Sept. 13, 2023 - Bannon's War Room
47:47
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is what you're fighting for. | ||
| I mean, every day you're out there. | ||
| What they're doing is blowing people off. | ||
| If you continue to look the other way and shut up, then the oppressors, the authoritarians, get total control and total power. | ||
| Because this is just like in Arizona. | ||
| This is just like in Georgia. | ||
| It's another element that backs them into a corner and shows their lies and misrepresentations. | ||
| This is why this audience is going to have to get engaged. | ||
| As we've told you, this is the fight. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All this nonsense, all this spin, they can't handle the truth. | |
| War Room Battleground. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, Wednesday, 13th September, the year of the Lord 2023. | ||
| As you know, having followed the first three hours of the show today, we're on fire because there's so much going on. | ||
| And I have three of my favorite people. | ||
| Frank Gaffney, Kevin Freeman, the economic warfare expert, and of course, Sam Faddis. | ||
| Maybe, I don't want to say the last good guy at the CIA, that'd be too harsh, but one of the great ones here to join us today. | ||
| Frank, I just want to do some housekeeping first, so people can understand this kind of In the appropriate- Gates went to the well of the house yesterday and said that Kevin McCarthy is not in compliance and that he and the MAGA right are going to either force him into compliance or Call a motion to vacate and the compliance was about part of it was the impeachment and other things going on. | ||
| But principally, it was about the fiasco with the appropriations process. | ||
| This massive deficit of 2 trillion dollars. | ||
| Nobody's addressing it. | ||
| McCarthy's kind of going on and cut these deals today. | ||
| The firestorm today. | ||
| It was what used to be pro forma when the committee got it done, the appropriations committee, the defense appropriations bill of $886 billion. | ||
| And of course, our defense real bill is over a trillion. | ||
| Doesn't have the votes to kind of move forward, at least initially. | ||
| And part of this, Matt Massey put up last night, I think there's 186 amendments they're talking about. | ||
| What I'm hearing from people is that the woke and weaponized was all in there in the defense authorization. | ||
| It hasn't come out. | ||
| Give me any thoughts you have on this process, because if they can't get this one done, and this they think is the easiest, then there's no chance the rest get done by the 30th of September. | ||
| And somehow, they're either going to force Biden's hand and McCarthy's hand about this government shutdown, or they're just going to roll over. | ||
| Your thoughts, sir? | ||
| Steve, as best I can tell, there's no chance that there's going to be all 12 appropriations bills ready to go by the end of this month. | ||
| It's just not going to happen. | ||
| The defense appropriations bill, I've just been told, is in temporary suspension. | ||
| And how long that will be, I don't know, but at least for the moment, because quite Understandably, the guys who are trying to instill a measure of fiscal discipline, specifically the Freedom Caucus, but some others as well, are frantic that they're now being told they just got to start passing bunches of spending bills without any sense of what the top line is going to be. | ||
| Is it going to be, you know, the $2 trillion overrun? | ||
| Is it going to be something less? | ||
| Is it going to be, you know, 2022 levels? | ||
| And without that, I think they're quite within their rights to say— So hold up. | ||
| This is important. | ||
| This is important. | ||
| Hang on. | ||
| This is important. | ||
| I just want to go back to that. | ||
| This whole fight over, are we pre-COVID? | ||
| Are we 2021? | ||
| Are we just going to take Pelosi's—what she's given us? | ||
| Is there somewhere in between your point of what you're hearing from people? | ||
| Until you get that, these guys don't want to be—some of them don't want to be on the hook for passing something that'll be a fundamental building block. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| And now look, I hope that Massey and the Republicans will stand up on their hind legs and make sure that we do get the, it's, you know, they call it woke and we're going to have a whole program on this tomorrow, Steve, but it's actually cultural Marxism. | ||
| that is now being force-fed to the United States military. | ||
| And I hope they get all that out of there, because I don't think that's the result of the authorization process so far. | ||
| It's a little unusual to do that kind of policy stuff on an appropriations measure. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| But it has to be done. | ||
| You know, I'm calling for a Senate intervention to save our military. | ||
| And this is a step in the right direction, as far as I'm concerned. | ||
| Combined, I'm going to get to Kevin and Sam here in a second on the same topic. | ||
| I'll start with you first. | ||
| We also have Dr. Michael Rickenwald, the third guy you're going to love. | ||
| Oh, fantastic. | ||
| I love Rickenwald. | ||
| If we have, if you have Tuberville, And we now know that Senator Tuberville's set of issues is much broader than just the abortion issue at the Senate level. | ||
| And he had holding up the promotions, in particular, a lot of these woke promotions, and he sees it. | ||
| And you now have patriots at the House level. | ||
| Saying, Hey, look, you know, even if there's an overall deal, there's so much woke in here that was in authorization that we can't let this neo-Marxism into the military. | ||
| It's the last institution we have standing. | ||
| What kind of firestorm we're going to have because you have people like Tuberville and you have people in the house and these people are not going to back down. | ||
