Sept. 28, 2024 - Bannon's War Room
48:55
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pray for our enemies. | |
| Because we're going medieval on these people. | ||
| You're not going to free shot all these networks lying about the people. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The people have had a belly full of it. | |
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big line? | ||
|
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room, here's your host, Stephen K. Bamm. | |
| You're back in the War Room. | ||
| It's Saturday, September 28th. | ||
| Natalie Winters hosting the second hour of the morning show, Steve's Favorite, to my favorite by extension. | ||
| We're going to get into all things global, all things geopolitical. | ||
| I want to start with Colonel Derek Harvey, who joins us Now, obviously, the Middle East is on fire with Nasrallah. | ||
| I guess now we know Hezbollah confirming that he was indeed killed. | ||
| I want to throw up on the screen real quick, though. | ||
| I think we just dropped the new version of austere religious scholar in reference to Khomeini Associated Press calling Hassan Nasrallah, quote, charismatic and shrewd. | ||
| I don't think they will be that nice to probably President Trump or anyone even tangentially linked to MAGA and their pieces on their death. | ||
| But I guess if you're a leader of an international terrorist organization, then AP will take a liking to you. | ||
| Colonel, if you could walk us through what is unfolding in Israel and Lebanon right now and where you think we're heading to. | ||
| Well, I think everything that's transpired over the last week to 10 days is very good news because Israel is seeking to reestablish strategic dominance and deterrence, and it knows how to fight a war, and it understands the Middle East far better than the Biden-Harris administration, which has been for a year trying to prevent Israel from achieving its war aims. | ||
| And, you know, importantly, the United States has a history of not understanding how to fight wars and win wars. | ||
| And we manage conflicts with the idea of we're going to get to a negotiated settlement with very evil people who will just restart a war. | ||
| And, you know, they have ignored that at this point in time, and they're moving on a fast pace to establish their war aims and You know, striking success, taking out the command and control network leadership and really discombobulating, you know, the Hezbollah leadership and creating confusion for the Iranians. | ||
| Number two, this is this has already been a regional war. | ||
| Iran has been orchestrating this in the Gulf. | ||
| At the Straits of Bab el-Mandeb, entering into the Red Sea, into the Mediterranean, the northern part of Israel, Gaza, Syria, West Bank, it is already spread. | ||
| And there were over 50 overseas attacks that have been interdicted by the Israelis that were targeting Jews worldwide. | ||
| So this is already a regional conflict and they're trying to bring it to a termination, which is very important, on favorable terms by crushing Hezbollah's military capability and Natalie, importantly, freeing, hopefully we can use this point of inflection to free Lebanon, to seize the opportunity to free Lebanon of the sectarian madness being driven by Iran and Hezbollah internally in the country of Lebanon. | ||
| This will obviously significantly affect Iran's posture on the global stage, but I'm just | ||
| curious with all the reporting we've been hearing coming out from our intel agencies | ||
| here, which as we've always maintained in the war room, I would argue those people are | ||
| more likely to be wanting to go after Trump than say Iranian entities. | ||
| I guess they're not mutually exclusive, but I'm just curious how you think what is going | ||
| on over there could potentially strengthen Iran's resolve to want to go after Trump or | ||
| or just how you think that that affects domestic politics here at home. | ||
| Well, it is hard to say because this would be speculative. | ||
| But the Biden-Harris administration continues to coddle the Iranians. | ||
| They allowed them to go more expansively to visit and do things in the United States when they came here for the United Nations meetings this week. | ||
| Why would we do that when Iran is backing a war against our ally in the region, is sowing turmoil throughout the broader region, is blocking shipping in the Red Sea and in the Persian Gulf, and is threatening former American officials, why would we allow them more visitation and more opportunities for publicity and going on American media to share their narrative, which is, you know, an abuse of accuracy and objectivity. | ||
| Now to Trump and the threats against Trump, the open border, The Iranian relationship with cartels and Venezuela government and intelligence officials that and they partner with, you know, organizations like Hezbollah that has a footprint in this country already. | ||
| It's not hard to see how they could develop partnerships to go after, you know, President Trump or former Secretary of State Pompeo or others who are on that target list from Iran. | ||
| I'm also curious, I was watching MSNBC's coverage of all this this morning. | ||
| I think Andrea Mitchell had an interview with sort of the Israeli side of operations against Nasrallah, and something that stuck out to me was they were saying that the United States didn't really receive any advance notice that they were going to be carrying out these strikes, despite the United States obviously supplying Israel with the overwhelming majority of its weaponry. | ||
| Is that something that is unique to the Biden regime? In other words, Israel feels so | ||
| alienated or frankly, they just don't respect Joe Biden, Kamala Harris. They feel like they don't | ||
