Jan. 18, 2025 - Bannon's War Room
48:09
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Applause. Applause. | |
| Applause. | ||
| Applause. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| You are in the War Room. | ||
| It's Friday, January 17th in the year of our Lord, 2025. | ||
| I'm going to start this show off with some sarcastic joke about that was Merrick Garland, of course. | ||
| Scum of the earth, traitor, an actual domestic extremist and lawfare extraordinaire, leaving the DOJ for the last time ever, a building he never, ever should have stepped foot in. | ||
| Though I am glad that Student Kay Bannon played a considerable role in making sure that he never became a Supreme Court Justice. | ||
| So enjoy your retirement, though something tells me you won't be having a lot of free time. | ||
| But I hope that that video, that round of applause for someone who has inflicted so much pain and tragedy and loss on the American people, on his very own fellow citizens. | ||
| It should make you so mad. | ||
| No, it makes me mad. | ||
| That's the man who put Stephen K. Bannon in prison for four months. | ||
| Peter Navarro in prison for four months. | ||
| Did nothing to get to the bottom of someone who tried to put Donald J. Trump seven feet underground. | ||
| And honestly, as Stephen K. Bannon would say, the buried lead of that video isn't even the weird gestures and the faint, oh my gosh, pre-Madonna act of Merrick Garland. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But it's the staff who applauded for him. | |
| Because that, my friends, that, and yes, I'm going to say it on MSNBC, that is the enemy within anyone who would applaud for that disgrace and sham and shame of a man, of an attorney general, of a political appointee. | ||
| For what he did to this country and lied about it to the American people and then had the nerve to hold press conferences and say that actually it's Trump who's weaponizing the DOJ, not him. | ||
| Yeah, that man gets a round of applause. | ||
| From what I'm told are supposed to be what? | ||
| Apolitical, agnostic, civil servants? | ||
|
unidentified
|
That is a wonderful... | |
| Shot and frame of the enemy that we have ahead of us for the next four years. | ||
| That is the civil servant class that for some reason thinks that they're better than you and probably get off on the idea of prosecuting you and your family. | ||
| And the only reason that I'm still probably able to sit here broadcasting the show is because President Donald J. Trump was brave enough to run again and win. | ||
| Or otherwise, they would all be applauding because we'd all probably be being perp walked. | ||
| Oh wait, they already did that with Stephen K. Bannon and probably half of the MAGA movement. | ||
| I think the January Sixers and their families would like a word with you over that shameful round of applause. | ||
| That has to be the most maddening and enraging two minute and whatever second video that I've ever seen. | ||
| But I guess just remember this, Merrick Garland. | ||
| You will never, ever be a Supreme Court justice because of Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| And you will go down in history when all of this is adjudicated, though your reputation is already not all that stellar, and I think you know that. | ||
| I think when you pretend to act shocked, it's not really an act. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You know you're guilty and you know you're evil. | |
| You'll go down in history. | ||
| It's probably one of the worst AGs in this country's entire history. | ||
| So I look forward to saying good riddance to Merrick Garland. | ||
| I don't know about you. | ||
| If it was the war room posse flanking those hallways, I don't think you'd be getting a single clap or round of applause. | ||
| I think you'd be dealing with something quite different. | ||
| And I'll leave it at that, Merrick Garland. | ||
| You're disgusting, embarrassment, sham of a person, let alone as an attorney general. | ||
| And on that note, someone who... | ||
|
unidentified
|
I don't think ever speaks as tough as I do because he's such a nice person. | |
| I'm honored to call him a friend, is the one and only Dave Brat, who I always joke that in high school, I was like your number one fangirl when you beat Eric Cantor. | ||
| I was probably the only then like 16 year old in LA who was a massive Dave Brat stan, but you know, I'll take it. | ||
| But I wanted to have you on to talk. | ||
| Primarily, we'll start, there's a lot of things, but they're all doubling down now on this narrative that right-wing billionaires are bad, but left-wing billionaires are apparently really good and deserving of presidential medals of freedom, right? | ||
| They're sort of putting then a lot of his economic policies, particularly the tariffs, through that paradigm, whereby they're trying to insist that it does not benefit the American people, but rather benefits the sort of 1% top oligarchic class. | ||
| Your thoughts, sir? | ||
| Yeah, well, my thoughts are you're equally great, and I've always been so proud to know you and your University of Chicago background. | ||
| But more than that, I've worked with colleagues, former admirals, the head of intelligence, naval intelligence for the United States of America, and he follows Natalie Winters. | ||
| And so I just want to give you a shout-out, too, for the investigative work you've done on China. | ||
| And your comments there, you know, we take for granted on this show, and this is a serious shout-out to everybody who's listening. | ||
