Nov. 1, 2023 - Bannon's War Room
48:57
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pray for our enemies. | |
| Because we're going medieval on these people. | ||
| You're not going to free shot all these networks lying about the people. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The people have had a belly full of it. | |
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you've tried to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big line? | ||
|
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bound. | ||
| Welcome to The Warrior at Midnight. | ||
| It's Natalie Winters hosting. | ||
| You've probably picked up by now it's not Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| We look and probably sound just a little bit different, I guess, maybe. | ||
| Steve partied a little too hard yesterday on Halloween. | ||
| Of course, just kidding, but I'm filling in for him at the 5 p.m. | ||
| hour, but don't worry. | ||
| He will be back tomorrow, but don't go anywhere because we have a very packed show on November 1st in the year of our Lord, 2023. | ||
| Joining us, I think we can call him a War Room fan favorite, certainly. | ||
| Not a favorite of whether it's the medical establishment, the vaccine manufacturers, or any of these people who are Tied up in these globalist plots to really take away your liberty, your ability to live freely, of course, no front to them, is Ed Dowd, who's joining us to discuss what really is some new charts coming from you, but an alarming trend, not just particularly on the federal level when you look at the debt to GDP ratio, but how the states really play in, at least from their debt perspective, Sure, no problem. | ||
| So we put out a report called The Great Federal Centralization. | ||
| So, Ed, I know you have some charts. | ||
| I know the War Room Posse loves charts. | ||
| So if you want to walk us through some of these figures, we can get in on the other side of these charts and to what it really means for the War Room Posse and for the country. | ||
| ED HARRISON Sure, no problem. | ||
| So we put out a report called The Great Federal Centralization. | ||
| And if we start with chart one, most people are familiar with this chart. | ||
| It shows that after the Great Financial Crisis, they turned on the government spending to save the economy and debt to GDP has grown to 120 percent from 60 percent in the Great Financial Crisis period. | ||
| So we're all familiar with that chart, but there's a little unnoticed trend that's been going on that you can see in chart two. | ||
| And what's interesting about this is since the Great Financial Crisis, State debt and federal debt combined together is called total public debt. | ||
| At the Great Financial Crisis period, state debt was 33% of public debt. | ||
| Since the Great Financial Crisis and the explosion of the federal balance sheet, state debt as a percent of total public debt is only 10%. | ||
| So what's been going on, essentially, is the U.S. | ||
| government has been subsidizing state budgets since the great financial crisis. | ||
| And right now, most state budgets get 40 percent of their budget from the federal government. | ||
| That has resulted in a couple of interesting observations. | ||
| First, the states no longer need to compete for private capital in the bond markets, but they do have to go to Washington, D.C. | ||
| to compete for federal dollars and lobby and whatnot. | ||
| It also, because of the centralization of power, makes corruption more likely in the D.C. | ||
| swamp. | ||
| And then thirdly, the states have basically given up their economic and political sovereignty to the federal government. | ||
| And if you're wondering why states like Texas and Governor Abbott haven't basically sent their National Guard down to the border, now you know why. | ||
| And why states refuse to do certain things that should make sense to those in the state, they're still hostage to the federal dollars. | ||
| The fourth observation, and this is speculation on our part at Finance Technologies, is that Mary Goran continues, at some point, the state of the federal government and the US bond market, and I'm talking many years now, may not be able to support this game anymore, and states may repudiate the debt. | ||
| We're sowing the seeds for a recession because some of the states, the stronger states with better economies, have better balance sheets, and at some point may want to secede. | ||
| The seeds of secession are in the debt markets, given the fact that the US federal government has been subsidizing states since the Great Financial Crisis. | ||
| That's an interesting unnoticed trend. | ||
| It also explains why things aren't going on at the border in Texas, as far as we're concerned. | ||
| Any questions? | ||
| Of course. | ||
| You know, next to climate change, I think sustainability is probably the left's go-to word. | ||
| They, of course, use it in a different sense, right? | ||
| They talk about renewable energies and fossil fuels. | ||
| But when you talk about sustainability, I think you bring up the very good point of what the United States is currently doing, whether it's borrowing against the future, just the runaway track that this train that is the United States economy is on. | ||
| Is not sustainable. | ||
| Maybe that also falls into the left's very good ability to use projection to try to defend themselves of everything they're guilty of. | ||
| But, you know, you use the R word, right? | ||
| You say recession. | ||
| I'm curious if you could just sort of walk us down what you think the inevitable conclusion or culmination of these trends, if not changed, what it looks like. | ||
| Yeah, so we were calling for recession starting in the third quarter, fourth quarter this year. | ||
| Our ECIs, early cycle indicators, were pointing down. | ||
| They started picking back up again, but they're still showing recessionary type numbers. | ||
| We had a big GDP number just printed in the news. | ||
| I think it was 4.9 percent. | ||
| Basically, the federal government was the player in town that kept the economy afloat. | ||
