May 16, 2025 - Bannon's War Room
48:55
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
| Pray for our enemies. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because we're going medieval on these people. | |
| I got a free shot at all these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Mega Media. | |
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Band. | ||
| $24,000 a year will get a $70 tax break. | ||
| Enough for a tank of gas or two. | ||
| But a family in the richest 0.1% gets a $255,000 tax break. | ||
| Enough for a new Lamborghini. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And it keeps getting better for the richest of the rich. | |
| Republicans make the tax cuts for billionaires permanent. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay, here we go. | |
| But you're listening to the 2026 midterm right there, folks. | ||
| So a lot of story you're doing in the budget committee. | ||
| I hear they're going to try to force a vote. | ||
| We're going to be in and out monitoring this. | ||
| I think Chip Roy and Ralph Norman, some of the budget hawks, some of the deficit hawks are all over the same. | ||
| This thing doesn't work right now. | ||
| We've got to rethink this. | ||
| So we'll see how this plays out. | ||
| Johnson's saying he wants to bring, I think, overall to the floor on Monday, the whole thing to kind of meet this Memorial Day timeframe. | ||
| They've got to pass to the Senate. | ||
| The Senate's already said, not going to pass in the Senate. | ||
| Not going to come close. | ||
| They're going to have to rework it. | ||
| So we're going to be going in and out of this. | ||
| Throughout the rest of the war room, and then a big analysis and assessment in the 5-7 hour. | ||
| By the way, George Simeon, who joined us last night in Paris, who was there with the expatriate Romanians, he's been going around to Europe, making sure he's got all those votes, is going to join us tonight. | ||
| Want to go to Romania. | ||
| Our own Tom Dan's normally in Greenland, but today in Romania. | ||
| Get us up to speed, Tom. | ||
| You're over there as kind of an observer. | ||
| And to provide kind of moral support, how does this populist, nationalist, sovereignist party, how does it look? | ||
| We already had one election stolen from them. | ||
| How do we look for Sunday? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey, everybody's ready here, Steve. | |
| Great to be with you on the Posse. | ||
| We're getting close to the moment of truth here. | ||
| Everybody's excited, confident. | ||
| This is about running through the tape. | ||
| They really believe the numbers are behind them. | ||
| They like what they're seeing, especially what it's not. | ||
| I think the Posse won't be surprised to hear that there's a phenomenon here that's the silent George Simeon voter, kind of like your silent Trump voter. | ||
| And that's significant. | ||
| You know, once you have the app. | ||
| I don't want people to get taken away by the misdirect because we're in that zone here. | ||
| So, you know, think Wisconsin and the Trump poll in, you know, 2020. | ||
| We know how that came out. | ||
| But you're going to see numbers that are going to show day in ahead. | ||
| That's just not the case. | ||
| And when you factor in this kind of, call it a spiral of silence, that's a significant kind of an eight-point kind of gain. | ||
| That we see. | ||
| So people are good. | ||
| It's about running through the tape. | ||
| Big execution. | ||
| It's going to be a bigger vote. | ||
| You're going to also have a significant portion coming in from the diaspora voters. | ||
| So you've got... | ||
| That's why he's out in Europe to get to the diaspora. | ||
| Tom, what about this issue of them stealing it? | ||
| They've already rejected one election where they won outright. | ||
| George got 40% of the vote last time. | ||
| They freaked out. | ||
| What about the EU, the party of Davos, the deep state over in Europe stealing this thing on Sunday? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey, look, polls are big media and the Brussels brigade, right? | |
| That's leading those. | ||
| And there's really marginal downside to not attempting every last thing if you're really looking at the last screams of a dying regime here. | ||
| That's the same in here. | ||
| So the best thing you can do is make it too big to rig. | ||
| Right? | ||
| That worked in Pennsylvania, work in Transylvania. | ||
| And that's the game plan here. | ||
| You just kind of go out, you run through the tape, you get a lot of eyes on the polls. | ||
| George and his team have lined that up. | ||
| You know, thankfully here, it's a paper ballot, one-day vote. | ||
| Tomorrow, it's a little bit different. | ||
| They go into a day of silence. | ||
| So as of 7 a.m. tomorrow, you know, there's a... | ||
| There's a whiteout in terms of no discussion of the campaign publicly on TV and media, and that includes social media now. | ||
| So that's a much different phenomenon than a barnstorming last 24 hours that we have here. | ||
| But it's going to be a battle like any others. | ||
| Nobody's going to hand you this, even though it's been taken away from you a few times here. | ||
| Brother Dans, what's your social media? | ||
| How can people follow up? | ||
| We'll try to get you on tomorrow morning on the Saturday morning show. | ||
| We've also got a couple other people flying in from Europe we're going to try to get also who are going to be there on Sunday. | ||
| How do people follow you? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm on Twitter, X, at Tom Dans, T-O-M-D-A-N-S-C-F-A. | |
| And also, I wanted to give a shout out to Will Donahue. | ||
| Here's a good friend. | ||
| He's head of the College Republicans of America and has really been helping on the poll front, helping George and team crunch numbers and really add some oomph to the full effort. | ||
| So we'll be tweeting out, giving up updates, and looking forward to keeping the posse. | ||
| So what's the Twitter feed one more time? | ||
| What's the Twitter feed one more time so people can follow? | ||
|
unidentified
|
At TomDansCFA, Chartered Financial Analyst. | |
| Make sure you're on the up and up. | ||
| Okay, Grace Mode, let's get that out of everybody. | ||
| TomDans, thank you so much, brother. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thanks, Steve. | |
| I think Tom's the handsome one and Paul's the smart one. | ||
| I might have a reverse. | ||
| Identical twins. | ||
| Thank you, sir. | ||
| Paul of the... | ||
| Infamous, the phrase that will not be said, Project 2025. | ||
| Captain Fennell, Rabbi Walecki, who's one of the smartest guys I know, has got a brilliant piece up about everything that took place in the Middle East this week. | ||
