the gunshots is consistent with the environment being presented, the distance presumed from the recorder to the shooting, and all of the other instances of what data can be examined from this brief clip are consistent and self-referential.
There's no inconsistencies.
So in other words, it's not a dubbed-in sound of a gunshot from somewhere else.
There's no lag time on the transmission of the sound.
There doesn't appear to be anything in there that would indicate that this is a hoax.
So he cannot say that, that we were both hoping that he would be able to do that.
So I retweeted it because he can't say it's a hoax.
So it might be valid and it might be real.
If that is the case, then we had a huge escalation on February 1 with officialdom.
For some reason, some level of officialdom was issued weapons and allowed to use those weapons in a situation that we cannot ascertain the circumstances.
So there's all kinds of scenarios that could be presented, but none of them are good.
People in decontamination, anti-contamination garb, shooting at people in the street cannot be good under any circumstances.
So I'm taking this as a very negative sign about the progress of this particular disease, along with all of the other indications that things are not as being portrayed by the Communist Party in China, such as the disappearance of the real heroes of Wuhan,
the doctors that reported it early, the deaths of all of the disappearances of all of the citizen journalists there that have sent out videos on what's actually happening.
And so this I find very troubling.
So assuming that execution because they were contaminated, because they were ill, or for whatever reason, did occur on February 1 doesn't mean they were ongoing, doesn't mean that it was anything more than, you know, who knows?
We just don't know.
It could have been an entirely isolated incident under all different kinds of circumstances that would not relate it to the disease itself.
However, occurring as it did within the disease outbreak center point and with the individuals as they're portrayed, the implication is that the disease is getting out of hand, that they're not able to treat it.
And even more troubling is that the powers that be may have reached an attitude of where they don't care about certain information coming up.
Okay, so it's very troubling that they might allow public executions from a management viewpoint of the Chinese Communist Party trying to manage this giant mass of humans that they call China, because it means at that stage they're going to have to be an iron hand and any resistance will be met with a bullet because these people at the top feel that threatened by the circumstances they're in.
That implies that this was a bioweapon.
Every time I examine this video and its relationship to what's ongoing, the only conclusion I can come to is that no matter what angle I attack it from, trying to get it to fit within this paradigm, it points back to this being a bioweapon.
Because in my mind, that would be the only thing that would trigger the Communist Party top echelon to reacting this way.
And because with a bioweapon, you're uncertain that you'll be able to control it.
You don't know what its effect is going to be on your population.
If there's a 15% death rate in the first three or four months, that might be its first go-around.
And you don't know what the combined effect is going to be out of cycles two and three that pile on to cycle number one.
Chinese government, as I'm quite certain, very well aware of the details of how bioweapons work.
There's a lot of conspiracy stuff that say that has evidence, like the deaths of people in Africa and the arrests of other people, that some form of genetic material was transmitted from Canada, taken from Canada to this biolab in Wuhan.
Why?
What was it?
Okay, shortly thereafter, we find ourselves in this situation.
So the Chinese government is allowing to occur the rumor mills, which are going to happen anyway.
They know that's going to happen anyway.
And they're allowing it to occur with no dampening down that this was released on China as a bioweapon, the rumors of that, and they're pointing the fingers at the USA and all the West in a general sense.
It's like on our internet here, of course, you're going to have all the batshit crazy guys like myself in extreme conspiracy mode.
China government is not dampening them down.
They're not letting it run wild, so they're monitoring the social media and they're using their algorithms to control the feedback loops on it, but they're not shutting it down totally.
So I think they're doing that personally, it's my opinion.
They're doing that as a way to vent and potentially deflect shit coming down on them for their part in this.
Whether they released it, whether they allowed it to be released, it doesn't matter.
But if this thing turns out to be particularly sensitive in attacking Asian phenotypes, then the upper echelon in China has got a lot to answer for.
And we may be witnessing over the course of this next year the collapse of the Chinese government and the social order as we know it now.
If this is a bioweapon, we will certainly be seeing that.
If this is a bioweapon, that collapse may come to Western society simply because infrastructures will break down, continue to break down, supply chains will continue to break down, and we're all going to have to react.
