All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 28, 2017 - Clif High
49:54
clif's wujo - Mandela Effect, AI, Quantum computers - Janary 2017
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Okay, good afternoon.
It's about two o'clock on Friday, the 27th of January.
This is a brief bit of a discussion on basically on one long topic, which is the Mandela effect.
But it we're not going to start there, we'll end there.
So we'll start with the idea of artificial intelligence because I've got a particular rant against that, and it does connect with what we're going to discuss here.
First, we need to define the idea of intelligence, and in my definition, intelligence is the ability to acquire new knowledge and change your mind, your opinion, based on these new inputs.
That's really the definition of intelligence.
So you could have anything be intelligent at all.
If it has the ability to accept new knowledge, new facts, and change its mind, it's growing.
And so that's intelligence.
Now, artificial intelligence, in my opinion, doesn't exist.
We hear it as a marketing slogan for computer companies selling AI for customer retention module AI.
Or drive your car AI.
And these are this is a misnomer.
This is not artificial intelligence.
These are what we call expert systems.
When you program such things, they are very large databases, usually sucked up out of a disk and put into RAM for fast access, and they operate based on if this, then this, if this, then this, if this, then this logic.
And they have no ability to acquire new knowledge or to change any of their existing programming.
And I'll demonstrate you to you in a second how this is the case on all computer systems on this planet.
So the idea of AI is a particular issue because in the woo-woo world, we have a lot of people running around fearful of AI.
They're afraid that space alien AI is going to come and eat us all.
And you'll hear language at some of the very prestigious discussion forums and conferences around such things as a secret space program, which actually exist, and these people that are otherwise intelligently there and thinking about things, analyzing correctly, just seem to miss some of the concepts of AI, and they say it as a phrase and they start becoming fearful of it.
And they're fearful of AI, and you'll hear people express this fear as being AI is artificial intelligence, machine intelligence, and it's cold, and so it's gonna be you know you can't reason with it, you can't give it hugs, uh, that kind of thing, right?
And then they'll immediately go a launch into how AI won't allow this or will try and protect itself or these sorts of things.
You'll also hear people discuss uh CERN.
I've heard this recently in a discussion about the Large Hadron Collider, where two otherwise um focused thinking individuals stated that they were using AI to look for the results of the Large Hadron Collider, and that would the AI show them the results if it decided not to.
And so that kind of stuff really annoys me because I do a lot of programming, and so I needed to tell people uh that kind of stuff cannot happen, and here's why.
Um basically what it comes down to is to tell you really quickly how computers and software interact, and you'll see why AI is not a possibility within our understanding of software.
Um now, so uh let's understand that we're intelligent as beings, we can take in information, we can change our mind and make new behavior patterns based on new inputs.
Uh there will be people that will claim that you can do this with software, and I will say no, that's not possible because the software is fixed, and I'll point that out in a second.
But for the purpose of thinking about it, uh we are conscious beings that have the ability to in our bodies to intake new material, change our minds, our thinking, and respond with new behavior as a result.
Machinery can't do that no matter what.
So, uh the the point about the AI stuff.
All computers operate on this idea of a thing called uh the primary or The root or ring zero.
And what that is, if you look way down in the middle of the computer, well, you take the cover off the computer, you've got a bunch of uh slots down this thing that's called a bus.
The bus is a vehicle for conducting a lot of electricity in a uh in a serial fashion, uh also through parallel fashion into a number of different cards.
One of those uh cards that connects is what we call the motherboard.
In the motherboard, you'll see this this big aluminum thing usually with all these fins on it, and that's the heat sink to keep the um uh motherboard main chip, the CPU of the computer cool enough to operate, and it sheds heat as part of its calculations and what it does.
And that's really the heart of the computer is the CPU, the central processing unit.
Central processing units operate on the if you drill down through all of the stuff that's connected to them, you get to this point where right in the middle of it, you discover there is as the engineers describe it, uh, what they call ring zero or primary ring.
And it's not really a ring, it's what is known as a register.
And as a register, it is a um it's a area in which ones and zeros cause a series of electrical gates to flip on or not.
And so uh these ones and zeros within the instruction set, the machine language causes these gates to react in specific ways such that specific states of being exist, and they exist within this thing that they call ring zero or the primary.
And we'll just call it RZ for our ring zero.
This ring zero, depending on the size of the CPU, will be eight bits, thirty-two bits, sixty-four bits, hundred and twenty-eight bits, etc.
etc.
But and it's basically limited to that.
So that refers to the number of potential gates that are in this thing.
Uh, and that's okay.
So this is at the heart of your computer.
This is the heart of the software as well.
So let's take a little bit of a divergence here for and look at code for a second.
Okay, these are all triggered by ones and zeros as we go through loading this ring zero, which is at the heart of the computer chip.
