Jan. 11, 2024 - Bannon's War Room
48:50
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| Secretary Mayorkas, I want you to look at these innocent Americans. | ||
| Do you see them? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I do, Congresswoman. | |
| They are dead. | ||
| They're from Dalton, Georgia, in my district. | ||
| They're dead because a 17-year-old, likely affiliated with the cartels, was smuggling illegal aliens into our country in Texas, breaking our laws. | ||
| And this happens every single day in our country. | ||
| Earlier this week, eight Republicans joined the Democrats and protected your job. | ||
| But I want you to know, you have a short time coming. | ||
| You can honorably resign, or we are going to impeach you. | ||
| And it's happening very, very soon. | ||
| Thank you, Mr. Chairman. | ||
| Excuse me, Hunter, apparently you're afraid of my words. | ||
| Whoa! | ||
| I'd like to reclaim my time, Mr. Chairman. | ||
| ...kind of burst their bubble. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Order. | |
| Wow, that's too bad. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The chair recognizes Ms. Graham from Georgia. | |
| I think it's clear and obvious for everyone watching this hearing today that Hunter Biden is terrified of strong, conservative Republican women, because he can't even face my words as I was about to speak to him. | ||
| What a coward. | ||
| Dr. Fauci fully believed in creating or enhancing viruses using the gain-of-function research or that capability in order to create vaccines. | ||
| And this is a shocking thing to think about. | ||
| The average person or most doctors practicing, you know, every day in their doctor's offices are blown away at the fact that you would create or enhance a virus in order to create a vaccine to fight it. | ||
| The risk is so high. | ||
| And what's shocking to me is back in 2012, he actually wrote a paper about it and wrote about the scenario that a pandemic could get released upon the world. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And he spelled that out in his article. | |
| And in the article, he says that it's worth the risk. | ||
| But it's not worth the risk because millions of people died. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Did he change your mind on anything at all? | |
| Did he give you any new clarity on anything regarding what you all did? | ||
| Yeah, the clarity that I just heard him talk about, because we were asking him about this specific article, is that he knew the risk. | ||
| And that's clear. | ||
| Not only did he write about it in 2012, but we were talking about it in there. | ||
| And I think I can speak for many Americans when I can say, absolutely, he belongs in jail for that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Turning now to the funding fight that you mentioned, there's a lot of frustration. | |
| Members, you have raised concerns about the deal that was cut. | ||
| The deal, of course, cut between Speaker Johnson and Chuck Schumer. | ||
| I want you to listen to what your fellow conservative Marjorie Taylor Greene told me about this yesterday. | ||
| Have you lost confidence in him? | ||
| I haven't seen anything come out of these negotiations that give me confidence. | ||
| And that's the problem. | ||
| People are saying that at home. | ||
| And they do not want to see our Republican Speaker of the House getting rolled in these meetings behind closed doors. | ||
| That's not what we want to see out of our Speaker. | ||
| Otherwise, what's the difference in Nancy Pelosi having the gavel and us having the majority? | ||
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
| Pray for our enemies. | ||
| Because we're going medieval on these people. | ||
| President Trump got a free shot at all these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you've tried to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
|
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. Here's your host, Stephen K. Babb. | |
| A 11 January in the year of our Lord 2024. | ||
| Yes, we're back in the worm in the nation's capital. | ||
| And the reason is, is that we have an emergency. | ||
| And the emergency is that we have a Speaker of the House that has lost his way. | ||
| And there are many people on the right that are trying to help him out and assist him. | ||
| But if that assistance is not taken, then, hey, we may be under new management here shortly. | ||
| Honored to have Marjorie Taylor Greene in as Congressman from Georgia. | ||
| Congressman Greene, and by the way, we're going to do two things here. | ||
| We've got Congressman Greene. | ||
| Russ Vought's going to join us to talk about his Twitter thread on the one-year CR. | ||
| We've also got Rosemary Jenks, and Rosemary Jenks has a brutal analysis of what Lankford and the Republicans over the Senate have been done about this. | ||
| I just wanted, before I go to Russ, a couple things we're going to go through today. | ||
| You've led the interrogation or the questioning of Fauci under oath behind closed doors for two days. | ||
| You have a vaccine injury committee meeting you're holding tomorrow with McCulloch and others. | ||
| You have been, started the impeachment of Mayorkas. | ||
| You, yesterday, Hunter Biden ran from you about the contempt hearings for oversight and the oversight meeting was amazing. | ||
| You've been the leader right now on not one penny for Ukraine. | ||
| Not gonna happen, fight that. | ||
| You've also been, hey, either shut the border down or shut the government down. | ||
| And now you're in the middle of the speaker fight because yesterday you joined, I think, the other 11 or 12 to stop the rule. | ||
| So you've thrown down hard on, we've got to get serious about this, we have to have a change of management. | ||
| Let's get Russ Vought in here for a minute. | ||
| Russ, I've got Congressman Green here, and I know she speaks for a lot of folks right now. | ||
| They're quite upset. | ||
| You've got either a middle way or... Remember, this audience, the Warren posse, the guys on our side up in the House, we hate the word CR. | ||
| We hate it, right? | ||
| It's emblematic of all the problems we've got now. | ||
| And so when someone like you that people revere come out on a Twitter thread last night and say, Hey, I think the only solution we've got here is a one year CR. | ||
| Can you walk us through that? | ||
| Sure. | ||
| And I just want to be very clear. | ||
| I hate CRs too. | ||
| And that's because almost all CRs, except what I'm proposing, is to take the previous year's spending level and just continuing it. | ||
| But we have an anomaly right now in the situation that we find ourselves in. | ||
| And that is that we are under a debt limit deal that was negotiated by the Democrats and Kevin McCarthy. | ||
