Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
The question is, why are you doing this? | ||
Why are you doing this? | ||
unidentified
|
And the answer is, because we can. | |
Because we have the power. | ||
You know, some of the details are like, you know, the plot of a political novel. | ||
And in fact, actually, my colleague Larry Wright wrote a terrific political novel just a couple years ago about this Texas state house called Mr. Texas. | ||
I highly recommend it. | ||
But, you know, this isn't fiction. | ||
It's a world of raw power politics in which you see how the escalation cycle begins. | ||
Texas does one thing, blue states respond, and all of a sudden we're at a kind of a level of political war. | ||
And I'm very struck, as I'm sure you are, Steph, with the language of war being used by Texas Republicans, being used by New York's governor today. | ||
And this is a form of unraveling in and of itself, but it's raw power politics. | ||
It's all because the Republicans do not have a workable majority in the U.S. House of Representatives right now. | ||
They're afraid of an election, a midterm election coming, and if history is any guide, throwing them out of the majority in the House, that would be almost a crippling blow for Trump's second two years of his second and final term in office. | ||
And, you know, what he's saying is, I don't want a level playing field in 2026. | ||
I want to do what I can to tilt the playing field in Texas. | ||
And I just, I think it's a new level of conflict that we haven't seen even in Trump's first term. | ||
You described this as a war. | ||
You said, bring it on. | ||
You've talked about doing something extraordinary, which is potentially paving the way for redistricting in New York, essentially to allow Democrats to take seats that aren't currently Democratic-leaning seats the way that Republicans are doing in Texas. | ||
Tell me about whether you think it's going to get there and whether you think if the war is going to be fought in those terms, who ends up winning? | ||
Rachel, if we refuse to fight for our democracy, then we're doomed to lose it. | ||
We don't want our democracy lost. | ||
And that's why I am sick and tired of fighting these battles with my hands tied behind my backs because we have independent redistricting commission. | ||
We love good government ideas. | ||
They're fabulous. | ||
But you know what? | ||
It puts us at a political disadvantage to all the Republican states who are able to gerrymander at will. | ||
So look at the tip of balance in the Congress now and what the Republicans are attempting to do under the direction of Donald Trump to literally hijack five Democratic seats in Texas, represented particularly minority communities. | ||
They're going to lose their voice. | ||
And the effect of that on New York, why I'm involved with this, if they stack it so it's almost impossible for Hakeem Jeffries to be Speaker in any time in the near future, certainly during the Trump administration, then I have to deal with the onslaught of attacks on my residents, the loss of health care for millions, children starving because they don't have the SNAP benefits, and seeing the ICE raids with unfettered power walking into our courthouses and our buildings and our schools wearing masks and flaring guns. | ||
There's no way to stop this if we don't find a way to have some checks and balance in Washington because we do not have it now. | ||
And if we don't stand up and fight, we'll not have it for the entirety of Donald Trump's tenure. | ||
And that is what is so frightening to me. | ||
You know what? | ||
I'm a New Yorker. | ||
I'm from Buffalo. | ||
Fighting is second nature to us. | ||
I'm not afraid of this. | ||
That's why I said bring it on because Texas, bullies in Texas, are not going to intimidate us now or ever. | ||
unidentified
|
We're also following all the new developments this morning in the showdown in Texas. | |
The state house is set to convene again today after the Republican governor ordered the arrest of dozens of Democratic lawmakers who have now fled that state. | ||
Those Democrats left on Sunday to block the GOP effort backed by President Trump to redraw the state's congressional map. | ||
Now that could have a huge impact on the 2026 midterms, potentially eliminating five Democratic seats in the U.S. House. | ||
And new CNN this morning, CNN reporting this morning, California Democrats are in deep talks to retaliate by redrawing their own map to potentially do away with five Republican seats in that state. | ||
Sources briefed on those talks say the new maps are expected to be part of a ballot referendum in a November special election. | ||
Texas House is expected to come back about 1 o'clock Central time, 2 o'clock Eastern time. | ||
When they gabbled in yesterday, that's when it was official that the Democrats had broken the quorum here by fleeing the state. | ||
We expect that to continue today. | ||
We are about halfway through this 30-day special legislative session, about two weeks left in it, so they would have to stay away to at least kill the redistricting bill during this session. | ||
But a reminder that the governor here in Texas can simply call another special session, put the redistricting bill back on that schedule, and that all of this would start all over again. | ||
That's why there's so many questions swirling around whether or not and how long the Democrats are willing to stay away from the state to block this measure. | ||
But what is interesting is you talk about there in the lead-in, that one of the things that we heard from Democrats over and over in the days leading up to them leaving the state is that what they hoped would happen is that this would ratchet up pressure, intensify pressure on other states, and spread the word about what is happening here in Texas and that other states, in Democratic states, would follow suit. | ||
And that was one of the things that several Democrats had told us leading up to yesterday's quorum break, that they had hoped to see that that would be one of their goals in leaving the state and trying to build momentum for awareness of the redistricting issue. | ||
