Matt Couch: Election Integrity And The Future Of The GOP | One American Podcast #3
Chase Geiser is joined by Matt Couch. Matt is a Political Analyst for TheDCPatriot.com, Influencer, and Truth Slinger
EPISODE LINKS:
Matt's Twitter: https://twitter.com/RealMattCouch
Chase's Twitter: https://twitter.com/realchasegeiser
PODCAST INFO:
Podcast website: https://www.patreon.com/IAmOneAmerican
In terms of branding, narrative, and policy issues, we need to give the Democrats something to respond to rather than just attacking us and waiting for our response all the time.
You know, I mean, there's, and I think it's like you said, it's holding our own side accountable is the start of that.
Like you said, if we, if all of a sudden we trade in a Peter Meyer for an Audrey Johnson, like you said, the Democrats have to go, we have a problem here in Michigan.
We had a Republican that was technically a rhino, you know, Republican in name only that we could kind of control.
He was voting with us.
It's like Adam Kissinger in Illinois, you know, guys that Scott Pressler is working on.
I'm working on Michigan.
Scott's working in play.
We're, you know, there's different ones.
We're all friends, but we're working in different parts of the country to try to get our country back and try to get it, you know, get the House and the Senate back in 2022.
And I think you just nailed it, you summed it up right there.
Give them something to worry about.
unidentified
We choose to go to the moon in Mr. Kane and do the other thing.
Not because they are easy, but because they are hard.
Man, you know, honestly, just trying to focus on these midterms.
That's kind of been my focus.
We did a big event weekend before last.
I guess it's hard to believe it's been like eight or nine days, you know, since the Faith and Freedoms event in Dallas.
And we have a ton of speakers there from myself and Pastor Brian Gibson, Pastor Greg Locke, Pastor Mark Burns, Craig Sawyer.
It's just Jovon Pulitzer.
There was just a slew of people there.
We had about 60 speakers and about 20 plus congressional and Senate candidates.
So the real goal for me is to get people in place that are going to primary the rhinos, that are going to go after these people that haven't voted towards what I consider to be a conservative.
They're siding with other tendencies and not siding with their constituents.
And I think that's a real problem.
We don't hold these people accountable.
We look at them and they go, oh, well, they got an R by their name.
We'll just let it slide.
And we don't hold them accountable.
And I really think that's the real problem in DC.
Everyone wants to blame the left.
I think the problem's in our own party.
And until we clean our own house, I don't think we can even focus on fixing America, if that makes any sense.
I mean, I think that's the real issue that we face.
You know, you look at, you know, there's certain guys like in Michigan, like Peter Meyer, who voted to impeach President Trump.
I'm backing a candidate up there named Audrey Johnson.
She's known as the MAGA bride.
It's an interesting story.
She wore a MAGA dress to her wedding.
But the real interesting story for me with her is, you know, that's kind of how she got some notoriety.
But the real story is, you know, she's a mom of four.
Her husband is career military, went full service in the Marines and the Army, which is unheard of, you know, to have, you know, full tours in both active duty, went into both branches.
So military bride, four, you know, four children.
She's in Michigan, you know, in that Grand Rapids area.
Adam Brassville, a friend of mine, is running her campaign, a great patriot.
He's ran a lot of campaigns around the country.
But I think, you know, getting her in place, you know, I asked her, so how are you going to deal with Washington, D.C.?
You know, she said, well, Matt, I've got four kids and, you know, Congress is like a daycare.
I think I'll be able to, I think I can handle it.
I think I can help clean it up.
And so those are the kind of candidates we need.
You know, I think we need new blood.
We need young people in office.
We need more females.
We need more minorities.
You know, the GOP just completely, you know, part of lately, they completely crap on females.
I've worked on multiple campaigns for the last three or four years around the country, and I've seen the GOP establishment like refuse to endorse females.
And then you look at a Marjorie Taylor Greene and a Lauren Bobert who went out there and literally, they didn't help them.
They just steamrolled and did it themselves.
Those ladies are just tough to the core.
They roll up their sleeves and they kick some backside and they got elected.
But they didn't get a lot of help from the GOP either.
And they still don't, as you can see, the GOP did nothing when the Democrats went to pull Marjorie Taylor Greene off of committees.
Nothing to help, nothing.
And so that I think honestly, Chase, that's the big thing is that I don't know how we fix this party unless we start Backing people like that and getting younger candidates in place.
You know, I think people are tight.
And I've got a, I live in a condo.
So if you hear that, I've got landscapers and I apologize.
So I wanted to ask you about that because I've noticed just from your Twitter in passing, scrolling through that you seem to be very skeptical of the most recent election that we've had in terms of legitimacy.
And I myself have mixed feelings on it because I was a Trump supporter, but I'm very reluctant to make the fraudulent election claim.
And it's because I'm not educated on the issue specifically.
There are guys that have spent three, four, five hours a day looking into all the stuff that have more informed opinions than me.
So I wanted to hear from you.
And I don't want to be like, I don't want to have like an antagonist opposition to you and whatever your perspective is, but I would love to hear from you, like what your rational thinking is in terms of the election integrity, because as it stands now, my perspective, which could totally be wrong, is that there wasn't necessarily any lawful cheating, but it was certainly very cheap the way that the Democrats won by using the mail-in ballots and writing the back of COVID.
So I don't know if that's the correct interpretation of what happened or not.
I think you kind of summed it up for me in my opinion as well.
I think it was strategically targeted.
You know, a lot of people, and I'm glad you, it's a great question.
I wish more people would open with the way you worded it because I don't even think I could have worded it that well.
Because honestly, you know, people, like you said, they want to go straight in with, you know, fraud, cheated, fraud.
