Oct. 31, 2024 - Bannon's War Room
48:56
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pray for our enemies, because we're going medieval on these people. | |
| I got a free shot of all these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big line? | ||
|
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Mann. | ||
| Thursday, 31 October, Year of Our Lord, 2025. | ||
| You're in the war room. | ||
| We are packed this hour, the hour of action. | ||
| You know, that goes back to President Trump's, the first inaugural address, where he lays out, like Lincoln's second inaugural address, President Trump lays out a number of things that have gone wrong with the country and goes, now comes the hour of action. | ||
| Now comes the Hour of Action, where he was taking on the established order back in January 20th of 2017. | ||
| Natalie Werner's going to be here in a moment with Michael Benz and Darren Beattie and maybe a couple, three others, and we're going to lay out how the color revolution has come to the United States of America to try to thwart your human agency. | ||
| Matt Boyle, the great Matt Boyle, joins us, the national political editor at Breitbart. | ||
| Matt, Walk me through. | ||
| You know the numbers better than anybody. | ||
| You know what has to happen here on a Thursday morning with early voting starting to wind down or wind up in Pennsylvania, right, and the mass mobilization effort about to start for Tuesday. | ||
| Where are we, sir? | ||
| For the first time in history, Republicans lead early voting in North Carolina and in Nevada. | ||
| They have a significant lead in Arizona. | ||
| These numbers look astounding. | ||
| We don't get partisan registration in Georgia, but the turnout is much higher in the red counties that Trump won big time in 2020. | ||
| And what we're seeing, according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution and reports that they've done yesterday and today, is that the, you know, nearly half a million of these early voters that are voting are the exact people that Turning Point Action identified earlier this year where, you know, these are low-propensity voters. | ||
| So if Donald Trump is actually turning out and Republicans are turning out Low propensity voters across the Sunbelt states. | ||
| Those Sunbelt states are moving away from Kamala Harris and towards Donald Trump. | ||
| And the race is really gonna come down to the final three states, which is Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. | ||
| If Donald Trump is able to win one of those three, he will very likely be the next president in the United States. | ||
| So in Pennsylvania in particular, the Democrat firewall, if you will, seems to be very weak for them. | ||
| It's around 380,000 votes at this point. | ||
| In terms of an advantage that they have in returns to this day, the Republicans have been doing very well with ballot requests in Pennsylvania, but they need to get their ballots in, right? | ||
| So the people in Pennsylvania need to make sure they go to the polls, that the Republicans turn their ballot in, either vote in person, or if you've got one in the mail, fill it out, bring it in. | ||
| And get them in over the course of the next couple days here. | ||
| The Republicans won a lawsuit against Bucks County, Pennsylvania, where they were trying to shut down early voting too early. | ||
| And that's a good sign for the Republicans. | ||
| But the point is that the more that those Republican ballots come in in Pennsylvania, the better and better I'd feel if I'm the Republicans going in here into Election Day next week. | ||
| This is a key point. | ||
| Now it's a huge turnout. | ||
| You're saying from where it's available is not available everywhere. | ||
| Your analytics are telling you that we are doing what we said we always had to do to get low-propensity voters out when they need more time because these folks are not going to stand in line an hour or two on a Tuesday. | ||
| We are not, according to you, as you see it right now, we are not cannibalizing Our game day vote. | ||
| In other words, this whole process is just to get folks to vote all the time on game day to go earlier. | ||
| It's a wasted effort. | ||
| But as you see this, we are getting the classic low propensity voter that kind of needs more options to do this. | ||
| Is that your analysis, sir? | ||
| Yes, and that's not just me. | ||
| I'm talking to the people like Turning Point Action, like Pennsylvania Chase, like Ralph Reed from Faith and Freedom. | ||
| And they're saying this, right? | ||
| Like, we're also seeing Decision Desk HQ's Michael Pruser. | ||
| Michael Pruser's not a Republican, okay? | ||
| He's not a conservative. | ||
| He's just a data guy at Decision Desk HQ. He's one of the guys that goes through these numbers. | ||
| He's saying it, too, across the board. | ||
| And so what we're seeing is And again, the Atlanta Journal Constitution reported it yesterday in a big piece there that Greg Blustein there did. | ||
| Again, no conservative, no Republican. | ||
| So if that's the case, the story of this election will be, if this all pans out the way we think it is, That the Republicans beat the Democrats at their own game, okay? | ||
| The Democrats jerry-rigged this system in 2020 to get early voting and to open up the mail and to, you know, turn it into election season rather than election day. | ||
| The story of 2024, if this ends up being the case, is that the Republicans beat the Democrats at their own game, if that's what ends up happening. | ||
| But we gotta close. | ||
| We're not there yet. | ||
| No, we have to close it. | ||
| Here's the thing. | ||
| It was the Elon Musk of the world. | ||
| It was the Miriam Adelson's of the world. | ||
| It's the Chris Buskirks. | ||
| It's the great Charlie Kirk. | ||
| It's the Ralph Reeds. | ||
| It's these independent organizations that kind of self-organized around, hey, we know we have to have a massive get out the vote movement. | ||
| What is so amazing here is that people did not take the sucker's play, Matt, for the commercials. | ||