| The real economy is still showing abysmal indicators. | ||
| So we suspect the wobble you've seen in the stock markets and the bond markets the last couple of months is the capital markets sniffing out that this game of federal spending can't continue unabated. | ||
| And at some point, the Fed, the Federal Reserve is going to have to come in again and do quantitative easing and or yield curve control to save this whole game yet again. | ||
| But they won't do that until the economic numbers are such they can't hide it anymore. | ||
| So we're still calling for a recession, officially in a recession at some point in the next 12 months. | ||
| But they definitely spent their way out of near death in the last several months. | ||
| I'm just curious, Ed, before I let you go, I know you're a hot commodity in media these days, so thank you for gracing the world with your presence, but you talk about what I think really is the buried lead of the report, but you link it to, for example, Governor Abbott's policies when it comes to the southern border and the federal government's sort of ability to either stop or at least somehow impede the implementation of states from being able to do what they want. | ||
| And I know you guys have always been sort of ahead of the curve, really tracking what I think in the more we call global government, right, these supernational entities, like the United Nations of the world, the World Economic Forums of the world, and it seems like they would definitely be on the receiving end, right, on the upside of the United States continuing to consolidate power with the federal government, which we would argue here is basically the administrative state, right? | ||
| You lose the ability to push back. | ||
| On these edicts, these dictates coming from the federal government, how do you think, I think COVID-19, you know, is a perfect example of the federal versus state kind of dichotomy, but how do you think that plays in to what, you know, the UN's of the world, the World Economic Forum's of the world want? | ||
| How does the United States centralizing our power and economic really future with the federal government sort of play into their hands? | ||
| That's a great lead into chart three. | ||
| Let's look at chart three. | ||
| Let's do a little history lesson on COVID. | ||
| So, since the Great Financial Crisis, the federal balance sheet has been growing, exploding as a percent of debt to GDP. | ||
| And you can see that from the great financial crisis to right before COVID, we ballooned $11 trillion or a run rate of $1.1 trillion on average. | ||
| Then after COVID, And COVID, mind you, was a war. | ||
| That was war-like spending. | ||
| We added another $8 trillion in a very short period of time, and that was $2.1 trillion annualized. | ||
| So basically, COVID was a war. | ||
| The states were held hostage by their budgets, and that's why so many states went along with the U.S. | ||
| dictates. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right. | |
| And they were unable to refuse or they were cajoled into going along. | ||
| So that is just one example of the raw power we saw in the federal government implementing what they wanted through the states and through the soft control of the state budget. | ||
| When you roll forward to your predict, talk about the UN, the WHO and these supranational organizations, clearly, they're going to try to get money from the federal government largesse of the US. | ||
| And that needs to be put to a stop because those organizations are above our laws and they will try to impose their will upon us. | ||
| So that is where the game rests. | ||
| And, you know, Speaker McCarthy, when he basically betrayed the GOP and all the voters, and basically he had an uncapped ceiling, The reason is that this game of credit creation needs the federal government to continually create debt to keep the Ponzi scheme going. | ||
| So it's all tied to the credit markets, it's all tied to the monetary system, and the merry-go-round of spending and stealing continues. | ||
| Thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| If the War Room Posse wants to stay up to date with all the reports and charts and graphs you're putting out, your analysis, where can they follow you and all the work that you're doing? | ||
| Well, our website has everything. | ||
| It's Financetechnologies.com, spelled with a PH. | ||
| We have all our vaccine research or economic stuff. | ||
| We also, you can follow me on Twitter, at Dow Edward, D-O-W-D Edward, and on, or I guess X, they call it now, and then on Getter, at Edward Dowd, post both places. | ||
| So, and of course, my book, Cause Unknown, The Epidemic of Sudden Death in 21 and 22 on Amazon. | ||
| Ed, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| Thank you, Natalie. | ||
| Of course. | ||
| No better time, I would say, to go to Birchgold.com slash Bannon to get your copy of the fourth installment of The End of the Dollar Empire. | ||
| You can see the people who are running the economy, much like this country, do not know what they're doing. | ||
| Or maybe it's a lot more insidious and nefarious than that. | ||
| They know exactly what they're doing. | ||
| They just don't care about you, your family, your financial future, any of that stuff, which frankly, I want to put that past them, but someone who is always keeping them on watch and giving you, I would argue, some of the best updates here in the war room is, of course, EJ and Tony. | ||
| EJ, I'll keep you through the break because we only got a few minutes, but I hear there are some new numbers out from the Fed. | ||
| Doesn't look too good, although that's sort of the strapline of the Biden regime, despite the term Bidenomics. | ||
| I don't know why they want to put his name on anything related to the current state of the economy, but I digress. | ||
| EJ, if you want to walk us through those numbers, like I said, I'll keep you through the break. | ||
| Well, Natalie, thank you for having me. | ||
| As if the last fiscal year was not bad enough where we borrowed a massive $1.7 trillion, the Treasury has now announced that they're going to borrow another $1.6 trillion. | ||
