Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
them in jail because we don't want them back. | ||
Sometimes you have to put them in jail because their country doesn't want them back. | ||
They'll send them back the way they do. | ||
Just so you know, I know all of the people that we're dealing with as the heads of countries, and they're very smart. | ||
They're very streetwise. | ||
And what they're doing is they're taking all of their criminals, and they haven't brought all of them yet. | ||
They brought a lot of them, though. | ||
But they'll bring all of them. I'm shocked it's taken so long. If I were in their country, | ||
it would have gotten a lot faster. I will tell you that I would have gotten that too. | ||
And they're bringing them into the United States. They're taking their drug dealers and their | ||
rapists, murderers and every criminal, bringing them into the United States. And their crime rates | ||
are way down. They're bringing people from mental institutions and insane asylums into the United | ||
States. | ||
And their population for the mentally ill is way down. | ||
They're in the United States. | ||
They're dumping them in the United States. | ||
They're driving them through a border that's totally open. | ||
We stopped them. | ||
We didn't let it happen. | ||
And when I first came into office, you know the story that President Obama, at the time, Had no way of getting them back. | ||
And I said, I want to get all of the MS-13 in particular out of our country, bring them back to where they came from. | ||
A general said, sir, that won't be possible. | ||
unidentified
|
Why? | |
Because they blocked the airports. | ||
They blocked the roads. | ||
They blocked everything. | ||
You can't do it. | ||
I said, so they're making a concerted effort? | ||
Yes, sir. | ||
They're making a concerted effort. | ||
We can't do it. | ||
They put planes on the runway so we can't land the plane, sir. | ||
And the same thing with the roads. | ||
They block up the roads. | ||
So if we have buses coming in, they block up the roads. | ||
They're totally blocked, and they're terrible. | ||
It's been that way for years, sir, all the way back to Bush. | ||
It's been that way for years. | ||
And I said, well, how much do we pay them in terms of economic development and aid? | ||
Sir, we pay them $750 million. | ||
I said, that's okay. | ||
Call them immediately and tell them we're not paying them anymore. | ||
And the following morning, I got a call from the three main culprits. | ||
Sir, I'd like to speak to you because I don't understand what the problem is. | ||
I said, well, you've sent us gang members and they send them. | ||
Remember that they send them. | ||
They said, we sent, uh, you send us gang members, you send us killers and you send us drug dealers and you send us horrible people. | ||
And when we want to bring them back to your country, you won't accept them. | ||
And that's under President Obama and all the way through and therefore you're in default. | ||
You are in total default of the money that we send you and we're not going to send you the money anymore. | ||
You're not getting any of the $750 million and more. | ||
We're not giving you any. | ||
You are delinquent. | ||
You are delinquent in what you've done. | ||
And you're not getting a, sir, please, please, can we talk? | ||
I said, yeah, we could talk. | ||
What? | ||
We would absolutely love to have MS-13 sent back to our country. | ||
We think they're wonderful people. | ||
They're not wonderful people. | ||
They're wonderful killers. | ||
But they changed their tune totally when I said they weren't going to get the money. | ||
I don't know why these people don't do it. | ||
And the 750 million dollars now is billions of dollars because Biden increased it very substantially. | ||
He thinks by sending them money, they're going to send fewer people into our country. | ||
How stupid is that? | ||
So they're giving him two and a half, three billion dollars. | ||
The 750. | ||
Not only did he give it, I didn't even pay after they made the call because I said, you know, you've treated us badly for so many years. | ||
We're not going to pay you anyway. | ||
But now they've given them, they're giving them billions of dollars, billions, much more than when I took over, it was $750. | ||
Now they're giving them billions. | ||
But they said, there must be an understanding, sir, we would love to take them back. | ||
And I said, well, you're going to get them back. | ||
And we started bringing them back by the thousands out of Long Island, out of Michigan, out of Ohio, by the thousands. | ||
And she compared ICE agencies, brave people to the KKK. | ||
She said, the ICE people, the ICE agents, I compare them to the KKK. | ||
Well, they don't really because you know, when you see when you go into like Long Island, like Ohio, like Michigan, we had a lot of them. | ||
And you see these men, most cases, men, the agents get out of a van. | ||
And walk into, they call it a pack. | ||
It's a pack. | ||
Not like a political pack, slightly different. | ||
Even nastier. | ||
Even nastier. | ||
Hard to believe, right? | ||
But they would go into a pack of these killers. | ||
And all you do, I've seen it so many times, all you do is see fists and feet and hands and fighting. | ||
Two minutes later, they stand up and they walk out. | ||
They have them by the feet. | ||
They walk them out. | ||
Or they drag them out, mostly drag them out, put them in paddy wagons, and they bring them back to their country. | ||
They take them back to the country, and the country is open arms now, open arms. | ||
And it's an amazing thing for her to say KKK is very unfair, but she doesn't know. | ||
She doesn't want to know. | ||
Very strong communist lean. | ||
She wants to end detention of illegal alien migrants, releasing vicious monsters into our communities to rape, maim and murder our population. | ||
She endorsed the funding the police and no cash bailed nationwide. | ||
She was the original no funder. | ||
And the only thing Kamala Harris can deliver is horrific inflation, massive crime and the death of the American dream. | ||
She is in favor of the death of the American dream because everything she does really stops. | ||
Any one of these items stops the American dream. | ||
We want our youth to go back and dream of being successful. | ||
Someday being really successful and employing lots of people and you can't get up early enough. | ||
I gave up that life for a life of politics. | ||
I gave up this, all of this, these beautiful places that I have all over the world for a life of being abused by the fake news media. | ||
And yet I would do it again. | ||
Somebody asked me the other day, would you do it again? | ||
I said, absolutely. | ||
Why would you do it? | ||
Why would you put yourself through? | ||
They go after you. | ||
They weaponize government. | ||
You have to deal with crooked judges that are after you and crooked prosecutors. | ||
And these New York, the New York court system is vicious and totally biased and frankly, totally crooked. | ||
Why would you put yourself through? | ||
I said, because we're going to make America great again. | ||