| Right now with social media and all these alternative news services like Breitbart and Real America's Voice and Worm and others, this ecosystem. | ||
| You can get information to people. | ||
| You don't need to spend all your money. | ||
| I think Trump's going to be outspent five or six times to one on TV ads. | ||
| And guess what? | ||
| At the end of the day, people were able to, as you said, to reconfigure the system and beat the Democrats at their... | ||
| At their own game and kind of how they try to rig this. | ||
| Is that the overall arching thematic knowledge we should take from this? | ||
| Yes, and again, what we're seeing is the smart people across the establishment media and across the data industry, etc. | ||
| Again, not Republicans, not conservatives. | ||
| I keep looking to John Ralston in Nevada. | ||
| He runs the Nevada Independent. | ||
| Again, no conservative. | ||
| And he gets a kick out of whenever the Harry Reid machine, he calls it, absolutely decimates and steamrolls Republicans in the state of Nevada. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm just not seeing it. | |
| We're just not seeing it. | ||
| He's flabbergasted every day that goes by here. | ||
| You know, an early voting's gonna come to an end in Nevada pretty soon here. | ||
| And the Republicans, as of this morning, up 42,000 votes, okay? | ||
| Like, in more than half the turnout has voted, or possibly there's a balance in the state of Nevada. | ||
| So what we're seeing right now is that the numbers are showing massive, the numbers are showing what the right set out to do. | ||
| With ballot chasing, etc., at the beginning of this year, is actually happening. | ||
| But, again, we have to close. | ||
| And one of the things that Charlie Kirk keeps warning about, and I would encourage everybody to spread this message, men have to keep turning out. | ||
| We're seeing particularly in Pennsylvania. | ||
| They need to get off the couch and they need to go vote. | ||
| And if they do that, Donald Trump's going to win the election. | ||
| But he can't just sit there and tweet and call into radio shows and And complain about it on social media. | ||
| You need to go vote, right? | ||
| So if you actually go vote, then we can actually change this and turn it around. | ||
| But the numbers are looking good. | ||
| Very cautiously optimistic here going into the weekend before the election. | ||
| But again, gotta finish strong and gotta finish hard on Election Day, right? | ||
| Election Day operations need to be flawless. | ||
| Need to be flawless, and there's going to be some bumpy air pockets there. | ||
| Matt, we'll have you back on. | ||
| You're the most brilliant guy out there, and you do the hard work. | ||
| Matt, where can people get you, where they go to get all the coverage of Breitbart, where they go to get you on social media? | ||
| Yeah, just Breitbart.com. | ||
| I also host our Saturday show on SiriusXM. | ||
| We're going to have J.D. Vance on this weekend. | ||
| I'm recording with him later today, the VP nominee, and I'm on ex-Twitter at mboyl1. | ||
| And we may have another special announcement about the Breitbart news show that we'll maybe talk about tomorrow. | ||
| Boyle, you're the best, you're the smartest, and you're the toughest. | ||
| Love you, brother. | ||
| Thanks for coming on today. | ||
| You bet, Steve. | ||
| Good to see you're doing well. | ||
| The guy's a rock star. | ||
| Another rock star, Natalie Winters, our breakout star here. | ||
| Natalie, I want you to set the table. | ||
| We got Benz, we got Beattie. | ||
| This is very important because, hey, the opposition here ain't dumb, okay? | ||
| They're quite smart, and they know what they're doing, and they're just not going to sit there and go, hey, you got Scott Presler, and you got all these people. | ||
| Isn't this lovely, right? | ||
| They're going to get more votes than we get. | ||
| Is that going to matter, Natalie Winters? | ||
| Set the stage for us. | ||
| Well, I guess it's morning again in America. | ||
| It's always a joy to be able to come on with you in the morning show. | ||
| It's been a while since we've been able to do this. | ||
| But look, like we were talking about yesterday, it's the same people, or should we say the same democracy crisis actors, who are up to their old tricks, right? | ||
| which is laying false flags, whether it's saying from the foreign silo that we're going to have massive disinformation campaigns or on the domestic side of things that MAGA is, you guessed it, domestic violent extremists, therefore necessitating by all means necessary to keep MAGA, to keep Republicans therefore necessitating by all means necessary to keep MAGA, to keep Republicans out of election rooms, out of ballot They want a kill shot on this election. | ||
| And when you say they want to stop the steal, I think that's too euphemistic for what is, of course, decades long, but a whole of society and really a whole of government approach that's almost, I think, fascistically corporatist. | ||
| And it's designed to really come for seizing the means, not just of elections, but of vote productions, right? | ||
| There's a difference between votes and ballots. | ||
| And I want to drill down, Steve, while we have a few minutes before we go to break, on sort of this timeline that I think really undergirds the thesis that we came up with yesterday, which is we are undergoing a color revolution. | ||
| And this all goes back to September, where you saw sort of the opening salvo, I would argue, of this disinformation campaign, when you saw the DOJ indict Russians for funneling what they say $10 million to come after conservative influencers. | ||
| Because in response to that, you saw the Senate Democrat Intel chair put out a letter pressuring CISA, the DHS subagency, to do much more when it comes to censoring election misinformation, followed in suit, you guessed it, by Adam Schiff, who sent a similar letter to all the big tech companies who sent a similar letter to all the big tech companies saying that they need to be more robust in their censorship of election misinformation and | ||
