Sept. 10, 2024 - Bannon's War Room
50:45
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pray for our enemies. | |
| Because we're going medieval on these people. | ||
| President Trump got a free shot at all these networks lying about the people. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The people have had a belly full of it. | |
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you've tried to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
|
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. Here's your host, Stephen K. Babb. | |
| Welcome to The War Room. | ||
| It's Natalie G. Winters hosting today, Tuesday, September 10th, in the year of our Lord, 2024. | ||
| We're, of course, always told by Democrats foreign election interference is an existential threat, so much so that Joe Biden late last night had to renew the national emergency that he declared. | ||
| Many years ago, that has to do with Russia and every country under the sun trying to interfere in the United States elections, despite tacitly admitting in that very same press release that no foreign country has actually done any demonstrable efforts to influence the outcomes of any United States election. | ||
| Try to square that, it's almost like they're trying to psyop us in believing The foreign countries are coming for our elections, except that's not really the case. | ||
| Oh, wait, it is, because in the same breath, the Democrats also don't want to pass the SAVE Act, the very same act that's going to prevent non-citizens, foreigners from voting in the upcoming election. | ||
| If you want to talk about foreign election interference, how about we talk about illegal immigration and mass migration and the importation of voters at record rates we haven't seen for decades? | ||
| But I know we can't talk about that, because then we'll get called racist, according to the mainstream media, right? | ||
| Well, here in the war room, we think that the SAVE Act is a prerequisite to have anything | ||
| that actually resembles an election, election integrity. | ||
| That's the opening salvo for what we want. | ||
| But Speaker Johnson is, of course, back up to his old tricks of cheapening legislation | ||
| that Americans deserve and need to defend and safeguard our election against the actual | ||
| national security threat that is noncitizens voting, turning it into a shiny toy. | ||
| Even though they passed this bill last year, now apparently the only way that Americans | ||
| are entitled to have safe and secure elections is if we attach it to another CR that's going | ||
| to fund the government at a rate that is going to only plunge us into further national debt, | ||
| where the only ROI that we get on that is DEI programs in the military and DEI programs | ||
| abroad. | ||
| I I know we've been calling our members of Congress on the show to make sure that we pass the SAVE Act, but we're not going to accept the false pretense that Speaker Johnson and Republican leadership has thrown down, which is that the only way we can have the SAVE Act is if we attach it to a CR, let alone we already have Joe Biden coming out saying he's going to veto it. | ||
| The Senate could easily strip it. | ||
| And by the way, by the time it's actually implemented, early voting will have already started. | ||
| I believe we're joined now by Congressman Cory Mills, who's come out pretty firmly and staunchly as a no on this CR. | ||
| Now, Congressman, can you sort of walk us through your opposition to the bill, where your colleagues stand on it, and just what sort of the future looks like for this CR? | ||
| Looks like we don't have Congressman Mills, so we'll start with another member of Congress that we have up. | ||
| That's Congressman Keith Self. | ||
| Congressman, you're out in Washington, D.C. | ||
| I always say I miss the Washington, D.C. | ||
| studio, but can you sort of walk us through your take on the CR, where you stand on it? | ||
| I know you guys are scheduled to vote on it tomorrow, but if you think it's even going to come to the floor. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, first of all, the SAVE Act, which you've pointed out. | |
| The House has passed the SAVE Act. | ||
| I voted for the SAVE Act. | ||
| I love the SAVE Act. | ||
| I think it's a common sense act. | ||
| Why is it even controversial that we're going to have U.S. | ||
| citizens vote in U.S. | ||
| elections? | ||
| I don't understand. | ||
| But we've passed it. | ||
| It's on Schumer's desk. | ||
| It's been on Schumer's desk, and he's not taking it up. | ||
| I don't think there is a snowball's chance that Schumer would ever let that go to the floor. | ||
| And it's not that they'll vote against the SAVE Act. | ||
| I don't think they'll ever have a vote on the SAVE Act. | ||
| So why are we negotiating against ourselves when we have already passed this very common sense bill? | ||
| It is not going to help the CR. | ||
| And frankly, I don't know that the CR is coming to the floor. | ||
| I've heard people, a variety of people, I mean, these are strange bedfellows. | ||
| You've got the Democrats, you've got the Defense Hawks, you've got the Libertarians. | ||
| All are saying that this is not going to happen. | ||
| So, I don't know, but if it does come to the floor, I don't know if it will pass. | ||
| And if it does pass, the one certain thing I am sure of is the Senate is not going to pass a CR with the SAVE Act. | ||
| They're probably not going to pass a CR, a six-month CR, into the next Congress. | ||
| What I am focused on is the Christmas omnibus. | ||
| Now, you think last year's omnibus was bad? | ||
| This year is a lame-duck session omnibus. | ||
| We have no idea what that Christmas tree would look like. | ||
| I can guarantee you that it would be huge. | ||
| There'd be a lot of shining objects on that omnibus, and that's what I'm focused on. | ||
| How do we get out of this Congress without the Christmas Omnibus that we've had for years and years and years? | ||
| If we are going to change the trajectory of Washington, D.C., the first thing we need to stop is the Christmas Omnibus. | ||
| Let's focus on that. | ||
| I'm just curious, is there any discussion going on now to push the SAVE Act through independently? | ||
| And are we correct to say that they are using, they're exploiting the SAVE Act as a shiny toy, in some ways a sort of sword of Damocles, where you're damned if you do, damned if you don't, but in reality, even if they pass the CR, it's just It's Christmas morning for the lobbyists and the Mike Johnson and the Republican leaderships of the world. | ||
| But what about the SAVE Act independently? | ||
| Could you see a vote ever coming on that to push it through to the Senate? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's already happened. | |