| I mean, these guys are dug in for a fight right now because I said, Hey, if we're going to just do this and just approve all this, then the country's over. | ||
| Frank Gaffney. | ||
| These are people who are principled. | ||
| And you're right. | ||
| I think I had a chance to visit with Senator Tuberville last week and was really impressed that what he started out with was just trying to protect federal law from what the Biden administration was doing to start spending federal dollars on abortions. | ||
| But it's bought time for him to go to school on what's happening to the military more generally And as we'll talk about tomorrow with Will Thiebaud, he's done an analysis that suggests 42% of the 300 promotions that this Tuberville hold applies to at the moment, Steve, are all in on the woke or Marxist agenda. | ||
| So he's standing his ground, and I hope he will continue to do so. | ||
| We need the posse to rally behind him. | ||
| But again, that's a topic for tomorrow. | ||
| Today, what we're anxious to make sure we hit is Whose side is Biden on? | ||
| And what he's doing to the military is one indicator that it's not ours, but it's only one, and the guys that we've assembled to talk about this today are surpassingly impressive on both what's happening and the implications of it. | ||
| Let's go around. | ||
| Let's take a first cut at this. | ||
| We've got Kevin Freeman, we've got Sam Fetters, we've got Dr. Michael Recktenwald. | ||
| Let's start with Kevin. | ||
| Kevin, give us an overview here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, go ahead. | |
| Sure. | ||
| Can I just suggest, I think Sam does a fabulous job of level setting on who Joe Biden actually is, who he's working for, and then we'll bring Kevin and Mike in separately. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's what I'm going to do. | |
| I'm going to bring Sam in for this, and then when Sam finishes his first spiel, I want to play from this morning, Morning Joe, on one of Sam's favorite people, David Ignatius. | ||
| But let's go. | ||
| Sam, you tee it off, and then I'm going to bring in Brother Ignatius so that you can respond to the comms director of the Central Intelligence Agency that currently is a columnist for the Washington Post. | ||
| Well, I gotta say, I have actually a soft spot in my heart for David Ignatius. | ||
| He actually wrote a good blurb for a book I wrote once upon a time. | ||
| But anyway, look, who's Joe Biden working for? | ||
| He's working for the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| You know, we live in this real weird world, Steve, as you guys well know, where we just deny reality and we pretend facts aren't facts and we can't see things, right? | ||
| I have said many times, if you took the totality of the evidence about Joe's contact with the Chinese Communist Party, classified documents, amount of money that's flowed to him, what we know about elite capture that the Chinese buy influential people on an industrial scale, on down the line. | ||
| And I say this as somebody who did this for a living for a very long time on our side. | ||
| If you just took Biden out of the, substituted the name of some West African leader for Biden and said this occurred in West Africa and asked everybody in American counterintelligence, what do you think's going on? | ||
| In about five seconds, they would all say, well, they bought the president of this country, they being the Chinese. | ||
| What do you mean what's going on? | ||
| It's classic, absolute textbook, elite capture. | ||
| They recruited this guy. | ||
| In my opinion, he works for them. | ||
| He is controlled by them. | ||
| And it is manifestly obvious, in my professional opinion. | ||
| Okay, I want to, because people look, you know this audience reveres you, and one of the reasons is you cut to the chase, but you've also, as a man of action, you've been there and done this. | ||
| I just want to go back through this. | ||
| As a professional, in spycraft, | ||
| Um, if, uh, if you were back at the agency, just reviewing the facts of what happened, there's no doubt in your mind that you've seen the evidence and can produce the evidence that he has been recruited and then bought and paid for and actually has actionable things he's done to show where either the bribery or the leak capture has manifested itself through policies and actions directly related to him, sir. | ||
| That is exactly right. | ||
| That is my professional opinion. | ||
| And again, just to emphasize for everybody, I mean, I've worked a lot of aspects of, of the Intel business, but the number one thing I got paid to do for the CIA for us was to do this to the enemy. | ||
| That is to recruit Russian Intel, Chinese Intel, Al Qaeda guys to go to work for us. | ||
| So I'm not talking about this from. | ||
| An academic perspective, an abstract perspective. | ||
| I'm saying, look, man, I swam in these waters for, in one way or the other, 30 years. | ||
| This is absolutely textbook. | ||
| I mean, look, Patrick Ho, CFC China Energy, known Chinese Intel, in direct contact with the Bidens, funneling them huge amounts of money. | ||
| The FBI arrested Ho on our soil. | ||
| He was prosecuted and imprisoned. | ||
| For bribing and gaining control of foreign officials. | ||
| They just charged him with the Africans he was in contact with. | ||
| And then they took a pass on all of his identical contacts with the Bidens and actually redacted reference to the Bidens from the transcripts, from the evidence in court. | ||
| So the FBI got to the point of having caught at least one of the Chinese spies in direct contact with the Bidens and then buried the whole thing. | ||
| Yeah, and Steve, if I could just say, when we are told endlessly by the president's defenders that there's absolutely no evidence suggesting that the president actually did things, perhaps in exchange for illegal funds flowing into his family's coffers, This is the prime example of it. | ||
