All Episodes
Previous Next
July 14, 2017 - Sargon of Akkad - Carl Benjamin
16:58
Janusz Korwin-Mikke's Facts vs Piers Morgan's Feelz
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
So normally I probably would have put this on my alternate channel, but this was just too good to pass up on.
Meet Janez Cohen Mick.
He's a radical capitalist and a Polish MEP, and he is absolutely unstoppable.
Welcome to you, sir.
Can you explain to people in Britain, please, why you believe women should be paid less than men because they're weaker, smaller, and less intelligent.
Just a quick note, they're on a satellite feed, his first language is in English, and he's a very old man.
So there is often a delay between them answering the question and him answering it.
I'm just going to cut those delays out to make this easier watching.
I am sorry you are lying.
I never said that the women should earn less.
I only said that because they are shorter, they are weaker, they are less intelligent, they are less aggressive, and so on and so on, they earn less.
By the way, shorter men earn less than the tall men.
The blonde earn more than the brunette.
There are differences and the differences should not be equalized, that's all.
So just to fact check, he's correct on all of those points.
Blondes are paid more than other women, short men do earn less than tall men, overweight women earn less money than slim women, and in fact, being good looking is just an all-round indicator that you're going to make more money in your lifetime.
When he says that women are less intelligent than men, it's a very sloppy way of saying that, on average, women's IQ tends to cluster around the mean.
What this means is that women are more likely to be of average intelligence, with fewer dunces and geniuses.
Men are a lot less average, producing higher amounts of idiots and also higher amounts of Nobel Prize winners.
This matters when you correlate IQ with earnings, and IQ does correlate with earnings.
The smarter you are, the more likely you are to have a much higher paying job.
This is why women will probably always earn less than men on average, unless specific measures are put into place to increase the pay of women and reduce the pay of men.
It's now important to point out something that Piers Morgan clearly does not understand.
When dealing with averages, any individual example is actually really not relevant.
You can't use an individual example to disprove a trend by definition of the terms you're using.
And before we go on, I'm going to kill two birds with one stone and also address the race realism argument that you have probably seen floating around.
IQ is not a factor on which we do anything.
We don't legislate for people's IQ, and we don't need to.
That's the point of having a free market, in fact, is that we don't need to do anything of the sort.
We can just let the market work, and the people who are smart will end up rising to the top, and the people who aren't smart don't.
That's what a meritocracy is.
But more importantly, IQ is just one dimension of a person's personality.
Having a high IQ doesn't necessarily mean you have good social skills, and in most jobs, in most businesses, good social skills are very important if you want to get ahead in life.
But the most important point for, I think, probably feminists to take away from this is the fact that you being a woman does not actually give us any accurate information about your capacity to do the job.
Being female doesn't make an intelligent woman less capable.
Being black doesn't make an intelligent black person less capable.
And that's why, regardless of the average statistics of either group or any group you care to choose, it should never be applied to the individual because it might not be right.
That is the liberal argument against discrimination on the basis of race or gender.
And this is directly opposed to the progressive argument that there should just be equal numbers.
It's an argument that demands control over the entire system and will organize it as to the whims of its own worldview in spite of the merits of the people who will actually end up in those positions.
Because the progressives are arguing for equality of outcome.
They are actually willing to discriminate on the basis of race and gender in favour of women and non-white people and against men and white people.
This is just institutionalising another form of racism and sexism.
When progressives say that they want to be tolerant, they mean that as a goal, whereas liberals see tolerance as a result, a consequence.
And the progressives will be illiberal in the pursuit of that end goal that liberalism will produce on its own merits without being discriminatory.
Just the case for why liberalism will always be better than progressivism.
But anyway, now that I've got that out of the way, let's enjoy this.
Can you, sorry, can I just interrupt?
Can you give me an example?
Okay, can you just give me an example of where a short man earns less than a tall man?
No, and he doesn't have to.
Why would he have a single example to hand when he's discussing a trend?
We've already discussed this, and I've already proven that he is correct on this.
Yes, of course, they earn less, but on the average, of course.
Also, blondes earn less more than brunette.
Also, it is checked, it is proofed, and women earn less because they are, and so on and so on.
No, he's not saying that this should be the case.
He's just explaining why this will be the case.
And remember this for when we get to the end of this video as well.
I didn't say that they should earn.
I'm a free marketer.
Dude, let me ask you though.
Do you personally believe that?
