Sept. 4, 2025 - Bannon's War Room
33:53
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| America's Voice family. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Are you on Getter yet? | |
| No. | ||
| What are you waiting for? | ||
| It's free. | ||
| It's uncensored, and it's where all the biggest voices in conservative media are speaking out. | ||
| Download the Getter app right now. | ||
| It's totally free. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's where I put up exclusively all of my content 24 hours a day. | |
| You want to know what Steve Bannon's thinking? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go to get her. | |
| That's right. | ||
| You can follow all of your favorites. | ||
| Steve Bannon, Charlie Hurt, Jack the Soviet, and so many more. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Download the Getter app now. | |
| Sign up for free and be part of the new pick. | ||
| Five minutes out before the hour, Travis Kelsey reflecting on his big engagement to Taylor Swift. | ||
| I think it's the first time we've heard from him. | ||
| That is today's Himmer Celebrity News. | ||
| The Chiefs tight end who will be on the field this week telling his brother how things have changed since the big announcement 10 days ago. | ||
| I felt the game actually. | ||
| Fox has not shown a second, I don't think, of this hearing, right? | ||
| You know why? | ||
| Because they're taking Big Pharma money. | ||
| Hello, Big Pharma Money. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And didn't show they were talking about, was it Travis, the football player, tight end of the Chiefs, and was it Taytay, Tata, whatever, Taytay? | |
| Her engagement. | ||
| The service of the show on that this morning. | ||
| That's what's taking place of the star chamber Bobby Kenny's going through. | ||
| Remember, big pharma's paid for this hearing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They won't let Bobby Kennedy answer. | |
| They throw up lie after lie after lie and invective. | ||
| And his great response: hey, yo, you guys have sat here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Warner all you've been here 25, 30 years. | |
| What have you done about this? | ||
| Nothing but go along with Big Pharma. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They won't answer that. | |
| You heard Ben. | ||
| I'm asking the questions here. | ||
| They don't want to be, they don't want to have to answer for anything. | ||
| Viva Fry, I want to go back to the beginning because we showed it nonstop yesterday. | ||
| You are, I want, you support releasing all the documents, getting full disclosure. | ||
| What did you not like then about yesterday, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
What it ended up looking like is that this has been co-opted and hijacked in the exact same way the Me Too movement was co-opted and hijacked to be weaponized for political purposes and to go after anybody who was an ideological adversary. | |
| When you had the women out there saying, we know the names, we are standing up for justice so that no victims ever get victimized again in the future, protect the children, but we're not going to mention any names, period. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And that other woman who was talking about her modeling career and how she ended up on Epstein's Island to witness things, I don't know that she was actually a victim of Epstein's sexual abuses, saying, you know, we're going to make our own list and we're going to keep it confidential. | |
| Stay tuned for more. | ||
| I mean, it looked cheap and tawdry, and it looked like they had co-opted Massey's righteous initial motion or the House resolution to disclose the documents and are co-opting it to bastardize it for their own whatever purposes. | ||
| Making a list of not just abusers, but anyone in Epstein's orbit, keeping it confidential for the victims. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That sounds like extortion. | |
| And so in as much as Bondi has blown this Epstein document release, they've embarrassed some of the alternative media that support Trump. | ||
| I think it's compromised Trump unnecessarily. | ||
| Massey puts forward a decent, you know, bipartisan with Rokan to support, and it gets co-opted by what we saw yesterday. | ||
| It looked like a dog in punishment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It had nothing to do with disclosure, justice, and naming names. | |
| It had to do with self-promotion and promising things for the future that they have in their hands right now. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Do you think are they're a lawyer? | |
| Are there lawyers telling them some reason that they could not at least give some of the names? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I mean, many times they talked, and they also, I think, raised the stakes because I don't remember this coming out in the Maxwell trial. | |
