Sept. 17, 2024 - Bannon's War Room
48:56
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pray for our enemies. | |
| Because we're going medieval on these people. | ||
| I got a free shot on all these networks lying about the people. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The people have had a belly full of it. | |
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
|
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| Welcome to the War Room. | ||
| It's Tuesday, September 17th in the year of our Lord 2024. | ||
| It's Natalie G. Winters coming at you live from Washington, D.C. | ||
| Now we're going to do what War Room does best on this show today. | ||
| We have some harsh words for Speaker Johnson. | ||
| Or maybe in honor of Steve, we'll call him Polly Pockets. | ||
| You like that? | ||
| We'll go with that. | ||
| Now we know you guys barely did anything to keep Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Out of prison, and your performative little stunt a few days before, it didn't fool anyone. | ||
| Speaker Johnson, just as we wrapped this morning's show, announced they're bringing back a six-month CR in the SAVE Act. | ||
| Denigrating and demeaning the SAVE Act as a shiny toy, insulting your intelligence, making you guys think that if they pass it, so much so that we need to continue to fund the federal government at bloated levels, that's $2.45 trillion annually, $6.3 billion a day, on top of $3 billion a day in interest. | ||
| That's a burn rate of $77,000 a second. | ||
| I know we used to critique those kind of numbers as fiscally irresponsible. | ||
| I wish we could go back to the era where we could just be concerned about fiscal responsibility. | ||
| But that's not what we're dealing with. | ||
| House Republicans want to continue to fund, not just a woke, not just a woke and weaponized, but a government that is quite literally at war with the MAGA movement. | ||
| I'm not just talking about the January 6th stuff. | ||
| There's news just breaking today. | ||
| Customs and Border Patrol interviewed the would-be Trump assassin from Sunday. | ||
| He was referred to the Department of Homeland Security for further investigation concerning remarks he made about Ukraine. | ||
| Do you know what DHS did? | ||
| Absolutely nothing. | ||
| And that's the DHS that Speaker Johnson wants to fund. | ||
| The same DHS that wants to fly tens of thousands of migrants into your town. | ||
| By the way, I looked through Speaker Johnson's Twitter history, I didn't see anything about Springfield in there. | ||
| Why's that? | ||
| You're telling us that we have to have a six-month CR, like I said, at these bloated levels, because we need election integrity. | ||
| Apparently, policy writers work now. | ||
| So I'd only ask you, if election integrity is so important, Polly Pockets, then why didn't you attach the SAVE Act to any of the five CRs? | ||
| Why didn't House leadership do that before? | ||
| Because it's not about election integrity. | ||
| It's BS PR spin that you're trying to push on the MAGA movement, because you know we care about election integrity here, to get your lobbyists, your paymasters, the Uniparty, the swamp, happy with the continued CR policy approach that you guys have done for decades. | ||
| And it's not gonna work, and Wharram isn't gonna support it. | ||
| And I tell you, just like we warned Zelensky, To look at all the other foreign leaders that have been used and gobbled up by the United States and the intel community here? | ||
| Why don't you look at the history of what happened to Kevin McCarthy when he went down the path of pursuing CRs with nothing in return? | ||
| And by the way, Mike Johnson, what you're doing now is tenfold, a hundredfold, a thousandfold worse Because Joe Biden and Democrats in the Senate have already admitted that they will strip the SAVE Act from the CR. | ||
| It's a non-starter. | ||
| And you don't have the votes anyways. | ||
| But you re-upped it. | ||
| You said you're going to hold the vote on Wednesday. | ||
| But let's be very clear. | ||
| In War Room Posse, I want you to make calls. | ||
| I want you to burn down the phone lines. | ||
| Metaphorically, of course. | ||
| Just like Heads on Pikes. | ||
| Metaphorically, of course. | ||
| We're going to refuse any CR until the Senate passes the SAVE Act and Joe Biden signs it into law. | ||
| It's the one place we have any leverage going forward in this election, and Speaker Johnson wants to act like he's on the back foot and not do a damn thing about it. | ||
| We saw what the Democrats and the federal government did to steal the 2020 election when Trump was still in power. | ||
| Can you imagine what they're going to do now? | ||
| And the only person standing in between us and that nightmarish future is Speaker Johnson. | ||
| Sorry, Polly Pockets, who doesn't even have the balls to tell the Senate to vote on something that we passed a year ago. | ||
| And he's going to insult your intelligence and ask for your vote and donations and cheapen election integrity by dangling the SAVE Act. | ||
| Like the shiny toy that he wants it to be. | ||
| If you cared so much about election integrity, Speaker Johnson, that should have been the first thing that you did when you became Speaker of the House. | ||
| What did you do instead? | ||
| You pushed for more foreign aid to Ukraine. | ||
| We know where your priorities are, and we're not going to fall for it. | ||
| So, Warren Posse, I want you guys to do what you do best, and do it in honor of Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Because they're doing the same BS that they did with Steve, the performative action before he went to prison, now they're doing that with election integrity. | ||
| And you know if Steve were sitting here, I know I'm no Stephen K. Bannon, but I'm doing my damn best job, you know he'd be saying the same exact thing, telling you guys to call 202-225-3121. | ||
| I want you to call your congressman and tell them they better not just be a no but a freaking hell no on the CR and then I want you to call Mike Johnson and say you don't pass or you don't put forth another vote on a CR until the Senate gets their act together and Joe Biden signs a safe act into law. | ||
| We have the leverage. | ||
