Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 28, 2024 - Bannon's War Room

48:48

Episode 3938: Kamala Is Flying Criminal Illegals Into Your Town

Participants

Main voices

natalie winters

23:30

Appearances

tej gill

03:37

Clips

bernie sanders

00:05

dave brat

00:31

donald j trump

00:09

jake tapper

00:08

kamala harris

00:10

steve bannon

00:16

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
steve bannon ▲ ● ▼		This is the primal scream of a dying regime.
unidentified		Pray for our enemies.
unidentified		Because we're going medieval on these people.
steve bannon ▲ ● ▼		You're not going to free shot all these networks lying about the people.
unidentified		The people have had a belly full of it.
		I know you don't like hearing that.
		I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it.
		It's going to happen.
jake tapper ▲ ● ▼		And where do people like that go to share the big line?
unidentified		MAGA Media.
jake tapper ▲ ● ▼		I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience.
unidentified		Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose?
steve bannon ▲ ● ▼		If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved!
unidentified		Hi, my name is Sally Hartman.
		I'm a volunteer with the Center for Worker Justice.
		I want to know, when you become president, Would you be committing to close the immigration detention centers?
		Absolutely on day one.
		On day one.
		Thank you.
		And thank you.
		...described Vice President Kamala Harris as a progressive.
		progressive.
		She has previously supported Medicare for All.
		Now, she does not.
		She's previously supported a ban on fracking.
		Now, she does not.
		These, Senator, are ideas that you have campaigned on.
		Do you think that she is abandoning her progressive ideals?
		No, I don't think she's abandoning her ideals.
bernie sanders ▲ ● ▼		I think she's trying to be pragmatic and doing what she thinks is right in order to win the election.
kamala harris ▲ ● ▼		There are consequential issues at stake in this election.
unidentified		And one is the security of our border.
unidentified		The United States is a sovereign nation.
kamala harris ▲ ● ▼		And I believe we have a duty to set rules at our border and to enforce them.
unidentified		And I take that responsibility very seriously.
		Stay off the concrete.
		Back over here.
		Off the concrete.
		Back over here, please.
		Stay off the concrete over there.
		We will never surrender America's sovereignty to an unelected, unaccountable, global bureaucracy.
		I'm America is governed by Americans.
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		We reject the ideology of globalism and we embrace the doctrine of patriotism around the world.
natalie winters ▲ ● ▼		You're in the War Room.
		It's Saturday, September 28th in the year of our Lord 2024.
		It's Natalie G. Winters hosting this morning.
		It's always an honor to host War Room, but as I always say, the morning shows on Saturday are especially significant because, as you guys know, those were and will be, again, very soon, Steve's favorite.
		We've got a packed show for you from the border to the latest Supreme Court reforms to setting up tip lines in Michigan for students to rat out their parents for owning guns to non-citizen police officers in the United States
		Buckle up.
		We've got a packed show, but I wanted to start with Kamala Harris' speech yesterday down in Arizona.
		That's some next-level gaslighting I've never seen.
		I know this administration pretends to not like American Energy or gas, but they're giving themselves a run for their money there.
		I don't think Kamala Harris even had to go down to Arizona or that proximal to the southern border.
		To be able to see the impacts that mass migration, legal and illegal, have had on this country.
		There's no such thing as a border state now, thanks to her immigration policy, because every state is a border state.
		But if you saw in that cold open, there was an arc to that, with Bernie Sanders saying the quiet part out loud, that Kamala Harris will say and frankly do whatever just to get elected.
		They euphemize it as being pragmatic.
		Well, if you can see in her past rhetoric, you've never heard the word sovereignty come out of her mouth before.
		I scanned through the entirety of her Twitter, all of the C-SPAN records, all of her campaign ads.
		She has not once ever described sovereignty in the context of the United States.
		I've never seen it.
		She made one passing reference to it in reference to Ukraine because, of course, I think that that should show you this show, the MAGA movement, has forced the Democrats, though it's purely performative activism, but to at least pretend to cater to that issue.
		But here's the thing, Kamala.
		You run down to Arizona.
		President Trump, in that speech that we played from 2018, had the nerve to throw down on sovereignty in front of the United Nations.
		And I think if Kamala Harris were truly serious about American sovereignty, I know Biden spoke at the UN.
		I don't think anyone paid attention.
		Kamala Harris should have given that speech to those global government overlords instead of speaking to a dead, probably all-paid-for crowd down in Arizona.
		I think it's kind of like Charles Manson or Mao or frankly the president of Planned Parenthood giving us a lecture on the sanctity of human life.
		We're not going to take lectures from you, Kamala Harris, on what sovereignty looks like.
		We're joined now by Chris Chmielinski from Center for Immigration Studies.
		Chris, there's a new bombshell report, it's not War Room, it's not Gateway Pundit, it's ICE itself, showing that over 660,000 known criminals have been allowed to enter the United States in the past few years, the buried lead in that report being, I believe it's over 13,000 who've been convicted of homicide, 16,000 convicted of sexual assault, and just for good measure about 2,000 who face homicide charges.
		You guys have always been ahead of the curve on reporting these figures.
		If you could just walk the audience through the gravity of this new report.