| even need their approval. But just the sort of chain of command on this issue, how significantly | ||
| has the Biden regime just kind of abdicated the world stage when it comes to the Middle East, | ||
| barring, you know, sending billions of dollars to Iran? There's really no | ||
| trust or confidence in the Biden-Harris administration, and rightly so. It also goes back to the | ||
| experience with Obama and Biden, you know, in the Biden, excuse me, in the Obama | ||
| administration. | ||
| The problem with this administration and with the Obama administration is they would leak important targeting information or intelligence that was collected. | ||
| And keep in mind that the Israelis have the best intelligence service War and has penetrated effectively across the Middle East. | ||
| We rely on them tremendously, but they have burned Israeli operations. | ||
| They have burned Israeli intelligence assets time and time again, and it's it has been catastrophic. | ||
| So there's a good reason not to do anything that would tip them off because they probably would have alerted Hezbollah in one way or another. | ||
| And Derek, I'm just curious, I want to pivot a little bit. | ||
| We're obviously talking about global governance here in the United States, especially as the UN Summit up in New York rages on, but it seems like global government is already coming to a town near you with Minneapolis swearing in its first ever non-citizen police officer. | ||
| Yeah, try to square that. | ||
| I don't know if you can. | ||
| As Steve would say, make it make sense. | ||
| But Denver, let's roll the coverage of it. | ||
| Let's roll the clip. | ||
| It's just, it's maddening. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The Minneapolis Police Department swore in new officers. | |
| And that includes its first ever female Somali officer. | ||
| Ben Henry was there and shares what she and other recruits hope to accomplish. | ||
| Lots of hope there tonight, Ben. | ||
| There is. | ||
| The department now has its first ever Somali woman officer and permanent resident, which is a non-citizen who's lived in the community since she was a child. | ||
| Lindsay, you said it. | ||
| One word that was used a lot tonight, hope. | ||
| Mayor Jacob Fry says he sees and feels the department building back up, not just in numbers, but in culture. | ||
| I like the tacit throw, saying hope and we're building back better, the department. | ||
| I didn't catch that until I just listened to it now. | ||
| But Derek, I'll just keep it simple. | ||
| Your thoughts? | ||
| Well, this continues a trend by the progressive left to diminish the importance of citizenship. | ||
| They want them to vote in our local elections, and they would like them to vote in federal elections, and they're encouraging it to be done illegally, in my view. | ||
| I think there's plenty of evidence of that. | ||
| There are plenty of Americans, citizen Somali descendants that could be recruited to do this. | ||
| They're making a political statement. | ||
| They can recruit and retain political officer. | ||
| I mean, police officers very easily if they if they want to. | ||
| This is again, you know, the crazy Minneapolis City Council and Police Department, you know, making progressive leftist decisions that undermines our citizenship and the importance of that. | ||
| So it's discouraging. | ||
| Derek, if people want to follow you, get all of your analysis on all things Middle East, but so much more, where can they go to do all that? | ||
| Well, I would encourage people to go to Derek Harvey, that's D-E-R-E-K-H-A-R-V-E-Y dot org. | ||
| I'm out in Nebraska doing some public speaking to groups this weekend, and that's a good place to contact me for that. | ||
| I'm at Colonel D Harvey on Twitter, and I'm at just Derek Harvey at True Social. | ||
| Derek Harvey. | ||
| Derek, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| We'll have you back on. | ||
| Natalie, you're doing great work for America. | ||
| Thank you so much. | ||
| Thank you, sir. | ||
| As are you. | ||
| Non-citizen police officers. | ||
| That's the lived reality of the Biden regime. | ||
| But Kamala Harris wants to stand and lecture you on the border, how they've done so much for the sovereignty of the United States. | ||
| That is a disgrace, and frankly, spitting on the graves of actual Americans, emphasis on actual, who've given their life to defend America. | ||
| Because if you want to stand there and say that borders don't matter, like all of our bettors up at the United Nations are busy doing, You're essentially saying that what they died for meant nothing. | ||
| And we here in the war room don't believe that, because we think borders matter and sovereignty matters. | ||
| Sovereignty, let's add that word to Kamala's limited vocabulary. | ||
| Apparently she just learned how to use it yesterday, unless it's in the context of Ukraine. | ||
| But how perverse Under the Biden regime, they're not just going to bus and drive and fly in taxpayer-funded chariot rides into your town, people from cultures that really, frankly, don't coexist with the United States. | ||
| Might be a hot take for Saturday morning, but it's true. | ||
| And they're not just going to demand that you accept this massive invasion and, of course, call you a racist if you don't. | ||
| Sorry, on MSNBC they said it's an, quote, adjustment that you need to get used to. | ||
| But now they're going to say that these people have to become your police officers too. | ||
| And the same news cycle that they're going to warn us about political violence, and we already have so many mishaps and errors going on with the Secret Service. | ||
| How long until we see our first non-citizen Secret Service agent? | ||
| Or maybe we already have, and it's going to come out soon. | ||
