Sept. 11, 2023 - Bannon's War Room
47:56
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is what you're fighting for. | ||
| I mean, every day you're out there. | ||
| What they're doing is blowing people off. | ||
| If you continue to look the other way and shut up, then the oppressors, the authoritarians, get total control and total power. | ||
| Because this is just like in Arizona. | ||
| This is just like in Georgia. | ||
| It's another element that backs them into a corner and shows their lies and misrepresentations. | ||
| This is why this audience is going to have to get engaged. | ||
| As we've told you, this is the fight. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All this nonsense, all this spin, they can't handle the truth. | |
| War Room, Battleground. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| But who, who should be taking that booster? | ||
| You know, John, I don't want to get ahead of the ACIP and their recommendation. | ||
| My own personal feeling is that I believe certainly those who are vulnerable, the elderly and those with underlying condition, but I believe we should give the choice to people who are not in the high risk groups to have the vaccine available for them because Again, we have experience with this type of vaccine in billions of people. | ||
| It's a safe vaccine. | ||
| Of course, with the mRNA, there's a very, very, very low risk, particularly in young men, of getting a myocarditis. | ||
| But if you look at the risk of myocarditis from COVID itself, it's greater than the risk of the vaccine. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| And so, from my own personal standpoint, Yeah, I would say that make it available for everyone, but certainly recommended for the high risk people. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And we're almost out of time, but I want to ask you, there's new stuff. | |
| Okay. | ||
| Welcome for the evening show. | ||
| It's 11 September, the year of our Lord 2023. | ||
| Of course, we've been doing commemoration of 9-11 all day and the implications thereof. | ||
| This week, Every day in the 6 o'clock show, we're going to be talking about where we are as a country, particularly given the rapidly shifting geopolitics of what's happening in the world, and we're going to focus. | ||
| The center of gravity of this is going to be on the Chinese Communist Party and China, but we're going to talk about implications all over the globe. | ||
| Frank Gaffney is going to be my co-host, hopefully, for all these episodes during the week. | ||
| I want to welcome Frank now. | ||
| Frank, I want to start with Fauci. | ||
| Because we've had two things that have come up and I know our audience is quite concerned about and that's why the kickoff for this kind of the new geopolitics start with this global governance issue. | ||
| You know, over the weekend, I think maybe it was on Friday, the governor of New Mexico came out with this mandate declaring a public health emergency. | ||
| And she had a banning of the Second Amendment because she said there's no absolute rights in the Constitution, so she banned really the Second Amendment from being in effect in New Mexico because of this, a public health emergency. | ||
| In addition, we've had Fauci and all these guys, they're all back up and now we're constantly hit non-stop. | ||
| With the next phase of the coming bioweapon, the pandemic 2.0 is coming and they're talking about mass mandates, we're talking about protocols, vaccine mandates, the vaccine, all of it. | ||
| But the world has kind of shifted because they've gotten much more sophisticated as you and the Committee on the Present Danger China and Center for Security Policy, your group, have been pointing out and saying everything from having Michelle Bachman over there. | ||
| One of the problems we have is that the Chinese Communist Party has taken over so many of the major institutions in the world. | ||
| And one of the problems we have is Geneva, Switzerland, and what is happening in that she, in this kind of brilliant geopolitical move, is now getting kind of under the radar a call for global governance that will literally strip the sovereignty, just like the governor of New Mexico. | ||
| Strip the individual sovereignty of people to defend themselves. | ||
| So the Chinese Communist Party is working on this global governance mandate initiative to strip the sovereignty of the American people. | ||
| And it couldn't be a better day to talk about this than 9-11, the commemoration 22 years later of 9-11. | ||
| Frank Gaffney, your thoughts and observations as we kick off this week of these rolling specials we're going to be doing? | ||
| First of all, thanks for doing those rolling specials, Steve. | ||
| You're absolutely right. | ||
| 22 years ago, our nation came together in the aftermath of an attack upon us in a way that we hadn't seen arguably since World War II. | ||
| It's a sharp contrast to what we've been seeing, particularly in the aftermath of pandemic 1.0, to use your metaphor, namely the | ||
| Posture that we got ourselves into where the kinds of things that were front and center for every American, our freedom, our liberties, our nation, our constitutional Republican form of government, were all under assault 22 years ago, and we rallied to defend them. | ||
| I mean, we talked about recruiting problems we're having in the United States military at the moment. | ||
| We didn't have any at that time, because men and women across this country were signing up to defend Today, you've got a governor in New Mexico, as you say, Steve, who is arrogating unto herself on the basis of, well, I guess just her own authority, restrictions on our freedoms that are reminiscent of what we saw in pandemic 1.0. | ||