| People are telling you there's nothing to see here, folks. | ||
| Move along. | ||
| This is not true, and we're going to document it. | ||
| We're going to bring the receipts in the course of this hour, both with Sam Faddis and his great work, including, by the way, at the accountabilityinitiative.org. | ||
| He makes book on a lot of folks in this administration. | ||
| It's not just Biden, by any means. | ||
| We'll have Michael Recktenwald, a former Marxist Professor at New York University, able to shed light on the work that is being done on behalf of the CCP and to the detriment of the United States, which is the same thing, with the direction and help of the Biden team. | ||
| And Kevin Freeman is going to talk about the economic piece of it and how this is playing into it. | ||
| OK, hang on. | ||
| We're going to get to that. | ||
| And this is because this is important. | ||
| I just got to stay with Fattis for just a second, because I was the guy brought in by Rudy and Costello to look at the laptop from hell in August of 2020. | ||
| And Sam, it took me. | ||
| And by the way, I am one one millionth of what Sam Fattis is. | ||
| But it took me just with the training I've had with Myles Guo and others to know about who the hierarchy is and how the money flows. | ||
| It took me about 20 minutes and looking into the laptop from hell because they couldn't interpret the Chinese documents with Ho and the chairman that this was it blew me away the scale and depth of what this family and what Bill Biden and Hunter Biden and his brothers had done. | ||
| So here's my question. | ||
| That's where we're seeing the laptop from hell. | ||
| The FBI and Bill Barr, Chris Wray and Bill Barr had this from November of 2019, or early December, late November, early December of 2019. | ||
| Sam, even as bad as the CIA has gotten off track, there's still some good guys at the FBI and the CIA. | ||
| This is not brain surgery. | ||
| Why are we sitting here in September of 2023 discussing this now and it's putting before in this impeachment when this evidence and your whole thing about the recruiting, it's been self-evident even during the Trump administration. | ||
| Why is it taken so long for this to kind of come out when it's so obvious to you? | ||
| And like you said, this was an African dictator. | ||
| You could have nailed this in three minutes. | ||
| Why are we sitting here in September having this discussion? | ||
| Well, let me say up front, Steve, my reaction to looking at the hard drive was exactly the same as yours, right? | ||
| It took me about five minutes to say, first of all, it's not Russian disinformation. | ||
| It's impossible. | ||
| And good God, we ought to turn on every red lamp flashing in the American counterintelligence apparatus. | ||
| This is the greatest counterintelligence threat we've ever faced. | ||
| There are very good people still in the FBI and the CIA. | ||
| This is being crushed from above. | ||
| The same reason 50, Their teeth about Russian disinformation in the laptop, right? | ||
| That was garbage. | ||
| Everybody, if you'd ever seen the laptop, that was garbage. | ||
| Deliberate lie. | ||
| I mean, that's the part that I think a lot of the American people still don't want to face, right? | ||
| More palatable to think about incompetence or indifference or bureaucratic inertia. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| No, guys, that's not where we are. | ||
| We have Turned our institutions against the American people. | ||
| The FBI should, they should have cleared the decks as fast as they saw Hunter's laptop and said, good Lord, if this is what we think it is, a guy might be getting ready to step into the Oval Office who works for our greatest enemy on the face of the earth. | ||
| Existential threat to the Republic, a real existential threat, and yet Years later, they are covering for a guy who, in my opinion, is a controlled asset of the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| That is a pretty big one. | ||
| Controlled asset is a term of art in spycraft, and when a guy like Sam Fettis says that, that is like Manchurian candidate level. | ||
| Now hang on for one second, Sam, because I think this is quite relevatory, and you're right. | ||
| Your book on the CIA, which was magnificent when you left, Ignatius did, because he understood That you were talking about changes that even he felt, I think, had to be done. | ||
| I want to play Morning Joe this morning because I think we've seen a tectonic plate shift in the administrative state about what horse they're going to back. | ||
| Let's play this morning, Morning Joe. | ||
| And I don't know that you'd like to hear what she has to say, but you may. | ||
| Go ahead. | ||
| The piece is entitled President Biden should not run again in 2024. | ||
| And in it, you write, quote, Biden wrote his political testament in his inaugural address. | ||
| When our days are through, our children, and our children's children, will say of us, they gave their best. | ||
| They did their duty. | ||
| They healed a broken land. | ||
| Mr. President, maybe this is that moment when duty has been served. | ||
| Biden would carry two big liabilities into a 2024 campaign. | ||
| He would be 82 when he began a second term. | ||
| And according to a recent Associated Press and ORC poll, 77% of the public think he is too old to be effective for four more years. | ||
| Because of their concerns about Biden's age, voters would sensibly focus on his presumptive running mate. | ||
| Kamala Harris. | ||
| She is less popular than Biden with a 39.5% approval rating. | ||
| According to polling website 538, Harris has many laudable qualities, but the simple fact is that she has failed to gain traction in the country or even within her own party. | ||