| The concept of truth, you've got to go back and you've got to get your kids to dig into that because we're being gaslit, and Steve Bannon and Natalie Winters and this show are one of the few places where you can go and they'll bring out the Judeo-Christian West and the concept of truth, etc. | ||
| And Rubio, this is all related to the question also, but Rubio, in his comments on China, etc., went back to Karl Popper and the open society and the rejection of metaphysics and truth and all that kind of thing. | ||
| So at the high level, the top folks are starting to follow Steve Bannon and this show and conceptions of the truth. | ||
| And so you're gaslighting on the oligarchs, right? | ||
| All of a sudden, Biden gives this gloom and doom, dark message of the oligarchs. | ||
| We ought to be aware of the oligarchs. | ||
| Of course, all of them, with the exception of Elon lately, are Democrat donors and are part of the anti-freedom of speech deal, right? | ||
| Zuckerberg. | ||
| It's not only the amount of money spent on the—what was it? | ||
| How much was it? | ||
| Half a billion dollars, et cetera. | ||
| But he targeted specific districts, and they were all Democrat districts. | ||
| And for this guy to get a pass now, it's just incredible, the gaslighting these oligarchs are doing. | ||
| And so it all goes back to first principles. | ||
| I used to be a Chicago free market person. | ||
| Milton Friedman and all these great people. | ||
| I still am, but it's kind of like heaven, right? | ||
| It's the end-state utopia. | ||
| Right now, and this is what Bannon has contributed, and you cannot overstate the importance of what he's done, along with President Trump, as you just noted. | ||
| But he's shifted the whole Overton window on this free trade thing. | ||
| I now ask my libertarian friends, and I got a lot of them, can you do free trade with China? | ||
| And no one even knows what it means anymore. | ||
| The free market system means you have free markets, and markets assume that you're using the price system in economics. | ||
| You're using prices to run your society. | ||
| All of human history made $500 a year for all human history until $1,700. | ||
| And then we started using the price system. | ||
| That's a social choice. | ||
| You have to choose to use the price system. | ||
| Adam Smith, Free markets. | ||
| There's always been markets, but there has not been the free market system. | ||
| And so these oligarchs are the furthest thing away from a free market system. | ||
| And the language has changed. | ||
| They're gaslighting on this in economics as well. | ||
| They say, well, don't you want successful people? | ||
| What, Dave? | ||
| Do you hate success? | ||
| Do you hate capitalism? | ||
| No. | ||
| I love capitalism. | ||
| I love free markets. | ||
| But that's a long-winded answer to We've got to get this train back on the tracks. | ||
| It's way off. | ||
| The Chinese are exploiting this. | ||
| The left are exploiting the fact that we don't have a bunch of firms on the supply curve, a bunch of small firms, America first citizens in charge of businesses. | ||
| Instead, we've got these oligarchs. | ||
| We've got to get rid of them. | ||
| Go back to Teddy Roosevelt and Jacksonian populism and everything Steve and you have been talking about. | ||
| And to that point, they sort of say that, you know, fiscally and from an immigration policy perspective, that the answer to our, you know, shortcomings or shortfalls is that we need to import, I'm sure you've heard this phrase before, the best and brightest, right? | ||
| Because we apparently lack that talent. | ||
| And we've obviously gone through the numbers. | ||
| It's complete and utter BS. It's propaganda, just like all the vaccine stuff was to boost profits. | ||
| In that case, it was for big pharma. | ||
| Now it's just more so for big business and corporations. | ||
| But walk us sort of through. | ||
| That internal struggle, and how important do you think it is for the Warren Posse to hold the line on that front? | ||
| Yeah, well, Natalie did an incredible job. | ||
| Go back to her reports on H-1B visa stuff, right? | ||
| So, Annette, you know, Steve had me on on that. | ||
| Everybody else was on on the show, and I just assume everyone knows that. | ||
| That's a disaster. | ||
| If you'll notice, the context here is the same as always. | ||
| It's never the American citizen first. | ||
| It's the American citizen last. | ||
| The H-1B visa is way up here on the pecking order. | ||
| It's the high human capital, high skill person we're talking. | ||
| Bring in the best and the brightest. | ||
| Of course, that's a farce, as you said. | ||
| And the biggest farce in its simplest form is that we have a technical worker shortage in this country. | ||
| That is not true. | ||
| I've spent my whole life in education, etc. | ||
| What the firms want and what they ask for is they say, hey, produce us just hundreds of thousands and millions of skilled workers. | ||
| And then they cherry pick and say, I want this one, this one, and this one, and this one. | ||
| Right? | ||
| So American society. | ||
| And education, by the way, is 90% funded by state and local, only 10% by federal. | ||
| So you at home, the American citizen, you're paying the bill for this. | ||
| And in Chicago, to get to the other end of the America First piece, the literacy rate for the poor kids in Chicago, third grade, is 12%, right? | ||
