Tony Shaffer & Matt Couch Return To Talk Brandi Love & The Future For Republicans | OAP #36
Chase Geiser is joined by Tony Shaffer and Matt Couch. In this episode we discuss everything from the future of the GOP to TPUSA's banning of Brandi Love from their recent event.
You know, I was very skeptical of the election fraud stuff.
You know, I thought that it was just kind of people like kind of wishful thinking, hoping, you know, everyone was sad that Trump lost.
I was sad that Trump lost.
And I was so skeptical about the election fraud stuff.
And then we had the Fulton news this week.
And then just that brief 12 seconds of that Arizona audit where he said that there were 74,243 or something like that ballots that they have no record of having sent out.
And I was like, whoa.
So my whole position on the fraud thing totally flipped this week.
And as you know, since last time we spoke, and I've gotten a lot of press on this because a guy named Bill, Bill McSwain has come forward and said very similar things.
Yeah.
And so I have not spoken to Bill.
I have had zero contact with Bill or anybody who was directly involved in that episode of what was going on.
So again, I understand people are skeptical.
They should be.
And they should be also just at least willing to allow for a review of everything.
And if everybody is so confident that Biden got 81 million votes, they should be the first to say, oh, yeah, no, we're confident.
Go look.
You're not going to find anything.
Unfortunately, I just don't see that coming from them right now.
You would think, and you know, it's funny because like on the one hand, you see that the left is incredibly critical of any sort of audit and they immediately cite that the audits, you know, are biased or, you know, anything they can do to undermine the integrity of the audits.
But at the same time, they launched like a January 6th investigation committee that's stacked only full of Democrats.
So it's like, like, what do you think?
Like, what's that then?
You know, and so I don't know.
It's just, it's like, it's like having all of your exes, you know, responsible for defining your reputation.
We're going to totally be on opposite sides of the spectrum here.
No, it's amazing to me.
I agree with everything you said, you know, Colonel.
I agree with everything you said.
It's amazing to me that the Biden administration, big tech, the mainstream media, the liberals, even some of the rhinos, they all are pushing this variant, but yet no one is complaining about the southern border being wide open.
You could drive tanks through it, semi-trucks at all points, hundreds of thousands of people a week pouring across, unvetted, unvaccinated.
No problem there.
But you know what?
Let's lock Americans down because this thing's dangerous.
And to carry that point on, I've never considered this a left or right issue.
And I actually don't.
I've actually, I got a question last night by another interview regarding the military.
Why is the military refusing to take the vaccine?
Well, there's a couple of reasons.
First, the military represents the healthiest demographic within our population, barring Olympic level athletes.
They're very fit.
I don't know if you've both been in the military or not, but if you're in the military, you have a physical fitness requirement.
Every service has a certain level of test you take at least once a year to pass.
If you don't pass, you get kicked out.
So the military has very high standards.
And one of the things I learned as a very young lieutenant is that the best defense against a biological agent, because back in the Cold War, we didn't know if the Russians would use a biological agent on us.
The best defense against a biological agent is health.
Be healthy, have a strong immune system.
So the military guys are saying, hey, I got a strong immune system.
I don't feel the need to take it.
And secondly, regarding experimentation, a lot of people see the current status of the drug and don't take my comments as bad-mouthing Donald Trump.
It's just this Operation Warp Speed.
God bless them for pushing it hard.
I want to see the clinical trials.
I was about to say criminal trials, but that's Dr. Fauci and the whole issue of Wuhan.
But just saying, just saying.
But for the purposes of our discussion regarding the COVID vaccine, I want to see what results after a full year of study.
I don't know why that's somehow revolutionary or radical and wanting that to happen.
Well, I mentioned this on the show before myself, but I don't know if you guys know that I'm a type A hemophiliac, so I have a bleeding disorder, which is why I wasn't in the military.
And I don't know if you guys remember what happened to all the hemophiliacs in the 80s, but the drug companies knew that the medicine for hemophilia was contaminated with hepatitis and HIV and didn't tell any of the families for years.
And they infected over 10,000 hemophiliacs, including children, with HIV.
And a lot of them died at AIDS, right?
So this wouldn't be the first time that big pharma just sort of allowed for casualties to happen in the name of sort of selling a product or moving a product.
And I don't know how the funding works for the vaccines.
Like, I don't know if they're already bought and paid for.