Let me ask you, let me ask you, do you personally believe that women are less intelligent than men?
Yes, of course, why are you not interested that they are shorter than men, but they are less intelligent?
Both statements are true.
This absolutely cracks me up, because all of the nuance of the point has disappeared at this point.
Now, Piers has boiled it down to, so you're saying women are stupid, aren't you?
Do you understand that when you say that on International Women's Day, what you're really doing is showing the world that you are just a horrendous sexist pig?
Piers has completely lost the thread of this conversation already, and we're barely a couple of minutes into it.
That's such a silly thing to say.
And Piers just gets better from this point onwards.
Or should I say worse?
It depends what you're watching for.
But excuse me, why you are not interested that the women are shorter or weaker than men?
Why, intelligence is only one future of women.
And of course, they are less intelligent in this several points on IQ scale.
There is no doubt on that.
But please don't mix up things.
He's got you there, Piers.
You didn't give a shit about the height, did you?
You don't give a damn of like bodily strength or anything of the sort.
Oh, no, no, no, but when it comes to the IQ, you're suddenly like, well, well, I mean, come on, we're not gender realists here, are we?
It's just true.
But it's not a judgment on any individual woman, and it's not a judgment on any individual man that he might actually be really fucking stupid.
And also presenting Good Morning Britain.
How can you say that women are less intelligent than men when you yourself sound so unbelievably stupid?
Piers, I hate to say this, but that is a question that is so stupid, he's probably just going to laugh in your face.
I don't understand you.
Well, because you're too stupid.
Let me try again.
Right?
How can you say that women are less intelligent than men when you are saying such incredibly stupid things?
Yeah, how can you say that when you yourself say such stupid things?
Piers, it's even worse than I expected.
That question was so stupid, he can't even understand why you're asking it.
First of all, I haven't heard you.
Okay, it is you are saying it's stupid.
It is scientifically proved and you say that what is scientists determined, you say it is stupid thing.
Well, it only shows that you are an idiot who don't believe in science.
That's all.
And please, don't mix up.
Don't mix things up.
Women are less intelligent than men, but nobody said that the men are wiser than women.
Oh no, I think it's just the opposite.
Piers, he can make you look like a science denier because you're not even trying to engage with the information he's giving you.
You're not addressing his points whatsoever.
All you're doing is getting morally outraged.
And that's not a refutation.
And what I don't understand, while I would agree that in cases that women are physically weaker than men, I don't understand how you can possibly justify a pay gap on the fact that women are shorter than men.
Because whatever your argument, that is just complete rubbish.
How tall are you?
Five foot four.
Right, there we go.
Well, check me.
That shows you.
Forget your scientific data.
She's only five foot four.
This is not an argument, Piers.
And if I were you, I'd get your position on the bell curve checked.
I knew he'd start laughing at you eventually.
Just saying things that are so stupid, Piers.
And you are so clearly out of your depth with the conversation with this man.
It's honestly embarrassing to watch.
Quite the ceramics.
I'm sorry.
You still believe in stereotypes.
You are now living in the state of the world.
We believe in stereotypes.
But the thing is, you clearly do.
Otherwise, you wouldn't need to get offended.
You don't believe in yourselves as individuals.
You're not thinking, well, okay, well, I don't apply to these averages.
Or even if you do, what difference does it make?
It's just you're so wrapped up in this.
And he's literally saying, well, these are just the numbers.
And you're saying, hey, those numbers hurt my feelings.
I don't think women are like that.
And it's like, well, Piers, I hate to say this, but the data actually tells us what women are like.
You saying, I don't think women are like that is you appealing directly to a stereotype you hold in your head.
We all want to talk to you in stereotypes.
You've just called women stupid, short, not deserving of gender pay.
Let me ask you this.
Let me ask you this.
Piers, the data is as the data is.
When he says stupid, that's your word.
He said, not as intelligent as men, on average.
And on average, they're not.
You get more intelligent men than you get intelligent women.
That's what he's saying.
And that's true.
You also get more stupid men than stupid women.
And that's true too.
But that's not something you're bothered about.
Because presumably it's affecting men or not women, but negatively.
But I mean, okay, go on.
Let's see your question.
You've been married.
You've been married about the world.
You've been married three times.
You have eight children by four different women.
And what relevance does that have, Piers?
That's such a silly thing for you to bring up.
Yes.
I have eight children.