| And because there's a lot of criticism of Netanyahu and the Israelis are lost, he's saying, hey, you're not seeing the big picture. | ||
| The Chinese Communist Party is who lost. | ||
| Give me a minute or two before we talk about your take on Ed Luce's book. | ||
| Or theory the case historically. | ||
| How do you think it went this week? | ||
| Who are the winners? | ||
| the losers. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| ...segments, basically, which is to say that we have secured peace again, not permanently, but we've reinstituted the Abraham Accord mindset that was in the first administration to tell the world, hey, we're not going to be involved with, you know... | ||
| Picking and choosing who runs what countries in the Middle East, and then we're going to let you guys run your own atmosphere in your own region. | ||
| We'll monitor, but that's not our business. | ||
| And that allows the United States government to then get its sights back on the right thing, the main thing, which is the government that wishes to displace us and destroy us, which is the Chinese Communist Party that runs the People's Republic of China. | ||
| So I think... | ||
| In a geostrategic sense, it's a major win for the United States, and it should tell China and, you know, the people inside the Communist Party that we see you and we know what you're doing, and you're not going to continue to get away with what you've been doing. | ||
| You know, I've said many times, I was on one of those battle groups in the North Arabian Sea in the workup. | ||
| For the hostage rescue attempt in Iran or in Persia back in 79 and 80, Ed Luce had a very specific take, and I'm a big advocate of this book. | ||
| You want to really find out about the National Security Council, how it evolved, and Kissinger and all this, and just amazing. | ||
| It throws you back in time to the 70s. | ||
| You very much disagree with Ed Luce and his take. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, I'm not against people reading books, and I'm sure it's very fascinating to read. | ||
| But what I took from yesterday's discussion was that it came across as a bit of a hagiography, you know, the biography of a saint. | ||
| You know, this idea that what was said and what wasn't said. | ||
| So what was said yesterday was... | ||
| You know, it was really Zabrinsky that influenced Reagan's notion of "I win, you die" as he was talking about America's reaction and response to the Soviet Union. | ||
| I've talked to people that were alive and working in the first Reagan administration and around him, and they say it's patently false that this was not something that Reagan... | ||
| Co-opted from Zabrinsky. | ||
| The same with this idea that somehow that he... | ||
| You know, restored defense spending. | ||
| I came in in '86, and the defense spending was restored under Ronald Reagan. | ||
| It was his build-up. | ||
| It was his idea of peace through strength. | ||
| It wasn't Carter's, and you lived that in the '79-'80 timeframe. | ||
| The same thing with this idea that, you know, there was Zabrinsky that helped lure the Soviets into Afghanistan. | ||
| Just seems to be a little bit of a hagiographical approach of how he writes. | ||
| About him. | ||
| Same with the Pope and things of that nature. | ||
| And it was also discussed yesterday, said that, you know, Zabrinsky wasn't a pessimist like Kissinger about America's foreign policy and America's future. | ||
| And the things that I've read and researched here say that that's not necessarily true. | ||
| And I will give you now the two things that really didn't get discussed yesterday that really are the lasting, true, lasting negative legacies of Zabrinsky and Carter. | ||
| One is... | ||
| 1979, switching recognition from Taiwan to the Chinese Communist Party in Beijing. | ||
| The lasting impacts of what that did in establishing most favored nation status that Zabrinsky was very supportive of, and this idea that he talked about, you know, the people who died in... | ||
| Hang on. | ||
| But hadn't what Kissinger and Nixon did... | ||
| With Mao Zedong and Zhou Enlai back in, what, the early 70s? | ||
| Didn't that almost just start an evolutionary, I'm not saying I agree with it, but start an evolutionary movement that the CCP is going to be the recognized government of mainland and eventually going to have to get away from recognizing Taiwan at least as the Republic of China, sir? | ||
| That's the conventional wisdom, is that what Kissinger and Nixon did in 70, 71. Ultimately led to what happened in 79, but I think that's not necessarily true. | ||
| It was the belief system of Zhebrinsky especially that thought that we must cooperate and end the destabilization by... | ||
| cooperating with China. | ||
| And so there was a way to be able to work through a different way to continue to recognize the legitimacy of Taiwan. | ||
| We had a command there since 1955 called the Taiwan Defense Command. | ||
| They shut that down. | ||
| So we are now in a position where we're militarily In a bad position because of that decision that was made back in '79 that could have been adjusted. | ||
| And then the other one that he did, which is the Panama Canal, and it was under Carter and Zabrinski, and it was Zabrinski that really was pushing Carter, saying you must do something because... | ||
| There's this threat of riots there. | ||
| And I have colleagues that served in the canal zone during that timeframe, and they're adamant that those threats about riots and that the canal would collapse and fall, you know, would stop the flow of traffic was an exaggerated threat. | ||
| But they used that, and this is where I suggest that Zabrinsky is actually a pessimist about America as well, because he sought to pull back America. | ||
| And to make us weaker. | ||
| And he trusted this notion that we could cooperate and engage with the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| And even up until right before he died, when he was 85 years old, he was interviewed and he made similar such comments. | ||
| So he was unreconstructed, in my opinion, from the 70s all the way through until his death, that he believed in engagement with the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| And he's known as a hawk, and he's known as an anti-communist, but he was really an anti-Russian because he was Polish. | ||
| So I think his Polish roots explain his views of the Soviet Union, which he really talked about as a Russian Empire more than he talked about them being a communist-led regime. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think we need to really look at that. | |
