Aug. 22, 2023 - Bannon's War Room
48:14
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
| Pray for our enemies. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because we're going medieval on these people. | |
| I got a free shot on all these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you've tried to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
|
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room, here's your host Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| Tuesday, 22 August, Sheriff Alert 2023. | ||
| The Global South is meeting in Durban right now, working out a plan to break off from the decadent G7 and the irresponsible global elites that have driven us into the ground. | ||
| America's enemies gather, and they're on the surge. | ||
| And we saw the cold open hand in the first hour of this feckless, illegitimate, Joe Biden wandering around Maui, that's now turned Maui into Ultra Magalan on this horrible, horrific tragedy out there that we still don't have any information. | ||
| Darren Beatty, we got a lot of Fedsurrection stuff you're coming with. | ||
| We don't have time for today, but we are going to get you back ASAP. | ||
| Where do people go to Revolver? | ||
| It's one of the best. | ||
| I'm so proud of what you've done with Revolver, what Rahim's done with National Pulse. | ||
| You guys are really building institutions on the right for people that want true information. | ||
| Where do people go? | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Revolver.news. | ||
| We've got a brand new FEDSurrection story. | ||
| White hot undercover cop caught cutting the fences surrounding the Capitol? | ||
| This is pretty explosive and it tracks an individual that we first covered known as Fence Cutter Bulwark and his exchange with a known undercover. | ||
| So it's very important, very explosive. | ||
| Revolver.news. | ||
| We have the latest coverage on the election, on the debates, on Maui, everything you want to know, including the Elon issues we've been talking about, both good and bad. | ||
| So go to revolver.news. | ||
| I'm on Twitter, not X. We're not going to dabble in the occult here. | ||
| Notwithstanding the fact that Jimmy Page allegedly got his Guitar prowess from Alistair Crowley, but even despite that, we won't dabble in the occult, despite my admiration for Jimmy Page. | ||
| You can find me on Twitter, at Darren J. Beatty, and we're on Gitter, always white hot, at Revolver News. | ||
| Hey, I'm just reporting facts. | ||
| We'll go into the details later. | ||
| I'm just reporting facts. | ||
| BD, thank you very much. | ||
| By the way, I've got Chadwick Moore and I've got the publisher of the Tucker book. | ||
| This is atrocious what Amazon did. | ||
| I'm going to get to that in a second, but I've got Congressman Admiral Ronny Jackson. | ||
| Congressman, I appreciate you carving time away, because when you're not saving lives, you're becoming a player on Capitol Hill. | ||
| And I know you're very close to President Trump. | ||
| You were his personal physician. | ||
| But the Hill newspaper had a lead story yesterday about major players to watch in the coming fight to essentially save the nation over this budget. | ||
| And some of the typical names were there, people that come on the show a lot, and bang, you were front and center. | ||
| Why did the Hill single you out for this, for the coming fight they're going to have over literally the direction of the West? | ||
| Because the people in the global South and down in Durban right now, they're trying to come up with an alternative currency, the U.S. | ||
| dollar, are focused very much on the irresponsibility of our elites that run this country from Wall Street to Silicon Valley, the oligarchs there, and the uniparty that controls the imperial capital of Washington, D.C. | ||
| So why were you highlighted, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, I'll tell you, Steve, just because, you know, this is not just me. | |
| There are a lot of members of Congress that feel the same way I do. | ||
| You know, you've had people, Chip Roy's been talking about how he's not going to vote for a continuing resolution unless there's border stuff in there. | ||
| I agree with that. | ||
| I signed that letter as well. | ||
| You know, the Freedom Caucus is looking at overall spending and spending caps from, you know, stuff that was part of the debt ceiling negotiations that they're trying to go back on now. | ||
| They're talking about they won't sign a CR. | ||
| I was the one that came out and specifically said that I will not basically vote for a continuing resolution unless it has some kind of impact on the DOJ and the FBI in the way that they've gone rogue over the last couple of years in coming after—or even more than that. | ||
| It's been three or four years where they've been coming after American citizens for political reasons. | ||
| And I just think the DOJ is too big now. | ||
| They've obviously got too many people. | ||
| They've got too much time on their hands. | ||
| I just jotted a few things down here. | ||
| If they've got time to collude with social media to influence elections, they've got too much time and too much money on their hands. | ||
| If they've got time to come after Catholics and parents as domestic terrorists, if they've got time to endlessly pursue these J6 misdemeanors and prosecute them like they're felonies, Denying bail and putting people in solitary confinement. | ||
| They've got too much time. | ||