And so we have all these things coming off of it as a chip, all these little wires that connect it to the rest of the machine, and those are our macroscopic control mechanisms that allow us to deal with the more or less microscopic printed circuit material.
And they connect us all the way out to your comp your your uh PC's uh uh keyboard as well as the screen.
And so it is through all of this kind of stuff that the direction is given to the rest of the machine to execute and cause things to happen.
Now, software is written by uh programmers, and they would say things like print LN semicolon, and that's print line.
That's print a line out of a printer.
And it's also, if you know the instructions and you knew the language, it it likely is print a line with a carriage return line feed, go to the next line on the paper or whatever it is you're printing on.
The print line can also be used on a screen, it could be used to a file and so on.
The instruction set for the print line, if we were going to be printing our image here, say that we had a machine that could scan this and got ready to print it, it would use a print line statement at some point to start outputting the uh image that it wants to display for us.
Just checking sound levels for a second.
So our print line uh is not ones and zeros of computer code, it's a more or less English kind of a word.
Um, it's a more or less you know, human kind of a word, no matter what your programming language, uh, it's going to be a more or less human sort of understandable word.
We actually run it through a thing we call a compiler.
Uh software is uh built around these compilers.
I've actually written a couple, and they they take human kind of language and they make it into a more denser uh stuff on its way to becoming ones and zeros for the computer.
And so we all know this.
The code that the software engineer or the coder writes, the print line statement, goes down and it becomes a compiled block of executable statements.
Depending on the language we're using, that compile and what we're actually stating, each and every one of these near human words could be potentially hundreds of compiled block statements.
We'll call these CBSs.
Alright, compiled block statements.
The CBSs all derive from that single print line statement.
And as I say, depending on the language, that language may have all kinds of functionality pumped into its individual words that then expand out by the compiler into a lot of this compiled language in these compiled blocks.
We're gonna have to get rid of that.
We don't need the space.
So compiled block of code.
That actually can get rendered into multiple individual executable statements for our PC under the conditions of its particular chip.
So the compiler will know about the chips, it'll know whether it's dealing with a 64-bit or a 32-bit machine, etc.
etc.
So now here's what we're really looking at though.
Each one of these lines is representing one of these complete set of instructions for our primary ring within our computer's central CPU chip.
And so these lines, there might be potentially hundreds here for each one of these compiled statement lines.
Each one of these guys is put into what's called a register.
A register is nothing more than a list of these things.
This list is used first in, uh first out fashion for that computer to process.
So this register is just a list of each and every one of these instructions from this line, which is part of this print line statement, that each one of these things has to get processed.
So the uh the register in your computer is a is the listing of software that it's going to be executing at a machine code level next, and then the one after that, and then the one after that, the one after that.
As part of writing code, you you allocate memory, you malloc your memory, and you shove a bunch of stuff into it, and then you point things out of the register to that stuff in RAM, and you do things with it.
Uh you draw charts, you um do calculations, um, you know, you draw screen stuff, uh, you make your software uh uh do uh reading very fast for you, uh, you have it monitor your greenhouse, all of these kind of things.
But it all comes down to a central point.
This right here, ring zero.
It's only executing one of these little tiny instruction blocks the size of that register at any given point.
So my my point to this is artificial intelligence can't exist as as humans are becoming uh afraid of it because there's only that single instruction being executed at any given point.
So software is not aware, there is no self there.
It cannot ever have emotions, it can't even replicate emotions, it all it can do is follow the instructions that are in the register and execute the next one next.
Now, true, I could have an instruction that was right here that said go over into this new section of RAM, get a whole bunch of new instructions, compile them, and then bring them back here and load them in the register from this point forward.
And so you can, you can change what's in the register.
As a programmer, you do that all the time.
Swap stuff in and out so that you change your executing block.
And you usually have to remember which block you're in when you swapped which one out and go back there so that it doesn't all crash.
And that's why we used to get the blue screen of death and uh programming for Windows machines was usually uh unallocated RAM stack crashes, all different kinds of stuff.
Weird language that all basically says we forgot where we were when we started this thing and now we can't get back there, so we're just gonna go to our blue screen of death.
And anyway, so software is not all that robust.
It is just what we as programmers think of and write down.
It is not possible for software itself when it is executing to make a decision.
It is only possible for it to execute those instruction sets that it's been told to execute.
So the computer has no understanding of what code it's gonna run next, nor even what all the code is.
So if you wanted to think of uh these expert systems uh or the artificial intelligence, which which are actually expert systems, um basically they they may have millions of uh of lines of code which would compile into tens of millions of instruction sets within your that could hit your register.
But it doesn't matter because at any given time that computer is only aware of one and it's not even aware of it, it's simply executing that.
There's no self there, there's no knowledge there.
There's no ability for that machine to make a decision at all.
All it can do is execute what the next code tells it to do.
So it would it's it's just not possible for artificial intelligence to run into something new, be able to describe that newness to itself, and alter itself in response to that newness.
