July 29, 2024 - Bannon's War Room
48:55
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| I've heard young leaders talk with me about a term they've coined called climate anxiety. | ||
| Right? | ||
| Which is fear of the future and the unknown, of whether it makes sense for you to even think about having children. | ||
| America has tried these failed economic policies before. | ||
| But we are not going back. | ||
| Here's the thing. | ||
| Defund the police. | ||
| The issue behind it is that we need to reimagine how we are creating safety and when you have many cities that have one third of their entire city budget focused on policing. | ||
| We know that is not the smart way and the best way or the right way to achieve safety. | ||
| Just think about it. | ||
| So we want to ban assault weapons and they want to ban books! | ||
| There's no question I'm in favor of banning fracking. | ||
| Listen, I think there's no question that we've got to critically re-examine ICE and its role and the way that it is being administered and the work it is doing. | ||
| And we need to probably think about starting from scratch. | ||
| Are you aware of the perception of many about how the power and the discretion at ICE is being used to enforce the laws? | ||
| And do you see any parallels? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I do not see any parallels between sworn officers and agents. | |
| I'm talking about perception. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I do not see a parallel between what is constitutionally mandated as it relates to enforcing the law. | |
| Are you aware that there's a perception? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I see no perception that puts ICE in the same category as the KKK. | |
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pray for our enemies. | |
| Because we're going medieval on these people. | ||
| President Trump got a free shot at all these networks lying about the people. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The people have had a belly full of it. | |
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you've tried to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
|
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved! | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| I am the next man up. | ||
| This morning, you saw the cold open. | ||
| Yeah, you hate her. | ||
| You really hate her. | ||
| But... There's been a wind shift if you're a sailor. | ||
| And we've got to attack in another direction because we've got a totally different opponent. | ||
| And that's going to require a totally different strategy. | ||
| I wrote an article back in January for the Washington Times, the best commentary newspaper out there in America. | ||
| And I said unequivocally that Joe Biden would not be the nominee, that the strategy that Dems had adopted was very simple. | ||
| They were going to let Joe run free through the primaries so that you would avoid A contested primary where you had a bunch of woke radicals trying to outwoke, out-radical each other. | ||
| The rule now in politics, and it's always been, that primary elections, as Nixon said, you run to the extreme. | ||
| And then in the general election, you run to the middle. | ||
| So think about it. | ||
| If you don't have to have a primary and you don't have Gretchen screaming at Gavin and Kamala screaming at whoever, then you can kind of keep all that woke stuff buried as much as possible. | ||
| All right, so Joe goes through the primary. | ||
| What I wasn't sure about Was whether Joe would step down voluntarily, whether he was part of the con or whether he was simply the mark at the poker game. | ||
| And that they'd have to take him out. | ||
| Sure enough, he turned out to be the mark at the card game. | ||
| They took him out. | ||
| They helped him. | ||
| He helped himself when he did the debate. | ||
| That was a strategic error, I think, on our part, showing him too soon. | ||
| We shouldn't have debated before the Nominees were cast and all of that, but that's in the rearview mirror. | ||
| But once Joe showed even more of his hand, he showed what everybody around the West Wing, including Kamala, knew, that he's not a functioning human being capable of being president. | ||
| The media, the corporate media, obliged by just savaging the dude. | ||
| And then in comes the George Cloonies and the Obamas and, oh, please step down, Joe, for your legacy. | ||
| And here we go. | ||
| So, you shouldn't have been surprised by it. | ||
| It was just a straight chess move. | ||
| You shouldn't be surprised by the fact that Kamala is getting a bump in both polling and fundraising. | ||
| The fundraising stuff is not really worrisome in the sense that there's just a lot of money that was sitting on the sidelines trying to push Biden out. | ||
| So that's just pent-up supply, as it were. | ||
| Just coined a new term. | ||
| The polling Again, I quote the sage Peter K. Navarro, going back to the 2020 race and this one, it's like, this is always going to be a tight race. | ||
