Clif High - clif high wujo January 12, 2017

All Episodes

Previous Next

Jan. 12, 2017 - Clif High

23:00

clif high wujo January 12, 2017

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Good afternoon.
	It's 1.23 p.m. on the 12th of January, 2017.
	This is just a quick wujo to bring everybody up to speed.
	It's been a month since I've done one of these.
	Sorry about that, but Igor and I have been extremely busy, mainly because of all of you guys, because the election of Trump, let's say, was a pivotal signal for a context change and basically a huge emotional release that's been captured by our spiders.
	And so we're busy racking up the terabytes of data for later processing, as well as processing right now for the Bitcoin gold, silver markets, dollar, all of that kind of thing.
	Doing that simply because of the huge volumes of release language.
	We are truly in the middle of a, or not even in the middle, we're probably not even at the end of the beginning, but we're in the beginning of a context change that is much larger than the context change, at least in terms of the numeric values that we saw in the 2003 to 2005 period of time here in the USA as the undocumented workers came out of their socially enforced invisibility.
	So something very large is indeed happening right at this moment at a level that is not controlled, dominated, or directed by Trump or the new administration or anything here in the USA.
	This is a global awakening.
	It's pretty much across the dollar empire at the moment.
	And we're sort of playing catch up to the Russians and the Chinese in terms of the emotional wave and where we are on it.
	So the English-speaking world, or the English dollar-dominated world, is going through a very large awakening that's led to huge levels of, for us, increase in emotional sums.
	So a lot of prescient language is potentially hidden in our new data captures.
	And we're kind of looking forward to getting in there and rooting around and see what we can find.
	But so that was point number one is that we're getting a lot of good language out of this particular point in time.
	If you feel that indeed there is an ongoing awakening around you, that you're in a big wave of people looking around and saying, basically, what the hell is happening here?
	Or who's in charge?
	What's going on?
	You're not wrong.
	You're quite correct.
	This is indeed what is happening.
	And we're getting a lot of that information captured by our spiders.
	Now, the Bitcoin report will be out late Friday, early Saturday.
	It's primarily focused from the end of January onward.
	It will be included in the end of the month regular ALTA report.
	So the Bitcoin gold and silver report, unless you're a trader, unless you intend to buy and sell and try and capture price movements and stuff, you probably needn't spend any money on it.
	We're going to include the whole thing in the report out at the end of the month anyway.
	So if you just buy the February ALTA report, you'll get this information.
	And, you know, it'll just be like 15 or 20 days stale by the time you actually, by the time we actually get the ALTA report out.
	But this is kind of pertinent information for those people that are of a trading mind.
	It's not anything I can ever do.
	It drives me crazy to do that stuff.
	I lose money every time I do that.
	I don't lose money gambling because I don't gamble.
	I would go to the last time I did that sort of thing was in Las Vegas in the 80s and I played the nickel slots and came home with a suitcase full of change.
	And so that cured me of ever wanting to do that again.
	Anyway, though, so there's that.
	I have a couple of interviews coming up.
	I'll post these as they're more as I'll put out a link as they're available.
	So now we have Bitcoin news.
	I don't want anybody to think that I'm skipping over this.
	The Bitcoin drop is as to be expected.
	This is what Bitcoin does.
	You know, like Bitcoin builds strong hands and strong stomachs.
	That's why also I don't see how people can trade it because if you tried to capture the price movements on this sort of thing, it would drive you crazy trying to follow it up and down all the time.
	It's not very smooth, you know, really choppy and volatile.
	But this is nothing compared to what's going to happen in the future.
	Now, for those that are interested in Bitcoin trading, there are a couple of opportunities that we're detailing out in this current Bitcoin report as best we can for the descriptor sets are really quite nice.
	I like those.
	But the timing, we're drilling in on it as best we can.
	But we are giving you the temporal markers to look for these couple of trading opportunities because I know people have been able to do that sort of thing, you know, sell it off at $1,100 and buy it back at $800 or lower, that kind of thing.
	So the Bitcoin is basically crocodile teeth up through the rest of the year.
	Don't worry about it.
	There's some stuff coming along that's going to cause a major not a rethink.
