Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
This is what you're fighting for. | ||
I mean, every day you're out there. | ||
What they're doing is blowing people off. | ||
If you continue to look the other way and shut up, then the oppressors, the authoritarians, get total control and total power. | ||
Because this is just like in Arizona. | ||
This is just like in Georgia. | ||
It's another element that backs them into a corner and shows their lies and misrepresentations. | ||
This is why this audience is going to have to get engaged. | ||
As we've told you, this is the fight. | ||
unidentified
|
All this nonsense, all this spin, they can't handle the truth. | |
War Room Battleground. | ||
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
It is Tuesday, October 1st, in the year of our Lord 2024. | ||
I am Mike Davis, the viceroy, the next man up, standing in for Stephen K. Bannon, who Biden and Kamala have in the clink. | ||
We have a great show today. | ||
First, we have the VP debate. | ||
With J.D. | ||
Vance vs. Tampon Tim at 9 p.m. | ||
tonight, and you can watch it on Rav. | ||
Today's show is gonna have three of my favorite people in America. | ||
We have Mark Paoletta, the first guest up. | ||
He is a longtime friend of mine, longtime warrior in this cause, one of Clarence Thomas' best friends. | ||
He's gonna talk about the weaponization of law enforcement. | ||
Along with what should be done to prevent this from ever happening again. | ||
And then the second part of our show, we're going to have Cleta Mitchell, an all-star attorney, along with Mark Lucas at my Article 3 project to talk about election integrity and action, action, action, as we gear up for election month before November 5th. | ||
We're in election month right now, So we need to be on top of this and Cleta and Mark will tell us what we need to be doing. | ||
So let's bring in Mark Paoletta. | ||
Welcome back to the War Room, Mark. | ||
Hey, Michael. | ||
Thanks for having me on. | ||
Thanks for joining. | ||
You are one of my favorite lawyers in Washington, D.C. | ||
I got to know Mark Paoletta through the Gorsuch confirmation. | ||
I clerked for Gorsuch and then I followed Gorsuch out to Washington to help him get through his confirmation process. | ||
And at that time, Mark Paoletta was the counsel to the vice president and the Trump White House, and he was invaluable during that confirmation process. | ||
He was the secret weapon during that confirmation process. | ||
It went very smoothly because Mark Paoletta was there. | ||
So I can't thank you enough for that. | ||
And it went smoothly because Mark Paoletta has so much experience working on confirmations. | ||
Talk about that. | ||
Talk about your role with Clarence Thomas's confirmation. | ||
Yeah, Mike, well, you were a great partner. | ||
The secret weapon for Justice, of course, is getting confirmed. | ||
You knew him better than anybody and knew what needed to be done. | ||
It was great working with you. | ||
I actually had worked on Justice Thomas' first confirmation. | ||
I was the first one in the Bush 41 White House to reach out to him In February of 1989 to see if he wanted to be appointed and got to know Justice Thomas at that point. | ||
unidentified
|
That's in the D.C. | |
Circuit, right, Mark? | ||
Yep. | ||
He was the EOC chairman in February of 1989. | ||
I was on the Judicial Selection Committee. | ||
I was asked to reach out and see if Justice Thomas would be interested. | ||
I got all of his writings, got to know him very, very well. | ||
He offered me a clerkship on the D.C. | ||
Circuit once he was confirmed. | ||
The White House Counsel's Office wanted me to come down to their office and work with them full time. | ||
So I did that. | ||
And then, fortunate, I did that because I was able to work on Justice Thomas's confirmation on the Supreme Court. | ||
And it taught me, Mike, that the left is vicious. | ||
We're going to talk about weaponization. | ||
I lived this. | ||
I was, I think, 26 years old, 27 years old. | ||
And I saw what the left did to the greatest man in our country, greatest living American, our greatest justice. | ||
They wanted to just destroy him. | ||
Here is this amazing Amazing, amazing man, right? | ||
An incredible American story. | ||
I was so happy when he was nominated, and I get to work on this great confirmation. | ||
It was a battle right from the beginning, but we were winning. | ||
It was just as Thomas had done everything, sort of in terms of, you know, a great life, a great career. | ||
He would be a great appointee. | ||
And what did the left want to do? | ||
Destroy him. | ||
Not just defeat him, Right. | ||
Destroy him, destroy his life, lie about him. | ||
And so it was seared. | ||
I've said this, I've written about it. | ||
It was seared in my soul in terms of what happened in that moment. | ||
And standing by your friends, standing up and standing by your friends, and seeing Justice Thomas go through that | ||
and never back down. | ||
And so that was born a wonderful, wonderful, deep friendship. | ||
That was in 91 he was confirmed. | ||
In 92 I was diagnosed with cancer. | ||
And Justice Thomas was there. | ||
All the time for me. | ||
Checked on me, came to visit me, called me. | ||
You know, he had just been confirmed beaten up, you know, and all that. | ||
But he was looking out for his friend who was going through a tough time. | ||
And so from that became this very, very close relationship that's been until this day. | ||
And, you know, he's been under attack and it's been a blessing to defend him. | ||
But going back to, I saw what the left would do, right? | ||
They knew they were going to lose on the merits. | ||
They knew Justice Thomas was going to get confirmed. | ||
We were looking at 60-plus votes. | ||
This was back in — Warren and I was thinking, this is October of 91, was when it all went | ||
haywire. | ||