| Yeah, great. | ||
| I love it. | ||
| I love that counter. | ||
| You're teeing up perfect to Posovic. | ||
| We're going to get on and talk about the election in Poland and the Middle East, all of it. | ||
| Captain, you don't have social media, do you? | ||
| Eventually we'll have to talk you into that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Not yet. | |
| I may have something to American greatness this weekend on the Navy. | ||
| American greatness this weekend. | ||
| Okay, we'll look for it and push it. | ||
| Captain Fennell, the smartest of the smart and keeping it on the main thing was the takedown of the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| The freeing of Laobajin. | ||
| Captain, thank you so much for joining us today from overseas. | ||
| Appreciate you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| Wow. | ||
| Brzezinski was not anti-communist. | ||
| He was anti-Russian. | ||
| He was anti-Russian because of his Polish roots. | ||
| A lot of people said that's why he kept trying to push him towards Afghanistan and away from an invasion of Poland. | ||
| D. Jack Posobiec, next in the war room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Band. | |
| There's a very fluid situation in the budget committee, but I think three votes kills it from coming at a committee. | ||
| Make sure they gotta go back and rework it. | ||
| Right now, Chip, Roy Norman, and Andy Clyde. | ||
| Andrew Clyde of Georgia. | ||
| I think Clyde's a no. | ||
| Breachin from Oklahoma has been on the show a number of times, Josh Breachin. | ||
| I think Breachin may be a no, but it looks like three, four, five, maybe five no's. | ||
| Don't know, but it looks like they've got three right now. | ||
| Who knows? | ||
| Very flexible situation. | ||
| Maybe we're going to start twisting some arms. | ||
| That's the case. | ||
| It kind of goes back, and you've got all kind of issues people have on everything. | ||
| So we will continue to monitor that directly. | ||
| Field of Greens. | ||
| Real organic superfood. | ||
| I take that in the morning of my shot. | ||
| I put it in the water before I get the Warpath coffee brewing. | ||
| You get a 20% discount. | ||
| Fieldofgreens.com. | ||
| Dr. Kim and the team over there. | ||
| This will give you a jolt. | ||
| This is all of your fruits and vegetables that you need every day, and it's not the kind of artificial way that other people that advertise dramatically on cable TV, particularly cable news. | ||
| This is real organic superfood. | ||
| Field of Greens, fieldofgreens.com, 20% off. | ||
| Go check it out today. | ||
| Promo code WARWROOM or promo code BANNON. | ||
| Maybe use them both to get 40%. | ||
| Who knows? | ||
| Doubtful, but try it out. | ||
| You will not regret it. | ||
| You'll feel great by taking this. | ||
| Jack Posobiec, you just had Captain Fennell, probably one of the smartest guys I know, say, hey, look, on this new book by Ed Luce. | ||
| About Brzezinski, Ed Luce, the columnist and senior editor at the Financial Times of London, U.S. editor. | ||
| He says, hey, Brzezinski wasn't anti-communist because he rubbed up on the Chinese Communist Party and tried to gauge her. | ||
| He's just another poll who's anti-Russian. | ||
| Your thoughts, sir? | ||
| Well, Steve, I mean, keep in mind that for a lot of the neocons and neoliberals that have come to the United States, these actually emerged as the Trotskyites. | ||
| So the Trotskyites were pushed out of the Soviet Union when Stalin took over them. | ||
| And this school of thought was pushed out of places like Poland, places on the periphery like Bessarabia, Ukraine, Victoria Nuland, her family. | ||
| They were pushed out. | ||
| They come to the United States. | ||
| And so they hate Russia because they view themselves as the people who should be ruling Russia. | ||
| It's not that they're not communist. | ||
| They're still communists. | ||
| They were just the communists that got pushed out in one of the many communist purges that took place so stalin took over here the stalinization prior to that you had the bolsheviks that pushed out the mention that that's when lenin took over and leninism marxist leninism took over the party took over the country and took over the revolution this is what you always have in so brzezinski He's coming to this from the perspective of, again, he's not anti-communist. | ||
| A lot of these guys aren't anti-communist. | ||
| What they are is they're anti-your version of communism. | ||
| They want their version, their wing of communism, to be the one that's in power. | ||
| and this is basically set the stage for where we are today with the system of globalism which emanates from Brussels and other globalist nodes Davos obviously this mini Davos that just took place over the last couple of days in Poland where they're trying to get their hooks in anywhere they can because they can see the system creaking apart that's what President Trump is is doing with the these tariffs. | ||
| That's why he's put the infrastructure in place to break the system of globalism and free the countries of the people that are still behind it the same way, in many ways, that we broke the system of the Cold War and the Iron Curtain and all the countries of the Warsaw Pact were under that. | ||
| This is a liberation movement. | ||
| That's what MAG is about. | ||
| And that's why these elections, people say, Poso, why are you going to Romania? | ||
| Why are you interviewing the Romanian presidential candidate? | ||
| I thought you were America first. | ||
| Why are you talking about the Polish election? | ||
| Yeah, you're Polish. | ||
| That's what you care about. | ||
| No, no, no. | ||
| What we care is about liberating The superpower of every country is its people. | ||
| That's why we talk about the Lao Ba Jing in China. | ||
| That's why we talk about the Russian serfs. | ||
| J.D. Vance got in trouble for talking about Chinese peasants. | ||
| But what he's talking about is... | ||
| Caring about the people over the oligarchs that would be in control of these countries and these massive supernatural, supranational international systems. | ||
| And that's why we're focused on this. | ||
| And Brzezinski, yeah, he was one of the guys that built a competing system of communism, which we now call globalism today, in order to compete with the Soviet Union. | ||
| You're talking about these elections that are going on. | ||
| We've focused on Romania, the second round. | ||
| The first round of Poland kicks off. | ||
| We've got a great sovereignty movement over there. | ||
| It looks like they're trailing in the polls and maybe even getting farther behind. | ||
| But talk about this event. | ||
