Stephen K. Bannon and John Solomon dissect an FBI probe into Senate Democrats over a leaked 2017 intercept, arguing it was a weaponized narrative to block Tulsi Gabbard's confirmation. They analyze the John Brennan conspiracy case in South Florida and celebrate Virginia's redistricting victory, where grassroots pressure overturned a referendum despite $80 million in wasted Democratic spending. Sean Spicer estimates Republicans now hold 212 House seats, while Philip Patrick warns that central banks are hoarding gold to hedge against U.S. debt devaluation, signaling a structural shift away from faith in American fiscal stability. [Automatically generated summary]
Yeah, listen, a lot of the weaponization starts with fake narratives, right?
People put a fake narrative out, they leak it to the media, the media drives it, and then it creates a weaponized investigation or a weaponized intelligence outcome.
This is another example of that.
So the FBI has opened a criminal investigation based on a referral from the National Security Agency.
So our main Arizona spy agency.
Believes that one of its intercepts was illegally given or provided to the New York Times.
And the pool of suspects that the NSA believes had access to it and were in a position in the timeframe when the leak occurred to create the leak appear to be people that work on the Democratic side of the Senate Intelligence Committee.
So the FBI has opened a criminal investigation into that possibility.
It's steaming ahead pretty quickly.
And I get a sense that they could have a resolution and a decision whether they've caught their leaker.
In the next couple of weeks.
But it's rare for the NSA to make a criminal referral about one of its intercepts.
So it's something that matters to them deeply.
But here's how it drove a false narrative.
So the intercept that was given to the New York Times is two Hezbollah guys talking back in 2017 when Tulsi Gabbard made her famous trip to Syria.
And they make a reference to the idea that she had a chance to meet with the big guy.
Not Joe Biden, by the way.
And the New York Times and others and Democrats who probably were behind that leak tried to create a false story that the big guy was a Hezbollah terrorist leader, when in fact, that's probably not at all what the conversation is about.
In fact, the assessment of the intelligence community is the reference to the big guy was a Syrian ambassador.
So, but they leak that.
It's a classified leak.
They use the media.
The media draws the wrong insinuation.
A fake narrative is out there.
And in this case, it was designed to stop Tulsi.
From being confirmed.
Now, she got confirmed, but that sort of leak is serious because it is a true intercept.
It's an accurate leak of an intercept that was given the wrong interpretation.
And so that's what's being investigated.
And I want to remind people in the last few years, the last 15 months, we've had more leak prosecutions than I can remember in a decade.
We remember John Bolton was a big one, but just last week there was an army person, there were several other intelligence people that have been prosecuted for leaks.
They're creating for the first time accountability for leaks in the future.
It will probably create a disincentive when people start spending five, 10, and 20 years behind bars for leaking this stuff.
So, one of the weapons of the weaponization era is now getting to face accountability and I think a disincentive for future people to do this.
And remember what they did on the Ukraine whistleblower.
The whistleblower complaint wasn't even legitimate.
They leaked that.
It led to impeachment.
So they leaked the Carter dossier, Carter Page dossier, and we ended up with a two and a half year fake Russia collusion investigation.
This is time tested.
And the reason it.
Keeps repeating itself as there's been no disincentive.
Kash Patel and Todd really seem right now to be, Todd Blanch really seem to be cracking down and getting the sort of cases done quickly that will create a disincentive in the future.
When people start going to prison for this stuff, it's going to be now.
I want to remind people about one other thing about the Senate Intelligence Committee.
Back in 18, in the middle of the Russia collusion caper, remember that it was that committee's intelligence security director who had to plead guilty.
He was Providing class or information we know it was classified in that, but information to a reporter he was sleeping with or having a relationship with.
And so this committee has a history of this, particularly when Democrats are involved.
The one common person on this committee during that whole time, Mark Warner.
Now, I'm not saying that he or his staff are involved yet, but that Mark Warner guy drove a lot of these false narratives that we've now debunked.
Probably the most secret, top secret, compartmented.
They don't have a reputation of turning over intercepts where they see intercepts to notify somebody hey, we gave that to somebody on the staff or somebody had that because everything they do is so compartmented.
I think this one had some concern for two reasons.
One, it was a very clear political leak, right?