| If they've got time to spend on every waking hour trying to keep Trump from running again, which is what they're doing. | ||
| Time to cover up the abundant crimes of the Biden family, including bribes from our adversaries and our enemies. | ||
| And time to sue Texas for doing the government's job of securing our border. | ||
| This is an organization who has lost their way. | ||
| They are not doing what they're supposed to be paid to do. | ||
| They've become a political tool. | ||
| They've become the secret police of the Biden administration, and they're coming after average Americans for political reasons. | ||
| This has to stop. | ||
| And, you know, the only way that we have to stop it right now is to use the purse strings that we have in the House of Representatives and to choke off some of the money that's going to DOJ and send a definitive message to them that we will not put up with this anymore. | ||
| They will go back to doing the job that they're paid to do in protecting all Americans. | ||
| or else they will not be funded anymore. | ||
| And they certainly don't need a new FBI headquarters. | ||
| I mean, it's ridiculous right now that we're gonna spend billions of dollars giving the FBI a new headquarters right now. | ||
| They don't need money for DEI. | ||
| They don't need money for their climate initiatives. | ||
| They don't need money for their Second Amendment programs that they have out there to take our Second Amendment right from it. | ||
| There are so many things that this DOJ is doing right now that needs to be stopped. | ||
| And I just wanna be part of the process of stopping this. | ||
| And I think we have an opportunity right now to stop part of it and to send a message to them. | ||
| And that's why I took the stance I did. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Amrit, let me ask you about your constituents and the folks in Texas, because folks, you know, right now they're saying, oh, you know, Texas is a law and order state, yet you've got radicals like yourself that are ultra-MAGA, that are now, they're saying the FBI and the DOJ is a defund the police movement. | ||
| What's your answer to that? | ||
| Do you still believe in law and order in the great state of Texas? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I 100% believe in law and order. | |
| You will not find a more staunch proponent of law and order than me and most of the other folks here in the great state of Texas. | ||
| We believe in law and order. | ||
| The problem with the FBI and the DOJ is it's not about law and order anymore. | ||
| It's about becoming It's about becoming a political weapon for one side versus the other. | ||
| It's about prosecuting and persecuting your political adversaries. | ||
| That is not law and order. | ||
| That is the Soviet Union. | ||
| We have to stop this. | ||
| I know that there are a lot of good, hard-working people that work in the DOJ and the FBI that are well-meaning, that are trying to do their job, that want to protect the American people. | ||
| That want to basically be a part of that establishing law and order, but there are a lot of people at the top and a lot of people in middle management right now. | ||
| The deep state, the deep state is real. | ||
| I know it. | ||
| You know it. | ||
| We've both lived. | ||
| We've both lived through it. | ||
| These people are not pure in their intentions anymore, and they are not a law enforcement agency anymore. | ||
| They are political arm of the Biden administration, and that's what needs to stop. | ||
| With regards to bread and butter law enforcement all over this country, the more we have, the better. | ||
| Admiral, when you get back in September, the clock stops at midnight on the 30th of September. | ||
| Do you believe that the leadership, McCarthy, will listen to the constituents of these states with congressmen like yourself and say, we can't do this anymore. | ||
| It's got to stop and force Biden's hand to shut down. | ||
| You're not shutting down the government. | ||
| You force Biden's hand to shut down his government. | ||
| Do you think the leadership has the stones to have your back? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, I hope so. | |
| They've got a five-seat majority right now. | ||
| They're going to need us, and there are more than five of us that are upset about some of the stuff that's going on right now that are making, for lack of a better word, demands on the process, because this is not the way it's supposed to work. | ||
| Steve, we're supposed to pass these appropriations bills. | ||
| We're supposed to do things the right way. | ||
| Why do we get ourselves in this situation every time where we have a continuing resolution, kick the can down the road to the end of the year, and then pass an omnibus that funds the government at some ridiculous level. | ||
| That's what happened last time. | ||
| That's not going to happen this time. | ||
| McCarthy's going to have to listen to the people on the right, or else he's going to have to rely on the Democrats to pass this. | ||
| They could do that. | ||
| They did that with the debt ceiling. | ||
| More Democrats voted for the debt ceiling than Republicans. | ||
| They could go down that path again, but I'm telling you, if that happens, it's going to be detrimental to leadership in the House. | ||
| If they blow off the concerns of people like myself and Freedom Caucus and some of the other people on the right that are making reasonable demands in this process. | ||
| It's going to be a problem. | ||