That's what we're going to do. | ||
And it's, it's very important. | ||
So when I win, I will immediately bring prices down starting on day one. | ||
We will end Kamala's war on American energy and we will drill baby drill. | ||
We're going to drill baby drill. | ||
That's going to bring down prices of everything because energy brought it up when they went away from my policy. | ||
They quickly went back to it. | ||
But by that time, it was too late. | ||
They lost control. | ||
But they've gone back to it. | ||
And if they win the day after victory, they'll stop with all the drilling. But they went | ||
back to it because prices were going through the roof. They were going really bad. And | ||
that's what caused our inflation. | ||
And that's what destroyed the lives of many Americans. | ||
But a reduced energy and electricity prices, I will buy at least half within a 12 month | ||
period. We'll be able to reduce prices between regulation and having a tremendous supply, | ||
which we have. I always say we have more liquid gold under our feet more than any other nation | ||
anywhere in the world, including Saudi Arabia and including Russia. We're going to terminate | ||
the green new scam. | ||
It's called the Green New Deal. | ||
It's a scam. | ||
And rescind all unspent funds. | ||
We're going to rescind that and pay off debt. | ||
And we're going to reduce debt. | ||
We took almost $10 trillion for nonsense, for absolute nonsense. | ||
We'll do bridges. | ||
We'll do roads. | ||
We'll do things that we need. | ||
But we're not going to be spending it and wasting it stupidly and have China laugh at us. | ||
I remember when, just a short while ago, Kerry goes, hops in his private plane, flies to China. | ||
To talk about the energy prices and the energy situation in China with President Xi, who I know very well, had a very good relationship until COVID came in. | ||
But that was a that was a fence too far. | ||
But we had a great relationship. | ||
And Kerry would go up there and he'd leave so happy. | ||
But they didn't they don't do anything. | ||
They just talk. | ||
They said, oh, yeah, we're going to do that. | ||
Oh, as soon as we get to it. | ||
In the meantime, they're building a coal plant every week. | ||
But now I hear it's two coal plants a week. | ||
And we're dying for energy. | ||
We don't have energy. | ||
And they're getting set for the A.I. | ||
because they're going to create so much electricity. | ||
And we're not going to be able to do it. | ||
But you'll do it if I have it, because that's an emergency. | ||
We have to be able to compete with China and other countries that are able to create new energy if they want to. | ||
And they're going to want to. | ||
And they do want to. | ||
But they're building at least one coal plant a week. | ||
Germany, as you know, went a little bit like us. | ||
And that was the end of Angola because their whole economy crashed and their new government is building coal | ||
plants all over the place. They're building brand new coal plants, nuclear | ||
plants and other things because Germany was going to fail. So why are we following | ||
these countries that tried it and failed? And they're smart countries. They | ||
tried it, they failed. Why are we doing this? Why aren't we creating great energy | ||
plants, great sources of Instead of playing this game with wind that is ruining everything, killing all your birds, destroying the fields, all these gorgeous fields. | ||
You got windmills all over the place and you have birds. | ||
You want to see a bird cemetery? | ||
Just go under a windmill. | ||
You see thousands of birds dead. | ||
The bald eagle, if you kill an eagle, they put you in jail for years. | ||
And yet these windmills knock them out like nothing. | ||
And nothing happens to the people. | ||
Now, it's a green scam. | ||
It's a shame. | ||
Look, I'm all for clean energy. | ||
I want clean water. | ||
I want clean air. | ||
But you can't destroy your country over it. | ||
You just can't do that. | ||
We want to stop wasteful spending and big government special interest giveaways. | ||
You have giveaways. | ||
You have some of these people that are giving. | ||
Look, they're not giving. | ||
Millions and millions of dollars to politicians because they like their policy. | ||
They're giving it because they made deals. | ||
They're going to take over lots of different things in our country. | ||
They're going to build windmills as an example. | ||
They're going to build Big solar fields that take up half the desert. | ||
Massive solar fields. | ||
And I'm a big fan of solar, but it can't fire our plants. | ||
It's not going to fire our plants. | ||
Fire up those plants. | ||
We've got to get them going. | ||
And the only thing that can do that is fossil fuel right now. | ||
And the only thing that can make electricity, which we all want, is right now fossil fuel and nuclear. | ||
And nuclear has its place, a very big place in our country. | ||
Very big place. | ||
China is going with nuclear. | ||
France has been going with nuclear for many years. | ||
We want to end the Biden-Harris electrical vehicle mandate. | ||
We have to get rid of the electric vehicle mandate. | ||
And look, Elon endorsed me strongly. | ||
Most powerful endorsed me. | ||
He said it three or four times the other night during our little chat. | ||
But A chat that was very well listened to and attended. | ||
We know that, right? | ||
Broke every single record, I think, in history. | ||
And he's a great guy. | ||
But I told him, I said, you know, I have one problem. | ||
I'm all for the electric car, but it's a very small percentage. | ||
I think the electric car is incredible. | ||
I think what you've done is incredible. | ||
But people are going to want, some people are going to want gasoline propelled cars. | ||
They're going to want hybrids. | ||
They're going to want other types of cars. | ||
And Elon, you know, They're going to have to do that, and he understands that fully. | ||
And I think he was amazed by this electric vehicle mandate. | ||
They want it for trucks, too. | ||
If you do it for trucks, you're not going to have any — you're talking about a supply chain problem. | ||
A truck going from New York to Los Angeles, if it's electric, will have to stop six times for long periods of time. | ||
If you have diesel fuel, it goes all the way, and you can even come a piece of the way back before you have to reload. | ||
And with diesel, the truck gets lighter because you're using up the fuel. | ||
With the electric, it stays at a heavy weight. | ||
An electric truck is two and a half times heavier than what we would call our traditional trucks. | ||
And a man from a company said to me, you know, sir, I've been buying trucks. | ||
For 50 years I've been buying them, and every single year they got better, and bigger, and stronger, and more powerful, and more efficient, more fuel efficient. | ||
And now we build apartments in the trucks, sir. | ||
And you would be proud to stay in those apartments. | ||
And then I say, I don't know if I would. | ||
But I know exactly what he meant. | ||
Those big, he said, it's incredible, the trucks. | ||
I said, who builds the best truck? | ||