	They've already done that.
	The Chinese central authorities in our data sets are already showing up as being embracing Bitcoin.
	It just hasn't been announced yet.
	And it may not be announced for a number of months.
	And how the Chinese are, they get everything ready and then they announce it.
	It's a done deal.
	So like I say, it may be a while, but our data sets are showing it as pretty much the route that it's going to go.
	So I'm not particularly worried about the price of Bitcoin, especially in dollars.
	The climate.
	Now, we're into some interesting temporal markers relative to the ice age.
	We're going to see as forecast maybe two or three or four alter reports back.
	I can't remember.
	You know, you write them for a year and it all blurs in your head.
	But some point back here in 2016, there was a long-term forecast saying that as we went through this winter, we would end up with a series of spotty nascent glaciers forming.
	And where those form will be able to give us, will be able to inform us, humanity, that is, as to where the central component of the new glaciation period is going to be.
	There's no reason that it should rhyme with previous ice ages.
	So just because Canada was once under three miles of ice like Antarctica is currently today, there's no reason to presume that Canada will be yet under ice in the next ice age.
	It may indeed, simply because the ice ages don't necessarily hop around a lot, but there's no certainty of that.
	And so the data had been forecasting that we'll be able to see glaciers forming in areas and thus be able to say, aha, there's a center of it, there's a center of it, and so on.
	Also, the data was pointing out that a lot of these glaciers and the snow was going to appear in the tropics, or the areas that we consider to be tropical at the moment.
	And so we've got that indeed occurring.
	We've got snow down into the beaches in southern Italy and snow in northern Africa, this sort of thing.
	And so those sets are coming out and actually manifesting.
	I don't see any other reason, and that actually gives me confidence, by the way, because they were part of the set with the long-term forecast for being able to pick out where the glaciers are going to go.
	Now, I don't see any reason that the glaciers should go too much of a walkabout.
	The reason I say that is because we have a slight indication in Antarctica that what's happening is that the ice on one side of Antarctica is sloughing off, but it's growing on the other side of Antarctica, and it's actually growing out over the ocean and it's going to be floating.
	Now, this is how ice, this is how the poles actually shift the glacial mass over time.
	And so we could presume that the ice is going to creep off of Antarctica.
	How rapidly that will occur, I don't know, but there are indications that it's occurring right now.
	And this is part of our big discovery thing because as the ice sloughs off of that part of Antarctica, it's going to reveal all kinds of stuff that the powers that be would rather remain hidden.
	And they're just going to have to deal with it.
	It just will be too large and too massive for any attempts to hide it.
	And so the point now is going to be to manage it insofar as our data is concerned and what it's saying.
	So there was that.
	So the climate news, the climate is changing because the internal magnetic structure of Earth as part of its expansion is also changing.
	So the planet is a sphere around an hourglass-shaped vortex that rotates very rapidly inside it.
	At the center of which, it's actually two vortices joined together like an hourglass.
	And at the center, instead of where the sand would go through, is where the plasma core of the planet is.
	And the plasma core, because it is plasma, which is energy at a level that we can't even visualize or comprehend, it captures other energy that goes through, like gamma rays would go right through me and through the planet, but grab, you know, it goes to the plasma core.
	Gets sucked in instantly.
	So that plasma core is what creates our magnetic field.
	And at this point, it's altering itself.
	And that magnetic field, the vortices, the hourglass shape that's inside our planet Earth, is what's moving.
	The Earth itself is not moving, but because that internal energetic representation is moving, that's what's drawing down the cold air from space in a new area over on that other side of Antarctica, thus freezing the ocean.
	Well, basically, it's drawing in fresh water from the atmosphere to freeze, but it's freezing on top of the ocean and extending out the ice mass on that side.
	And of course, because the hourglass shape is connected at the center, the force of the vortices is connected into the plasma.
	It's also changing on the North Pole.
	That's why the North Pole is becoming thinner ice and becoming more ice-free.
	Now, that argues right there that they're not in lock sync.
	That argues that we're going to have one of those periods of an ice age where they separate.