unidentified		Yeah, first, thanks for having me on, Natalie.
		And this is a pretty bombshell report.
		It was ICE data that was given to Representative Tony Gonzalez of Texas, who represents the border region down in Mexico between San Antonio and El Paso.
		And what this report details is that ICE knows that there are about 425,000 convicted criminals who are in the country illegally that are just walking freely on the streets of the United States right now.
		You mentioned the point that every state is a border state.
		Here's one of the reasons why, because we have 425,000 convicted illegal alien criminals
		just walking anywhere throughout the United States. We don't know where many of them are.
		Another 222,000 are pending charges.
		Just listen to some of these criminal offenses that are associated with a group of people.
		62,000 of them have been convicted of assault, 14,000 of burglary, 56,000 with drug convictions,
		13,000 convicted of homicide, and another 2,500 that have been convicted of kidnapping.
		So like I said, a pretty damning report.
		And what it really speaks volume of is the situation of sanctuary cities here in the United States.
		Now, some of these are individuals that may have crossed the border illegally and been released under the Biden-Harris administration's border policies.
		But a lot of them were actually convicted here in the United States, put into local county and state jails, and then were released from those jails.
		And ordinarily, what would happen is those jails would notify ICE when they're about to release one of these criminal illegal aliens, so ICE could pick them up and then return them to port them back to their home countries.
		But you have sanctuary cities who refuse to cooperate with ICE officials.
		And so they're just releasing these individuals back onto the streets without notifying ICE.
		Not to mention the fact that a lot of ICE's resources are currently dedicated to the ongoing border crisis.
		So you've created this situation where we have nearly three quarters of a million very dangerous individuals walking the streets of the United States who, quite frankly, shouldn't even be here in the first place because they're here illegally.
natalie winters ▲ ● ▼		And when you read the rap sheets of some of these individuals, a lot of them, as you guys have reported, come from, you know, entities related to Hamas, Hezbollah, the cartels, the Chinese Communist Party.
natalie winters ▲ ● ▼		And when you hear all these sort of, you know, rumors, reports of assassination teams working to get President Trump or just even the foreign election interference narrative more broadly, how much of a national security threat do you think this poses, especially at a time like right now?
unidentified		It's huge because not only do you have these individuals that we know about have been released onto the streets, but we also know that over the last several years, we've had 2 million gotaways along the border.
		And we know that the vetting that Border Patrol is doing, the Border Patrol agents are doing the best job that they can.
		given the situation.
		But they're not really given the resources needed to thoroughly vet these individuals
		before they're being released into the United States under the current administration's policies.
		So there are a lot of dangerous folks that, again, not only have been released from our prisons
		as this ICE report detailed, but also crossing the border illegally that we know about,
		and also the ones that have crossed the border that we illegally that we don't know about.
		And, you know, the FBI wants to let us know, wants to make us feel better that they're keeping tabs on all these people.
		They know exactly where they are.
		But look, we've had two assassination attempts.
		on the former president within the last couple of months.
		So it's hard to keep all of these individuals under watch. And quite frankly, I don't think
		they are, and it's probably only a matter of time. Yeah, between reversing the DNA testing
natalie winters ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, between reversing the DNA testing protocols, making our southern border just even more
		protocols, making our southern border just even more of a highway for human traffickers, or altering
		of a highway for human traffickers, or altering the number of questions that they were asking
		the number of questions that they were asking Chinese nationals to admit their ties to the
		Chinese nationals to admit their ties to the Chinese Communist Party to basically ram them
		Chinese Communist Party to basically ram them through into the United States. I think it's fair to
		through into the United States.
		I think it's fair to say that it's intentional.
		I'm just curious, though, you guys have covered the issue of immigration, legal and illegal,
		for decades.
		And the talking point that you hear from MSNBC in the context of Springfield or what's going
		on in Aurora, Colorado, with the gangs taking over these apartment complexes is that, oh,
		we're happy to have the conversation on immigration.
		We've been doing that for so long.
		We just don't want to, you know, get into any of the pet-eating rumors because that's racist.
		We can't talk about that.
		But I don't think I'm mistaken.
		Has the mainstream media ever actually indulged an actual conversation about the ramifications of immigration?
		Or does it have to be released through reports like ICE?
		This one, the latest one that we saw with, of course, whistleblowers telling Congress just last week that, you know, the Biden regime has actively worked against getting out information like this.
unidentified		Well, normally, unfortunately, what they do is they rely on talking points from groups like open borders groups like Cato and other open borders groups that have a self-interest in mass immigration, both illegal and legal.
		immigration, and really in the form of open borders.
		They'll talk about, well, mass immigration does this for the economy at the macro level.
		So they talk about all these great things, but they don't talk about what impact it has
