Aug. 28, 2023 - Bannon's War Room
48:47
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
| Pray for our enemies. | ||
| Because we're going medieval on these people. | ||
| You're not going to free shot all these networks lying about the people. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The people have had a belly full of it. | |
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you've tried to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big line? | ||
|
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| So I would actually like to have a short-term CR only to make our arguments stronger. | ||
| Because, Maria, if we shut down, all of government shuts it down. | ||
| Investigation and everything else. | ||
| It hurts the American public. | ||
| But if we're able to pass our appropriation bills, We're in a stronger position to remove those Pelosi policies that are locked into law right now. | ||
| The woke-ism, the overspending, the non-security of this border. | ||
| We want to secure the border, make us energy independent, make our streets safer, and let our parents have a say in their kids' education. | ||
| What corrupt activities did you suspect they were engaged in? | ||
| It would take half a day for me to discuss every single count, but I can say that Burisma illegally produced, sold, and utilized gas. | ||
| Tluchevsky, the founder of Burisma, recently made a plea deal with the prosecution In a case where he was accused of giving a $6 million bribe, which is the kind of money that you don't just give away if you're not really engaging in anything illegal. | ||
| So his plea deal was to cover up a $6 million bribe that he gave earlier. | ||
| Do you believe that Joe Biden or Hunter Biden got bribes? | ||
| I do not want to deal in unproven facts, but my firm personal conviction is that, yes, this was the case. | ||
| They were being bribed. | ||
| The fact that Joe Biden gave away $1 billion in U.S. | ||
| money in exchange for my dismissal, my firing, isn't that alone a case of corruption? | ||
| One thing you did tell me, and this is what you said the last time you were here with me, you said that it's, you know, forget 20 million, it's 50 million, and this is based on documents that you've seen that we have not seen yet. | ||
| So can you, is it still 50 million? | ||
| Is it more? | ||
| war now? | ||
| I mean, what do you know? | ||
| Oh, it's staggeringly high. | ||
| It's definitely, it's definitely more than 50 million. | ||
| It's staggeringly high. | ||
| I'm not allowed to share the confidential information in the suspicious activity report sitting at the treasury right now, but the amount of money we are talking about is staggering. | ||
| And the fact that mainstream media has just ignored this, swept this under the rug and said all of this is normal, this is probably the most corrupt president in US history. | ||
| And I don't say that lightly. | ||
| I mean, I come from a very purple district, but the double standard here is very obvious. | ||
| There's a two, two different standards of justice in this country. | ||
| And, you know, Joe Biden ought to probably have a mugshot when this thing is said and done. | ||
| I want the American people to see all the evidence that we have. | ||
| You were not only an impeachment manager in the January 6 impeachment of Donald Trump, you were a constitutional scholar. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So do you agree with Asa Hutchinson on this? | |
| Well, absolutely. | ||
| And we've been saying all along that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment presents a clear and unequivocal statement that anyone who has sworn an oath of office, and by the way, not just a president, but members of Congress and others who hold federal office, who engage in insurrection or rebellion, having sworn an oath to uphold the Constitution against enemies foreign and domestic, can never serve again in federal or state office. | ||
| And this was added after the Civil War as a general constitutional principle, and we have to abide by it. | ||
| Donald Trump was impeached by the House of Representatives for inciting an insurrection against the Union, and then 57 of 100 senators determined as a constitutional fact that Donald Trump had incited an insurrection. | ||
| So I think you've got robust, bicameral, bipartisan majorities that have already established this as a fact. | ||
| And I agree with the conservative Federalist Society law professors who are out there saying, as well as Mr. Hutchinson, that Donald Trump is disqualified, just as if he were running and not a born U.S. | ||
| citizen, or if he were running and he were 24 years old. | ||
| Three questions, Sean. | ||
| Did you coordinate with the Biden administration, the same administration who's indicted their general election opponent in D.C. | ||
| and Miami already? | ||
| Did you coordinate with them? | ||
| Did you work with Jack Smith? | ||
| Look at the same witnesses. | ||
| Any coordination there? | ||
| And did you use federal funds as part of this investigation? | ||
| We asked these same questions of Alvin Bragg a few months ago, and he, in fact, did use American tax dollars to go after President Trump in Manhattan. | ||
| And, oh, by the way, Alvin Bragg sued us when we subpoenaed one of those prosecutors up there in Manhattan. | ||
| He sued us, we went to court, and the court ruled for us. | ||
| So we're going to be just as aggressive here. | ||
| We're going to do it within the Constitution, but we're going to do our duty to get the answers the American people deserve for this ridiculous indictment that's taken place in Georgia. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because you notice, I have never once, not one single time, suggested to the Justice Department what they should do or not do, or else I'm bringing a charge and not bringing a charge. | |
| I'm honest. | ||
| The political conundrum continues to unfold in the United States of America. | ||
| As the election year inches closer, Trump's indictment, a key point that Democrats could have banked upon, may turn out to be a plank for the former US President. | ||