| When you say a problem, Are you guys prepared, if he goes to Hakeem Jeffries again and really gives Hakeem Jeffries, makes him essentially the majority leader, are you prepared to then move on a motion of AK to remove McCarthy as Speaker? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Steve, I'm going to be honest with you. | |
| I think that that's inevitable if we continue to rely on the Democrats to pass this important legislation that's coming out of the House. | ||
| The American people gave us the House back, albeit a small margin here. | ||
| They gave us the House back because they want to stop the nonsense that's happening in this country. | ||
| They want to turn the tide. | ||
| They want to take this country back. | ||
| And giving us the House back was the first step. | ||
| We have an obligation to the people who put us here to do what needs to be done. | ||
| So I think if we continue to rely on the Democrats to pass important legislation out of the House, it's going to be a real problem for leadership. | ||
| And I think that the way the rules are set up now, that's inevitable. | ||
| That's going to happen. | ||
| Congressman, how do people follow you? | ||
| How do they go to your website? | ||
| How do they go to social media and follow you in this monumental fight that's going to occur here in the next week or two? | ||
|
unidentified
|
They can just go to RonnieJacksonTX.com and they can find all of my social media there. | |
| They can follow me online. | ||
| Admiral, thank you for joining us today and send our best regards to all the folks back in your district in the great state of Texas. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you, Steve. | |
| I appreciate you and what you're doing as well. | ||
| Thank you for having me. | ||
| Thank you, brother. | ||
| There's very few people closer to President Trump than Admiral Jackson. | ||
| I want to bring in now, we're going to get back to Texas in a second about Ken Paxson, but I want to bring in Chadwick Moore first. | ||
| Chadwick, you see the complete firestorm now. | ||
| On this whole political process, from what's happening in Durban, South Africa to Biden's disaster in Maui. | ||
| But one of the centerpieces we've got is the next 48 hours, the Murdoch's trap they laid in Milwaukee for President Trump. | ||
| He's not having any of it. | ||
| And he chose, which I've been the strongest advocate of for many, many months. | ||
| to have a sit-down interview with Tucker Carlson. | ||
| Why is Tucker now such a key part of this fight against what the Murdoch's trying to do to this nation? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, she was, as I quoted in the book, some liberal pundit had once called him the high priest of Trumpism, which I think they meant as an insult, but I don't think that's an insult at all. | |
| You know, it's very clear now that the reason why Fox took him off the show was ideological. | ||
| I don't think you can argue against that at this point. | ||
| And they wanted that voice out of the mainstream media, which is to say they want it out of the official approved national discourse. | ||
| So, what you're going to see on Fox tomorrow night, I'm sure, is, if you watch it, I don't really know if anyone is, but is going to see what that network, what their globalist interests have in store for the Republican Party, what they want the Republican Party platform to be, and what they want to see their candidates talking about, which, of course, Donald Trump is very much an outlier, and so is Tucker Carlson in most of those approved talking points. | ||
| You had Vivek Ramaswamy on his recent interview with Tucker saying that he has trouble getting donors for one major reason, and that's his stance on Ukraine, and these would be Republican, big Republican Party donors. | ||
| So, I think you're going to see a lot of the same. | ||
| You're going to see Fox News' worldview. | ||
| You're going to see a lot of candidates who don't want to get on the wrong side of those two moderators and are going to be kind of towing this line that those corporate interests that control Fox News would like to see for the Republican Party and, ultimately, for the next president. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Hal, we've got about a minute here and I'm going to hold you guys through the break. | ||
| Tell me about the interview with Tucker. | ||
| It's a pre-recorded, it's not live, it's pre-recorded, correct? | ||
| I think he's in Europe this week? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Correct. | |
| From what I understand, it's a pre-recorded interview with Tucker. | ||
| Tucker sat down with Trump a few times now. | ||
| And, you know, Trump was very smart for not walking into this trap. | ||
| It's obviously set up to have an entire stage of people do nothing but try to throw shots at him. | ||
| And it was so ridiculous and so insulting. | ||
| If you heard the reports of a couple of weeks ago that the Fox, you know, Suzanne Scott and these other Fox executives going out to Bedminster to beg him to come on their network. | ||
| This network does not like Trump, obviously. | ||
| They never did in 2016. | ||
| They still don't. | ||
| But they, number one, were begging for his ratings, and number two, just for a chance for people to take pot shots at him to try to bring him down. | ||
| Thankfully, Trump has, you know, decided not to walk into that trap, which is very smart of him. | ||
| Okay, hang on, Chadwick. | ||
| We're going to take a short break. | ||