But Republicans are fighting back. | ||
The governor is obviously threatening arrest, threatening fines, as well as threatening possible criminal charges of bribery as well. | ||
Democrats dismiss that as hollow threats. | ||
But Republicans are also telling them, you know, they're simply cowards for not being here. | ||
At 1 o'clock Central Time, the House is expected to reconvene. | ||
Yesterday's session lasted only a few minutes, just enough time for the Speaker of the House to initiate the process of issuing the civil arrest warrants. | ||
And then shortly after that, the Texas governor ordering DPS to bring state troopers to bring the Democrats back. | ||
But of course, outside of the state lines, much of this is not enforceable. | ||
So the Democrats will remain gone. | ||
The question is, for how long? | ||
The US Department will say that the president won not just the last election, but he also won the one before that, the one he actually lost. | ||
And anybody who points out that Russia tried to help him win the one before that should be criminally charged for saying that, even though it's true. | ||
We are not heading towards something like this. | ||
We are there. | ||
It is here. | ||
It is the environment in which we are now living. | ||
And so, given that you now live in a country with an authoritarian leader, the question is, what can you do for your country? | ||
The question is no longer how to prepare for this risk or how to try to avert it, but rather how to fight it now that it is here and in effect. | ||
And, you know, we're awake now. | ||
It's clear. | ||
We're all living here. | ||
It's very obvious that this is not going to get better on its own. | ||
This is not going to fix itself. | ||
An authoritarian just seeks more and more and more power throughout not just politics, but through all of society, systematically trying to eliminate any effective means of opposing him. | ||
This is a one-way ratchet if we leave it up to him. | ||
But that at least does give us some clarity for Americans who do not want to leave it up to him. | ||
We're beyond waiting and seeing now. | ||
It is clear what is going on. | ||
It is clear now that the small D democratic tools that we've got right now as a country, these are as good as it is going to get. | ||
We are never going to have more resources to fight for our country than we do right now. | ||
This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
Pray for our enemies because we're going medieval on these people. | ||
Here's not got a free shot on all these networks lying about the people. | ||
The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
I know you've tried to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
It's going to happen. | ||
And where do people like that go to share the big line? | ||
MAGA Media. | ||
I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | ||
If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Vance. | |
All right. | ||
Good morning, everyone. | ||
Dave Bratt sitting in for the great Stephen K. Bannon this morning. | ||
We have a power pack show leading off. | ||
There's so much in the news. | ||
You don't know how good Stephen K. Bannon is, sifting through just endless piles of history-making news every single day, every minute, sorting it out, weighing what needs importance. | ||
And that's what the war room does every day. | ||
So honored to be sitting in. | ||
I'm going to start off with breaking news. | ||
House Oversight Committee under rep James Comer, who I serve with. | ||
Huge moves here. | ||
And, you know, when these guys do the right thing, give them some positive feedback. | ||
James Comer breaking. | ||
House Oversight Committee is compelling the following individuals to appear for depositions through issued subpoenas. | ||
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, October 9. | ||
Former President Bill Clinton, October 14. | ||
Former U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland, October 2. | ||
Former FBI Director James Comey, October 7. | ||
Wow. | ||
Former U.S. Attorney General William Barr, August 18. | ||
Former U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez, August 26. | ||
Former U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions, August 28. | ||
Former FBI Director Robert Mueller, September 2. | ||
Former U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch, September 9. | ||
Former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, September 30. | ||
All this in relation to the Epstein files. | ||
We got Alex deGrasse with us. | ||
He's going to be coming in with commentary and then Sam Fadis on this conspiracy we'll dig into in a minute as well. | ||
Yesterday, breaking news, if that's not enough, Pam Bondi directed the Justice Department to grand jury investigation of the Obama administration, Brennan Clapper, Comey, et cetera, as well. | ||
So that's another huge piece of breaking news. | ||
So we've got action, folks. | ||
We've been talking and now we've got action. | ||
And I just want to bring in a stray tangential thing that I think is important that we need to remember as Americans. | ||
This seems a little nerdy or whatever, but I think you'll get it and the war room posse will get it, right? | ||
We are a republic, a constitutional republic, not a democracy governed by mob rule. | ||
So last week, the big breaking news and Mike Benz, just always unreal, Natalie, always unreal on this. | ||
But the National Endowment for Democracy, right? | ||
Just that term, right? | ||
They're responsible for overturning governments and cooperation with the CIA and State Department and all this kind of NGOs. | ||
You all know the story, but I don't like the term National Endowment for Democracy. | ||
If you look at this conspiracy that's been alleged by Tulsi and now going to grand jury, we got too close to being a democracy in this country, right? | ||
With the censorship regimes, all the big tech on board that project. | ||
Conservative CEOs were scared to speak out. | ||
