Sargon of Akkad - Carl Benjamin - This Week in Stupid (10⧸04⧸2016)

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 10, 2016 - Sargon of Akkad - Carl Benjamin

22:37

This Week in Stupid (10⧸04⧸2016)

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello everyone, welcome to This Week in Stupid for the 10th of April 2016.
	If you see anything you'd like to see in This Week in Stupid, tweet using hashtag TWIS or post to rsaganofacad.
	I don't know why, but I've got a funny feeling that this week's episode is going to be a bit of a heavy one.
	So let's start with a woman who's only slightly more popular than bowel cancer, Hillary Clinton.
	The hill dog is having a problem.
	That problem is men, and the problem really is that they don't like her.
	Hillary Clinton has the biggest chance in US history of shattering the ultimate glass ceiling and becoming the first female commander-in-chief.
	But could men spoil it for her?
	I can't wait to find out how this is about sexism.
	I mean, nobody's perfect, but I don't trust her.
	She's too slick.
	I'd rather have her husband, says George Rousia, 81, a former independent and Democrat at a Donald Trump rally, who said he's voting Republican this year.
	Clearly, because he's not only sexist, he's also racist.
	According to a recent university poll, 68% of white men have an unfavourable opinion of Hillary Clinton.
	Presumably with the other 32% saying they don't follow politics.
	This comes after Clinton lost 7 out of the last 8 primary elections and caucuses to Bernie Sanders, who cornered the male Democrat vote 64-35% in Wisconsin, according to CNN exit polls.
	Their complaints focus around Clinton's ability to revive the economy, and they complain that she's opportunistic, not honest, and does not care about them as she champions minority rights and gun control.
	Now, you might be thinking, well, these sound like perfectly rational objections to Hillary Clinton.
	She's probably not able to revive the economy, she probably is opportunistic, she's definitely not honest, and she clearly doesn't give a fuck about them.
	However, you have clearly forgotten about feminist mind readers, because other people have attributed this opposition to latent sexism.
	Of course it is.
	Of course it's that she's a woman.
	It's not that she is blatantly dishonest, constantly lies, constantly just changes her position whichever way the wind is blowing.
	Doesn't stand for anything except for the enrichment of the Clinton Foundation.
	It's not that.
	It's that they hate women.
	But you know what?
	Everyone expected that.
	Men are obviously a bunch of sexists.
	Pigs as well, in fact.
	And of course Hillary Clinton is a feminist.
	At least, since feminism became quote unquote popular.
	Of course, this isn't going to help Hillary because most women don't like her either.
	Another recent poll shows that Donald Trump has a 68% unfavourable rating among women.
	But 58% also view Hillary Clinton unfavourably.
	In fact, Hillary's unfavourable rating is two points higher among women than it is among men.
	So clearly there are a lot of latent sexists among the women as well.
	It's not a regional thing either.
	Apparently all across the United States, more than half of the people, oh sorry, more than half the women polled found her to be unfavourable.
	Unsurprisingly among Republican women they viewed her 90% as unfavourable.
	Among independent 65% unfavourable.
	Among conservative 88% unfavourable.
	Among moderates about 50% unfavourable.
	65% of white women polled didn't like her compared to 56% of Hispanic women polled who didn't like her.
	Dislike of Hillary Clinton is spread evenly among the age groups as well, with 58% of young women thinking that she's awful and 60% of old women thinking that she's awful.
	In households that earn under $60,000 a year, 56% found her unfavourable, whereas over 60,000 care a year, they're 61% unfavourable.
	So as the wages go up, the preference for Hillary goes down.
	So there are a lot of reasons that people hate Hillary Clinton, and I've got no doubt that her declaring herself opportunistically as a feminist to Lena Dunham is certainly one of those reasons.
	Because there are a lot of people who think that feminists are some angry, militant, man-hating lesbians, such as Rebecca Bradley, who just won a 10-year term to the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
	I wouldn't get too excited, because she does appear to hold some decidedly retrograde views.
