One American - Chase Geiser - Tucker Carlson Leaves Fox News & AOC Celebrates Journalist Deplatforming As "Effective"

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 27, 2023 - One American - Chase Geiser

02:11:24

Tucker Carlson Leaves Fox News & AOC Celebrates Journalist Deplatforming As "Effective"

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	You're tuned in to the American Journal with your host, Chase Geyser.
	watch it live right now at band.video Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
	I am excited to be here again on this Tuesday, the 25th of April, 2023.
	One day closer to the end of the world and reporting every detail along the way.
	It's been an honor and a pleasure to be with you as a guest host on and off the last couple of weeks.
	I'm very excited to see Harrison back in the studio tomorrow.
	I will be listening closely, and I'm sure you're excited to get him back too.
	Thank you for putting up with me and tolerating me throughout this time as Harrison needed that special time with family, and we're all excited to have him back.
	And congratulations again to him and his family on their new daughter.
	Obviously, the big news is the ousting of Tucker Carlson from Fox News.
	A decision Fox made seemingly in light of litigation.
	But also seemingly irrational given that he was, if not number one, number two in terms of their revenue generation.
	And I can't imagine a business, just as a small business owner, I can't imagine letting go of my most valuable assets or letting go of that which produces the most income for me.
	I do want to show a clip in this first segment.
	This first segment, of course, is the shortest one in the hour.
	I want to sneak in Bill O'Reilly in clip five, talking about the firing of Tucker.
	Fox News did not want to remove Tucker Carlson because, as you pointed out, he was the second highest rated program on the network next to the five.
	And he was the most well-known individual host.
	So they didn't want to move him out.
	But there are lawsuits coming on the wake of Dominion.
	They lost 800 million plus on Dominion.
	And now you have Smartmatic coming up, and you have two individual lawsuits.
	Actually, one filed and one that may be filed.
	And that was the key.
	So one of uh Tucker Carlson's producers apparently taped a whole bunch of stuff.
	Her lawyer went into the Fox attorneys and said, unless you pay so and so money, um, we're gonna sue you.
	And Fox said we're not paying, so they filed suit in New York City, and they had the tapes, and those tapes may be released to the public.
	All right, and they're not good tapes for the Carlson program.
	Second thing was last night on 60 Minutes.
	Ray Epps, you may remember that name, said to the audience, Tucker Carlson ruined my life and my family's life by accusing me of having some kind of provocative role in the January 6th riots at the Capitol.
	That was setting Epps up for a massive lawsuit against Fox News and uh Tucker Carlson.
	So that's three lawsuits we know about, and there'll be more by shareholders who are angry about the $800 million settlement, and they're gonna go after the Murdochs and the board of directors.
	Faced with that, the board of directors said, we gotta start cleaning this up.
	Well, if Ray Epps isn't a Fed, which of course we don't know for sure that he is, he's certainly a turncoat.
	I mean, on the one hand, the other day we were showing the video of him on January 5th and January 6th, encouraging people to storm the Capitol, rush into the Capitol, go inside the Capitol, into the building, seemingly as a radical, enthusiastic right winger.
	And then you have him on 60 Minutes of All Places just the other day, saying that Tucker Carlson ruined his life.
	This is why I'm wearing the bow tie today, folks, in honor of Tucker Carlson, the one man in this whole story who actually stood up for his principles, reported the truth, reported the stories that he wanted to report, despite whether or not they were popular or well received, despite whether or not they would bring on all sorts of antagonism from the left and the leftists all over the world.
	And yet you have Ray Epsuo gets a little pushback because there's accusations that he's a Fed.
	And all of a sudden he hates Tucker Carlson and it's ruined his life, and woe was me.
	Come on.
	Come on, man.
	Anyways, stick with us, folks.
	We will be back after this break.
	Make sure you visit Infowars Store.com.
	We've got so much to talk about today, and I'm looking forward to going over everything with you.
	You're watching the American Journal with your host, Chase Geiser.
	Watch live right now at Band.video.
	Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
	We're gonna have a great show today.
	I've got a feeling.
	I feel like I'm on fire.
	I feel like I'm burning up like a Vietnam War protester.
	I am on fire for the truth.
	Got this new report in that Tucker Carlson is being accused of promoting a hostile work environment.
	It's always the case that whenever anyone influential is kicked down, they are always kicked again while they're down.
	And it seems like we've entered a culture where litigation is the primary force regardless of the culpability of any party.
	We see recently that Fox News settled regarding the Dominion case.
	And it seems, at least according to O'Reilly, that the ousting of Tucker Carlson was in large due to fear of further litigation.
	So regardless of whether or not Fox News is guilty, or regardless of whether or not Tucker Carlson for that matter is guilty in terms of this story about promoting a hostile work environment, we see that the litigation comes and comes and comes again because just filing a lawsuit against either an organization or an individual these days,
	especially if that individual or organization seems to have a tremendous amount of money, just filing one dramatically increases the likelihood of a settlement and a favorable outcome for the plaintiff, regardless of whether or not the defendant is guilty at all.
	And so we've entered this system in which there's an incentive to sue people because there's really no negative repercussions if you don't.
	A lot of lawyers that are involved in this type of work simply take a percentage of whatever the central settlement is.
	So there's no risk up front to the plaintiff in these cases.
	And these defendants feel like they're forced to settle because they don't trust that the outcome of a trial would be favorable, regardless of whether or not they have actually done anything wrong.
	One of my least favorite characteristics or features of our criminal justice system is the incentive to plea out, to do a plea deal.
	We saw with the January 6th shaman that he pleaded guilty to several crimes that seemingly he did not commit after new evidence was released that was withheld.
	And we see that Fox News settled rather than going to court over the Dominion case.
	Lost millions and millions of dollars, hundreds of millions of dollars for that matter.
	And we see here that there's another attempt at any sort of right-wing influencer with this Tucker Carlson accusation of promoting a hostile work environment.
	The article here says that Tucker Carlson is facing a lawsuit from his former head of booking, Abby Grossberg, who says she was subjected to a hostile and discriminatory work environment.
	Ms. Grossberg, who I will finally refer to as Miss Grossberg, who was fired by Fox News shortly after she filed two lawsuits against the company in March, joined Mr. Carlson's team in 2022 after several years as a senior producer for Maria Porteromo.
	Another Fox host.
	Ms. Grossberg said in a lawsuit naming Mr. Carlson that male producers regularly used vulgarities to describe women and frequently made anti-Semitic jokes.
	So they just happened to hate two totally unrelated protected groups.
	On her first day working for Mr. Carlson, Miss Grossberg said she discovered the office was decorated with large doctored pictures of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi wearing a plunging swimsuit.
	She said she was once called into the top producer's office to be asked whether Miss Artaroma was having a sexual relationship with the House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy.
	Now, I don't know Tucker Carlson personally.
	I would love to meet him, but I have had the pleasure of watching his content for several years now.
	And I really enjoyed a podcast that I mentioned the other day on this show, where he appeared on the full cent Podcast.
	So with that, I want you to have the opportunity to hear a short minute and a half clip from that podcast.
	Clip 10, where Tucker talks about his true sentiments regarding women, and tell me whether or not you think he is being earnest here.
	If I have a club and there's no membership requirement, anyone can go.
	It's not really a club, is it?
	It's a public park.
	Right.
	That's what they're saying about women.
	You just are if you say you are.
	And those people are giving us a lecture about misogyny.
	Sorry.
	It's funny though.
	So how did they say I like women actually?
	Because they're totally different.
	I don't understand like 80% of what they say.
	I don't need to.
	I'm married to one for 32 years.
	I have three daughters.
	I think they're like fascinating and interesting because they're so different.
	I listen super carefully to what they say.
	What's the biggest thing you've learned in your marriage about women?
	They're amazing.
	That they are that they compliment us.
	So your average young man looks at women, if we're being totally honest, and is like they're dumb.
	They're easy to fool.
	Like I can talk him into sleeping with me.
	And like men get this attitude, like women are dumb.
	And the reason they feel that way is because women have a completely different way of seeing the world that's innate.
	It's inherent.
	Their brains are different.
	Measurably.
	Which is why I hate the trans thing, because it's pretending that some guy with a male brain, who's not at all in any sense a woman can become a woman with plastic surgery.
	No.
	It's an insult to the complexity and the mystery of women, which, if you're, you know, in a long-term marriage, you really confront it on a daily basis.
	What you learn when you get married and you like decide, like, no, no, I'm staying with you.
	I'm helping you raise your children.
	I'm gonna die next to you.
	Like you really make the commitment, and you you can't get out of it.
	Then you're forced to confront who women really are, and you learn they're amazing.
	What a misogynist.
	What a misogynist.
	Can you believe he's sitting there calling women amazing?
	He's a trans exclusionary radical feminist.
	And frankly, he made a really good case in that podcast for why his position is actually the one that's more favorable to women than the position of the left, especially in the context of the trans debate.
	And so, really, just based on that minute and a half, I don't believe for a minute that he's guilty of creating a hostile work environment.
	I I think I think he's getting cavanaugh here in a way.
	I really just think that they're taking advantage of the current political climate in order to try to milk him for as much money as possible and render his voice silent, similar to the efforts that have been made against Alex Jones over the last several years.
	Regarding another political influencer and accusations from a woman, the importance of E. Gene Carroll's lawsuit against Donald Trump.
	Apparently, Donald Trump is being accused of raping this woman in the 90s, as I understand it.
	And it seems to me these days, you can pretty much throw a rock and hit a white guy who's been falsely accused of sexual assault.
	And it seems that the more powerful and wealthy people are, the more likely they are to be accused of sexual assault.
	And maybe it's just a coincidence, but perhaps the reason is this is actually a gold-digging operation.
	Frankly, I don't believe for a minute these accusations, not because I'm a Trump supporter, but just because I don't believe it.
	I wouldn't believe it if it was if the same accusation was made against many on the left who I despise.
	Some of them I would, however.
	And I think it's interesting that articles like this by the New York Times are written about these allegations from the 90s with really no substantial evidence when there's little to no coverage of the Clinton accusations.
	And there's no coverage of the sexual assault of minors that we've witnessed Biden commit.
	And with that, I want to play clip number nine of Biden's assault caught on video.
	Why is there no coverage of this?
	Those who are listening, there are screenshots associated with this clip that I'm sharing with you of the little girl in the video years later, saying that she was inappropriately touched by the now president of the United States.
	She says that the president did, in fact, manage her through this video.
	And that she deleted the comment, admitting that it was the case, because she was worried regarding the repercussions of making such a claim that she wouldn't lose friends and overcome problems.
	You can clearly see in this video, coupled with the fact that this girl admitted in writing that that's what happened.
	You can see that we have a president of the United States who sexually abused a child on video.
	No coverage at all, but E. Gene Carroll to make accusations against Trump from the 90s, and that somehow is worthy of a coverage in the New York Times.
	Or a former fired employee can claim that there's a hostile work environment with Tucker Carlson after he is let go from Fox News.
	And that somehow gets coverage.
	I can't believe this, folks.
	I want you to stick with us.
	We have so much more to cover throughout the hour.
	I will be taking calls later on in the show today.
	Make sure you check out TurboForce Plus from InfoWars Life.
	It is a more advanced formula for optimum focus and energy, now available for 25% off.
	With Turbo Force Plus, you do get more power, more strength, and more energy than the original TurboForce formula.
	It's got a little bit less caffeine in it, so you don't crash, but it's got more nootropic supplements in it to make sure that you stay sharp throughout the entire day.
	Stick with us, folks.
	Go to Infowarsstore.com in a new tab, and we'll be right back after this.
	It's funny that this whole entire Tucker Carlson fiasco seems to have come as a surprise to so many.
	I know, and I'm embarrassed to say, I know that it came as a surprise to me.
	There is one among us who was right about what was gonna happen this month.
	Weeks and weeks ago, I want to play clip three of Alex Jones talking about Tucker Carlson maybe being let go or leaving Fox over a month ago.
	And I believe Tucker, he's hardcore, he's awake.
	The left admits it, and so I predict he won't be at Fox News the near future if he's unable to put this out.
	I'm gonna leave it at that.
	He's practically no Stradamas.
	I seriously think he can read the stars.
	It's amazing.
	And it's funny to see that in the context of what Trump had to say about it.
	I want to fire right up to clip one of Trump reacting to the news that Tucker Carlson was let go.
	And you can see that Alex Jones saw this coming weeks ago, but Trump was blindsided.
	Let's check it out.
	So Tucker Carlson was sitting here two weeks ago interviewing you.
	He's gone.
	What do you make of that?
	Well, I'm shocked.
	I'm surprised.
	Uh he's a very good person, a very good man and very talented, as you know, and he had very high ratings.
	So we're just learning about it almost as we speak.
	You and I just said, wow, that was something that's a big one.
	Uh I don't know if it was voluntary or was it uh was somebody fired, but I think Tucker's been uh terrific.
	He's been, especially over the last year or so, he's been terrific to me.
	There's a lot of turmoil over there, Fox.
	I mean, 787 they just paid.
	Why would they get rid of a guy who's performing?
	Why would somebody do that to their business?