He didn't tell me. | ||
He said, they all do. | ||
You have four companies, five companies, they all do, sir. | ||
They build great ones. | ||
But for 50 years they got better. | ||
Every year. | ||
I started off with one truck. | ||
I said, how many trucks do you have now? | ||
unidentified
|
27,000. | |
I said, 27,000? | ||
And all big ones. | ||
He's the biggest. | ||
This is the biggest. | ||
He said, for 50 years I've been buying and every single year they got better, more efficient, stronger. | ||
He said, if they make us buy electric trucks, we will go back 70 years because the truck is worse than the one we had 50 years ago. | ||
And he said, I won't be, I won't partake in it. | ||
They want people, they want the truckers, the trucking industry to do that. | ||
One other thing, the truck is heavier. | ||
And the battery is much larger than the tanks. | ||
And the battery would take up about half of the payload. | ||
Think of that. | ||
But just as importantly, the battery and all that goes into electric is much heavier. | ||
The truck is, it weighs two and a half times more than a normal truck fired up by diesel. | ||
And he said, if that's the case, sir, you would have to rebuild every single bridge and road in America because the weight is so enormous, it wouldn't be able to go on the bridges and all of the different weight-bearing roads in America. | ||
I said, did you explain this to the people? | ||
I mean, you know, a five-year-old child, if he was hearing these things, it doesn't go far, it takes too much room, you don't have any room left for anything, it's almost the whole thing would be carrying a battery. | ||
Does anybody explain this to these people? | ||
We do explain it, they know it very well. | ||
At the end of the meeting, they say, we don't care. | ||
Just start making your electric truck. | ||
We're not going to do it. | ||
We're not going to do it, he said. | ||
So we're going to repeal all that. | ||
We're going to repeal Kamala's regulatory onslaught, saving households an estimated $5,000 a year at a minimum. | ||
The massive tax cuts and no tax on tips. | ||
We're going to make sure it gets done. | ||
She's not going to get it done. | ||
She didn't hear about it until I said it and then she went out and she went and did it. | ||
Welcome to the war room. It's Natalie G Winters hosting today, Thursday, August 15th in the year | ||
of our Lord 2024. Give you a little bit of President Trump live speaking in Bedminster, | ||
I think our very own Jane Zirkle is there. | ||
I should probably ask him a question shortly, but we wanted to give you some signal, not noise here, too, in the war. | ||
And we got a good show lined up for you. | ||
We're joined first by Scott Besant, who had a star performance yesterday at Trump's rally in Pennsylvania. | ||
Thank you so much for joining us, Scott. | ||
Today I know you're on the show this morning, but there's obviously a lot of discussion. | ||
I don't even like to use the term price controls. | ||
That's too euphemistic, but defending price gouging coming from the Harris campaign. | ||
But can you kind of walk us through historically how that really is such a dangerous approach to take for the issue of inflation, which up until recently I thought we weren't even actually dealing with per the Biden regime's official stance. | ||
Well, good. | ||
Good, thanks for having me again, because there's so much to talk about | ||
and so much to unpack. | ||
And first... | ||
We know Vice President Harris was 10 feet away. | ||
So, you know, this, this is the Harris economy. | ||
And why is it that 90 days before the election, she's going to start with these Soviet style, you know, command and control policies. | ||
And, you know, as you said, the history of these things is they never work. | ||
They, They result in empty shelves, higher costs for everybody, worse products. | ||
And just look, why did the Soviet Union fall apart? | ||
Why did all the Iron Curtain satellites fall apart? | ||
Their crowning achievement was building a Lada as a car. | ||
Look at what's going on in Venezuela. | ||
Venezuela was One of the richest countries in the world and then they resorted to a central planned economy, price controls, and I was looking at a graph today and as soon as they implemented the price controls, guess what happened? | ||
Prices went straight up. | ||
I've been fortunate in my lifetime To spend time in Argentina, but it's been an unfortunate time for Argentina that the shelves are empty when you go into stores. | ||
People buy milk in the morning because it's more expensive in the afternoon. | ||
This is what price controls do. | ||
No one's incented for the productivity gains. | ||
No one's incented to build new stores. | ||
Look what we've got in the Democratic We've got food deserts. | ||
We've got, you know, chain stores closing. | ||
So, the poorest segment of society are now having to pay the highest prices because chains are pulling out. | ||
And, you know, companies will close. | ||
Grocery stores run on very thin margins. | ||
And, you know, of all people, of all entities, the San Francisco Fed, and I promise you, they are not known for Well, Scott, I think it's so curious. | ||
politics of the San Francisco fed they did a big study and | ||
they said. That absolutely price gouging did not. The | ||
cause the Biden Harris inflation. Well it's got it I | ||
think it's so curious I mean. | ||
To push price gouging now the efficacy of that you know | ||
approach aside it's purely a political move and I think it | ||
sort of begs the question. You know why did you wait. Kamala | ||
until you were were running for elections the president to do | ||
anything. Meaningful to counteract inflation let alone | ||
let alone take probably the most ill-advised approach to do so. | ||
But when you sort of look more holistically at all of the economic policies, as you pointed out, Harris has been, you know, the wingman, if not sort of the driving force behind a lot of these decisions. | ||
Is it fair to say that the kind of economic path to just what is complete and utter misery that the Biden regime has set us on, not that it's intentional, but that there's almost, they're choosing to inflict this economic suffering and pain on the American people with just the horrible decisions that they're making. | ||
Well, look, I think it is intentional because it's intentional when you want big government. | ||
You know, they are about big government, the big regulation, And which causes big inflation. | ||
And you know what comes next? | ||
Big taxes. | ||
Look at California and Minnesota. | ||
California has the highest taxes in the country. | ||
Minnesota is the fifth highest. | ||
And both of those states are losing population. | ||
Losing population. | ||
And within the 50 states in the U.S., Red states are seeing an inflow. | ||
My home state of South Carolina, as a percent of population, has the most new people moving in. | ||
And that's through sensible regulation, low taxation, no taxation on Social Security, I might add, and a low cost of living because people are allowed to go about their business. | ||