| Media reports reveal that the White House Counsel's Office met with the top aide to Special Counsel Jack Smith. | ||
| This was just weeks before Smith brought charges against Donald Trump for mishandling the classified documents. | ||
| This has raised some eyebrows. | ||
| According to the White House, the visitor logs Jay Bratt, who joined the special counsel team in November 2022, held a meeting in the White House on March 31st this year with Carolina Saba, who is the Deputy Chief of Staff for the White House Counsel's Office. | ||
| An FBI agent, Daniel Ray, also joined the meeting, and nine weeks later, Trump was indicted by Smith's office in June 8, 2023. | ||
| You see, this was not a lone meeting. | ||
| Prior to this one, Brad also met with Saba at the White House in November 2021. | ||
| This was the time when Trump was caught in negotiations with the National Archives, who were demanding presidential records from his Mar-a-Lago estate. | ||
| This was before a formal probe had started. | ||
| Another meeting was also held in the White House in September 2021. | ||
| This was with Catherine Relay, an advisor to the White House Chief of Staff's office. | ||
| As of now, one does not know what was discussed in these meetings which we've just stated. | ||
| You see, Bratt is a long-time Department of Justice hand. | ||
| He has been serving in the National Security Division since October 2018. | ||
| This election focuses on probing and prosecuting cases affecting the national security and also the foreign relations of the United States of America. | ||
| Experts say that... | ||
| Let me have you keep that clip. | ||
| Keep that clip up. | ||
| Monday, 28 August, year of the rule of 2023. | ||
| Hopefully it's not lost on anybody in this audience that we have to go to India. | ||
| It's a fabulous TV network over there, WION, to get really the best and most focused analysis of the situation about the Biden White House, knowing about and actually having meetings with the special counsel and people around the special counsel prior to the phony indictment for the Records Act. | ||
| Mike Davis is going to be here. | ||
| So there's so much going on. | ||
| There we gave you a taste of it, of what's going on on the legal side. | ||
| Fannie Willis has got to be in federal court today to defend her, to start to defend her, this ridiculous RICO lawsuit. | ||
| Also Jack Smith's, you know, up to his neck in this thing now. | ||
| We're going to Mike Davis come and break it all down. | ||
| You got Jamie Raskin's people. | ||
| We told you they're pushing this 14th Amendment. | ||
| And I actually think Jack Smith is going to bring another charge of what the conspiracy for insurrection or whatever that bogus charge is to try to keep Trump off the ballot in California and other places. | ||
| We'll get all that with Mike Davis. | ||
| The signal, not the noise. | ||
| McCarthy thinks you're a moron. | ||
| So here's what he's dangling now. | ||
| This is a guy that didn't support an impeachment inquiry before the recess. | ||
| We know that from Don Bacon, the congressman in Nebraska, saying that, saying the last congressman, McCarthy, didn't support it, needed more evidence. | ||
| You've got, now you've got Shokin giving an interview with Kilmeade on Saturday night. | ||
| You've got Nancy May saying she's seen more than $50 million of bank transfers. | ||
| You've got plenty of evidence. | ||
| But McCarthy, because the members went home, the members went home for August recess, and we've heard field reports from all over that you're lighting them up. | ||
| That constituents are going, and particularly the Red District congressmen that voted for the Biden debt deal. | ||
| They're lighting them up and saying, what are you guys doing? | ||
| This thing has to be shut. | ||
| You have to force Biden to shut down this government unless you get the real cuts you want and take out the weaponization. | ||
| At the same time, they're saying, what is going on with impeachment? | ||
| You don't even need impeachment inquiry. | ||
| Just go right to impeachment. | ||
| Trump's saying the same thing. | ||
| So McCarthy goes on Maria Bartiromo Saturday morning. | ||
| I'll play that clip multiple times during the day and he runs it up the flagpole and see who salutes. | ||
| And that is, well, you can't, I really can't shut down the government. | ||
| I need a CR that maybe goes to March of next year. | ||
| That's what he wants. | ||
| I need a CR that goes through the holidays of the March, because if we do it, then you're going to shut down all the impeachment inquiries. | ||
| See what he's trying to do? | ||
| He's trying to hold out the shiny toy. | ||
| Hey, forget the impeachment inquiry. | ||
| Go right to impeachment and enforce Biden to shut down his own government. | ||
| You need massive cuts that you promised to appropriations that are not going to happen. | ||
| There's not going to be a CR. | ||
| And McCarthy, we're putting you on notice. | ||
| If you need Hakeem Jeffries, you're going to have immediate motion to vacate. | ||
| And there are plenty of alternatives now. | ||
| They've always looked for—you had to have a bid away. | ||
| Right? | ||
| That's a Wall Street terms that, hey, I got to have another option here. | ||
| There's a couple of other options out there to replace you as speaker. | ||
| So no. | ||
| You know, it's so insulting, so insulting how dumb you think your constituents are to buy that. | ||
| Well, we really got to keep we can't shut down the government because all these good things we have to do. | ||
| And, you know, we're going to have the impeachment inquiry. | ||
| And if you shut down, no, no, no, no. | ||
| The plenty of research and go on impeachment. | ||
| Midnight on the 30th, there's not going to be a CR. | ||
| You're not going to continue this game. | ||
| You're not going to bury this country in exorbitant debt at these prices, and that you've lied about everything. | ||
| Everybody, by the way, Tom Massey, MTG, where's all your appropriations? | ||
| Grab your big cuts in appropriations, all going to get out. | ||
| Where is it? | ||
| Where are the cuts? | ||
| Where's the appropriation? | ||