		on ordinary people.
		And at the end of the day, our nation's immigration policies, both legal and illegal, are hurting
		Americans.
		They're hurting Americans in the pocketbook because of the taxpayer benefits that a lot of these illegal aliens are taking advantage of.
		And obviously the taxpayers have to flip the bill to support them.
		It's hurting working Americans because it's flooding the labor market with cheaper foreign labor.
		A lot of individuals who can be paid under the table and avoid taxes and things like that.
		So it's not only keeping American wages down, but it's also preventing them from from possibly getting some more of the low-skill, lower-wage
		jobs that they might need to help supplement their household income or to make ends meet. So
		it's really creating a lot of issues for the everyday American, but instead they just want to focus
		on, oh, well, it's good. Overall, it's good for the economy. And overall, we want to be a
		country that welcomes these people and provides humanitarian assistance to those that are in need.
		Well, what about helping them where they're coming from instead, rather than driving
		our country down?
		While trying to bring them in and allowing and giving them again taxpayer funded benefits and the like.
		So they always want to talk about it in their own context and they're always very, very closed eared when we want to talk about the concerns that we have and the direct impacts that it has on Americans like what you've seen in Springfield.
natalie winters ▲ ● ▼		And Chris, hang with us through the break because I want to get into the non-citizen voting aspect of all this too.
		You guys have been doing some groundbreaking reporting on that, but I think the case is clear when your policies are so woefully unpopular with the American people, they have to import an entirely new version of an electorate.
		Using both illegal and legal immigration the LA Times reporting just a few days ago following up on the New York Times story that at record rates They're doling out citizenship to individuals who otherwise would not have received and of course rescinding Trump era immigration policies Ramming through those backlogs so they can give these people citizenship so they can vote in the 2024 election they even admit it in the New York Times article particularly in swing states Sure, no conspiracies, no coincidences there.
		Warren Posse, you're going to be joined by Chris after the break, walking through the latest with non-citizen voting, but in the meantime, it's birchgold.com slash Bannon or texting Bannon to 989898.
		Gold is on track for its strongest return since I think 1978, so it's always a good reason, but right now is the best time to give Philip Patrick and the team a call over at Birchgold or get the latest installment of the End of the Dollar Empire.
		We'll be right back after this short break.
unidentified		Here's your host, Stephen K. Bamm.
natalie winters ▲ ● ▼		Welcome back to the War Room.
		We're still joined by Chris Chmielinski, who, like I said before the break, you guys have been very much out of the curve on the threat that is non-citizens voting, though the Biden regime has done some fun, we'll say shenanigans, with defining what exactly constitutes someone to be a citizen so they can vote in the forthcoming elections.
		But hit us with the latest in terms of the numbers you guys have been gathering and just the general report.
unidentified		Yeah, so we estimate that there's about 30 million non-citizens living in the United States currently.
		So they comprise of three different groups.
		They can be legal permanent residents, they can be temporary guest workers or foreign students, for example, or they can be illegal aliens.
		And we're getting that number from census data.
		So again, around 30 million non-citizens.
		And I just want to point out that Most of them are able to receive both a driver's license and a social security card.
		Let's just take the border crossers.
		For example, if somebody crosses the border illegally and they get paroled into the United States by the Biden administration, they're going to get a work permit, which then allows them to get a social security number.
		And in 19 states, they're issuing driver's licenses to people who are here illegally, and all 50 states issue driver's licenses to non-citizens.
		So it's easy for them to get the two key documents that can then enable them to complete the national voter registration form and register to vote in the state that they happen to be living in at the time.
		So it makes it very easy for them to register, and there's no checks in place to ensure that when these individuals register to do a vote,
		that they are actually citizens.
		Too often we see election officials just take for granted that if an individual has a driver's
		license and they have a social security number, oh, they must be a U.S. citizen and eligible to
		vote in the United States. But again, that's not entirely true.
		So as long as it's easy for noncitizens to register to vote in the United States, it increases the risk that they'll actually cast a ballot in November.
		And that's what we're trying to, one, raise awareness about, and two, stop.
		The House recently voted on the SAVE Act, both as a standalone bill, which it passed, Overwhelmingly, with bipartisan support that would require documentary proof of U.S.
		citizenship at the time of registering to vote and would also require states to clear non-citizens from their voter rolls.
		But you also saw the House unsuccessfully try to pass a CR a few weeks ago that had the SAVE Act as part of it.
		So we'd like to see Congress take this up and make it a requirement that states need documentary proof of U.S.
		citizenship before someone can register to vote within their state.