| It's on Schumer's desk today. | ||
| We passed it in July. | ||
| The SAVE Act passed through the House of Representatives. | ||
| Chuck Schumer has it on his desk. | ||
| The Senate could vote on the SAVE Act tomorrow. | ||
| They don't need us. | ||
| They could vote on the SAVE Act tomorrow. | ||
| And I think that's what we ought to be saying to them. | ||
| The SAVE Act is on your desk, Schumer, and we want to vote on it. | ||
| We want people to be on the record voting against the idea that only U.S. | ||
| citizens vote in U.S. | ||
| elections. | ||
| Now, the CR itself, again, I'm not sure Whether it will come to the floor, if it does come to the floor, I'm not sure it will pass. | ||
| There's a lot of uncertainty around the CR today, with or without the SAVE Act. | ||
| Congressman, I think there's also something particularly sick about voting on the CR tomorrow, where you just have, you know, House GOP members putting out their Afghanistan report yesterday, talking about how DOD failed routinely from every second, every inch of what happens in Afghanistan every day. | ||
| Yet in the same breath, they want to continue to fund that very same Defense Department Unchecked levels that we've never seen in the history of this country. | ||
| So, I know you were involved with the Afghanistan report. | ||
| Can you sort of walk the audience through the top lines of what you guys discovered in that, what is a 300 page report? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, I will tell you, Chairman McCaul used his experience as a federal prosecutor to good effect with this report. | |
| It is laid out formally as an indicting document, and that's exactly what it does. | ||
| It indicts the State Department, and frankly, it really indicts the NSC, the National Security Council, and Jake Sullivan. | ||
| I will tell you, all roads lead to Jake Sullivan. | ||
| There are some fascinating documents or findings in this document. | ||
| For instance, the ambassador was the first person to leave. | ||
| He left his staff behind. | ||
| We left 9,000 Americans. | ||
| We left over 100,000 interpreters that worked for us. | ||
| They set up the first checkpoint, was run by the Taliban, and then when the ambassador got to Doha, Qatar, he cheated on his COVID test to make sure he got home. | ||
| Look, I spent 25 years in the military. | ||
| The leader eats last, the leader leaves last, the leader leaves himself in danger until his men are out. | ||
| No man left behind. | ||
| Ambassador Wilson left every American behind. | ||
| This is an indicting document and again I say all roads lead to Jake Sullivan because that's where this decision was made. | ||
| They were going to go to zero come hell or high water. | ||
| They didn't care. | ||
| The military executed their orders as best they could which they are under civilian control. | ||
| But I will tell you this is not particularly a military failure. | ||
| This is a failure of the Biden-Harris administration And they will own it. | ||
| They own it, and I will tell you it will continue. | ||
| Because look at the effect. | ||
| And this is one of the real issues in this document. | ||
| The world changed because of the Afghanistan withdrawal. | ||
| The world changed. | ||
| We now had Russia moving toward Ukraine. | ||
| We had the evil axis of China, Russia, Iran raise their ugly head because they saw weakness. | ||
| That is the real impact. | ||
| Now, we lost 13 brave service members, and I want to quote something the chaplain said in the service today when we gave the Congressional Gold Medal to all 13 families. | ||
| She said, In honoring their sacrifice, may we strive to uphold the high standard they held in defense of freedom. | ||
| Would that we be so courageous in the face of imminent and unfathomable danger, fear, and panic. | ||
| That's what we need today. | ||
| We need a president. | ||
| We need President Trump to be back in the Oval Office So that we can once again stand with strength through peace, where our adversaries understand that we will not bow to them, that we will stand as the beacon of freedom that we have been for 250 years. | ||
| I think that that decision in Afghanistan, that withdrawal, changed the world. | ||
| Not only those 13 families' lives, but the world. | ||
| Well, Congressman, you repeatedly say, you know, the word indictment and indictment on Jake Sullivan and all the top brass within the State Department, and I definitely think that that's more in the territory of what certainly this audience wants when it comes to actual accountability. | ||
| I'm not really sure what, you know, 300-page reports and strongly worded letters and nice soundbites on Fox News necessarily give those families in terms of condolences and, you know, feel-good moments. | ||
| So what would you say to the audience who's watching this? | ||
| And I know it's not your committee or your report, but who's watching this and saying, that all sounds nice and good, but if you guys can't indict them, you guys have the power of the purse, why aren't you leveraging that and going after these people's salaries, going after the woke programs, going after the intentionally America Last embeds within the Defense Department? | ||
| Why is it just 300-page documents that, respectfully, I don't think a lot of Americans take the time to read? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It is a great question, and I appreciate you asking it. | |
| We have tried to go after the salaries of many of the Biden administration. | ||
| We have had conservative amendments to cut funding. | ||
| And frankly, if it's a very conservative amendment, our bill, we tap out at about 60 votes. | ||
| If it's somewhat conservative, we tap out at about 125 votes. | ||
| That's all the votes we have. | ||
| So in a body of 435, even 130 votes doesn't get you very far. | ||
| We must have a new president. | ||
| We must have an executive that obeys the law, that executes the law, that he has sworn to uphold. | ||
| That's what's coming in November and then in January. | ||
| Congressman, if people want to follow you, stay up to date with everything you're working on, especially as we barrel towards this CR vote, where can they go to do that, support you, check out everything related to your campaign. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, you can follow me through my weekly newsletter. | |
| Go to keithself.house.gov. | ||
| Sign up for the weekly newsletter. | ||
| If you're on social media, basically what the format is for each platform, Rep. | ||
| Keith Self. | ||
| Rep. | ||
| Keith Self. | ||
| I appreciate it. | ||
| And these are vital topics. | ||
| I thank you for asking me each of them. | ||
| We have got to have a change in the executive for any of these issues to be rectified. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Thank you, Congressman. | ||