	I mean, this is a hit piece, and so I'm expecting them to have taken a bunch of her statements out of context.
	She does appear to be decidedly anti-homosexuality, which is really the point.
	The more you push in one direction, the harder the pendulum swings back in the other.
	Since we're on the subject of feminism, there's a page called Anti-Feminism Australia, which appears to be a series of forums who have recently had their Facebook pages shut down for hate speech.
	This hate speech is, of course, disagreement with feminism, and they've been reported many times by feminists who have realised that feminism is something that Facebook is obviously going to endorse, so just be aware, you can't trust Facebook to be in any way politically neutral when it comes to the regressive left.
	The regressive left have waved their little victim flag, and Facebook has come running to coddle them.
	Because that really is as pathetic as feminism is becoming now.
	Other people are having opinions on Facebook, and we don't like it.
	Flag it for hate speech.
	Hate speech, hate speech, hate speech.
	All this disagreement, it's all hate speech.
	So really, it comes as no surprise to me that major feminist outlets like the Huffington Post are willing to take advice on feminism from children.
	Maisie Williams offers brilliant reason to stop calling people feminists.
	Why has no one thought of this before?
	Well, okay, I mean that's actually not a bad idea.
	I don't think people should call themselves feminists.
	I think they should be anything else other than a feminist.
	But let's hear her out.
	So in one of her early Game of Thrones interviews, she was asked if Aria Stark is a feminist.
	She says, I didn't even know what a feminist was.
	And then someone explained it to me and I remember thinking, isn't that just like everyone?
	And then I realised, everyone is not a feminist, unfortunately.
	And this is how feminists try to latch on to the uninitiated.
	They say, well, here's a childlike definition of feminism.
	Actually, it's about equality.
	And people think, well, yeah, sure, why not?
	I'm all for equality.
	And then what they leave out are the distinctly unequal things that feminists want to do in order to reach their perfect feminist utopia.
	But anyway, Maisie Williams' idea is this.
	She says, I also feel that we should stop calling feminists feminists and start calling people who aren't feminist sexist.
	And then everyone else is just a human.
	Okay, sexists aren't humans.
	You're either a normal person or a sexist.
	People get a label when they're bad.
	Of course, this does mean calling 82% of Americans sexists, because they're not feminists.
	And feminists who think that they represent some kind of moral majority don't.
	But they don't realise this and they're never going to listen to facts or reason.
	They're just going to be like, why don't we just call every non-feminist a sexist?
	That's surely going to increase the number of people who are feminists.
	The article ends with this interesting comment by Maisie.
	I'm going to say this in this interview, I wouldn't say it with anyone else.
	I sometimes really worry about speaking up about feminist subjects out of fear of being bashed by women on social media.
	And sometimes it's men too, but there are women who are just nasty.
	I'm trying to do the best I can.
	I got a voice.
	I believe in equality and I know I have more power than the average person to reach people.
	And I'd get petrified in case people are rude.
	I don't know what to tell you, Maisie.
	Maybe you should just call these women sexists.
	I mean, how could they be anti-equality?
	How dare these women not join the cult of vagina?
	You know what?
	Feminism doesn't just stop with women's equality.
	It's time to get intersectional and talk about race.
	GapKids pulls controversial ad after critics call it racist.
	This is the racist advert in all its glory with a white girl leaning her arm on the head of a black girl, which is clearly code for get back to the cotton fields you fucking nigger.
	At least according to critics of this advert who clearly have nothing better to do with their time.
	And presumably after realising what a bunch of horrible racists they actually were, Gap decided to replace the image in the campaign and apologise to their critics on Monday, tacitly admitting that they had a point and they did think those darkies shouldn't be allowed to mingle with the white folks.
	Gap presumably realised that they did actually think that separate drinking fountains for separate races is a good idea.
	The thing is, Gap really realized that what they wanted is for black people to look at their brand and go, Massa.
