All Episodes
Previous Next
July 17, 2025 - Bannon's War Room
47:48
WarRoom Battleground EP 810: One Year Ago Today The Release Of Peter Navarro
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I think it's a shame.
I think it's a disgrace.
Peter Navarro went to prison for standing with President Trump.
They demanded that I break the law.
I refused.
Now he's telling all.
I went to prison so you won't have to.
It's his gripping true story of love, lawfare, and exposing corruption behind bars.
Stand with Peter.
Scan the QR code now or go to Amazon.com to order your copy.
I went to prison so you won't have to.
Peter Navarre joins us.
We're going to have David Bozell, Naomi Wolf, James Zirkle also in the remainder of this hour.
A lot going on.
There will not be, I don't think, will be a presser at 7 o'clock now at the Capitol regarding these threats, these assassination threats on MTG by an employee, Seth Jason, a voice of America, who has been arrested and indicted in Washington, D.C. Judge Janine, by the way, got voted out of committee today.
So did Emil Bovey, although there was a fracas about Boveys.
We'll get to all that in a little while.
Peter Navarro, why is, and look, you're beloved by this audience.
You were a co-host for years.
You preach the gospel of Trump, of meganomics.
Both your books were big bestsellers with this audience piling in.
This book is quite different, and we're in a different time.
I think it's ironic that, you know, a year after you spoke at the RNC, came out of prison and won the first time ever.
A guy comes out of prison, goes main stage, speaks at the RNC, and basically a year after the assassination attempt on President Trump, we're in this situation where it doesn't look like we're making a ton of progress of taking down of all the other accomplishments of the administration, and they are legion, particularly on the economic side.
It doesn't look like we're very far advanced in taking down the deep state.
So why should people buy this book and why should they buy it and read it now?
Steve, the title of the book, I think, says the answer to that question.
I went to prison so you won't have to.
There's a line at the end of the speech in Milwaukee.
And what I meant by that, Steve, is that the fact that I went to jail, that you went to jail for defending the Constitution, I think shone a very bright light to the American people on the fact that partisan Democrats were weaponizing our justice system in a way that threatens to take away the freedom,
not just of you and I and of President Trump, and he would be in jail right now if we had lost that election, but of everybody who stands up for what's right and good in America.
And so the book itself is a reminder of what can happen when you stand up for what is right.
It's a story.
It's many stories.
It's a story of what it's like to be in prison.
But it's also a story of the scandal, frankly, that I uncovered when I was inside.
I didn't go in and whine and hold my head into a pity party.
I rolled my sleeves up, found out that there was a failure, an abject failure of the Biden administration at a policy level to implement President Trump's First Step Act.
And I set about trying to fix that.
So this book has a lot of things going on in it, but ultimately it's a reminder, Steve, that you and I and President Trump and everybody watching this could wind up in prison if we let those people be in power.
And if we don't hold, this is the important thing, bury the lead, Steve.
And I often do that, unfortunately.
We've got to hold the people accountable for who put us in prison and who went after Donald Trump and tried to put him in prison.
You know the names.
It's Comey, Clapper, Page, Truck, Brennan.
It's Pelosi.
It's Benny Thompson.
It's Liz Cheney.
It's Biden himself, the J6.
It's all of that.
And we got to do that.
We can't do that.
And folks, and folks, understand if we don't do it now, we're going to rule the day because these people are going to come back and they only play hardball.
Peter, I want to have, I'm going to bifurcate this.
I want to have you back and maybe we'll get Jared on.
The great, I don't think people understand the brilliance of the First Step Act.
And you're absolutely correct.
The First Step Act President Trump got passed in, I think, 19, 20, 19, 20, was an incredible piece of legislation.
The Biden regime specifically did not put it into effect because of the political implications it would have for President Trump.
We'll do that on a separate day.
Only one economic question.
We play your clips when you're talking to all the big shots out there, which are great.
Does the price situation today prove the lie that the tariffs, which are, one, bringing jobs back, two, if they're not bringing jobs back, they're bringing the external revenue service has got over $100 billion?
Have we finally proven the lie that they're not going to raise prices substantially, sir?