The confirmation process.
It had nothing to do with providing Congress something that would be beneficial to their understanding and oversight, right?
It was purely, hey, let's see if we can get a reporter to make this look sinister so that we can stop Tulsi Gabbard from being Donald Trump's DNI and having a former Democrat in his cabinet.
That's one component.
I think the second component is the two people they were monitoring were very sensitive and long term monitored sources.
And once that conversation is leaked, they know, oh, darn, the way we've been communicating with each other, the NSA has been listening to us.
And they go dark and they go onto different devices, and that creates a tremendous loss of human intelligence and SIGINT.
And so I think that those two elements drove the NSA to make the referral.
Now, here's a great example of how the deep state is still somewhat in operation.
This referral was made in July of last year.
Kash Patel did not know about it until just a few short weeks ago.
As soon as he found out about it, man, things went into hyperdrive and the counterintelligence division did its work.
Referral and hid it from the people and the decision makers who could have been acted upon it.
And I think that's another component, a reminder that as much progress has been made against this, there are still bad actors doing bad things right now in Trump 2.0.
I think that fresh eyes have come in with Joe DeGeneva, who, you know, is one of the most skilled prosecutors we've created in the last half century of federal prosecution.
A U.S. attorney took down Marion Berry, the crooked mayor at the time, the cocaine using mayor.
Then he was an independent counsel, then a special counsel.
Now he's a special assistant U.S. attorney for this.
I think there's been, From the work I can tell and the buzz in the defense lawyers community, I think a decision has been made that they're not going to bring a little tiny case against John Brennan, the perjury case from 2023, and then send it to the Washington, D.C. grand jury, or excuse me, to the Washington jury for a nullification case, right?
Because the most likely thing is John Brennan would not get convicted in D.C.
I think they made a decision that this is the keystone to a larger case where John Brennan's looked at as abusing the intelligence process.
One, by knowing that Hillary Clinton had put the whole Russia collusion fake story together, allowing it to come all the way through without stopping it.
And then after the election, taking the career conclusions of the ICA, which was that Vladimir Putin did not intervene in the election, and changing it to Vladimir Putin helped Donald Trump.
I think the lie is going to be viewed as an overt act within the statute, but that they're going to go back and charge John Brennan with a larger conspiracy if the grand jury is inclined.
Now, I think that is the sort of thing that is the more adult decision rather than just throw something out to get an effect.
And I think that that's a sign of what's happened in Miami since Joe DeGeneva got there two weeks ago.
You're starting to see an experienced prosecutor make experienced decisions and build cases that are lasting, keep them in Florida, not send them to the Washington, D.C. jury poll that is 90% Democrat.
So my inclination is that may slow down a John Brennan decision by a few weeks to a couple of months.
But the sort of case that John Brennan will face will be in Florida, and it will be a conspiracy case that looks at the full time of what he did.
As an ongoing conspiracy.
When you hijack the ICA, when you allow the FBI to go and investigate something you know is a ruse by Hillary Clinton, you've corrupted a much larger part of the intelligence process.
And that appears to be where the De Genova team is going based on the buzz that the defense lawyers have right now.
Well, I think we've learned today something that I've learned in a number of years at the RNC, which is sometimes the tail can wag the dog.
And today, I knew that the Virginia Supreme Court was going to rule this way.
They had to, Steve.
The law was so clear.
And I was unwilling to make a political assessment, as some other people did, just saying, well, they have to get reappointed by Democrats.
So the justices are going to rule with the Democrats.
I'm not ready to have that level of diminished view of the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Virginia.
I loved many things about the decision.
First of all, I think we have shown an awful lot of big shots all over the place.
The little county judge in Taswell, Virginia, didn't just fall off a turnip truck.
Judge Hurley's brilliant opinion has stood the test of time.
He found four massive constitutional violations.
The court chose to.
Focus in particular on one today, but Judge Hurley's brilliant opinion was reaffirmed wholeheartedly today in a four to three decision.
And he knew the law.
And I knew the day of the oral argument, Steve, and you and I spoke that day.
I knew that the justices were prepared, they were educated, they had done their homework, they asked intelligent questions, and they got right to the heart of the matter in a way that only Native Virginians can do.
