Nov. 30, 2023 - Bannon's War Room
47:48
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is what you're fighting for. | ||
| I mean, every day you're out there. | ||
| What they're doing is blowing people off. | ||
| If you continue to look the other way and shut up, then the oppressors, the authoritarians, get total control and total power. | ||
| Because this is just like in Arizona. | ||
| This is just like in Georgia. | ||
| It's another element that backs them into a corner and shows their lies and misrepresentations. | ||
| This is why this audience is going to have to get engaged. | ||
| As we've told you, this is the fight. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All this nonsense, all this spin, they can't handle the truth. | |
| War Room Battleground. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| It's Wednesday, November 29, Year of Our Lord 2023. | ||
| Thank you for continuing on in our late afternoon, early evening edition of The War Room. | ||
| We're now in the early evening, second hour. | ||
| We started the first hour in Arizona. | ||
| We talked about the indictments in Cochise County. | ||
| By the out-of-control, illegitimate attorney general out there. | ||
| I want to go now to New Hampshire, Dan Richards. | ||
| Dan, you're chairman of what, the Institute for Constitutional Studies? | ||
| Walk us through what happened in New Hampshire today. | ||
| You were, I guess, a plaintiff or got this case going that was argued today in the New Hampshire Supreme Court. | ||
| Tell me what it's about and why is it relevant? | ||
|
unidentified
|
...to change or fight the statutory changes to mandatory constitutional provisions. | |
| And that's really the summary, that the legislature has simply exercised undelegated powers and expanded its authority by statute. | ||
| So what does that mean? | ||
| Because this happened in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. | ||
| Also, it's happened throughout the country. | ||
| For the non-constitutional scholar, non-lawyer, walk me through what that actually means and why, when they've turned down so many of the cases, did the New Hampshire Supreme Court take this one? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, specifically because of standing, right? | |
| So I have a constitutional right under both the state and federal constitution to vote. | ||
| And so those two, both constitutions restrain your state and federal government. | ||
| And so these two, these three issues I argued today were one, that the expansion and use of voting machines is unconstitutional because the people didn't authorize the change from 1784. | ||
| Same with absentee voting. | ||
| They added five additional exemptions not authorized by the state constitution, increasing the absentee turnout from a normal 4% to 32%. | ||
| And then finally, using voting machines to conceal unverified, uncertified absentee ballots. | ||
| Again, a dilution of almost 26% in the 2020 race. | ||
| Is it your contention that the 2020 race would have turned out differently, that President Trump would have actually won, which he did win New Hampshire, but have been acclaimed or certified that he won New Hampshire, if all four of these had not been prevalent at the time? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely. | |
| And I would say that the reason for that is that Moore v. Harper is a recent case by SCOTUS that was just decided this summer. | ||
| That's the redistricting case out of North Carolina. | ||
| And I would suggest to your audience that had that opinion been issued by Roberts when the 2020 elections was being contested, none of these fights would have gone the way they've done. | ||
| And it's a fascinating backstory that when Roberts wrote the opinion, I thought to myself, who took the leash off of him? | ||
| Because he's giving us everything we need to fight back. | ||
| In other words, that your rights stand on a higher plateau and the burden of proof now is upon the government. | ||
| Prior to this case, and the Heller-Bruin decision as well, we would always, in court, have to prove how we were harmed. | ||
| Okay, okay. | ||
| Hang on. | ||
| Hang on. | ||
| Full stop. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| This audience are not constitutional scholars. | ||
| They didn't go to school and study the Constitution. | ||
| I'm not a lawyer. | ||
| You've already lost me. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sorry. | |
| So I want to go back. | ||
| Why is Maury V. Harper, Maury V. Harper, just slow down, Maury V. Harper, Very good point. | ||
|
unidentified
|
here why is something about I think was about the North Carolina legislature and the redistricting there those maps why is Roberts opinion that what was it why is it important why is have anything to do with this very very good point the issue there was this North Carolina Republicans obtained a majority and under the under their authority they redistricted the state | |
| The problem is that they made it advantageous for the Republican Party, and so the Democrats sued and lost. | ||
| They appealed and lost. | ||
| And so the Supreme Court decision is all about who gets to write your election laws, and can that power be delegated? | ||
| And that's what they said that it can't be. | ||
| The legislature of the several states is bound to establish our election laws and you can't give it to somebody else. | ||
| And so that's, that's really the long and the short of that case. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| But, but hold on, but you just said that the legislature made these changes in, uh, they didn't change the constitution, but the legislature changed the laws of the four areas you just told me. | ||
| So why is that go against Robert's opinion? | ||
| You've lost me already. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Great point. | |
| And the reason is, is that you can't change the state constitution by statute. | ||
| It must be submitted to the voters on a referendum vote in order to obtain the changes. | ||
| And that's what I'm, that's what my lawsuit is about. | ||
| That they didn't do that very process. | ||
| Moore v. Harper, in Roberts's opinion, he reaffirms that position. | ||
| That you can only, you can only write statutes. | ||