| And what is even worse, And we'll be drilling down on it with some of the best people in the country in the course of this program, is that they have in mind institutionalizing arrangements whereby somebody that at least the people of New Mexico have voted to have represent them and exercise governing authority over them, at least at the state level. | ||
| Well, that's all going to be over the side if this global governance scheme has, you know, the desired effect, which is to have people that none of us voted for, none of us decided we wanted to have, you know, rule us, suddenly be in a position to do that. | ||
| And that would be the Director General of the World Health Organization. | ||
| And what makes all of this such an urgent item, and so, you know, requiring of the kind of action, action, action that you | ||
| constantly are encouraging us to engage in, is that on the 20th of September, the plan is to have the United Nations General Assembly kind of lay hands on these global governance schemes, endorse them with the active support, surprise, surprise, of the Biden administration, and with the very direct connivance of the Chinese Communist Party and Xi Jinping, | ||
| With these kinds of supranational arrangements that will crush our sovereignty and inflict upon us arrangements that restrict our freedoms in a way that will make, I think, the response to the first pandemic, the Wuhan virus and all of that, look like a day at the beach. | ||
| And that's what we're going to talk about here today. | ||
| We mustn't let that happen, but we really need help. | ||
| Raising awareness about the fact that it's even underway and engaging people that we do elect to represent us to tell the UN and the World Health Organization and all the rest of these characters, including the Biden administration, we're not having it. | ||
| Walk through, we've got an incredible, all week we've got an incredible lineup, but let's talk about today. | ||
| Go ahead and introduce who our folks are going to be because it's amazingly impressive and I think quite ironic that on the commemoration 22 years later of 9-11, we actually have some of the best experts in the country on the deep state and these other institutions throughout the world that the globalists use to try to strip | ||
| American sovereignty, quite frankly, in a scale that I think Osama bin Laden would not even have thought to be possible, Frank Gaffney. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| I couldn't be more proud of the people that will be making remarks today and throughout the week. | ||
| Steve, we'll start with Alex Newman. | ||
| Alex is a fellow that I suspect most of your audience knows of, if not knows You know, well, they should. | ||
| He's a journalist, a podcaster, an author, including of a book I think that's very relevant to today's topic, Deep State, the invisible government behind the scenes. | ||
| He is truly an expert on this whole UN and other international organizations takeover By the Chinese Communist Party and their friends, and we're going to hear from him a bit about September 20th and the rest of the agenda. | ||
| He's joined by Dr. Meryl Nass, a woman who has been extraordinarily formidable as one of those frontline doctors, warning about the truth about COVID, what was being done to us, which was a biological warfare attack, as she'll lay out in considerable detail. | ||
| She is an expert. | ||
| on biological warfare has been for years. | ||
| She's also a trained medical practitioner and has seen firsthand the consequences of following the advice. | ||
| At the time, the World Health Organization was spreading it with pandemic 1.0. | ||
| And she's also very, very closely monitoring what is happening to try to give the World Health Organization unprecedented power. | ||
| That will be extraordinarily detrimental, as I say, to our sovereignty, national as well as personal. | ||
| We'll be talking with her. | ||
| She has recently started a tremendously important new organization, Door to Freedom. | ||
| She's being punished by the Medical Board, by the way, in Maine for spreading disinformation about all of this. | ||
| We'll hear more about that from Meryl Nass. | ||
| And finally, we'll be joined partway through the program by one of our great friends and colleagues, Reggie Littlejohn, who runs Women's Rights Without Frontiers and is the co-chair with me of the Stop Vaccine Passports Task Force of the Committee on the Present Danger of China, committee member, a fabulous resource on all of this. | ||
| And we're going to really walk through what is being done and why you don't know anything about this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And that's not an accident. | |
| To get into this, because the Committee on the Present Danger of China, as you know, the audience knows you and I have a theory of the case. | ||
| You wrote the book The Indictment, which is the very first book of The War Room, our publishing venture and it actually goes and says we should have indictments, it lays out indictments on financial oligarchs in the United States, big tech operatives, Silicon Valley, obviously people in the Biden regime and obviously in the CCP for infiltration. But make the connection to people because you and I are always hammering the CCP. How does this Committee on the Present Danger | ||
| have a subcommittee on the vaccine passports? | ||
| Because a lot of people say, well, what does that have to do with Xi and our existential threat in Beijing? | ||
| What is something that's happening in Geneva and World Health Organization and really to protect people throughout the world from spreading illness? | ||
| What does that have to do with the Chinese Communist Party, Frank Gaffney? | ||
| Well, it's very simple. | ||
| It has everything to do with it, Steve. | ||