I think I commented that day that the presentation by the California lawyer sent in to represent the Commonwealth, the yes position, one of Mark Elias's lawyers slash thugs, he was disrespectful, I think, in many of his responses to the Virginia Supreme Court justices on the verge of being flippant.
And if you look through this opinion, you will see multiple smackdowns.
Of the position of the Commonwealth that reminded me a little bit of Justice Alito taking Katanji Brown Jackson to school earlier this week.
I did say that it was a plausible argument that the challengers were advancing, and I think it is a plausible argument.
It's a close call.
Look, the situation is terrible, but when we talked when the challenge first came up, I said, Virginia is not California.
Even though, yes, they both did it by referendum, and the voters did have their say, there are state specific rules.
We live in a system of federalism, and state constitutions are significant and important.
And the Virginia State Constitution says quite clearly that in order for a state constitutional amendment to pass, it needs to pass the House of Delegates, that's their legislature, two-house legislature.
Then there needs to be an ensuing general election, and it needs to pass the next House of Delegates.
Here, voters started going to the polls in September.
40% of the votes that were cast in the House of Delegates election in November were cast prior to.
There being a proposed constitutional amendment which went before the voters, which was passed by the House of Delegates in late October.
That is a serious structural protection.
The structural protection existed not for this particular vote.
Well, it is going to be significant for the midterms.
I'll get to that in a second.
It bears mentioning that the grounds by which this Virginia ballot initiative was overturned, not wanting to disenfranchise voters.
Again, I agree that that's a defensible ground in a vacuum.
Here in Louisiana, where I live, we've literally disenfranchised about 42,000 voters.
We don't know how many exactly because the state won't tell us, but the Supreme Court overturning of the Voting Rights Act led to Jeff Landry, the governor, declaring an executive order, declaring an emergency, canceling the House elections, but people had already started voting on absentee ballots.
So we're literally disenfranchising people that have cast votes.
Here in Louisiana.
It's appalling.
And the new Tennessee map that they've drawn is a total, as an obvious affront to the law there, where they're not supposed to consider race, and yet somehow they've divided up Memphis equally into thirds, where black voters are divided now into three different districts in equal measure, a third, a third, a third.
So just truly appalling what's happening in Tennessee and here in Louisiana in particular.
The midterm impact is real.
I think the Democrats are still clearly favorites to take the House.
I think that.
This gives the Republicans at least a plausible map by which they might be able to protect the House or make the House majority for the Democrats pretty narrow.
And so I think it has a meaningful difference.
That probably will not be what flips the House, but you never say never in politics.
And it's, you know, we don't exactly know what the political environment's going to be this fall.
What about, I mean, and Jake Sherman and I have been talking about this.
When you, necessarily, when you redraw these maps and you take one safe Democratic district where you've crammed all the Democrats into it and you've dispersed them throughout the state, are there going to be more competitive places?
I do think that there will be some backfiring, but it's kind of like on net, there will still be more Republican seats.
You look at Texas as a prime example.
The Texas, read gerrymander was premised on the 2024 election map where Trump really overperformed among Hispanic voters.
Now, if the polls are to be believed about just his massive drop of Hispanic voters, and not even really polls, we saw it in the New Jersey election, for example, just in highly Hispanic districts and the 2025 governor's election, you know, those maps that they drew to try to benefit them in places like the Rio Grande Valley, for example, you know, will probably backfire.
There's a great Democratic candidate named Bobby Polito down there, for example, I think will win one of those gerrymandered seats.
So there will be some backfiring in some places.
I think maybe this is a risk in Florida as well.
But on net, I do think the Republicans have advantaged themselves.
I think I'm at 212 with Alabama, but I think we got to break that down and figure out what districts are considered.
I mean, the bottom line is whether it's 212 or 211, and the Dems are around 207, 208, you got about 16 toss up districts.
And again, here's what annoys the crap out of me, Steve when journalists say things like, and you heard some of those clips, you know, the how they're favored to win the house, the you need 218 for a majority, right?
So you have to win six of 16 states to take keep the majority, six of 16.
That's what 40.
That's not a bad odds.
And so when people say things that are based on history, like, you know, it rains every third Tuesday, there's nothing that makes it predictable about that.
That's just a pattern.