And it's, and the problem is when you make, when you make accusations like that, you better be able to pick those up and prove it because they're going to deplatform you.
And so that's a lot of the reason why there's a lot of people that have, you know, big name people that are beating this drum and screaming it from the rooftops, but they haven't shown any proof to the American people yet.
And I think that's, that's alarming to me to just go around and make that accusation.
I do believe they strategically targeted seven metro cities, but I am careful to say that because what do you mean by strategically targeted?
I think they knew where they could control the judges, the city councils, the mayors, and even the state secretary, secretary of states, the attorney generals.
They targeted, obviously, Fulton County and Atlanta.
They targeted Pittsburgh and Philadelphia.
They targeted Milwaukee, Detroit.
They targeted Phoenix and Las Vegas.
Where I don't believe, everyone else talks about machine fraud, right?
I don't think that's what happened.
I truly believe that if there was fraud, it came from hand ballots because that would be the easiest to manipulate.
No one really wants to have that conversation, right?
And that's why you would see the machines being shut off.
And that's what happened across the board is, you know, they were shut off, then they went to hand counting.
If you notice, that was the whole situation, water leaks, all sorts of situations in that realm of things and that thought process.
But at the end of the day, I think as a party, this is me personally.
Now, I'll take a lot of heck for this.
I've been saying it recently.
You've probably heard it.
We have this group in our movement, probably, and it's an alarming percentage.
Chase, it could be over 50% that literally thinks they're going to pull Joe Biden off with a cane and push Donald Trump out on stage and be like, your president is back.
This has never happened in our nation's history, folks.
It's never happened in the history of our country.
I don't see it happening now.
I think that if we're not careful as a party, we are going to get, you know, it's like, you ever seen the movie Hoosiers?
It might be, it's one of those, I think it's Dennis Hopper Hoffman.
I can't remember.
It might be Dennis Hoffman, but he's the assistant coach and he's kind of a drunk, you know, and they see and he sobers him up.
But he said that he's forced to coach the team in this tough game.
And he makes this reference, you know, hey, boys, don't get caught watching the pain drive.
You know, he's going to run the thicket fence play.
And so the purpose of this is, I think, as conservatives, we're going to get caught watching the paint dry if we continue to live in the past and focus on that.
To me, there was not widespread fraud.
I've had this argument with people because, you know, the argument I hear is my vote doesn't matter.
My vote doesn't matter.
I think that is an absolute absurdity for people to continue to spew that nonsense.
Your vote mattered in Texas where Trump won by almost 800,000 votes.
It mattered in Ohio in the same effort.
It mattered in Florida.
He won every county in Oklahoma.
He took 75% of Arkansas, 63% of Nebraska.
And I can go on and on with the numbers.
Your vote absolutely mattered.
I hate that we have a group, a large percentage of our party telling people that their vote doesn't matter.
I think it's detrimental to the Republic.
It's detrimental to our process in elections.
And you've got to stop that because, you know, if they do, let's just say they prove the fraud, if there was, let's just say they prove it.
Well, now you've got half the country convinced or half your party convinced that their vote doesn't matter.
You're going to have the same situation that happened in Georgia where you had all those knuckleheads down there in December telling people not to vote, and then we lost the Senate.
I think we have to stop doing that as a party.
I think you got to investigate those areas, those seven metro cities, and they're doing that in Maricopa County.
Obviously, I put out a tweet that went extremely viral yesterday.
I think it's got like 50,000 likes right now, but basically, it said, it said, no one sends 100 lawyers to cover up a victory.
Alex Stohall and Walt Blackman running in Arizona.
Walt's a 21-year retired Army tank commander, a strong Black conservative.
There's some great candidates out there that are running that we can flip seats.
If Bob Lanceya wins in Rhode Island, guess what we just did?
We turned Rhode Island red.
If Audrey Johnson replaces Peter Meyer and we get a stronger Republican presence in Michigan, Willie Montahue takes out Val Demings in Florida.
You see where I'm going with this.
There are strategic things we can do to take the House back, to get the Senate back, and to start to try to correct and fix this problem where I don't believe that fraud is going to come into play and stop any of those moves from happening.
But I think the biggest thing is people have got to get off their backsides and get involved.
Join a street team.
Be a door knocker, be a poll watcher, get involved from the city council level, Chase, all the way up to the state senate to the federal level.
The biggest thing I see in our party, and I'll yield back and give you your time back here, but the biggest thing is that our party, we just want to sit on our hands and we want to point the finger and we want to complain.
No one's getting involved.
And I heard a lot of feelings.
I get people mad at me when I say that, but I'm all over the country almost every week.
I'm on a plane somewhere.
I see it.
And the number one thing that I think our party is facing is that we just want to, we want to point the finger.
We want to say this happened or that happened.
But at the end of the day, the way we get America back is we got to get involved.
People have to get involved.
And I'm not, you know, and they got to quit thinking, oh, it doesn't affect me.
It does affect you, you know, and I'll yield back.
Well, I think one of the problems that we inherently have just by virtue of being conservative is that the nature of our party and our policy is to preserve and protect certain established norms, like the Constitution, for example, or the Second Amendment, for example, right?
Major platform issues for conservatives.
And so we always tend to react to any sort of assault on what we're trying to conserve.
And that gives the Democrats an advantage politically because they can be very proactive in their attacks.
And it makes the Republicans look, just like you said, like they're sitting on their hands and just waiting for what side of the fort that we need to defend now, right?
So we'll run to the left flank, we're running to the right flank.
But I wish that we realized that in order to win this battle, this right versus left battle, the Republicans have to start being incredibly proactive.
And they need the best defense is a good offense, right?
So we need to start taking back ground, both politically in terms of candidates that are elected.