September, I think, 27, 28 was when the allegations, these lies were made about him. | ||
But the hearings were in October 10 to 13, I think. | ||
But to see what they did to him and how they would stop at nothing. | ||
We're seeing that now. | ||
So when I think about—anyway, so that was my beginning on my relationship with Justice Thomas. | ||
As you know, when President Bush picked him, right, the other thing is, And we've talked about this before. | ||
The most important ingredient for a Supreme Court justice, in fact, a president, but Supreme Court justice, is courage, right? | ||
And a backbone, and willing to stand up in the fire. | ||
That is what Justice Thomas had, okay? | ||
He had experience. | ||
He was smart. | ||
He had been a D.C. | ||
Circuit judge, or he was at the time. | ||
He'd run an agency, all that sort of stuff that is the, you know, the traditional, you know, solid stuff. | ||
But what set him apart was his courage. | ||
We saw that for 10 years. | ||
That since he had come to Washington, he had been under fire by the left, sometimes by the right, but he's always standing up for what he believed in, and he wouldn't back down. | ||
That's what makes — that's why President Bush, 41, said he was the best qualified, and he was exactly right. | ||
And I've said that since the day he said that, that Justice Thomas, when he was nominated, was the best qualified justice at the time. | ||
And he's turned out to be. | ||
What a prescient thing President Bush said, is he's our greatest justice. | ||
Ever, in my opinion. | ||
He's our greatest living American. | ||
And so it was revolutionary for me. | ||
It was like career-defining, life-defining to have worked on that nomination, to see what the left would do to a good man, a great man, try and tear him apart. | ||
There's a documentary that I was very involved with, we can talk about later, but called Created Equal. | ||
Clarence Thomas, in his own words, I urge you, I urge all of you, the posse, to watch that film. | ||
It's on Amazon, it's all different platforms, but you'll see an amazing American story. | ||
So I worked on that and that was in 91, learned a lot of lessons. | ||
I also saw some of the weaponization with the independent council statute, right? | ||
That was, I think, enacted in 1978. | ||
What was that? | ||
It was the Democrats enacting a law to go criminalize, essentially, policy differences. | ||
And they went after Republicans left and right, including four days before the election in 1992, right? | ||
This was the Iran-Contra matter. | ||
And they were going after President Bush. | ||
And four days before the elections, they indicted Cap Weinberger, OK, on a completely bogus charge. | ||
This is this guy, Lawrence Walsh. | ||
OK, awful person. | ||
OK, a Republican from long ago, right back in the 50s. | ||
But he was hellbent because he was an independent counsel and wanted to kind of show that he was going to come up with something. | ||
And, you know, power corrupts. | ||
All right. | ||
So he wanted to take down President Bush. | ||
And he indicted Cap Weinberger with documents that he thought showed President Bush knew more than what he had said. | ||
It was completely bogus. | ||
But it was to affect the election, right? | ||
It was to weaponize law enforcement to affect an election, okay? | ||
President Bush lost, as you know. | ||
He pardoned, actually, Cap Weinberger. | ||
I was blessed to be able to write a fair chunk of that pardon in December of 1992. | ||
And guess what? | ||
I think it was in In December, even before the pardon, when the judge, the federal judge, Tom Hogan, dismissed the indictment. | ||
OK, so this was a complete exercise in using law enforcement for political ends, as we're seeing now on steroids. | ||
But all to say, I've lived this stuff since the early parts of my career and learned a lesson that has been seared in me since then. | ||
Yeah, let's talk about this, Mark. | ||
You have been the original warrior on this lawfare. | ||
There's Democrat lawfare and election interference. | ||
Whether it was the lawfare, the original lawfare against Clarence Thomas, where they wanted to smear a great American because you had a conservative black man who escaped the left's Plantation. | ||
And they have never forgiven Clarence Thomas for that. | ||
You have a black man who has the cardinal sin of thinking on his own, and the left hates him for that. | ||
And then you talked about the independent council during the Bush 41 administration, where they tried to weaponize law enforcement to interfere in the election. | ||
So you have a lot of experience with this. | ||
Let's fast forward to what's happening against President Trump. | ||
You have the Democrats trying to bankrupt Trump, they've indicted him four times and tried to throw him in prison for the rest of his life. | ||
They've tried to take him off the ballots in Colorado and in Maine. | ||
And when the Supreme Court stepped up with Clarence Thomas as the leader of this new constitutionalist Supreme Court, the first one in 90 years, The Supreme Court stepped up and stopped this republic-ending lawfare and election interference because this is so much bigger than Donald Trump. | ||
It's about the presidency and therefore our country. | ||
What has the left tried to do after that? | ||
Now they're trying to destroy the Supreme Courts that got in their way and they have underfunded Trump's Secret Service protection twice. | ||
And almost got him killed. | ||
And so they are going to stop at nothing to stop President Trump. | ||
And these are very dangerous tactics by the left. | ||
Let's talk about when Trump wins on November 5th. | ||
What needs to happen, Mark Paoletta, in a second Trump administration to bring accountability for this unprecedented Republican lawfare and election interference so this never happens again? | ||