Churches were closed. | ||
You all did the Fauci piece, what RFK's uncovering, all of that. | ||
We got way too close to being a pure democracy without guaranteed rights for minority factions. | ||
You know, James Madison, the Constitution of the U.S. So hold us all accountable on this kind of thing, right? | ||
This really matters. | ||
The rights of minorities in law, because those, the left, the far left, China, you can tell the difference, right? | ||
They're never talking. | ||
They just want to grab power, seize power, and then the rights of minority factions are not protected. | ||
And so, Alex, why don't you just stay, if you want to comment just a minute on today's breaking news? | ||
I think we just got a couple minutes left since the cold opening was so long. | ||
But Alex deGrasse, fire away. | ||
unidentified
|
Thanks. | |
Yeah, I mean, this stuff is huge on Comer. | ||
I mean, this is really one of the greatest conspiracies, of course, in deflection. | ||
And obviously, the posse once again at the forefront of driving this issue like redistricting. | ||
Am I coming through or no? | ||
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
Yep, you're good. | ||
You know, once again, at the forefront of driving this issue into action. | ||
unidentified
|
And it's great. | |
I mean, we have to keep up the gas. | ||
The service that all of us are doing, working the phones, pushing this forward, I think couldn't change the fate of the country, especially looking at the midterm day. | ||
So we'll talk more about that. | ||
Yeah, and keep going, Alex. | ||
So you've got two issues now. | ||
You got the James Comer piece on the Epstein files, and then you've got the Tulsi going to the Justice Department as well. | ||
So do you see this? | ||
I mean, is it a time where the posse, you know, we never stop, right? | ||
Steve Bannon never stops. | ||
But is this a time where we can actually say we've got action taking place here on behalf of the American people for a change? | ||
Yeah, I mean, I certainly hope this gets across the finish line. | ||
I think it will require sustained action from the posse. | ||
unidentified
|
I think positive reinforcement to members of Congress, you know, all right, Alex, right back after the break. | |
Sorry, folks, I was off on the clocks a bit. | ||
Right back. | ||
unidentified
|
America's Voice family. | |
Are you on Getter yet? | ||
unidentified
|
No. | |
What are you waiting for? | ||
It's free. | ||
unidentified
|
It's uncensored, and it's where all the biggest voices in conservative media are speaking out. | |
Download the Getter app right now. | ||
It's totally free. | ||
unidentified
|
It's where I put up exclusively all of my content 24 hours a day. | |
You want to know what Steve Bannon's thinking? | ||
Go to get her. | ||
unidentified
|
That's right. | |
You can follow all of your favorites. | ||
Steve Bannon, Charlie Project the Soviets, and so many more. | ||
Download the Getter app now. | ||
Sign up for free and be part of the new thing. | ||
Back in the war room with Alex deGrasse. | ||
Alex, let's just finish up on the news of the day again. | ||
You know, you are familiar with the polling. | ||
You work with several representatives, major leaders in the country. | ||
You got your finger on the pulse of the base in particular. | ||
Why is the base so fired up about transparency and truth-telling and these Epstein files and then the prosecution of this conspiracy case? | ||
What is it at base that makes this such a huge issue right now at this moment in time? | ||
Well, I think like Steve has always said, you know, it speaks to really who runs the country and our concern with the deep state and the powers that be. | ||
And I think, you know, I think the posse are amazing smart people. | ||
We understand that the Democrats are using this to weaponize on the Epstein stuff, which is a total scam. | ||
We know President Trump has nothing to do with any of this stuff. | ||
He knows that. | ||
People know that. | ||
But they've got this lie. | ||
And so if people want to uncover the truth, which I think will greatly damage the Democrat Party based off everyone's basic understanding of who the real players are here involved in basic stuff. | ||
So we welcome any of this transparency and accountability. | ||
I think that, you know, I don't think it's a major, major issue at the top of minds with voters, but the Democrats are certainly attempting to politicize this. | ||
And then our people too are wondering kind of what's going on. | ||
So I think that's important to kind of put the bet, flip the script, force it on the Democrats and expose them. | ||
Obviously, you know, Russia Gate is one of the biggest scandals, in my humble opinion, and crimes that we've seen for our republic and the depths that they've gone. | ||
So I think that is the whole ballgame because really everything, and that was when I was young. | ||
I mean, working with Elise and right out of college and working when she actually questioned Comey in 2017 and her, when she just got on the intelligence committee, that actually set in motion. | ||
It's an untold story, really. | ||
Steve, we talk about it where he sort of didn't answer why they didn't alert the big aid on the counterintelligence investigation. | ||
The Trump people started asking questions. | ||
Devin Nunes then jumped in to the investigation following that famous March 2017 Comey hearing in front of the intelligence committee, which many posse members that have been following this. | ||
And then, you know, everything is sort of connected to this. | ||
Obviously, the reelection. | ||
I mean, everything stems from, you know, this notion that this lie that President Trump was a Russian agent, which is out of control. | ||
And so I think getting to that, to that really is one of the most pressing issues because I think it will shatter the modern Democrat Party. | ||
Because when I talk to voters, my Democrat friends, they actually think that Trump was a Russian agent as of like a year ago. | ||