natalie winters ▲ ● ▼		And Chris, before we let you go, there's obviously been a lot of mainstream media reporting, sort of from a glowing profile angle, from the New York Times, the LA Times most recently, talking about how the Biden regime has really amped up, juiced up the rate of doling out citizenship to people conveniently just ahead of the 2024 election, with not even the tacit but sometimes outright explicit admission that these people will be able to sway the election in 2024, since so many of them reside in swing states.
natalie winters ▲ ● ▼		Can you just sort of walk the audience through how anomalous it is to be doling out citizenship at this rate when in reality so many of these people always sort of just lived in green card territory and that was just sort of the norm, but now the main variable that's different is that they can now vote?
unidentified		Right.
		And that's a good point that you make.
		A lot of times, green card holders or many green card holders, even though they're eligible for U.S.
		citizenship, they don't necessarily get U.S.
		citizenship.
		And it's just for a number of reasons.
		They just feel, well, legal permanent resident allows me to stay here and gives me pretty much every benefit that a U.S.
		citizen has, with the exception of maybe obtaining a passport and being able to register to vote.
		So they figure, why go through the hassle of earning U.S.
		citizenship?
		or obtaining US citizenship when I don't really have to, don't really have an interest in doing
		so. So it's been a common practice that not every green card holder eventually gets US citizenship.
		Many of them do. Like I said, it's probably about 50-50 of them. But there has been an effort by
		the Biden administration to try to encourage the green card holders to go through the
		naturalization process and get their US citizenship. And that would, of course,
		make them eligible to vote in the upcoming fall election.
		So it's- It's hard to say whether or not it's connected to the election, but it's certainly suspicious that they are, as you mentioned, they're allowing an abnormally high number of legal green card holders, legal permanent residents to naturalize in recent months.
natalie winters ▲ ● ▼		And Chris, if people want to follow you, stay up to date with everything you guys are working on, where can the audience go to do that?
unidentified		Yeah, they can visit us at the Immigration Accountability Project, IAProject.org, and we're across all the social media channels.
unidentified		You can see those if you come to our website, IAProject.org, you can see all those social media links and a donate button on the top right-hand side of your screen.
natalie winters ▲ ● ▼		Chris, thank you so much for joining us.
unidentified		Thanks.
unidentified		Thank you for having me on.
natalie winters ▲ ● ▼		Of course.
		I heard the CR plus SAVE Act mentioned.
		I got a little triggered.
		For those of you who've been watching the 5 p.m.
		show last week, you guys know we held the line on that and Speaker Johnson will continue to hold the line if that's necessary.
		And it sounds like everything that Chris is describing is tantamount to, I don't know, Foreign election interference.
		Maybe I'd report that to the State Department and get my, that's right, $10 million reward if you flag any form of foreign election interference going on ahead of the 2024 election.
		Just a quick note, quite interesting.
		We're seeing Senate Democrats now weaponize the intel that is Iran threats against President Trump.
		Again, we've been sort of judicious in analyzing if those threats are Legitimate are just the ghost of John Bolton trying to fearmonger and warmonger more with Iran.
		They never give it a rest.
		But they're now pushing, using that narrative to push for broader censorship purview under
		the already rogue and frankly explicitly anti-Trump CISA, that is the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure
		Security Agency that played such a critical role in the 2020 election of downplaying and
		essentially silencing any claims of election fraud.
		So that is how it works up here in Washington.
		They weaponize narratives, whether it's the case of the Secret Service in the first assassination
		and second assassination attempt to get them, that's right, more money, that's the answer
		to the problem.
		On that front, or in the case of threats against President Trump, I find it pretty damn insulting
		they're going to weaponize that to censor MAGA ahead of the election.
		And Denver, if we can roll the clip of, frankly, one of this audience's favorite members of Congress, Stacey Plaskett, who I think has given War Room quite a few shoutouts on the House floor, myself included.
		So thank you for that, Stacey.
		But let's let this, I'm sure, highly intellectual individual say the quiet part out loud about government weaponization.
unidentified		What is the point of this subcommittee?
		Because it's necessary for the public and the media to hear, to try, and provide cover for the eradication of the Department of Justice and the FBI.
		We are having these hearings so that you become immune.
		You become inured to the notion of the removal of the FBI and DOJ.
		So that those agencies are no longer there to serve as a check against white nationalism, great replacement theorists, Christian nationalists, white fragility, fascists, and the twice impeached, convicted felon, former president, and would-be dictator, Donald Trump.
natalie winters ▲ ● ▼		Whole lot of buzzwords there, but the buried lead is the one she saves to the end, saying that the DOJ is going to be a check on President Trump, putting the convicted felon for good measure.
		I want to link this to a story that we're going to be, shall we say, very ahead of the curve on here in the War Room because it actually has to do with the War Room.
		There's an individual, you know we like to make people famous here in the War Room, by the name of Steve Castor.
		Who is the General Counsel of the House Judiciary Committee for Republicans, or at least for Republicans in name only.
		That is, this is, I guess, Jim Jordan's guy, at least when it comes to Judiciary Committee's ongoing investigations.
		He's also someone who, per a new profile piece in The Hill, which newsflash, if you're a Republican and the mainstream media is giving you glowing profile pieces, Probably means you're on the right the wrong side of history.