	And one half of the vortices will be building ice around the ocean side of Antarctica and peeling the ice off of the ice mass.
	So far, that's what it looks like.
	And at the other end of the vortices, we'll go walk about until it becomes stabilized.
	So we may find that the new North Pole magnetically is just basically sort of a stopping off point on a way to a new, more permanent North Pole that might not be determined for decades yet, but will certainly be connected to new icing in that area because these vortices,
	the open mouth part of the hourglass, pulls in very cold energy from space and causes the air and water to freeze on its way into ground out in the planet.
	So, and that's the point of the energy.
	It wants to connect with Earth and all of that business.
	So, the climate aspect of this is basically stepping right along as we'd anticipated, which would mean that the most of the closest projections are for major food impacts over the next four years.
	So, from 17 through 21.
	And in that period of time, we should get to a more realistic and stable understanding of what's actually going on in terms of what's affecting our food crops and the costs and everything will have been escalating.
	So, we're into it this year.
	So, along with all of the political crap we got going in the USA and within the dollar-dominated empire, we're also going to run into the climate reality that we're going to have to face, which is, you know, there is not global warming.
	And every planet goes through these processes as it goes through its expansion.
	And one of the side effects of the expansion periods here on Earth are ice ages, and we're entering one of those now.
	We're seeing a lot of the language come out from the anti-media, anti-legacy media, if you will, in all forms about the strange weather not being global warming and about these other elements of it popping up.
	Again, we've had ice age, geez, I don't know, 10, 12 years or longer in our data sets being forecast because it's going to have a huge impact.
	No, ice ages are not terrible.
	The whole world does not get covered in ice.
	In fact, what happens is a lot of the ocean, because of the increased ultraviolet coming in and the other energies from space, a lot of the ocean evaporates, becomes fresh water in the air, goes over the land, gets really cold, and freezes, and that lowers our ocean levels.
	And when it does so, it actually shows us whole lots of new land that we can mess around with for maybe five or six thousand years until it starts going the other way and we start flooding again.
	So we're on that side of the curve relative to gaining new lands, even if a lot of the existing land is going to be a little colder than we're used to.
	So, like I say, ice age is not necessarily bad.
	There's going to be a lot of interesting outgrowths from it, including the stuff coming out of Antarctica that we've labeled here as the discovery with the in all caps.
	Anyway, so Antarctica news we've got showing up even insofar as the markets again.
	So as we're trying to do Bitcoin stuff, I keep running into Antarctica as a continuing meme that's going to be popping up, and it's going to be influencing market activity.
	So again, we're just looking for more of that to appear over the next little bit of time here.
	And last thing is the healthcare system.
	I wanted to go into this because the data sets have been insistent that regardless of the, or without regard to whatever the new administration does here in the U.S., USAPOP is going to run into a hard wall in the healthcare system.
	And it's going to be a combination of effects.
	It's going to be a combination of the hyperinflation, dollar problems at a dollar to other currencies level, and also availability and competition in terms of for materials.
	Now, there's other elements involved that are in the woo-woo business side of things relative to the discovery and how we're going to all want to rethink how we do or how we approach body maintenance.
	And so our data sets are pointing out that the healthcare system in the United States is going to hit this wall, and part of that wall is going to be an acute reduction in the availability of services and medicines and stuff.
	So my point in bringing it up is to point people back to Ayurveda, a Hindu form developed in India that's a Hindu form of medicine that's basically, let's just say, 80 to 90% herbal based, that is 5,000 and 6,000 years old.
	And so at that level, it is our oldest sustained and sustainable medical system.
	It's also based on a relatively cheap proposition of herbal material in an evidence-based treatment program, not theory-based.
	So in other words, there's no theory that this pill that they give you is good for, you know, liver and gallbladder.
	They know it works because of the evidence over time of, you know, 5,000 years and in each year, you know, 80 to 100,000 or 5 million people or 7, 100 million people, that kind of thing, who have taken it over this period of time.