| And as a result of that, there are caps in place that if you extend the current loss spending and there's the final appropriations bill of the year. | ||
| So it has to be a full year bill. | ||
| It can't be one of these short term CRs. | ||
| That will trigger a $73 billion cut to non-defense spending, and non-defense spending alone. | ||
| And there's a reason why that is. | ||
| It's because they were generally trying to hide spending that both parties had agreed to. | ||
| And so to make the bill, the debt limit, look artificially lower from a fiscal responsibility perspective, they set the cap too low. | ||
| Now, that wouldn't have been an issue if Kevin McCarthy was still the speaker for them, but he's not. | ||
| And as a result, think of it as a light switch. | ||
| This light switch would trigger a 9% across the board cut to non-defense spending and non-defense spending alone. | ||
| And right now, I'm one of the biggest critics of Mike Johnson right now. | ||
| He is bowing to the fear of a government shutdown within his own ranks. | ||
| I think he should stand up to that fear like Congressman Green would have him do, but he's not. | ||
| Right now, the only thing that you could probably get passed in a small, slim majority is something that would be called a continuing resolution, but would have the effect of a $73 billion cut across the board. | ||
| And the Democrats know this. | ||
| This is why they were so desiring to sign onto the bill that Johnson has put forward, which, by the way, would be $100 billion more Then what was agreed to by Kevin McCarthy. | ||
| And so that is a hundred billion dollars more than a continuing resolution. | ||
| So you get a sense for why the Democrat, this is the main threat that the Democrats know and are preparing for. | ||
| And if we can get conservatives comfortable with it, it would be a major coup d'etat and it would give him a chance to, to, to go in a totally different direction. | ||
| But I understand where people. | ||
| I hate the notion of a CR, but this is a different CR. | ||
| It is also, to be clear, it is not the Thomas Massey 1%. | ||
| They're totally different. | ||
| This is a full year unlocking of an across-the-board $73 billion that trigger is already in law for a set of historical, recent, contextual reasons that I've already discussed. | ||
| Let me just do some math so people can understand this, if I'm correct. | ||
| If you've got the discretionary spending, you've got the defense budget, I think it'll be at $800 billion around there, the non-defense, $73 billion would roughly be a 10% cut in discretionary non-defense spending, roughly, is that what you're saying? | ||
| Correct, it would be a 9% cut. | ||
| And defense, because what they did was, you know, they set the cap for defense higher, And so you're, if you extend defense and obviously you and I would like to go lower on defense, but if you extend current law for defense, that's going to come in below their statutory cap. | ||
| That is not the case for non-defense because in non-defense they had this, this, this cap that they set because they wanted it to appear low. | ||
| So they sent it at $704 billion and they had this whole plan. | ||
| We call it the side deal. | ||
| that they were going to spend outside the caps and that was going to be able to be secured in the presence and person of Kevin McCarthy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| They never thought they'd be here, so what they did on this, they didn't really think Okay, one thing I gotta make sure the audience understands, because this is going to get to the heart of the problem with Speaker Johnson. | ||
| You just said something that I think is shocking people. | ||
| Walk us through the math of why Johnson's proposal he signed on is a hundred billion dollars more. | ||
| He's been so played by the Democrats, it's shocking. | ||
| How did he get to a situation, and show me the math, And back to the $100 billion increase. | ||
| $100 billion more than the continuing resolution, not $100 billion more than the agreement that McCarthy negotiated. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Right. | ||
| So again, it gets back to this. | ||
| They set the caps. | ||
| Their design was to set the caps so that they could appear to their conservative members that they were doing some historic deficit reduction. | ||
| They weren't. | ||
| So he has agreed to this arrangement with Schumer that is $100 billion more than a continuing resolution would be in terms of the across-the-board cuts. | ||
| So that would be $1,564 trillion. | ||
| He has agreed to a spending level of $1.659 trillion. | ||
| So again, you hate CRs, I hate CRs. | ||
| has agreed to a spending level of $1.659 trillion. | ||
| So again, you hate CRs, I hate CRs. | ||
| This isn't really the same type of CRs that we all hate, but he's doing something else $100 billion worse than that. | ||
| And that's his solution without even considering that this might be approached. | ||
| Now, I think as a result of yesterday with a number of the members getting his attention by bringing a rule down, these conversations are probably happening, but it's going to be vital that we all have kind of situational awareness. | ||
| And my view always, Steve, is I care about substance over form. | ||
| I hug substance tightly, and I'm loose with form. | ||
| And you hug strategy tightly, and we'll use the tactics we've got to use. | ||
| A couple things. | ||
| Am I to take it that the difference then between your, to go back to the one year CR, and what Johnson agreed to, is $173 billion difference? | ||
| Being the $100 billion he's agreed to? | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, it's $100 billion. | |
| So basically, how do you get... The difference between the $73 billion and the $100 billion They don't get their defense increased. | ||
| Defense only flatlines. | ||
| So that's really the difference between the cut and the $100 billion. | ||
| I know you've got to balance. | ||
| What about just approving DOD and DHS for the 19th and then shutting the government down saying, hey, we've got to play hardball here. | ||
| Everything else shuts down until you secure the border. | ||
| I'm all for that. | ||
| What about that strategy? | ||
| In terms of trying to navigate these different fights that are going on, I would time this, but I'd have the fight to secure the border, I'd pass what you can pass, but do not pass a massive Chuck Schumer spending agreement with Mike Johnson when you have this on the table that you could do to leverage long-term cuts. | ||
| Russ, where do people get to you today, particularly on Twitter? | ||
| I know you've got to bounce. | ||
| We've got to bounce. | ||
