critical thinking - covid 19 - what (may) work & why
|
Time
Text
Hello, good morning.
It's uh February 13, 2020.
It's 7.31 a.m.
This is another uh video about the uh COVID-19 situation, and uh we'll just jump right into it.
There's a bunch of new information that's emerged, and um we can examine what's coming up.
Uh the idea today is to settle off on what works and why.
It's important that we discuss the why as well.
Okay, so um Hubei official, the um the people that run uh the province of Wu, in which uh we find Wuhan the city, um in the in that area, uh are saying as a and as a um so what we're gonna talk about is official responses at the moment and the uh the city people there are saying
that this is the numbers they have.
They don't say they're not lying, but they come really close to that, and then they say here are the things they know they don't know, which is very nice of them.
Okay, very straightforward, very adult.
So they tell you, you know, there's 40,000 confirmed cases.
There's 1,300 confirmed deaths.
Uh there's 38 hundred confirmed recoveries, okay, and they have pretty strict um criteria for how they judge recovery.
So under the circumstances, I'm willing to accept that there have been 3800 people that have recovered.
This is in a way though, not very good, okay, because stacked up against the duration of the illness and the number of people that uh have it now, we see that it is a very long-lasting condition and that it's as difficult to be judged recovered as it was initially judged to be judged actually having the coronavirus.
Anyway, so we continue here and there's just more to discuss in terms of the Hube numbers.
Uh so um it's disturbing that there's only 3800 that have recovered out of the nearly 50,000 confirmed cases.
Uh it's disturbing that the death toll keeps rising.
It's nice to know it's not unsettling.
It's very nice to know that the Hubei province uh officialdom is acknowledging that they they obviously can't record as a coronavirus death people that are not within their system as having had coronavirus.
So if someone dies on the street of coronavirus, it'll never be ascertained that that's why they died.
They'll simply just be handled as a as a dead person in these days because coronavirus is so prevalent, they're taking extreme measures and usual death practices are not being followed.
So there's gonna be a lot of uh people's deaths and illnesses that are not record recorded.
Also the Hubei people uh officialdom acknowledges that individuals that are ill with coronavirus that are that don't present themselves at hospitals to be confirmed with the coronavirus also are not on any of the numbers.
And then this leads to some uh troubling extrapolations uh on a two-fold level.
Okay, so um the extrapolations are If we were to go to USA medical uh sources, uh NCIB, the national um uh uh informational databases for National Institute of Health, for CDC and these kind of things, you'll find articles in there that say uh that discuss pandemics and the spread.
You can find lots of information about how pandemics spread.
And uh a couple of these articles in the database also discuss informational discrepancies during the spread of um such pandemics, although they only do so obliquely.
Um it's interesting to note that the lowest possible number uh in a usual pandemic uh would be three times higher than officialdom reports, both in uh infection rates and and uh death rates.
However, the um the disturbing part of this is that we should also have three times higher levels of uh reported recoveries.
And here's how that works.
Okay, the reason that we get to a situation where you have a sudden spring up in the number of people officially listed as recovering, usually in a pandemic, is because the people that get it but don't report to hospitals and stuff,
uh will tough it out, they'll start to recover, they'll get antibodies, they'll start to build back up, and then they'll present to the hospital, then they'll get diagnosed, but then they'll already be on their way to uh self-cure, their body having taken care of it, and so they'll there'll be a jump in the the uh reported number of um recovered cases.
And that's that's uh so consistent with um pandemics that uh public health officials that study this at that level know about this effect, the spring back effect they call it, and discount it just because it's it can't be taken as an indication that the virus is being beaten.
All right, so we need to watch out for that, the spring back effect.
And it's actually data pollution is what it amounts to because these people were never reported initially uh in that cohort of being infected, otherwise that cohort would be very much larger and we would have a proportionate level of recovered um people.
So but but the equally disturbing part is that we don't have a spring back effect showing up at all, which seems to imply uh, or I am inferring, means that the virus is very long lived in the in the population, such that if it takes three weeks to get ill, you might be ill with it for three weeks.
Um, and thus the lag time reporting all of these numbers becomes significant because it crosses monthly boundaries, and that influences how data is collected because government collects data on monthly predictable kind of basis, right?
