Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
It's the sort of harebrained, comedic look of it all that they want you to focus on, right? | ||
And while you are distracted by the spectacle, they want you to lose sight of the fact that all of these people will have tremendous power with no actual qualitative experience, which could lead to massive corruption and the destruction of everything we've known for decades about what the federal government actually does. | ||
And the only people standing in the way are career civil servants who have no interest in facilitating this unbridled scorched earth vengeance led by incompetent people. | ||
Which explains why, according to multiple sources who spoke with Politico and the Washington Post, Donald Trump is expected to announce that Russell Vout, a key author of Project 2025, will once again lead the Office of Management and Budget, as he did in Trump's first administration. | ||
NBC has not confirmed that reporting. | ||
Vout, who once said that he wants, quote, bureaucrats to be traumatically affected, It's a self-proclaimed Christian nationalist who's pushing a post-constitutional vision for the second Trump administration, which includes this novel theory that Congress doesn't have complete control over spending and that a president can circumvent their power of the purse. | ||
That will now be able to enact key aspects of Project 2025, which includes decimating the federal government and bleeding it of any nonpartisan civil servants. | ||
Trump and his deputies will have nobody, nobody standing in their way. | ||
Vout joins folks like WrestleMania McMahon, TV doctor Mehmet Oz, real-world Boston cast member and former Wisconsin Congressman Sean Duffy, Fox regulars Pete Hegseth and Matthew Whitaker, and a real-life version of an American horror story. | ||
Mr. Brennan, on a question about process, including the background process, there's been multiple reporting that they signaled early on they're not going to have the FBI do background checks. | ||
They're going to either outsource, privatize that, or even just sidestep it. | ||
They're not going to do background checks. | ||
And they're just going to issue security clearance by executive order of the president to whoever he wants to issue to. | ||
To someone who's not worked in the national security apparatus, it's like, ah, maybe you guys are too uptight about this anyway. | ||
What do you think about this idea? | ||
unidentified
|
Well, it certainly is a very radical deviation from the way things have been done in the past under all administrations, Democratic and Republican. | |
The only individuals who don't go through a background check, basically, are the president and the vice president when they are elected into office. | ||
But everybody else, all cabinet officials, need to go through that background check, especially those in national security that are going to be given, provided, this country's most sensitive classified information, the secrets. | ||
And so therefore, the professionals in these organizations, in the intelligence community, in law enforcement, want to know that when they're sharing this information with these individuals, that they've already gone through that security clearance process. | ||
And the fact that the Trump administration is not adhering to that process, either for the FBI background checks or ethic pledges and other types of things, Really, I think, has raised serious concerns in the minds of a lot of the professionals who are going to be put in the position of having to support and brief these individuals if they get confirmed by the Senate. | ||
This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
unidentified
|
Pray for our enemies, because we're going medieval on these people. | |
I got a free shot of all these networks lying about the people. | ||
The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
It's going to happen. | ||
And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
Here's your host, Stephen K. Vance. | ||
Welcome. | ||
It is Thursday, 21 November in the year of our Lord, 2024. Welcome. | ||
So here's, right there, John Brennan, no, we're not going to allow the deep state to determine who's in the Trump administration and who's not, okay? | ||
Either in the White House or one of the departments, cabinets, all of it. | ||
You're not running the deal. | ||
We're running the deal. | ||
And Brennan, you should stop going on... | ||
Just a recommendation. | ||
Stop going on MSNBC and start lawyering up. | ||
Because you're in a short list of people that I'm sure are going to be investigated in this vast criminal conspiracy against President Trump and MAGA. So you don't need to worry about our clearances. | ||
You don't need to worry about FBI checks. | ||
That's not your worry anymore. | ||
You should worry because on the afternoon, the 20th of January, 2025, we're going to strip you of your security clearance and take your pension away. | ||
So I would be talking to your financial advisor. | ||
Then you're going to spend millions and millions and millions of dollars in years and years and years trying to defend yourself against deep investigations, just like you did to us. | ||
Now, the difference between The good guys in the MAGA movement and around President Trump and you guys, you're like rats leaving the ship. | ||
All I see is the Hollywood elite, DeGeneres yesterday going to the Cotswolds in England. | ||
You guys are fleeing the country. | ||
McCabe sitting there whining. | ||
Weissman whining. | ||
Whining. | ||
Leaving the country. | ||
Not standing up and defending your position. | ||
You know why? | ||
You know what crimes you're guilty of. | ||
So, no, Brennan, we're not going to play your game. | ||
We're not going to go through your system. | ||
We're not going to let the deep state, the deep state, the infiltration, and the transition team needs to wake up and get very focused on either CIA or FBI infiltration down there. | ||
Don't trust any of them. | ||
They're not trustworthy. | ||
They're not trustworthy. | ||
There may be some, but they have to be vetted. | ||
And I mean really vetted. | ||
I would not trust anyone from the FBI. I would not trust anyone from the CIA. I just would not. | ||
Until they're properly vetted. | ||
Brennan, you're not going to vet us. | ||
Your cronies are not going to vet the Trump team. | ||
Not going to happen. | ||