| Maybe that's why we keep seeing President Trump almost getting assassinated. | ||
| What these people have done to cheapen what it means to be an American citizen is so disgusting, but it's so intentional. | ||
| And when people stand there and say that Kamala Harris doesn't have a plan, you are underselling the radicalness of the Democrats' agenda on all things. | ||
| Especially when it comes to cheapening American citizenship, and I'm not just talking about America Last trade deals, I'm talking about the fact that they want to replace you and your vote with a non-citizen. | ||
| House Democrats won't even frickin' vote for the bill, and House Republicans will demean and cheapen it by attaching it to a CR so we can continue business as usual up here, so their lobbyists can keep getting paid. | ||
| That's what sovereignty is to these people. | ||
| That's what democracy is to these people. | ||
| It's a sham. | ||
| We're the actual defenders of democracy here in the war room. | ||
| And people like Steve Castor, the general counsel for House Judiciary, who's too busy giving puff piece interviews to The Hill about how he can't do anything about Stephen K. Bannon because there's no legislative purview for him to do anything about it. | ||
| Yeah, the Democrats' legislative justification that they use for, frankly, everything, is that they want to destroy the United States of America. | ||
| They want to shred the Constitution, all the while gaslighting, saying that we're the ones who want to do that. | ||
| Yeah, the same Democrats who, just last night, are joking on TV about getting rid of the Supreme Court. | ||
| And Steve Castor wants to sit there and give softball interviews to The Hill saying that he can't do anything about Stephen K. Bannon sitting in a federal prison. | ||
| Note to self, Steve Castor, maybe don't tell the enemy that you're so weak and feckless that if they come for the leader of the MAGA movement, you're gonna sit on the sidelines and do nothing and take it. | ||
| That's what America last looks like. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're going to have Norbin Laden after the break talking all the more about... | |
| Welcome back to the War Room. | ||
| That was a clip from this week's UN General Assembly Summit up in New York. | ||
| That was Haiti's interim leader drinking from the pitcher. | ||
| Not the glass, but maybe we should be saying, thank God it wasn't a cat. | ||
| I'm going to lose my job for that. | ||
| Probably not. | ||
| But I stand by it. | ||
| We are joined now by the one and only Noor Bin Laden, who's going to give us the latest of certainly non-joking matter stuff coming out of this UN summit. | ||
| New treaties, new PACs. | ||
| But we have a cold of Secretary General Guterres speaking. | ||
| So let's trigger the audience some more. | ||
| No laughing matter and roll that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I was born out of a cold artifact. | |
| International challenges are moving faster than our ability to solve them. | ||
| We see out-of-control geopolitical divisions and runaway conflicts, runaway climate change, runaway inequalities and debt, runaway development of new technologies like artificial intelligence without guidance or guardrails. | ||
| And our institutions simply can't keep up. | ||
| Crises are interacting and feeding off each other. | ||
| For example, as digital technologies spread climate disinformation that deepens distrust and fuels polarization. | ||
| Global institutions and frameworks are today totally inadequate to deal with these complex and even existential challenges. | ||
| We can't create a future fit for our grandchildren with systems built for our grandparents. | ||
| The summit of the future is an essential first step towards making global institutions more legitimate, effective and fit for the world of today and tomorrow. | ||
| It cannot fail. | ||
| I think, as President Trump would say, that is some central casting all the way down to the, like, Dracula accent. | ||
| But, Noor, walk us through the latest, like I was saying, the digital future pact, all these weird treaties that they're pushing, what the state of affairs is up in New York. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| And that's great to be with you on the show. | ||
| I was listening to the previous segments and your commentary is absolutely superb. | ||
| So we'll try to build off of that right now with with our discussion. | ||
| But you use the term gaslighting several times earlier. | ||
| And to me, this little clip is the epitome of gaslighting. | ||
| And it's so emblematic of, you know, UN speak. | ||
| And globalists speak, you know, they try to pretend that they are all these crises that they need to solve when in fact, you know, they are either completely manufactured, made up, or they are actually engineered by these very people. | ||
| And and the rhetoric is always the same, you know, they have to save the world. | ||
| And, you know, they are only 17 percent in terms of the completion of the Sustainable Development Goals. | ||
| And we need to turbo charge the The 2030 agenda in order to meet their target and they need to transform global governance and what essentially that means it's that they've been working on this agenda for so many decades. | ||
| You know even before the U.N. | ||
| was even set up in the late 40s. | ||
| You know they tried it with the first iteration with the League of Nations. | ||
| But right now they are at this very important inflection point where it's kind of make or break for them. | ||
| And they are trying to ram through this 2030 agenda down our throats. | ||
| And as I mentioned on the show with you, Natalie, several times before, but also with Dave Bratt last Thursday, what really stands in the way is the MAGA agenda and the America First agenda. | ||