| I don't know about you guys, Warren Posse, but I'm getting sick and tired of watching so many Republican members of Congress go on, whether it's Fox News or Insert Outlet, hear Mike Lawler on MSNBC this morning. | ||
| Newsflash, if MSNBC wants you to win your race and has you on to do happy talk interviews, probably means you're not actually a good Republican. | ||
| I'll save my Mike Lawler riff for until then. | ||
| But the goalpost on accountability is not a 300-page document that you guys put out after Joe Biden drops out of the race, many years after what actually happened in Afghanistan. | ||
| Transpired. | ||
| Accountability, I'm going to use the word that Congressman Self said, is indictments for treason for people who knowingly put American lives on the line and didn't care about it. | ||
| We know the reason why Hillary Clinton didn't do anything in Benghazi because there wasn't any chance for her to profit there. | ||
| But that is a problem that plagues the entire Biden regime. | ||
| And frankly, it's almost more sinister and perverse. | ||
| Because these people are betting on America's decline. | ||
| It's not just managed decline anymore, it's accelerated decline. | ||
| And for all the naysayers in the mainstream media who say that this show is more of a detriment to democracy than anything the Biden regime has ever done, what transpired in Afghanistan is 10, 100, 1,000 times worse than anything that has ever allegedly, emphasis on allegedly, been said on this show. | ||
| So why do you think about that morning, Joe? | ||
| And the next time you see a House Republican on Fox talking this report up, don't take it. | ||
| We'll be right back after this break. | ||
| Congressman Corey Mills. | ||
| There is nearly $1 trillion of infrastructure and pandemic funds yet to be spent. | ||
| That's right, there's a massive amount of money that the lame duck administration is pushing hard to spend in their last few months. | ||
| If Biden can push out these funds, we could see another prolonged inflation surge, just like during COVID. | ||
| And I'm sure you remember the terrible effects that high prices had on Americans and still do. | ||
| But there's hope. | ||
| A surge in prices can be beaten. | ||
| A gold IRA from Birch Gold Group is the ultimate inflation hedge for your savings. | ||
| To see how to protect your IRA or 401k, get a free info kit on gold by texting the word BANNON to 98 98 98. | ||
| Plus, Birchgold's special offer has been extended through the election. | ||
| When you make a purchase, they're giving away free Trump silver coins. | ||
| These unique collectibles depict Trump defiantly raising his fist after the attempt on his life. | ||
| Don't miss your chance to own this one-of-a-kind piece of history preserved in a silver coin. | ||
| Protect your savings from Biden's spending spree and get your free Trump silver coins. | ||
| Text Bannon to 98-98-98 today. | ||
| 9898 today. That's Bannon to the number 989898. | ||
| You guys know the raison d'etre of this show is to call your members of Congress to burn down the phone lines. | ||
| Metaphorically, of course, we love to speak in metaphors here in the war room. | ||
| Otherwise, we get censored and banned, but we take that as a badge of honor. | ||
| But I really want you guys to make sure, don't get sidetracked by the debate tonight, that you guys are calling your members of Congress to ensure that they join what I believe is already existing 10 members of Congress who have come out publicly. | ||
| Saying that there are no against the CR. | ||
| We're joined by one of them now who has come out quite forcefully. | ||
| That's Congressman Cory Mills of the great state of Florida. | ||
| Not Palm Beach, but it's okay. | ||
| Congressman, if you can sort of walk us through why you came out so strongly against it, your rationale. | ||
| I know you've always been against a CR, but this one, like we were getting in the previous break, is I think particularly offensive. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, it is. | |
| And look, you teed it up absolutely perfect when you talked about the shiny object, which is exactly what this is when we talk about the SAVE Act. | ||
| You know, the idea that you're going to try and do a policy rider for the SAVE Act, which they think is going to somehow get through the Senate, be signed into law, and have the implementation time to actually impact election integrity is a farce. | ||
| It's a way for them to continue to do the DC status quo of kicking the can down the | ||
| road. | ||
| So when I look at the probable what-ifs or I look at the guaranteed certainties, the | ||
| certainty is this, a continuing resolution at the Pelosi COVID emergency spending levels | ||
| is going to be a $2.45 trillion expense in 365 days. | ||
| It's going to be a $6.3 billion a day expenditure or $77,000 plus per second. | ||
| This is what is going to eliminate our middle class and the average American. | ||
| We promised America in January 23 that we were going to get 12 single point appropriation bills that was going to get the necessary spending cuts while also putting policies in place like H.R. | ||
| 1 Low Cost Energy Act to guarantee that we have economic growth strategies. | ||
| We can't cut our way to prosperity. | ||
| This is not doing the definition of insanity by kicking the candidate the same thing repetitively over and over and over and expecting a different outcome. | ||
| Go back to the 117th Congress, the 116th, the 115th, the 114th. | ||
| It's the same thing where it's the continuing resolution around September and then an omnibus that drops all the pork possible at the end of the year. | ||
| This is the same thing under Pelosi and it's the same thing under this leadership. | ||
| And so I'm not going to continue to play these games by drowning the American people or going down the D.C. | ||
| status quo and not prioritizing what America feels today when it comes to economic prosperity. | ||
| President Trump himself has just recently put out on truth that if there is no guarantee of the SAVE Act, which the president's already said that he's going to veto, the Senate's already said that they're not going to take it up, and that that's been obvious since the SAVE Act was actually passed. | ||
| And I want to make this clear to the American people, because here's another kind of wool being brought over your eyes, is that the SAVE Act has already passed. | ||
| It passed July 10th of 2024. | ||
| So this isn't an attempt to try and get it passed. | ||
| This is an attempt to try and attach it so that it puts people into what you said, which is that damned if you do, damned if you don't scenario, where they try to act as if we are against election integrity. | ||
| Let me be clear. | ||