And that's how they like to, that's what how all of their uh statistical analysis is done, is usually on a monthly um uh situation over time.
Uh so sorry, there's small bugs in here from coming up from the beach.
Um, so um so it should be three to nine times higher.
All right, nine is the is the expected rate in a virulent disease.
I've seen nine times higher than reported uh listed for pandemics that even go into forestry.
So I ran across the thing about certain forest um uh uh pandemics viral kind of attacks on trees, and and uh it if they're aware of it, they the forest ranger kind of guys are figuring there's nine trees uh with it for every tree that they see.
Uh so that just gives you an idea that this number seems to be replicated throughout pandemics across all kinds of species.
Okay, so the Hube officialdom says that they know that there's many unknowns out there.
Uh as an official response, they're starting to intrude in their own number process with weasel words.
Uh initially they're saying we've got it, we know certainty, we'll have it done by this date, certainty we'll have it done by this date.
Now they're admitting that there's a lot of unknowns snowballing on them.
They're they're reacting in a human way and saying things, and they're and they're attempting to get the message across that things are uncertain without implying that things are totally out of control.
Um so that's um something to consider that the words themselves, the way in which the officialdom is presenting them, and the truthfulness is a is a good sign for us as adults dealing with this, but it is a bad omen for what's actually going on on the ground.
It's probably very, very, very scary.
Okay, so um it's hard to know where to begin.
Okay, well, staying on officialdom out of Hubai.
There's video circulating, and I've retweeted it after a friend of mine did an analysis on it.
This video appears to show uh people in uh anti-contamination garb, anti-contamination suits, blue and white suits, with um automatic weapons, with government Chinese government issued weapons, or weapons of those types, uh killing people in uh Wuhan.
Uh this video was dated February 1.
I don't know if the video is 100% legitimate.
When I came across the video, I was horrified, and then I I took a moment and I sent it to a friend of mine who is a retired military police a detective you'd have to call him.
He was an officer in the in the United States Army, and he he's retired military police.
And uh he had 25 years as military police.
As far as I know, that's the only job he ever had in the military, and he he made it to where he was a detective.
Uh and he analyzed it, and the issue for me was was I hearing it correctly.
In other words, I heard gunshots.
I think those gunshots um aligned with the visuals that are being presented.
But I don't shoot guns enough to be able to tell intuitively.
Uh this friend of mine um he does, okay.
He's uh he's not he's a lives in the south, he hunts, and he's been um military policeman all his life, so he he was required to shoot continually throughout his career, and also he knows how to analyze um gunshots, especially in videos.
That was one of the things he'd done.
And he came back and he told me that we cannot falsify this, okay.
So he can't say that this video is as it uh presents itself.
He can't say it's valid or true in that sense.
What he can say is that the sound quality of the gunshots is consistent with the environment being presented, the distance presumed from the recorder to the shooting, and all of the other um instances of of what data can be examined from this brief clip are consistent and self-referential.
There's no inconsistencies, so it's so in other words, it's not a dubbed-in sound of a gunshot from somewhere else.
Um there's no uh lag time on the uh transmission of the sound.
There doesn't appear to be anything in there that would indicate that this is a hoax.
So he cannot say that that we were both hoping that he would be able to do that.
So I retweeted it because he can't say it's a hoax.
Uh so it might be valid and it might be real.
If that is the case, then we had a huge escalation on February 1 with officialdom.
For some reason, the um some level of officialdom was issued weapons and allowed to use those weapons in such in a situation that we cannot ascertain the circumstances.
Okay.
So there's all kinds of scenarios that could be presented, but none of them are good.
Uh people in decontamination, anti-contamination garb, shooting people uh in the street cannot be good under any circumstances.
So I'm taking this as a very negative sign about the progress of this particular disease, uh, along with all of the other indications that things are not as being portrayed by the uh communist uh party in China, such as the disappearance of the um uh the real heroes of Wuhan,
the doctors that reported it early, uh the deaths of all of the and disappearances of all of the um citizen journalists there that have have uh sent out videos on what's actually happening.
And so this I find very troubling, all right.
