July 24, 2025 - Bannon's War Room
48:52
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| President Trump's direction and with the support and coordination of the House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rick Crawford, today we've released a declassified oversight majority staff report that was produced in September of 2020. | ||
| The stunning revelations that we are releasing today should be of concern to every American. | ||
| This is not about Democrats or Republicans. | ||
| This has to do with the integrity of our Democratic Republic and American voters having faith that the votes cast will count. | ||
| There is irrefutable evidence that detail how President Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false. | ||
| They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help President Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true. | ||
| It wasn't. | ||
| The report that we released today shows in great detail how they carried this out. | ||
| They manufactured findings from shoddy sources. | ||
| They suppressed evidence and credible intelligence that disproved their false claims. | ||
| They disobeyed traditional tradecraft intelligence community standards and withheld the truth from the American people. | ||
| In doing so, they conspired to subvert the will of the American people who elected Donald Trump in that election in November of 2016. | ||
| They worked with their partners in the media to promote this lie, ultimately to undermine the legitimacy of President Trump and launching what would be a years-long coup against him and his administration. | ||
| We're here today because the American people deserve the truth, they deserve accountability, and they deserve justice. | ||
| The report goes into great detail about the information that Russia and Putin had on Hillary Clinton, which included possible criminal acts, like secret meetings with multiple named U.S. religious organizations in which State Department officials offered, in exchange for supporting Secretary Clinton's campaign for the presidency, significant increases in financing from the State Department. | ||
| They also had documents that showed the patronage of the State Department to State Department employees who would go and support Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign. | ||
| There were high-level DNC emails that detailed evidence of Hillary's, quote, psycho-emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness, and that then Secretary Clinton was allegedly on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers. | ||
| Then CIA Director Brennan and the intelligence community mischaracterized intelligence and relied on dubious substandard sources to create a contrived false narrative that Putin developed a quote-unquote clear preference for Trump. | ||
| The implications of this are far-reaching and have to do with the integrity of our Democratic Republic. | ||
| It has to do with an outgoing president taking action to manufacture intelligence to undermine and usurp the will of the American people in that election and launch what would be a years-long coup against the incoming President of the United States, Donald Trump. | ||
| I think this is a huge stress test for Trump and his coalition, which, you know, it's not all of MAGA, but it is Stuart Rhodes, it is Stephen Bannon, it is Michael Flynn, it is a certain significant portion of his base that is animated by this notion that the deep state and the dismantling of the deep state are job number one for Donald Trump. | ||
| It's bigger than any tariff war or any social safety net program or even maybe immigration. | ||
| For them, this is the animating sort of factor in their support for Trump. | ||
| And it's why Stuart Rhodes said Donald Trump's life was spared during the assassination attempts. | ||
| He was here to dismantle this elite cabal and open back up our democracy, right? | ||
| I'm paraphrasing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Do you believe that any of this new information implicates former President Obama in criminal behavior? | |
| We have referred and will continue to refer all of these documents to the Department of Justice and the FBI to investigate the criminal implications of this. | ||
| For even President Obama? | ||
| Correct. | ||
| The evidence that we have found and that we have released directly point to President Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment. | ||
| There are multiple pieces of evidence and intelligence that confirm that fact. | ||
| I think the underlying point there is that we understand from intelligence what Russia said that they had. | ||
| And the important point here is that if they were trying to influence the election, as President Obama and James Clapper and John Brennan, everybody said they were doing in order to support Donald Trump's election, they would have released the most damning of that information, some of which I detailed here. | ||
| You'll find the rest in the report, prior to the election to help Donald Trump win. | ||
| They specifically withheld what they had on her, the most damning information, because they thought that she would win the election. | ||
| They had plans to release it just prior to her inauguration to, again, so discord and chaos in America. | ||
| A spokesperson for former President Obama said in a statement earlier this week, quote, nothing in the documents issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 election but did not successfully manipulate any votes. | ||
| How do you respond to critics like former President Obama and also others on the Hill who say that the administration is conflating apples and oranges here, conflating allegations of actual hacking of voter machines and allegations of interference generally? | ||
| I think it's a disservice to the American people that former President Obama's office and others who are criticizing the transparency that is being delivered by releasing these documents. | ||
| They are doing a disservice to the American people and trying to deflect away from their culpability in what is a historic scandal and negative action towards the American people and our Democratic Republic. | ||
| The answer to that statement can very clearly be found throughout all of the documents that we have released. | ||