	Because they're they're losing money right now.
	Their stock has gone down.
	Well, I was surprised that they made a settlement on that case.
	I thought that was a case that uh should easily be won.
	And they made a settlement.
	Look, you'll have to ask them.
	I'm not I'm not representing them at all by any we uh by any means, but the Tucker uh situation, again, you don't know if it's a firing.
	Maybe he left because he wasn't being given his free reign.
	He wants free reign, maybe, but uh I was surprised by it.
	Oh, this is how legacy media dies with thunderous applause.
	And don't get me wrong, if Tucker left not on his own terms, I do feel bad for the guy.
	He had a pretty sweet gig.
	I think he was making something like eight million dollars a year or something over there.
	20 million.
	Wow, wow, that the data I was looking at was outdated in that case.
	So he was making a lot of money over there, and I do feel bad for him if he is disappointed that he's no longer with Fox.
	That being said, I am delighted to see pretty much any legacy media company make a terrible decision and lose such an incredible talent, such an incredible asset.
	And we've seen so many pundits resign or lose their jobs over the last several years, not just because of scandals, but I think in large, a lot of these scandals are excuses for these legacy media outlets to let go of talent that they simply can't afford anymore.
	Does Fox News really want to pay someone 20 million dollars a year when fewer and fewer advertisers are using their network because social media advertising is less expensive?
	There's so many alternatives to placing an ad in between segments on a cable news network that these legacy media outlets are really suffering.
	We've seen media in general print media just go straight to hell practically over this because their entire business model has switched from a subscription base to a click base, right?
	The more traffic that they get to their site, to their articles, the more impressions they have on the ads that are placed on the site, and the more money that they make, so they lie and they lie and they lie, and they use inflammatory headline after inflammatory headline to get as many clicks as possible because it's no longer about reporting the truth to a dedicated subscriber, so much as it is about getting as much traffic as possible to generate adver ad revenue.
	And so I really think that what's happening right before our eyes is an example of legacy media dying, and it's dying a slow death, but there's no coming back for it, folks.
	Platforms like InfoWars at Band.video are the future of media.
	Twitter is the future of media, independent journalists, substack.
	These are the people that we can trust.
	These are the people that will have the attention of the masses moving forward because it just doesn't seem like legacy media is learning the lessons it needs to learn to pivot in this climate where technology is changing rapidly in the face of artificial intelligence and all these other platforms and technological opportunities.
	They're just not changing.
	It's very boomery.
	And I don't want to insult any of the boomers out there.
	Don't get me wrong.
	I appreciate you for the wisdom that you bring.
	But you can't always do things the way they've always been done in a world that's always changing.
	I want to fire up Savannah Hernandez last night on Timcast IRL.
	Love that podcast as well.
	The great Savannah Hernandez in clip seven talks a little bit about this other development in terms of what's going on with Tucker.
	Let's fire up that clip and then we'll talk more about it after.
	To be quite honest, I am tired of these leftist politicians who do continue to incite people to violence.
	We can look at the LGBTQ community, Antifa, Black Lives Matter.
	The list goes on and on.
	We can look at, you know, at the FBI and all the times they've entrapped Americans and tried to incite them to violence.
	Let's go ahead and get into all of that.
	And we want, we have AOC over here talking to the Biden administration, demanding them to take Tucker off of air.
	It's absolutely ridiculous.
	You know, Chuck Schumer came to the case.
	Yeah, that's what I'm saying.
	Chuck Schumer came forward too because he was saying that uh, you know, Tucker Carlson uh killed democracy.
	It was the destruction of democracy when he came out and he showed the American public more January 6th footage that the J6 commission was withholding.
	It's just absolutely ridiculous to me.
	And I'm so tired of being run by criminals that that's just where we're at in America in 2023.
	Uh, you know, the left can go ahead and incite violence against us all day long, but um, Tucker Carlson can't go and accurately report on uh his own show.
	You know, there's something interesting about this dynamic because you never see people on the right actually calling for the arrest or imprisonment of journalists on the left.
	Now, you'll see people all the time on the right say that Hillary Clinton should go to prison or different political leaders should go to prison because they either violate their oaths of office or or explicitly break the law.
	But you don't see a lot of people advocating on on Twitter up from the right or getter or wherever they are, that Brian Stelter go to prison or Don Lemon go to prison.
	We despise these people because they lie time and time again and manipulate the people against the truth.
	But no one thinks that Don Lemon should be locked up, or that any pundit on CNN should be locked up.
	And so for a representative like AOC to have the audacity to say that someone like Tucker Carlson should be arrested or imprisoned as a member of the press, explicitly protected by the Constitution of the United States in the Bill of Rights.
	That is absolutely alarming to me.
	And it's so egregious that I just can't Give her the benefit of the doubt that she doesn't understand.
	I can't say, you know what, she's ignorant.
	Everybody knows the First Amendment of the United States.
	Everybody knows that since elementary school.
	It protects freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, right to petition, freedom of the press.
	And yet she's calling for the arrest of someone because this person reports something that they believe to be false.
	Or perhaps they're lying, saying that they believe it's false and they know it's true, and that's why they really want them arrested.
	This to me is more grounds for arrest than anything Tucker Carlson has ever done on the air.
	Don't you think that a congresswoman who advocates for the arrest of journalists has violated the laws of our nation more than any journalist who's reported something that may or may not be true?
	And frankly, I believe the things that that Tucker reports on.
	I don't think that he is lying, but even if he were to lie on air, it's still protected by the Constitution of the United States of America.
	Something that AOC swore an oath to protect.
	Right back after this break.
	Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
	So make sure you have your phones ready.
	Anxious to hear what you think about all of this new news.
	A poll that came in just a couple of days ago.
	A whopping 70% think that Biden shouldn't run again.
	I'm thinking to myself, run?
	The guy can't even walk.
	you Or talk.
	Or hold a meeting.
	Or find a spot that he's supposed to stand, even if it's got tape on the floor, or read a teleprompter, or accurately file his taxes, or protect his relative from sexual abuse by another relative.
	Jeez, what can the guy do other than ruin a country?
	He's got a real talent for it.
	But I wanted to bring up this poll because, of course, Biden announced this morning that he's going to run for re-election.
	Re-election.
	Thank you.
	And frankly, if I'd known that he was running for re-election, I would have actually given some thought as to whether or not I want to vote for him.
	Like it's it's catching me off guard that he's running again, and so now I actually have to consider whether or not I should vote for him.
	I want to show you guys another example of the reasons that the right has so much animosity for the left these days.
	Showed you this poll saying 70% of people don't think that Biden should run again.
	It goes to show that the left is losing support, and not just Biden, but I think the left as a whole.
	And it's things like this next clip, clip number four of Trudeau, that I believe are the catalyst or the animosity from American patriots to the left.
	Fired up.
	Misinformation and disinformation is carrying people to believe things that are untrue.
	Vaccinations is a perfect example of it.
	Like any modern bit of medical advancements, there are potential side effects in vaccinations.
	And there are people who've probably gotten very sick from vaccinations on the billions of people who've been vaccinated against COVID over the past few years.
	But there are far more people who obviously have died due to COVID.
	Died from not getting vaccinated.
	And the idea that people can fly in the face of science, well, individuals are allowed to make their own choices.
	There may be all sorts of different reasons why someone is hesitant to get vaccinated.
	But I make a distinction, and I have always have between someone choosing for personal reasons to choose not to get vaccinated, and someone deliberately using misinformation to mislead and scare other people with so-called facts that aren't facts at all,
	That lead them to make a choice that endangers their lives and the lives of other citizens.
	So, as Prime Minister, through the greatest public health crisis that we've faced in a hundred years in this country, since the Spanish flu, my responsibility was to keep as many Canadians alive as possible.
	And all of the scientists and the medical experts and the researchers, not just in Canada but around the world, misinformation.
	Vaccination was going to be the way through this.
	And therefore, while not forcing anyone to get vaccinated, I chose to make sure that all the incentives and all the protections were there to encourage Canadians to get vaccinated.
	And that's exactly what they did.
	We got vaccinated to a higher level than just about any other of our peer countries.
	And that's why we had a less deadly pandemic than most other countries.
	Well, there's the leader of off-brand America lying to you and saying that the Canadians were actually allowed to make their own decisions about whether or not to get vaccinated, where we know virtually every regulation possible was put into place to ensure that they had to, even if they didn't want to.
	Had the great Colkin on this show as a guest in the third hour, he's an immigration attorney.
	And he's talked about how Canadians are seeking asylum in the United States to avoid taking the vaccine.
	They are claiming that they need asylum from their government because they're being forced to take this drug.
	This implication that he never mandated these vaccines is asinine.
	It's a lie.
	If Tucker Carlson is a liar, then Justin Trudeau is the best of the best at lying.
	He is the king of lying.
	He is the cream of the crap when it comes to lying.
	And there's a distinction between personal reasons and intentional disinformation or misinformation.
	What incentive does anyone have to lie about negative side effects of the vaccine?
	There were a lot of incentives to lie about the efficacy and safety of the vaccines.
	A lot of people made billions upon billions of dollars.
	A lot of government officials were able to increase the power of their various departments by mandating these vaccines and claiming that they were safe and effective.
	So many incentives to lie and say that they were totally safe and totally effective, but not any incentives to lie about.
	Why would I sit up here and just make it up that I was skeptical about the safety of these vaccines?
	So, what disinformation or misinformation is Justin Trudeau even talking about in this situation?
	And the fact that he used the term allowed is what really grinds my gears.
	Because he's saying that people are allowed to voice their concerns or allowed to choose not to get a vaccine, as if that's a decision that requires permission.
	When you're a kid, your friend asks you to come over for a sleepover, and you say, I'm not allowed, that's because it's not your right to go over there.
	You have to have permission from your parents.
	And so the fact that he would use this term is just indicative of the level of narcissism and egoism that he has, how power hungry he is, shutting down bank accounts, excluding the Canadians from their right to bear arms and buy and sell firearms, mandating the vaccines and then lying about it.
	Who's the criminal, Tucker Carlson or Justin Trudell?
	This is the reason that 70% of Americans don't think that Joe Biden should run again.
	This is the reason that the general population is being radicalized against the government.
	And I want to show you a clip at the end of the segment right now of clip number six, where I talked about this a little bit yesterday.
	This is what's firing up our side.
	This is our hope.
	Go ahead and fire away.
	Only one in 40 Germans were actually identified as Nazis when the Nazis came into power.
	Unemployment in Germany was upwards of 30%.
	That means one in three people were out of work.
	When you have 30% unemployment, that means that a vast number of people every day are waking up at the crack of dawn, Looking for work all day until dusk and not finding any.
	And when you have that type of unemployment rate coupled with a currency that requires you to bring your money into the grocery store in a wheelbarrow in order to buy a loaf of bread for your family, you start to have a people with radical ideas.
	And when you have a people with radical ideas, and there are enough of them, then they start to get organized.
	And when they start to get organized, they start to take power.
	And if there is a situation in a country where there are two parties, which are virtually a uniparty that are at odds with one another and sort of really balancing the scale, it's like this immovable force meeting this unstoppable force, just sort of in this lock.
	All you need is a small wedge to offset that imbalance or that balance.
	And that small wedge takes all the power.
	So even with one in 40 Germans identifying as Nazis, they were able to go into this dichotomy and create enough of an imbalance that all that was left was theirs for the taking.
	And all of the policies that our government is doing today, whether it's crippling the dollar, whether it's ruining the economy, whether it's this faux EV crap that's gonna give all of our money to our enemies, is radicalizing the people.
	It's radicalized me.
	I never dreamed of being a podcaster or on InfoWars two years ago.
	Before three years ago, the only thing I knew about Alex Jones was Bohemian Grove.
	Because I remember watching it at my student work desk in 2012, being like, what the hell?
	It's real.
	But I've been radicalized by the left.
	I have been baptized by the fire that is leftist corruption.
	Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
	We'll be taking calls in the next hour.
	So make sure you call in 877-789-2539.
	I want to hear from you no matter what is on your mind.
	You know, it's funny talking about the vaccine because the first time that I ever called in a radio show, I called in Phil Valentine's radio show on a drive back from college campus, maybe 10, 12 years ago.
	And I was so nervous and I talked so fast and I stumbled over myself and I talked too long.
	And I just want you guys to feel very comfortable calling in here because there is absolutely no judgment.
	Whatever's on your mind that interests you or that concerns you, make sure you call in and let us know.
	I'm here to talk about anything.
	877-789-2539.
	In the last segment, we talked a lot about Justin Trudeau and Joe Biden running for office again officially as of this morning, as well as the 70% of Americans in a poll who expressed that they don't want Joe Biden to run again.
	And what strikes me is so funny about this poll is that it comes in the wake of seemingly years of Democrats saying MAGA Republicans are a threat to our democracy.
	White supremacism is a threat to our democracy.
	Right wing extremism is a threat to our democracy.
	And I've talked tirelessly on this show about how I hate democracy.
	The irony, of course, is that if the left loves democracy so much, then why is Joe Biden running for president when 70% of Americans don't want him to run again?