So assuming that execution uh because they were contaminated because they were ill, or for whatever reason, are uh did occur on February 1 doesn't mean they are ongoing, doesn't mean that it was anything more than uh, you know, uh who knows?
We just don't know.
It could have been an entirely isolated incident under all different kinds of circumstances that would not relate it to the disease itself.
However, occurring as it did within the disease um outbreak uh center point and uh with the individuals as they're portrayed, the implication is that the disease is getting out of hand, that they're not able to treat it, and even more troubling uh is that the powers that be um may have reached an attitude of where they don't care about certain uh information coming out.
Okay, so it's very troubling that they might allow public executions uh from um a management viewpoint of the Chinese Communist Party trying to manage this giant mass of humans that they call China, because it means at that stage they're gonna have to be iron hand and any resistance will be met with a bullet because these people at the top feel that threatened by the circumstances they're in.
That implies that this was a bioweapon.
Um every time I examine this video and its relationship to what's ongoing, the only conclusion I can come to is that no matter what angle I attack it from, trying to get it to fit within this paradigm, it points back to this being a bioweapon.
Because the in my mind, that would be the only thing that would trigger the uh communist party um top echelon to reacting this way.
And um, because with a bioweapon, you're uncertain that you'll be able to control it.
You don't know what its effect is going to be on your population.
If there's a 15% death rate in the first three or four months, that might be its first go-around.
And you don't know what the combined effect is going to be out of cycles two and three that pile on to cycle number one.
Chinese government, as I'm quite certain, very well aware of the details of how bioweapons work.
There's a lot of conspiracy stuff that say that uh that has evidence like the deaths of people in Africa and the arrests of other other people, that um some form of genetic material was transmitted from Canada, taken from Canada to this biolab in Wuhan.
Why?
What was it?
Okay, shortly thereafter, we find ourselves in this situation.
So the Chinese government is allowing to occur um the rumor mills, which are gonna happen anyway, they know that's gonna happen anyway, and they're allowing it to occur with no dampening down that uh this was released on China as a um uh uh a bioweapon, the rumors of that, and they're pointing the fingers at the USA and all the West in a general sense.
The the, you know, it's like on our internet here, of course, you're gonna have all the the batshit crazy guys like myself in extreme conspiracy mode.
China government is not dampening them down.
They're not letting it run wild, uh, but so they're monitoring the social media and they're using their algorithms to control the the feedback loops on it, but they're they're not shutting it down totally.
So I think they're doing that personally, it's my opinion, they're doing that as a way to vent and potentially deflect um shit coming down on them for their part in this.
All right, whether they released it, whether they allowed it to be released, it doesn't matter.
But if this thing turns out to be particularly sensitive in attacking Asian phenotypes, then the upper echelon and China has got a lot uh to answer for, and we may be witnessing over the course of this next year the collapse of the Chinese government uh in the social order as we know it now.
Uh if this is a bioweapon, we will certainly be seeing that.
If this is a bioweapon, that collapse may come uh to Western society, uh simply because uh infrastructures will break down, continue to break down, supply chains will continue to break down, and we're all gonna have to react.
That reaction is going to cause a lot of upheaval, it'll cause uh social consequences uh beyond the understanding of most people to uh to grasp now, and social changes.
So, uh, you know, if this is a bioweapon, if it's released, if it's not phenotype specific, that is, if it attacks, you know, all different kinds of humans with the same vigor, then we're in a situation where we can't overestimate, it would be hard to overestimate the impacts at this early stage.
So a year from now we won't be living the same lives, okay.
And um, that's even if we get on top of it, uh, if it is a released bioweapon.
If it's not, we'll know soon enough.
Uh, I do not believe that we will see uh any kind of release of pressure on the populations from this over the course of April, which is when it would tend to die out if it was just a regular seasonal flu.
Uh, that being the case, if you've got anything going on over the course of um March or April that involves travel, you may want to be very considerate of the and and be aware of the uh national circumstances relative to coronavirus where you're at during that period of time,
because that will be into the hundred-day point at which many governments will simply take what they will consider to be absolute minimum level containment uh efforts, and they'll shut down travel, and you'll be trapped wherever you are.
