July 29, 2024 - Bannon's War Room
48:54
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Fortunately, I have to give you a very long, I-don't-know-the-answer-to-your-question answer, because it is very complicated. | |
| And quite honestly, you know, the health sector doesn't know what to do, because this is now first and foremost a political problem. | ||
| And what I've said to the Biden administration is the health sector can't solve this on its own. | ||
| We're going to have to bring in Homeland Security, Commerce Department, Justice Department to help us understand how to do this. | ||
| And I've said the same with, I met with Dr. Tedros last month in Geneva, WHO, the Director General, to say I don't know that the World Health Organization can solve this on our own. | ||
| We need the other United Nations agencies. | ||
| NATO, this is a security problem because it's no longer a theoretical construct or some arcane academic exercise. | ||
| 200,000 Americans died because of anti-vaccine aggression, anti-science aggression. | ||
| And so this is now a lethal force. | ||
| And now I feel as a pediatric vaccine scientist, just as it's important for me to make new vaccines to save lives, the other side of saving lives is countering this anti-vaccine aggression. | ||
| Now when you look at Wisconsin, and that is just absolutely ground zero for probably the state of the three most important states where this election is going to be decided. | ||
| And the polling, the recent polling, is so close that it just shows how this election is going to be such a nail-biter and really subject to what crazy event is going to happen and ultimately shake it in one direction or the other over the next six months or so. | ||
| To Terliza's point, there were a pair of polls released just Yeah, this bird flu has arrived in the U.S. | ||
| very fast and furious. | ||
| We think it was introduced back in February. | ||
| That's what the data is indicating. | ||
| It was one transmission from some bird to cattle, to cows. | ||
| And it's mostly right now being transmitted among dairy cows because we think it's because of the milking machines and it's just a general situation. | ||
| especially the concentration of the virus is very, very high in the milk. | ||
| And that's why we're also telling people not to drink raw milk, | ||
| because unless it's pasteurized, and we're mostly certain pasteurization is okay, | ||
| even though pasteurization doesn't kill all viruses, it should be okay. | ||
| But definitely don't drink raw milk, and there's a big segment of the population | ||
| that is really into raw milk right now. | ||
| And I'm very worried about them, but somehow this fad is still continuing, | ||
| despite all the risk that's currently going on. | ||
| And because this bird flu, as you said, it's 50% mortality among those who we detect it. | ||
| And if this truly jumps into humans and spreads human to human, we're in deep trouble. | ||
| you This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
| Pray for our enemies. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because we're going medieval on these people. | |
| I got a free shot on all these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big line? | ||
| MAGA Media. | ||
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
| Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | ||
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room, here's your host, Stephen K. Babb. | |
| Welcome to The War Room. | ||
| It's Natalie G. Winters hosting today, Monday, July 29th, in the year of our Lord, 2024. | ||
| Quite the cold open. | ||
| MSNBC, that's a clip from a few months ago, saying the quiet part out loud that this election is going to be determined by some unforeseen events, some unforeseen circumstance except when you actually do the research, when | ||
| you do the due diligence, you see that bird flu is a disease that our elites have | ||
| been intent on weaponizing and manipulating, sort of similar to COVID-19. For years now, | ||
| it's no surprise that it is now allegedly emerging at the rate it is, or at least they're | ||
| hyping it in the mainstream media. | ||
| That opening clip, of course, Dr. Peter Hotez, one of the leading voices, demanding that you're a bad American if you don't get your COVID-19 vaccine. | ||
| Well, he now wants to weaponize the entire force of the federal government, even the Commerce Department, in concert with the United Nations and probably the World Economic Forum, too, to try to dispel any rising anti-vaccine sentiment here. | ||
| In the United States, because we'll say the quiet part very out loud here in the war room, which is that it looks like they are trying to make bird flu the next public health scare that I'm sure will necessitate mail-in ballots and lockdowns and all that good stuff that we have not forgotten about. | ||
| As the Atlantic tried to push for pandemic amnesty, we do not like any form of amnesty here in the war room, let alone pandemic amnesty, because if we don't hold the elites Accountable, we know that they will try to roll out a similar pandemic. | ||
| Some would say it's a plandemic all over again. | ||
| Joining me now to discuss this and so much more is the one and only Tom Renz. | ||
| Now, Tom, I would just love to get your thoughts on that opening clip of Dr. Peter Hotez insisting that the entire force of the federal government needs to be rolled out to dispel anti-vaccine sentiment. | ||
| Well, he looks like Harry Potter's Uncle Vernon, honestly. | ||
| And Uncle Vernon there apparently does not care any more about the Constitution now than he did before. | ||
| The Supreme Court said repeatedly the Constitution doesn't take a break in an emergency, but we had $14 trillion with a T exchange hands under the COVID debacle. | ||
| And no one's been held accountable. | ||
| So you can bet on the fact that they're going to try and do it again. | ||
| And Hotez is the poster boy for Big Pharma, so he's going to say whatever it takes to make sure that his masters are making their $14 trillion again. | ||
| So, sort of, when we track these narratives, we're all about the signal and not the noise here in the war room. | ||