| This whole narrative, of course, being buttressed by then what happened with the hurricanes where they said there was so much hurricane disinformation. | ||
| Mayorkas goes up there, does a press conference calling it hate speech and the operative word that he used being deplorable speech for people who dared to call out the Biden regime for putting America last. | ||
| And their hurricane response so much so that you see them wheeling out Nina Jankiewicz on MSNBC that weekend to say that we need to have the disinformation governance board be reinstated only to then be followed by a huge not just internal memos from DHS, but actually fact checks from the politifacts of the world saying that a lot of this hurricane disinformation originated overseas, primarily in Russia. | ||
| Therefore prompting get ready House Democrats to send additional letters pressuring and behind the scenes campaigns to to all the social media platforms demanding that they and I'm quoting from their letter increase monitoring and removal of misinformation, enhance fact checking partnerships and strengthen the algorithms meant to flag conspiracy theories. | ||
| And the real buried lead here to Steve again, like I said, this is laying the groundwork for a massive post-election censorship wave, is that they launched a rumor control website to sort of go after hurricane disinformation, leading us to the conclusion here in the war room just a month back that it was essentially the test run for what they're going to do this election, because the last and leading us to the conclusion here in the war room just a month back that it was essentially the test run for what they're going to do this It was in response to the 2020 election. | ||
| You know we pay very close attention to the words that they use. | ||
| Very rarely do they call it rumors and not disinformation. | ||
| This, of course, giving them the pretext for then an ODNI memo melting down over foreign election disinformation. | ||
| And of course, you have Bob Woodward, Christopher Steele, even Bob Mueller, all coming out and saying that President Trump is still talking to Russia, right? | ||
| It's the resurgence of this Russian narrative. | ||
| Of course, compounded with the idea that MAGA is so violent that they need panic buttons and Narcan and bulletproof glass in the counting rooms and that they need one way windows so you can't see in. | ||
| Natalie, we're going to bring in Michael Benz, Darren Beattie to join you and talk about this color revolution. | ||
| I'm going to be here. | ||
| Rudy's going to join us towards the end of the hour. | ||
| We got a lot to go through here in the war room. | ||
| Birchgold.com slash Ben and make sure you go and talk to the experts. | ||
| Talk to Philip Patrick and the team and ask them the question, the stock market is at an all-time high. | ||
| How can gold be near an all-time high? | ||
| It's kind of counterintuitive. | ||
| Ask them the question. | ||
| Wait for the answer. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| I'm hearing Real America's Voice back in a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Vann. | |
| Welcome back to The War Room, where I just want to preface, Steve told me to open the show. | ||
| I am not having a Kamala moment where I am coming for Steve, much like she came for Joe Biden, but I am honored to be joined by Mike Benz and Darren Beattie, I think two of the men who've done some of the foremost work. | ||
| was about four years ago that you came on this show to break a story i would say eerily similar to what i was just walking through with steve i know there was a big event by jamie raskin yesterday sort of alluding to the theories the concepts that we were just discussing but if you can sort of walk us through if you think that our critique that what we are experiencing right now is indeed a color evolution how you think that checks with what we saw in 2020 absolutely thank you | ||
| Thrilled to be here, especially with Steve in the mix once again. | ||
| It's great. | ||
| And it is nostalgic because, as you say, it was over four years ago that really we began to popularize the concept of the color revolution. | ||
| In fact, one of the color revolution NGOs, the Election Integrity Partnership, I've published a whole piece that has been talked about in university lectures following the trajectory of the Color Revolution conversation and putting my appearances on War Room at the very beginning. | ||
| So it's actually very interesting that one of their own institutions, which is now extremely embattled, if not defunct, thanks largely to our other guest here, Mike Benz. | ||
| But this organization actually said, here's a dangerous Russian narrative. | ||
| They're talking about the color revolution, namely the fact that a specific faction of our security establishment that is known to undermine and attack leaders they don't like in Eastern Europe, and otherwise they're doing the same thing to Trump, the same people, the same thing. | ||
| This is a dangerous narrative. | ||
| Of course, we're going to call it Russian disinformation, and we're going to track its evolution into the popular consciousness. | ||
| And guess where the starting point was? | ||
| None other than right here in War Room a little over four years ago. | ||
| So it's pretty remarkable, that comparison, but it also invites some contrast as well, and You know, there is this circulating clip that I think you'll play at some point of Representative Raskin, who is a nutjob. | ||
| He is unhinged. | ||
| He is neurotic. | ||
| He's got something wrong with his synapses. | ||
| So we have to take it with a grain of salt. | ||
| But his theory, which he has advanced publicly, is that Trump is constitutionally ineligible to be president on the basis of his sham interpretation of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. | ||