		I'm just gonna put that out there But Steve Castor thought that it was a good idea To tell the hill.
		I'm just gonna read the quote because it's so outlandish.
		I don't think you would believe me if I summarized it You ready?
		We can't conduct Investigations for purposes of shining a light on something for the purposes of finding the facts he said noting they must have a legislative purpose and Get ready.
		And so a lot of people on the outside just expect us to re-engineer the work of the January 6th committee, and we can't keep Steve Bannon out of jail.
		We can't keep Peter Navarro out of jail.
		And I think a lot of our critics are just angry that we can't do things like that.
		Well, Steve Castor, I would say we're a heck of a lot more than angry, and it's not misplaced or unjustified.
		The Democrats have steamrolled not just hearings, but full-blown Hollywood-produced Investigations and essentially TV series on January 6th.
		They don't just investigate Republicans, they charge them with nonsense crimes amounting to hundreds of years in prison, and you want to go give a glowing puff piece interview to The Hill saying that you can't do anything about Stephen K. Bannon or Peter Navarro being in prison?
		For starters, maybe you shouldn't tell the enemy that you're so weak you're not going to do anything about the ongoing lawfare assault, because note to self, that might invite more of it.
		If you know your strategy is that, oh, well, we can't do anything.
		And also Steve Castor, who's been involved in basically every major GOP congressional investigation for the last two decades, I think I now know why we lose and why we don't get anything done.
		Because it's people with worldviews like yours where you'd rather get a nice article in The Hill praising your work, bashing Stephen K. Bannon and Peter Navarro's surrendering, than actually trying to do anything about it.
		Because I don't really know what the legislative purpose is of the January 6th committee besides putting American patriots in prison.
		But I'm so glad you held the line on that, Steve Castor.
		Oh wait, you didn't.
		Yeah.
		More of that right now.
unidentified		Here's your host, Stephen K. Vance.
natalie winters ▲ ● ▼		You know the metaphorical weapon of this audience is our infamous phone calls.
		So I suggest that this weekend and next week we call 202-225-3121 and we ask Jim Jordan
		if we think it's a good use of his staff or should we say lead counsel's time to be giving
		interviews to the Hill saying we're so weak we're just going to roll over when Democrats
		come for this country.
		Apparently their legislative purpose is destroying the United States and the best Steve Castor can say is Sorry, Steve Bannon.
		We can't help you.
		I don't think that's America first, and I don't think that that's what MAGA is about,
		so I think we need to, again, metaphorically burn down those phone lines. It's 202-225-3121.
		And while you're at it, speaking of putting things into your own hands, make sure you're
		checking out mypatriotsupply.com. They have a host of new deals, especially ahead of Election Day.
		Things are getting dicey with all these hurricanes and storms and cyber security attacks. Who knows
		what they have up their sleeves, so make sure you're checking out mypatriotsupply.com.
		I'm honored to be joined now by Dr. Pierre Corey.
		There's always so much to get into on the ever-evolving front of the lies with COVID vaccines, but there's one story that I saw you guys have been sort of ahead of the curve on, this new group called the Public Good Project, sort of a broader representation Of these PR campaigns that you guys discovered have been funded by, you guessed it, the pharmaceutical giants, but that have been essentially deputized and weaponized to attack people who dared to speak out against COVID vaccines.
		Can you walk the audience through this quite deceptively named public good project?
unidentified		Yeah, I mean, that's an example of a tactic that industries have deployed for decades.
		It's called third party kind of these PR campaigns where the industries themselves distance themselves from the activities, but they fund activities, particularly online, to go after truth tellers, right?
		So the truths that we're speaking, which are inconvenient to industries, they'll attack us back by using like regular folks who appear just to be opinionated and, you know, try to put us down, attack us and You know, it causes immense harm.
		I mean, I was, you know, at the tops of an academic career and with my advocacy for reasonable, safe, effective treatments in COVID and avoidance of these toxic vaccines, my career ended, you know, and I just got my board certifications revoked, you know, because some of these same people wrote in complaints to the medical boards that I was a misinformationist.
		And so, you know, we're at war and it's a war for the truth.
		And this is some of the tactics that they use.
natalie winters ▲ ● ▼		What struck out to me about this report, too, was how far reaching some of the individuals in this orbit actually were, and I'm not just talking on the leadership front.
		You, of course, have people coming from the federal government, from Bill Gates' world, but you see their information being laundered through people.
		Whether it's fact checkers, I saw it was a Georgia state representative who tried to push for legislation allowing minors to consent to vaccination without their parents' permission.
		Just a host of people who took really, really radical positions on the COVID vaccine.
		From your sort of purview, whether it's this, you know, one instance or just more broadly, How many, I think I saw it was, you know, $11.5 or some odd billion dollars that the Biden-Harris regime themselves has sent to similar style campaigns?
unidentified		Yeah, the money is immense.
		And you mentioned a couple of players, right?
		So not only the government, the money gets to people and influencers that way, but Bill Gates is notorious.