This push For more intervention, this is the Californication of America. | ||
And if Vice President Harris and Governor Walz come in, you know, there's nowhere to go. | ||
They control all 50 states and they will turn it into the model of what they had. | ||
And they love this. | ||
But I think Joe Biden campaigned as Scranton Joe and then took off his mask and became one of the most radical presidents in terms of government policies, central planning, Soviet-style planning, and the American people were surprised. | ||
Kamala Harris starts out way on the left. | ||
And I don't think anyone is going to fall for this soft pedaling. | ||
I was in my car today and that 70s song from the Who, We Won't Be Fooled Again, was playing and the American people aren't going to be fooled again. | ||
And for people old enough like me, we've seen this 70s show. | ||
And this really is the 70s show. | ||
It's big government. | ||
It's intervention. | ||
It's the private sector in retreat. | ||
It's the malaise. | ||
You know, Donald Trump was prosperity at home, peace abroad. | ||
This is misery at home and chaos abroad. | ||
I'd say quite fitting for the WHO, of course, the WHO trying to roll out another pandemic too, double meaning there. | ||
But Scott, if people want to follow you, stay up to date with all of your analysis on the economy, I know they certainly trust you. | ||
Since President Trump does, where can they go to do all that? | ||
Sure. | ||
IR at KEYSQ.com. | ||
Thank you so much for joining us, Scott. | ||
We'll have you back on soon. | ||
Good to see you. | ||
Likewise. | ||
We should have Darren Beattie joining us next. | ||
As always, he has his finger on the pulse, maybe the trigger, of the DNC pipe bomb hoax. | ||
There's been some new developments. | ||
We'll also have Julie Kelly joining us shortly, but Darren has a hard out. | ||
So Darren, why don't you walk us through the latest on the front of the DNC Kamala pipe bomb hoax, the breaking news. | ||
Absolutely. | ||
Well, I'm thrilled to hear that you also have Julie Kelly on because she's done great work. | ||
And in fact, this is the occasion for this latest development as some truly remarkable footage that she was able to release that in context is even more explosive. | ||
So what is You know, I'll let her talk about that, but basically, more extensively, but basically, the footage, in my view, strongly supports the notion that the pipe bombs, which, according to the FBI, were planted the evening before, on January 5th, were more likely planted on the 6th, in fact, very shortly before they were conveniently discovered. | ||
And this has always been such a bizarre thing about the pipe bomb, in particular the DNC one, is that if the FBI story is correct, we're led to believe that someone planted a bomb. | ||
And if people go to revolver.news, go to Julie Kelly's report, We have very clear multiple photographs illustrating just how conspicuously out in the open this DNC pipe bomb was. | ||
And so from very early on, in fact, one of the things that was really a red flag about this whole pipe bomb story was how this bomb could have been lying out there in the open for nearly 17 hours. | ||
It wasn't stumbled upon by a random pedestrian. | ||
January 6th was a high foot traffic morning. | ||
So no pedestrians, no motorists. | ||
If you look closely, you'll notice that there's one of those D.C. | ||
municipal scooters parked right by those benches. | ||
Nobody using the scooters saw the pipe bomb. | ||
And then, you know, most miraculously or really suspiciously or damningly, depending on the way you want to look at it, The Secret Service itself, which we have now confirmed, we reported this for a long time, but we now confirmed on the basis of an OIG report that had been studiously suppressed by Mayorkas of Open Borders fame, we now know that the Secret Service did indeed do a sweep the morning of January 6th. | ||
That sweep involved not one, but two canine units and dogs, and we have video of this sweep. | ||
Did the dogs have COVID that day? | ||
So they missed it too. | ||
So basically everyone missed this DNC bomb, and yet just like the RNC bomb, it was discovered basically within a 15-minute time window that perfectly coincided with the already deeply suspicious and fed-saturated REIEP's orchestrated breach of the west perimeter of the Capitol. | ||
And so What are the chances it wouldn't be discovered for that long? | ||
Very small. | ||
Even if the Secret Service was in on it from the beginning and deliberately missed it in a sweep, that still leaves open the possibility that pedestrians could find it much earlier than intended and it would screw up that whole synchronicity because they blame the Ray Epps orchestrated breach on the pipe bombs. | ||
They're saying, oh, The officers just responding to the pipe bomb so we didn't have the resources and the material we needed to stave off that initial breach. | ||
So the synchronicity was critical and so critical, in fact, that Steve Sund, who is the former head of the Capitol Police, hypothesized, you know, the pipe bombs weren't planted to detonate. | ||
They were planted to be discovered and cause commotion right as the attack on the Capitol is happening. | ||
Which all sounds well and good. | ||
The only question that remains is the people who discovered these pipe bombs were not Trump supporters. | ||
One was Carlin Younger. | ||
A woman that I'm sure Julie will have something to say about and younger currently works for an organization called Pendulum, which does contract work for the government in order to track and presumably suppress or counteract. | ||
Disinformation narratives. | ||
So of all people, this kind of person was the one who conveniently stumbled upon the first pipe bomb. | ||
Then of course, barely 15 minutes later, of all people, it's a plainclothes Capitol Police officer who finds the second one at the DNC. | ||
And so The footage that Julie has presented to us, in my view, greatly reinforces the sense that these were planted much later on, and in fact maybe as late as 1250, which makes more sense because that's sort of mitigating the risk of some random person stumbling on it prematurely. | ||
So you plant it, and then you find it conveniently right after, and then you ensure the timing. | ||
You know, it really, I think, throws back to a report that we did on the surveillance footage from the DNC. | ||
You know, this is another interesting thing. | ||
From all this recent surveillance footage that we've seen that have come from the Capitol Police, this has a blind spot For the most part on the actual bench where the pipe bomb was. | ||
We know for a fact that the DNC's security cameras do not have that blind spot and that those were the cameras that the FBI used to present footage. | ||
But we proved years ago that this surveillance footage has not only been tampered with | ||
because the frame rate is super low, way lower than any kind of industry standard, | ||
we proved definitively that the FBI is withholding footage from a camera that we know that they have access to, | ||
whose angle would show definitively whether or not the person they say was the pipe bomber planted it | ||