	Isn't that right, Gap?
	Isn't that exactly what you thought?
	And if that's not what you thought, and if this advert wasn't racist, why were you fucking apologizing?
	You did nothing wrong, your advert wasn't racist, and unless you actually are racists, you don't apologise for something that's not racist.
	But do you know what actually genuinely was racist that nobody has to apologise for, in fact, that's going to be covered up?
	Black Lives Matter activist accused of racism.
	Toronto co-founder asks for strength not to cuss slash kill these men.
	So Black Lives Matter protesters packed up their things and ended a two weeks sit-in outside the Toronto police headquarters on Monday, but controversy over the movement has just begun.
	Usra Kogali, one of the local chapter's co-founders, is gathering criticism over a controversial message she wrote online.
	Please, Allah, give me the strength not to cuss slash kill these men and white folks out here today.
	Please, please, please.
	Just as a quick aside, can anyone point out anyone who supports Black Lives Matter who isn't either a complete cuck or a black supremacist?
	Just out of interest.
	I'm yet to find one.
	Reactions to the message were mixed.
	Stephanie Smith, an editor of Toronto's CP24, called it a disturbing tweet.
	But Marjorie Wollins, a public relations consultant, told the star that the group should be commended for remaining controlled.
	Why?
	Were you expecting them to chimp out or something?
	Are you a racist?
	I mean, you're supporting Black Lives Matter, so I'm guessing you are.
	And many would be willing to overlook the controversial message.
	Well, I'm not one of those many.
	I'm actually interested in talking about her controversial message.
	But this is the problem, right?
	There are white people who are suddenly going to excuse what they have done because it was done by a black person.
	Because in their mind, black people are simply not the equals of white people.
	Black people's agency doesn't carry the weight of a white person's agency because they're black.
	I mean, look at this.
	Megan Bowler, a University of Toronto professor in the social justice education department, as if that should exist, said the focus on a throwaway comment was a deeply disturbing distraction from the issues demonstrators sought to raise.
	Hmm.
	Now, let me just make a prognostication.
	Megan Bowler is white, in her late 30s, probably single, upper middle class, and has an academic career that has contributed jack shit to human knowledge.
	Ding ding ding.
	We have a winner.
	Now, I'm really fucking sick of seeing Lily White professors teaching black kids that they are in fact inferior.
	Because that, to me, would be the first step on the road to denouncing someone as a racist.
	Megan Bowler.
	But no, you teach black kids that they in fact can't do anything wrong because they're black.
	Black people are inferior.
	So when a black person's being racist, it's just a distraction.
	For white persons being racist, like say you, it's not just a distraction.
	But for some reason, no one picks up on the fact that you inherently think black people are lesser than white people.
	You've got it in your mind.
	Otherwise, you wouldn't wash over what this person has said.
	She's saying, please, Allah, give me the strength not to murder white people.
	It's just a distraction.
	It's just a, it's just a thing.
	It's not important.
	She's just a nigger.
	She can't do anything sensible or wrong or sane.
	I know, I'm the white saviour.
	Seriously, I'm really tired of the apologetics for these people.
	Just for anyone who does this.
	I don't give a fuck what your skin colour is.
	It does not matter.
	I'm really getting sick of people being exempt from their bullshit based on things like race.
	And, you know, full marks to Switzerland.
	Swiss anger at Muslim handshake exemption in Thurwell School.
	So a Swiss secondary school has caused uproar by allowing two Muslim boys not to shake hands with women teachers.
	A common greeting in Swiss schools.
	Why?
	Oh, because they're darkies, of course.
	They can't know any better.
	It's their culture to discriminate against women like this.
	The boys had told the school that it was against their faith to touch a woman outside their family.
	And the complaint was, a local teachers' union said the exemption discriminated against women, which it does, but that's not really the fundamental issue here, is it?
	The fundamental issue is when in Rome you do as the Romans do.
	You are not in some backwards dark ages hellhole in Arabia.