| We're going to return with a book that should have been number one on the New York Times bestseller list, was magically not number one in the New York Times bestseller list. | ||
| How did that happen? | ||
| Why did it happen? | ||
| And who did it? | ||
|
unidentified
|
next in the war room. | |
| Your host, Stephen K. Bamm. | ||
| Okay, in the next, what is it, 72 hours, next three or four days, from Durban, South Africa, to Jackson Hole, where the central bankers are meeting, to Milwaukee, Wisconsin, where the, this trap of the Murdochs is set, to Bedminster, where the interview with President Trump is taking place, or you'll be able to see. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| The way to think about it, it's all of a piece. | ||
| I forgot to mention, Atlanta for the part of the Moscow show trials with President Trump's arraignment on Thursday. | ||
| We'll be covering all of these wall-to-wall, but they're all inextricably linked. | ||
| Remember the way to think about it. | ||
| It's all of a piece. | ||
| It's all of a piece. | ||
| See, what I don't understand, Chadwick, knowing the commitment you made to the book and when we had the book launch party for you down at Turning Point and I've had a number of people, not just simply the Warren posse that have read it, ordered the book and love it. | ||
| I've had other people, too, that many of whom are not MAGA, and they say, hey, this is a terrific book. | ||
| Let me bring in Ed Priato. | ||
| Now, Ed, here's what I don't get. | ||
| How do people buy this book and go order this book and actually have this book in huge numbers? | ||
| And we get the New York Times list comes out and it's not mentioned anywhere because Amazon is reporting different numbers than actually have it. | ||
| So walk me through. | ||
| We had Beatty up here about the censorship issue still prevalent at Twitter, formerly known as X. | ||
| What is going on here? | ||
| It seems to me pretty straightforward. | ||
| You sell the books. | ||
| The book gets registered when the person buys it. | ||
| That's a count. | ||
| That's a fact. | ||
| It's not an opinion. | ||
| It's a fact. | ||
| Then why can't that manifest itself on these lists that then propel the book forward, etc.? | ||
| They say the book's a big hit. | ||
| In fact, they came out and did the exact opposite. | ||
| You had coordinated hits. | ||
| Oh, the book sold 1,000 copies. | ||
| The book sold 2,000 copies. | ||
| We sold more than that when Chadwick more first came on the show back I don't know in May the first time we had Chadwick on To announce the book it went up. | ||
| We sold more we sold more books that day just from the war room hit Then the the oh, they only sold 2,000 books or 3,000 books. | ||
| I said man, they sold that in an afternoon with a with a And this was before Chadwick went up the learning curve of how to do these interviews. | ||
| Just kidding, Chadwick. | ||
| You're getting better all the time. | ||
| I think it was the picture of Tucker. | ||
| So, Ed, help me out here, brother. | ||
| What the hell's going on? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| Well, we weren't surprised by the New York Times thing because that's happened to us before. | ||
| The first book we did was Peter Navarro's book, A Frequent Guest on Your Show. | ||
| And Peter killed it in his first couple of weeks of sales. | ||
| Never saw the New York Times list. | ||
| That didn't surprise us. | ||
| The Wall Street Journal had us at number four, Publishers Weekly at number three. | ||
| Sales have been very strong. | ||
| People have been buying the book directly through our website, TuckerTheBook.com, and we've had great direct sales. | ||
| And although direct sales aren't registered by Bookscan, That gave us a very good handle on what we could expect, you know, through the retailers. | ||
| In this case, Amazon did some things that we've never seen before. | ||
| We know they had 7,000 odd books on hand because we delivered them. | ||
| They had them on hand on day one. | ||
| And the book was listed as sold out within minutes of its release. | ||
| And yet those sales weren't reported to BookScan. | ||
| BookScan reported total sales through all retailers at 3,200 books, I believe it was, which is nothing. | ||
| So either Amazon sold out their stock, in which case, why weren't those books registered, those sales registered? | ||
| Or they didn't sell out their stock, in which case, why were they telling people the book was not available for sale? | ||
| Amazon did something else that we've never seen before. | ||
| People sent us screenshots. | ||
| Luckily, we have a lot of friends out there. | ||
| Tucker's followers are keeping him appraised of everything that's going on. | ||
| And we saw screenshots. | ||
| Amazon was sending an email to people who ordered the book, saying, the book is out of stock. | ||
| We don't know when, essentially, we don't know when we're going to have it. | ||
| Do you still want it? | ||
| Do you really want this book? | ||
| If you do, you have to proactively go on your terminal and tell us that you still want it. | ||
| If you don't, your order is going to be canceled. | ||
| I have never seen that before. | ||
| Wow. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So some of this stuff, you know, the times, you know, we expected. | |
| Some of this other stuff, we didn't. | ||
| But the type of thing they're doing, it was also a coordinated, these articles that came out simultaneously, you know, had Amazon and people in back of it. | ||