| Always. | ||
| It's a 50-50 country. | ||
| National polls are a very weak proxy for what the outcome will be because it all comes down to five or six battleground states. | ||
| We're a 50-50 country. | ||
| And it's Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, hopefully Nevada's in play. | ||
| That's it. | ||
| This will come down to half a million votes, one way or the other. | ||
| Maybe as little as 200,000 as it was spread across three or four battleground states. | ||
| So, what Do we in the war room do? | ||
| And the first thing I want to say, I want to go back. | ||
| I want to go back to 1992 because I've seen this movie before. | ||
| In fact, I was in the movie. | ||
| I ran for mayor of what then was the seventh largest city in America, San Diego, America's finest. | ||
| I never ran for office before. | ||
| I kind of came out of nowhere to run in that race. | ||
| And I was kind of like a mini Trump in the sense I was running on a populist platform, grassroots campaign, vastly outspent. | ||
| I won the primary and just, just nearly lost the general election too. | ||
| A woman. | ||
| In the year of the woman, no less. | ||
| It was the same year that some other women in politics would rise to the fore. | ||
| But here's the analogy here. | ||
| I had this fundraiser. | ||
| Her name was Maggie Mazur. | ||
| She's just a very graceful, grand dame. | ||
| She just was a nice person and she did her job very well. | ||
| And every time I saw her and checked on the fundraising, her greeting would be, Be Charming. | ||
| And her message to me was, In particular, with the woman I was running against, is that you can't, a guy, a man, I don't care what they say about all this equality stuff, at the end of the day, men cannot bully women. | ||
| Men cannot In politics. | ||
| Men cannot in life, as far as I'm concerned. | ||
| But in politics, men can beat the hell out of each other, throw whatever wild punches they want. | ||
| But you have to be really, really careful when you're a guy running against a woman. | ||
| And I drew a woman that was not unlike Kamala. | ||
| Harrison in in a lot of respects. | ||
| I mean first of all She was she had Unfavorables that were higher than her favorables and In other words people people didn't didn't like her very much And the reason they didn't like her was for two reasons. | ||
| One, she hadn't done a very good job in her job. | ||
| But number two, this was like, you would think this would be a blessing. | ||
| Her husband had actually been caught in flagrante delicto laundering money for a drug cartel. | ||
| Dick Silberman, that was his name. | ||
| Her name was Susan Golding. | ||
| And you figure the question was always, was she in on the thing, right? | ||
| And my answer was, of course she was, because he was like this rich guy who fell on hard time. | ||
| She wanted to run for governor. | ||
| She needed money. | ||
| So he got desperate and went out and did that, right? | ||
| But you couldn't directly raise that issue in the campaign. | ||
| Because the logical thing that would happen was that women would rise to her defense on the grounds that, well, she just got fooled by the guy. | ||
| It wasn't really her fault, right? | ||
| So it was like a third rail. | ||
| And I made the mistake at the end of the campaign After she had piled, like, millions of dollars of crap on me. | ||
| Just vicious stuff. | ||
| Just, I mean, like, just vicious kind of ads. | ||
| That's politics. | ||
| So I ran my own little vicious ad. | ||
| And it was my undoing. | ||
| It was, it was like I lost, at the margin, Democrat women. | ||
| I turned Democrat women off by running negative ads against the wife of a convicted money launderer, simply pointing out that that had happened. | ||
| And it's a cautionary tale. | ||
| Now, here's the message for this campaign. | ||
| Anybody else Can attack Kamala Harris. | ||
| PAX can attack her. | ||
| Other politicians can attack her. | ||
| This, that, and the other thing. | ||
| But it's going to be dangerous for my old boss, particularly in a debate, as to how he goes about attacking her. | ||
| And you can do it in a B-charming way. | ||
| That's the funny thing about Kamala. | ||
| You can eviscerate Kamala Harris With a smile on your face and some clever one-liners and maybe a really good Pocahontas nickname, but you can't do it with a bludgeon as the candidate yourself. | ||
| So if you step back from this whole thing, I think the way she ultimately has to be beaten | ||
| is on policy, because we beat her on policy on everything but abortion. | ||
| Economy and inflation, double digits, Trump wins. | ||
| Border security, double digits, Trump wins. | ||
| weaponization of government, double digits. | ||
| Trump wins. | ||
| National security, foreign policy, off the charts! | ||
| I mean, nobody trusts Kamala Harris to deal with the Chinese, the Russians, the North Koreans, the Iranians, the Ukrainians, the Gazans, the Hamases, the Hezbollahs, and the way she's... I mean, she's an anti-Semite. | ||
| The way she treats Israel and all that, nobody trusts her with that. | ||
