Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
According to the Times, Israeli officials obtained an approximately 40-page document, which they codenamed, as Ed said, Jericho Wall. | ||
It outlined, point by point, exactly the kind of devastating invasion that led to the deaths of about 1,200 people, probably many more. | ||
The Times writes, Israeli military and intelligence officials dismissed the plan as aspirational Considering it too difficult for Hamas to carry out. | ||
Earlier this morning, Israeli defense forces responded to the report, writing in a statement, quote, the IDF is currently focused on eliminating the threat from the terrorist organization Hamas. | ||
Questions of this kind will be looked at into a later stage. | ||
And I will say, Joe, that has been the answer from Benjamin Netanyahu and his people every step of the way. | ||
We'll talk about this later. | ||
Well, the problem with that is, and we're going to talk to Jackie about this very soon. | ||
And the reporter behind this piece. | ||
Right, the problem with that is that Israel needs U.S. | ||
funding. | ||
We need to know what we're funding. | ||
Are we funding Benjamin Netanyahu? | ||
Are we funding his designs to stay in power? | ||
Are we funding an operation where we have to look and guess, okay, well is this in the best interest of the Israeli people? | ||
Or is this in the best interest of a prime minister who deliberately focused on the West Bank? | ||
Deliberately turned a blind eye to this plan for a year. | ||
A year where it's specifically laid out. | ||
So, I'm not so sure that Congress and the President want to approve even more money for Israel until we know that there's actually somebody running Israel that even the Israelis support. | ||
The Israelis don't trust Benjamin Netanyahu. | ||
The region doesn't trust Benjamin Netanyahu. | ||
Political leaders in the United States don't trust Benjamin Netanyahu. | ||
So there's not really a later. | ||
Later is now. | ||
This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
Pray for our enemies. | ||
unidentified
|
Because we're going medieval on these people. | |
President Trump got a free shot at all these networks lying about the people. | ||
The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
I know you've tried to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
It's going to happen. | ||
And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved! | ||
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
Here's your host, Stephen K Vance. | ||
It's Friday. | ||
One December in the year of our Lord 2023. | ||
Yes, we've kicked off the last month of a turbulent year. | ||
It's only going to get more turbulent. | ||
Later is now. | ||
Morning Mika, giving you the basically the collective thought, the conventional wisdom. | ||
Remember Axios and Morning Mika. | ||
Are the two that lay out the conventional wisdom of the apparatus that runs this country and still tries to run a failed empire. | ||
We're going to get to all that. | ||
I just want to make sure I'm going to come back to this, but I wanted to tee it up. | ||
Because there are two kinetic conflicts going on right now. | ||
They're all converging into the kinetic part of the Third World War. | ||
Because remember, the Chinese Communist Party has been at war with us for many years. | ||
They've been very open about this unrestricted warfare. | ||
And that includes biological weapons. | ||
Naomi Wolf is going to join us here in a minute. | ||
Biological weapons as laid out in the pandemic. | ||
It includes a chemical warfare as laid out in fentanyl and of course what's going on in Maine and other places about these marijuana For instance, particularly Fentanyl and Real America's Voice is going to do a special with the families of Fentanyl, the casualties of Fentanyl over the weekend and we'll be talking about a lot. | ||
This is going to be tomorrow and Sunday. | ||
It's going to play its entirety on Sunday. | ||
Tara Dahl and the team will be hosting that. | ||
Harry will be producing it as we also are going to be in Iowa with President Trump and President Trump's going to give a speech. | ||
I think the speech is at five o'clock tomorrow. | ||
It's going to be Very, very, very important about the fight against this really tech takeover of the of the US government and using artificial intelligence and other apparatuses to absolutely control you and take your liberty, take your freedom, and to really see who the enemies of democracy are, the enemies of the people and what they're doing. | ||
We're getting all that. | ||
There's also a third. | ||
We're going to honor the Monroe Doctrine tomorrow also. | ||
With part wouldn't throughout the whole two hours will be flipping back from Iowa to a discussion of the Monroe Doctrine because there's about I believe to be a potential major kinetic conflict in Latin America. | ||
A kinetic conflict across borders that I don't think has been seen since the 19th century. | ||
And that's over at Guyana in these oil resources in Venezuela and what Venezuela is doing with the CCP and with KGB backing. | ||
against maybe even Brazil, but definitely Ghana. | ||
So we're going to get into that tomorrow, which is only going to drive, put more, more pressure on the open border of the Southern United States. | ||
So we're going to get into all that and we will connect all the dots here, but I want to make sure I just, just write it down that on the, these kinetic conflicts are starting to explode. | ||
Now you heard right there, morning Joe, Talking about, should they even fund Netanyahu? | ||
This explosive report, and if you follow Tara Dahl's reporting with these IDF colonels that we did over the last two weeks, there's been a lot of talk about this Jericho wall, about having it, and we don't have the clips yet, maybe we'll have them later in the show. | ||
We were live when this was going on, on 7 October. | ||
I brought Jack Passobe again because we could see obviously the time difference, what was happening. | ||
And at the time, we were very critical of Netanyahu, we were very critical of the IDF, we were very critical of the Mossad. | ||
And what Morning Joe, they're trying to make it political against Netanyahu. | ||