| Election law statutes can only be written pursuant to the state and federal constitution And not create all this other funny business that they've been doing for a very long time. | ||
| Okay, now we're on it. | ||
| Now you're in our wheelhouse. | ||
| Tell me, what does the New Hampshire Constitution actually say? | ||
| I know what you say, all these things that change, the legislations change. | ||
| Tell me, as simple as you can tell me, what does the New Hampshire State Constitution say about voting? | ||
|
unidentified
|
In 1784, we assigned three human beings, a local moderator, a selectman, and a clerk. | |
| Those are three eyewitnesses that are constitutionally assigned the duty to sort and count the vote. | ||
| And that's the key, sort, not just count. | ||
| And that means a physical examination of the ballot. | ||
| And so that's what it provided for so that you had three eyewitnesses. | ||
| And when the moderator is done sorting and counting the ballots, he has to swear in a public setting that his count is true and accurate. | ||
| Well, how can he swear something is true and accurate when he in fact did not count the ballots? | ||
| He let electronic device that he has no custody or control of do the job for him. | ||
| So that's what the Constitution requires, that those three human beings, because guess what else they can do? | ||
| They correct mistakes on the spot. | ||
| Okay, but hang on. | ||
| 1784, I don't know, 235 years ago, roughly, over 230 years ago, has there not been any changes to the voting back from, remember 1784 we didn't have the steam engine, right? | ||
| We didn't have internal combustion. | ||
| We didn't have any technology, we didn't have lighting, we didn't have electricity. | ||
| It was a time of the Enlightenment, but a time of pre-technological, the Industrial Revolution. | ||
| So, how there has been changes, and no one's ever challenged that in the 230 plus years, you're still going off the Constitution, which essentially has it laid out from 1784. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The genius of the document is that it can be altered or amended by the people as time passes, and it has been many times. | |
| That's how we create absentee voting here. | ||
| And so you're right. | ||
| It hasn't been changed in New Hampshire since 1784. | ||
| I'm the first person to challenge this issue. | ||
| That's why the Supreme Court heard this case. | ||
| And, uh, yeah, it hasn't been challenged. | ||
| And by the way, Massachusetts constitution is nearly identical and they did change it. | ||
| They did put it a referendum. | ||
| They changed the constitution. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
| And they authorize the constitution. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| What about the common, what about the Commonwealth? | ||
| What about the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania? | ||
| They did the exact same thing. | ||
| They did not change their constitution. | ||
| Am I correct in that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, that's exactly what many of these cases were about, that these Trump cases lost, because there wasn't the case precedent in place to direct the courts as to what to do with the matter. | |
| Yeah, it was really a hot mess and so now Morvey Harper has given the court specific instructions. | ||
| Hang on, was that the change? | ||
| Was it the Morvey Harper opinion by Roberts at the Supreme Court last year that all of a sudden made your case relevant or actually gave you standing whereas before, you know, the people in Pennsylvania, nobody got any traction on this thing? | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's exactly right. | |
| Fascinating backstory on that case is that the dissenting opinion of Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch, they didn't object to the majority opinion. | ||
| It was Morvey-Harper's 6-3 decision. | ||
| They objected because they claimed that there was no controversy. | ||
| And in order for the case to be heard in the Supreme Court, there must still be a controversy. | ||
| And so Roberts forced them to hear this case, give an opinion, and it put in place the precedent so that all of the shenanigans that went on during 2020 and all those cases we lost are no longer subject to local judges. | ||
| Now the Supreme Court has ruled and it has lined the rules as to how these cases... Steve, this is going to affect all 50 states. | ||
| Are other people in Pennsylvania and others have people reached out to you and said, hey, get me up to speed here, you know, make me smart about what I need to do because this is incredible. | ||
| I argued this from the absolute beginning. | ||
| I argued this. | ||
| With Bill McGinley and Raheem Kassam when we saw Mark Elias' transition integrity project. | ||
| And I'd been arguing from the spring, I said the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, I wasn't voting for New Hampshire, I said the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is basically making all these changes that I think are in the Constitution about how you have to vote and nobody's paying any attention to it at all. | ||
| So are now people reaching out to you to say what do you know so that they can then go to court on this? | ||
| Because this needs to be sorted before 2024. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely, and Steve, I think I'm the first person to bring such a direct challenge in this manner. | |
| I know I am in this state, and that was brought up this morning. | ||
| And even more recently, let me bring this to your attention, Steve. | ||
| A few weeks ago, a Connecticut Superior Court judge overturned the local Bridgeport, Connecticut mayor's race. | ||
| Two Democrats going at it, and one of them is cheating. | ||
| They've got them on camera ballot box stuffing at the deposit box and inside the voting location. | ||
| And and to quote the lower court, again, this is just two weeks ago, said the following. | ||
| The legislature has instead enacted a regulatory scheme designed to prevent fraud as far as practical and mandating the way in which absentee ballots are to be handled. | ||
| And here's the key. | ||