| So where do people go? | ||
| Because the fight is on, and this is folks, it's 24-7, moving target. | ||
| Where do they get to you, Russ? | ||
| At RussVote is the Twitter and getter and truth, and theamericarenewing.com is our website. | ||
| We'll be posting throughout the day, and we're back and forth with people who are against us. | ||
| Okay Russ, thank you very much. | ||
| It's not the Thomas Massey CR. | ||
| Then we'll push it out today. | ||
| Thank you very much. | ||
| We're going to take a short commercial break. | ||
| Get on your Warpath coffee, get jacked up. | ||
| Congressman Green is going to join us here. | ||
| To give her point of view, she's gonna get you jacked up. | ||
| Warpath.coffee.com, get your discount. | ||
| Now this is the Dark Roast, Mariner's blend, my favorite. | ||
| Worked on this for a year and a half, about two years. | ||
| We've taken the acid kickback out, so if you've never tried Dark Roast, you don't like it, try it! | ||
| We've also got all the other blends. | ||
| Warpath.coffee, back in a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bass. | |
| Okay, just so the audience understands, Warren Posse understands, I love Russ Vought. | ||
| He's done such an amazing job as a great OMB director. | ||
| He'll be a senior member of Trump's second term. | ||
| But on this one, I just adamantly disagree right now. | ||
| It's quite simple. | ||
| First off, this budget's outrageous. | ||
| The show's budget's got significant, massive cuts, and even in defense, And you must close the border or shut it down. | ||
| Here's the problem with Johnson and these guys. | ||
| They're taking off the table the leverage we have. | ||
| Congressman Green, you've been, and I'm going to get to all the other stuff you're fighting on, but I've got to get back to this, particularly the border. | ||
| In the conference, why are other members in the conference so afraid of a government shutdown? | ||
| Well, they find it embarrassing. | ||
| The press runs around the Capitol every single day and puts this great threat in front of them. | ||
| Republicans, House Republicans, will be blamed for a government shutdown. | ||
| When all reality outside of the bubble of Washington, D.C., regular Americans could care less about a shutdown because they view the Capitol, they view this town as the exact complete cause of all of their woes. | ||
| This government has put them in $34 trillion in debt. | ||
| This government has ripped our border wide open. | ||
| We have a daily invasion that is not going to stop with a deal about $60 billion for Ukraine. | ||
| That is an absolute lie. | ||
| This town has caused all the problems for the American people. | ||
| They don't care if it shuts down. | ||
| They don't care if federal employees are not receiving a government-funded, taxpayer-funded paycheck. | ||
| They want the government to get out of their lives. | ||
| What we should be doing is we should be going to a limited functioning. | ||
| This is a corporation on the verge of bankruptcy. | ||
| I'm a successful business owner, Steve. | ||
| When you get into trouble like this, When you are bleeding money, when you are losing your value in your customers' eyes, when your customers are ready to just say, screw you, I want nothing to do with you anymore, and that is where we are right now in U.S. | ||
| history, you shrink down to a limited level. | ||
| We can keep our air traffic controllers going. | ||
| We can keep our border patrol going. | ||
| We can keep very limited parts of the government going, but let me tell you something, we don't have to fund all of this garbage. | ||
| Okay, this is what I want to talk about, because there is an alternative, and that is you pass, you do your appropriations bills, you get finished with DOD. | ||
| Yeah, we finished our job. | ||
| The most fundamental, so they can't sit there and say you're putting people in jeopardy. | ||
| That's right. | ||
| The rest of it, Biden's regime basically shuts itself down. | ||
| No, if I'm Speaker of the House, I finish the job in the House. | ||
| I pass the appropriation bills. | ||
| And then I tell Chuck Schumer in the Senate, it's your job now, buddy. | ||
| You do your work. | ||
| And then we'll talk. | ||
| But right now, Mike Johnson is getting rolled in meeting after meeting after meeting. | ||
| When he is talking to Jake Sullivan and Chuck Schumer every day and impressed with these Four Corners meetings, but he's not talking to me and other important members in our Republican conference at all about any of the negotiations and any of the plans and exactly what we want to see done. | ||
| He's failing on the job. | ||
| But the biggest red flag for me, Steve, right now that has me livid is this deal with Ukraine. | ||
| This is a losing war. | ||
| It is a losing issue. | ||
| The American people do not support it. | ||
| Our border security is not a negotiating tool for the Ukraine war that the Pentagon loves and Joe Biden loves and the Democrats love and that these rhino neocon Republicans and Nikki Haley is frothing at the mouth over because her donors support it. | ||
| No, no, no, no, no. | ||
| Mike Johnson should not be going in there with Chuck Schumer and saying, oh yeah, yeah, we're going to make this deal where 5,000 illegal aliens, not migrants, cross the border every damn day so you can get $60 billion over to Zelensky, the most corrupt president in the world right now, because Ukraine is not the 51st state. | ||
| Every day Mike Johnson gets closer and closer to this deal brings me closer and closer to vacating the chair, because I have absolutely had it. | ||
| Now, everybody knows, and we don't need to go there. | ||
| You were a big supporter of McCarthy, but you went along with this. | ||
| You said originally last week, hey, we don't need to vacate the chair. | ||
| We don't need to do this. | ||
| It's just more chaos. | ||
| Let's just power through. | ||
| In the last 48 hours, you've changed your opinion dramatically. | ||
| In fact, you were one of the 13, I think, that blocked the rule yesterday, which was really the throwdown to say, dude, if it's not going to be serious, nothing's going to get done. | ||
| Essentially, Gates and company seized the floor. | ||
| What has changed your mind from saying, hey, I supported McCarthy, but let's go with this guy, if that's what it's going to be, we don't want any more chaos, we don't want the media on us, to saying, no, you either get this stuff done now, grow a backbone, or you're out. | ||
| That's right, I started this Congress in full faith, really wanting to work and get something accomplished. | ||
| Because that's my background, Steve. | ||
| I come from the business world, where you work with everybody for the goal. | ||