		I mean, he gives $300 million to media companies all around the world, which do immense censorship and propaganda for him, as well as hit jobs on all of us.
		You know, it's an immense and formidable enemy.
		And that kind of money and funds and the control of so many, I would call them institutions and media outlets, you know, the funding to, for instance, the American Board of Internal Medicine that revoked my board certifications.
		I mean, it's so tied up with the pharmaceutical industry and they essentially become stewards for them and pumping millions of dollars into the foundation that controls the certification boards.
		And so the money is everywhere.
		The influence is everywhere.
		Well, we have is like our voice and independent media, really, because, you know, that's one of the things.
		It's one of the pillars of this rally that I'm here for in D.C.
		is to fight this state control of the media and surveillance.
		It's really destroying our country.
natalie winters ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, for all the aspersions that our ruling class likes to throw against, you know, state-run media in authoritarian countries, I would argue that we have the similar, if not worse, problem here at home.
		Before we get into why you're in D.C.
		and how people can attend that march, I'm just curious from your perspective, obviously, with, you know, COVID vaccines, that was sort of the great unmasking that so many people, I think, saw through.
		But whether it's, I think, is the, you know, Make America Healthy Again with RFK Jr.
		endorsing Trump, it seems like people are really dialed in on the food supply, on nutrition, water quality, stuff like that.
		Do you think, I mean, there's obviously already pre-existing campaigns of that ilk, but do you think we're going to see the left media, the sort of state-sponsored outlets, double down, not just on COVID vaccines, but on health and wellness more broadly, pushing back against so-called alternative facts or narratives, however you want to spin it?
unidentified		Oh yeah, I mean I can probably pull out a dozen examples this week and you use that term doubling down.
		That's a tactic I've seen.
		The more truth that we try to put out, they double down with the lies and they try to suppress that truth.
		And you know, Natalie, You know, before COVID, I mean, I read propaganda and believed it all.
		I mean, I read the New York Times.
		I believe the medical journals.
		I lived in a world that I didn't know didn't exist.
		And the world that's been revealed to me in these last four years, you know, is immensely disturbing to me.
		You know, I'm not a political scientist.
		I'm a physician.
		But what I saw happen around medicine and COVID and the political implications of it and the control of it.
		And led me to come to this realization that You know, effectively, and this is part of the the rally this weekend, is that I discovered our government is literally controlled by corporations.
		We live in almost like a corporate fascist state.
		And like you mentioned, all those issues, I mean, the corporations are dictating the policies around our food, our health, our wealth, money.
		And, you know, we have to bring power back to the people.
		And, you know, it's really it's a really sad and disturbing sight.
		I really do believe our country has been slowly stolen over the decades by by corporate influence and regulatory capture.
natalie winters ▲ ● ▼		I'm just curious because this story that's coming out about the COVID vaccine sort of misinformation campaigns, we know it's all projection, but it follows just a few months back with the media doing sort of a full court press, I would say, on trying to look like they were covering vaccine injuries from sort of a, you know, at worst agnostic, at best, you know, open and inquisitive approach, right? They had Ashish Jha, the former COVID
		response coordinator on air saying, we want to look into your vaccine injuries seriously. One
		of the Cuomo brothers is, you know, crying, saying, I'm vaccine injured too. And here in
		this show, we sort of described it as a limited hangout. In other words, they're trying to
		claw back some of the trust in public health because they know they hemorrhaged it so badly with
		COVID. But when you see these sort of limited instances where they're trying to regain some
		credibility, especially when it comes to COVID vaccines, when you see that narrative juxtaposed with
		the kind of, you know, evergreen pandemic narrative, whether it's avian influenza or monkeypox
		that they're always trying to re-up, where do you think we stand on those threats or the idea of
		a disease X pandemic as of now, especially as we barrel towards this election?
unidentified		Yeah, I appreciate what you said about that limited hangout, right?
		It's this desperate attempt to retain some shred of credibility when most of us who are awake and aware, we realize that we've been drowning in lies and in policies devoid of scientific principles for four years.
		And, you know, You know, that limited hangout only goes so far, right?
		They stop short of full transparency, a full admission that they got it wrong.
		And, you know, to your question about what do I think about the future with these kind of pandemics?
		I mean, I look at what happened in COVID, right?
		One of the greatest transfers of wealth and increase in government control over society across the world.
		I mean, those two objectives are irresistible to certain powers, especially the wealth.
		You look at the business model of COVID, you release a virus or have a virus escape from a weapons lab, and you create this global pandemic, and then you're given all of these powers to control the flow of money and people, and it's actually quite terrifying.
		So they learn what they could achieve in COVID.
		What would stop them from doing it again?
		And they've made these lame attempts.
		They're injecting fear into the media around these new viruses, right?
		Like monkeypox and avian flu and then disease X.
		I mean, disease X is like a placeholder for doing this again.