That reaction is going to cause a lot of upheaval.
It'll cause social consequences beyond the understanding of most people to grasp now and social changes.
So, you know, if this is a bioweapon, if it's released, if it's not phenotype-specific, that is, if it attacks, you know, all different kinds of humans with the same vigor, then we're in a situation where we can't overestimate.
It would be hard to overestimate the impacts at this early stage.
So a year from now, we won't be living the same lives.
Okay.
And that's even if we get on top of it, if it is a released bioweapon.
If it's not, we'll know soon enough.
I do not believe that we will see any kind of release of pressure on the populations from this over the course of April, which is when it would tend to die out if it was just a regular seasonal flu.
That being the case, if you've got anything going on over the course of March or April that involves travel, you may want to be very Considerate of the and be aware of the national circumstances relative to coronavirus where you're at during that period of time,
because that will be into the hundred-day point at which many governments will simply take what they will consider to be absolute minimum level containment efforts and they'll shut down travel and you'll be trapped wherever you are.
This brings us back to the fact that we're on this 100-day timeline.
There's two ways to look at this.
I believe that the Chinese government has reached the conclusion that this is a bioweapon.
I believe that this is the case because of a number of different elements within the unfolding story here.
I believe that the Chinese knew that there was an exposure in early December and that by January 23rd, they knew they were in deep trouble.
So the early exposure of this may have given somebody upper management level an indication that indeed this was an unleashed bioweapon and not a natural occurrence.
The reason I say that is they reacted very quickly.
They reacted very quickly in an extraordinary time in the Chinese culture.
That is, they shut things down in Wuhan and Hubei on the 23rd of January.
The Chinese lunar new year and the Chinese New Year is like a huge cultural deal within their social order.
It's like the holiday, okay?
And it occupies their mindset for months and months and months on both sides of the period.
Well, the 25th of January was the peak of that period.
So what the Chinese government did was to shut down travel in Hubei province on the equivalent of Thanksgiving in the USA, you know, the Thanksgiving travel period or the Christmas travel period.
They shut it down then.
So they knew then that they had a problem in Wuhan.
Their serious problem was that it is estimated that over the two days or three days prior to the shutdown, some 5 million people left the province.
There's also reports that at the time they shut it down, they were forcing people onto those last trains and airplanes to get everybody out.
So they didn't have them in the province.
So they didn't really try and trap everybody that might be exposed.
They pumped out 3 to 5 million is what they estimate.
3 to 5 million people traveled in those few days.
So those three to five million are carriers.
They have to be considered to be infected.
And so now many of them are going to start showing the effects of that because we're actually looking at something that might be up to three weeks before symptom onset.
So if they were exposed in the travel period then, the last week of January, then it would be just now mid-February that they're going to start coming down with the illness and manifesting symptoms.
A lot of them would have manifested something at some level prior to this, but we won't see a lot of those individuals getting really, really, really sick until now.
And so we find ourselves in this terrible situation of where we have contamination out there.
The horse has left the barn.
He's running all over the planet.
We just don't know where he is, where he's going to pop up next.
And it's too late, in my opinion, to worry about that because we're basically going to end up in a planet-wide quarantine over these next few years.
And that's our situation at the moment.
This stuff is changing as we go along.
Just before the lockdown, which may have affected 40 or 50 million people, they had that extraordinary travel period, and they have not, the Chinese government has not given any indication that they've done anything to deal with the travel vehicles themselves.
So there was no indication that throughout any of this period that any of the trains that were jam-packed with people, any of the airplanes that were jam-packed with people were in any way decontaminated.
So if it's true that It lasts for nine days on smooth surfaces.
It's a nine, not a G, then you can add nine days to this incept period here of the mass infection, which, as I say, would have been in those three days from the 20th to the 23rd of January.
So then we would be to some of those people being infected on trains in the first week in February.
So there will be a secondary large cohort here in this last week in February showing up with the illness.
And so we're right in the very, very, very early stages of this.
Now, the governments will do everything they can to dampen all this down, and they've already declared the end of April as the all-clear day.
The reason they're doing that is because that would be a traditional day you could use as an all-clear for a generalized flu because we're getting into spring, the weather warms up, which would tend to promote the virus, but also you get a lot more people outside in the sun, which brings up vitamin D levels.