| I know Republicans are used to losing, but we don't lose here in the MAGA wing of the Republican Party and Speaker Johnson better get on board. | ||
| That's 202-225-3121. | ||
| Now if we have Darren, I want to give you guys just an example of the weaponized federal government. | ||
| That'll do a little tease real quick. | ||
| We've got Jeff Clark and Kingsley Cortez of the Center for Renewing America. | ||
| Victims, I would say, of the weaponized government that we've seen. | ||
| We're gonna get into all of that. | ||
| But I want to play a cold from a 60 Minutes interview with Matthew Graves. | ||
| Let's roll it, Denver. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We begin with the prosecutor in charge. | |
| U.S. | ||
| Attorney Matthew Graves told us what drives the prosecution of January 6th. | ||
| The crime was severe. | ||
| It was an attack on our democracy. | ||
| Once you replace votes and deliberation with violence and intimidation, you've lost the | ||
| democratic process. | ||
| You've lost the rule of law. | ||
| But it's also about the victims, the officer victims who were injured that day, and making | ||
| sure we hold people accountable for the harm that they inflicted on the 140 officers who | ||
| reported physical injury. | ||
| Matthew Graves has worked in the Bush and Biden Justice Departments. | ||
| Now as U.S. | ||
| Attorney for the District of Columbia, he's won more than 1,000 January 6 convictions and lost only two of the cases at trial. | ||
| What is the best evidence that you've had? | ||
| The crimes that occurred that day are probably the most recorded crimes in all of our history. | ||
| You also have the words of the defendants explaining what they were going to do or what they had done. | ||
| The allegation is made that the White House is guiding your work. | ||
| I've never met President Biden, let alone talked to him, which is normal, I would add, because there are walls for very good reasons between the Department of Justice and the White House so that prosecution can focus on what it should be focused on, whether there are violations of law and whether those violations of law consistent with the rules that we follow should be federally prosecuted. | ||
| There are people, maybe millions of people in this country, who are skeptical about what you just said. | ||
| No one is being prosecuted for their views. | ||
| They're being prosecuted for their acts. | ||
| And we've seen defendants in January 6th take full advantage of all the protections afforded under the Constitution. | ||
| To me, that's the picture of due process. | ||
| It was the Trump Justice Department that set the standards for the prosecutions. | ||
| Decisions were made by career prosecutors who work at justice for years, regardless of who the president might be. | ||
| The career prosecutors quickly realized that you needed guidelines in place, determinations about who was going to be charged, who wasn't going to be charged, and what they would be charged with. | ||
| That process started in January 7th, 2021, during the prior administration. | ||
| To this day, we continue to use guidelines that the career prosecutors put in place during the prior administration. | ||
| The buried lead there being, of course, that the Biden regime should be owning all of those J6 prosecutions, not trying to pawn it off onto Donald Trump. | ||
| That's what they've made their whole freaking campaign about. | ||
| But now we see a nice about face now. | ||
| Jeff Clark, I want to bring you in on this. | ||
| We'll bring Darren in after the break. | ||
| I'm told that people who've been persecuted, prosecuted by Matthew Graves and the like, that you guys have just enjoyed all of the wonders of the Constitution. | ||
| Your thoughts? | ||
| Look, I testified at a field hearing that Matt Gaetz ran, and I talked about all the violations of due process. | ||
| Let's just start with the Fourth Amendment violations, the fact that they scooped up most of these people through what was clearly a general warrant, and general warrants were The history in English law that gave us the Fourth Amendment in the first place, that you have to have particularized probable cause to arrest somebody, that they just scooped them up by grabbing their media and their phone contacts on that day. | ||
| Right there you have a serious violation of the Constitution. | ||
| You don't hear any of that from Matthew Graves. | ||
| And, again, the timing of this, right, 60 minutes is always an interesting thing because they try to set narratives with it. | ||
| Why do you think they're trying, it's not necessarily a walk back, but I would say it's sort of a whitewash, right, of what they did with the January 6th committee. | ||
| Why, again, releasing it just a wee hours after President Trump was almost assassinated, why now? | ||
| Well, they want to impact the election, Natalie. | ||
| They're trying to make it evergreen and remind people of January 6th. | ||
| It's almost like been their entire issue, their raison d'etre, going back to the start of 2021. | ||
| And so they're not going to let people forget it if they possibly can. | ||
| And look, the other thing they're doing is I heard echoes from Matthew Graves there of Merrick Garland's speech last week in the Great Hall of Justice, which my office was very close to, to the U.S. | ||
| attorneys who were assembled, telling them that we have this wonderful thing, the Justice Manual. | ||
| It ensures that we're engaged in neutral processes, we're following norms, etc. | ||
| So he's also just following his boss's lead. | ||
| It's interesting timing. | ||
| Kingsley, I'm curious, I'll bring you in on this. | ||
| Your thoughts, why we're seeing now such a projection, right? | ||
| The Biden regime just insistent, we're not weaponizing the government against you guys. | ||
| Kamala saying it's Trump who's going to do that. | ||
| Your thoughts, why now? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| I mean, maybe they're seeing some internal polling, you know, that we're not, that the January 6th prosecutions are, you know, not favored by the American people. | ||
| Perhaps that could be the case because I think a large portion of this country sees how weaponized and politicized the DOJ has become. | ||
| Under Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. | ||
