Dec. 2, 2025 - Bannon's War Room
56:53
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
| Pray for our enemies because we're going to medieval on this people. | ||
| You're going to not get a free shot. | ||
| All these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
| MAGA Media. | ||
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
| Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | ||
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Waru, here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| Tuesday, 2 December, year of our Lord, 2025. | ||
| Senator Bernie Marino is putting forth legislation about stopping this situation where you can have allegiance to two countries and two passports. | ||
| If you're going to be an American citizen, you're going to be an American citizen. | ||
| Senator Marino from Ohio is going to join us. | ||
| Dave Bratt is also with us. | ||
| We're going to go to the Pentagon shortly. | ||
| A couple of things. | ||
| Home Title Lock has got a special. | ||
| The $1 million triple lock protection. | ||
| The Home Title Lock, they put up a million dollars for legal accounting, everything. | ||
| In case somebody, if you have Home Title Lock, in case somebody does get into your title, they back you up with a million dollar triple lock protection. | ||
| They've got a special right now for 14 days. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Check it out. | ||
| HomeTitleLoc.com, promo code Steve. | ||
| You get a 14-day free trial on Home Title Lock. | ||
| You get the million dollar protection. | ||
| Talk to Natalie Dominguez and the team. | ||
| Don't let AI, cyber, rogue lawyers, rogue accountants, rogue relatives, friends, whatever, get into that title. | ||
| That's your guarantee. | ||
| That's your anchor to winward that you actually own that house that has 90% of your net worth your entire retirement. | ||
| For many people, it's been their savings account. | ||
| So don't jeopardize it ever. | ||
| HomeTitleLoc.com, promo code Steve, but get to Natalie Dominguez and the team. | ||
| Dave Bratt, before we get everybody rolling and go back to the Pentagon, the just war theory. | ||
| Get the audience up to speed on Thomas Aquinas and the just war theory, particularly how it applies to this conversation we're going to have throughout the day or the next couple of days. | ||
| Venezuela, sir. | ||
| Well, it's related to what we've been talking about. | ||
| Just war theory came out of Augustine in 400 and then Aquinas in 1300, but comes out of the Greeks and human reason. | ||
| And they argued, they all argued, that whole line of thinkers argued this was objectively true. | ||
| So they came up with criterion about what a just war should entail. | ||
| And there's about eight objective points the Oxford Don's throwing me for a quick quiz on my understanding of this right here. | ||
| But the basics are solid. | ||
| And you ought to go through that checklist. | ||
| And ethics, you know, the Judeo-Christian ethos ought to be part of our government. | ||
| Does just war theory, I didn't do it to chop block you, but I want to get it out there. | ||
| There is a thing in the West. | ||
| No, talk about this. | ||
| It gets back to Pete Hegset. | ||
| Folks, understand they're coming for Pete, and they're coming hard. | ||
| One is they want to get, they understand they screwed up with this whole Kelly thing and the seditious six. | ||
| They want to change the conversation. | ||
| They think they're going to change it around Pete Hexet, but that's why it's absolutely ridiculous. | ||
| Okay, we got the, let's go right to the Pentagon. | ||
| The briefing is start. | ||
| Our own Kingsley Cortege right there. | ||
| And attempting to sow discord in their ranks. | ||
| To name a few examples, Governor Gavim Newsom claimed that President Trump was fabricating emergencies in order to justify the deployment of the National Guard in some major cities. | ||
| Governor J.P. Pritzker claimed that the deployment of the National Guard amounted to an attack on the American people. | ||
| Outside an ICE facility in California, Rep Maxine Waters taunted the troops standing guard and demanded to know whether they intended to shoot her. | ||
| And of course, the seditious six urged members of our military to defy their chain of command in an unprecedented, treasonous, and shameful conspiracy to sow distrust and chaos in our armed forces. | ||
| This rhetoric insults our warfighters who put their lives on the line every day to keep Americans safe, and it creates an environment where criminals feel emboldened to commit violent acts against them. | ||
| Right now, over 2,200 National Guardsmen from all across the country are serving as a part of Joint Task Force DC with an additional 500 on the way. | ||
| Each one of them will continue working to ensure the safety of all who live, work, and visit the district. | ||
| We will not lose sight of our mission. | ||
| This targeting will only embolden our resolve. | ||
| Our warriors are strong, and we will not back down until our capital and our cities are secure. | ||
| Defending our homeland and rescuing America's greatest cities from endemic violence is the highest and best use of our military. | ||
| I would also like to take a moment today to welcome all of you here to the Pentagon briefing room as official new members of the Pentagon of Press Corps. | ||
| We're glad to have you. | ||
| Legacy Media chose to self-deport from this building, and if you look at the numbers, it's pretty clear why no one followed them. | ||
| National trust in these mainstream media outlets has cratered to 28%, the lowest ever recorded. | ||
| The American people don't trust these propagandists because they stopped telling the truth. | ||
| So we're not going to beg these old gatekeepers to come back, and we're not rebuilding a broken model just to appease them. | ||
| Instead, we're welcoming new media outlets that actually reach Americans, ask real questions, and don't pursue a biased agenda. | ||
| The public has moved on from the old model, and so will the Pentagon. | ||
| This is the beginning of a new era. | ||
| We look forward to working with you to keep the American people informed and to ensure transparency. | ||
| In the interest of transparency, I want to provide an update on the department's operations against narco-terrorists in the Western Hemisphere. | ||
| To date, there have been a total of 21 kinetic strikes on drug boats in our hemisphere, with 82 narco-terrorists killed. | ||
| Each strike conducted against these designated terrorist organizations is taken in defense of vital U.S. national interests and to protect the homeland. | ||
| Our operations in the Southcom region are lawful under both U.S. and international law with all actions in compliance with the law of armed conflict. | ||
| These actions have also been approved by the best military and civilian lawyers up and down the chain of command. | ||
| A completely fake story in the Washington Post, now discredited by the New York Times, tried to mischaracterize these successful strikes in bad faith. | ||
| It was an attempt to damage the Secretary and the President, and the people saw through it. | ||
| The phony Washington Post story even attributed statements to the Secretary that were totally fabricated. | ||
| He never said them. | ||
| That is the epitome of fake news. | ||
| As the White House confirmed yesterday, the decision to restrike the narco-terrorist vessel was made by Admiral Bradley, operating under clear and long-standing authorities to ensure the boat was destroyed and the threat to the United States was eliminated. | ||
| Secretary Hegseth stands behind Admiral Bradley 100%. | ||
| Admiral Bradley made the right call, and unlike the previous administration, we have our warfighters back at this department. | ||
| This department will defend our homeland. | ||
| This is not a catchphrase. | ||
| It is a commitment. | ||
| And as the Secretary said, when it comes to killing narco-terrorists, we have only just begun. | ||