	You're in Switzerland.
	A first world modern secular nation.
	Their customs are you shake the teacher's fucking hand, so you shake the teacher's fucking hand.
	Just like if I were to go to Saudi Arabia, I would bow to the Saudi king, because it's their fucking custom.
	Is it really so hard to respect the customs of the nation you have found yourself in?
	It's interesting that Islamic groups are not unified on this point either.
	For example, there is no reference in the Quran justifying the refusal to shake a woman's teacher's hand, said the Swiss Federation of Islamic Organizations.
	And the Forum for Progressive Islam urged the Swiss not to give in to extremist demands.
	Good.
	However, the Islamic Central Council of Switzerland has said that a handshake between men and women is prohibited.
	And then said, after the sex attacks in Cologne, they asked Muslims to keep their distance from women.
	Did they say that, or did they ask women to keep their distance from Muslims?
	And did they ask Muslims just not to rape and sexually assault?
	But now they demand they get closer to them.
	Oh, oh, we just can't understand these complicated rules.
	Don't rape, shake a woman's hand.
	How is this any different?
	This is, of course, total horseshit.
	And if you're in a country that requires you to distinguish between shaking a woman's hand and raping her, maybe you shouldn't be in that country.
	And maybe you should be in a country where, I don't know, women are clad head to toe in fucking black and aren't allowed out of the house without a male relative.
	Maybe that's where you belong.
	Or maybe you could just be honest and come clean and saying, yeah, okay, we're being wilfred and obstreperous in order to push our culture on yours.
	I mean, we can all see it.
	It's good to see that Switzerland doesn't have the same political class as Germany.
	German minister told police to remove the word rape from reports about mass migrant sex attacks in Cologne on New Year's Eve.
	I presume that Muslim children in Germany don't have to shake the hands of female teachers or show them any amount of basic respect.
	So a German state minister allegedly tried to pressure police in Cologne to remove the word rape from reports about the mass sexual assaults committed by asylum seekers on New Year's Eve.
	Cologne's Express newspaper claimed that the Interior Ministry of North Rhine-Westphalia pressured a senior police officer to delete rape from an internal report issued on January the 1st.
	KHK told me that the State Control Centre wanted the report cancelled and the expression rape deleted.
	Read a document written by another police officer that was then printed by the Express.
	I'm not fucking surprised.
	Given that it took four days for this information to come out anyway, and that was only because of social media, God fucking bless it, I would not be surprised by this claim at all.
	According to the paper, Officer KHK and his colleague were on duty when the events of the night before being discussed for an interim report.
	The night before, hundreds of women had been sexually molested and robbed by marauding gangs of refugees, most of them from North Africa.
	Yeah, and others from the Middle East in general.
	And it's important to note that three rapes ended up happening on that night.
	And the police report that was filed filed it as a peaceful night and nothing of interest happened.
	The initial report that the officers discussed read, rape, sexual harassment, thefts committed by a large group of foreign people.
	Officer KHK received a call hours later requesting he delete rape at the behest of the state interior ministry.
	The officer refused.
	Fucking good on you, mate.
	NRW Interior Minister Ralph Jaeger, who allegedly wanted the word rape removed from the official reports, is facing calls to stand down.
	He is due to be quizzed by parliamentary colleagues on Tuesday.
	Good.
	Well, so he should.
	He's part of a state cover-up that has been exposed.
	We know there was a deliberate attempt at a cover-up of what happened to protect migrants under the all-encompassing veil of political correctness.
	Because victims don't actually matter when the narrative is in jeopardy.
	He denied the allegations through a spokesperson, Coward, who said, it's not true that the rape on New Year's Eve and Colin was supposed to be hushed up.
	Bullshit!
	We know you tried to hush it up.
	It has come out.
	We have the evidence.
	But his office did admit that professional discussions about the criminal classification of what went on was actually occurred.
	And that's interesting because we know that rapes occurred.