| Maybe it did, right? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I don't follow these things that closely. | |
| But a couple of victims said they were raped and then passed around or trafficked to be raped some more by powerful people in politics, finance, business, and entertainment. | ||
| Was it some, and this is obviously stuff that's over 20 years old. | ||
| is would any of lawyer have told them you can't say the names? | ||
| I mean, why weren't they able to say, is there some restriction they had to come forward, at least with a couple of the names yesterday, to let people know that this was something more than just Maxwell and Epstein? | ||
| You know, a number of people float a number of reasons why. | ||
| They can't name them because they live in fear. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And so to that argument, I say, if you're living in fear of what your abusers might do to you, you don't come out on a platform and say, I'm going to name you in the future. | |
| You sit there and wait and wait for me to name you. | ||
| It's the exact opposite of what you would do. | ||
| Have they signed NDAs because they might have gotten compensated for their abuse and therefore contractually cannot disclose the names? | ||
| Possibly. | ||
| And then, you know, I say possibly, but even then, then it sort of does taint their pursuit of justice, that if they've received compensation and signed NDAs and now they say, well, we want you to release the names because we already got compensated for what we claim to have happened to us in the past. | ||
| Other argument they say is defamation. | ||
| If they say they might get sued for defamation, you're dealing, people came out yesterday and said Virginia Guffray is a national hero for having done did what she did, and we're not going to do it because we're afraid of getting sued for naming the people who we claim sexually abused us. | ||
| I have never been in that position, so I don't know what is a normal human response. | ||
| I won't judge it, but it doesn't do wonders to promote this purportedly bipartisan bill, which now looks like a total gong show. | ||
| And so if I'm Thomas Massey, I'm irritated having seen what I saw yesterday because it is not going to garner any more support for what I think should have been a pretty straightforward thing to do. | ||
| Pass the bill, release the documents in as much as you can without breaking the law. | ||
| Don't release 30 some odd thousand pages individually scanned, making it unsearchable, highly redacted. | ||
| So the liars on Twitter can say, huh, I wonder why this entire passage is redacted because it must have Trump's name in it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
When the victims yesterday come out and say, Trump was supportive, you know, back in the day, we never alleged that he's done anything bad. | |
| Whether or not the release would embarrass people in high places or other countries with which we want to maintain diplomatic relations, it's possible. | ||
| But it doesn't matter because if they don't and they keep bungling this release of the Epstein files, the political ramifications at home are going to be such that the Democrats are going to continue weaponizing it, much like they've done, much like they've done. | ||
| Weaponizing the refusal to follow through on what was not a campaign promise, but a campaign issue that Trump himself brought up and brought to the fore. | ||
| So I don't understand the entire debacle from the get-go. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think someone needs to replace Pam Longy. | |
| Bailey would be a good replacement. | ||
| But yesterday did nothing to help the cause. | ||
| Yeah, particularly the situation. | ||
| I think most of these are Democrats. | ||
| I think that's one of the ironies here. | ||
| The Dershowitz thing yesterday, because we covered it all, and somebody asked a question about Dershowitz and Virginia. | ||
| And I guess she retract some statements she made about Dershowitz. | ||
| I'm kind of confused about that. | ||
| But what was amazing is that the people that wanted full disclosure shut down the reporter. | ||
| They said Dershowitz was paying him and, you know, it was untrue and that didn't happen. | ||
| Do you know what are the details of that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because it sounded odd for people that wanted full disclosure to be jumping some guy who's asking a question about did she change her testimony at some point in time and exonerate or attempt to exonerate Dershowitz. | |
| Absolutely. | ||
| So the question, as far as I could hear it, I would love to know who the journalist was was asking questions about Virginia Guffray having made allegations against Dershowitz and retracted them. | ||
| And when people retract other statements, they're going to say exoneration or others are going to say intimidation, just depending on your perspective. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I personally, this is not defending Dershowitz. | |