| This shows you how they're so in the fix. | ||
| Yep, go ahead. | ||
| If I could throw out on that, Atlas Intel, you remember those guys out of Brazil? | ||
| They were number one in the Brazilian elections. | ||
| They actually underestimated Bolsonaro the first time around. | ||
| He came out, overperformed everything, and they said you were being too pro-Bolsonaro, and then he came out and overperformed that. | ||
| Atlas Intel was out this morning, which I think is probably going to be the last poll going into the first round of the Polish elections on Sunday. | ||
| And this has got the conservative about a point up over the liberal over there, over the globalist. | ||
| And folks, remember Atlas Intel, they were the ones that called seven for seven of the swing states and that Donald Trump would narrowly win the popular vote. | ||
| And all of that came directly to pass. | ||
| But why is Obama, they have this, and this is the way Davos works, they have this huge conference of investors and crypto and tech and all this, and it's all Obama's administration. | ||
| And Obama, I'm hearing, is getting paid a million bucks. | ||
| To go give a speech over there? | ||
| Is any this accurate as they try to gun-deck, just try to dominate media with all these globalists and all these great left-wing Americans on the eve of this election, sir? | ||
| Well, Steve, and the great Wojciech Pobolczyk, who's been a longtime member of the War Room Posse, has been posting this up and giving us the translation to English. | ||
| And so I'm... | ||
| Drifting off of him, drafting off of him a little bit here, but what he's saying is, it's very clear to me. | ||
| You've got Barack Obama, John Kerry, Francis Fukuyama, Valerie Jarrett, and Applebaum, from the Atlantic, who's married, the crown princess of globalism at the Atlantic, who's married to Sikorsky, the minister of defense of the current globalist prime ministership in Poland today. | ||
| They're all over there speaking. | ||
| By the way, Alex Soros speaking. | ||
| In conjunction with Huma Abedin, I don't know if they're married or if they've got like some kind of throuple thing going on over there. | ||
| But of course, we all know her connections to Hillary Clinton and to Anthony Weiner. | ||
| They're all there today. | ||
| And Steve, we can sit there and talk about, oh, it's so terrible and they're doing all this. | ||
| Why have they decided to make Poland their stand? | ||
| I'll tell you why. | ||
| Because they're losing Romania. | ||
| And because what do Poland and Romania share along with Hungary? | ||
| They are the eastern borders of NATO with Ukraine. | ||
| This is all about Project Ukraine and that the globalist plans for Project Ukraine have completely gone down the tubes. | ||
| They didn't want Donald Trump to come back. | ||
| They didn't want these peace deals. | ||
| They've got this huge thing going on in Istanbul. | ||
| They're doing the prisoner swap today. | ||
| They're making pole in their last stand. | ||
| Faraj takes over the Tory party and becomes prime minister. | ||
| The two go-to people we can count on in Europe happen to be in Eastern Europe. | ||
| Hungary, Viktor Orban in Hungary, and the Poles, correct? | ||
| I mean, that's our go-to guys. | ||
| They're the guys that have always spent more than 2% of GDP. | ||
| You never had to be a supplicant about defense. | ||
| The Poles get it as they're a true ally, although I'm not crazy about their leadership now. | ||
| The Polish people are a true ally to the Americans, sir? | ||
| Well, absolutely. | ||
| And at times, Poland has been called the 51st state because America and Poland are so connected because they viewed America's role in the breaking of the Soviet Union, the freeing and liberation of Poland from the communist infrastructure, along with, by the way, a certain pope who we all remember very fondly. | ||
| Pope John Paul II, my brother and I, had the opportunity to pay our respects to the dearly departed pontiff at his tomb in St. Peter's just a few days ago. | ||
| And so we remember all that went on. | ||
| That fused this relationship between the United States and Poland. | ||
| And remember... | ||
| Poland was one of President Trump's very first trips to Europe in the first administration, and he gave what is, quite frankly, I think his most full-throated endorsement of the ideology of the defense of Western civilization as originally. | ||
| Constituted that he's ever given anywhere in his entire political career. | ||
| I mean, he's went to Warsaw, and he talked about the history of the Warsaw Uprising, fighting against fascism, fighting against communism, and that the Polish people said it's very clear the things that carried them through, throughout all of the oppression that they faced from the Roman Empire, excuse me, the Russian Empire on, they focused on their language. | ||
| Their culture and their faith. | ||
| And they never gave up their language, their culture and the faith. | ||
| And that's something, by the way, that America can also learn from the polls as well as we have faced these headwinds as well. | ||
| Jack, we've got to bounce, but two things I've got to bring up real quickly. | ||
| Cash has just announced they're going to send the 1,500 people at the F. It's going to come on an interview he's doing with Maria Bartiromo, a play on Sunday morning, that he's getting all the FBI folks out of the headquarters, that monstrosity, that brutalist monstrosity right there on Constitution Avenue. | ||
| He's going to empty that out starting this summer. | ||
| In addition, Comey... | ||
| What upsets me about this Comey thing is that he's not being investigated for all of his other crimes. | ||
| That this thing comes up at the seashells. | ||
| Give me a minute of your thoughts before we bounce. | ||
| Well, Steve, everyone remembers we campaigned quite forcefully on the direct dismantling of the FBI, and so I certainly applaud this move. | ||
| The J. Edgar Hoover building is an absolute eyesore in Washington, D.C. I was talking before about how America – we fought the Soviet Union for so long that we became this sort of DEI version of the Soviet Union ourselves. | ||
| And you see this reflected in the character of the architecture and the buildings of Washington, D.C. Should the agents be removed? | ||
| It should be stripped brick by brick. | ||
| And by the way, James Comey, his job should be having to haul the bricks away piece by piece like he's one of the Israelites building the pyramids just in the opposite way for everything that he did. | ||
| By the way, not just for some social media posts, but for everything he did to this country and what he did to President Trump in 2016 and 2017. | ||