| I'm the co-sponsor of the SAVE Act. | ||
| I voted yes on the SAVE Act, as did five Democrats. | ||
| I'm sorry to tell the people, but this is the wool being pulled over your eyes, and the continuing resolution does nothing more than continue to fund the Department of Injustice and all the others to include the open border policies we have gone against with H.R. | ||
| 2 Secure the Border Act for 19 months. | ||
| If attaching a policy was so great, then why not stop treating the symptoms and recognize the disease? | ||
| It's not just the illegals voting in our actual elections. | ||
| It's the illegals coming across our border, period. | ||
| That's why we have more angel families, fentanyl overdoses, child sex exploitation. | ||
| I mean, all of these things that could be nipped in the bud if we can get H.R. | ||
| 2 across, but the Senate won't take it up. | ||
| The same way that they won't take up the SAVE Act. | ||
| So I'm not going to continue. | ||
| I've never voted for a CR, a minibus, omnibus, or I don't care if you call it a short bus. | ||
| At the end of the day, we have to get some physical responsibility, limited government, and put the American people first. | ||
| Your colleagues really seem to want to die on the hill of funding the very same DHS that is pumping their districts full of, you know, Haitian refugees that are killing people's pets, ducks, and geese. | ||
| It seems like there's enough defectors now within the Republican Party. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| That's what I've been saying. | ||
| It seems like you guys have enough Republican defectors to sort of prevent this CR from passing, but certainly not going to stop Speaker Johnson. | ||
| I know history has a way of repeating itself from probably kowtowing to Democrats to try to pick up those outstanding votes. | ||
| What do you think the future of this bill looks like? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, I think that it looks just like the ones that he passed recently where he puts a clean CR on the floor so that he can continue to fund these physically irresponsible numbers by getting the Democrats to jump on board. | |
| They've already said they'll support a clean CR. | ||
| You know, this is the whole farce is that he wants to make it look like this is a bipartisan effort with the SAVE Act when the reality is is that You know, the Democrats already said they'll pass a clean CR and that he told me there's at least 14 Republicans who had signed a discharge petition. | ||
| I think that we have to have as the American people go forward. | ||
| This is why I've said this for a long time, Natalie. | ||
| I'm not a Republican. | ||
| I'm not a Democrat. | ||
| I'm a constitutionalist. | ||
| Our 7th Article 27 Amendment constitutionality, our freedoms, our liberties, our physical responsibility, our limited government by eliminating the federal government from our day-to-day lives to return to the state and individual rights as it is under the 10th Amendment, is what matters. | ||
| And I'm not going to continue to do the D.C. | ||
| dance where we act like this isn't something that continues to happen and that three clean C.R.s hasn't already passed under this leadership. | ||
| Congressman, what can the audience do to help you in your crusade to make sure that this CR doesn't pass? | ||
| Is it calling their representatives? | ||
| Are there any members in particular that they need to single out? | ||
| What's your suggestion? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, it's certainly getting out. | |
| Look, we know for a fact that the 435 members up here shouldn't be dictating to the American people. | ||
| It's the call to arms where everyone basically gets on the phone and starts actually reaching out to the representative to say, hey, this is my concern and this is what I've heard. | ||
| Don't be tricked into thinking that the SAVE Act has not been passed already. | ||
| It was July 10th. | ||
| Don't be convinced that this CR is somehow going to give us another fight at the Apple after the president comes in. | ||
| This is the problems that we keep kicking the can and this frivolous out of control spending which has now got us at 36 trillion dollars. | ||
| I want to just bring something up Natalie. | ||
| This is the first time in American history as a result of our debt that we're going to spend more money in servicing the interest payments on our debt than we'll spend in our entire national defense spending. | ||
| With this CR, we're going to spend $3 billion a day just in our interest payments alone. | ||
| America cannot sustain this way, and if we want to continue to be the America who has prosperity, the shining beacon on the hill, or the area that we're at And Congressman, just give me two minutes on what is, I think, the glaring hypocrisy of the Afghanistan report being released, obviously way too late, but yesterday, and then in the same breath, your colleagues wanting to continue to fund that radical America Last government. | ||
| That has blood on their hands, quite literally. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, that's exactly right. | |
| And I hope that we never forget the 13 brave heroes who sacrificed their lives. | ||
| You know, this is the Harris administration with Biden at the, you know, eating ice cream, sniffing children moment in the basement that has continued to try and run away from this because they know that this blood is on their hands. | ||
| I'm not going to continue to fund them at the levels that they're requesting so they | ||
| can continue to do harm, or they can continue to utilize lawfare of the Department of Injustice, | ||
| or they can continue to allow Secretary Blinken, who we had to almost hold in contempt of the | ||
| Congress, to release the 23 cable dissent members that was telling and warning months | ||
| and months ago that the strategy they're using is going to get American lives killed. | ||
| So we need to get accountability. | ||
| And I can tell you that while the report is great, a report is not accountability. | ||
| I have not seen a single person from the DOD removed who has actually lost their rank or anyone from the State Department who's been removed. | ||
| A mea culpa, my fault, my sorry, my bad. | ||
| I'll take responsibility. | ||
| It's not accountability. | ||
| Until we get someone who loses their job and loses their commission and is held responsible in the real way, Then it's not true accountability, and I apologize to the 13 Gold Star families that we haven't done enough to get the true accountability they deserve, but I'm going to continue to fight, and you can guarantee that. | ||
| Yeah, when Nancy Pelosi caught wind of Trump's call with Zelensky over Ukraine aid, I don't think they put out a 300-page report. | ||