| What the World Health Organization, which is run by an Ethiopian communist selected for the job of Director General by the Chinese communists, in every aspect, at the beginning of the pandemic caused by the Wuhan virus, that biological warfare attack, right on through to the present moment, | ||
| The World Health Organization under Tedros Ghebreyesus has slavishly embraced and amplified and legitimated the Chinese Communist Party's program, what came to be called the China Model. | ||
| And every one of us remembers vividly what that meant here. | ||
| That meant Well, mask mandates. | ||
| It meant social distancing. | ||
| It meant lockdowns. | ||
| It meant mandating of vaccines that had not been adequately tested. | ||
| And Meryl Ness is one of the great experts on that subject, as she is on all of this. | ||
| And I would simply say to you, Steve, that if you didn't like what they did to you, they meaning, yes, the CDC, and yes, the FDA, and yes, the White House Task Force, and all the rest of it, But most especially what the World Health Organization did to instigate all of that. | ||
| Well, you're going to hate what they have in mind for you next. | ||
| And what is now afoot? | ||
| It's not just some distant prospect or some, you know, wild global resetting scheme. | ||
| It is the agenda that is now very much underway. | ||
| And if we don't get on top of it and stop it, which is the point of this program, It will enslave all of us in a way that, again, makes what we lived through not so long ago in Pandemic 1.0 look like it wasn't so bad. | ||
| And it was. | ||
| So who do we start with first, Frank? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Take it away. | |
| I'd like to go to Alex first. | ||
| This is an incredible panel. | ||
| Alex Newman is a guy who has been sort of looking at this at the macro level. | ||
| In a very impressive way, and I'd like to have him take point on sort of laying out, well, where we've come from, I guess, and where we're headed on the 20th of September, especially. | ||
| Alex Newman, welcome. | ||
| Thank you, gentlemen. | ||
| Great to be here. | ||
| And so this major summit that's coming up on September 20th is being convened by the U.N. | ||
| General Assembly. | ||
| And the plan is this is an interim step. | ||
| We're about halfway through the 15 years of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, which the head of the UN General Assembly described as the master plan for humanity. | ||
| Now, when these emerged back in 2015, Obama signed them, didn't get ratification by the Senate, but the Communist Party of China came out and said they had played a crucial role in developing this master plan for humanity. | ||
| It literally intends to transform every area of our lives under the guise of global governance, of moving political decision-making power from the nation state, from subnational governments, all the way up to the UN. | ||
| And so they're moving on this very, very rapidly, and it's all building up to the next summit, which will be next year. | ||
| That'll be the summit of the future, where they're planning on totally restructuring the UN and basically coming out of the closet finally and really announcing that we now have our decisions made for us by the UN. | ||
| And we know this because they're putting out policy briefs on the run up to it. | ||
| They've got about nine, I think, two of them are still yet to be released. | ||
| But if you read these documents, and I broke the story on this on the front page of the Epoch Times back in April. | ||
| They're telling you what they're doing. | ||
| They want the UN to be the decision-making authority over nation states, over businesses, over any kind of institution in the event of a global emergency, which they tell you in the document doesn't have to be global and doesn't have to be an emergency. | ||
| That's how serious it is. | ||
| Now, I reached out to the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Congressman Mike McCaul. | ||
| He expressed some kind of nebulous concerns without a whole lot of specifics. | ||
| But right now, the Biden administration is fully in support of this agenda. | ||
| The State Department told me so when I reached out. | ||
| So we are careening toward this cliff of global governance. | ||
| And really, global governance is a euphemism that sounds less threatening than what they're really doing here. | ||
| That is empowering these UN institutions, like the World Health Organization, to become true government agencies with decision-making power, with enforcement power, even with taxation power. | ||
| So that's what we're moving toward. | ||
| And of course, the Communist Party of China is right at the center of it. | ||
| They have been from the beginning. | ||
| And back in 2013, they had a very important meeting that went completely under the radar. | ||
| No media outlet that I'm aware of other than my reports on this. | ||
| Talked about it at all. | ||
| But it was the G77 plus China meeting. | ||
| This is about 134 governments they met in Santa Cruz in Bolivia. | ||
| They came out with a final declaration. | ||
| It was called Toward a New World Order to Live Well. | ||
| And in this document, they said the UN should handle terrorism, which is interesting as we're on the anniversary of 9-11. | ||
| They said the UN General Assembly, which is basically a club for dictators, should be considered the emblem of global sovereignty. | ||
| And they said that the UN needed economic global governance over the world. | ||
| That's what we're careening toward and this major summit that's coming up later this month at the UN headquarters in New York, that's going to be the first big step laying the groundwork for the next summit coming in 2024. | ||
| Frank, let me jump in here. | ||