Don't need it. | ||
Thank you, but no thank you. | ||
In fact, all of the people associated with the administrative deep state have to be thoroughly vetted. | ||
Not our people coming in. | ||
President Trump took a bullet to the head and then won a landslide victory four months later. | ||
He gets to choose who's in his government or not. | ||
And no. | ||
And if you're thinking, oh, well, the professionals don't like it, they can leave. | ||
They can leave, and we're going to make them leave. | ||
You're either with the program or you're not with the program. | ||
There's no concept in the Constitution of checks and balances. | ||
There's no checks and balances inside the executive branch. | ||
This is the deep state's perverted mindset. | ||
It's a perversion of the Constitution. | ||
Checks and balances are from the other two branches of government, the judiciary and the legislative. | ||
And President Trump believes in that. | ||
He believes in that. | ||
Also believes in things like recess appointments. | ||
You can do that and still believe in checks and balances. | ||
But no, there's no checks and balances. | ||
This is the perverted thinking of the administrative and deep state. | ||
They run the deal. | ||
They call the shots. | ||
You don't call the shots. | ||
You're not going to call the shots anymore. | ||
Game over. | ||
President Trump, as I told the New York Times, is a blunt force instrument. | ||
And he's delivered blunt force trauma onto the administrative state. | ||
And you see it all day long on MSNBC. MSNBC, by the way, I don't know if you guys fully realize it, but Bill O'Reilly summed it up last night, I think on Cuomo's show. | ||
I'll try to play that clip a little later in the show. | ||
But MSNBC that we monitor 24-7, I think has just been dumped. | ||
And I agree with Bill O'Reilly. | ||
I think NBC News in the hierarchy of the Roberts family said, hey, this hate-filled network. | ||
It's so deranged, so deranged that we've got to cut it loose. | ||
And they're putting it in with other cable properties because cable's dying. | ||
They're putting it in with other dying cable properties and spinning it off to shareholders. | ||
But essentially, they're cutting it off from any capital so it will implode. | ||
And you see, Morning Joe, we're going to get into all this. | ||
But I want to start first because Inside Baseball. | ||
The finance aspect of this is now being worked through, and obviously we have thought from the beginning that a safe pair of hands is Scott Besson, right, as Secretary of Treasury. | ||
Kevin Warsh is in the hunt. | ||
I understand Rowan over at Apollo. | ||
I don't know how you pick a private equity guy, given all the damage private equity has done to workers in this country. | ||
How someone at Apollo is even on the shortlist. | ||
And Rowan is a very smart guy. | ||
Some people may even say he's brilliant. | ||
Right? | ||
Some people may even say he's brilliant. | ||
But I don't think he understands MAGA. They have Rorsch and Besant. | ||
Besant clearly has been with President Trump for a while. | ||
I think a very safe pair of hands. | ||
And then it's whoever's going to be NEC. So I think President Trump is chewing this over. | ||
I know that all the interviews took place yesterday. | ||
I think he's mulling it over in his mind. | ||
And President Trump is a finance guy and understands that. | ||
So we have to just stand by and see what's going to happen. | ||
But clearly, I think that particularly what I think attract this audience to Besson and look, no candidates perfect, but that he came up with this concept, this construct of a growth strategy to get us out of here. | ||
And we're going to need that. | ||
And somebody's got to be able to execute that. | ||
Okay? | ||
Somebody's got to be able to execute that. | ||
Because this is our last shot to do it, given the firestorm we've got on this debt. | ||
And I think you're seeing kind of a global margin call right now. | ||
As importantly is that you've got to figure out how to finance this. | ||
You've got to figure out going forward. | ||
But as importantly is what exactly are we doing? | ||
What are we doing programmatically? | ||
How are you going to cut? | ||
If you go after the administrative state by billet and program, you also at the same time are thinking about cutting costs. | ||
The key there is Office of Management and Budget. | ||
And I think it'll be announced today, at least the news is breaking it, not totally confirmed, that Russ Vogt over at CRA, who's been a contributor to this show for years and years and years, and a guy that I revere because he's such a just down-the-middle boom. | ||
Here's what it is. | ||
He knows the math better than anybody. | ||
And I think with Elon and Vivek and now MTG has been announced on a subcommittee to help the Doge guys. | ||
This is all going to merge into the appropriations process. | ||
We're going to have a lot of very smart people coming from different perspectives with a guy like Russ Vogt that can work with both the Hill and President Trump over in the Oval Office to kind of get your hands around federal spending. | ||
People are coming up with new ideas and concepts all the time. | ||
One of the most striking and brilliant, because you know you've had Jeff Clark working on this thing about the recess appointments, which may be a tool that we need in the toolbox. | ||
Another tool that's just, it's kind of breathtaking of its possibilities if you have Very smart, very tough, spines of steel, people that are prepared to execute on it. | ||
I want to bring in Mark Paoletta. | ||
Mark, you have been kind of one of the theoreticians of this. | ||
I want to walk through. | ||
I got about two minutes here, and I'm going to hold you through the break. | ||
We couldn't get all through it last night. | ||
The... | ||
The impoundment. | ||
Why is, in nomenclature, we're always trying to get the Warren Posse, our cadre, ahead of the curve here. | ||
Why is impoundment, what is it, and why is it going to be so important in President Trump's program going forward to really get control of this out-of-control federal government, sir? | ||
Empoundment is the president's authority to not spend funds that Congress appropriated. | ||
In our founding and going back in England and coming over to the United States, it was always appropriations were a ceiling, not a floor. | ||