| Again, showing that Russia has took action to try to sow discord in the election, but showed no preference for or against any singular candidate. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Maybe either for you or Caroline, The President said yesterday that Obama committed treason. | |
| Do you or the White House believe that the Supreme Court's immunity decision protects Obama from prosecution? | ||
| Look, I can speak to the President's feelings on this matter. | ||
| He spoke to all of you yesterday in the Oval Office, but I also spoke to him about this this morning. | ||
| And he wants to see all those who perpetuated this fraud against our country, who betrayed our country and the Constitution, to be thoroughly investigated and held accountable. | ||
| And it's been 10 years of this. | ||
| And I would just add, based on everything the director has said and declassified, all of you in this room should go through it and take a look at this report and review the intelligence because unfortunately that hasn't happened. | ||
| And many of the people who perpetuated this hoax, Clapper, Andy McCabe, James Comey, and many others have been hired by major networks in this room to go on television and continue to spew these lies knowing that they are lies. | ||
| And if you all recall, just flashback to 2016 and the years after, the entire Trump won presidency was embroiled in this scandal that was perpetuated by the Democrat Party. | ||
| And you had major Democrat Party officials in this city, namely Adam Schiff, Hillary Clinton, Elizabeth Warren, who went on television and told the American people, Donald Trump is an asset of Russia. | ||
| It was a lie. | ||
| They always knew it. | ||
| Hillary Clinton herself said that President Trump would be a puppet for Putin. | ||
| Senator Tim Kaine at the time called President Trump Vladimir Putin's defense lawyer. | ||
| Adam Schiff stated, and one of the worst things a lawmaker can do is to tell the American people, I know something you don't know. | ||
| It's just classified and I can't tell you. | ||
| And that's what he said. | ||
| I can tell you that the case is more than that. | ||
| I can't go into the particulars, but there's more than circumstantial evidence now. | ||
| And not enough people in this room, not enough journalists in this country pushed Adam Schiff to say, what are you talking about? | ||
| What evidence do you have? | ||
| Everybody just ran with the lies and it led to impeachments. | ||
| It led to the division of our country. | ||
| Unfortunately, so many Americans from listening to outlets in this room believed in these lies. | ||
| And it's a complete scam and it's a scandal. | ||
| And the president wants to see accountability for that. | ||
| This is their cause, the deep state. | ||
| And Steve Bannon said, look, it's not that he's going to lose. | ||
| It's not that Trump could lose his entire coalition in the course of this Epstein saga. | ||
| It's just that he could lose 10 to 15 percent. | ||
| And that's enough to lose the House and that's enough to lose Congress in 2026 and the presidency in 2028. | ||
| And I think that's real math. | ||
| To me, what's really interesting in why all of this might matter months and years from now is I think we're seeing in real time that the very movement that Trump created in some ways is bigger than him. | ||
| And it's now a little different than him. | ||
| They really bought into MAGA. | ||
| Like Steve Bannon wasn't joking. | ||
| These people really believe in the things that they talked about. | ||
| They believe in these conspiracy theories. | ||
| They believe in the deep state. | ||
| And they believe that Donald Trump has an obligation to them and to the movement and to the people who voted him into office to stick with it. | ||
| And I think that's where the frustration is on Epstein. | ||
| You look at the polls. | ||
| It's the first issue I can think of where you see Republicans legitimately divided, almost 50-50, where Republican, his base, which is usually with him 90 to 95% of the time on most topics, is really troubled by this and they want all of the records to be released. | ||
| First on Secretary Rubio, he put out a statement in 2020 following that Senate Intelligence Committee report. | ||
| And he said, what they found is troubling. | ||
| We found irrefutable evidence of Russia meddling, which the director of national intelligence just confirmed for all of you that Russia was trying to sow distrust and chaos. | ||
| But what's the outrage in this that Secretary Rubio did not say at the time, the Democrats were saying at the time, is the fact that the intelligence community was concocting this narrative that the president colluded with the Russians, that the president's son was holding secret meetings with the Russians, all of these lies that were never true. | ||
| And he also said at that time, we discovered deeply troubling actions taken by the FBI under Comey, particularly their acceptance and willingness to rely on the steel dossier without verifying its methodology or sourcing. | ||
| The steel dossier that many outlets in this room ran as the gospel truth, and it was cooked up and paid for by the Clinton campaign. | ||
| As for your second question, Caitlin, I think, who is saying that, that she would release this to try to boost her standing with the president? | ||
| Who has said that? | ||
| Well, the president has publicly undermined her when it came to Iran. | ||
| He said she was wrong. | ||
| He told me that she didn't know what she was talking about. | ||
| That was on Air Force One on camera. | ||
| The only people who are suggesting that the Director of National Intelligence would release evidence to try to boost her standing with the president are the people in this room who constantly try to sow distrust and chaos amongst the president's cabinet. | ||
| And it is not working. | ||
| I will just answer your question directly. | ||
| I am with the president of the United States every day. | ||
| He has the utmost confidence in Director Gabbard. | ||
| He always has. | ||
| He continues to. | ||
| And that is true of his entire cabinet, who is all working as one team to deliver on the promises this president made. | ||
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
| Pray for our enemies, because we're going medieval on this people. | ||
| You're going to not get a free shot at all these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you've tried to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big line? | ||
| MAGA Media. | ||