Yeah, Mike, again, it's really worth just—look, the posse knows, everyone knows, Mike Davis has been the person out there from day one being the most ferocious defender of President Trump, calling out the left. | ||
And you know what, Mike, you showed—you were Norm-breaking, if you will, in a good way. | ||
As a Senate staffer, when you called out and attacked, right, and brought the receipts on the attacks on Kavanaugh during those hearings, and the lies of the witnesses that were coming forward and exposing it. | ||
And that's what we need to do. | ||
Again, I saw this back in the 90s with going after Clarence Thomas, with going after President Bush. | ||
But we've never I've never seen anything like this. | ||
It's absolutely chilling to President Trump and to his allies to use the law to destroy you for doing just regular things, right? | ||
Normal things, going to rallies, right? | ||
Giving speeches, challenging elections. | ||
These are things that have been done time and time again. | ||
And what do they do? | ||
They use the law. | ||
This is why it's so dangerous. | ||
They use the law to destroy you, all right? | ||
And so you're right. | ||
On so many cases, as you've defended on, what do we need to do? | ||
We need to bring accountability, right? | ||
When President Trump wins in November and takes office in January 2020-25, we need to make sure The Department of Justice is not an independent agency. | ||
The FBI is not an independent agency. | ||
They serve the President of the United States. | ||
They work to accomplish his agenda. | ||
So immediately, he should fire Chris Wray, the FBI director. | ||
He should fire Jack Smith and completely dissolve that January 6 unit that's at Main Justice, at the U.S. | ||
Attorney's Office, and any U.S. | ||
Attorney's Office around the country. | ||
And kind of shut down all of those persecutions, if you will, looking at the January 6th prosecutions, you know, put an immediate halt to them, review them, drop whatever ones are appropriate. | ||
I'd set up a special task force to do that. | ||
I would then look at each of the people that had been sentenced and either commute, again, after reviewing the facts, if it's appropriate to commute or pardon those individuals, | ||
because what the left has done is chewed up just regular Americans exercising their | ||
constitutional rights, many of them. | ||
That's what needs to happen. And then, in my view, there needs to be | ||
investigations into those investigations. | ||
right? | ||
The January 6th investigation, the crossfire hurricane. | ||
You know, the crossfire hurricane has been kicking around for so long, it was so nefarious, right? | ||
But there needs to be a deep dive, an investigation and prosecutions, if appropriate, of people who abuse their power for political ends, to get a president, to interfere in an election, And use their power in an unlawful way, in an abusive way. | ||
Let's back up right there, Mark, and talk about Crossfire Hurricane because this is so important. | ||
Remember to the War Room Posse what Crossfire Hurricane is. | ||
Hillary Clinton had her illegal home server as the Secretary of State. | ||
not only did it have our nation's most classified secrets, it also had the Clinton Foundation | ||
foreign corruption, her pay for play foreign corruption schemes. She's the Secretary of State, | ||
she's doing favors for these foreign governments, these foreign actors. They're donating to the | ||
Clinton Foundation that's underwriting their lavish lifestyle for the Clintons, right? | ||
And that home server gets hacked, presumably by the Russians, maybe by others like Iran | ||
or the Chinese. But the concern was, was before the 2016 election, this home server was going to | ||
get released by the Russians. And so what did the Obama, Biden, Clinton regime do? They made up the | ||
Russian collusion hoax. They made up the Steele dossier at Perkins Coie. They went to the FISA | ||
court. They lied to the FISA court and got illegal spy warrants on then candidate Donald Trump and | ||
even President Donald Trump. And they spied on him because if this information came out with | ||
Hillary's pay for play foreign bribery schemes, they wanted to blame a Russian disinformation | ||
They wanted to blame a campaign dirty trick with Trump. | ||
And you say, that's crazy. | ||
How could you possibly think that? | ||
They did the same play in 2020 with Hunter Biden's laptop, with the 51 former intel officials working with the CIA to say the same thing about Hunter's Laptop. | ||
And guess what? | ||
Trump declassified Crossfire Hurricane the day before he left office. | ||
The intel community, the FBI, went crazy, went to Mark Meadows, the White House Chief of Staff, and says, you can't release this. | ||
This will violate the Privacy Act. | ||
So Mark Meadows, the day they left office, said, OK, do your Privacy Act review and get these out public. | ||
And guess what? | ||
They didn't do the Privacy Act review. | ||
Instead, they did the Mar-a-Lago raid to go get back these Crossfire Hurricane records. | ||
I think This is a criminal conspiracy that's been going on for many, many years. | ||
That's the whole point of the Mar-a-Lago raid, and that needs to be investigated. | ||
Yeah. | ||
And so, Mike, it's really interesting. | ||
You go from 2016, which is when the Obama administration was in power, right? | ||
And then into 2020, when President Trump is in power. | ||
But you know what? | ||
There is this deep state, particularly at these law enforcement agencies, the intelligence, quite frankly, anywhere. | ||
But for these purposes, there is a deep state that's operating and that was hostile, adversarial to President Trump. | ||
And that's what's so outrageous here, right, that they were working You're exactly right. | ||
There were intel officials. | ||
There were, you know, law enforcement officials working with the Biden people, with Antony Blinken, right, to come up with this lie about this laptop and so-called Russian disinformation. | ||