But we need to give, in terms of branding, narrative, and policy issues, we need to give the Democrats something to respond to rather than just attacking us and waiting for our response all the time.
And I think it's like you said, it's holding our own side accountable is the start of that.
Like you said, if all of a sudden we trade in a Peter Meyer for an Audrey Johnson, like you said, the Democrats have to go, we have a problem here in Michigan.
We had a Republican that was technically a rhino, you know, Republican in name only that we could kind of control.
He was voting with us.
It's like Adam Kissinger in Illinois, you know, guys that Scott Pressler is working on.
I'm working on Michigan.
Scott's working in play.
There's different ones.
We're all friends, but we're working in different parts of the country to try to get our country back and try to get, you know, get the House and the Senate back in 2022.
And I think you just nailed, you summed it up right there.
Give them something to worry about.
Right now, conservatives are like, oh, well, you know, this guy's got an R in front of his name.
We'll just go with the flow.
But now all of a sudden we put in an Andre Johnson and we or we pulled out and, you know, an Adam Kissinger.
We move in another stronger.
So you put a stronger Republican in Michigan in that seat, you know, that's not going to vote to, you know, fraudulently impeach a president based on feelings.
You know, you do the same thing in Illinois, you know, and you like you said, you start giving them things to worry about.
But, you know, I'm backing Chad Prather for the governorship in Texas in a gubernatorial race.
You know, my my big issue with Abbott is the fact that, you know, you don't get to.
He's the one who put the unconstitutional mass mandate on Texas, you know, nine months ago.
Now, I guess it's been 10 months ago.
You know, you and then you take it off and then he wants a pat on the back or an attaboy.
I think, you know, the Democrats, just from what I know, you know, being kind of on the inside a little bit, they're going to run Beto O'Rourke against him.
You know, Beto is becoming very seasoned in this presidential debates, presidential campaign runs, Senate runs.
He was a congressman, whereas you've got Abbott.
I don't believe that Abbott is going to hold up.
And my theory on this is Texans are there's a lot of Texans that are very, very upset with Abbott, the mask mandates, the fact that he waits on DeSantis.
It's like it's like, man, you're you're on you're by yourself in the middle of the woods on top of a rock.
You're obviously virtue signaling if you're wearing a mask on top of a cliff with a mask.
You know, it's insane to me.
Does he have a chance?
Sure.
I mean, look at what Donald Trump did.
I believe that people like Mark Cuban and Dwayne Johnson are going to be a real power that the Republicans are going to have to face in the next few years in presidential cycles.
I think both those guys are going to probably run at some point on the Democratic ticket.
But I think right now, I think you're going to I think someone like Chad Prather, who is a Texan, you know, who who has millions of followers, who can compete with Beto, who can, you know, has a sharp tongue, who can fire things back.
I think there's a real risk of of conservatives losing the state of Texas by being complacent.
We I think that if they're paying attention to the Cruz and the O'Rourke race last time, you know, like you said, it was insane.
I think it wasn't like one hundred million dollars for a Senate race.
It was insane.
The number it may have even been higher than that.
You know, Chase, it was way up there.
They will go even higher.
And we've seen what happens.
You look at the Pennsylvania governor, you look at Kemp and Georgia.
you look at Whitmer in Michigan, you look at these states where you have Doocy in Arizona, you look at these states where you have weak governors or wishy-washy fence straddlers in the governor's spot.
And obviously, you look at DeSantis in Florida, that state is rock solid.
He's not going to allow, it's important, it's imperative that you have strong governors in the big conservative states.
And I think Texas is literally teetering on a very volatile situation.
He's got another challenger, too, that's, I think, going to run now in Texas.
I can't remember his name.
I think he's like almost a billionaire businessman.
Now, let me ask you, as someone who moved to Texas in the fall, is there traditionally a primary opponent for governor of the same party?
Because like with Trump, for example, virtually no, I mean, I know he technically had a challenger, but it was so minuscule that his, I don't even know its name, right?
So is that traditionally something that happens in Texas?
Is the governor traditionally challenged within his own party?
Probably not, but I think it's one of those things where I think the mass mandate was kind of the last draw.
I'm friends with Chad Brader.
I believe that was kind of the last, you know, the last straw for him.
He's like, I've had enough.
You know, the guy just continues to go.
And he made some really bad decisions during COVID.
And Texans haven't forgotten that.
The lifelong Texans that are the hardcore ones that have been there, that are really, really staunch, conservatives, they're very upset about it.
And I think, and I think he needs challenges.
I mean, I really do.
I mean, that's my take on it, because I think the Democrats are going to come for that seat heavily.
And I think they're going to put hundreds of millions of dollars behind Veto O'Rourke or Matthew McConaughey, but they're going to come for it.
And right now, I don't see Abbott being able to hold up.
Now, I could be wrong, but if you look at how close that, you know, that Cruz O'Rourke race was, it should be concerning, especially with what we're seeing in the southern border with San Antonio and El Paso and Houston and that influx of blue that's coming in.
It's working its way up into Waco and Austin, even Dallas city limits now.
I mean, realistically, Texas is red, but all the metros are blue now, the big metros.
Have you looked in any data as far as what percentage of migrants to Texas are Democrat?
Because, I mean, California obviously is a heavily blue state, and a lot of the people are coming from the Silicon Valley area, which is a heavily blue area, but still like a third or 40% or whatever the number is of Californians are Republican, right?
So there's got to be a number of those migrating out of the out of these blue areas that have struggled throughout COVID that are that are Republican, like myself, for example.
I was conservative in Orange County and I moved here.
And so what percentage of people migrating to this state do you think are actually blue that are turning the state purple?
I'm not sure exactly where it's at, but the rumor is he's going to run against Ken Paxton.
And so, and that, and that's, that's literally, that is a rhino.