You still have to run the races.
We have to put up a candidate.
They have to put up a candidate.
I think I feel really good about the Senate, but these four seats in Virginia puts, you know, Rob Whitman back in the first.
You've got John McGuire, Ben Klein, and Jen Kiggins all now in the second.
And those are all now.
Very Republican favored.
Jen Kiggins, obviously, probably a little bit more of a competitive race, but I think she'll do fine.
And then you do look at the four that Ron DeSantis added in Florida, the one in Alabama that you just mentioned, the one in Louisiana.
Suddenly, we're at a 10, just off that alone, that puts 10 seats.
Remember, we are truly at a one seat majority in the House right now.
We ended up with a two because a Democratic member from Georgia passed away last week.
But like to go into the midterms, and I think we'll probably go in when all is said and done with about Uh, an additional, I mean, just in the last like three weeks, we will probably end up with a net 12 seats.
That's a big deal.
When you talk about 16 seats being uh toss ups, having a 16 going in with 16 seats you know in play, this is the real battlefield, and the media will not tell you this.
That's why it's important to listen to your show, to listen to my show at six o'clock every night.
But like, the no one wants to actually show you their math, and so just to make an offhanded comment that oh, we're gonna win, here's another thing.
Actually, I'm going to say two more things.
The Democrats blew 80 plus million dollars in Virginia.
They went to donors saying, We can pick four seats off.
Give us your money.
Give us a million.
Give us $5 million.
Donors in the Democratic Party are pissed.
They're pissed at Abigail Spanberger and they're pissed at Hakeem Jeffries.
So when they turn around and ask again for money, they're going to say, You didn't treat the first dollars well.
Number two, in the world that we're in right now, the Democrats' momentum matters.
And the Democrats had a crappy discussion between Indiana and what's happened the last couple of days on redistricting.
It's been bad for Democrats.
Republicans feel emboldened.
We need some excitement.
We need some momentum.
We need something to motivate us.
This was it.
So I'm just telling you right now, this is a shift.
I don't know how long it'll last, but this has been good for Mike Johnson, for President Trump.
As you know, Trump 2.0 can only truly, fully continue if we keep a House Republican majority.
And the grassroots feel like they're part of this.
They feel like, hey, they took the redistricting starting with Texas last year.
Abbott and those guys didn't want to do it.
The grassroots.
Started a firestorm.
They called a special session.
The grassroots loves these redistricting wars.
And what's happened over the last 48 to 72 hours, my phone's been blown up with people that are so excited, so pumped up that they can see victory here.
I mean, because remember, they were talking about 20 or 30 seat blowout.
Trump's going to get impeached.
We kept saying, hey, hey, don't be a doomer.
Don't get black pilled yet.
This is a fight.
Now it's a real fight.
The momentum's on our side, and the Democrats totally in the mumble tank.
And by the way, can I just, can I, can I, one last thing?
I mean, the donors are pissed.
They're all going to, the finger pointing is going to be epic.
Abigail Spanberger has already put out a statement, but there's a lot of people pointing the finger at her.
She's pointing at other places.
Hakeem Jeffery, rightly so, is bearing a lot of the brunt.
But the other thing that, you know, watching and you played some of these clips, them tie themselves in knots.
When this vote happened, Hakeem Jeffery literally said, F around and find out, you know, and now he, it was interesting when they thought they had a plan.
They told everyone to go screw themselves.
And now it's funny, they haven't.
When Virginia was on the precipice of being the most gerrymandered state in the union, they didn't care about representation.
They don't care about it, Massachusetts being zero Republicans, Maryland just being one.
Suddenly, now today, the talking point shifted.
We suddenly care about proportional representation.
And let's just remember I know Patty Lyman's coming up.
She's been a great advocate for Virginia at the Republican National Committee.
Virginia is the most fair state.
We're 6'5.
We have a Democratic majority congressional delegation that, to be honest, is exactly what it should be based on the current voting patterns in Virginia.
That is fair.
And it is temporary to the extent that it's every two years we get to vote.
But it was on the precipice of becoming the most gerrymandered state in the union.
And not one Democrat cared.
So I think, look, I love the fact that the grassroots, you guys on the show, have shown your power, whether it's buying my book or getting governors off their butts.