| Alex, I thought that our Constitution had a provision in there that protected the American people and the sovereignty of the nation from idealistic, naive, or even nefarious characters that would get the United States into this. | ||
| It's called the Senate has to basically approve a treaty. | ||
| Or confirm a treaty by two-thirds of the majority of that body, or two-thirds of the senators. | ||
| How do they get around that? | ||
| This is obviously a treaty, is it not? | ||
| It most certainly is a treaty. | ||
| And I'll say a couple things on this, Steve, and this is really important for people to understand. | ||
| I was actually at the UN Climate Summit in Paris when they first pioneered this strategy. | ||
| The Obama administration came out and said the Paris Agreement was not a treaty in the traditional sense of the term. | ||
| It was an executive agreement. | ||
| So the Communist Chinese, they agreed they were going to keep increasing their CO2 emissions. | ||
| They had their rubber stamp legislature approve this as a treaty. | ||
| The Obama administration said, no, it's not a treaty. | ||
| It's an executive agreement. | ||
| We're going to implement this only through executive orders, regulations, policy memoranda, etc. | ||
| And so we're not going to get this ratified by the U.S. | ||
| Senate. | ||
| They did the exact same thing with UN Agenda 2030, this master plan for humanity, as they call it, which calls for global wealth redistribution, vaccines for everyone, global indoctrination of all children. | ||
| You can read the document yourself. | ||
| So yes, this is a treaty, but Obama and now Biden are both acting like they have this new power that they invented out of whole cloth, a so-called executive agreement. | ||
| This is non-existent. | ||
| It is patently anti-constitutional. | ||
| And I'll build on that even further, Steve, and say, even if They were able to get two-thirds of the U.S. | ||
| Senate to go along with this, which they won't be able to. | ||
| We know that. | ||
| And that's why they're not submitting it for ratification. | ||
| But even if they were able to get that, this would still be unconstitutional. | ||
| The U.S. | ||
| Constitution is the supreme law of the land. | ||
| If the federal government wants to grant itself new powers or delegate new powers that it doesn't have to international bodies, it must amend the Constitution. | ||
| Thomas Jefferson made this very clear. | ||
| The Supreme Court has continued to make this clear, ruling in 1957 in Reed v. Covert, that the U.S. | ||
| government cannot grant itself new powers just by signing a treaty. | ||
| So even if they were able to get this through the Senate as a treaty, which they can't, that's why they're not submitting it, It still would not be valid because it's unconstitutional. | ||
| If they want these kinds of powers, if they want to give these kinds of powers to the World Health Organization and the United Nations, they have to do the proper method for changing the Constitution. | ||
| Those are outlined in Article 5. | ||
| This is unconstitutional on its face, and the Republicans in Congress, I think, have an obligation to defund all of these efforts. | ||
| Whether they'll do that or not remains to be seen, but we'll find out soon enough. | ||
| But Steve, here's the rub. | ||
| Yeah, go ahead. | ||
| One thing that's absolutely terrifying about all of this is that Senator Ron Johnson, one of the best guys we've got in the United States Senate from Wisconsin, actually offered an amendment five or six months ago now that would have established that whatever these guys came up with at the World Health Organization, including a treaty, | ||
| But also something else, and we'll talk about it with Meryl Ness, there's a whole other parallel thing called Amendments to International Health Regulations. | ||
| And he said, you know, whatever they're going to call it, an executive agreement, amendments, if it comes out of the World Health Organization and it is going to threaten our sovereignty, It must come before the United States Senate for its advice and consent, pursuant to that quality control mechanism that, as you said, the founders brilliantly inserted so that we wouldn't have this kind of sellout. | ||
| It was defeated on basically a straight party line. | ||
| The Senate has declined to do its duty, in other words, and the Biden administration is hell-bent, if I can use that expression, To get this done without the American people even being aware, let alone having a say in it. | ||
| That must not happen. | ||
| Before we go to Merrill, I just want to make sure, for the audience, Alex, you said in one of the first things we did when President Trump took over, we said we were getting out of the Paris Climate Accord, and we did. | ||
| The internal fight we had on that was a war to the knife. | ||
| I mean, the background of what happened there to do that, and that was a hard commitment President Trump made, and I'll be honest with you, we barely got it done because of, and that was with President Trump's shoulder to the wheel of the fight of what you call the deep state or the administrative state, just went absolutely nuts. | ||
| You said that this has already happened a couple of times, and you cited some other examples. | ||
| Walk through, in your mind, where we've already acceded to what you would consider to be treaty obligations that have taken the sovereignty of the American people but are currently already being implemented. | ||
| What were those? | ||
| There are numerous examples where the U.S. | ||
| government has used the treaty process to try to accumulate new powers that do not rightfully belong to it, that are not constitutional. | ||
| To start with, the Constitution is very, very clear on this. | ||
| It starts in the beginning and it even ends in the Tenth Amendment, making very clear that any powers that are not delegated to the U.S. | ||