| I don't think Dershowitz is guilty of anything. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What Dershowitz did mention at one point on another podcast, I think it might have been with, I want to say Pesobic, but I might be wrong, is that some people made some false accusations because, much like with the Me Too movement, people see dollar signs and it's cynical and it's gross, but it's reality. | |
| There are legitimate bona fide victims of Epstein's sexual abuse and sexual abuse involving others because I don't think Ghelane was trafficking only to Epstein. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And then there are other opportunistic players who come in and see dollar signs, say, I'm going to make some accusations against some high, you know, profile people, and I'll get paid too. | |
| And so when Dershowitz said there is a list, I've seen it, it's got names, but it's also redacting the names of people who made false accusations. | ||
| That's a plausible explanation. | ||
| But when a journalist comes out yesterday, starts asking questions, what about some of the false statements that were retracted or recanted? | ||
| And then you have these alleged victims rejoicing in the silencing of a journalist who's giving them the attention that they claim to so desperately want. | ||
| It just made it all look very cheap, very exploitive, very partisan. | ||
|
unidentified
|
When you get Gloria Allred appearing out of the blue, I mean, it's like saying Candyman three times in the mirror. | |
| The entire movement has been bastardized, corrupted, and now is being counterproductive. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And we showed her, she was the last speaker. | |
| She comes up. | ||
| I'm surprised she still didn't have her Hillary buttons. | ||
| I had to deal with her in the 26 campaign. | ||
| We had to deal with all her lies and misrepresentations. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So Pam Bondi has said on Fox that there was a list that was on her desk. | |
| Dershowitz, you just, I don't want to repeat what Dershowitz said. | ||
| He said he'd seen a list. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Isn't that one of the fundamental questions people have? | |
| Is there some list out there? | ||
| Is there, are these women going to provide it? | ||
| Was there already a list beforehand? | ||
| I mean, this is some of the just basic fundamental questions that folks that want to have full disclosure on this have. | ||
| I mean, can you give, have people before said there's actually a list? | ||
| And if they say it, if Dershowitz and Pam Bondi say it, how can you kind of unsay it? | ||
| Because one's the Attorney General of the United States, the other is one of the most prominent constitutional lawyers around and a colleague and close friend of Epstein. | ||
| There is the expression, you don't attribute to malice, what could be explained away by incompetence. | ||
|
unidentified
|
When it comes to Pam Bondi, had no opinion of her when she was appointed. | |
| I would have preferred Matt Gates personally. | ||
| Had no opinion of her, but performance has been what it has been. | ||
| You can't say certain things in a certain position and then just walk it back and pretend like it never happened. | ||
| Even her explanation for what she says she intended to mean when she said there's a list on my desk, yada yada, coupled with the missing minute, which has now been contradicted by the actual evidence, it compromises the credibility of that department of the administration. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And it happens to be a big one, the DOJ. | |
| Is there a list like a checklist, a to-do list? | ||
| Hey, this is client X, Y, and Z. | ||
| No. | ||
| But there were unnamed, unindicted co-conspirators who were given blanket pardons under the 2008 plea deal. | ||
| Those are names. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I mean, what's going to be the rationale to say we're not going to release the names of the unindicted co-conspirators who got effectively a non-prosecution agreement under this deal in 2008 that made no sense? | |
| That's the list of the names that we want. | ||
| People who were financing Jeffrey Epstein, people who were at the island. | ||
| They might not all be guilty, but nobody's expecting a list of, hey, here's my favorite clients for sexual abuse. | ||
| But everybody knows, colloquially, what we're talking about, people in the orbit, people who participated in it, people who were unindicted, unnamed, but got non-prosecution agreements, and people who visited the island. | ||
| Because if you visited that island, you may not be a sexual abuser, but my goodness, people are entitled to know at this point in time. | ||
| And more secrecy just allows this to be used against Trump the way we saw with that stupid rubbish story of a letter, the boobies with the signature of Donald Trump. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The birthday birth. | |