| In fact, the extended version of this clip in circulation, he's criticizing the Supreme Court for not being proactive enough in effecting revolutionary change, and he thinks they really dropped the ball because they haven't gone along with this sham theory that We're good to | ||
| to step up and basically do what the regime has accused Maga of doing, namely overturn the election if necessary and not certify Trump's legitimate victory if indeed he does And he entertains some crazy stuff like we'll need bodyguards, it's gonna be civil war conditions and this or that. | ||
| So it's scary language. | ||
| It's worth tracking. | ||
| I don't think the temperature is as hot as it was in 2020. | ||
| In fact, I think Trump is far more normalized than he was in 2020, which will make it very difficult, I think, for the regime to mobilize these kind of color revolution policies. | ||
| I think we want to track the color revolution stuff, but the first things first, we need the victory first. | ||
| And what I'm really worried about now is that the regime kind of senses it doesn't have the energy it needs to do that full-on color revolution mass demonstration. | ||
| And so they're really going to double down I'm trying to steal it so that they can claim the legitimate victory. | ||
| So I almost think it's the cart before the horse. | ||
| Right now the key is turn out, get people out, vote. | ||
| we need a very healthy margin of victory in order to countervail what will surely be an extended effort for on the part of the regime to simply steal the election immediately so they don't have to attempt this color revolution plan that jamie raskin has entertained because he's a nut job the atlantises generally i think are on the defense um | ||
| Victoria Nuland, one of the Color Revolution architects, she resigned in a huff in disgrace because Biden passed her over for a promotion. | ||
| Her husband, who is a disgraced guy, overweight, looks like a human gefilte fish. | ||
| This guy resigned in disgrace from Washington Post because Bezos is now playing footsie with MAGA. So I think the broader sort of constellation of events, there's much less consensus at the regime level that Trump poses this existential threat, | ||
| which I think shifts the incentive structure such that the regime understands if we're going to do it, we have to steal it On the election, through the election, and that this kind of wildcard Graskin plan is kind of far-fetched, but don't get me wrong, never count these people out. | ||
| They are nuts, they do play for keeps, and this is a plan that they have in their back pocket. | ||
| So that, I think, in a nutshell is... | ||
| Sure. | ||
| And to that point, I certainly think that Trump has become more normalized among the average American voter, but I wouldn't necessarily think that the blob will accept him as being a normalized political entity. | ||
| And to that point, there's a very interesting article in the New York Times. | ||
| There are four anti-Trump pathways we failed to take. | ||
| There is a Right. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Right. | ||
| The idea of democratic black backsliding and they walked through, I would argue, what you've seen them do to President Trump. | ||
| The first is trying to keep him off the ballot. | ||
| The second is the partisan gatekeeping. | ||
| Right. | ||
| The RNC failed. | ||
| We obliterated that. | ||
| And then the idea of containment. | ||
| So that's the convergence of the Kinzinger and Liz Cheney types onto the Democratic ticket. | ||
| And the last way that they say that they can try to prevent Trump from winning is by weaponizing civil society, I think, in the style of that Time magazine piece. | ||
| But I'm curious, I think we have Mike Benz, who we can bring on. | ||
| Mike, in terms of the idea that we ostensibly had control of the federal government in the 2020 election, Now we evidently don't, or there's at least a disparity there. | ||
| When you see the reports of the FBI, DOJ, and particularly CISA already being so heavily embedded on the ground in these election offices, what do you think are the nodes of power that this audience needs to really be looking at that you think they're going to turn on come election day and especially the post-election period? | ||
| Well, the CISA issue really has two components. | ||
| One of them is the Technical security over the voting machines and the other one is the censorship aspect and the fact is is CISA is operationally mostly composed comprised of CIA and NSA hackers who migrated over to the domestic side of DHS in order to secure our elections on the on the electronic voting machine realm and You know 100 in 2020 they were behind the most massive censorship campaign | ||
| Ever orchestrated in human history. | ||
| There were tens of millions of tweets that were targeted. | ||
| Seven and a half million tweets about Dominion. | ||
| Two and a half million tweets about Stop the Steal. | ||
| They characterized your tweets, your Facebook posts, and your YouTube videos if they undermined public faith and confidence in a Joe Biden victory as being a cyber attack on the critical infrastructure of elections because they were a cyber tweet. | ||
| And they basically defined the confidence in Joe Biden winning as being the critical infrastructure of the United States of America. | ||
| Which is all pretty shocking, but they've been reprimanded for doing so by Congress. | ||
| They've been subject to multiple lawsuits. | ||
| The second thing that they've been involved in... | ||
| Oh, they also are running these giant media literacy operations in order to effectively help coerce censorship of alternative news sites at the state level. | ||
| But the fact is, is during that censorship campaign, 100% of the quote, repeat misinformation spreaders were all pro-Trump outlets, all 21 of the top 21 Repeat misinformation spreaders, as they said, were Trump supporters. | ||
| They also deputized this outside group, the Election Integrity Partnership, to use their 24-7 cyber mission control capacities. | ||
| And that outside partnership deemed Donald Trump to be the death star of disinformation. | ||