Now I tried desperately with some really cool programming languages to get close to that in writing true artificial intelligence, way back when we first had PCs.
And I would use um uh programming languages like Prologue, which is named Prolog for programming and logic, but it's got a pure prologue languages, it's got a really cool feature.
And that is that you can uh in the process of executing, you can actually run the compiler, uh, add new code to it and so on.
But it's an interpretive language.
And ultimately, it can only do what's within the software that makes itself available to it.
Uh and it gets really uh complicated as a software engineer to try and anticipate the kinds of things you might run into.
So basically, if you were going to try and write artificial intelligence to go and colonize Mars and conquer Mars for you, and then send you a message when it was done, uh you would have to try and describe to it, you well, you what you would do is you'd try and describe to that artificial intelligence, which is an expert system that just beer merely is a database that it can shove into RAM really quick and get access to.
But you'd have to describe to it potentially all of the things it might encounter.
You know, five-headed hydras uh that might bite at the wheels of its conquering machine, or you know, uh mud pits that um the the little tiny miniature Lillipution Martians might try and push you into uh with little tiny sticks, um, or you know, radiation from space, all this kind of stuff.
So if it's not programmed, if it's not there, available in the code, the software is not able to write its own code, it can't alter itself.
So it is not conscious.
Uh it's extremely dumb, it's stupid, uh, it really annoys me that people get afraid of it.
Uh, you can use that as a marketing term all they want, but it's an expert system.
It is not artificial intelligence, nor can it ever be.
So there's no self there.
No computer can in any way uh do anything other than operate under the instruction sets provided by the programmers.
Programmers have yet to figure out a way to get uh computers to emulate emotion.
They can get it to emulate some of the uh uh outside effects of emotion, but it's not like the computer understands it.
It's simply responding to those clues that the software engineer built into it.
Um so if if we don't think about it as a programmer, it's not going to be put in there.
It's very much like an island.
If you don't bring it with you, you're not gonna find it there.
Uh so um uh that's fundamentally the the little discussion here about artificial intelligence.
The reason that this is going to be pertinent will become uh um it will make more sense here in a few minutes.
So um anyway, so this is our uh this is our ring zero, and it's gonna have to go for a minute as we get into some of this other stuff.
Now, this is all going towards the a discussion of the Mandela effect.
And I'm hoping I'm shouting enough to get this through under the circumstances.
So, uh recap here real quick.
Uh Mandela effect is touted as being uh time-changing or um uh some weird woo-woo effect.
You'll see this uh referenced online all over the place, the Mandela effect is growing.
Okay, the Mandela effect is real without regard as to what it is.
So it's either uh bad memory individually uh being uh pimped and and pumped up online, it's either bad memory collectively, um common delusions that that frequently we have in our species, um, or um it's uh electromagnetic influences on our brain causing any of the the previous ones.
Uh we don't know what what the cause is.
Uh it could actually be time changing and stuff happening and things being changed, um uh, but it may not be that, and it's still a real uh valid effect.
So the Mandela effect, even if it is nothing more than a mass psychosis, is still a valid thing to be concerned about because it has started off as very small and it's growing.
And beyond that, within the um details of the Mandela effect, which we will address in a little bit, the uh initial uh uh details have now spread, and the mental support structures that are developing for each and every one of these details is as rigid and solid and self-referential, uh non-contradictory, etc., as was the original one.
This is out without regard as to whether or not there actually is anything happening to time or anything happening to our memory about what we think of as our collective past.
And so the Mandela effect is frequently described as everybody thinks Nelson Mandela died in 79, and he and he died here a few years back, and we were all shocked.
I I wasn't, it wasn't that particular issue was not one for me, uh, because I remember what started it off.
That was actually an issue of collective uh bad memory because what happened was in 79 uh another uh radical uh freedom fighter in South Africa died.
His name was Stephen Biko.
Uh when it was reported, it was erroneously reported at that time as Nelson Mandela.
Those outfits that reported it, some of them corrected it the next day, but this is pre-internet, so there was no debunking, there was no uh mass hysteria over it that would uh have pumped up the um correction to nearly the same level as the original uh statement.
So a lot of people uh correctly remember thinking that Mandela died in in the late 70s, and it was all due to an erroneous newspaper report.
So there was an instance of where we have a uh a memory that is not um supported by the reality, but the memory itself is valid.
Now uh the rest of these issues that start coming on up uh deal with things like logos on on um companies and advertising over time, um phrases out of movies, uh many other diverse individual things, including phrases in Bibles and other uh works that people remember a specific way and are no longer uh a particular way.
Now, in some of these cases, we actually have uh dual uh supporting uh evidence in the sense that uh some of these individual cases have uh a lot of people remembering it as uh path A and other people remembering it as path B, and yet factual evidence for both paths exist now, and at some point in the past, did not, uh, presumably, according to how we are thinking about this.