You know, that's the Bush family.
You know, Ken Pax has done a marvelous job as attorney general in the state of Texas.
You know, he's been the Biden administration at every turn, trying to hold them accountable.
So when you look at that, you know, from when you flip the, you know, flip the script a little bit, the hardcore, you know, rhinos, the institutionalists that want to, you know, that side with the Democrats in a lot of their voting are going to try to, you see, they're all in it together is the best way I can put it.
Our party's compromised itself into basically being traditionally Democrat, right?
The old school form of the Democratic Party in a lot of ways.
And, you know, I love Trump.
The reason I love Trump was because I'm a populist and I saw him as the only candidate that was a populist, but I don't necessarily buy the argument that he was conservative.
And I don't agree with a lot of the things that he did in terms of how he led.
For example, I agreed with the wall, but by getting the wall done with executive order, it's totally susceptible to the next administration just shutting it down, right?
Rather than getting it done with legislation.
So, a lot of the things that he did, even though I agreed with them, I disagreed with the way that he did them.
And obviously, he spent a lot, but I just wanted a populist president.
And I believe to this day that Trump adamantly supports the United States and loves this country before all other countries.
And so, that's why I'm still a fan of him, despite some of the things that bother me about him.
But one of my concerns is as the government continues to spend and sell bonds to the Federal Reserve in order to fund the spending, I'm concerned about inflation increasing the gap between the rich and the poor in the nation.
And I know that that's a talking point that's used by the left a lot, but I'm not concerned about it for the same reasons.
I'm concerned about it because it seems to me that as the middle class shrinks, there'll be less incentive for either party to represent who used to be in the middle class or who is in the middle class or who should be in the middle class.
And it seems to me that this is an incredible opportunity for the GOP to claim that they are the party of the middle class.
Traditionally, they were the business party, right, of small businesses, and then they kind of got branded as the big business party.
Now, the Democrats claim that they're for the poor, the poor, but they're really for big business and contractors because everything they spend money on just makes the rich richer, right?
And so, how can the GOP brand itself as the middle class, working class Americans party?
I mean, I think you saw some of that in 2016 with what the president did, Trump, that is with making us energy independent for the first time in probably our lifetimes, if not ever, as a nation.
I'm one of those people that, you know, it's amazing we say, oh, well, we're concerned about climate change, so we're not going to drill on American soil, but yet we'll buy oil from every other country in the world.
Literally the most moronic notion there is on the planet.
And then we also lose American jobs and that and pay foreign wages.
It just, it makes no sense.
So I think, you know, with what Trump did, when you look at what he did with, you know, bringing back, you know, almost 700,000 manufacturing jobs, you look at what he did with making America energy independent, I think that you've got to do something along those lines.
Now, something happened in Pennsylvania.
You know, now, once again, there's going to be a lot of investigations.
I don't think anything will come of it.
That's just me, you know, on this whole voting situation on where things lie.
Did it really happen?
Was there fraud?
At this point, I think it's all going to come out, but I'll just be honest, I don't think it's going to change anything.
And I think that makes people upset because they control the judges, the Department of Justice.
They control all three.
They control the House, the Senate, the White House.
I love it when people think that, well, we're going to prove the fraud.
And my response is, well, who's going to do anything about it?
Because they control everything right now.
And obviously, Merrick Garland has a weaponized Department of Justice now, what they always claim the Trump administration of actually doing, but never happened under Bill Barr and Session.
So I'll go back for a second on your question.
I truly believe that, you know, energy independence is number one, bringing manufacturing back to America.
I have been saying that before Trump was elected, before he even ran.
The key to getting America back is American manufacturing.
We have to get back to making not just American steel, but everything.
Because this is one of those, and it's a talking point, it's a foreign policy talking point.
Nobody wants to have the discussion because they're all paying these people.
So basically, where I'm going with this is, it's frustrating because they're making so much money off of China, the politicians, the lobbyists.
But in actuality, what benefits Americans, let's say a war breaks out, Chase.
Do you think China is going to keep selling us their cheap steel and their cheap infrastructure to build planes and tanks to fight them?
It's really the notion, you know, it's probably why the Chinese and the Russians and the North Koreans or the Iranians are laughing at Americans, and they should right now.
Because in retrospect, we are beholden to China on almost everything.
We should have our own steel.
We should have our own infrastructure.
We should have our own chips.
We should have our own everything that we need here in-house.
Because right now we are dependent on everything.
I would say it would be hard to bet.
I don't know the actual number, but would you say it's probably 85, 90% of everything in America is coming from China at this point?
And so if actual confrontation does break out, like what we're seeing starting to happen, you know, you see Russia loading up with hundreds of thousands of troops on the Ukrainian border.
Are they going to take that back?
We don't know, but it sure looks like it at this point.
They've been loading up for two months now over there.
You've got Russia now bullying up on Ukraine and putting two, 300,000 troops and 3,000 tanks on the border and running drills and with their aircraft carriers out there.
So all of this is happening.
North Korea is launching missiles again.
You know, they don't care.
You know, all hell has broke loose since Biden took over.
But the point is, when you talk, your question was, how do we get America back to that middle class?
It's with building everything at home.
We have to get back to taking care of our farmers, taking care of everything here at home.
We should be focusing on farmers, focusing on manufacturing, focusing on American-made, focusing on getting that back.
And the problem is it's like no one, I mean, it's a great question, but how do you make these people that we elect in DC actually start putting policy in place to do that?
Well, and one thing that's that I'm curious about, and I haven't looked into the numbers to try to figure this out, but obviously labor in China is excruciatingly cheap to the point where we would consider it slave labor if it was being done in the United States.
There's not really a dispute about that.
That's definitely the case.