| I saw a headline, it says, oh, book only sold 3,000. | ||
| I said, the book sold 3,000 copies back in May, the first time Chadwick came on. | ||
| I mean, this is so it's a coordinated attack. | ||
| It's a coordinated attack to suppress MAGA, the Trump movement, the voice of Tucker. | ||
| They're obsessed. | ||
| Would you not agree, sir, with suppressing Tucker Carlson? | ||
| Anything to deal with Tucker Carlson or his voice or his platform, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely. | |
| I mean, you know, obviously, it started with Fox. | ||
| And we've seen it. | ||
| There's been headwinds all along with this book, you know, from silly things to, to big, bigger things like this. | ||
| That one first piece that came out, the headpiece, they tried to say that because the sales were low, that proves that Tucker is irrelevant. | ||
| You know, he never, Fox needed him, you know, that sort of, Fox didn't need him, he needed Fox. | ||
| And that obviously isn't the truth. | ||
| Now, the second week we have sales of over 11,000. | ||
| Which by any metric should have put us just behind number one on the Times bestseller list. | ||
| Of course, we're not there. | ||
| But it proves that he is relevant. | ||
| Of course, we knew that. | ||
| And they're just trying to, and it's like they're reading from the same script. | ||
| So many outlets that picked up on that first sale, picked up on that Tucker is a relevant theme. | ||
| It's like they're all having coffee together and deciding what they're going to say. | ||
| They are. | ||
| Only because they are. | ||
| Ed, hang on for a second. | ||
| Chadwick, where do people get the book? | ||
| Look, Tucker Carlson is at the center of this revolt in the United States to put power back in the hands of the people. | ||
| It's quite simple. | ||
| It's a populist nationalist movement. | ||
| Tucker is central to it. | ||
| And the Murdochs want him memory hold. | ||
| And that is not going to happen. | ||
| And you're going to see tomorrow night when he interviews the President of the United States, Donald J. Trump. | ||
| How do people, Chadwick, How did they get the book? | ||
| And where can they go to find out where you're going to be doing book signings and all this? | ||
| Because this book is only the very beginning of being huge. | ||
| And it really is a must read. | ||
| It's very accessible. | ||
| You learn a ton. | ||
| And you actually see the important thing. | ||
| You see the arc of a man and the arc of a man's ideas. | ||
| Because Tucker was not with us when he first showed up to Washington, D.C., I don't know, 20 or 30 years ago. | ||
| And it shows you really the arc of a man and really the arc of a movement. | ||
| Because Tucker was in the heart of it then. | ||
| Where do people go, Chadwick, to find out more about the book, more about you, and where can they buy it? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure, you can go to, if you want to get direct from the publisher, you can go to TuckerTheBook.com. | |
| Again, those numbers aren't recorded by BookScan, but we wanted to offer that anyway for people who don't want to give their business to these big corporations. | ||
| Or you can go to Walmart, Books A Million, Barnes & Noble, they all carry the book. | ||
| I wanted to add something, we were talking about those hit pieces, which was quite funny, I think you might enjoy, Steve. | ||
| is, uh, you know, there's these outlets that like the Guardian and the Daily Beast, and they're basically just receptacles for media relations departments to just spoon-feed stories to people, right? | ||
| We were reading the Guardian hit piece on this book, and the obvious point of this, as Ed pointed out and you pointed out, was to- it's not about me, it's not about my book, it's about trying to diminish Tucker Carlson to get those 10 headlines they got one day to look like he's not important and he's not relevant. | ||
| You read these Guardian stories about this book, They read exactly like a Fox News media relations person gave them what to say. | ||
| One of the articles even made the point to reference no other book except for Greg Gutfeld's book, which it claimed was doing really well. | ||
| No other book was referenced except for Gutfeld's book. | ||
| So that's all you need to know about how these media operations work. | ||
| And if someone wanted to diminish Carlson's profile, there's only one family in the world that have an interest in doing that. | ||
| And we know which family that is. | ||
| That would be the Murdochs. | ||
| Did I mention they were not U.S. | ||
| citizens? | ||
| No. | ||
| By the way, what Chadwick just brought up is called a tell. | ||
| That's a tell when you read these. | ||
| A sophisticated eye reading these articles. | ||
| Chadwick, where do they go to find out more about you personally, and particularly about where you're going to go throughout the country to meet people? | ||
| The night we did the book launch for you was fantastic. | ||
| You know, more than most authors, you're actually quite personable, and it shows in a room. | ||
| So where can people go? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, well, thank you. | |
| That party was great. | ||
| Steve, you and your audience have been the biggest supporters of this book, and it means so much to us, and it's been awesome. | ||
| But you can find me on Twitter, at Chabuk underscore more. | ||
| I'm also a columnist at The Spectator, and we're putting together, you know, some book tour stuff. | ||