	You would think that if he had such great respect for the will of the people, he would say, oh, the wheel, the will of the people is sacred.
	It's sacrosanct.
	So I can't run again because that would be against my moral code.
	That would be against my principles to run again, because I believe in democracy.
	And it just goes to show that the leftists don't actually believe in democracy.
	They only believe in democracy when that sort of language is convenient to their own attempt at a power grab.
	If they believed in democracy, then there would be more issues on the ballot for everybody to vote on.
	Some states, of course, have this provision in their constitution where there's enough signatures on a petition, for example, you can bring a specific issue as a ballot measure.
	That's an example of direct democracy.
	But the left doesn't really believe in democracy.
	And the funny thing about it is you can't really believe in democracy and claim to fight for minorities at the same time, because the definition of democracy is that a majority wins over a minority.
	So if the black population of the United States is approximately 13% of the United States, then how is democracy good for that population when they're never gonna win the majority of the vote?
	If people actually vote on racist interests, racist incentives.
	And I don't know if there's a way for us to get people to stop talking about democracy so favorably.
	It's particularly perturbing to me when I see the right do it, because the right should know better, especially given that the party is called the Republican Party because it supports a republic.
	Why is it that we've been tricked by our teachers or our leaders to worship this form of government that is called democracy when we know that the people, by and large, make terrible decisions, and that no minority can really be protected.
	No individual rights can really be protected in a true direct democracy.
	I wonder what would happen if we just let everyone vote on every issue.
	What would happen if all Americans could vote as to whether or not they get a million dollars a year in universal basic income?
	We know if we look at the details that that would be absolutely catastrophic to our economy.
	Government, of course, would have to print money in order to write those checks, and then the value of the money would be worthless.
	So everybody would wind up where they started.
	But I bet you the average person would vote for that if it was an option on a ballot because it sure sounds good.
	There's a great clip of a spiritual leader that I that I've seen.
	It's it's it's been viral before.
	You've probably seen it.
	So it's rule by the stupid, rule of the mob over the individual.
	And we see it all over the world, whether it's Canada, whether it's the United States, whether it's Europe.
	There's this constant antagonism towards the idea of a sovereign nation, right?
	Russia is no saint, but this war in Ukraine is in large a war of sovereignty.
	It's Russia claiming its independence and its right to be its own nation without the influence of NATO in large.
	I'm sure there are some corrupt motives behind it.
	I'm sure that there are some evil actions being taken behind it.
	Profits being made behind this war, this aggression on both sides.
	There were bad people on both sides.
	But it's a claim to sovereignty.
	And it seems to me that the left hates national sovereignty because national sovereignty implies another level of sovereignty, which is individual sovereignty.
	And so they do things like eradicating everyone's individuality by ascribing identities to them.
	So if you want to be a woman, you can just say that you're a woman.
	Tucker covered that at the beginning of this segment or this the show today when I played that video, talking about how just being able to say that you're a woman by claiming it sort of eliminates any meaning behind what it is to be a woman.
	Matt Walsh, of course, emphasized this with his documentary, What is a woman?
	And so really, the more they try to put us into groups, the more they try to ascribe a group identity to us, the more we lose our sense of self.
	And if we lose our sense of self, then we lose our sense of rights.
	And if we're pushed into self-sacrifice and altruism and notions like this, then we wind up feeling miserable with low self-esteem, as if we owe the world everything because we're a drain on it unless we give the world everything.
	And it ties into every single leftist issue, whether it's climate change, you as an individual are bad for the earth, you as an individual are harming the planet, harming the climate, harming the earth, anything that you do to manipulate it or shape it is a tragedy or a crime against the rights that the planet itself has, or a crime against your community, which of course is intentionally ambiguous, you become an enemy of the people without which which people being defined.
	And then when we we talked yesterday about the new mortgage policies that are gonna roll out on the first, regarding giving better rates To lower income, excuse me, lower credit scores, charging people with better credit scores who've been more responsible, more for their mortgages.
	It's this idea that if you've somehow been more successful or more responsible, it must have been an outcome of privilege and not character.
	Therefore, you owe a debt to your intentionally ambiguous community.
	And they use that sort of moral gaslighting as a tool to trick people into guilt voting for them.
	We've seen time and time again, election after election, people vote for the wrong candidates because they have some sort of guilt.
	We've seen white guilt pushed.
	I noticed it in college in 2010 when I went to college that you go to an intro to sociology class, and I went to a private Christian school where all the teachers had to vow that they were a member of a church and a Christian, a believing Christian, in order to even teach there.
	And it you go to sociology one-on-one and you're immediately Satan because you're a white guy.
	And they try to make you doubt yourself.
	Because when you doubt yourself, you're malleable.
	I would encourage you today not to doubt yourself to have the confidence to call in and share what's on your mind at 877-789-2539.
	Again, that's 877-789-2539.
	Because I want to hear what you think about everything that's going on.
	What do you think about Tucker Carlson's ousting?
	What do you think about Joe Biden officially announcing that he's running for office again, even though he can't walk?
	And did you pick up on Alex Jones last month calling it?
	Alex Jones was right again about Tucker Saul Tucker Carlson leaving Fox News.
	Did you notice that on March 8th?
	Where are you landing in terms of Trump and DeSantis?
	Who else do you think is gonna run?
	What do you think the outcome is going to be in 2024?
	Is it too late to save the country?
	I refuse to believe that it is because believing that it's too late is a sure way to guarantee that it's too late.
	So I'm gonna fight to the very, very end.
	If you guys haven't seen the movie Cool Hand Luke, I encourage you to watch that movie because there's a very important scene in it, a boxing scene in which Paul Newman's character is facing a much stronger opponent.
	And he, of course, can't beat this opponent head on.
	But every time he gets knocked down, he gets up time and time again.
	Eventually, his stronger opponent gives up and everyone walks away.
	And the only one left standing in the yard is Paul Newman's character, Coolhand Luke.
	So the end is only guaranteed when the individual gives up on himself.
	As long as America lives in the heart of one American, or the reason why I named my podcast the one American podcast, then America has a chance to manifest itself in the world again.
	Stick with us, folks.
	We'll be taking your calls in the next segment, 877-789-2539.
	Check out InfoWars Store.com during the break.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
	I will be taking your calls this hour, 877-789-2539.
	Something beautiful is happening.
	We talked a lot in the first segment about the collapse of corporate legacy media.
	And you all know how hard they've come after Alex these last few years.
	Really hard.
	And I've kept up with it.
	I've studied it, I've read all the articles.
	I've listened to Alex's show, I've listened to the opponents of Alex.
	I can't imagine what it's like to go through something like that personally.
	I can't imagine what it's like to be an employee of a company that's going through that.
	And yet he keeps getting up time and time again, just like Cool Han Luke.
	And don't worry, Andy, Luke, I'll take your call.
	But we see the stelters disappear.
	We see the Megan Kelly's disappear.
	I mean, she has her own show, but she got fired from two networks first.
	We see Tucker Carlson deplatformed.
	All of these mainstream legacy pundits are being taken off the air, but Alex Jones Is still live on the air every day, sometimes seven days a week, sometimes for four or six hours at a time.
	When they take Tucker Carlson down, they can't take Alex Jones down, and it's because of you.
	When they take Don Lemon down, they can't take Alex Jones down, and it's because of you.
	When they take Brian Stelter down, they can't take Alex Jones down, and it's because of you and your support as individuals.
	How are we not winning on that front?
	If we're the ones that are still on air, go ahead and play clip number eight, Alex Jones still on the air.
	Before we wrap up tonight, there's one more thing I do want to say.
	Anyways, excuse me, ladies and gentlemen.
	This will be my final word.
	Excuse me.
	CNF has canceled reliable sources.
	Excuse me.
	Bill O'Reilly is leaving this chair and this network after more than 20 years.
	I've been trying to control myself, trying to be professional about this.
	But at a certain point, I just am just really getting pissed.
	Excuse me.
	So a big development today at our own network, CNN parting ways with anchor Don Lemon.
	I mean, what the hell have we become?
	Excuse me.
	After more than a dozen years at Fox News, I have decided to pursue a new challenge.
	Excuse me.
	Let me start with my headline tonight.
	I'm retiring.
	This is the last hardbone MSNBC.
	Excuse me.
	This is my last newscast here.
	Excuse me.
	Hi everybody and welcome to Fox News Tonight.
	I am Brian Kilme.
	As you probably have heard, Fox News and Tucker Carlson have agreed to part ways.
	Excuse me.
	I'll see you next time.
	When Fox News settles for an amount that I believe is less than some of the amounts discussed regarding the Alex Jones case, and it fires Tucker Carlson, but Alex Jones is still on the air.
	It goes to show how Will is a factor more than anything.
	And a board of directors of a publicly traded company will always buckle under a small amount of pressure.
	Nobody ever makes a statue of a committee, but individuals have the capacity to awaken the hero within.
	And it's individuals like you that are reasonable are the reason that this network is still on the air every single day.
	The reason that Alex Jones is still telling the truth to millions of people a week, every single day, every single week, every single month, every year for the last 25 or 30 years, if not more.
	And that's why it's so important that we keep fighting the good fight.
	That you do what you can as an individual, whether it's going to InfoWars Store.com and just donating $10 a month or $5 a month, or whether it's checking out TurboForce Plus, I actually recommend TurboForce Plus because I think philosophically it's the moral thing to do.
	Because if we're gonna save this country, it's gonna be the individuals that do it.
	And if we're gonna be the best version of ourselves, we have to have the energy and the focus to fight the good fight.
	And that's exactly what TurboForce Plus gives us.
	It's now 25% off, and you will get more power, more strength, and more energy with it than the original Turbo Force formula.
	I use it as often as I can get my hands on it.
	It's absolutely amazing.
	My clients love that I take it because I do better work for them.
	And you InfoWarriors out there love that I take it because I give a better show when I've had my Turbo Force Plus.
	Stay with us, folks.
	Calls in the next segment.
	Welcome back to the American Journal.
	Folks, it is an honor and a pleasure to be with you.
	I cannot wait to take these calls.
	The phones are blowing up here, but don't hesitate to call in because I'm gonna get through as many of them as I possibly can.
	877, 789-2539.
	We have been sharing the truth, covering the news in a way that no other outlets or media platforms do, as we're proud to do here on InfoWars livestreamed at Band.video.
	Make sure you share it.
	Make sure you check out InfoWars store.com.
	Up first, I want to take Tim from Seattle.
	Tim, what is on your mind, man?
	Um, yeah, you said earlier that the Don Lemon and those journalists from CNN and MSNBC shouldn't be arrested.
	I knew somebody was gonna be mad.
	I knew it as soon as I said it.
	What's on your mind?
	What do you think?
	Yep.
	Well, they use their influence, their time on air to coerce and manipulate the will of the masses to take an experimental jazz.
	Oh, yeah.
	They're evil people.
	They're 100% evil people, but is isn't that's not illegal, man.
	It's freedom of speech.
	Well, no, it is illegal because it says right here in the number one of the uh the Nuremberg code that you no fraud seek, uh duress, uh overreaching, anything.
	You can't say anything.
	It's only between you and your doctor.
	Nobody else in the world can tell you or and try to influence you it's to take an experimental gene therapy.
	So I understand that Nuremberg mandate is counter our first amendment protection.
	So I would ask you, what law do you think supersedes what law?
	Do you think that the Nuremberg trials resulted in uh uh a a supreme law over the constitution of the United States?
	No, I don't, but I think what should happen is is that people should not be so stuck in the wheeze about which is which is more powerful, which which uh has more precedent, and just enact the laws that apply.
	Because the Nuremberg Code, I mean the Constitution wasn't written for eugenesis, but the Nuremberg code was, and so we could use that.
	You know what I'm saying?
	Let me ask you what you think would be more effective.
	Do you think it would have been more effective to prosecute and hold accountable these lying pundits?
	Or instead of prosecuting and silencing them, just ensuring that every other American on the internet wasn't silenced for the past three years on social media.
	Because I think that if the truth had equal say in the matter and the debate about vaccines or any of these other issues over the last three years, that these pundits would have been rendered powerless.
	I I I think that their power over the people was because the opposition was silenced.
	Uh I think you're right, but still it doesn't matter.
	That didn't happen.
	They did silence you, and then the others did use all of their COVID money uh backing to tell the world to take a shot.
	So they're guilty of Nuremberg crime.
	Uh uh just prima facie, guilty.
	I mean, we can try them, but I mean, they did commit crimes by using their influence to coerce and terrorize people into putting an experimental gene therapy into the body with no cure.
	Yeah, I'm with you.
	I understand.
	I I'm not sure that I that I agree with you, but I do respect what you said because I think it's a very reasonable take.
	Well, I agree, I agree with the first the free speech thing, right?
	But they're not used to free speech.
	They're being paid.
	It's not free speech.
	They're they're under a direct uh they're being mandated to tell these uh this information to people.
	So it's not like it's free speech.
	Me and you talking right now, this is free speech.
	But with somebody with uh talking points from the World Health Organization, that's not free speech.
	They're under duress themselves.
	Do you think that they knew that they were full of it?
	Uh it doesn't matter at a certain point.