| They prematurely impeached him, right? | ||
| That's how Nancy Pelosi operates. | ||
| Congressman, if people want to follow you, stay up to date with everything you're working on, especially the CR, that fight, where can they go to do all that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, you know, very similar to my colleague, Keith Self, you can go to my house.gov website to sign up for our newsletter, which is Battlefield to Beltway. | |
| We can also go to at Cory Mills FL on X or Rep Mills Press. | ||
| You can follow me on Truth at Mills for Florida. | ||
| And again, this is about we the people, not we the government. | ||
| We have to come together and start putting America first. | ||
| And that's what this is about. | ||
| And that's what my entire office is about. | ||
| I think it's battlefield to battlefield. | ||
| It's just the enemy looks a little bit different, right? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Battlefield to beltway. | |
| I mean, at least on the battlefield, you know which enemy is fighting and shooting at you. | ||
| Here, it seems like it comes from all directions. | ||
| Indeed, Congressman. | ||
| Thank you for joining us. | ||
| We'll have you back on soon. | ||
| Of course. | ||
| It's an insult to our intelligence, Speaker Johnson. | ||
| I'm looking right at you. | ||
| We're not going to fall for your shiny toy that is the SAVE Act. | ||
| It already passed. | ||
| We don't have to attach it. | ||
| And by the way, Joe Biden has already come out saying he'd veto it anyways. | ||
| The Senate's not going to do anything about it. | ||
| So don't cheapen what is the most important issue in America today, that is election integrity, just so you can make your lobbyists, your paymasters, your donors, the establishment that you represent, happy, laughing all the way to their banks, their offshore banks, probably their islands too. | ||
| Did I just go there? | ||
| Yes, I did. | ||
| We'll be right back after the break with Ed Dowd. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Vance. | |
| Welcome back to The War Room, where you guys better be calling your members of Congress | ||
| That's 202-225-3121, if I'm remembering correctly. | ||
| And maybe while you're at it, also check out Public Square. | ||
| You guys know it's America's marketplace for companies that don't hate you. | ||
| Stop giving your money to people that hate you. | ||
| And don't let people who hate you steal your home, your personal data. | ||
| That's hometitlelock.com, promo code BAN, and they have some wonderful Deal's going on now, just in time for the election, when a big cyber pandemic, big cybersecurity stuff is coming, according to the World Economic Forum. | ||
| Speaking of the World Economic Forum and our globalist sociopathic overlords... | ||
| Sorry, the experts, my bad. | ||
| Yesterday was the three-year anniversary of Joe Biden rolling out his COVID mandates. | ||
| That's not lost on anyone, especially this audience, this show. | ||
| We're joined now by Ed Dowd. | ||
| Ed Dowd, I'd love to sort of get your reflections on this three-year anniversary, but really also just sort of a general summary, too, of where your work stands on exposing the lies of the vaccine industry when it comes to the COVID-19 jab. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| Thanks for having me on, Natalie. | ||
| Let's just start with the grand point that we're three years from the COVID mandates, and the COVID mRNA vaccines are still being touted by the CDC. | ||
| They haven't been recalled. | ||
| There's evidence everywhere they cause massive amounts of death, disabilities, and injuries. | ||
| So at this point, you know, the genocide, the government genocide that I talked about on your show three years ago continues. | ||
| And you know it should have ended then. | ||
| There was enough evidence from theirs alone. | ||
| Then the insurance companies and then it started to roll into all cause mortality and the disability numbers. | ||
| There's there's databases everywhere all over the globe that shows something happened in 2021. | ||
| And it's off the charts. | ||
| And at this point it's kind of it's kind of a joke. | ||
| It really is. | ||
| And the problem is that there are so many people that have their hands in the pie. | ||
| We had tech companies censoring on behalf of the government getting paid. | ||
| We had media getting money from Pfizer. | ||
| We had the medical establishment getting covered bucks. | ||
| And it just it's something. | ||
| And then we have the Fortune 500 companies and most of American companies mandated this thing. | ||
| So everybody kind of wants to memory hole this. | ||
| And it's one of the biggest national tragedies that's going to stay with us for years. | ||
| And it continues. | ||
| The good news is excess deaths have moderated. | ||
| They're down from the peak that I highlighted yesterday in my tweet in a group like policy cohort of 80 percent millennials excess death in the third quarter. | ||
| of 2021 when the mandates were rolled out. | ||
| And that, for me, was the smoking gun evidence. | ||
| We were running around 20, 25 percent going into that. | ||
| You had mandates that pulled forward all the vaccine-hesitant millennials and the, you know, or lazy millennials, and they all ran to go get their jabs to keep their jobs. | ||
| And we saw that spike. | ||
| This is kind of, for me, been a just a sad story of watching inaction by all the government branches. | ||
| Well, and speaking of the government lying, I'm sure it comes as no surprise to this audience, they're still doing it. | ||
| Janet Yellen coming out very recently saying that she doesn't see any red lights, any bad indicators about the state of the economy. | ||
| An interesting fact I saw today, 452 large companies have now declared bankruptcy year to date. | ||
| That's the second highest number. | ||
| In the last 14 years, I could rattle off statistics to take us to the end of the show, but I'd rather just get your sort of synopsis of just some of the worst indicators, whether it's the bond market, S&P, tech stocks, you name it, but where you think we stand on the sort of economic front right now. | ||
| Yeah, you know, Janet Yellen made that comment. | ||
| I saw it. | ||
| It was an eerie comment out of nowhere. | ||
| Everything's fine. | ||
| Everything's fine. | ||
| It literally brings me back to Hank Paulson in 2007-8 saying the subprime would be contained. | ||
| He was Treasury Secretary under Bush. | ||
| It's like same vibes, same vibes, right before, you know, the rug pull financially is going to happen. | ||
| Let's talk about the lies to government, not only on the vaccines. | ||
| They're fraudulently making up employment numbers. | ||
| We had last month the largest revision down since the Great Financial Crisis, when things were chaotic and it was hard to, like, count. | ||