| And I think, you know, Jeff is a fantastic example of that, right? | ||
| He is a brilliant attorney and that is why they are going after him. | ||
| They're trying to disbar him, trying to throw him in jail even because he dared to investigate the 2020 election. | ||
| So whether it's, you know, Jeff Clark, great legal minds in the conservative movement or the January Sixers, they want to set a deterrent so that we don't fight back, so that we're afraid and we're sidelined and we have to push back against that. | ||
| No, it's so true. | ||
| And I mean, when's the last time you guys have ever seen Matthew Graves give an interview? | ||
| I don't think he's often in primetime, let alone a whole 60 minutes kind of documentary trying to, like I said, whitewash his image. | ||
| We're going to be joined after the break by Darren Beattie, who I think takes a lot of the credit for making Matthew Graves a household name, I'm sure to Matthew Graves. | ||
| Strong dismay. | ||
| But until then, you guys gotta make sure you're checking out birchgold.com slash Bannon. | ||
| It's texting Bannon to 989898. | ||
| That's how you support the show. | ||
| Keep us going. | ||
| And maybe check out Patriot Mobile, too. | ||
| It's patriotmobile.com. | ||
| Use promo code Bannon. | ||
| They have a host of deals. | ||
| And I would say On your cell phone that you bought with your investments from Birch Gold using Patriot Mobile, you should call 202-225-3121 and let Speaker Johnson, your member of Congress, know that you don't want another damn CR until the SAVE Act is passed and signed into law. | ||
| And if Biden doesn't want to do that, then they can own foreign election interference. | ||
| And I will be the first to submit a tip to the State Department and claim my $10 million reward. | ||
| Because I know where there's foreign election interference. | ||
| It's non-citizens voting in the United States, and Democrats refuse to do anything about it because they know their policies are so unpopular with the American people, they had to import tens of millions of people to vote for them. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But it doesn't work if you have to verify with IDs to vote. | |
| Right? | ||
| Darren Beattie after the break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bamm. | |
| Welcome back to the War Room. | ||
| We're joined now by Dr. Darren J. Beattie. | ||
| I'm sure no friend to Matthew Graves, but Darren, I'd love if we could just kind of get your top line assessment. | ||
| Why 60 Minutes is wheeling him out now and just some of the buried leads in that interview. | ||
| Well, you know, it is very interesting, the timing especially, and it's hard not to interpret the timing in the broader context of sort of Merrick Garland's rehabilitation tour. | ||
| There's definitely something about Trump and others now pointing out what to any American is manifestly obvious, that the Biden administration and the Biden DOJ specifically have weaponized our institutions politically in order to attack their enemies in a way that completely degrades any historical understanding of constitutional structure. | ||
| That very much hit a nerve with them. | ||
| And so Merrick Garland, who is very much one of the premier janitorial mop-up men for the regime, and he has been for decades and decades, going all the way back to Clinton when he had the domestic terror portfolio, to now this rehabilitation PR tour with Graves, who just sounds so pathetic. | ||
| I'd actually, I'd never heard him speak before. | ||
| He sounds so pathetic. | ||
| Um, but it's interesting that it was 60 Minutes, because in fact, the audience might recall that a while back, 60 Minutes did a fully dedicated Puff segment on none other than Ray Epps. | ||
| And in fact, one of the producers for that program had reached out to me and, you know, did the whole thing about, oh, you know, I'm just interested in learning more about Epps. | ||
| I want to learn more about your work. | ||
| And I gave him just a devastating barrage of damning information about Epps, none of which made it into their ultimate segment. | ||
| The segment involved Epps directly accusing me and Tucker Carlson of making up stuff about him. | ||
| And I was told till the very last minute that I would have a chance to be on there because my work was the subject of the entire segment. | ||
| And then for whatever reason, they decided not to have me on, which is amazing because think of all the home court advantages 60 Minutes would have had. | ||
| They can splice and dice, they can edit. | ||
| And then, you know, if I actually say anything great, they can just decide not to use it. | ||
| And yet with notwithstanding all of those advantages that they had, they evidently thought that the case against Epps was so damning. | ||
| That they'd be better off just not letting me talk. | ||
| So it's interesting that 60 Minutes in particular has irrigated to itself the role of sort of J6 janitors. | ||
| And that's a narrative that it's really harmed the regime. | ||
| They've invested so much in that. | ||
| People are thinking, Gosh, this was three years ago. | ||
| How many years ago was this? | ||
| And yet it's such a live issue for the Democrats. | ||
| It's what they have. | ||
| It's their main pretext for the very weaponization of these institutions that we've been talking about. | ||
| So much has been riding on this fake Fed's direction narrative, which is why I've been attacked so viciously and from so many different angles. | ||
| by the regime for, I should say, doing a rather decent job at changing the national conversation about this fake FEDSurrection to the manifest and glaring holes in the official story, whether it be EPS or the pipe bomb. | ||
| So that was sort of my impression, the 60 minutes thing. | ||
| It's part of this rehabilitation tour because I think internal polling and also Narratives presented by Trump and the team and so forth, it's really crossed a threshold. | ||
| And people have just understood the obvious at this point, that Biden, Harris, Merrick Garland, the whole team, the whole corrupt crew, have run our institutions into the ground because they've corrupted them politically for their own selfish purposes. | ||