| I hope Biden has this conversation with himself about whether to run and that he levels with the country about it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It would focus the 2024 Let me have it. | |
| We could go on there. | ||
| And of course they talk about the age, but this, I can tell you today in the White House, it's not Kevin McCarthy's impeachment effort inquiry going on that's number one, and that is a five alarm fire. | ||
| It is that David Ignatius, when David Ignatius speaks, Sam Faddis, correct me if I'm wrong, It's well-informed by members of the intelligence and national security apparatus, sir? | ||
| Yeah, without question. | ||
| David has, for a very long time, enjoyed direct confidential access to folks at very, very senior levels in the intelligence community. | ||
| He's talking to the guys in the top drawer there, in the sense of power, anyone. | ||
| Sam, are they, is this signal, are they sending the signal to the Biden White House and to others that they know what's going on and they're just cutting this guy loose? | ||
| He's not going to get the air cover from the administrative and deep state, sir? | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| I mean, obviously the unanswered question in my opinion is have you created the monster that no longer you, that you can no longer control, right? | ||
| I mean, have you, have you now, has he now actually bought All of the garbage about how he's actually competent and should be in the position and his ego has gotten to the point where he won't take orders anymore. | ||
| We'll see. | ||
| But I think that's unmistakably what they're, what they're trying to do. | ||
| Get, shove him aside, cut him away. | ||
| By the way, it shouldn't be lost on people that the White House sent a blistering letter to MSNBC, CNN, I think Fox and others to say they want the networks to push back as hard as possible on this impeachment effort. | ||
| We'll get to in a second. | ||
| Kevin Freeman. | ||
| Frank, let's bring in Kevin. | ||
| And talk about the economic consequences. | ||
| Particularly, Kevin, you saw today inflation still raging out of control. | ||
| The American people are now having the hidden tax of inflation as high as their regular taxes at the federal level. | ||
| Mortgages are low from 1996. | ||
| Second mortgages are a non-event now because people can't afford them. | ||
| The entire thing for the working class and middle class is a complete meltdown. | ||
| Walk me through your assessment of all this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, isn't that according to plan, where we'll own by 2030 absolutely nothing and we'll be supposedly happy about it? | |
| Well, why? | ||
| Because we'll be so massively in debt that we'll be happy to get out from under the debt. | ||
| That's the Great Reset. | ||
| That is the purpose. | ||
| To the point on China, though, and the compromise of Joe Biden, everything this administration has done from beginning to end has put us at risk of China. | ||
| Now, China has problems. | ||
| Their economics Situation is worse than ours, but they're going to remedy that with totalitarian control, a digital yuan, control of the people, you can't spend without their permission and so forth. | ||
| And they've captured, elite captured, unrestricted warfare, President Biden, and he's towed the Chinese line. | ||
| So he's now introducing into America under Executive Order 14067, March 9th, 18 months ago, An idea to take over the digital dollar with central bank digital currency, a.k.a. | ||
| Biden bucks. | ||
| And that's being introduced now at the G20. | ||
| They've got the FSB's written a paper on how 20 nations can do this. | ||
| We know China's going there. | ||
| It's totalitarian control. | ||
| But with our central bank digital currency under 14-067, President Biden created this very specific, it's got to be DEI, diversity, equity and inclusion. | ||
| It's got to be ESG. | ||
| And they say the new currency that we're to have is to guarantee that we can protect against climate change. | ||
| It's to guarantee equity among the people. | ||
| Well, who does that benefit? | ||
| It benefits communist China because they'll be able to produce goods and services while our corporations are hampered. | ||
| So the economy is collapsing because of massive debt. | ||
| In fact, we've got $33 trillion in debt and the natural interest rate, according to the Federal Reserve, is 5%. | ||
| That means we have $1.65 trillion of natural interest that's being expended by the federal government with this massive debt. | ||
| All the old debt that was at cheaper interest rates is going to roll off. | ||
| We are now nearing a technical bankrupt position, and all of this is due to Biden taking our economy down, and it will benefit his Chinese masters. | ||
| Okay, I want to go back to this digital currency and the social credit score. | ||
| You know, one thing I say on the Birchgold, go to birchgold.com slash abandon right now, the end of the dollar empire is a three part series. | ||
| We're going to release the fourth part quite shortly. | ||
| But we talked not just the debt trap, the end of the us as a prime reserve currency. | ||
| I keep saying, Kevin, I want you to explain to the audience that Our central bank, besides printing money to print the money for the two trillion dollar deficits, because this is the way the system works, it is printed, right? | ||
| All their other focus is on this central bank digital currency. | ||
| Why the BRICS, the Global South, the people that have the resources, their central banks are buying gold with both hands. | ||
| Now the G20 is trying to change that, but they're buying gold at record rates. | ||
| Connect the Chinese Communist Party's social credit score When you release a central bank digital currency, it is literally owned by the central bank and you have a use license for it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
citizens. | |