We are showing that grassroots can make a difference in our economy and it can make a difference when it comes.
Philip Patrick's going to be with us in a moment to wrap up a wild week everywhere in the Persian Gulf War and commodity markets, the capital markets, redistricting.
I mean, there are decades in which nothing happens, and there are weeks in which decades happen.
Welcome to one of those weeks, folks.
Birchgold, take your phone out.
Text Bannon, B-A-N-N-O-N, at 989898.
Get the free, with no obligation, port manual on investing in gold and precious metals in the age of Trump.
No obligation, totally free.
You get to Philip Patrick and his team.
And they talked about all the methodologies, tax deferred IRAs, 401ks, all of it.
Most importantly, you'll find out, and talking to Philip and his team, of why gold has been a hedge for 3,000 years of man's recorded history and is a hedge now as Lula and the Chinese Communist Party and the BRICS nations put all this pressure on the petrodollar.
Get to Philip in a second.
Patty Lyman, you're a hero.
You're a steady hand.
You're a steady Eddie.
You're like Scott Bess and Dave Bratt, all these guys are steady Eddies.
You sat there after the oral argument and said, Steve, I know it's hard to believe, but I think this is so black letter.
I think Judge Hurley, what he's written is so brilliant.
I think even Democrats on this, even though the guy reappointed by the state Senate, I think we're going to be fine here because I think justice is going to prevail.
And in the first chart that we pulled up, you can see a couple of I think really interesting things.
First of all, we can see how central bank gold buying has more than doubled on average over the previous five years than it did from the decade before.
Secondly, we can see when it started.
It was very specifically, you know, second half of 2022, immediately after Biden weaponized the dollar against Russia.
And of course, the headlines today central banks set a new record in the first quarter of this year.
It was 244 tons of gold.
And I want to point out that's not gross buying, it's net after sales.
You can see the spike in the second quarter, end of the second quarter in 22, immediately after sanctions were approved, spikes up more than doubles from the previous year, and it hasn't let up.
In fact, the first quarter of this year was the biggest nominal value of gold buying in world history.
So, first of all, they're buying these countries at all time highs, right?
Or close to, right?
Which tells you they're not chasing a trade.
This is something different.
Secondly, as you point out, we've talked a lot about the BRICS nations, but this is much broader than this.
This is Poland, the Czech Republic, Malaysia, Guatemala, Cambodia, the UAE.
This is countries all around the world.
These are very different countries.
With very different economies, governments, and cultures, but they're all reaching the same conclusion.
They want less paper promises and more physical gold.
Why?
Well, I think it's becoming increasingly clear where the dollar is heading.
The trajectory is unsustainable.
We've got to remember that every new dollar bill printed simply devalues all other dollars in existence, right?
We're running today a multi trillion dollar annual deficit.
The federal debt just broke 39 trillion.
Five months ago, we were talking about it just breaking 38 trillion.
Right, the deficit is absolutely exploding.
Now, we got an administration in the form of Trump, unlike every previous administration in recent history, that understood what the problem was and they made it a priority.
Right, fiscal responsibility, debt reduction, doge tariffs all of it was designed to get a handle on it, and even they weren't able to do it.
The deficit, at least for now, has expanded.
I think what it shows us is the problem goes beyond anyone's ability to solve today.
What we have is a self. perpetuating debt machine.
And that's why countries are moving to gold.
It has no counterparty risk.
It cannot be printed into oblivion.
But, you know, I think ultimately, if I want to summarize the structural shift, we are entering today a new financial world.
The old one was built on faith in US debt and the dollar system.
The new one is increasingly about who controls real assets.
Central banks today are seeing the same risk as Americans, and they are just taking steps to present it.
Listen, Countries still use dollars for trade.
We're seeing it, right?
Countries need dollars.
But what they are doing is moving away from dollars as a long term store of value.
Because ultimately, given our trajectory, they are not good for that.
And gold is.
And when I talk about a structural shift, that's what I'm referring to.
Given that you're not going to see the end of the dollar anytime soon, what you're saying is that to the degree they can possibly do it, they're going to be shifting into assets that does not have the exposure to the decrease in purchasing power that the dollar is.
It looks like may have just you look at the math.