| That is, customer is king and you serve your customer. | ||
| And you run a good business, you run it right, you take care of your employees, and you make a profit, not a loss. | ||
| So that's how I started this conference. | ||
| Now I supported Mike Johnson, but this thing is steamrolling downhill faster than I could ever imagine. | ||
| What do you mean by that? | ||
| No, it went the last 48 hours. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What do you mean by that? | |
| It's the past 12 hours. | ||
| 12 hours? | ||
| The past 12 hours has shocked me. | ||
| It's no communication, completely blaming everything else, going in and he's making deals. | ||
| You know, I was on the NDAA conference committee, and I never got to participate in any of the policy discussion, which was extremely important. | ||
| When he rolled over and gave them everything. | ||
| Yeah, because Mike Johnson went into the four corners and made the deal. | ||
| And so, I didn't get to do my job. | ||
| Others like me didn't get to do it. | ||
| None of us got to participate. | ||
| Is it his staff he's got? | ||
| His lack of background? | ||
| Is he just not a fighter? | ||
| Why are we in this situation? | ||
| Look, Mike Johnson is a nice guy. | ||
| He's a good guy. | ||
| But that doesn't mean that he's good at negotiating. | ||
| That doesn't mean that he's able to walk in and read the room. | ||
| But he's got tons of people like you that he can reach out to and have a formidable team. | ||
| You've got some killers up there. | ||
| Right, I get an occasional text message, and that's not going to work. | ||
| And it's not working, because look at the results. | ||
| He is losing the faith and the support of conservatives across America so fast, and he's lost many of them already. | ||
| I mean, look at what is happening. | ||
| One year CR? | ||
| Are you kidding me? | ||
| That is an absolute embarrassment. | ||
| That is a joke. | ||
| We don't need to be doing that. | ||
| If we have to fall back to that, then it's technically a loss anyway. | ||
| I don't care if you're cutting $73 billion. | ||
| Just the concept, you would go back to a CR, which we swore and pledged we would never do. | ||
| Yeah, we all go home for Christmas. | ||
| We all go home and spend all this time at home, and yet we can't pass five remaining appropriation bills. | ||
| I want to go back to the conference. | ||
| This is the key point. | ||
| Your constituents, if we got them on today in a town hall, they are 100% in back of you saying, hey, if you can't pass these things and get a real budget with cuts and secure the border, shut it down. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Correct? | |
| Absolutely. | ||
| No question. | ||
| My constituents right now, this is where they are. | ||
| These are hard-working people. | ||
| These are people that have tremendous faith in God. | ||
| Most of them Christians. | ||
| These are people that have worked all their lives in whatever capacity their job is. | ||
| These are people suffering under Biden's inflation. | ||
| These are people, veterans, that fought in the Vietnam War, maybe the Korean War, some of them World War II still. | ||
| These people, their hearts are bleeding Over our government serving every other country in the world, but the American people last these are people have watched their jobs Flee overseas for decades now, which which is so important to me. | ||
| It's so important It's the first chapter in the book. | ||
| I wrote Steve as our jobs going overseas. | ||
| These are people that do not They don't want to see our government continue to fail them, and they don't want to see our Republican Speaker of the House going in there, buddy-buddy with Chuck Schumer, helping Joe Biden pass his agenda faster than Nancy Pelosi did. | ||
| And that is literally what is happening. | ||
| And my constituents are sick and tired of it. | ||
| They want accountability. | ||
| That's why when Hunter Biden ran out of the room as soon as I started speaking— Why did he run out when you took the mic? | ||
| Because he's terrified of what I had to say. | ||
| And what was that going to be? | ||
| That was going to be directly about the Mann Act violations, human sex trafficking, the unbelievable amount of evidence that we have. | ||
| You're prepared to go then. | ||
| You've sat here six months ago, eight months ago, said you went to Treasury, you saw the file, the file on the human sex trafficking is that thick, and it's all documented by wire transfers. | ||
| You were going to do it, and they knew you were going to do it. | ||
| Is that why they ran? | ||
| He knew, and I tell you what, when I brought it up, every Democrat on the Oversight Committee lost their minds. | ||
| They start screaming, revenge porn, and she's showing porn. | ||
| No I'm not, they're blurred out. | ||
| I'm actually showing images that Hunter Biden made himself and uploaded to porn sites with prostitutes that he paid and flew across state lines. | ||
| That's against federal law, just like evading a subpoena is. | ||
| You believe he needs to be criminally charged for that? | ||
| One hundred percent. | ||
| That's the one issue that makes him run away faster than anything. | ||
| And the Democrats lose their minds. | ||
| They start screaming, interrupting, objecting, point of inquiry. | ||
| You know, it was wild yesterday. | ||
| And then I introduced it into the record. | ||
| AOC literally left the room. | ||
| Jamie Raskin's head was exploding. | ||
| I thought his new hair transplants were going to fly out. | ||
| So bad. | ||
| Listen, I want to go back. | ||
| We talk constituents. | ||
| Given that we have people all over the country on here all the time, basically every Republican district, even the ones that quote unquote Biden won, which he wouldn't win today. | ||
| The constituents are there too. | ||
| What is it about the reps that they're afraid of your logic and say, look, we can do a limited thing, keep defense, keep DHS, keep what you need, the minimum, but force Biden to shut arrest down because no more money. | ||
| What don't they? | ||
| Why? | ||
| Why don't they follow you? | ||
| What don't they understand? | ||
| Why are they afraid of that? | ||
| Because they think their re-election hinges on the lobbyists and the big donors that they think help them get re-elected. | ||
| Not at all. | ||
| Their people elect them. | ||
| Their people vote for them. | ||
| And we have so much momentum right now. | ||
| Steve, President Trump is winning. | ||
| Bigger than he did in 2016. | ||
| Bigger than he did in 2020. | ||
| He is winning so big right now because of the issues. | ||
| And House Republicans could be winning in very much the same way if House Republicans would get over their Trump derangement syndrome and their DeSantis endorsements and their Nikki Haley love affair or their neocon Ukraine foreign war garbage. | ||