| Whether fraud has been committed in the handling of certain absentee ballots is irrelevant to the question of whether there has been substantial compliance with all the mandatory provisions of absentee voting law. | ||
| It goes on to say, the validity of the ballot, therefore, depends not on whether there's been fraud, but rather whether there's been substantial compliance with mandatory requirements. | ||
| And that was sufficient grounds. | ||
| In other words, you don't have to prove with these new precedents that are now going to be guiding our courts. | ||
| You no longer have to prove how you were harmed. | ||
| It's now up to the government to prove that its statutory scheme today would have been lawful when the Constitution was either written or amended. | ||
| Has this caused a firestorm up in New Hampshire? | ||
| Are people saying, hey, you're bringing up something, you want to take us back to the Stone Age, that you're one of these hardcore originalists, and that we live in a post-industrial society, we live in a digital society, and that Dan Richards and these guys are all horse and buggy guys? | ||
|
unidentified
|
My answer is simple. | |
| I don't oppose any changes that a two-thirds majority of my state in a referendum would cause our state constitution to be changed. | ||
| We are, after all, a constitutional republic and not a democracy. | ||
| And in a constitutional republic, powers of the government are few and well-defined, as James Madison famously said. | ||
| So, yeah, no, I don't object to change. | ||
| What I object to is change that And that's the basis of my case here, that you change the function of my government without the consent of the voters and that's expressly and expressively, you can't do it. | ||
| Can't do it. | ||
| Dan, this is amazing. | ||
| We want to spend more time with you. | ||
| Where do people go to get more knowledge about this case? | ||
| This is going to be landmark. | ||
| No matter how they rule on this, this is a shot across the bow of 2024. | ||
| This is a shot across the bow of the Mark Eliases of the world. | ||
| This is a shot across the bow of the Rhino Republicans in these states that cut deals, didn't go by the rules, shredded their constitution. | ||
| and just allowed this election of 2020 to be stolen. | ||
| This is why everybody, including Democrats, have big issues with the 2020 election and the legitimacy of the Biden regime. | ||
| So where do they go to find out more about you, this case, et cetera? | ||
| We look forward to having the audience jump in and then having you back on. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you for that. | |
| And we're putting a team together now because this has been a one-man effort up until now. | ||
| And I would like to point out too, as you just suggested with the rhinos, all the people I'm suing in this case are, I'm a lifelong Republican and I'll never vote for a Democrat, not even from my grave, right? | ||
| And who am I suing? | ||
| Chris Sununu, John Fromella, the Secretary of State, the Speaker of the House, the President of the Senate, my local town. | ||
| They're all Republicans and they're all burying their head in the sand and they don't want to deal with the problem. | ||
| Dan Richards, one man with the cussedness and the grit can change history. | ||
| Let's hope it's going to go your way. | ||
| Where do people get you, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right now, I've got to create that platform. | |
| So I will get back to your staff and get you. | ||
| You're a one man band. | ||
| What about you? | ||
| Do you have social media at all? | ||
| Dude, not only are you arguing something that's pre-industrial revolution, you are pre-industrial revolution. | ||
| Do you have a Twitter feed or getter? | ||
| No, I don't. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I don't. | |
| You're right. | ||
| Those are all true. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Well, anyway, my staff will help you figure it out. | ||
| We'll get back to you. | ||
| You're a patriot and a hero, and I'm telling you, the Revolutionary Generation, and particularly the folks that wrote the Constitution for the great state of New Hampshire, the Granite State, live free or die in 1784 and ratified it, would be very proud of you, sir. | ||
| Very proud. | ||
| So you should understand that. | ||
| Look forward to having you back on. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you, sir. | |
| Thank you. | ||
| Dude, that is a total throwback right there. | ||
| That's a throwback. | ||
| Those are the kind of fighters you need. | ||
| I hope you're jacked up now. | ||
| One man alone with no website, no social media. | ||
| I want to go to the reverse of that, and I want to see how the modern mind thinks about the Constitution and thinks about our constitutional republic. | ||
| Let's go ahead and play the clip. | ||
| I'm bringing Scott McKay. | ||
| I agree. | ||
| We're seeing a cognitive decline, but we're also seeing some dog whistles from him. | ||
| The reason, when he makes these cognitive mistakes, because they're indicia of cognitive decline. | ||
| So you think they're purposeful? | ||
| Well, I think he's mixing them all in. | ||
| I think he's having the cognitive decline. | ||
| And then when he catches himself making mistakes, he says, well, you know, because Obama is really Biden's boss. | ||
| That is a dog whistle to the white supremacists in the country that are like, I don't want a black man in charge again. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's too late. | |
| You can't undo that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It already happened. | |
| Deal with it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I agree with that. | |
| I think he appeals to that racist section of his base that doesn't want a black guy to get any kind of credit. | ||
| You know, he made his bones on the birth of BS. | ||
| Okay, that's your favorite show, The View. | ||
| In case you missed it today, just the clips. | ||
| Let's bring in Scott McKay. | ||
| Scott, you've written a book Very prescient. | ||
| I'm wondering when The View is going to invite you on, but you've written a book called Racism, Revenge, and Obama. | ||
| You basically essentially make the case. | ||
| Let me say it differently. | ||
| You attempt to make the case that Obama is still calling the shots here. | ||