| So you had the judge, jury, and executioner completely rigged Against the one side of the equation going into it but given that those people are a hundred percent never Trump and They are involved in the sort of black ops dirty world of hacking I mean, there's no way you can be a hacker unless you are either a criminal or a government employee That's it. | ||
| It's a shadowy world with very little oversight and Yes. | ||
| it would be very easy for them to either directly or indirectly by, for example, leaving the door open and allowing some outside third group, potentially not from this country, to do it. - How's this? - Oh, I don't know if I just heard something And Mike, we're going to have to jump to break shortly, so I'm going to hold you there. | ||
| But I think it's worth noting that we're definitely on the right track when it comes to, I think, singling out CISA. Just yesterday, she had a whole long-form interview with Washington Post, and they even had her on Fox News. | ||
| So you know they're trying to deprogram, shall we say, some of the MAGA loyalists. | ||
| I'd humbly posit that they should put Jen Easterly... | ||
| The CISA director here on War Room, of course, news also breaking yesterday that CISA has launched its election infrastructure subsector coordinating council where they're giving out documents and planning strategies to a myriad of election offices on how they can combat misinformation, disinformation, malinformation, whatever word they want to come up with. | ||
| But that's what we're up against, right? | ||
| The pretext that MAGA is coming for your vote, that MAGA is going to be violent. | ||
| They laid the groundwork for the Biden regime to infiltrate election offices. | ||
| Your republic, if you can keep it. | ||
| Your vote, if you can keep it. | ||
| But we'll be right back. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Welcome back to The War Room. | |
| Maybe temporarily we should become the vanguard against the color revolution. | ||
| I think we're going to focus in on someone I know you guys know, Jamie Raskin. | ||
| I know Steve has some thoughts. | ||
| I don't think it's just petty because he played such an integral role in sending you to federal prison, but this is the man who is the architect, the backbone of so much of this color revolution stuff. | ||
| It's all because, you know, my going to prison, Navarro going to prison is all part of the J6. Real quickly, because I'm going to get back to the color revolution. | ||
| You know, Beattie, I don't dismiss Jamie Raskin. | ||
| Jamie Raskin's a power... | ||
| Of course he's a little weird. | ||
| He's a red diaper baby, isn't he? | ||
| His dad's a frickin' Marxist professor. | ||
| But he's smart, and he's tough, and he's got... | ||
| He's like Mark Elias. | ||
| I admire these guys and the fact that they're tough. | ||
| I like having opponents like that because they're relentless like we're relentless. | ||
| We're not going to compromise with us, them, and they're not going to compromise with us. | ||
| They're going to send Bannon to prison. | ||
| I kind of admire that. | ||
| I like the way they're tough, but they're focused on the narrative here. | ||
| This thing about Trump not being eligible, they're like a dog with a bone. | ||
| They're not going to give it up. | ||
| Give me a minute or two on that again, why this is so important. | ||
| And then, Natalie, you take it over. | ||
| Well, I think one thing that's interesting is a common thread throughout all of this, what they did to you, their theory about Trump's ineligibility. | ||
| All of this is centered around January 6th, which even the left doesn't really care about. | ||
| They're not really mobilizing voters on the basis. | ||
| They tried a little bit, but have not been successful. | ||
| They're far more successful mobilizing on the basis of what they call reproductive rights for women. | ||
| That's the stuff that they care about. | ||
| So the actual purchase of this January 6th stuff seems to be very diminished as far as the electorate is concerned. | ||
| But in terms of these extracurricular approaches to nullifying or delegitimizing Trump, they're still thoroughly invested in it, which I think, you know, now is over three years. | ||
| We're getting on four years since January 6th. | ||
| And sometimes people ask me, like, why are you still talking about this? | ||
| Why does it matter so much? | ||
| This pipe bomb thing, which, by the way, if that If we find the pipe bomber, that would end the election. | ||
| Unfortunately, that's probably not going to happen before the election. | ||
| But this stuff isn't just theoretical. | ||
| It isn't just about the people still in prison for false charges on January 6th. | ||
| It is a major part of this larger edifice of the false narrative that the regime has used to delegitimize Trump, to demonize Trump, to implicitly justify the multiple assassination attempts on Trump. | ||
| And of course, to serve as a pretext, allowing for the weaponization of the national security state and the Justice Department against Trump supporters. | ||
| This is all really January 6th, the fake narrative of January 6th, what we call the Fed's erection. | ||
| That's at the very basis of this. | ||
| And that's why the regime is so apoplectic when we attack January 6th and their false narratives and expose it. | ||
| So I think, yes, Raskin does have this plan. | ||
| He's paired up with some nefarious people who have been effective. | ||
| I think it's serious enough that we should be tracking it. | ||
| I'm simply saying that in terms of the temperature, in terms of the capability, I think that 2020 was kind of a high watermark for that. | ||
| And now Trump has broader legitimization across certain elements of major stakeholders in the regime, if it did not be like Elon Musk, Bezos is sort of warming up, even Zuckerberg. | ||
| You know, there's it's a lot different environment that I think is much less conducive to this sort of whole of society mobilization effort that's often at the basis of these kinds of color revolution tactics. | ||