And what happened in the post-Watergate, Watergate period is that Congress turned it upside down and said, It's a floor. | ||
You have to spend every nickel appropriated. | ||
This is how they take care of their special interests. | ||
But you have to spend every single nickel appropriated or you're breaking the law. | ||
And so we've done a lot of work led by Russ over the past four years. | ||
We did some of this in the White House. | ||
And just to digress for one second, Russ's vote, if it is correct, would be spectacular as the new OMB director. | ||
That would be a superb, superb choice. | ||
Happy if he gets it. | ||
Because impoundment and all of these tools that need to be done need somebody who's smart and tactical and with a spine of steel. | ||
That's for us. | ||
But it's really—and we did a lot of work on two 20-page papers looking at the history of impoundments, the constitutional basis for impoundments, and how every president up until Nixon impounded hundreds of millions, billions of dollars in funds, OK, because they didn't think it was the right thing to do on exercising their authority. | ||
And Congress agreed with them in most instances. | ||
There was battles back and forth. | ||
And that's the hurly burly, as Justice Scalia has pointed out, between the two branches. | ||
But it's the president exercising agency as the chief executive officer. | ||
If Congress appropriates $100 million for a program to build a tank, say, and you can do it for $50 million or $75 million, it is under the current law. | ||
It is against the law to spend. | ||
Go ahead. | ||
Hang on for one second, because this is so this is so important. | ||
And it gets back to so many different concepts of really the intellectual architecture of the second trunk 2.0. | ||
All they're chasing in the media, they're chasing the shiny toys. | ||
At War Room, we're giving the cadre the information you need to drive the action forward. | ||
Short commercial break. | ||
Mark Paoletta with impoundment and other issues related to the executive branch in a moment. | ||
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | |
We're talking about President Trump's economic and finance plan, all of it going forward, because, you know, people do make the case that this is what people voted for to get the economy going again, get jobs, get money. | ||
It's quite complicated, but the team is coming together. | ||
Scott Besson's plan for economic growth, kind of this growth strategy. | ||
I think the President spent a lot of time chewing on that. | ||
Clearly, if it's true about these announcements about Russ's vote, that goes back to President Trump's first term where, of all the stuff going on in the White House, the one thing that was locked down was President Trump's understanding of the math, and that's because of Russ's vote and his team. | ||
Make sure in times of financial turmoil that you check out the folks at Birch Gold. | ||
Birchgold.com slash Bannon. | ||
Philip Patrick and the team. | ||
In fact, you can text message if you want to, Bannon, at 989898. You get all types of free information kits about the 401ks, IRAs, all these tax-deferred and tax-free ways that you can shift into precious metals. | ||
But first, you have to understand why it's been a hedge fund. | ||
Against times of turbulence for 5,000 years of man's recorded history. | ||
That's what Philip Patrick and the team can walk you through. | ||
So check it out today. | ||
Also, home title lock, you know, maybe 80% of your net worth is tied up in that title of that home, your castle. | ||
The last thing you want is some bad guy, either cyber or somebody you knew, maybe a lawyer used to work for, an accountant, to get in and to monetize that title. | ||
The people that stopped that is home title lock. | ||
Home title lock dot com. | ||
Go check it out. | ||
Slash ban and check it out. | ||
I want to go back. | ||
I want to make sure the Warren Posse understands this because in the days and months and weeks ahead, when you see all the stuff flying around, Doge and you got Vivek and Elon, you know, they're broing out. | ||
They've got very serious players they're already bringing in underneath them because these are serious guys. | ||
And this government efficiency is really going to dovetail with appropriations and with OMB in a process. | ||
Marjorie Taylor Greene is going to chair up a subcommittee in the House. | ||
She's going to be with us later. | ||
What it is is to deconstruct the administrative state, right, to refurbish and to re-energize these departments of exactly what we need in a limited government. | ||
Okay? | ||
People have talked about limited government. | ||
The conservatives ran around. | ||
I'm a limited government conservative. | ||
Okay, bro, I got it. | ||
Trump delivered it. | ||
Well, he delivered on the cusp of it. | ||
And now we're going to get down, and folks, when you have a $6.5 trillion budget, and this place is like Paris. | ||
You've got the boutiques, you've got the Lamborghini dealerships, the pain in cash, the seven, what, five of the seven richest counties in the country are around the imperial capital. | ||
That's not by accident. | ||
There's a ton of money that flows through here, right? | ||
More money than flows through Wall Street, right through here. | ||
And that's what Russ Vogt and Mark Paoletta are the tip of the tip of the spear. | ||
So this unitary executive theory, which kind of gets back to really the executive being both three things. | ||
The chief executive of the United States government, the commander-in-chief of the uniformed services, and the chief magistrate. | ||
The chief law enforcement officer ain't the attorney general. | ||
It's the president of these United States. | ||
That would be Donald Trump. | ||
Now you get down to... | ||
I want to go back to the history. | ||
Nixon... | ||
This is one of the big fallouts of Watergate. | ||
One of the massive... | ||
This is one of the reasons that the federal government, even after the Great Society, exploded. | ||
And even Reagan couldn't get his arms around it. | ||
Because what did they do? | ||
They held Nixon hostage to get this changed. | ||
Did they not mark pay a letter? | ||
Yes, Steve, you hit it perfectly. | ||
You know, the 1970s was just a horrible time for the presidency. | ||