| The longer it goes on, the more it gets used against Trump. | ||
| Wall Street Journal, just hang her for one second. | ||
| I'll hold you through the break. | ||
| We've got Jan, Epic Times, on deck in the War Room. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, welcome back. | ||
| Viva, what are your coordinates? | ||
| A lot of people are going to be watching you about this entire culmination. | ||
| They've got the Oversight Committee. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's up on the hill. | |
| I can tell you, folks, MSNBC for the rest of the night was nothing but Epstein with a little Bobby Kennedy thrown in, firing the CDC. | ||
| But it was, they're obsessed. | ||
| They're absolutely obsessed by it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So, Viva, where do people go to kind of have your clear-headed thinking on this topic? | |
| Well, I'm live daily on Rumble at 3 o'clock. | ||
| So, Viva Fry on Rumble. | ||
| And if you put in Viva Fry in the search engine, you'll find me on the internet. | ||
| But Viva Fry, we've got an amazing community at viva barnslaw.locals.com. | ||
| And Twitter, it's the VivaFry. | ||
| And I'm covering this. | ||
| I sort of seem to be pissing off everybody these days with this because I'm sort of pissing off the Trump side that thinks that the oversight committee is doing enough. | ||
| I'm pissing off the Massey side by sort of saying that yesterday didn't go well for Massey and people are accusing me of not being sensitive to the victims. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But I'm saying if you're a bona fide victim and you saw what went down yesterday, you should be pissed because that is compromising your purported aspirations of all of this, which is disclosure and justice and preventing future victims. | |
| But what you're saying, correct me if I'm wrong, and it gives them time too to get their list together because they weren't either prepared or they were told not to by their lawyers come forward yesterday. | ||
| You would think in doing that very dramatic event, and let's take the pre-event out, which Gloria already and some of the lawyers are running. | ||
| Let's take the event itself. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You would assume to have the mass, the maximum impact, you would have brought up at least a few names when they talk about the rich and powerful to let people know that it's somebody more than Maxwell and Epstein and then drive the story forward. | |
| They brought up Lex Wexnerns, Les Wexnerns to say how Epstein got his financing. | ||
| But Epstein was circulating these women according to their own admissions around his circle of friends. | ||
| You're afraid of lawsuits, but doing this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're afraid of retribution, but doing this. | |
| Look, and then teasing out and making your own private list that you're going to use for whatever. | ||
| Do you think the oversight committee, which obviously the Republicans and President Trump are telling people to focus on, don't you think that they can, it'll take them longer, but don't you think they can get to the same place? | ||
| I think they're getting to the same place. | ||
| And that's why, you know, between the action of the Oversight Committee and the civil war that the Massey discharge petition seems to be igniting, you know, people are getting frustrated. | ||
| At least there's pressure now, but there's progress now, but there's progress now only after the pressure that everyone was putting on Bondi when they were being told to let the Epstein story go. | ||
| Like fun, we're going to let the Epstein story go. | ||
| Viva, everybody will tune in three. | ||
| How about that? | ||
| And get you on social media where you're coming in hot. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So thank you very much, sir. | |
| Thank you, Bravin. | ||
|
unidentified
|
He's upsetting everybody equally, which is normally a good thing. | |
| Jan, I call it Jakalik, right? | ||
| You're telling me Jakalik is the Polish name. | ||
| First off, you were at the speech yesterday, Dad. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Do good. | |
| Yesterday was a glorious day for Poland in America, was it not, Jan? | ||
| 100%. | ||
| And I mean, I do think you actually nailed it in the speech. | ||
| I think when you talk about Poland, actually, it brings out the best in you, if I may say that. | ||
| Because Poles, you know, I'm Polish. | ||
| I'm a native speaker. | ||
| My parents escaped communist Poland. | ||
| That's how I learned about the horrors of that system from the beginning. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And polls have that same zest for freedom, that same desire, core desire for freedom that attracts people to America, that attracts people to the American idea. | |
| And as another gentleman pointed out the other day, Poland also had the first democratic constitution in Europe, right? | ||