This report is much deeper than this. | ||
And this is what I keep saying. | ||
If Israel is an ally, they're going to be an ally. | ||
We don't need another protectorate. | ||
And the pitch is they're the best ally, they're the best ally. | ||
This report stinks to high heaven because of the Mossad, Shin Ben, the IDF military intelligence, the IDF response, all of it. | ||
As I said on the show when it was happening, given the complexity of this operation, given the scale of it, and given the distances they were going, like 40 or 50 miles, it is impossible somebody didn't know about that. | ||
The scale of this was just too big. | ||
And it was just unbelievable. | ||
They've actually implied later in the morning, Joe, that there might have even had inside help. | ||
And I keep saying, if you look at the CNN reporting on what they picked up on the papers of Hamas on the kibbutzes, they had the details of these kibbutzes down to, I mean, the square foot of actually where they were going to take the hostages. | ||
Were they going to take them to where the veterinarians are? | ||
Are they going to take them to the dental offices? | ||
Where are we going to hold them? | ||
That could not possibly have come unless they had inside information. | ||
It's just impossible. | ||
And they allude to this In the New York Times, they alluded to this in this morning's show. | ||
And we're in the middle of funding this right now. | ||
This is not about Netanyahu. | ||
This is actually, you know, the Jewish Spartans in 67 and 73, and in 48, back down the Arab armies. | ||
This issue is not just about Israel. | ||
This is a Sharia supremacist war against the West, in which the first front they're taking on, the kinetic part, is in Israel, but the non-kinetic part, at least for right now, is in Europe. | ||
This is why they're saying the huge stories breaking over the last 24 hours. | ||
There's a civil war going on in France. | ||
Remember those generals, we reported on those generals last year that signed, the French generals that signed the letter that was dismissed by the French elite, you know, a kind of a camp of the saints moment where the French elite dismissed it and the generals and a bunch of colonels signed this, field grade officers signed it from the French military, first time ever. | ||
At least since they tried to take out De Gaulle for leaving Algeria back in the early 1960s. | ||
And they said, we're going to have a civil war unless we start a mass deportation program. | ||
You heard that phrase before? | ||
Mass deportation? | ||
And that is a war against the West. | ||
There's also this war against the West and about technology and about these sociopathic overlords. | ||
I want to start today with Naomi Wolf. | ||
Naomi, thank you for joining us. | ||
Two things going on and I want you to, we've got about six minutes here, we're going to hold you through hopefully a lot of the first hour. | ||
Because this is based upon a lot of work that you and your team have been doing. | ||
Ken Paxson finally filed a lawsuit I think yesterday against Pfizer and at the same time Vigilant Fox had this amazing piece up. | ||
Just explain to the audience exactly where we stand about these vaccines and Pfizer and all of it because it looks like now all of your work and all of these other people's work and the Vigilant Foxes of the world is starting to converge into actual legal action ma'am. | ||
So, indeed, Ken Paxton, who's had an interestingly rough run of it because his own party ganged up against him when he first started, as I recall, taking aim at the pharmaceutical industry, he has successfully launched a lawsuit, and he's doing it the right way. | ||
He's accusing Pfizer of false, deceptive, and misleading acts and practices, making unsupported claims about the company's COVID-19 vaccine And he's saying that it's in violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act. | ||
And just a note for your audience, the reason this is so great is that the PREP Act, that federal piece of legislation, protects Pfizer and all pharmaceutical companies federally. | ||
But nothing prevents state attorneys general from saying that the companies are violating state law. | ||
And specifically, and I'm so proud to say our lawyer, George Smith, Also took this approach in Ohio. | ||
He also is saying that there's a violation at the state level of laws that protect people at the state level from being lied to by advertisers. | ||
False, deceptive, misleading practices. | ||
So other things that we can be super proud of and happy about, we the Posse, we the supporters of Amy Kelly and the War Room Daily Clout, 3,250 doctors and scientists, Who have been laboriously going through Pfizer documents and boiling down what's in them to these 92 reports now that anyone can understand, including Ken Paxton and his staff. | ||
I'm sure I believe that they've been informed by the work that we've done looking at their their press release here. | ||
One of their points that undergirds their lawsuit is that Pfizer claimed that the vaccine had 95% efficacy. | ||
And they got to that number by bad math. | ||
And you all will remember that we broke the story that Pfizer got to the 95% efficacy by tricky mathematics, by fudging numbers. | ||
So they point out that Pfizer got there through relative risk reduction, which is super misleading because it's tiny, miniscule numbers as opposed to actually 95% of all the vaccinated people. | ||
That that was a misleading impression. | ||
They point out that Pfizer claimed that the vaccine was durable and kept from the public information that it affects Wayne after a couple of months. | ||
You all will remember that we reported over a year, a year and a half ago, that the Pfizer internal documents show failure of efficacy and vaccine failure. | ||
And they reached this conclusion in November of 2020, you know, literally a month or two after the rollout. | ||
So Pfizer knew, as I've been saying on your show over and over, saying every chance I got, Pfizer knew within two months of rollout that the vaccine did not work, that it failed in efficacy, and that the third most common side effect was COVID. | ||
In the Pfizer documents, that's not a working vaccine. | ||