| And that is why You are really seeing a concerted, long-standing attack specifically on America. | ||
| And while they come up with all of these treaties and international instruments, such as those that came out of the Summit of the Future, namely the Digital Compact and the Declaration for Future Generations, which are all part of the Pact for the Future, The goal is very, very specific. | ||
| The goal is to really undermine the foundational documents of the United States of America, the Declaration of Independence, the U.S. | ||
| Constitution and the Bill of Rights. | ||
| These three documents in particular are really the ultimate kryptonite of the globalists and their agenda. | ||
| And that's why you're seeing all of these journalists and scholars come up with all of these articles. | ||
| and papers calling for either, you know, throwing the Constitution itself into the dustbin of history or severely modifying it in a way where it would essentially be rendered completely moot. | ||
| And the goal is very much to eliminate the one shining example in the world of what it means to be free and to have liberty as a people. | ||
| And this is really the core of the battle that we're in, as I mentioned with Dave the other day. | ||
| And I'm so happy at the very beginning of the show, in your opening clip, you shared an excerpt of one of President Trump's speeches at the United Nations. | ||
| And I would say that no one has done a better job than President Trump and obviously also Steve to frame the | ||
| battle, to frame the predicament in which we find ourselves, which is freedom versus globalism. | ||
| And I encourage everyone to revisit President Trump's inaugural speech and the speeches | ||
| he gave during his first term as president in that wretched, absolutely wretched hall | ||
| of the United Nations headquarters where all of these Malthusian psycho freaks gathered | ||
| over the past couple of weeks in New York. | ||
| I may have missed it, but I don't think I heard in all the speeches being rolled out up at the UNGA anyone condemning all the attacks on President Trump or the lawfare, except I think Naibu Kelly did very briefly, but I don't think he's probably received very well there, much like President Trump. | ||
| I'm curious. | ||
| I want to drill down on the Pact for the Future. | ||
| It sort of seems like it's the rebrand of the WHO pandemic treaty, in other words, giving these, you know, globalist bodies the ability to declare an emergency for essentially any reason they so choose. | ||
| Can you kind of walk the audience through what exactly these people itemize or would consider to be, as the World Economic Forum says, poly-crises that would amount to an emergency? | ||
| Before I answer your question, Natalie, you teed it up perfectly for me. | ||
| There's a quote I would like to read by John Foster Dulles in 1952, right before he became Eisenhower's Secretary of State, and he was in Louisville, Kentucky, giving a speech at the American Bar Association, and he had this to say. | ||
| He said that treaty laws can override the Constitution, that treaties can take power away from Congress and give them to the president. | ||
| They can take powers from the states and give them to the federal government or to some international body, and they can cut across the rights given to the people by their Constitutional Bill of Rights. | ||
| And there is a second quote I would also like to share, which was penned by a famous historian, James McGregor Burns in 1984, in his book, The Power to Lead. | ||
| And obviously, this historian was well known for his criticism of the US government system of checks and balances. | ||
| And he had this to say, he said, the framers of the US Constitution have simply been too shrewd for us. | ||
| They designed separate institutions that cannot be unified by mechanical linkages, frail bridges, tinkering. | ||
| If we are to turn the founders upside down, we must directly confront the constitutional structure they erected. | ||
| And this is what is happening in the halls of the United Nations, in their offices behind closed doors, at the WHO, at the World Economic Forum, you know, at the Bank of International Settlements, at the World Bank, at the EU. | ||
| All of these institutions were set up For that specific reason, to undermine what the American founding fathers managed to secure, which were our rights, inalienable rights granted to us by God. | ||
| This is what they want to do away with. | ||
| They are using to come back to your question and to drill down more specifically on the pact of the future global the global digital compact and the declaration on future generations. | ||
| They are using all of the technological progress that has been achieved to reach their goal by instituting a digital public infrastructure, by implementing digital IDs, digital payments, CBDCs, tracking all of us and | ||
| As I keep saying, locking us up in our digital grids where every single thing we do will be under their control. | ||
| We don't need to imagine what it looks like. | ||
| It's happening in China with their social credit score system. | ||
| Everyone needs to watch that episode of Black Mirror entitled Nosedive to understand what is coming down the pipeline. | ||
| And Nora, if you can just hang with us through the break, we've got a few more questions I want to ask you. | ||
| Warren Posse, in the meantime, before we go to break, real quick, you've got to make sure you're checking out birchgold.com slash Bannon, texting Bannon to 989898. | ||
| Gold, I think, has always been a hedge, but especially against all these globalist CBDC schemes, though I think that might be Two nice word, that's Burchicle.com slash Bannon. | ||
| And while you're at it, Public Square, it's helping to support and platform companies that are not a part of the globalist agenda. | ||