So let's examine a couple of things here real quick that I've come across.
Uh the man this is sort of ancillary to the Mandela effect, but actually maybe go into the core of it.
And this gets back to our discussion of artificial intelligence and how computers work.
Because uh the what I described here uh in these past few minutes uh we can think of as traditional computing.
Uh little printed circuit boards, the printed circuit boards we got from reverse engineering uh crash space the alien stuff in the 1940s that led us to discover uh printed circuit boards, fiber optics, a number of different items that were fed into the civilian population from that point on.
Uh this is uh accepted fact in the woo-woo world.
Uh so um it's really kind of cool by the way, to just uh acknowledge that we're in woo-woo, acknowledge this is an accepted fact, not have to detail why it's true, and and bother with trying to prove 60 years of secrecy in history.
Okay, so uh I think I've noticed a correlation uh between some current events and the uh rise, spread, and growth of the Mandela effect through larger and larger populations.
And I'll detail that in a second.
So let me state that I do not think it is the large hadron collider.
Large handron collider is this big giant um uh supposed uh atom smasher that they set up in uh Europe that is under all these countries, anchored in rock, shooting out bazillion times um uh the amount of electricity that's ever been created before to make giant magnetic fields that are many times the strength of our planet and maybe causing mental aberration.
So it could have been the large hadron collider at that level, but there's uh some other correlations here that I think are perhaps more meaningful.
So let's examine the idea of these things called quantum computers.
Now, the idea in a quantum computer, and I'm gonna go Through it without any of the math.
It's real easy.
These things are actually simple to understand if you understand them from a woo-woo perspective and leave out all of the their mathematics in terms of the you know psi this and the XY position on the state of this and so on.
So a quantum computer, basically at an idea level, is an attempt to create a machine that uh would at a quantum level, which is below microscopic, below nano, and way down deep uh in the in the in our reality would deal with what what they call quantum strangeness.
Strangeness is uh two particles that uh no matter how far separated react instantly and are always in the same state with each other.
Uh the Chinese are using that as we speak.
Um so I'll get into that in a second too.
Um so anyway, the um uh the quantum strangeness that they try and capture has basically there's four elements to it.
We don't have to go into those four.
Um but what we do have here is a seeming correlation.
Now, I deal in data mining, and there's a difference between correlation and causation.
Just because two things are correlated does not mean one causes the other.
It's just that you can track their rise through your data set at the same levels.
Uh, and there appears to be an inner link.
That's all it says.
There appears to be an inner link.
So I found something where we appear to have an interlink between the rise of the Mandela effect and its spread and its diversity, and the spreading of these quantum computers throughout our actual physical environment.
Uh now, so uh quantum computers and what they are.
As I explained uh a few minutes ago, we in a regular computer you have the central primary ring that is your that is your bits that you're trying to turn on or off.
In quantum computers, there's another state, which is both on and both off.
So it's not only one and zero, it's also both one and zero simultaneously.
And this is where you get into some of these quantum weirdnesses.
And we don't care about the um uh thing they're attempting to deal with because in a woo-woo world, basically what they're trying to do is to deal with the same stuff that keeps all of our cells together.
Our human bodies are dealing, and all of our reality is nothing but quantum strangeness.
And if you go and do the history of it and look at uh quantum thinking and uh you know go through Einstein and Heisenberg and all these people and come up to Schrdinger's cat and all of these um uh issues, basically they're trying to put into a mathematical framework that makes sense in their noggins um a description uh at a mathematical level that explains the quantum weirdness that is our reality.
Why our cells don't fly apart, why uh you know the atmosphere doesn't crush us, all of these all things are all connected with uh with our quantum weirdness.
Now, uh within quantum computers, here's the idea.
Instead of just having a regular uh register, they're gonna have a register that when you look at it can tell you if, for instance, it's both uh one and zero, or if it's one, or if it's zero.
And so you get these three states, and you're not able to predict what that what that state is going to be, which which is going to end up until you actually look at it.
And you're gonna do all this stuff to cause those states to change relative to something you want to try and find out.
Now, it needs to be noted that all quantum computers at their core are analog machines.
They're not digital the way that we think of this, because digital and anal and and this um and the quantum stuff doesn't really work together.
Uh they're all going to be analog machines.
But leaving that aside, what a um what a quantum uh computer really is an attempt to get at this spooky uh entrainment factor of molecules or or the submolecules, particles, uh, that may be waves and they're not sure, and it doesn't really matter what but except for when we look at it.
And so what they're trying to do is they're trying to get these things uh and isolate them on basically a computer chip that has just like all the other chips, it's got all these little wires coming out of it and so on.
Uh and I'm gonna have links um uh in the description below to some of the other videos from the people that are building these machines, and you can go and look at some of these things online and see how they're all put together.