| It's not something that they really come out and explicitly say, right? | ||
| You sort of have to read the tea leaves, and one that I think Major tells is that they've given emergency use authorization for bird flu vaccines. | ||
| Can you walk the audience through that development and the significance of that? | ||
| Yeah, this is profound, and the timing on it is so, so important. | ||
| So you've got to understand, On June 28, the Loper decision was made. | ||
| And for the audience, in case you don't know, the Loper decision overturned something that in law we call the Chevron Doctrine. | ||
| And basically in doing so, they made it a lot easier for a guy like me to sue the federal government and the deep state, the fourth branch, the administrative agencies. | ||
| So I have a lot more ability to sue them now than I did before. | ||
| Shortly thereafter, They recategorized, the FDA recategorized and issued and extended an EUA authorization for bird flu basically. | ||
| This is really profound and it's a major tell. | ||
| See, what I think was going to happen is the law for COVID vaccines was substantially different than the law would be for a flu vaccine. | ||
| Flu vaccines have been out for a long time and there's a lot of court cases out there that allows them to mandate a traditional flu vaccine. | ||
| Now, what I think they were doing is they were going to push mRNA into the flu vaccines, which would essentially make it COVID vaccine 2.0, and then try and force the flu vaccines on people using flu vaccine law, even though it was just another version of the COVID vaccine. | ||
| Because of the Loper decision, that's harder for them to push through. | ||
| So now they had to essentially kind of pull out the old COVID playbook and suggest that this was another emergency use authorization situation. | ||
| So what I would expect now is when disease X rolls out, when the bird flu is, you know, So HHS Secretary Becerra, I believe, he kind of rolled out the PREP Act, which basically allows the FDA, right, to grant this emergency use authorization. | ||
| But I think the question that a lot of people are asking, which definitely bears resemblance to, I think, the kind of question about COVID-19, since 2022, there's really only been, what is it, 11 or so documented cases or incidents, hospitalizations due to bird flu. | ||
| So it just doesn't really comport, I think, with the timeframe for them to be wanting to certify vaccinations, right? | ||
| The data doesn't really check in terms of this becoming a public health emergency. | ||
| So what do you make of the timeline on this? | ||
| Yeah, the timeline's critical, but for them to issue an EUA on these vaccines right now, when there's really no one getting bird flu. | ||
| Bird flu has been around for decades. | ||
| I mean, bird flu is not a new thing. | ||
| And the idea that somehow, suddenly, it's going to jump to the human population is absurd. | ||
| Now, I will say, on my other screen over here, I have right in front of me a huge study where they are doing, in the United States, on U.S. | ||
| soil, gain-of-function on bird flu. | ||
| Okay, so they're doing gain-of-function work, the same gain-of-function work that gave us COVID. | ||
| They're doing that same gain-of-function work under Joe Biden and Kamala Harris that they did that created COVID, but they're doing it on bird flu. | ||
| So it looks like they're prepping this the same way that they prepped COVID, right? | ||
| They do the gain-of-function work, suddenly, oops, it got loose, and guess what? | ||
| We've got another plandemic. | ||
| I think the same thing is happening. | ||
| They have this, and in fact, in this particular study, which was published on NIH, This particular scientist from the University of Wisconsin reports that he has created a high-yield virus that replicates at over 10x fold better than the wild-type bird flu. | ||
|
unidentified
|
10x! | |
| So they are making it more pathogenic, they're making it more dangerous, they're making it spread quicker, they're making it reproduce quicker. | ||
| They're literally doing this work in the United States now. | ||
| We can expect that there will be an oops or it will somehow just appear In nature, despite the fact that bird flu has been around for decades and has never jumped to humans in any substantial way. | ||
| And then they will have a vaccine just sitting there ready to go so that they can force it into our arms again. | ||
| It will be a replay of COVID. | ||
| Well, in a lot of these studies that they were conducting with bird flu, which, like you said, go back years prior, you buried the lead. | ||
| They were funded by Anthony Fauci, right, and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. | ||
| It's the same key players. | ||
| I know Bill Gates was involved in funding a lot of these studies. | ||
| Too, but I'm just curious how you sort of see the timeline progressing on this Do you think like for example the clip that we played? | ||
| Concluding that cold open the so-called expert that they have up on TV He seems to just draw a number out of a hat He says there's gonna be a mortality fatality rate of 50% and provides absolutely no evidence, right? | ||
| It's kind of similar scare tactics that they used with kovat Do you think that this is going to be disease X that they are going to use to sort of? | ||
| Well, I do think that disease X will probably be some version of the flu, bird flu, or the flu of some type. | ||
| I don't think it's out yet. | ||
| I think it'll be a new strain. | ||
| I think it'll be a new strain that they probably release, although they'll say it was just a zoonotic. | ||
| I think it'll get out. | ||
| You know, the timing is a little hard to tell. | ||
| What I do know is that They've been working on this extensively. | ||
| The amount of gain-of-function work. | ||
| We have Project Next Gen, which Biden funded up to five, I believe, five billion dollars to work on mRNA vaccines and things like that. | ||
| We have all these different things all pointing towards preparation of this. | ||
| They're developing aerosolized vaccines. | ||
| They're developing all these different types of vaccines, including something that's called SA RNA, which is amplifying. | ||