| Walk us through this. | ||
| Show us the receipts. | ||
| Let's put it up in Whoopi's Grill about what you have and why you say it's not really racism or Trump that's driving this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, first of all, Thanks for having me on, Steve. | |
| Let me just kind of lay this out there. | ||
| Race is now the opposite of accountability in America, right? | ||
| We use race to shield people from actual accountability for actions and so forth. | ||
| The receipts on Obama, I mean, the number one thing was the most patently obvious is a year and change ago when Barack Obama showed up at the White House and was treated as a conquering hero. And the President of the United States was wandering around the room on video looking for a conversation and nobody will give him one. | ||
| You know, and we've seen over and over again, all of Biden's people were Obama's people. | ||
| Biden's policies were Obama's policies. | ||
| But, but, but, but. | ||
| Hang on, hang on. | ||
| But that's a natural. | ||
| This was Bush 41. | ||
| It was Reagan's third term. | ||
| Anytime you have someone, particularly a vice president, that wins an election off of a previous president who's kind of tapped out because he's had his eight years. | ||
| Everybody throughout history says it's their third term. | ||
| Why is that a big deal? | ||
| So Obama is a conquering hero for those guys. | ||
| So he came back to the treatment as a conquering hero, and Biden's always been kind of an afterthought, just like Bush was to a large degree. | ||
| Why does that show anything that Obama's running the White House? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, think of the 2020 Democrat presidential primary between Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. | |
| And remember, Kamala was Team Obama's choice in that election. | ||
| And she crashed and burned at the beginning of that primary process. | ||
| And Biden was crashing and burning. | ||
| And then, deus ex machina, we had Joe Biden all of a sudden installed as the nominee in South Carolina. | ||
| And then he picks Kamala Harris as his number two. | ||
| 80% of Democrat voters in that primary process wanted nothing to do with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. | ||
| The two most obvious puppets of Team Obama turned out to be number one and number two on their ballot. | ||
| And, you know, you're right. | ||
| There is a certain amount of continuity that you get with the party. | ||
| But hang on, that makes total sense. | ||
| Obama's their guy. | ||
| That's obvious. | ||
| If Obama won something, you know, Biden wouldn't exist politically without Obama. | ||
| Obama was the one guy, since he didn't actually come in and endorse anybody else, that was the biggest thing that Joe Biden had going for him. | ||
| So why is that? | ||
| What is your thesis? | ||
| Obama still runs things and it wouldn't be kind of odd if his team and his policies and the fruition of my point is that Biden is 10 times, I think, more radical than Obama. | ||
| So what is your theory of the case? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, is Joe Biden's history as an American politician commensurate with a more radical approach than Barack Obama's was? | |
| I would say that that definitely is not true. | ||
| And he had 40 years in the Senate to establish that record. | ||
| All of a sudden, the guy is cognitively disabled as he is, and he becomes a far-left radical when all of his policies, again, are metastasizations of things that happened. | ||
| And we talk about this extensively in the book. | ||
| All of these things are furtherances of groundbreakings we had during the eight years of Obama. | ||
| And so, this is more than just the standard, yeah, this is the third term of so-and-so. | ||
| Are you guilty? | ||
| Make your case against Whoopi. | ||
| Because Whoopi said the Scott McKays of the world that are really the guys that are amplifying this dog whistle. | ||
| are the racists here because Obama's a black man, and they just can't cotton to the fact that a black man is essentially running the White House this time. | ||
| And this is a dog whistle to the white supremacists, the white nationalists, the breathe through the mouth white working class, that you gotta not vote for Biden. | ||
| Counter her argument. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, Joe Biden's a white guy. | |
| So for her to be making this argument is a concession that this is Obama's third term, right? | ||
| Because otherwise, if Joe Biden was the president, there would be no argument about race, would there? | ||
| I mean, we have a white guy, actually a white guy who established himself as pretty seriously a racist. | ||
| I mean, that was Kamala Harris's Yeah, but you're saying the white guy has no power that Obama's the puppet. | ||
| But you're saying the white guy has no power that Obama's the puppet. | ||
| So counter her argument by you going and saying that Obama actually controls the White House with his five or six or seven or eight top aides or the deputies of those aides that are now the senior people in the White House, Susan Rice and etc. | ||
| I know Susan Rice punched out, but all those that were there from the beginning that he's running it counter the argument that you're that you're just amplifying a dog whistle. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, I mean, what I'm what I'm saying is, is that she's conceding that Obama is the active ingredient in the Biden White House if she's going to bring up race. | |
| Thanks. | ||
| I mean, it's pretty obvious. | ||
| I mean, if Joe Biden is the guy actually in control, then you have a white guy in control, and there should be no discussion of race in this. | ||
| And so, you know, and then the other part of it is, like I said, this is Barack Obama's third term from a policy standpoint, because there's very little that Joe Biden is doing that isn't a direct Like I said, mishastization of what happened during Obama. | ||
| Does that shock you? | ||
| I mean, wouldn't it be shocking if it was the other way? | ||
| Of course it's going to be his third term, just like Bush. | ||
| Although Bush in the second term of Reagan, they got all the Baker and the Bush guys in there. | ||