So their own lawyers in Texas have either picked up on this or picked up on You know, this information from elsewhere, and it's very good because it's true. | ||
And lastly, they point out that Pfizer embarked on a campaign to intimidate their loved ones. | ||
I love what they're kind of focusing here in on by claiming that the vaccine affected transmission. | ||
Remember, don't kill grandma by visiting her for Thanksgiving. | ||
Don't kill grandma by hugging her. | ||
Get vaccinated because presumably that Prevents you from transmitting this evil pathogen to your loved ones and murdering them. | ||
Well, none of that is true. | ||
And we broke that story too. | ||
Um, and other people did as well in the, uh, European parliament, for instance, by grilling Pfizer executives, they admitted that they didn't even test for whether the vaccine affected transmission. | ||
The vaccine doesn't affect transmission. | ||
Um, but, but Paxton points out that this, uh, was, you know, underlay this campaign of intimidation of the public. | ||
And then he goes on to point out that vaccinated people die more often than unvaccinated people. | ||
A greater percentage of deaths from the COVID-19 among the vaccinated population as opposed to the unvaccinated population. | ||
The other thing I absolutely love, and I think we are all again referenced in this part of his argument, he points out that when it became clear that this vaccine had failed and was dangerous and damaging, although he's interestingly focusing not on the harms, but on the misleading claims, which I think is solid law. | ||
I mean, it's all solid law, but it's a great approach given what he's saying, which is false advertising. | ||
Naomi, Naomi, Naomi, just hang on for one second. | ||
We're taking a commercial break. | ||
We're going to break this all down in detail. | ||
We're going to get to the Vigilant Fox, all of it on a Friday morning in the War Room. | ||
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bamm. | |
OK, I'm going to get back to Naomi in just a minute. | ||
This is a blockbuster, two things, a blockbuster lawsuit. | ||
And Paxson does know about, obviously, the work of Daily Clout and the War on Posse, the 3,500 volunteers. | ||
Of course, the lawyers, Amy Kelly, everything that's been done. | ||
These 92 reports have been incredible. | ||
Ken Paxson showing courage. | ||
And bravery, because courage is contagious, Ken Paxson's filed. | ||
And it is against the consumer side, probably the effects of all that. | ||
We'll get into that. | ||
I'm sure that'll come next. | ||
This is all inextricably linked. | ||
This would not have happened if this audience had not manned the ramparts and allowed them to impeach Ken Paxson. | ||
Part of the impeachment of Ken Paxson was because of this. | ||
Big Pharma was all in back of that, of many things. | ||
The Bush apparatus, Big Pharma, others wanted Paxton out. | ||
Why did they want Paxton out? | ||
They understood that Paxton was a guy that understands what state attorney generals, the power of state attorney generals. | ||
The one thing you say about Democrats, they use their power. | ||
When their folks ring doorbells and knock on doors and hit them with 25 bucks and get in the streets, when they get up there, they deliver. | ||
For their constituents. | ||
Not for the country, for their constituents. | ||
Our people are normally too cowed by the media. | ||
They're going to call me a racist. | ||
They're going to call me a xenophobe. | ||
They're going to call me a nativist. | ||
They're going to do this. | ||
They're going to say bad things about me. | ||
And I'm not going to be in the country club anymore. | ||
I'm not going to be able to go to the Lions Club anymore. | ||
And I'm afraid. | ||
That's where we are. | ||
That's what's called controlled opposition. | ||
This country didn't get in the multiple crises we have if you didn't have a compliant opposition party that was just there like the Washington generals are there for the Harlem Globetrotters. | ||
I want to bring in Congressman Burleson now from Missouri. | ||
Congressman, of course, we got the Santas. | ||
One of the things about Santas I can't understand is that we played Matt Gaetz and Higgins yesterday. | ||
They've never expelled anybody that hadn't been convicted, so I'm confused about that. | ||
Also, with McCarthy leaving and other things happening, aren't you on the precipice of giving up the majority if people continue to roll on this Santas deal, sir? | ||
Yeah, Steve, thanks for the question. | ||
I'm really concerned about the precedent that it's setting. | ||
We just went through January 6th, where the Democrats tried to imprison anybody that chose to not vote or certify the election. | ||
They confiscated the phone of General Scott Perry. | ||
Us setting a precedent that it takes an indictment—as you know, you can indict a ham sandwich, That if it takes an indictment for a member of Congress to be removed, members of Congress are going to suddenly be indicted all across the United States. | ||
So I think that this is a horrible precedent. | ||
I do think that there is some animosity from the New York delegation against him because of his votes. | ||
He votes pretty darn conservative a lot of times. | ||
So I think there's a lot to it. | ||
I think it's just personal politics. | ||
Yeah, look, we're not defending Santos. | ||
He's got his own track record, but this is about a higher principle. | ||
Another thing about a higher principle, people look to you... | ||
In the war on the show and in the in the vast audience of the war room posse as a guy that's a fiscal conservative. | ||
I mean, you've got some sanity. | ||
I think one of the things we find disturbing and look the show is obviously huge fans of Speaker Johnson, but to be brutally frank. | ||
We're just not feeling it right now. | ||
We don't think there's enough focus on what has to happen and particularly what has to happen is You know, if they're going to shut down the government, they're going to shut down the government. | ||
But you guys should be working 24-7. | ||
We've got a $2 trillion deficit. | ||
But more importantly, from September 18th to December 18th this year, we will have added another trillion dollars to the national debt. | ||