Steve, we had five months now with Jerome Powell refusing to lower interest rates on the grounds that the tariffs were going to cause inflation.
We've had five months in a row where the inflation reports, CPI and PPI, have consistently below expectations.
We're in a deflationary mode.
Here's an interesting stat for you, Steve.
I don't know if you know this, but gas today at about $3 a gallon, when you adjust for inflation over the years, is at the lowest in terms of purchasing power it's been for any modern president.
It's that low, and it's down about 40% since we took office.
Eggs are down, I don't know, $2.50 a dozen.
And the CEA, the Council of Economic Advisors, just came up with a fascinating report showing that import prices are actually going down even as we gather $100 billion in money from the tariffs themselves.
So it's, look, the best thing here, Steve, is that the first term provide us with the receipts.
The same people who are saying the tariffs are going to be inflationary or cause a recession said it the first time around.
You can just do cold opens all day long with them from circa 2018, 2019.
It didn't happen.
Not going to happen this time either.
So Trump is the tariff king.
And he's like McKinley.
He's taking the tariff.
He loves McKinley.
He loves the T worker.
He's gone far beyond McKinley.
The T-Works.
Oh, hang on.
Go ahead.
Go ahead.
No, go ahead.
Peter, no one in the West Wing stays as monikily focused as staying in his lane.
I would talk to Peter and says, no, that's not my lane.
I'm staying in my lane.
I've noticed you've been going after, and I'm just throwing this out there for discussion in the chats.
I've noticed you've specifically been going, particularly been going after Too Late Powell, probably harder than President Trump.
Are you angling for the Fed chair?
Are you trying to steal a march on Kevin Warsh?
You couldn't give that.
You couldn't give that to me.
Should Hassett Warsh and Scott Bessett be worried that you're stealing your...
You're taking a lot of shots.
No, no, no.
Well, but here's what's the difference between me and everybody else besides Donald Trump with respect to taking shots at Jay Powell.
I've been doing this since 2018 and 2019.
And when Biden was in office, I was taking shots simply because, and you know, Steve, I delivered the receipts.
Look, three major policy errors in six years, which have cost this country billions and billions and billions of dollars in hardship.
So, no, who's the famous Roman general who went back with the plow, right?
You know who I'm talking about?
Cincinnatis.
Cincinnati.
I'm Cincinnatus, baby.
I got a plow waiting in Palm Beach for me with my beautiful fiancé, Bonnie.
As soon as I'm done with this, man, you ain't getting me back for anything, baby.
Okay.
You're going to be busy.
I might guest coast every once in a while in Palm Beach with the SI brothers there and all that stuff.
They're great, great folks.
Well, let's sell some books one more time.
Where do they go?
All right, one more time.
This is important.
You don't have to.
Where do they go?
Yeah, look at this cover.
And this is my beautiful girl here.
This is from when we were on the stage at the convention.
I went to prison, so you won't have to.
It's available on Amazon now.
We want to drive this thing right up to number one so that the New York Times can't deny us bestseller status.
It would prove that they can't censor us.
And Steve, I do have to thank you for your forward.
And it may well be better than anything that's in the book, but the book's pretty damn good.
Well, the forward came from the heart because you're like a brother to me.
And Bonnie's like a almost like a sister.
She's so great.
Peter, thank you for coming on.
I know it's tough to break away from the White House, but thank you.
And you can go back to work.
Thank you, brother.
Always a pleasure being with you, Steve.
Take care, brother.
Senior advisor to the President of the United States and his tariff advisor.
President Trump's getting these tariffs rolling, Peter, on manufacturing, as you know, for years here as a co-host.
Historic day all around.
Historic day.
We had Russ vote on to start the day, and I wanted to get David Bozell on here to kind of wrap it up.
David, here's the question.
Talk to us about, this has been a long, I don't know, 20, 30-year process that your group, Media Research Center, has focused on why we fund with taxpayer money a left-wing progressive news service that does nothing but go after conservatives, President Trump, the MAGA movement.
Finally, today, we got our comeuppance.
Why has it taken it so long, sir, and why is this so important?
Well, why has it taken it so long?
First and foremost, they've had Big Bird to rely on.