| And therefore, if we eliminate paper dollars in the paper money system that we're in and replace it with central bank, it will be in the same position the Chinese are. | ||
| They'll be able to determine whether you can travel, you can spend money. | ||
| There's even talk at the G20 on the on the outskirts of the G20. | ||
| They're doing interviews. | ||
| And one of the interviews with one of the bankers saying how excited they are. | ||
| That if they issue a central bank digital currency, and that's what you're transacting in, you might go to the coffee shop to get a third cup of coffee, but the government knows you've already had two cups of coffee that morning, and they can cut you off from getting a third cup of coffee. | ||
| Or they could keep you from going to McDonald's. | ||
| and getting a cheeseburger because your cholesterol scores are too high. | ||
| Or maybe you said something on the internet that they don't like and so they can punish you by taking money out of your account. | ||
| It is total control because they own the money and they just give you permission to use it. | ||
| Or maybe you're the wrong skin color and they can take money away from you and give it to somebody whose ancestors were slaves. | ||
| Bottom line is this is the social credit system of China being implemented economically. | ||
| And so they can take total control of the people without maybe goon squads going around killing people to put the fear of God into you. | ||
| Instead, they just take control of your money and they don't let you spend, they take it away from you, they give you bonuses, and it's a reward and punishment system to make certain that you line up with what the state wants you to do. | ||
| That's a simple thing. | ||
| Tell us, Freeman, hang on, hang on. | ||
| I gotta go to break. | ||
| Freeman, 30 seconds. | ||
| Is this real or is this just some conspiracy fantasy that all of us have thought up in our heads? | ||
| 30 seconds. | ||
| How real is it? | ||
|
unidentified
|
100% real. | |
| You can see it in their own words at the World Economic Forum. | ||
| Or whether they've said it on the outskirts of the G20 session, they're salivating over this. | ||
| And just read Executive Order 14067, it's absolutely real. | ||
| Okay, short commercial break. | ||
| I got Frank Gaffney, we got Sam Faddis, we got Kevin Freeman, the Economic Warfare Specialist, we got a former Marxist, Dr. Michael, the revered Dr. Michael Recktenwald, all here in the War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're going to be back in just a moment. | |
| Okay, one of the things we're trying to do here is to make sure that you are prepared, self-reliant. | ||
| That's why we spend a lot of time on the central bank digital currency because Kevin Freeman's right. | ||
| This thing is real. | ||
| And they're rolling because they know they got a device and a mechanism and an apparatus that could give them potentially total and complete control. | ||
| And that's what they want. | ||
| And they're upfront about it in their writings, the executive orders, all of it. | ||
| This is why we want you to be prepared. | ||
| Jace Medical. | ||
| Remember, we started talking about the Chinese Communist Party, their control over the supply chains, uh, when we're years ago, but specifically the beginning of the pandemic. | ||
| Remember Rosemary Gibson, her tremendous book about this on medical. | ||
| Well, Dr. Sean Rowland and the team over at Jace Medical took action and built up a company that protects you from the CCP's control over the supply chains. | ||
| Go to jacemedical.com today and check it out. | ||
| Also, for emergencies, don't let happen what happened to the folks in Maui. | ||
| Be prepared. | ||
| Be on watch. | ||
| Go to jacemedical.com today and check it out. | ||
| They took action on Rosemary Gibson's warning to the American people, and that's why we love the guys over at Jace Medical. | ||
| Frank, Kevin, you've been at this, you're one of the most respected guys in this field. | ||
| Because the central bank digital currency is not getting the coverage and that's the way they want it. | ||
| Give me the action item. | ||
| What do we do? | ||
| We've got to stop this. | ||
| So tell me, give me the Kevin Friedman solution. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, in the Constitution, actually the only person, the only way you can stop is at the congressional level. | |
| If they implement this at the congressional level, then we're fighting in the courts over privacy rights and so forth. | ||
| But there is a provision in the Constitution, Article 1, Section 10, and it was put there by the founders for fear that the federal government would go off the rails. | ||
| It says, no state shall coin money, emit bills of credit, make anything but gold and silver coin a tender and payment of debts. | ||
| I wrote a whole book on this called Pirate Money. | ||
| It's discovering the founders' hidden plan for economic justice and defeating the Great Reset. | ||
| And we are meeting with state legislators on a continuing basis. | ||
| We have 13 states lined up that would like to have gold and silver coin using modern technology, operating as an alternative to Federal Reserve notes. | ||
| It's more constitutional than the Federal Reserve. | ||
| Essentially, you can take a Texas bullion depository, individuals can send them money, they can buy gold and silver, hold it for them there, and then allow them to transact business in it. | ||
| It would be transactional gold and silver. | ||
| I want people to go to the website, but just let me ask a dumb question. | ||
| How did Secretary of Treasury Chase and Abraham Lincoln get around this provision in the Civil War? | ||
| I think it was in 1862. | ||
| Didn't we start printing Federal Reserve notes then to finance? | ||
| They couldn't sell enough bonds, so they financed the war by deficit spending, by basically creating a federal currency. | ||