And that cheap labor makes it economical for us to import a lot of goods from them.
But you have these incredible costs of shipping and the fees on top of shipping across the ocean to the United States.
How much of a difference marginally is there between cost of, say, if we were to manufacture all of our iPhones in Iowa instead of Wuhan or wherever they're being, Shenzhen or wherever in China they're being manufactured, how much more expensive would an iPhone become?
I think there's enough conservatives and people that are tired of America getting trampled on that if you had your option of a phone that was $32 and one that was $42 and that one says made in the USA, I think they're going to pay the $10 more a month and take the made in the USA product and thus start building up our, you know, our manufacturing that way.
Yeah, I think you're right.
I mean, that's, that's the real kicker.
What sacrifices are being made?
It's really, it's really sad.
I mean, the corporations, you look at the mask mandate, they're controlling everything.
You know, all the governors, all the mayors, they started pulling back the mask mandate, you know, Chase, because they knew they didn't, they can look like the good guy to the conservative base that didn't want to wear the mask, who thought it was against their constitutional rights, and it is, but now they know the corporations control it, whether it's the airlines, the hotels, the restaurant chains, you can see where I'm going with this.
They can go, oh, well, you know, it's a private establishment.
It's just like no shirt, no shoes, no service.
Now they can say no shirt, no shoes, no mask, no service.
And it takes their hands out of the equation.
The corporations are controlling the media.
They control the politicians.
It's basically something that our founders, I don't think, really saw coming.
Well, and the problem when we talk about big tech in general, one of the qualms that I have with the issue is that is that the left says, hey, they're private companies, they can censor who they want.
They can deplatform who they want.
And I'm a firm believer in sort of two perspectives on that.
My first perspective is I don't believe that any monopoly has existed in the United States without government sponsorship.
They've all been sponsored or subsidized in some way by government, or they're under threat of government breakup.
And so by that argument, yes, they are monopolies, but they're empowered by the government.
And second of all, I don't consider them private companies.
I consider them extensions of the government.
You see the government outsourcing violation of constitutional rights like freedom of speech to big tech under the protection of, hey, it's a private business, right?
But if you're Twitter or Google and you're constantly being threatened by Elizabeth Warren on Twitter for being convicted of antitrust law violations or anything like that, you're going to cater to them.
Your board of directors is going to cater to them and you're going to censor people that are opposition.
You're going to try to get as friendly with the government as possible in order to avoid that sort of a breakup or that happening to your business.
So these big tech companies, they're not private companies.
These are extensions of government at this point.
And therefore, that's why I believe that our constitutional rights should be protected when we use their platforms as well, because they are not exclusively, it's different if you're going into somebody's small restaurant and they're telling you, hey, don't say the N-word here, otherwise we're going to kick you out.
Okay, that makes sense.
But If you're on Google or Twitter and you're expressing yourself and you're being censored, that isn't private business censorship.
That is government censorship because of the threat the government has on these platforms, in my opinion.
And it's basically, it's targeted on who they want to censor as well.
You know, someone on the left can say exactly what you and I say and nothing happens, but you and I say it, and they will literally suspend us indefinitely.
Well, look at all the look at all the Hamas stuff going on, right?
With between Israel and Palestine.
You see world leaders supporting Hamas.
You see people calling for the most violence possible against people just based on their race or ethnicity or faith, right?
And they're not being taken down from these platforms.
But then as soon as somebody tweets something about suspicious ballots appearing at 2 a.m. in a van, they get banned, right?
And I tweeted this earlier today.
My whole, the left is, is right to a certain extent in being critical of conspiracy theories because so many conspiracy theories are just horseshit.
Pardon my language.
But the point that I'm point that I'm trying to make is the reason conspiracy theories exist is because there's no trust in the media narrative.
The same with what happened on January 6th.
I firmly believe that the reason that the January 6th event occurred isn't because anything that Trump incited.
It's because the media lied so much about Trump over the years that when they said the election was legitimate, which I believe that it probably was legitimate or very close to legitimate in terms of legally, not necessarily ethically, but legally legitimate, nobody believed them.
And it wasn't because they're stupid.
It wasn't because Trump said anything or they were coerced by leadership or QAnon said something.
It's because the media lies so much about everything that how is anybody supposed to believe them when they actually do tell the truth for once on an important issue?
You know, I started my start in media before I got into politics a long time ago doing pro wrestling and mixed martial arts radio.
This is over 20 years ago.
There was a pro wrestler named Eddie Guerrero, you know, and his slogan was cheat to win.
I don't know if you've ever been a pro wrestling fan or not, but that's literally, you know, even though he cheated, he still won.
And I think, I mean, I think there's, like you said, we don't have to like the methodology of how it happened, but did they find a way to do it with some loopholes and things?
It looks like they did.
And that's the real problem.
I mean, I think, you know, someone's going to have to come up with some serious evidence.
My issue is all of these people claim this.
I don't know about you.
I've yet to see any proof put out there in a way that explains it in layman's terms to the American people.
And I think if somebody could come out there and say, hey, look, here's a picture of this pallet of ballots, right?
And here's a picture of this pallet of ballots before they, you know, we started voting on, you know, October 21st for early voting.
And then, you know, you should have said that there should be ways to figure this out that shouldn't, that should not take a process.
It shouldn't be hard.
You should be able to go, okay, well, hopefully I don't have anything on this, but you know, so this is what about, you see what I'm going to do.
Well, and the fact that so many of these cases brought against the election were just dismissed or not even heard.
You know, I understand that a lot of them, if not all of them, were just baloney.
But the fact that they weren't heard really undermines the integrity of the process, right?
So like, I feel like if these arguments were heard in open court and ruled on, then, you know, it could put the issue to rest because the biggest problem right now isn't whether or not, in my opinion, it's not whether or not Trump actually won.