| We can win this with America first, and the Speaker of the House needs to figure that out. | ||
| He needs to figure it out. | ||
| Chuck Schumer's not his buddy. | ||
| Joe Biden is not his friend. | ||
| Jake Sullivan is definitely not his friend. | ||
| House Republicans, we need to be doing a lot better. | ||
| You're heading to Iowa as a surrogate tomorrow for this weekend. | ||
| Are you going to be there through Monday helping President Trump? | ||
| I am going to be there. | ||
| I can't wait. | ||
| It is massive. | ||
| I mean, his support is incredible. | ||
| New Hampshire is next. | ||
| But I want to tell you, it's going to grow from there. | ||
| It really is. | ||
| Okay, short commercial break. | ||
| We're going to return with Marjorie Taylor Greene. | ||
| We got Rosemary Jenks. | ||
| Rosemary Jenks is going to expose the lies and, quite frankly, the treason that's going on in the Senate right now in this border situation. | ||
| And Senator Lankford should be embarrassed about this. | ||
| And people in Oklahoma have got to take action on this. | ||
| This is an embarrassment. | ||
| Rosemary Jenks joins MTG and myself in the War Room. | ||
| Just a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| In times of turbulence for the last 5,000 years of a recorded history, gold has been a hedge against those times of turbulence. | ||
| So make sure you go to birchgold.com and talk to Philip Patrick and the team and find out why gold has been on the march for the last couple years and why the central banks of the BRICS nation, not the Federal Reserve, but the BRICS nation, are buying gold at record rates. | ||
| Go check it out at birchgold.com. | ||
| Right before I go to Rosemary Jenks, why did you join the group yesterday to seize the floor in the block, and basically you guys sent a message. | ||
| Ain't nothing, nothing's going to go on here until we get to the heart of this, and the heart of this is securing the border, and if you have to shut down the government, we're finished with the happy talk. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's right. | |
| What caused you to do that? | ||
| My reasons were different than Freedom Caucus. | ||
| They're hyper-focused on numbers and I agree we have to cut spending. | ||
| I don't disagree with them. | ||
| My reasons are completely different though. | ||
| My issues are the border and this Ukraine war, this love affair with Washington D.C. | ||
| We have an opportunity and we have had the momentum going into stopping funding for this Ukraine war, the most corrupt country in the world right now where American money is being laundered, literally laundered, through this war. | ||
| And our money is going into hands and our weapons are going different places. | ||
| If I remember correctly, you have been 100% correct on the Ukraine war from the beginning. | ||
| Am I mistaken in that? | ||
| You've been 100% correct. | ||
| No, I've called it from the beginning, Steve, and it has caused so many problems. | ||
| How do people then come into conference and brief you with this thing of Trump wanting another 60 billion dollars, which next year is going to be another 60, another 60? | ||
| How do they sit there with a straight face and we said, well, hang on. | ||
| I've been against this from the beginning. | ||
| You guys have been right. | ||
| And you've lied to the American people about the success of the Ukrainian army to the detriment of the Ukrainian people. | ||
| That's why they can't recruit right now. | ||
| Remember, they're essentially press ganging people to fight because they killed, you know, 60, 70, 80,000 young Ukrainian troops. | ||
| They are literally murdering a generation of young men in Ukraine. | ||
| And Washington has blood on their hands for doing that. | ||
| And that's what they're forcing our country, our taxpayers, to fund generational murder. | ||
| It's like genocide in Ukraine of Ukrainian men. | ||
| Paid for by the American taxpayer. | ||
| And it's sick. | ||
| It's sick and disgusting. | ||
| They're also lying. | ||
| And many of my colleagues buy the talking points. | ||
| If we don't stop Vladimir Putin in Ukraine, he's going to keep going and he's going to take Europe, just like Hitler did. | ||
| This is a lie that they tell them over and over again, because if you look it up and you really do your research, Putin is not on record saying that he wants to march all the way across Europe and take Europe. | ||
| He's not saying that at all. | ||
| And this is really a civil war. | ||
| This has been a civil war between Ukraine and Russia for years and years and years. | ||
| And then they turned it into a lie and made it into something big and threatening like World War I and World War II. | ||
| You were adamant, I think, in one of the funny things that you fought to say. | ||
| And I thought you got approval. | ||
| You say, hey, the only way anybody will back this, you have to have a full accounting. | ||
| We have to have transparency. | ||
| That's right. | ||
| How has that played out? | ||
| Because I still don't know. | ||
| Nobody knows where the money's going except into yachts and for the oligarchs in Ukraine and in the south of France. | ||
| That's right. | ||
| I demanded an audit. | ||
| Audit, and we don't... And they promised me an audit. | ||
| They say all the time, well, it's audited daily. | ||
| Marjorie Taylor Greene, Google, look it up. | ||
| Is that a lie? | ||
| They claim that it's audited, but I haven't seen... I've asked for the receipts, and I haven't gotten the receipts in my audit yet. | ||
| No, it's all a lie. | ||
| It was, let's appease her, let's appease her, calm her down, and then we can keep going. | ||
| I'm done! | ||
| I'm totally done. | ||
| I'm absolutely done. | ||
| You know, it's getting to the point of I'm wondering who's running in these primaries. | ||
| Because it's getting to a point where it needs to stop. | ||
| And they want to keep going. | ||
| They want the Ukraine more, Steve. | ||
| They want a war with Iran. | ||
| And they constantly tell us over here, across the street over here, they're constantly telling us about the upcoming war with China. | ||
| You know, here's my issue. | ||
| Why do we have to have an upcoming war with China, when if we did it right here with our economy, we would beat China economically, and we can do that, and that is exactly how you defeat China. | ||
| We don't have to go to a World War III war level with China. | ||
| But that's what they want. | ||
| That's what they want. | ||
| In the Red Sea, I spent half of my time at sea in the North Arabian Sea in the Persian Gulf. | ||