| How did Lincoln get around this? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's in the book. | |
| They produced greenbacks. | ||
| The Federal Reserve didn't exist at the time, but they produced greenbacks. | ||
| in a decision in 1870 Hepburn versus Griswold, they ruled that completely unconstitutional because they weren't backed by anything and then Ulysses S. Grant packed the court, added two new justices, and then overturned that one year later. | ||
| And that set us up for the fiat money problems we have. | ||
| So you're right on target, Steve. | ||
| Do we have the greatest country in the world always fighting? | ||
| I'm telling you, this is why in my Birch Gold thing, the politics of money in the 19th century, I'm telling you, every person, every laborer knew about it. | ||
| And that's what we've got to get back to today. | ||
| Freeman, fantastic. | ||
| Steve, just one quick thought. | ||
| The beauty of what you're trying to do to get people at Birch Gold to buy gold is that Kevin's pirate money gives them a way to make this transactionally usable, not just something that's stashed away in a depository. | ||
| It's the way to go and it will crush what they're trying to do to put this control mechanism in place. | ||
| Kevin, one more time. | ||
| Where do people not just get the book? | ||
| Where do they get your site that explains this? | ||
| Because at the state level, this is once again why Freeman is such a genius. | ||
| He's so outside the box. | ||
| He crushes the box. | ||
| Kevin, where did you go? | ||
|
unidentified
|
To get the book, PirateMoneyBook.com. | |
| To watch Economic War Room, EconomicWarRoom.com. | ||
| Those two websites. | ||
| PirateMoneyBook.com, EconomicWarRoom.com. | ||
| Great resource. | ||
| Amazing. | ||
| Frank, let's tee up a fellow traveler. | ||
| Let's tee up Dr. Michael Recktenwald. | ||
| In the best sense of the word, he's fellow traveling with us now, but he used to travel with the left, the radical left, the Marxist left, in fact. | ||
| And one of the things that's just extraordinary about him is he's got the zeal of a convert. | ||
| He understands what we are up against better than just about anybody. | ||
| He knows the playbook because he used to be working on it. | ||
| He has also written a whole series of books, I think 11 of them now, including one really important one called Thought Criminal, and another that talks about the Great Reset and the struggle for liberty. | ||
| He's one of the guys who can help us make the case, make book, if you will, on what it is that Joe Biden has been doing to take down our country for the benefit of the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| Michael Recktenwald, great to have you with us. | ||
| Over to you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Great to be here. | |
| Thanks for having me. | ||
| Nice to see you again, Steve. | ||
| You know, I think what we're looking at here is, you know, we're talking about Joe Biden as being compromised, and I think that's the case. | ||
| But now we have this institutionalized in the state so that, you know, there's talk of getting Biden out of there. | ||
| But this is now in the DNA of the nation. | ||
| There has been a concerted, controlled Infiltration of the state by this neo-Marxist ideology and objectives. | ||
| In fact, I'd say following up on Sam is the Great Reset is really a globalist plan and China is a globalist ambitions. | ||
| They've always had globalist ambitions. | ||
| So the nation-state means nothing to these globalists like Biden and the people that I think are controlling him. | ||
| And that is to say They don't care about national sovereignty or national defense, etc. | ||
| They're looking at establishing a global order, and the United States is the final impediment to that global order, and likewise they're trying to undermine it at every turn. | ||
| They are doing it with China because China has global ambitions as well, and likewise they look at China as a kind of model to roll out across the West. | ||
| So that's it in a nutshell. | ||
| Hang on, hang on, Dr. Reckenwald, real quickly. | ||
| When you say it's because the long march through the institutions and in a fourth turning you always have this, this, this, you know, convulsion around institutions. | ||
| When you say it's in the DNA of our institutions, it's not simply about someone like a crook that's taken bribery like Biden. | ||
| How did, what is in, what is that DNA? | ||
| What is in our institutions and how did it get there? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, yes, as you put it, there's been this long march for the institutions. | |
| This was Rudy Dutschke's idea, but it's really a Gromsky or Antonio Gromsky Marxist idea that you don't directly attempt to overthrow capitalism. | ||
| What you do is that you infiltrate all the institutions that you can and begin to propagate socialist ideology And then you effectively weaken the structure from within so that it's a controlled demolition rather than an explosion. | ||
| So it's like a soft coup d'etat. | ||
| And the way they did it is by, since I'd say it goes back to the early 20th century frankly, we had major institutions like tax-exempt foundations that were infiltrated by communists And who began giving money away to influence the educational system, in particular at first, to gain a foothold in there for these ideas. | ||
| And they used all kind of educational plots to do it. | ||
| Dewey and Paulo Ferrer, all of these educators, for example, were all trained Under a neo-Marxist ideology, then they start to permeate throughout the country and all the educational institutions. | ||
| Now you've prepared the citizenry for accepting a kind of socialist undermining of the social order and the state. | ||
| And this took place, you know, obviously, the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory was somewhat determinative here. | ||