| You've got nothing. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| So this, you're going to force Biden to shut this government down at midnight on the 30th. | ||
| And yes, people are going to vote and come back and say, we want an impeachment. | ||
| And you're not going to hold, you're not going to hold out one for the other. | ||
| By the way, motion to vacate, and there's a couple of alternatives, and I think there's a couple of alternatives that President Trump would support, which means death knell to McCarthy. | ||
| We've had it with your wimp nature. | ||
| Mike Lindell, you've got big breaking news. | ||
| Normally, we're not here to give shoutouts to the RNC, but I guess you've been able to get them off the dime and get some work done. | ||
| Tell me what this announcement is. | ||
| Yeah, it's so big. | ||
| Since last January, everyone knows when I ran for RNC and didn't win, but I got to know the 168. | ||
| A lot of them were doing great things, getting together a resolution that would encourage paper ballots, hand-counted, same-day voting, precinct level. | ||
| And, uh, signature required. | ||
| Well, they passed it Friday and it is awesome. | ||
| Um, I, uh, I can tell you a couple of things on here. | ||
| Uh, it goes through the front, the front of it. | ||
| It says, whereas the grassroots activists of the Republican Party have discovered and made it abundantly clear that they are recognized problems with electronic voting machines and procedures and intentional complications of systems that become complicated by labor and slow down our election process. | ||
| Then the next, it goes through the problems. | ||
| Experts agree that the most resilient voting systems are paper ballots either marked by hand or with an assistant device and are verified by the voter by any means of tabulation. | ||
| Then Steve, it goes down to, we've got all these, it goes to resolve that the National Committee will namely handmark a voter verified paper balance to ensure every voter is memorialized by a paper record. | ||
| Then we have Steve. | ||
| Support the rights of counties and states that are willing and able to completely and efficiently implement voting procedures that do not require the use of machines and those that implement hand-counted procedures that are fully audible. | ||
| That one's very important to me because we went around everybody to all the counties to get rid of these electronic voting machines. | ||
| And we were getting pushback. | ||
| We get pushback all the time. | ||
| I've got a perfect example in Arkansas. | ||
| And I want to bring this one up if I can. | ||
| I tell you what, Mike, hang on one second. | ||
| We're going to take a short commercial break. | ||
| Mike Wendell is going to join us on the side. | ||
| We're going to break down all the legal fights about law for today with the Mike Davis. | ||
| And as Jack Smith crushed his own case in Florida, We got Jim Hoffed, what's happening in Michigan and Georgia, all next in The War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
By the way, we don't have time to play it. | |
| Maybe I'll play it later in the show, later today, but there's a clip of Kemp at a get-together where he's being confronted by some voter integrity guys. | ||
| And I think they made the voter integrity people to change their shirts because it's too offensive to the establishment down there. | ||
| But Kemp says that any, and he was Secretary of State for eight years, he says that any machine can be hacked. | ||
| I think that's what's on the tape. | ||
| Mike, why is this a big deal? | ||
| I know you've worked with the RNC to do this, but we're, you know, 14 months away or 15 months away from an election that we must win. | ||
| Why is this, and I understand you've been working like a Trojan to get this done, but tell the audience, just summarize it succinctly. | ||
| Why is this important? | ||
| Okay, with this resolution passed, it's now with the RNC what they want, which Republicans—we've been getting more pushback by Republicans in everything we're trying to do than all the Democrats put together. | ||
| It's ridiculous. | ||
| You go into a county, you try and get something done, and a Republican goes, well, we don't want that. | ||
| We don't want that. | ||
| This resolution says what the Republican Party wants. | ||
| We want paper ballots, hand-counted, same-day voting, precinct-level, signature required. | ||
| And this is a beautiful resolution. | ||
| What it's going to do, Steve, and I'll give an example. | ||
| In Arkansas, a county there, Cleaborn County, last year, went to paper ballots, hand-counted, and a guy named Kim Hammer, the senator there, quick went in and passed a bill in Arkansas. | ||
| If you go to paper ballots, we're going to defund your county. | ||
| It didn't make any sense. | ||
| Now they're doing the same thing in Arkansas. | ||
| They have barcodes on their ballots. | ||
| This is a big thing, everybody, that's coming up on September 21st at 9.30 a.m. | ||
| in Little Rock. | ||
| All these things were done illegally in Arkansas with these ballots, and they're leading the charge to be able to go to pay-per-balance hand-counted, but this barcode made them all, I believe, illegal. | ||
| So, once again, this Kim Hammer, a Republican, is fighting this. | ||
| Now, Steve, with this resolution, we can go in there and say, any Republicans that fight that don't want to secure our elections, you look at them and go, what, are you part of the Uniparty? | ||
| Are you a RINO? | ||
| Are you a Democrat? | ||
| What are you? | ||
| And they're going to stand out like sore thumbs. | ||
| We are tired with the plan I have, the plan I have with That we announced at the summit a week ago. | ||
| This works perfect together. | ||
| We're out there trying to secure our elections in every county in the United States and we're going to be policing them. | ||
| Now we have the tools so they can't push back on us anymore. | ||
| Very important. | ||
| Okay, perfect. | ||
| Is this up on your site? | ||
| Where do people, we'll put it up on Worm, where do people go to get information about this? | ||