And you'll see that that it's like a computer chip that is instead of being built into your um uh motherboard and that motherboard put into the bus of a uh uh PC, what actually they're doing is they're taking the chip,
the computer chip, and they're trying to isolate it uh from the things that will impact this special state of um let's just call it woo-woo that they're after with this these quantum effects that they call quantum strangeness and other weird terms, but it's woo-woo, okay.
Let's be factual about it.
So what they do is they take their computer chip here, and they you'll usually see them vertical for a number of reasons.
This chip is going to be held with these kind of holder things that will connect it to an arm.
There'll be an arm over here, and that arm is going to be connected to another bigger arm, and there's wires all the hell and gone, and all of this whole unit here is going to be put into a big insulated metal can.
Whoops, a big insulated metal can.
And that big insulated metal can, the big insulated metal can is there to cool the bugger down, okay, because they've got this theory here.
What they're trying to do is they're trying to keep quantum strangeness, as they call it, isolated only to this chip right there.
And in order to do that and and sample their quantum strangeness, they can't have the quantum strangeness that creeps in from the atmosphere.
So they got to pump out all the atmosphere.
And they can't have the quantum strangeness that creeps in from heat.
So they got to get rid of all of the heat.
And so they're taking it down colder than space, far colder than space ever will ever ever get.
So cold they don't even know if they can measure it that cold.
And the idea is that any atoms in there will really freeze and they'll fall to the bottom of the bucket and they won't affect the um the particles you're trying to actually measure, which they're building into these chips.
And really, if you want to talk about quantum strangeness, you ought to listen to the lecture about how they're building the chips, but that's a secondary issue.
Okay, because at the moment it's the isolation approach, I think, that is it's causing the um correlation to exist.
Now, so what's happening though is that they're super isolating this thing.
They're doing it so much that they're trying to calm the atoms in the uh matrix, the the material upon which that chip is built.
So when they when they make their printed circuit uh with these super high-tech machines and stuff, that printed circuit is on a material that substrate, and they're trying to calm its atoms so they don't get any quantum strangeness creeping in from the atoms of the of the chip itself.
So this this thing is isolated.
Now, um, and they built a bunch of these guys, and these these buggers work, and they're able to actually through some mechanism, they're able to get through this isolation to talk to the chip and get information back out of it.
And they've got to do an analog, a digital to analog conversion.
Uh, you'll see these DAC um things in their diagrams all the hell and gone, uh, because they're dealing with an analog state machine here, uh, and you're just basically sampling the uh position of of what you think of as atoms at a particular point in time.
Now that's how they think these machines work.
Okay, and so they know they're okay.
As I was saying before the battery interrupted, uh, we know that these guys with the um quantum computers are trying to preserve quantum strangeness within their chip, and the only way to do that is to eliminate it coming in from anywhere else because they want to be able to manipulate it,
set up a set of parameters, allow the strangeness to do some work for them, examine the state of the strangeness when it's all done with its work, and then pull out huge answers to very complex problems without having to sweat the hard stuff by doing it through what we would think of as brute force with a digital uh sort of an approach.
Uh so basically it's an analog computer.
Uh, it works at a quantum strangeness level, it has to have that quantum strangeness eliminated from everywhere else, and they in order to do that, they have to isolate it from the environment.
Now, they do this without really grasping what's going on.
Okay, the quantum strangeness is a is, in my opinion, uh uh intimately and integrally part of uh our experience as humans and all beings because it's what holds all of the universe and the materium together.
That quantum strangeness is uh is inextricably linked to consciousness, and they don't quite get that.
And so uh what I think is going on is that as they build these quantum computers, they build these giant cans that they isolate the chips uh in, and they go to a great deal of trouble within the local environment To push away all of the quantum strangeness that is around that local environment so that they can work on this chip in a pristine sort of a fashion, or so they believe.
Now, as a result of that, what I think is occurring is that we may be having, we we have a correlation between the Mandela effect and the spread of these quantum computers.
The reason that I think that this occurs, by the way, the effect on consciousness, is that fundamentally these guys are trying to drive down through all of the elements of matter, uh, all of the vibrations that can be caused by excuse me, by anything in universe.
Heat, etc., uh, you know, vibrations of people walking around, all these different kinds of things are eliminated around these cans, and they keep going further and further and further down into uh, if you will, uh lighter uh forms of of things that can cause these quantum effects.
And in essence, they're trying to push their uh device in an isolated fashion as a probe closer to the base energies that form what the physicists call the diarrhea C, but which we can think of as the giant consciousness field that that is throughout all of uh universe that we participate in.
And we know that this consciousness field exists because physicists have to go to a great deal of trouble to eliminate it now from all physics experiments.
Uh they've discovered, for instance, that if you had 26 possible outcomes mathematically in a particular physics experiment, if you look at it, you're only going to get uh four that might show up.
Instead of 26, your range will always only be four.