The sun decontaminates the skin, yada, yada, yada, yada.
And so it's where they usually fade.
You know, seasonal flus.
They're seasonal because people up here in the northern hemisphere don't get enough sun, and we usually don't supplement with vitamin D, and therefore our immune systems get weakened and people become susceptible.
Now, so this particular time is different, but we can make these calculations right here that we'll see these larger flushes over these next two weeks of people becoming ill.
Whether they're reported outside of China is another issue entirely, because they're going to now start showing up all over China, not just within these restricted areas.
And it'll have to do, just as we've seen with the cruise ships and all of that kind of stuff, once they start testing for it, they find that it's, you know, that it really does spread rapidly.
They find it very rapidly.
Now, there's something else about this.
Up until now, there were batches of the test for this that were failing three out of four tests.
The actual reagents in the test itself was no good.
I understand that's been corrected, that those batches have been, you know, used up or whatever.
But it still takes two tests to confirm that you're free of the virus, okay?
Because the first test could be a false negative, and the second test they give you could also be a false negative, but it's statistically less likely.
And for sure, if they do another third one and it's negative, then they can say you don't have the virus.
But what they're doing is they're also finding false positives.
So some people with just the initial contact were run into contained areas with people with coronavirus when they didn't have it.
When they just had a test that said yes, and then two or three days later, they had another test and it said no.
And so they were released from quarantine after having been there with people with coronavirus for two or three days.
So now we're seeing the impact of this spread in areas like outside of China.
And the cruise ship is the largest containment area, but now we know it's in the prisons and in the health system in England.
It's showing up in Middle East in Islamic areas.
The reporting from there is very, very, very spotty for all different kinds of reasons.
And it's, but it does appear that the infection is spread throughout the Mideast and down into Africa.
And we're actually seeing early reports of this effect of the 23rd.
The reason that this is so key is because a lot of those people out of Wuhan flew back to Africa because they're living in cities in Africa.
And out of that 3 to 5 million people, we don't know how many hundreds of thousands may have been in China for the holiday with the intent of going back.
Many of them couldn't go back because they got trapped in Wuhan.
But also many of them did get out ahead of time and also have been exposed.
So Africa will start blooming with this in a way that may be like cruise ships, right?
Because when the Chinese go back to those cities in Africa, they stay reasonably isolated in those cities.
It's not like they're out and about in a general sense mingling with the local populations as a rule for most of them.
Okay, so that's sort of where we are and some of the things that will happen.
I suspect that the all-clear day All clear day won't be.
I suspect that we won't be clear of this in April, at the end of April.
Actually, that would be over here.
That would be over here at the end of April.
I suspect that won't be the case.
I suspect that we'll actually still be in the bloom phase then.
And what the governments do is going to depend on how freaked out they are by the economics.
And if they get totally freaked out by the economics, they'll release a lot of things.
They'll declare that we're clear anyway, and then we'll be off on a serious journey over the next three years.
Now, so that's where we are here.
That'll be the 100th day for the Western world.
If you live in the Western world, that'll be the time that the governments finally start reacting.
And you may find yourselves caught out if you're doing heavy, if you're traveling.
But there's just no way of knowing what day they're going to make these decisions on, how they're going to react, how draconian they're going to be, how long it'll take them to put clampdowns on.
It's very difficult, for instance, in the United States, given our legal and economic system, for the government to say, okay, you know, stop all airplane flights between all cities today, right?
It's going to be extremely difficult, and it's going to cause vast quantities of chaos, upheaval, and uproar.
And they know this, and someone's going to at some point have to make the decision to do that.
It will be done with extreme reluctance.
So I suspect that it will be pushed out that way as far as possible before they make these decisions, which is not good for the overall spread of virus.
And as someone who's taking the personal responsibility, this is a point that I'm taking very seriously.
That at some point out here, we run into the increase potential of supply chains running into an officialdom response where not only is it people that can't move, it's goods that can't move.
And goods wouldn't move because people wouldn't be going to work, et cetera, et cetera.
At that point, we're into, you know, house stasis, they call it in China, or stay at home, right?