| And particularly, how they take it down to their precinct level and how they take it down to their county election level. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Right now we put it on LyndaleOffenseFund.org, everybody. | ||
| It's up there right now. | ||
| I put all the information up there this morning. | ||
| And you go there, LyndaleOffenseFund.com or .org. | ||
| I put everything's there. | ||
| The plan, the RNC, everything's there. | ||
| And you can go through it all. | ||
| It's amazing. | ||
| One of the best news that we've had in a long time, Steve. | ||
| Okay, so now officially we have the RNC on board for paper ballots, game day vote, all that. | ||
| Mike, real quickly, the company. | ||
| They're trying to put you out of business. | ||
| People have to understand, they're hitting people from everywhere. | ||
| We're going to have Rudy on here later, Kerry Lake. | ||
| They're coming after everybody. | ||
| They're particularly trying to shut down the employee-owned company, MyPillow. | ||
| Tell me about what are you guys doing to combat that? | ||
| Well, and this just happened over the weekend, or actually last week, where we were getting money for, I was personally, and the bank stopped it on the guy that we were, where we were getting it because they deemed it political. | ||
| And this is for my company, for my pillow. | ||
| And Steve, what we're combating it with? | ||
| We have all of our towels that are in. | ||
| They're back in stock, and we're doing a 50% off sale for these six-pack sets. | ||
| Use promo code WARROOM. | ||
| All these colors are in. | ||
| We've been without them for about a month and a half, and it's the biggest savings you're ever going to get on it. | ||
| Right now, on a six-piece towel set, you get two washcloths, two hand towels, and two of the bigger towels. | ||
| And we've got everything else here on sale, too. | ||
| If you go to mypillow.com, go to the Square War Room, everybody. | ||
| You guys have helped us out so much. | ||
| We put all these specials there. | ||
| We have over 200 products, bathrobes. | ||
| We have everything for the bathroom, everything for the bed, of course. | ||
| We've got our sheets on sale. | ||
| We've got our percale sheets on sale that we're closing out that line. | ||
| We just started those today, too. | ||
| Closing out that line. | ||
| You can get queen size for $35. | ||
| King size for, I think, $39. | ||
| And twin size, $25. | ||
| This is a full set of sheets. | ||
| We're doing all these sizes and all these colors that just came in. | ||
| But we're closing out that line to make room for the MyPillow 2.0 that's been so successful. | ||
| This is how we've been fighting back, is creating new products and new specials so we can get my employees doing what they love doing, and that's making products, making these Biopil 2.0s. | ||
| Those are on sale too, as everybody knows, 50% off. | ||
| So, we're passing the savings on to you guys out there, and it's working, and it's keeping us going. | ||
| We're an employee-owned company. | ||
| I just am the biggest shareholder. | ||
| We have families, grandchildren, children, all my employees. | ||
| They have to sit and worry every day because he's attacked. | ||
| The one last week was disgusting, that they stopped another person's bank from giving us money because the big bank held it back and said it was political. | ||
| Because why? | ||
| Because I want to have secure elections in our country. | ||
| All people want that. | ||
| When I talk to people, it doesn't matter if they're Democrat, Republican, illiberal, or conservative. | ||
| I talk to them. | ||
| Everybody wants an election, not a selection. | ||
| So we're doing everything we can, Steve, and your audience has been great. | ||
| Promo code War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thanks. | |
| You guys go to mypillow.com. | ||
| Go down to, you see the square? | ||
| Use that promo code War Room. | ||
| And I want to say one last thing, too. | ||
| I have mystore.com. | ||
| You can also use promo code War Room there, everybody. | ||
| That helps entrepreneurs that are hurting right now because of the economy, because this administration is ruining our country. | ||
| And these guys all need help, too. | ||
| Great Christmas gifts. | ||
| I know it's early, but you know what? | ||
| You're never going to get stuff at these prices right now because we don't have the box stores. | ||
| So we're passing it right on to you. | ||
| The RNC has now officially gotten on board, Mike Lindell, with this resolution now about paper ballots, game day vote, no machines. | ||
| This is big. | ||
| Mike's going to drive this. | ||
| Mike Lindell, thank you very much. | ||
| We'll let you go back to work to save the company, brother. | ||
| Yep. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Thanks. | ||
| A totally selfless individual right there. | ||
| Puts everything on the line. | ||
| I'm telling you, he's taking some real incoming, some real shots. | ||
| I've got a couple of minutes here. | ||
| We're going to leave you today. | ||
| We're going to reprise Johnny Cash Promise Land in a moment. | ||
| I want to get in Mike Davis. | ||
| Mike's going to stick with me for a few minutes. | ||
| Mike, let's start off. | ||
| We had to go to Indian television, Indian national TV, to get a succinct summary of Jack Smith. | ||
| Why is this a bombshell about the situation with Jack Smith in the White House, sir? | ||
| Well, what his communications with these White House staffers are highly inappropriate and they violate longstanding policies and procedures within the Justice Department, including Biden attorney general Merrick Garland's own memo on July 21st, 2021, where it makes it very clear that Justice Department officials, when they are communicating with the White House, have to go through the attorney general or the deputy | ||
| attorney general. | ||
| And those communications, initial communications, have to go through the White House counsel or the deputy White House counsel. | ||
| And the whole point of that is to insulate the Justice Department, particularly these criminal investigations, from undue political influence. | ||