The FBI knew at the time in 2019 that it was legit. | ||
It was Hunter Biden's laptop and the contents on it was all legit, all real. | ||
And so that is the deep rot right, in our government. | ||
And what happens is a lot of these bureaucrats, right, there's this phrase, it's like, | ||
we be here when you come, we be here when you're gone, right? | ||
They think they run the government, and particularly in the law enforcement, in the military, | ||
in the intel communities, because it's impenetrable | ||
to what I'll call political leadership, right? | ||
We elect a president of the United States, and he's gonna bring in his team and implement his agenda. | ||
And that's what's so important on day one, the FBI and the Department of Justice, | ||
the president needs to make it clear that we are pursuing. | ||
my agenda, a lawful agenda, okay, and in terms of looking at these investigations, the abuses | ||
that have happened over the many years, they need to be looked into and people need to | ||
be prosecuted if there are violations, you know, and do the proper investigation. | ||
But they need to be looked at. | ||
It needs to be a special team, too, right, because relying on career officials that were | ||
knee-deep in it or are partial to it is not going to get you anywhere. | ||
So that's what needs to happen. | ||
It needs to be—remember, as you know, Mike, I've talked about this before, the independent counsel statute, which I mentioned before, was enacted to get the executive branch, okay? | ||
Criminalize things. | ||
And so it went after a number of people and ruined their lives, okay? | ||
When it turned on Bill Clinton, When we had the end of Ken Starr and that independent council, guess what? | ||
And it kind of blew up Bill Clinton's presidency, right? | ||
And made life very difficult for him. | ||
The Democrats let that law lapse. | ||
Everyone hated it. | ||
Once the Democrats had a taste, And I'm not just talking about, I'm talking about, you know, going after Mark Hauk, right? | ||
They wanted no more of it. OK? And that's what has to happen now, is accountability, | ||
OK, on these investigations that have happened and abuse of investigations. And I'm not just | ||
talking about—I'm talking about, you know, going after Mark Houck, right, the gentleman who | ||
protested outside the Planned Parenthood, where the FBI raided his home. Things like that, where | ||
they've gone after normal Americans, when they've gone after President Trump. | ||
All of these things need to be investigated and there need to be prosecutions where appropriate. | ||
That's a very good point, Mark, because people think, oh, it's Donald Trump. | ||
He's a former president. | ||
He's a likely future president. | ||
He's a billionaire. | ||
It's unfair what's happening to him, but he can withstand this. | ||
But you're making the point. | ||
This is so much bigger than Trump. | ||
This is about the presidency, and this is about if the If our law enforcement and intel agencies can be weaponized against the President of the United States, guess what? | ||
We are all toast. | ||
They are not only going after the President, they're going after his top aides, like Steve Bannon, who's in prison right now, Peter Navarro, who went to prison, his attorneys, John Eastman, Rudy Giuliani, Jeff Clark, his supporters on January 6th, who were persecuted, parents outraged by gender chaos in schools, And the resulting rapes in high school bathrooms. | ||
Christians, like Mark Houck and a 75-year-old Christian woman, praying at an abortion clinic, go to prison under the FACE Act while they give amnesty. | ||
The Biden-Harris Justice Department gives amnesty to BLM and Antifa and Hamas supporters and trans terrorists who are attacking Catholic churches and these Planned Parenthood abortion industry activists. | ||
We can't have two systems of justice. | ||
And that's why it's so important And this Trump 47 administration that we have good Americans like you, hopefully, if Trish, your wife, will let you, to send you in there to help clean up this mess because you have the background and you have the backbone and experience to do it. | ||
You were the OG on this weaponized justice against Clarence Thomas and Bush 41. | ||
Yeah, Mike, it's a long time coming. | ||
You know, President Trump has stood up to this. | ||
When he was president, he did things like pull out of the Paris Climate Accords, you know, terrible things that no other president, no other Republican president would have ever done. | ||
Right. | ||
And so that's why I think it's important when he gets reelected to look into the deep state and the weaponized state, the weaponization that the deep state does against, you know, not only President Trump and sort of the political opponents at that level, but just normal everyday Americans that get chewed up with their lives destroyed by this weaponization. | ||
And it's all, right, it's all pursuing what I'll call leftist things, right? | ||
As you just went, and you're the best, Mike. | ||
I mean, I just love listening to you talk. | ||
You've spent so much time on this, but you got it all right there. | ||
I mean, every single one of those things, right? | ||
One, when President Trump comes in, Those things should be halted immediately. | ||
All of this DEI, all of this, you know, woke stuff should be shut down instantly, right? | ||
Secure the border. | ||
Get rid of every single, you know, criminal alien that's committed rape and murder. | ||
Set up a deportation system to restore order to our country and safety. | ||
And so it's focusing on violent crime, And those sorts of things that the Department of Justice needs to do. | ||
It's raining in the FBI in their intel, right? | ||
What they've been doing, right? | ||
The FBI used to be a law enforcement entity that went after crime, like violent crime and financial crimes and all that sort of stuff. | ||