| We should not count it out, but we want to keep track of it. | ||
| But first things first, we need the actual win. | ||
| In order for them to attempt to steal it. | ||
| We need the win first. | ||
| And I think that's where they're really going to be focused on just shenanigans in Pennsylvania and all around. | ||
| So I think that should be our chief focus now. | ||
| But of course, we want to have an attentive eye to what these rascals like Raskin and his Confederacy of Color Revolution miscreants are up to. | ||
| Well, and of course, the whole January 6th narrative, everything that you saw coming out of Jack Smith, the 165-page filing, it was all to produce not just political theater. | ||
| I think we should call it agitprop to lay the pretext to say that MAGA's violent, right, that there's going to be violence post-election. | ||
| Even Axios is leading with that. | ||
| And if we have Mike Benz back, I'm curious, Mike. | ||
| Like that New York Times article really honed in on, they were focusing on how civil society will buttress these sort of more institutionalized government efforts to steal the election, both on Election Day and after. | ||
| But there's a new report out today from the Center for Countering Digital Hate. | ||
| I know everyone's favorite here in the War Room audience. | ||
| Of course, it's laundered foreign money. | ||
| It's tied to the former CIA directors, you know, deep state incarnate. | ||
| But I'm curious how you think they're going to weaponize The civil society aspect, the sort of censorship industrial complex to really be the Praetorian Guard of this more government narrative that Jamie Raskin and those types are pushing. | ||
| Well, just breaking this morning, YouTube replied to the New York Times hit piece that sourced the Media Matters aggregation of Misinformation videos, you know, there was this threat letter from Media Matters to Ben Shapiro and to Tucker Carlson and about 30 other conservative content creators where they would identify 200 to 300 different YouTube videos that they said contained election misinformation and then Ask them, are you a part of the YouTube Partner Program? | ||
| And it was a very obvious threat to get them demonetized if they supported Trump narratives for the next two or three months. | ||
| And there was a big fear, I think, by these mainstream conservative content creators that they would be demonetized by YouTube in the same way That so many others were in the last election cycle when this sort of angel of death letter came down. | ||
| But YouTube actually replied this morning saying, we've reviewed the 286 videos that you flagged and none of them violate our community terms of service. | ||
| It's important to keep, you know, all ideas open, especially during political season. | ||
| So this is an actual rejection by YouTube Of the typical pressure cooker method of getting conservative folks demonetized. | ||
| And my understanding is that Sundar Pichai made a personal phone call to Donald Trump recently, the head of Google. | ||
| The head of Apple recently made a call to Trump complaining about the failures of the Biden State Department in protecting them from a $15 billion fine. | ||
| Zuckerberg is now skated towards Trump. | ||
| Elon obviously is a major Trump supporter. | ||
| So the linchpin of the censorship strategy relies on having tentacles, relationships that they've built over years between the government censorship advocates, the civil society censorship advocates, So that it gets translated into censorship policy at the tech level. | ||
| But the tech companies are becoming more and more resilient against that and have been firing those censorship liaison staff. | ||
| So what the blob is doing in return is moving upstream in order to create laws, foreign laws and state level laws, in order to force the tech companies to do the censorship now that they've lost the interstitial liaisons who are able to back channel it. | ||
| And so that's what they're doing in Europe with the EU Digital Services Act. | ||
| That's what they're doing in Brazil and Australia and Canada. | ||
| And this is all being coordinated by the U.S. State Department. | ||
| But that's a very big win this morning. | ||
| I mean, that would have sent a very powerful message, a chilling effect, I think, if Ben Shapiro... | ||
| And Tucker Carlson had lost their monetization this week because they suggested that the Democrats might cheat. | ||
| I think that would send a message to other conservative content creators who still have mainstream advertising that they don't want to lose monetization like they just saw Ben Shapiro or Tucker lose. | ||
| So, right now, we're sitting about as good as we can in terms of resilience to these CCDH-type tactics. | ||
| I'm curious too, Darren, to bring you back in. | ||
| Obviously, they never miss a chance to outsource anything, whether it's our jobs or, of course, censorship efforts. | ||
| But there was just a leaked DHS memo today. | ||
| I want to read a quote from it. | ||
| The greatest risk of election-related violence comes from extremists who believe conspiracy theories about widespread election fraud or who have other election rules. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| really just the sort of manifestation, the culmination of years of this January 6th fear porn, though, of course, putting the pipe bomb narrative to the side. | ||
| Give us a minute on that and how it dovetails, too, with the new story that you've put up. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| I mean, it's the same old script. | ||
| It's like the old, you know, rock star playing the big hit from 30 years ago. | ||
| It's kind of falling flat, frankly. | ||
| I think what Mike said is really important about YouTube as part of a broader trend is that... | ||
| The whole infrastructure, the key nodes and connection points in the infrastructure have been thwarted, have been undermined, largely, frankly, to the efforts of Mike Benz himself. | ||