	So so if you tell you if you tell if you say something that isn't true on accident, you you should be held accountable.
	Uh just really depends on uh what the damage done by what you said.
	Honestly, I mean, not by like the Sandy Hook standards, but we're talking about an experimental medical gene therapy that's it's made billions probably.
	Yeah.
	Well, I'm with you on the on the concerns about the vaccine, and I'm with you that they lied about efficacy and safety, whether they knew they were lying or not.
	I'm just really concerned that if we start prosecuting people based on promoting lies, then whoever's in political power will just be able to lock up political opponents.
	You know, I mean the happen to the January 6ers like what happened to Alex Jones, time and time again that we've seen that abused, you know.
	But we have an email.
	I'm sure there's a paper chain uh from Fauci all the way to the CDC and back and forth.
	There's none of that with us.
	So I mean, we could say that some people's lives and disinformation, they're they're fine because it's free speech, but when you have an actual concerted agenda to depopulate the world based off of using lies and deception through the media, a little bit different.
	And it should be treated differently.
	Well, I appreciate your call, man.
	Thanks for calling in, Tim.
	It's always an honor to talk to you.
	I want to hear next from Jack in Wisconsin.
	Jack, what's on your mind today?
	Hey, Chase, can you hear me all right?
	Yeah, you sound great.
	Yeah, sorry, I had to take off that mask real quick again.
	Um I wanted to circle back again to Nicola Tesla stuff before you go, because you're a Nicola Tesla fan.
	I love it, man.
	That's why I took the call.
	Yeah, so uh we left off yesterday.
	You were talking about when the uh the feds and the Navy and all the US different elements took like Nicola Tesla's trunks uh after he died.
	And like they sent it off to be uh analyzed and stuff, and John G. Trump's dad, I mean, uncle, John G. Trump, uh, who's Trump's uncle was looking through it and you know, mysteriously said, like, oh, there's there's nothing there of interest, you know, even though Tesla is like the electric Jesus and brought electricity and all the comforts that come with it.
	Uh, not saying he's like Jesus, but he's like the oldest.
	I understand Jesus for electricity.
	Yeah, thank you.
	Thank you.
	Yeah, you're not all sensey.
	Um some of the trunks he was uh uh leaving behind were like booby trapped.
	Right, mentioned that uh yeah, because like and they had the bell hops open them uh up, like I said yesterday.
	But what was weird with that was that eventually, uh, even though Tesla was dead, he was able to tell which uh trunks were being opened by bell hops and civilians and which ones were being opened by the feds, kind of like that wavelength form theorem where like you know, a particle goes through a crack.
	Sure, like when a fed walks in the room, you're goosebumps and you feel afraid.
	No, more like the physics things, like when you're observing a particle, it will act differently than when you're not observing it.
	Right.
	And he was using all this advanced physics and science stuff because uh even like JP Morgan was talking and asking him to like, hey, figure out how to open up portals to the afterlife so we can bring back dead relatives and ties in all the CERN stuff, and I think all that stuff is being implemented today.
	That's why stuff feels so weird.
	So you plus you think that like the the elite of the world are trying to use this technology in order to bring back the dead or ensure their mortal immortality?
	Not only that, but like uh opening portals for demons to get in and like hijack people's minds, you know, like opening the the gates to hell, you know, and um Tesla was a religious person and believed in that.
	You see things like CERN, uh, which was in Europe, and then Fermi Lab was in the US for a long time, which is in uh Batavia, Illinois, you know, and they have like a 33 ton magnet there, huge magnets and all these like uh weird science stuff.
	And you know, that kind of ties in then with uh he like was talking about how he could copy people on an electronic level and do clones via like electricity, where you're doing like alchemy, electric to uh solid, uh energy to solid alchemy, which was also weird stuff he was rumored to do.
	It's like you could do clones like a copy machine.
	Um then that ties in then with the time travel stuff, which obviously is like you know, the holy grail of conspiracy.
	But don't you don't you think that if time was real, somebody would have come back and said hello?
	Well, you know, like the the what the people online and you know, all the people who talk about it, the things they say, not me, of course, but like say like the first rule of time traveler club is you don't have any more time travelers because it's like the more time travel people, the more messed up things can get.
	What if you're not time travel is possible?
	But the fact that we haven't seen anyone from the future come back is proof that we go extinct before we discover the technology of how to travel in time.
	I think uh the more the bigger I I like that, but like I think the bigger piece of evidence is like look how weird stuff is and all the weird conspiracy theories that ended up being uh true.
	Like why not this one?
	You know, and it's like has all the indicators of like being true, all the money put into it, all the interest put into it.
	And you know, the math is real, you know, there's places in the universe and conditions where you know, like by black holes and stuff where time gets bent, like how can that not be then manipulated with um technology that genius investments come up with.
	Thank you so much for your call, Jack.
	I really do appreciate it.
	If I could go back in time, I'd probably go back to 2009 and buy a bunch of Bitcoin and give it all to InfoWars.
	Make sure you check out Infowarsstore.com and get yourself some Turbo Force Plus.
	Stick with us, folks.
	I'll be taking more calls after this break.
	I put on my clothes like a bodyguard.
	I put the dogs on patrol in my home backseat.
	Welcome back to the American Journal folks.
	I'll be taking your calls the rest of this hour.
	Make sure you call in eight seven seven seven eighty nine two five three nine.
	But it's so what you have to say about anything in the whole wide world.
	I'm gonna hear up.
	Next from Sean at New York City.
	Sean, what's on your mind?
	Hey, good morning, Chase.
	How are you?
	Good morning, sir.
	Thank you for your call.
	Great.
	Uh, you know, there's a conspiracy theory going on.
	I'm not quite sure if this is true, but uh since Harrison's away on maternity leave, is it true that men can have babies?
	You know, you'd have to ask Harrison himself.
	That's I'm friends with Harrison, but we're not gonna be able to do that.
	Can we call him right now and tell him congratulations from the InfoWars universe?
	Yeah, we might be able to do an outbound call, outbound call to him.
	Let's call him.
	Let's call.
	Maybe later, man.
	Uh if you call back later, I'll see if I can swing in uh uh during one of these breaks.
	I don't know if it's possible or not, but I'm sure that he would love to hear from you.
	But yeah, what is the deal with maternity leave?
	Is that has paternity leave been a thing for a long time, or is this just like a new thing?
	Because I it was something I never could have even imagined when I was growing up.
	Well, I'm surprised that Alex put that in the contract.
	Yeah, yeah, absolutely.
	He's cool.
	Is it in your contract?
	I I'm just here as a volunteer because I believe in the info war.
	That's true.
	And it also I want to say that if you did invest in 2009 in all of that Bitcoin, the money you would have now, you probably wouldn't even know who InfoWars was.
	Yeah.
	That's true.
	I don't know, man.
	I don't know.
	I think I would have caught on.
	I've always been a truth seeker.
	I mean, you know, the musk is one of the richest men in the world and he knows who InfoWars is.
	You see, like Elon Musk talk about, you know uh artificial intelligence, and I I believe that artificial intelligence has already taken away the wisdom and the knowledge that we need to control what's going on in these corporations and companies that most of the older people that died off from either ventilators and Mendes Vier uh have now figured that the re-migrating but what was it called inside of companies when they were doing uh replenishing
	all of the workers?
	What was that called?
	Oh, I don't know.
	It's like migration immigration, but within corporation.
	Yeah, I mean they put this together because they knew people were gonna start dying from the shock.
	So they had to like figure out how many people in the next couple years they're gonna need to replace the.
	Let me ask you this.
	Let me ask you this, Sean.
	Do you think that our politicians actually took the shot?
	Um, well, I mean, I've seen some pretty wild videos of needles falling inside of the the needle as they're doing it.
	So, you know, I think there's been some props.
	You know, Kamala's first shot, the needle was bent backwards and all of this stuff.
	You know, I don't I don't think these videos are fake.
	You know, I don't think these videos are, you know, I I could hear the sound of the needle.
	I could see the needle.
	You know, Robin Quivers had it posted on her on her uh Instagram for the longest time.
	Her getting the shot.
	And you could literally see the needle, doesn't even puncture her skin.
	It shoots up into the into the the syringe.
	Do you think maybe they got the shot before they did like the uh the press thing and they faked it on the press thing?
	Exactly.
	And and and and the only poor people, like Alex said, the good the good news is they administered this drug wrong.
	And a lot of people didn't get the proper infection to kill a shot, you know.
	So a lot of this might have fallen by the wayside.
	But they they attempted to kill the human race, man.
	What are we gonna do about it?
	Let's have babies.
	Let's go, Harrison.
	More babies.
	Yeah, that's right.
	You gotta populate the earth with your worldview.
	Thank you so much for calling in, Sean.
	It was really a pleasure to hear from you.
	I want to hear next from Tweety Bird and FEMA Region 6.
	Tweety Bird, what's on your mind today?
	How's it going?
	Can you hear me?
	Yeah, you sound great.
	How are you?
	Good.
	Nice to hear from Chase.
	They're always interesting guys.
	I'm mighty hunter.
	But uh, anyways, I'll get quick to it.
	There's a few uh Ray Up stories that haven't been told from January 6th, and I want to challenge everyone out there who may have some footage.
	There was a lot of cameras on the ground, a lot of vintage cameras, might not necessarily be people on our side of things that day that were filming every angle up close to this.
	But there was a uh an incident at the ellipse where a Ray Epps, I can't say it's him for sure, but a figure like a Ray Epps came out in a repo uniform and tried to do the whole let's go take the capital blah blah, you know, a little 10-minute speech and was stopped by people surrounding him, telling him, no, we're here for the 10 days of uh investigation, we're here for the indictment about to be served by the grand jury.
	And you know, so it he got cut off and ushered out.
	When he gets caught, he stripped his repo man uniform off and tries to say he's with Trump and he's wearing White House staff and stuff.
	And then uh after uh similar very close by, uh a group of uh people get called down by their group to join up with the other group down uh by the other event.
	And uh there was a restaurant nearby where Ray Epps himself, this one I know was him, was confronted inside the restaurant.
	I know it's on film.
	There needs to be some brave people come out and put this video out of him being confronted in the pub to let's say the left if you're facing the back of the building.
	Um and uh uh as well as there was uh footage of every angle of the death that is not spoken of, where citizens carried this man off uh to the left of the building when cops were refusing to let the ambulance come any closer, claiming the crowd was in the way, but there was no crowd in the way, and it was just the SWAT cops that eventually had to move out of the room.
	If they were able to get Ashley Babbitt to an ambulance, they were able to get somebody else from an ambush because she was in the thick of it.
	Well, I encourage everybody to go watch the the really really slow down breakdown of that Ashley Babbitt scene and reanalyze what they think about it anyway, uh with uh watchful eye and uh uh I'm really nervous, Chase,
	but I just want to pray that we're all effective and that we all uh can be sharp tools in the quiver right now, because uh there's a lot of heroes still out there, and like Alex says, it's not the people like me and you that are doing something heroic that have the chance to turn into the system.
	It's the Imron at Wands that have the chance to uh to do the right thing.
	You know, it's uh all these people that were there that day with vintage cameras knowing what's about to happen that saw what happened, and uh have the chance to speak up.
	But anyway, I'll let you go, Chase.
	Uh have a good day.
	Thank you so much for your call.
	I really do appreciate hearing from you, Tweety Bird.
	Next up, we've just got a couple of minutes left of this segment.
	I want to hear from Marcus in Idaho.
	Marcus, what's on your mind today?
	Hello, Chase.
	Hi, how are you, sir?
	I'm good.
	Um, I want to say uh first off with a question.
	Um, who funded all of these news outlets?
	I don't know.
	You tell me.
	Um funder for I mean, what is the most commercials that these news outlets have?
	Yeah, pharmaceuticals that take over 80% or something of all ads or pharma.
	Exactly.
	Yeah.
	And so when you've got that, who owns these news organizations?
	And so who tells them, well, you gotta kick off somebody.
	So I think that um some of this uh Tucker and um I don't know about lemon dumb lemon, but uh is definitely these pharma companies saying well, you gotta get them off.
	But also at the same time, they're not getting that same billions of dollars from the government.
	So right now their funding is drying up from there, it's not dried up.
	There's still all the commercials, but it's not the same billions of dollars that they were getting from Big Pharma to tout the line.
	Yeah, and you know what?
	I think that's the reason that Biden came out and said, you know, we're gonna cure cancer.
	He made that special cancer committee or or whatever they set up is because he knew that the revenue from the pandemic was gonna dry up for these drug companies, and he's trying to put in place other committees, initiatives, policies that will ensure that these pharma companies continue to make the same amount of money because we know that it's painful for businesses to make a tremendous amount of money in a short period of time and then have that disappear.
	That's why the social media platforms hired so many people during the pandemic because there were so many people on social media and there was so much demand for advertising.
	And then when people went back to work and weren't spending as much time on social media, they had to do these mass layoffs.
	So absolutely, pharmaceuticals are seeking other ways to generate a comparable amount of revenue to what they were making during the pandemic.
	Stick with us, folks.
	I'll be taking more calls in the next segment, 877-789-2539.