| government are not allowed to be exercised. | ||
| All the powers that are delegated essentially are outlined in Article 1, Section 8. | ||
| So if it doesn't have that power listed in Article 1, Section 8, it's got to submit To an amendment process where they can then accumulate those powers. | ||
| And we've done that many times, right? | ||
| When the American people thought the federal government should have authority to ban alcohol sales, we went through that amendment process. | ||
| We amended the Constitution so that the federal government would then have the power to ban alcohol. | ||
| We ultimately determined that was a bad idea, so we removed that power from them. | ||
| So we have this process in place. | ||
| The founding fathers were very smart. | ||
| Unfortunately, totalitarians, people who want the government to have powers that it was never intended to have, but know they're not going to get it through the ratification process, are trying to use the statutory process, the regulatory process, and the treaty making process. | ||
| If you look at the treaties that the US government and the agreements, the conventions, etc, that the US government has made with the United Nations, going back almost 50 years now, what you will find is Consistent efforts to usurp power. | ||
| Now, when these have come before the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court has struck them down on occasion. | ||
| Reid v. Covert is the one example that I mentioned where the Supreme Court said, no, the federal government doesn't have that power. | ||
| That involved an agreement, a foreign treaty that purported to grant the federal government new powers over biological issues and things like that. | ||
| Somebody was charged under this and the defendant went all the way to the Supreme Court and said, look, you don't have that power. | ||
| That's not a constitutional power. | ||
| Forget your treaty. | ||
| The Supreme Court agreed with that. | ||
| And so I think at some point, hopefully the Supreme Court will come in again and point out that a lot of these powers are unconstitutional. | ||
| But the Paris Agreement is a very good example of that. | ||
| And we could go back through many others, the arms trade treaty that they're trying to come up with, even the the UN conventions on all these different issues, the UN human rights processes, all of these delegate powers to the UN that the federal government never had to begin with. | ||
| This is very much the case with what they're doing now with the World Health Organization as well. | ||
| So we've seen this consistent effort, first of all, to keep Americans ignorant about what the Constitution says. | ||
| And second of all, to exploit that ignorance to grant new powers either to the federal government or to their buddies at the United Nations. | ||
| This has got to stop. | ||
| Steve, this is a great point to wish to bring up. | ||
| Yeah, go ahead. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Good. | |
| No, I was just going to say. | ||
| Well, I tell you, we're coming to a break. | ||
| So I want to, can you tee her up for after the break? | ||
| Give me a minute on that. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| I think one of the things that Meryl Ness has done, both as a medical practitioner as well as a brilliant researcher, is figure out what are the implications of the kinds of things that are being now directed by this treaty, for example, or by these amendments. | ||
| Not least of which will be to greatly expand the probability of biological warfare agents being widely disseminated around the world. | ||
| It's madness! | ||
| And there's no adult supervision. | ||
| Hang on for a second. | ||
| Meryl Ness is going to join us. | ||
| We've got Alex Newman. | ||
| Reggie Littlejohn's going to jump in here. | ||
| We've got Frank Gaffney as my co-host. | ||
| global governance and the taking of sovereignty of the American people and our beloved Republic. | ||
| War Room Battlegrounds with Stephen K. Bannon Okay, Alex Newman's got to bounce, but Alex, you've got to commit to me in the audience. | ||
| We're going to have you back hopefully this week. | ||
| It couldn't be a better day for this than 9-11 to have you come back sometime over the next couple of days and talk to us about your book, The Deep State, because I think a lot of people have a lot of questions of what went on on September 11th of 2001. | ||
| What's your social media, your website? | ||
| How did they get the book, brother? | ||
| Thank you so much for having me, Steve. | ||
| Really a pleasure. | ||
| Be happy to come back on. | ||
| My website is LibertySentinel.org. | ||
| People can get a copy of the book there if they're interested. | ||
| It's called Deep State, Invisible Government Behind the Scenes. | ||
| And my Twitter handle is AlexNewman underscore JOU for journalism. | ||
| And thanks again, Steve, for all that you do. | ||
| Looking forward to talking to you again. | ||
| Thank you, Frank. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Thank you, Frank. | ||
| So we got Meryl Nass. | ||
| Meryl, welcome. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Frank gave you a pretty big tee up. | ||
| What are your thoughts and observations? | ||
|
unidentified
|
What's going on is that basically some small coterie of globalists is trying to take over as much of the property and power in the world as they can. | |
| And so they are creating a soft coup and using a lot of different methods to basically encumber us and to gain power and authority and money and property. | ||
| So obviously climate change and A ton of things that are going to be required by nations is one method of doing this. | ||
| So the G20 just met this weekend and they said, we need $10 trillion just to deal with the changes we have to make to comply with the climate change requirements. | ||