		And they're just trying to rally the troops, get everyone coordinated so they can do another, you know, another, you know, bonanza like they did in COVID.
		And so my hope is that we have awakened and educated the public to not fall for this because they certainly are going to do it again.
natalie winters ▲ ● ▼		And you guys are working your very hardest to do that this weekend, I believe, here in Washington, D.C.
natalie winters ▲ ● ▼		If you want to walk the audience through why you're here, what you guys are doing, and how people can attend, and some of the other speakers, I'm sure people would love to hear that.
unidentified		Yeah, so it's a rally that was founded and created by...
		Brett Weinstein and Matt Toon, and we have a diverse array of speakers from politicians to journalists to physicians like myself, lawyers, public speakers.
		And, you know, it's not a political rally in terms of right or left.
		I mean, we're all pretty much heterodox at this point.
		None of us is deeply embedded on one side or the other.
		We really just want to inject Common sense and restore power to the people, you know, there's sort of eight pillars that That you know, the speakers have established as being really important priorities for this country things like, you know, stop the never-ending wars You know recodify and sanctify and form consent, which was which disappeared medical ethics was, you know incredibly violated in these last four years and
		You know, stopping, like I said, state media control or state control of our media and as well as surveillance, bringing back family sovereignty.
		And, you know, these are such important principles.
		We're seeing them, Rob, and also lawfare.
		You know, I noticed in your prior segment, you talked about how they've weaponized the, you know, the Justice Department.
		And to an extent I've never seen before, and they seem to be on They're almost rapacious. They won't stop. And no matter
		how much we're calling it out, they keep going with these legal actions against people
		that stand in their way.
		And so we're bringing everyone together. We want everyone to either watch or come. Please come down
		to D.C. We want to have a show of force, bring power back to the people. And if you can't come,
		It's jointheresistance.org.
		Go to the donate button.
		You know, we have entertainers there as well, and so there's gonna be music and hopefully a little humor, some fun, and also some seriousness.
		You know, RFK Jr.
		is gonna be a keynote speaker, Jordan Peterson there.
		We have, you know, a group of intellectuals that are also coming, and I think it's gonna be a really powerful event, and I hope it motivates people to learn about what's going on in our country and what we need to focus on to kind of Recapture it back, and so that's why another tagline is, you know, restore the Republic, because we think it's been taken.
natalie winters ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, Republic, if you can keep it, and I think you just outlined who exactly we need to keep it from, though maybe they're on full display up in New York right now at the UN General Assembly.
natalie winters ▲ ● ▼		Dr. Corey, if people want to follow you, and one more time, go to the march, attend the march, where can they go to do all that?
unidentified		Yeah, so the march is at the mall.
		Go to jointheresistance.org for the rally.
		For myself, my telehealth clinic is drpiericori.com and then I have a substack that's pretty well read.
		It's called Pierre Cori Medical Musings and so I appreciate that.
natalie winters ▲ ● ▼		Thank you so much for joining us, sir.
		I look forward to seeing you at the event, and I think I'm going to force my producer to come with me, so we will see you there.
		Thank you so much.
unidentified		Looking forward to it, Natalie.
unidentified		Thank you.
natalie winters ▲ ● ▼		Of course.
		I think it's safe to say COVID-19 was the progenitor, the precursor to the lawfare that we're seeing now, and we're not going to let him get away with it.
		We'll be right back after this short break.
dave brat ▲ ● ▼		Homes across America are being stolen every day.
		It's called title theft, and it's why you need to get home title protection from HomeTitleLock.com today.
		If no one's keeping an eye on your title, then it's just a matter of time until they target you, too.
		Don't fall prey to these thieves.
		Go to HomeTitleLock.com today and make sure your title is safe.
		Use promo code BANNON and get a complete title scan of your home's title and your first 30
		days of triple lock home title protection for free.
unidentified		Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon.
natalie winters ▲ ● ▼		Now, when I saw this story, I was like, the cultural appropriation of Mao Zedong and the
		Marxists has gone, I think, even too far for Democrats.
		They're now setting up, using your taxpayer dollars in the great state of Michigan, tip lines for students.
		I think elementary school age students to report their parents for, they say, illegally storing or improperly storing firearms, but let's be straight, for owning guns.
		Absolutely insane.
		We're joined now by Tej Gill to walk us through this story.
		Tej, your thoughts on, like I said, this cultural appropriation of Mao Zedong?
tej gill ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, well, it's not surprising at all.
		They did this in California.
		California has a law.
		When you buy a gun, you have to sign a document saying you have a gun safety and you keep your gun in there.
		But this in Michigan takes it to the next level because they implemented a $1 million tip line.
		So they're going to have a million dollars out to kids next school year to report their parents for not having their guns locked up.
		I'm all about gun safety, but not gun control.
		You shouldn't have to have your gun locked in a safe.
		You should teach your children not to play with your guns.
		That's what's going on.
		And then if you look at who's doing all these mass shootings recently in the last couple years, it's all transvestite people or people that are on some sort of the antidepressants.