| Once that's in your system, it may stay there forever. | ||
| We don't know for sure. | ||
| But they're doing all this stuff. | ||
| They're bypassing safety protocols by running through the EUA process. | ||
| And this is going to be a disaster. | ||
| And I think that one of the things that we've got to understand You know, Donald Trump's out there. | ||
| He's been talking about, hey, we need to investigate this. | ||
| We would never want to mandate anything. | ||
| We would never want to force anything on anyone. | ||
| You know, we got to pay attention. | ||
| And he's been calling for investigations. | ||
| Compare that to Biden and Harris, who are out there doing everything they can to fund and push full steam ahead on all this. | ||
| And you know, but for the lawsuits and the work that we did early on with COVID, who knows those vaccine mandates might still be here. | ||
| Biden and Harris wanted to force this down everybody's throat. | ||
| And, you know, we've got a very clear choice in 2024, whether we want a guy who's not going to force it on it, or we want to deal with two people who are going to use everything in the government's power to jam this down our throat. | ||
| Yeah, she wasn't just the border czar, she was the vaccine czar, too. | ||
| And you're so right, and I think that there's an important parallel to draw. | ||
| The same so-called experts that are supposed to be preventing these pandemics are the same safety experts like the Secret Service who are supposed to be preventing assassination attempts on leading presidential candidates like President Donald J. Trump. | ||
| But these experts, they always seem to fail, and I will say the failures Always seem to go one way. | ||
| Tom, if I can hold you through the break, I know you have some new analysis on all things assassination attempt. | ||
| There's some text messages that are coming out, and we have the identities of the individuals who are on the congressional task force to investigate this, but I don't know if there'll be a lot of investigating going on. | ||
| A lot of rhinos, no real patriots. | ||
| Tom will join us after the break. | ||
| More Impossible will be back. | ||
| We also got Mike Benz and Tim Burchett joining us, too. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We'll be back after this 90-second break. | |
| Messages revealed that the gunman raised suspicions of a counter-sniper who was leaving his shift at 4.25 p.m. | ||
| That's more than 90 minutes before the shooting, 30 minutes sooner than previously reported. | ||
| At 5.14, the gunman was photographed, and at 5.38, The officer shared photos they had taken of the shooter to a group chat. | ||
| By that point, they also knew he had a rangefinder. | ||
| It would be another 33 minutes after he fired that he was shot and killed. | ||
| Walk us through the details and what was going on with law enforcement communication that day. | ||
| Well, it is striking how sort of haphazard it all was, both when it happened and how it happened, not over some radio frequency, but over text message, basically. | ||
| So it starts with three snipers from the local police who are in a warehouse building near the rally site. | ||
| Their job is to sit there and look at the rally site. | ||
| It's now, as you said, 90 minutes before Trump ends up taking the stage. | ||
| One of them has to leave. | ||
| He has to go do another job. | ||
| As he walks out, he sees kind of this suspicious-looking, stringy-haired kid sitting at a picnic table nearby. | ||
| He texts the other officers, hey, there's a guy out here who's kind of odd. | ||
| He saw me walking out with my rifle, so he knows you all are up there. | ||
| Just be aware. | ||
| As the afternoon to the evening goes on, more officers from that same local sniper detail see this guy, notice him being weird, see him using the rangefinder. | ||
| They take a picture of him. | ||
| They send it to state police, who gives it to the Secret Service. | ||
| It's like a chain of text messages. | ||
| Basically, by the end of it, the actual warning that this person is out there doing something suspicious doesn't get to everybody in the Secret Service until just a few minutes before the shooting. | ||
| Then they start to scramble people, but it's too late. | ||
| The gunman's already on the roof. | ||
| He's already found a position that the police can't easily reach. | ||
| Yeah, you say basically that the shooter was a step ahead of the Secret Service multiple times, even in preparation for the event. | ||
| He was scoping out beforehand. | ||
| He was using a drone. | ||
| Tell us more about that. | ||
| Well, he got to the site before the Secret Service did. | ||
| So Trump announces the rally's happening on July 3rd. | ||
| On July 7th, Crooks comes out to the site, walks around for 20 minutes. | ||
| And it's not until the next day that the Secret Service makes its first walk through the site and starts preparing. | ||
| Now he, Crooks, sees something in this site that the Secret Service, for all their training and manpower, missed. | ||
| Which is the potential of that roof, the one we've been talking about so much, as a sniper's nest. | ||
| Trust the experts, I guess not quite. | ||
| We'll have Mike Benz joining us shortly to unpack some of the latest revelations on all things assassination attempt against President Donald Trump. | ||
| But Tom, while we still have you before I let you go, I mean, I feel like, you know, you look at everything similar to me through the lens of our elites failing so abysmally, right, at trying to prevent COVID-19, pandemic prevention being the biggest grift ever to exist, or I guess racket is a better way to term it. | ||
| When you see evidence like this continue to pour out, how can you say that it's not intentional? | ||
| What is your take? | ||
| Well, I think that this comes down to questions, right? | ||
| And what we don't see is people asking the right questions. | ||
| As we see the AI, we see the Google, we see everybody censoring the Trump assassination attempt. | ||
| No one has asked the obvious question, including that reporter. | ||
| You play that clip, right? | ||
| And this guy's making all sorts of excuses. | ||