	And then make sure you visit Infowars Store.com.
	right back after this break.
	Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
	I will be taking calls the rest of this hour.
	We'll be calling 877-792539.
	Who do I want to talk to this segment?
	He's got something interesting to say.
	Oh, can't say no to Simon in Florida.
	That accent, Simon, I want to hear from you, man.
	What's on your mind?
	Hello there, Chase.
	It's a pleasure to speak with you again.
	And may I say, you know, I don't normally patronize that you had an outstanding run covering Harrison.
	So my on this congratulations on your time there.
	Thank you.
	I appreciate that.
	It means a lot.
	So um very quickly, what Trudeau was saying, and people can just um look this up if they make a note of this, it's I C 10 Z 28.1.
	We don't need to talk about that.
	But if they looked it up, he literally was reading out the definition of a medical disease classification code.
	Can I just interrupt you for a second?
	I do want you to finish your thought.
	But your knowledge is so vast based on our interactions via DMs and on the show that I'm beginning to think that you're Chat GPT.
	Can you verify that you're not artificial intelligence?
	Well, you've already verified by that by not detecting a left-wing bias, right?
	That's right.
	That's right.
	Okay, go on.
	But moving on, moving on from that, what I would point out is um, in relation to the Biden um announcement that he's uh running for a re-test, that he's saying that he still needs to finish the job,
	and I'm sure this thought will have automatically occurred to many of the InfoWars audience, but the job that he has in mind is the final destruction of the United States, and this four years has been um putting a lot of the legislation and most importantly,
	the regulations in place in order to facilitate the implementation in the period 2025 to 2029.
	So, what is the incentive to destroy the United States just for the sake of conversation?
	Well, I I think we're seeing it in many European countries, particularly with net zero, which is being implemented at an accelerated pace just this week.
	We've now seen the European Union saying they're going to cut down their CO2 emissions from 2005 levels.
	They were originally planning to do 43% by 2030.
	Now they've just announced overnight that they're going to do 62%, which obviously is basically 50% more than they already planning.
	And this is by 2030.
	So you're saying, okay, so we were going to do this hugely ambitious goal over the course of like 2020 or 2030.
	Here we are in the early stages of 2023, and we're now increasing those goals by 50%.
	And the United States government has done a similar thing.
	Many people may have heard they did this thing called the methane pledge a couple of years ago.
	Well, last November, they suddenly, without any external pressure whatsoever, said no, we're going to go far beyond that, and we're going to announce the methane pledge plus that has an enormous impact upon oil and gas and coal mining in the United States.
	And that went into effect on the 13th of March of this year.
	And so when people think, you know, that all these politicians are important, it's often bureaucrats who are implementing federal rules that have been put in place years in advance with almost no public knowledge whatsoever.
	And it's Obama who entranched the senior executive service.
	Trump wanted to be able to bar those people, and he was debating putting orders in place that would give him the powers to do that.
	But he but he never did it.
	Like so many of his promises, like draining the swamp, you know, they they were great sound bites, but they never really got done.
	So even if you have Republican control of, say, the House, if you don't have control of the House and the White House, and 60 seats in the US Senate, it's actually very, very hard to repeal or unwind Regulations that have already been put in place by the previous administration.
	Sure.
	Particularly the United States Civil Service, as Trump found, is inclined to disregard all of your instructions and just keep on pursuing their agenda.
	And this is not unique to the United States civil service.
	You see online in these chat rooms between civil senior civil service members of, say, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, America, the European Union, the UK, they're all talking about being the steward of intergenerational change.
	Right.
	And so that's what's really undermining democracy.
	It's not just influence from the UN and the World Economic Forum.
	It's these people entrenched in senior positions who are literally operating on an agenda that is irrespective of short-term elections every couple of years to say the US Congress or every four years for the Canadian Parliament.
	They see themselves there as handing on long-term plans over the face of 10 or 20 years.
	But they have a belief need to be done, irrespective of the instructions of the election.
	Now, do you do you think they actually care about these policies manifesting?
	Or is it just politically convenient to make promises about environmental goals or outcomes that are only going to take place after your long out of office, right?
	It makes sense for Joe Biden to say that half the cars in the United States in 2030 are going to be electric vehicles because it sounds great to his constituents now who believe that's a great idea, but he doesn't actually have to do any of the work to make it happen because he won't be president in 2030.
	But this is exactly my point.
	If he facilitates the regulations being in place not on mandating what the car companies manufacture, but putting in place clean air emission standards so that it makes them impossible to manufacture anything else,
	Because they can't make any form of combustion engine that produces exhaust that clean, and then delegate the authority to implement that some senior manager of the environmental protection agency who's going to be there without threat to his job for the next 20 years.
	Right, like Fauci has been in the same position for 20 or 30 or 40 years.
	Yeah, it doesn't even matter if Biden's even alive, let alone still president.
	Because you really think he's alive now.
	He's more machine than man now.
	We we we can discuss this um further on your shows if I do actually have the opportunity to work with you on some of this geopolitical stuff next month.
	But I I would certainly say that there's a lot more going on than the American mainstream media are bringing to people's attention, particularly in the Middle East.
	And those are going to have impact upon the distribution of energy supplies and Americans' cost of living.
	So hopefully we'll be able to discuss those issues in more length on another occasion.
	But anyway, like I said, congratulations on your run, and I'm sure you want to take many other calls today.
	Thank you so much for your call, Simon.
	It's always an honor and a pleasure to speak with you.
	And yes, I will absolutely reaffirm that commitment to make some content together, do a podcast together in the next month.
	I'd love to speak with you for a lengthy period of time about all of your knowledge as an artificial intelligence.
	And I do appreciate your vast knowledge and willingness to share it with such a distinguished accent, Simon.
	Before we go to break, I want to remind everybody to check out TurboForce Plus.
	The reason I've been pushing this product so hard is not because they make me do it or they ask me to do it.
	I mean, I'm I do push products generally speaking because they want me to mention certain deals and promos that are going on.
	But I've been pushing this product particularly hard because it's actually awesome.
	Like if every Patriot took TurboForce Plus and no leftists took it, we would have a tremendous advantage.
	I'm almost convinced that it's how Germany invaded Poland in two weeks in World War II.
	I think they were on Turbo Force Plus.
	They say it was infhetamine, but I don't know.
	I feel like if the Polish people had Turbo Force Plus, they might have held Off for another seven days or so.
	Anyway, stick with us, folks.
	calls in the next segment.
	Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
	War is hell, but the info war is heaven as far as I'm concerned.
	It's been an honor and a pleasure to be with you this week and most of last week.
	We're taking more calls for the rest of the show today.
	Next, I'm gonna pick a softball of a call because I know this guy.
	He's a great guy, a true American hero.
	Spent a lot of time talking to him last night in the Discord channel.
	I want to hear from Indy Luke in Indiana.
	Indy, what's going on, brother?
	Good morning, Chase Kaiser.
	How you doing, brother?
	Good, man.
	It's always good to hear your voice.
	Right?
	Right.
	First off, I want to get I want to plug real quick.
	Um if you haven't, or if you don't know about the getter chat, get on Gitter, type in info wars, and get on the chat.
	We recruit for our Discord through that channel.
	Um we want it, we want to hear from you guys.
	Um I've recently, you know, kind of gotten to this fight.
	Uh we have a podcast too.
	Big Fred 999 on Rumble.
	Um, yeah, we we do a podcast at 8 o'clock Central Time uh pretty much every night.
	If you go on that Rumble channel, you can find us there.
	Um I wanted to talk about a few of the topics you brought up earlier, earlier in the show.
	Sure.
	Primarily about Nazi Germany and how they've gotten control of the population through, you know, like regulations.
	Um they've this is an information war at its finest.
	They've got us by the fault, pretty much.
	In a sense, in that they've used techniques like MK Ultra throughout the years.
	Um that and they use the CIA, which is their shadow strings that they pull the public through and their spy agencies to mass control.
	Um very good, and plus they have control of the media.
	So whatever you see on there, which is why I was very aggravated yesterday when Tucker got pulled because that's one of the people that's actually in there that was telling the truth.
	A lot of people might not branch off to find like getter or um rumble, you know, because it's convenient to not do.
	You know what I'm saying?
	Yeah, I'm with you, man.
	But let me push back a little bit on that.
	It in not in a combative way, but it just just I want to run this by you and see what you think is.
	I've been thinking about this for a long time, and for a long time I was really frustrated at the lies and the lies and lies from the left in the legacy media.
	We had caller earlier today that made some really great points of trying to make the case using Nuremberg for why we should arrest these pundits when they lie maliciously, as they so often do.
	And I mean Seattle.
	I I've come to the conclusion that I don't think we have a knowledge issue.
	I think we have a wisdom issue because the truth is out there, and those who seek it find it.
	Whether you're a Christian or not, it's true what Jesus said.
	Asking you shall receive, seeking you shall find, knocking it shall be opened unto you.
	And so those who seek the truth inevitably find it.
	They arrive at the actual studies and they read the actual studies behind claims made in headlines.
	They eventually find the Alex Joneses of the world or the Joe Rogans of the world.
	But we don't have the wisdom to realize that we should seek the truth, and once we arrive at it, we should actually adopt it.
	So many of us reject all of the evidence.
	We had a caller earlier today that was talking about footage that was largely unseen of Ray Eps and a repo suit and things of that nature.
	I'm thinking to myself, like, that's a good point.
	I'd love to see that footage, but doesn't everybody already kind of know that that guy's fishy?
	Like, is there anyone out there who's just adamant, you know, looked into it, did the research, interviewed people, and came to The conclusion that this was not fishy.
	And we can't make any explicit claims on this network about whether or not he was a Fed because we don't know for sure, but it's certainly an overwhelming case, in my opinion.
	That might have been some Fed involved.
	So so the question is then, is the problem that people are being lied to, or is the problem that people are refusing to hear and believe the truth.
	Well, it's it's both.
	It's it's they they are conditioned to dismiss it.
	You know, the CIA actually coined the term conspiracy theorist.
	So when someone calls someone a conspiracy theorist, they instantly dismiss it in their mind.
	I do want to get to one more point.
	Sure.
	That is that is you the listeners.
	Everyone who is hearing my voice right now, you are heroes in your own lives.
	You can get out there, you can speak up for your communities.
	You can get out there, you could wake three people up that would save the world.
	You know what I'm saying?
	Like you guys are the heroes.
	I know that there was a caller earlier that said something about um, you know, these um organizations being heroes, they're not heroes, they're they're doing what they what they are you know, like what they have to do.
	Sure.
	You know, well, and organizations are made up of individuals.
	Correct.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	And those, I mean, they can be heroes, but we the people, we have to speak out against this, mass noncompliance, nonviolently.
	We have to wake people up.
	It it's absolutely essential for people to really get this across.
	I mean, I've been promoting Alex Jones since 2011.
	Moment I found him on YouTube when I was looking up 9-11 stuff, it was I I knew I sensed that he was a real person, and I it just I'm drawn.
	Do you remember how awesome YouTube used to be?
	Oh my gosh, dude.
	It was beautiful, man.
	Yeah.
	Like I it it was this back to back to fact of fact, like information.
	But see, that's where it's so dangerous now.
	And you know, if we continue on, I mean, the AI is coming out, it's gonna be primarily leftist, and it's gonna just give you that information, that leftist garbage, and it's gonna push it down your face to where you also build a relationship to it.
	So innate, you won't be able to defend your own ideas because you're on an alpha thinking, you know, you're actively talking to this AI.
	It's like argue, it's like arguing with Einstein.
	Even if you're right, you can't be in an argument because he's just got so much more knowledge you know, about it.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	Yeah.
	Thank you so much for the call, Andy.
	I do have to let you go because I do want to make sure I can take some more calls this segment.
	But I think that your points are absolutely awesome, and it's an honor that you called in today.
	It is about the individual finding the hero within and being heroic.
	It is about seeking the truth and also having the wisdom to acknowledge it.
	And I encourage everyone to check Indy Luke out in the getter chat as you requested.
	I want to hear from Wayne in Texas.
	Wayne, you've been waiting a long time.
	I really do appreciate it.
	We got a couple of minutes left of this segment.
	How are you doing, Wayne?
	Doing good.
	Hey, so the reason I wanted to call him, I also want to say something pertaining to the last caller.
	The real interesting thing is is actually live in what you believe.
	You know, you can have your senses exercise, like in the word of God, and you can go out and you can live it.
	Yeah.
	Or you can have your senses exercise in the AI machine, the computer feeding you with the dopamine hits, dressing you up according to the fashion of this world, and you're gonna find it unfulfilling, you're gonna have to change that suit pretty often.
	And that's like the focal point of those those mob roll mass psychogenic illness kind of you know, moves to where it's like a beehive, you know, where where one stings and then the rest jump on, you know, and then it's on to the next ad, right?
	But it becomes very unfulfilling.
	I um and and what I what I wanted to call and talk about though, uh, aside from that, is uh, and sorry, I just got done running, but you're cool, man.
	Uh Robert Kennedy Jr., who wrote the real Dr. Fauci, uh, and you know, obviously his uncle JFK Jr. was married to Jacqueline Kennedy O'NASA.