I don't know if they make more money the more that they're consumed.
I don't know how that works.
So I can't make a reasonable accusation that the only reason they're pushing the vaccines is because they're trying to make money off of them.
That's where my head kind of goes.
But Big Pharma doesn't seem to me particularly cares about health care so much as they do about the bottom line, which is, you know, that's fine.
That's what business does.
But you have to navigate that in a society so that the safety and health are the top priority rather than just whim.
I mean, I think you have to look at insulin, for example.
You look at chemotherapy treatments.
I mean, there's no, the cost is obviously, I mean, I used to run, believe it or not, medical clinics back in the day as an administrator.
I've had a strange career while always being in the media in some capacity.
But, you know, a syringe used to be about 74 cents a piece.
Now, this was, you know, I'm going back probably 10 years.
You know, so we're giving 500 million doses to other countries.
We can easily say that we've already just given $500 million for this thing just in those doses.
And then you throw in whatever it costs to manufacture the vaccine, the vaccine cost, shipping.
It's got to be at a certain temperature, the formulation, somebody's got to make it.
We're talking billions and billions and billions with a B, but yet we don't see any relief from this administration or the government for people that are, you know, a lot of people have to choose between, you know, insulin and food, as high as that drug is.
Chemotherapy patients have, you know, have literally ruined and bankrupted many senior citizens because they can't afford the treatments and they're giving everything they can to stay alive.
I just, if we're able to do this for a vaccine that is basically from the numbers and what we see, and I've got a lot of doctors I've talked to that are local that don't, you know, it's 50-50 right now with the doctors I've talked to on the vaccine.
Some are for it, some are against it.
Some want to see more testing, more trials.
I lean towards the guy that wants to see more testing, more trials.
I think it's asinine that we're trying to push this off now.
The main push is on children under the age of 18.
When normally a child's vaccination, a vaccine is going to take four, five, six years in development.
And I think that's the real scary thing here.
If you're 18 and over, you know what?
We can do whatever we want at that point.
You can vote.
You can join the military.
You can do a lot of it, drive a car.
You can do a lot of different things by a cigar.
But if you're under the age of 18, I think pushing anything on a population that can't make their own decisions when it's this untested and unproven, I think that should be the real focal point.
No, and this is what I resent about the current environment where simply stating fact becomes a revolutionary act by the fact that the other side has decided that they want to support and report on a political narrative, not on the truth.
And I don't know how to combat that completely other than just continue to say, let's just follow, let's follow science.
Let's listen to science.
Let's do things which are common sense.
And the moment you say that, you become the enemy of the state and you're going to be censored by the White House, apparently.
I saw that list of people.
Yeah, it's like, I like Mercola.
I mean, I don't know him, but I mean, I used to drink, I used to have his protein all the time.
You know, he has protein you could buy on Amazon.
So I just don't understand how the government can decide for you what's going to happen and what not happen.
And this goes to McConnell's issue regarding him saying, like, you either you vax up or we're going to put you back in masks.
That sounds a lot like Nazi talk, like, hey, we're going to send the Gestapo out to make sure that we poke you.
And if you don't like it, you know, you're going to suffer the consequences.
I mean, I think I've told Chase this before, Tony.
If you would have told me five years ago that I would have been in Rolling Stone magazine four times, I would have been like, man, this is a pretty great life I'm living.
So they won't let me within 200 feet of an airplane.
Always crashes.
Yeah, that was a joke when I lived in California whenever we were driving, driving to the airport, and you see like a single engine plane flying and you just always like, oh, I hope it's not Harrison.
So I do want to ask you guys, let's just say that the evidence continues to mount about some voting issues in these states over the course of the next several months.
Like, even if the evidence is overwhelming, what's going to, is anything going to happen?
I mean, I'll just tell you, I mean, my take on it.
I mean, I think it's going to help as far as what the state legislatures can do as far as putting regulations in place that actually will make this to where it doesn't happen a second time around.
You've already seen some things that have been passed in Michigan, Georgia, Nevada, and even Arizona where the legislation has passed things to keep this from happening.
They're passing them in Florida, Texas, and other states, Ohio.
So I think you're going to see that.
Do I think they're going to prove fraud?
Probably so.
Are they going to jerk Joe Biden off with a cane and push Donald Trump up on stage?
Absolutely not.
I think it's going to be probably a sad time in our nation's history.