Congress did this massive power grab with the Empowerment Control Act, with the Independent Council Statute, with the War Powers Resolution, all things to cripple the presidency, cripple the president, and having agency in order to carry out his duties, his responsibilities. | ||
And so, you know, it It is a perfect time for this president, for the president-elect to come in and reassert those powers all across the board, right? | ||
And the key is, it's not norm-breaking, right? | ||
It's returning the presidency to what it's been historically. | ||
And that's the part that we've done a lot of work on, you know, on impoundment, okay? | ||
You know, it all goes all the way back to Jefferson and probably to Washington. | ||
It just wasn't recorded in terms of impounding funds. | ||
Congress appropriates The president says, I don't need this money. | ||
I don't like this money. | ||
I'm not going to spend it. | ||
And so there was a push and pull over over the years. | ||
But, you know, when I focused when we did this work and I refer the posse to the CRA website where there's two 20 page papers that lays all of this out. | ||
Again, you had Roosevelt, FDR, during the Depression and coming into the war, refusing to spend money, citing economic emergency, right? | ||
He impounded hundreds of millions of dollars, as did, I'm looking at some of the stuff we did, Truman. | ||
He impounded half the National Guard's appropriation. | ||
In 1949, he impounded funds appropriated by Congress for two supercarriers. | ||
He deferred various domestic programs in order to focus on the Korean War efforts. | ||
Okay, okay, but hang on, but hang on. | ||
Yo, yo, yo, hang on. | ||
Full stop. | ||
I got that, but that was pre—how are you going to do it? | ||
I got all that, but that's pre-1974. | ||
At the height of the Watergate, for Nixon to save himself, he says, I'll give these guys this, and maybe they'll back off. | ||
They didn't. | ||
They drove him out of office. | ||
How are you going to do it if it's actually been codified into law? | ||
What magic are you and Russ vote? | ||
Because trust me, the left's going to come in on you guys hard. | ||
How are you going to do this now when it's actually in law, sir? | ||
Again, the law is so invasive of the president's authority to direct the executive branch, and as he is with the commander-in-chief, chief executive, where he has a purview over all the laws and making sure that they are all being properly executed. | ||
Okay, so you're telling me we're going to force, since we control the House and the Senate, You guys may do it, but the left is going to sit there and take us. | ||
They're going to go into a federal court, get a TRO, and go, hey, I'd love it, but pay a letter, a vote, and Trump are breaking the law, and we want them to revert back to the law. | ||
Aren't you going to force a... | ||
I'm not saying this is a fight we want, but somewhere the Supreme Court of these United States is going to get involved here. | ||
Are they not, sir? | ||
Sure. | ||
Well, the mechanism they set up to enforce the Empowerment Control Act is for the Comptroller General to sue the president for not spending the funds. | ||
It is our very considered judgment that the Comptroller General is unconstitutional. | ||
He is a legislative officer that's appointed by the president, and he can sue the president. | ||
That just doesn't happen in our system. | ||
A person appointed by the president is not allowed to sue the president. | ||
And so we welcome a challenge from the Comptroller General because I do believe that the Supreme Court would strike down the Comptroller General as an officer. | ||
He's an unconstitutional officer. | ||
That's the way the Empowerment Control Act is set up. | ||
And we saw the partisanship of the Comptroller General when he issued that ridiculous opinion when we paused the money For 60 days so that the president could decide how best to spend the Ukraine funding back in 2019. That was the Comptroller General who made this outrageous decision that it was a violation of the Empowerment Control Act. | ||
And he made that decision because he said the Department of Defense had already certified that this money would be spent a certain way. | ||
Completely writing out of the scene, the president of the United States, who is the chief executive commander-in-chief, who gets to decide at the end of the day how best to spend that money. | ||
So we welcome that challenge, Steve. | ||
I do think that this law is unconstitutional. | ||
It's an invasion of the president. | ||
It's a terrible law policy-wise. | ||
But in terms of trying to jam the president- I love it. | ||
With how he makes his determinations in spending money. | ||
Yeah, I love it. | ||
Because this is part of the deconstruction of the administrative state. | ||
Remember... | ||
The Supreme Court has our back here with Gorsuch and the guys on the Chevron deference, right? | ||
Now, there's going to be all types of things in here that are unconstitutional. | ||
This is part of it. | ||
In restructuring the government, you're going to have to go and take these things that have been unconstitutional out, and we're going to have a couple of three fights that maybe go all the way to the Supreme Court. | ||
Is that not correct, Brother Paoletta? | ||
Yes, and you'll see one of the co-authors of that paper, both papers actually, is Daniel Shapiro, who was a recent law clerk to Justice Thomas and is a superstar lawyer. | ||
I had spent time up there on the court. | ||
And you were talking about the Unitary Executive Department of Justice. | ||
There's a great article by one of Justice Thomas' former clerks too, Sai Prakash, about how the president is, I think he titled his law review article, the chief prosecutor of the United States, and showed how early presidents like Washington, Adams, and Jefferson directed specific prosecutions of specific people And also told the lawyers, | ||
because there was an Department of Justice at the time, but told the prosecutors, the federal prosecutors, to stop prosecutions when the president reconsidered Those directives. | ||
So that's the way our system is set up. | ||
There's no way around it. | ||
He is the chief executive. | ||
He's the commander in chief. | ||
Thomas Jefferson, if memory serves me correctly, Thomas Jefferson directed the entire prosecution for treason of Aaron Burr, who had once upon a time been his vice president of the United States, or was his vice president of the United States. | ||