| So Poland and America have a lot in common. | ||
| You have been on the show many times, and we always talk about your reports. | ||
| We love the EPOC Times. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We think it's the best broadsheet in the world. | |
| And you have been one of the leaders as the folks over the EPIC Times in telling the world the dangers to Lao Beijing and to the world at large of the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| So this was the headline in today's Financial Times. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And it's obviously geopolitically, we're at an inflection point in world history, right? | |
| And this was brought about by many people in the West, leaders in the West, business leaders, finance leaders, corporate leaders, kicking the can down the road and being in business with the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| And Jan, we'd love to have you back on. | ||
| And maybe hopefully this weekend or something, I want to break it down with some experts like yourself and go through it for the audience. | ||
| However, I have you on here for something very specific. | ||
| The most important thing that came out of this military parade in the show of force of the BRICS Nations and they had a conference call with Taking Down the Dollar. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You had everybody up on the podium and you particularly had Minnie Me over at North Korea, the first time he's on the podium, actually seeing a military parade with the Chinese Communist Party and the KGB Putin and many others. | |
| Got the Moolah's up there, the people that run Persia, all of them. | ||
| The most important thing that happened, I believe, the buried lead, was the sidebar conversation that was caught on a hot mic between Putin and Xi. | ||
| Remember, Putin and Xi are two of the three most powerful people in the world. | ||
| The third being your guy, Donald John Trump, who's down here at the White House at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And she and Putin are talking about transhumanism. | |
| They're talking about how they have technology now coming from Wait for It, organ Harvesting, who Jan's the world's expert on this, right? | ||
| That they can get new organs, fresh organs from living human beings, and that they believe they themselves are on the cusp of living to 150 years old, and that others that will come shortly thereafter will have total immortality. | ||
|
unidentified
|
After all the abuse, Falun Gong and Epoch Times and you got for years and years and years about this was some fantasy, this another conspiracy theory, these people are nutcases. | |
| You can't trust them. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You got to trust the CCP. | |
| Do you feel a little bit of relief that the truth has come out from the demon's own lips, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
This is almost a, I mean, it's the most serene experience because it, I mean, it's kind of the last thing I would expect. | |
| This is the dark secret that the Chinese Communist Party never, ever wants to admit to, that Xi Jinping never wants to admit to. | ||
| It's been something that's been happening at scale for at least 25 years. | ||
| It's something they've never had a credible response to. | ||
| It's always just been denial and attack the messenger. | ||
| That's all it's been. | ||
| So to hear it actually, you know, a discussion of continuous, continually transplanting organs to achieve immortality, perhaps 150 years, Xi Jinping responds to Vladimir Putin. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I mean, it's very clear what they're talking about. | |
| And the evidence around this with the China tribunal and again, 25 years of work that's been basically done, or at least 20 years of work that's been done to figure this out, because that's when we realized it was real, is, I think, incontrovertible at this point. | ||
| And now they've actually validated it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What does this mean? | |
| What does this moment in history mean? | ||
| They've come together because, hey, I've been having conversation with people and saying, don't think they're not offering. some people to come on their side and build this new access, not just to control the Urangian landmass, but the entire world for world domination. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Don't think they're not offering these guys, hey, look, we can get you to 125 right now and keep you healthy and keep you sexually active and with a little spring in your step and an active ruler. | |
| What are the geopolitical implications? | ||
| Because this is made in China 2025. | ||
|
unidentified
|
When you and I used to talk about that, I said, hey, the top 10 industries that they want to dominate by the year 2025, what year are we in? | |