| Lastly, I would like to announce that the War Department has created a new division for strategic marketing that will be led by Abby Lower, who will hold the title of Deputy Assistant to the Senate. | ||
| We're going to go back to the Pentagon for the questions, but I want to bring in Senator Bernie Marino from Ohio. | ||
| Senator Marino, what you announced the other day is incredibly bold about this allegiance to the country. | ||
| Can you explain to the audience what you're doing about this bill you're putting forward, sir? | ||
| Steve, thank you for having me. | ||
| It's very, very straightforward. | ||
| You're either an American citizen or you're a citizen of another country. | ||
| You can't have dual alliances. | ||
| You can't have dual allegiances. | ||
| We pledge allegiance to the flag every day, every morning in the United States Senate. | ||
| It's crystal clear. | ||
| I think most Americans are surprised to learn that you can't even have dual citizenship. | ||
| When I became a U.S. citizen, Steve, by the way, one of the greatest honors and privilege of my life. | ||
| I swore allegiance to the United States of America and not to the country where I was born. | ||
| It's pretty straightforward. | ||
| It's common sense. | ||
| It should have been done a long time ago. | ||
| Are you getting anybody signing up as a co-sponsor or are you getting blowback, sir? | ||
| Well, we're getting blowback from the open border globalist Democrats, who are basically all of them. | ||
| We are going to work to get some Republican support. | ||
| I plan to put it directly on the Senate floor in a process called a live UC, which means I can go right on the floor. | ||
| And unless somebody objects to the bill, it passes. | ||
| I have got people in the House reaching out to me, Republicans, of course, that want to have a companion bill so we can get this thing into law. | ||
| Will this just be going forward? | ||
| Or is your intended in the language? | ||
| Are you going to, if people that have dual citizenship today, will they have X amount of time to think it through and make a decision? | ||
| Or is it just folks going forward? | ||
| No, it's everybody, and they have one year to make a decision. | ||
| You're either an American citizen or you're a citizen of another country. | ||
| You can't have dual allegiances. | ||
| It's not possible. | ||
| And again, Steve, this is a privilege. | ||
| It is the greatest honor to be a citizen of the greatest country on earth. | ||
| You have to pick a team. | ||
| And of course, it's easy to pick the American team. | ||
| And by the way, Steve, something that's not really been talked about, a lot of the hostages that we have to deal with around the globe are dual citizens. | ||
| That is a problem for foreign policy. | ||
| The Supreme Court made a bad decision in 1967. | ||
| I think when our bill gets through, I think the Supreme Court will reverse that decision and restore the Nationality Act, which had been the law of the land for a long time here in this country. | ||
| Are you prepared? | ||
| They're going to call you a nativist. | ||
| They're going to call you a racist. | ||
| They're going to call you a xenophobe, all of that. | ||
| Are you prepared for that, Senator? | ||
| Well, Steve, look, I was born in Columbia, South America. | ||
| I'm actually Hispanic. | ||
| But again, I made a conscious decision at the first opportunity I could when I turned 18 years old to become a United States citizen. | ||
| This country welcomed me. | ||
| It's an honor and a privilege to be a member of this elite group called American Citizens. | ||
| And this idea that we've destroyed that by bringing in tens of millions of people who broke into our country illegally. | ||
| We reward them, Steve. | ||
| Let me just be clear. | ||
| We reward them with all kinds of social benefits that are supposed to be just for American citizens. | ||
| They can call me whatever the heck they want. | ||
| I've been called much worse by better people. | ||
| And at the end of the day, this is about doing the right thing for the American public, restoring the dignity and privilege and honor of being an American citizen. | ||
| You know, Senator, I was talking about, you know, Andy Sarabi and your team is the best around, I think. | ||
| I was talking to the guys the other day when I saw this that, you know, we followed you for years. | ||
| You've been on the show for years. | ||
| First time you ran, then coming back, winning that tough primary, then winning the tough general. | ||
| And I said, Bernie Marino is becoming one of the biggest pipe hitters in the U.S. Senate. | ||
| How did that happen? | ||
| You come across such a mild-mannered guy, but you have really become a firebreather. | ||
| What happened? | ||
| Well, Steve, look, it's the systematic destruction of this country is what's gotten a lot of us into politics. | ||
| Yourself, President Trump, JD Vance. | ||
| We watch the other side of the aisle. | ||
| And by the way, with the cooperation of some Republicans, let me just be clear about that, systematically erode this country. | ||
| We're just not going to put up with it anymore. | ||
| And I think it's extremely important to have moral clarity on these issues. | ||
| These are not ambiguous things. | ||
| Either you believe in the principles of this country or you don't. | ||
| The gray area is what sucked the life out of this country. | ||
| And we have to be strong. | ||
| We have to be clear. | ||
| Senator, I want people to find out everything about this bill, but also you, your social media, the website, where they go. | ||
| They can follow me on X at Bernie Marino. | ||
| We are very clear on what we believe in, and what we believe in is the foundational principles of America. | ||
| Your listeners should know this: our founders were citizens of another country, because, of course, the United States didn't exist. | ||
| There wasn't one that kept their citizenship, including Alexander Hamilton, which was born in the Caribbean. | ||
| They all honored and respected what they had done. | ||
| Let's respect our founders. | ||
| Let's respect the principles that built this great nation and restore it to the heights that it belongs. | ||
| Only people that are invited into this country come here. | ||
| They have to assimilate. | ||
| They have to learn our language. | ||
| We introduced a bill to make English our official language. | ||
| No dual citizenships. | ||
| Let's restore the greatness of this country by restoring the greatness of what it means to be an American. | ||
| Senator, honor to have you on here and honored to be able to break this story about what you're doing and get everybody go see it. | ||
| It's fantastic. | ||
| Great work, sir. | ||
| Thank you, Steve, and thank you for keeping the fight on. | ||
| Thank you, brother. | ||
| Bernie Marino is saying, hey, you got one year to make your mind up. | ||
| You get allegiance, but you're going to get allegiance to one country. | ||
| You pick them. | ||
| Let's go back. | ||
| We're going to blow the break here. | ||
| Let's go back to the Pentagon right now in the brief. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's great to be here. | |
| I want to know if you can confirm any additional National Guard deployments under Title 10 in additional cities. | ||
| And have any governors reached out for help under Title 32 as well? | ||
| And how do you determine how National Guard troops are armed? | ||
| Great question. | ||
| So I don't have anything to announce at this time in terms of new deployments, but I can tell you that our mission set is critical. | ||
| We are keeping American cities safe all across this country, and we are going to remain committed to that. | ||
| These missions aren't going to stop in Chicago, in Los Angeles, in D.C. | ||
| We understand the urgent threat that is facing many of these cities, and the National Guard is proud to step in alongside our law enforcement partners to help with that. | ||
| And I can confirm that everybody in D.C. is now armed. | ||
| And a lot of our D.C. National Guardsmen are now also doing joint patrols with members of the police department here in D.C. | ||