| And that seems like that's exactly what's going on here. | ||
| Remember, it was Jay Bratt who is working with these officials in the Biden White House before the raid against President Trump, and then after the raid against President Trump, before they bring the indictment. | ||
| Jay Bratt is a senior, he's essentially a head of the counterintelligence section within the Justice Department. | ||
| He's a career Justice Department official, but he was appointed by Democrat administrations into these top career jobs, the administrative state jobs. | ||
| And it's just, there needs to be an explanation from Merrick Garland and Jay Bratt and Jack Smith for why he was coordinating. | ||
| Why was Jay Brett coordinating with the Biden White House before they went after Trump? | ||
| And it's very obvious to anyone with a brain what's going on here. | ||
| It's obvious that this Mar-a-Lago raid, which was greenlighted by President Biden through his Deputy White House Counsel Jonathan Suh, is a political hit against President Trump. | ||
| Mike, I'm going to take a break. | ||
| When I come back, I want to I want to go back. | ||
| You're the first one who really added the timeline here about the New York Times article and about telling Merrick Garland the Biden White House was not happy and they wanted to prosecute. | ||
| So I just want to go put this in the time frame because Biden has been adamant. | ||
| He's come to the mic many times, said, hey, I haven't done anything. | ||
| My White House hasn't been in touch with these guys. | ||
| We have not forced this, et cetera. | ||
| This is an explosive, explosive revelation about what's really going on. | ||
| Also, the 14th Amendment, and then Fonny Willis is in court today, Jack Smith's in court today, all of it. | ||
| President Trump, we're going on offense here in the War Room. | ||
| Johnny Cash, Promised Land. | ||
| We'll be right back. | ||
| I am bound for the promised land. | ||
| I'm bound for the promised land. | ||
| Oh, who will come and go with me? | ||
| I am bound for the promised land. | ||
| O'er all those wide extended plains shines one eternal day. | ||
| There God the sun forever rains and scatters night away. | ||
| I am bound for the promised land. | ||
| I'm bound for the promised land. | ||
| Oh, who will come and go with me? | ||
| I am bound for the promised land. | ||
| When shall I reach that happy place and be forever blessed? | ||
| When shall I see my father's face and in his bosom rest? | ||
| I am bound for the promised land. | ||
| I'm bound for the promised land. | ||
| Oh, who will come? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K Vance. | |
| Okay. | ||
| As we've committed to you, we're not going to get wrapped up in all this nonsense on the law fair, but we've got to talk to you strategically about what's happening because it is one big effort that they understand now they can't beat Trump at the ballot box, even with everything they're doing. | ||
| In fact, I think there's a poll John Fredericks pointed out to me, African-Americans, which I think Trump won eight or nine percent in 2020, I think the polls are showing like something like 15 or 20% are leaning his way now because particularly about all this lawfare stuff. | ||
| So they understand more and more. | ||
| You got Newsom running around. | ||
| He wants to have a debate with DeSantis. | ||
| New Hampshire poll, I just posted on Getter, Bobby Kennedy at 31%. | ||
| People are going to vote in the Democratic primary up in New Hampshire that Biden's kind of kind of written off. | ||
| So they're under siege and the warfare is doubling down. | ||
| So I want to go back through this meeting at the White House with the Jack Smith of Mar-a-Lago. | ||
| You got Jack Smith and them are in court today in DC to talk about the scheduling of the trial the J6 trial. | ||
| You've got you've got Fannie Willis. | ||
| I mean here they're trying to suck up because remember remember the concept of opportunity cost. | ||
| Something just doesn't cost you what you have to pay for it, the time you have to sink in. | ||
| It's the opportunity of what you don't do, what you can't do with your resources, you can't do with your focus. | ||
| They're trying to get Trump on every area to tie his team up, to tie him up, to have all the fundraising go there, to suck out all the resources and particularly the time to think and the time to act. | ||
| And so that's why we're trying to break it all down and make sure this thing is exposed for the absolute, what it is, election interference. | ||
| You have an elite in this country. | ||
| In a donor base in this country, the backseat elite, they're paymasters that want to crush and destroy Trump, put him in jail for 700 years and destroy this movement. | ||
| That is their number one priority and they will break any law. | ||
| They will use any means necessary to do that. | ||
| They have no bounds of decency and no bounds about the rule of law or any respect to the customs and traditions of our great republic. | ||
| Mike Davis, this guy Brett, he's a piece of work, right? | ||
| He's over the White House and they're plotting and scheming with the White House Counsel's Office on exactly what they're going to do. | ||
| This led to the whole thing with the National Archives, the New York Times, when they put the shot across Merrick Garland's bow. | ||
| Anonymous sources tell us that Biden is very upset that he's acting like a ponderous judge and not like an Eliot Ness, Rudy Giuliani prosecutor, all of it. | ||
| But before I go to these other topics, Brad, this guy's a piece of work, right? | ||
| He's broken the bounds of customs and tradition before and going after the Trump movement, sir? | ||
| Yeah, I mean, we know of two very clear ethical violations by this Jay Brad. | ||
| Number one, he had these highly inappropriate communications with the Biden White House before and after the Mar-a-Lago raid. | ||
| He had communications that he's not allowed to have under longstanding Justice Department rules and procedures, including a July 21, 2021, memo from Biden attorney general Merrick Garland. | ||
| So, he has a lot of explaining to do. | ||