| Illinois Public Policy Institute, go look it up. | ||
| 88% illiterate. | ||
| If we, America First, really want to do our job and do it well for the black, brown, blue-collar workers, etc., we're going to pay attention to those third graders who can't read because we know the K-12 system, you just pass them all on, right? | ||
| So no one cares about developing an American workforce which is exceptional, which is what you're getting at, right? | ||
| We only talk about STEM and high-tech and H-1B, high-skill visas. | ||
| That's a disaster, too. | ||
| And you all know the stories about Disney firing everybody and then making the American workers train in the cheaper workers, right? | ||
| It's all cheap labor. | ||
| And keep your eye on all the cheap labor states. | ||
| Anyone that's got golf courses and hotels and all that. | ||
| South Carolina, keep your eye on those Congress guys. | ||
| I used to know a bunch of them. | ||
| My buddies, some of them were good friends, but they voted terrible. | ||
| Immigration, right? | ||
| Steve Bannon and this show. | ||
| And President Trump, and actually the Republican platform this time, right? | ||
| The economy, the border invasion, and endless wars. | ||
| If your folks are not voting right on those three issues, there's your signal. | ||
| We need Dave Brat back. | ||
| That's my hot take. | ||
| But you're too nice a person. | ||
| I wouldn't subject you to that. | ||
| No, I loved it up there in Trump. | ||
| If you would have asked me five or ten years ago if we'd ever have secretaries like this and a cabinet like this, I would have laughed at you. | ||
| I would have said, there's no way you're going to get this degree of excellence on the technical issues and the courage. | ||
| So, you know, President Trump, all credit to him. | ||
| It was his choice. | ||
| But, boy, he chose some winners. | ||
| Divine providence, indeed. | ||
| And of course, this audience, I think, played an extremely large Herculean role in all of this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Dave Brat, hopefully maybe we'll see you in the admin. | |
| I think you would do well there. | ||
| If people want to follow you in the meantime, I know you're a superstar on Getter. | ||
| Where can people go to do that? | ||
| No, that's it. | ||
| Brat Economics on Getter. | ||
| Nothing's changed. | ||
| I'm a long-run guy. | ||
| I don't like the day-to-day chatter. | ||
| The economic fundamentals have not changed in 70 years. | ||
| Go look it all up. | ||
| Get your young kids studying those charts. | ||
| It's all right there. | ||
| Brad Economics on Getter. | ||
| Thanks, Natalie. | ||
| You've got to return to tradition, right? | ||
| There you go. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, yes. | |
| The basics. | ||
| Get it right. | ||
| Eat your spinach. | ||
| Dave, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| I'll have you back on soon, and hopefully we'll see you around at a bunch of the inauguration stuff. | ||
| I am honored to be joined now by the brilliant Dr. Robert Malone. | ||
| I have so much that I want to talk to you about. | ||
| I want to sort of draw a through line here. | ||
| I believe it was in the Wall Street Journal, there was a big article talking about the WHO, how they're lying about the origins of COVID. Again, fact check. | ||
| The Word has been saying that for a while. | ||
| You've sort of been saying that for a while. | ||
| But it's sort of a, I think, similar parallel, like limited hangout that you're seeing now with all these kind of tech bros, right? | ||
| Come around late to the game now trying to give all their money and resources to Trump, insisting that they've sort of, you know, ideologically converted and are now the latest members of the MAGA agenda, the Maha movement, take your pick. | ||
| But your thoughts on what you think is sort of driving this, if you want to get into the COVID stuff, the tech stuff, I'm sure the audience would love your take on both. | ||
| Well, and of course, it seems like we may have put a stake right through the heart of the bird flu vampire. | ||
| It's looking encouraging. | ||
| And again, to follow Dave's footsteps and your own comments, many thanks to the War Room Posse for your support and recognition and unwillingness to buy into the propaganda that was circulated regarding avian influenza. | ||
| There was just another report out recently that Shocker In non-human primates, so this is monkey models, it turns out that avian influenza is just not very infectious when by the oral route. | ||
| Who cares about that? | ||
| Well, that was all the threat about raw milk, remember? | ||
| All the fear about milk and that the cows had avian influenza and they were going to put it in the milk and we were all going to get avian influenza from drinking the milk. | ||
| Well, it turns out somebody did the science and published it recently in a stunning Reversal of the Journal of American Medical Association, I think, is the publisher for this. | ||
| But it's turned out that bird flu is not very infectious by an oral route when you drink it. | ||
| It is infectious to some extent in non-human primates in the nose and upper airways, but not in the gut. | ||
| So there's that. | ||
| The story that you're talking about regarding the World Health Organization, and that is kind of an exemplar. | ||
| For what's going on right now, now that President-elect Trump is about to form his new administration, is we're seeing a lot of revisionist history and various forms of PR being pushed out. | ||