And but if you don't look at it, and you run the experiment by having all of these little contraptions, uh, turn it on when you're not aware of it, don't think about it, and all of this kind of stuff, then hey, maybe one of these other uh twenty two uh potential options will show up.
But if you got a student there looking at it, you're only gonna get those four.
And they describe this in a bunch of different ways, but basically what they're running into is the consciousness field.
And that's all of us.
And so here's the here's the deal.
My under my understanding of this is that as they isolate this quantum chip, they're basically pushing out quantum weirdness, strangeness, they call it.
Woo-woo.
Well, they're pushing out consciousness.
They're pushing out the consciousness field effects on their chip.
So, from my perspective, a couple of things are going to be relatively obvious from this idea.
If I'm correct, then the denser they make their chips, uh, with more um uh quantum strangeness being entangled and captured, then uh, and the more they isolate those, the the better they get at isolating them, the uh the larger the likelihood is that quantum noise is going to be driven up.
So I think they're gonna run into a situation that is analogous to the early days of jet airplanes when they would run into this barrier that they called the sound barrier.
And uh they didn't know if their planes were gonna break up, they didn't know if they would enter into another dimension, they didn't know if the sun would explode or their feet would fall off.
They had no idea what what was going to happen once they broke the sound barrier.
They thought, for instance, their machine wouldn't be capable of surviving it, and so they'd end up as you know, scattered remains all over the the desert, this sort of a deal.
Uh and we they understood something about the sound barrier as they were going forward with it, but the actual doing of it presented uh different set of circumstances that had to be engineered.
And so these guys that are building these quantum chips, in my opinion, uh are creating conditions that are analogous to that in that they're pushing away more and more of the consciousness field or the quantum strangeness, and it's piling up around their cans.
Now they've got their cans inside these really nice cool uh big giant boxes, and they're big giant boxes, so that humans can get in there to tweak these things.
Well, uh I have another theory about that, we won't go into that aspect of it.
But anyway, so that so that was one of my conclusions is that as they were uh was the sort of a noise effect that quantum noise is going to go up as their engineering goes up, and it's uh directly attributable to their success of isolating the rest of consciousness field from their quantum machine.
That is to say, preserving their pristine quantum strangeness and shoving out all the rest of it from universe.
The better they get at that, the uh more quantum strangeness there is piled up around that now vacuum, if you will, relative to the quantum strangeness.
And you it wants to be uniform throughout the materium.
So probably they shouldn't be doing this, but that's a secondary issue.
Okay, now I think we can establish that there's a correlation between the spread of these machines across the um uh United States, down California, into Houston and or into Texas and these areas, and then in the East Coast, I think we can actually plot those against the rise of several of the Mandela effect uh centers, as well as several of the um focus points within the Mandela effect itself.
So, in other words, I think that the reason we have a lot of people that are saying that the Bible has changed is because of the machines down in Houston, or in NASA being uh uh run by NASA down in Texas, and the spread of that consciousness isolation is going throughout the Bible belt, and so this is gonna be the most common uh element that they're able to um ex see and express uh the Mandela effect or this consciousness wave that's being pushed out of the machines uh in their lives.
And so we're gonna see that uh in the um uh the other center of it on the west coast, is uh curiously close to Hollywood.
And where do we see a lot of the Mandela effect stuff?
In movies and TVs and radio scripts that where everybody swears that because they were uh Star Trek aficionados or Star Wars uh groupies and they watch the damn show 1800 times in X number of years, and they can recite every bit of dialogue and all of a sudden the dialogue is changed.
You know, what happened?
When did this occur?
And uh, you know, it's all centered around Hollywood, it's all centered around the movies and the um uh TV to a lesser extent, there's a couple of instances of uh radio.
And where's another effect of this that we see it?
It's in advertising, which is located in the East Coast near where some of these computers were originally developed, and some of the other alternate um machinery is being run, uh albeit irregularly.
Um, and so I think there's even a correlation to uh whether or not it's operational, how long it's operational, as to how widespread the effect is and how the Mandela effect and how deep it is.
Uh so you know, this can be checked out, uh other people can look and plot it, it's very easy to sort of check.
Uh so in other words, the Mandela effect is not about South Africa, it's only about our memories, and so you want to track where people are when they're reporting that they suddenly stumble into the Mandela effect.
And oh, by the way, just to let you know, one of the primary producers of these quantum machines that goes to a lot of trouble to build these isolation cans to keep the the computer analog computer chip from experiencing our quantum weirdness that we're putting into and receiving from universe in the consciousness field is located in Vancouver, BC.
And they've been making machines that are now in the Hollywood area, the uh NASA Ames research labs, and there's they're the in the NASA facilities in Texas, and they're similar to some of the machines that are working on the East Coast of the US.
And you'll notice we don't have Mandela effects in Bollywood or Russian movies or Australian movies or so on.
Now, here's the interesting part.