This brings us back to uh the fact that we're on this hundred-day timeline, okay.
The there's two ways to look at this.
I believe that the Chinese government has reached the conclusion that this is a bioweapon.
I believe that that um that this is the case because of a number of different um elements within the ex the uh unfolding story here.
I believe that the Chinese knew that it that there was an exposure in early December, and that by January 23rd, they knew they were in deep trouble.
So the early exposure of this may have given somebody upper management level an indication that indeed this was an unleashed bioweapon and not a natural occurrence.
The reason I say that is they reacted very quickly.
They reacted very quickly in an extraordinary time in the Chinese culture.
That is, they shut things down in uh Wuhan and um uh Hubai on the 23rd of January.
The Chinese lunar new year and the Chinese New Year is like a huge cultural deal within their social order.
Uh it's like the holiday, okay, and it occupies their mindset for months and months and months on both sides of the period.
Well, the 25th of January was the was the peak of that period.
So, what what the Chinese government did was to shut down travel in Hubai province on the equivalent of Thanksgiving in the USA, you know, the Thanksgiving travel period or the Christmas travel period.
They shut it down then.
This so they knew then that they had a problem in Wuhan.
Their serious problem was that it is estimated that over the two days or three days prior to the shutdown, some five million people left the province.
There's also reports that at the time they shut it down, they were forcing people onto those last trains and airplanes to get everybody out.
So they didn't have them in the province.
Not necessarily so they didn't really try and trap everybody that might be exposed.
They pumped out three to five million is what they estimate.
Three to five million people traveled in those few days.
Uh so those three to five million are carriers.
Uh they have to be considered to be uh infected.
And so now many of them uh are gonna start showing the effects of that because we're actually looking at uh Something that might be up to three weeks before symptom onset.
So if they were exposed in the travel period then, the last week of January, then it would be just now mid-February, that they're going to start coming down with the illness and manifesting symptoms.
A lot of them would have manifested something at some level prior to this, but they won't we we won't see a lot of those individuals getting really, really, really sick until now.
And so we find ourselves in this terrible situation of where we have uh contamination out there, the horse has left the barn, he's running all over the planet, we just don't know uh where he is, where he's gonna pop up next, and it's too late, in my opinion, to worry about that because we're we're basically going to end up in a planet wide quarantine over these next few years.
Uh, and that's our situation at the moment.
Um, this is stuff is changing as we go along.
Uh, just before the lockdown, which may have affected 40 or 50 million people, they had that extraordinary travel period, and they have not the Chinese uh government has not given any indication that they've done anything to deal with the travel vehicles themselves.
So there was no indication that throughout any of this period that any of the trains that were jam-packed with people, any of the airplanes that were jam-packed with people were in any way decontaminated.
Uh so if if it's true that it it lasts for nine days on smooth surfaces, it's a nine, not a G, then you can add nine days to this uh insect period here of the mass infection, which as I say would have been in those three days from the 20th to the 23rd of January.
So then we would be to some of those people being infected on trains in the first week in February.
So there will be a secondary large cohort here in this last week in February showing up with um with the illness.
Uh and so we're right in the very, very, very early stages of this.
Now, the governments will do everything they can to dampen all this down, and they've already declared the end of April is the all-clear day.
The reason they're doing that is because that would be a traditional day you could use as an all-clear for a generalized flu because we're getting into spring, the weather warms up, also which would tend to promote the virus, but also you get a lot more people outside in the sun, which brings up vitamin D levels, the sun decontaminates the skin, yada yada yada yada.
And so uh it it's where they usually fade, uh, you know, uh seasonal flus.
They're seasonal because people up here in the in the northern hemisphere don't get enough sun, and we usually don't supplement with vitamin D, and therefore our immune systems get uh weakened and people become uh susceptible.
Uh now, so this particular time is is different, but we can make these calculations right here, and that we'll see these larger flushes over these next two weeks of people becoming ill.
Whether they're reported outside of China is another issue entirely, because they're gonna now start showing up all over China, not just within these restricted areas, and it'll have to do just as we've seen with the cruise ships and all of that kind of stuff.
Once it uh once they start testing for it, they find that it's uh uh you know, that it really does spread rapidly.