I mean, people are that sort of consumed by that madness that they've been fed by the mainstream media. | ||
And you look, the mainstream media is obviously exposing themselves in broad daylight, trying to cover up desperately in the last 48 hours, all the major networks claiming, you know, there's no evidence, this, that, all this stuff. | ||
I mean, there's a ton of evidence and it will be a huge reckoning for this country. | ||
I hope it leads to reforms on the intelligence committee and in the community. | ||
And no one should be able to have this type of power to, you know, I mean, I think this was, in my opinion, you know, a vast CIA operation in domestic soil, spying on President Trump. | ||
That's what I think. | ||
Oh, colluding with foreign powers. | ||
I mean, this would be huge. | ||
You know, that's my take from looking at the evidence. | ||
But, and it goes to the top. | ||
Oh, that's right. | ||
That's right. | ||
The Tulsi, Operation Mockingbird, everything. | ||
NBC news. | ||
We don't know. | ||
They're in, like you just said, the mainstream media is putting itself out of business here. | ||
When the files do come and when the testimony does come, they are sitting on a hot mess, right? | ||
I mean, this morning on the cold open, everyone saw that we don't know what happened. | ||
They're not naming any names. | ||
We don't know any crimes. | ||
You'll notice they never mentioned the Biden laptop. | ||
They don't mention the Chinese money. | ||
We have the receipts, Scott Perry in Congress. | ||
I had the checks in his hands. | ||
So the receipts are there. | ||
I'm going to get into that with Sam Fattis coming up next, too. | ||
But why don't you give us a summary recap of redistricting? | ||
I was redistricted, right? | ||
I had my most powerful county, Hanover County, just great all-American people. | ||
The Unit Party works together on this. | ||
Folks at home may not get that with the unit party is. | ||
That's when you upset the Republican Apple cart. | ||
All political views are my own here. | ||
And you upset the Democrat Apple Cart. | ||
They work together and they make little side deals. | ||
This is not one of them down in Texas, although there is unit party element here, right? | ||
I mean, the Republican, I guess maybe it is, right? | ||
But trying to get all five seats. | ||
This is a good Republican move. | ||
And the Democrats do this regularly, and we're not used to it. | ||
And so, Alex, give us where do we stand lately with all these folks up visiting Illinois? | ||
So, you know, it's interesting about Illinois. | ||
So it's the most, you know, gerrymander state in the country. | ||
I think I saw Brian Harrison, who's been hammering on the show that went on CNN and held up, held up the map that showed that, you know, they've got this long, skinny, they got all these crazy seats. | ||
So, you know, they are a scam at heart. | ||
And, you know, the reality is they're at risk because they've already kind of redistricted to a pretty, I mean, sorry, they've already kind of gerrymandered to a high extent. | ||
Of course, they believe they can pick off some seats in California, maybe a few in New York. | ||
But the reality is that we can pick off way more. | ||
And so they are not used to fighting fire with fire, right? | ||
I mean, these are the rules and we're playing hardball. | ||
These are the rules of the game. | ||
Nothing's illegal on any front. | ||
This stuff will get tested. | ||
And, you know, Kathy Hochl, who's the biggest scam on the planet, polling in the 30%. | ||
And I mean, she attempted the gerrymander in New York State twice. | ||
Elise led lawsuits. | ||
We defeated her. | ||
And so now they want to change the Constitution because they're whining, but to try to get a third attempt at gerrymandering. | ||
And so, you know, too bad. | ||
I mean, that's how this works. | ||
I mean, this is political hardball, right? | ||
I mean, this is tough stuff. | ||
And so it's great that we were talking about 12 seats yesterday. | ||
Now we're talking about 13 with J.D. Vance, Vice President Vance, maybe going to Indiana is the latest news. | ||
They're looking at a second seat in Indiana. | ||
So I'm not sure the latest on that front, but now we're talking about 13. | ||
I think there's other possibilities being discussed. | ||
And of course, this is escalation, but they're the ones that escalated this, Dave. | ||
I mean, this is the joke, right? | ||
We've been, we've been the ones fighting with one hand behind our back. | ||
And now we're seeing Patriots drive the ship and fight back with fire for fire. | ||
And, you know, too bad for them. | ||
unidentified
|
But we've got to see this through, honestly. | |
Yeah, I agree 100%. | ||
And the Republicans, I beat someone in leadership. | ||
And, you know, people are kind of friendly up there, but then things don't go. | ||
You don't get put on committees. | ||
You don't get any money for your reelection if you don't vote 100% with leadership up there. | ||
And now, President Trump has come in with MAGA and broken the mold, right? | ||
And so he's a fighter. | ||
And so now you got some of the Republicans joining the fight and not getting rolled. | ||
We used to be Cub Scouts and have white papers on everything, but we never fought. | ||
We lost on everything. | ||
And today we're finally seeing some of these receipts. | ||
And so put on your statistician hat. | ||
How are we looking for 2026? | ||
Because that is going to be key in the House and the Senate with the moves you see going on right now on redistricting. | ||
What's your conservative bet? | ||
Well, I think it's going to be really tight. | ||
It's always very tight in the House. | ||
I mean, I think the issues are on our side if Republicans continue to focus on affordability, the border, you know, foreign policy wins and peace across the world, as well as trade and rebirth of manufacturing. | ||
I mean, really, no one over the last six months for any president has been able to deliver the type of transformational change that not just President Trump, who deserves the credit, but Republicans in Congress. | ||