when they say that he did the evening before. | ||
We proved that they're withholding that footage, which is weird because you think if only for propaganda purposes, they'd want the money shot footage of the guy actually planting the bomb down, but they divert from that. | ||
At a critical moment, why? | ||
Why not show us that? | ||
I think Julie Kelly's footage that suggests that they planted it much later gives us some clarification there. | ||
And that if indeed they planted it later, that would mean a lot of damning things, not the least of which is that the entire charade, the entire surveillance footage that the FBI has lauded as gospel is basically fake or staged. | ||
So It's really remarkable stuff. | ||
And Darren, I'm going to hold you through. | ||
We've got to jump to break, because I want to continue down on this. | ||
And like you said, we'll have Julie Kelly and Dr. Naomi Wolf joining us shortly. | ||
Until then, virtual.com slash Bannon, the latest installment of End of the Dalek Empire. | ||
unidentified
|
much more less. Great. He's your host Stephen K. Welcome back to the war room. | |
We're still joined by Dr. Darren J. Beatty, who is under attack. | ||
Can we say that? | ||
By everyone's favorite news guard. | ||
A moment of silence for our fellow Americans who have to work at that company. | ||
I could only imagine if that were my life. | ||
We like it in the war room much better. | ||
But Darren, I hear you guys, according to the far left news guard lackeys, are you guys spreading misinformation? | ||
Guilty as charged. | ||
I think it's giving them too much credit to call it an attack on this point. | ||
But I did get A little missive from Samuel of Ohio State fame. | ||
Samuel was concerned because Revolver News reported a story that some Minnesota government official Modified a flag to look like a Somalian flag. | ||
And he said, well, according to the person who designed this flag, it doesn't really look like the Somalian flag. | ||
And people can go to the site Revolver.News, look at the flags. | ||
They look exactly the same. | ||
So again, it's another one. | ||
They drop another one in the litter box, these guys at NewsGuard. | ||
And we've been on them a while. | ||
They hate us so much. | ||
I think we have the lowest possible NewsGuard rating. | ||
They gave us an F- rating for this information. | ||
unidentified
|
I didn't even know they had F-s. | |
Oh yeah, it's a minus. | ||
They went as low as they can go and they send me their best people. | ||
I hear that Samuel from Ohio State is one of their fiercest warriors. | ||
So when I hear from Samuel, he's got a nice Twitter bio. | ||
He celebrates his favorite baseball team in his bio, of course. | ||
What can I say? | ||
He's got a cute smile. | ||
So Samuel's concerned about the disinformation, but we've exposed NewsGuard back and forth. | ||
I mean, this is an organization. | ||
Think of the business model of an organization like NewsGuard. | ||
You can pay NewsGuard for them to tell you what websites have a good nutrition content. | ||
Their scam is they say, oh, this is a nutritious site. | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, this site is more, this is junk food. | |
So we're a junk food site, according to them. | ||
And you can pay them to basically decide what content is nutritious and what content is toxic junk food. | ||
And if you have any doubt as to their discernment or the disinterested nature of their determinations, one need only look at the people who've served on their board of advisors, which include legendary liar Michael Hayden, who used to run the CIA and NSA, and in fact, oversaw the NSA while they were doing all the stuff that Edward Snowden exposed. | ||
Notorious friend of Peter Ast, Arne Duncan, goes kind of a callback to the Obama days. | ||
You've got Richard Stengel, who's described himself as Obama's something like censorship czar. | ||
He was the head of the State Department's Global Engagement Center, which basically does censorship and propaganda for that. | ||
And his big thing now is promoting hate speech, reimagining the First Amendment. | ||
So it's just a who's who roster of complete scum, not to mention the fact that one of their biggest clients, at least at the time we reported, was a PR group called Publicist that does major deals with pharmaceutical companies. | ||
And at the time, they were really upset with us. | ||
Of course, it had to do with COVID misinformation and disinformation. | ||
So the fact that such an organization could exist at all is ridiculous to me. | ||
I think in light of Elon taking over X, their say in things, their pull, their leverage, such that it ever was, is vastly diminished. | ||
And so now they're reduced to a sad little husk of their former selves. | ||
And nothing but little old Samuel from Ohio State Excuse me, sir. | ||
I think you've been doing... I'm concerned about your reporting about Tim Walz. | ||
It's actually kind of pathetic. | ||
I almost feel guilty for talking about it. | ||
I hope Samuel doesn't see this. | ||
There's still time to turn your life around, maybe. | ||
And that's all I have to say about NewsGuard. | ||
I know for all the discussion that we hear about throwing journalists in jail, those that are deserving of it, I always say you can't leave out the fact checkers, and I would put News Guard on that list, because as you outlined, there's some, I'm sure, interesting financial crimes and conflicts of interest there that they have not been forthright with, though they love to operate under the guise of impartiality and act like they're these, you know, I think, arbiters of truth. | ||
when in reality they're just pharmaceutical or corporate-backed, frankly, prostitutes for a | ||
certain agenda, and they don't like outlets like War Room, like Revolver. So we thank you for your | ||
service. And we hope Samuel sees this clip. Maybe he'll turn his life around. But until then. | ||
Indeed. I think prostitutes might be too generous for Samuel, despite his nice smile. But | ||
I'm blowing him a kiss. | ||
I'm blowing a kiss to all my friends at NewsGuard. | ||
Thanks for your attention. | ||
I know they're scouring the site every day. | ||
So good job. | ||
Pat on the head, Samuel. | ||
And for all the NewsGuard people, if they want to follow you, if they want to check out all the reporting at Revolver, where can they go to do that? | ||
If you want some junk food, according to NewsGuard, junk food that's changed the national narrative on a variety of critical topics, including January 6th, censorship and other things, go to revolver.news. | ||
We're at the bleeding edge of what you want to know about a lot of developing stuff. | ||
So revolver.news. | ||
And I'm having a lot of fun on X at Darren J. Beattie. | ||
So you can check that out, too. | ||
We will see you in the war room soon. | ||
Thank you for joining us, Darren. | ||
Thank you, Natalie. | ||
Someone else who is probably on NewsGuard's naughty list is the one and only Julie Kelly, who joins us now. | ||
Now, Julie, we sort of did a little teaser with Darren about the pipe bomb hoax, how it continues to unravel. | ||
But you were sort of the driving force behind a lot of this reporting. | ||