| Jack, where do people go to get, particularly this very important weekend, to get all the updates from Jack Posobiec? | ||
| Yeah, we'll be up on Twitter. | ||
| We'll be up, of course, on Human Events daily here, 2 p.m. Eastern, as well as throughout the weekend. | ||
| We'll have it up as well. | ||
| Thank you, Jack Posobiec. | ||
| Great work. | ||
| Budget Committee. | ||
| By the way, Charlie Kirk follows us at noon. | ||
| Two hours of nationalist populism served up hot. | ||
| Short break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Mann. | |
| Okay, we're going to do a couple things here. | ||
| As soon as the committee starts to vote, right now I count three, and three kills it, at least for today, makes them go back and rethink this thing. | ||
| We're going to go live to that. | ||
| Josh Hammer joins us. | ||
| Josh, in Axios, the lead story, we talk about, I quoted about the second hundred days more important than the first. | ||
| That 10 years on June 15th is the 10th anniversary of Trump coming down the golden escalator. | ||
| And I say that's all a preamble to what's going to happen in this 100 days. | ||
| Most importantly, the convergence of these crises is the constitutional crisis of President Trump's Article II powers in these radical judges that are basically up in his grill. | ||
| Supreme Court yesterday was supposed to be 14th Amendment. | ||
| It turned out to be something quite different. | ||
| Are we in that crisis right now, Josh Hammer? | ||
| Steve, Donald Trump is facing a judicial insurrection the likes of which no president in American history has ever faced. | ||
| At least, literally at least since Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War with Chief Justice Roger Taney trying to subvert him in every move. | ||
| I mean, this is actually, no exaggeration, the largest scale, most sprawling, subversive Article III judicial activity in at least a century and a half. | ||
| And they did this the first time around, Steve. | ||
| Donald Trump faced 64 so-called nationwide injunctions from rogue lower court judges during his first term. | ||
| Which, by the way, was more than the first 44 presidents combined. | ||
| And they picked up essentially right where they left off in this second term, despite the fact that Justice Clarence Thomas, in the so-called travel ban case, Trump v. | ||
| Hawaii, back in 2018, Justice Thomas wrote in a very prescient concurrence, he said, we're going to have to step in here and stop these so-called nationwide injunctions unless they do so of their own volition. | ||
| And, you know, the judges have not done so of their own volition, so here we are. | ||
| So you're right. | ||
| So the case that was argued yesterday, this CASA, is a birthright citizenship case. | ||
| It has to do with the magnificent and legally substantively 14th Amendment correct Donald Trump birthright citizenship executive order saying that the children of legal aliens are not automatically conferred citizenship. | ||
| But the posture of this case and specifically the way that the U.S. Solicitor General's office, the current SG is John Sauer, the former Solicitor General of Missouri. | ||
| Fantastic, fantastic lawyer, former clerk to Justice Scalia. | ||
| The SG's office right now is in very, very good hands under Solicitor General Sauer. | ||
| I think that the lawyers, Steve, made a tactical decision to try to argue this about the scope of relief rather than addressing the 14th Amendment question head-on. | ||
| That's not to say that they are not confident in their convictions. | ||
| They should be. | ||
| Their argument on the 14th Amendment is correct. | ||
| Rather, they're probably just counting votes here, and they're probably saying that... | ||
| I cannot count five votes at this current time to uphold Donald Trump's executive orders. | ||
| So they're trying to go for a slightly different argument here, trying to go for a ruling on the scope of so-called nationwide injunctions, which in my column today, I argue, is actually just as arguably an even more important issue. | ||
| It is at least just as an important issue. | ||
| Because when you have rogue lower court judges that are starting to slap these so-called nationwide injunctions here, well beyond the confines of what the judicial power of which the Article 3, Section 1, You have literally subverted America's constitutional structure. | ||
| You have made this a system of unvarnished judicial supremacy, of judicial despotism. | ||
| Abraham Lincoln, I mentioned him earlier, he was kind of the famous combatant against judicial supremacy. | ||
| In his first inaugural address, he said that the candid citizen must confess that if we, the people, allow final decisions about our law and politics to be settled by the judiciary there, the people will have ceased to be their own rulers. | ||
| And fundamentally, Steve, you know, the patriots of 1776, this country was founded to rebel from the tyranny of King George III in Britain there. | ||
| They did not do so in order to simply willfully subjugate themselves of their own volition generations later to a distinctly black-robed form of tyranny. | ||
| That is not what they signed up for. | ||
| That is not what our constitutional charter suggests. | ||
| And God willing, the court will do the right thing here and rule that these so-called nationwide injunctions are unconstitutional. | ||
| And where do people go to get your social media? | ||
| Because you're putting up stuff all the time. | ||
| I want people to follow it. | ||
| Yeah, so I'm on xjosh__hammer. | ||
| Instagram is joshbhammer. | ||
| My own show, The Josh Hammer Show, available everywhere. | ||
| Podcasts are sold. | ||
| And then I have my new book out as well, Israel and Civilization, The Fate of the Jewish Nation and the Destiny of the West. | ||
| Josh, thank you. | ||
| I'm going to have you back on next week to talk about, do we need to resolve this by the end of June when the court goes on its summer break? | ||
| The Josh Hammer. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| This article is amazing. | ||
| It gets to the heart of what happened yesterday in the Supreme Court. | ||
| Thank you, sir. | ||
| My pleasure, Steve. | ||
| Josh Hammer is so correct about it. | ||
| Abraham Lincoln. | ||
| Very honored. | ||
| Tim Albarino, thank you for being in studio here. | ||
| It's my honor, sir. | ||
| Why are you called the real Indiana Jones? | ||
| Well, I'm an explorer, and I've done a lot of work in Peru. | ||
| Peru, and so in Peru... | ||
| Peru's got many aspects to it. | ||
| You've been in the Amazon part of it? | ||
| I lived for 10 years, yeah, in the Amazon basin of Peru. | ||
| Why would you live 10 years in the Amazon? | ||