They find it very rapidly.
Now, there's something else about this.
Up until now, there were batches of the test for this that were failing three out of four tests.
That the actual reagents in the test itself was no good.
I understand that's been corrected that those batches have been, you know, uh used up or or whatever, but it still takes two tests to confirm that you're free of the virus, okay, because the first test could be a false negative, and the second test they give you uh could also be a false negative, but it's statistically less likely.
And for sure, if they do another third one and it's it's negative, then they can say you don't have the virus.
But what they're doing is they're also finding false positives.
So some people with just the initial contact were run into um uh contained areas with people with coronavirus when they didn't have it.
When they just had a test that said yes, and then two or three days later, they had another test, and it said no, and so they were released from quarantine after having been there with people with coronavirus for two or three days.
So now we're seeing the impact of this um spread in areas like outside of China, and it's uh the cruise ship is the largest um containment area, but now we know it's in the prisons and in the health system in England.
Uh it's showing up in um uh Middle East in Islamic areas.
The reporting from there is very, very, very spotty um for all different kinds of reasons, and it's uh uh but it it does appear that uh the infection is spread uh uh throughout the Mideast and and down into Africa, and we're actually seeing early reports of this effect of the of the 23rd.
The reason that this is so key is because a lot of those people out of Wuhan flew back to Africa because they're living in cities in Africa, and out of that three point three to five million people, we don't know how many hundreds of thousands may have been in China for the holiday with the intent of going back.
Many of them couldn't go back because they got trapped in in Wuhan, uh, but also many of them did get out ahead of time and also have been exposed.
So Africa will be start blooming with this in a way that uh maybe like cruise ships, right?
Because when the Chinese go back to those cities in Africa, they stay reasonably isolated in those cities.
It's not like they're out and about in a general sense mingling with the local populations as a rule for most of them.
Um so that's sort of where we are, and some of the things that will happen.
I suspect that the uh all clear day.
All clear day won't be.
Uh, I suspect that we won't be clear of this in April, at the end of April.
Uh actually that would be over here.
That'd be over here at the end of April.
I suspect that won't be the case.
I suspect that we'll actually still be in the bloom phase then.
And what the governments do is going to depend on how freaked out they are by the economics.
And if they get totally freaked out by the economics, they'll release a lot of things, they'll declare that we're clear anyway, and then we'll be off on um a serious journey over the next three years.
Um, so so that's where we are at our here.
That'll be the hundredth day for for the Western world.
If you live in the Western world, that'll be the time that the governments finally start reacting, and you may find yourselves caught out if you're doing heavy if you're traveling, but there's just no way of knowing what day they're gonna make these decisions on, how they're gonna react, how draconian they're gonna be, how long it'll take them to put clamp downs on.
It's very difficult, for instance, in the United States, given our um legal and economic system, uh, for the government to say, okay, you know, stop all airplane flights between all cities today, right?
It's gonna be extremely difficult, and it's gonna cause vast quantities of chaos, upheaval, and uproar.
And they know this, and someone's gonna at some point have to make the decision to do that.
It will be done with extreme reluctance, so I suspect that it will be pushed out that way as far as possible before they make these decisions, which is not good for the overall spread of virus, and as someone who's taking the personal responsibility, this is a um uh a point that I'm taking very seriously.
That that at some point out here we run into the increase potential of supply chains running into an official dom response where not only is it people that can't move, it's goods that can't move.
And goods wouldn't move because people wouldn't be going to work, etc.
etc.
At that point, we're into uh, you know, uh house stasis, they call it in China, or or um uh stay at home, right?
And uh and so then we've got other issues that will arise with the social order.
But this is the kind of thing it'll Happen out here somewhere.
I don't know what I mean, it's it's predictable if we saw certain indicators as to when they were getting close to it, but they're not likely to provide those indicators willingly because bear in mind all governments are going to get shit for this.
Um doesn't matter if they participated in creating it or not, their reactions will always be criticized negatively over this because people are dying.
And so many other people are going to suffer, and the whole social order is going to change.
Um there's gonna be good that comes out of it, of course, but you know, at this point we can't see it.
So now let's get into some of the stuff that works and why.