| I don't think this would be the case if it weren't for the mass exposure that he's affected of this whole complex. | ||
| And it's not just YouTube which basically told the commissars to screw off. | ||
| It's The Stanford Observatory, one of the major think tanks behind the disinformation censorship pretext, that is defunct. | ||
| The Global Engagement Center, which is, of course, the nerve center of a lot of this disinformation scam, censorship scam founded by a guy, by the way, who wants to reimagine the First Amendment and prohibit what he calls hate speech. | ||
| This is in the State Department. | ||
| It's on the chopping block this December. | ||
| And, you know, the commissars are terrified of it. | ||
| And And this is another reason, by the way, why the congressional side of the election is important, not principally because of the Raskin plan, although that's important, but it's also going to be relevant to whether institutions like the Global Engagement Center continue. | ||
| But any way you cut it, I think 2020 was really the high watermark of Yeah, I think. | ||
| We've seen the escalation to the red part of the color revolution, red being blood, which we saw spilt from former President Trump at Butler. | ||
| That's what happens when, you know, Steve being in prison, you can't deplatform, you throw him in prison. | ||
| He can't throw in prison. | ||
| You get what happens at Butler. | ||
| And Darren, we're going to have to bounce shortly. | ||
| So can you give the audience a little tease on the story and where they can go to read the piece, follow you, stay up to date with everything Revolver's doing? | ||
| Revolver.News, we will be and are at the cutting edge of the potential color revolution, the potential steel that's going on before the color revolution. | ||
| All matters election and after. | ||
| We are white hot. | ||
| We will continue to simmer throughout the election. | ||
| So follow Revolver.News, check it multiple times a day. | ||
| We are white hot and ready to report the truth no matter what it is. | ||
| So Revolver.News. | ||
| I'm on Twitter at Darren J. Beattie. | ||
| Norm Eisen's favorite publication. | ||
| And Mike Benz, I'd say you're probably maybe Rosa Brooks' favorite Twitter activist. | ||
| Mike Benz, if people want to follow you, stay up to date with everything you're exposing. | ||
| Where can they go to do that? | ||
| On X at Mike Benz Cyber. | ||
| Mike, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| And to both you, Mike and Darren, thank you for these last four months, having always been such solid, dependable, reliable guests. | ||
| It's why we're in, I would say, pretty good spot when it comes to all things color revolution. | ||
| But like you guys know, we have to have the victory first. | ||
| They've already trained 30,000, 30,000 election officials at the hands of CISA, the agency that says if you dare to raise any claims or concerns about election fraud, that you're a conspiracy theorist. | ||
| And you can probably be traced to Russia. | ||
| Again, it's the same intel community that said the Hunter Biden hard drive was Russian disinformation. | ||
| And we saw how that story panned out. | ||
| Yeah, we were right. | ||
| And we have been right. | ||
| And we're right on this color revolution thing. | ||
| And no amount of censorship or intimidation from Jack Smith or otherwise is going to make us stop. | ||
| We'll be right back after this short break. | ||
| Stephen K. Bannon, Natalie Winters. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Band. | |
| Okay, welcome back. | ||
| Rudy Giuliani, America's Mayor, joins us. | ||
| Rudy, you've been with President Trump from the beginning, the early days, back in 14 and 15 on this topic. | ||
| You've known him for 30 or 40 years. | ||
| But on this weekend, the mass mobilization weekend to get ready for next Tuesday, where do you think we stand, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, I guess we're a normal election. | |
| I have no doubt every instinct I have, all my political experience of 40 or 50 years tells me he's in very good position to win this election. | ||
| And then everything else tells me, watch out. | ||
| I mean, these people are the most evil, the biggest cheaters in the history of America. | ||
| They attempted it in 16 with Russian collusion. | ||
| They accomplished it in 20, not just with the vote count, but also with the suppression, as you know, as well as I do, of the hard drive. | ||
| I mean, if we had gotten that out, there'd have been no vote count problem. | ||
| He'd have been defeated by 20%. | ||
| So they stole that election. | ||
| Forget about the vote count. | ||
| So what are they going to do now? | ||
| They tried everything. | ||
| Even now, they're trying to disqualify him, or after the election, on this ridiculous insurrection that's never been alleged, never been proven, never been established. | ||
| It's in their sick minds. | ||
| So they could try anything. | ||
| I went to him a year ago and told him, at the request of Bernie Carrick, our friend, watch out. | ||
| They've tried everything. | ||
| They may try to kill you. | ||
| Now, I'm not saying they did try to kill him, but I know as an experienced investigator, I wouldn't exclude that possibility either. | ||
| These people are completely amoral. | ||
| And if it's all uncovered, what they've been doing, a lot of them are going to be ruined. | ||
| So they are desperate. | ||
| We have to be very careful. | ||
| What's your recommendation of how we secure this? | ||
| We just had the guy talking about the color revolution. | ||
| What is your recommendation right now? | ||
| We've got a couple of minutes here about what we need to do to secure. | ||
|
unidentified
|
My recommendation right now is, number one, get out as many people to vote who are friends with us. | |
| All of you who are saying, what can I do? | ||
| Write down ten friends. | ||
| Bring them to the polls. | ||
| I'm going to vote in about one hour here in Florida. | ||
| And I'm going to devote the rest of my time getting everybody I know out to vote. | ||