This thing is exploding. | ||
Can you just get us up to speed on where we stand and what you're working on? | ||
Yeah, I'm with you, Steve. | ||
I was in a meeting this morning with the Speaker. | ||
We made it very clear that The time to fight is now. | ||
It's not to push the fight until later. | ||
We're sick of pushing off the fights, and we're sick of letting the Senate push around. | ||
A lot of times, this place, they operate immediately saying, oh, the Senate will never do that. | ||
Who cares what the Senate's going to do or what they're not going to do? | ||
This is the House. | ||
This is a Republican House, and he's a Republican speaker. | ||
You know, I told the speaker all the time, the way in which he was appointed reminds me of how King David was appointed after Saul was removed as king. | ||
And they went down the line and knocked off all the brothers and finally got to David. | ||
But you know what? | ||
Now's the time for Mike Johnson as David to pick up his five stones and slay a giant. | ||
This is important. | ||
I mean, the mentality, we know McConnell and these guys, they want to continue the spending because they were part of the compromise and the collaborationists that got these bills passed, these spending bills. | ||
Speaker Johnson, you guys start with a totally clean slate. | ||
I mean, what is the mentality? | ||
Why would we not stand and fight right now and have a frank conversation with the American people? | ||
This is not about shutting down the government for some couple of weeks in January or in February. | ||
This is a national crisis of the balance sheet of the United States, which we stand on the edge of an abyss of which we'll never be able to pull back. | ||
I don't understand why Speaker Johnson, who's always kind of been a fiscal conservative, why would he blink now? | ||
I think that, unfortunately, this building doesn't want to fight. | ||
People try to avoid the fights. | ||
But we have to save the country. | ||
We have to save America. | ||
And you're not going to save it by doing things the way that it's been done all along. | ||
We're going to have to make cuts. | ||
And I'm sick and tired of hearing from members of my conference that we could cut all of discretionary and we still are not going to address the issue until we touch entitlements. | ||
Don't tell me that until you bring forward a suggestion about how we're going to reform Social Security, how we're going to reform Medicare or Medicaid. | ||
Because we all know that if they can't make cuts to discretionary spending, they're never— We're going to touch the entitlements. | ||
Your point is 100% correct. | ||
With spending all this money all over the world, to spending all this money, half a trillion dollars for this illegal alien invader so they can get healthcare and education and comforts, The American people, the working people in your district, Missouri 7, is not going to support touching their $1,200 a month from Social Security or the little bit of Medicare they got. | ||
They're just not going to do that. | ||
They're not going to support this. | ||
Until you go and show them you've already done some of the tough work on discretionary spending, both on defense and on the social programs, they're just not going to believe you. | ||
And this fantasy, and this is Nikki Haley, this is Chris Christie, this is all the leadership. | ||
Well, it's really an entitlement problem. | ||
It's not an entitlement problem. | ||
It's a spending problem. | ||
And you have to start where you can start. | ||
And you start here. | ||
What in the conference don't they understand about that? | ||
Let me take it another way. | ||
Are the good hard-working folks in your district, is there any confusion at all with those folks about what needs to be done? | ||
No, there's not. | ||
When I talk to my district when it comes to government shutdown, their attitude is, shut the place now. | ||
They want to see a fight. | ||
We made it clear to Mike Johnson that if you're not willing to shut down the government, you've already given up the fight. | ||
You've already let the Senate win. | ||
You've already let the swamp win. | ||
If you're not willing to let FISA expire, then you've already lost. | ||
If you're not willing to let the NDAA expire, then you've already lost that battle. | ||
They are using all of these You know, all of these deadlines to force us into bad votes and allowing this awful regime to continue. | ||
Your constituents get it because they kind of speak for America. | ||
Those must pass and those deadlines are leverage we can use, that the people can use. | ||
This is leverage for the people, not for the apparatus that wants to turn a different way, make it reverse. | ||
These are the best things that ever happened to us because they're our leverage. | ||
Congressman, how do people follow you? | ||
Because I want to make sure that they're following, because you are at the forefront of this fight to tell people, hey look, Now is the time to fight. | ||
This is the best time for us to fight, because we do have these deadlines, and that gives us leverage. | ||
And your constituents, and I'm talking about blue-collar people, many of whom never went to college, or middle-class people that had the chance to go to college, they understand this. | ||
They understand the fact that we've got to fight now. | ||
You've got to make these cuts now. | ||
If you don't do it now, it's never going to happen. | ||
unidentified
|
So how do they follow you, Congressman? | |
I would say, they can follow me at Rep. | ||
Eric Burleson on any of the social medias, but what I would want to say is that if the Speaker is not going to come forward and say no to the Senate and do another continuing resolution, If he's going to allow for all these clean FISA renewals and all these other things, we are going to say no for him. | ||
And what that means is it means violating the norms and voting down the rules. | ||
unidentified
|
But if that's what it takes, that's what we're going to do. | |
If it means taking a trip to the border and denying them the majority, then that's what we're going to do. | ||
At the end of the day, we're here to save America. | ||