He directed that. | ||
I just want to go back. | ||
I keep saying this is the Thomas Court, but now you're seeing the philosophy of Justice Thomas, one of the greatest justices this country's ever had. | ||
You're now seeing it through MAGA. Dude, Trump, when they just talk about the courts, that's where the fight in the Senate is so important. | ||
But in the executive branch, in the legislative, there's so many former clerks of Justice Thomas. | ||
They're at the tip of the spear in the kind of reorganization of this government. | ||
Mark, I know you've pressed for time, but can you just hold through one break? | ||
I've got a couple minutes on the other side, because I want to talk about these processes. | ||
Because they're sitting over there on MSNBC and the New York Times. | ||
Oh, these people are agents of chaos. | ||
It's quite the opposite. | ||
This is a very well-organized, very methodical steamroller that's coming for the administrative state. | ||
And they're yammering and yelping and, you know, oh, this is all chaos. | ||
It ain't going to be chaos. | ||
You're going to get rolled. | ||
You're going to get rolled and you're going to get rolled hard. | ||
And that's because there's some very smart and very tough people from Silicon Valley all the way to Washington, D.C. and a couple of three down in Mar-a-Lago in West Palm Beach. | ||
That are working on this right now. | ||
Short commercial break. | ||
Mark Pialeta joins us. | ||
Posobiec's here because the Biden regime, I might add the illegitimate Biden regime, is right now, with no guidance from Congress, getting us into a shooting war over in the Eurasian landmass. | ||
Yes, that would be Ukraine and Russia. | ||
Jack Posobiec, Naval Intelligence Officer, joins us right after Mark Pialeta. | ||
Next, in the War Room. | ||
Question about process, including the background process. | ||
There's been multiple reporting that they signaled early on. | ||
They're not going to have the FBI do background checks. | ||
They're going to either outsource, privatize that, or even just sidestep it. | ||
They're not going to do background checks. | ||
And they're just going to issue security clearance by executive order of the president to whoever he wants to issue to. | ||
To someone who's not worked in the national security apparatus, it's like, oh, maybe you guys are too uptight about this anyway. | ||
What do you think about this idea? | ||
unidentified
|
Well, it certainly is a very radical deviation from the way things have been done in the past under all administrations, Democratic and Republican. | |
The only individuals who don't go through a background check, basically, are the president and the vice president when they are elected into office. | ||
But everybody else, all cabinet officials, need to go through that background check, especially those in national security that are going to be given, provided, this country's most sensitive classified information, the secrets. | ||
And so, therefore, the professionals in these organizations, in the intelligence community, in law enforcement, want to know that when they're sharing this information with these individuals, that they've already gone through that security clearance process. | ||
And the fact that the Trump administration is not adhering to that process, either for the FBI background checks or ethnic pledges and other types of things, Really, I think, has raised serious concerns in the minds of a lot of the professionals who are going to be put in the position of having to support and brief these individuals if they get confirmed by the Senate. | ||
Brennan, you don't understand. | ||
We're putting you guys through the checks, not vice versa. | ||
People don't trust the FBI and don't trust the CIA and don't trust you. | ||
You know why? | ||
You're a criminal. | ||
Yo, bro, you're a criminal. | ||
You know you're a criminal. | ||
So this is the administrative state and the deep state's perversion of the Constitution and the perversion of our system. | ||
Mark Payaletta. | ||
I'm glad I got Poso coming on right here because he's an intel guy. | ||
This is a perversion. | ||
They're talking about a check and balance inside the executive. | ||
The checks and balances, correct me, Paoletta, and I'm not a lawyer, are the judiciary and the legislative on the executive and the executive on those two, right? | ||
There's nothing in the Constitution. | ||
This would be inconceivable. | ||
You think Washington, who they had to kind of come and talk into running for president? | ||
You think Washington, General Washington, would run for president, become the president, the founder of the nation? | ||
If he had known that inside his own administration, where he's chief executive officer, you got these permanent bureaucrats that put a check on him? | ||
Have you lost your frickin' mind? | ||
This is the problem. | ||
And Brennan said the quiet part aloud, hey, Brennan, we are vetting your guys. | ||
We are vetting the FBI. This is why Kash Patel needs to be head of the FBI. You're being vetted, and you're going to be bottom-blown. | ||
And by the way, bro, you're going to be under serious criminal investigation. | ||
So either leave the country to someplace we don't have an extradition treaty, or get ready to lawyer up and have all your left-wing buddies, all the billionaires you hang with, because now you're not going to have a security clearance because you're not going to be able to feed them the secrets. | ||
We ought to have a mass day one. | ||
Declassified. | ||
When you sit in there, this is how they keep control. | ||
Look, I had a high security. | ||
I had above an SCI back in 1981 as a young naval officer, as a special assistant, the chief of naval operation. | ||
I played this game for many, many decades. | ||
They control the information. | ||
The one way I have to piss off, the briefer every morning came in and gave me a brief. | ||
I go, why is this class? | ||
Navarra and I would sit there, why is this classified? | ||
And they go, they go, they hemorrhage. | ||
They control the information behind this bogus... | ||
Now, there is some stuff. | ||
I'm the first one. | ||
There's some stuff that, you know, maybe you've got to keep classified. | ||
But it's not the millions and millions of classified documents. | ||
God, that's a control game. | ||
Brennan, you don't control the executive branch. | ||