| And you mentioned the Zuckerberg cast suddenly having a come-to-Jesus moment. | ||
| But in the case of the World Health Organization, of course, they're Under threat that the new administration will pull the rug out from under them in terms of the funding, and I certainly hope they do. | ||
| The WHO under Tedros Dubryos has been just notoriously corrupt, and they have an existing partnering agreement, a very solid, important partnering agreement with the CCP. So we really have the WHO and the CCP and Tedros wedded at the hip. | ||
| And that kind of comes to a point in this recent Wall Street Journal disinformation piece that was published by the Gabriella Stern, who is the communications director for the World Health Organization, titled, WHO Responds to China, COVID-19 Origins. | ||
| So this puff piece was written by her as a clear attempt. | ||
| To distribute the propaganda line that the WHO and Tedros did, in fact, try to hold China accountable and force them to be more transparent. | ||
| But when you dig into it, and this all relates to the origin of the virus. | ||
| Of course, that's the big issue. | ||
| And by the way, that may well become a major issue in the early days of The new HHS secretary should Bobby succeed in being confirmed. | ||
| But the issue here is that this communications director is asserting that the Tedros and the World Health Organization has always had an open mind concerning the origins of the virus and whether or not it came from a natural source or a lab leak or an engineered. | ||
| When we read this, Dr. Jill Glasspool, Malone and myself, we were stunned to see that because we knew that was untrue. | ||
| That was disinformation. | ||
| It's propaganda being put out, trying to rewrite history, the history of how the WHO has mismanaged the COVID crisis and mismanaged their roles and responsibilities and basically got in bed with the CCP. And what we were able to document Was that the World Health Organization and their governing body, | ||
| the World Health Assembly, put out a directive to Mr. Tedros that he should investigate the natural origin of SARS-CoV-2. | ||
| Specifically, they did not ask him to look at anything having to do with the possibility of a lab leak. | ||
| And so the resulting study that came out from the WHO flies in the face of this PR push that's being propagated here by this communications director because all it talks about is potential natural origins. | ||
| It doesn't even address this like one paragraph in which it addresses the possibility that there might have been a lab leak. | ||
| And it basically just discounts that. | ||
| And here's the kicker. | ||
| It does so based on this study, the notorious study that was published in Nature by some folks from Scripps and others that asserts that the natural origin of the virus was Due to transmission from bats | ||
| or other zoonotic origins. | ||
| But all of this paper that Nature Medicine published, The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2 in May 2020, which formed the basis of our Senate and House and Tony Fauci and the NIAID. And the WHO and Tedros, all asserting that this couldn't possibly be a lab leak. | ||
| This paper that was published in Nature was not actually peer-reviewed. | ||
| It was a communication. | ||
| It was treated like a peer-reviewed paper. | ||
| It was treated like it was the gospel. | ||
| But in fact, it was a non-peer-reviewed communication. | ||
| And so the whole foundation for this pyramid that they've built, this house of cards, About the natural origin of SARS-CoV-2 is basically fraudulent. | ||
| There's no real substance to it. | ||
| It's speculation by a group of scientists that had conflicts of interest. | ||
| Dr. Anderson down at Scripps Institute in particular. | ||
| And so that's the core of this. | ||
| We wrote an opinion back to the Wall Street Journal. | ||
| And they chose not to publish it, and so we put it out on Substack. | ||
| But the thing that matters here is I think from the rumors that I'm hearing that there's a good chance that the incoming administration may be interested in disclosing a lot of the documents that are known to exist within the government that provide the paper trail. | ||
| Regarding what was actually known and what was discussed and what was performed in order to try to suppress the lab leak hypothesis and suppress knowledge about the role of the U.S. government, Defense Threat Reduction Agency, and the NIH in funding the gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. | ||
| What I hear rumor of Is that there is a lot of documentation and a lot of back and forth and also a lot of information that has gone back and forth between government officials and the pharmaceutical industry. | ||
| And none of that has been able to come out under the Biden administration. | ||
| They've kept that all bottled up and to the extent they've been willing at all to allow things to come out under Freedom of Information Act. | ||
| As you recall, they are highly redacted, almost full pages in many cases. | ||
| And that's no longer going to be the case, I think, from what I hear, is that we may well have a flood of something akin to the Twitter files coming out from the government documenting all of this nefarious activity that's going on. | ||
| And I think that's one of the most intriguing parts about this whole story of what was the origin or the proximal origin. | ||
| Dr. Malone, we're going to have to jump to break real quick, but I want to hold you because that's some pretty bombshell news. | ||