| So their safety is, of course, top of mind, and we will continue to make sure that they're able to do their jobs in keeping all of our great Americans safe across our cities. | ||
| Yes, Bradley. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're now 90 days into these Venezuelan drug strikes. | |
| A growing number of members on Capitol Hill are getting their metal up with regard to war powers. | ||
| If they do move forward with some sort of war powers effort, will the administration seek to challenge the validity of the war powers resolution or will it comply? | ||
| I wouldn't want to get ahead of the president's decision-making process in regard to Venezuela, but I can tell you what I mentioned earlier: the department is a planning organization. | ||
| We are always ready. | ||
| We have plans for every single contingency, and we are going to make sure that when it comes to narco-terrorism, we're dismantling that throughout the Western Hemisphere. | ||
| And you've seen that in the success of our strikes. | ||
|
unidentified
|
One follow-up, if I may. | |
| 53% in a recent CBSUGov poll said they support the strikes on these drug boats, but 70% said no military operations within Venezuela. | ||
| Nevertheless, members of Congress are increasingly calling for regime change there. | ||
| What's the Department of War's message to those members of Congress? | ||
| The Department of War stands behind the President 100%, and we will execute on the orders that our Commander-in-Chief gives us, and we're proud to do so. | ||
| That will continue. | ||
| And again, any decision that is going to be made about certain military actions in the Western Hemisphere region will be the President's alone. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes? | |
| Todd Wood from CDM's Army Closes Press. | ||
| There's been a lot of reporting that, yes, it's about drugs in Venezuela, but also possibly about election fraud electronically. | ||
| Do you have any comment on that? | ||
| And also, are assets, we've heard that Special Operations Aviation Assets are exercising for direct action missions in that region. | ||
| Can you confirm that at all? | ||
| On your first question, I would refer you to the State Department. | ||
| I think they would probably be able to give you a better answer on that. | ||
| But in terms of your second question, I can tell you that we are conducting training missions and exercises. | ||
| We've got the Ford Aircraft Carrier now that is down there in the Southcom region. | ||
| And as I said, the Department's a planning organization. | ||
| So a big part of that planning is doing trainings and make sure that we're ready at a moment's notice to protect our interests and to protect the American people from narco-terrorism. | ||
| Yes, RC. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Has there been a determination at this point from the Army Secretary on a distinguished service medal for specialist Sarah Bexram? | |
| I would refer you to the Army for that. | ||
| And if I hear anything, I will keep you posted. | ||
| That would be wonderful news. | ||
| Yes, James. | ||
| Hi, James O'Keefe. | ||
| Nicholas Turza, branch chief here at the Pentagon, was caught on a video in the spring stating, quote, Trump is illegitimate. | ||
| We're going to resist him, quote, everything he does. | ||
| We know there are other people like this that work here. | ||
| My question is: what steps is the Department of War taking to identify and address personnel who are in the self-described resistance movement? | ||
| Thank you for the question. | ||
| That's why the work you all do is so important. | ||
| This is a big building, and we want to make sure that we have the absolute best people working in it to protect Americans every single day. | ||
| We don't take lightly what every single civilian and military person in this building do every single day. | ||
| They do a lot of hard work, and we want to make sure that they're up to the task, that they're on board and willing to serve our commander-in-chief, who was elected by the whole of the American people to serve as our president. | ||
| And we support him 100% here at the Department of War. | ||
| That is our mission. | ||
| That is our chain of command. | ||
| So, personnel is policy. | ||
| The Secretary has said that many times, and I know you all in this room are aware of that as well. | ||
| That was really the crux of his speech at Quantico not long ago to the generals. | ||
| Our people are our most important assets. | ||
| So, we will continue to make sure that our people are consistently putting America first. | ||
| That's something we care very much about. | ||
| Yes, Alex. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thanks, Kinsley. | |
| Are there plans to host or hold more of these regular press briefings? | ||
| And if so, how frequently? | ||
| Absolutely, we'd love to. | ||
| It'd be great to get everybody in here. | ||
| I know we have the Christmas holiday coming up, but we'd love to make it a weekly or bi-weekly tradition. | ||
| So, we're excited to have you all in the Pentagon for those. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We will be receiving more readouts of the Secretary of War's meetings with the President yesterday, much like a statehortman in the White House, provide readouts and scheduling and things like that. | |
| We'll be receiving more of those. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| In the interest, as I said in my opening, in the interest of transparency, we want to make sure that you all are informed. | ||
| That's a commitment we take seriously. | ||
| Obviously, we're slightly different than other agencies in that we have national security and operational concerns, but we will tell you as much as we can because we want the American public to know all the incredible things that our warfighters are doing every single day and all the amazing initiatives the Secretary is pursuing here at the Department of War. | ||
| Yes? | ||
| Thanks, Kinsley. | ||
| Jordan, Conrad, Gateway Pundit. | ||
| I wanted to ask you in May, the Secretary announced a new investigation into the Afghanistan withdrawal under Biden. | ||
| In light of the recent events with one of these refugees killing a service member, is there any updates on that investigation? | ||
| I don't have any updates for you at this time, but I can tell you that the review that we're doing into the horrendous Afghanistan withdrawal under the previous administration, the Biden administration, is expected to be complete by summer of 2026. | ||
| And we are committed to ensuring that this review, unlike others, is much more unredacted, that the American people are able to consume the report for themselves and see what truly happened on that fateful day and that fateful withdrawal. | ||
| And we owe it to our service members to accomplish that. | ||
| The review is being led by our chief Pentagon spokesman and senior advisor to the Secretary, Sean Parnell, an Afghan veteran himself. | ||
| And he takes very seriously the responsibility to getting answers to the American people. | ||
| So we are committed to that 100%. | ||
| And in summer 2026, the public will be able to have that report. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Thank you, Kinsley. | ||
| A question for you in regards to the Afghan withdrawal when we brought all these migrants onto military bases or these refugees onto military bases. | ||
| We saw a surge in assaults immediately after sexual assault and physical assaults. | ||
| And then all of a sudden, under the previous administration, we no longer learned of anything that was happening anymore on these military bases. | ||
| Does this Pentagon plan on giving us any type of criminal data on that to see what actually happened when they were brought onto these military bases? | ||
| And do we have any status updates on like FBI investigations and such? | ||
| So for FBI investigations, anything that would be a criminal law enforcement matter would obviously be something to direct to the Department of Justice, as we cannot speak to that from our perch here at the Department of War. | ||