| This is literally a $850,000 revision down in the year. | ||
| And everyone was anybody that could look at the numbers knew that was coming. | ||
| So it's been fraudulent numbers. | ||
| And then in the last payroll number that came out August the headline number was good but they revised July and June down huge. | ||
| And the markets are finally catching on to this that the numbers are fraudulent. | ||
| And the markets reacted badly on Friday. | ||
| They're bouncing the next day or two. | ||
| But what we see coming is not good. | ||
| We were predicting last year, if you remember, a recession in the second half of 23. | ||
| Unfortunately, we were wrong. | ||
| But we figured out why we were wrong. | ||
| The government ramped up government spending. | ||
| So deficit spending is on the rise. | ||
| Illegal immigration, believe it or not. | ||
| Illegal and legal immigration added a ton to the GDP. | ||
| And also the Federal Reserve lending money to banks that are underwater for a year also helped. | ||
| The problem is we've got to bounce from our economic indicators up to right below the zero line and above the zero lines economic expansion. | ||
| So all it did is kind of kick the can down the road. | ||
| That juice ran out. | ||
| In March, and we've been rolling down ever since in our economic indicators into this month, which is lower than every previous month. | ||
| So there's bad news on the horizon, not to mention the most controversial election in our lifetimes, which is pausing all business investment. | ||
| No one's making a decision until they see who's going to be in power. | ||
| There's a buyer strike going on on Wall Street. | ||
| I was talking to some hedge fund guys who invest big dollars Certainly not. | ||
| Ed Dowd, if people want to follow you, stay up to date with all of your economic analysis, where can they go to do that? | ||
| the election. So we're going to see I think a market correction into October. That will favor Trump. I don't | ||
| think they can hold up and put lipstick on this pig too much longer. The | ||
| truth is coming out. | ||
| Certainly not. Ed Dowd if people want to follow you stay up to date with all of your economic analysis where can they | ||
|
unidentified
|
go to do that. You can see all our vaccine research at the | |
| humanity projects dot info. Our economic research is at finance | ||
| technologies dot com with a pH. | ||
| I'm on Twitter at Doud Edward, D-O-W-D Edward, and Getter at Edward Doud. | ||
| Doud, happy three years. | ||
| Of course, kidding. | ||
| Thank you for joining us. | ||
| We'll have you back on soon. | ||
| Thank you so much. | ||
| I feel like the Grim Reaper of death, but that's what I've been up to. | ||
| How about this? | ||
| Next time you come on, you can try to bring us some good news. | ||
| How about that? | ||
| I'll try to bring some good news and some good analysis. | ||
| I think one piece of good news is if the market's correct into October, that favors Trump tremendously. | ||
| There you go. | ||
| In a strange way, you want to see the markets kind of wobble into October. | ||
| Ed Dodd, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| You know, you can now legally bet on elections here, thanks to the firm Kalshi. | ||
| Fun fact. | ||
| Another fun fact, we're joined by, should we say MSNBC's least favorite person? | ||
| Maybe most favorite. | ||
| I think they're kind of obsessed with you, Mike Davis. | ||
| Before we get your commentary, let's roll this clip. | ||
| Last night, Denver, let's play it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Laura and Don McGahn are all the way over here on the right. | |
| What is on the other side? | ||
| There's an individual by the name of Mike Davis, and I was talking to Mike Davis earlier today. | ||
| He used to be a Grassley aide. | ||
| He is somebody who is running a conservative legal group that is aligned with Donald Trump, very close with the likes of Steve Bannon and others. | ||
| Don Jr. | ||
| has floated him openly. | ||
| Don Jr., who picked J.D. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Vance, is still nominating people? | |
| It said that he should be a good acting attorney general, somebody that could in the first months execute on what would be those vast indictments. | ||
| I was talking with Mike Davis earlier. | ||
| He said he doesn't believe he could constitutionally be the acting attorney general, but there are individuals who could. | ||
| And Mike Davis told me that, as an example, that Democrats need to be prepared for, again I keep coming to this conspiracy charge, that could come out of Fort Pierce. | ||
| Because, as Mike Davis tells me, you had the search warrant execution by the FBI at Mar-a-Lago, which Donald Trump has claimed was unlawful. | ||
| You could go and have somebody as an acting attorney general go and seek this indictment out of Fort Pierce, Where you could potentially have a more favorable jury pool, favorable to Donald Trump. | ||
| And in that conspiracy indictment, you could loop in the likes of Fannie Willis, Matthew Colangelo, Alvin Bragg. | ||
| Really, and I was talking to a legal ethics professor out of NYU a few moments ago. | ||
| He told me it doesn't take much to get an indictment, as we know, right? | ||
| That's enough Von Hilliard for me. | ||
| We're joined now by the individual named Mike Davis. | ||
| I just have to add real quick, they purposely try to dehumanize you with the way that they frame you, right? | ||
| You're not Mike Davis, it's an individual named Mike Davis. | ||
| But Mike Davis, can you walk us through your response? | ||
| Should they be scared? | ||
| I would say this. | ||
| Gingers are used to being dehumanized, and so we're the lowest people on the totem pole. | ||
| They're giving surgeries to transgender migrants. | ||
| We don't get anything as gingers, so I'm perfectly used to it. | ||
| But I would say this. | ||
| It's kind of hilarious that when I troll the left and use the same charges that they're using against President Trump and supporters, 18 U.S.C. | ||
| Section 241 Conspiracy Against Rights, if you conspire to violate constitutional rights. | ||
| And then if we take it to a very favorable jurisdiction, the Democrats did it in D.C., we can do it down in Fort Pierce, Florida, and you can indict us. | ||
| A ham sandwich is what they essentially just said on MSNBC, meaning you can indict someone pretty easily and put them through hell. | ||
| I mean, what do they think that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris and Merrick Garland and Jack Smith and Jay Bratz and Alvin Bragg and Matthew Colangelo and Big Tish James and Big Fanny Willis and Nathan Wade and these other lawfare Democrats have been doing against President Trump? | ||