| But what all these global international organizations are also saying is that they're hyping the fear of pandemics. | ||
| And saying we need a global biosecurity agenda. | ||
| PPPR, which is potential pandemic pathogens and response. | ||
| I didn't get that exactly right. | ||
| The PPP stands for two things. | ||
| So potential, sorry, pandemic prevention, preparedness and response. | ||
| And all the nations are going to be required through this WHO treaty and amendments to the international health regulations to improve their health establishments. | ||
| They need more primary care. | ||
| They need to train all their healthcare professionals. | ||
| Hang on, Meryl. | ||
| Hang on. | ||
| You're from Maine. | ||
| You're from Maine, correct? | ||
| Okay. | ||
| So what the powers that be are going to say in Geneva, in the media centers, on Wall Street, in Silicon Valley, the best and brightest geniuses. | ||
| Look, Meryl's a nice Uh, lovely person from Maine, but she's got a tinfoil hat on with a propeller. | ||
| And the two great challenges of the planet are pandemics that don't look at national borders and climate change, which is going to destroy Mother Earth and that we have to organize in a supernational level. | ||
| And not worry or the Merrill Nass's of the world in, you know, some 1500 person Hamlet in Maine is going to be able to stop everything. | ||
| So what evidence do you have that this is actually a globalist takeover, ma'am? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay, so there are just a ton of documents that and that is what I'm drawing from. | |
| So the WHO and its member states have created drafts of a new pandemic treaty. | ||
| And also new amendments, over 300 potential amendments to the existing health regulations. | ||
| And the UN has issued a draft document called the Silence Procedure, which is going to be accepted unless a nation complains. | ||
| It will be accepted on September 20th. | ||
| The WHO documents are planned to be accepted next May. | ||
| What these documents do is encumber nations To follow them. | ||
| So the two WHO documents are going to be binding in their current form, which means there will be compliance issues. | ||
| Nations will be monitored to see whether they comply and there will be what they call accountability. | ||
| So we don't know how these nations are going to be forced into being accountable to their promises. | ||
| But some method will be used to beat them into submission. | ||
| Okay, what are they agreeing to do? | ||
| They're agreeing to go out and surveil the environment for pathogens, potential pandemic pathogens. | ||
| They have to swab people, animals, wastewater, and look for them all the time. | ||
| What happens if they find them? | ||
| They're required by this WHO treaty to quote-unquote, share them globally, unquote. | ||
| They have to put this, they have to do, Genomic sequencing, put the sequence online and make it available to other nations and to the WHO and presumably to hackers. | ||
| What this means is we're actually putting potential, they call them potential pandemic pathogens, but the real name is potential biological warfare agents, biological weapons. | ||
| These are microorganisms that could cause a pandemic. | ||
| We're gonna work on them. | ||
| That's being called gain of function. | ||
| What it really means is biological warfare research. | ||
| Giving these viruses and bacteria new functions that can make them more deadly or more easier to transmit from person to person or animal to animal. | ||
| And we're going to call it global sharing and make it sound very pretty. | ||
| But in fact, that is a euphemism for proliferation of biological weapons, which, by the way, is prohibited by the existing Biological Weapons Convention, of which over 184 countries are parties and have ratified. | ||
| It's been in existence for 51 years. | ||
| So these are things these documents require of nations. | ||
| They also require that vaccines for pandemics are going to be developed very rapidly without liability for the manufacturers or the nations. | ||
| And there are additional requirements to surveil our social media and to only allow the WHO's public health message to get out. | ||
| Now, The whole idea that we can spend tens of billions of dollars or hundreds of billions to prevent pandemics is actually a false idea. | ||
| It is a house of cards. | ||
| If you spend a lot of time and effort surveilling to find potential pandemic pathogens, and then you work on them in laboratories, you're actually increasing by orders of magnitude the likelihood that they will escape. | ||
| if you share them with other nations, you're increasing the likelihood that one of those nations or subnational states, organizations is going to release them deliberately or accidentally, and we have a new pandemic. Now, the U.S. already has a program for monitoring potential pandemic pathogens, and it is called the Federal Select Agent Program. The CDC and the USDA manage it, and any entity in the US. | ||
| that does any research or work on potential pandemic pathogens must report to the CDC-USDA if there is an escape or an accident, a loss or a theft. | ||
| Every year, approximately 200 reports come in to CDC That there have been escapes of these pathogens. | ||
| Now, luckily, we haven't had any really deadly pandemics in the U.S. | ||
| as a result. | ||
| But in China, Singapore and Taiwan, there were leaks, escapes from laboratories of SARS-1 in 2003 and 2004 that did, in fact, kill people and cause small outbreaks before they were controlled. | ||
| So the idea that by looking for them and studying them, we're going to save ourselves, it's a false notion. | ||
| We're actually going to be at greater risk. | ||
| We have to stop this whole concept. | ||