| But what I can tell you is that we are aware of a lot of that activity that went on. | ||
| It's despicable. | ||
| One is too many, right? | ||
| And we understand that the Biden administration unfortunately put our troops in our country last in many cases. | ||
| The Secretary is committed to correcting that. | ||
| And I think that's what you're going to see going forward. | ||
| Yes. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
| Thank you. | ||
| I wanted to ask about Somalia, which isn't talked about very much, but we have done 101 strikes in Somalia in 2025. | ||
| And there was a raid carried out in some caves. | ||
| And I'm quoting former Congressman Matt Gates, who I didn't realize would be here today, but he asked why we're sending, quote, hundreds of U.S. troops into fortified caves in Somalia to kill like five guys. | ||
| And I think it's a good question as to why the U.S. military is still in Somalia. | ||
| Thank you for the question. | ||
| So I can assure you, right, this is an America-first Department of War and president. | ||
| So we aren't conducting forever wars in Somalia. | ||
| We're not seeking regime change or, you know, we're not nation building. | ||
| But I will say that this department's narrowly scoped intelligence-driven counterterrorism operations in places like Somalia, alongside our partners, allow us to protect the American homeland from terrorist threats and to protect our interests. | ||
| So we will continue to make sure that the American people are kept safe. | ||
| That's our utmost priority. | ||
| But, you know, we're not isolationists. | ||
| We're also not neocons. | ||
| We're realists. | ||
| We understand that threats face the American people every single day. | ||
| We take that incredibly seriously. | ||
| But at the same time, we're always going to make sure that we're putting America first. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And if I could follow up on Laura's question, actually, but from a different angle, she mentioned that are we reassessing our relationship with Qatar because of funding of the Muslim Brotherhood? | |
| It's been widely documented in mainstream Israeli papers that the Israeli government funded Hamas, which we also designate as a terrorist organization. | ||
| Are we therefore reassessing our relationship with Israel because of this? | ||
| That would be a better question for the State Department, as they're the ones who have those foreign diplomatic channels. | ||
| Yes, Ryan. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| And thank you for doing this press briefing. | ||
| I wanted to get back to the South Comp strikes real quick, just broadly speaking, not specifically about the September 2nd strike, but broadly speaking, are we doing any kinds of post-strike assessments to determine that the intelligence that informed those strikes was accurate? | ||
| Are we recovering any drugs on board those vessels? | ||
| You mentioned each vessel struck as equivalent of 25,000 overdose deaths. | ||
| So are we mostly picking up fentanyl or cocaine or what have you? | ||
| What's going on with these boats? | ||
| Like what's on these boats? | ||
| Yeah, thank you for the question. | ||
| So I can tell you in terms of your question about intelligence that our intelligence absolutely confirms who these people are. | ||
| And I can't get into right from this podium how we know that. | ||
| I don't want to communicate to the enemy the ways in which we're carrying out these strikes. | ||
| But I can tell you that without a shadow of a doubt, every single one of our military and civilian lawyers knows that these individuals are narco-terrorists. | ||
| We know what they're carrying, where they're coming from, and where they're going. | ||
| And they are trying to bring drugs to our shores that kill and hurt American citizens. | ||
| The President takes that very seriously. | ||
| And when he designated these groups, designated terrorist organizations, that opened up a lot for us here at the Department of War. | ||
| We can engage in ways that we never could before. | ||
| So that's all I can say at the moment on that topic, but I can 100% affirm that we know without a shadow of a doubt who these narco-terrorists are. | ||
| Yes, Wade. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So you were speaking earlier about the Washington Post report concerning the Secretary of War and Admiral Bradley. | |
| And my question is, does the Department of War plan on pursuing any sort of legal action against the Washington Post? | ||
| And what consequences will there be for lying to the American people? | ||
| Because of course the implication there was that Pete Hegseth and Admiral Bradley are war criminals and that was the implication and that's what a lot of people on social media were saying after the fact. | ||
| So could you speak to that? | ||
| Yeah, it is frankly disgusting that the Washington Post would publish something that is so insanely false. | ||
| And we've seen this from the mainstream media before, right? | ||
| Anonymous sources that are being quoted that probably have no idea what's going on. | ||
| And the Washington Post actually went so far as to falsely attribute a quote to the Secretary of Defense of War, excuse me, that he never said. | ||
| That is preposterous that they would write that and pass that off as true journalism. | ||
| Thankfully, the New York Times stepped in and corrected the record and let the American people know that what they were publishing was absolutely fake news. | ||
| So the Washington Post, I think readership should think twice before reading that outlet again. | ||
| It is disgraceful that they call themselves journalists. | ||
| And we told them as such, right? | ||
| We get press queries like we do from all of you. | ||
| We told them this story was completely fake news on Thanksgiving evening with a three-hour deadline and they still published it anyway. | ||
| It's disgraceful, but thankfully the American people see through it. | ||
| Yes, Jack. | ||
| Kingsley, does the Secretary's office or the Pentagon in general, the department, have a message for Senator Wicker, who as a Republican has now backed this inquiry into Secretary Hagseth, again, accusing him of war crimes? | ||
| It seems strange to see a Republican going after one of President Trump's own cabinet members. | ||
| So I can confirm that the Secretary of War spoke with Senator Wicker, and they had a good conversation where he was able to explain to him a lot of the rationale behind these strikes. | ||
| And we work closely with all of our partners on the Hill, whether Republican or Democrat, to keep them up to date on what this department is doing in regards to the strike. | ||
| So we will continue to do that, and we'll continue to brief members of HASC and SASC, and we look forward to continuing those relationships. | ||
| Quick follow-up. | ||
| You mentioned working with partners on the Hill. | ||
| Another senator on the Hill, the Democrat side, is Senator Mark Kelly. | ||
| Now, we heard some reporting about a possible investigation into him regarding his status as a retired member of the United States Navy, still on pension, and therefore still under the jurisdiction of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. | ||
| And as such, his membership, you mentioned the Seditious Six. | ||
| Would that be grounds for possibly bringing him back to active service for an investigation for NJP or even a full court martial? | ||
| So you're correct. | ||
| The Department of War received serious allegations of misconduct against Senator Mark Kelly. | ||
| And in accordance with the Uniform Code of Military Justice and other applicable recommendations and regulations, we're doing a thorough review of all of these allegations. | ||
| And the Secretary of War has tasked the Secretary of the Navy, John Phelan, with doing a thorough review, looking into all of these allegations and providing him an update on December 10th. | ||