The biggest problem is that nobody knows for sure either way.
They just have opinions.
And we have to know for sure in this country if we want our republic to survive.
I mean, and I think it's sad that we've got these federal judges with lifetime appointments who can basically never be fired, who make crazy money, have crazy stature, crazy benefits, and they don't even have the testicular fortitude to hear these cases.
Now, granted, if it's Joe Blow that works at the hardware store and he files a suit with his local attorney, I can understand a federal judge's frustration of going, look, dude, you don't have any standing.
But you still ought to at least look at what the guy presents, spend a couple of hours, humor it, and move on.
My Lord, they sue everyone for anything and everything and clog up our court systems for it.
Nothing could be more.
Put all that on the back burner and let's deal with, like you said, and let's deal with this.
Let's get these judges doing what they're actually paid to do.
And let's hear these cases because I can't think of anything the court should be hearing more like you just alluded to than they should be hearing these cases and ruling on them, seeing the evidence.
And then, like you said, it'll either all get washed out or you might have five or six cases where someone, there's an aha moment and someone like you or I can go, wait a minute, that's 37,000 votes in a county that in a state that buyed only one by 8,000 votes.
Then you then all of a sudden you do have a light bulb moment and you can actually start having that conversation.
Hey, we need to talk about what happened in this state.
But until then, like you said, if their judges aren't even going to hear it, all it does is cloud the doubt.
You got half the country who's still pissed off and they're not clearing anything up, right?
Well, and I know that constitutionally speaking, the way that elections are conducted are divvied among the states, right?
The states, the states decide how to conduct their own elections.
And to me, that makes sense, but I would be interested in considering, I'm not adamant for it yet, but I'm interested in considering the notion of a constitutional amendment to that issue because I have a problem with the fact that,
say, Michigan's election policy for federal elections, not state elections, but federal elections can impact policy at the federal level that impacts my life as a Texan, right?
So I can understand how if, look, if this state wants to elect their governor this way without voter IDs and whatever, that's them.
But if you're electing people to the House or the Senate or to the presidency, it seems to me reasonable that we would have universal procedures as to how that's done across the states.
But I don't know.
I mean, that could be controversial, but I just, I speculate that if our founding fathers had seen what this has looked like basically since 2000, right?
There would be, they might have made some changes in terms of how elections could be conducted.
And obviously back then, there weren't any voter ID laws and election integrity was probably much more difficult to enforce.
But it seems to me that it's not fair to various constituents throughout the country when certain key swing states have policies that aren't conducive to election integrity.
Literally, you know, when you go to vote, you have to dip your finger in dye, your index finger, and it will last about, stay in your finger for almost a month.
They literally have better election integrity in Afghanistan, for God's sakes, than we do in America for our voting systems.
I mean, the fact that we don't, you know, the fact that you need an ID to buy a beer, you know, to buy cigarettes, to go to a movie, for God's sakes, if you look too young, they'll even card you in a movie theater, right?
They'll card you at Walmart or Target or Best Buy if you buy a rating on a DVD.
Yeah, I understand, but my life, you know, just to give them the benefit of the doubt, just to play the devil's advocate, because I think I agree with you, but my life, I am self-employed.
You know, I mean, you have to have an ID to, you know, to go ride the bus for God's sakes.
You know, they're not going to sell you a bus pass without an ID in a big city.
You know, it's one of those things where I think it's, you know, my grandfather always said, you know, excuses are like, part of the lane, excuses are like assholes.
You know, and so I feel like it's just another long, it's amazing, but I bet if you, you know, you said you need an ID to vote, but I'll bet you money, these people can find a way to have an ID to buy liquor, to buy their smokes, to buy other things that they need.
I'll bet you money, they can all find a way to have an ID to do that.
You know, it's disheartening that you need an ID to drive a car.
You need an ID to, you know, to go to get on a plane.
And you see where I'm going, I can just keep going down the whole.
But I mean, to me, an ID to vote should be the number one thing you need an ID for.
Even if you just brought your social security card, even if it wasn't a photo ID and you had your social security card and they made sure that that number could not vote twice, that would be, and everybody's got one, right?
You get one in the mail within a month of being born.
That seems to me like a really reasonable approach.
Well, and the problem is now because the people that are working the you know the voting booths or the polling are now worried about being called a racist.
So now they're not even carding people or asking for IDs.
But I mean, at the end of the day, that is the number one thing we have as a free republic is our right to vote.
Without it, we're no different than a lot of the countries in the world that are suppressed.
So that is something that I think you have to fight for.
There's no excuse for anyone because if you don't have ID to vote, that means they can start stealing elections, which means they can start stealing your country.
They can start stealing everything.
And I don't know why this is even, honestly, it shouldn't even be a talking point.
Well, and if Democrat, the thing is that the reason this is good for Democrats too is because then Republicans would stop questioning whether or not Democratic candidates are legitimate when they win.
You know, if we had voter ID everywhere, that would, you know, we gripe about something else.
You mean to tell me that they have the ability to just drop a check or a direct deposit, not once, not twice, not three times, not four.
What are we on?
Number six?
Something like that for some people?
They can draw, they can, they know your bank account without you even sending in any paperwork and they can just drop money in it like that for hundreds of millions of Americans.
You're telling me that they couldn't mail everyone out a voter ID.
With what you know, they obviously have your driver's license picture because they know what your bank account is and they're dropping stimulus checks.
And so they obviously know what your driver's license looks like, where you live, what your bank account is.
So just well, there's no question that the government knows who the citizens are.
I mean, just by virtue of having social security cards, it's all there.
Now, the only question with that is like, of course, when people die, there's latency and whether or not the government knows that a person is dead.