Let's give them some credit. | ||
I mean, they muscled some of this stuff through, and I think they need to not be shy and sort of lean in and sort of take the message home and sort of amplify this because I think the Democrats will come with a type of sophistication and viciousness that we've not seen before. | ||
I mean, we cannot count them out. | ||
They are vicious. | ||
People with hunting, they will have, I mean, they'll have billions and billions and billions of dollars that they will spend in ways that we won't even be able to comprehend with dark money and nonprofits and super PACs and the Soro stuff. | ||
And I mean, we already, I think some of the Republicans were standing outside the Driple C. And I think it was in the news, but I think we watched their PowerPoint presentation. | ||
I don't know why they never set the blinds. | ||
It's on the first floor. | ||
They're really dumb people over there if the Democrats. | ||
And they're walking through with this. | ||
They've got this influencer plan. | ||
They've got all this money. | ||
So there's going to be a record amount of misinformation that because they can't win on the issues. | ||
So I think things will be tight. | ||
If we pick up seats, that's great. | ||
I'm not nervous. | ||
People say, oh, they're doing this because they're losing on the issues. | ||
That's what the Democrats are like. | ||
No, I think we're great on the issues, but why wouldn't we do what they've done for years, net what we can, put us in the best position? | ||
Maybe we pick up seats. | ||
I mean, that would be against the norm, of course. | ||
You've only seen in the last hundred years twice after an incumbent midterm party in power that picks up seats. | ||
But hey, anything's possible with President Trump. | ||
We're not raising them like two or three to one across the board. | ||
We've got grassroots. | ||
We just have to kind of keep it going. | ||
I think a big difference between now and 2018 is, you know, we held a lot of seats in 2018 that Hillary Clinton had won that we were defending in the House. | ||
And now it's quite the opposite. | ||
I think we're only defending three seats that Kamal Harris, one that are held by a Republican, and there may be 13 or so that are the opposite, right? | ||
Where a Democrat holds that President Trump did better than the previous House candidate. | ||
And so, you know, if we could focus on those key seats, and I've been working with the posse, I think they're going to have a report out soon that goes through those seats, goes to the targets, see where some of those are. | ||
And of course, things will shift with the lines. | ||
But it's going to be a knife fight of knife fights. | ||
And we've talked about this. | ||
And I've been coming on the show for years in cycles where it's like the house, the house, the house. | ||
Now this is the ballgame. | ||
And if we hold the house in any extent, we keep this moving. | ||
If we lose it, everything is done. | ||
Yep. | ||
Alex deGrasse, thank you so much for all you do for the country, for coming on the warroom this morning. | ||
How do people follow you across the board? | ||
Give us all your social media. | ||
I'm Matt DeGrasse, 81 on X. I'm at Getter Truth, the whole thing. | ||
Thank you, Dave. | ||
Thank you, everyone, to the posse. | ||
Let's just stay locked in on this redistricting on the investigations in the House. | ||
And so we'll keep this going. | ||
Thank you. | ||
Yep, you bet, Alex. | ||
Thanks for being with us. | ||
All you friends down in Texas, I get down there quite a bit visiting Dallas, Houston, friends all over that great state, all Americans, Trump by 14%, and yet we're having this crazy corruption with a uniparty down in Texas. | ||
And so get on the hotlines, call your representatives, state senators, everybody. | ||
Show them you mean business. | ||
And we'll be back with more on this issue. | ||
But first, we got Sam Fattis on this CIA corruption as well. | ||
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Max. | |
All right, back in the war room. | ||
I want to give a shout out to our good friends at Birch Gold. | ||
I don't know whether you all saw Tucker Carlson's interview on the Federal Reserve with, I'm looking for the name, Richard Warner. | ||
You ought to all go watch that. | ||
Warner, you know, you're going to get economists, academics love to just critique each other on, you know, how many angels can bid on the head of a pin or needle or whatever. | ||
But man, his insights on the institution of the Federal Reserve when it was founded, two brothers running the U.S. and the German Federal Reserve banks at the same time, not running, but two significant leaders, two brothers. | ||
I mean, you can't make this stuff up. | ||
The 1914, World War I connections, the Fed loves war. | ||
You just cannot make the stuff up. | ||
So I highly recommend that to everyone. | ||
And I also just want to remind everybody on this economy, right? | ||
President Trump's hitting on all cylinders, right? | ||
You could not do a better job redefining the whole geopolitical landscape, achieving fairness, bringing manufacturing back to America, right? | ||
$8 trillion foreign commitments, $2 trillion American firm commitments, $10 trillion in CapEx coming our way, right? | ||
But that's going to take a while. | ||
And don't lose track of the fact this is still in many respects Biden's economy, right? | ||
That $2 trillion deficit we have is a major problem. | ||
Still, it's ongoing because everybody knows if you lop $2 trillion off of a $28 trillion economy, that's a major hit, right? | ||
And you'll be in a recession. | ||
So the solution is fairly simple. | ||
It's very hard to do, but it has to do with the Federal Reserve, of course. | ||
And our friends at Birch Gold know this kind of thing. | ||
If we promise, and the Congress, this takes some leadership to cut some spending out of that $2 trillion deficit. | ||
And then you make a deal with the Federal Reserve to lower the interest rates based on that cut, it's a new day for business. | ||
Business will pop like you've never seen it, right? | ||