| So we will have more information to come on that. | ||
| But I would just add that this despicable video that Mark Kelly participated in with the Seditious Six was a politically motivated influence operation that was an attempt to undermine the chain of command to sow distrust and division in our armed forces. | ||
| That is absolutely ridiculous and it puts our warfighters at risk. | ||
| And again, he doubled down on the Sunday shows. | ||
| I don't know if you all saw him on the Sunday shows, but he basically insinuated that service members who do not defy President Trump's orders could face potential prosecution in the future when Democrats are back in power. | ||
| He even called our troops and likened them to those of the Russian military. | ||
| This is totally disgraceful from an elected official, and the department takes it very seriously, and that is why we have launched this review. | ||
| And Kinsey, just to be clear, so if Secretary Phelan were to recommend court martial, that would be on the board. | ||
| What was the question? | ||
| Sorry. | ||
| If Secretary Phelan were to recommend court martial, that could be an option on the table. | ||
| All options are on the table at this moment in time. | ||
| And we look forward to getting the Secretary of the Navy's review. | ||
| And the Secretary of War has been very clear in his statements as well that he takes this extremely seriously, and it is unacceptable. | ||
| That's all the time I have today. | ||
| Thank you all so much. | ||
| I really appreciate you coming out. | ||
| Thank you, Kevin. | ||
| Let's bring it to me. | ||
| Kingsley Cortez-Wilson, you know, Kingsley for years at CRA, other places. | ||
| Incredibly impressive, I think. | ||
| Just, I think, incredibly impressive. | ||
| Great briefing, to the point, answer the questions. | ||
| The ones she didn't know or were not in her bailiwick, she passed on to like State Department, et cetera. | ||
| Jack Pasobic asked great questions. | ||
| David Zeer, you saw O'Keefe, Laura Loomer, just an incredible array of MAGA figures and media figures. | ||
| So I also wanted to say when I was watching that and thinking about what's happened at the White House with Caroline Levitt, you remember Caroline came on here the first time when she was running for the House for the Congress, for the House seat up in New Hampshire in the primary, right? | ||
| And she was a little raw. | ||
| And look how good she made herself. | ||
| There's like Charlie Kirk. | ||
| They work and they work and they work and they work. | ||
| Andrew Breitbart, when Andrew Breitbart, first time he did some radio interviews, was not great. | ||
| He did reps, just like in football. | ||
| Worked and worked and worked and worked and made himself one of the best people in all media. | ||
| Same with Charlie Kirk. | ||
| You've seen Kingsley Cortez there. | ||
| You see Caroline Levitt. | ||
| And to think about all the young people in the audience asking great questions. | ||
| I mean, I watched a lot of those Pentagram briefings. | ||
| That was just, I think, absolutely spectacular. | ||
| Dave Bratt, I know you got to bounce. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Before you do that, your thoughts, sir? | |
| Yeah, well, I'll just comment on Senator Marino. | ||
| I loved his comments. | ||
| I think it fits in with a conversation we were having about the Judeo-Christian ethos. | ||
| A great Catholic writer, R.R. Reno, wrote a book recently. | ||
| Russ Vogt recommended it. | ||
| It's called Return of the Strong Gods. | ||
| And it talks about how the left has tried to get rid of our loves, objective loves, going back to the Greeks, Plato, Augustine, the same line we've been talking about. | ||
| And just go through them. | ||
| What Reno goes through. | ||
| He goes through the love of God, the love of country, and the love of family. | ||
| Let's just go through those kind of in order just in 30 seconds, and I'll keep it tight. | ||
| The love of God, hero Israel, I'm the Lord your God. | ||
| You shall worship no others. | ||
| I'm one, and you will have no others. | ||
| That's what it means to love. | ||
| Let's go to skip to family. | ||
| Go to your wife. | ||
| Try working it out where you say, I love this wife, but I love another wife. | ||
| And, you know, my values are your values. | ||
| And it's all subjective and it's all relative. | ||
| Try that out on your wife. | ||
| How's that going to work out for you? | ||
| I don't think it's going to go so hot. | ||
| So when those loves are so clear, what happens to the love for country? | ||
| It's only in the U.S. with this openness. | ||
| And it all goes back to this relativism. | ||
| Now the left does not love our country. | ||
| This is unheard of in human history, right? | ||
| Just, you know, the weakness of love your country is if it goes overboard the other way, the golden mean, too much love for your country, something of that order, if you want to argue that. | ||
| But to not love your country is just absurd on its face. | ||
| So I love what Senator Marino said about dual loyalties. | ||
| You can't have them. | ||
| And just get me at Brad Economics on Getter. | ||
| And everybody, get out and support the election today and then support the war room. | ||
| Spread this platform. | ||
| We won't win long-term, mid-terms. | ||
| If you don't share this platform, you're never going to get a better education than what happens on this show every day. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| Oxford Don Pierce got a shout out from Dave Bratt, my theologian, my theologian in residence. | ||
| Sir, you kept it tight. | ||
| You see how tight that was at the end? | ||
| It was tight. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And your production yesterday on Whitaker Chambers and Buckley was just awesome. | ||
| And I think you have the last installment coming up because that was everybody needs to watch that and learn that. | ||
| Folks, we got so much great content now. | ||
| We're going to be doing so tomorrow at 11 o'clock. | ||
| We're going to play part two of that that we couldn't get to over Thanksgiving because there was so much news going on. | ||
| But with Sam Tannenhaus, it was just people, we got so many great feedback from everybody. | ||
| He sold a ton of books. | ||
| It was extraordinary. | ||
| We want to talk about the Buckley Revolution. | ||
| And I'm going to have him back on because we still have so much to go. | ||
| You have to understand the foundational elements of the MAGA movement. | ||
| And this is kind of the history of conservatism in this country from really the Great Depression all the way up to the beginning of Donald Trump taking the stage, right? | ||
| So it's just Tannenhausen is an extraordinary individual who's very special. | ||
| So thanks, Dave, for that shout out. | ||
| We'll see you tomorrow, sir. | ||
| Great. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| We're going to go back to the Pentagon in a moment as soon as we get Jack Bosobic and some folks up. | ||
| I just want to say, you saw right there, tell me the difference in the quality of the questions. | ||
| There wasn't. | ||
| These questions were on point. | ||
| They were sharp. | ||
| They were asking relevant things, not trying to play gotcha. | ||
| And you saw Kingsley Cortez Wilson give as good as she got, handle herself just great. | ||
| And what she didn't was outside of her zone. | ||
| She didn't try to spin it. | ||
| It didn't try to take it on. | ||
| She said, hey, you should talk to the State Department about that. | ||
| So I thought that was fantastic. | ||
| A lot of news. | ||
| So the president, we're going to have a cabinet meeting. | ||
| The president, I'm sure, is going to invite the press in. | ||
| There's going to be all kinds of news. | ||
| saw the president last night in the evening. | ||
| He was lighting up people on social media and then start again this morning. | ||
| So I'm sure he's going to have a lot to say on a number of topics. | ||
| I'm sure the press is going to come after him viciously today. | ||