| It doesn't make sense. | ||
| It's increasing risk, but it's under the guise of protecting people. So once the public understands this, yeah, go ahead. Yeah, hang on for a second. I want to get to Franklin. So what Merrill laid out is, this has been worked on for years, if not decades. And it's not just the framework, but what they have in actually the apparatus to execute is | ||
| quite sophisticated and very well thought through. | ||
| How have we not had The party of liberty, the Republican Party, how have they gone on along with this up until now? | ||
| I mean, we got this meeting on the 20th of September. | ||
| It's obviously we're going to create a firestorm, as we've done with our reporting that you helped so much with in the spring with Michelle Bachmann and others. | ||
| Actually, we did part of it last year. | ||
| But how have people You know, gone along with this. | ||
| Alex Newman just said McCaul. | ||
| He talked to McCaul. | ||
| McCaul, yeah, I got a couple of maybe, you know, technical problems on this. | ||
| How can the Party of Liberty have gone along with this, Frank Gaffney? | ||
| Well, there's a lot there, Steve. | ||
| You document every single day that the Party of Liberty is anything but on a whole host of issues. | ||
| And I think this is the case, too. | ||
| And to the point about, you know, we're all wearing tinfoil hats. | ||
| We lived through The dress rehearsal for all of this. | ||
| These are the sorts of things that were tested. | ||
| Lockdowns, for example, forced vaccinations, other kinds of control mechanisms, censorship. | ||
| What Meryl Ness is just laying out, Steve, and Reggie Littlejohn will do more on in a moment, is these are the building blocks for the kind of totalitarian global arrangements, the New World Order that Xi Jinping is seeking and is moving inexorably forward to. | ||
| I would say that most Republicans simply don't have any idea this is afoot. | ||
| We had Ralph Norman, a great, great leader in the Congress, as you know, Steve, get about 19 or 20 of his colleagues together back when we were worrying about the World Health Organization getting all of this done last May. | ||
| Well, they didn't, but they're working now to get it done for sure by next May. | ||
| And why it is so vital that we have this conversation and that the posse spin up to go make the Party of Liberty, take this on, is we will not have liberty if what Merrill is describing here runs its course. | ||
| And at the moment there's really nothing standing in its way. | ||
| You know, Bill Gates is in favor of it, the Chinese Communist Party is in favor of it, Big Pharma is in favor of it, the World Economic Forum, The European Union and especially the Biden administration all want these kinds of new arrangements. | ||
| To hell with our sovereignty and on with the, well, I guess the Orwellian lockdown of the future permanently. | ||
| at the behest of people like Tedros Ghebreyesus. | ||
| It must not be allowed to happen. | ||
| Could we bring Reggie up? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because I think she's got a lot to say on this. | |
| Let's get Reggie to jump in here. | ||
| Meryl, that was fantastic. | ||
| What Reggie specifically has done is pick up on some of the points Meryl just made about the sort of digital gulag that goes along with all of this. | ||
| And I want to make sure we heard from her on that if we can. | ||
| Welcome, Reggie. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hi, thanks for having me. | |
| So Reggie, talk a little bit about the digital dimensions of all this and how that translates into control that we don't ever get out of if they have their way. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So this is the thing. | |
| I believe that the COVID-19 was a dress rehearsal to roll out an infrastructure that is going to snap shut in the next pandemic. | ||
| And regarding the digital gulag, the major components of it are digital IDs and central bank digital currencies. | ||
| So regarding digital IDs, many states have have adopted or during COVID-19 they adopted vaccine passports. | ||
| I believe that that we and others on the Stop Vaccine Passports Task Force made that term radioactive. | ||
| So now they call them smart health cards or even a digital driver's license. | ||
| Any mandatory digital ID can serve as the platform for the China social credit system. | ||
| And as you know, in March of this year, Xi Jinping himself said that he wanted to be very active in reforming global governance. | ||
| He is pushing down the China social credit system. | ||
| He's doing it through the digital IDs, which will track everything about us. | ||
| If you go on to the World Economic Forum website, there's a chart that is like a circle chart and it shows all the different aspects of what you have to have a digital ID in order to do. | ||
| In other words, to access health care, to access. | ||
| to pay your taxes, to buy and sell anything online. | ||
| It goes on and on. | ||
| There are a dozen different categories, all but you will have to have a digital ID to effectuate and then if you don't have a digital ID, you're going to be basically paralyzed. | ||
| And what are they going to do with these digital IDs? | ||
| It's already been shown that they are tracking conservatives. | ||
| They're tracking your social media posts. | ||
| They're tracking your internet search history, your internet spending history, in order to get a 360 degree view of you as a human being, and to see whether you are pro-narrative or counter-narrative. | ||
| And if you're counter-narrative, like many of us, basically most of the people here are, | ||