| His top aides like Peter DeVaro, who went to prison, Steve Bannon, who's still in prison, his attorneys, Jeff Clark, John Eastman, Rudy Giuliani, many others, his supporters on January 6th. | ||
| What the hell do they think Biden and Kamala have been doing to our side for non-crimes, for fake crimes? | ||
| And what they're actually doing is a real crime. | ||
| It's really a conspiracy against rights to politicize and weaponize our intel agencies and justice systems at every level in DC, New York City, Albany, Atlanta, Phoenix, Arizona. | ||
| It's just all over the place. | ||
| It's unrelenting what these Democrats, these Biden Kamala Democrats have done to Trump and his supporters. | ||
| And so why do they act like it's just so far ahead of left field that this could actually happen to them? | ||
| And real quick, Mike, just give me a minute your thoughts on this CR in terms of continuing to fund this law fair. | ||
| Your thoughts on sort of the SAVE Act CR split. | ||
| Well, I strongly support the SAVE Act because if we let non-citizens vote in our federal elections and don't verify, it's already illegal for them to vote, as they say. | ||
| So why the hell do they object to verifying? | ||
| And the reason is obvious. | ||
| If they don't want to verify that non-citizens are illegally voting, then they want non-citizens to illegally vote. | ||
| And we've caught that. | ||
| We've caught that in Texas, for example, where Texas Governor Greg Abbott has found thousands of non-citizens who have illegally registered to vote and nearly 2,000 non-citizens who have voted. | ||
| So I think it's critically important that we force the SAVE Act to get passed. | ||
| And if we have to shut down the government to do it, do it. | ||
| Because if we let non-citizens vote, we're going to lose our country anyway. | ||
| Mike Davis, if people want to follow you, Article 3 Project, real quick, where can they go to get all that? | ||
| Article3project.org. | ||
| Article3project.org. | ||
| You can donate there, take action on the SAVE Act, and follow us on social media. | ||
| And thank you, Natalie. | ||
| Thank you, sir. | ||
| And Warren Posse, you know they put Steve Bannon in prison because they wanted to shut down this show. | ||
| And as much as it was Democrats and the Biden regime, it was establishment Republicans, like Speaker Mike Johnson, who basically did nothing until the 11th hour and still not a lot of substance going on there. | ||
| You know why they did that? | ||
| They wanted to try to shut this audience up, which is why. | ||
| For the sake of Steve and what the hell he is having to go through in Connecticut, the fact that they tried to silence this audience and silence Stephen K. Bannon and Peter Navarro, I really hope, I urge you guys to call your members of Congress in honor of Steve. | ||
| That's 202-225-3121. | ||
| If you've never done it, instead of writing Steve a letter like he says, make a call in his honor. | ||
| You guys are always asking me, give me something to do. | ||
| Say no on the CR. | ||
| We're not funding. | ||
| BS Biden regime any longer. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We'll be right back after the break. | |
| Welcome back to The War Room. | ||
| Now, the Biden regime, they seem to have a penchant for lying and maybe an addiction to revising jobs reports. | ||
| We know there was, of course, what was it, 800 and some odd thousand jobs that, oh, sorry, we lied to you. | ||
| They never actually existed. | ||
| Well, they just revised that jobs report again today, lowering it by an additional 86,000 jobs. | ||
| Again, that's the second time for the June report. | ||
| Now, six out of the seven last jobs reports they've put out, they've had to revise to lower the numbers. | ||
| And if you broaden it out to the last 15 reports, of those 11 of them, they've had to revise and lower. | ||
| I say it's intentional. | ||
| We always know it's not incompetence when it comes to the Biden regime. | ||
| But we're talking about millions in job revisions over the last Two years alone. | ||
| Philip Patrick knows a little something about that. | ||
| You guys are always, of course, tracking this over at Birchgold. | ||
| But Philip Patrick, I'd love to just get your thoughts on these staggering numbers. | ||
| Yeah, of course. | ||
| And it's it's just a consistent theme with this administration. | ||
| So June and July labor reports, they overstated jobs by 86,000. | ||
| That's again why anyone would trust anything coming out of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. | ||
| At this point, though, it is just surprising. | ||
| They've already, as you mentioned, it was about 900,000 plus overstatement of jobs over the last year and they've been | ||
| doing it consistently. | ||
| As I've said before, this goes some way to explaining this massive disconnect between | ||
| the Biden administration and the American people. They've been telling us for years now | ||
| how good the economy is, how we should not be trusting our reality. | ||
| Just look at the numbers and sure enough, the numbers turn out to be nonsense. | ||
| But like I said, it's very, very dangerous. | ||
| People, the Federal Reserve, institutions have to make decisions based on numbers and the numbers coming out of this administration are an absolute nonsense. | ||
| There's an interesting Reuters article out today. | ||
| The headline, U.S. | ||
| election is just one risk among many for nervous stock market. | ||
| We, of course, know the World Economic Forum, our globalist elites, are planning something, a pandemic, a cyber pandemic, whatever it may be, mail-in balloting. | ||
| But as you look, as we barrel towards this election, how do you think that's also going to impact the stock market? | ||
| Look, it is not going to be smooth sailing between between now and the election, and it will be by design, whether it's a pandemic where we get another outbreak of monkeypox, something is going to happen. | ||
| We know the Fed are going to meet later this month. | ||
| They're going to drop interest rates, the hope being it'll give some stimulus to the markets, drive it up to make, you know, the administration look good heading into November. | ||
| My, you know, The only hope I have is that the Fed are very, very bad when it comes to lowering interest rates and preventing recession every single time they are too late. | ||
| I agree with Edward Dowd. | ||
| I think we're going to see some volatility in the market, some downside between now and the election. | ||
| I think it will benefit Trump's campaign. | ||
| Really excited for the debates tonight. | ||
| Kamala is weak on the economy, and I think that's where Trump will shine. | ||
| Philip Patrick, if people want to get in touch with you guys and the team over at Birchgold, hit the audience one more time. | ||