We're all waiting on too late, too late Powell, as Trump says, and he, boy, is he right on that one right now. | ||
And so the Fed, I hope they wake up and give a significant cut that goes in tandem with cutting spending. | ||
And if you take the money away from the federal government and put it in the private sector, boom, there goes the productivity we need. | ||
But there's $2 trillion in funny money sitting there that we need to fix soon. | ||
And I don't see Congress or the Senate showing any sign because they're scared stiff to make those cuts. | ||
And so I just want to give a shout out, call Birch Gold, birchgold.com slash Bannon. | ||
Get their glossies written by Steve. | ||
They're all free. | ||
Birchgold.com slash Bannon or tax the bannon to 989898 for a free copy of the ultimate guide for gold in the Trump era. | ||
And I'll also give a shout out to my friend Kevin Freeman and his book, Pirate Money. | ||
Go look him up. | ||
He was referenced by Judy Shelton, the superstar the other day, for his innovations down with gold as a currency in Texas and Florida. | ||
They passed both states. | ||
So huge moves. | ||
So now we've got a little cold open we're going to go to. | ||
And then we got Sam Fattis coming up with a CIA conspiracy breaking news as well. | ||
Attorney General Pam Bondi has directed Justice Department prosecutors to launch a grand jury investigation into whether officials in the Obama administration committed federal crimes when they assessed Russia's actions during the 2016 election. | ||
That's according to a senior Trump administration official. | ||
The move comes after National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard claimed last month top Obama administration officials carried out a quote treasonous conspiracy against Donald Trump. | ||
She did not offer evidence of that. | ||
Gabbard said she is sending criminal referrals to the Justice Department. | ||
We don't know what the crimes are that are alleged here. | ||
We don't know who is being targeted and we don't know where this grand jury will sit. | ||
And all of that's very concerning. | ||
Normally in the prosecution process in this country, no one is indicted. | ||
No investigation is announced or anyone is indicted before a grand jury has heard evidence and a fellow citizen decides this other citizen should be charged with a crime. | ||
Here we have an approach where there's sort of a, you know, the director of national intelligence makes a sweeping allegation, potentially that the former president of the United States was involved in a treasonous plot. | ||
And then you have the attorney general announcing that she is launching a criminal investigation of this plot. | ||
But again, we don't know the charges. | ||
We don't know where they're going to investigate her or who it's going to be. | ||
But the one thing we do know, Jonathan Lemire, is this is extraordinarily stupid. | ||
It's extraordinarily stupid on so many counts. | ||
If you look at the timeline, the timeline doesn't add up. | ||
It's like when Donald Trump is saying that Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton created the Epstein files. | ||
No, no, no, no. | ||
That all happened during Donald Trump's first term. | ||
You look at the timeline here about what happened and when it happened, Barack Obama had nothing to do with this by anybody's accounts, and especially by the Senate Republican Intelligence Committee run by Marco Rubio, who afterwards said that it was Donald Trump's 2016 campaign that created a, quote, grave counterintelligence threat to the United States of America. | ||
That was Marco Rubio, the current Secretary of State. | ||
That was every Republican on the Senate Intel Committee after pouring through all of the documents. | ||
That's what they found. | ||
And when poor John Durham was made to sacrifice his professional career to go around the world investigating the investigators, he found nothing and ended up making a fool of himself. | ||
I mean, we even found out that the two documents that supposedly fed into the Clinton conspiracy, that she was the one pushing this, actually was Russian disinformation. | ||
So, again, they know in the Justice Department that this is all BS. | ||
What's going on here? | ||
unidentified
|
Well, first of all, Joe, I think this is a desperate attempt to distract. | |
This is playing politics. | ||
unidentified
|
This is reviving structures. | |
Yes, reviving old conspiracy theories. | ||
unidentified
|
To talk about this, the timing here is illuminating. | |
This, of course, comes back to the headlines. | ||
All right. | ||
I think you get the point. | ||
It's enough to make you pull your hair out. | ||
It's too much to take. | ||
The misdirection has all been from the left. | ||
That's why they're all being subpoenaed as of last week and breaking news today. | ||
And we're going to get to the bottom of it. | ||
And so we have one of the best experts on the CIA, Sam Fattis, with us right now. | ||
And I just wanted him to react. | ||
But, you know, we all get upset. | ||
You get emotional. | ||
The war room and the base gets just totally frustrated. | ||
Now the goods are coming in. | ||
And so it's time to take action on our part, too. | ||
And so I asked Sam to come on and maybe highlight, you know, what are two or three of the major receipts? | ||
They say there's nothing there. | ||
In the war room, we need to have just two or three receipts that we can just go to, just our go-to talking points for our neighbors, our friends, the church group, write an op-ed in the paper. | ||
And so, Sam, how do you react to that clip? | ||
And what would you encourage the war room to do to take action on this? | ||
Because this is the biggest conspiracy in American history that I know of. | ||
I can't think of anything greater coming from potentially two presidents of the United States on down through all the intelligence agencies. | ||
Our institutions have been shattered. | ||
And so, Sam, take it from there. | ||
Thanks for being with us. | ||
Well, thanks for having me. | ||