| But would it surprise you that the policies were just Obama's policies, but taken to the next level? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, it's not the way Joe Biden was sold to the American public. | |
| Right? | ||
| and he was sold as a centrist. | ||
| Of course, they actually sold Barack Obama at the time back in 2008 as a centrist. | ||
| Oh, I see. | ||
| You're saying Obama's approval was so far down, his policies had so failed, it looked like another failed presidency, the hope and change didn't work, the country was, when I took over the campaign, it was two-thirds wrong track, one-third right track, which is a killer. | ||
| You're saying that they sold Biden as not Obama's third term, specifically as a moderate that was going to bring the country together and not have these divisive policies that Trump had had them divisive from the right, Obama had divisive from the left. Is that your theory of the case? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I would say that that's a pretty good theory, yeah. | |
| And that you took it on. How do people, are you... | ||
| I want to make sure people get tons of access to you, because actually the book is quite fascinating. | ||
| I've been up on your grill, but I wanted you to be almost like The View would have you on, because I think it would be the best interview for you to have. | ||
| I'd love to see you on The View. | ||
| Are you going around and giving talks about this book? | ||
| Are you doing a book tour of this? | ||
| This issue about Obama. | ||
| And Obama's control or not control in the White House, because he did have, and Susan Rice is like the chief, you know, lieutenant of the mafioso. | ||
| They had her there for as long as they needed her. | ||
| They've got others. | ||
| Are you going around and giving a book tour? | ||
| Can people actually see you talk about this? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, right now we're doing lots of appearances like this, obviously, so that we can get the maximum amount of word out. | |
| I mean, I think this is going to be the fourth, the fourth show I've done today. | ||
| I'm getting a lot of practice, I guess. | ||
| I mean, I've done radio shows across the country. | ||
| We're doing podcasts. | ||
| I did a thing in Canada last week that just aired today. | ||
| So, yeah, I'm getting out there. | ||
| Is the book cover, hang on, I'm going to hold you through the break. | ||
| I've got Dr. Thayer, I've got Ben Horner, I've got a lot to get through. | ||
| Pull the book cover back up, if you can, Memphis, please. | ||
| That book cover looks pretty ominous. | ||
| Was that book cover done on, was that design on purpose? | ||
| I mean, it's like red with a black background. | ||
| You know, Obama looks like a demon. | ||
| Was that done on purpose? | ||
|
unidentified
|
We made a conscious choice not to go subtle with either the book cover or the title of the book. | |
| And I think it's important because... Hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on. | ||
| I'm gonna bring you back after break because I want you to get a full answer on this. | ||
| Well, you came to the right place. | ||
| We're not terribly nuanced here in the War Room, so you're talking to the posse over the dinner hour. | ||
| Okay, we're gonna take a short break. | ||
| Scott McKay, the author of Racism, Revenge, and Obama. | ||
| Back in a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room Battleground with Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| Okay, when you're hanging and you gotta, you know, go up against guys like Scott McKay this time of day, I always make sure I've got Warpath Coffee. | ||
| Warpath.coffee, promo code War Room. | ||
| The dark roast is the finest dark roast ever made. | ||
| We worked on this for a year, year and a half with Tej Gill and the great team over there. | ||
| They got mild roast, they got blends, they got everything. | ||
| Holiday, just go to the site, warpath.coffee. | ||
| But I will tell you that this will give you that late afternoon charge that you need, particularly if you're going to hang here in the war room. | ||
| Also, Turning Point USA, go to AmFest. | ||
| AmFest is 16th to the 19th in Phoenix, the greater Phoenix area. | ||
| We're going to be there. | ||
| We're going to be broadcasting. | ||
| I'll be speaking on the main stage, I think on Sunday. | ||
| It's going to be absolutely incredible. | ||
| We want to see as many of the War Room Posse there as possible that we get to meet and greet and talk. | ||
| And particularly, if you had a chance to pick up and read Scott McKay's book, we can go through that. | ||
| Scott, where can people get this? | ||
| This is going to be controversial. | ||
| They're already calling you that you're one of the problems here, that you and your followers are all racists and xenophobes and nativists, that you got the dog whistle out there, that a black man is going to be president again for another four years just to rile people up. | ||
| So I want to make sure people get your book and read it and discuss it with their neighbors. | ||
| So where do they go? | ||
|
unidentified
|
You know, all of the places, Amazon, Barnes and Noble, all of those, uh, the usual places you buy books, uh, have got it. | |
| It's out now. | ||
| Racism, Revenge and Ruin. | ||
| It's all Obama. | ||
| Uh, you can look up my name on Amazon and any of those, uh, other book sites and, and it's there. | ||
| So, um, you know, sales have already started, but they're a little bit brisk. | ||
| So that's a good, a good thing. | ||
| I, I imagine you're going to meet a, I think this is going to be a holiday gift people want to give, particularly people in their family may not agree with this as a stocking stuffer. | ||
| Uh, where do they, um, your social media, what's that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| I'm, uh, at the hayride on, on Twitter. | ||
| I'm also at Reviver, R V I V R D O T com Reviver.com. | ||
| You can find me on Facebook. | ||
| I write a column three days a week at The American Spectator, which is spectator.org. | ||
| And you can go to my website that covers Louisiana and Southern politics at theheyride.com. | ||
| And check us out also for national politics at reviver.com, which is r-v-i-v-r dot com. | ||