| So if any of your audience, you know, wants us to come to town, just, they can shoot me a DM or send me an email, and we can work something out. | ||
| Thank you, brother. | ||
| Ed, are they letting you have social media yet, or are you still on the short leash? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm not on social media at this point, yeah. | |
| You can reach me at Paul Stevens Press if you want to reach me. | ||
| Yes, Ed, we've referred to him as the Hammer. | ||
| Thank you, Ed, very much. | ||
| Appreciate it. | ||
| Of course, this is the Murdochs working with Guardian, working with the Daily Beast to try to suppress the voice of Tucker Carlson. | ||
| Why? | ||
| Because Trump didn't walk into the trap in Milwaukee with the Keebler elves they set up. | ||
| He decided to sit down and have a real conversation that the American people would be interested in with Tucker. | ||
| And that's why they're trying to diminish him. | ||
| Tucker's bigger than he ever was. | ||
| Bigger than he was at Fox. | ||
| Because he's unchained from all the controls of the Murdoch. | ||
| Okay, here's what we got. | ||
| We're going to come back. | ||
| We're going to take a short break. | ||
| We're going to play John Philip Souza to take us out. | ||
| I'm going to Texas. | ||
| I've got an update on the Ken Paxton of it all. | ||
| They're coming after, remember, they're coming after anybody that steps up to the apparatus they're coming after. | ||
| A very dire situation in the great state of Texas. | ||
| We're going to go back to there. | ||
| And also John Solomon. | ||
| He's got a put up a piece last night on just the news that I think is pretty blockbuster, because it strips away the mask and the phony pretense of all this crap that coming after Trump about everything is going to happen on Thursday. | ||
| Everything happened on the first impeachment. | ||
| John Solomon, the great investigative reporter, has it all tied together. | ||
| John Philip Sousa, El Capitan. | ||
| We're going to return to the war room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Just a moment. | |
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Okay, we're going to return to the great state of Texas. | ||
| Because this is a 30-front war and one of the big fights, as you know, is going down in Texas, not just on the southern border, but also in the state capital. | ||
| Lauren Davis joins us now. | ||
| She's running for the, I think, the GOP chair in Dallas. | ||
| That city's a mess with the mayor. | ||
| Lauren, tell me about what is going on in this impeachment of the Attorney General, Ken Paxson. | ||
| He seems like one of the few guys that stood up to the Biden regime from the beginning. | ||
| So what's going on there? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, that's exactly the point. | |
| You know, he is the greatest attorney general the entire country has seen. | ||
| He is the strongest fighter Texas has ever had, you know, against this tyrannical regime that Biden is. | ||
| And, you know, we fully expect for him to return to office. | ||
| I don't really foresee a scenario where he doesn't. But we have to inspect what we expect of our conservative Republican senators. And so we just have a handful, there's about six, who we just want to mention and discuss because we can't take for granted the | ||
| pull for the lobbying firms, for the just Austin Swamp and for the consultants to be in the ear of some of these senators. | ||
| And they could potentially be making a really bad choice to vote for this impeachment that is completely illegal and not following the law. | ||
| Hang on a second, hang on a second. | ||
| You gotta explain to the nation, and of course we have a huge global audience and to the world, here's what I don't understand you gotta help me explain here. | ||
| In Texas, It's one of the hearts of MAGA. | ||
| And not just that, you have so many great grassroots leaders. | ||
| This show is built on the grassroots, on grassroots leaders. | ||
| You have so many great grassroots leaders in Texas. | ||
| And you have a huge MAGA voting base and population down there. | ||
| And people moving in, they want to be MAGA. | ||
| That's where they're going. | ||
| But then you got Abbott, you got the state legislature that seems like, how can that, why is this, there's disconnect between a massive MAGA voter base, a activist, as tough as boot leather, Texans, grassroots leaders. | ||
| And you got this, you got the, you got the, the, the general assembly down there and the governorship that just is like completely establishment. | ||
| How does that work? | ||
|
unidentified
|
You know, I think it's a transition in Texas. | |
| I think, you know, the grassroots has existed. | ||
| Um, for some time, but I believe it's really becoming mainstream. | ||
| And so, you know, as you grow and gain in your, in your power and your efforts, and we're more coordinated and there's people like me who, you know, are, are new into politics over the last couple of years. | ||
| Um, I'm a mother who, who woke up from COVID and went down all the rabbit holes and hadn't voted in primaries and then ended up launching my bid to run against Clay Jenkins. | ||
| And now I saw all the trouble. | ||
| of the systems of our Republican Party. | ||
| And so that's why I'm going for GOP chair in Dallas County, because we have to fix it at a system level. | ||
| So that's how it's happened. | ||
| We have, just generally speaking, been comfortable in Texas, have taken our eye off the ball, just assumed because someone said they were Republican, that they were conservative Republican. | ||