I mean, we're in this war now.
It's 25 billion for the first couple of weeks.
They first put a proposal together for 200 billion, then it was 100 billion.
But you've got the 1.5 trillion dollar defense budget.
And when Scott and these guys put together the entire budget, you just do the math.
Unless you catch a real break on growth, right?
And real growth, you're looking at a one and a half or two trillion dollar deficit.
And this is, and you're saying that the central banks throughout the world that.
Every person there all went to Stanford Business School or Wharton or Harvard Business School.
They can work an HP 12C calculator, right, to get net present value.
They're sitting there going, Hey, boss, I think we might be, I think we ought to load up on gold.
And the guy's going, Well, hang on a second.
It's near an all time price.
What are you doing?
They go, Look, I think we've got longer term issues here.
When you've got, I tell people, when you've got Russ' vote and you've got Besant and you've got Trump, and we still haven't been able to crack the code yet, this is the whole problem in the House.
I mean, when Russ goes up, he's putting up a $5 billion rescission package.
I mean, $5 billion is what they spend in an afternoon, and they're yelling and screaming on MSNBC.
So, unless you had somebody who went in there with a consensus, we had to do it.
Don't think you're going to cut spending to the degree you have to cut it.
And that's why the world right now is looking at this situation and making some decisions that I think are structural in nature.
Where do people go?
What I want over this weekend and next week is folks to get access to you and your team because this takes some, you know, going online and talking to people about and making sure they understand exactly what they're doing.
You got all kinds of great.
We got the end of the dollar empire, which gives you a bigger picture thing, historical, but with a lot of math.
You've got then the ultimate guide for, Investing in gold and precious metal was a little more concise and to the point about hey, make it if you're going to make a decision today.
All of this is free, it's all no obligation.
This is our partnership with Birch Gold to make sure we immerse people in information.
So when they make these decisions, they kind of have a framework of how they make it.
The referendum may have been wiped out, but the revolutionary change that has taken place in the Republican Party of Virginia.
Because of the referendum, the way we worked together, the way we transformed our party from a failed top down control experiment to a bottom up party, which is what Jeff Ryder, our new chair, has been able to do.
We had people working together that for years, Steve, didn't work together because they couldn't stand each other, but we had a united front here.
And we're going to keep the pedal on the gas.
We must keep all of our Republican seats.
This year in Virginia, we must keep them.
One of them is in trouble, but if a few adjustments get made, I think we can win that.
But then, Steve, immediately as soon as the midterms are over, every single seat in the General Assembly, the House of Delegates, and the State Senate, those are all up next year, and we can win back the General Assembly.
And that's how we stop Spanberger for the next two years.
So we are not stopping with this.
What I've seen has literally Inspired me and reminded me again why Virginia is like no other state.
And they thought that they had us and they didn't.
Patty, I think from 1619 to 1776, the House of Burgess was the lower, was the assembly in the Crown Colony of Virginia.
They just 250 years ago, I think this previous week, had dissolved, understanding that Virginia was taking the lead with Thomas Jefferson and others, Massachusetts, to write the Declaration of Independence.
They understood they were going to, they were at war with the British and they're going to war.
So no longer needed to have something associated with the Crown Colony.
Very historic this happened this week.
Your closing thoughts on this, ma'am, this revolutionary movement in the Commonwealth of Virginia.
Yeah, it is extremely historic that anniversary is today.
And that's why our slogan here in Virginia this year is America Made in Virginia, because it was.
I want to, there were all kinds of talk during this, all kinds of noise.
But the signal during this whole process is I knew that fidelity to the law would carry the day here in Virginia, and it did.
And I can't say, so many people wanted us, expected massive multimillion dollar checks to come from the RNC and other places, which they're not even allowed to do.
But the RNC came through for us in the way that mattered the most.
They funded our litigation in this case.
We had four or five active lawsuits.
One of them was decided today, it was dispositive.
The rest are moot.
But I can't thank them enough, the Republican National Committee, for coming through and being there.
Election lawyers are expensive, and they were there for us.
So we ask people to thank you to the posse for praying for us.
This is the goodness of God 100%.
And we ask them to, if they want to support us, va.gov.
And my Twitter is x, excuse me, Patty Lyman2, P A T T I L Y M A N 2, at x.