| But it's not going to be over the course of a year. | ||
| Oh, no. | ||
| This is just six months. | ||
| The next six months is going to require Almost as much borrowing as we had in the entire previous fiscal year. | ||
| And by the way, the last fiscal year was over a 20% increase. | ||
| It was about a 23% increase compared to the year before that. | ||
| So things are just spiraling out of control very, very, very, very rapidly. | ||
| Something that we talked about on The War Room about a month ago, and it is coming to fruition already. | ||
| Just curious, we're talking with Ed about, you know, the sustainability of the current fiscal trends that we see here, the just unabashed spending, you know, how long and please, if you can, I know it's just a guess, we won't hold you to it, but you know, a concrete number in terms of whether the timeline or amount of money that we will run up against a point where there's no turning back, you know, how long do we have to turn this ship around? | ||
| Natalie, that's a great question and I'm not going to pretend to know the answer because it has proven to be different for different countries around the world at different periods in time. | ||
| The point of no return for Weimar Germany was different than it was in Argentina or Venezuela or Greece or a million other different places. | ||
| So we just have to hope and pray that we do still have time, because it does feel like we are getting close to, if not already in, that financial doom loop, as it's sometimes called. | ||
| It's kind of like if a family racks up a ton of credit card debt, Natalie, and then the financing charges on that debt. | ||
| So we're just talking the interest. | ||
| We're not talking about paying down the debt. | ||
| Just the interest alone exceeds the family's income. | ||
| Well, it makes it literally impossible to ever pay that debt down. | ||
| It guarantees the debt is going to continue to grow month after month just because of the interest charges, even if you're not actually spending any additional money on that credit card. | ||
| And we are thankfully not at that point yet as a nation, as a federal government, but that is the way we are headed, which is very, very scary. | ||
| EJ, I'll hold you through the break because I want to get into more of that and unpack it, but Warren Bossie, I'm sure you guys by now have seen the evidence, the wire transfers going to Joe Biden from the entity that was CEFC. | ||
| China Energy, you guys of course know it. | ||
| Seems like House Republicans are a little late to the game, but I just want to remind you DEFC China Energy is the very same Chinese Communist Party-run conglomerate who I obtained deleted documents from admitting that they wanted to wage warfare on the United States and make China the world's leading country. | ||
| And one of the key planks, the key policy platforms as to how they wanted to usher in, dare I say, that New World Order was through the trend, I'm sure you've heard it before, of de-dollarization. | ||
| And I think the two guests that we just had show you That CEFC, China Energy, and more broadly the Chinese Communist Party have gotten a pretty high ROI, return on investment for all the money that they gave the Biden family, because they are waging war on America. | ||
| And if this path continues, the other hope might just come true that China will be a leader. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| I don't know about you guys, but I have to say I'm getting pretty tired. | ||
| I know the Oversight Committee is doing great work with their investigations, but I want some accountability and some action. | ||
| And frankly, I want some impeachments to start. | ||
| I'll take Joe Biden. | ||
| We can throw in Mayorkas and Garland just for fun. | ||
| Very deserved fun, I would add. | ||
| But like I said, we'll get, I think we'll have Mike Davis joining us later in the show. | ||
| We'll get into and unpack some of those wire transfer. | ||
| I think the check, maybe you guys have seen the picture by now, really money laundering at its finest. | ||
| And we have E.J. | ||
| Antoni, not to discuss Money laundering with us. | ||
| That'll be for another segment another time because the Biden regime has given us enough financial data points and frankly alarming trends to analyze probably for four hours a day at least. | ||
| But also included the Fed announced that they were not going to be hiking interest rates again before we get into sort of the ramifications of all of this stuff. | ||
| Lupin, you know, Israel, Ukraine aid. | ||
| What's behind that decision? | ||
| Can you sort of unpack that for the audience? | ||
| Certainly. | ||
| Unfortunately, I think this is really a sign that Powell has given up the fight on inflation. | ||
| He loves to talk about how committed he is to getting us down to 2% and how he clearly watches inflation expectations. | ||
| Well, we are not back to 2%. | ||
| We are not even trending towards 2%. | ||
| We're trending towards over 3%, and inflation expectations are well above the 2% target. | ||
| So, clearly, nothing that he's doing matches what he is saying. | ||
| That means that I don't think we get back to 2% inflation, let alone zero, which is where it should be. | ||
| But I don't think we're going to see meaningful reductions in inflation below 3% any time soon, especially not when we have a Treasury that seems hell-bent on borrowing us into oblivion. | ||
| And this is going to continue to cause the interest payments on the debt to absolutely explode. | ||
| I think the control room there has a chart that basically shows these things going almost parabolic, where in the last several quarters under Joe Biden, the combination of issuing trillions of dollars in debt, that's not an exaggeration, along with interest rates going through the roof, is causing those interest payments to absolutely skyrocket. | ||
| And they are already consuming more of our GDP, more of our government spending than the entire bloated defense budget. | ||