| I don't think Michael Siefert of Public Square would be particularly well-received if he were to address the UN, though I don't think he ever would. | ||
| It's just patriot-fueled companies, so make sure you're checking out PublicSquare.com. | ||
| We're joined after the break by Noor Bin Laden, and we're gonna get into the Supreme Court. | ||
| I have to say, I do think it is a bit of a heckle to everything that Noor was saying as they're coming for the Constitution, United States of America. | ||
| The same day, you see the Democratic Senator put out the bill for the largest, sweeping, most radical, that's the translation, reforms for the Supreme Court. | ||
| No conspiracies, no conspiracies. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Vance. | |
| Welcome back to The War Room. | ||
| We're still joined by Norbin Lawden, who's going to bounce, but I think she has one more highly relevant quote that she wants to read for us. | ||
| So, Nor, hit us with that and let people know where they can follow you and stay up to date with all of your wonderful analysis. | ||
| Sure thing. | ||
| Thanks Natalie. | ||
| It's actually a quote that I read on the war room almost two years ago when I was first reporting for Steve on Davos. | ||
| But I think it's incredibly relevant and deserves to be read again. | ||
| It was it's a quote by James Warburg. | ||
| He's the son of one of the key architects of the Fed Paul Warburg. | ||
| And in 1950 at a hearing discussing the UN Charter at a subcommittee actually revising the UN Charter. | ||
| He called for the U.N. | ||
| to actually supersede the U.S., and let me read you the quote. | ||
| He said, We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. | ||
| The question is only whether it will be achieved by consent or by conquest. | ||
| Mr. Chairman, I am here to testify in favor of Senate Resolution 56, which, if concurrently enacted with the House, Would make the peaceful transformation of the UN into a world federation, the avowed aim of United States policy. | ||
| This is 1950, Natalie, and the quotes that I read earlier, you know, 1952 from Dulles and 1984 from Burns, goes to show, you know, what we've been discussing on the show and what I've been talking about for many years now, that this is very much a longstanding plan, and we are in the last stages. | ||
| And the point I would like to end with is that everybody watching this show, the War Room Posse, You said it brilliantly yesterday, Nathalie. | ||
| Everyone needs to be reading Stephen King Bannon's op-ed, you know, victory is at hand. | ||
| It's so crucial. | ||
| We're in the lead to the election. | ||
| And this message is more critical than ever, because this is what we're fighting. | ||
| This is what is at stake. | ||
| And so I cannot recommend people revisit and share that those remarks by Steve enough. | ||
| And in terms of following my work, I suggest, you know, my substack, norbinladen.substack.com, and the website I created with friends of mine, antimatters.world, in order to learn and understand and fight back against the digitalization of our societies. | ||
| Nora, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| Ladens loves you. | ||
| We'll have you back on soon. | ||
| I love the posse too, and keep up the amazing work, Natalie. | ||
| Great, great job. | ||
| Thank you so much. | ||
| Yesterday I read Steve's letter in full on air and of all the hours I've spent broadcasting this show, other shows, that's probably the most impactful and personally it's a significant few minutes of my career reading Stephen K. Bannon's letter from prison about how Victory is at hand, so I hope you guys spend this weekend making sure that Stephen K Bannon's prison missives materialize into a win for President Donald J Trump. | ||
| Springboarding off of everything that Nora just said, we know the Supreme Court is obviously on the front lines, and for that, taking a lot of heat, safeguarding those liberties that the United Nations and their WEF counterpart globalists want to come after. | ||
| After, I want to play a probably similarly triggering, same level, that UN clip, appearance on Bill Maher last night, referencing the Supreme Court. | ||
| Denver, let's roll it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You know, the Democrats had, like, elected people. | |
| The Supreme Court is completely his. | ||
| You know, I mean, it's so disgraceful, this court, that it shouldn't even be allowed to | ||
| be called the Supreme Court. | ||
| It's an insult to Motown to call it the Supreme Court. | ||
| It's not even a court. | ||
| It's only a court in the sense that the court of Louis XVI was a court. | ||
| You know, I mean, basically, it's a harem. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| It's a harem. | ||
| It's Trump's harem. | ||
| So I always feel sorry for the three real judges on the court. | ||
| You know, I know a lot of people have jobs, not me, not you. | ||
| And you have to go to work every day, and there are people you don't like at work. | ||
| But can you imagine having to go to work every day? | ||
| Alito. | ||
| You'd have to go to work with Alito, with Kavanaugh, you know. | ||
| I mean, it must be horrible. | ||
| So, what Biden should do, not that you asked, but when they passed that law, the Supreme Court passed that ruling, you know, where they said, you're not the president, you're the king, which is what that ruling is. | ||
| You can do whatever you want. | ||
| You can never be, you know, held responsible. | ||
| I thought, you know, Biden's still the president. | ||
| No one seems to notice, but... Biden should dissolve the Supreme Court. | ||
| Dissolve the Supreme Court? | ||
| I'm the president. | ||
| I'm the king now, like you said. | ||