So why don't you walk the audience through what you uncovered? | ||
Right. | ||
So always I defer to Darren Beatty. | ||
I don't think I ever write a story about the pipe bomb hoaxes threats without linking to his work because he has just done some of the most incredible detailed An explosive, no pun intended, work on the pipe bomb story. | ||
So what we discovered is video from the surveillance cameras Darren was talking about that shows this individual exiting the DC Metro Police SUV at around 1251. | ||
He walks towards the location where the pipe bomb was allegedly discovered. | ||
There's no camera, Natalie, shockingly, there was no camera aimed at that little park area outside the DNC. | ||
So we can't really see what he did, but he walked out. | ||
He was carrying a bag. | ||
I mean, everyone can see the video. | ||
He was carrying a bag, and then two minutes later, he went back to the DC Metro SUV and got inside. | ||
Then, allegedly, a device was located, was discovered about 15 minutes later. | ||
Now, this explains, Natalie, how the bomb-sniffing canines who were at the property hours before Kamala Harris arrived at 1125, officers from at least three agencies, Capitol Police, D.C. | ||
Metro, and the U.S. | ||
Secret Service, did not see this device underneath the shrub between those two benches. | ||
We don't even know how many pedestrians and passersby who walked past it as well, even the night before early morning. | ||
We could see people on the video as we were looking at the footage outside the DNC, people walking towards the Ellipse. | ||
Of course, that's Capitol Hill, as you know. | ||
So those two buildings, RNC and DNC, are just a few blocks from the Capitol. | ||
So you could see people walking west towards the Ellipse to listen to Trump's speech. | ||
No one saw this in all of that time. | ||
Well, now we know why, Natalie, because it wasn't there. | ||
It wasn't there to that individual. | ||
I don't know if he's law enforcement, if he's some sort of an asset, he's an informant, whatever. | ||
Planted that prop device there as a way to initiate the panic wave of January 6th, which is exactly what they did. | ||
When there were reports coming across that a device was found at the RNC 20 minutes before that, then at the DNC, it prompted the evacuation of the Cannon House office building, which is also right there. | ||
You had lawmakers tweeting on being evacuated from the building because of a bomb threat. | ||
Thanks, Donald Trump, et cetera, et cetera. | ||
So three and a half years later, Natalie, they're still rounding up. | ||
I'm just looking today. | ||
They arrested a husband and a son for January 6th on misdemeanors, but they can't find the MAGA pipe bomber who almost assassinated Kamala Harris that day. | ||
So again, to Darren's point and what we've talked about and I've talked about with Steve Bannon for years is that this was just one other inside job of the total inside job that was January 6th. | ||
And walk us through the latest on the sort of January 6th, not even prosecution, but persecution front, how those cases are going. | ||
So, Natalie, incredibly, the DOJ is still rounding up J6ers. | ||
The FBI still investigating J6 protesters. | ||
I think in the past 10 days, they've arrested maybe a dozen people. | ||
They're trying to get the total caseload. | ||
What Matthew Graves, the D.C. | ||
U.S. | ||
attorney who's handling all these prosecutions, the Biden appointee, his wife runs this really far-left radical women's nonprofit in Washington, D.C., and he has promised that this total caseload will reach 2,000 before the statute of limitation runs out. | ||
So there are now about 1,500 total defendants. | ||
The DOJ has a 100% conviction rate before D.C. | ||
juries. | ||
Not a single J6-er, Natalie, has walked out of a D.C. | ||
courtroom after a jury trial acquitted on all charges. | ||
And of course, as you know, the biggest evidence we have of this political persecution, wrongful prosecution, is the Supreme Court in June reversed, overturned how the DOJ has been applying its most common felony, 1512c, to obstruction of an official proceeding, which they charged more than 350 J6ers with, including Donald Trump. | ||
And the Supreme Court came back and said, oh, no, DOJ, you have been Intentionally, they didn't say intentionally, but they have been intentionally misapplying that post-Enron obstruction of an official proceeding statute. | ||
So all of those convictions are going to be overturned, but it's too late for a lot of them. | ||
Natalie, you had over a hundred people who were sentenced to jail. | ||
Some of them have already served their jail time on this felony, even though the Supreme Court said that the DOJ has wrongfully applied it. | ||
So, but I think the most shocking thing is that the DOJ continues to round people up, investigate them, Charge them, prosecute them, and try to put them in jail. | ||
As you know, the so-called praying grandmother, 72-year-old Rebecca Laverence, who was convicted of four misdemeanors, sentenced to 10 months in, or the DOJ wanted 10 months in prison. | ||
The judge didn't give her prison time, but stole $103,000 she had raised in her Give, Send, Go account as punishment for her public statements about the political persecution of J6ers. | ||
Absolutely wild. | ||
Julie Kelley, you're always ahead of the curve on this. | ||
If people want to follow you, get the Substack, get your writing, where can they go to do all that? | ||
Thanks for having me on, Natalie. | ||
You're doing such a great job. | ||
Steve is so proud of you, I'm sure. | ||
So, I'm at Substack, declassified with Julie Kelley, Real Clear Investigations. | ||
Also, I have long-form articles there, and Twitter, at Julie underscore Kelley, too. | ||
Always a must-follow, despite what NewsGuard says. | ||
Julie Kelley, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
Thanks Natalie. | ||
I'm sure News Guard also probably doesn't like Birch Gold or My Patriot Supply that much. | ||
That's why you know you have to go to birchgold.com slash Bannon. | ||
Also go to mypatriotsupply.com. | ||
Joe Reek and the team can set you up with anything you need if you're into prepping or stuff like that. | ||
You know, the WHO has said that we're in a state of emergency when it comes to monkeypox and dozens of new pathogens have been added to the kind of crisis list, including but not limited to black death. | ||
If you go to my Twitter, I did a long form episode just by myself on this and how the CIA is actually using now feminists to say that if you attack Kamala Harris, on Twitter, on Instagram, that you're engaging in hate | ||
speech. | ||
Imagine that. | ||
Sure, we're probably not far from the day where saying good things about gold is going | ||
to be considered hate speech and bringing in Philip Patrick from Birchgold. | ||
Now, Philip, we see Kamala. | ||
Apparently, she didn't care about inflation until today. | ||
But again, inflation also, they never said it was a real thing until today. | ||
So now their genius solution coming from the brain trust that is Kamala Harris and her advisors is price controls. | ||