| But really, this started before that. | ||
| They already had set the table with these tax-exempt foundations, and then the Frankfurt School came over and they welcomed these foundations. | ||
| They welcomed them with open arms. | ||
| The Rockefeller Foundation funded Herbert Marcuse, for example. | ||
| Hang on, slow down, slow down. | ||
| These institutions you're talking about are from the biggest and most brutal capitalists. | ||
| It's the Ford Foundation. | ||
| It's the Rockefeller Foundation. | ||
| It's the Carnegie Foundation. | ||
|
unidentified
|
These are uber-capitalists. | |
| They crush labor. | ||
| They could care less about populist economics. | ||
| They could care less about people. | ||
| How did the institutions, with the money that was endowed to them from, I would say, the most brutal capitalists that the American system has ever produced, How do you make the case that they are the ones that actually became infiltrated by communist thinking, or neo-Marxist thinking, and that has led to the infection of our education system in the beginning, and really the motive power in back of the Long March? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, one way to look at it is that these uber-capitalists, as you referred to them, were not really free market advocates at all in the first place. | |
| They were actually monopolists, and so they had something in common with socialists, and that is what? | ||
| They want a monopoly system. | ||
| So their objective is to get rid of laissez-faire altogether, to get rid of the free market, to capture all markets and get rid of all competitors. | ||
| And so what is socialism if not a monopoly scheme? | ||
| And likewise, they made a party with the socialists to bring this about. | ||
| So it makes sense, in some sense, that these foundations, although their money came from | ||
| The most capitalist organizations, at least in terms of profit-making and domination of their market sectors, it made sense that they then would take proceeds, fund these tax-exempt foundations, get massive tax write-offs, and then begin to try to establish a system that actually ends up in socialism, | ||
| In the sense that you have a kind of actually existing socialism on the ground, and you have a kind of monopoly state hybrid on top. | ||
| And that's what's going on with the Great Reset. | ||
| That's what the ESG is about. | ||
| It's about creating a shared monopoly scheme, a cartel scheme, that drives all competitors out of business. | ||
| And as Sam pointed out, it's actually benefiting China. | ||
| Because China doesn't abide. | ||
| They don't play that game. | ||
| They're just letting us use that game. | ||
| Or letting the West use that game in order to de-industrialize and undermine our own... It's state capitalism. | ||
| This is what the Chinese model is kind of a thing. | ||
| You have a bunch of oligarchs who run it. | ||
| We've taken over the model for them and look back even to the Rockefellers and Ford and these guys who do it. | ||
| I just want to make sure, definitionally, because we're a big name in nomenclature here, so that the war room, particularly our working class people that haven't had the chance for advanced degrees, understand. | ||
| You keep saying socialism. | ||
| But it's a state capitalism model. | ||
| And isn't the underpinnings of Gromsky, it's neo-Marxism, because socialism sounds kind of, OK, we're just all going to own this thing. | ||
| Isn't the DNA much more pernicious? | ||
| I mean, isn't it atheistic? | ||
| Isn't it anti-liberty, anti-freedom? | ||
| It's basically everything that the foundation of the Judeo-Christian West stands for. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, absolutely. | |
| It has to undermine these value systems because Christianity is an impediment. | ||
| Why? | ||
| Because they posit, Christians posit a God that's above these gods, and so these people really have self-apotheosis ideas. | ||
| That is, they want to be gods. | ||
| They have to get rid of Christianity, and they have to get rid of the American values, in particular of independence, individual liberty, and In self-determination, because these are, you know, they've been trying to collectivize the United States since the 20s, as I've discovered. | ||
| So they've attempted to sovietize in the Soviet area, the United States, for decades. | ||
| And China just happens to be a new partner. | ||
| Yeah, and on that point about sovietizing, one of the things that I want Michael to talk about is | ||
| A technique that of course was used brilliantly by Lenin to take over the Russian government and is being brilliantly used now by what I think of as the Obama-Biden 3.0 administration to essentially create the Marxist takeover of this government is the phenomenon of the political commissar. | ||
| And they dress them up in different ways. | ||
| I think DEI is the political office that these guys are being given in agencies throughout the USG. | ||
| Could you speak a little bit to that and how it's necessary to really take and hold control of an institution like the United States government, Michael? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, yeah, DEI, Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, is a kind of way to ingratiate The so-called beleaguered minorities and to set them as weapons against the majority, particularly the middle class, and to effectively guilt trip the middle class into surrendering their wealth and their rights. | |
| That's what wokeness is really all about. | ||
| It has a function. | ||
| Its function is to undermine the idea of merit. | ||
| And to undermine the idea of rights, and to turn them into privileges, so that you see everything as a privilege that then can be revoked. | ||
| This is what wokeness is about, in effect. | ||
| Divide and conquer. | ||