		It's not your normal kids that are doing this stuff.
		It's people that have some sort of mental illness.
		We definitely don't need to implement a law and then a million dollars for this.
		A million dollars and go somewhere else.
		But this is Governor Whitmer who had the FBI create a false kidnapping a couple years ago.
		I don't know if you remember that.
		We need more gun freedom, not gun control.
		This country, it's a second amendment.
		It's built on guns.
		It's built on free speech.
		The reason that Japan did not invade mainland United States is because the Japanese admiral said when they were planning the Pearl Harbor attack was, in America, there's a rifle behind every blade of grass, and they don't need to be locked up.
		You need to teach your children gun control, especially what happens if you're single, living alone.
		You shouldn't have to have all your guns locked up.
		It should be about gun safety, not gun control.
		This is crazy.
		It's a communist tactic.
		The communists in the USSR, I have a couple of friends that were from the USSR in the 1980s.
		They would have neighbors reporting neighbors, family members reporting family members.
		That's how they main control the population.
		It's called divide and conquer.
		It's the oldest tactic out there.
		That's what they're doing.
		There's nothing more invasive than dividing, conquering between children and their parents.
		You're literally incentivizing children to turn against their parents.
		It's sickening.
		It's crazy.
		But it's not surprising.
		It's the Communist Party.
		It's the Democratic Party of Communists.
		They're bringing back all the old communist rules and laws.
		It's crazy.
natalie winters ▲ ● ▼		Tej Gill coming in hot on a Saturday morning, and I will add, too, there's another buried lead in that ICE illegal invasion report that we focused on in the first half of the show.
		There are thousands of migrants with crimes related to illegal possession of firearms, which, putting that issue aside for a second, it just shows you the double standard.
		And, of course, it's the same breath that Biden, what did they announce just two days ago, that they want to, you know, come for your guns, but they're Ready and willing to send all of our taxpayer dollars to go buy guns for Ukraine.
		I say start the clock before we have a buyback program where we're going to be sending our guns over to Zelensky.
		But Tej, I believe next week is International Coffee Day.
		I know we don't usually celebrate globalist holidays here in the War Room, but we'll make an exception.
		Walk us through... I have it somewhere.
		Warpath Coffee, the latest deals and how people can get it if they want to do so.
tej gill ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, the website's warpath.coffee.
		This is Steve Bannon's favorite coffee.
		We created a dark roast for him.
		It's the Mariner's Blend.
		And then we have a new product out we want to launch here today for the War Room Posse.
		We created it special for the War Room Posse.
		It's a free Steve Bannon mug.
unidentified		So we have him up on the website.
tej gill ▲ ● ▼		Wow.
		Yeah, we're going to do a limited run of these mugs.
		You can get them right now.
		20% off for the War Room this weekend.
		Just use promo code WARROOM and it's at WARPATH.COFFEE and get this free Steve Bannon mug.
		So get it, get it while it's hot, because we're only going to do one run of these.
		WARPATH.COFFEE, promo code WARROOM.
natalie winters ▲ ● ▼		Get it while it's hot, no pun intended.
		Tej Gill, as always, thank you.
		Thank you for joining us.
		One more time, the link, the code.
tej gill ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, the website is warpath.coffee.
		And for the War Room Posse, the promo code to get 20% off is warroom.
		Just put in promo code warroom and you're gonna get 20% off.
		And like I said, we're only doing one run of these mugs.
		So get them while they're hot.
natalie winters ▲ ● ▼		Tejagiel, thank you for joining us.
natalie winters ▲ ● ▼		We'll have you back on.
tej gill ▲ ● ▼		Thank you, Natalie.
unidentified		Thank you.
natalie winters ▲ ● ▼		Of course.
		And speaking of communism, if they're saying the quiet part out loud, trying to give kids money for ratting out their parents for owning guns...
		I know there's been a lot of focus and coverage on the, what is it, 741, I think, intel officers or intel community members who came out and endorsed Harris over Trump.
		Of course, coming on the heels of Dick Cheney and the author of the torture memos and Liz Cheney and Taylor Swift.
		Quite an interesting eclectic group you got going on there.
		But right now, we're obviously focusing the stories that they've endorsed Harris.
		But I think the other side of the coin, what this audience really needs to pay attention to,
		and it's why it is imperative that we win, is that those 741 people, which again,
		it started out as what, four anonymous sources saying that Trump was linked to Russia.
		Then the 2020 election, it became the 51 Intel officers saying the Hunter Biden hard drive
		was Russian disinformation.
		It shows you how desperate they are, that they're now rolling out people in the hundreds.
		But that's also going to be the public face of the campaign that is going to come,
		and I'm going to use this word intentionally, hunt down MAGA and the grassroots
		and people linked to this show, if Kamala Harris wins,
		because they won't be, to use the word, burdened by really anything,
		because it's essentially the second term.
		And they're going to go so hard, and the fact that they're already rolling out
		members of the Intel community, That is going to be the public face of the network that is going to come after MAGA.
		I would argue it's going to make the January 6th prosecutions look like child's play.
		Although I guess they want to make child's play ratting out your parents for owning guns in the United States of America.
		That's what we are up against.
		We're going to get into all of this after this break.

▲