The Constitution's got Trump as the chief executive officer, the commander-in-chief of the military, and the chief magistrate, and the chief law enforcement officer. | ||
So suck on that. | ||
I'm tired of you people. | ||
I'm sick and tired of what you've perverted this country. | ||
You've destroyed this country. | ||
You've destroyed individuals in this country. | ||
You are a pervert. | ||
unidentified
|
You are a pervert. | |
Mark Paoletta, is that a twisted version of the Constitution and the problem we got? | ||
And no offense, conservatives, because he said Bush administration did it. | ||
This is the frickin' problem. | ||
The Bushes, you played patty cake with them, and you played footsie with them, and you just went along. | ||
This is why Trump... | ||
It's Washington, Lincoln, and Trump. | ||
He's the armor-piercing shell that's blown through that. | ||
He is the blunt force instrument for the American people. | ||
He is tribune of the people. | ||
And he's left blunt force trauma on this perverted system. | ||
Mark Paoletta. | ||
Yeah, and going back to Russ's comment, I mean, the trauma comment, which is the deep state... | ||
Does control the bureaucracy. | ||
And I wrote about this and pointed out some examples where, look, President Trump, it's his agenda that's gonna be implemented by every single person in that executive branch. | ||
They work for him. | ||
They have a duty, a responsibility to help carry out his program. | ||
Do we want feedback and to make things better? | ||
Yeah, but it's not to defeat the program, it's to help the program, right? | ||
And once the decision is made and moving forward, they are required. | ||
And we saw too many times, right, Too many times, so many times, where career people stonewalled, slow-rolled, objected, refusing to work on programs. | ||
And when I say this, or policies or projects, President Trump, the Department of Justice, was investigating Yale University for discrimination in their admissions practices. | ||
This has been ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, and yet you had career people refusing To work on it like they are some noble people fighting back against whatever the invaders. | ||
I mean, this is what we're talking about. | ||
They slow roll looking into the deaths of elderly people in New York nursing homes under Democratic Governor Cuomo. | ||
They thought that was wrong. | ||
They didn't like to do that because he was a Democrat governor. | ||
They actually went to the IG and started an investigation into this investigation, which I think is still pending, okay? | ||
So that's what the deep state does. | ||
And I don't want to, as you said, see, there are good people in there. | ||
I've worked with them. | ||
They did great work for President Trump, actually, and Russ. | ||
There's a lot of good people. | ||
There's a lot of good folks in there, and they're going to stick around. | ||
But hey, they're all going to get vetted. | ||
You ain't vetting us. | ||
We're vetting you. | ||
So understand, write that down. | ||
We're vetting the FBI and the CIA. You're not going to vet anybody. | ||
We don't care about your vetting. | ||
You're corrupt. | ||
We're going to vet you, and we'll take the handful of guys that are good, and the rest get bottom-blown. | ||
I want to get you back on and talk about process, because we're running out of time. | ||
But Grace Chung and Mo are going to put out, I want these papers read. | ||
I also want the unitary executive. | ||
So we got some homework assignments, folks. | ||
And we're going to quiz because I need the cadre. | ||
I need the posse. | ||
You're going to be in the ramparts. | ||
You need to know this stuff. | ||
This is inside baseball. | ||
These were the big fights. | ||
By the way, talking about inside baseball, Charlie Gasparino, who's... | ||
Okay, this is Charlie Gasparino's big... | ||
This is his big scoop. | ||
Charlie Gasparino, the guy at the Post and Fox business. | ||
Breaking. | ||
Top hedge fund managers are growing wary about the debt situation. | ||
The Counting. | ||
They believe Biden and Joe Biden and Yellen manipulating interest rates in the run-up to the November 5 by selling so much short-dated debt so as not to cause a spike in longer-dated yields. | ||
Have you ever heard that before? | ||
Here in the war room a year ago when they started doing it. | ||
We called it out then. | ||
We said, like, Argentina. | ||
Now Gasparino and all the guys in Fox and all the guys in New York Post are going to run around with their hair on fire. | ||
Yo, bro. | ||
They've been doing this for a while. | ||
Pay attention. | ||
Take notes. | ||
Get your number two pencil out. | ||
Payaletta, you're a rock star. | ||
I need everybody to go to CRA, but more important, I think we just got to make it. | ||
Put it up on social media. | ||
Grace, Mo, Jane, let's blow this out. | ||
Homework assignments. | ||
And this sounds great, doesn't it? | ||
Unitary executive theory. | ||
You've got the impoundment clause. | ||
Everything we're going to be doing here, Payaletta, where they get you on social media. | ||
Sure. | ||
Thanks, Steve. | ||
I'm at Mark Paoletta. | ||
And also my website is markpaoletta.com. | ||
I got all my op-eds, papers, that sort of stuff that I've written and done. | ||
So you're right. | ||
The posse, an amazing force. | ||
Get educated on this stuff. | ||
There's two 20-page papers. | ||
There's an op-ed I wrote on the president asserting His operational control of the Department of Justice as the founders envisioned and structured our constitution. | ||
So it's a great moment. | ||
It's an inflection point. | ||
I 100% agree. | ||
And come January 20th, the president hits the ground running. | ||
We change this country. | ||
Change it. | ||
Last question. | ||
Is it going to be anybody at CRA left after the administration's staffed up? | ||
Just curious minds want to know. | ||
We love you guys, but I'm afraid all of us. | ||
I'm not going to have any contributors. | ||
Everybody's gone. | ||
My product, they're all gone. | ||
Anyway, we love you, Paoletta. | ||
What's your personal, once again, what's your personal, where's your social media? | ||
Sure, at Mark Paoletta on X is where I do all my posting. | ||
And then markpaoletta.com is my website. | ||