	By the way, who was hotter, Jackie or Marilyn?
	Just real quick.
	Oh, Maryland.
	With without a doubt.
	That have way more, way more curves.
	Hey, um, you know, if you're into that kind of thing.
	I think Marilyn wanted to have purple hair today, though.
	Well, yeah, and then she was into some darker stuff too, I think.
	But, you know.
	She liked white guys.
	I'm thinking more like more along the lines of like Hollywood Babylon kind of kind of thing kind of thing.
	But uh, let's see here.
	So now now get this.
	So the current acting director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases who took over for Anthony Fauci.
	And this is some of Robert Kennedy Jr.'s skeletons in the closet, although I don't think they're really his, but uh it was previously the principal deputy director involved in uh the HIV AIDS research regarding pre-exposure prophylact prophylaxis.
	And his name is Wayne, we've only got 30 seconds left in the segment, but I want you to finish your thoughts.
	So will you hold through the next break and and and finish your thought in the next segment?
	Yeah, absolutely.
	All right, thanks, Wayne.
	In the meantime, folks, make sure you check out Infowars Store.com.
	Get yourself some Turbo Force Plus.
	I guarantee after one day of using a half scoop, you will wonder why you didn't get some sooner, because you'll see just what you're missing without it.
	Call an 8777892539, and we will be back with Wayne after this break.
	Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
	What a hell of a show today.
	Man, we've got one hour left, and frankly, I wish that it was more because I'm having a blast talking to all the callers, covering this news, talking about Tucker, talking about what's going on in terms of the elections coming up and all issues pertaining to American politics and how we can save this country from the globalist takeover.
	Wayne, you were saying.
	So I'll I'll say this.
	So um, so the current acting director who took over for Anthony Fauci as a director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
	And he was previously the principal deputy director involved in the HIVAIDS research regarding exposure or pre-exposure prophylaxis research is a guy by the name of Hugh Alchenclos, A U C H I N C L O S S Jr.,
	whose father, Hugh Alchencloss Sr., is the first cousin once removed of Hugh Dudley Alchenclos, who is an attorney in standard oil heir and was married to the mother of Jacqueline Kennedy O'Nassis, Janet Lee Alchincloss, who later became Janet Lee Bouvier.
	I mean, that's that's pretty interesting.
	Yeah, but see, I get weird about relative connections as far as conspiracies are concerned, because I'm descended from Charlemagne.
	But I mean I'm saying can conspiracy aside, though.
	You have a guy who's a principal directory, uh principal deputy director who worked closely with Anthony Fauci.
	Right.
	And HIV AIDS research in pre-prophylaxis, you know, vaccination uh regiments.
	And who's now become the you know, director in position of Anthony Fauci, who also has ties to standard oil through lineage, and who also has ties to the Kennedys, Robert Kennedy having written the book on Fauci.
	I'm just saying, you know, Robert Kennedy Jr. sounds like he knows a lot more about what was going on than maybe even his book entails.
	Have you done a deep dive into Anthony Fauci and his negligence regarding the AIDS crisis in the 80s?
	Have you looked into the fact that he knew that blood transfusions and medications made from blood products were infecting children with HIV and hepatitis and nothing was done about it for years?
	Have you ever looked into that?
	Well, yeah, and then to call it negligent, I think, you know, tongue tongue in cheek.
	I mean, I would say more, you know, willful neglect.
	Yeah.
	Uh, which seems to be very common, you know, amongst the NIH, I mean, you know, there's all sorts of things the NIH, you know, does if you want to look at, you know, different reports and things like that.
	I mean, you can look at you can look at things like you know, parvo studies, because I know and um, you know, in some of these uh vaccine regimens, you know, that have been, you know, there have been veterinary care directors and things like that.
	But you know, they have testing like snap testing that tests, you know, for viruses for parvo vaccination or for you know parvo infected dogs, but the vaccine that they're given to prevent parvo infections is detected a lot longer with those snap tests.
	Uh you know, then the the snap the sensitivity of snap tests detects that vaccine oftentimes.
	And so the dog won't actually have harbo, but what they'll do is they'll they'll say it does, they'll stick it in a quarantine area with other actually, you know, uh dogs that actually have it and expose them to it that way.
	And I mean, it's just a big money grabbing.
	And that's that's kind of what you find.
	If you look into the pre-prophylaxis research, it's one of those similar kinds of deals.
	It's just it's a big money grab, uh, you know, for you know, preventative terror maintenance, but I mean, they're the ones engineering, you know, the the transmutability uh of a lot of these issues that would cause a necessity to have a pre-prophylactic prevention measure.
	Yeah, we've seen it time and time again with the government, and not just in the healthcare sphere, but just generally speaking, where our political leaders create a problem in order to offer the solution, and the solution almost always requires an increase in power for the government.
	And that's how they sort of perpetuate their their claim over the subjects of the United States.
	Well, it's problem reaction solution.
	Like, think about it with the with the recent housing thing with the credit score.
	So when you get a loan through a credit, you know, through through any banking institution, when you buy a home, not only do you pay down payment, but you also pay solely towards interest and done towards the principal all of time.
	So it's only and you're paying property tax on a home that's owned by the bank that you got the loan from.
	Wayne, thanks so much for your call.
	We got to cut the break.
	I'm sorry to cut you off.
	Make sure you guys visit Infowars Store.com.
	We'll be taking more calls in the next segment.
	Stick with us, folks.
	677-7925-39 Music I can't believe that NPR was so upset.
	Being designated as a publicly funded news organization on Twitter.
	And then it goes and it publishes something like this.
	It makes one wonder whether or not it is an extension of the United States intelligence community's propaganda wing.
	We know that the intelligence community is spying on all Americans and explicitly spying on Tucker Carlson, as we've disclosed on this show before, as he's openly admitted a number of times.
	And we see NPR, not private reporting.
	Come out with this article that says how Tucker Carlson took fringe conspiracy theories to a mass audience.
	Fringe conspiracy theories.
	Mass audience.
	The word fringe really, really strikes me because it's got a certain connotation to it.
	Fringe, meaning not very many people believe it, so therefore it must not be true, or it must be only for stupid radicals.
	Of course, all true theories were fringe to begin with.
	So they sort of commit a fallacy even with the language that they use.
	But this is all operating on a subconscious level, folks.
	The language that they use impacts our subconscious even more than it impacts our consciousness.
	And that's why so many people in America are suffering from mass formation uh psychosis.
	Because we've been talking about during this show, you have that which is knowledge and that which is wisdom.
	And the issue isn't that people don't have access to the truth, it's just that they've been brainwashed to the extent that they don't seek it, and when they are faced with it, they do not acknowledge it or accept it.
	Because of language like this.
	How Tucker Carlson took fringe conspiracy theories to a mass audience.
	So he's taking radical ideas that aren't true because most people don't believe them, is the implication, which of course is a fallacy.
	And he's dangerous because he's exposing them to a mass audience, and this is harming the world because millions upon millions of people, as a result of Tucker Carlson's fringe conspiracies and lies, now believe something that is dangerously false or dangerous to believe.
	Tucker Carlson, speaking at an event in Hollywood, Florida in 2022.
	Carlson was ousted from Fox News on Monday.
	Duh.
	One of his legacies as a host will be mainstreaming conspiracy theories into politics and media.
	Okay, now they're predicting the future.
	I tell you what, Alex Jones is so much better at predicting what's going to happen than NPR.
	It's not even close.
	Until his abrupt ouster on Monday, Tucker Carlson used his primetime Fox News show, the most watch hour on cable news.
	So this is what's funny about it.
	They call it the most watch hour on cable news because they want to emphasize that his audience is so broad that his conspiracy theories are dangerous, right?
	If he's got a huge audience, this is really dangerous if he's spouting conspiracy theories.
	But at the same time that they bring up this most watch hour on cable news point in the headline, they're using the word fringe to discredit the legitimacy of any of his claims.
	So if he's got a mass audience in the more people the better, then doesn't that make him right?
	Because you're saying fringe is a bad thing here on the headline, but you're saying a mass audience is a bad thing here, too.
	I tell you what, there's a mass audience that believe in vaccine safety and efficacy.
	Does that automatically make it gray?
	Or is it a fringe theory?
	This is just the cognitive dissonance here.
	Okay.
	Used his audience to inject a dark strain of conspiracy mongering into Republican politics.
	As if only Republicans listen to Tucker Carlson.
	He's railed against immigration, claiming it makes our own country poorer and dirtier and more divided.
	He's called white supremacy a hoax and asserted hate speech is a made-up category designed to get the First Amendment and shut you up.
	I don't see anything that unreasonable here.
	As Fox News' tent poll, drawing around three million viewers a night, Carlson's show has been both a source of that kind of a nationalist populist conservatism that Donald Trump embodied, but it's also been a clearinghouse for conspiracies, said Nicole Hemer, a history professor at Vanderbilt University who studies conservative media.
	So we got an expert in here.
	Great.
	Somebody who's never actually worked in the real world and been in academia her entire life, I assume.
	I could be wrong though.
	Three million viewers a night.
	Nationalist populist conservatism.
	So they used to just criticize people for being Republicans because it used to be just Republican versus Democrat, but now it's Democrats versus anyone who's got any sense of patriotism or loyalty to their country, regardless of whether or not they're Republican.
	I don't consider myself a Republican, but I do consider myself a populist.
	Of course, I almost always vote for Republicans.
	But why is it that it's inherently bad to be nationalist or populist?
	You look up the definition of populist, even if you go to chat GPT, the most leftist AI in existence, and ask what the definition of populist is, it is described as a political philosophy or ideal that believes that the average person should be put first, not the established elite.
	So why is this getting lumped in with nationalism and conservatism?
	They're not necessarily the same thing.
	And you know that the reason they're using the word nationalist here is because they're just trying to associate it with Nazism.
	National Nationalist Socialist Party.
	Many of the false narratives Carlson promoted were part of the great replacement conspiracy theory, the racist fiction that non-white people are being brought into the US to replace white voters.
	Okay.
	I don't think that he was arguing that non-white people are being brought into the United States to replace white voters.
	I think he was arguing that people that are more likely to vote for Democrats are being brought into the country to replace Republican voters.
	Just because there's a correlation of races across those two political categories doesn't mean that it's racist to make the claim that if you bring a bunch of a bunch of Hispanic people or impoverished people or government-dependent people into the United States, they're more likely to vote for a leftist policy because they are less informed and because they are more vulnerable, so they're more susceptible to the temptations of voting for government policies and programs.
	But that's inherently racist.
	I think it's racist to say that Tucker Carlson is racist just because he's white.
	You're assuming he's racist because he's white sounds racist to me.
	The great replacement conspiracy theory isn't fringe anymore, it's mainstream.
	The theory was once considered the fringe territory of white nationalists.
	Okay, so now we're really digging into white nationalists, which is basically another term for neo-Nazi.
	But thanks to Tucker Carlson, this kind of direct that you would normally only see on far-right forums and online spaces, had a primetime audience on cable news every night, said Melissa Ryan of card strategies, which tracks disinformation and extremism online.
	Now, when I see a sentence like this card strategies tracking disinformation and extremism online, I just think censorship and intentional misinformation and narrative control.
	That's just what it screams to me.
	But hey, what do I know?
	Carlson's show gave many Fox News viewers what they wanted, she said, including false claims about the 2020 election, COVID vaccines, and the January 6th Capitol insurrection.
	Even though no one's been charged of insurrection.
	You know, we should submit this claim to card strategies to see if they can get to the bottom of this misinformation here.
	As well, smears against gay and transgender people and Russian propaganda about fictitious Ukrainian biolabs.
	There weren't Ukrainian bio labs.
	Metabiota didn't receive a DOD contract worth tens of millions of dollars to conduct research inside bio labs in Ukraine.
	They don't exist.
	There aren't YouTube videos from before the war broke out of scientists talking about the work and research that they're doing in labs in Ukraine.
	There's just no bio labs in Ukraine.
	It was one of those countries that just doesn't, you know, care about biology or study biology or allow the United States to conduct research that is illegal in the United States.
	Carlson and the 4chan to Fox to Trump pipeline.
	Now we're getting somewhere, folks.
	Tucker is a chameleon, Ryan said.
	He's very good at reading the room and figuring out where the right wing base is at and adapting to give them as much red meat as they want.
	Well, if he's a chameleon, then why is he only seeking out a right wing base?
	If you're a chameleon, that means you act like a Democrat in front of Democrats and you act like a Republican in front of Republicans.
	This sounds like you're claiming that he's a chameleon, like he has no real principles, but then in the same sentence, you're saying that he only caters to a Republican audience.
	During Trump's presidency, a 4chan to Fox to Trump pipeline emerged, Ryan said.
	In one notorious example, a conspiracy theory was circulating on the anonymous message board, falsely claiming South Africa was engaging in a genocide against the white farmers.
	We'll get more into this after this break.
	Make sure you guys visit Infowars Store.com, check out Turbo Force Plus.
	I highly recommend it.
	Can't recommend it enough.
	I asked for some during the last break, but they are having a hard time finding it because somebody's always stealing it around here.