| And then there's all the woke stuff, okay? | ||
| I mean, just, come on. | ||
| The transgender destruction of women's sports, all of that stuff. | ||
| She is so vulnerable on policy, but she is a woman. | ||
| And a woman of color. | ||
| And she's gonna simply campaign on that. | ||
| And we're gonna have to be really Careful about how we go about taking her apart. | ||
| And it's not going to be easy. | ||
| And folks out there, put your seatbelts on. | ||
| No nerves here. | ||
| It's always going to be close. | ||
| And we're going to have to be smart about this. | ||
| All right, I'm Peter K. Navarro. | ||
| When we come back, we're going to bring in the esteemed, one of my favorites, Mike Davis. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Every citizen in this country has an obligation right now. | |
| You know, in 20 years and 30 years, if you are watching this, I promise you, your children and your grandchildren will come to you and they will ask, in 2024, what did you do when democracy is at stake? | ||
| They're not going to ask you about gas prices. | ||
| They're not going to ask you what was going on Wall Street. | ||
| They're going to want to know when Donald Trump was threatening democracy's very foundation, what did you do? | ||
| So each and every one of us can do everything. | ||
| You can volunteer for a campaign. | ||
| You can volunteer to be a poll worker. | ||
| You can volunteer to work for a civic organization, nonprofit organization, doing voter registration or get out the vote. | ||
| And most importantly, you can speak out in your town square on social media to your friends, your families, at your bridge club, your knitting club. | ||
| Tell people it is critical that they register to vote and that they vote for Kamala Harris and the Democratic Party ticket up and down. | ||
| Mark Elias, this guy, how did I go to prison and not see him there? | ||
| That was the architect of the steel. | ||
| How did they get away with running on defending democracy when they use Every branch of the federal government to punish folks like Donald Trump, to try and indict and prosecute him, put Steve Bannon in jail, put me in prison, and somehow they're able to take this moral high ground where, ooh, unless you elect a Democrat, we'll lose | ||
| Democracy, it's like ridiculous, but that's the world we live in. | ||
| I'm going to bring in one of my favorite guys out there in this sphere. | ||
| He's also co-author of the new book I've got, The New MAGA Deal. | ||
| It's at newmagadeal.com. | ||
| You can get it on Amazon as well. | ||
| Mike Davis handles a lot of the weaponized stuff. | ||
| We do have breaking news today on Biden's initiative to decimate democracy as we know | ||
| it with respect to the Supreme Court. | ||
| So let's bring in Mike. | ||
| We've got three things to go over. | ||
| I'd like to do them one at a time. | ||
| Joe Biden wants to do something about the recent Supreme Court ruling that preserves | ||
| immunity generally for presidents. | ||
| So people can't sue these presidents as soon as they get out of office on whatever the | ||
| hell they want to sue them or try to indict them or whatever. | ||
| So Mike, what's going on here? | ||
| Yeah, so after Biden politicized and weaponized the intel agencies in the Justice Department to go after then-presidential candidate Donald Trump, after these Biden Democrats impeached Trump twice for nonsense, after Biden sent his Justice Department to go after President Trump, they've tried to throw President Trump in prison for the rest of his life. | ||
| for non-crimes. | ||
| They've tried to bankrupt him for non-fraud. | ||
| They've eviscerated 250 years of constitutional executive privilege going back 250 years to George Washington to destroy Trump and to destroy his top aides like you, Peter Navarro, who just spent four months in prison after President Trump asserted constitutional executive privilege. | ||
| And then they sent Steve Bannon who's in prison right now for constitutional executive privilege and then | ||
| When that didn't work, they tried to simply take Trump off the ballot. | ||
| And when that didn't work, President Biden used extreme campaign rhetoric, his campaign strategy that Trump is a threat to democracy who must be stopped at all costs. | ||
| And then Biden intentionally underfunded Trump's Secret Service detail, which led to President Trump almost having his head blown off on national TV. | ||
| That didn't work. | ||
| So now Biden and Kamala Harris are trying to destroy the Supreme Court | ||
| that's in their way. | ||
| And they're doing this on three different fronts, as you said, Peter. | ||
| They're trying to, the Supreme Court recently held correctly | ||
| that the president of the United States, any president of the United States | ||
| is immune from criminal prosecution for their official acts, | ||
| just like federal judges are immune, just like members of Congress are immune. | ||
| Just imagine if there's not immunity. | ||