Up until HBO bought Big Bird about three or four years ago, every time Republicans got close, Steve, to getting this across the finish line, Big Bird and Elmo would show up in a congressional hearing, and no Republican ever wanted to have an ad in their district come reelection time saying, he voted to kill Big Bird.
So that was kind of the chief reason why this never got across the finish line.
But I just have to thank, take this form to thank President Trump for honoring his promise.
Every Republican nominee, every Republican president before him has pledged to do this to get rid of NPR and PBS.
He stuck to his guns.
He did it.
I wanted to mention Russ.
Man, Russ comes up with this idea for rescissions.
We've been trying to figure out when was the last time, I didn't even know what rescissions meant when I first heard this word in early spring.
It hasn't been used since 1972.
Score one for Conservative Incorporated.
Heritage helped out.
Americans Principal Projects with Terry, Center for Renewing America, Russ's Old Shop, Conservative Partnership Institute for America.
Everyone banded together to get rid of this thing.
This has been a 40-year quest to get rid of this taxpayer-funded propaganda.
I wished NPR and PBS the very best of luck in the open market.
I really, really do.
I hope they get everything that they can get to survive.
I have a funny feeling that they are not going to survive for too terribly long, particularly at their price point with all these assets.
I mean, they've got 11 studios, 11 studios in Washington, D.C. alone.
They have 42 studios in Alaska, 42 in the state of Alaska.
So we hope we're going to go push after it, getting rid of these assets and selling them off.
And so that's going to be an important deal for us.
But I was teasing my father, Brent.
All it took was for him to step down as president of Media Rest Research Center.
Then this came about two months later.
So, you know, if he had stepped down 38 years ago, we may have been here a lot sooner.
Your father's a great man, and he's been on this crusade a long time.
How do you answer today?
They threw up at the last second in the debate.
And we got to give a hat tip to all those organizations, and particularly Senator Eric Schmidt of Missouri that really went out of his way and stood up, I think, for 24 hours, beating back amendments.
How do you answer the question, well, this is terrible because now, you know, MAGA is all rural and these folks aren't going to get rural news.
You can't get rural news.
None of the rural communities are going to be serviced because NPR and PBS are not going to be out there in rural America.
Quite frankly, it's never an argument I've heard, but it's one they're throwing up.
Your response, sir.
Kerrville, Texas.
We did a deep dive into NPR's local affiliate down there in Kerrville, Texas as the floods were unfolding.
And this was a claim that NPR made in their closing argument.
They're the only ones that could provide an emergency beacon to a local rural community.
They were missing in action.
Kerrville, Texas, totally missing in action.
And in fact, Texas Public Broadcasting System had the audacity to put out on Facebook a plea for its followers to call their senators and congressmen to preserve their funding for the purposes of preserving their emergency broadcast system within the NPR apparatus.
They put out the social media post while the floods were beginning in earnest.
Okay.
And they were nowhere to be found.
In fact, Kerrville Police Department in Texas confirmed to the Media Research Center that they did every single, the spokesman down there, they did every single private radio show that they could get their hands on in and around Kerrville County.
You know who never called Kerrville Police for an interview?
KTXI, the NPR affiliate down there.
They were totally missing in action during an emergency in a rural setting.
So the argument never just didn't really fly.
Their local programming, and I know they like to say that they were the only bastion for local programming.
Only 5% of NPR's entire apparatus was devoted to local programming nationwide.
It's a total lie.
Most of all their programming was beamed out from Boston, New York, Philadelphia.
Yeah, which really plays the world communities.
David, your father was going to head up VOA and then the whole thing, the global media, then he's gone to be the ambassador to South Africa.
So Kerry's over there, and of course we had this situation today.
As we go forward, and Russ has said we're going to do more rescissions.
President Trump says, look, I want to get all this, you know, she's taken VOA down to its deck plates.
Media Research Center, where else are you guys going to be pointing that we should include in future rescissions packages, other wasteful media spending basically as left-wing media that taxpayers are paying for, sir?
Yeah, well, what the taxpayers are paying for, well, one of the things that we've got a really keen eye on, Steve, I want to look really deep in Apple News, Google News, Yahoo News, and Microsoft.
These are all outlets that are coming by default on our cell phones and devices nowadays.