| Because that's the headwaters of the Amazon, right? | ||
| That's right, yeah. | ||
| That's like going up the Nile to Sudan and Ethiopia, going up to the headwaters. | ||
| You're like Richard Burton. | ||
| Is that who you base yourself on? | ||
| I actually dropped out of high school in my senior year and moved to Peru when I was 18 years old. | ||
| Your parents must have loved that. | ||
| They didn't. | ||
| And what was the program? | ||
| Well, I was just very desirous of adventure, and I wanted to get out and experience different cultures, and American suburbia didn't suit me well. | ||
| What did you learn in 10 years in the Peruvian Amazon? | ||
| Oh, God, I learned a lot, but I really adapted well to Peruvian culture. | ||
| I love Peruvian culture, especially the jungle culture, and I learned Spanish. | ||
| What is the jungle culture? | ||
| When you say you love Peruvian culture, what did you love about it? | ||
| It's a very simple life. | ||
| It's very wild. | ||
| I think Peru is one of the last wild places on Earth. | ||
| Peru and parts of Africa, obviously, but there's so much to discover in Peru. | ||
| It's definitely one of the most mysterious places on the planet. | ||
| There's still lost cities being discovered all the time. | ||
| In fact, we discovered one a few years ago. | ||
| That's the Inca civilization? | ||
| The Inca, yeah, and then a bunch of pre-Inca civilizations. | ||
| Pre-Inca civilizations, wow. | ||
| Yeah, and I think there's actually evidence in Peru. | ||
| The Inca's one of the most sophisticated empires ever created, right? | ||
| The Inca were the Romans of the Americas. | ||
| More so than the Aztecs. | ||
| The Aztecs were a little crazy. | ||
| More so than... | ||
| I mean, they're kind of equivalent to the Maya. | ||
| You know, they built big cities and had an empire of 10 million inhabitants. | ||
| So, I mean, they were very, very incredible. | ||
| Pizarro and the Conquistadors. | ||
| That was their big takeout. | ||
| 172. | ||
| So why is a guy that specializes in... | ||
| the Amazon or your Explorer, you're here and you got a briefing this week from Congress about the UFOs. | ||
| And our big thing here, the UFO is just a misdirection play given everything we got to do about the deep. | ||
| I was with Congressman Burleson yesterday and he briefed me on some of the stuff that's been going on in Washington, here in Washington. | ||
| And there's been a lot of important UAP related things going on here in D.C. They've had several very important meetings. | ||
| Yesterday, or the day before yesterday, they were briefed by the FBI. | ||
| The UAP caucus members went over to the FBI and asked them some very pointed questions about UAP UFOs. | ||
| And this included Congressman Eric Burleson, Congressman Tim Burchett, Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna. | ||
| Those three have been all over it. | ||
| They're the core group in Congress who's working on this issue. | ||
| And they're working tirelessly. | ||
| And they're fiercely intelligent. | ||
| And they're all MAGA. | ||
| And they're all MAGA, for sure. | ||
| And they're dedicated 100% to getting to the bottom of the UAP reality. | ||
| And what do you think that is? | ||
| You've specialized in this for... | ||
| You're a constant guest on my favorite of all shows, Coast to Coast, right? | ||
| George Norian. | ||
| George Norian. | ||
| George Knapp. | ||
| Yeah, those guys are great. | ||
| And, of course, the original, the great one, Art Bell. | ||
| That's right. | ||
| So we're kind of in a post-disclosure world now. | ||
| I mean, we've had two hearings in Congress. | ||
| Because of President Trump. | ||
| Because of, yeah, I would say, I think Trump is going to be a disclosure president. | ||
| I really do. | ||
| Obviously, this is a disclosure administration. | ||
| I mean, we're going to get the, eventually, we got the files on JFK. | ||
| Hopefully the Epstein stuff is coming soon. | ||
| And I would fully expect Trump to be a disclosure president and to make moves to inform the American people of the UAP reality. | ||
| And, I mean, we've had two hearings, and we've had some amazing witnesses who have firsthand knowledge of what's called the legacy program. | ||
| The legacy program refers to a crash retrieval program, and we're talking about UFOs. | ||
| And David Grush, in the first hearing, who worked for Air Force Intelligence, disclosed The incredible reality that we have, the United States government has been involved in the recovery and reverse engineering of non-human craft. | ||
| A systematic... | ||
| Recovery and reverse engineering. | ||
| Precisely right. | ||
| Not just something somebody made off. | ||
| The kind of thing we're trying to cut, whether USAID or whatever, all these government programs kind of have budgets and people that work it, and you've got to keep it up to speed about how you're doing, correct? | ||
| So it's an official government kind of bureaucratic response. | ||
| Exactly right. | ||
| But this is deep, deep state. | ||
| I mean, this goes deeper than the deep state. | ||
| This is the biggest secret that our government has. | ||
| Nothing is bigger than this. | ||
| That when you talk about UAP, especially, you know, we're way beyond lights in the skies. | ||
| We're way beyond, are UFOs real? | ||
| Now we're talking about crash retrievals. | ||
| And David Grush in the first hearing said, not only have we retrieved the craft, we've retrieved the quote-unquote biologicals associated with the craft. | ||
| Biologicals would mean like... | ||
| Things, like folks. | ||
| Non-human. | ||
| Non-human folks. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's right. | |
| That's biologics. | ||
| Officially, that's where we are right now. | ||
| Okay, let me ask you. | ||
| Knowing that this is because... | ||
| One of the things that shocks me is that this does not get more attention. | ||
| And one of the reasons it doesn't get more attention, the types of people that could drive the attention, the MAGA base, are sitting there going... | ||
| You know, they're stealing our country. | ||
| The deep state's all over. | ||
| Hell, we don't even have Comey. | ||
| The thing that upsets me about Comey and the seashells is, screw the seashells. | ||
| This guy should have been under investigation from day one and should be in prison already. | ||
| So the MAGA base, including 90% of this audience, who naturally would be saying, yeah, what the hell, are hesitant because they're saying it's a misdirection. | ||
| It's a distraction. | ||
| It's a distraction because this stuff has obviously been known for you. | ||
| So what is forced? | ||