| I'm sure the audience wants to hear more about that. | ||
| Hang with us, Warren Posse. | ||
| Don't go anywhere. | ||
| We've got Dr. Malone, Senator Colton Moore, who apparently has been behaving very badly in the state of Georgia. | ||
| He's getting arrested. | ||
| So I guess here in the war room, we're very understanding of people who get arrested like none other than Stephen K. Vannon, because it's all politically motivated. | ||
| when you stand up for America first. | ||
| We'll be right back after this short break. - Here's your host, Stephen K. Mann. - Welcome back to "The Stephen K. Mann. - Welcome back to "The War Room." We are still joined by Dr. Malone, who we've got a few minutes left with. | ||
| Dr. Malone, you just, I think, dropped truly some sort of bombshell news in terms of getting to the bottom of the origins of COVID, but I want to pivot real quick because I know people look up to you as sort of a thought leader, not just in the COVID origins, fight, crusade, the noble quest, but also in sort of the Maha movement, where I think that H sort of stands for two things, obviously healthy, but also just honest, right? | ||
| We just want to stop being lied to by whether it's the intel agencies, the FDA, like me. | ||
| Choose your pick. | ||
| Take your pick. | ||
| But I'm curious to get your assessment sort of, I guess, maybe springboarding off of what you were just talking about, where you think there are promising signs in terms of the COVID origin question, where you think we stand on the MAHA agenda being able to really kind of become intertwined with the MAGA agenda from a personnel perspective, from a policy perspective. | ||
| How would you sort of assess it so far? | ||
| Well, thanks for that question. | ||
| And actually, I'm going to be speaking to a group that's focused on that tomorrow, starting at 9 a.m. | ||
| at the MGM, right by National Harbor. | ||
| And they've assembled people that have been very involved in MAGA and MAHA, as well as the crypto worlds, to come together and start talking about the agenda. | ||
| What I think I'm seeing is a focus on President, I think we can call him President Trump now, President Trump's agenda and his mandate that Bobby, the intended director of HHS, secretary of HHS, that Bobby has a mandate to demonstrate improved health in the American people within one year. | ||
| Mr. Trump wants to see a demonstrable improvement in the health of the nation. | ||
| And that means there's a real sense of urgency right now around that. | ||
| There's a number of ways to go at it. | ||
| Obviously, we can do things like address the fentanyl crisis, and we can focus on the various things that have to do with diet. | ||
| That's a big one. | ||
| And that's one that Kelly and Casey Means and many other people have been advocating is that we really try to be more honest and transparent with the American people about the foods that they're eating and the quality of the foods and things that are contributing to poor health as well as advancing good health. | ||
| We're going to see a lot more about that. | ||
| The banning of red dye is just the first little camel's nose in the tent. | ||
| I think we're going to see some changes in labeling. | ||
| I think we're going to see more transparency. | ||
| You talked about honesty as a key message. | ||
| And I think that that's going to start to percolate through the whole food industry. | ||
| It's a fine line. | ||
| If you're somebody coming from a libertarian perspective like I am, you really don't want to see more government regulation. | ||
| But on the other hand, if we don't have a fair and equal... | ||
| Level playing ground that's established by the government. | ||
| Then we have bad actors. | ||
| You were talking about oligarchs earlier. | ||
| We have very large, you know, erstwhile monopolies that are abusing the food supply and abusing farmers and abusing the consumers. | ||
| So I think we're going to see some efforts to try to address that through the USDA and also through the FDA. I think we're going to see, and this is a message that's been coming along again and again, the attempt to pivot the NIH and the whole biomedical research enterprise away from this focus on disease towards a focus on health. | ||
| I wrote a recent Substack essay in which I talked about the underlying problems of public health and that public health as it's currently practiced in the West It's basically socialist. | ||
| It is grounded in the idea of top-down imposition of solutions that will optimize health for the average person. | ||
| So it's all based on kind of a large data and large actions in which there's mandates implemented down, whether it's vaccine mandates or all kinds of other things we're not even aware of. | ||
| Most people aren't aware of what's going on. | ||
| And so I think that what I would like to see, and I think we're likely to see it, is a pivot more back to the idea of subsidiarity, that people should be empowered at the most local level to make their own decisions. | ||
| And in the case of healthcare, that's the physician-patient relationship. | ||
| So that's what I hope I see, and I absolutely hear. | ||
| That there is going to be a major focus on disclosure and transparency so that the American people have a better idea of what's really been going on behind their back. | ||
| And it's only if they get behind us, if MAGA and the Posse and the general American public realize all the different ways they've been had and they start demanding change, that's when we can have change. | ||