And a lot of folks, particularly some of our seasoned audience, are looking at Apple News sort of by default.
I mean, they're not logging onto X and creating accounts.
They're not logging onto Instagram and creating accounts.
So these news entities that are basically, I mean, Google, for example, is getting a lot of its source material, especially in Gemini from Wikipedia of all things.
So Media Research Center is definitely going to take a look at this and make sure if we have to, if we need to do to Apple News what we've done to NBC and MSNBC and create that public backlash against their presentation, then we'll do it.
David, how do people get you on social media?
We know you guys got a lot going on.
And how did it get over to MRC?
Particularly, you got different venues.
You're putting up news all the time.
It's a great news page.
Where do people go?
Yeah, the MRC is the main X account.
Go to the MRC.org website, smash the donate button if you can.
Newsbusters.org is the news analysis operation.
Free Speech America is the grassroots division of the operation.
So those are the three main entities, MRC, Newsbusters, Free Speech America.
Your Newsbusters guys are great.
Always got first.
I got to tip my cap to Tim Graham, Brent Baker, Dan Schneider.
These guys have been working like dogs to get this across the finish line.
So kudos to all those guys.
Incredible team, including especially Dan Schneider.
Love that guy.
David, thank you so much for being on here, brother.
Thanks, brother.
Anytime, man.
Take it easy.
Yes, sir.
His father, one of the legends, has been after PBS and NBR for decade after decade.
Finally, President Trump comes up with a way.
And that fight was intense.
Eric Schmidt, the senator from Missouri, gets a real hat tip there.
But it was huge.
The Democrats knew if one got through, a bunch are going to get through, and they're back working on another rescissions package, even as we speak.
Naomi, and I want to make sure Grace and Mo put this up.
You wrote a fascinating piece.
I want you to lay it out.
Right now, even as you speak, there's a Donny Brook up on Capitol Hill because some Republicans are joining with Democrats to say, hey, we're going to have an amendment here or we're going to pass something that the House wants to basically release all the Epstein files.
So tell us about your article.
Sure.
And it does take kind of a minute or two to lay it out.
Well, basically, I felt the need to write this article showing a part of what may be kind of around this decision about releasing or not releasing the Epstein files based on what I knew to be true from previous years of my own life.
And it was triggered by an interview that Eric Weinstein, who's the Harvard-trained mathematician, who till 2022 was the managing director of Teal Capital, gave to a podcast.
It's been viewed 2.4 million times.
He gave it just a few days ago.
And in it, he was describing something that I'm very familiar with, and I will tell you in a minute why.
But what he was describing is a situation in which it's like another flank of the Epstein story, right, that has gotten very little attention.
But I think it's very important.
And he was describing a situation in which there was almost a lure set up at Harvard by Epstein.
Harvard kind of facilitated meetings between Epstein and many, many key professors, especially in mathematics and in the sciences, computational science, psychiatry, consciousness, and also gave Epstein an office in an institute, a mathematics institute that Epstein helped to fund.
Epstein gave Harvard $9 million.
And Weinstein, Eric Weinstein, was asking the question on his podcast, why did Epstein know about my work?
Who sent him to essentially follow me?
The other thing that Weinstein brought up, I knew to be true, which was kind of larger than just Harvard.
And what I know to be true, and so listening to Eric Weinstein felt very familiar and recognizable to me, very important.
Eric Weinstein was basically saying all of these leading intellectuals who were kind of caught in the Epstein web, right, innocent and guilty, we don't know.
But there was kind of a facilitation of contact with Epstein.
And all of these absolutely key intellectuals in key areas that kind of fast forward became our world in its most dystopian aspect, they were kind of gathered together in multiple venues.
One of these venues was Harvard, as I mentioned.
One of them was my former agent, John Brockman.
And John Brockman has been my agent, you know, my whole career until 2019.
He's also the agent of many luminaries in the science world.
And he convened something called Edge.org, which was a very kind of elevated platform in which he had all of these leading lights ask each other questions, address philosophical issues.
Pretty exciting, you know, very energetic intellectual community.