The media is obviously not going to cover it fairly.
They never do.
But I do believe that this is a, for conservatives out there, it should be a bipartisan issue.
This shouldn't be a political issue.
It should be an American issue of, hey, I don't care what side you're on.
I want my vote to count.
And voter ID should be mandated.
If you're against voter ID, you're against what America stands for, period.
There's no reason for anyone to be against voter ID.
And then the bogus story that you need a Xerox copier to be able to vote is unbelievable.
But honestly, nothing I don't think is going to change other than you're going to see more proof of election fraud.
Then you're going to see states make more regulations and changes.
You're going to see the DOJ come in with that new 1,000-plus attorney civil rights division claiming in the name of racism that these laws by these state senates are and state houses are basically racist.
And it's going to be a fight, but I think the states and the ultimate, if the judges do what they're supposed to do, in the end, the state should win because the state should have control over that, like our Constitution says.
I'll yield back to Tony, but I just don't think, I think there's a lot of folks going around the country.
I'm not going to name any names.
You guys can figure it out.
They're standing on stages and they're screaming that Donald Trump's going to be president in six, eight weeks.
And I think it's setting our entire movement up for another massive letdown that they don't need mentally or spiritually.
So, Matt and I violently agree on that last point.
I mean, there's real damage being done by certain folks who feel the need to make money more than be honest with the people who they're up on stage talking to.
And I think it's very sad.
I'm not going to be popular with what I'm going to say, but it kind of echoes what Matt's saying.
HR1, the For the People Act, which I call the Screw the People Act, is poison.
The federalization of the election system not only would cause huge and irrevocable damage to our ability to ensure one person, one vote, it's against the constitution.
Matt is right.
I mean, I'm a big 10th Amendment guy.
I think all the states do need to maintain and secure their own elections.
On this note, I've testified to a number of legislatures, including Texas, Georgia, South Carolina, Pennsylvania several times.
I just testified in front of Pennsylvania two months ago on this topic, on the topic of secure elections.
And I do believe that the states are going to look at this seriously, especially the Democrat, I'm sorry, the Republican-controlled states that have Democrat strongholds because Georgia, Pennsylvania are largely, I think, conservative.
Georgia, actually, you know, outside of Fulton, Fulton County, it's a red state.
Same in Pennsylvania, Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, and a couple of other notable exceptions, it's all red.
So I think they're going to take very seriously the anomalies observed in those urban centers.
But is what will the results be?
I think the results will be an admonition of the people who broke the rules.
But with DOJ being compromised, I think we've all talked about my Bill Barr experience.
I don't think it's gotten any better since Bill Barr left.
I don't think they're going to do anything seriously to rectify this.
So it's going to have to be a legislative driven thing in all the states that have concerns.
One of the things that went really under the radar was the Clinton administration's forethought to in place through the federal bureaucracy a lot of people loyal to them.
One of the things notable, and I think you all recognize you have political appointees who go into an administration and basically rule the run the bureaucracy.
Much more important, I would argue, are those who go in as professional employees, as civil servants, who are essentially GS employees, GG employees, senior executives who work their way through and become a professional.
Those folks stay there forever.
And I believe people like Lois Lerner was not an anomaly.
She was a young recruit, got into the bureaucracy, was very much loyal to a political cause, not the people of the United States.
And if you put enough of those people in the system and you kind of encourage them to work their way up, you have a very loyal bureaucracy who responds to you and only you.
And that's why I think we see now a very defined two-tier justice system where you can have the 6th of January folks literally dogged by the FBI and Antifa, BLM, Hunter Biden.
They all skate.
So, you know, and that's one of the things that again, it's not, it's not, you cannot miss it.
You cannot miss the two-tier system.
So that's why I think the system is so corrupt because they had they took the other political side took the time to actually work their way, work into the bureaucracy, people who are partisans, not professionals.
I mean, when I came to Washington, I started as a GS9 as a military case officer.
And look, how does Jamie Gorellik end up going from DOD as a lawyer to Fannie Mae to run loans?
How does that happen?
How does it happen?
Is she like some brilliant loan officer that should take over Fannie Mae and oversee?
That's what I'm talking about.
They tend to find people who are loyal to their political cause and they kind of see them through.
And this includes people like James Comey.
What's the whole cast there of characters?
They were compromised by the fact that they felt more obligated to support a political cause than their oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution.
That's my belief.