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
| Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | ||
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Waru, here's your host, Stephen K. Baff. | |
| Thursday, 24 July, Year of Our Lord 2025. | ||
| Last night we did the AI conference and couldn't get to the entirety. | ||
| We had Ian Trottier with the new book on Brennan. | ||
| He's the Brennan expert. | ||
| We had Colonel Derek Harvey, who's an expert on all of it. | ||
| Colonel Harvey's going to be with us. | ||
| We're going to go through this in detail. | ||
| Later in the show, we're going to pick up a live stream of Jack Pasovic and General Flynn over to the security conference. | ||
| I think at 11.30. | ||
| We're planning on doing that, so we'll pick that up and they'll have a lot to discuss about this situation. | ||
| Right there, you saw the seriousness of the charges. | ||
| Of course, the engine room's already noted, you know, it's a lot of this about optics and about style, about the way you present. | ||
| This is why it's so important for the president to kick this off in the Oval Office in front of a head of state, very important ally in the Philippines and on global television, as all those pressors are. | ||
| Tulsi Gabbard, I think it's very important for Tulsi every couple of days to go back to the White House press briefing room because it's a forcing function. | ||
| They're forced to cover it. | ||
| And the engine room did not miss on the optics of it. | ||
| Right there, she looked like a commanding field commander, right? | ||
| Unflappable, just laying out the facts. | ||
| No brag, just fact. | ||
| And it had that, she was in the white like General Washington. | ||
| Absolutely perfecto. | ||
| And Caroline Levitt, so proud that Caroline got her start on this show years ago when she was running in a very tough primary up in New Hampshire. | ||
| Look at her arc. | ||
| Look at her learning curve. | ||
| Just a total hammer. | ||
| That piece where she rips the face off the media in the room and says, you guys have for years paid people that are still contributors and making big money to go on TV knowing what the facts were and lie. | ||
| The lawsuits here, I'm telling you, we've got to bring this together. | ||
| You've got to stick the landing. | ||
| It's all there in front of us, and it's up to us to do it. | ||
| John Solomon's on here yesterday. | ||
| What did John Solomon tell you? | ||
| I think they're going to announce a federal task force to get on top of this, the best, the best, to get all the information, get it up there quickly, and start getting some indictments. | ||
| Guess what happened last night? | ||
| Wait for Federal Task Force announce that they're putting this together. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| Colonel Harvey, John Solomon, Jack Posobiec, General Flynn, everybody here in the war room. | ||
| Because Voice Family, are you on Getter yet? | ||
|
unidentified
|
No. | |
| What are you waiting for? | ||
| It's free. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's uncensored. | |
| And it's where all the biggest voices in conservative media are speaking out. | ||
| Download the Getter app right now. | ||
| It's totally free. | ||
| It's where I put up exclusively all of my content. | ||
| 24 hours a day. | ||
| You want to know what Steve Bannon's thinking? | ||
| Go together. | ||
| That's right. | ||
| You can follow all of your favorites. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Steve Bannon, Charlie Kirk, Jack Posobiec, And so many more. | |
| Download the getter app now. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sign up for free and be part of the movement. | |
| Okay, welcome back. | ||
| So much to get to. | ||
| Artificial intelligence, rescissions, economy. | ||
| The president, guess what? | ||
| The president of these United States is going to go over to the Federal Reserve today to do a building inspection. | ||
| Might have a chat with a couple of people over there. | ||
| The Versailles on Connecticut Avenue, $2.5 billion. | ||
| I didn't actually realize how big it was until I went by it the other day. | ||
| I think they field stripped the building. | ||
| Now, the San Luis asbestos, I don't know. | ||
| The whole thing's so convoluted. | ||
| And the problem is not the building, but the building may be a solution to a problem. | ||
| Who knows? | ||
| President's going to go over there. | ||
| We will cover that. | ||
| I think he's going over at 4 o'clock. | ||
| Rav will cover it. | ||
| We'll pick it up at 5. | ||
| I'm trying to get David Malpass here tomorrow. | ||
| Haven't been confirmed. | ||
| I'm trying to book Malpass remark with Philip Patrick. | ||
| Talk about everything going on at the Fed and how it impacts your life. | ||
| Then on Saturday, Judy Shelton, who is at the Fed under President Trump, is one of the most brilliant Fed watchers will be here on Saturday. | ||
| So and Philip Patrick Mar. | ||
| We'll figure all this out. | ||
| A lot going on. | ||
| Todd Blanche, I think Todd Blanche is in route. | ||
| He's the deputy attorney general. | ||
| Trump's lawyer, former lawyer. | ||
| He and Emil Bove were the two guns that Boris got in harness and powered through all these problems for President Trump in those very dark years of 21, 22, 23, and 24. | ||
| He's en route, I think, to the prison in Tallahassee. | ||
| He's going to actually sit down and talk with Maxwell today. | ||
| And the House is getting out of town today, but they have they're sending out subpoenas to the Clintons, and they've subpoenaed her, I think. | ||
| And they're looking at testimony, a deposition. | ||
| Maybe not testimony, a deposition on, in fact, I think the deposition is going to be in the prison in Florida. | ||
| So deposition on 11 August. | ||
| Because the House will be gone. | ||
| So this will all come back. | ||
| But big movements on the Epstein situation. | ||
| Of course, the judge turned down the releasing of the grand jury testimony. | ||
| I think they've got to go back and be more specific. | ||
| What actual sections do you want? | ||
| What's going to be redacted? | ||
| And how do you cover for the victims? | ||
| So more on that. | ||
| But Todd Blanche. | ||
| Todd Blanche, obviously now in charge of this over at DOJ. | ||
| And I think that is a good thing. | ||
| Todd Blanche is a no-BS, let's get to the facts kind of guy. | ||