Hold it, so let me get this right. | ||
You're going to vote down the rule, or are you actually going to go and just say, hey, we're going to take off and go to the border and show the American people what the problem are? | ||
But you don't even want to come... You're going to say, hey, we're not going to allow these to get to the floor. | ||
Is that what I'm hearing? | ||
Yeah, if they start talking about bringing Ukraine to the floor, we're going to deny the majority. | ||
We're going to the border, and we're going to spend all day long We're going to spend weeks at the border until they get it, until they realize this border has to get fixed before you even have a conversation about money that we're going to blow in Ukraine. | ||
I don't want to have that conversation at all. | ||
But if they're going to do things like that, if they're going to bring forward clean reauthorizations of some of these bills or another continuing resolution that's a clean continuing resolution, then we have to take bold action and put our foot down. | ||
Congressman, I know a lot of folks are going to want to follow you now, so where's your website and what's your social media? | ||
Yeah, just look up Eric Burleson. | ||
unidentified
|
Rep. | |
Eric Burleson. | ||
We also have a podcast called Fresh Freedom. | ||
It's me and the other Freshmen Freedom Caucus members. | ||
Perfect. | ||
We'll make sure we push that. | ||
We'll get it up. | ||
Congressman, thank you. | ||
Thank you for being a fighter. | ||
And thank your folks out in that district for having your back. | ||
Thank you, Steve. | ||
Missouri 7. | ||
Thank you, brother. | ||
This is like in the revolution. | ||
All kind of people you never heard of before all of a sudden step into the forefront. | ||
What he just laid out is a fairly radical plan to say, we're not going to do this. | ||
We're going to use every technical aspect, every procedural aspect, every parliamentary aspect to make sure that you're not going to go forward and destroy this country anymore. | ||
And Mike Johnson, you and your staff better start writing this down, because I'm telling you, the people are on the side of the fighters. | ||
Understand you got a biblical worldview as I keep saying go to Revelations and read the section about come and see because that's what's happening to our Republic right now. | ||
Short break back in a moment. | ||
The Israeli Defense Force military intelligence may be the best in the world. | ||
We have DIA, which is the arm which is five times the size of the CIA. | ||
IDF's intelligence operation, I think is pound for pound the best in the world. | ||
Then you have Mossad. | ||
Then you have the CIA. | ||
unidentified
|
We have 17, you know, you have NSA. | |
It is impossible. | ||
Impossible. | ||
This thing, it was a military operation on land, sea, and air with 5,000 missiles, paragliders. | ||
It's over a geographic, although Israel itself from tip to tip is about from the southern border of Virginia and North Carolina to Baltimore, right? | ||
So it's not huge. | ||
But given that, they were all the way from Tel Aviv to Gaza. | ||
This took months. | ||
The Wall Street Journal said months. | ||
I think years of planning. | ||
Logistics. | ||
Recruitment. | ||
Training. | ||
Finance. | ||
And people don't talk about this. | ||
unidentified
|
They had Palestinian journalists in beds. | |
There were Palestinian journalists in beds. | ||
This was like us going into Iraq in 2003. | ||
A wealth, I shouldn't say well thought through, but a logistically thought through where we actually had embeds. | ||
It is impossible for the intelligence apparatus between the United, and not just that, let's, the Saudis and UAE, their intelligence apparatuses work with the Israelis and work with the United States. | ||
It couldn't have happened. | ||
It's impossible for it to happen. | ||
Okay, that was from weeks ago, and we did that also on the first day with Jack, that's with Cash, a couple weeks later. | ||
But it's impossible, and this is why we have to understand, before any more funding, I mean, and this is not about Netanyahu, the political, the color revolution against him, or anything with the Supreme Court. | ||
This is deeper. | ||
This is about the IDF, and there's breaking reports right now, news coming out right now, IDF just put out that they're under heavy barrage in Gaza. | ||
It's back on. | ||
Which I'm a supporter of. | ||
You got to take care of these Sharia supremacists right now. | ||
You got to do it. | ||
That's the Muslim Brotherhood franchise in Gaza. | ||
And for all you folks out there that maybe not that big of supporters of Israel or maybe you got a bone to pick, you know, you think the Jewish people do things in the West and they're doing this and they're doing that. | ||
That's to me all beside the point. | ||
That's all beside the point. | ||
That's an argument for a different day. | ||
The point is, is that this is the beginning of the kinetic conflict of the Sharia supremacists, backed by the CCP, who's underwriting the mullahs in Persia, in Tehran. | ||
And now we know UAE, quote unquote, our great ally, Mohammed bin Zayed, who I think is the best guy in the region. | ||
They've already talked about the de-dollarization. | ||
They announced that they're going to get off the petrodollar. | ||
That's your ally. | ||
And your other ally, quote unquote, Israel, we have to understand how this happened. | ||
How did they have this information for a year? | ||
And was this people looking the other way or maybe people on the payroll? | ||
There's people on the payroll. | ||
There's so many people on every side of the trade over there. | ||
Remember, we're giving money to the Turks. | ||
We're giving money. | ||
We're underwriting Egypt. | ||
We underwrite all these intelligence services and all their militaries. | ||
This is another thing about the stupid Americans. | ||
I hate to be so blunt, but in Qatar, which is the nest of vipers, the nest of vipers, we have a massive military base, which I argued from day one, we got to get that base out of there. | ||
That's one of the big things I want to do in the first year of the administration. | ||
We've got to get out of Qatar. | ||