Now they've become this intel entity that's going after Americans for exercising their rights on, you know, First Amendment rights, where they want to worship, right? | ||
What they want to talk about. | ||
All this disinformation I ain't so cold. | ||
You are a great man. | ||
We're running out of time. | ||
Tell the war room posse how they can get a hold of you. | ||
What are your coordinates? | ||
Sure, Mike. | ||
Follow me on X at Mark Paoletta. | ||
I have a website, markpaoletta.com, where I post up, I write a lot of op-eds up there, some congressional testimony. | ||
I'm at the Center for Renewing America with Russ Vogt, and you can follow me over there. | ||
We're doing a lot of work on impoundments. | ||
But this is the most important issue, Mike, and I really appreciate you having me on. | ||
Mark Paoletta, you are a great American. | ||
You're one of my best friends in Washington, D.C., and I look forward to you going in and kicking ass for Donald J. Trump and the second administration. | ||
So thank you very much for coming on today. | ||
Thanks, Mike. | ||
Next up, we're going to have Cleta Mitchell and Mark Lucas talking about election integrity. | ||
Cleta Mitchell is an all-star election lawyer. | ||
Mark Lucas from the Article 3 Project. | ||
Stick around after the break. | ||
With the massive tax hikes proposed by Harris, an almost 40% top income tax rate, 7% increase to the corporate tax, a capital gains tax on unrealized gains, and the fact that she's proposing to add almost $2 trillion to a current $2 trillion deficit. | ||
You might be thinking it's time to make more of your savings tax sheltered and inflation sheltered. | ||
This is where I trust the good people at Birch Gold to help you. | ||
Birch Gold will assist you in converting an existing IRA or 401k into an IRA in gold. | ||
And the best news, you don't pay a penny out of pocket. | ||
Just text the word BANNON to 989898 and get a free info kit on gold. | ||
There's no obligation, just information on fortifying your savings before the crazy times really hit. | ||
With an A-plus rating, with a better business bureau, and thousands of happy customers, you can trust Birch Gold, too. | ||
Text BANNON to the number 989898 for the free info kit today. | ||
America is standing on the brink of an election meltdown, and Jim Rickards, editor of Strategic Intelligence, the man who predicted the 2008 financial crisis, Trump's victory in 2016, and the COVID disaster is sounding the alarm. | ||
Rickards has just dropped a bombshell that could change everything you think you know about the 2024 election. | ||
He's uncovered what he calls the Democrats' secret plan to keep Trump out of the White House, even if he wins. | ||
This isn't some far-off theory. | ||
He's warning that this meltdown could lead to a 50% market crash. | ||
The total collapse of the U.S. | ||
dollar and violent riots in our streets. | ||
The stakes are higher than ever, folks, and if you're not prepared, you could lose everything. | ||
But Jim Rickards isn't just predicting disaster. | ||
He's laying out five critical steps you need to take now to protect yourself, your family, and your financial future. | ||
This isn't fear mongering. | ||
It's coming straight from a man who's been at the highest levels of intelligence, finance, and national security. | ||
Go to Meltdown24.com. | ||
right now to watch his urgent presentation. | ||
Don't wait until it's too late. | ||
Meltdown24.com. | ||
That's Meltdown24.com. | ||
unidentified
|
all this nonsense, all this spin, they can't handle the truth. | |
War Room Battleground with Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
Welcome back to the War Room. | ||
I'm Mike Davis, the viceroy, the next man up, standing in for Stephen K. Bannon, who Biden and Kamala have in the clink. | ||
We have up all-star election attorney Cleta Mitchell, one of my good friends, one of my mentors. | ||
She's fantastic, along with Mark Lucas, who works with me at the Article 3 Project, he runs the Action, Action, Action. | ||
So let's talk about election integrity, Cleta and Mark. | ||
We have a lot going on. | ||
We have a lot going on with non-citizens who are illegally voting, and we have a lot going on in specific swing states. | ||
We're going to talk about Arizona, Virginia, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin over this next 20 minutes. | ||
So let's move quickly. | ||
Cleta, what do we have on Arizona and Virginia? | ||
To start with, remember about two weeks ago, the Marxist Secretary of State of Arizona, Adrian Fontes, announced that, oh, whoops, they had found that there were 98,000 or so people registered in Arizona who they thought had provided documentary proof of citizenship, | ||
but actually had not. | ||
And so you'll remember that the Republican Party of Arizona went in and threw in with Adrian Fontes, the Marxist, | ||
to say, oh, well, we can't possibly require these people to provide proof of citizenship. | ||
The state Supreme Court agreed with that. | ||
Fortunately, America First Legal and Strong Communities Foundation of Arizona, | ||
Marissa Hamilton, objected to that, said everybody ought to have to provide proof of | ||
citizenship. | ||
But in any event, yesterday it was announced that, well, it wasn't 98,000, it was 218,000. | ||
So now we have nearly a quarter million people on the voter rolls in Arizona | ||
who have not provided documentary proof of citizenship as everyone had believed they had all along. | ||
And, of course, they don't want to make the list public so that people could come forward with their proof of citizenship. | ||
And it's just a basic nightmare. | ||
And we also had a recording released yesterday where the Democrats' officials, the governor, secretary of state and attorney general, were saying, oops, this is only going to feed the Republicans' allegations that there are actually non-citizens on the rolls. | ||