| The two carrier battlegroups, still carrier battlegroups, under complete assault by Persian proxies to keep the Suez Canal open, which, hey, that's free navigation waters. | ||
| Where are the Europeans? | ||
| The Brits got a couple of combatants down there, but to keep the Suez Canal open is for free trade between Asia Essentially, in Europe. | ||
| Where are the Europeans? | ||
| Once again, NATO not picking up the slack. | ||
| Let's go to... I want to bring in Rosemary Jenks. | ||
| I want to bring in Rosemary Jenks. | ||
| By the way, this book is amazing. | ||
| MTG. | ||
| You get it from President Trump's publishing company. | ||
| It's got some great poll quotes in the back. | ||
| You got Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, AOC, Nancy Pelosi, Liz Cheney. | ||
| Whoopi Goldberg's the best. | ||
| This woman gets to come and talk about taking over the country and she's not behind bars? | ||
| How does that... This is the worst... This is a heck... On the back are absolutely the worst comments I've ever heard about a person in my life. | ||
| I think they're great endorsements. | ||
| They're great endorsements. | ||
| The book is amazing. | ||
| President Trump's publishing company, Sergio Agor and the team. | ||
| You go there right now. | ||
| Can you go to Amazon and get it? | ||
| You can find it everywhere. | ||
| It's on Amazon. | ||
| It's not my Barnes & Noble when I go down there. | ||
| Why is that? | ||
| Well, it's supposed to be. | ||
| Have you had any book signings at Barnes & Noble? | ||
| Not yet. | ||
| I should have one in my hometown though, Rome. | ||
| Barnes & Noble in Rome. | ||
| Didn't they try to shut you down this weekend from a book signing? | ||
| Oh, absolutely. | ||
| People are buying it. | ||
| MTGbook.com. | ||
| MTGbook.com. | ||
| They're getting copies. | ||
| Why are they afraid of you having a book signing with Patriots down in Florida, the free state of Florida? | ||
| Well, it was the same thing that happened to Matt Gaetz and I in California a few years ago. | ||
| They just started calling and threatening the venues. | ||
| Hundreds and hundreds of calls, death threats, even to a church. | ||
| One of the venues was a church. | ||
| But Florida Patriots are incredible. | ||
| Why are they so afraid of what you have to say in the book and you personally being somewhere? | ||
| Why are they afraid of it? | ||
| Same reason why Hunter Biden ran out of the room yesterday in the Oversight hearing. | ||
| He's a sex trafficker? | ||
| He's a sex trafficker? | ||
| Human sex trafficking. | ||
| It's in the SARS reports. | ||
| You have the receipts? | ||
| Absolutely! | ||
| Oversight has the receipts. | ||
| The DOJ should be prosecuting Hunter Biden for many other things. | ||
| You're saying for crimes? | ||
| Man-act violations. | ||
| We have all the evidence. | ||
| He sex-trafficked people from out of the country or just across state lines? | ||
| Prostitutes across state lines and brought them in across state lines, flew them across state lines for sex, filmed videos of having sex with these women, then uploaded the videos on porn websites. | ||
| Did the Secret Service know this at the time? | ||
| I don't know how they didn't know. | ||
| If he had Secret Service protection, I don't know how they didn't know. | ||
| Does that lead to a bigger scandal, you think? | ||
| I think it's a huge scandal. | ||
| The Biden family. | ||
| I mean, look at Hunter Biden. | ||
| Look at what he's done. | ||
| He didn't register as a foreign agent. | ||
| That one right there is not. | ||
| David Weiss is not prosecuting him for that. | ||
| But let's go a step further. | ||
| This is an issue with all prosecutors. | ||
| Fannie Willis in Georgia. | ||
| I just sent a criminal referral to Governor Kemp and our Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr yesterday because allegedly Fannie Willis and her lover, Nathan Wade. | ||
| Alleged lover. | ||
| Who was married and is now getting divorced. | ||
| Alleged lover. | ||
| I guess the wife doesn't think it's alleged. | ||
| She's subpoenaed Fannie for the divorce hearing. | ||
| That's right. | ||
| Mike Davis, the fighter, actually sent me last night and said it's the most brilliant thing he's seen done in this is your criminal referral of Fannie Willis. | ||
| We have to. | ||
| Do folks in Georgia back you on this? | ||
| I hope so. | ||
| If our governor and attorney general do not investigate Fannie Willis, then they are literally going to be guilty of turning a blind eye to the biggest possible corruption. | ||
| And you talk about RICO charges. | ||
| Fannie Willis, it looks very obvious that she colluded not only with the White House, because there's evidence that Nathan Wade went up there. | ||
| At least he billed for it. | ||
| That's right, he billed for it, so that means it's there. | ||
| And then also, there appears to be collusion with the January 6th Committee in preparation for prosecuting President Trump and his co-defendants in Georgia. | ||
| And you're going to bring all that forward and hammer all this? | ||
| Yes, it has to be done. | ||
| Georgia, the people of Georgia are embarrassed. | ||
| We are fed up with it. | ||
| Is Kemp and the Reiners going to move on this? | ||
| Are they going to look the other way? | ||
| I'm planning to call our governor later today. | ||
| I'm planning on calling our Georgia Attorney General later today. | ||
| Would this be your first move in MTG running for the governorship of Georgia? | ||
| I'm not ruling that out, Steve. | ||
| I've got a lot of options open to me in the future. | ||
| Georgia is my home state. | ||
| Born and raised there. | ||
| I love Georgia. | ||
| It's my home. | ||
| And the Democrats want Georgia more than any other state in the United States of America, and we have to protect it. | ||
| Such a great state with such a powerful economy. | ||
| Let's bring in Rosemary Jenks. | ||
| Rosemary, today on Jake Sherman's Punchbowl, they talk about Schumer running the deal with Johnson. | ||
| He's providing air cover, but they talk about what's going on in the Senate with the Ukraine war. | ||
| But Lankford's got this compromise. | ||
| He's working on this thing. | ||
| If they can just get humanitarian parole, and we had Bensman on yesterday, talk about that. | ||
| But your analysis, Rosemary, and you're the best, you say that's all a lie, that this is the worst thing you've ever seen. | ||
| Explain to us what Lankford and the Senate Republicans are doing to the country. | ||
| This is unbelievably traitorous, this deal that they're coming up with. | ||
| I put this into three buckets, what I've seen of it so far. | ||
| The first one is completely unrelated to border security. | ||
| They have provisions to increase What does that have to do with the border crisis? | ||