Historically, that has never worked well. | ||
Can you kind of walk us through the red flags that that should be raising for the audience? | ||
Significant red flags, and they've mentioned price controls before, but as you mentioned, They just have never worked historically, and quite frankly it's anti-capitalist. | ||
The reality is it's just an administration that continues to ignore the fact that massive deficit spending is massively inflationary, and they've refused to admit this time and time again. | ||
But now we're having Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JP Morgan. | ||
He came out and said, look, the Fed are likely going to cut rates by a quarter point, but I don't think that's going to have a dramatic effect on inflation longer term. | ||
And his rationale was exactly what we're talking about. | ||
He said, look, the Fed can only control monetary policy, right? | ||
They can control interest rates and the cost of money. | ||
What they cannot control is fiscal policy, huge government spending. | ||
And despite what the administration have been telling us for years, it is inflationary and it's what's causing the problem that we have. | ||
This is just more nonsense for the administration and more sort of finger pointing. | ||
But the reality is the problems are domestic and the problems are with the administration. | ||
And how has gold always kind of remained immune to, you know, whatever the ill-advised whims of Kamala Harris, whether it's price controls or just straight up communist economic policies? | ||
How has gold always kind of stayed above the fringe? | ||
Well, gold, I think, is designed... I mean, look, they say that every cloud has a silver lining, and the cloud of this economy and this administration's policies is it is ultimately good for gold. | ||
Look, if you look at the problems that we have, we're talking about inflation that is very sticky for the Fed and I think will continue to be so. | ||
We have recession likely here or shortly on the horizon. | ||
We have a world running away from the US dollar. | ||
All of this, by the way, has happened in the last three and a half years under the administration. | ||
These things are very problematic for people sitting in the markets or sitting in U.S. | ||
dollars, but they are all very positive drivers for gold and silver. | ||
Inflation drives gold up being a commodity. | ||
Gold has an inverse relationship with the dollar, which is why central banks around the world are buying more gold than any other years in history. | ||
Under Biden to hedge in the same way that we do, so the short answer is gold is just designed for problematic climates, and that's what we have in front of us. | ||
unidentified
|
And. | |
Harrison Waltz. | ||
How much you know more of a precarious situation? | ||
Do you think that they will will plummet and where that's maybe a leading question, but that they will, you know, throw this this economy into. | ||
They don't really show any signs of stopping or improving on the inflation front. | ||
Well, no, look, if you're denying that a problem exists or you're denying that you are the cause of the problem, then there's not going to be a solution. | ||
And that's why I've said time and time again on the show, this is the most important election, certainly of my lifetime. | ||
And I think Of most people's lifetimes. | ||
If we do not change course, we're at the point of no return. | ||
Look, we have a world that is running from the U.S. | ||
dollar. | ||
We're losing the petrodollar status, so there's nothing guaranteeing longer-term demand for the dollar. | ||
And while all of this is happening, central governments around the world are watching the administration push Congress to run $2 trillion deficits, right? | ||
If the world didn't want dollars today, What's that going to look like in three, four, five years from now? | ||
So we know what four years of Kamala means. | ||
It's the same thing as four years of Biden. | ||
Huge deficit spending and an inability to recognize problems. | ||
I've said we may be at the point of no return already. | ||
Trump has a very tough task in front of us, in front of him. | ||
But another four years of Kamala, Biden, we're done. | ||
Phillip, if people want to follow you, get in touch with you and your team, where can they go to do that? | ||
It's really simple. | ||
So for very good information on precious metals, on the economy, for the end of the Dollar Empire series, all they have to do is go to birchgold.com forward slash Bannon. | ||
Again, birchgold.com forward slash Bannon. | ||
That'll get them access to a lot of very good information. | ||
And for me personally, it's at Philip Patrick on Getter. | ||
Philip Patrick, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
We'll see you soon. | ||
Thank you, Natalie. | ||
You guys know we're already barreling towards what is it, October 1, probably a looming government shutdown spending fight. | ||
We're, of course, going to stay ahead on that. | ||
But I sort of think a lot of this talk about fiscal policy, though it happens in the context of what's happening here domestically, it sort of leaves out, I think, something that is almost more concerning and a lot more nefarious, which is what's happening on kind of the international level of globalist organizations in the sense that, you know, when we are thrust into another pandemic, Right? | ||
Independent of whatever Congress does, that will lead us to more ballooning federal deficits and debt and spending. | ||
And I think when you see the WHO re-upping these pathogens of concern, whether it's Black Death, monkeypox, avian influenza, concurrently with a media push happening now, the Johns Hopkins kind of brain trust just putting out a study, a paper, why we're still waiting for a pandemic treaty. | ||
The pandemic treaty deadline has passed, but the need for it hasn't. | ||
I think you have to loop those two narratives together. | ||
You link them together and you see that they're using this as a predicate, I would argue, | ||
not just to institute mass mail-in voting, but I think almost from a more sinister angle, | ||
kind of lay the groundwork for advocating for the pandemic treaty, which you guys as | ||
the War on Posse were so instrumental in defeating. | ||
I know you guys made your phone calls with the Committee on Present Danger of China, | ||
going against kind of the efforts to curtail our sovereignty, ceding it to the global | ||
government that I don't know about you. | ||
I never elected. | ||
I never voted for Tedros or Klaus Schwab or any of these people. | ||
But I think we need to stay very, very vigilant on that narrative when it comes to how they're weaponizing these pathogens, not just in the literal sense. | ||
I'm not just talking about gain of function research, but more broadly on the election interference front. | ||
And of course, the kind of broader critique, which I think they're using it as evidence | ||
to, as I just outlined, push to re-up and reinstate this pandemic treaty. | ||
Like I said yesterday on the show, when the UN High Commissioner for Refugees feels comfortable | ||