| Where can they go to do that? | ||
| Very simple. | ||
| Birchgold.com forward slash Bannon. | ||
| Again, Birchgold.com forward slash Bannon. | ||
| That'll get them access to a free information kit, really good information on how and why to invest in precious metals. | ||
| And then you can reach me directly at Philip Patrick on Getter. | ||
| Philip Patrick, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| Thanks, Natalie. | ||
| Just a little fun fact, when you guys doubt the efficacy of the War Room Posse. | ||
| Remember who we focused on yesterday, Mike Rogers of Alabama? | ||
| Yeah, the same guy who cares more about Ukraine's borders than his own, because his district is getting overwhelmed with Haitian refugees from who knows where. | ||
| Can't track them. | ||
| Well, he's actually come out, believe it or not, against the CR, probably the most ossified swamp creature that exists in the history of that institution. | ||
| That shows you a little bit of war room pressure. | ||
| You can convert people. | ||
| We're all into the zeal of a convert here in the war room. | ||
| That's why you guys got to make sure you're calling 202-225-3121 with the message being Biden said he'll veto the SAVE Act. | ||
| The Senate could have passed it if they actually cared about it. | ||
| So even if you pass the CR, all you're going to get, even if you pass it with the SAVE Act, all you're going to get is the CR. | ||
| No CR. | ||
| No more funding the radical agenda of the Biden regime. | ||
| No more funding the same DHS that is flooding American towns full of refugees from countries that we don't even want to know what's going on there. | ||
| Who's profiting? | ||
| Well, we do here in the War Room, but the mainstream media certainly doesn't. | ||
| We're not giving a single penny more, whether it's the DOJ, DHS, any of that. | ||
| We don't care about government shutdowns here, because that very same government is the same government that's weaponizing against us and waging economic warfare. | ||
| Just listen to what our last two guests had to say. | ||
| Someone who I think knows a little bit. | ||
| Just a little bit about economic warfare, lawfare, and election integrity, the convergence of everything we've discussed on today's show is the one and only Mike Lindell, who joins us now. | ||
| Mike, you have arguably the best deal I think you've ever had. | ||
| Wholesale pricing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
In history. | |
| Absolutely in history, you guys. | ||
| You wouldn't believe it, but a couple weeks ago we got this huge order from a box store, and I'm all excited. | ||
| Hey, the box stores are back! | ||
| Well, this box store went bankrupt on Monday, and so we have thousands of the pillows we made here for them, and we're going to give them to you. | ||
| The War Room Posse exclusive. | ||
| I announced it this morning. | ||
| For $14.98. | ||
| This is a blowout sale exclusive for the War Room. | ||
| This is a wholesale pricing. | ||
| This is what they were paying. | ||
| So you guys are getting these for wholesale. | ||
| They canceled this. | ||
| Of course, it wasn't their fault. | ||
| But once they're gone, they're gone. | ||
| It's a limit of 10. | ||
| you guys for it so i want everybody to get get part of this promo code war room you see these are normally 49.98 they're on sale 29.98 this is what the whole what the box store was paying 14.98 so war room special the biggest special in the history of my pillow And it happens to be one my employees were very proud to make over the last couple weeks and gotten us back real busy. | ||
| And then here we have them back. | ||
| So you can take advantage of this. | ||
| Go to the website. | ||
| You see it's the first square there, the blowout sale. | ||
| Limited time. | ||
| Once they're gone, they're gone. | ||
| And we have the new product there, those dishcloths. | ||
| You guys get on those. | ||
| $19.99. | ||
| That's a War Room exclusive. | ||
| A lot of new products came in you got to check out too. | ||
| And the bathrobes are on sale. | ||
| That's a War Room exclusive. | ||
| Check out the closeout and overstock. | ||
| We actually added a few things to that. | ||
| You save up to 80%. | ||
| Another War Room exclusive. | ||
| With this, we are breaking records. | ||
| I told Steve we're going to break records. | ||
| And what is it, Natalie? | ||
| It's a win, win, win, win. | ||
| You guys call 800-873-1062. | ||
| My employees are so excited for this sale. | ||
| All the call center reps keep them busy. | ||
| They work off commission. | ||
| And they are very happy that we have a product that everybody's diving on this morning. | ||
| We are so happy that we can do this. | ||
| It's a War Room exclusive, and it's the lowest price in history for any MyPillow ever. | ||
| And we've got, once they're gone, they're gone. | ||
| They'll limit 10, you guys. | ||
| It's very exciting. | ||
| I mean, it's like making lemon into lemonade. | ||
| That box store, we feel bad for them, but their loss is your gain, everybody. | ||
| The power of the War Room Posse. | ||
| Mike Lindell, we'll see you back here tomorrow. | ||
| That's right. | ||
| God bless you. | ||
| See y'all. | ||
| Warren Posse, you've got to make sure you tune into the show tomorrow. | ||
| I didn't have time to get to it today, but I'm going to be walking you through a new, very concerning story. | ||
| You thought the pandemic treaty was bad? | ||
| How about globalists using the foreign election interference narrative to put together a similar style treaty so all the countries in the world can collaborate together to work against foreign election interference, which always seems to come After populist candidates, no conspiracies, no coincidences. | ||
| Denver, real quick, let's throw up that picture of that CBS News graphic. | ||
| They're already warning you, quote, experts worry the inexperience of new supervisors could lead to mistakes. | ||
| When it comes to election results, those mistakes always seem to go one way. | ||
| We're gonna get into this and so much more. | ||
| I told you guys they were gonna use that narrative. | ||
| Say MAGA's driving election officials. | ||
| We have shortages. | ||
| Trump is scaring all these election officials. | ||
| They're resigning. | ||
| Now we're going to have election mistakes. | ||
| That's called predictive programming. | ||
| Get used to it. | ||
| Buckle up. | ||
| What are we, 55 days out from the election and they're already saying there's going to be mistakes? | ||
| Yeah, buckle up for the pandemic, the cyber pandemic, the cybersecurity attacks, you name it. | ||
| Love to see how all those Haitian refugees in Springfield, Ohio, love to see who they're going to be voting for. |
Export Selection