| And I think that House Republicans, particularly Jim Jordan on the House Judiciary Committee, should haul him in and ask him about these inappropriate political communications with the Biden White House. | ||
| Number two, Jay Bratt stands very credibly accused of serious misconduct. | ||
| Walt Nata is one of President Trump's co-defendants in the documents case. | ||
| And Stanley Woodward was applying for a D.C. federal judgeship in the D.C. federal courts. | ||
| And this Jay Bratt raised this application with Stanley Woodward when they were talking about the criminal charges against Trump and Walt Nata. | ||
| And Jay Bratt essentially threatened Stanley Woodward and said that his application for his judgeship is on the line, essentially, if Walt Nata does not turn against President Trump. | ||
| I don't know how that's not obstruction of justice, And again, House Republicans should haul in Jay Brad on this. | ||
| And we need to have people filing motions. | ||
| There's a motion pending in D.C., but it's an Obama judge who wasn't going to do a damn thing about this. | ||
| I think they need to renew this motion with Judge Cannon. | ||
| They also should file a complaint with the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility, and maybe make a criminal referral here, too, because Again, how is this not obstruction of justice? | ||
| You are threatening the attorney of a co-defendant. | ||
| If you don't turn your client against President Trump, we're going to go after your application for a federal judgeship. | ||
| You can't get more inappropriate than that. | ||
| Now, Fannie Willis has got to go into federal court today, and she's basically got to make the case of this kind of bizarro RICO charge. | ||
| Because she doesn't have a crime, so she's got to pitch a conspiracy. | ||
| But she's essentially got to lay out her case to the judge, correct? | ||
| Because they're going to make a decision on Meadows and other people, whether they shift it to federal court and then talk about the immunity clause? | ||
| Yeah, I mean, under federal law, you can't charge federal officials with state crimes in state court based upon their official federal their federal duties. | ||
| And that's the whole point of the removal statute, that when the White House chief of staff is setting up phone calls for the president, and you're trying to say that that's somehow a part of a RICO conspiracy, that can get that case removed to federal court. | ||
| And then what I presume President Trump will do here is file a motion to dismiss both the January 6th indictments, both with Fannie Willis down in Fulton County, Georgia, along with Jack Smith in D.C. | ||
| under two legal theories. | ||
| Number one, the motion to dismiss because President Trump had presidential immunity. | ||
| If he's ordering his vice president, for example, to not certify the election, he's clearly doing that as the president of the United States because a A private citizen cannot do that. | ||
| A private citizen doesn't have the power to order the vice president to do anything. | ||
| So he's clearly acting within his presidential powers or at a minimum at the outer perimeter of his presidential powers, which is the Supreme Court case law. | ||
| And so you can file a motion to dismiss that this is covered by presidential immunity. | ||
| Alternatively, if this is in his personal capacity, this is speech and conduct protected by the First Amendment. | ||
| It is not a crime to object to presidential elections. | ||
| It's allowed by the Electoral Count Act of 1887. | ||
| of 1887, it is not a crime to twist political arms. | ||
| That is allowed by the First Amendment. | ||
| It's not a crime to redress government. | ||
| That's allowed by the First Amendment. | ||
| I mean, if it were a crime to do these things, Democrats would be in prison for objecting to Republican presidential wins in 1968, 2000, 2004, and 2016. | ||
| If it's a crime to be boorish, just about every politician in America would be in prison. | ||
| So these are silly legal theories, and the racketeering is particularly dumb by a particularly dumb Democrat prosecutor named Fannie Willis. | ||
| And the advantage of doing this presidential immunity motion to dismiss is that it is immediately appealable all the way up through the legal system, including to the Supreme Court of the United States. | ||
| They have discretion on the cases that they take, but I don't know how the Supreme Court would not take a case of this magnitude. | ||
| Yeah, I don't think that they, I don't think that, uh, you'll see that, um, a Fannie Willis will never be, uh, uh, they will never think she's Louis Brandeis. | ||
| Uh, they're also talking about the scheduling today in D.C. | ||
| about the trial. | ||
| Even if this thing was to go forward, there's no way this trial could come together on the J6 part of it until 25 or after the election? | ||
| Well, it sounds like Judge Tanya Shutkin, who is an Obama Judge, her husband's also an Obama judge. | ||
| I can't think of another time in history where a married couple was appointed to the federal bench by the same president of the United States. | ||
| That just shows you how tight they are with the Obamas. | ||
| I mean, maybe it's because Tanya Shudkin comes from a long line of Marxists. | ||
| Her maternal grandfather was a Jamaican revolutionary. | ||
| So, you know, Obama picked the right judge for this case. | ||
| You know, we've said this before. | ||
| There's no chance that President Trump is going to get a fair trial in Washington, D.C. | ||
| You have this Obama judge who's radical. | ||
| She has been the harshest sentencer of these January 6th defendants. | ||
| She puts them in prison even when the Biden Justice Department doesn't ask for prison time. | ||
| And they're throwing the book at everyone. | ||
| So, if the Biden Justice Department doesn't think a January 6 defendant deserves prison time, and Judge Tanya Shutkin puts them in jail anyway, that just shows you what a radical is, while she defends these BLM protesters, who are a hell of a lot more violent and destructive than January 6 defendants were. | ||
| It's just unreal. | ||