| So you'll see some action. | ||
| Also, with Tulsi, Derek Harvey joins me. | ||
| This should be passed. | ||
| Tulsi and these guys, remember, Derek, Colonel Harvey, there are dozens, if not hundreds, of whistleblowers coming out of the woodwork now, as you can imagine, in the intelligence community and other places that have for years wanted to talk but didn't know, quite frankly, it was anybody to talk to. | ||
| Now they realize with Tulsi throwing down hard that they're coming forward and it's time for, we had John Salmon on here yesterday. | ||
| He said there's going to be a federal task force of FBI and DOJ and across the apparatus to get on top of this. | ||
| They announced last night that that's going to happen, but we need to expedite this because you can see the mainstream media coming in for try to chop block Tulsi. | ||
| Give me your assessment of what you heard yesterday. | ||
| We had you on five, but we didn't get time to really get into it because of the AI conference. | ||
| What's your assessment of what you heard from the White House press briefing room, of which I think Tulsi ought to be there every two or three days to throw down and force the media to cover it? | ||
| What's your assessment of what you heard yesterday, sir? | ||
| I and I, Tulsi Gabbard, laid out the case brilliantly yesterday, and Carolyn piled on. | ||
| It was very clear that, you know, what Carolyn, when she went after CNN and MSNBC and others, because they are either too lazy or ideologically in the tank, you know, and we are refusing to actually read, I think, you know, these reports, | ||
| the, you know, intelligence community assessment analysis that was chartered by, you know, Congressman Devin Nunes, the CIA note that was put out on 26 June by John Radcliffe that laid out a good case against Brennan and this ICA, the Russian hoax material and other things. | ||
| It was brilliantly laid out by Tulsi, but there's tremendous amounts of material. | ||
| If people will just read it, it's factual, it's truthful, and they're just denying the truth and the facts when they question these things. | ||
| Secondly, there's going to be more coming out because the roadmap is there. | ||
| There's been a lot of work done. | ||
| Durham has got classified annexes. | ||
| For example, one annex that's on the Hillary intelligence plan to link Putin to Trump. | ||
| That needs to be declassified. | ||
| The one on the steel dossier needs to be declassified. | ||
| There are classified annexes from the Inspector General's report into misdeeds with FISA and how that played into the steel dossier and the like. | ||
| So there's a lot that still needs to come out, and there's tremendous amounts of material that's already available to the strike force, but we were never able to get access to individuals in DOJ and FBI, Cash Patel and others will tell you this. | ||
| We were stonewalled by our own DOJ and our own FBI, and over at the CIA by Director Pompeo and then later Gina Haspel with being able to access the people we needed to to depose. | ||
| The coaching tree here, I want to go back so people know the connections here. | ||
| On the House intelligence, when Nunez ran, and Nunez ran it, quite frankly, because Mike Pompeo was promoted off there and went to CIA, which was not the best. | ||
| So Pompeo went to CIA because he had been in House Intel. | ||
| Nunez, Devin, took over. | ||
| Cash Patel, I believe, was the general counsel because the Republicans controlled it because we controlled the House. | ||
| You were chief investigator or chief of staff? | ||
| Chief of Investigations and Director of Analytical Integrity Issues for the IC. | ||
| And so you guys, I want to go back to the war that was already in the intelligence community at the time between the deep state and really the forces that were enervated by President Trump actually winning and coming and say, we're going to clean this mess up. | ||
| Walk our people, when you say deep state, how do they roll? | ||
| And how can they actually be part of a government if you have politicals come in and they're supposed to be able to direct these people? | ||
| Because now we're hearing, you know, you're going to release background information from House Intel. | ||
| You got all these other reports that are classified that haven't been declassified. | ||
| They're going to be declassified now so people can read them. | ||
| They're going to be shocked. | ||
| I mean, how does all this happen, Colonel Harvey? | ||
| Well, if you take a look at the list of people that were just even over at the meeting on 9 December when they met with the ICA on December of 2016, it's a list of who's who, but they're mostly professional career people. | ||
| If you look at Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Sally Yates, and so many others that were involved at CIA or at DNI, at the National Security Division and DOJ, these were career people who were like-minded with their political appointees that were supervising them. | ||
| And they had the same view, the same worldview. | ||
| And keep in mind, you know, Republicans aren't really seeking the careers in these fields and burrowing in like the Democrats successfully do. | ||
| And we're just not as good at that type of stuff. | ||
| And so they have a lot of like-minded people that continue to perpetuate themselves administration after administration. | ||
| This is what's so shocked. | ||
| And by the way, the White House put up last night a report from NBC News that we're going to put up here momentarily on Getter that's pretty shocking about NBC News at least has a headline about Tulsi Gabbard calling Obama, because they say a president, led a treasonous conspiracy. | ||
| That is the fact. | ||
| That's the information that's out there. | ||
| Now it's going to be the FBI with a, I hope, a relatively rapid investigation and DOJ with actually bringing charges can bring this to a head. | ||
| But the stakes cannot be higher. | ||
| They just couldn't be higher. | ||
| And if we fail to deliver, if we fail to stick the landing, this is going to have massive repercussions because you're not going to be able to take, we've got the weapons right now for us. | ||
| We have a process, right? | ||
| We have the weapons. | ||
| We announced the strike force last night. | ||
| The administration announced the strike force to pull it all together. | ||