You have to get out of there. | ||
You can't be there. | ||
These guys are demons. | ||
They wouldn't even sign and agree to the terror financing. | ||
You know, EO, the deal we had when we went to Riyadh to kick off, you know, Riyadh, Jerusalem and in Rome. | ||
They wouldn't even kind of sign it. | ||
They're begrudgingly, because they're the nest of the Vipers. | ||
This is how the stuff is financed. | ||
Why do you think the Mossad guys over there are negotiating right now, which is a disgrace? | ||
The whole thing, and I'm telling you, we're getting sucked into something that we don't know who the players are, we don't know how competent the players are, and now you've got the whole military, which doesn't know how to win anymore, the senior level, the junior and mid, NCOs and junior officers. | ||
The bravery is unquestioned. | ||
You're over there right now, and now we got this thing, the Jericho wall operation, that they knew about it for a year? | ||
Knew about it for a year. | ||
And this gets to Benny Gantz and all of them. | ||
This is not the political liberals and progressives versus the right wing and the ultra-orthodox and all that stuff. | ||
That's all Israeli internal politics. | ||
I'm talking about the competence. | ||
Hey, in 48 and 67 and 73, you had what I refer to as the Jewish Spartans. | ||
And hey, they stood them all down, right? | ||
I'm not feeling it. | ||
I'm not feeling it at all. | ||
And we got to know what we're getting into. | ||
This is why this, the thing about, it's not just about offsets. | ||
We ought to have some inquiries and you ought to put some Biden guys up there and saying, Hey, what do you, what do you know about this thing? | ||
What did the CIA know about it? | ||
What did DNI know about it? | ||
What did NSA know about it? | ||
We got half of Gaza's on the payroll. | ||
There's something stinks to high heaven here. | ||
I've said it from the beginning. | ||
And once you get sucked into this and a kinetic conflict in there, baby, you're in it. | ||
And don't think Erdogan. | ||
You've got the Ottoman Turks. | ||
You've got the Arabs. | ||
You've got the Persians. | ||
You're going to have the Egyptian arm of the Arabs. | ||
And it's starting here. | ||
In France, they're in a civil war. | ||
In Sweden, they're in a civil war. | ||
In Netherlands, they just voted to stop. | ||
We don't want a civil war. | ||
We'll put Gert Wilders in there. | ||
In Ireland, Ireland is about the mothers. | ||
Those are the mothers. | ||
The mothers are sitting there going, we got these guys from North Africa and the Middle East. | ||
that have had the women, you know, behind the hijabs and all this for forever. | ||
And now they got these young Irish girls and they're after them. | ||
It's the mothers, the 30, 40 and 50 year old mothers, excuse me, 40, 50, 60 year old mothers and grandmothers sitting up there. | ||
That's what that's about. | ||
It's all coming to this country. | ||
When you see these protests, you got to wake up. | ||
When you see these protests, they're protest, they're up there at a Columbus. | ||
This is not about the Jews. | ||
And this is not about Israel. | ||
This is about you. | ||
This is about you. | ||
And people got to wake up about this. | ||
The last thing I want is another conflict. | ||
There have been Bannons over there since, you know, 44 years ago as a young officer. | ||
I was over there in the Persian Gulf in the North Arabian Sea. | ||
My kid brother went over there as a pilot. | ||
My daughter deployed over there at the 101st. | ||
Nephews have deployed over there. | ||
So, hey, we got no love for the region, and we're glad to get back and get the hell out of those hell holes as soon as you could. | ||
Right? | ||
So it's not like we're saying, oh, we got to do this, but hey, you're going to have to take a stand and it's coming here and it's going to come here to scale that is going to overwhelm people because of what these progressives have done, not just open borders, but to flood our country with illegal alien invaders. | ||
Mark my word. | ||
Naomi, another thing we said, mark our word on is everything to do with this vaccine, the whole deal, the Wuhan lab, what happened? | ||
Everything you've been lied to you've been misrepresented and Liz you're Naomi was so impressed with your first thing. | ||
The only thing she wanted to say is that every tort lawyer, every tort lawyer in the country ought to be signing up, ought to be signing up folks right now and getting into court and dropping papers. | ||
Let's finish with Paxton because then I want to get to Vigilant Fox because that's even more of your research. | ||
And by the way, the research of, I can tell you the research of Daily Cloud is something that people spend a lot of time thinking through. | ||
So don't worry about that. | ||
Walk me through the rest of Paxton and then Vigilant Fox. | ||
Sure. | ||
So the last important point in Ken Paxton's press release about his lawsuit is that he points out that when Pfizer realized that they were lying to people and being found out, instead of coming clean, they turned on and orchestrated a smear campaign against critics and dissidents like yours truly and well, all of the brave doctors that you've had on your show and the people know about who were speaking up and | ||
Saying something's wrong here, brave scientists. | ||
And he said he's going to stick up for the people of Texas and their right to not be intimidated, not be misled. | ||
And he also kind of calls out the Biden administration implicitly by saying that these lies were used as a, you know, to undergird forced vaccinations, a mandate, and that people were intimidated to take these vaccinations based on these lies. | ||
So he's covered everything critical. | ||
He doesn't go into side effects. | ||
That's probably another lawsuit. | ||
It's probably criminal charges. | ||
But I think he's done a really impressive, thorough, very understandable job explaining why Pfizer violated Texas state law in lying to Texans to get them to take this dangerous, ill-tested injection. | ||
And you think right now, I want to make sure just to find it, this is on the consumer side and because they lied in consumer fraud and as you guys showed, but you think later for the actual harmful effect, is that going to be the second? | ||