| But the point is, if you've got people throughout the government whose job is to enforce that, you do get control, no? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, absolutely. | |
| The perfect example is in the military. | ||
| The military's got this sexual harassment, and I'm not saying there's not sexual harassment that goes on in the military. | ||
| It's got to be gotten rid of because now you have women serving as well as men in combat positions. | ||
| But they've set up this whole, outside of UCMJ and outside of the chain of command, they've put political commissars into the military right now, adjacent to the command structure, on sexual harassment. | ||
| That is pure political commissars. | ||
| This is exactly how the Soviets got control of the Red Army, or the Czar's Army, eventually. | ||
| And DEI is not just at the government level, it's at the company level. | ||
| They're political commissar, and the HR department is essentially political commissars right now. | ||
| We got to bounce. | ||
| I want to go back. | ||
| I want everybody to tell me their social media, where they go. | ||
| I want to start with Faddis. | ||
| Faddis, real quickly. | ||
| If we had a James Angleton today, who's in charge of counterintelligence, would we have had the problem with Joe Biden? | ||
| Give me a minute on that before you give me your coordinates. | ||
| Not if Angleton was allowed to do his job and be all over this. | ||
| Again, it's, it is screaming. | ||
| I mean, this makes the Russian penetration of the Manhattan Project look like child's play. | ||
| Right? | ||
| You put a guy in the White House who works for the other side, everything else is irrelevant. | ||
| I don't care how many carrier battle groups you have, air wings, everything else. | ||
| Who cares? | ||
| It's irrelevant if the commander-in-chief works for the other side. | ||
| Thaddeus, real quickly, I want to hear it in your lips. | ||
| Joe Biden is a controlled asset of the Chinese Communist Party? | ||
| Yes, my professional opinion. | ||
| He works for the other side. | ||
| Bought, paid for, controlled. | ||
| Understand, not bent a little bit, not leaning their way under their thumb. | ||
| Affatus, what are your coordinates? | ||
| How do people get to And Magazine and all your social media? | ||
| And Magazine, andmagazine.substack.com. | ||
| That'll take you every place else I am online. | ||
| Great resources. | ||
| Great work. | ||
| Kevin Friedman, the economic warfare expert. | ||
| Where do people go, brother? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Economicwarroom.com is our best resource. | |
| And Pirate Money. | ||
| Kevin, I love the idea. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pirate Money. | |
| Pirate Money. | ||
| We're going to have you Buy the book. | ||
| We're going to have you back on about that. | ||
| The state level, absolutely brilliant. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And how Lincoln and Chase just got around it. | |
| It's a fascinating story how this thing even got created. | ||
| Dr. Michael Rechtenwald, obviously incredibly profound. | ||
| We need more people to drill down on this. | ||
| Where do people go to get your books and your writing, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, thanks, Frank. | |
| Thanks, Steve. | ||
| michaelrectinwald.com is where everything can be found. | ||
| michaelrectinwald.com, one word, no K, no H. And I'm also on X, I should say, at GreatResetProf. | ||
| Doctor, thank you so much. | ||
| Frank Gaffney, Doug, you know, Gaffney, about having the 6 to 7, I'm so jacked up now at 7 o'clock, I can't get to sleep at any reasonable hour. | ||
| So where do people go to get your information? | ||
| You never can get to sleep at any reasonable hour, Steve. | ||
| That's the beauty of the work you do. | ||
| Listen, just a concluding thought, Steve. | ||
| We're talking about all of this in the context of the impeachment of the President of the United States. | ||
| If the betrayal of our country That we've documented here and in the previous two days programs is not part of that inquiry. | ||
| The Congress is not doing its job. | ||
| You can get me at securingamerica.tv, at presentdangerchina.org, at securefreedom.org, and theindictmentbook.com. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| By the way, when a guy like Sam Faddis says that people have got to listen, it is from a deep respect for the institution that he gave his life, his life's work to work for and to make sure to promulgate and also for the defense of his country. | ||
| So it doesn't come any deeper than that. | ||
| Guys, thank you very much. | ||
| Incredible show. | ||
| 202-225-3121. | ||
| From what you've heard tonight, call your congressman and share your knowledge. | ||
| Also, what Kevin was talking about, we're going to have him back on, but go to birchgold.com slash Bannon. | ||
| You got to drill down. | ||
| We're trying to teach a postgraduate, a graduate level course here to make sure that you're up to date on both the theory and the practice of real politique. | ||
| You need to understand the politics of money, the politics of your currency. | ||
| Go to birchgold.com slash Bannon today. | ||
| Sign up and also ask the pertinent question. | ||
| Hear what Freeman said. | ||
| Why is the Federal Reserve spending so much time on a central bank digital currency that you can't actually own, you just license from the government? | ||
| Yet, the BRICS nations, the new geopolitical reality we warned you about, those central banks are buying gold with both hands at record rates. | ||
| Ask. | ||
| Ask Philip Patrick and the team. | ||
| Get an answer and then think about it. | ||
| Okay, we're going to be back here at 10 o'clock tomorrow morning. | ||
| I told you. | ||
| Four hours a day. | ||
| We are on fire. | ||
| We're also going to be up on Getter later this evening. | ||
| Make sure you check us out on Getter and Rumble. | ||
| Thank you very much. |
Export Selection