I don't know why they would think that. | ||
Then they said, well, it's just an error. | ||
It's just a glitch. | ||
But it's a big problem that you have that many on the rolls in a state that requires documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote to get the full ballot in Arizona. | ||
So that's an ongoing challenge. | ||
Yeah, let's talk about Virginia, Cleta. | ||
We have Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin who has found 6,000 non-citizens on the Virginia rolls. | ||
You have news for the War Room Posse that it gets worse. | ||
Talk about that. | ||
There's a citizens organization, EPEC, and I'm sorry, it's election something. | ||
They do data analysis of all the records, the voting records, and their voter rolls in Virginia. | ||
And they do a great job. | ||
They're volunteers. | ||
And they released a report yesterday that showed that of those 6,000 non-citizens, that there were approximately 1,000 ballots cast. | ||
Remember, of course, Democrats say, Oh, it's very rare for non-citizens to vote. | ||
Well, in this case, they were able to document that there were around 1,000 votes cast over the last couple of years. | ||
So hold on, hold on. | ||
Cleta, that's 1,000 people who, 1,000 non-citizens, who they've been able to identify who have actually voted in Virginia. | ||
This is in addition to the 2,000 non-citizens that Texas Governor Greg Abbott has been able to identify in Texas. | ||
So those are 3,000 non-citizens who they've been able to find in just two states who have voted. | ||
Is that correct? | ||
Well, yes, 1,000 votes. | ||
It's not quite 1,000 people because some of them voted in more than one election. | ||
So it's about 1,000 votes cast by something like 600 to 700 of those people who were identified as not being eligible to register in the first place. | ||
But yes, and then you have the situation in Alabama where they found 100,000, and now the Department of Justice is saying, oh, you can't remove noncitizens from the rolls, which is also not legally accurate. | ||
But one of the things going back to Virginia is that The citizens group studied the ballot, which ballot these people had requested. | ||
And in Virginia, you don't register by party, but you can tell from some of the data, if they voted in a primary, you can see which ballot they requested. | ||
And guess what? | ||
Most of the people for whom data exists of those non-citizens, guess what? | ||
They requested the Democrat ballot. | ||
Which tells us everything we need to know. | ||
There were like 2% who requested the Republican ballot and almost 30% who requested the Democrat ballot. | ||
They didn't have the data for the others because they didn't vote in the primary. | ||
So it's everything we need to know. | ||
It is exactly what we know. | ||
This is their new political majority for the Democrats. | ||
Yeah, that's exactly right. | ||
And the Article 3 projects and the Article 3 Foundation, its sister organization, has been on top of this. | ||
Cleta, you've been instrumental in getting us the support we need. | ||
Mark, let's talk about this. | ||
We're going to talk about the SAVE Act, but first we're going to put up the 30-second ad that the Article 3 foundation has put out where it's very | ||
clear that it is illegal for non-citizens to vote in federal elections. It is almost always a federal | ||
crime and it is almost always a deportable federal crime. Let's play that 30-second ad. | ||
unidentified
|
In the United States, voting is a sacred right guaranteed by our Constitution. | |
It is a right for which men and women for centuries were willing to sacrifice their lives to protect it. | ||
If you are an American citizen, fulfill your duty, register to vote and vote. | ||
But it is illegal for non-citizens to vote in federal elections, including the 2024 presidential elections. | ||
Doing so is generally a federal crime and a crime that can lead to deportation. | ||
Only American citizens can vote for president and other federal positions. | ||
The Article 3 Project is running this ad in many swing states. | ||
We're spending a million dollars. | ||
The Article 3 Foundation, the C3 sister organization. | ||
Mark, let's talk about the SAVE Act and the Article 3 Project's action page. | ||
If you go to article3project.org, article number 3project.org, and click on Take Action, Walk the War Room Posse through what they can do on the Take Action page to light up our members of Congress on the SAVE Act. | ||
unidentified
|
Yes, Mike. | |
So the Article 3 project, we wanted to build this Action Center so that the War Room Posse could easily take action. | ||
We understand you have jobs and families and hobbies. | ||
When you go to our Action Center, we want to make it very easy for you to connect with your lawmakers. | ||
And we've seen that Kamala Harris, her election attorney, Mark Elias, And Democrat election officials all across the country are burning the boats on election integrity. | ||
They have reached a point of no return. | ||
They understand they cannot beat President Trump in an honest election. | ||
And we see that non-citizen voting has become a major issue all across the country. | ||
So you can click on the Take Action button. | ||
You can take action on the SAVE Act. | ||
You can contact your local congressman and also United States Senator. | ||
But we're seeing this disturbing trend of non-citizen voting all across the country, including in the states. | ||
In the state of Wisconsin, for instance, we see that the Secretary of Transportation, Christina Boardman, admitted to the Wisconsin Legislature that nearly 90,000 non-citizens have a driver's license or a state ID. | ||
Let's put that number in perspective. | ||
In 2016, President Trump beat Hillary Clinton by 27,000 votes. | ||
In 2020, Joe Biden supposedly beat Trump by 20,000 votes. | ||