| But they're going to have this trial during the presidential election, right? | ||
| Unless they can get this January 6 trial stayed pending appeal, which they might be able to do with this presidential immunity. | ||
| That's the goal, is to interfere in the presidential election. | ||
| They impeached President Trump twice. | ||
| That didn't take him out politically. | ||
| They've indicted him four times, and now they've turned him into Tupac. | ||
| And now they're terrified he's going to win. | ||
| Tupac Trump. | ||
| By the way, announcement, breaking news, on September 6th, President Trump and his co-defense are going to be arraigned. | ||
| It's a split process in Georgia. | ||
| They're going to be arraigned on the 6th. | ||
| We'll get more details about that. | ||
| I think President Trump may even be doing that electronically, but we'll get more details on that. | ||
| Last thing. | ||
| So understanding you've got these bizarre cases that really don't hold up. | ||
| Jamie Raskin, I knew this was going to happen. | ||
| As soon as the Federalist guys wrote it, we had Dershowitz up here saying it's all nonsense. | ||
| The 14th Amendment doesn't pertain to Trump at all. | ||
| But the drumbeat now is that, and you see in California, they're talking about the legislature coming together, removing from the ballot. | ||
| Their last gasp here is going to be this 14th Amendment. | ||
| But you've got a theory, and I know Julie Kelly does too, that Jack Smith could come back and it was a conspiracy for insurrection or something that he could throw that in and try to get some traction on this 14th Amendment or at least cloud people's minds up with that. | ||
| Can you give us just your thoughts on Julie Kelly's? | ||
| I think she's been doing such a great job about this. | ||
| Yeah, Julie Kelly's been fantastic, and she's been warning us for many, many, many, many months that they're going to do a seditious conspiracy superseding indictment against Trump to try to disqualify him under the disqualification clause of the 14th Amendment, Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. | ||
| These are the Civil War Amendments, the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, and they were passed to ensure due process and equality For free slaves and it's in all Americans really but the reason we have the disqualification clause section 3 of the 14th amendment is because after the Lincoln assassination after the Civil War these Confederate sympathizers were kept getting elected to Congress and other offices. | ||
| And so they had this disqualification clause that if you took up arms against the United States, if you tried to overthrow the United States through the Civil War, you are disqualified from holding office. | ||
| And this has been dormant largely for — since the Civil War, since this era. | ||
| And now the Democrats are trying to use this bogus legal theory to say that, OK, we tried to impeach Trump twice. | ||
| We've indicted him four times. | ||
| We've actually made him popular. | ||
| And, oh, crap, there's actually a really good chance now that the American people may decide to put President Trump back in the White House, again, President Tupac. | ||
| And so now what they're going to do is this Hail Mary, where they're going to try to have these, you know, these Democrat and even some Republicans, there's apparently the Republican Secretary of State up in New Hampshire, is trying to say that they're just going to take President Trump off the ballot in these states. | ||
| Like somehow that's not, That's not going to anger the American people and lead to disastrous consequences. | ||
| They want party insiders, uniparty insiders, to decide the next election, not the American people. | ||
| And that is simply not going to fly. | ||
| And I imagine you're going to see that President Trump, with a beefed-up legal team, I think we're going to start seeing President Trump on offense starting this week on all of these issues, whether it's presidential immunity, whether it's this disqualification clause under the 14th Amendment. | ||
| We're going on offense, and I think we're going to take off the gloves legally and politically and start punching back legally and politically. | ||
| Mike Davis, how do people, I want people to get to your social media and to your site because things are heating up and Mike Davis is always a good early search radar, as I say. | ||
| So where do people go, sir? | ||
| Yeah, we've been on this for the last year, Steve, and everything we've discussed has come to fruition. | ||
| So you can donate at article3project.org, article number 3project.org. | ||
| We are gearing up now for this fight. | ||
| We're not going away. | ||
| At Article 3 Project, at Article Number 3 Project, and my personal is at M-R-D-D-M-I-A. | ||
| M-R-D-D-M-I-A. | ||
| Thank you, Stephen. | ||
| Thank you, brother. | ||
| Thanks for doing this, rearranging our schedule. | ||
| Okay, short commercial break. | ||
| We'll be back in the warm in just a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We will fight till they're all gone. | |
| We rejoice when there's no more. | ||
| Let's take down the city. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Vance. | ||
| There's so much going on. | ||
| The impeachment trial in Texas. | ||
| The riot in Manhattan over the illegal aliens. | ||
| We're going to do that all this afternoon. | ||
| Darren Beatty is going to join us. | ||
| A lot of stuff going on in capital markets. | ||
| A lot of stuff going on with China. | ||
| We're going to do all that this afternoon. | ||
| Andrew Clyde, Congressman Clyde is going to join us next hour. | ||
| Rudy Giuliani. | ||
| On the Shoken thing. | ||
| So there's a lot going on. | ||
| President Trump, Mike Davis gave you a heads up. | ||
| There's a pivot to go on offense and that is going to happen in the next, I don't know, 48 hours, 72 hours. | ||
| So stand by and strap in. | ||
| We have to make sure that you don't have an extra burden on you. | ||
| HomeTitleLock.com. | ||
| Go there right now. | ||
| Immerse yourself in information. | ||
| Don't let one of these cybercriminals. | ||