If I'm correct, the Mandela effects are going to spread as the quantum computers that use this same isolation kind of technique spread.
Other forms of quantum computers can exist and likely do and will.
Uh and we are doing some other things with quantum computers.
But if I'm correct, and they built one of these machines and they bought it and they stuck it right next to Bollywood, all of a sudden we'd start seeing Mandela effect stuff being reported about Bollywood movies in Hindi and so on.
And they would have the examples there, and and this sort of a um spread would thus be quite noticeable.
So we keep on the lookout for new spreads of the Mandela effect, and we should be able to thus come back and quantify.
Is it because we have a new quantum computer working or is Cliff full of shit?
Or is it because we have a new uh old quantum computer that's now working with a bigger chip and thus spreading a larger uh amount of this um uh bow wave, if you will, of consciousness, because they have to isolate the can even more because the chip is that much bigger, much more powerful.
So uh so there's a couple of ways that this spread is actually uh able to be correlated, in my opinion.
Um doesn't mean I'm right, but I may be.
This is something to think about.
So that doesn't get into any of the actual details of the Mandela effect, but deals with it as a um, if you will, a disease going through the social body.
What is it?
Should we be concerned?
Is it space aliens beaming our memories away gonna cause us to do a tower of babble moment where we can't even uh talk to each other because we can't we don't hear everybody's sound the same and we think everybody's um you know, basically that we're going mad or they are, and so we're gonna start slugging.
Um so uh, you know, there's some things to be concerned about when you get strange effects that are uh sweeping through the internet.
Uh doesn't mean it's anything more than uh mass psychoses from a bunch of bad burritos uh that then gets spread and so on.
However, um uh not knowing is something that uh requires the investigation.
And so there's some of the thinking about the Mandela effect here, that it may be related to these uh quantum computers, and here's why.
And also, it is not related to artificial intelligence because that does not exist.
On this planet's only expert systems.
Now, let me point out a couple of quick things.
If artificial intelligence existed, it'd be real easy to get rid of it if we didn't like it, which is to just set off an EMP device of some form or unplug the bugger and it's gone.
Uh so and it'll never know that the plug is going to be unplugged because it has no self, it has no sensor array that tell it to monitor that that way, and so on.
And it'll be too late by the time it discovered that its plug was pulled.
Uh so artificial intelligence is not a big threat.
Now, because you can just get rid of it.
Uh the other aspect of the quantum stuff to bring up is the Chinese.
Uh we don't see, for instance, a lot uh any Mandela effects being reported in the Chinese language that I've been able to find with my spiders.
And we do a great deal of sweeping on China uh China pop uh general discussion kind of stuff for for my work with the Alta reports, and I haven't been able to see any Mandela effects being reported in native Chinese.
I've seen discussions in Chinese about the Mandela effect, but not actual new reports that are attributed to uh you know Chinese origin.
So that may mean that the Chinese quantum computers, uh, should they have them, don't operate the same way with this isolated CAN stuff pushing back on uh everybody's consciousness, everybody's um uh uh stran quantum strangeness.
Now, we know the Chinese are are very much into uh quantum stuff because they're doing it another way.
They're using one of the four uh principles of quantum strangeness entanglement to create um uncrackable uh communications vehicles.
And what they've done is they've got a s satellite out in space that gets two particles to be vibrating exactly the same, so that these guys are 100% in sync.
And then it takes and it beams one particle down to observatory A, and it beams the other particle down to observatory B. And these particles are separated by over a thousand miles, or a thousand kilometers maybe, uh, about six hundred plus miles in uh China.
And so you've got them in one observatory here and another observatory there.
I think it's like Tibet and someplace in the northeast or northwest of China.
And uh so the idea is that these two particles are 100% in trained, that wherever they are, no matter how far apart, uh so kind of like the um uh the speaking stones in Stargate universe, uh no matter how far apart, they'll always be in exact sync.
So they've got a guy, they put the particle in a vat of stuff in um uh uh observatory A, and they've got it in observatory B separated by a thousand miles, they've got a uh skin of something across the top of the vat uh for particle A, they give it a uh tap, and then particle B jumps.
And at the same time, particle A jumps is a from the reverberation.
So they start beating out uh the their version of scientific uh code.
And they start doing ASCII and they start sending stuff back and forth.
And nobody on the planet Earth will even know that communication is occurring, let alone have a hope of cracking it, because you have to have one of those two particles in order for this to occur, and none of this information is being sent through what we think of as uh airwaves.
Uh uh so it's it's entirely uh quantum strangeness.
It's truly woo-woo, it's truly happening at the consciousness field level.
That sort of brings in some other issues later on for another Wujo about how people could hack a consciousness field, how they potentially could hack that kind of um communication system, and at the very uh at a bare minimum you could disrupt it.
I could show you how that could be done as well.
Uh so you could sort of like uh what do they call it?