I'm smiling and laughing on my end, not because there's anything funny about this, but because, you know, as a CIA guy, I got used to being lied to. | ||
But what always drives me crazy is when people tell me stupid lies. | ||
And listening to Scarborough, I'm like, for the love of God, buddy, did they surgically remove your integrity? | ||
What's happening here? | ||
Yeah. | ||
Let's grab three things. | ||
I mean, there's a lot of them. | ||
One, and I get it that people, this has been going on for so many years and there's so much disinformation, it's hard to sort out. | ||
So three things. | ||
First of all, the whole Russia gate nonsense, the whole is, was a lie, was a deliberate lie from the beginning. | ||
The whole idea that Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump were in bed together and the Russians were supporting him and all of that was a lie. | ||
So it was not, this is not a question of negligence, incompetence. | ||
Somebody wasn't doing their job just right. | ||
They believed questionable information. | ||
A dossier was created by a guy who was hired indirectly, but hired by Hillary Clinton's campaign via her law firm. | ||
So Hillary Clinton commissioned a completely bogus dossier investigation, let's use that term very broadly, to create a complete fiction. | ||
This is trash. | ||
It always was trash. | ||
In the normal course of business, the Central Intelligence Agency and the FBI would have never looked at this, would have never given it credence. | ||
The sourcing was non-existent. | ||
And the obvious motivation, the political motivation, just reeked of this. | ||
So nobody unintentionally, through negligence, through bad practice, ran with this. | ||
It was deliberate. | ||
It was a conspiracy from day one for the specific purpose of throwing impacting a presidential election. | ||
Second, laptop. | ||
Yeah, and first, hey, Sam, on that one? | ||
Yes, sir. | ||
On that first point, just let us know, because we're not experts in the CIA and this analysis and all this processes they use. | ||
How far down did this go? | ||
Was this just a few people at the top of the CIA, you know, that kind of by analogy, the FBI and whoever else, the intelligence agencies? | ||
Or did this go, was there awareness going down the ranks a bit? | ||
Well, it had to be awareness going down the ranks a bit. | ||
What's the exact number? | ||
I don't know. | ||
Does that mean the entire organization was in on it? | ||
Not what I'm saying. | ||
But you're not going to find that two people at the top did all this all by themselves. | ||
That's not the way this, that's not the way this functioned. | ||
And that will, I think, be to the benefit of people like Tulsi Gabbard and now the DOJ, because what you'll find is that there are, I don't know, a couple of dozen folks anyway who were on the inside of this, and some of them will now realize what they were on the inside of, and it'll be time to jump ship, right? | ||
Which is what you need to prosecute this. | ||
The second thing I would say, you know, in terms of receipts, the laptop. | ||
This entire supposed controversy, is the thing real or not? | ||
Again, there was never any controversy. | ||
I looked at the thing very, very early on at Steve's request. | ||
It was apparent to me within five minutes the thing was legit. | ||
And there are a million reasons for that, but it would have been impossible to fabricate and have it stand up to scrutiny. | ||
But we also know the Bureau contacted Apple almost immediately and confirmed the laptop was Hunter's. | ||
And they also confirmed that it was being backed up to the cloud, as is normal. | ||
And therefore, they confirmed that the contents were legit. | ||
So they weren't confirming just that the hardware as originally sold, was sold to Hunter. | ||
They confirmed that, yeah, that's everything on there is what he has been backing up, obviously automatically, for however long he'd had the laptop. | ||
So again, there was never the entire idea that there was a question about this, that the Russians that created it, was again a fabrication, whole cloth. | ||
And all the people at the top conducting the investigation or looking at this knew that. | ||
So again, a complete, absolute lie. | ||
They knew there was never any question the laptop is real. | ||
Third thing I would highlight just to grab the picture. | ||
Hey, Sam, let me hold right there. | ||
We got 30 seconds to break. | ||
Sam Fattis, two down, one to go, right? | ||
The Steel dossier, Hillary campaign goes through our intelligence agencies. | ||
Second, the laptop. | ||
Absolutely 100% confirmed evidence. | ||
So, you know, NBC, MSNBC, if you're watching, there's two receipts. | ||
The third one to come with the great Sam Fattis. | ||
Stay tuned to the war room, and we're going to cover it all today. | ||
Breaking news, huge. | ||
Stay tuned to the war room. | ||
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | |
All right, Dave Bratt, back in the war room with a great Sam Fattis, CIA operative analyst. | ||
Very lucky to have people of this caliber with us in the war room, along with the Oxford Don, Stephen K. Bannon, who's a master across all these areas as well. | ||
And so put these to memory, folks. | ||
Sam just laid out the first two big points. | ||
The third, Pam Bondi yesterday directed the Justice Department to grand jury investigations of the Obama administration. | ||
Brennan Clapper Comey put that to memory, write articles on this stuff. | ||
The average person still is not aware of any of this, unfortunately. | ||
This is a fairly sophisticated, high-level analysis that the war room posse gets, but most people don't. | ||
And so it doesn't do any good to go yell at everybody. | ||
Just explain these facts, share them in a factual way. | ||
And so, Sam, you let us through the first two big receipts that we have, the Steel dossier, and then secondly, laptop, the Biden laptop that goes along with the money to the big man. | ||
And what's the third receipt the folks in the war room can share with friends and neighbors? | ||