There's an op-ed page on there, and it's got about 50 op-eds, Defending the President, Taking on the Left, Defending the Supreme Court, and as you mentioned, our greatest justice in our history, Justice Clarence Thomas. | ||
All the attacks on them. | ||
That's another piece of this too, right, Steve, which is the left wanted to pack the court so that they can control the opinions coming out. | ||
And thank God for the Supreme Court and what President Trump did because in the past four years, there were key decisions like the presidential immunity decision that protected the presidency, right, and our country. | ||
Thank God for the moral courage of Justice Clarence Thomas. | ||
You're seeing this is just not the Thomas Court. | ||
The entire executive branch and the legislative branch are full of acolytes of one of the greatest Americans in the history of this republic. | ||
So, Mark, thank you so much. | ||
Appreciate you being on here. | ||
Thanks, Steve. | ||
Clarence Thomas, look at his courage and look at Trump's courage. | ||
Because it's upon courage that all the other virtues rest. | ||
Jack Posobiec, before I get into the war in the Ukraine and this jam-up, Brennan, right there, you see the control they want to have? | ||
They think inside the executive branch they have, you ain't got control anymore. | ||
The controls, and how are you going to do it? | ||
You come out of the intel committee, the naval intel community, but all of you guys kind of think alike, how are we going to break this? | ||
How are we actually going to break them, Posobiec? | ||
Well, Steve, it's very simple and it's got to be top-down. | ||
The very first thing you've got to do, and when Tulsi Gabbard is confirmed as our DNI, then she's got to bring the heads of all 18 over there and say, look, if you're not on board, you're out. | ||
Honestly, no, I'm going to go one further. | ||
She's got to get rid of all of them. | ||
She's got to get rid of all of them day one. | ||
Clean house, full clean house. | ||
And then, this is what you said, Steve, instead of them vetting us, we're going to hold hearings on who should be the next director of these various agencies. | ||
We're going to go through every single one of them. | ||
And as they sit there, we're going to say, what have you done in your job? | ||
What have you done in terms of the issues? | ||
Look at what they're doing. | ||
With Ukraine-Russia right now, and we'll get into it more after the break, but it's very clear. | ||
You've got a mentality that America should be the global empire, that America should be the world police, that America should be dominant across Eurasia, that America should be dominant across every single sphere of the world. | ||
And it's not our fight in so many of these cases because what do we do? | ||
We go to the New York Times. | ||
We find out that CIA and the Vindman brothers and all those guys hanging out over there, that they were planning and training these operations. | ||
And by the way, we're going to pull in a lot of these people, too, because I got some questions about what Ryan Wesley Routh, the second Trump assassin who goes on trial at Eileen Cannon's courthouse here in a couple of weeks. | ||
I want to know what's in his CIA file that was handed over to DHS when they pulled him into secondary screening in Honolulu before he went to shoot President Trump or try to at least down outside the West Palm Beach golf course. | ||
They are shredding files right now over at CIA and that's what we need to get to the bottom of immediately. | ||
Okay, hang on. | ||
You're going to stick with me here. | ||
Post-7, I appreciate you. | ||
I know you're incredibly busy, but this is quite important. | ||
I think Ray and Mayorkas just canceled going to the Hill, maybe to the Senate. | ||
Maybe that's because of the judges. | ||
I'm going to get it all worked out. | ||
We're going to be back in a moment. | ||
Post-7 is going to be with us. | ||
And this is because the Hill didn't force the War Powers Act and didn't make Biden come years ago. | ||
We're a thousand days into this war. | ||
We've got a million dead Ukrainians. | ||
Only 38% of them support this war now. | ||
And it's escalating minute by minute. | ||
Next. | ||
unidentified
|
News on Capitol Hill this morning, where both FBI Director Christopher Wray and the Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas are apparently refusing to appear before a Senate committee this morning. | |
That hearing had been planned for months, but this is an 11th hour back out. | ||
In a statement, the chair of the committee, Democrat Gary Peters, saying, quote, for the first time in more than 15 years, the Homeland Security Secretary and the FBI Director have refused to appear before the committee. | ||
Their choice to not provide public testimony about their department's efforts to address wide-ranging national security threats robs the American people of critical information and the opportunity for public accountability. | ||
Let's get over to NBC's Ken Delaney for more on what's going on here. | ||
So, Ken, Senator Peters says this is a, quote, shocking departure from tradition. | ||
Is it? | ||
It is fairly shocking, Ana, in part because this hearing had been planned for weeks, and it was only on Monday that these two top officials decided that they weren't going to testify in public, and they did so both in the House version of this hearing and the Senate version. | ||
And it's pretty clear what's going on here. | ||
These two men are not expected to continue for very much longer in their jobs, and these congressional hearings are very unpleasant for them. | ||
They get grilled by members of both parties on all sorts of issues. | ||
They even get death threats in some cases after these hearings. | ||
And so they're choosing not to appear in public. | ||
Now, the FBI is saying in a statement to us that they have provided lots of information in public settings over the last year about all kinds of threats. | ||
And that's true. | ||
But, you know, this was a chance for the taxpayers to hear from these people who work for them about significant threats facing the nation. | ||
And they're not going to get that chance. | ||
Oh... | ||
My. | ||
God. | ||
Oh. | ||
My. | ||
unidentified
|
God. | |
I think this just might have something to do with their criminality. | ||
They don't want any more on the record. | ||
They can't take any more on the record because the House particularly, we were waiting for them. | ||