| And it's become very clear, particularly with the House doing what they did to Kim Paxton originally, which is the reason why we're talking, is that they're not who they say they are. | ||
| And you know, we can take as a grassroots activist like I am, and who supported me in my races, who we beat in establishment in my primary, two to one. | ||
| So the grassroots is strong. | ||
| And the legislature just needs to recognize that. | ||
| And they're all going to be primary. | ||
| The ones who vote against Kim Paxton are going to be primary because the grassroots is stronger than ever. | ||
| But we have to take responsibility for our movement and say, maybe at times we have just taken people at their word and haven't held them accountable. | ||
| And so they start answering to consultants, lobbyists, and Austin turns into a swamp, not much different than DC. | ||
| So that's how we've gotten there, just by comfort and complacency. | ||
| Perfect. | ||
| But we can see the fight, because you've got great people down there. | ||
| You've got great grassroots leaders. | ||
| We've got to bounce. | ||
| Can you give us the names of the six, or do you have a website? | ||
| I want our people to get immersed, particularly folks in Texas. | ||
| Do you have a website people can go to see who these six are that they should call and voice their opinion to? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, I don't have a website, but I've got their names. | |
| And you know, these all hold themselves to be conservative people, so we just need to make sure they stay conservative. | ||
| And that's Billy Hancock, Charles Schwartner, Mays Middleton, Brian Hughes, Charles Perry, and Drew Springer, and particularly Mays Middleton. | ||
| He donated $300,000 to Paxton's primary opponent. | ||
| So I know Brian, you know, Hughes, he's down in Dallas a lot. | ||
| He's a good conservative, but we have to make sure it is our job as the grassroots and our grassroots donors to hold people accountable for who they say they are. | ||
| So if these are truly conservative candidates, we need to hold them accountable. | ||
| Okay, this is our opening salvo. | ||
| We're going to drill down. | ||
| We're going to make all these six famous in the days ahead. | ||
| The trial starts, I think, September 5th in the Senate down in Texas, in Austin. | ||
| What's your social media and what's your website? | ||
| How do people follow you? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure. | |
| Yes, you can follow me on Twitter at MomsLoveFreedom. | ||
| I post all about Ken there and all political things. | ||
| But yes, help me help Texas stay red. | ||
| And keep it truly conservative as it should be, and we can all clearly see that we're failing at it. | ||
| So let's make a statement, our grassroots. | ||
| The folks in Texas, in particular, this invasion going on at the border in Texas, the Rio Grande Valley to South Texas, right in the middle of it. | ||
| Lauren, thank you so much. | ||
| We're going to spend a lot of time on this issue of the impeachment of Ken Paxson, one of the true warriors out there. | ||
| So thank you, ma'am. | ||
| Appreciate it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| I appreciate the time. | ||
| So you got the marker, Grace and Mo, let's cut that clip and get the names of the six out there. | ||
| We're going to spend a lot more time on this. | ||
| John Solomon joins me. | ||
| John, another great investigative report. | ||
| My head blew up when I saw it because it strips the mask off everything. | ||
| So take a minute. | ||
| We've got about seven minutes. | ||
| I want you to just walk us through it and connect the dots. | ||
| But I want people to understand how important this is about the lies. | ||
| When Trump walks into Georgia on on Thursday. | ||
| I want you to remember this segment of John Solomon on Tuesday. | ||
| John Solomon. | ||
| Yeah, listen, since Joe Biden ran for office in 2019, he's been lying about his son's business relationships. | ||
| He said his family got no money from China. | ||
| They got six, seven million dollars from China. | ||
| He said my son's laptop was disinformation. | ||
| It was real. | ||
| He said all these things to get the job of president, to fool the American people into hiding what was really going on in his family, shaking down foreign interests for millions of dollars. | ||
| One of the lies that has been sustained the longest is that when Joe Biden fired or forced the firing of the Ukraine prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, in 2015, by leveraging $1 billion in USAID, he threatened to withhold a billion-dollar loan guarantee until the Ukrainian president fired Victor Shokin. | ||
| That had nothing to do with his son, even though Shokin was aggressively investigating Burisma Holdings and Hunter Biden at the time. | ||
| He said it had nothing to do with it, I was simply carrying out US policy. | ||
| Well the documents we made available overnight and into this morning Completely debunk that. | ||
| It shows that the official State Department policy, the official Justice Department policy, the official Treasury Department policy in the fall of 2015 was that Viktor Shokin was doing a good enough job reforming and fighting anti-corruption or creating anti-corruption efforts in Ukraine that he deserved the billion-dollar loan guarantee. | ||
| Joe Biden didn't accept that recommendation over the course of several weeks. | ||