| You have both the material, and now you're seeing a beginning of a process come together that you can actually see how this thing develops. | ||
| Now, it's going to be massive, you know, pushback, not just pushback. | ||
| They're going to try to chop block us every way, set traps for us, blow people up, clean more mines all over the place, right? | ||
| It's going to be tough. | ||
| What would your recommendation right now, Colonel Harvey, be to Tulsi and Joe Kent and that team over at DNI? | ||
| Continue to do what they're doing, which is going through the information that they have, the reports that have already been done, whether it's, you know, and some of these are not, you know, under their authority like the Durham report, that's DOJ, but work across the community to get information released and provide access to individuals and materials. | ||
| Keep in mind, this House intelligence report was locked up, and we couldn't get it released in September, October, or November in 2020 when we were trying to get it released. | ||
| So what they are going to need to do is continue to press forward. | ||
| Over at DOJ and FBI and on the Hill, there has to be the intensity, the energy, and resources committed. | ||
| People, people that are smart, that are curious, and are good investigators to pull this together along with some of the better legal minds to tie this together, put the puzzle together, and then lay out obstruction of government proceedings, seditious conspiracy, perjury, creation of false documents, FISA abuse, lay it all together. | ||
| Because when we look at this individually, Steve, just the ICA, that's bad enough. | ||
| But look at the human and signals, intelligence efforts to target the Trump campaign, the Trump transition, and then onward. | ||
| Look at what they did in targeting Michael Flynn and how they abused their authority, their legal authority. | ||
| Colonel Harvey, hang on for one second. | ||
| We're going to hold you over. | ||
| More to come. | ||
| Stick the landing, folks. | ||
| short break. | ||
| I think when they hear a comment like that. | ||
| You know, it is, it's terrifying. | ||
| It's frightening. | ||
| I have a lot of conversations with former colleagues, people who are or were in the intelligence and law enforcement community and may have worked in the Obama administration, other places. | ||
| And people are really trying to assess what is life going to be like if Donald Trump wins a second term. | ||
| And on a very personal level, I mean, these are torturous discussions with their family members about whether or not they have to leave the country to avoid being unconstitutionally and illegally detained. | ||
| I mean, people are actually worried about being thrown in jail or grabbed in some sort of extrajudicial detention. | ||
| And I think, you know, as crazy as this sounds in the United States of America, I think people should really consider that these are possibilities. | ||
| Listen to what the man says. | ||
| He typically does what he says, as crazy as it seems. | ||
| And that's really all the indicators you need. | ||
| When the director says that she's referred these filings to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, tonight we're told they formed what is called a strike force. | ||
| Do you have concerns that they will attempt to prosecute you? | ||
| Well, certainly I do. | ||
| You know, after eight and a half years of this, and I don't know of an intelligence product that was more scrutinized, more investigated than that product was by numerous people. | ||
| You know, it's very disconcerting. | ||
| It really is. | ||
| And I take seriously when the President of the United States accuses me of being a participant in a treasonous conspiracy, which is ridiculous. | ||
| Yeah, what's your reaction to that? | ||
| It's ridiculous. | ||
| It just is untrue. | ||
| So what will you do if they come after you? | ||
| What is your plan? | ||
| Well, I'll lawyer up, I suppose. | ||
| Already have. | ||
| You've already hired attorneys in case of an anticipation that this Trump Justice Dormant could try to prosecute you. | ||
| We've had sort of perpetual attorneys since I left the government in 2017. | ||
| We talked about this a couple of weeks ago, Steve, that Cash Patel opened an investigation in April inside the FBA. | ||
| It's a predicated criminal investigation that looks at everything from the clearing of Hillary Clinton to the start of Russia Gate to all the way through Jack Smith raiding Florida and the Biden White House sticking the National Archives and telling to get the FBI and Donald Trump in the classified documents case as one continuous criminal conspiracy, much like you would look at a drug cartel or an organized crime organization like the Mafia. | ||
| When the Justice Department starts an investigation like this, their first step is to name a federal strike force, to get a strike force of the best agents and prosecutors, have them work exclusively on this and develop the different overt acts. | ||
| What are the overt acts? | ||
| Is it the ordering of the crossfire hurricane? | ||
| Is it Obama knowing that it's a fake scandal and allowing it to go on? | ||
| Is it hijacking the ICA? | ||
| You go through that. | ||
| I think Pam Bondi's on the verge if she follows the Justice Department's normal predicate. | ||
| I got an open conspiracy case to name a federal strike force and to move this to the next level. | ||
| Just think about this. | ||
| That means the Obama administration and the Democrats and all of those who are involved in the weaponization are going to be treated just like the mob, just like a drug cartel. | ||
| They're going to be pursued by a federal strike force to determine whether their political conspiracy to get Trump rose to a criminal conspiracy. | ||
| I think that's the next step. | ||
| I would not be surprised based how far I know this investigation has evolved if that happens within the next week. | ||
| That will give us a sense that maybe for the first time, there's a serious effort to investigate this and to bring accountability all the way back from 16 all the way through 24. | ||
| That's what I'd be watching for. | ||
| And Shazam, guess what happened last night? | ||
| A federal task force was announced. | ||
| They're moving forward, a federal strike force. | ||
| I'm going to get to Solomon in a second. | ||
| I want to connect dots here with the first part of that cold open. | ||