| The Hey Ride's fantastic, and of course, American Spectator's among the best. | ||
| Thank you, brother, for being on here. | ||
| Really appreciate it. | ||
| Scott McKay. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Take care. | |
| See you soon. | ||
| Racism, revenge, and ruin. | ||
| Obama's third term. | ||
| Check it out. | ||
| We had EJ earlier. | ||
| We also have talked about the trillion dollar debt in 100 days. | ||
| Think about that for a second. | ||
| A trillion dollars in 100 days. | ||
| Harnwell is going to come on from Rome. | ||
| We're going to talk about Clearly Ukraine has some other issues. | ||
| The full court press on Ukraine right now is like something I've never seen. | ||
| They've got two things going on. | ||
| Number one, they want to have a longer CR. | ||
| I'm just breaking the news to you. | ||
| They want to have a longer CR because they understand that we're going to demand massive budget cuts, the MAGA base, and they don't want to do it. | ||
| They don't have the political will to do it. | ||
| So they're looking for every way to kick the can down the road. | ||
| And this is what they want to do first. | ||
| They want to get the 60 to 80 billion dollars for Ukraine done first. | ||
| That's what they want to do. | ||
| And they're prepared to put any trinket on there they have to, to try to fool you. | ||
| You've got to go to Birchgold right now. | ||
| And I tell you, ask Philip Patrick. | ||
| Go to birchgold.com. | ||
| Ask Philip Patrick and the team. | ||
| Get them online. | ||
| Call them. | ||
| Ask Philip Patrick and the team. | ||
| What's another trillion dollars of fiat money on the nation's balance sheet right now in 100 days? | ||
| How's that going to impact things? | ||
| This is why the BRICS nations, this is why the BRICS, the people that control the resources in the world, are de-dollarizing. | ||
| This is why they're buying gold at record rates. | ||
| They bought record ounces of gold in 2022 and they're doing it again in 2023. | ||
| And guess who leads the pack? | ||
| Wait for it. | ||
| You already guessed. | ||
| The Chinese Communist Party at 25%. | ||
| So ask Philip Patrick that. | ||
| Get a big hot mug of Warpath coffee. | ||
| Go to your favorite chair. | ||
| Sit down and just think. | ||
| Cut off the phone. | ||
| Cut off the television. | ||
| Just sit down with your own self and start to think it through. | ||
| Like, what in the hell is going on here? | ||
| Do it yourself. | ||
| You're free men and free women. | ||
| Harnwell, I had an interview on GB News today, one of my favorite news sites in the world, a news broadcaster in Great Britain, and a lot of it was about the follow-on from the Tucker. | ||
| interview yesterday about the Irish. | ||
| And people know I'm Irish. | ||
| I was born fighting, as the Irish are. | ||
| I very rarely talk about my heritage. | ||
| I never talk about Irish politics because it so disgusts me of how the elites in that country, the political elites, the Uniparty, have sold out the Irish people. | ||
| And to be brutally frank about it, the Irish people have not fought back. | ||
| It is the most, I think, co-opted country in Europe into the EU. | ||
| And what you've seen is this explosion the last couple of days because of the situation with the immigrant population and the knifing of the children and these other people. | ||
| And what is brought to mind is this Allison Pearson in The Telegraph has written a brilliant piece. | ||
| And Dr. Bradley Thayer broke it down for us. | ||
| It's on warroom.org right now, and this is why you ought to get our free email. | ||
| Make sure you go to the site. | ||
| He broke the piece down brilliantly, and it is a brilliant piece to begin with, where she said, hey, look, this multiculturalism is not working. | ||
| And what you're seeing is the mothers of Ireland, women in their 40s, 50s, and 60s that are not going to allow their daughters to be exposed to fighting-age males from North Africa and the Middle East that are, quite frankly, looking for women, and they see these young girls that are not with hijabs and not covered, and it just drives them crazy, and they want sex. | ||
| I mean, she couldn't have been more brutally frank. | ||
| It's a brilliant piece. | ||
| I'm kind of shocked the Telegraph, which I know you and I loved for many decades, which has kind of gone wet, put it up. | ||
| Your thoughts, brother? | ||
| If I may, good evening to you. | ||
| I'm going to start by talking not about Ireland, but a personal anecdote from my time in Brussels, in Belgium, which has a very similar immigrant breakdown to it. | ||
| I remember very starkly One of my colleagues, who also worked in the European Parliament, worked for a different MEP from me. | ||
| She once told me that in some of the rougher areas in Brussels, just to stop being molested, because whenever she travelled on the underground system, she'd always have Moroccan guys come over and stroking her arms, if she was wearing a t-shirt or something, and stroking her hair, just to stop that. | ||
| She would actually wear a hijab, just in order for these guys to leave her alone. | ||
| So your opening introduction about these mothers and grandmothers in Ireland, it's absolutely true, and it strikes me as absolutely true. | ||
| I mean, it's well known as a fact down on the ground, not only in Ireland, but in the Netherlands, in Paris, in parts of Germany. | ||
| There's a huge swathe now across across Europe, across the European Union. | ||
| If you are a girl, if you have blonde hair, if you have blue eyes and you just want to be left alone by many young guys, 20-year-old guys who weren't born in the West but have come over, then yes, you are open season if you're not wearing a head covering. | ||
| So that's what a lot of girls do now. | ||
| And just, they're obviously not Islamic. | ||
| Why is that not talked about? | ||
| Hang on, with the rapes in Sweden and what's happened in France, why is this not talked about? | ||
| The point of Alistair Pearson, and everybody should read Thayer's breakdown of it and then get the original copy yourself. | ||
| We'll figure out how to get behind the paywall and make sure you can read it. | ||
| She makes the case that these mothers are the ones that have been demonized. | ||