	Sure you call on 877892539.
	We're not done with calls today, just because I covered an article.
	Stick with us, folks.
	Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
	I can't believe that MPR wrote a whole article around the claim that Tucker Carlson took fringe conspiracy theories to a mass audience as if he was just spouting conspiracy after conspiracy.
	And they basically only cited one.
	So in all the years that he was on the air, the best thing you could come up with is this one conspiracy theory around the great replacement?
	And it was a stretch at that.
	Anyway, we'll be taking more calls this segment.
	I want to hear from there was a good call that I saw during the break, and it slipped from under me.
	Let's hear from Matthew in Ohio.
	Matthew, what's on your mind?
	Hey Chase, how's it going?
	Good, man.
	How are you doing?
	I just uh I didn't even plan on calling because I listened every day, and I just saw the last uh segment about the article about how white nationalists have you know been morphed into a white supremacist.
	Yeah.
	I literally had this exact conversation with my niece who's saying you're in high school, all that nonsense, you know, the whole liberal thing's bad, the white people bad.
	And uh she made a comment and I just spoke out loud and I said, Well, I'm a white nationalist.
	He said, You're a Nazi?
	Literally said those words, and I was like, Do you understand what that what that means?
	I'm a white person that likes my nation.
	That's not a white premises.
	Like it's just it blows my mind.
	I know, but there's a colloquial understanding of what that means.
	So you gotta be careful because technically you're right, but people are not gonna interpret it that way when you use that expression, man.
	So don't like uh under my Twitter uh Twitter handle, don't put white nationalists.
	Yeah, I'd be careful about that.
	That might get your Twitter account banned.
	So that'll be misunderstood for sure.
	And and again, like like this, like just I was thinking the article I mentioned, like the uh, you know, the non Ukrainian bio labs, and it's just I was thinking of you know the senator who you know who didn't know who uh Alice Jones was, you know, we try to get a bad Marco Ruby all asked Victoria Newland, you know, under oh and you know what did she say?
	There's there's no biolabs or you know, biological research facilities or something of the sort, and it was just like the play on words and the manipulation of language that is just it's if you step back on it, so like it's the whole red pill, you know, whatever, but it's if you just are looking from the outside looking in, it's like, how do people fall for this?
	And it's I just uh Yeah, yeah.
	And you know, honestly, dude, this is like the this is the difference between good writers and bad writers.
	Like, let's just take an example of Lord of the Rings, right?
	If you read Lord of the Rings, it's great.
	If I sat down and tried to rewrite that book with the same exact characters, same exact story, same exact conversations, but I wrote it in my style, it would not be nearly as good as Tolkien's version of it because words matter, they resonate with our emotions, they resonate with our psychology.
	And so we have to be really careful about the information that we consume and and aware that it is entering our subconscious, and we have to run it through a rational filter.
	Because if you were just to not know anything about NPR being a leftist organization or publicly funded or anything like that, and if you were just to read this article as sort of a naive person, all of these words that they're using them and they manipulate your position on the matter, would just go straight to your subconscious and and impact the way that you look at the world and and Tucker Carlson for that matter.
	I agree.
	And just kind of like a follow-up, is that like the same like principle with like 9/11 to where like even like just a month or two ago I was talking with like with my family with my grandpa and people, and they immediately when I said that the government has some kind of you know something to do with that didn't even get in any details, they everyone in the room attacked me, like was like mad.
	Like, how dare you say that?
	I'm like, I didn't say people didn't die, and I and I still have you know travel from seeing in my head people jumping from the buildings, but yeah, we just saw COVID and you all acknowledged that the government was manipulating COVID, which shut the world down, but they wouldn't crash plays into a you know towers and you know the Patriot Act and on and on and on.
	It's just yeah, yeah.
	Well, I mean, if you if you go back and look at clips, there's highlight reels of of George Bush, they're hard to find on YouTube now.
	But thousands upon thousands of times did he and his administration say the war on terror, the war on terror, the war on terror, the war on terror.
	They drilled it in and they showed the footage of 9-11 over and over and over and over again for 10 years, and that had an impact on people to where if you even suggest or imply that maybe our government knew that it was gonna happen or may have been involved, or the official narrative isn't true, it's emotionally totally triggering for lack of a better.
	I hate to use that term, but it's triggered for people that have been brainwashed.
	And my brother's a pilot, and this is the last thing I'll say, and just like like regardless of planning the Pentagon, he said, you know, that there wasn't playing, so I just waited some time and I said, Hey, is it possible to fly like a big like a jumbo jet, you know, 30 or 40 yards or so off the ground and have it going to go, oh no, the wind velocity and the I'm like, well, how does it happen with the Pentagon?
	Oh, you're going back to that.
	And I'm just like, so do you understand logic and facts of being a pilot?
	But again, like you just said it's from the constant decade plus of drilling, it's there's there's there's literally just a wall inside people's minds, and it's it's sad, really, but absolutely.
	Well, I appreciate your call, Matthew.
	Thanks so much for calling in.
	It always means a lot to hear from all the callers, and you brought some really great points to the table today.
	I do want to hear from Robert in Massachusetts before we go to the next break.
	Robert, what's on your mind today?
	Hello.
	Hey, what's up, man?
	I can hear you.
	Hi, how you doing, man?
	Good.
	So um, I just wanted to call in just um kind of piggybacking off that conversation about YouTube and how it used to be like a uh an information free-for-all, but now where everything's so censored and everything's so scrubbed from the internet, like there was this video that I seen a while back, and it kind of settled me, and it's like that it just sounded so crazy, but you have this middle-aged woman sitting there explaining the fact that she worked for NASA.
	She had these documents, and she said that it was also online.
	She said it's right on their website.
	She said, and she and it was so concerning to her that she felt compelled to ha sit down and have this interview with I don't even know who it was.
	Um, but it was on YouTube, and she was talking about in the documents how it was talking about that the they were gonna kill Americans on live television, and they were gonna be able to take them out with laser beams and um you know, all this other wild stuff.
	And I'm like, what the heck?
	And this lady sitting here having this conversation, dead serious.
	And I was able to show it to other people, and they were like, wow, that's crazy.
	But now I can't even find it.
	I can't find it anyway.
	I'm wondering if you guys can find it.
	Um, because I know you guys are able to pull up some stuff too.
	Um, but yeah, it was just it was so crazy.
	I'm like, this lady was dead serious.
	She looked like a school teacher.
	Like she she looked like you know, my mom's age or something.
	She looks like Hillary Clinton.
	Almost.
	Yeah, she kind of almost looked like a Hillary Clinton kind of like style.
	Is that her on the screen?
	I don't know if you're watching.
	I'm I'm not I can't see the screen because I'm on the phone right now.
	Um, but let's see.
	No, I'm looking at the screen now.
	I didn't lose you.
	Um, yeah, yeah, yeah.
	NASA war documents revelations playing out.
	I'm pretty sure it's revelation though, not revelations, right?
	NASA war revelations, that's what it is you're saying.
	Yeah, yeah.
	I think that I think we found it.
	I think it's on the screen here.
	You'll have to um comment on the video on band.vide um when you do the playback and let us know if this is the right one.
	This looks like exactly what you're talking about.
	It looks like Hillary Clinton meets Stevie Nicks.
	Yeah, yes, that's it.
	That's her.
	That is it.
	You guys are awesome.
	That's crazy.
	I knew you guys are possible.
	Yeah, I couldn't find it.
	You guys found this in like two seconds.
	These guys are pro.
	These guys are pro Wow, yeah.
	I know, I know, and if you listen to this lady, it it's so mind-blowing.
	It's like, who the heck is working for NASA and putting this on the on the government website and and talking about these agendas just so comfortably, and it's all in one document that she has that.
	I'm like, did they whack this lady or something?
	Did they like kill her?
	I'm like, what the and scrub it off the internet, but no, you guys found it.
	Wow.
	Well, that's awesome.
	I'll have to check that out.
	Thank you so much for calling in, Robert.
	I really do appreciate it.
	Uh we're about ready to do it right here in just a couple of seconds.
	So make sure you stick with us through the break.
	I will be taking calls the rest of the hour, the next 30 minutes before the great Alex Jones show begins.
	Make sure you check out Turbo Force Plus, it is more power, more strength, and more energy than you've ever had before.
	InfoWars store.com.
	Stick with us, folks.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Welcome forward, man.
	Welcome back to the American Journal of Great show today.
	Great show.
	Seven days.
	Since last Tuesday.
	All tomorrow.
	I'm very excited to have him back because I can't wait to watch his show.
	That's my least favorite thing about guest hosting is I don't get to watch Harrison host the show.
	And I know that he is looking forward to speaking with you.
	I've been talking with him on the phone every couple of days, checking in.
	His family's doing well as far as I understand.
	And he is definitely excited to be back hosting the show tomorrow.
	He mentioned to me last night that he had been going through his saved tweets, his bookmarks, and putting together content for the show.
	So I think he's excited to hit the ground running when he comes back.
	And I know that you'll all love to have him back as well.
	But thank you so much for giving me the privilege to be the guest host on this show and for giving me the time of day and listening to what I have to say, as well as calling in and sharing your own thoughts as well.
	That that really means a lot to me to hear from you guys and to get you engaged in this info war.
	Make sure you check out InfoWars Store.com and we'll be taking more calls during this segment.
	I want to talk to Robert in Thailand.
	Robert, what's up, man?
	Are you still a breeder?
	Thanks, babe.
	Yeah, you know, still breeding, still uh going strong over here, you know.
	Um uh as long as I'm breathing.
	Super male vitality.
	You know, that's definitely and let me tell you, just uh a quick uh plug here as well.
	I've gotten stuff sent out here.
	I got X3 and I got um Brainforce Ultra sent out here to Thailand.
	So if I can get it sent out to Thailand, and the guys made it really easy, the the people who work with shipping and everything are great over there with y'all.
	Uh so if I can do that, you guys listening, all you listeners out there, if I can get it sent to Thailand and go through all that, y'all can do it too.
	So be sure and support the broadcast because they are making a huge difference.
	Um and and Chase, uh I I I know that the previous caller complimented you, and I I also wanted to say that we're excited to have Harrison back, but we're gonna miss you, man.
	It's been great.
	It's been really good.
	It's really been a Pleasure.
	I appreciate that.
	Yeah, for sure.
	Okay.
	So kind of a goofy topic, but you know, since Don Lemon is out there in the wind, uh, I think we should try and convert him.
	You know, I mean, he's bitter about CNN.
	And, you know, I mean, I don't know, man.
	I heard that I heard that conversion therapy doesn't work.
	What about how what would it take to red pill Don Lemon?
	You know, I mean, I don't know.
	I don't know.
	That's a good question.
	You know, that the broader question is how do you change someone's mind about their whole entire world view?
	And I think the only way to do it is like an internment camp and massive amounts of interrogation.
	Well, I mean, Joe Biden, because his best buddies D Jin King has a lot of experience with that.
	You know, I was uh also gonna throw a um a question out there about Freemasonry, and okay.
	I have a couple buddies who are Freemasons.
	Um, one of them is pretty high up, and he sends me stuff every once in a while because he knows I'm into mysteries and my family has uh the Charlemagne connection and a bunch of weird royalty history and stuff.
	So I've been kind of nudged into joining, but I've kind of resisted it because I'm in a weird, uh weird business and family situation right now.
	I don't think it would be prudent.
	But from what I've heard, there's some sort of a fracture going on in Freemasonry, and this might help with some people who have a conflict with you know, talking to you or anybody else who might be related to Freemason or whatever who who's on if wars occasionally or regularly, this might help them process that because like you were saying, you know, all organizations get infiltrated.
	And from what I've heard, there's a real fracture in the Freemasons, where there's some people who are more interested in learning of the mysteries, more interested in the obscure hidden truth, and versus kind of an old guard who may or may not be probably the block that has that infiltration, plus you know, more of a political kind of grain to it.
	I don't know if that would be uh somewhat accurate uh appraisal of what's going on.
	Yeah, that's a great question.
	So it's it's complicated to answer that because I wouldn't describe what's going on in Freemasonry as a fracture or a schism, but there's a couple of variables to consider.
	The first variable to consider is that a lot of people think of Freemasonry as this sort of universal globalist organization that's sort of a top-down pyramid with, you know, your most worshipful grandmaster at the top, and then everybody is sort of a pawn below that.
	But the way it works is each grand lodge is has total autonomy over its own jurisdiction.
	So similar to how many of our founding fathers originally intended for the United States to be, where the federal government was very small and weak and each state was hyper independent.
	That's how the Grand Lodges are set up.
	So the Grand Lodge of Texas makes the rules for the Masons in Texas and the Grand Lodge of Tennessee makes the rules for the Grand Lodge of Tennessee.
	And there's no like higher federal lodge.
	There's no Grand Lodge of the United States.
	And each lodge, each Grand Lodge determines whether or not it recognizes another lodge as legitimate.
	So in the United States, the lodges recognize each other as legitimate.
	There are what are called clandestine lodges, which are like fake lodges that aren't considered legitimate, Freemason lodges.