| You're so right that timing is everything and I just want to flag this again. | ||
| No conspiracies, no coincidences, but it is curious to me that you see on Sunday an alleged assassination attempt on President Trump by a guy who is, I mean, so obsessed with Ukraine. | ||
| He makes the neocons and war hawks here in Congress look like it's amateur hour. | ||
| But this is kind of coming at the same time that NATO is getting ready to push for long | ||
| range missiles being able to be used into Ukraine, really escalating that conflict to, | ||
| I think, a degree we haven't seen before. | ||
| There's obviously a lot of back and forth going around there. | ||
| Can you kind of walk the audience through the latest on the front of the Ukraine war | ||
| and where we stand with the sort of long range missile debate? | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| But really quickly, I want to add one more point. | ||
| And you know, this is Madeline Peltz or whatever her name is, is going to have a field day with this. | ||
| But it must be said, because part of this 60 Minutes thing was this whole victimization tour featuring these poor Capitol Police officers who, oh no, these poor Capitol Police officers. | ||
| Now look, I strongly condemn any of the violence, whether it's done by the feds or whether it's done by You know, people who are there for authentic reasons or whatever. | ||
| All this violence is bad, but I can't help but notice with a degree of cynicism and contempt that they're portraying these Capitol Police officers as these worst victims. | ||
| Oh, no, they were attacked. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, no. | |
| Oh, no. | ||
| Let's cry about it endlessly for years and years and years. | ||
| And these are the same people who completely ignore the fact that there's been not one but two assassination attempts against Trump. | ||
| And, you know, people pointed this out. | ||
| The first assassination attempt where the bullet actually made contact with him and narrowly missed his brain, God forbid. | ||
| And his immediate reaction was to stand up bravely with a fist in the air. | ||
| Contrast that with these cowards on January 6th, these weak people on January 6th, including and maybe especially the congressmen. | ||
| You see the photos of them hiding under the desk, cowering. | ||
| In these kinds of moments, you learn who your leaders really are. | ||
| And that contrast, I think, is extremely telling. | ||
| So yes, I'm sorry for, you know, the violence. | ||
| Nobody deserves violence, including the Capitol Police. | ||
| But for them to parade themselves around as victims this long, for the media to make that the cause, when they won't talk about these two assassination attempts against Trump, it's so pathetic and it gives up the game. | ||
| As for the Ukraine issue, Look, we reached a grim milestone recently. | ||
| There's a piece in the Wall Street Journal heralding one million dead and wounded in the Ukraine-Russia conflict. | ||
| One million. | ||
| And it's still not enough for these greedy filth running our country and running it into the ground. | ||
| We've dumped almost $200 billion into this endless pit of useless blood And treasure to enrich Raytheon, to enrich our corrupt defense contractors, to enrich the corrupt Ukrainian oligarchs. | ||
| For what? | ||
| So a million people can die for no reason? | ||
| Now in the debate, they asked Trump, they said, do you want Ukraine to win the war? | ||
| He said, I want the war to end. | ||
| He's the only guy who wants it to end. | ||
| Kamala, who's now the favorite of Dick Cheney, the disgraced Iraq war architect, she wants to go on indefinitely and parrots these neocon talking points about Russia wanting to invade Europe or something like this. | ||
| And now with these missiles, we're at the verge yet again of another major escalation. | ||
| You still have people in the State Department, in the Biden regime, Biden-Harris regime, who are desperately eager to escalate this conflict still further. | ||
| A million dead and wounded is simply not enough for these degenerate freaks. | ||
| And so it's, it's a very sad thing. | ||
| And, and the fact of Trump as the peacemaker is so crucial because it resonates with people across the board. | ||
| People understand this was the guy who didn't start any wars. | ||
| That's why they tried to assassinate him twice and might try it again. | ||
| But it's not just an issue of foreign policy and peace that we pointed out. | ||
| War Room has been great on this. | ||
| We've covered this in our color revolution segment. | ||
| There's some really interesting overlap between the segment of the deep state that's obsessed with Russia and the segment of the deep state that's obsessed with going after Trump. | ||
| The same color revolution architects obsessed with Russia for decades. | ||
| These are the people undermining, corrupting and ruining our institutions in order to illegally undermine Trump and the democratic process. | ||
| And what better instantiation and embodiment of this? | ||
| than in this latest guy who tried to assassinate Trump, who is literally recruiting people in the field to go and fight in Ukraine. | ||
| So I think this underscores just what a live issue this is. | ||
| It's an intersection of so many different things, so many corrupt elements and agendas of the regime, that I think Trump really needs to double down and beat this hornet's nest until it no longer exists. | ||
| Certainly. | ||
| Darren, we've got to bounce, but if people want to follow you, stay up to date with everything you're working on, where can they go to do all that? | ||
| We have a nice piece on this very Ukraine issue, the intersection between Ukraine foreign policy and this latest assassination attempt, right up there at revolver.news. | ||
| And if you want to support us, because we were demonetized by Matt Graves reporting on J6, Get a fedsurrection shirt and wear it when people ask you, hey, what's the fedsurrection? | ||
| You be sure to tell them what it is. | ||
| The more people wake up to the truth, the bigger headache Matthew Graves and his team of degenerates has in the morning. | ||
| It's the real F word. | ||
| Darren, Jay, Beattie, thank you for joining us. | ||
| I'm sure we will have you back on soon. | ||