| permanent immigrant visas every year. | ||
| Why would you increase legal immigration in a border crisis bill? | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| They also have work permits for the adult children of H-1B holders. | ||
| What does that have to do with the border crisis? | ||
| Nothing. | ||
| The next bucket is actual incentives for illegal immigration. | ||
| They are giving immediate work permits to everyone who is released, every illegal alien who is released from custody. | ||
| I mean, so they're acknowledging that they're going to continue catch and release, and they're going to give them immediate work permits. | ||
| If you had to come up with a way to incentivize more illegal immigration, this is what you would do. | ||
| It's unbelievable. | ||
| They have a provision to give taxpayer-funded lawyers to certain illegal alien children and mentally incompetent illegal aliens. | ||
| I'm guessing that number is going to grow as they realize that they get taxpayer-funded lawyers. | ||
| The third bucket is lowering legal standards. | ||
| So just like in California where if you shoplift under $1,000 it's all fine, And of course shoplifting has skyrocketed. | ||
| This says if the number of encounters per day on an average over a seven-day period exceeds 5,000 per day, then we get an extra expulsion authority, but that can only be used for a certain number of days. | ||
| So under 5,000 illegal aliens per day is just fine. | ||
| But over 5,000 is a problem. | ||
| It is stunning to me, and I don't know if you remember, but in 2019, former DHS Secretary Jay Johnson said that 1,000 illegal aliens per day overwhelms the system. | ||
| So now the standard under this plan is 5,000 per day. | ||
| It is insanity. | ||
| Instead of talking about fixing parole, they're talking now about capping parole. | ||
| So a little bit of parole abuse is okay, as long as it doesn't exceed that. | ||
| It's insanity. | ||
| Rosemary, real quickly, how do people get your new project? | ||
| You've got to go pretty far in the woods to hit the trip wire where Rosemary Jenks calls somebody traitorous and treasonous. | ||
| You think this rises to that level, what Langford's been working on behind closed doors? | ||
| This is the theme of the day today, Republicans getting played by Democrats. | ||
| Most of these, the most outrageous demands in this are White House demands that Unfortunately, Senator Lankford is going along with. | ||
| I don't believe that most Senate Republicans will go along with it, but Senator Lankford has gone down a path that he cannot get away from until he just walks away from the deal. | ||
| And that is what we're encouraging him to do. | ||
| We've actually pinned a tweet on our Twitter account, which is I underscore A underscore project. | ||
| And it says, It's time, Senator Lankford, it's time to walk away from the border deal. | ||
| You're doing more harm than good. | ||
| So we're asking that your audience go to our Twitter page and retweet that, at Senator Lankford, so that he can hear from people across this country and particularly if you're in Oklahoma. | ||
| He needs to walk away. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Now. | |
| Rosemary, we'll get all your social media contacts. | ||
| We've got to go to a break. | ||
| Thank you very much, Rosemary Jenks. | ||
| Also, 202-225-3121. | ||
| Call the main switchboard. | ||
| Ask for Senator Lankford's office, particularly if you're from Oklahoma. | ||
| This is going to be a stain on the hard-working patriots out there. | ||
| This is an outrage. | ||
| It's a sellout of the American people. | ||
| They're doing it behind closed doors, and they're going to try to jam it next week. | ||
| Short break. | ||
| MTG on the other side. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Your host, Stephen K. Bamm. | |
| Okay, birchgold.com slash war room. | ||
| Go check it out right now. | ||
| Talk to Philip Pashmanti. | ||
| I'm going to talk a lot about capital markets. | ||
| Although, next up, the great Matt Boyle joins us. | ||
| He had a two-hour interview with President Trump. | ||
| He's been rolling out stories every day. | ||
| The number one political reporter in the nation's capital is going to join us here right after MTG. | ||
| Bolts, MTG has a couple of three important meetings. | ||
| They're a little heated given some of the comments you made earlier. | ||
| Make sure you get the book. | ||
| Go to mtg.com. | ||
| To get MTG. | ||
| By the way, pitch by Liz Cheney, Nancy Pelosi. | ||
| I've never seen so many cruel things ever said about a person in the back of a book. | ||
| It's worth just getting itself. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| Number one, tomorrow, the vaccine injury, you've got McCulloch and also our team. | ||
| It goes at noon. | ||
| We're going to live stream it here on our War Room. | ||
| Get it, rumble, all of it. | ||
| We'll be making commentary because that's a topic that's not talked about enough. | ||
| Not enough. | ||
| You've had a belly full of it. | ||
| You said, hey, I'm holding a hearing. | ||
| We're going to bring the best guys in there. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
| Two, Fauci, there are very few times that MTG is lost for words. | ||
| It was quite evident in the cold open that when you came out of that hearing for two days, when they asked you, you were a little bit in shock. | ||
| I mean, like, you know, you're trying to kind of get your thing. | ||
| Tell me, what was so bad that you heard in there that led you not to be able to, like, jump on it right away? | ||
| It was actually listening to Dr. Fauci talk about the pandemic and talk about gain of function, talking about the research done in those labs. | ||
| And the whole reason, the whole purpose of gain of function, according to him, is in order to get ahead of nature, which means play God, actually act like you're God, take the gain of function and create viruses So that these lab researchers can create vaccines. | ||
| He would weaponize these viruses. | ||
| And then back in 2012, he's written about this for years. | ||
| Back in 2012 in an article, he lays out a scenario that literally happened to all of us, where they use the gain-of-function research in a lab, create a virus, create a vaccine, then, oh no, the virus escapes the lab, and it's the nightmare scenario that happened to the world with COVID-19. | ||
| And he said in his own words that the gains outweigh the risks. | ||
| The gains outweigh the risk. | ||
| He's talking about millions of people dying. | ||
| Millions of people died and he believes the gains outweigh the risk in order to create these vaccines. | ||
| The mindset that he has, Steve, is so disturbing. | ||