| First off, the folks that got worked up and burned down, I think a footlocker and a bus, they're being charged with hate crimes. | ||
| You've got Conor McGregor who stood up and said, hey, your plan is not good enough, you won't address this. | ||
| They're going after them with hate crimes. | ||
| The whole thing in Ireland has been focused on the folks that stood up and the focus on the mothers. | ||
| How have we gotten this thing so up down? | ||
| This is worse than cancel culture. | ||
| This is a deep-seated self-loathing of your own people and your own culture. | ||
| This is a cancer. | ||
| This cancer is actually even deeper and worse than multiculturalism, sir. | ||
| Steve, does it not illustrate perfectly how totally absent, bereft, more principled, woke progressives are that their first instinct here is to blame the victims? | ||
| Female victims, by the way. | ||
| Female victims of male molestation. | ||
| These aren't fictional things that have been brought up that you often read about in the press, where the guy's just presumed guilty 20 years after the event. | ||
| And frankly, no one can prove one way or the other. | ||
| And it's basically, he said, she said. | ||
| These aren't those instances, right? | ||
| These are instances that are happening today that are perfectly verifiable. | ||
| And the first I think that the woke progressive establishment that has created this disaster over many decades, the first thing they do is blame the victims, women, who are being harassed, molested, raped, and subject to all forms of violence and abuse. | ||
| by immigrant men, their first recourse is to blame the victim. | ||
| That's absolutely astonishing. | ||
| I can think of no other instance where that would be acceptable apart from there is a hierarchy of victimhood in the West. | ||
| And sadly, women have a lot of power over men these days. | ||
| Basically, you believe women and that kind of movement. | ||
| But they're not at the top of the pyramid. | ||
| They're not at the top of the apex. | ||
| There is an officially sanctioned victim group that trumps all others, and those are people who weren't born here. | ||
| Those are people often who come in illegally, often people who have been subject to court orders for deportation and have just stayed. | ||
| These people are untouchable. | ||
| There is an instance here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
There's just one... | |
| Steve, I have, I must read one quote here in this excellent article, because it just explains everything. | ||
| It explains the situation, I think, that Ireland is in, right? | ||
| This is the guy, we're talking about Aisling Murphy, who was the 23-year-old teacher who was brutally murdered, and the guy who killed her was a gypsy, an illegal gypsy in the country. | ||
| I think they've been marked for deportation as well. | ||
| And this is what her boyfriend said, Ryan Casey, in court. | ||
| And no journalist has picked this up beyond the telegraph. | ||
| This is what he said as part of the victim impact statement. | ||
| How can someone come to this country Get social housing, social welfare, not hold down a job of any description, and never contribute to society for 10 years. | ||
| This is not the country that Aisling and I grew up in and want to love. | ||
| It has officially lost its innocence. | ||
| This country needs to wake up. | ||
| This time, things have got to change. | ||
| That's a very powerful quote. | ||
| I mean, his girlfriend was killed, right? | ||
| Let's not forget that. | ||
| A very powerful quote. | ||
| And those were all pertinent questions. | ||
| The answer is, of course, The answer to those questions, how does it happen, is because you had an out-of-touch sociopathic government that implemented all these things over the will of the people, and yet the people still voted for them. | ||
| That's the important thing here. | ||
| In some senses, Steve, and the article does of course mention that of a population of just 5 million, 1 million people in Ireland now born abroad. | ||
| The Irish people have had plenty of opportunities to change course over many years, and they have not done so. | ||
| In some sense, Steve, pains me to say, in some sense, these are chickens coming home to roost. | ||
| No, they've been sheep. | ||
| There's no doubt about it. | ||
| Now, there's many things of Irish history, but there's no elites or uniparty in the world that have sold their people out than the Irish political leadership. It's disgusting and revolting. They report to the party of Davos. They report to Brussels. They report to the city of London. They report to Wall Street and to the Atlantic Council in Washington, D.C. | ||
| These people are fully woke. | ||
| We talked yesterday and went ahead. Michael Walsh on one of the members of the Worm Engine Room, who lives in Ireland and does work for us there, actually talked about a town. I think it's called Yall, where there's 800 Ukrainians and only 400 or 500 citizens. | ||
| And the Ukrainians have been 100,000, essentially draft dodgers. | ||
| There have been some women and children, yes, but it's just fighting-age men that want to get out of the country and not defend their country. | ||
| They're not taking the best in Ireland, the Irish politicians don't care. | ||
| Before we do that, I know we've got to get to Ukraine, only got a couple of minutes, so maybe we do the Ukraine tomorrow. | ||
| But, because Gert Wilders, I've known Gert now for over a decade, this kind of came out of nowhere unless you've been paying attention of the seething anger And when you talk about seething anger, you're talking about the Netherlands, which is probably the most liberal, open, nice people in the continent of Europe, and also the Irish, who are pretty chilled and pretty laid back. | ||
| Is this the thing that's happening on immigration that they don't even want to discuss publicly, and then all of a sudden, out of nowhere? | ||
| Gerd Wilders gets, what, 35 or 36 seats and can actually have the lead in forming a government in a place as not just liberal but progressive as the Netherlands, as the Dutch? | ||
| Steve, this is, you know, looking at the parallels between the Netherlands and Ireland, I'm just astonished. | ||