And this larger community included people like the Harvard math professor Martin Nowak, you know, distinguished people, the cognitive scientist Daniel Dennett, Richard Dawkins, the evolutionary scientist, the anthropologist Mary Catherine Bateson, theoretical physicist Marie Gelman, Elaine Pagels, the Gnostic Gospel Scholar.
So it was these extraordinary intellectuals.
Well, no one knew, at least no one I knew knew, that Epstein was funding this foundation.
So that's really interesting because, again, the people they were tapping became the direction that science and culture took in the subsequent 15 years.
I mean, really what your contributor who talks about transhumanism would really recognize.
Now, that in itself wouldn't be so huge, except Eric Weinstein pointed out that in his view, Epstein, I can't assess this, I have no idea.
In Eric Weinstein's view, Jeffrey Epstein was an intelligence asset and that what Epstein was doing along with or in alliance, a construct, as Eric Weinstein put it, the kind of heir essentially of Robert Maxwell's having bought Pergamon Press,
which was the major science imprint, which then was bought by Elsevier, which is now the major science imprint and a leading manufacturer of the COVID, et cetera, vaccine narrative.
What Eric Weinstein claimed, and it sounded very right to me, is that Epstein, in addition to everything else we know about, right, that Epstein was steering science, right?
Directing and steering and gatekeeping science or this construct, as Eric Weinstein put it, of Epstein and whoever was running him.
Well, let's add a piece to that.
And we know that he was funding many of these people.
In about 2010, John Brockman began to host really renowned dinners called initially Millionaires Dinners and then Billionaires Dinners.
He did this sometimes in concert with TED, the TED conference.
And what he did there was he brought together these intellectuals in computational science, in pre-AI, in evolutionary biology, in genomics, together with the emperors and empresses of the tech world of Silicon Valley.
So then like one example in 2010, it's kind of amazing.
In one room, this entity funded by Epstein convened Amazon's Jeff Bezos, then Google's Marissa Mayer, Craig Venter, who sequenced the human genome, Susan Wochiki, who later was CEO of YouTube, Nathan Miravold, former CTO of Microsoft, who then founded Intellectual Ventures, which is, of course, the ground zero of funding and investment in Silicon Valley.
Interestingly, the inventor of the PCR test, Carrie Mullis.
I have no idea what to make of that.
And then year after year, you know, Ariana Huffington, later Sergey Brin, the co-founder of Google, and the co-founder of Microsoft, Paul Allen, and Tony Fidel, the father of the iPod.
Well, so there was this kind of thing.
Hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on.
Just stick right there.
We're going to hold you through the break.
Quite fascinating.
People should know that John Brockman is an institution in and of himself, one of the major, I would say, institutions in not just science, but the writing of science and technology and making sure it gets out, disseminated out to the populace.
Short commercial break.
The dollar versus gold.
Dollars under assault.
The BRICS nations understand this.
This is why they've started a massive de-dollarization program.
President Trump has put them on notice.
You're going to get a 10% tariff if you go along with this.
I think, as Peter Navarro and these guys think it through, a Lot of these folks are going to get tariffs because 10% because he's already done it to Brazil.
Now, a big part of that's because of Bolsonaro, but some of that is because they hosted the BRICS conference in Rio.
You can go find out everything about that in the Rio Reset, birchgold.com/slash bannon, the end of the dollar empire.
We've only been right about this for four years now.
Make sure you understand not the price of gold today, but the process of what drives the price of gold.
Once you understand that, you will understand why it's been a hedge against times of financial turbulence and particularly now, as MTG said, since 1971, when we really went off the gold standard by President Nixon.
Why it's been a hedge so far in the 21st century, one of the best performing financial assets.
Don't take it from me.
Talk to Philip Patrick and the team at Birch Gold.
Do it today.
Naomi Worf, Jane Zirkle on the other side.
In America's heart, go on.
War Room.
Here's your host, Stephen K. Mann.
There's a lot of talk about the midterms.
They're doing a redistricting down in Texas.
That is, they're talking about bringing five seats in.
We're going to need every seat we can get, folks.
I can tell you that.
I want to give a shout out to Glenn Story and the team in Texas.
You know that they are fighting in Tarrant County and Denton and all these places to keep Texas MAGA.
We've argued all the time on Patriot Mobile.