| Did he take the fifth while he was there and just not answer questions? | ||
| Not when I heard him. | ||
| He was answering every question. | ||
| See, he also plays this innocent doctor that is just wanting to save lives. | ||
| And the problem there is... | ||
| His version of saving lives is not like regular doctors practicing medicine. | ||
| He's Dr. Frankenstein. | ||
| He is Dr. Frankenstein. | ||
| There's no doubt about that. | ||
| And we're all lab mice. | ||
| You're convinced of that now? | ||
| 100% convinced. | ||
| Two things. | ||
| Do you believe he perjured himself in his testimony because he was under oath? | ||
| And number two, do you see criminal referrals coming out of this committee about this? | ||
| I'm not sure about this committee because this committee has not yet investigated the vaccines and that's why I'm holding my own hearing tomorrow. | ||
| Why are they not going to do a formal thing on the vaccines? | ||
| Why is it dependent upon you? | ||
| They don't want to do the vaccines. | ||
| As a matter of fact, some of the members on the committee defend the vaccines. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Is this because of Big Pharma money or is it some logic to it? | |
| That would be an answer for them. | ||
| It seems to be probably donations from Big Pharma or the fact that they legitimately believe in the vaccines and they may not believe that people are being injured. | ||
| But here's the deal. | ||
| People have died from the vaccines. | ||
| People are suffering from strokes, heart attacks, blood clots, myocarditis, and now we have the CDC has recommended the vaccines for the childhood vaccine schedule, which is outrageous. | ||
| The protocol. | ||
| The protocol. | ||
| That means every kid gets it at birth. | ||
| Every kid gets it. | ||
| Listen, I believe we listen to people, and the VAERS reports have shown that people have died and people have been injured, and it's our job as representatives to listen to people, and I'm really excited about this hearing tomorrow. | ||
| I thank you. | ||
| Thank you for showing up. | ||
| Mallorca's impeachment, Fannie Willis criminal referral, you're on the Fauci thing, Hunter Biden on the sex trafficking, you're the number one lead of the spear on the Ukraine shutdown, border shutdown. | ||
| You're not afraid of a government shutdown? | ||
| Not afraid. | ||
| Listen, I think what we heard from Rosemary, she was fantastic. | ||
| What she was talking about, $5,000 a day, it's okay for $5,000 a day according to the deal that Johnson and Schumer are making, but you know what that really means, Steve? | ||
| That's just like the shoplifting in California. | ||
| It's okay if you shoplift if you're under $1,000 a day. | ||
| It's the same mindset. | ||
| $5,000 a day equals $1.8 million a year. | ||
|
unidentified
|
$1.8 million a year. | |
| And it's amnesty. | ||
| You know who said it? | ||
| a day equals 1.8 million a year. | ||
| A year, 1.8 million a year. | ||
| And it's amnesty. | ||
| You know, who said it? | ||
| AOC recently. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| This is voter recruitment. | ||
| Voter recruitment. | ||
| You agree with President Trump. | ||
| They're getting in here so they vote right away. | ||
|
unidentified
|
1,000%. | |
| It's voter recruitment. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Tomorrow at noon, we're going to live stream your hearing. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Because nobody else will have it with Dr. McCaul, some heroes of this movement. | ||
| On Monday, you're in Iowa. | ||
| We're going to have you on here on Monday. | ||
| You're a surrogate for President Trump. | ||
| Tell me about what's happening in Iowa on Monday. | ||
| Oh, we are going to be fired up. | ||
| Iowa caucus, it's going to be big, the 15th, so I'm excited. | ||
| I'll be at different locations giving speeches. | ||
| I'm so excited to see the process. | ||
| I've never done it before. | ||
| I'm promoting President Trump all the way and trying to persuade anybody that's fallen for the DeSantis or Nikki Haley's garbage. | ||
| Nikki Haley stands 180% away from every one of President Trump's America First policies. | ||
| Nikki Haley is the neocon establishment dream. | ||
| Let me tell you who she is. | ||
| I'll take you back in time. | ||
| It's really easy. | ||
| Look at what they did to John Kennedy when he was a threat. | ||
| Look at what they did to Nixon. | ||
| Look at what they attempted to assassinate Ronald Reagan. | ||
| He was never the same after that. | ||
| Who did they force him to have for Vice President Bush? | ||
| Then we got Cheney. | ||
| Nikki Haley is their emergency catch-all. | ||
| And they want her as Vice President. | ||
| Number one, if the president asked you to be his vice president, would you accept? | ||
| Of course I would. | ||
| I would serve President Trump in any capacity, but I want to make it clear that is his decision, and his decision alone. | ||
| What about a cabinet position? | ||
| What cabinet position, if it wasn't VP, he came to you and says, look, I need you in my cabinet, I need your fighter, I need you near me, what cabinet position would you take? | ||
| The only cabinet position that I would truly be interested in working in is Homeland. | ||
| I believe. | ||
| You would be Homeland Security Secretary? | ||
| I would definitely. | ||
| Would you seal the border? | ||
| All the years I haven't talked, would you seal the border? | ||
| One hundred percent. | ||
| I would fight that. | ||
| I would deport people. | ||
| I would do everything possible. | ||
| Can you do the mass deportations? | ||
| I would enact the policies that he's laying out. | ||
| Going after child traffickers. | ||
| Going after cartels. | ||
| I fully support President Trump's border agenda. | ||
| MTG is the person and MTG is the book. | ||
| You get it at MTG.com. | ||
| Get it this weekend. | ||
| Make sure you see it. | ||
| We're going to have you back, I guess, tomorrow from Congress. | ||
| Let's do it. | ||
| On your hearing, which nobody else has the stones to have except MTG. | ||
| And I'll ask for one more thing. | ||
| Please call Governor Kemp and Chris Carr's office and tell them that we need a criminal investigation into Fannie Willis and Nathan Wade. | ||
| Okay, we're going to get that number up. | ||
| Good to have you back. | ||
| Thank you, Steve. | ||
| Glad to be back. | ||
| You're tan, rested, and ready and on fire. | ||
| MTG. | ||
| By the way, there's going to be some very tough discussions you're leaving for right now, right? | ||
| I'm looking forward to it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
With senior folks? | |
| Yep. | ||
| Let's send the speaker the clips from this. |
Export Selection