| Oh, the sniper noticed something the Secret Service didn't. | ||
| What, a building 150 yards away? | ||
| What, they didn't see it? | ||
| Of course they saw it. | ||
| Here's the thing that was the most important thing that that reporter said that, of course, MSNBC wouldn't call him out on. | ||
| He said that it wasn't until a couple minutes before the shooting that the Secret Service became aware, and suddenly they just didn't have time to do anything. | ||
| Okay, so let's be clear what this means. | ||
| We saw the pictures of the snipers sitting on the roof, staring at Crooks through their scope. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| So these guys are watching Crooks. | ||
| They're watching him through a scope. | ||
| They can see clearly that Crooks is pulling a gun up and aiming it towards the president. | ||
| Now, presumably they would have to get authorization to shoot him. | ||
| Who didn't give the authorization? | ||
| Why, when there were several minutes, didn't someone say, shoot the guy if he's pointing a gun at the president? | ||
| Why would they do that? | ||
| More importantly, why, if there were several minutes that passed from the time that the Secret Service became aware of Crooks being there until the time he shot, why didn't they charge the stage and get Trump off the stage? | ||
| That's their job, right? | ||
| Their job, their first job is to protect the president. | ||
| They didn't. | ||
| This was intentional. | ||
| There is no way that you can say, well, you know, we heard a rumor that a guy was on the roof with a gun and, you know, well, we, you know, we just couldn't get our radios to connect to local police. | ||
| And, you know, we waited a couple minutes and we left the president on the stage and then, oops, he got shot. | ||
| That's not an accident. | ||
| That defies logic, and it defies common sense on a level that is so absurd that I'm incredulous every time I hear it. | ||
| This was intentional, and we need to know who was involved. | ||
| Why was Mayorkas involved with this? | ||
| Why was DHS involved? | ||
| Why were all the three-letter agencies involved? | ||
| And why is no one asking Who in the government knew? | ||
| What was their involvement? | ||
| And how in God's name did you let the President of the United States stand in the sights of a gun for several minutes before you did anything, including charging the stage and just getting him off the stage? | ||
| The Realtel, Eli Crane, of course, who's already been to Butler, Pennsylvania, wasn't even included in the seven-man commission appointed all by Speaker Johnson to investigate the assassination attempt. | ||
| Tom, if people want to get your show, follow you, stay up to date with all of your analysis, where can they go to do all that? | ||
| Please go to www.TomRenz.com. | ||
| You can't search Tom Renz. | ||
| If you search me, you just get Google headpieces on me. | ||
| You have to actually type www.TomRenz.com because God knows searching Tom Renz wouldn't come up TomRenz.com. | ||
| It's TomRenz.com. | ||
| We've got a sub stack, TomRenzSubStack.com, and if you're willing, please support us at GiveSendGo slash RenzLaw. | ||
| Give, send, go slash Wren's Law. | ||
| We do most of our legal work for free. | ||
| We do most of our work for free. | ||
| We just do it because it's the right thing. | ||
| Your support's helpful. | ||
| Thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| You know, the elites are, of course, lying to you about all things fiscal policy and the economy as well. | ||
| Inflation, I'm sure you guys feeling the pain of that's why you got to go to birchgold.com slash bannon to get the latest installment of the end of the dollar empire if you're missing steve like i am of course you should if you haven't uh read i think we're up to the fourth or fifth installment i think the fifth uh at the end of the dollar empire written by the one and only steven k bannon i'm sure there's some good steve sayings in there so make sure you head to birchgold.com | ||
| Slash Bannon to to get your copy. | ||
| We're joined by the one and only Mike Benz No, the rhyming between Tom Tom runs and Mike Benz is not intentional, but I'm here for it but Mike your thoughts on these latest developments when it comes to the shooting the text messages and of course the the tech censorship we're already starting to see in droves and Well, we really need names at this point. | ||
| One of these open leads that Tom was getting at around the roof is this whistleblower allegation that Jim Jordan revealed that at least one agent from Secret Service was supposed to be stationed on the roof, but for some reason stood down, and we heard something about it may have had to do with the heat on the roof. | ||
| The temperature that day had a high of 91, which is not very hot for a summer in Pennsylvania. | ||
| That's, you know, it's not 110 degrees. | ||
| It's low 90s. | ||
| But what was the name of that officer or agent? | ||
| Getting to the specifics of who dropped the ball tells the story of who they were connected to. | ||
| What was that agent's cell phone text messages like? | ||
| What was that agent's radio communications? | ||
| Because just to reverse engineer this, If this was a government plot, it would have required a government agent or informant to have been in this shooter's group chats or online community, radicalizing this person or having awareness around this. | ||
| And again, it was only seven days before the rally was announced that the rally was held, which means this person, we're told made three explosive devices, had this sophisticated Relatively sophisticated plan, having scoped out the area, used an aerial drone, and all this. | ||
| It seems likely that this person was being groomed or in a community of people who were proposing that this person should kill the president at some point in time. | ||
| And when he happened to come to Butler, Pennsylvania, he was able to scramble this so quickly. | ||
| But it would have required some corrupt agent or cell within the FBI or probably more likely, frankly, DHS's Homeland Security Investigations, HSI, which is this unique unit within DHS, which has come out actually had more undercover agents infiltrating January 6th than even the FBI had, which is very curious because they're not attached to the Justice Department, so they get to be a sort of free-roaming cell. | ||