But other than that, the government knows who the citizens are and who they aren't.
It's just for some reason, there's pushback against applying that knowledge to our election system.
And, you know, I'm sure that cheating happens.
I'm sure that it happens on both sides, but we should eliminate this vulnerability before it becomes obvious that it's really happening on a big scale.
And the funny thing is, one thing that really bothers me about the left is that oftentimes you don't see minorities making arguments on behalf of themselves.
You see sort of like white privileged, educated Democrats making arguments on behalf of minorities, right?
So I bet if you went into, you know, a low-income minority neighborhood in any major city and you walked around and you asked people whether or not they think that people should have an ID to vote, I bet you a lot of them would say, yeah, absolutely, because these are reasonable people.
Just because they're poor doesn't mean that they all have the same exact position as the establishment elite of the party that they vote for.
And so I just, I'm so frustrated with basically elite politicians claiming to be the voice of Hispanics or any other minority because it just doesn't seem like there's a connection there whatsoever.
And I think that's the other thing too, is that, you know, there's this misconception that minorities are just poor and living in the streets in every metro city.
Most of them live in the suburbs.
It's a rare few group that lives in the inner city that, you know, that is complaining about these issues.
A lot of minorities live in the suburbs.
They have kids, they have families, they have jobs, they're middle of the road income, middle class, they're working hard.
I think it's just, you know, it's an insult to them as well.
And most people that I know, what I like to do is, you know, you can take my word for it and then they go, well, you don't know what the struggles are.
But I've got a lot of great friends, you know, like Damoni Felder and Willie Monahue and others out there that I can lean on.
Donnie Anthony, who ran for the mayor of Arlington, Texas, who are black males and females in America who are conservatives.
And when you talk about this with them, they laugh.
They go, this is no, it's an excuse.
It's ridiculous.
No, they're just making excuses.
They're lazy.
Now, this is what, and I think that's where the conversation has to go, Chase.
You know, ask people, because, you know, you and I are going to be like, oh, well, you don't know what it's like.
Well, I ask people who are living in those areas, who have been there, who know what it's like, and they all tell me that it's just an excuse.
I've got a great friend, and I've told his story a few times on air.
And he grew up as one of the enforcers for the Crips in Little Rock.
And, you know, now he manages multiple locations.
He's a pro-MMA fighter and his nickname is Riff.
And literally, the reason why he got that nickname is when the Crips had, you owe the Crips money, they sent Riff.
He had a Riff with the Crips, and he was literally the enforcer.
And so he'll flat out tell you that racism is nothing more than an excuse.
You know, he's like, look what I've done with my life.
You know, he runs multiple retail locations that he has now.
He's a pro-MMA fighter.
He, you know, he's, you know, he's made something of himself.
But I think you just have to, you have to talk to these people and you have to, you know, say, look, here's the deal.
You know, we've been there.
Put people that have been in their shoes and show them how to get out of that situation.
I don't think we do a good job.
It's the same thing with police brutality.
You know, you and I are both white guys, but I was taught at like five years old by my father.
You know, you respect authority, you respect the police.
When I learn how to drive, first thing my dad says is don't mouth off to any cops.
If you get pulled over, you keep your hands at 10 and 2.
You look straight ahead.
You say, yes, sir, no, sir.
Yes, ma'am, and no man.
Now, according to the media stereotype, I shouldn't have to do that, right?
I have privilege, but it's not the case.
It's all how you're raised.
And I just feel like we're not doing a good job of relaying that.
And the communities aren't doing a good job of relaying this.
You know, you see the left really pushing a couple of things the past couple of years.
Universal basic income is one, higher minimum wage is another.
To me, and I could be misguided on this, so correct me if you have any other insight.
But to me, it seems that these policies would actually only serve to harm the most vulnerable among us because of the increase in federal debt that it would create and then the devaluation of the dollar that it creates, right?
When we have to print to fund these programs.
How can we convince the Democratic voter base, particularly the minorities or the impoverished among the voter base?
How can we convince them that these democratic policies are actually harmful to them?
Because if you get universal basic income or higher minimum wage, but your money's not worth as much as it was six months ago or a year ago, then you're not actually being helped at all.
And I actually, as an aside, I was talking with a friend about this, and I mentioned this in the last episode that I did with Ian Miles Strong.
I was talking with a friend of mine about what happened with the black community in particular over the course of the last 50 years, because before the 70s, it was sort of the nuclear family, very Christian values.
And it seems to me very plausible that the reason so much has changed culturally in that community is because of inflation after we went off the gold standard.
Because if you're barely making it by, but you're making ends meet, but barely, and then all of a sudden your money's worth 10% less.
And that puts you on the other side of that line, then you're working extra jobs.
You're not home with your kids as much.
You might have to turn to crime, whatever.
It seems to me that inflation and devaluing of the currency could explain almost every racial problem that we have in the United States.
Yeah, I mean, I think, you know, it goes into the whole, you know, the minimum wage argument too.
I mean, it's all ties in together.
It's like we don't have common sense as a society.
And I mean, man, I could go down the rabbit hole on the teachers' unions in the schools because I think that's a lot of where this problem really resides, what they're being taught, you know, in public schools and college institutions.
But common sense would say if the minimum wage is, say, let's just use $8.50 an hour for an example, if you raise that to $1,250, is the price of coffee going to go up?
Is the price of bread going to go up?
Is the price of milk going to go up?
So all they're going to do is level it out.
So, like you, like you said, with Universal, you know, basically, it's, it's, I don't know how it's hard when people don't really grasp common sense because of the world we live in.
I don't know how you explain it to them.
I wish I had a better analogy for you, but to me, it's just it's a common sense thing.