Stop giving your money to people that hate you and give it to people who support your values.
But the most important thing is the service itself is extraordinary.
Go today and make the switch, 972Patriot or patriotmobile.com slash Bannon.
Call Patriot Mobile, 972Patriot, and you can talk to an American citizen in their customer service department and talk about all the different services they provide.
It's an incredible mobile company supporting your values in this great fight for Texas.
I tell you, folks, we lose Texas.
It's all over.
Patriot Mobile.
Go check it out today.
Naomi, continue on.
This is quite fascinating.
He basically, through Brockman and Harvard, these are.
Brockman is at the equivalent of Harvard as far as brands go.
And particularly in science and technology, he's considered to not have a peer.
Also, Pergamon Press, the other presses that Maxwell owned, et cetera.
What do you mean, though, by you believe for the intelligence services or the deep state or the globalist that he had his hand in guiding science and technology, ma'am?
I just want to be really clear.
Those were Eric Weinstein's words.
I have no knowledge of what Jeffrey Epstein was, but I think what Eric Weinstein is saying is incredibly persuasive because what he's saying is Epstein, whoever was running Epstein, and, you know, Epstein was obviously bigger than just a financier, right?
There's like something was running Epstein, just in terms of the air miles and the money.
And, you know, it's just bigger than any one individual could be.
One goal is not just the story that we know about, which is a horrible, horrible story about, you know, politicians and retail clothing manufacturers abusing girls.
There's an additional kind of dual use story, which is about steering science.
And if you look at the, and I think Eric Weinstein is right.
And if you look at the last 15 years, the direction of these scientists that were tapped by Epstein and Harvard, essentially, into this network and Brockman and the direction of big tech are the same direction, right?
And I don't know if, you know, I don't know where that's coming from, but I think those are the important questions we need to ask.
Like this is the dystopia we are in now.
The surveillance state, transhumanism, you know, constant monitoring, central bank digital currency, you know, the focus on Neuralink, you know, the reading, trying to get into people's brains and bodies.
These were the people who were identified by Epstein and whoever was running Epstein.
So where I'm going with this, I think my essay is a very sympathetic one toward President Trump.
I'm, you know, I was raped as a child.
I want nothing more than justice for those, all of those victims.
I want nothing more than transparency.
But my reading between the lines and understanding what I think Eric Weinstein is trying to say leads me to conclude that President Trump is in a really impossible position because A, there are innocent as well as guilty.
This is my conclusion, my judgment, innocent as well as guilty major scientists probably in those unreleased records, innocent as well as guilty.
And B, there are probably innocent as well as guilty major technologists in those records.
I mean, we know some of them are in those records.
And I have to know that the major technologists, the Silicon Valley guys, are critical to this administration.
So my guess is that I have no knowledge, no one's leaking, no insight or anything.
Just to guess from being A, a former political consultant, but also B, in this community, right?
My guess is that there are people innocent and guilty.
We can't possibly know, but it was a network that swept up all these people, putting pressure on President Trump to not release it because all these, you know, all these technologists, all of these scientists were swept up into kind of a, I don't know what to call it, more than a honey trap, right?
I mean, when Harvard did a report on contacts of staff, of professors with Epstein, Harvard was saying they didn't just take his money, they accepted his invitations, they went to his place in New Mexico, they went on his plane, they went to his island.
Well, these are, you know, some of them may have done horrible things.
I'm not exonerating anyone.
We have no idea.
But some of them are likely to have been nerdy people targeted essentially.
And this is what I'm hearing Eric Weinstein saying by this operation, swept up into it and compromised so that innocent or guilty, they are, you know, in a snapshot of contact with Epstein that could destroy them, you know, whatever they did or didn't do.
So that's what I just think people should be aware of when they're thinking about this very distressing situation.
We've got to bounce.
So are you saying that you agree that the record shouldn't be turned over?
Or do you think some mechanism ought to be worked out that the records are turned over?
Well, I'm not saying either of those things.
Look, I always want transparency.
And let's not forget that we have the victims right there.
You know, they should be supported.
They should be speaking.
They can put back on the record everything they want to put back on the record.
I believe in transparency.
That's not what I'm saying.