| Thank you, Natalie. | ||
| Of course. | ||
| We're in Posse. | ||
| In the meantime, we've got to check out birchgold.com slash banner text BAN into 989898 to get the latest installment of the end of the dollar empire. | ||
| Do it until we think special deals until we get closer to the election, which I'm sure we're going to see a heck of a lot more Republicans for Harris get wheeled out. | ||
| People who profit off of the Ukraine war continuing to happen. | ||
| I don't know where Dick Cheney's ass ends and his Halliburton board seat begins, but that's what's motivating him. | ||
| They've never cared about this country, they just want to profit off of it. | ||
| You guys know that all too well. | ||
| Jeff Clark, Kingsley Cortez, after this short break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Jeff Clark is being attacked because he's so strong and so good. | |
| They are destroying and have destroyed the rule of law in America and they were using our judicial system in order to prosecute and persecute President Trump and anyone who supported him. | ||
| The punishment and the pain that has been inflicted on him in his life is so important to the regime because they want to set a deterrent. | ||
| If President Trump had sailed off into the sunset, none of this would have happened. | ||
| But his key ally in this is this guy, Jeffrey Clark. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But who is effectively plotting a coup with the president? | |
| What was his only qualification? | ||
|
unidentified
|
That he would do whatever the president wanted him to do. | |
| Jeffrey Clark, who was fully committed to corrupting the DOJ on Trump's behalf. | ||
| When they raid your house, and they take all your electronics, and they're parking black vans outside your house, and they're following you sometimes, and you know your communications are being monitored, you know, it can tend to have an impact on you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think they expected me to cave, but I couldn't. I won't. | |
| And I will never do. | ||
| Welcome back to the War Room. | ||
| I don't know about you guys, I just had a little shiver chill down my spine. | ||
| I heard Stephen K Bannon's voice, which I haven't heard in a long time. | ||
| We, of course, miss him and look forward to having him back here, but you guys have sort of a similar story of political persecution because you guys are so effective, uniquely effective in what you do. | ||
| So tell us a little bit about either Kingsley or Jeff. | ||
| You were the producer of this. | ||
| You did all of it, so thank you for all the work you did on it. | ||
| But about the documentary, why'd you guys make it? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, I think, you know, we wanted to make it because obviously you see pieces of lawfare, you know, if you follow someone like Jeff, someone like Bannon, you read about it in the news, you hear politicians on the campaign trail talking about how we need to end the weaponization of the DOJ. | |
| But we wanted to kind of just tell a story and put it all in one place where the American people could truly, like, digest what is happening to people like Jeff. | ||
| Who's, you know, only crime is supporting President Trump and believing in the Constitution and wanting to ensure that the American people can have trust in the results of elections. | ||
| I mean, those are not crimes, right? | ||
| But in modern day America, the regime and the deep state are treating those things as crimes and treating Jeff Clark like a criminal. | ||
| So we wanted to put this out really to just kind of educate people on what, you know, someone like Jeff is going through, what his family is being put through. | ||
| And I think one thing that makes our documentary really different than a lot of other ones out there is we talk about the need for accountability, right? | ||
| We can't just complain about the lawfare that's happening. | ||
| We need to make sure that, you know, retribution, revenge, you hear those words thrown around. | ||
| It's not retribution or revenge to hold people accountable. | ||
| The system requires it. | ||
| If we do not do that, we don't have a rule of law in this country. | ||
| So it's important that people like Jeff are out there continuing to fight, putting, you know, their entire lives on the line for this country. | ||
| He's a true hero. | ||
| and a patriot. You hear Bannon say it there. He's a fighter and I think that when you watch | ||
| Yes. | ||
| this movie, you will really feel that. | ||
| As we always say, it's not retribution, it's justice. And I know there's a little bit of | ||
| an interesting story about Stephen K. Bannon's involvement in the film. When did you interview | ||
|
unidentified
|
him? | |
| Yes. So, very funny story. | ||
| We actually were set to film with Steve that day when he had just found out he would be reporting to Danbury Federal Prison, and I figured, you know, if it were me, I would want to cancel my entire schedule that day. | ||
| I think any normal person would, but Steve sat down with us. | ||
| He did the interview because he supported Jeff, and he cares about this movement, right? | ||
| It's bigger than him, and he's always been a movement-first, America-first patriot, and I think that just says a lot about the kind of guy Steve is. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| That's a mic drop right there. | ||
| Jeff, I'm curious, though, you know, you hear the overlay. | ||
| If it's not Stephen K. Bannon talking, it's Joy Reid. | ||
| It's all the lovely Star Wars bar. | ||
| That's what Steve would probably say. | ||
| We hear a lot of talk about, you know, violent rhetoric, crazy rhetoric, Democrats radicalizing their base against people like you who just want to defend the Constitution. | ||
| MSNBC is also busy doing segments about how the Constitution is a threat to democracy and we need to, I believe, get rid of it. | ||
| That was the guest last week. | ||
| On the receiving end of some of this rhetoric, what is it like to be the person whose face is on MSNBC every night? | ||
| Well, look, first let me thank Kingsley, the producer, director, and War Room Films, and Steve. | ||