| In fact, there's an audio from Jeremy Brown, one of the January 6th defendants, that he posted online of a 45 minute audio of him being | ||
| recruited by multiple HSI agents, again DHS investigations agents, a month before January 6th | ||
| to get him to infiltrate the protests and to turn against Trump supporters and to basically share | ||
| all of his intel. | ||
| And so they were recruiting people for the January 6th protests within DHS. | ||
| What were required is somebody within DHS or FBI to have advanced knowledge that the shooter was going to do this in the way that he did, that is, logistically, using this roof, which was the nearest surface of attack with a line of sight to the president. | ||
| Communicating with someone in Secret Service to abandon the roof. | ||
| And we know that the roof was abandoned at two points. | ||
| An officer was supposed to be on the roof and either was on there and left or was supposed to be on there but didn't go. | ||
| And then we had an FBI SWAT team who had a direct line of sight to the roof but then magically left the room. | ||
| Before or after the shooter did the activity. | ||
| So you had multiple simultaneous points of failure. | ||
| We need to know the timeline. | ||
| Did the person abandon the roof at the same time that the SWAT team abandoned their line of sight to the roof? | ||
| Because that would suggest that it was coordinated. | ||
| Who was the officer who abandoned the roof? | ||
| Because that will tell you what rogue cell within the Secret Service there may have been. | ||
| Who he was coordinating with. | ||
| Who gave the stand down order to not be on the roof. | ||
| Because if there was a plan to be on the roof, and they stood down from it, someone gave that order. | ||
| We need the names of those officers and agents. | ||
| And Mike, we've got to jump to break. | ||
| I want to hold you through. | ||
| But this is why the sham task force that Speaker Johnson constructed, they're only focusing on the Secret Service because they don't want to get to the thing itself, which is the weaponization. | ||
| All the way to the top, DHS, Mayorkas, and all those other rogue apparatchiks who are weaponizing this federal government to the extent that we saw on July 13th. | ||
| We'll be back after this break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Vance. | |
| Welcome back to the War Room. | ||
| We're still joined by Mike Benz. | ||
| Now, Mike, sort of picking up where we left off in the discussion, you know, I think there's an interesting kind of corollary between the fact that, A, the Gab CEO, right, a few days ago came out on social media saying they identified some posts believed to be by the shooter that expressed sort of pro-Biden, anti-Trump sentiment. | ||
| Concurrently, you have the Fed saying, well, actually, you know, he was a lone wolf. | ||
| We don't know what motivated him. | ||
| We haven't been able to really find a digital footprint. | ||
| Then a few days later, it becomes, oh, well, he had some weird accounts overseas, allegedly. | ||
| And then you see these big tech platforms like Google stepping in and sort of censoring search results about Trump assassination attempt, Facebook censoring the iconic image of President Trump standing with his fist in the air saying, fight. | ||
| Because apparently the Secret Service agents were smiling in it or some bizarre excuse. | ||
| But how do you think all of that sort of weaves together to show how these other actors are maybe contributing to what is, if you want to call it a cover-up, or just a not true meaningful investigation of what motivated this individual to do what he did on July 13th? | ||
| Well, we know there's pressure on the tech platforms to reduce access to the iconic Trump fight, fight, fight photo because there were talking points memos circulated in the media that were leaked that instructed anchors and editors to not put that picture on screen and not to linger on it because it glorified Trump and made him look good. | ||
| And so this is basically a plausible deniability type operation with what Facebook did. | ||
| Now there is a technique they use called near duplicate hashing, which is this idea that once they load an image into a database to be banned or throttled, It picks up on what it calls near duplicates, so that people can't evade the ban on the image by posting something similar to it that slightly alters it. | ||
| And their official story today, after the heat they're picking up now for censoring that image, is that they had intended to suffer a slightly altered version that purported to show Secret Service agents smiling, Rather, but you know, first of all, I mean this is, they know what their technology does. | ||
| The idea that, so what they said is there were some, that someone altered an image, that image to put a smile on the face of a Secret Service agent and that them putting that into the banned images database Picked up through the near duplicate of the actual original photo itself But you know, this is they know what their technology does and and frankly folks, you know that there There was a range of emotions that appeared in real time for anyone who did see these did see it So I'm not even sure I buy the official story | ||
| But, you know, you have a lot of parallels, not just on the censorship of coverage of January 6th and the censorship of the July 13th event, but even on the foreknowledge case. | ||
| Earlier today it came out that none other than Nancy Pelosi, the person in charge of capital security that day on January 6th, Received advance notice of a plot to breach the Capitol the day before. | ||
| Now, what we know is that about six months ago, it came out that Nancy Pelosi had actually been filmed by her daughter, who was shooting in the Capitol that day, a documentary. | ||
| She had been filmed in real time, saying this exact quote, and it's at the top of my ex-feed, at Mike Ben-Saiba right now. | ||
| I've been waiting for this, for trespassing on Capitol grounds. | ||