| One of the things they are going to announce are these Trump accounts and Scott Besson is going to put a little more flesh on the bone about the new accounts for the babies born, I think from 2024 on. | ||
| And then Michael Dell has announced and I think they're going to have a special announcement with Michael Dell. | ||
| I think in the Oval this afternoon at 2 o'clock, Michael Dell has committed $6.5 billion to put into the accounts of the young people, which I don't know, I think it's $100 or a couple hundred bucks. | ||
| So it's going to be pretty extraordinary. | ||
| Let's go. | ||
| We got brother Trevor Comstock with us. | ||
| We're going to slip this in. | ||
| We're going to try to get some folks in here before the cabinet meeting starts. | ||
| They normally start a little late. | ||
| Trevor Comstock, we got you on early today. | ||
| Talk to me about, by the way, that sale over the holiday weekend, I understand, went great. | ||
| I was able to see a lot of people. | ||
| I did some traveling over Thanksgiving. | ||
| And man, people are raving about the products they got at Sacred Human Health. | ||
| Talk to me, sir. | ||
| Yeah, I appreciate you, Steve. | ||
| So yeah, I wanted to come on real quick. | ||
| I didn't get a chance to come on yesterday, but we are running our Cyber Monday sale still through today. | ||
| So you can definitely use code cyber at checkout for 25% off any one-time order. | ||
| Definitely wanted to mention that before I forget. | ||
| But also, you know, for those who don't know, you know, we've been doing this for about two years now. | ||
| The feedback's been incredible. | ||
| Huge thank you to the Warm Room Posse. | ||
| You've been instrumental in our rising. | ||
| But yeah, at this point, we have about seven products. | ||
| We are rolling some new products out as well very soon. | ||
| So I'm excited to talk about those. | ||
| But again, for anyone that doesn't know, our Grass Fat Beef Liver is our flagship product and most popular. | ||
| It's great for energy and vitality and overall well-being. | ||
| And then, of course, we have our collagen, which is great for things like joint support, gut health, as well as skin and hair. | ||
| And then our natural immunity product, which is great to take if you're traveling or if you're feeling a little bit under the weather, definitely helps speed up recovery in that scenario as well. | ||
| And then some of our newer products are our creatine monohydrate, which is amazing for memory, cognitive function, as well as overall brain health and also muscle recovery. | ||
| So that's a really phenomenal product. | ||
| We've been getting some great feedback on that. | ||
| Then, of course, our towel moisturizer, which we dropped about three months ago, has been extremely popular. | ||
| It keeps selling out. | ||
| We are in stock right now, but it is still moving very fast, especially with the sale going on. | ||
| That's just amazing for overall skin hydration, as well as the anti-inflammatory properties, help with things like reducing redness. | ||
| Maybe if you have some eczema, seborrhea, et cetera, on your face, it works great in that scenario as well. | ||
| But I encourage anyone that hasn't been to our website to check it out, sip through some of the reviews. | ||
| And then, of course, if you have any questions, we're always happy to help answer anything that you might have. | ||
| The reviews are key and getting to Trevor Comstock is key. | ||
| So go one more time. | ||
| Where do they go to the site to read the reviews, see all the product descriptions, all the information, the receipts, and then get to you. | ||
| Where they go, sir. | ||
| Yeah, you can go to sacredhumanhealth.com. | ||
| And as I mentioned, just use code cyber at checkout for 25% off any one-time order all the way through today. | ||
| And yeah, I hope you guys check out the website. | ||
| Thank you, sir. | ||
| Appreciate you. | ||
| Appreciate the site and the products. | ||
| I got to tell you, you got a lot of fans. | ||
| Go back to the Pentagon. | ||
| Jack Basobic is there. | ||
| Jack, great question. | ||
| Tell me, let's start with your, give me the overall impression of the whole thing about who was there, how it was handled, a new day at the Pentagon. | ||
| Then I want to drill down on somebody's specifics. | ||
| I got. | ||
| Steve, I got a special guest right here. | ||
| It's James O'Keefe come up. | ||
| I said, James, this is the overt media. | ||
| He's the covert media. | ||
| We got the button cameras. | ||
| Got the eyeglasses, but not here today. | ||
| Not here today. | ||
| I don't believe him for a second, Steve. | ||
| He's got the, well, he didn't have glasses on right now, but he did when he was walking in. | ||
| Interesting. | ||
| Too much obset. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Asked tonight. | |
| What was O'Keefe's overall impression? | ||
|
unidentified
|
He's off. | |
| He's off. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| What was your overall impression? | ||
| Well, you know, look, Steve, my overall impression is it's very professional. | ||
| And look, you know, the Washington Post said, you know, what they had their narrative coming into this. | ||
| They had multiple narratives, one of which got blown up faster than an ARCO boat. | ||
| And when you really think about it, though, we're here to answer questions. | ||
| Excuse me, we're here to ask questions. | ||
| They're here to answer them. | ||
| I asked serious questions, and I got serious answers. | ||
| And I even made sure to drill down on the question about Senator Kelly regarding this court martial. | ||
| Okay, I get it. | ||
| There's a process. | ||
| It's going to Secretary Phelan. | ||
| Great. | ||
| If he comes back and recommends court martial, is that on the table? | ||
| And Press Secretary Wilson just came in there and did confirm that court martial is on the table for Secretary, or excuse me, for Senator Kelly. | ||
| Now, what's also interesting, I don't even know if this has been reported yet. | ||
| I hadn't heard it, that Senator Wicker and Secretary Hegseth had a phone call. | ||
| I have to double-check exactly what she said when that call was, but said they did speak regarding this investigation. | ||
| Supposedly, it was a good call. | ||
| So again, these are a lot of the things that we're drilling into. | ||
| We're here to ask serious questions. | ||
| It was a very professional briefing. | ||
| It was professionally done. | ||
| And the mainstream media has completely, as Kingsley said, self-deported themselves from the process. | ||
| Well, you've also cut off your readers from true information. | ||
| And that's why the likes of Ellen Nakashima have to make up stories in the Washington Post. | ||
| Well, they make them up anyway. | ||
| Now they just don't have to schlep over to the Pentagon to make them up. | ||
| They make them up from their home because they're going to work from home, right? | ||
| Right. | ||
| Yeah, they're just down the street. | ||
| And by the way, Steve, I do have to say, I just have to say, I'm completely appalled that Hegseth and Admiral Bradley really would come in and double tap these narco-terrorists with another $250, $250,000 hellfire missile when the sharks would have clearly taken care of the problem by themselves. | ||
| Eventually. | ||
| Jack, talk to me. | ||
| I was saying about Andrew Breitbart would be so proud being a citizen journalist and seeing what has happened in the evolution of all these different sites and personalities. | ||
| Who's Jim Hoffgy, by the way, who worked with Andrew? | ||
| Well, give us, because we couldn't see from the camera, who was there from MAGA Media? | ||
| I mean, it's kind of an all-star team, right? | ||
| Wait, like I said, so a lot of people have stepped off right now, but we do have, we have Justin News. | ||
| We had James O'Keefe, who was just here, of course. | ||
| We've got R.C. Maxwell, who's reporting for Red State. | ||
| You had Libby Emmons from the Postmillennial and Human Events, obviously myself from Human Events. | ||