| And go home. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Good to see you're centrist. | ||
| Yikes, that appearance happening, I believe, the same day with what the Washington Post is calling one of the most, quote, ambitious efforts to date to remake the Supreme Court. | ||
| I know the mainstream press deals in euphemisms, but even that is too much for me. | ||
| We're joined now by Will Trackman of formerly the Trump administration, now General Counsel at the Mountain States Legal Foundation. | ||
| Will, if you could walk us through this new proposal introduced by Senate Democrats to add, what is it, six Supreme Court justices, just how truly radical that would be? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, well, I guess not quite radical as just dissolving the Supreme Court. | |
| But what you heard from that Bill Maher clip is someone who doesn't understand that the Supreme Court imposed gay marriage across the country and just protected the free speech rights of social media companies this last term. | ||
| And I guess all of those would go away if you dissolve the Supreme Court, which is surprising to hear, you know, someone on the left say it. | ||
| The proposal from Senator Wyden of Oregon, which is going to go nowhere but is designed to start a conversation and really it's a declaration of war against the U.S. | ||
| Supreme Court, would be to add six Supreme Court justices to the current nine. | ||
| Six of the current nine have been appointed by Republican Presidents, three by President Trump, Two by President Obama and one by President Biden. | ||
| And as you could see, if you added six, you could tinker with the majority. | ||
| You could create essentially nine Democratic appointees if Kamala Harris won. | ||
| Now, of course, if President Trump won, I suppose you might have 12 to three in terms | ||
| of presidential appointments, which is why this will never happen and never go through. | ||
| But the goal is to declare war on the rule of law and to undermine the legitimacy of | ||
| their decisions and to put a marker down that the Supreme Court needs to change its opinions | ||
| and it needs to be intimidated into doing so or the Congress will come for it. | ||
| And that's a shame. | ||
| It really does undermine the rule of law to have one branch attack another branch. | ||
| You don't see the Supreme Court saying we need to dissolve Congress or anything like that. | ||
| So it is a marker and we need to respond to it as such and defend the legitimacy of the Supreme Court. | ||
| And for the audience, can you just sort of game out the differences as to how this, I mean, obviously, harsh appetite to go after to reform the Supreme Court will be with Republicans taking the Senate, keeping the House, or of course, if Kamala Harris were to win, how you think the various ways that could all shake out, what lineup could potentially give them the grounds to pursue such radical policy proposals like the one they just announced? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, calling the Supreme Court reform is a bit like smashing a vase on the ground and calling it vase reform. | |
| This is a very dangerous proposal, and I've described it previously as an extinction-level event for our republic, and very likely unconstitutional. | ||
| But suppose they got their way. | ||
| Suppose the Democrats held onto the Senate. | ||
| They retook the House and Kamala Harris takes the presidency and they abolished the filibuster | ||
| and they added six Supreme Court justices to the court. | ||
| That would then tinker with the majority. | ||
| You'd create a nine to six democratically appointed majority. | ||
| Now of course some of the Democrats have sided with Republicans recently. | ||
| Justice Jackson, a Biden appointee, sided with the January 6th protesters last decision. | ||
| So this proposal accounts for the fact that they can still lose one of the Democratic appointees and still have an eight to seven majority to reverse that precedent, the precedent about presidential immunity. | ||
| various other precedents about turning the issue of abortion back to states. | ||
| So this would absolutely be directed at recent decisions decided by the Supreme | ||
| Court justices, mostly appointed by President Trump, in order to create | ||
| one more legislative body. | ||
| You know, you've got the democratically controlled Senate and House and | ||
| presidency in this hypothetical. | ||
| And the only thing they would need to have complete control of power would be the US. | ||
| Supreme Court to either bless what they've already done or mandate what they can't get, even through Congress. | ||
| So it really would be a disaster for the Republic. | ||
| It would certainly make all of our faith in the rule of law fade away, because you'd have just one more legislative body at One First Street and the Supreme Court. | ||
| And before we let you go, just walk us through the latest on the Secret Service investigations that you guys have been working on. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| Well, I'm coming to you between assassination attempts, it looks like, by Iran and other folks. | ||
| So after the first assassination attempt, Mountain States Legal Foundation, my firm, announced an investigation of the Secret Service because former director Kim Cheadle had announced a 30 by 30 plan, that is 30% of Secret Service agents We have nothing against female Secret Service agents. | ||
| We just want the best and brightest in the job. | ||
| And we're very concerned that that's not how the Secret Service has been hiring or promoting its agents. | ||
| And that leads to things like an agent being unable to holster their weapon when President Trump was shot, an agent hiding behind President Trump when President Trump was at the podium. | ||