| We can't implement legislative change. | ||
| Just de facto, we have to have some real strong populist support from the general population, and particularly from MAGA and from the Posse, to drive these legislative initiatives. | ||
| So that's what I hope I'm seeing, and I think it's likely to pass. | ||
| I am still holding out for a complete and utter ban on seed oils. | ||
| I hope I don't have to hold my breath on that one, right? | ||
| 10 out of 10. That must happen. | ||
| We will manifest it. | ||
| Dr. Mullen, thank you so, so much for joining us. | ||
| I know the audience really respects your opinions on all of these issues. | ||
| In the meantime, before you hopefully come back and join us soon, where can people go to stay up to date, follow you, read the books, get the books? | ||
| Where can they do all that? | ||
| Best is the substack. | ||
| We put out the essays daily. | ||
| And Friday and Sunday, of course, it's the funnies with all the memes. | ||
| But Malone.news and on X at RWMaloneMD and on Getter. | ||
| Thanks for having me on. | ||
| Of course. | ||
| Thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| Have fun at your speech tomorrow. | ||
| I'm sure we will. | ||
| See you around D.C. for all the inaugural stuff. | ||
| I am honored to be joined now by someone who I think only comes on War Room whenever he's causing a problem down in Georgia, and that is State Senator Colton Moore. | ||
| I think you know him of Fannie Willis and impeachment fame. | ||
| But I just want to start with this story sort of from the top. | ||
| I'm sure right now the audience has seen the video of you attempting to go watch, go listen to the State of the State address. | ||
| You can see the video there. | ||
| You get essentially... | ||
| Thrown to the ground. | ||
| I'm not exactly sure why they did that. | ||
| It seems like you share my confusion and all of that, at least for a verified, meritable reason. | ||
| But walk us through what happened to you yesterday, and then we're going to really, most importantly, get into how the audience can help you fight back against the people who did this to you. | ||
| Yeah, thanks so much for having me on. | ||
| You know, this is the first time in the history of Georgia that we've ever ran across a situation like this. | ||
| You know, it's a joint assembly of both the House and the Senate. | ||
| And I have a constitutional and a legal obligation to be present. | ||
| And ultimately, the Speaker of the House, he was a complete and total tyrant. | ||
| His name is John Burns. | ||
| He said, I wasn't allowed to do that. | ||
| So then he sends out his attorney, this Keith Williams, who wants to do a WWE body slam. | ||
| And, you know, it's obviously assault. | ||
| And then they arrest me for willful obstruction, a misdemeanor, which in the state of Georgia constitutionally... | ||
| So there were a tremendous amount of constitutional violations. | ||
| I mean, I reminded all the state troopers there that they all swore an oath to the Constitution. | ||
| I mean, basically, you start calling out the corruption in Georgia. | ||
| You know, you start hounding Speaker John Burns for allowing... | ||
| Fonnie Willis impeachment articles to lay on his desk for nearly a year. | ||
| I mean, the posse was always calling his office up and telling him to get a hold of those impeachment articles. | ||
| And let's get to investigating Fonnie Willis. | ||
| Well, you know, they just put you in cuffs. | ||
| John Burns, he's a never-Trumper, all right? | ||
| He's a complete and total tyrant. | ||
| He's even had men dressed up as women do the prayer and invocation on the House floor. | ||
| I don't believe he and I are in the same party whatsoever. | ||
| Well, and to that point, I mean, I think you sort of rose to fame and prominence, at least here in the war room, because of what you were doing, you know, in part against Democrats, right, obviously, what Fannie Willis was doing. | ||
| So it just seems so interesting to me that—not interesting, I think you and I both know the answer to it, but that there's sort of the corollary, right, the spillover effect that the establishment Republicans hate you, you too. | ||
| But just one more time, walk us through. | ||
| I mean, I'm not hearing— It sounds like you did anything wrong other than, I guess, personal animosity between you and the Speaker because you've dared to actually hold the line on all things President Trump and America first. | ||
| What exactly did they detain you for? | ||
| You were truly just trying to go and watch the state of the state. | ||
| I mean, it makes no sense. | ||
| That's it. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| That's all. | ||
| I mean, it's very mafioso. | ||
| What type of world? | ||
| What state of the state? | ||
| It's a state of tyranny. | ||
| I mean, this attorney, his name's Keith Williams. | ||
| He works for the Speaker of the House. | ||
| He pushes me down onto the ground right in front of 18 state troopers, and they arrest me for obstruction. | ||
| It's absolutely mind-boggling. | ||
| It's a constitutional crisis, but I tell you what it does, Natalie. | ||
| It allows, it forces the issue to where now representatives of the House have to decide whether they're going to allow this type of blatant tyranny to happen before them or they're going to do something about it. | ||
| You know, I'm really concerned with my own personal state representative who's too afraid to speak out against this tyrant. | ||