| You had Laura Loomer, who was here. | ||
| Matt Gates reporting from OAN, former Congressman Matt Gates, Liam Cosgrove from Zero Hedge. | ||
| You really have, you know, the intent. | ||
| And then, of course, David, our own David Zeere as well as myself with Real America's Voice. | ||
| And so you really have this spectrum of voices from across the ideology of the right, across the ideology. | ||
| So you've got the right, you've got the center-right, you've got libertarians. | ||
| You probably have a couple of greenies if you dig around enough. | ||
| You know, this really is a broad bag of reporters that's come here today, people with different backgrounds, some like myself who are veterans and have a military background, some who are coming off straight into this from political reporting. | ||
| Savannah Hernandez, for example, who's done great on-the-ground reporting. | ||
| So she can understand what these National Guardsmen are facing and the ICE deployments in these various cities, but maybe doesn't have the chops just yet. | ||
| She's learning very quickly, of course, of the military, the rank, different titles, Title 10, Title 32. | ||
| What does it all mean? | ||
| What different authorizations do you have? | ||
| So people are working through that quite a bit, teaching them to speak military. | ||
| But it's interesting, though, because you had serious questions from serious people. | ||
| The mainstream media is going to paint this a certain way. | ||
| We already know that they will. | ||
| But what's key here is that the American people are actually getting information put to them regarding what's going on in the world, particularly when it comes to very top issues. | ||
| We're talking about Mark Kelly. | ||
| We're talking about the Venezuela strikes. | ||
| We're talking about the strategy with Maduro. | ||
| We're talking about Somalia and the special forces raids that are going on over there that are even kind of below the radar. | ||
| Again, these are not stories and questions that you're going to get everywhere else. | ||
| David Zere asking the question about forced protection for the National Guardsmen, the women who are out there in harm's way, and get that answer back that they're now going to be upjoined with local law enforcement, DC law enforcement here in town to make sure that something like that doesn't happen again. | ||
| These are serious stories. | ||
| These are the most hard-hitting stories in the country right now. | ||
| And that's why the people in this room are here. | ||
| Steve, they weren't handed these seats. | ||
| They earned them. | ||
| Big time. | ||
| That's why Andrew would be so proud, so proud of all you guys. | ||
| Great briefing, great information, great questions. | ||
| Had real energy to it, not like normally the deadpeats of the mainstream media. | ||
| Jack, Human Events Daily, 2 o'clock today on Real America's Voice. | ||
| We got Charlie Kirk next. | ||
| Charlie Kirk, I'm thinking we'll take a lot of the cabinet meeting. | ||
| I think President Trump's going to open it up. | ||
| I'm sure he's going to be on fire. | ||
| You're at 2. | ||
| You're going to be live at the Pentagon. | ||
| Steve, that's right. | ||
| We'll be live. | ||
| And as you mentioned, of course, we have the cabinet meeting, and then the president is supposed to give an address at 2 o'clock. | ||
| Of course, the president is never late. | ||
| The president is always on time. | ||
| So we'll see exactly when he chooses to give that address today. | ||
| So we'll take that live if we can. | ||
| Of course, I've got my ear to the ground regarding does it have anything to do with Venezuela? | ||
| Does it have anything to do with Maduro? | ||
| We're going to find that out hopefully as soon as possible. | ||
| Jack Pesobic, give your social media coordinates and we'll let you bounce. | ||
| All right, we're up at Jack Pesobic, and of course, the show is human events daily across Apple, Spotify, Everyway, Download Podcasts. | ||
| Thank you, brother. | ||
| Appreciate you. | ||
| All-Family Pharmacy. | ||
| If you want to have medical freedom, one of the foundational elements of that is pharmaceutical pharmacy that you can get access to someone that a professional, a doctor, that actually prescribes stuff with you for you. | ||
| This is why we've now partnered with All Family Pharmacy. | ||
| Go to allfamilypharmacy.com, promo code Bannon. | ||
| Buy one, get one free. | ||
| If you haven't done a previous order, order today, buy one, get one free. | ||
| It ends today. | ||
| So make sure you go to allfamilypharmacy, that's alloneword.com, promo code Bannon. | ||
| Check it out. | ||
| You're going to be blown away about the offerings here. | ||
| This is your key to medical freedom. | ||
| Okay, we got Mike Lindell. | ||
| Is Mike Lindell joined us? | ||
| Not yet. | ||
| Okay, we're looking for Mike Lindell. | ||
| We're going to take a short commercial break. | ||
| We're going to take a commercial break. | ||
| We're going to come back. | ||
| The cabinet meeting was supposed to start. | ||
| Normally, these things are backed up a few minutes as the president kind of gets organized with his cabinet. | ||
| I think this one's going to be on fire today. | ||
| Charlie Kirk is going to follow us. | ||
| The Charlie Kirk show, I believe that the cabinet, particularly the public part of the cabinet meeting, some of it will take place during Charlie Kirk's show. | ||
| So we'll toss it to Charlie at noon. | ||
| Charlie will obviously toss it to Jack Pesobic. | ||
| Jack's going to be back at the Pentagon. | ||
| There is going to be an event at 2 o'clock. | ||
| I believe that might be around Michael Dell. | ||
| Huge announcement today about the Trump savings account, the Trump accounts. | ||
| Some of that's going to be, I think, Secretary Besson at the cabinet meeting. | ||
| And then at 2 o'clock, I think you're going to have Michael Dell talking about a $6 billion donation he's making to Americans. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Children. | |
| Short break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We rejoice with the no more. | |
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| You know, the Michael Dell situation may be handled at the Academy. | ||
| I think some of the reasons they may be running a few minutes late. | ||
| Also, I think, I don't want to promise this, but I think that there may be some discussion about the Federal Reserve today at two, that very special announcement. | ||
| And of course, you know, we've pushed Scott Bessant, but there may be a backup plan to that. | ||
| I think it will be a backup plan. | ||
| But I think tentatively, maybe 2 o'clock for some at least more discussion about the Federal Reserve. | ||
| Is the cabinet starting? | ||
| Let's go ahead and go to the cabinet meeting, the president's about to address this. | ||
| We have vaults downstairs. | ||
| We've lots of pictures that haven't been exposed to the world for, in many cases, over 100 years. | ||
| We brought them up, and we're using them as they should be used. | ||
| But the cabinet room looks beautiful like it should now. | ||
| The Oval Office looks beautiful like it should. | ||
| It was like the rest of the country. | ||
| It was in disrepair. | ||
| One year ago, our country was dead. | ||
| Then said to me by many leaders, we had a dead country. | ||
| Now we have the hottest country anywhere in the world. | ||
| It's true. | ||
| The hottest country anywhere in the world. | ||
| Think of that. | ||
| In four long years of the Biden administration, there were just $1 trillion of new investments in the United States in 10 months. | ||
| We've secured commitments of over $18 trillion. | ||
| So they had, in one year, they had less than $1 trillion. | ||
| It's in a period of four years. | ||
| Think of it. | ||
| Four years they had less than a trillion. | ||
| In 10 months, we have more than 18 trillion. | ||
| Is that right, Scott? | ||
| It's even going to be higher than that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It'll be higher about that. | |