| You know, as I entered here today to sit at the table with you, Natalie, I was struck by the fact it's one of the first times I've been back since Steve has gone to prison. | ||
| And it's just, it's sad. | ||
| And it's truly ludicrous that he's in prison for an offense that so many Democrats have committed and have just blown off Congress about. | ||
| But there's a two-tiered system of justice. | ||
| That's why he's in jail. | ||
| That's why Peter Navarro went to jail. | ||
| Look, you know, I'm one of MSNBC's favorite targets, and you mentioned the Constitution. | ||
| I mean, no one, maybe with the exception of Ari Melber at MSNBC, knows anything about the Constitution. | ||
| And so they pretend to talk about it, but the Constitution for them is basically just like our democracy, as I've Tweeted recently, you know, that's like La Cosa Nostra, like it's our thing. | ||
| It's our democratic thing and it is whatever we want to try to accomplish and that's the way they approach the world. | ||
| And so to be on the receiving end of that, I didn't think that I would ever be such a major target, but it turns out that if you're the only high-ranking official at the Justice Department who is suspicious of the 2020 election and wanted to do more investigation of it, That that set me out from other people and that's why I've become a major target that they have to squash. | ||
| And I hope that people will get the documentary on Rumble and watch it and like it and spread it around by word of mouth. | ||
| And again, you know, just I was blown away when I saw early cuts of the work that Kingsley had done in putting it together. | ||
| So I really thank you and I thank War Room Films for, you know, for helping to put it all together. | ||
| Of course. | ||
| And, you know, you bring up lawfare, and I think why this audience respects you so much, and I'll certainly speak for Steve, is because even in the face of all of this, you don't back down. | ||
| You're still sitting here, and we're about to do a segment that's probably going to get us on MSNBC tonight for what we're about to say, right? | ||
| There's a new CNN story up. | ||
| We hid this morning, but I wanted to get your thoughts on it. | ||
| Headline, the sleeper case trying to stop Trump and the RNC from intimidating voters and poll workers. | ||
| Trying to put the Trump campaign, Trump himself, and the RNC under court supervision. | ||
| The same judge on the case is Tanya Shutkin. | ||
| You may remember her from Jan 6, Jack Smith, DC case, Infamy. | ||
| Funny how it always works, right? | ||
| We'll leave it at that. | ||
| But your kind of, give us your assessment on just the oddities of this case and how it is. | ||
| It is lawfare! | ||
|
unidentified
|
Key's closed. | |
| Well, so the first thing to understand is to understand what is a consent decree, and that's what they're really seeking, right? | ||
| And so it's an attempt to replicate something that was in place for more than two decades. | ||
| There was a fight about a gubernatorial election in New Jersey, and the RNC agreed to a consent decree that bound them from, you know, the early 1980s until 2015. | ||
| It was in place that long. | ||
| And, you know, if you have a judge who's holding on to a consent decree, like a dog, you know, holds on to a bone that's like grasped in its teeth, you know, it's very hard to get out from it. | ||
| And so Republicans under that consent decree were not allowed to engage in election observation operations, right? | ||
| Which is key. | ||
| You want to have parties from both sides watch what's going on during the voting process, during the counting process. | ||
| This is a feature of state law in many states. | ||
| I think it should be a feature everywhere. | ||
| And the idea, first of all, that the RNC back in the 1980s gave that up, as opposed to fighting that all the way, and especially saying that's a violation of their First Amendment rights, is flabbergasting. | ||
| But they did. | ||
| And so this case against Trump using the Ku Klux Klan act of all things, uh, you know, | ||
| to say that, uh, his activities of doing things like talking to me at the justice department, | ||
| that those are, should lead to the RNC having to say, mother, may I, before they engage | ||
| in any election related activities or filing lawsuits, et cetera. | ||
| It's bonkers, but you know, they brought it in the most favorable, uh, forum to do that, | ||
| which is in Washington DC federal court. | ||
| Uh, and now they have judge Chetkin. | ||
| It seems to me as well, Natalie, that they've been holding this case in reserve. | ||
| If all else fails, right? | ||
| If the assassination attempts don't take out Trump, if the lawfare in New York, uh, and | ||
| Florida and DC, uh, doesn't take him out. | ||
| Let's, you know, try to handicap the RNC so they can't help Trump win the 2024 presidential election. | ||
| And so people have to watch this case. | ||
| It really should be dismissed after the Trump immunity decision on July 1st from the Supreme Court. | ||
| But we're going to see what fancy footwork Judge Chudkin might employ to try to save that case. | ||
| And just walk us through one more time the timeline. | ||
| You're saying it's brought in 2020, but they've been almost intentionally slow rolling it, trying to make it, I think, sort of a gotcha moment on the Trump campaign. | ||
| So it's bounced around to different judges. | ||
| It's now landed with Judge Chutkan. | ||
| And, you know, it seems like, you know, the most anti-Trump judges seem to wind up with the key Trump cases in front of them, which is curious. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But, you know, I think we call that democracy. | |
| Well, there are no conspiracies, but there are no coincidences. | ||
| So, you know, look, I'm suspicious of it for that reason. | ||
| But the case is one reason why the case was delayed is because everyone realized and there's, you know, transcript of Judge Chudkin saying, like, well, I'm going to resolve That's a tall order. | ||
| issue soon. And she says it's going to be resolved soon in the lower courts. But obviously, | ||
| the Supreme Court on July 1st totally reversed her, totally reversed the DC circuit that | ||
| sits above her. And so now she's got a problem. She's going to have to have them proceed on | ||