| I guess he's, well, my goodness, if they can put you in cuffs, they can put me in cuffs. | ||
| It creates a chilling effect. | ||
| All over the state of Georgia, no matter what your religion is, your ethnicity, everyone in the state of Georgia, we all have equal protection under the law. | ||
| And because one man wanted to be an authoritarian, 200,000 people that I represent were disenfranchised from having their voices heard in that joint session. | ||
| I want to read the statement that the Speaker of the House put out because it seems like they're not backing down. | ||
| Obviously, you're not backing down either. | ||
| And I would say, hey, empirically, historically, whichever side of the fight has the war room posse in their corner, they typically end up coming out stronger. | ||
| His statement, I mean, talk about gaslighting. | ||
| The situation outside of the House chamber this morning was incredibly unfortunate. | ||
| The senator refused to cooperate with doorkeepers and law enforcement and created a dangerous situation when he chose to use force against our law enforcement officers, dedicated doorkeepers and House staff. | ||
| I want to thank every House staff member and our entire House family for holding the line to honor Speaker Ralston's legacy of dedicated service to our state. | ||
| As you saw today, the integrity and decorum of this House are non-negotiable. | ||
| Period. | ||
| A lot of, I would say, stolen valor and gaslighting going on there. | ||
| But just walk us through what you think the remedy to this altercation, this situation, has to be. | ||
| Does he need to be removed as speaker? | ||
| Do you think that, you know, you can continue on having this man in power? | ||
| I think you are right to assess it as a state of tyranny. | ||
| And I think tyrannical leaders, I don't think history treats them very well. | ||
| But what are sort of your plan of action moving forward? | ||
| No, I would encourage folks to sign on to the official petition to have John Burns resign. | ||
| You know, I don't believe we're in the same party, as I mentioned before. | ||
| I think the executive committee of the Georgia GOP, I think they should remove him as a Republican, just like they did former Lieutenant Governor Jeff Duncan, who was campaigning for Kamala Harris and sided with Fonnie Willis when Donald Trump and the 19 others were charged in the RICO case here in Atlanta. | ||
| That's the type of thing that has to be done, and we have to set a strong example so this type of thing never happens again. | ||
| All right? | ||
| I mean, it's never happened before. | ||
| So how in the world can we allow this type of blatant tyranny to exist in our state? | ||
| If we don't fight now, we'll never have freedom. | ||
| So if the posse wants to sign the petition, make the phone calls, really help give you the power that you need to make this happen, where can they go to do all that and support you? | ||
| You can always go to x at real Colton Moore, just like real Donald Trump. | ||
| You can also go to iStandWithColton.com, and you can help us out with our legal defense fund there. | ||
| As you can see on your screen there, Rhino Wrangler. | ||
| Because if you're a Republican and you're not acting like it, you're a Republican in name only. | ||
| You're a Rhino. | ||
| So we are Rhino Wranglers here, and just like most of the war room posse. | ||
| And Senator, I'm just curious to sort of abstract away just from what's going on on a state level in Georgia. | ||
| Obviously, President Trump, thank goodness, thank God, is about to be sworn in as the next president of these great United States of America. | ||
| But I think we're already sort of seeing the pushback, the resistance, not even necessarily coming from Democrats, but coming from sort of the old Republican guard. | ||
| I'm just curious, as someone who has held the line so much so that you're getting... | ||
| Beaten up in your own, you know, home state where you represent. | ||
| Your sort of assessment from, you know, just like a meta perspective of how you think the Trump administration will be able to navigate a lot of this staunch establishment Republican opposition. | ||
| Well, I tell you what, Natalie, I'm so excited about A.G. Pambody. | ||
| I cannot wait for her to get confirmed by the Senate. | ||
| And at 12.01, I tell you what, she's getting a letter from my office inviting her to come to Georgia and do some sniffing around at all the corruption we have going on here in Atlanta. | ||
| Super excited. | ||
| Super excited about Donald Trump being president once again. | ||
| In your opinion with Pam Bondi, at least when it comes to the state of Georgia, where do you think that she should be probing and investigating first? | ||
|
unidentified
|
What are you guys really going to be focusing on in terms of liaising with the DOJ? Well, I mean, first and foremost, we've got to take care of this Fonny Willis situation. | |
| I mean, our AG, Chris Carr, he's done absolutely nothing. | ||
| Like, he's went after other district attorneys for, like, $5,000 mishaps, and Fonny Willis has done hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of tax dollar mishaps, and no one can seem to hold her accountable. | ||
| Fonny Willis needs a takedown coming from the Department of Justice, because here in Georgia, we've made it very evident that we're not able to clean up our own mess. | ||
| And the one guy, myself, who's trying to clean it up, well... | ||