| That really puts into context just how out of control this problem is becoming. | ||
| I'm just curious, EJ, I know you have FOIAed, I think, or at least reached out to Treasury to get some of these metrics, these indicators, the ones that they don't want you to see, which is probably the ones that we so desperately need to see. | ||
| They're always good at hiding that stuff and redacting the important information. | ||
| But I'm just curious, and this might be sort of a naive question, but it doesn't really seem, it's sort of like what you said, the Biden regime has just sort of accepted the fate of inflation, I would argue there. | ||
| Inducing it, but from the messaging angle, I know that this is more of a politics, you know, comms question, but you would think they would be trying to get ahead of this, but you don't really ever hear them give actionable steps as to how they're countering this, or at least in a substantial or meaningful way. | ||
| So I'm just curious, is there anything at all that they're doing to try to stop this, or really can it only be perceived that the actions that they're taking are just fanning the flames of inflation? | ||
| Well, if we go by their actions, Natalie, they are clearly exacerbating the problem, not lessening it. | ||
| The Treasury continues to spend and borrow trillions of dollars that it doesn't have, looking at various aspects of the Fed's balance sheet and different interest rates in various markets, things like the reverse repurchase agreements. | ||
| We can basically tell that the balance sheet is literally trillions of dollars too big, and it's going to take a year and a half to two years of the current rate of sales off that balance sheet, or reductions off that balance sheet, in order to get us anywhere near a meaningful equilibrium. | ||
| In other words, both the Fed and the Treasury are either not doing enough, or what they are doing is completely counterproductive to the inflation fight. | ||
| And I'm sure with what's going on in Ukraine, what's going on in Israel is, as you said, only going to exacerbate this problem. | ||
| Further, I'm just curious if you could kind of walk us through how you think that is going to impact these numbers, but also how it's just a bald-faced lie when Janet Yellen and all these types, you know, stand up there and tell us, we have the funds to give the money to Ukraine. | ||
| We have the weapons. | ||
| Well, I think if you do a stock check on our ammunitions pile, they would Very humbly begged to differ. | ||
| But how do you think these international conflicts are going, and even I throw in the southern border, how are all of those issues intertwined together going to accelerate parabolic and then some exponentially, probably logarithmically on those graphs show this chaos is just going to continue for who knows how long? | ||
| Well, Natalie, all of these different things cost money, and one of the problems when we get onto the topic of wars is that, you know, I'm trying to remember who it was, Natalie, who said that the first casualty of war is the truth. | ||
| Well, I would say the second casualty, and it's a very close second, is a nation's money supply. | ||
| Because as soon as we hear those war drums, what happens? | ||
| We immediately start writing checks. | ||
| that we can't pay for. | ||
| And so the Fed is again going to step in and start the money printers to pay for things that we just simply can't afford. | ||
| And it doesn't matter whether that's the war in the Ukraine or whether it's Israel or whether it's China moving against Taiwan, whatever the case may be, we simply don't have the money. | ||
| It is mind-blowing that Janet Yellen can get up to a microphone and say that we have money for two wars. | ||
| Forget two wars. | ||
| Forget one war. | ||
| We can't even pay our own bills. | ||
| If you look at the borrowing in the month of October, for example, that just ended, Treasury had to borrow over $500 billion in one month. | ||
| A single month. | ||
| That is much more than we had to borrow in the month of September. | ||
| It's over $100 billion more than we had to borrow from the previous October. | ||
| This idea that we can afford any of these adventures overseas is just absolutely ludicrous. | ||
| As you pointed out with the southern border, we're not even taking care of the problems here at home. | ||
| What business on earth do we possibly have with these different overseas adventures? | ||
| If anything, if we're going to give money to anyone overseas, that better be a loan and not a gift, because we don't have the money to give. | ||
| We've already seen talk, the murmurs, you know, about how a CR potentially through January might be taken up in the House. | ||
| You know, I think the way at least the, you know, Representative Matt Gaetz is and some of our allies in the House I've always looked to single-subject spending bills as sort of the way out, at least towards restoring some fiscal sanity, although that's still operating within the paradigm, right, within the environment that is very inflationary, and it's not doing too great for the American people. | ||
| So I'm just curious before, I'm sure, the news cycle will be dominated with all this CR discussion and debate, what would be your warning here at the onset to lawmakers on Capitol Hill, to the newly elected speaker, as to why we cannot have a CR? | ||
| Because we can't afford it. | ||
| I mean, what on earth of any of the information that has come out of the Federal Reserve, the Treasury recently, what on earth in that makes you think that we can possibly afford any more CRs, that we could possibly afford to continue spending at these absolutely insane levels? | ||
| We had a $1.7 trillion deficit in all of last year. | ||
| We're going to borrow $1.6 trillion just in the next six months. | ||
| We are almost doubling the debt in a single year. | ||
| That is the kind of exponential or logarithmic growth in spending, in deficits, in debt that we were talking about earlier. | ||
| That is unsustainable, and it is going to be catastrophic. | ||