| an amended complaint that's trying to strip out the things that violate all the immunity | ||
| protections that Trump has. And I tell you, and I tell the audience, that's a tall order. | ||
| I don't think it can be done, but I think we know that Judge Chodkin's going to let | ||
| I'm sure she will. | ||
| And in the same breath, lecture us about democracy. | ||
| A little bit of breaking news for you guys, the War Room Posse, which I hope you've been making calls in the breaks, and I hope you're going to continue doing it after the show, like I said, in honor of Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| There's some reporting coming out from Olivia Beavers of Politico saying that House GOP leadership is indicating that they may have flipped some no votes on the CR plus SAVE Act privately and publicly. | ||
| I'm not letting on exactly how many votes that would be. | ||
| Per their count last week, there were at least 10 public no's and a group of undecideds. | ||
| So that means you guys have a busy night ahead of you, making sure not just that those people don't flip their votes, but that the undecideds stay firmly in the no category. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's 202-225-3121. | |
| 202-225-3121. I truly think, even Biden regime aside, one of the main reasons that they tried | ||
| to throw Stephen K. Bannon in prison and succeeded at it is because of what this show did to Kevin | ||
| McCarthy. | ||
| Because if Kevin McCarthy and his henchmen wanted to do something about Stephen K. Bannon, Peter Navarro, any of the Jan Sixers, they could have nullified those subpoenas on day one. | ||
| Or wait, if you guys cared so much about election integrity, That's why we got to pass the SAVE Act, right? | ||
| Why didn't you guys create a nice special committee or commission like you did on weaponization, China, and COVID? | ||
| On the stolen election? | ||
| I don't think I ever heard those words come out of your mouth, Speaker Johnson. | ||
| Or Kevin McCarthy. | ||
| How'd Kevin McCarthy fare? | ||
| How'd he do in his primar- Oh, wait. | ||
| Yes, Speaker McCarthy, that's one of the proudest things that I've ever done in my 23 years on this wonderful planet, and that is play a small, infinitesimal role in deposing you as Speaker of the House. | ||
| And if this audience needs to do that again with you, Speaker Mike Johnson, we'll do it, and we'll do it for Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| So I hope that you guys call tonight, it's 202-225-3121, because as you know, whether it's election integrity or any issue, because those Republican congressmen are too busy giving off-the-record, fun statements to Jonathan Capehart and Politico, telling him that they actually want Trump to lose the election, because it'd be easier for them to win the re-election, and they don't like the direction that Trump has taken the party. | ||
| Stop aligning the Republican Party with the grassroots. | ||
| Align it with the donors and the lobbyists, the same people that want the CR to pass. | ||
| That's why we're saying no CRs until the Senate passes a SAVE Act and Joe Biden signs it into law. | ||
| It's not that complicated, Speaker Johnson. | ||
| So get on board, or the Warren Posse's going to do what they do best. | ||
| Maybe we'll give you a little taste of what actual democracy looks like. | ||
| And that's phone calls to 202-225-3121. | ||
| We're going to give you a master class in the power of democracy tonight. | ||
| I hope you guys call. | ||
| I know I will after the show. | ||
| I hope you do it in honor of Stephen K Bannon. | ||
| It's 202-225-3121. | ||
| Bill Blaster. | ||
| Hit up Grace Chong. | ||
| You know the drill. | ||
| But let's do this one for Stephen K Bannon. | ||
| No CR. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We'll be right back. | |
| War Room. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bamm. | ||
| ♪♪ Welcome back to the War Room. | ||
| Kingsley, Jeff, I know you guys gotta bounce, so one more time, hit us where we can follow you and get the doc. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Please go to thejeffclarkstory.com to watch the documentary and definitely share it with your friends. | |
| We go through, you know, election integrity, the whole deal, so this is the kind of documentary that they don't want you to see. | ||
| Jeff Clark. | ||
| And you can follow me at JeffClarkUS on Getter and X and at RealJeffClark on Truth Social and always follow the Center for Renewing America which is at AmericaRenewing.com. | ||
| When are you going to get the MSNBC contributorship gig? | ||
| They should pay you. | ||
| Soon. | ||
| In a Trump's America. | ||
| I'm not going to hold my breath, Natalie. | ||
| And follow Kingsley. | ||
| What's your personal account? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm Kingsley Wilson on all the platforms. | |
| There we go. | ||
| I know. | ||
| I always call you Kingsley Cortez. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Dead naming. | |
| I know, I'm sorry. | ||
| We've been friends for a long time. | ||
| All right, Regan Reese from The Daily Caller joins us now. | ||
| Regan, you have some new, pretty explosive, but I guess also totally expected reporting on who is going to be hosting the forthcoming VP debate. | ||
| Why don't you walk the audience through it? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, Natalie, you're totally correct in that this is new, but it's not totally surprising. | |
| That's a lot of the comments that I've gotten in response to this report. | ||
| So CBS News is set to host the vice presidential debate. | ||
| CBS News' executive leadership, alongside its parent organization, Paramount Global, have their leadership riddled with Democratic donors. | ||
| There are several Paramount board members who have donated thousands of dollars to the Biden campaign in 2020, as well as some CBS News leadership. | ||
| The Paramount CEO has donated to the Biden campaign before. | ||
| The CBS president has donated to the Biden campaign before. | ||
| It's important to note with the CBS president, she donated while she was at ABC News and has not donated since. | ||