You think that Paxson will come at that later? | ||
I mean, I hope so. | ||
There's no way to know. | ||
I mean, he nearly had his career ended the last time he tried something not even as courageous and sweeping as this. | ||
Um, but that criminal, those criminal charges have to be filed, and he's the person to do it. | ||
I mean, he's the person to lead the way. | ||
Absolutely. | ||
Uh, now talk to us about Vigilant Fox. | ||
The Paxons didn't quite get into this, but walk me through this. | ||
Vigilant Fox is one of these, um, People on Twitter and these other platforms that just put together, quite frankly, brilliant synthesis of things that are out there. | ||
And this is one of the reasons I said yesterday on John Frederick's radio show is that, or Monday, no, excuse me, Tuesday, That the right-wing media and conservative media has never been better. | ||
Because Fox is terrible now. | ||
You saw that thing last night was a disgrace. | ||
I'm not even going to talk about it. | ||
It was a total disgrace. | ||
This is all the Murdoch's going hardcore never Trump. | ||
And they're pushing Newsom as a new national figure. | ||
That's the Murdoch kids and those wives of the Murdoch kids who are left-wing, not even progressive, they're left-wing foreigners. | ||
But the movement's never been more robust because we have Daily Clout, we have Vigilant Fox, you have all these tremendous people on Twitter and other platforms. | ||
Walk me through what his tweet is and why it's so important for this audience to understand it. | ||
Yeah, I'm a huge fan of Vigilant Fox. | ||
He is picking up a story that a group of people broke, including us, in October, early October of this year. | ||
And it is truly, truly shocking. | ||
He's updating people on the fact that there was a trial within a trial, and I'm looking at our October 6th story by Dr. Flowers, Erica Delph, she's called the angry pharmacist in the War Room group, and Team 3 War Room investigators, including Ed Clark, and they were picking up on work that was done by Josh Gutzko of Hebrew University. | ||
And basically, all of these experts found that hidden within the Pfizer documents, there was a secret trial. | ||
In the secret trial, 502 subjects without their consent, without their informed consent, so illegally, were given a different formulation than the formulation that Pfizer had presented to the FDA for the Emergency Use Authorization that allowed it, ostensibly, to be put in everyone's arms. | ||
Right at the very last minute, After this other formulation, Process 1, had been presented to the FDA, there was a bait-and-switch. | ||
And 502 people were injected with Process 2, a different formula altogether. | ||
Process 2 was far more dangerous. | ||
It caused 2.4 times the number of adverse events as Process 1, the one that the FDA had been authorizing. | ||
It was Process 2 The more dangerous, the more than twice as dangerous, unauthorized formulation, secret formulation, that got rolled out and put into everyone's arm. | ||
Okay, okay, hang on. | ||
unidentified
|
Whoa, whoa, whoa. | |
Hang on, hang on, hang on. | ||
That's gotta be impossible. | ||
Are you telling me all the things we went through in the FDA, as bad as that process was, that they actually, I mean, how could they actually switch to another process off another trial, and not, did they not inform the FDA, or the FDA go, oh, you get a hall pass for this? | ||
I don't, hang on, I'm gonna bring you back in the next block, because now my head's blown up. | ||
I don't, this thing is so, part of it's incompetence, but the other's just flat malfeasance. | ||
Flat malfeasance. | ||
And we're going to get back into, I got Joe Allen and Ben Harnwell. | ||
We're going to get back into later this issue about what Schmidt told us the other day about the entire government being now around AI. | ||
Because this gets into the surveillance state, not the surveillance state, this gets into the control state. | ||
Not only are they going to surveil you, they're going to tell you what to do and when you're going to do it, and you're not going to get out of line. | ||
They're taking this up next level. | ||
And look at what they've just done, what's been exposed already, just on the vaccine. | ||
Short break. | ||
We're back with Naomi Wolf in a moment. | ||
we're going to okay so it's game on back in uh... | ||
back in israel of hamas the muslim brotherhood franchisees unloading rocket assaults idea of sitting back We're getting more than that in the rest of the day. | ||
Burleson, who's a backbencher, but remember in the revolution, there were a lot of backbenchers all of a sudden started stepping up and becoming, you know, the firebrands that you need. | ||
He laid out, the plan he laid out, Uh, in the, at the bottom of the hour, we're going to replay that at the top, uh, is how you fight and how you use leverage. | ||
So we'll go back through that. | ||
Also president Trump's speech on Saturday is going to be quite important. | ||
It's going to be a throw down, but not, not, I would say not the typical throw down. | ||
It's going to be something that is going to, I think, help redirect this campaign. | ||
The campaign is going along fine. | ||
Don't get me wrong, but it's what you can tell what Biden's doing right now. | ||
That trying to paint everybody as a fascist and shut everybody down. | ||
We're going to play the Mayorkas clip and play the Eric Schmidt thing later because President Trump gets what they're trying to do and he's not going to tolerate it. | ||
So we're getting to all that. | ||
With Burleson and these cuts behind the scenes, there are huge fights going on. | ||
Looks like the Ukraine thing may be sidelined, all of it, but we're still going to hit 34 trillion by December 18th, which will be 90 days after we hit 33 trillion. | ||
Go to birchgold.com right now. | ||
Make sure you understand it. | ||
The end of the dollar empire, the third installment's the debt trap, where we get you into everything. | ||
This is the one we put out before the debt ceiling, which is the debacle that's got us into $4 trillion of new debt within an 18-month period. | ||