| We have to turn this ship around, and we have to do it fast. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm glad I remembered something from high school math. | |
| I'm going to take credit for exponential and logarithmic growth. | ||
| I was never a STEM major. | ||
| Political science was where I shined, evidently, though my professors would probably beg to differ. | ||
| But E.J. | ||
| and Tony, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| If people want to stay up to date with all of your wonderful analysis, cutting through the noise, just giving us the signal, where can they go to do that? | ||
| Best Place to Find Me is going to be on X and the handle is at Real EJ Antoni. | ||
| EJ, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| Thank you for having me. | ||
| And we got about three minutes before we have to jump to break, but I know Mike Davis likes to maximize his time on this program, so I will just toss it to him. | ||
| If you could give the posse an update, I know you're out in Colorado covering the effort to basically make sure that people out there cannot vote for Donald Trump. | ||
| But hey, I thought it was our side that's guilty of election interference. | ||
| So Mike, if you want to take it and I'll hold you through the break, you can pick up where you left off. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So we are in day three of this trial by these Democrat operatives in front of this legally biased Democrat judge in the Denver District Courts. | |
| And Democrats impeached President Trump twice for nonsense. | ||
| They indicted him four times for non-crimes. | ||
| They're trying to bankrupt his family business for the non-fraud of paying back sophisticated Wall Street banks. | ||
| In full, on time, as agreed with interest. | ||
| And that didn't work. | ||
| That election interference and lawfare is backfiring. | ||
| President Trump is going to beat President Biden like a drum on November 5th, 2024. | ||
| So the Democrats are throwing their legal hail Mary. | ||
| And this is their first opportunity to get in court in a blue state of Colorado, a Democrat hellhole in Denver, where they're trying to say that the 14th Amendment's a post-Civil War provision to boot out of office a Confederate Insurrectionists who engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the Union during the Civil War. | ||
| These Democrats are dusting off this provision 155 years later, and they're trying to claim that January 6th was an insurrection somehow, and that President Trump is therefore disqualified from the ballots here in Colorado. | ||
| They're going to get a favorable ruling against Trump in Colorado by this biased judge. | ||
| The Colorado Supreme Court has stacked By left-wing activists because we can't win elections out here apparently as Republicans. | ||
| And so the U.S. | ||
| Supreme Court's going to have to put on their big boy pants. | ||
| They're going to have to step up and reverse this legal nonsense, this election interference. | ||
| Mike, hang with us through the break. | ||
| You had great timing there, because I was just about to cut you off. | ||
| I have to say, I almost don't recognize you when you're not in front of the Article 3 Project banner. | ||
| I wish we didn't have to keep sending you to different courts across the country, because that means that the left's lawfare crusade against Donald Trump continues. | ||
| But unfortunately, until then, it's going to have to be the case without Mike Davis, without Mike Lindell, and a host of other people joining us. | ||
| So stick through the break. | ||
| We will be right back. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bound. | |
| Welcome back to the War Room. | ||
| We've still got Mike Davis. | ||
| Now, Mike, if you have anything more to say, more inside baseball and what's going on in Denver to keep Trump off the ballot, please fill us in. | ||
| But I also would love to get your, you know, let's juxtapose it, right? | ||
| We have two worlds. | ||
| We have what the left is doing now for the 10th time, their 10th iteration of lawfare against President Trump. | ||
| And meanwhile, House Republicans have released their, what is it, 20th memo, 20th picture of a check claiming money laundering with the chart showing all the arrows. | ||
| Very confusing. | ||
| Poor messaging. | ||
| We don't even seem to be able to actually, it's not even lawfare when we do it because it'd be justified, but it seems like it's very unequal, right? | ||
| The two sides, our ability to really, I think, hold people to account, one justifiably, so the other just sort of because they don't like that Donald Trump wants to take down the administrative state. | ||
| So I'm curious, your thoughts on the newest revelations out of House Oversight today. | ||
| And like I said, if there's anything more going on there, please fill us in. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's start with this trial. | |
| Today, Cash Patel testified, and he testified that President Trump authorized the National Guard for January 6th, and it was the Democrats, D.C. | ||
| Mayor Muriel Bowser, along with Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who did not want the National Guard there. | ||
| So here's the question you want to ask. | ||
| If you're trying to organize An insurrection like the Democrats pretends. | ||
| Why the hell would you send the National Guard to the Capitol to protect the Capitol from the insurrection you're supposedly It just doesn't make any sense. | ||
| What happened on January 6th was a lawful protest permitted by the National Park Service that devolved into a riot, right? | ||
| And how many people would show up to an insurrection unarmed? | ||
| And why would President Trump send troops to this insurrection? | ||
| It's just complete nonsense. | ||
| The Democrats put on You know, these performance artists, these Capitol Police officers who are trying to make a name for themselves during this trial, they also put on an expert witness yesterday. | ||
| Believe it or not, he got his Ph.D. | ||
| in sociology in Vegas, of all places. | ||