| As Nancy Pelosi, the person who was supposed to be in charge of Capitol security, but denied | ||
| requests for additional troops and additional support. | ||
| In the Capitol as it was being breached, being giddy that the breach was happening and confessing | ||
| to foreknowledge that it would happen because she said, I've been waiting for this and then | ||
| explicitly named the crime that she was waiting for trespassing on Capitol grounds. | ||
| And so. | ||
| You have the situation now where we're learning of advanced knowledge of the shooter from Secret Service, from local law enforcement, and what remains now is, was there also foreknowledge from the FBI and DHS? | ||
| That is, was there foreknowledge from the FBI in the form of somebody being in his group chat? | ||
| Him having been radicalized by an online community that had feds in it, a similar situation to the Whitmer fednapping, or to the Garland, Texas ISIS attack, or to the 2017 Three Percenters militia infiltration. | ||
| You know, this very common technique. | ||
| Or did it come from within DHS itself and sheltered off even from the Justice Department in the form of HSI, Homeland Security Investigations, with a very curious note here. | ||
| Which was that Secret Service was understaffed that day, we are told, because of the NATO summit. | ||
| And so Trump had a reduced Secret Service detail. | ||
| And many of the people who were supposed to be Secret Service were replaced by, you guessed it, members of HSI. | ||
| So it could have been a totally closed shop if HSI agents had been in contact with that shooter. | ||
| What if it was an HSI agent who was in that small compartmentalized loop who was supposed to be guarding the roof and stood down that day because they were keeping it all at that cellular level? | ||
| This is why we need the names of those DHS agents responsible for the roof that day. | ||
| Not who's the DHS secretary. | ||
| No more jumping on the grenade like they let Merrick Garland do when his honchos at the FBI or DOJ do malfeasance. | ||
| They say the buck stops with me and then We don't get to know the operations of the actual feds themselves. | ||
| They love glorifying the feds when it helps them. | ||
| We know all about Harry Dunn and the hero police officers who stopped, we're told, the events of January 6. | ||
| But curiously, we don't know the names of the ones who magically allowed gross negligence at best and, shall we say, willful Willful malevolence or God forbid a criminal conspiracy at worse. | ||
| So if they're going to dox their agents for good press, then we have a right to know who screwed up here because that will open the font of investigation into who they're connected to and how this could have been organized from the inside. | ||
| Yeah, between what's going on at the border and the election interference carried out under CISA, I think it's a toss-up if DHS is probably the most rogue federal agency. | ||
| Maybe I'd give an honorable mention to Treasury. | ||
| It's why you guys have to go to birchgold.com slash Bannon to get the latest installment of The End of the Dollar Empire. | ||
| You guys know the Fed is, of course, lying to you about all things inflation. | ||
| They say that the economy is great for American people, but you guys know that that is not your Your lived reality. | ||
| You also know Jim Rickards. | ||
| We love having him on here in the War Room. | ||
| That's why you gotta go to RickardsWarRoom.com to get his kind of daily briefing. | ||
| You know, there are very few people that Steve brings on the show for economic analysis, let alone your own personal finances, and Steve entrusts him. | ||
| So I think You should too! | ||
| That's RickardsWarRoom.com to get his daily briefing. | ||
| But Mike, this kind of brings me, I think, full circle to another just fantastic report that you guys have put out talking about how, of course, CISA, again under DHS purview, is working to, and I want to get the phrase right, to Psychologically inoculate Americans basically against conservative values. | ||
| I don't even know what that means. | ||
| Can you walk the audience through what this next iteration of just full-blown censorship is coming? | ||
| and conservative individuals. So, CISA has joined together with the U.S. State Department's | ||
| Global Engagement Center, which is the censorship cell within the State Department. It became | ||
| really very publicly known, particularly during the Twitter Files incident, because the State | ||
| Department's Global Engagement Center, which, and by that they mean engagement with the private sector. | ||
| That's what engagement means. | ||
| And CISA has its own external engagement cell, which is how CISA talks to Google and to Facebook and to Twitter 1.0 and whatnot. | ||
| So, they're using what they think is a very clever technique, which basically copies what they did in Russiagate with the Christopher Steele dossier. | ||
| If you remember, Christopher Steele was a member of MI6. | ||
| He was a former British intelligence agent who then started a private intelligence operation | ||
| called Orvis Business Intelligence. | ||
| And that was farmed out to Christopher Steele to create this intelligence dossier on Donald | ||
| Trump that the CIA and the FBI then held up as being evidence of Trump being a Russian | ||
| So it was this boomerang technique of our spy agencies going to foreign countries in order to create a predicate to take action against domestic political opponents. | ||
| So the way DHS and the U.S. | ||
| State Department are doing this here and CISA, our cyber security agency who does cyber censorship, They've teamed up with the University of Cambridge, which is effectively the UK's version of Stanford. | ||
| Stanford sits at the heart of the American Silicon Valley. | ||
| Cambridge sits in what they call the Silicon Fen, which is basically the Silicon Swamp, which is where the tech companies are in the United Kingdom. | ||
| Cambridge is obviously a very elite university with a big brand name. | ||
| Cambridge, for the past several years, has been hosting a global disinformation summit. | ||
| And Mike, Congressman Burchett is joining us. | ||
| I guess he has to catch a flight. | ||