	And we have evidence that the stuff works, as opposed to our system within the West that is backing up our healthcare system here, which is, oh, we have a theory that because this herb seemed to do this, that if we strip that herb down to its constituent parts, we can find the constituent part that did the activity we're seeking and make that stuff and retail it for lots of money.
	And that's our theory.
	And we're going to go to the FDA and present this stuff and they're going to let us do it.
	Now, basically, the reductionist approach, in my opinion, always leads to nasty side effects.
	And it won't matter anymore anyway, because our reductionist approach requires the destruction of vast quantities of material to reduce it down to that single component.
	Or it requires access to other materials to synthetically reproduce that single component.
	And in order to theoretically affect what we're after and cause all the other side effects.
	So, but the data sets are arguing or presenting an argument that big pharma, insofar as its ability to deliver to the fucked up dysfunctional healthcare system in the Western dominated world, is going to run into this same wall and will be crumbling over 2018 or 17, 18, and 19.
	And that as it crumbles, we're going to see a reduction in the ability to deliver into the healthcare system.
	So my point in bringing it up is now, if you have a continuing need for medicines, you may want to start now while you can still exist within the big pharma and looking for Ayurvedic alternatives.
	Now, in my opinion, Ayurveda is slightly better than TCM or traditional Chinese medicine because I find that traditional Chinese medicine has a tendency to take the Western reductionist approach and would give you, say, two or three herbs to attempt to do something, whereas the Ayurvedic approach might give you 200 herbs in a formula to achieve the same thing.
	And so, in my opinion, the Chinese, traditional Chinese medicine, TCM, is more reductionist based.
	And I just like the more inclusive, you know, get in all the ameliorating factors and so on approach of the Ayurveda.
	Plus, it has to be acknowledged that TCM derives from Ayurveda and is their analog to it.
	So, and you know, the Hindus produce, the Indians produce just great medicines, just go right to the source, and they're reasonably cheap, too.
	So, it's a pretty good deal all the way around.
	So, that brings up one more small point.
	I'm not alone in recently being, or we're not alone here at Half Past Human, in recently being attacked by nefarious parties at an internet level.
	A lot of the other woo-woo guys are also under assault at the moment.
	This appears to be part of a response, if you will, wave of activity that is in response to the awakening.
	And they're trying to curtail, I guess you would call it, certain outlets.
	So, just to let you know, your favorite corner woo-woo guy may be getting some problems from officialdom.
	And so, if they're asking for help, they may really need it.
	Just to let you know that this is the situation.
	We've recently come through it.
	Our structure is tricky, really tricky.
	You know, I've done security for government and for big corporations, big corporations, and have worked on systems where there's actually physical interrupt so that cracking can't actually be achieved.
	So, in any event, just to let you know, if you're in the woo-woo business, as I pointed out, not only are your views and your AdSense account under assault by algorithms that are under the control of people that are not aligned with your interest, but now apparently they're moving out into the brick and mortar world and causing problems there as well.
	Anyway, I've been rambling on too long as it is, doing some other experiments here.
	I have to get back to the data processing for our Bitcoin report.
	That's basically what allowed me to do this.
	And also to cool some polenta outside because it's 23 degrees Fahrenheit, which is what, you know, anyway, out there.
	So, it's going to cool pretty quick.
	And I'll be out on videos on a couple of interviews over these next few weeks.
	We will have the Bitcoin report out by early Saturday because the timing, and we're actually trying to shoot for a specific timing to get ahead of some events that may be inbound this weekend.
	Anyway, that's it, guys.
	Good luck to us all.
	Enjoy the context change.
	It looks like it'll probably go on for at least five or six years, maybe decades.
	It's just hard to say at this point, but it continues at least through the long-term data and its error range.
	So, we're looking out three and a half years there.
	And it doesn't show any sign at all of lessening in terms of its emotional impact as we go forward in long-term data.
	So, I suspect this is a multi-decade kind of a deal, and we're just at the very beginning of it.
	Really cool, really cool, you know, to kind of know that, oh, geez, you know, history is changing around us, and we get to look and watch it.
	Anyway, take care, stay warm.

▲