In 2020, Joe Biden supposedly beat Trump by 20,000 votes. | ||
And today, the state of Wisconsin has 90,000 non-citizens with a state ID. | ||
And the Secretary of Transportation, Boardman, she refuses to provide the Election Commission | ||
a list so they can validate the citizenship against the voter rolls. | ||
Even Governor Tony Evers, who is a Democrat, says that he does not object to data sharing with citizen information from the DOT to the WEC. | ||
So you can go to a3paction.com. | ||
You can take action to contact Governor Tony Evers and also the Secretary of Transportation, Christina Boardman, and tell them to stop non-citizens from voting. | ||
So Cleta, let's talk about what's going on in Georgia and Pennsylvania. | ||
Give the Posse the update on Georgia and Pennsylvania. | ||
This is a big week in Georgia and Fulton County Court. | ||
Yesterday, there was a hearing on the case brought by the DeKalb County Republican Party, challenging the use of the Dominion voting machines. | ||
And they presented evidence about how easy it was to both hack The machines as well as to leave no evidence of the intrusions. | ||
And so that was a very interesting hearing. | ||
And I don't know what the judge will do, but that was took place several hours yesterday before Judge McAfee. | ||
And then today, as we speak, there is a today there has been a hearing on two cases before Judge McBurney. | ||
Now, remember, this is Judge McBurney, who yesterday ruled that the Georgia law restricting abortion was invalid and invalidated the statute. | ||
He is a Harvard undergrad in Harvard law. | ||
And so he is hearing two cases. | ||
One, the Democrats are trying to make it They're trying to fauci-ize the elections all over the country and to say that the bipartisan board members on election boards all over the country have no authority to use their discretion to make sure that the returns are accurate and to make sure that everything is being done in accordance with the law. | ||
Their argument is they have to sign the paperwork And a test of the accuracy of the election, whether they're accurate or not. | ||
So there are two rules of the state election board that are being challenged as part of today's hearing. | ||
And then on Friday, there is yet another case, and this time before Judge McAfee again, In which the Democrats and left-wing groups are challenging the authority of the state election board to issue rules and regulations at all, even though the statute is very clear. | ||
So there's a collective heads exploding of the progressive left, Mark Elias and that whole crowd, because you now have a rule of law state election board enacting rules and regulations to make sure that the elections are conducted accurately, And that they are conducted in accordance with the law and that they're transparent. | ||
And so they are objecting mightily. | ||
They've got the whole establishment media howling. | ||
And but we're now in the hands of two judges in Fulton County. | ||
And so we'll see what happens with these judges and whether they'll follow the law or whether they'll follow the progressive crowd. | ||
Well, this is Judge Scott McAfee. | ||
Is that what you're saying, Cleta? | ||
The same judge who allowed Fannie Willis to drag him around Yes. | ||
his courtroom when she got caught with her legal conflict of interest by hiring, | ||
big Fannie hired her dumb, unqualified boyfriend, Nathan Wade, paid him $250 an hour, $700,000. | ||
And then she lied about it in court and said that her Black Panther father | ||
told her to keep three months or six months of cash They went Dutch on these trips to Napa, Belize, the Caribbean. | ||
She's a gray goose girl. | ||
And Scott McAfee didn't disqualify her from the case. | ||
So our hope right now is with Scott McAfee, or whatever the hell his name is, this little pencil neck, weak judge, In Fulton County, Georgia, who's scared of his shadow and used to work for Fannie Willis. | ||
I guess he's nominating a Republican. | ||
Here's the other judge that we have to be concerned about, and that's the judge who was hearing the cases today. | ||
He's the one — Judge McBurney actually presided over the Fannie Willis special grand jury. | ||
So, he's the one who supposedly allowed all of these things to happen. | ||
Judge McAfee is the one who has denied the motions to dismiss. | ||
But all of these defendants, whose only sin was to follow the law and to file an election contest or to be one of the electors or to refuse to certify an election when the numbers didn't match, Judge McBurney presided over all of that. | ||
And so he's doing two of the cases, and the other two cases are being heard by Judge McAfee, who you just described as having heard the cases, the appeals, and the Fannie Willis disqualification motions. | ||
So that's where we are in Fulton County. | ||
Wouldn't it be nice if we had Republican judges who actually had backbones? | ||
It would be fantastic. | ||
Anyway, Mark, what do we have for action items down in Georgia? | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, Mike, since Clea and I spoke to you last week on The War Room, we had over a thousand people take action in the state of Georgia. | |
And we're telling that Georgia State Election Board Chairman John Fervier to support election integrity. | ||
And from what we're hearing on the ground from people that have been around the chairman, they sense that his demeanor has changed. | ||
So I believe that those emails, those phone calls, those social media postings that the War Room Posse is making on A3PAction.com is making a difference. | ||
John Fervier was a Republican appointment to the Georgia board on the state elections. | ||
And he admitted to inviting a far-left attorney to testify that worked on behalf of CREW, Mike, an organization that you know very well, because CREW attempted to kick President Trump illegally off the ballot in the state of Colorado. | ||