| And his expert testimony was when President Trump says peaceful, he doesn't mean it. | ||
| But when Democrats say peaceful, they mean it. | ||
| When President Trump says fight, he means insurrection. | ||
| And when Democrats say fight, they mean, you know, politically fighting, not physical violence. | ||
| It was just insane. | ||
| This whole thing is insane. | ||
| Unfortunately, the Colorado Supreme Court is probably going to affirm what this judge does. | ||
| And like I said, the Supreme Court of the United States is going to have to step up. | ||
| The Democrats fear President Trump so much on November 5, 2024, that they're doing everything they can to stop him, including this legal Hail Mary of dusting off this 14th Amendment provision from the Civil War. | ||
| So there's that. | ||
| As for the Biden crime family, there's just more evidence of 10% to the big guy. | ||
| You had $400,000 going from the CCP to the Biden family. | ||
| Every scumbag Biden got a piece of it, including Joe Biden, who got his 10%. | ||
| He got his $40,000. | ||
| He got his check from his brother, another check that said loan repayment from From James Biden to Joe Biden. | ||
| I just want to know how did Joe Biden have all this money to loan to his scumbag brother, James? | ||
| And if this isn't smoking gun evidence that the President of the United States is compromised, is by corruption, compromised by these foreign bribes, by this other corruption from China, from Ukraine, every trouble spot around the world. | ||
| I don't know what more evidence Democrats need and House Republicans under Speaker Mike Johnson just need to start moving forward with impeachment. | ||
| Now I know why Democrats support gun control, because they don't want any more of these pieces of smoking gun evidence to be released on the Biden family. | ||
| I think I second your idea, your statement, really, your imperative that we move forward on impeachment. | ||
| Mike, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| If people want to follow you, stay up to date, the latest on everything happening in the courtroom, outside of the courtroom, feel like you're a jack of all trades on all the issues, where can people follow you to do that? | ||
| article3project.org you can donate there at article3project on gitter twitter truth at article number three projects and my personal is m r d d m i a and thank you of course thanks so much for joining us Now, we have Sheila Matthews, who is the founder of AbleChild. | ||
| And I have to say, I watched your interview on War Room Battleground with Steve, and it was so interesting. | ||
| So I was super excited to get the chance to interview you, because everything that you do, it really gets to, I think, the heart of the issue. | ||
| I know mental health is a term. | ||
| that's bandied around a lot oftentimes. They like to make the issue first about gun control, but then the discussions about mental health are not really meaningful because they don't get to the heart of the problem. So before we get into all that, if you could walk the audience through, I understand there were some developments with the affidavit. | ||
| Some of the actual material evidence Perfect. | ||
| So nice to meet you and thank you for having me on. | ||
| his psychiatric kind of evaluation, if he was on SSRIs, who his therapist was or psychologist was. | ||
| So if you want to walk the audience through all that, then we can get into how the system creates people like him, basically. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Perfect. | |
| So nice to meet you and thank you for having me on. | ||
| This morning, Fox News was reporting that the shooter had stopped taking his medication and this information was kind of shocking to me because I thought that was new information. | ||
| So I went to the Attorney General's website in the state of Maine because they had just released and put up all the documents on the Attorney General's website. | ||
| So when I went to the website, I found that first of all, the link was not, I couldn't access the link. | ||
| So I wrote to the attorney general's office and I got a response back from Dana Hayes. | ||
| She's the special assistant to the attorney general. | ||
| And I provided that to you right there. | ||
| The link was down, and so they were trying to fix that. | ||
| I had a question about the redacted names of the psychiatrists, and she responded back, I don't know what you are referring to about the psychiatrists. | ||
| It doesn't appear any of the documents we've released reference a psychiatrist. | ||
| Now the affidavit is 61 pages long. | ||
| And so I was starting to rapidly go through this, but when I got her response back, I was like, wow, this is exactly really proves what I'm saying here is able child is saying is that the psychiatrist's name and the psychologist's name. | ||
| Now that we've learned there's two treating people in his life are being withheld. | ||
| They were not in the affidavit. | ||
| So. | ||
| I was like, well, I can look through the affidavit for other things that might be of concern for the public. | ||
| So I pulled up the 61 pages right on the first page. | ||
| Item number one, they have the date of the shooting wrong. | ||
| I found that to be very alarming. | ||
| They have it on 3-25-2023. | ||
| I thought that was a glaring mistake. | ||
| I know that they're under a lot of pressure to get to the judge, but I think that was a critical error and that should be revised because that's incorrect. | ||
| And then throughout the rest of the affidavit, They of course redacted the psychiatrist and the psychologist, but they throughout the document have not blocked out some of the victim's telephone numbers. | ||
| So I'm hoping that they watch the show this evening and maybe can go back through the document and block out some of Those errors, I think those are pretty big for a report going before a judge on a mass murder. | ||
| So then we move over to the arrest doc, I'm sorry, the search warrant. | ||
| And on page two of nine, you can see, which is a very good thing, that they ask for a The medications prescribed to Robert Card. | ||