| Do you have a counterargument that this has just been forced recently and it's not a misdirection plot? | ||
| I don't believe it's a misdirection. | ||
| What's forced it is the whistleblowers. | ||
| Specifically, David Grush. | ||
| I mean, he broke the ice on this thing. | ||
| Explain who Grush is for the audience. | ||
| David Grush was intelligence. | ||
| He was working for Air Force Intelligence, and he was assigned to investigate in an official capacity to investigate the question of UAPs. | ||
| And what happened was he ran up against a program, what they refer to as the legacy program, the crash retrieval program, that he ran up against this program, and he was not allowed to be read into the program. | ||
| They wouldn't tell him anything about it. | ||
| It was so classified. | ||
| It was so classified that even in his official capacity investigating this phenomenon, they would not tell him anything. | ||
| And then he received threats to his life, certainly to his career. | ||
| And he's had confirmation from individuals who are highly placed in the military. | ||
| And he testified a year ago? | ||
| I think a year or two ago was the first hearing. | ||
| They had another hearing last year, and that featured some whistleblowers, namely Lou Elizondo. | ||
| But Gruss was about a year and a half or two years ago. | ||
| He came for it, which was shocking at the time. | ||
| But that's when we're in the middle of Biden and stolen the election. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| Nobody could get focused. | ||
| It's kind of bad timing for UAP disclosure. | ||
| But that's the question. | ||
| Is it... | ||
| Is it the reason the deep state wants it out now because there's so much going on? | ||
| That is a good question. | ||
| That is a good question. | ||
| I've often thought about that. | ||
| Because normally these would be – this is what people have talked about for 50 years. | ||
| It's every science fiction movie. | ||
| This would be the front page of Daily Mail every day and people couldn't get enough of it. | ||
| It would be wall-to-wall hearings. | ||
| It's not. | ||
| So the phenomenon is real, but is it being utilized as a distraction to keep people away from the Epstein files, for example, to keep people away from – All of the nefarious activities happening in the deep state. | ||
| It's possible, but nevertheless, the phenomenon is real. | ||
| Why did you... | ||
| We got 30 seconds here to hold you through the break for our last segment. | ||
| Given everything that you work on, all your interest, why have you shown so much interest in this? | ||
| Because I've come up... | ||
| Because I've experienced the reality myself. | ||
| I saw one of these crafts at close range. | ||
| It was 40 feet above my car. | ||
| I saw it in Brook Park, Ohio, where I grew up. | ||
| And this was maybe... | ||
| 12 years ago. | ||
| And it hovered above my car for at least 30 seconds, and I was with my brother-in-law. | ||
| And he saw it too? | ||
| And he saw it too. | ||
| And you're not a tinfoil hat guy? | ||
| I'm not a tinfoil hat guy, no. | ||
| Okay, hang on. | ||
| Tim Albarino is in the house here for congressional briefings from Burchett, APL, and of course Burleson. | ||
| We love all three of them. | ||
| Short break. | ||
| back in the warm in a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Vann. | |
| We'll be right back. | ||
| No vote yet. | ||
| As soon as it is, we're going to cut. | ||
| We're probably going to toss that to Charlie Kirk. | ||
| Charlie will handle that on the 12 noon. | ||
| Something's got to happen here, folks. | ||
| You've got to get your arms running. | ||
| Albarino, we haven't covered this enough. | ||
| One of the reasons is that it isn't a distraction enough. | ||
| Given your expertise in this area, what did you learn from Burleson over the last couple of days to say, hey, look, I think this thing's ready to go to the next step of disclosure. | ||
| And also, we've only scratched the surface of finding out what the government knows, correct? | ||
| Yeah, and that's, you know, the real issue with Congress is that these programs, these legacy programs, have completely circumvented the oversight of Congress and the American people. | ||
| And they're using our money. | ||
| And they want to know why. | ||
| And this is really at the core of the interest in Congress of what's going on here because it's completely circumvented. | ||
| But it's also circumvented, at least in the first, President Trump and his oversight. | ||
| If you were in the Oval right now talking to President Trump, what would you tell him in the two or three things you think he ought to do on the executive branch because it's an executive branch program to get his arms around it? | ||
| You know, I don't believe that the president doesn't have the need to know. | ||
| According to what I call the dumb state, because a lot of these projects are housed in deep underground military bases, and the president doesn't have the need to know or the classification, the proper classification, to get down clearance. | ||
| Full stop. | ||
| You're saying that they don't believe that Commander-in-Chief, according to the Constitution, has a need to know what's going on. | ||
| No, presidents are transitory. | ||
| They come and go. | ||
| This is classic deep state. | ||
| This program has been going on for decades. | ||
| So has President Trump been briefed on the UAP question? | ||
| Probably, but at a superficial level. | ||
| And even if he were to say, okay, I want to get into one of these, the S4 facility, for example, in Nevada, I want to get in there and I want to see the craft, they would deny him access. | ||
| Give me this again. | ||
| They would do what now? | ||
| They would deny the President of the United States access to these programs. | ||
| We just had Josh Hammer on the first. | ||
| We talk about President Trump's Article II powers. | ||
| Chief Executive, you can cut budgets and fire people. | ||
| The second is Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, and no court can come before him. | ||
| You're saying the way, to your knowledge, these programs work and the deep state works in this, they believe Trump has no need to know on this and no access as Commander-in-Chief. | ||
| Yeah, some presidents have been briefed. | ||
| But they really don't. | ||
| At a superficial level? | ||
| At a superficial level, yeah. | ||
| I mean, they may know. | ||
| I mean, Trump very well at this point. | ||
| Why should people not think you're a nutcase by a tinfoil hat by saying this? | ||
| Well, maybe six years ago they might have. | ||
| But if you pay attention to what's been happening in this city, I mean, we are in a post-disclosure era. | ||