| If you remember the cold open from the show, Caitlin Collins is always asking the edgy question like, hey, aren't you just doing this, Tulsi, because Trump lost confidence in you as DNI? | ||
| And, you know, he told me last week that he doesn't think you know anything and you're an idiot. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And you saw Caroline Levitt jump in there and start ripping her face off. | ||
| Caitlin Collins, put a pin in it. | ||
| Let's go back. | ||
| The first one was McCabe. | ||
| Yes, we're very worried if Trump wins because of what Trump is saying about investigations and about this treasonous conspiracy. | ||
| Folks, that was 8 June of 2024. | ||
| And what do you talk about? | ||
| We're already in discussions about leaving the country if Trump wins. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| The second one, Clapper, was wait for it last night where he says, hey, I've lawyered up. | ||
| These brothers know we're coming. | ||
| This is why I'm banging behind the scenes. | ||
| I'm saying, go grab their passports now. | ||
| The FBI should go to Obama, Hillary Clinton, all of them. | ||
| Take their passports. | ||
| You're going to see these rats heading down a rat line. | ||
| You heard McCabe, that is from over a year ago when President Trump was just talking about it in interviews Or going buck wild at these rallies and people digging it, saying we got to do this. | ||
| Well, now we're doing it. | ||
| And John Solomon said yesterday: hey, if this thing's real, the next phase you'll see in the development is a federal strike force to bring together the best of the best to actually hone this down and get real about what crimes are really committed, what's the information we've got, and how people are going to be charged. | ||
| And last night it was announced, John Solomon. | ||
| First off, John, I like your assessment of McCabe Clapper in Caitlin Collins' Sir. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Some of it looks a little bit like the Russian prov to TV, right? | ||
| Donald Trump's going to come in the dark of night without any basis and arrest me. | ||
| We know that's not going to happen. | ||
| And CNN has become going back to 2016 when they would not get off the Alpha Bank baloney story, which every investigation ever looked at. | ||
| It found it to be nothing but utter nonsense. | ||
| They peddled that, and now they're peddling that there's some secret Stasi police that's going to come and arrest the Obama people unwarranted. | ||
| What the Justice Department did last night is follow its normal rules. | ||
| There's an allegation made. | ||
| They stand up a strike force because it's a conspiracy, an enterprise organization they're potentially looking at. | ||
| They're following the rules. | ||
| Something that Andrew McCabe and the FBI didn't do back during the Clinton era, or during the Obama era. | ||
| They misled the FISA court. | ||
| They violated the normal norms of intelligence reporting and analysis. | ||
| They created an intelligence product predicated on a false document and did so knowingly over the objections of their intelligence experts. | ||
| That is the abnormal. | ||
| What happened last night with Pam Bondi is the normal. | ||
| But listen, CNN for most of the last 10 years is hardly recognizable from the CNN that when I first got in the profession started in the 80s and 90s. | ||
| So it doesn't surprise me. | ||
| And I understand why James Clapper lawyered up. | ||
| There are some serious issues to be resolved here, and he probably does need a lawyer. | ||
| John, walk people through, now that they've named that they're pulling this task force together, what will happen? | ||
| Walk us through what we can expect behind the scenes of what kind of work they're doing. | ||
| You said yesterday it's to focus down and get to real charges and see, you know, separate the wheat from the chaff, the speculation and the conspiracies versus hard fact that you can actually take to a grand jury and then get an indictment on, sir. | ||
| What the team will do is they'll bring in all the different skill sets. | ||
| I think the National Security Division will be brought in. | ||
| Ironically, that's the same division that pursued Donald Trump on the classified documents but took a dive on Joe Biden's classified documents. | ||
| I think that division will be brought in and then they will look for what they believe to be the overt acts of the conspiracy, the various actions that led to a criminal conspiracy. | ||
| Then they'll have to evaluate the statute. | ||
| Are there any in the current statutory limitations or any that the statute paused on because evidence was hidden from us for a long time so we can charge it even now? | ||
| They have to decide the venue. | ||
| Are they going to bring it in DC? | ||
| Are they going to bring it in Florida? | ||
| There'll be lots of work and then there'll be grand jury subpoenas. | ||
| There'll be significant interviews going on. | ||
| You'll look for your cooperating witnesses. | ||
| As I said yesterday, the strike force is a tool that was built during the pursuit of the mob, the mafia, the Irish mob, the Russian mobs. | ||
| And it has a very clear methodology on how they work. | ||
| And one of the things that they do is they roll up people on the low end of the scale early, and then they try to get them to turn on their bosses and get us the truth. | ||
| So if the ultimate targets are someone like a John Brennan or James Comey or Barack Obama, who's, by the way, not going to be indicted, anyone who thinks Barack Obama is going to be indicted, it's not going to happen. | ||
| President Trump's immunity victory last year in the Supreme Court is going to protect Barack Obama. | ||
| Barack Obama should send a thank you card to Donald Trump. | ||
| But you could imagine a scenario where they lay out a conspiracy and Barack Obama is named as an unindicted co-conspirator. | ||
| That would be one hell of a legacy for the 44th president. | ||
| But they'll roll up people and see what they know and can they roll up on the bigger guns who orchestrated this shenanigans, which now looks to be quite criminal when you look at what Tulsi Gabbard put out in the last few days. | ||
| I hope we have a brilliant young prosecutor in DOJ that'll come up with a workaround, but we'll put a pin in that, come up with a workaround, because I don't think we'll be happy unless there's an indictment of Obama. | ||