| Bloomberg, hey, the cybercrime is up like 30%. | ||
| Don't let a cybercriminal get in and get your title to your home. | ||
| Go to a hard money lender. | ||
| Take out a big loan, $200,000. | ||
| Second, high interest rates, record high interest rates. | ||
| Or record high interest rates for the last, I don't know, 20, 30 years. | ||
| And then all of a sudden you're financially crippled. | ||
| And you've got to spend time with lawyers and all that. | ||
| Go to HomeTitleLock.com right now and check that out. | ||
| Also, Birchgold. | ||
| Everybody go to Birchgold right now. | ||
| We need you fluent in everything to deal with the end of the Dollar Empire. | ||
| This whole process of the budget and everything is going to come down to our currency, the Federal Reserve. | ||
| We're going to take a hard stand. | ||
| I've been dealing with people in the House for the last 10 days. | ||
| They're not going to buckle. | ||
| They are absolutely furious with what McCarthy's trying to pull off. | ||
| Just go to birchgold.com right now. | ||
| Download, we've got a pricey on Durban, on the de-dollarization, plus we have the whole end of the dollar empire in the U.S. | ||
| dollar, and we've got another major installment, all free, coming out in September. | ||
| I'm working on it right now. | ||
| Robert Bowes, tell me, Harrison Floyd. | ||
| Have we freed Harrison Floyd yet? | ||
| Why is he still in jail, sir, and what are the prospects here? | ||
|
unidentified
|
He's still in lockup, Steve. | |
| And this is the jail where the older Robert Kennedy protested out in front of to have Martin Luther King released for the unjust conviction years ago. | ||
| So, Harrison Floyd is still in jail. | ||
| Today, he has two counsels through the generosity, tremendous generosity of the Give, Send, Go campaign. | ||
| He's raised $275,000 and that's great. | ||
| His wife, I spoke with his wife this weekend, she's overwhelmed. | ||
| We got word through to Harrison and his counsel, two new lawyers are down there today to enter an appearance for him and then they will hopefully get to a bond hearing to get him out of the most dangerous jail in the country with 2,000 inmates and several deaths. | ||
| We don't have time, but he should be in the next 24-48 hours, hopefully with a bond hearing, and be able to get him out of that hellhole? | ||
|
unidentified
|
They think they're going to set the bond hearing. | |
| By the way, great interview with Mike Davis, my Trump administration colleague. | ||
| You know with Jamie Raskin, what they're trying to do with the 14th Amendment. | ||
| President Trump was acquitted by the Senate. | ||
| He's already acquitted for insurrection. | ||
| It's a bogus thing. | ||
| Yeah, Harrison is... No, this is just another thing. | ||
| This is all media. | ||
| You see in New Hampshire, they're going to try to get some of these state assemblies in these blue states to meet, like in California, and try to pass something to get them off the ballot. | ||
| Trust me, audience, hunker down because there's going to be a fight. | ||
| It's totally bogus like everything. | ||
| I want to say something about Harrison Floyd. | ||
| We're going to get into this and help the team up there present new information that's out there, other information you haven't heard, that will blow your head up. | ||
| And you will see that Harrison Floyd, a decent man, trying to do his patriotic duty to defend the Constitution, has been terrorized. | ||
| Essentially been terrorized by the law enforcement and justice system of DOJ, the FBI, Fannie Willis, all of it across the board. | ||
| But we'll wait for the day to do that. | ||
| Right now, Robert, where do people go to find you, get information, and continue to back Harrison? | ||
| And let Harrison's wife know that we have his back 1,000%. | ||
| Where do people go? | ||
|
unidentified
|
We'll do. | |
| And by the way, Harrison honorably served this country as a U.S. | ||
| Marine. | ||
| He's got shrapnel in his back and shoulder. | ||
| He has committed no crimes. | ||
| And by the way, he's also being—it's the state of Georgia against all these—it's going against President Trump and Harrison Floyd. | ||
| It's not—it's Chris Carr and Brian Kemp have A role to play here. | ||
| It's the state of Georgia bringing these bogus charges. | ||
| So, um, yeah, thank you. | ||
| Harrison, Harrison has a give, send, go. | ||
| And, um, it has been well topped off. | ||
| Very good, very generous. | ||
| We'd actually like, uh, we've got an electorsfund.org to help, you know, David Schaffer, Jeff Clark, um, that they need the help now. | ||
| Harrison's good. | ||
| He's got enough to make bond and pay lawyers. | ||
| We're so grateful for that. | ||
| And I'll pass that on to his wife as well. | ||
| Okay, perfect. | ||
| A big fight down there. | ||
| Thank you very much, Brother Bozo. | ||
| I'll be back on here. | ||
| She's got to go to court today and kind of lay out this Rico thing. | ||
| You'll see how bogus this is. | ||
| But they're going after patriots and heroes like Harrison Floyd, Schaefer, Jeff Clark. | ||
| It's outrageous. | ||
| We're not going to top it. | ||
| We're punching back every second of every day. | ||
| This is the great Hank Williams, his version of Promiseland. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hank Williams singing, Promiseland. | |
| There God the sun forever reigns and scatters light away. | ||
| might away. | ||
| I I am bound for the promised land. | ||
| I am bound for the promised land. | ||
| Oh, who will come And blow with me, I am bound for the promised land. | ||
| No chillin' winds nor poisonous breath can reach that helpful shore. | ||
| Sickness and sorrow, pain and death are felt and feared no more. | ||
| I am bound for the promised land. | ||
| I am bound for the promised land. | ||
| Oh, who will come and go with me? | ||
| I am bound for the promised land. | ||
| When shall I reach that happy place and be forever blessed? | ||
| When shall I see my father's face and in his bosom rest? | ||
| I am bound for the promised land! | ||
| I am bound for the promised land! | ||
| Oh, who will come and go with me? |
Export Selection