| This is a fact. | ||
| This is no longer a theory. | ||
| It's not a conspiracy theory. | ||
| UAPs are real. | ||
| And according to the whistleblowers, They're non-human in origin. | ||
| The reason I felt there was something up here, it was a misdirection, but at least real, when they put out the gun camera footage from Navy fighter planes, when the Pentagon puts that out... | ||
| I mean, that's as real a deal as you can get in the United States. | ||
| We saw the gun camera and you heard the pilots talking to each other. | ||
| I said, whoa, this is a pretty big... | ||
| This thing's got reality. | ||
| I don't know where it goes. | ||
| I don't know what it means, but that's a whole different level. | ||
| And I said, what in the hell is the Pentagon releasing it now for? | ||
| That's right. | ||
| It really began in 2017 when the New York Times published the Nimitz incident. | ||
| They had leaked footage that was provided to them of what's today known as the Tic Tac UFO. | ||
| And that video has never been debunked. | ||
| Neither has the gimbal video. | ||
| You know, there were three that were confirmed by the Pentagon to be real. | ||
| And that was the Nimitz incident video, the Tic Tac UFO, the gimbal incident, and GoFast. | ||
| They've attempted to debunk GoFast, but gimbal and Nimitz, they cannot debunk those. | ||
| And those appear to be advanced aerospace vehicles that are capable of incredible aerial maneuvers. | ||
| And we're talking about... | ||
| You know, supersonic speeds faster, making right-angle turns at thousands of miles per hour. | ||
| This is a new kind of technology, a new physics that we're unaware of. | ||
| And this is the reality that these congressmen are grappling with right now. | ||
| And, you know, for the most part, they're getting stonewalled everywhere they go. | ||
| The FBI, what I heard from Burleson was that the FBI was very impressive. | ||
| They were very concerned about the situation. | ||
| But they don't, according to the guys that he talked to, they don't really know. | ||
| A whole lot more than ufologists, than people who've studied this thing for a long time in the private sector. | ||
| Are they dismissing it as you guys are in a wild goose chase? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Not at all. | |
| Something serious, but we know we're in as bad a shape as you are. | ||
| No, they understand that this is a reality. | ||
| Everybody who these congressmen talk to understand that this is a reality. | ||
| But do you understand what you're saying? | ||
| Do you understand you're saying that in the most powerful nation on earth that has a constitution that the commander-in-chief of the armed forces, right, the one that's constitutionally deputized to do this, that there are elements of the government, not just about what's going on in Iraq or Russia or China or anything like that, but they have a very sophisticated and expensive program. | ||
| They've recovered these vehicles. | ||
| They've recovered the biologics. | ||
| They are reverse engineering in that they don't believe. | ||
| They don't believe that he's eligible to be read in. | ||
| In Congress, they would get some sort of black program to finance this, but the American people don't know about it. | ||
| That's precisely right. | ||
| That is so revolutionary, if it's true. | ||
| It is true. | ||
| And, you know, as I said, presidents are transitory. | ||
| These special access programs, this is the biggest secret we have. | ||
| We are reverse engineering non-human technology. | ||
| Hang on a second. | ||
| I'm going to go to Lindell. | ||
| Where do people get you? | ||
| Where do they go to get your social media, all your rights? | ||
| You put out a number. | ||
| Yeah, I wrote a book called Birthright. | ||
| We had you on a couple of years ago. | ||
| Yeah, I wrote commentary and introduction to the book of Enoch. | ||
| Timothy Albarino on all social media platforms, YouTube, and I'm actually doing a conference in Bozeman, Montana with Joe Allen. | ||
| Joe's going to be, he's on the roster. | ||
| And when's that going to be? | ||
| That is the 17th, June 17th through the 18th. | ||
| Did we approve Joe's of traffic? | ||
| Real quickly, how concerned are you about AI? | ||
| I'm very concerned about AI. | ||
| Why? | ||
| Well, because I think we're heading for a, what I call in my book Birthright, a post-human apocalypse that's coming. | ||
| This is what we had you on for a hanger for one second. | ||
| Mike Lindell. | ||
| We got no budget. | ||
| We're about to hit a debacle. | ||
| The bond market's going to reject everything we say. | ||
| Albarino's saying we got a deep government. | ||
| We got alien spacecraft. | ||
| No, by the way, AI's going to take over. | ||
| Sell me a set of sheets, brother. | ||
| You got it, Steve. | ||
| Okay, everybody, this is real important. | ||
| We have just a few allotted. | ||
| This is the last day. | ||
| There might be some left for the weekend warriors, but you guys, this is it for the sale on the Giza Dream sheets. | ||
| The $49.98, any size, any color. | ||
| It doesn't matter if you order Split Kings, Cal Kings, Kings, but once we have allotted, it's gone, it's gone. | ||
| We hope there's some left for tomorrow, but we don't know for sure. | ||
| Also, we're closing out the... | ||
| 50% off crosses. | ||
| The my crosses. | ||
| You got the men's and the women's. | ||
| They're beautiful. | ||
| They're made in the USA. | ||
| And you guys go to the website, click on Steve, and go down there. | ||
| Use that promo code WARROOM. | ||
| Get it today before they're gone. | ||
| This is, you guys, this is the best specials we've ever had. | ||
| 50% off on the crosses and more than that on the sheets. | ||
| They're $49.98, any size, any color, while they last. | ||
| 1-800-873-1062. | ||
| I am back at my call center. | ||
| I'm going to go down and take a couple of the calls. | ||
| Take some calls. | ||
| Most powerful promo code. | ||
| MyPillow.com promo code. | ||
| Mike, we're having the afternoon show. | ||
| Tim Albarino. | ||
| It was an honor having you in here, brother. | ||
| Look forward to having you back. | ||
| We'll cover that conference. | ||
| And we'll have you back on next week. | ||
| I want to talk about what you found. | ||
| You need to drill down. | ||
| I can tell the audience is... | ||
| By the way, people can get tickets at AlbarinoEvents.com. | ||
| AlbarinoEvents. | ||
| We'll push it. | ||
| Grace, you can put it out. | ||
| They're starting to vote on the budget committee. | ||
| We're going to toss it to Charlie Kirk. | ||
| Charlie will take it from here. | ||
| Poso with two. | ||
| Steve Gruber at 3. Back to Boeing. |
Export Selection