So look, I looked at the laptop very early on, given unfettered access to it. | ||
I had a copy of the hard drive for a very long time and spent way more time than I would have liked going through it. | ||
What do you learn when you look at the laptop? | ||
Hunter can't find his trousers on a good day. | ||
Hunter eats Viagra like peanuts and he snorts Coke by the kilo. | ||
But more to the point, what do you see? | ||
You see that the Biden crime family was taking millions and millions of dollars from pretty much every thug on the planet. | ||
But beyond everything, above everything, they took more money from the Chinese than anybody else. | ||
And not just from the Chinese, from individuals who were Chinese intelligence officers, Chinese spies. | ||
Best estimate I've seen, $31 million. | ||
Okay, spies don't give you money because they like you, and they don't give you money because they hope you might think kindly of them. | ||
It is a hard business. | ||
When you take tens of millions of dollars from Chinese intelligence officers, obviously something is coming back the other way. | ||
So back to the issue of the laptop and covering it up. | ||
American counterintelligence and intelligence officers see this laptop. | ||
They know it is real almost immediately. | ||
And they can see all that same data, which means we had a guy at that point running for president of the United States, compromised by owned by Chinese intelligence potentially. | ||
And their decision was not to turn on the red lights, sound the siren, and immediately dive into this. | ||
It was to cover the whole thing up and tell the American people nothing to see here. | ||
Greatest counterintelligence threat potentially in our history. | ||
And they just walked on and buried the thing. | ||
Yep. | ||
Point three, Sam. | ||
Point three is American counterintelligence decided to bury the fact that we were looking at a real Manchurian candidate in Joe Biden. | ||
Wow. | ||
Wow. | ||
Unbelievable. | ||
Now, you know, the war room, we get depressed with this kind of news. | ||
Are our institutions recoverable? | ||
And what, you know, in a minute or so, how do we recover trust in these institutions. | ||
What would you recommend? | ||
What do we need? | ||
We need accountability, which is what everybody in MEGA asks for all day, every day, right? | ||
You can't charge John Brennan with perjury, which, you know, a misdemeanor charge, give him a traffic ticket. | ||
People have to be charged, tried, convicted, go to prison for felony-level offenses. | ||
We need to, this was an ongoing conspiracy and an attempted coup, and it has to be dealt with as such. | ||
Yep, outstanding. | ||
Sam, how do people follow you and get the points you just made? | ||
Stuff receipts we can share with each other, with the press, et cetera. | ||
Go to And Magazine on Substack, AND Magazine.substack.com, and look. | ||
You can search there, and you can see that we've been writing about all of these issues for several years now. | ||
So, and everything we write has references, embedded links. | ||
I'm not asking you to take it on faith. | ||
Do your own research. | ||
Follow it up. | ||
unidentified
|
Right. | |
Right. | ||
Very good. | ||
Thank you. | ||
Thank you, Sam, for being with us and for your life's work and for what you're doing with the war room. | ||
God bless you. | ||
All right. | ||
Now we're turning over to Texas redistricting. | ||
We have Chaplain Rich Stoglin with us. | ||
We're going to do a cold open with the pastor, and then we'll get to him. | ||
Texas House is expected to come back about 1 o'clock Central time, 2 o'clock Eastern time. | ||
When they gabbled in yesterday, that's when it was official that the Democrats had broken the quorum here by fleeing the state. | ||
We expect that to continue today. | ||
We are about halfway through this 30-day special legislative session, about two weeks left in it, so they would have to stay away to at least kill the redistricting bill during this session. | ||
But a reminder that the governor here in Texas can simply call another special session, put the redistricting bill back on that schedule, and that all of this would start all over again. | ||
That's why there's so many questions swirling around whether or not and how long the Democrats are willing to stay away from the state to block this measure. | ||
But what is interesting is you talk about there in the lead-in that, you know, one of the things that we heard from Democrats over and over in the days leading up to them leaving the state is that what they hoped would happen is that this would ratchet up pressure, intensify pressure on other states and spread the word about what is happening here in Texas and that other states, in Democratic states, would follow suit. | ||
And that was one of the things that several Democrats had told us leading up to yesterday's quorum break, that they had hoped to see that that would be one of their goals in leaving the state and trying to all right that's great. | ||
We got Chaplain Rich Stoglin with us. | ||
Rich, we got a minute on this side of the break. | ||
And so give us your initial reaction. | ||
What's the latest news breaking and what are you guys doing down there in Texas? | ||
The great state of Texas deserves redistricting the precincts, all of these districts that these people claim that they care so much about. | ||
They're horrible. | ||
They're terrible. | ||
And we've got to make changes. | ||
Time is now. | ||
Very good. | ||
Hey, Chaplain, we're going to go to Representative Harrison as well with you after the break. | ||
How do people get you in 20 seconds? | ||
Rickstogland at yahoo.com. | ||
All right. | ||
Very good. | ||
Look up the chaplain. | ||
We're going to be right back with the chaplain and then Representative Harrison from Texas to bring us up to date. | ||
This is crucially important for the Trump agenda, for Trump policy to take place. | ||
So stay with the war room. | ||
Texas should be a no-brainer, right? | ||
Trump wins it by 14%, and we're having issues in Texas. | ||
No good. | ||
Stay tuned. |