| But this is the type of stuff that we expect to see the Trump campaign be concerned about and hit leading up to the vice presidential debate, especially after the controversy with the ABC debate and the bias you saw with the moderators there. | ||
| And do you see any, you know, indicators in terms of how they're presenting this debate? | ||
| They're, of course, presenting themselves as neutral arbiters, I'm sure. | ||
| But you think the Trump campaign needs to double down on the messaging, kind of get ahead of the curve and expose these hacks for the partisan hacks that they are? | ||
|
unidentified
|
You know, I think we saw the Trump campaign really hit CNN and ABC ahead of both debates on their past bias and their connections to the Biden campaign and how they have supported them in the past. | |
| And so I expect to see that again with the CBS debate. | ||
| Especially, I think, Americans were kind of taken aback at what transpired during the ABC News debate and how the moderators just seemed to be teaming up on Donald Trump. | ||
| How they only fact-checked Donald Trump, but never fact-checked Kamala Harris, despite her making multiple false statements. | ||
| And so, yes, I expect to see, as we get closer to this vice presidential debate, especially as it's expected to be kind of this last debate in the 2024 presidential cycle, we don't expect to see a third debate, the Trump campaign expose CBS for being biased. | ||
| And, you know, hopefully they'll be using the Daily Caller reporting to do so. | ||
| Reagan, you're always ahead of the curve. | ||
| If people want to follow you, stay up to date with all of your reporting. | ||
| A myriad of issues. | ||
| Where can they go to do that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
ReaganReese underscore on Twitter and Instagram. | |
| And of course, the Daily Caller website. | ||
| Reagan, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| I know the audience appreciates when you bring, I always say, the footnote for the statements that we all know are true. | ||
| But it's always nice to have the evidence in our back pocket. | ||
| We'll have you back on soon. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thanks. | |
| I appreciate it, Natalie. | ||
| Of course. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Mike Lindell, I think we have you up. | |
| You always have the best deals. | ||
| It's always breaking news whenever Mike Lindell is on. | ||
| Oh, this is this is going to be a good shot. | ||
| I'm excited. | ||
| I see the preview up there. | ||
| Mike Lindell hit us, hit us with the deals. | ||
| Yeah, we're gonna just talk deals here. | ||
| I have so much updates on the country. | ||
| You guys can check that out on lyndaleplan.com. | ||
| But this is the last few hours for what the box stores did. | ||
| Remember this box store bought this huge purchase order for my pillow? | ||
| We made these standard pillows and they canceled us right at the last minute when the trucks were ready to roll. | ||
| And so we took them and we brought them to the war room posse at $14.98. | ||
| That's what the box stores would have paid, the $14.98. | ||
| And this is it. | ||
| We allotted them all. | ||
| The allotment's out. | ||
| We should have enough till maybe a few more hours. | ||
| You guys get the rest of them. | ||
| There is a limit of 10 per person. | ||
|
unidentified
|
$14.98. | |
| Best Christmas gifts. | ||
| They're the best gifts around. | ||
| Put them in every bedroom in your house. | ||
| But you, this is the MyPillow patented fill that gives you the best sleep ever. | ||
| Remember, there's a 60-day money-back guarantee and a 10-year warranty on this. | ||
| I always forget to talk about the product itself. | ||
| That's why we've sold almost 84 million is because they actually work. | ||
| And remember, you can wash and dry them, they stay healthy, but they actually work. | ||
| They keep your neck aligned and you get the best Best sleep ever. | ||
| So go to the website, find Steve's face down there. | ||
| Smile and face, we miss so much. | ||
| Click on it at MyPillow.com. | ||
| There's the blowout sale. | ||
| We got our sheets on sale. | ||
| Our famous sheets as low as $24.98. | ||
| By the way, the sheets are our real president's favorite MyPillow product. | ||
| He talks to me all the time, but Mike, those sheets are incredible. | ||
| They are incredible. | ||
| They're the best sheets you'll ever sleep on. | ||
| I personally helped develop them years ago. | ||
| There's nothing like them. | ||
| So you get to check out our sheets. | ||
| We've got the slippers and sandals, clothes out on them for nine, as low as $9.50. | ||
| And then we got the bathrobes. | ||
| We put, this is a war room exclusive on sale. | ||
| And the Made in America socks. | ||
| You guys haven't tried these socks. | ||
| They're the best socks ever. | ||
| As low as $3.75 a pair. | ||
| All of these products we put for exclusive for The War Room, call 800-873-1062. | ||
| 800-873-1062. | ||
| My reps, they work from home. | ||
| These are stay-at-home moms and dads that actually we won almost a year ago now because the IRS did not want them working from home. | ||
| But they're allowed to work from home on commission. | ||
| So the more you buy, you're helping them out too. | ||
| And we don't have anybody in between us anymore because the box stores have canceled us. | ||
| The shopping channels have canceled us. | ||
| Every place has canceled my pillow, my employee-owned company. | ||
| I think that's what we call a win-win. | ||
| Because their CEO will not stop talking to model X. | ||
| So win-win-win-win. | ||
| I know I beat you to the punchline, but we'll have you back on tomorrow, I'm sure. | ||
| Mike Lindell, thank you for joining us. | ||
| War Impostor, while you're at it, also check out slnt.com to get the Faraday bags so the government can't geofence you, geotrack you, who knows what they're doing. | ||
| The Faraday bags are very cool if you're into that EMF stuff. | ||
| That's slnt.com. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Use promo code WAROOM. | |
| The lobbyists, probably Zelensky, the Democrats, everyone who underestimates the MAGA movement and thinks you guys, as Steve Bannon would say, are a bunch of grundoons and rubes, are banking on that CR to pass. | ||
| So let's laugh at them, and let's make sure it doesn't. |
Export Selection