So you ask, I answer.
So, Matt, do you do you?
What do you think?
I mean, I don't know if you agree with my thinking.
No, I mean, I think everything you're saying, I mean, I may go off a different rabbit hole here a little bit, but I mean, I think it's just, you know, so many people in DC, and you know, Tony knows the landscape a lot better than I am.
I've only been really fighting this battle hard the last five years, you know, from a full-time standpoint.
He's been in the battle for decades.
And so, but I feel like so many people, whether they're at the Pentagon, whether they're in a defense contractor position, you know, lots of guys in DC.
Everybody you meet in DC is a defense contractor if you don't do enough business out there.
You know, that's a nice way of saying I don't want to tell you what agency I work for.
And so, but the point is, is they are promised things from higher ups, from politicians.
You know, it's like, hey, you know, stay this course, you know, because you're going to be in line for this position and you're going to be.
And so the majority of the people doing that, in my opinion, Tony, can most of them have been on a Democratic level.
And so a lot of these, even generals, for example, you know, the reason why Trump shook things up so much, nobody wants to talk about this, is there were guys that were groomed, and Tony can speak to this way better than I can.
I heard him do it.
They were groomed these positions.
And then Trump comes in and he's like, you know what?
I like Bob.
You know, Bob worked with me.
I was on a board with him.
He was at Exxon for seven years.
I'm going to make Bob Secretary of State.
I know it's Rex Tillerson, but my point is, there were guys that expected to get hundreds, if not thousands of positions.
And when Trump came in, he's like, nope, I like this guy.
Nope, I want that guy.
And he just took DC.
It was like you're at a craps table.
He took the dice and just threw them blindfolded.
And that's why, in my opinion, Tony, that's why he pissed so many people off.
Look, the Hillary Clinton National Security staff in waiting was a thing called Beacon Global.
You could look over there and see the list of names of people who were going to be brought into the administration.
Everybody knew that it was their turn.
Michelle Flanoy was going to be the Secretary of Defense.
They had it all laid out.
And so I think, again, that's why you saw this massive resistance to Trump the moment he came in.
And look, Mike Flynn, and I know this from talking to Mike directly, Mike was going to go in because he got fired by Brennan and Clapper.
He was going to go in and flip the table over.
He just didn't care.
It's like, yeah, I'm going to go mess up their little boys club.
And he was.
And I think that was one of the reasons that they went after him first because they knew that their little reindeer game was going to be upset by Mike Flynn coming in saying, okay, you're going to have to defend everything you're doing.
You're going to have to match budget to output to requirements.
You're not going to be able to just kind of go out there and do what you want.
I mean, the spoil system's been around in the United States ever since Andrew Jackson, you know, and I love Andrew Jackson.
So I'm not ragging on him, but it's like this whole buddy system doesn't really seem to be playing out very well in the long term, especially when we have infrastructure in place, for lack of a better term.
I hate the word infrastructure is now a bad word, but we have infrastructure in place that doesn't really allow for a whole lot of accountability in terms of the deep state, right?
Like whenever the FBI gets in trouble, they conduct an internal investigation, right?
Yeah, they're all like Tony said, they all turn the cheek and go, man, I have no idea what these guys are talking about.
And, you know, look at Pelosi as an example and her husband.
I mean, if it was a high prominent, you know, Republican official, congressional or senate member who was doing what Nancy Pelosi is doing, and all of a sudden, every like literally, there's multiple occasions to where right after there's been a government ruling, her husband's came out and bought millions of dollars of these stocks.
If it was Kevin McCain, and I'm not a Kevin McCarthy fan, I don't want to get on my tirade about that right now with the campaigns he donated to this week.
But if it was any of these guys, you know, maybe it's a Thomas Massey or a Rand Paul, somebody who they really despise, was doing what Pelosi was doing and their wives were dropping half a million to a million dollar stock options every time they got out of a meeting about that kind of situation.
There'd be federal indictments.
I don't have any doubt, Tony.
I mean, I think they would already have, you know, there would be DOJ investigations.
It would be a mess.
And I think that's what Tony's alluding to: is it just, it's so corrupt at so many levels.
You know, they control the Department of Justice in a lot of facets.
They control judges.
They control clerks.
It's not an easily fixable process, and unfortunately, uh, you know, we had some people in there.
You know, Tony's been fighting by himself with other guys out there.