| One last thing. | ||
| You had the new House chair, Intel chair, Rick Crawford, on last night on your show. | ||
| His quote was, this is the greatest perpetuation. | ||
| Obama executed the greatest perpetuation of fraud against the American people in history, and he cannot plead ignorance in this case. | ||
| Talk to me about the House and the Senate side of this, sir. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Listen, the Senate side has always sneered at the Russia collusion thing. | ||
| You know, when Marco Rubio was in charge of the Senate Intelligence Committee, they bought a lot of the FBI's garbage. | ||
| It took John Durham to reverse that. | ||
| It took Michael Horowitz to reverse that. | ||
| So the Senate has always been a little bit asleep at the switch. | ||
| They've expressed some outrage, but not nearly as much. | ||
| The House has always been the leading edge of trying to get us the truth. | ||
| And I think today, what the House thought was the worst case scenario back in 18 and 19 when Devin Nunes wrote his first report, and then when Derek Harvey and Cash Patel wrote that second report released yesterday in 2020, I think it's a lot worse than even everyone imagined. | ||
| It just looks that it's much more serious a matter when you put all the disparate parts together. | ||
| And I think, you know, Rick Crawford's a member of the Gang of Eighties, one of the most powerful people in the United States. | ||
| He has the same access to intelligence as the president in the Speaker of the House. | ||
| And for him to say what he said on the show last night, he thought his words carefully. | ||
| He didn't say it off the cuff. | ||
| It wasn't a talking point that some political aide wrote for him. | ||
| He really believes that what you see in the intelligence community assess it, in the FISA abuses, in the things that succeeded them, like ignoring the China intelligence in 2020 or trying to make Donald Trump's classified documents worse than Joe Biden's, is a complete corruption of the system. | ||
| And the engineer-in-chief, the ignition point in 2016 is President Barack Obama. | ||
| He can't run from the evidence anymore. | ||
| And that evidence, we laid it out a couple times, but he's in the meeting with Brennan. | ||
| He knows that Hillary Clinton is making the fake Russia scandal. | ||
| He doesn't stop the FBI a few days later when they open up on the fake allegations. | ||
| In December, when Donald Trump pulls off 2016 and pulls off the unthinkable and he beats Hillary Clinton, he's about to get briefed that the Russians didn't have a preferred candidate. | ||
| He cancels that briefing and orders a new intelligence assessment so we can come to something different, which, by the way, is based on bad and false evidence. | ||
| And then in January, when he should be thinking about getting his presidential library together, he's presiding over a meeting to figure out how they can go after Mike Flynn after the FBI had cleared Mike Flynn of wrongdoing. | ||
| That is not a president doing his job. | ||
| That is a president doing what Congressman Crawford, the House Intelligence Committee, said. | ||
| It's a fraud, and he's at the forefront. | ||
| He attends key events. | ||
| Those are overt acts. | ||
| If this becomes a criminal conspiracy, some of those things we just mentioned are going to be the overt acts. | ||
| Now, do we know it's criminal yet? | ||
| We'll see. | ||
| But I think to have the House Intelligence Committee say that thoughtfully, not off the cuff, tells you how serious the people who know the evidence are taking it. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| Impressive. | ||
| John Solomon, where do people get on social media, all your content, and tell them about the 6 o'clock show? | ||
| Yeah, I get to follow you every day right here on Real America's Voice, Justin News, No Noise with the amazing Amanda Head. | ||
| Jay Solomon reports on all social platforms and the website, JustinNews.com. | ||
| And thanks, Steve. | ||
| You've put a lot of attention on this. | ||
| You've moved this dialogue forward. | ||
| I'm really grateful every time we get to talk. | ||
| You guys are doing all the heavy lifting. | ||
| I got the easy job. | ||
| Just schedule them, slot them in, and let's roll, baby. | ||
| John Solomon, thank you. | ||
| Investigative reporter. | ||
| The tip of the spear on this. | ||
| Solomon, Derek Harvey, this goes back. | ||
| These people have been fighting this thing for a decade, over a decade. | ||
| We've got to stick the landing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We must stick the landing. | |
| Derek Harvey on the other side. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We rejoice with the Lombard. | |
| Let's take down the DCP. | ||
| Use your hook. | ||
| Even Kay back. | ||
| Got to stick the landing. | ||
| That's our new mantra here. | ||
| Todd Blanche en route. | ||
| I guess he's going to, he's actually going to go to the prison and interview her. | ||
| So Maxwell, and if DOJ's down there, that has the feel of some deal's going to be cut. | ||
| Todd Blanche, the deputy, with everything on Todd Blanche's shoulders, he ain't down there to go see Pensacola or Tallahassee, I guess. | ||
| Tallanasty. | ||
| It's pretty serious. | ||
| Plus the House is going to depose her in Tallahassee at the prison on the 11th. | ||
| House has already announced on this situation, I guess they want Bill Clinton also. | ||
| So you've got two running trash. | ||
| You got the Epstein thing, you got the House, you've got the overall treasonless conspiracy. | ||
| Also, the House is very involved in that. | ||
| Derek Harvey, you were there. | ||
| You and Cash. | ||
| Coming from the coaching tree of Nunez, you guys were there in the House. | ||
| Man, are we glad that Crawford's there now, sir? | ||
| Thank, well, we're very thankful that he's there. | ||
| He replaced Congressman Mike Turner from Ohio, who was milquetoast and not a strong MAGA candidate who was willing to dig for the truth. | ||
| He partnered far too much with his ranking member Heinz, and he distanced himself from the investigations and Devin Nunes and tried to make nice with Adam Schiff and the crew. | ||
| And that's not the kind of leadership we needed. | ||
| Rick Crawford is a man of great character and a good leader, and he understands the stakes for our country. | ||