| And so we just need absolutely qualified Secret Service agents. | ||
| If you're looking to give us information, you can go to our website at mslegal.org to talk about that case or give us intel about the Secret Service so that we can make sure that they're only hiring the best and the most meritorious people for the job. | ||
| What did you make of the hearing a few days ago? | ||
| Do you think that that was enough? | ||
| We've been pretty critical of that sham task force. | ||
| We think they haven't really left any stones turned. | ||
| What are your thoughts? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, I fear for the Republic. | |
| I mean, if something were to happen to either President Trump and Butler or some future candidate, It would really shatter our Republic. | ||
| The fact of the matter is that people vote for, millions of people vote for presidential candidates. | ||
| And if a single person can undermine the will of the voters by getting close to someone in Butler, Pennsylvania and destroying that, we really do have the mixture. | ||
| That leads to a chaotic situation. | ||
| God forbid something had happened back in July. | ||
| Thankfully, it didn't. | ||
| But that hearing made me think we've got a lot of problems. | ||
| DEI hiring is one of them. | ||
| But there's quite a few issues within the Secret Service that need to be promptly resolved. | ||
| And I suppose one good silver lining is that no matter who's in charge, they ought to want to be safe. | ||
| And so regardless of whether it's Democrats or Republicans, they ought to come together to make sure the Secret Service agents are the best and the brightest and the most qualified to protect our public officials. | ||
| Will, if people want to follow you, or like you said, submit those tips, help you guys out with your investigations, where can they go to do that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
So we're Mountain States Legal Foundation. | |
| We're based in Denver, but we have cases throughout the country, especially in D.C. | ||
| And so we're mslegal.org. | ||
| That's M-S-L-E-G-A-L.org. | ||
| You can obviously become a contributor and a supporter. | ||
| You can also give us good case ideas. | ||
| And if you have intel about the Secret Service, we'd ask you to go there and let us know. | ||
| You can stay anonymous if you want. | ||
| We just need your help making sure that we have the best and the brightest in the Secret Service agent positions. | ||
| Well, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely. | |
| And War Room Posse, you gotta also make sure you're calling 202-225-3121, letting Jim Jordan and Steve Castor know that, why don't you get off your ass and do something about Stephen K. Bannon and Peter Navarro, and don't just play the fiddle or hold performative hearings while Rome, or in this case, the United States, burns. | ||
| Also make sure you're checking out hometidalock.com. | ||
| It's promo code BANNON. | ||
| You get 30 days free. | ||
| We know there's all these weird cyber security attacks happening and I guess with all the criminal illegal aliens, they're going to be looking for something to do. | ||
| New people to turn into criminal or into victims and you don't want to become one of them. | ||
| So that's hometidalock.com promo code BANNON. | ||
| We'll see. | ||
| I might just go on a little rant about the whole Diddy thing after this short break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because we have no- War Room. Here's your host, Stephen K. Bamm. | |
| Welcome back to The War Room. | ||
| You guys know we cover everything here in the War Room, and we like to assess, give you signal, not noise. | ||
| So I want to give you a little bit of signal, not noise, my take on the Diddy arrest and everything we're seeing going on there, because I truly think that it links back in some ways to the continued assassination attempts that you've seen against President Trump. | ||
| What do I mean by that? | ||
| Donald Trump represents not just in the fact that he aligned the Republican Party with the base, but actually speaking for the American people. | ||
| He's so hated, right? | ||
| He showed up to the UNGA in 2017 and 2018 and told them to their face, we will not surrender to the false song. | ||
| Globalism. | ||
| But if you bring it back to the 2016 campaign when they thought they were going to nuke his career with the infamous Axis Hollywood tape, and of course this relates to something last night. | ||
| You see George Conway, MSNBC, rolling out a new ad with new, I guess, sexual assault or something of that vein. | ||
| Accusers against President Trump. | ||
| They're up to their same old playbook. | ||
| But President Trump, when they tried to take him out, I think you keep saying it with these assassination attempts. | ||
| It doesn't work, right? | ||
| He actually went on to win the 2016 election, and it was a huge middle finger to the existing power structures, whether that was Hollywood, whether that was the political institutions, whether it was the RNC or the DNC. | ||
| You know everyone in the RNC was trying to get President Trump Um, to step down, and it was actually Stephen K. Bannon, who was one of the most critical voices, if not the lone voice, in the room on that fateful day that told President Trump to not step down and to keep running because he would win with, I believe the quote was, 100% metaphysical certitude, in the words of Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| And when you see things happening after that, such as, let's start with the Me Too movement, Followed by the Epstein list. | ||
| It's an interesting coordinated attack, I think, on the existing power structures that were designed and set up to make people like President Trump never happen. | ||