	So you trying to take the word rape out of a circumstance where rapes actually occurred is a cover-up.
	I know that's difficult to believe.
	Not that the German political class would try and cover something up, but that we are not as stupid as you fucking think.
	We know what you're doing.
	But you know what?
	It's not all doom and gloom.
	There are indeed refugees being deported back to Turkey.
	Refugees.
	You know, of wars.
	Quote-unquote on all of these fucking words.
	The majority of the first group of people were from Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Morocco.
	These people are not refugees.
	They are not fleeing from ISIS.
	There is no war in Morocco at the moment.
	What these people are, are economic migrants.
	They are taking advantage of a crisis to try and grab some free money.
	Because believe it or not, progressives, brown people can be bad too.
	They can see a situation, think, ooh, I can make some money out of this and take advantage.
	And they should be sent back.
	Yes, actual Syrian refugees aren't being trafficked back.
	That's good.
	They're actual refugees, people who genuinely are fleeing war, have been dispossessed, have had their property destroyed.
	Yeah, sure, don't send them back.
	But the people who don't come from there and who are taking advantage based on the same colour skin should be sent back.
	Is that so hard?
	Of course, there's the Turkish equivalent of SJWs who have been out there protesting the EU has started the biggest official human trafficking in human history.
	I don't think you understand what human trafficking is if you think what these people are doing, putting them on a bus and sending them home because they are illegal immigrants, is human trafficking, you retards.
	It's important to remember why this is happening though.
	This is because Turkey is receiving $3.3 billion in aid, as well as permission for Turkish nationals to travel to certain EU countries without a visa.
	Why are we letting them have that?
	Well, I'll tell you why.
	Back in February, Turkey literally threatened the EU to open the gates and send refugees to Europe.
	They literally are extorting us for millions of dollars or pounds or euros, whichever currency you want to use, and for favourable treatment in exchange for not flooding us with economic migrants.
	You know, I really am really, really getting sick of the regressive attitude that these people aren't smart enough to make their own decisions, to come to their own conclusions, and to be able to act in a way that would be politically equal to white people.
	And that's what this is all about.
	It's all about the inherent superiority complex that white progressives have and the fact that they deem non-whites to be inferior.
	So when, for instance, a leftist Norwegian politician gets raped by a Somalian, he feels bad for the Somalian.
	Seriously, when he is being brutally sodomized by a Somali immigrant, he feels guilty.
	Because, oh, the Somali immigrant didn't know any better.
	It's just his culture.
	He can't help it because he's just black.
	So after being brutally raped by this immigrant, this man goes to hospital, he has DNA samples collected, and then eventually they secure evidence and convict this guy and he spends four and a half years in prison.
	A Norwegian prison, which is essentially a mandatory summer camp.
	But anyway, upon his release, he's going to be deported.
	As one would expect from a foreign criminal who decided to rape someone, they've been punished.
	Now you deport them.
	Why would you keep a foreign criminal in your country?
	But just listen to this.
	I got a strong feeling of guilt and responsibility.
	How can Rose?
	I was the reason he wouldn't be in Norway, and instead sent to an unknown future in Somalia.
	He's already done his time in prison.
	Would he get punished again and this time much harder?
	Well, I can help you out there.
	No, he's not going to be punished for rape in Somalia because I don't think they think what he did was wrong.
	But more to the point, were you thinking this when his dick was in your ass?
	When he had his arms around your throat, holding you down, penetrating you and ejaculating inside of you?
	Were you thinking, well, I hope he doesn't get punished for this?
	Imagine being so contemptuous of black people, thinking that they are so subhuman and inferior that after being brutally raped by one, you say, in his culture, sexual abuse is about power and not lust, and it's not considered to be a gay action to be the one who engages in power and violence.
	I don't feel anger against my rapist because I look at him as a product of an unjust world, a product of an upbringing full of war, because he can't possibly know right from wrong.
	And so it's okay for him to fuck me.
	It against my will.

▲