| They'll know who you are, and because of facial recognition and real-time geolocation, they know what you look like, they know where you are, they can make you so that you can't travel, they can make you so you can't access your bank accounts and your credit cards, and if you combine that with a central bank digital currency, so you can't use paper money anymore, they will be able to basically control everything that you buy. | ||
| So if they don't like you, they can trap you. | ||
| They can say your money will not work more than five miles from your house, or your central bank digital currency access to it is just not going to happen at all, like they did to the truckers in Canada. | ||
| We've got to bounce, but I want to get everybody's coordinates here because the audience, I can already tell, is blowing up and they want more. | ||
| Real quickly, Reggie, even at the G20, Isn't a big subcommittee of the G20 working on a coordinated, not just digital currency, but also digital ID, what they call the digital future. | ||
| Isn't that also an aspect of the G20 that's really underreported? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, okay, so the G20 is behind it, the World Economic Forum is behind it, the UN is behind it, the WHO is behind it, and they just, they recently signed some kind of an agreement to engage the European Union platform and make it global. | |
| And this has been a big announcement, Steve. | ||
| It's just not, it's announced in, not in the mainstream media, it's announced in the alternative media, but they're not hiding this stuff. | ||
| Reggie, real quickly, where do people, we're going to stop him, where do people get to you, Reggie? | ||
| How do they get to you, social media and your platform? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, social media, please go to Real Reggie Littlejohn on Getter. | |
| Real Reggie Littlejohn. | ||
| But the main thing I would like to ask people to do, we need to act immediately, because as Meryl said, there's a September 20th vote that could potentially come up in the United Nations. | ||
| But it's a coordination between the United Nations and the World Health Organization. | ||
| So go to stopvaxpassports.org, stopvaxpassports.org, and sign our Align Act that says stop the WHO from taking over our national sovereignty. | ||
| Meryl, NASS, by the way, spectacular, and we love the people in Maine. | ||
| I have a big hunk of my family came from Maine. | ||
| Where do people go to get you, Meryl? | ||
|
unidentified
|
So, on Twitter, I'm at Nas Meryl. | |
| My substack is merylnas.substack.com. | ||
| And the new organization that is fighting all this, and we'd love you to sign up for our newsletters and join us, is doortofreedom.org. | ||
| Spectacular work, Meryl. | ||
| Spectacular work. | ||
| Frank Gaffney, where do folks get you? | ||
| What are your coordinates? | ||
| Great Americans. | ||
| Securefreedom.org is my mothership. | ||
| SecuringAmerica.tv is our show. | ||
| And PresentDangerChina.org, Steve, of course, is the committee on the present danger China. | ||
| We've been doing webinars on all of this. | ||
| I urge people to check them out. | ||
| Thank you for doing this program. | ||
| In honor of the patriots and victims of 9-11, the worm is going to commit every day. | ||
| Part of our four hours of live television is going to be on the run up to this 20 September issue at the United Nations. | ||
| We need to stop this. | ||
| We need to stop it dead in its tracks. | ||
| Guys, thank you so much for coming on, and thanks more importantly for the work. | ||
| Incredible. | ||
| Reggie Littlejohn, Merrill Nass, Frank Gaffney, and of course Alex Newman. | ||
| You just heard Reggie Littlejohn right there on the Central Bank Digital Currency. | ||
| I want you guys to ask yourselves right now, what I really know about this and how scary is this? | ||
| Go to birchgold.com slash Bannon right now. | ||
| Go and talk to one of Philip Patrick's experts. | ||
| First, you can download for free all the information I've put up there about the end of the dollar empire, the end of the United States Federal Reserve note as the prime reserve currency and the massive impact it will have. | ||
| But the question I want you to ask Philip Patrick is slightly different. | ||
| I want you to ask him why the Federal Reserve of the United States is so maniacally focused on a central bank digital currency. | ||
| You just heard Reggie Littlejohn talk about everything that can happen with this for your freedom and your sovereignty and your economic well-being. | ||
| Also ask him why the G20 is in back of this, the World Economic Forum is in back of this, what we call the Party of Davos. | ||
| Why are they in back of it? | ||
| Why? | ||
| And ask them why the central banks of the BRICS nations Well, the CCP is driving this. | ||
| Why are they buying gold at record levels? | ||
| Why are they buying gold in 2022 and 2023 at record levels? | ||
| Make sure you get the answer. | ||
| Then I want you to think about it. | ||
| Now, where do you go? | ||
| You go to birchgold.com. | ||
| You got all the information. | ||
| We have all the installments at the end of the dollar empire. | ||
| I've got a new one coming out. | ||
| Hopefully within the week. | ||
| We're laboring on this on the fourth installment. | ||
| It'll blow your head off. | ||
| But I need you to get involved and really understand the dangers of the central bank digital currency and what you can do about it in your own personal life. | ||
| So go check it out today. | ||
| Okay we're gonna be back at 10 o'clock tomorrow morning. | ||
| I want to thank everybody at Lyndale TV, everybody at Real America's Voice for helping us with our coverage all day long of the commemoration of the 22nd year of 9-11 and hopefully in honor of the victims and the heroes we were able to put forward an agenda that can save the sovereignty of this great Republic. | ||
| See you tomorrow morning live 10 a.m. |
Export Selection