Um not scan them, um the blockers that they have on airplanes and stuff where they send out signals to to scramble, there's scramblers, uh, that scramble all of the radar in this kind of a deal.
So you could do that with quantum stuff if you approached it the correct way.
Uh but in any event, so I I'm actually um interested to see how the Mandela effect progresses, the individual items that show up um as examples of it are less interesting to me at a personal level than the effect is in general at a very large scale level.
And I'm gonna end this here pretty quick.
I'm really pissed at all these uh guys that are in the woo-woo world, they're getting people whipped up about artificial intelligence as the big bad evil alien uh kind of thing coming along in.
Uh and by the way, uh you cannot use the example of neural nets.
You can't use the idea of uh uh artificially intelligent aggregation, that is to say, millions of individual nano machines that uh each somehow produce a thought component that all goes together to form a uh coherent intelligence.
Uh uh that shit doesn't happen.
Uh and it won't happen.
And you can uh say a bunch of different reasons as to why it happens.
So some of the stuff you see in the Hollywood versions of the replicators going mad, you know, destroying the planet, you could certainly have that, but they're not going to be done uh uh at a level of evil control or any of this.
Also, by the way, if you watch the language of these people that are discussing AI, because as soon as they start discussing it with any emotional terms, evil, uh, you know, cold or cruel or any of this kind of stuff, um, uh they're discussing an emotion which can't exist in a machine.
And so they're off the off the trail right then, and their speculation is merely uh expression of their own personal fears and has no basis in reality.
And I guess that's it.
Uh so I wanted to bring up the issue of the quantum computers, because that's kind of cool, and also the Chinese and what they're doing with their stuff is really interesting.
Uh so we're getting into some real woo-woo world here.
Uh, but I wanted to point out, hmm, there may be side effects to going uh too woo-woo too fast and not knowing uh and not having good paradigm to think about this.
I don't know that these people at D-Wave machines, who are the primary producers of these quantum things, have ever thought about what it is they're actually isolating their computer chips from.
They think of it as atoms, and they're you know, so far wrong there because there are no uh solid atoms in this whole universe, and they're basically looking at energy in a very um antiquated way, and here they are trying to isolate this thing from other energy waves, which they admit, yet they don't really acknowledge what the kind of energy it is, how and the and the side effects that are going to exist.
Uh they're just looking at it from their tunnel vision of oh, we gotta build this computer faster before anybody to make these giant optimizations for Google.
So, you know, Google's got money.
I mean, I'm not getting on their case, you know, and they need the optimization.
They got a hell of a task.
Because here's basically one one last thing and then I'll shut up.
Uh Google's got a real problem.
Uh, if I'm gonna do a search, I want might put in a thousand search terms, you know.
I want to have um my car have this, that, the other, and have thousands of things in there to find a search term uh specific to me.
And I may want to have it on a specific day and all these kind of things.
And so Google's got to take these thousands of variables and match it to the tens of bazillions and always growing um uh web pages that they and uh uh and uh YouTube videos and videos and all this other stuff that they've got to index.
And so they have uh brute force matches break down real quick when you've got things of that size.
It's called the you know the scale uh unscalability of polynomials uh problem.
And it uh gets to you know the nth uh uh X over uh N to the you know tenth minus tenth and all of this kind of stuff, right?
Numbers so big they can't actually the computers would uh can't actually calculate it.
We don't have enough electricity to drive the computer, we don't have enough time to actually uh sit around while a brute force tries to fill in my request uh to get me the web page that I want, which really I only want to find, you know, the the car sales outfit four or four blocks away.
So uh there's different ways to approach it, but Google basically has an unenviable task, which is to try and stay ahead of all of us bastards as we create yet more content, put it out there that has to be indexed and changed and new language and new relationships and all of this kind of stuff.
These guys work their asses off when you think about it.
And so they're trying to get ahead of the game, and they were gonna use these um uh quantum computers uh to do this really cool quantum tunneling thing, uh, which is akin to in trainment, uh entanglement, um, to pull out answers without having to go through the brute force part of it all.
Uh but uh I'm of the opinion that they're gonna run into some of these things, and we may indeed be causing some kind of a uh an effect in the consciousness field, which may be manifesting as the Mandela effect, and nobody can deny that the Mandela effect is real, regardless of what it is.
Uh, you know, whether there's any uh whether it's anything more than collective bad memory or not, there is an effect that's ongoing and can be measured and it's increasing.
And if it were a um uh general psychoses where we're walking down the street and everybody's afraid of the color green uh being expressed in um uh street lights, well, at least the street light manufacturer guys might want to uh to see have a look at it uh to see if their lights were somehow changing in relation to the sun and causing, you know, uh brain patterns that caused fear in people or something.
Uh, my point being that if there's a uh large pu large-scale public um uh disturbance in the force, hmm, maybe we ought to look at it.
Anyway, uh bye guys.
▲
Export Selection