| Just imagine if the Trump 47 Justice Department indicted and prosecuted President Obama | ||
| for capital murder for his extrajudicial drone strike on two American citizens, including a minor. | ||
| Just imagine if the Trump 47 Justice Department prosecuted President Biden for his illegal mass parole | ||
| of 10 million illegal immigrants into our country and the resulting migrant crime. | ||
| I mean, is Biden this stupid that he's now calling for a constitutional amendment to reverse | ||
| what the Supreme Court just did? | ||
| Let me, let's look at that for a minute, okay? | ||
| Because, um, Thank you. | ||
| There's a tradition, for example in the House, we did it when we got on the Republican side of passing bills we know we're not going to pass to simply to showcase who we are and all of that stuff. | ||
| Do you think that Biden-Harris actually believe that they could pass a bill, for example, that would take away criminal immunity for presidents? | ||
| Or do you think that they're just trying to use it so that they can hold up something and say, convicted felon? | ||
| I mean, is this just politics or is this a real policy threat? | ||
| Because I think they're just looking at their polling and they're saying, okay, let's do crap like this to highlight vulnerabilities that we perceive. | ||
| Look, I think that they actually are playing for keeps here. | ||
| You have Kamala Harris, who has hired Brian Fallon from Demand Justice, this radical group that has called for radical assaults on judicial independence for many years. | ||
| He is Kamala Harris's communications director, her top communications aide. | ||
| And look, this is what I think is going to happen. | ||
| If Kamala Harris actually wins the presidency, And with that, she wins the House of Representatives and keeps the Senate. | ||
| They will absolutely nuke the legislative filibuster. | ||
| The vote threshold from 60 votes to 50 votes plus the vice president are 51 votes. | ||
| They will absolutely pack the Supreme Court. | ||
| They will add several justices. | ||
| They will appoint left-wing radical justices like Tanya Shutkin. | ||
| Brian Fallon has his wish list of radicals. | ||
| And there goes our God-given rights to speak, to worship, to associate, to protect ourselves. | ||
| The Supreme Court is our last line of defense that protects that, and we saw this with COVID lockdowns. | ||
| We saw this with BLM riots. | ||
| We're going to see this more and more with Hamas riots. | ||
| Today's Democrats are radical leftists. | ||
| They're Marxists, and they are trying to destroy our country, and they know the Supreme Court Quick aside here and I'll let you continue. | ||
| want to destroy the Supreme Court and that's why it is so critical that we put | ||
| President Trump back in the White House because you want President Trump or | ||
| President Kamala Harris replacing Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Sam | ||
| Alito on the Supreme Court. Quick aside here and I'll let you continue. What Mike | ||
| said was very very important with respect to one thing okay. | ||
| Everything he said was very important. | ||
| But the buried lead in this, if Harris wins, let's imagine a world in which Kamala Harris actually wins the presidency. | ||
| The way the votes are going to go will almost certainly also guarantee that the Democrats control both the House And that's where it becomes truly frightening, because as I argued when I was on the stage at the RNC, it took all three branches of government to put me in president. | ||
| It wasn't just the House holding me in contempt, it was the Department of Justice and White House prosecuting me, and then an Obama judge stripping me of defense. | ||
| So, Mike, you're absolutely right, if Harris wins, They'll probably win the House and Senate, and they'll keep doing what? | ||
| Continue, sir. | ||
| You can talk about the ethics as well. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, look, the Democrats controlled the Supreme Court for 90 years, right? | ||
| And then President Trump's biggest and most consequential accomplishment of his first term was transforming the left-of-center Supreme Court to the first constitutionalist majority in 90 years. | ||
| And that Supreme Court Is doing what it's supposed to do, which is put the federal government in check to make sure that the federal government does not have power that we did not loan it under our US Constitution. | ||
| Our loan agreement with the federal government and to make sure that the power we did loan that federal government is divided between the three branches between Congress writing the laws, the executive branch enforcing the laws, and the federal judiciary interpreting the laws. | ||
| That has all been turned on its head over the last 90 years where you have these unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats, the Tony Fauci's of the world, making all of these decisions, having all three powers, having power the federal government's not supposed to have, and then consolidating That power in the executive branch with unaccountable bureaucrats and the Supreme Court is rolling that back and that is a grave danger to the left because if they lose power, if they lose their executive branch power, they're not going to be able to get their agenda passed because they know that they can't get their elected members or elected members of Congress to pass | ||