$4 trillion. | ||
That'll not one penny ever be paid off, even by your children and grandchildren, who are going to live like Russian serfs because of this. | ||
And that's why Burleson's got it, and the people in Missouri 7 got it. | ||
You gotta fight, you gotta fight now, and you gotta use every ounce of leverage, just like the Democrats do. | ||
Look what Market License guys are doing in Arizona. | ||
I give them a hat tip. | ||
I can't stand them. | ||
I oppose them. | ||
Their policies are terrible for America. | ||
They're self-centered, and in some cases, even evil. | ||
But on their side of the football, they fight, and they do not back down, and we need more of that. | ||
Also, the Jace Medical, make sure this thing on your medical and the Chinese Communist Party, it's building, it's building, it's building. | ||
It's not going to end in a good place. | ||
And they're going to be shutting down the supply chain access just like they did before. | ||
And they're going to focus on medicine. | ||
Biden's finally got the joke of what we've been preaching on here since January 2020. | ||
They're actually going to put out an EO on supply chains specifically about this. | ||
You can't depend upon Biden. | ||
Go to Jace Medical right now. | ||
Find out all the information about how the Chinese Communist Party controls 100% of active pharmaceutical ingredients and see how those are important in the medicines you take here in life. | ||
Full stop. | ||
You just read that. | ||
Get yourself a hot pot of Warpath coffee. | ||
Sit down and contemplate. | ||
All we want you to do is to think. | ||
You're free men and you're free women. | ||
You can make your own decisions. | ||
That's what self-reliance is about. | ||
Naomi Wolf, Vigilant Fox. | ||
This could not have happened, Naomi. | ||
I can't believe the fact that with all that thing we went over in the FDA and also emergency use authorization, they could actually do a secret, not exposed, not disclosed test on what, 500 people and then use the process two that was never approved. | ||
They could put that in there and that would be the vaccine. | ||
And what universe does that make sense? | ||
Look, it's taken us a year and a half to go through these 450,000 documents and produce 92 reports. | ||
The FDA arranged to get these 450,000 documents for one week. | ||
So they arranged to overlook it in essence. | ||
It's their job to take these documents and find these red flags, these anomalies. | ||
Also, it was buried in here. | ||
I mean, you've got to credit the War Room team once again. | ||
Erica Delph literally noticed anomalous numbers, batch numbers, ending creepily in Z, the letter Z, and she went and picked through, you know, hundreds and hundreds of different places they'd hidden in these people, and she identified that it was a single cohort. | ||
It was in the United States, I'm sorry to say. | ||
These test subjects were in Florida, California, New Jersey, and Texas, and they got this secret formula processed to And the worst part, I haven't even shared with you all yet, the worst part of Process 2, as Kevin McKernan, the distinguished scientist who runs medicinal genomics in Beverly, Massachusetts, found in his own lab, Process 2 is contaminated. | ||
Process 2 contains plasmids and fragments of DNA. | ||
And so these ingredients, which should not be there, they're not supposed to be there, they're not disclosed, they're dangerous. | ||
Um, people like Dr. Ryan Cole are very concerned that these plasmids and fragments of DNA that are in process two now in the arms of people who took the Pfizer vaccine. | ||
unidentified
|
Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, hang on. | |
Slow down, slow down, slow down. | ||
Are you telling me that not only is it not the process that was approved and never should have, but that should have never been approved in the first place, but that gun decked one in the second trial, the second secret trial, what was added? | ||
Was it inadvertently added or purposely added or how did this get in there? | ||
Well, you don't have documentation that we've seen in either the Pfizer documents or the first tranche of the Moderna documents. | ||
to explain the reasoning of why there's plasmids and fragments of DNA in process two. | ||
But both Moderna and Pfizer have these bad undisclosed ingredients that Kevin McKernan found by taking vials of the Moderna vaccine and the Pfizer vaccine. | ||
And I actually went with a cameraman to his lab and looked at what he had done, looked at the vials, went to the PCR test machine where he I saw, you know, that these fragments were in there. | ||
I mean, he really deserves a lot of credit for finding these ingredients. | ||
They're in both the Pfizer and the Moderna injections. | ||
And again, Ryan Cole and other oncologists are very concerned that these ingredients kind of can merge with your cells in such a way as to make it more likely that people will be exposed to things like terpenes. | ||
I'm going to ask you to stick around, but the question I've got from when we come back from a short break, The whole purpose of the process is to make sure stuff like this can't happen. | ||
The whole point of the FDA, the whole point of paying for the administrative state, in their best days, is that this is the type of just basic compliance. | ||
You should have a set of rules. | ||
I tell you what, we'll let your home repair team finish whatever you're banging around in the background. | ||
We'll let you guys finish and we'll come back to Naomi. | ||
She's promised to stick with us through the next break. | ||
I've also got Joe Allen. | ||
Joe's going to give the big talk at the AFA tomorrow night and Saturday night in LA. | ||
I'm not sure if there's any more tickets. | ||
We'll talk about that. | ||
Charlie Kirk also on the Turning Point team. | ||
We've got Charlie Kirk. | ||
I've actually asked the team at Patriot Mobile to come in and say a few words, since they were so instrumental in saving Ken Paxton. | ||
If Ken Paxton had been removed by that phony impeachment they had, none of this would have happened on Pfizer. | ||
You finally had somebody courageous enough to step up and do it, and he was almost taken down. | ||
You saved him. |