And I have my Facebook page, Patty Lyman, RNC National Committee Woman for Virginia.
And I am a proud, proud Virginian today.
And Steve, you stood with us 10,000%.
And I'm happy to stand with you as a fellow Virginia.
Now, what we have to do now, folks, is those four seats, which we got through divine providence of working through the agency of these lawyers, the great Judge Hurley, and the Commonwealth of Virginia Supreme Court.
Now, it's incumbent upon us that we hold all four seats, right?
And a couple of them are going to be tough, but we know how to do hard things.
The 7 0 in Alabama is still, although the Rhiners don't like to hear this, is still on the table.
I'll try to explain more tomorrow on tomorrow morning's show.
And we're going to have a lot more updates in this redistricting, a lot more.
We're actually going to have an update from Peter McElvenna and others on what happened in England the other night.
Another huge victory.
Uh, for everyone, uh, Nigel Farage, I think, teeing himself up really to be the next prime minister of the United Kingdom, and couldn't be prouder of Nigel having started the reform party from scratch.
Nigel Farage, first off, got his country's sovereignty back.
This is why I say he's one of the biggest political figures in the history of the United Kingdom, in the history of it.
I mean, I think this guy is at the level of the Israeli or more, got their sovereignty back through Brexit, and I saw that that was 100%.
Uh, Nigel Farage putting it on his shoulders, and of course, Raheem.
Was there with him as one of his top aide de camps.
Raheem, in fact, has been back over this entire time helping with this situation.
It's just been magnificent.
So, I want to give a hat tip to everybody associated with reform and everything that's going on there.
We've got so much news that's going on, a lot about AI today, some stories breaking the Daily Mail and others.
Instead of me doing my primal scream here on a Friday afternoon, we're going to get organized and I'll walk you through the logic of it to understand what a major role you're having.
In really crafting the probably the most important debate we're having about the future of this technology and the future of the human species.
And I couldn't be prouder of the war in Posse.
A couple things, especially that these companies, our sponsors are providing you All Family Pharmacy.
It's promo code BANN35.
That's 35% off.
This is a totally free consultation.
You go online, you can talk to a licensed professional, a pharmacist.
This is an online pharmacy, and they're passing savings on to you.
By the overhead they're cutting, and they're giving you your medical freedom because you're not at the beck and call of the big pharma, the big McKesson distribution network, andor the drugstore chains.
They give you an alternative to get your medical freedom.
Just go to allfamilypharmacy.com, promo code BANNIN35.
You talk to these professionals, you see what they get.
I think they have 400 different medicines.
You check it out.
Then you have a pharmacist andor a licensed medical professional for your state.
Make sure that you have it.
So, Or can get.
If you can't, Michael Kunzman and the team will work with you.
So, All Family Pharmacies providing that special.
Also, my Patriots apply.
Look, this is the number one company in the space.
They kind of created this space of preparation.
They've set up a special page for us, preparewithbanon.com.
If you go there right now, they got all kinds of specials, all kinds of sales, preparewithbanon.com.
Right now, they have the family starter pack, as low as $100 per family member for a full week of survival food.
So go check it out.
This company is, like I said, the axe in the space.
They kind of created this years ago where people were going, hey, do I have to be a prepper?
I said, absolutely not.
This is about planning ahead.
Right, and uh, it's just incredible.
So, they got major discounts.
Prepare with Bannon.com, you get your own landing page.
That's what these companies are doing either giving us their own landing page or your own direct number.
Uh, tomorrow, also break down more about the U.S. dollar.
Some of the things that Philip said today.
So, the show tomorrow morning is going to be packed.
Uh, our own Ben Harnwell is going to follow us for a report on international and Europe.
So much on fire, it's unreal.
Also, Mike Lindell, Mike Lindell, for an entire day, can't come on, he's running around Minnesota.
In the heat of that race to become governor, he's got the Mother's Day special, mypillow.com, promo code warroom.
You get free shipping, free shipping on everything you order.
So, hey, have my back.
I told Lindell, dude, I can sell this as well as you can.
Let's see if that's a fact.
It all gets down to the math when it comes to Lindell.
You get free shipping, free shipping on mypillow.com.