And so then we've got other issues that will arise with the social order.
But this is the kind of thing it'll happen out here somewhere.
I don't know what I mean, it's predictable if we saw certain indicators as to when they were getting close to it, but they're not likely to provide those indicators willingly because bear in mind, all governments are going to get shit for this.
Doesn't matter if they participated in creating it or not.
Their reactions will always be criticized negatively over this because people are dying.
And so many other people are going to suffer and the whole social order is going to change.
There's going to be good that comes out of it, of course, but at this point, we can't see it.
So now let's get into some of the stuff that works and why.
First off, earplugs may be indicated because the reports out of China is that they're issuing those to people, kind of a filler plug that prevents air intrusion.
It may be that they're worried about all kinds of all of your mucus membranes being affected by this, which again suggests that it's a bioweapon.
Now, this virus was reported by a guy out of India as having two HIV insertions.
And what they do is they unpeel the genome, and then they saw typical HIV protein inclusions within the genome of this critter of the coronavirus, of COVID-19.
This is now why I think I, or this is a clue to me as to why the reports that I got out of my herbalist out of Wuhan that Chaga mushroom given to his patients seem to have prevented them from getting the illness and or getting it severely.
Okay?
And so that's Chaga.
Chaga mushroom is a type of mushroom.
It's a polyphore, which means it has lots of little spore emitters.
It doesn't have a veil.
It grows on the tree.
It is considered to be the cancer of a birch tree.
Now, the chaga mushroom has two things going for it relative to this particular outbreak in this disease.
Those two things include its relationship to the HIV human virus, right?
Well, as its relationship to the birch trees, it's been suggested that for COVID-19, they found various different kinds of molecules that should be an effective anti-COVID agent.
They're not saying they found cures or drugs or anything for it.
We're talking about some people that are working on the very high-level people that have written a research paper that says that coronaviruses are susceptible to these kinds of things.
Well, chaga mushroom is the cancer of birch trees.
As it kills a birch tree, it sucks up all of the what are known as polyphenols.
Okay, the highly complex sugars that exist within the tree that are almost oils get sucked up by the chaga mushroom and made part of its internal mechanism.
And so the chemicals we want to get are in birch tree extract.
My thinking, as somebody who studied traditional Chinese medicine and Ayurveda and herbalism, is you can't take birch tree extract.
You can't be sucking that stuff down every day.
You're going to cause yourself all kinds of problems because of its harsh and hot nature.
Okay.
If you go and look it up, you'll find that the birch tree also, birch bark extract also triggers any number of allergies, weird kind of allergies, because it doesn't have the actual stuff in it.
It just has an allergen close enough to make your body think that you're being exposed to this allergen and you get this allergy.
The chaga mushroom does not take up those allergens as near as I can find.
And I've done some more research on that.
I can find no reports that the chaga is taking up the material.
Medicinal mushrooms are very unique on this planet because they're so well tolerated by individuals.
Now, chaga mushroom also is anti-cancer.
It's a huge antiviral agent.
And I've put on my Twitter feed articles that I was able to find from, without even really hardly working at all to find them, that link chaga as an HIV protease inhibitor.
Okay, the HIV virus, a protease molecule, is what the viruses use to trick your cells into making more of the virus.
So basically, viruses come into your cell, they can't replicate on their own.
They trick your cell through these protease molecules into replicating their DNA, not its own, not that cell's own DNA.
So that cell works making that virus fill up that cell.
And some viruses will actually cause the cells to rupture when they just get so many, the cell wall can't handle it.
And then the virus really spreads within your body.
So these protease molecules are what allow the virus to trick your cell to replicating it instead of the cell itself.
And so we have protease inhibitors, which inhibit the protease molecule, preventing that virus from tricking your cell.
And if it can't trick your cell, it can't reproduce.
And the first white cell or macrophage that comes along will glom onto it, eat it, and you'll get rid of it.
So, you know, so viruses desperately need protease.
The HIV inclusions in the coronavirus may be its weakness, all right?
Because chaga is a known HIV protease inhibitor.
And so they may have tried to make this coronavirus seriously nasty stuff.