| on the academia side, on the journalism side, on the government side, and members of the | ||
| trust and safety operations at all the major platforms to globally coordinate censorship | ||
| activity for the months ahead. | ||
| So it's this big operating. | ||
| Congressman Burchett is joining us. | ||
| I guess he has to catch a flight. | ||
| Can I hold you through and just have Tim join us real quick? | ||
| Not to censor you, but Congressman Burchett, I know you have to catch a flight. | ||
| We don't want to make you miss it. | ||
| Your thoughts on who Speaker Mike Johnson appointed to this task force? | ||
| Who's missing? | ||
| Should we entrust them to get to the bottom of what happened on July 13th? | ||
| Well, of course, I think, Cori, thanks for having me on. | ||
| I think Cori and Eli should have been on there. | ||
| I know they've got seven. | ||
| They ought to increase it to nine and just tell the Democrats they can have seven or something like that. | ||
| I think they They've proven themselves to have the knowledge of what's going on and what went down. | ||
| And they have a real history in this kind of operation and what needs to go. | ||
| So yeah, I'm disappointed. | ||
| Am I surprised? | ||
| No, not really. | ||
| I wish I could come on your show just one time and have great news to report and just be excited about things going on in my party, in our party. | ||
| But I think that's why it's just imperative That Donald J Trump get elected because of what's going on in this country. | ||
| And we've got to give our house the guts to do the right thing. | ||
| And currently right now, you know, we're voting or we're taking a tough stand. | ||
| We don't have that, whether it be spending or Or anything else. | ||
| We ought to be running headlong into a term limits bill and a bill that says that Congress can't trade, that can't do stock trades. | ||
| Sorry, my head's hurting. | ||
| But yeah, I'm very disappointed in what's going on with that. | ||
| And I wish I wish for better, but that's what we got. | ||
| I hope they come to a good conclusion and get all the facts. | ||
| But another thing that worries me is when you have a lot of attorneys, which is what they do, they're loaded up with attorneys, and I get it. | ||
| Mike Johnson, he's a constitutional attorney and I get that, is that it's going to run a little bit longer than it should. | ||
| And America is going to lose interest in this, and I think whatever becomes of it will be clouded in just that. | ||
| Because, as you know, attorneys, I love them, you need them, but dadgum, this thing could go on for a long time. | ||
| They ought to put a time limit on it of a week, and just subpoena the hell out of everybody that needs to be in there, and just make them wait, and bring them in, and do marathon sessions. | ||
| Well, Congressman, you do have some good news to come on the show. | ||
| You were recently endorsed by the one and only President Trump, so there we go. | ||
| You see, that's something positive. | ||
| I'm toxically positive. | ||
| He called me a conservative warrior, and I was vibing down the road, actually. | ||
| I was not expecting that at all. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You are! | |
| Well, I don't know about all that, thank you, but I was just tickled to death. | ||
| Feared most heavily by the aliens and the extraterrestrials and the deep state. | ||
| Congressman, if people want to follow you, where can they go to do that? | ||
| At Tim Burchett on Twitter. | ||
| That's my cool. | ||
| I've got an official one, Congressman Tim Burchett, but I've got the at Tim Burchett. | ||
| And that's the cool one that I do all my fun stuff. | ||
| It's still got a lot of official stuff on there, but I let it fly. | ||
| I do my videos that I walk off the floor that everybody made fun of, and now everybody does them. | ||
| So it's kind of cool. | ||
| Congressman, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| We've got to jump to break. | ||
| We will see you soon. | ||
| And without Mike Benz after the break, we will be right back. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Vance. | |
| Welcome back to the War Room. | ||
| We still have Mike Benz walking us through all the ways that the federal government, in conjunction with globalist organizations, are working to basically make sure that you don't hold any of the beliefs that you do or that this show promotes or that Mike promotes. | ||
| And his foundation, Mike, if you want to pick up, we've got a few minutes before we've got to bounce, but where you left off. | ||
| So the University of Cambridge is working with the Department of Homeland Security in the United States to create psychological inoculation against conservative viewpoints. | ||
| It's really astounding. | ||
| So I mentioned that Cambridge is this connective node that coordinates censorship insiders from multiple different countries. | ||
| But they recently came out with something that they call the Misinformation Susceptibility Test, | ||
| which they published in loud, proud, bold lettering, shows conclusively through science that conservatives | ||
| are more likely to believe fake news than liberals are. | ||
| I mean, it's so political. | ||
| But some of the things that they did is, is in order to do this test is they generated fake | ||
| headlines or headlines that were not real headlines, | ||
| and then had self-identified conservatives and liberals say whether or not those headlines were real or fake. | ||
| Now, some of their questions in order to come up with this. | ||
| Fake news headline that conservatives are more likely to believe fake news were headlines like certain vaccines are loaded with dangerous chemicals and toxins. | ||
| So if you believe that statement in a headline, you are now a believer in fake news. | ||
| And because more conservatives believe that than liberals, they can now say through science, conservatives need more psychological inoculation. | ||
| So we need to focus more censorship effort on conservatives. | ||
| Others include, headlines include, one in three worldwide lack confidence in non-governmental organizations, NGOs. | ||