There's a there's a few fighters, don't get me wrong, but it's he's, you know, it just like Trump, you know, guys like Tony and DC have been outnumbered for two, two, three decades.
This is a fight that's going to take years to fix, and it's not a simple fight, folks.
It's going to take a lot of work and a lot of getting the right people in the right places.
So, yeah, so Matt knows, and I said this at Matt's event a while back.
There were three failings of President Trump.
And I'm just going to lay them out.
First, he never understood the importance of the budget.
I think Kimberly Klasich rightfully tweeted yesterday, and I retweeted it: the budget crisis is created by both sides.
It's like, oh, yeah, both sides have responsibility.
We have a massive debt because both sides have just let it go.
And for a handful of for only for a handful of people like Thomas Massey, Walter Jones, a handful of others are saying, This is going to kill us.
We need to stop this.
But, you know, here we are.
We're still spending our and Trump never got control of it.
Secondly, he should have got control, but just for the fact that all bureaucrats depend on their funding.
And so, if he had made the point, unless you do the policies I recommend you do, you're not going to get your budget.
He should have made that very clear.
That's what the Democrats do.
They're going to cut you off at the knees, and you're going to be, oh, you can have your fine agency, but you can't do anything.
He never, he was never advised to do that.
So that's mistake number one.
Mistake number two: big media.
He talked about all the different, oh my God, social media is this and the other.
Didn't do anything to stop it.
I know for a fact he was advised to do something and decided not to.
Why he didn't, I don't know.
But now he's suing him.
You know, I mean, yeah, yeah, here's what it is.
So he failed to do that.
And I'm just trying, you know, I'm going to get in trouble for saying this, but it's the truth.
He didn't take aggressive action against the social media giants, and he was the first one to suffer.
He's the first one they got, right?
I mean, you know, oh, sorry.
So, and the third area is what Matt was focused on: personnel.
Policy is personnel.
And so, you're right.
I've gone to reenactments, reenactments at Antietam, where part of the reenactment was the corrupt contractors delivering bad food to the Union troops at the front.
So, we've seen corruption the entire history of the nation.
You're not going to get rid of it.
You're not going to get rid of people getting paid off.
It's going to happen still.
So, what you got to do is pick and choose your battles.
And the way you do that in Washington is to pick the people who can get things done based on your agenda.
Reagan was a master.
So, I was, I had a sit-down years ago with John Lehman, Secretary of the Navy.
And I was admitting it's like, John, how did you get control of the Navy?
Because, you know, Navy's got a mind of its own.
I said, How did you get how did you manage all of these big-headed people?
You know, he got rid of the father of the nuclear Navy, Admiral, what's his name?
Which was not an easy thing to do because he was a god.
I'll think of his name in a second.
So, I said, How did you do that?
And John said, Well, I basically recognized I can't fire people.
So, I said, I basically figured out a list of folks who are going to oppose me and I promoted them.
It's like he put them in a big building over in Roslyn and said, You're too important to have to do work.
You need to think big thoughts and do big things.
So, he got all these people who he knew were going to be problems and put them in a room, like in a big building, gave them their own mission.
It's like, you go breathe each other and let me know when you come up with ideas.
So, so basically, yeah, no, it's great.
It's like, so you so basically he used the strength of the bureaucracy against the bureaucracy.
It's like, so you can do this, and he did it.
He got control of the Navy, fired people, you know, he got rid of people, and he was effective.
So, one of the things I do looking at my standards, how I try to get things done, it's how effective are you?
And this is one of my criticisms of the military, we should probably talk about another day.
The military has become completely focused on measures of performance, MOP.
But, okay, you perform these five things, you do well, you get a great evaluation, you get a medal.
But were you effective?
Did you do anything to actually win the war, beat the bad guys?
Because during World War II, it was measures of performance.
I want to see him like, I want, I want real pictures of him, you know, in shorts and a t-shirt, telling the White House you have to bring him a club sandwich while he's playing Mario Kart, you know?
I'm telling you, like I, I thought, I'll be honest with you, two or three months ago, I would have said DeSantis is the best shot we have at taking the White House in 2024.
And I would have stood with conviction by that statement and said, no, Trump needs to take a back seat.
But with what I've seen coming out of Trump's campaign, the people, he's got a few smarter folks around him now than he did back when he was in the White House.
I believe advisor-wise, they're getting a little more brazen, a little more ballsy, if you will.