| That's really good. | ||
| I'm interested in seeing that and so should the public be interested in seeing that. | ||
| However, what's missing is the medical records. | ||
| They don't ask for any of the mental health records and that to me is a big problem. | ||
| It's either that they already have all these records and they don't need to get a search warrant for them or They just don't think that they're important. | ||
| So I thought that was a real big problem. | ||
| And then the other two documents I included were the incident reports. | ||
| I think that these are the two reports that the mainstream media is utilizing to kind of drop in different data. | ||
| But this data point is really good because It is when they come out for the incidents and it's a firsthand of the deputy interviewing people and the first incident report is a narrative about the ex-wife and the son being extremely concerned about his mental health and the mainstream media has done a good job explaining that and you can | ||
| It's nothing new here as far as, uh, as what is reported in the mainstream media on the initial calls, uh, regarding the mental health concerns. | ||
| And, um, but, um, on the second, uh, sheriff deputies, uh, incident report on, on a nine 15. | ||
| You flip to what really concerns me is this is the incident that actually happened at West Point on the army barracks and his psychotic episode in which the other officers, his commanding officer, had arrived at the scene and Card had | ||
| Put himself in a room and they were very concerned. | ||
| Everybody was teasing him. | ||
| And I found this to be a really, just a very bizarre situation that happened in our military. | ||
| And basically based on this situation, they decided to commit him. | ||
| And this is where new information comes in is, well, he went, we know he went to Keller. | ||
| Barracks, you know, the hospital. | ||
| And that we knew of, but we did not know a psychologist there determined that he needed further treatment. | ||
| And that Card was taken to Four Winds Psychiatric Hospital in Katona, New York for treatment and evaluation. | ||
| This is really, really important. | ||
| Because treatment in today's world, in the psychiatry world, treatment is psychiatric drugs and the evaluation. | ||
| So this is really, really important. | ||
| And it says, during the four hours I was with Card, he never spoke. | ||
| He just stared through me without blinking. | ||
| He spent 14 days at Four Winds, and then he was released. | ||
| To my knowledge, he has not sought any more treatment since being released. | ||
| So this information is new as far as I was concerned. | ||
| I was having trouble accessing the report as my email from the state of Maine indicates. | ||
| So it's just pretty bizarre the incident that happened. | ||
| And the withholding of the data. | ||
| So we pretty much know that they already have this information. | ||
| And Sheila, we got a junk to break, but I'll hold you through because as an investigative reporter myself, you always know you've hit the nail on the head. | ||
| You found the part that they don't want you to find when they're obscuring the data, when they're redacting it. | ||
| I've filed my Share a FOIA request, but it means you're definitely on the right path. | ||
| I'll hold you through. | ||
| Hopefully we have time to get into the broader ramifications of the mental health discussion. | ||
| We also got Mike Lindell joining us after the break. | ||
| But Warren Posse, hang in there. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We will be right back after this short commercial break. | |
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Banner. | ||
| ♪♪ Welcome back to The Worm. | ||
| It's still not Stephen K. Bannon, but he will be back for the 6 p.m. | ||
| hour, so make sure you don't go anywhere. | ||
| In the meantime, you can also go to birchgold.com slash Bannon to get the latest installment of The End of the Dollar Empire. | ||
| As you guys can tell, not just from this show, but probably just from looking out your window and being in touch with reality, we are in for some crazy times ahead financially and otherwise, so you've got to go to birchgold.com slash Bannon to maybe at least try I think successfully so, to take back some of that control. | ||
| Sheila, I got a question for you before I've let you go, and I'll definitely have you back on, because I wish we had more time, but unfortunately I don't have the authority or pay grade to blow the brakes. | ||
| But, you know, it seems like my takeaway from everything you were going through is that there is sort of this, I maybe won't go full out and use the word cover-up, but there's an effort to sort of obscure the truth about this individual status, at least with regard To therapeutic treatments, psychologists, access, SSRI usage, and it sort of seems like the same tactics that the media uses when it comes to whether it's issues like COVID-19 vaccines or prescription drugs, right? | ||
| There's sort of a conflict of interest there. | ||
| There's some reason that they're not giving us the full truth and nothing but the truth. | ||
| And I know that your organization really hones in on that, right? | ||
| That's kind of your goal, to give parents, specifically young boys, school-aged children, Really access to true information about the negative side effects of going on these SSRIs. | ||
| So I'm just curious in your opinion, you know, what exactly is going on here? | ||
| Why are they covering this stuff up? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, the behavioral health vendor that has the contract is making a lot of money. | |
| And I think the important thing here is to get that information. | ||
| So I think it's a billion dollar industry and they evidently are willing to hold other You know, the gun manufacturer is responsible, but they are refused to hold the mental health industry and the vendors that the army and the schools and everybody else is using. | ||
| The states are in bed with the behavioral health vendors. | ||