| In other words, not be able to speak out against the regime, speak out against the system and actually find success. | ||
| So they had to set up, whether it was the Me Too movement, the Epstein list, which of course we'll never see the actual names released, but that in and of itself is a more powerful form of blackmail than actually releasing the list because all of the people who were on there They know that if their identities were to be doxed, it would essentially become a moot point. | ||
| So in some ways, you see this nebulous kind of ring of blackmail or the latent threat that is the Me Too movement against any Hollywood actor, any public figure, that at any moment someone from 20, 30 years ago could come out and essentially destroy your career and reputation for allegations that you know the mainstream media isn't going to pour over. | ||
| And then you see the whole Diddy narrative, which again, the FBI refusing to release really any information except I believe three key details. | ||
| One of them, the buried lead, being that they had video cameras in every single room. | ||
| And I think the question is, why would the FBI intentionally release that one scant piece | ||
| of information about the whole Diddy scenario when they've been pretty tight-lipped on everything | ||
| else? | ||
| And it's similar to, I think, the psychological effect that they want the Epstein lists and | ||
| the Me Too movement to have on these people, which is that it's an internalized form of | ||
| blackmail. | ||
| And when you see all these young rappers coming out and endorsing Trump, and all of a sudden | ||
| you see Diddy getting raided and talking about how they have all these celebrities on camera | ||
| engaging in PG, nefarious activity, I think that these are sort of power structures that | ||
| they have propped up to keep the Hollywood elite, the institutional kind of powers that | ||
| be in line. | ||
| And President Trump represents an extreme threat to that. | ||
| And I think if you extend that critique much more broadly, their fear started primarily with Brexit, which was what? | ||
| Another populist victory. | ||
| And like Mike Benz, whenever he's on the show, he always says the United States might be the muscle behind the censorship industrial complex, but it's actually the UK that's providing a lot of the money into the NGOs that are carrying out this censorship. | ||
| So I think while they have, you know, set up the, you know, Diddy and Epstein and Me Too stuff, Obviously with legitimacy there, but to be blackmails on sort of the elite ruling class, I think you see the censorship industrial complex as sort of the, you know, average citizen's equivalent that they have used to try to repress the truth from coming out and keep us in line. | ||
| And I think it dovetails quite nicely with everything that Nora said about what the UN has been pushing. | ||
| And that's the, not a rant, but I guess a lecture you get from me when your D-block guest drops out. | ||
| So on that note, we have the one and only Mike Lindell, who joins us now to hit us with the latest when it comes to my pillow deals and some breaking news. | ||
| Mike, hit us with it. | ||
| Yeah, Nellie, I'm down here hunting in Iowa, but Monday's a big day, everybody. | ||
| If you can check out frankspeech.com, go there and check it out. | ||
| We're going to be in court in Georgia on Monday with the great Kurt Olson against Brad Rastenberger. | ||
| This has been going on a while, but it's going to be really big. | ||
| Big report Monday on the War Room, too. | ||
| But FrankSpeech.com. | ||
| In the meantime, everybody, I wanted to get on here to get you the biggest deal of the year. | ||
| This is a commercial now that's taken over. | ||
| Everybody's wanting these pillows. | ||
| They're $14.88 for the standard pillow. | ||
| And the queen size, only $18.88. | ||
| $19.88 on the king. | ||
| Queen's size only 1888, 1988 on the king. | ||
| But here's the deal, free shipping. | ||
| As many as you want to get, you can get free shipping on your entire order. | ||
| This is a War Room exclusive. | ||
| They're $14.88 for the Standards, $18.88 for the Queens, $19.88 for the Kings. | ||
| These are the MyPillow Classics. | ||
| These are the ones that the box stores canceled, and it's your benefit. | ||
| Go to the website everybody and use that promo code warmer go down to you see Steve Click on his face there. | ||
| We all miss him There's your free shipping on your entire order and you got the my pillow mattress toppers and those mattresses Take advantage of this free shipping on those big ticket items. | ||
| They're all on sale right now for the war room posse and My operator's standing by 800-873-1062, everybody. | ||
| It's all because of you that my pillow's gotten this far with all the attacks. | ||
| It's a win-win-win! | ||
| My pillow, you're helping out my employees. | ||
| It's a win-win-win-win! | ||
| Helping out the war room, and you're helping yourself get the best sleep in history. | ||
| Mike Lindell, thank you for joining us. | ||
| We'll have you back on soon. | ||
| I think that's my second favorite background that you've ever had. | ||
| First only being the DNC when Harry Sisson came on air and we asked him if he had had a vasectomy. | ||
| He never answered that question and I feel like I just have to put this out there after I just went on that rant. | ||
| Hillary Clinton, I'm not suicidal. | ||
| Play nice. | ||
| But Warren Posse, as always, thank you so much for hanging with me on Saturday mornings. | ||
| You guys know I host the 5 p.m. | ||
| shows now, so feel free to tune in there. | ||
| It's always an honor to sit in this chair for Stephen K. Bannon, though I shouldn't be. | ||
| It's because of people like Stephen Castor that I am. | ||
| It's 202-225-3121. |
Export Selection