I don't think there is nothing fantastic in that, but there is nothing wrong in that.
But please, you have said, as I hear, because I don't hear you well, that I said that women are stupid.
I hadn't said that.
I said that you're stupid.
Intelligence is very easily measured.
And we know by scientific methods that the women are less intelligent.
But it doesn't mean that they are stupid.
It doesn't mean that they are less wise.
It is quite a different thing.
I think there are many people who will appreciate that explanation of exactly what he meant.
But it's clearly way above Piers' pay grade.
When you say to the world women are less intelligent, I take that to mean that you believe women are more stupid.
Because stupidity, I don't know if you're aware of this, because you're an incredibly stupid man, is linked to intelligence.
Do you see how it works?
Piers, I laughed for a very, very long time at that.
And I cut it out for the sake of my audience.
It's one of the most interesting interviews I think I've ever witnessed, actually.
And I do feel like I sat on the sidelines while two men discuss the intelligence of women.
Believe it or not, this was not a discussion about the intelligence of women.
This was a discussion about the intelligence of Piers Morgan.
I'm not sure we ever got to the bottom of why a shorter man should earn less than a taller man, even if we're going to get into the issue of gender equality and the pay gap.
But thank you very much.
Can we ask you?
I think we should ask you again.
Sorry.
Yeah.
Go on.
But please, let me say something.
I never said that women should earn less.
I am only explaining to these idiot feminists because they say, oh, women are earning less.
Why?
So I'm explaining why.
Right.
If you are weaker, do you have a final earn less?
Do you not know it?
And bizarrely enough, Piers actually does grasp the point, which he'll go on to demonstrate shortly.
But not before he's asked some more remarkably dim questions.
How tall are you?
In English, I don't know, but one meter 89.
Right.
Bad sex foot.
Okay.
It's quite extraordinary to have a guy who's unbelievably dim.
What's amazing about this is it's clearly his ego that's preventing him from actually engaging with what's being said.
Because as soon as Yanis Cohen-Mick disappears, he changes completely.
But first, Mr. Cohen-Mick is going to just drop a couple more red pills.
Do you have a final message for the women of the world on International Women's Day?
You can talk to them directly.
What would you like to say?
Well, in Poland, it is generally regarded International Women's Day as a communist invention because you must understand.
And of course, the radical capitalist has to blame the commies.
I love this so much.
It's the best thing in the world.
Rev up the helicopters.
The left wants to promote women because the women like to be protected.
The women think that the men should protect them and the state should protect them.
And then they would vote for the non-state, for a welfare state.
In the meeting with me, a woman in the first row said, oh, it's fantastic that the state orders me to wear a seatbelt because the state laughs me.
It takes care of me.
Okay, okay.
We're going to have to leave it there.
We're going to have to leave it there, I'm afraid.
Thank you very much indeed.
Yeah, that's right.
Shut it down, Piers, because holy shit, you can't allow him saying things like this on TV, can you?
I've got to say, you are the greatest advert for Britain leaving the European Union I think I've ever encountered.
So as somebody who voted remain, you could have single-handedly persuaded me to vote Brexit.
Thank you very much indeed for joining us.
My God.
The irony of this is that I've got no doubt that Yannis Cohen-Mick is absolutely pro-Brexit.
He's a man that stands up in front of the European Parliament and tells them to their faces that the European Union must be destroyed.
Our enemies are in mosques, in the mosque of Paris, in the mosque of Marseille.
What we should do is to reject the socialism, to abolish income taxes, ruining the industry, to liquidate all the social benefits, attracting to the Europe the worst elements and demoralizing all the Europeans, to reintroduce the death penalty.
We cannot win the war when they kill us and we cannot kill them.
In fact, if you are to survive, we must reject all the acquis common autaire.
Therefore, I think the European Union must be destroyed.
He's just so woke.
I did a video a while ago about him on my alternate channel that he ended up putting on his personal Facebook page.
I'll leave a link in the description.
I've got so many clips of him just saying the most blunt things in the world.
I love every second of it.
I just never know what he's going to say next.
Yeah, and you should be paid more, and Piers, obviously, should be paid more than any of us because you're...
But remember, he wasn't saying you are less intelligent and therefore should get less money.
He was explaining why women get less money.
I love her face now that he's just mansplaining to her.
Actually, say a 15-year-old boy or already more intelligent than his mother.
That was what I would say in my family.
▲
Export Selection