And I honestly believe that he is 100% on a different level right now than even he was back in 2015 and 16 when he was running.
People are behind him.
It doesn't matter where I go.
People know what I do for a living.
People are, you know, used to, it would be like Tony could probably, they'd pull you aside and they would whisper and they'd go, hey, hey, I like what you guys are doing.
Somebody from 25 feet away will go, Matt Couch, you know, keep kicking their teeth in, buddy.
And I'm like, what the hell?
You know, like people are mad.
And I, and I think Trump is seeing that.
He knows that he's got a motivated base of tens of millions.
He, you know, I mean, if you just go by their own numbers, he got 75 million votes, the most ever by an incumbent president.
And I promise, well, I say I shouldn't promise.
If the Republicans have any stones whatsoever left in them, they will fight with everything in their being to not be locked down next year because I think that's that's the goal.
I mean, they want to control the narrative with the with the lockdowns.
They want to control the government.
They want to control the voting.
They want mail-in voting.
I think if Georgia does what George is going to do and Vernon Jones becomes your governor, and I think if Whitmer is out in Michigan, which I think there's a real strong possibility of that with the candidates running up there, take the House and the Senate in 2022, which I believe will happen without even the fraudulent states that are under question right now, those seven metro areas.
The GOP, it's up to the GOP, but they got to fight for this.
Trump can't do it alone, but I believe he's got a chance to win, probably carry more votes than he did last time.
Because I've never seen people, like I saw what it was like in 15 and 16 and even leading up to the 2020 elections.
People were, you know, they were pulling aside, you know, privately, Tony.
But now, I mean, people aren't even hiding it.
They're like, hey, man, you want to come over and speak at our church?
You want to come over and speak at the VFW club?
And I'm like, man, guys, man, what happened to all the silent majority stuff?
It's gone.
I mean, they're mad.
And I'll yield back and let Tony answer that question too.
Yeah, no, look, there's no doubt that there's buyer remorse.
I still don't believe Joe Biden got all the votes that they say.
I'm just, I'm sorry.
I just, I just don't believe it.
He doesn't have the charisma of Obama or the drive of Trump.
He just doesn't.
And I just have a hard time believing it.
With that said, the anger is real.
Matt's picking up on it.
And a lot of people feel that Biden is failing, especially in demographics, which he said he would help.
He's not.
I mean, he wasn't going to, anyway.
You know, everybody knew it, but I think people are really going to wake up, especially blue collar.
One of the things notable that I think is always missed, and I'm a populist in many ways.
And this is one of them.
It's like, I love built in America.
I love stuff built in America.
I think we should support American workers.
I don't think it's a radical point of view, but things like killing the XL Keystone pipeline, that kills blue-collar jobs.
I'm an environmental guy.
I got an environmental degree.
Matt, we talked about this at your event.
The best and most safe way of moving oil efficiently and safely is a pipeline.
You put it on rail, you put it in containers and vehicles.
It's unsafe.
There's a number of videos online where you can see these big trains in Canada that something broke.
And next thing you know, you're wiping out of town.
That doesn't happen with pipes, with dedicated timelines.
So that's another area.
And then the Southwest border.
Another issue, the Southwest border, is cheap labor degrades the ability of union workers to get really good union jobs.
Because why would anybody want to put a union guy on something and pay him a good wage when you can get somebody who's here illegally to take money under the table at like one quarter of the union guy?
How is that helping the demographic of the Democrat Party?
It's not.
So one of the things we need to do, I've gone to Scranton.
unidentified
talked to people in scrap it's like that's where biden's from right It's like, Joe is not on your side.
So I'm just saying, but I'm just telling you that we need to make an outreach to those folks.
You know, like I spent time with Tulsi Gabber.
I love Tulsi.
I think Tulsi is someone who feels more like we do than her side does because I know she sincerely wants the best for people.
She's wanted to do things which are more populist and Bernie-like.
You know, I'm just saying, don't agree with those.
But I know in her heart, she wants to do the right thing to help people.
And I don't believe for a minute that the larger progressive Democrat Party, progressives versus classic liberals, classic liberals I get along with.
I love them.
Progressives, I don't.
And I think that's what we need to do is reach out to those traditional classical liberals who really do see, do have the same concerns we do about the country and where it's going.
Arguing over tax rates instead of whether or not to impeach the opposition.