| Oh, yeah, that's right, 2025. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The top five were advanced chip design, quantum computing, artificial general intelligence, artificial intelligence, regenerative robotics, and WaitFort, CRISPR, and biotechnologies. | |
| Those were the top five. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That is the five you need to converge to get to the singularity. | |
| These folks are very strategic and they're very focused. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The geopolitical impact of what they were saying is more folks than the important than the geopolitical impact of this military because it implies the top types of advanced technologies they are working on in dark, in the darkest, secret, most place of the Chinese Communist Party in the KGB, sir. | |
| Steve, first of all, let me just clarify exactly what we're talking about for the uninitiated. | ||
| We're talking about unlimited, at-scale, on-demand killing of prisoners of conscience for their organs for the Chinese elites and wealthy transplant tourists. | ||
| That's the shortest way to summarize what's happening. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And that this has happened at such a scale. | |
| We're talking, by best estimate, 60 to 100,000 transplants a year, okay, since at least the mid-2000s. | ||
| So this is a very large scale. | ||
| This is a lot of money. | ||
| But more importantly, if you're someone that believes that there is no God, that there is no connection to divine, that there's no moral guardrails at all, what it means is life. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And that is exactly what they're talking about. | |
| There was an example of a Chinese official that basically had multiple, this was actually disclosed by someone else that was sort of kind of doing a eulogy for them who had had during COVID, multiple organs replaced. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And many of these leaders right now that I was looking at the average, I think 88 is the average age now that these leaders have, much higher than the general population and even other parts of the world. | |
| So I think they're kind of sending a message here and they're sending a message. | ||
| We're doing the kind of work that you aren't allowed to do out there for those of you that might be interested. | ||
| And we can frankly set you up. | ||
| So let's get in bed together. | ||
| I think that's a message. | ||
| And in a sense, for people that don't believe there's accountability in heaven or something of this nature, that could be very attractive because that extends one's life. | ||
| And at the moment, there's a limit on that. | ||
| And this is what their quest is for. | ||
| So I think the geopolitical implications, as you correctly say, are absolutely massive. | ||
| And in a way, I almost wonder whether this hot mic moment, you know, nothing ever happens at the Chinese Communist Party that isn't. | ||
| And I'm almost wondering if this hot mic moment wasn't a kind of a message, a coded message or something like that. | ||
| I'm not a, you know, I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but they are really, really meticulous about not getting anything unwanted out. | ||
| First off, it was a hot mic. | ||
| There'd be 100 dead technicians, right? | ||
| They would go through. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, they have, in the, what, the 20 years of his reign or rule or the 15 years and everything, you've never had a hot mic moment like this. | |
| So, no, I don't believe for a second it was just caught on where they want the word out. | ||
| They want to promulgate it. | ||
| Jan, you've done amazing work, the Epoch Times. | ||
| And so folks that have not been following this for years, they were criticized as cranks, as conspiracy theorists. | ||
| And now from the demons' own mouths, you've heard exactly what they're doing, not what they're planning on doing, what they're doing and what they're offering for at least today, potential immortality and at least extending human life to 120 to 150 years old. | ||
| You're absolutely right. | ||
| It's the demons. | ||
| It's the summoning of the demons. | ||
| And this is why this is so dark and has to be quite frankly shut down. | ||
| Jan, where do people go for your reporting, Epoch Times, all your social media, all of it, sir? | ||
| TheepochTimes.com, of course. | ||
| You can look up American Thought Leaders. | ||
| It's on the front page. | ||
| You can also look up my YouTube channel, which seems to be less censored these days. | ||
| So we're actually getting more traction. | ||
| I welcome you to visit us there. | ||
| The other thing, and this is part of the surreal experience, I just signed a contract with Skyhorse to write a book on exactly this issue, but it's basically using this horrible organ harvest in power harvesting industry as a lens to understand the Chinese Communist Party writ large. | ||
| And so it's going to be coming out in February. | ||
| And it's almost like in that sense, this hot mic was a gift because guess where the book is going to be starting? | ||