| what they want passed. They want unaccountable bureaucrats to do that. And so what you're | ||
| seeing is now that the Democrats have lost the Supreme Court, they're trying to destroy | ||
| it. They're trying to destroy its legitimacy. They're trying to say that there are ethics | ||
| issues with the Supreme. Joe Biden, of all people, is complaining about ethics at the | ||
| Supreme Court. Joe Biden, of all people, is saying that Supreme Court justices are too | ||
|
unidentified
|
old. Are you kidding me? | |
| I'll take you into the next break. | ||
| I got 30 seconds here. | ||
| I just want to echo how Important what Mike talks about. | ||
| I didn't know that the Democrats held the Supreme Court for 60 years, a left of center thing. | ||
| And that's remarkable. | ||
| That's frightening. | ||
| I see, however, this thing going on with the attack on the Supreme Court as yet another lever for them to get to the abortion issue, because it's going to be Supreme Court Roe v. Wade, Supreme Court Roe v. Wade. | ||
| If they win on the abortion issue, the country's gonna lose on the economy, border security, foreign policy, weaponization of government, and all the woke stuff. | ||
| Peter Navarro will be right back, and we'll pick up the track with Mike Davis. | ||
| We are here in the War Room, Stephen K. Bannon's War Room. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| We're talking with Mike Davis. | ||
| I'm going to get to him in a second, but first... | ||
| Gotta do a little Birch Gold rendition here. | ||
| Here's what I can tell you. | ||
| Here's the read I'm supposed to do. | ||
| Forget about that. | ||
| The importance of gold in your portfolio is really twofold. | ||
| One, if you're concerned about inflation, then gold's a very good hedge against inflation. | ||
| Number two, if you're concerned that the geopolitical risk in this world is Going up and high. | ||
| Hamas, Ukraine, China in the South China Sea. | ||
| We'll be talking about that, by the way, later on in the program with Brad Thayer and Jim Finnell. | ||
| If you think there's heightened geopolitical risk and the possibility of inflation, It's really useful to have gold in your portfolio. | ||
| The beauty of Birch Gold is that you can take your IRA or your 401k, move it into physical gold without worrying about taxes and stuff like that. | ||
| So my recommendation is if you want to learn about this, go to BirchGold.com. | ||
| All right. | ||
| So let's get back with Mike and reprise what the latest Biden initiative is. | ||
| We've got a situation where Biden is announcing he wants to move forward with Term limits. | ||
| Term limits on Supreme Court justices. | ||
| Ethics and immunity. | ||
| My take on this whole thing is that it's more political than anything. | ||
| These become levers for them to talk about things which are showing up in their polling. | ||
| It's pure campaigning. | ||
| Mike, on the other hand, I think he's made a better argument that if Kamala wins the White House, that'll likely mean they'll also have majorities in the Senate and House and could actually do this kind of stuff. | ||
| So, Mike, let's talk a little bit about the ethics portion of this. | ||
| Obviously, there were some things that came up with a couple of conservative Supreme Court justices. | ||
| Mountains were made out of these molehills. | ||
| But somehow, the Democrats think they can turn them back into mountains. | ||
| Why don't you explain to the listeners what that's all about and why it's wrong. | ||
| President Biden, whose family has taken over $20 million from China, Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, every hellhole, trouble spot around the world, it seems like, have sent millions of dollars to what seems like every Biden family member's bank accounts, except for the six-year-old granddaughter, who Biden won't claim because he's a total scumbag. | ||
| And Kamala Harris has known about this all along, and she's aided and abetted this corruption. | ||
| She's covered it up. | ||
| Now, these two corrupt politicians, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, want to pretend like the Supreme Court is corrupt. | ||
| And they want to pretend that the Supreme Court is corrupt because Justice Sam Alito's wife, Martha Ann Alito, flew flags. | ||
| She flew a couple flags. | ||
| One was One was a patriotic flag that George Washington flew, and another was an American distress flag when one of her crazy left-wing neighbors called her the C-word, right? | ||
| And so somehow that's an ethics problem for Justice Alito, and somehow Justice Alito was required to recuse from January 6th cases because of these flags that his wife, Martha Ann Alito, flew. | ||