First off, earplugs may be required, uh maybe um uh indicated uh because the reports out of China is that they're issuing those to people, uh a kind of a filler plug that prevents uh air intrusion.
Uh may be that they're they're worried about all kinds of um all of your mucus membranes being affected by this, which again suggests that it's a bioweapon.
Now this virus was reported by a guy out of India as having two HIV insertions.
So eight and and what they do is they um unpeel the genome, and then they saw uh typical HIV protein inclusions within the genome of this uh of this critter of the coronavirus of COVID-19.
Uh this is now why I think I or this is this is a clue to me as to why the reports that I got out of my herbalist out of uh Wuhan that uh chaga mushroom given to his patients seem to have prevented them from getting the illness and or getting it severely, okay.
And so that's chaga.
Chaga mushroom is a is a type is its type of mushroom.
It's a polyphore, which means it has lots of little um excuse me, lots of little um uh spore emitters, doesn't have a veil, it grows in on the tree, it is considered to be the cancer of a birch tree.
Um the chaga mushroom has two things going for it relative to this this particular outbreak and it's in this disease.
Those two things uh include its relationship uh to the HIV uh human uh virus, right, as well as it's its relationship to the birch trees.
It's been it's been suggested that for COVID-19, there's uh they found like uh various different kinds of molecules that should be an effective anti-COVID agent.
They're not saying they found uh cures or drugs or anything for it.
Uh, we're talking about some people that are working on the um very high-level people that have written a research paper that says that you know coronaviruses are susceptible to these kinds of things.
Well, chaga mushroom is the cancer of birch trees.
As it kills a birch tree, it sucks up all of the what are known as polyphenols.
Okay, the the highly complex sugars that exist within that the tree uh that are almost oils, get sucked up by the chaga mushroom and made part of its internal mechanism.
And so the chemicals we want to get are in birch tree extract.
My thinking as uh somebody who studied traditional Chinese medicine and Ayurveda and herbalism is you can't take birch tree extract, you can't be sucking that stuff down every day, or you're gonna cause yourself all kinds of problems because of its harsh and hot nature.
Okay.
If you go and look it up, you'll find that the birch tree also, birch bark uh extract also triggers um any number of allergies, weird kind of allergies, because it doesn't have the actual uh stuff in it, it just has an allergen close enough to make your body think that you're being uh you know exposed to this allergen, and you get this allergy.
The chaga mushroom does not take up those allergens as near as I can find.
And I've done some more research on that.
I can find no reports that the chaga is taking up the um the material.
Medicinal mushrooms are uh very unique on this planet because they're so well tolerated by individuals.
Now, chaga mushroom also is anti cancer, it's a huge antiviral agent.
And And I put on my Twitter feed articles that I was able to find from without even really hardly working at all to find them that link chaga as an HIV protease inhibitor.
Okay, the HIV virus, a protease molecule is what the viruses use to trick your cells into making more of the virus.
So basically viruses come into your cell, they can't replicate on their own.
They trick your cell through these protease molecules into replicating their DNA, not its own, not that cell's own DNA.
So that cell works, making that virus fill its fill up that cell, and some viruses will actually cause the cells to rupture when they just get so many the cell wall can't handle it, and then the virus really spreads within your within your body.
So these protease molecules are what allow the virus to trick your cell to replicating it instead of the cell itself.
And so we have protease inhibitors, which inhibit the protease molecule, preventing that virus from tricking your cell.
And if it can't trick your cell, it can't reproduce, and the first white cell or macrophage that comes along will glom onto it, eat it, and you'll get rid of it.
So you know, so viruses desperately need protease.
Um the HIV inclusions in the coronavirus may be its weakness, all right?
Because chaga is a known HIV protease inhibitor.
And so they may have tried to make this coronavirus seriously nasty stuff, but in doing so, because a human was involved and thinking about it and they didn't know about chaga and other medicinal mushrooms that are serious protease inhibitors, it may be that they made this thing obliquely weak, trying to make it stronger.
Okay.
Uh it's this is just my thinking.
This is, you know, I'm um a whacked out uh internet paranoid here, uh, so you know you have to validate all this stuff for yourself, but that's my thinking that we may have actually had a a lucky uh side effect of these people monkeying around with this virus.