But in doing so, because a human was involved in thinking about it and they didn't know about chaga and other medicinal mushrooms that are serious protease inhibitors, it may be that they made this thing obliquely weak trying to make it stronger.
Okay, this is just my thinking.
This is, you know, I'm a whacked out internet paranoid here.
So, you know, you have to validate all this stuff for yourself.
But that's my thinking that we may have actually had a lucky side effect of these people monkeying around with this virus.
Now, the chaga mushroom, you want to make sure when you buy this stuff, you can buy it as a powder.
The herbalist I was dealing with had elderly patients that were taking somewhere around half a gram up to a gram a day, but nobody was taking more than a gram a day.
The chaga mushroom, relative to the HIV, relative to the articles I've read, basically says you just need to have a little bit of the chaga mushroom in you all of the time to inhibit the protease from the HIV, but also from other viruses.
Chaga is a huge antiviral mushroom.
It pulls up all different kinds of things from the birch trees that inhibit other virus protease recreation of themselves.
And then it also has this for the HIV.
So you're getting it both ways.
But you've got to get chaga that is grown on birch trees.
I don't think you can use the mycelial version of this because the chaga mushroom would have no exposure to the birch trees and would not be picking up these particular molecules that seem to fit in and kill the coronavirus.
Okay.
Now, this is actually the way in which vaccines are made.
They take eggs in the main and they inject the virus into the egg yolk.
They let it replicate like mad, and then that's their core material for their vaccine.
They will irradiate that virus and kill it.
And then on the assumption that its shape is enough to trigger your body into making antibodies and killing the virus on its own naturally.
So far, in our human history, mostly this idea works.
All right.
We've gotten into the situation here with the anti-vaxxers and all of this because of the poor quality of big pharma and its production of vaccines.
And in order to maintain the quality, as minimal as it is, of the vaccines that they're producing now, they have to overload them with so many preservatives, they're causing side effects in the human body just from the preservatives.
And that's why a lot of people don't want to take vaccines.
But vaccines, in the main, can work, except we have an interesting situation here now.
I'm not going to accept that any lab anywhere has perfected a vaccine for coronavirus in a short period of time.
The reason I'm not going to accept that is because there's article after article after article that reference the coronaviruses that are similar to, that are on the evolutionary chain of COVID-19.
And these other viruses, they've had a hell of a time engaging and building vaccines because the vaccine itself triggers the body's cytokinic response, the inflammation response, and can cause the very problem they're trying to eliminate.
So here's what they're running into.
On COVID-19, the shape of the molecule that identifies the virus to your body such that your body could produce a response, an antibiotic response, is triggering cytokine storms.
That is, the vaccine, the dead virus in vaccines, in coronavirus that's within the genetic lineage of this.
So coronaviruses they've been studying these last few years, they've been trying to make vaccines for animals.
And it hasn't worked.
It's only worked marginally.
It's only been effective in some kind, in some cases, as low as 8%.
All the rest of them got the disease and they died.
And it has to do, according to the articles I've read, with the unique shape of this particular strain of coronaviruses, and that this unique shape causes the body to super overreact and produce inflammation responses because it thinks you're hugely exposed and you're about ready to die.
And then it kills you with your own immune response.
And they've had a very difficult time coming up with vaccines.
So there is no functioning vaccine for coronaviruses.
Now here's something else to clue you in.
Coronavirus and the common cold are the same thing.
See, a cold is a virus.
It's of the same family of viruses as COVID-19.
And so you know there's no vaccine for the common cold.
So the likelihood that an effective vaccine for this will ever emerge is pretty small.
If you are thinking now that you're going to be saved by big pharma as they develop a vaccine, you can continue to think that for a few months.
And it will be maybe five or six months when they finally come on out and they say, okay, we've got a vaccine, but they'll come on out and they'll tell you it's going to be ready in, maybe they'll say it'll be ready in four months.
And then four months will pass and it's not available.
And you'll just sort of forget about it.
And then maybe another two or three months, you'll hear that it'll be another two or three months out.
So it'll just never appear.
And it's because we can't, by the nature of the virus itself, have an effective coronavirus Vaccine that doesn't trigger now that we're getting into these kinds of coronaviruses that doesn't trigger its own problems.