| Basically, it's exactly the same situation going on, only just in two different countries. | ||
| Exactly the same. | ||
| And this is going to be replicated elsewhere. | ||
| Now the FT yesterday, I almost made it onto the show yesterday, I didn't quite make it on yesterday, but the FT had three articles in there that are all directly tied together on these arguments, but it was sort of by chance, it wasn't as if they were winning a themed analysis. | ||
| The thing about the Geert Wilders election that really astonishes me, Steve, is how every time the Western media are talking about it, they're calling it a shock victory. | ||
| a shock result. | ||
| Well, I was surprised. | ||
| I saw the, you know, I was surprised that he did so well. | ||
| But, you know, what planet are you living on? | ||
| For it to be a shock. | ||
| The anger in some parts of the Netherlands has been building as it has in Ireland, as it has been for elsewhere. | ||
| The tragedy of the Dutch situation, however, Steve, is I don't quite know what What a democratic government within the norms of democracy and the limits imposed on democracy. | ||
| What the Netherlands can now do to rectify its problem. | ||
| I mean, if you consider certain countries like ships that have holes beneath their hulls, well, they're letting in water and pretty much you can still turn it around. | ||
| You can block the hole, kick out the water and your ship We'll steady itself and go on. | ||
| But there gets to a point when the boat lets in so much water that it's only a case of time until it sinks. | ||
| And I sort of think that the Netherlands is in that situation now. | ||
| I don't think there's any way coming back for the Netherlands. | ||
| I don't think there's any way coming back for France either, to be honest with you. | ||
| But some countries can turn it around. | ||
| I don't quite know what Gert Wilders is going to be able to do. | ||
| But there's no way. | ||
| I mean, it just shows you, you know, It's the same thing talking about the Netherlands, talking about the island situation. | ||
| It's not a shock, it's a fact that the debate… It's not a shock if you're paying attention. | ||
| Let me go to Giorgia Maloney for a second. | ||
| You see that this is something even she who kind of ran on this, and particularly her side of the political spectrum, being actually farther to the right than Salvini, she blinked right away. | ||
| I mean, she's been, correct me if I'm wrong, pretty meh about the immigration crisis in Italy, and that's because she wants that EU money. | ||
| She needs that EU cash. | ||
| Am I wrong there? | ||
| She doesn't need it. | ||
| It's a choice that she has made. | ||
| She could quite easily, she had the popular mandate to run a different type of government. | ||
| She did. | ||
| She collapsed like a wet round paper bag, sadly, to say that, Steve. | ||
| Again, she might be able to turn it around. | ||
| She's not given any great indication of having the fight in her to do this. | ||
| And as I mentioned on the show before, she is electorally secure at the moment in order to do this, to somewhat betray her base, because there is presently no one on her right flank that can challenge her. | ||
| It's betraying her country. | ||
| We've got to bounce. | ||
| I said on Tucker what went viral. | ||
| What you've seen in Ireland, is a small scale what you're going to see in the United States. | ||
| Ireland's let in 125 or 130,000 illegal immigrants in the or I guess immigrants the way that the EU calls it in their political class in the last year. | ||
| That'd be the equivalent of 9 million here in the United States which is just the number that Biden has allowed in so far. | ||
| You're going to see when deportation time comes and it's coming You're going to see something at a much bigger scale, and it's not going to be pretty. | ||
| Ben, how do people get to you on social media? | ||
| We'll do Ukraine tomorrow. | ||
| Thank you so much, Steve. | ||
| Yeah, subscribe, folks, to the exclusive newsletter that Steve was talking about earlier with Dr. Thayer's great article. | ||
| If you want to read that, you just need to subscribe. | ||
| Go to the warroom.org website and put in your email address. | ||
| It's as simple and straightforward as that. | ||
| Catch me on Bannon's War Room on Rumble, and of course on at Steve Bannon on Getter. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Natalie, Ben, Joe Allen, and now Dr. Thayer give us exclusive content, plus we get exclusive content for everybody else. | ||
| You've got to get the newsletter. | ||
| If you listen to the podcast or radio, our ever-expanding radio presence, you need to get the newsletter. | ||
| You need to go to the site. | ||
| You need to get the visuals. | ||
| You need to get to actually see what we're showing here on television. | ||
| It'll only add to your knowledge and your understanding. | ||
| Ben Harnwell, thank you very much. | ||
| Honored to have you on, brother. | ||
| See you tomorrow. | ||
| Thank you so much, Steve. | ||
| Go ahead. | ||
| Our international editor located in Rome. | ||
| This fight on the budget, the fight on the deficits is out of control nature. | ||
| It's only going to get more intense. | ||
| Uh, we're going to be back here at 10 o'clock tomorrow morning, and we're going to be kicking it off with a lot of developments on Capitol Hill. | ||
| I know everybody's looking for marching orders. | ||
| Just keep your powder dry right now. | ||
| One thing you should do to make sure you command the ramparts is take anything off your plate. | ||
| You can take off your plate. | ||
| The, uh, cyber crime situation coupled with artificial intelligence is only going to, um, Explode. | ||
| Because AI right now only adds to the power of the cybercriminals. | ||
| Go to HomeTitleLock.com. | ||
| HomeTitleLock.com right now. | ||
| Check out what they've got to protect you against these cybercriminals. | ||
| You need it. | ||
| You may not know that, but you need it. | ||
| So go check it out today. | ||
| I want to thank everybody. | ||
| The show's been intense. | ||
| We're going to get the article from Alistair Pearson up so everybody can read it, think about it. | ||
| I want to thank all of our sponsors. | ||
| We're going to be back here on fire Tomorrow morning at 10 a.m. |
Export Selection