Now, the chaga mushroom, you want to make sure when you buy this stuff, you can buy it as a powder.
The herbalist I was dealing with had elderly patients that were taking somewhere around half a gram up to a gram a day, but nobody was taking more than a gram a day.
The chaga mushroom, relative to the HIV, relative to the articles I've read, basically says you just need to have a little bit of the chaga mushroom in you all of the time to inhibit the protease from the HIV, but also from other viruses.
Chaga is a huge antiviral mushroom.
It pulls up all different kinds of things from the birch trees that inhibit uh other virus uh protease uh recreation of themselves, and then it also has this for the HIV.
So you're getting it both ways, but you've got to get chaga that is grown on birch trees.
I don't think you can use the mycelial version of this because the chaga mushroom would have no exposure to the birch trees and would not be picking up these particular molecules that seem to fit in and kill the coronavirus, okay.
Now, this is actually uh the way in which vaccines are made.
They take eggs in the main and they inject the virus into the egg yolk, they let it replicate like mad, and then that's their uh their core material for their vaccine.
They will uh irradiate that um uh virus and kill it, and then on the assumption that its shape is enough to trigger your body into making antibodies and killing the virus on its own naturally.
So far in our human history, mostly this idea works.
All right.
We've gotten into the situation here with the anti-vaxxers and all of this because of the poor quality of big pharma and its production of vaccines.
And in order to maintain the quality as minimal as it is of the vaccines that they're producing now, they have to overload them with so many preservatives they're causing side effects in the human body just from the preservatives, and that's why a lot of people don't want to take vaccines.
But vaccines in the main can work.
Except we have an interesting situation here now.
I'm not going to accept that any lab anywhere has perfected a vaccine for coronavirus in a short period of time.
The reason I'm not going to accept that is because there's article after article after article that reference the coronaviruses that are similar to that are on the evolutionary chain of oops of COVID-19.
And these uh these other viruses, they've had a hell of a time in engaging and building vaccines because the vaccine itself triggers the body's cytokinic response, the inflammation response, and can cause the very problem they're trying to eliminate.
So here's what they're running into.
On COVID-19, the shape of the molecule that identifies the virus to your body such that your body could produce a response, an antibiotic response, is triggering cytokine storms.
That is the vaccine, the dead virus in vaccines, in coronavirus that's within the genetic lineage of this.
So coronaviruses they've been studying these last few years, they've been trying to make vaccines for for animals, and it hasn't worked.
It's only worked marginally, it's only been effective in some kind in some cases as low as eight percent.
All the rest of them got the disease and they died.
And it has to do, according to the articles I've read, with the unique shape of the of this particular strain of coronaviruses, and that this unique stray uh uh the unique shape causes the body to super overreact and produce um uh inflammation responses because it thinks you're hugely exposed and you're about ready to die,
and then it kills you with your own uh immune response, and they've had uh very difficult time coming up with with vaccines.
So there is no functioning vaccine for coronaviruses.
Now, here's something else to clue you in.
Coronavirus and the common cold are the same thing, right?
See, a cold is a virus, it's uh it's of the same family of viruses as COVID-19, and so you know there's no vaccine for the common cold.
So the likelihood that an effective vaccine for this will ever emerge is pretty small.
If you are thinking now that you're going to be saved by big pharma as they develop a vaccine, uh you can continue to think that for a few months, and it will be maybe five or six months when they finally come on out and they say, okay, we've got a vaccine, but they'll come on out and they'll tell you it's gonna be ready in well, they maybe they'll say it'll be ready in four months, and then four months will pass and it's not available, and you'll just sort of forget about it, and then maybe another two or three months you'll hear that it'll be another two or three months out.
So it'll just never appear.
And it's because we can't, by the nature of the vac of the virus itself, have an effective coronavirus virus vaccine uh that doesn't trigger now that we're getting into these kinds of coronaviruses that doesn't trigger its own problems.
So we're in day 72.
It was a supposition in this uh manual on biochemical warfare that I read that the government of a target uh targeted nation, if it was a sneak attack, it would finally dawn on them by the hundredth day that they're uh they were under attack by a bioweapon.