If, if you, if you put it at a certain level, you know, and it costs this person more money now to employ people, it now costs the people at the manufacturing place that make the bread, that make the meat, that make the milk.
They now have to pay more.
Everything goes up.
You know, everything goes up.
And so you're not really making any more money.
Minimum wage was never meant to live on.
This universal thing is just, it's crap.
You know, it's a socialist talking point.
It's more of the, you know, rich guy bad, bring everyone down to their playing level, you know, and that's, that's what it is to me.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I mean, that's, that's basically what it is.
The entire premise is anyone who's successful in America is the enemy to the left and their socialist agenda.
And I think it's, it's sad because you're teaching people to be government dependent, you know, you're teaching people that, you know, they can't do anything on their own.
You're like you said before we, I think before we started reporting, you know, you and I both have a saying we use called live in the dream.
You know, right now, people are, they're pretty much being taught there is no dream, you know, and I mean, it's unreal.
When I look at the success stories in America, you know, you look at a guy, I mean, I mean, I'm a big fan of the show Shark Tank.
I mean, conservatives may not like me here saying that, but I love the entrepreneurship and the show and learning off the show.
And you look at guys like Damon Johns, you know, and where he came from.
You look at guys, you know, there are so many people out there.
Look at a Michael Jordan, you know, and how he grew up and now he's a billionaire.
And you look, you know, so many success stories out there from a minority standpoint.
Well, if you read it, if you read The Millionaire Next Door, which was the 90s book, I don't know if they've updated it, but 80% of millionaires are first generation, right?
And that's one of the things that's things that's awesome about capitalism is that just because you grew up poor doesn't mean you end up poor, right?
See, but the reason that that's not politically conducive to the Democrats is if it's true that the American dream is possible, if it's true that you can be anything you want, then that means that failure is you're culpable for your own failure, right?
And the Democrats need your failure to be someone else's fault in order to justify government intervention to establish justice, right?
So the Democrats don't want anybody believing in the American dream because how the hell are they supposed to get elected if their whole entire platform is based off of helping people because it's impossible for them to get out of the situation they're in unless we do something.
And that's why I think the Democrats are inherently racist, whether or not they're doing so wittingly, because they either believe that minorities can't do it on their own, or they want to convince minorities that they can't do it on their own, even if they can.
So they're either malicious or racist.
Either way, it's sort of a different reason that they're racist, right?
If they're trying to put them down, then it's racist.
But if they believe that they can't come out of it, then it's also racist too, in my opinion.
If you read enough Danesh D'Souza books, he'll kind of put where he thinks their party is, you know, but Thomas Sowell, you know.
Oh, yeah.
Oh, yeah, absolutely.
I mean, I think it's hard to argue that they're not holding minorities down.
You look at look at liberal cities, for example.
You look at Baltimore, you look at Chicago, you look at Detroit, look at Memphis, you know, look at Washington, D.C., Muriel Bowser, what an insane, horrible job she's done for that city.
But, you know, the worst cities in America are ran by Democrats and have been for decades.
It's just sad.
And, you know, it's a definition of insanity.
You know, if you do the same thing over and over again, expecting a different result, that's what these people are doing in these cities.
And you probably already knew that from what our mindsets were.
I don't think Donald Trump needs to run in 2024.
But we'll talk 2022.
I think it needs Iran DeSantis.
That's my personal opinion in 2024.
As far as 2022 goes, my concern with Donald Trump right now is that he is endorsing many people that really have no business being endorsed.
He's endorsed certain people, like he endorsed John Bozeman, U.S. Senator here in Arkansas, who literally stood on the Senate floor and chastised him about January 6th.
And I don't necessarily think it's Donald Trump, but I think that the inner circle of those people advising him are very dangerous to 2022.
And that's why you got people like myself and my group that are at Pastor Gibson and Pastor Locke and Pastor Burns and others out there, Kenny Lee on my team that are working hard.
Sean George, who's a founder of Beard Bet, we're all working hard to get these, you know, to get dozens of candidates to primary the rhinos.
I think it's very scary that whoever's advising President Trump is advising him to endorse some of these people that don't really have America first principles.
They, you know, they're establishment shills, and it's very concerning.
We need more Marjorie Taylor Greens.
We need more Lauren Boverts.
You know, we need more younger, vibrant, you know, candidates in office in our party.
And I'll just throw this one at you and get your opinion on it.
And it's your show.
I'm used to hosting too.
So I don't know how we continue to win seats if we continue to elect nothing or put in place, I should say, nothing but 60, 60, 65 and up year old white dudes.
Now, I'm a white guy.
I guess I can get by with saying that.
But my point is, you know, we need more female candidates.
We don't have a party that relates to the suburban mom.
We don't have a party that relates to suburban women.
We have seen that in the polling numbers, you know, and also we're not relating to Christians.
You know, a huge chunk of evangelicals and Christians stayed home in 2020 and didn't vote.
A lot of people don't realize that.
So I think we've got to get more female candidates, more minority candidates, more young candidates.
That's the way you energize the base.
That's the way you pull more female voters.
It's the way you pull more minority voters.
And if our party doesn't start to embrace that, Chase, I think we're in a lot of trouble.
And I think one of the problems with our system is that even once you're elected, you're dependent on party leaders in terms of what committees you get placed on, right?
And that causes a lot of people with good intentions to sell out very quickly to the mean of the party or the average of the party.
And I don't know if there's any way that we could change that.
So that's not the case.
But, you know, instances like Marjorie Taylor Greene getting stripped of all her committee placements and stuff like that, like that's very, that really undermines her constituents.
And you could say that it's her fault because of certain inflammatory things that she's said or claims that she's made.
I don't know.
But regardless, to me, it seems ridiculous that there's so much power placed in party leaders in terms of who serves on what committees.