And this radical Soros-funded group, along with Mark Elias, and like Cleta had mentioned, all these left-wing attorneys are collectively losing their minds on what's going on in Georgia. | ||
And these Georgia State Election Board officials, the people at the county level, they need your support. | ||
So not only do we have to hold these bad judges accountable, we have to thank these ordinary citizens who are standing up every single day in the breach and thank them for standing up for election integrity. | ||
Very good. | ||
We have about four minutes left. | ||
Let's cover Pennsylvania, the make-or-break state for Trump. | ||
Cleto, what's going on in Pennsylvania? | ||
If you can just talk for a couple minutes and then we'll have Mark jump in and then we'll close this out with your coordinates. | ||
Well, there's an awful lot going on in Pennsylvania. | ||
The Pennsylvania Fair Elections Committee coalition is really working hard under the able leadership of Heather Honey. | ||
And just before midnight last night, a group of Pennsylvania congressmen filed a federal lawsuit challenging the lawless guidance Really, contrary to law, on UOCAVA, the Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act, where they have given guidance that a person does not have to prove that he or she is eligible to register to vote in Pennsylvania. | ||
It is contrary to federal law. | ||
It is contrary to state law. | ||
That was filed just before midnight. | ||
We really have a situation where the Secretary of State is appointed by the governor, is really just violating the law with impunity. | ||
And that's one of the things that we have to address and a whole range of issues where they are not, | ||
these election officials are not following the law. | ||
Mark, what do we have in Pennsylvania for action items? | ||
unidentified
|
A3P is encouraging people to contact Governor Josh Shapiro and the Secretary of the Commonwealth, Al Schmidt, | |
to support election integrity. | ||
Governor Shapiro implemented automatic voter registration for people who went to get a driver's license or an IED at DOT centers. | ||
And it was recently reported that Pennsylvania has at least 620,000 non-citizens with a state ID. | ||
To put that in perspective, in 2016, Trump defeated Clinton by 68,000 votes. | ||
Trump defeated Clinton by 68,000 votes. | ||
In 2020, Biden defeated Trump supposedly by 80,000 votes. | ||
And in the state of Pennsylvania today, over 600,000 non-citizens have state IDs. | ||
And Al Schmidt, he knows they have problems in Pennsylvania. | ||
He was the former Philadelphia City Commissioner. | ||
In that role, he testified to the Pennsylvania Senate. | ||
that he was briefed on a study that showed over 100,000 non-citizens were registered to vote. | ||
So in the state of Pennsylvania, we just launched this action alert today. | ||
I'm encouraging the War Room Posse, go to the article number 3project.org, take action, and let Governor Shapiro and Secretary Schmidt know they need to stop non-citizens from voting. | ||
I hope these Democrats and other left-wing activists know that we are ready this time. | ||
We have people like Cleta Mitchell, an all-star attorney with her eyes and ears all over the country. | ||
We have people like Mark Lucas of the Article 3 Project. | ||
Who are engaging people to take specific action at specific pressure points. | ||
So these election lawyers, judges, officials know we are paying attention this time. | ||
They are not going to rig and steal the 2024 election like they've done in prior elections. | ||
We're not going to let non-citizens rig and steal this election. | ||
We're not going to let these left-wing operatives rig and steal these elections. | ||
We're paying attention this time. | ||
Cleta, how does the War Room Posse find you online? | ||
I think the best thing to do is to go to X and I'm just at Cleta Mitchell on X and I try to put things up every day and something having to do with election integrity. | ||
I just learned that the League of Women Voters in Wisconsin is fighting the constitutional amendment that's on the ballot there in November. | ||
To require, to say that only citizens can vote in Wisconsin, and the League of Women Voters is fighting it. | ||
Don't anybody ever think that they're really nonpartisan? | ||
They're awful. | ||
But I try to put information there, on X, because that's the place where most people can see it, and we can share it with our friends and neighbors and our other followers. | ||
So watch, follow me on X. Thank you, Mark. | ||
We have 30 seconds. | ||
What are your coordinates? | ||
unidentified
|
Yes, follow the Article 3 Project at articlenumber3project on Getter, Truth and on Axe. | |
You can visit our Action Center, a3paction.com, articlenumber3project.org. | ||
Yeah, I would say to the War Room Posse, we were on this election. | ||
We are paying attention. | ||
Again, we're not going to let these left-wing activists rig and steal this election like they've rigged and stolen prior elections. | ||
We're not going to let non-citizens illegally vote. | ||
They're not going to get away with it this time. | ||
So thank you for joining the War Room and make sure you pay attention. | ||
You tune in to RAV for the 9 p.m. | ||
unidentified
|
BP debate. | |
With J.D. | ||
Vance and Tampon Tem, J.D.' he's going to clean his clock. | ||
♪♪ Homes across America are being stolen every day. | ||
It's called title theft, and it's why you need to get home title protection from HomeTitleLock.com today. | ||
If no one's keeping an eye on your title, then it's just a matter of time until they target you, too. | ||
Don't fall prey to these thieves. | ||
Go to HomeTitleLock.com today and make sure your title is safe. | ||
Use promo code BANNON and get a complete title scan of your home's title and your first 30 days of Triple Lock Home Title Protection for free. | ||
That's HometitleLock.com. |