	There are lodges that have women in them, for example, and those aren't recognized by traditional Freemasons because it's a fraternity, it's a brotherhood.
	Um so there's not really like a schism in the entire fraternity, but on that note, what happened after World War II is all of the veterans came back from the war, they were heroes, and they missed the sense of camaraderie that they experienced during the war.
	And simultaneously, no lodge wanted to vote any veteran down who applied to be a member.
	So in order to become a Freemason, you don't have to be related to anyone, you don't have to be asked by anyone.
	It's actually forbidden to ask someone to become a Freemason because it's important that you choose of your own free will to become a Freemason.
	Like if you know, if you want your employee to become a Freemason, you're not supposed to be a last and that sort of thing.
	And so the the lodges have to vote universally to let someone in.
	And the reason for that is to keep harmony in the lodge.
	So no one knew gets in unless everybody that goes to that lodge is okay with it.
	And that way it prevents, you know, schisms within the lodge and problems there.
	So what happened was all the World War II veterans joined, and then they had the baby boom Generation and the baby boomers were very like anti-tradition, right?
	They were the hippies, they were the anti-Vietnam protesters.
	None of them joined.
	So there were all these lodges that were created after World War II because of the massive influx of members, and then a whole entire generation just didn't join.
	And so we have like all these lodges now where there are either people in their 20s and 30s or people in their 70s and 80s, and there's not like a whole lot in the middle because the generation skipped it.
	And so there's a lot of jobs, there's there are a lot of lodges that have like nine guys that show up or 18 guys that show up.
	Whereas, you know, 50 or 100 years ago, you'd have lodges where 120 guys would show up, sort of like a like a moose lodge or an elks club, right?
	Uh, and so that has been a challenge because there's just sort of this gap in the demographic, and there's this kind of more traditional mindset.
	The other thing that people don't understand too is that when Freemasons talk about politics all the time, but it is forbidden to talk about religion or politics within the context of a lodge meeting.
	And that's also for the same reason that it has to be unanimous.
	It's it's it's about keeping the harmony.
	So Democrats can be Masons, Republicans being Masons, any religion that believes in God can join Freemasonry.
	You have to believe in God.
	Um but uh politics and religion are not discussed in lodge meetings for the sake of keeping the peace.
	Okay, yeah, I know that was kind of a rant.
	Well, no, no.
	I mean, my mentor sort of so to speak.
	Um, you know, he's more into hermetics, but he believes in a higher power, so he describes himself as tolerated.
	He's a really humble, but you know, very experienced and very knowledgeable guy.
	Um, and yeah, you know, I've been following some of the things that he's been saying.
	And yeah, there's been no notion that anybody would ask, but I've been, you know, kind of shown kind of different things about it that that definitely are appealing.
	And and I I like the idea that you know, hell, I mean, uh back 12 years ago, I went to Bilderberg, and we wouldn't know where Bilderberg was unless there were people in Bilderberg leaking the location ahead of time and telling us stuff.
	So you know, there's uh okay, cool.
	Thanks for answering that.
	Uh, I know that was a bit of a of uh a redundant thing to keep hearing about the Mason stuff when you're gonna have to be.
	Okay, it's fun.
	I love talking about it.
	Thank you so much for your call, Robert.
	I really do appreciate it.
	We've only got 30 seconds left on this segment.
	We'll be taking more calls in the next segment.
	I'm really looking forward to hearing from more of you.
	It's been a pleasure this morning to hear from all of you as well.
	Make sure you visit InfoWars Store.com.
	Check out TurboForce Plus.
	I need to buy some because I'm not getting enough just being here and having it.
	After Harrison comes back, I'm gonna miss my fix.
	I highly recommend that you check it out.
	Get it for yourself, get it for your friends and family.
	It is an awesome, awesome way to improve the quality of your day and the quality of your work.
	Stick with us, folks, we'll be right back after this break.
	Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
	This is the last segment of the hour and the last segment of the show this morning.
	It has been an honor and a pleasure being with you the last seven days here on the American Journal.
	Great Harrison Smith will be back with us tomorrow.
	Make sure you stay tuned for the Alex Jones show coming up right after this.
	A lot of great news in the works.
	I just saw this video from AOC over the course of the break, and I just have to share it with you because we were talking about AOC at the beginning and how she advocates for the arrest of journalists, and now she is celebrating deplatforming as something that works.
	Let's play clip 11 here and talk about it right after that.
	Tucker Carlson is out at Fox News.
	Couldn't have happened to a better guy.
	Um I will say though, is while I am very glad that the person that is arguably responsible for the some of the largest driving some of the most uh amounts of death threats and violent threats, not just to my office, but to plenty of people across the country.
	Um, I also kind of feel like I'm like waiting for the cutscene at the end of a Marvel movie after all the credits have rolled, and then you see like the villains like hand re-emerge out to glip grip over like the end of a building or something, but deplatforming works and it is important, and um there you go.
	Good things can happen.
	No one says I wasn't gonna issue a death threat, and then I watched Tucker Carlson and now I'm gonna send one.
	He's responsible for death threats.
	First of all, she criticizes him for being responsible for death threats to her office and others.
	And then she celebrates deplatforming as something that works.
	But isn't a death threat the ultimate deplatforming?
	Like how is it that we've come to a place as a culture that we accept the notion that it's okay for our politicians to celebrate the deplatforming not only of regular citizens who have the right to freedom of speech, but of journalists?
	This is sick.
	Six stuff.
	These people are evil.
	They are evil.
	I don't wish death upon AOC.
	I wish her to be rendered powerless by a populace that knows who to vote for.
	These people are not fit for office.
	Frankly, it's a violation of her oath to even advocate deplatforming, especially of a journalist.
	How could you possibly swear to protect the Constitution of the United States of America and then go out and celebrate the deplatforming of a journalist just because it's someone of the opposite political persuasion?
	I'm having an Alex Jones moment right now.
	Next up, I want to share something that might cheer us all up in honor of Harrison Smith and his excellent work, and in celebration of his returning to the American Journal tomorrow, I do want to play clip two of some highlights of his presence on this show over the last couple of years and get everybody amped up for the great Harrison Smith coming back tomorrow to the American Journal.
	Harrison Schmidt, we've seen the evidence we laid out.
	They're calling for my arrest, his arrest, everyone's arrest.
	I mean, I don't understand how the American people don't see what's going on here.
	It's January 6th, 2021, a day that will go down in history.
	If we were a functional normal nation, did Ibrim X Kindi, aka Henry, whatever, finally realize that his entire life's work is a total scam?
	She's literally having the baby right now.
	So I'm I'm gonna have to leave soon.
	I was actually talking to Chase Geyser.
	He hadn't seen this, it just came out and said, Oh, you see this, that you know, all these documents.
	Oh, maybe I shouldn't even say what he said.
	I shouldn't have said his name.
	I won't tell you what he said.
	I won't tell you what he said.
	All right, next up, I want to take a call to wrap up this segment.
	Because I want to get to as many of you listeners as possible.
	Let's hear from Steven and Georgia.
	Steven, what's on your mind?
	Hey, man, did you just fall off the ladder?
	No, no, no, it's okay.
	Hey, I got a lot to talk about.
	So I'm gonna talk really fast.
	Okay.
	Thanks for calling Alex.
	Yeah, listen to Alex since 9-11, over 20 years.
	Spent thousands at your store.
	I'm running for president in 2032.
	I think I decided about 30 years ago.
	I'm 51 now.
	Originally from Iowa.
	Uh, my great-grandfather was allegedly killed by the DuPont over an electric railway system.
	We were the richest family in the world, and then my grandfather was left as an orphan.
	So I have a bone effect with me.
	Global elite.
	As for me, I spent most of my life in academia as an environmental engineer.
	Most recently a Georgia Tech.
	I got fired or let go from three different universities.
	Due to my views on climate change hysteria, social justice.
	I lost millions of grants because of it.
	Saw a lot of corruption and the good old boy syndrome with our our uh funding agencies.
	Know a lot about fluoride climate change and other stuff.
	To me, our students are being brainwashed completely.
	Um another thing about our church, uh churches.
	I was in a men's church group recently, and about 10 people were there, and they never heard of Alex Jones, and I couldn't believe it.
	I shared my views with totally and told repeatedly that we respect everyone's views, and I took it like, hey, you need to stop talking about this because we we need other people to have their views too.
	So I was kind of taken back by it.
	And uh what I wanted to talk today was about this.
	I spoke with a major client major climate scientist recently, and she said that WEF and NDB uh NWO's plans won't work.
	That we can't they can't afford it, so just go back to your normal life and don't worry about it.
	And I was taken back by that too, because you know, as you know, I've this is absurd as they're gonna do their plans anyway, and they're gonna drive this country into the ground.
	I mean, this whole thing with Biden and the war on fossil fuels is just nuts.
	Yeah, so my question is, you know, why can't we do more?
	Like in academia, you know, why can't Alex and InfoWars and the whole crew, why can't we hold nationwide conferences like we do in academia?
	You know, and just it could be virtual and just develop these action committees uh to counter the uh NDBO plans along these lines.
	Why not get Jordan Peterson or Tony Robbins on board?
	I think Tony he could be compromised by or he he's just totally not political.
	Yeah.
	But I think Jordan could be a great ally.
	If the NWO is going for broke, we have to go for Brooke too.
	We have a reached a critical mass long ago.
	You know, if Alex had 25 million listeners a day, so why so we are very powerful and could cause change.
	So I want your thoughts on this.
	The first thing we could target is chemtrails, which is nationwide.
	You know, why doesn't Alex Jones on this important issue which we see every day up in the sky?
	Why why do we need a foreign action community and get Dane Wiggins involved?
	So you feel like people isn't doing enough?
	No, uh absolutely not.
	I mean, we I mean, we gotta do more.
	I mean, just look at where we're at.
	I mean, Biden, whether if he's Biden number three or number four, I mean, th they're screwing us over, man.
	I mean, we we we gotta do more.
	Yeah, the best thing you can do is do is share bandot video, share InfoWars, share Alex Jones, share clips.
	I highly encourage all listeners to cut 15, 30 seconds of of the shows that they like on this platform on this network, and and share them on social media because you the reason that your your men's group at church didn't know who Alex Jones was is because the people who share his content are either censored or they're too shy to share it because they don't want to be pigeonholed into being perceived as conspiracy theorists or radical extremists and things of that nature,
	and we just have to shed any sort of self-consciousness we have around espousing our political views.
	We have to think of ourselves as evangelists of the truth and do what the Mormons do and knock and walk and be unashamed of what we believe, in my opinion.
	I think that's the first step.
	So okay, so along along these lines, and again, I don't know if we reached uh a ceiling when it comes to sharing our videos because I share them all the time.
	Sure.
	Um, but I mean well, what do you think about the idea of having a conference in these action committees where like I was thinking about putting a sign on the uh the road out here in Ackworth, Georgia, that says, Alex Jones was right, call me, you know, and just develop like a little group here.
	You know, I think that's kind of what we do every day on the show, though.
	I mean, this is a nationwide, this is an international conversation, and we have callers from all over the world calling.
	We try to kind of do that every day, but there is something to be said for meeting in person, actually shaking hands, having human-to-human interactions with people of like-mindedness.
	And I tell you what, man, I call upon you to set up the conference, and if you get it lined up, I'll come virtual.
	I got one last question, and sure.
	Yeah, I don't mean mean to mean negative about this at all.
	I mean, I believe Alex, I've been following him for a long time.
	Okay.
	You know, when I was at Georgia Tech, and some of these I call them children.
	I mean, they're just so brainwashed.
	I mean, one of them says, Oh, we don't believe Alex, we think he's a CIA agent agent, and blah, blah, blah.
	And then William Mount, I know you know probably know him, this guy in Portland, he seems like he's pretty legit and in the know.
	I mean, he says that that that Alex is given you know, r not free rain, but rain up to some degree.
	And I was hoping that you could silence that.
	And you know, William said that Alex way back when received money from CIA.
	I mean, like, I'm not trying to I I just want to just crash the uh any kind of negativity, just the more people believe what Alex is saying.
	So I just hope you can address that, or maybe Alex.
	Yeah, the best the best I can do to address that in these last 15 seconds is say that sounds like a fringe conspiracy theory to me.
	But I could be wrong, maybe his CIA.
	But if he is, then I'm all for the CIA because I tell you what, folks, he's saving America every day on this network.
	Stick with us, folks.
	Alex Jones coming up next.
	What?
	Alex Jones coming up next.
	1776 Testosterone Boost is back in stock.
	It is a private label of the number one best selling natural testosterone booster on the market.
	It does incredible things for men, but women also love it.
	Ladies and gentlemen, you need to experience this product for yourself.
	I never have any issues in the libido department, but it's always good to supercharge it and take it to the next level.
	And I'm just gonna tell you, bottom line, my wife is blown away.
	I am a Tyrannosaurus Rex in the sheets.
	And I'm telling you, at 49, I've got more energy in that department than I had when I was 18.
	And I owe it all to 1776 Testosterone Boost.
	Now back in stock at Infowarstore.com.
	It's also great for your muscles, your body, your energy, your workouts.

▲