writing articles for The Guardian demanding that right-wing populists never control government, | ||
never dictate immigration policy, they're not just saying the quiet part out loud. | ||
They're comfortable telling you that they don't want us in office. | ||
They don't want MAGA. | ||
They don't want us taking our country back. | ||
You know, they're decrying us for even daring to say the words great replacement theory. | ||
It's not a theory. | ||
It's not a conspiracy. | ||
It's it's happening and they're using public health and all these crises. | ||
crises to sort of usher these radical changes, this radical transformation in. | ||
Someone who knows that firsthand is of course Mike Lindell, who joins us now from yet a | ||
different background. | ||
I like this one better than the one yesterday. | ||
I like the full image. | ||
unidentified
|
I hope you have some good news for the posse. | |
Yeah, I just had to pull over beside the road here. | ||
I just came back from actually New Jersey. | ||
I just got to Minnesota. | ||
I was at Bedminster. | ||
We did a couple events there last night and this morning. | ||
Guess what I talked about, everybody? | ||
Election crime and securing our election platform. | ||
It was a great two days and I'm back in Minnesota now. | ||
I'm going to address, we just got served papers now by the Attorney General of Minnesota for my foundation. | ||
So they're attacking my foundation, my outreach charity, and my Lindell Recovery Network. | ||
They're just hammering them with all this. | ||
They want all this discovery. | ||
They filed a case to the Attorney General of Minnesota. | ||
You know, Natalie, I don't think they like that I was bad-mouthed on our governor here, Waltz. | ||
What do you think? | ||
I mean, I don't know what their agenda is, but it sure is suspicious, okay? | ||
So, but we're not, uh, we're not, I'm not going to let it bother me or distract me. | ||
I told the lawyers go take care of this nonsense. | ||
I'm back here to take care of my employees who are taking care of all of you guys out there. | ||
And the War Room Posse, I was just, uh, I was actually, um, um, reaching out on emailing, uh, Steve and, uh, um, and to giving him updates on stuff. | ||
And one of the things I told him that the, the posse has been great supporting the show and supporting my pillow. | ||
And so we're gonna go back, we're gonna offer the special today, we're bringing back the $25 extravaganza, which has been the biggest request, and we're adding about six other products to that. | ||
So you've got all the ones we had on there, the kitchen towels, the bath towels, which we just got in a whole nother assortment, the sandals and the pillows. | ||
If you go to the website now, We've added all kinds of products. | ||
You know, we have over 300 and some products now. | ||
Now, the exclusive special, where also you get with God, all things are possible. | ||
That pillow is yours free with any purchase. | ||
So there we have the mattress topper with the free sheets. | ||
You have that one sale and sale. | ||
There's the exclusive Giza Dream Sheets, which is our real president's favorite. | ||
Queen size, lowest price in history, only for the posse. | ||
$59.98, $69.98 for the kings. | ||
There's, and there's the big closeout and overstocks. | ||
So when you guys get to the website, click on that, you'll have over 80% or up to 80% of all these closeout items. | ||
There's blankets there. | ||
There's, um, you name it. | ||
It's there. | ||
All clothing from my pillow, pajamas, everything you guys didn't even realize we had. | ||
We're putting this all before the next season here. | ||
Get it for pennies on a dollar. | ||
We've got to bounce, but we will have you back. | ||
As always, thank you for joining us, Warren Posse. | ||
Remember, when they were attacked by the government, they were attacked saying they wouldn't let | ||
them work from home. | ||
We beat that, everybody. | ||
Now they can work off commissions from home. | ||
unidentified
|
We've got to bounce, but we will have you back. | |
As always, thank you for joining us, Warren Posse. | ||
Thanks for hanging with me. | ||
I don't know how, but President Trump is still speaking. | ||
He's still doing it. | ||
So we're going to toss back to him. | ||
Coming at you live from Bedminster, New Jersey, the man, the myth, the legend, President Donald J. Trump. | ||
Have a good one. | ||
Against Elon. | ||
He let them go because he was having a lot of problems in California. | ||
They were making it impossible for him in California. | ||
What they were doing with the taxes and everything were making it impossible for him. | ||
And Sean O'Brien's a great guy from the Teamsters you're talking, yeah? | ||
Sean is great. | ||
I think Sean would understand it better than anybody. | ||
Don't forget, the unions are really threatened by what's coming in, by these millions and millions of people coming in. | ||
Sean O'Brien understands that. | ||
The black population is absolutely threatened. | ||
The Hispanic population is absolutely threatened. | ||
Because these people are coming in. | ||
They're going to take their jobs. | ||
They're going to make it very, very hard. | ||
What's happened in our country is very dangerous, very bad thing. | ||
unidentified
|
Q. One more on the economy, sir, because Dr. Tim Walden is out on the campaign trail today | |
and he's been saying that he believes that he wants things to get worse so that he can campaign on it. | ||
Is that what you're getting at here? | ||
What's your response to that? | ||
I wish I didn't have to do this. | ||
If our country were run by Democrats and it was run beautifully, where we were really being productive and everything else, I would have never done this. | ||
I wouldn't have done it if I thought I couldn't have won. | ||
I think I can win. | ||
I think I can win easily once they're exposed for what they are, which is, you know, radical left lunatics. | ||
And that's what they are. | ||
They're going to ruin. | ||
She's going to ruin our country, going to ruin our country. | ||
And I just hope the people of our country, and I believe they are because I see it already happening, but I hope they are able to think for themselves, because if they think for themselves, if they look at the destruction that's going to be caused by Kamala And this person from out of nowhere, he came out of nowhere, a state that I love that state, but a state that's doing so poorly, where he's the one that signed in tampons in boys' bathrooms. | ||
He signed a bill that boys' bathrooms, all boys' bathrooms in Minnesota will have tampons And what's going on? | ||
What's wrong with us? | ||
What's wrong with us as a country? | ||
So no, I would if we had somebody doing a phenomenal job I would be extremely happy. | ||
What I want to do is I want to see, even the last few months, I hope the country does really well, even though it would make it probably a little bit harder to win. | ||
I hope the country does really well. | ||
It's country first. | ||
I want our country to do great. | ||
If they were great leaders, I would be the first to say they're doing a fantastic job. | ||
Thank you all very much. | ||
I appreciate it. | ||
Thank you. |