| I get a mugshot in the same place Donald Trump's getting a mugshot. | ||
| So we definitely need some help there. | ||
| And we also need some help for just basic civil rights, just like I have a civil right to represent my constituents in northwest Georgia on the House floor, and you've got this tyrannical mafioso-style speaker. | ||
| Yeah, that's a Department of Justice issue as well. | ||
| So she's got plenty to do down in Georgia, and I know plenty to do across the United States. | ||
| So we're praying for her because it's going to be a big issue. | ||
| Senator Colton Moore, thank you for not just holding the line and staying in the breach, but for joining us this Friday evening. | ||
| One more time, your call to action for the posse. | ||
| If they want to follow you, keep up to date. | ||
| But more importantly, remove this guy's speaker, sign the petitions, make the calls. | ||
| Where can they go to do all of that? | ||
| You can always follow my Twitter at RealColtonMoore, and we'll be giving you links that make things easy there. | ||
| But tell you what, if you live in the state of Georgia and you're part of the posse, Call up your state representative. | ||
| I'm sure you can find their campaign website phone number and demand that they call on Speaker John Burns to resign. | ||
| What a joke. | ||
| What a joke. | ||
| What a sick joke. | ||
| A tyrannical joke. | ||
| Colton, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| We'll definitely have you back on soon, hopefully to celebrate his removal. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you, Natalie. | |
| Appreciate you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Of course. | |
| Warren Posse, I, of course, always appreciate you guys hanging out with me for the last, I guess, two hours. | ||
| I wasn't under the impression that I was going to be hosting at all today, so it was a last-minute show, but I think we ended up, honestly, breaking a lot of news. | ||
| So, as always, thank you for hanging with me. | ||
| Got to pay some bills here in the war room, so make sure you're checking out thenationalpulse.com slash war room, sacred human health, the best beef liver that you can get, and it's MAGA, MAHA-friendly, warpath.coffee, using promo code war room. | ||
| Got to go grab my bag of coffee somewhere. | ||
| Of course, government gangsters, that's war room.film, rebels, rogues, and outlaws. | ||
| The best book if you're here in D.C., find a war room posse member or someone who's in the book and we'll sign it. | ||
| And of course, birchgold.com slash Bannon. | ||
| The place to go and get the latest installment of the end of the dollar empire. | ||
| I think if there's anything that we've learned from all the guests that we had on today, or I guess, frankly, four years of Joe Biden, it's that this regime, the powers that be, the people who clap and applaud for Merrick Garland, frankly, they have no taste or they just hate this country. | ||
| And whether it's the former or the latter, it's not good for your financial future or your bank account. | ||
| So make sure you're checking out birchcold.com slash Bannon. | ||
| And of course, jacemedical.com. | ||
| You can use promo code war room. | ||
| Don't be relying on the Chinese Communist Party for anything, let alone your personal medication. | ||
| And last but certainly not least, tax network, USA, TNUSA.com slash Bannon. | ||
| We need you in the fight, not dealing with a bunch of crazy tax stuff. | ||
| All the, what, IRS agents that Joe Biden funded up the wazoo to come after you while crying that he's the one who's going to be weaponized against. | ||
| Well... | ||
| Just a fun fact, I believe Joe Biden, it was one of the lead stories in Axios today, will be writing a book that's probably going to be hard to do from prison, but on how he has a great legacy. | ||
| That was sort of the pitch. | ||
| I hope no one buys it. | ||
| Find a way to get a jerry-rigged copy so you don't give any more money to the Biden crime family than they've skimmed off of you for Hunter Biden's, I guess. | ||
| Various business ventures, whether it be in China, Iraq, probably Afghanistan, Ukraine, take your pick. | ||
| But I don't think that the Joe Biden book pivot is necessarily what the American people want, because you know what, Joe Biden? | ||
| People love President Donald J. Trump so much that they probably would have stood out in the freezing cold weather. | ||
| If it were me personally, I would have still held the inauguration outside, but that's okay. | ||
| We get it. | ||
| It's very cold. | ||
| There's so many patriots here, like I said, for those of you who aren't in D.C. or for those of you who are, you will see that it is just MAGA, warriors, and patriots everywhere. | ||
| It's a wonderful vibe, probably the safest and most beautiful this city has ever been because usually it's just a bunch of... | ||
| Woke-looking transgender bureaucrats who sort of have a satanic, soul-sucking look in their eyes. | ||
| And that's me being nice and TV-friendly. | ||
| So it's always a nice change of pace when you have actual patriots who just survived four years of absolute and complete and utter hell from a man named Joe Biden and his criminal lackeys like Merrick Garland, Lloyd Austin, and all these other hacks. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Who, God willing and Godspeed, will be rotting in prison. | |
| Until then, Natalie Winters here in the War Room out. | ||
| I will see you guys soon. |
Export Selection