So we're in day 72.
It was a supposition in this manual on biochemical warfare that I read that the government of a target targeted nation, if it was a sneak attack, it would finally dawn on them by the 100th day that they were under attack by a bioweapon.
China, apparently, the government participated, knew they were working on it.
And in Wuhan, it may have been an accidental release.
It's hard to keep this stuff under control.
It doesn't matter if it was accidental or deliberate.
It happened.
It's in there.
It's out and about now.
It's totally out in the world now.
It's not possible for us to contain China at this point because of the Chinese New Year and those three to five million people that left the infected zone.
As we now know, you know, it's Japan, it's all over.
So we now have to start thinking about what will work.
All right, so on supplies, I'm going to get done here real quick, guys.
We have very few of them available, but you may find N95 masks.
These are produced by 3M.
3M.
They're selling them at huge, huge rates.
Used to be you could buy a big tube of these things for about $15.
They're a paper kind of a mask.
They're a particulate mask, okay?
This is why, but this is 95.
Okay, so the N95 is named as N95 because it filters out 95% of the particulates if you're a sander or you're painting or whatever.
95% of the stuff gets filtered out.
But they're not antiviral.
They don't work down to the micron level necessary to screen out a virus, but that's not why you can use them effectively.
They are a pretty good standard, I think, for judging other masks that you may run across.
The reason that they can be used effectively is because viruses don't swim.
This virus may be out and spread by airborne, but it's not like the virus is out there swimming by itself out in the air.
Okay, the virus is respirated out.
You'll sneeze, you'll cough, an infected person will sneeze or they'll cough, and the virus will come out.
So that's the airborne virus.
There's also the surface virus as they touch things, right?
But the airborne virus will always be attached to a water droplet of some kind.
So that means that particulate masks of the 3M N95 specifications can be effectively used.
No, they're not going to stop viruses, but they do trap water molecules.
As you'll see, when you wear them, your respiration will actually create a layer of sweat on the inside of them.
Further, also trapping anything incoming.
But you have to bear that in mind.
You've just made this thing wet, which is going to be a good virus hosting space.
So you have to consider these as disposable.
I don't think you could dry them out enough to kill a virus.
Maybe you could.
Maybe we'll have to experiment with that.
They're using three such masks a day, three particulate-grade.
The little blue foldy ones are the same kind of inner material as the N95 in terms of its spaced out compressed paper.
And so the Chinese people are now allowed three masks a day for going out by the government.
And they're using these because, again, it's an aerosolized situation.
The virus is not free-floating.
It can't be dry.
It needs moisture or it dies out.
So that's why the N95 and other paper kinds of particulate masks could be made that would do you good because they're going to filter out the aerosolized stuff if you're in crowds.
I'm going to add this one, upload it here now.
We've had horrid new potential information about this.
And I think we need to, I think we need to be real serious about this and very, very personally responsible for what's going to happen to your health as we go forward.
I've got no information on whether or not earplugs are helpful, but it sort of makes sense because of the mucous membrane supporting the little hairs in the air.
Anyway, guys, so with respect, sorry we ran so long.
Hope it helps you out and get you some more information and to why things like Chaga may work.
We don't know that they actually do.
We have a little tiny bit of knowledge that they may, but we also have some supporting studies and documentation as to why that may actually work.
This is why I've got no respect for the people that pimp MMS chlorine dioxide because they don't have any kind of research anywhere saying it works in this particular pathway in the body and stuff, and they're thinking about it as just so fuzzy.
Here, you can actually say chaga works because it inhibits this HIV protease, and it just so happens that this coronavirus has two of these HIV inclusions in it that will require those proteases in order for that whole virus to replicate.
So they may have actually put in a backdoor way to kill it if you knew about this ahead of time.
And it just was coincidental and sort of lucky here.
Anyway, as I say, I hope this helps.
You're going to want to buy, if you go this route, you're going to want to get your chaga mushroom that's been grown on real birch trees.
That will be described as from fruiting bodies.
Okay, not mycelium from fruiting bodies.
Good luck to us all.
You know, humans are pretty dumb most of the time, and we need all the help we can get.
▲
Export Selection