| Baby, oh, baby. | ||
| Skyhorse, best publisher out there, best publisher. | ||
| So you're with great people. | ||
| Jan, we look forward to that. | ||
| We look forward to your reporting. | ||
| And thank God you and the guys at the Epoch Times were on watch here. | ||
| Really appreciate you. | ||
| Thank you, Steve. | ||
| Bobby Kennedy, the Star Chamber continues, and we will continue with that after a short commercial break. | ||
| Take your phone out. | ||
| Bannon. | ||
| Text Bannon 989898. | ||
| Get the ultimate guide, the free guide for investing in gold and precious metals in the age of Trump. | ||
| Gold is on fire. | ||
| Find out why. | ||
| That's the key. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Find out the pattern recognition. | |
| Short break. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, let me go to Nothing's Happening at the Star Chamber. | ||
| We're going to have a compressed part of this tonight. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Naomi Wolf is going to join us to go through it. | |
| An Inquisition. | ||
| Bobby Kennedy, I think, gave better than he got. | ||
| But you see how Big Pharma lines up on this? | ||
| Maybe Charlie Kirk will pick up some of it in the next hour. | ||
| In fact, if we get another one of these demon Democrats up there, let's go to it live. | ||
| Chris Hoare, talk to me, brother. | ||
| You always come in with some fantastic offers for the Warren Party. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Posse, they are jacked up this morning because Bobby Kennedy, they've been trying to tear Bobby Kennedy apart in process of trying to fire him as secretary of HHS, sir. | |
| Well, Steve, we've got a lot to be concerned about this week. | ||
| You're reminded there about what the Chinese are doing their show for us yesterday with North Korea and Russia. | ||
| And that is to me just a reminder that we as Americans need to be prepared for anything at any time. | ||
| The number one way to do that is to make sure that you have communications that will work should the Chinese or others attack our communications infrastructure and networks. | ||
| Satellite funds are independent of that, Steve. | ||
| As you know, they work regardless of whether the power is up or whether the telecommunications networks are down, the cell towers are down. | ||
| Your satellite phone is going to keep working. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And at sat123.com, you can still get a free satellite phone with activation. | |
| That phone will cost you $1,000 to $2,000 anywhere else in the world. | ||
| But free with activation, you're paying 95 bucks a month for your service to get up to 150 minutes. | ||
| But, Steve, I want to bring back something that happened just last week, of course, the tragedy in Minneapolis with another two kids killed senselessly. | ||
| And just that is a reminder that we need to make sure we're protecting our kids when they go off to school. | ||
| So, this week with the free satellite phone, we have a limited offer of the free bulletproof backpack for your kids as well. | ||
| Steve, this bulletproof backpack weighs just two pounds. | ||
| It can hold up to an 18-inch laptop, but it has a Kevlar panel in it that will stop bullets from hitting people. | ||
| And this is something we developed in conjunction with our friends in special operations and law enforcement in California to give kids a fighting chance should they be in such a terrible situation. | ||
| And we all hope and pray you're not in that situation. | ||
| But these days, you just don't know. | ||
| There are too many of these shootings, and there's too many crazy people out there with guns. | ||
| So, this backpack was developed to give you a fighting chance or give your kids a fighting chance when you send them off to school. | ||
| Steve, we're all buying backpacks for our kids anyway. | ||
| They cost two, three, four, five hundred dollars or more, many of them. | ||
| But none of those protect you against ammunition, and that's why we developed this. | ||
| And again, you can get this at sat123.com free with activation with a free sat phone, or you can call 941-841-0844. | ||
| That's 941-841-0844. | ||
| But, Steve, I think this is about the only thing that can give you peace of mind when you send your kids off to school. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What about, I want to go before we let you go with the cell phone itself and your concerns about the grid, your concerns about telecom happening, the Chinese and other bad actors working with them, the North Koreans. | |
| How do you think this is a bigger concern today than it was even a couple of years ago? | ||
| Yeah, I do, because look, we've seen numerous examples of equipment, whether it's equipment that operates in our ports or operates on cell towers or on the electric power grid. | ||
| These components and these machines coming out of China are pre-built. | ||