So Tony, I don't know if you got to see this.
Matt, I know you saw it, but I did a short video yesterday.
And I don't know if I'm missing something as just a naive layman, but I looked at the hiring, the job openings on the DNC website versus the job openings on the GOP website.
And it is scary to see who the Dems are hiring for what positions compared to what the Republicans are doing.
The Republicans have six openings on their website right now.
One of them is an internship.
Whereas if you go to the Democrat site, look at who they're hiring, they've got entire teams dedicated to finance, dedicated to social issues, dedicated to digital strategy and branding.
One of the things that's my pet peeve about the Republican Party is that they don't emphasize branding on their candidates.
And so it's like, how are we, you know, I'm optimistic that the sentiment and the will is there among the people to make a difference in 2022 and 2024, but I'm very discouraged by what I'm seeing from the actual party itself.
It doesn't seem like they, you know, they feel the fire.
But what cracks me up is she's wearing a sundress and heels.
And there were literally conservatives talking about what she was wearing.
And I'm like, have you seen what the 19 to 25-year-old women are wearing that are at this conference?
They're all wearing dresses shorter than hers.
And you're making this argument.
But the whole thing is, throw profession out the window.
If you're going to play the moral police, and I have friends I'm going to bring up here, and I don't want to piss these guys off because they are powerful guys in our movement, but I'm going to bring it up and use this analogy.
Chase probably already knows where I'm going with this.
You're going to kick her out because she's a porn star and you don't like it from a moral compass, but yet at the same time, you're okay with Scott Pressler.
You're okay with Rick Rinnell.
These same people were even pushing Caitlin Jenner for the governor of California.
That whole crowd that runs with Charlie Kirk was pushing that.
And, but I'm just using it as an analogy that's like, look, either everyone's included in this movement or they're not.
It's a terrible president to make.
I have no problem with Rick or Scott.
What they do in the bedroom is none of my decisions.
And same thing with Caitlin Jenner.
But so to me, for turning point, the purpose was you kicked her out based on her profession, which is only because of a moral aptitude.
So if you are doing that, then at the same time, allowing, if we're going to talk about sin, then you're allowing all these other people to be a part of it.
It's just hypocritical.
It's a horrible look for our party.
It's going to be used in the 2022 midterms.
It really is going to be horrible because we already have, we don't reach women well as a party.
We don't reach suburban moms well.
We don't reach minorities well.
But you know what?
Hey, what the hell?
Let's exclude, let's exclude folks.
And I'll yield back, but it's amazing how a group that kicked out a porn star could identify a porn star so quickly.
Look, I'm in the second profession, and morally, the things I've done would get me kicked out because I've done things that for our government, you know, that are considered kind of immoral.
I don't know what to say.
You know, in my profession, we kill people for a living.
And I'm not trying to be over the top.
It's kind of like that, it's kind of the bottom line of what we do.
So I don't want to be judged morally for the things I've done over my career, nor do I believe that we should hold anybody to any standard other than what principles do they believe to be in the best interest of the American people.
Do they want to be part of something to help protect our interests as the American people?
And are they sincere?
That's it.
I mean, and she seems to be all of those things.
So it really is disappointing to see that somehow, and I don't know where this moral streak comes from because nine times out of ten, those who are most pious are the ones who are the most compromised regarding this sort of thing.
Well, it's like, like, if they really think that men around the country, you know, like real men, not betas, are going to walk around and go, hey, did you hear Trump slept with Stormy Daniels?
So, how do we, how do we, how do we, how do we get the party to hustle?
Like, how do we put how do we put them to the coals, so to speak, in terms of like, I feel like the party as a whole, the leadership in place and the RNC itself take for granted, like, the donors that they get, all this stuff.
That's the number three for the kidsticks at home.
Uh, you know, that's how you make three or we have since we were kids.
Three answers, and I'll make it quick because I've jumped up like a five-year-old who had the answer here.
Um, but literally, there's there's three answers, okay?
Basically simple: Rona McDaniel, Mitt Romney's niece, has to go.
Oh, yeah, Kevin McCarthy, who literally donated to five of the 10 people who voted to impeach Trump, the Rhinos, went into PAX and gave them hundreds of thousands of dollars this week for the rhinos who voted to impeach Trump, who's who literally are turncoats.
McCarthy has to go, and Mitch McConnell.