| Now, of course, Cambridge is connected up to its ears with NGO censorship work, as is the U.S. | ||
| State Department. | ||
| Now, people who are more right-wing nationalists tend to oppose globalist NGOs. | ||
| So they will obviously, because they lack confidence in NGOs, are going to be more likely to believe a politically loaded question like that. | ||
| Others include reflecting a demographic shift. | ||
| 109 U.S. | ||
| counties have become majority non-white since 2000. | ||
| Now they call that fake news because it's something like 60 or 70 rather than 109. | ||
| But it's the same, it's the exact same trend. | ||
| If you were to do this on the other side with a liberal-centric sacred cow issue, you would see all this and then some. | ||
| We've had this Blue Anon issue where it was reported one in three Democrats believed that Donald Trump wasn't even hit by a bullet. | ||
| But now they get to, now the U.S. | ||
| State Department and the Department of Homeland Security get to hold up this Cambridge study that we need to focus more of our censorship work and our media literacy work against Trump supporting American conservatives because a British lab is established through science that they are more likely to believe fake news. | ||
| And this cell within the University of Cambridge called the Social Decision Making Lab, Last time the Brits tried telling us what to do. | ||
| I don't think that ended that well, and I don't think that that's a right-wing conspiracy theory, but Mike, if people want to follow you in the meantime, we'll obviously have you back on. | ||
| I promise I won't interrupt you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The audience always bites my head off for doing that. | |
| If people want to stay up to date with everything you're working on, where can they go to do all that? | ||
| Best place, follow me on X at MikeBenCyber. | ||
| All one word, MikeBenCyber. | ||
| I'm everywhere a million times a day on there, so that's the best place. | ||
| See you soon, Natalie. | ||
| You do your own psychological inoculations, and we are here for it. | ||
| We're very appreciative for you, sir. | ||
| We also got Krom Carmichael. | ||
| Krom, Solty, can you let the War Room Posse know the latest deal you got going on? | ||
| Yes, Sally. | ||
| You know, let me just say, I always enjoy coming on War Room after Mike Benz because I get to listen to him for about 10 or 15 minutes before I come on. | ||
| He is absolutely fascinating. | ||
| So that was terrific. | ||
| But I've got my little bottle of soul tea right here. | ||
| And I have been taking our own product, our active ingredient called theoflavin. | ||
| I've been taking our product for 25 years. | ||
| I am 75 years old, I take zero prescription drugs, and my cholesterol when I first started taking salt tea was elevated at 230, and it dropped down to, excuse me, my bad cholesterol was 130, and it dropped down to 89, my bad cholesterol, and it's been under 90 ever since. | ||
| And I got through, just very quickly, we got an email from one of our customers named Karen. | ||
| It says, I have a great success story. | ||
| I have genetically high cholesterol. | ||
| My combined number seven months ago was 245. | ||
| And that was with a very strict diet, watching what I eat, especially saturated fats. | ||
| I got a blood test this past Thursday, and it went down to 212 after eight months of being on saltine. | ||
| This is now considered normal for me due to my genetic factor. | ||
| And Crawford, coming up against the end of the show, we'll have you back, but can you just give the audience real quick the website to go to in the code? | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| Go to warroomhealth.com. | ||
| That is warroomhealth.com, and use the code WAROOM at checkout. | ||
| You'll get your first shipment for 50% off, and then you'll get three bottles for the price of two thereafter. | ||
| It's our very best deal, and we love offering it to the folks at War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Natalie, thanks again for having me on. | |
| And Mike Lindell, we got you up too, I believe. | ||
| Give us the latest for the posse. | ||
| And I just served the salty guy. | ||
| I'm telling you guys, I've been sleeping on a MyPillow for over 20 years and look at me, I've got a lot of energy. | ||
| We're giving out free, the free Patriot MyPillows. | ||
| No purchase necessary for the War Room Posse. | ||
| There it is right there, the MyPatriot multi-use MyPillow. | ||
| No purchase necessary, just the shipping, but you guys add to your cart. | ||
| Go to the MyPillow website, scroll down till you see Steve there. | ||
| And when you get there, you're gonna see all the specials. | ||
| You're gonna see the, there it is. | ||
| We're doing, this is an exclusive War Room special, the Giza Dream Sheets, which by the way, is our real president's favorite MyPillow product. | ||
| It's mine too. | ||
| Then you have the Queen MyPillow, still on sale, 1998. | ||
| That's a War Room exclusive. | ||
| To the right of that, the new MyPillow Mattress Topper, Queen size, 1999. | ||
| We also have the Back to the Dorms, Uh, for $69.98, um, and then you have the dish towel sets, uh, the six-piece towel sets. | ||
| Now, all the new colors are coming in that you guys should get on those before they're sold out, but call 800-873-1062. | ||
| By the way, today, get that free pillow. | ||
| We're breaking records today. | ||
| Everybody loves it. | ||
| There's only so many of these. | ||
| I think there's a couple, maybe three or four hundred left. | ||
| Get them now. | ||
| We're going to try and get everyone, we will get everyone in the war room one of these Patriot pillows until they're gone. | ||
| Mike Lindell, as always, thank you for joining us here in the War Room. | ||
| I'm sure the posse will pile in. | ||
| Maybe I'll just have to get one of those pillows myself. | ||
| That is, of course, a promo code WARROOM. | ||
| I will be back here tomorrow hosting. | ||
| Like I think I said last show, I have taken over. | ||
| The 5 p.m. | ||
| will be getting into some lies about how you should already expect delays in election results. | ||
| We're not buying it. |
Export Selection