Jack Posobiec, this is pretty breathtaking. | ||
I keep saying, this is why we had you on the day. | ||
You've got the war in Ukraine, they're ramping up. | ||
The International Criminal Court with a nudge from the United States has just indicted Bibi and I think his defense minister. | ||
You've got hundreds of thousands going to come across the border. | ||
Charlie Gasparini just figured out. | ||
You've got Yellen over there selling more short-term 90-day notes like Argentina. | ||
The entire process is to set up and destroy Trump in the indirect. | ||
That's what I'm saying. | ||
Folks, right now is the fight. | ||
Right now is the fight. | ||
If you take a vacation, if we look the other way, and those senators get your frickin' asses back up to D.C., Braun and Cruz, where in the hell are you? | ||
We're gonna stop more judges last night. | ||
This is a disgrace. | ||
You're paid to get here and represent the people. | ||
Braun, I don't care if you're the governor of Indiana. | ||
Indiana can wait. | ||
Not going anywhere. | ||
Football team's on fire. | ||
You can get your ass back here and stop some of these radical bottom-of-the-barrel judges. | ||
Poso, this is about as up in your grill as you can possibly get, coming from a guy that spent four months in Danbury, kind of directionally what they just did, sir. | ||
Well, Steve, it's very obvious what's going on. | ||
And yes, of course, you were, as well as Peter Navarro, sent away for four months each for refusing to testify. | ||
Now, I don't believe that they were subpoenaed in this instance by the United States Senate. | ||
You were subpoenaed, of course, by the January 6th Select Committee, which was an illegitimate committee as constituted. | ||
And Speaker Johnson, I'll give him a little credit on that one. | ||
Speaker Johnson even submitted to the Justice Department and to the courts that it was illegally constituted. | ||
And so the idea that they would refuse an acting standing committee of the United States Senate, which is the first time this has ever happened, United States Senate Homeland Security team. | ||
It shows me exactly what's going on here. | ||
Steve, we can see it on every front. | ||
You see it in Ukraine and Russia. | ||
You see it in Israel-Gaza and the ICC. You see it down on the border where they are planning this mass—it's the million-man march across the border right now is what they're doing, and Oscar Blue Ramirez has the entire thing. | ||
They are attempting to shock the system. | ||
They are pushing everything into the red. | ||
They're trying to redline the entire system before Trump gets in there. | ||
And what they're going to do is when he gets in and when everything is falling apart, they're going to say, oh, look, look at the chaos. | ||
Look at the drama. | ||
Look at Trump and Elon and all in RFK and told CC. We told you these are Pete Hegseth, Bad Picks, Cash Patel. | ||
You know, cash only. | ||
We love only cash. | ||
They're going to say, oh, it was all bad picks. | ||
And Trump's gay. | ||
They don't know anything they're doing. | ||
And Scott Besson. | ||
And no, they can't figure it out because they're trying to redline the system. | ||
They're setting fire to the house before they leave it. | ||
And we can see the American people can see what's going on. | ||
And President Trump's got to be very smart. | ||
And fortunately, he is the man for the job in terms of all of this. | ||
And I certainly don't have any inside information on this, but I certainly hope that he's picking up the phone to these various entities around the world and saying, look, look, we understand what they're doing. | ||
We understand what's going on. | ||
We are on top of this, but we need our landing teams in there immediately. | ||
Not January 20th. | ||
You need them there right now because we can all see what's going on. | ||
Yeah. | ||
Jack, I know you get a bounce, but give me a minute on this. | ||
I get two minutes here, but 90 seconds. | ||
Give it to me on what's happening in Ukraine. | ||
This thing's escalating, and folks, it's going to spin out of control. | ||
The fog of war is setting in right there right now. | ||
What is your biggest concern? | ||
Well, right now we're also—we're hearing what they're attempting to do, what the U.S. is doing and the U.S.'s little puppet there, Keir Stahmer, over in the U.K. are trying to do when they jerk him on his leash are to get—to fire these long-range missiles into Russia with the attempt to get Russia to respond with a massive provocation, thereby in denying President Trump the capacity and the parameters for a peace deal to take place. | ||
So what Russia has done at this point— They haven't responded with lighting up Kiev. | ||
There certainly are warnings of this, but there was a massive strike last night in the city of Dnepro. | ||
Now, the Ukrainians are saying that this was intercontinental ballistic missiles. | ||
And if this was an intercontinental ballistic missile, Steve, this is very serious, and the war room posse has to take this seriously. | ||
And this is a serious show and a serious audience. | ||
That would be the first time an intercontinental ballistic missile ICBM was ever used in combat. | ||
However, the Russians are claiming it was not intercontinental. | ||
They are claiming it was medium range. | ||
So clearly a threat. | ||
And that's what the MIRV, the multiple reentry vehicles, all the rest of it, independently targetable. | ||
So look, they are ratcheting things up. | ||
We need President Trump there immediately. | ||
I would love to see a special envoy that's put over for the Ukraine war. | ||
You don't need an ambassador. | ||
You don't need a secretary. | ||
You need someone who's living and breathing this 24-7 that's Trump's man. | ||
And his physical presence there will actually serve to calm things down. | ||
Poso, what is your social media? | ||
I want everybody on your social media today because you're putting up great stuff. | ||
We're up on Ad Jack Osobic and of course we'll be back here at Human Events Daily later at 2 p.m. | ||
unidentified
|
Eastern. | |
Okay brother, love you. | ||
unidentified
|
Keep grinding. | |
Something tells me Poso may be a top draft pick into the White House, maybe national security over at the Pentagon. | ||
We need young men and women that are clear-minded and patriots in this time of war. | ||
Short commercial break. |