Uh China apparently the government participated, knew they were working on it in Wuhan.
It may have been an accidental release.
It's hard to keep this stuff under control.
It doesn't matter if it was accidental or deliberate.
It um it happened, it's in there, it's out and about now.
Uh it's totally out in the world now.
It's not possible for us to contain China at this point because of the Chinese New Year and those uh three to five million people that left the in infected zone.
Uh as we now know, you know, it's Japan, it's all over.
So we now have to start thinking about what will work.
All right, so on supplies, I'm gonna get done Here, real quick, guys.
We have very few of them available, but you may find N95 masks.
These are produced by 3M.
3M.
They're selling them at huge huge rates.
Used to be you could buy a big tube of these things for about $15.
They're a paper kind of a mask.
They're a particulate mask, okay?
This is why.
But this is 95.
Okay, so the N95 is named as uh N95 because it filters out 95% of the particulates if you're if you're a sander or your painting or whatever.
95% of the stuff gets filtered out.
But they're not antiviral.
They they don't work down to the micron level of the necessary to screen out a virus, but that's not why you can use them effectively.
They are uh pretty good standard, I think, for judging other masks that you may run across.
The reason that they can be used effectively is because viruses don't swim.
This virus may be out in the and spread by uh airborne, but it's not like the virus is out there swimming by itself out in the air.
Okay, the virus is is respirated out.
You'll sneeze, you'll cough, the infected person will sneeze or they'll cough, and the virus will come out.
So that's the airborne virus.
There's also the surface virus as they touch things, right?
But the air airborne virus will always be attached to a water droplet of some kind.
So that means that particulate masks of the 3M N95 specifications can be effectively used.
No, they're not going to stop viruses, but they do trap water molecules.
As you'll see when you wear them, you you your respiration will actually create a layer of sweat on the inside of them.
Uh further also trapping the the uh any anything incoming, but you have to bear that in mind.
You've just made this thing wet, which is gonna be a good virus uh uh hosting uh space, so you have to consider these as disposable.
I don't think you could dry them out enough to kill a virus.
Maybe you could, maybe we'll have to experiment with that.
They're using three such masks a day, three particulate grade, the little blue foldy ones are the same kind of inner material as the N95 in terms of its uh spaced out compressed paper.
And so the Chinese people are now allowed three masks a day uh for going out by the government, and uh and they're using these because again, it's an aerosolized uh situation.
The virus is not free-floating, it can't be dry, it needs moisture or it dies out.
So that's why the N95 and other uh paper kinds of particulate masks could be made that would do you good because they're gonna filter out the aerosolized stuff if you're in crowds.
Um I'm gonna add this one, upload it here now.
Uh, we've had horrid, horrid uh new potential information about this.
And I think we need to uh I think we need to be real serious about this uh and very very uh personally responsible for what's going to happen to your health as we go forward.
I've got no information on whether or not earplugs are helpful, but it sort of makes sense because of the um uh because of the uh mucus membrane supporting the little hairs in the air.
Anyway, guys, so with respect, sorry we ran so long.
Uh hope it helps you out and get you some more information and to why things like chaga may work.
We don't know that they actually do.
We have a little tiny bit of knowledge that they may, but we also have some supporting uh studies and documentation as to why that may actually work.
This is why I've got no respect for the people that pimp MMS uh chlorine dioxide because they don't have any kind of um research anywhere saying it works in this particular pathway in the body and stuff, and they're thinking about it as just so fuzzy.
Here you can actually say chaga works because it inhibits this HIV protease, and that just so happens that this coronavirus has two of these HIV um uh inclusions in it that will require those proteases in order for that whole virus to replicate.
So they may have actually put in a uh backdoor way to kill it if you knew about this ahead of time, and it just was coincidental and and sort of lucky here.
Anyway, uh, as I say, I hope this uh helps.
You're gonna want to buy if you go this route, you're gonna want to get your chaga mushroom that's been grown on uh real birch trees that will be described as from fruiting bodies.
Okay, not mycelium from fruiting bodies.
Uh good luck to us all.
Uh you know, humans are are pretty dumb most of the time, and we need all the help we can get.