| Number two, go volunteer. | ||
| Volunteer for the party. | ||
| Volunteer with Turning Point. | ||
| Volunteer with Elon. | ||
| These groups are all over the place. | ||
| I visited maybe 20 or 30 of them. | ||
| They're reaching out for help. | ||
| The more we have, the more we can discover. | ||
| Also recognize we're already litigating. | ||
| We've been litigating for six weeks. | ||
| So we're way ahead of where we were last time. | ||
| It's not like what you and I saw, you know, four years ago. | ||
| We came in and nobody had been doing nothing. | ||
| And some of these things have already been turned around, like in Virginia. | ||
| And even the ones that appear to be small ones act as deterrence because they know we're being vigilant. | ||
| And the more people we can turn out for inspections, The more frightened they get. | ||
| We're not going to remove their cheating. | ||
| They cheat because they're crooks. | ||
| But we can reduce it to a minimum so we can win even without a landslide. | ||
| I had to do this in my second election. | ||
| And I was told by my security people, we gave up 30,000 votes. | ||
| We had to overcome that. | ||
| That's basically what we have to do. | ||
| Get it down to a minimum. | ||
| And I'm feeling pretty good about it, Steve. | ||
| Much better than I did Oh, gosh, four or five months ago. | ||
| Elon's involvement in it has really, really helped. | ||
| And I was in Georgia all weekend, and they're working together. | ||
| We've got five different groups, which can also be chaos. | ||
| And the media is trying to say it's chaos. | ||
| It isn't. | ||
| They're working together, dividing up voters, dividing up types of voters. | ||
| Keep doing it and join them. | ||
| They need help. | ||
| They need help. | ||
| Go join them in your local area. | ||
| We're going to have Chris Buskirk on today. | ||
| He's out with Tucker and the president in Arizona. | ||
| Buskirk, we're going to talk about that. | ||
| The five horsemen of the administrative state apocalypse. | ||
| The five horsemen that have done the get-out-the-vote. | ||
| We'll do that today. | ||
| Rudy, your book, you've got a book, podcast. | ||
| Where do people go to get all your content, brother? | ||
| Particularly on this weekend and through game day next Tuesday. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, you can get me at 7 o'clock on the speech network with our friend Mike. | |
| I think he's going to be on very, very, very shortly. | ||
| You can then get me at 8 o'clock on X. | ||
| And I'm on every night now, right through the election, including over the weekend. | ||
| We transmit suggestions on how to help. | ||
| We try to bring up news that everyone is ignoring and not covering, and try to give you the information you need. | ||
| So the day after the election, we don't say, gee, we should have. | ||
| We're going to do it before the election. | ||
| And just how important it is to get involved. | ||
| Don't sit back. | ||
| There's something you can do. | ||
| If you can't do anything else, you can get everybody you know out to vote. | ||
| Rudy, we love you. | ||
| We're going to have you back on to go through your current situation and all that. | ||
| Spend some time with your brother. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You know, they heard us without your voice. | |
| We were hurt without your voice. | ||
| Nah, you guys were stepping up. | ||
| They tried to... | ||
|
unidentified
|
We all stepped up, but you have a special voice, so get it out there all weekend. | |
| I'm just a dumb, wild Mick. | ||
| You guys are amazing. | ||
| Rudy Giuliani, we love you, brother. | ||
| Rudy lives to fight another day. | ||
| Lindell, when Bernie Carrick's head of Bureau of Prisons, we'll talk about your prison pillow line, but give our audience, our audience is working nonstop. | ||
| They want a deal. | ||
| Give them a deal. | ||
| Well, here's the deal. | ||
| We're done with the free Steve Pillow. | ||
| What we're gonna do now is we're gonna pivot. | ||
| You get with God, all things are possible, the MyPillow 2.0, and then you get them with God. | ||
| That's free, no purchase necessary. | ||
| We want you to go to MyPillow, and we want you to shop. | ||
| Use the promo code WARMROOM. Yesterday, Steve, it was huge, the support coming in. | ||
| So everybody get that free, with God, all things are possible, MyPillow. | ||
| No purchase necessary, but you want to get there and help out. | ||
| The flannel sheets are in. | ||
| There it is right there, everybody. | ||
| There's the pillow. | ||
| You get the MyPillow 2.0. | ||
| Just pay shipping, but you get free shipping available if you buy $75 worth on the site. | ||
| All of the War Room specials are there. | ||
| We're gonna run them through the election here and beyond. | ||
| We got those flannel sheets. | ||
| That's a War Room exclusive as low as $5998. | ||
| Steve, I've been telling them all that was your favorite last year. | ||
| All the new colors are all in. | ||
| We've got the Overstock special exclusive to the War Room, Made in America Sox. | ||
| All of these were so, this is a win-win-win, everybody. | ||
| You've helped my pillow grow with our, we hired a bunch of employees this week, helped support this greatest show. | ||
| The most information we need to get out there, Steve, our great leader is back. | ||
| They're also helping you guys get the best night's sleep of your life and the best of these USA products that are helping entrepreneurs and helping my pillow employees. | ||
| So thank you. | ||
| God bless you all. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Promo code WORM. Thank you very much, Mike. | ||
| Love you. | ||
| Look forward to having me back on. | ||
| The great Charlie Kirk, one of the five horsemen of the apocalypse. | ||
| In the MAGA, turn out the vote. | ||
| Mass mobilization is next! | ||
| A rising young voice in populism and nationalism. | ||
| Post those later in the day, we're back here 5 to 7. |
Export Selection