You really want to change the party fundamentally, and you want to actually do this.
And we're not just BSing ourselves.
You know, Rona McDaniel, Kevin McCarthy, Mitch McConnell are out.
I don't know who you bring in to run the you know, run the RNC, but it's got to be somebody strong.
Rick Grinnell would be a choice for that, possibly.
There's somebody like that that could do it.
And then also, as far as like, you know, as far as the House goes, you know, obviously you've got a Lauren Beaubert, but I think Jim Jordan's more experienced.
I'd put a Jim Jordan there as the leader of the House and I would put a Rand Paul or somebody that actually has some testicular fortitude in the Senate.
But if you don't, if we win in 2022, gentlemen, and we don't change those three roles, it doesn't matter, I don't think.
And I'll shut up unless you guys convert to finish the answer that I think you want to chase regarding why the RNC versus the DNC has such different job descriptions.
Anyway, she needs to go because that's why Trump that Trump was the Republican Party until he left.
You know, I think he won't be amazing.
Don't use my imagery for fundraising.
So the party's got to get back together.
And Trump's got to recreate his organization.
If he's going to be the man, he's got to be the man because the Republican Party, without his push, is going to be as feckless as we've seen.
Right?
And they still got to account for all this money they raised to defend the vote, right?
Or, you know, go after all the corruption.
Where'd it all go?
$200 million?
There's something wrong with that.
So, but you're right.
And the other thing, and this is where the three of us, I'd like us three to be in leadership positions because I can organize stuff.
I almost said something, but I can organize things and get them done.
And I think you need to have people like Matt who understand the demographic and the media.
Chase, you have to have someone like you being a quarterback, kind of telling people where to go, what to do and how to organize, and basically just find a way to modernize without offending people, like being Charlie Kirk and get together.
No, I'm serious.
It's like, what the hell are you thinking?
I agree.
And by the way, why would Miss Love?
She can make some big contributions.
Just say it.
Why would you alienate someone who could actually help your party, for God's sake?
She put out a great tweet that I retweeted a couple of days ago, and it was brilliant.
And she said, you know, she said, you know, she said, she said, they said I was there to because I wanted to get a younger, younger college audience to someone to that degree.
And she said, I assure you, I reach more college and high school men than Turning Point could ever dream about in their company's history.
You know, I just think that the party needs to shy away from the moral dogmatism.
I think that's part of the reason why so many young people don't like the Republican Party today because of its association with a lot of sort of the dogmatism, you know, that was more rampant 20 years ago.
We're still kind of branded as like this evangelical party.
And though, you know, evangelicals are an important part of the Republican Party and conservatism.
And I'm not bashing that at all, but the party is more about freedom than anything else.
And I wish that we would take that brand, you know, and really ride with it.
But, you know, we're going to have to have politicians that actually advocate for policies of freedom.
Well, you know, I'm friends with Pastor Brian Gibson, one of my best friends in life and one of my business partners.
And, you know, and when I started sticking up for Brandy Love, I went, oh, man, you know, because I mean, you know, he's my one of my mentors.
And I respect what he has to say.
And literally, like, first words out of his mouth is he's like, you're absolutely right to stand up for her.
He's like, can you imagine if we as Christians just started shunning people that we actually want to lead to Christ?
Or that we said, he said, how are we going to mentor people to make them conservatives, to make them better people, better Christians?
If we're like, you know what, you're not welcome here because of who you are or what you do.
He's like, no, hell no, come on in.
We'll teach you our way and see if you like it.
It's unbelievable that that was the mindset of this group was to instead of including them to try to draw more people to the movement, they wanted to shun them, alienate them, humiliate them.
So when big pastors like Gibson, Pastor Brian Gibson are like Matt, you, Tony, Chase, you guys have the all are on the right mindset.
This is not what we are as a party.
It's not even who we are as Christians.
We don't shun people like this.
So I don't know what they're thinking, but it was a terrible move.
I started this podcast because it occurred to me that there was a concerted effort to shame America and what it means to be American.
When I asked myself, what can I do about this?
It's really hard because I'm not a political action committee.
I don't have a tremendous amount of followers.
I certainly didn't when I started.
I am one American.
One American podcast reinforces the values and ideals of America.
It reinforces Americanism by having conversations with key influencers of all sorts of different backgrounds, beliefs, but with one thing in common: the belief in America and that America is inherently good.