I'm saying that there could be something much bigger than we realize here, including a national security problem.
And that my trust is always in citizens.
And so I think citizens should just be aware of the larger context, be aware that there are innocent as well as guilty people, probably, very likely in those records.
Be aware that there was a weird targeting of leading lights of American science, as well as a targeting of technologists.
And that created a synthesis, which is everything we live in now.
And that's as far as I can go.
I mean, obviously, I think what's really interesting is what Alan Dershowitz said, who was formerly Trump's lawyer and Epstein's lawyer.
And Dershowitz gave an interview in which basically he was saying, really, what Pam Bondi should do is put pressure on the New York courts to release the list.
And again, as a former political consultant, I get what he's doing.
The blowback, what I'm saying is the blowback from the Trump administration releasing whatever lists there are, and no doubt there are voluminous lists of all kinds, is going to be so catastrophic for this administration because his funders, sponsors, supporters, the most powerful network in the world is probably swept up in this, innocent and guilty, as well as some of the leading scientists of the world.
So that's where I want to leave it.
And obviously, it would be good if the New York courts released everything with us being monitored.
I mean, you have to approach the New York courts.
You have to approach the federal court to release all the sealed evidence, to unseal the documents.
That's the first step you have to do.
Anyway, there's a lot going on.
Special counsel, not special counsel.
What's going to happen?
President Trump said, hey, if there are documents you can release, release them up on the Hill right now.
They're fighting about an entire bill that might, not that the Hill has a lot of authority here, but to do it.
Naomi, where do people go to get all your information and read this essay?
Yeah, I do want people to read the essay because it's a nuanced situation.
And it's over on Outspoken, which is my sub stack.
And it's called The Network in the Worlds of the Elite.
And you can always find me too on Daily Clout.
And you can always order the Pfizer book, which is very important.
And I'm at Naomi R. Wolf on X. And thank you, Steve, for letting me share this.
Thanks.
Sure.
No, it's very important.
Very powerful.
Brockman, Harvard, all of it.
Thank you, Naomi.
Okay, we were going to play, and I was going to have Jane as a guest as a reporter.
Jane did these amazing interviews.
We're going to do those tomorrow.
And Jane's going to join us tomorrow, the great Calamity Jane Zirkle.
We're going to play, I think it's important today to end and to actually play Peter's entire speech on the one-year anniversary of it at the Republican National Committee.
Because here's the Republican National Convention.
Here's the disturbing thing.
It could be ripped from today's headlines.
You just heard Naomi talk about all these different networks and science and technology and all these prominent people and the driving of technology and science in a certain way.
The deep state is winning right now.
There's supposed to be a massive declassification of some material, supposed to be today, maybe tomorrow.
But right now, until they identify special counsel to work on that part of it, let alone the Epstein, we're making very little headway.
So we're going to play its entirety.
One year ago today, almost at this moment, Peter Navarro's speech at the Republican National Convention on the day that he left a federal prison, which was unprecedented.
Peter Navarro takes it from here.
We'll see you back here tomorrow morning at 10 a.m. Eastern Daily Time.
We're going to have Jane on tomorrow night with me to go through her interviews.
Let's hear Peter Navarro.
This is a beautiful thing.
I think you folks just want to know if you can see my MAGA tattoo I got there.
Yes, indeed.
This morning I did walk out of the federal prison in Miami.
Joe Biden and his Department of Injustice put me there.
Tonight I'm here with you in this beautiful city of Milwaukee.
I've got a very simple message for you.
If they can come for me, if they can come for Donald Trump, be careful, they will come for you.
If we don't control our government, their government will control us.
If we don't control all three branches of our government, legislative, executive, and judicial, their government will put some of us like me and Steve Bannon in prison and control the rest of us.
Here's how it went.
Here's how I got in prison.
The legislative branch came for me first.
Your favorite Democrat, Nancy Pelosi, created your favorite committee, the sham January 6th Committee, which demanded that I violate executive privilege.
What did I do?
I refused.
The J6 Committee demanded that I betray Donald John Trump to save my own skin.
I refused.
Here's the thing about the Constitution.
They demanded that I break the law because they have no respect for it.
I refused.