| They're building in back doors so the CCP can get access to them once they're installed here. | ||
| And this isn't conspiracy stuff. | ||
| This is fact. | ||
| We've had to send back numerous pieces of machinery and equipment to China because there were back doors in it that would allow the CCP to control or at least to view and watch what these machines are doing over here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And we also know for a fact that the Chinese and others have put viruses into our communications networks and other infrastructure networks that can be operated to basically kill platforms. | |
| You know, we've seen these kind of outages all around the world. | ||
| We saw them earlier this year in Spain and Portugal where they just took out the power grid. | ||
| And whilst what they were saying over there was that this was just an error that was caused by an overload in the power grid. | ||
| You know, what many people were saying quite rightly is that that error would be very unlikely. | ||
| It was much more likely that that was a cyber attack. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And so, if the Chinese or others can do that, and that would leave everyone without a working cell phone, and that would leave everyone without communications. | |
| But if you have a satellite phone, you know, you would still be able to stay in touch, Steve. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And that's why the U.S. military and first responders use the exact same equipment as that we're giving away for free today. | |
| Can you, one more time, where do people go? | ||
| Who do they talk to when they get there? | ||
| Just they can call 941-841-0844. | ||
| That's 941-841-0844. | ||
| Or go to sat123.com. | ||
| That's s-at-t-123.com. | ||
| And you can get a free phone with activation and a free bulletproof backpack. | ||
| And you can make sure that you are safe and your kids can be safe and that you will always be able to stay in touch, no matter what the Chinese or these other guys are up to. | ||
| Thank you, brother. | ||
| Appreciate you coming on. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thanks, Steve. | |
| Do we have any more? | ||
| Who's Bobby Kennedy getting grilled by now? | ||
| The Republicans have been pretty good about letting him. | ||
| I know one. | ||
| Yes, she's for Warren. | ||
| Oh, she's okay. | ||
| Let's go. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Did we miss Pocahontas? | |
| No. | ||
| Hopefully, Charlie Kirk will pick it up. | ||
|
unidentified
|
If not, Grayson Moe will stream it. | |
| And Grace and Mo are in Korea right now for the fantastic Korean event put on by Mina Kim. | ||
| We want to show support of that. | ||
| We've got people on the road. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Of course, our own Natalie Winters is in Asia doing reporting over there. | |
| So we've got a lot going on as the War Room staff goes out. | ||
| Also, I think Mo's going to be in the United Kingdom for the Tommy Robinson event. | ||
| Trying to get Natalie over there too if she's finished with Asia. | ||
| So it's a lot going on. | ||
| Charlie Kirk's going to follow us, Pozo. | ||
| And Pozo was spectacular yesterday. | ||
| In my speech to the Polish folks, I did, you know, Pozo has taught me so much. | ||
| Pesovic's taught me so much. | ||
| I kind of drafted off that. | ||
| He followed me in the speech, and I think I took some of the best lines. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But Jack, thanks, brother. | |
| You were fantastic. | ||
| Charlie Kirk, Jack Pasovic, Steve Gruber, Eric Bowling, back at 5 p.m. | ||
| I'm giving a speech late this afternoon. | ||
| I should be back in time for the five. | ||
| But if not, Dave Bratt will be here. | ||
| And if I'm not here this afternoon for this, which I'll try to be, I'll be back tomorrow morning. | ||
| We've got a lot going on in Washington, D.C. as everybody's back in town. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I want to make sure home title.com, home titleock.steve60 for one buck. | |
| One buck. | ||
| You get 60 days to try out the service to make sure that you can find out why every dream you've ever had is in your home. | ||
| 90% of your net worth is in your home. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You don't want some bad guy, some varmint, AI, cyber, rogue lawyer, rogue accountant, rogue in-law, take the title to your home and go take out a second mortgage from a hard money lender who does not want to hear your tale of woe. | |
| They want the money. | ||
| So make sure it doesn't happen to you so that you can man the ramparts. | ||
| Man, we got a September that is on fire. | ||
| We're going to cover it all. | ||
| I promised you a Star Chamber today. | ||
| You saw what Big Pharma, when they got those guys on the payroll, they want them coming in hot. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Bobby Kennedy gave as good as he got. | |
| Back at five. |
Export Selection