| And there was also Justice Clarence Thomas, Who went on trips with his best friend of 25 years, a best friend who had zero business before the Supreme Court. | ||
| And Joe Biden and Kamala Harris think that now that the Supreme Court is unholy corrupted, it needs to be reformed, as they call it. | ||
| And this reform includes passing an unconstitutional ethics regime Where lower court judges, hand-selected lower court judges would tell their bosses, would tell Supreme Court justices whether they get to sit on cases or not sit on cases. | ||
| This is absolutely insane. | ||
| Lower courts, a district court would be able to do that. | ||
| A district court judge, presumably in the District of Columbia? | ||
| Yeah, that's just it. | ||
| We have nine justices on the Supreme Court. | ||
| They're not interchangeable. | ||
| There is a presumption that Supreme Court justices do not recuse from cases, unlike the lower federal courts, where they're interchangeable. | ||
| You can bring a federal judge from another place over to sit. | ||
| But stay with me on this. | ||
| Both Steve and I went through cases at the District of Columbia Federal Court. | ||
| Which is literally about, I don't know, 500 yards from where I'm sitting. | ||
| It's a court that has 11 Democrats and five Republicans on the appeals court and a similar kind of Democrat majority. | ||
| So it's like a kangaroo court. | ||
| So if you pass a law that says district court judges are going to Order Supreme Court judges to recuse themselves. | ||
| Isn't that like, it's like a ridiculous stack deck, is it not? | ||
| It's clearly unconstitutional. | ||
| Look, here's the bottom line. | ||
| Democrats controlled the Supreme Court for 90 years. | ||
| They don't control it anymore. | ||
| Democrats don't like that, so they're trying to destroy the legitimacy of the Supreme Court. | ||
| They're trying to have left-wing judges like Judge Tanya Shutkin apparently tell Clarence Thomas whether he can sit on a case or not. | ||
| This is kangaroo They want to turn the Supreme Court into a kangaroo court. | ||
| They want to turn our country into a banana republic. | ||
| These are Marxists who only care about power. | ||
| The Supreme Court is in their way, so they want to destroy the Supreme Court. | ||
| You know, we talked in the previous segment, I'm the devil's advocate here. | ||
| I think they're just doing it to kind of troll us. | ||
| Essentially and to raise these issues so basically they do this kind of thing and then the next day on the war room we have to recount the stuff that Thomas and Alito did and defend it. | ||
| It's easily defended because nothing really happened but it forces us to do that and Somehow, I'm not sure that works for us. | ||
| I'm trying to think what the appropriate response should be, whether we just, when they do stuff like this, whether we pivot away or whether we have to come down really hard on it. | ||
| The way you've gone about this is really powerful. | ||
| It's like, I don't know if people know who Tanya Chutkan is, but God saved the Queen on that one. | ||
| I mean, she is far to the left, but there's nothing new on the District Court of Columbia. | ||
| So anyway, I think what's happening here With Kamala coming along, is that they are defining what this election is going to be about more than we are. | ||
| I'm a little concerned about this. | ||
| Let's hit the last one, term limits. | ||
| What's that one all about? | ||
| Well, before we go to that, I would say this, Peter, you just spent four months in prison from this Biden regime. | ||
| Was that political rhetoric? | ||
| Or did they actually follow through? | ||
| Steve Bannon spending four months in prison. | ||
| They tried to take Trump off the ballot. | ||
| They tried to bankrupt him. | ||
| Look, Biden created the environment. | ||
| Biden and Kamala created the environment where Trump almost got assassinated, right? | ||
| They tried to put parents in jail for protesting the gender chaos schools and the resulting rapes in high school bathrooms. | ||
| They put Christians in prison for praying outside of abortion clinics while they give amnesty to BLM and Antifa and Hamas and Joe Biden, every scumbag Biden. | ||
| This is not political, right? | ||
| These people are playing for keeps. | ||
| And if Kamala Harris wins the presidency, she will win the House. | ||
| She will win the Senate. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They will nuke the legislative filibuster and they will pack See, I'm doing my job here as the devil's advocate because that was beautiful. | |
| I pat myself on the back. | ||
| You nailed it. | ||
| I mean, that's exactly right. | ||
| Tell me about the term limits thing. | ||
| What is that all about? | ||
| I have a fire alarm going off. | ||
| Here we go. | ||
| That's good. | ||
| So the term limits, we have lifetime tenure in the Constitution for federal judges. | ||
| And the reason, we also have pay protection. | ||
| And the reason we do that is we want federal judges to not have to worry about their next job, their next paycheck when they're making these decisions. | ||