| He's from Arkansas, and we are very blessed to have him there, along with Cash and Bongino over at FBI, and Tulsi Gabbard and John Radcliffe, both at CIA and DNI, respectively. | ||
| We've got a good team in place. | ||
| Now they have to build the bench to go after this in the strike force, as John Solomon laid out earlier. | ||
| Would you anticipate, just given the information's out there, well, let's go back. | ||
| Why is the House, the report you and Cash Patel, now the director of the FBI, worked on that you wanted to come out in 2020 because it was ready, why did they block that? | ||
| Why was that blocked? | ||
| Did they feel that that would tilt the election more to Trump's hand? | ||
| Was it a political reason? | ||
| Was there actually security reasons, national security reasons around it? | ||
| Why is this thing being released now in the summer of 2024, excuse me, 2025 when you guys had it ready to go in 2020? | ||
| The CIA blocked it. | ||
| And you have to look at Gina Haspel and the leadership there because we didn't have control of the document. | ||
| It was produced, researched, and everything over at CIA headquarters. | ||
| And we were not allowed to take any notes or materials out of the vault. | ||
| We were supervised very closely. | ||
| John Radcliffe tried to get it out when he was DNI. | ||
| Got to remember, there was a lot going on at the time. | ||
| But you can tell right now, if you read the report, it was explosive about what was done in 2016 to frame Donald J. Trump and the linkage to Putin. | ||
| And there was damaging information in there about what was known and what was put on the cutting room floor, what the Russians did not use, negative information about Hillary Clinton and the like, more information about the intelligence plan of Clinton, the steele dossier. | ||
| And keep in mind, still a majority of people in this country believe significant parts of the Russian hoax that was propagated by CNN, MSNBC, Andrew Weissman, and the Mueller probe. | ||
| Unbelievable. | ||
| Colonel Harvey, where do people go? | ||
| And we're going to get you back on and we'll do a special where we break down that house intel report that's now out or the codicole that you guys worked on that they kept under wraps. | ||
| We'll break it down for the audience. | ||
| So we want this audience as smart as possible. | ||
| We've got to get everybody up the learning curve. | ||
| Where do people go for your social media, sir, and all your content? | ||
| DerekHarvey.org and then Derek Harvey at Truth Social and Colonel D. Harvey on X. Thank you, brother. | ||
| Appreciate you. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| We're going to have Natalie Dominguez on here, hopefully in the next hour. | ||
| If not now, in the next hour. | ||
| Now, we have. | ||
| Oh, my gosh, Natalie Dominguez. | ||
| Okay, Natalie Dominguez. | ||
| You've been a lifesaver. | ||
| People want to know about the $1 million triple lock protection. | ||
| Why is it important? | ||
| Why is it necessary? | ||
| Why should people be concerned about this little piece of paper called their title, which represents, I don't know, 80, 90% of their net worth, ma'am? | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. | ||
| Thanks so much for that introduction, Steve. | ||
| So as most of you know, when you see me, we kind of cover current news stories, and I think this is a perfect example of what you're asking for. | ||
| So last month, federal authorities announced that Michangelo Tillman, a 52-year-old from Philadelphia, was sentenced to six years in federal prison. | ||
| From 2015 through 2019, he orchestrated a deed theft scheme targeting at least five properties in the city, which he forged deeds to transfer the ownership of the properties to himself via false identities. | ||
| And one of these false identities was actually a deceased man who'd been deceased for three years, which we also covered in our last story. | ||
| The report notes on one of the cases, he had also alternated between using fake notary stamps that you can get online for 20 bucks and actually bribing notaries for notarization without identity checks for, get this, 50 bucks. | ||
| That's what the report says. | ||
| For $50, he was able to bribe a notary to not look at an ID and legally on paper, you know, help facilitate transferring this out of someone's name. | ||
| Anyhow, he filed the deeds with the Philadelphia Recorder of Deeds office and then would either proceed to rent out the homes or sell them to unsuspecting buyers. | ||
| And the report said that he also had co-conspirators that he would pay off with profits from the sales. | ||
| And we see this all the time, right? | ||
| Especially in the sales portion of things. | ||
| People that are pretending to be real estate agents, complicit notaries. | ||
| I remember earlier this year, there was a case from a Germantown that involved a notary that was accused of facilitating like two dozen homes or over two dozen homes. | ||
| And get this, despite the man's schemes that affected 11 homeowners, the city of Philadelphia has been noted saying that they also got cheated out of unpaid tax revenue. | ||
| Typical government, right? | ||
| You have homeowners whose homes have been stolen, rented out, their privacy violated, and the government's worried about tax revenue. | ||
| It's like Graceland all over again, right? | ||
| So the only way you, if you, they're not going to care about your title. | ||
| Only you can do it. | ||
| Where do they go for the $1 million triple lock protection? | ||
| Where do they go today to talk to you and the great team over at Home Title Occ, man? | ||
| HomeTitleOcc.com. | ||
| If you guys sign up, use promo code Steve. | ||
| You're going to get a free title history report. | ||
| We talk about these stories all the time. | ||
| If you want to know, find out today. | ||
| You don't got to go down to a county office. | ||
| We'll do it for you. | ||
| We'll cover it. | ||
| We'll talk to you about it. | ||
| HometitalOck.com, promo code Steve, and you're going to get a free trial of our million-dollar triple lock protection. | ||
| It's not only 24% non-frequent urgent alerts. | ||
| Yep, 24 urgent alerts, million dollars to back you and fight for you if you're a victim of fraud. | ||
| A restoration project. | ||
| Natalie Dominguez, hometitaloc.com, promo code Steve. | ||
| Talk to her today. | ||
| Thank you, ma'am. |
Export Selection