| So they're doing everything they can not to mention the treating psychiatrist and the psychologist or I mean, they could clear all this up right away and just provide us with his treatment records so we don't have to guess, you know? | ||
| We can't guess anymore. | ||
| It's just, people are dying, families are really suffering, and we continue to have these mass shootings. | ||
| I think they have to release the records at this point. | ||
| So that's my call to action, is that they need to release it and they're withholding it. | ||
| So then we can start solving these mass shooters problems because we can look at the treatment they're receiving and find out if they're getting a cocktail of drugs. | ||
| So that is, to me, the reason why they're obscuring The treating psychiatrist and the psychologist, they have the key. | ||
| They have the key to this man's mind and what psychiatric drugs he was given. | ||
| So I think that's what they're hiding. | ||
| So yes. | ||
| And I think It's, it's, they're all connected. | ||
| The people that, it's very carefully scripted. | ||
| The FBI is carefully scripting it. | ||
| The public health commissioner is, and now the attorney general, Janet Mills, wants to shut this down. | ||
| And they're going to use the excuse that it's an ongoing investigation. | ||
| So they're not going to be providing any more information. | ||
| So until they release the mental health records, we're really at square one with these mass shootings. | ||
| We just need more information. | ||
| We're very lucky to have someone like you who I'm sure is on the front lines of trying to get to the bottom of this. | ||
| So Sheila, if the War Room Posse wants to stay up to date with everything you're working on, of course, find out more about your organization. | ||
| Where can they go to do that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
They can go to ablechild.org and our work is all illustrated there. | |
| We definitely need support. | ||
| We would love donations. | ||
| I have some investigative reporters that I would like on this and, you know, so we really need help. | ||
| And so we're looking for support and we appreciate being on The War Room. | ||
| Of course. | ||
| Thank you so much for joining us, Sheila. | ||
| Have a good one. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| Bye-bye. | ||
| Now I know it's been sort of a depressing show and I apologize for that, but we have Mike Lindell, an eternal optimist and someone who always brings good news and good deals to the War Room. | ||
| So Mike, if you want to give the War Room posse some good news so we end the show on a happy note. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay, well, the first good news, everybody, is, you know, I've been attacked for two months, since August, since we unveiled the plan to secure our election. | |
| We have only a few days left before November 7th here, that's elections coming up in a week. | ||
| And you can all learn about that, too, and help us out at LyndalePlan.com. | ||
| That's LyndalePlan.com. | ||
| Learn what the plan is, if nothing else. | ||
| Get educated on it, everybody, because you can all get involved over there. | ||
| but we also need help. | ||
| And then I wanna give a great announcement. | ||
| One of our retailers, a few that we have left that have attacked with MyPillow, they stayed with us, stayed with Tron, now they come back. | ||
| And I believe that's because of pressure from the war room posse that they were afraid, hey, we're gonna get boycotted if we're gonna just not have MyPillow like the other ones were back in the day. | ||
| So that's good news. | ||
| But the really good news for all the War Room Posse, we're passing on the best special we're going to have leading all the way up and through November 7th. | ||
| To celebrate this plan, we're having this Giza Dream Bed Sheet Special. | ||
| These are queen size. | ||
| They're on sale everywhere for $89.98. | ||
| These are the sheets that made us famous for $59.98 exclusive for the warmer posse. | ||
| The king size, the regular price. | ||
| We got one hundred fifty nine ninety eight on sale for nine nine ninety eight. | ||
| Take another thirty dollars off for the war room policy. | ||
| All the colors, all the sides are in stock. | ||
| Use the promo code war room and you guys can really help by keeping my operators busy. | ||
| Calling in your order eight hundred eight seven three one zero six two. | ||
| That's eight hundred eight seven three one zero six two. | ||
| And if we go to the website, you guys, right there, go down to and click on the War Room Posse Square. | ||
| There you see those sheets. | ||
| These are exclusive War Room special. | ||
| The MyPillow 2.0, $39.98. | ||
| The towels, all the towel sets, $29.98. | ||
| You guys, we have all these great specials. | ||
| You've been so supportive. | ||
| We're going to run them through November 7th for those Keys of Dream bedsheets. | ||
| Get all your Christmas presents now. | ||
| We have over 220 products at MyPillow now. | ||
| Mike, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| You know, they say it's better to be feared than loved, and I guess that applies to the War Room Posse. | ||
| Not just with the office of Kevin McCarthy, but with big box stores and retailers. | ||
| So I love it. | ||
| The two of them have that in common. | ||
| Mike, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thanks, Sam. | |
| God bless you. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| You too. | ||
| Have a good one. | ||
| Warren Posse, thanks for hanging with me. | ||
| Like I said, see you. | ||
| We'll be back from 6 p.m. | ||
| hour and, of course, tomorrow morning. | ||
| So no need to fret. | ||
| No need to go anywhere. | ||
| You can check that out. | ||
| You can also go to warren.org, check out some of the latest stories. | ||
| Got a great one. | ||
| Well, not so great for our country, but a drop-in yesterday about Ukraine corruption. | ||
| It goes all the way to the top, all the way to Antony Blinken. | ||
| No surprise there. | ||
| Have a good one, Warren Posse. |
Export Selection