And a Democrat majority in the House then voted to hold me in contempt.
All right, what happened next?
The next jackpoo to drop was the executive branch.
Another one of your favorite Democrats, Democrat Attorney General Merrick Garland.
There's a winner.
I mean, Jack Smith indicted and prosecuted me for criminal contempt of Congress.
Now, here's what's weird about it.
It's something that Democrat prosecutors refuse to do against one of their own, including two guys with blood on their hands, Eric Holder and Alejandro Mayorkas, the great border czar, right?
They've actually gotten people killed for decades, for decades.
The Department of Injustice right now, the Department of Justice policy stated, hear me out on this, if Congress slaps a subpoena on a senior White House advisor like me, the advisor's duty is to politely tell them to go pound Sams.
That's exactly what I did.
So far we got two branches, legislative and executive.
The judicial branch delivered the final blow.
Just as, here's another favorite of yours.
Just as Democrat Judge Juan Marchand, you know this guy?
Did to Donald John Trump in his Manhattan kangaroo court.
Another Democrat judge, a guy named Ahmed Maida, keep your eye on this guy, Ahmed Maida, Obama appointee.
They stripped me of every possible defense.
And then what?
Just like in Manhattan with Donald Trump, they threw me the wolves of an anti-Trump jury in where the D.C. swamp, they convicted me, they jailed me.
Guess what?
They did not break me.
And they will never break Donald Trump.
They will never break Donald Trump.
All right, now here's the most important thing I'm going to tell you.
You may be thinking this couldn't happen to you.
Make no mistake, they're already coming for you.
Joe and Kamla, they threw out the woke blue carpet across the Rio Grande, opened our borders to what?
Murderers and rapists.
When Donald Trump said it, thank you for saying that.
When Donald Trump said murderers and rapists in 2016, they go, oh, racist, whatever.
We read the papers.
It's murderers and rapists.
Murderers and rapists, drug cartels, human traffickers, terrorists, Chinese spies, and a whole army of illiterate, illegal aliens stealing the jobs of black, brown, and blue-collar Americans.
They put them right on your front doorstep.
Now here's another thing, Joe Biden, and you've got to love this, the green new scam.
We're in the heart here in Milwaukee, around all this.
This is where the auto industry, that new scam is destroying our industry, leaving us at the mercy of the battery factories in Shanghai and slave labor in the Congo.
Biden inflation.
You're going to hear a lot of this because it's so friggin' true.
Biden inflation is coming after what's left of your savings and eating your wages.
And the Democrats, here's the thing.
I'm sitting in prison thinking about this.
It just eats at me as the Democrats come for your kids.
They're indoctrinating them with poisonous attitudes on race and gender.
And here's the thing.
When politics fails, the investigations and prosecutions begin.
They did it to me.
They're going to do it to Trump.
But hear me out.
They've also done it to Catholics, pro-life activists, and parents.
Parents who are just standing up for the kids at school board meetings.
This is a tale of two Americas, and you know it wasn't this way when Donald Trump was president.
I remember the days I was there.
In Trump's America, you were safe and our borders were secure.
In Trump's America, you were more prosperous, and you didn't have to choose between what?
Food on the table, medicine in the cabinet, and a roof over your head.
And in Trump's America, you didn't have to worry about being locked up for disagreeing with the government.
I went to prison so you won't have to.
I am your wake-up call.
All right, this is where I'm going to have fun now because I'm going to leave you now with the last three words, the last three words my beautiful fiancé said when I left that morning for prison.
They weren't, I love you.
That was a given.
She simply said, we got this.
We got this.
That's what bring my girl out now.
That's what these law affair jackals don't understand.
When they put people like me in prison and fire figurative and now literal bullets at Donald Trump, they also assault our families.
On Election Day, America will hold these lawfare jackals accountable.
Now here's the sweetest thing that's going to come off my lips.
Vote Trump Vance.
24 for Trump, 47.
I'm Peter Navarre.
I went to prison, so you won't have to.
This is my beautiful girl.
She did the time with me.
That's what these friggin Democrats don't understand.
They do this to our families.
She's my girl.
Yeah.
I love you.
Let's win.
Do not let up.
Do not let up.
▲
Export Selection