| Their job is to protect the American people from the federal government. | ||
| And we want to insulate these judges. | ||
| Biden and Kamala Harris want to do now because they don't like that President Trump transformed the Supreme Court to the first constitutionalist majority in 90 years. | ||
| What they want to do is they want to pack the Supreme Court. | ||
| They want to pick off these conservative judges on these select cases with this ethics regime that they're trying to impose. | ||
| How does the term limits work, Mike? | ||
| Is it an age limit or is it a tenure limit? | ||
| How does it work? | ||
| It'd be every way. So if you're on the Supreme Court for 18 years, you would be kicked off the | ||
| Supreme Court, essentially, and you would become a senior justice and then, you know, just kind of | ||
| get sent to pasture. It's kind of amazing that Joe Biden, this decrepit, you know, 81 year old, | ||
| demented, corrupt man served 36 years in the Senate and has been a politician his entire life | ||
| is now calling for term limits for Supreme Court justices. | ||
| This is very rich. | ||
| What's interesting to me is that he's doing it rather than Kamala. | ||
| This is kind of an interesting kind of dynamic that's going to go on as well, where they're going to come at us from two different directions. | ||
| Biden's going to be doing some stuff. | ||
| She's going to be doing some stuff. | ||
| I mean, let's face it, when you're an incumbent, that's going to be pretty powerful. | ||
| I mean, he's going to be able to get away with stuff. | ||
| He's going to do stuff that if Kamala did it, she might take more direct heat as she's running. | ||
| I mean, what are your thoughts? | ||
| This is definitely the Biden-Kamala proposal to destroy the Supreme Court. | ||
| There's no question. | ||
| Kamala is a lot more liberal, a lot more aggressive than Biden has been on this. | ||
| This is Kamala pushing Joe Biden to do this. | ||
| Remember, it is Brian Fallon who ran Demand Justice. | ||
| Brian Fallon is Kamala's top aide. | ||
| He ran a radical group Look, she ran a bloodless coup against Joe Biden. | ||
| He is the president and name only. | ||
| Kamala Harris is the president right now. | ||
| She is the de facto president of the United States, and this is very much Kamala Harris's radical scheme to destroy the Supreme Court. | ||
| Sixty seconds, Mike. | ||
| Can you do a greatest hits on Kamala when she was in California? | ||
| When she was the AG of California, she was the OG. | ||
| She was the OG for a politicized and weaponized justice system. | ||
| She acted like she was this tough prosecutor. | ||
| She was not. | ||
| She would go after low-level Drug offenders, black men, she'd hit them on marijuana charges to rack up her numbers to make it look like she was tough, but she was the one who politicized and weaponized California's justice system to coddle criminals, to coddle illegal immigrants. | ||
| The Biden-Harris migrant crime that we're seeing now, she was the one who debuted that in California when she was the Attorney General. | ||
| All right, hey, can you stay for the last segment? | ||
| You have about eight more minutes after the break. | ||
| Is that cool? | ||
| Of course. | ||
| There's one more thing I want to go over with you that I think is kind of interesting. | ||
| I am Peter K. Navarro. | ||
| This is Stephen K. Bannon's War Room. | ||
| Greetings to the Admiral out there in Danbury, if you're listening. | ||
| Posse, stick around. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We got this. | |
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Hey, Peter K. Navarro in for the Admiral. | ||
| We have Mike Davis. | ||
| Mike, I did want to thank him. | ||
| He did a couple of chapters in the new book I've got out. | ||
| It's the new MAGA deal. | ||
| I think you'll like the subtitle. | ||
| It's the unofficial deplorables guide. | ||
| To the Trump 2024 platform, it's NewMegaDeal.com. | ||
| NewMegaDeal.com. | ||
| That's Dodd Jr.' 's publishing house. | ||
| Or you can get it on Amazon. | ||
| But Mike does three chapters, I think, on the weaponization of government. | ||
| And whenever I get Mike on the show or on the line, I always want to pick his brain on big issues. | ||
| And there's one that's really interesting to me, having been at the front lines of this weaponization of government. | ||
| It's like the District Court of Columbia. | ||
| There's 12 districts, I think, around the country. | ||
| This one is notoriously left, and it gets all contempt of Congress cases and things like that. | ||
| If I put a gun to your head, which I would never do, and said, are appeals court panels, usually three judge panels, random? | ||
| Or are they chosen in another way? | ||
| Most people, including judges themselves, according to the data, say it's a random process. | ||
| But it's not. | ||
| And the poster child for that is the prosecutions of Steve Bannon and Peter K. Navarro. | ||
| So, I've had four cases. | ||
| One associated with my criminal case. | ||
| Three associated with a civil case that the weaponized justice system did. | ||