| It's been going up. | ||
| And we're waiting for the Supreme Court case, and it's so important and so vital for this country because we're not only respected again, we're putting out wars by our trade policies. | ||
| And we're taking in hundreds of billions of dollars, and our country is wealthy again and secure again, and it's part of national security. | ||
| And I hope that goes well. | ||
| I think it's very important. | ||
| But think of the number. | ||
| We're going to be over $18 trillion in 10 months, which is a record times probably eight or ten times, I think more than that, for any country. | ||
| There's never been a country that's had that kind of an investment ever in history. | ||
| And there's never been a country that's had half of that. | ||
| It's a tremendous thing that's taking place. | ||
| We have companies moving in from all over the world, from Mexico, from Canada, from Europe, from China, from Japan a lot. | ||
| We just had Toyota is going to spend $10 billion they just announced on building new plants in this country. | ||
| Our workers, they're going to be all workers. | ||
| But they're spending a tremendous amount. | ||
| So the stock market is at 46 all-time highs. | ||
| And this last Friday, which is called Black Friday, was the biggest ever online sales that there's ever been by a lot. | ||
| More Americans are working today than at any time in the history of our country. | ||
| I mean, these are the facts we have to get out. | ||
| And, you know, there's this fake narrative that the Democrats talk about, affordability. | ||
| They just say the word. | ||
| It doesn't mean anything to anybody. | ||
| Just say it. | ||
| Affordability. | ||
| I inherited the worst inflation in history. | ||
| There was no affordability. | ||
| Nobody could afford anything. | ||
| The prices were massively high. | ||
| Do you remember when we took over eggs? | ||
| You did a great job on that, Madam Secretary. | ||
| Agriculture, Brooke. | ||
| Eggs were four or five times higher than they had ever been. | ||
| They said, don't order eggs for Easter at the White House. | ||
| And we ended up doing it, and we got the egg prices way down lower than what they were before. | ||
| But the word affordability is a con job by the Democrats. | ||
| They say affordability. | ||
| Watched the other day where some very low IQ congresswoman talked about affordability, affordability, affordability. | ||
| She had no idea. | ||
| Their prices were much higher. | ||
| As an example, energy, gasoline, we're now at about $2.50 a gallon. | ||
| We're going to be, I think, at $2 a gallon. | ||
| We could even crack that at some point. | ||
| I'd love to do it. | ||
| And we could do it more easily if we weren't building up the strategic national reserves, which Biden emptied out before the election so that he could try and get elected. | ||
| Meaning, she, he started it, then he got thrown out of the race. | ||
| Then she took over and she kept it going. | ||
| And they emptied out these strategic national reserves, which are really meant for something else. | ||
| They're not meant to keep people happy with their gasoline price. | ||
| They're meant for war. | ||
| They're meant for problems, big problems. | ||
| He emptied it out, and then she continued it during the process of trying to get elected. | ||
| Didn't work out too well for him. | ||
| And they virtually brought it down to the lowest level, I believe, in history. | ||
| And it didn't have much of an impact because the prices were very high. | ||
| But our prices now for energy, but for gasoline, are really low. | ||
| Electricity is coming down. | ||
| And when that comes down, everything comes down. | ||
| But the word affordability is a Democrat scam. | ||
| They say it, and then they go on to the next subject. | ||
| And everyone thinks, oh, they had lower prices. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No. | |
| They had the worst inflation in the history of our country. | ||
| Now, some people will correct me because they always love to correct me, even though I'm right about everything. | ||
| But some people like to correct me, and they say 48 years. | ||
| I say it's not 48 years, it's much more. | ||
| But they say it's the worst inflation that we've had in 48 years. | ||
| I say ever. | ||
| But whether it's 48 years or ever, it's pretty bad. | ||
| We had the worst inflation that we've ever had. | ||
| Since last January, we've stopped inflation in its tracks. | ||
| And there is still more to do. | ||
| There's always more to do. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But we have it down to a very good level. | |
| It's going to go down a little bit further. | ||
| You want to have a little tiny bit of inflation, otherwise that's not good either. | ||
| Then you have a thing called deflation. | ||
| And deflation can be worse than inflation. | ||
| But we have it almost, we'll soon be at a perfect level, but we inherited the worst inflation. | ||
| But we have 20 states that are now selling gasoline at less than the $2.75, think of that, $2.75. | ||
| And it was at $5 under Sleepy Joe. | ||
| Grocery prices are down with the cost of Thanksgiving turkey this year down 33%. | ||
| It was lower than 33% lower than under the Biden administration. | ||
| Egg prices are way down 86%, thank you. | ||
| And mortgage rates, despite the fact that we have an incompetent chairman of the Fed, a real dope, who should reduce rates. | ||
| I saw even Jamie Dimon said he should be reducing rates. | ||
| I never saw Jamie Dimon say that. | ||
| I wonder why he said that. | ||
| But he really said it because he's right. | ||
| But we have a guy that's just a stubborn ox who probably doesn't like your president, your favorite president. | ||
| But they're going to be coming down. | ||
| We'll be announcing somebody probably early next year for the new chairman of the Fed. | ||
| I talked to Scott about taking the job and he doesn't want it. | ||
| You got the greatest job here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, sir. | |
| Right? | ||
| He said, no, I want to stay chairman. | ||
| I want to stay right where we are, Treasury. | ||
| And I think we're doing really great, aren't we? | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're doing great, sir. | |
| It's a great team to be part of. | ||
| Yeah, it's amazing. | ||
| Under my executive order to lower prescription drug prices, which I think is the single biggest thing we've ever done that nobody writes about because you fake news. | ||
| I've made unprecedented deals along with Bobby and Oz and all of the people that work on it. | ||
| A lot of people, a lot of people that you wouldn't even think work on it, but they do to slash drug prices by 200%, 300%, 400%, 500%, 600%, 700%, 800%. | ||
| Nobody's ever heard of it before because I instituted favored nations and no nation agreed to do it. | ||
| And then I said to the nations, if you're not going to do it, I'm going to charge you 100% tariff, which is more money than we're talking about. | ||
| And they said, sir, we'd love to do it, please. | ||
| We would be honored to do it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And they agreed that they would go along with the whole thing. | |
| Nobody thought you could do it because they felt, number one, you couldn't get the drug companies to do it. | ||
| So we're paying, as an example, for the, let's call it the fat drug, the fat drug, FAT, for fat people. | ||
| Anybody use it at the table? | ||
| Don't ask. | ||
| But the fat drug was $135. | ||
| Think of that for certain people, $1,300 for certain countries, $1,300 in New York. | ||
| So in New York, it was $1,300, and in London, it was $135. | ||
| And a friend of mine called me, he said, What is this? | ||
| Why is it? | ||
| He got used to paying $1,300. | ||
| Well, now what we have it down to is, Bobby, what's the number? | ||
| Like $150 or something? | ||
| We have it down to a low number. | ||
| The Charlie Kirk show. | ||
| I'll pick it up from here. | ||
| We'll see you back here at 5.550. |
Export Selection