| And Steve had two cuts at the apple. | ||
| And there's Sixteen judges on the appeals court. | ||
| You get these three judge panels, and on every single panel of those six that Steve or I had, two judges, Cornelia Pillard and Patricia Millett, both Obama appointees, either both or one of them appear on all six of those panels. | ||
| Now, if I gave you the choice of that and the probability and going out in the middle of a thunder and lightning storm as to which would be more dangerous probabilistically, you'd probably choose the lightning. | ||
| It'd be safer because the odds of that Are slim to none, unless they're packing those appeals courts. | ||
| And those two women are directly responsible for Steve and I going to prison. | ||
| So Mike, As the Democrats are talking about term limits and ethics and all that on the Supreme Court, what do we do about something like that? | ||
| Can those judges be forced to recuse themselves and stuff like this? | ||
| I mean, does that strike you as odd? | ||
| Talk to me about that. | ||
| President Obama, one of the most important things that President Obama did from a left-wing Democrat perspective was he stacked The D.C. | ||
| Circuit with left-wing radicals. | ||
| Remember, they nuked the filibuster for judges under Obama, and it used to require 60 votes to confirm these lower court judges. | ||
| They brought that down to 50 plus the VP or 51, and Obama was able to stack the D.C. | ||
| Circuit with these left-wing radicals. | ||
| And it just seems like these left-wing radicals, whether they are these D.C. | ||
| Circuit judges or the corrupt Manhattan Judge Juan Marchand, who happens to be on all these Trump cases, just randomly drawn on all these Trump cases. | ||
| It's not random at all. | ||
| The chances that these left-wing judges just happen to be on all these Trump-related cases is not random at all, and it's corruption to its core. | ||
| And House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan should send an oversight letter to the D.C. | ||
| Circuit And ask them about this so-called random draw of these same left-wing judges, these same left-wing radical ladies who Obama put on the D.C. | ||
| Circuit. | ||
| How are they on all these Trump cases, right? | ||
| And then, it's just, it's obviously not random. | ||
| It's obvious. | ||
| I should note here, though, I should note here, Mike, that if you read the law about how judges are picked, there's nothing in it about random. | ||
| They're not required to go random. | ||
| I mean, so they wind up stacking it. | ||
| I like the idea of Jordan contacting them, but keep going. | ||
| I just wanted to point that out. | ||
| There's nothing that requires randomness in the draw. | ||
| Well, I mean, the whole point of a random draw of these judges is to make it look like this is not a partisan process. | ||
| And the problem is, is this has been a partisan process with these Democrat prosecutors, these Biden and Kamala Democrat prosecutors and judges. | ||
| And witnesses and operatives who have politicized and weaponized our justice system at every level, whether it's the federal level with the cases against Trump by Jack Smith, the cases against you, Peter, the case against Steve Bannon. | ||
| He has several cases against Steve Bannon by these Democrat prosecutors and these Democrat hellholes of New York, D.C. | ||
| How did Steve draw the same judge? | ||
| I mean, you got Alvin Bragg and Juan Marchand going after Trump and Steve Bannon. | ||
| I mean, same judge. | ||
| I wonder how many judges they have in the New York court there. | ||
| Seems like there's only one named Juan Marchand. | ||
| It's ridiculous. | ||
| And that Juan Marchand's daughter, Lauren Marchand, is raising millions of dollars. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Biden, for Kamala Harris, for these Biden and Kamala Democrats. She's raising millions | ||
| of dollars. She gets a cut of that. That requires Judge Juan Machon's recusal under New York | ||
| statute. When President Trump raised this recusal issue, how did he respond? He retaliated | ||
| against President Trump. Juan Machon said he was going to put President Trump in prison | ||
| if he mentioned Lauren Machon's name. This is corruption to its core. And this is why | ||
| this next election is so important. Again, do you want President Trump or President Kamala | ||
| Harris appointing these judges on the Supreme Court and the lower federal courts? Do you | ||
| want the Trump Justice Department? | ||
| The things that you said today, Mike... | ||
| Of all the great things you said today, your admonition that if Kamala wins, we'll lose the Senate and House. | ||
| Mike, quickly, social media, you want to plug anything? | ||
| Yeah, article3project.org, article number 3project.org. | ||
| You can donate there, you can follow us on social media, and you can take action there. | ||
| Thank you, Peter. | ||
| Alright, you're my brother. | ||
| NewMegaDeal.com to read Mike Davis' contribution. | ||
| NewMegaDeal.com. |
Export Selection