| He flipped that recommendation around on its head. | ||
| He actually decided to leverage the billion dollars and withhold it in order to force the firing of Shokin. | ||
| In fact, some people that were involved in the process got caught off guard. | ||
| They didn't know about it when he did it in December 15. | ||
| They woke up after the Christmas holidays and saw a leak in the Ukrainian newspaper and they were surprised by it. | ||
| Hang on, hang on. | ||
| My head's blown up like when I read it. | ||
| You're telling me that the guys inside the Obama administration, the national people were working on this, actually opposed it as policy and Biden Then flipped it, and that's how we got him sitting at the Council of Foreign Relations, or wherever he was, making that statement about getting rid of Ashokan. | ||
| So this was the policy they had worked on and agreed to, because they were making enough progress on corruption. | ||
| And then Biden completely flipped it? | ||
| Is this not the smoking gun, brother? | ||
| Well listen, we impeached the President saying there was no there there. | ||
| We impeached President Trump back in 2019 when in fact there was a significant there there. | ||
| One of the documents that is shocking is a June letter, June 2015 letter from Victoria Nuland. | ||
| She's still in the Biden administration. | ||
| She's now the Undersecretary of State. | ||
| She wrote a letter to Shokin saying, hey, we're impressed what you're doing. | ||
| In September, a couple months after that letter, the official task force charged with governing this policy voted to give the billion dollars and to keep Shokin in place. | ||
| And then Joe Biden in November flips it around. | ||
| We're going to put some new documents out tonight. | ||
| You're going to see the flip. | ||
| It happens over Thanksgiving weekend of 2015, just before he goes to Ukraine. | ||
| At that very moment, he's flipping the policy. | ||
| Steve, here's the big thing. | ||
| In that moment, his son, Hunter, is dealing with a PR crisis. | ||
| The New York Times and the Wall Street Journal are threatening to write a story saying Burisma's under investigation by Shokin. | ||
| They're panicking, trying to create a PR strategy. | ||
| In fact, they coordinate the PR strategy with Joe Biden's office and it's at that moment, when Hunter Biden's feeling the heat, that Joe Biden flips the policy around and says, you're not getting the billion dollars unless you fire Shokin. | ||
| Those are the documents you can see out there today. | ||
| There's one other one I want to highlight because If you remember during impeachment, there was a famous witness. | ||
| He wore a bowtie every day. | ||
| His name was George Kent. | ||
| And he said during his testimony, yeah, Joe Biden created the appearance of a conflict of interest with his son, but it never really impacted U.S. | ||
| policy. | ||
| The same thing was said by Maria Ivanovic, his boss, the ambassador. | ||
| We have a classified email. | ||
| We've made it public on the Justice News website. | ||
| It quotes George Kent writing to Maria Vanovich, the two witnesses who said Hunter Biden had no impact on policy, saying the opposite. | ||
| He writes, George Kent writes his boss, the ambassador, in a classified email, somebody should tell Joe Biden his son Hunter Biden undercut our anti-corruption efforts in Ukraine. | ||
| He directly blames Hunter Biden and his relationship with Prisma for gutting the anti-corruption effort. | ||
| That also reverses a very big storyline Democrats painted during the 2019 impeachment and ever since. | ||
| So, brother, this is the smoking gun because this is about Biden as VP, just like the CCP, the CEFC, all of it, monetizing the asset when he's still in office, selling his country out. | ||
| Why is why are we not hearing about a formal impeachment inquiry like this afternoon from McCarthy and Comer and these guys and highlighting the fact that you'll be one of the first witnesses, sir? | ||
| I'm serious. | ||
| I don't understand. | ||
| I read it last night. | ||
| Why is McCarthy not on Fox, not on Hany last night announcing it? | ||
| Yeah, well, listen, I think people are just absorbing these documents. | ||
| Keep in mind, these documents were kept from Congress during the impeachment trial. | ||
| Jay Sekulow, one of the lawyers for President Trump during the first impeachment trial, said, we never saw these. | ||
| Imagine how we would have changed the destiny of that case had we known about these sort of documents. | ||
| People are still absorbing it. | ||
| They're going to learn about it. | ||
| They're going to get another dump of documents tonight and another dump tomorrow night. | ||
| At that point, all of this will be laid bare. | ||
| Every single document that the State Department and others withheld from the American people, they'll have it, and then there'll be a really great question. | ||
| What will the Congress, what will James Comer, what will Jim Jordan, what will others do to bring justice for this incredible lie that was foisted on the American people? | ||
| That will be ready to be seen. | ||
| There are a lot of lawmakers calling me today, a lot of members of Congress calling. | ||
| I think this is beginning to resonate. | ||
| People are beginning to realize how important a moment this is. | ||
| Where can people go to follow all this, the show, and your social media, and also Just the News, the site? | ||
| Well, we're lucky enough, Amanda Head and I, to follow you every night at 6 o'clock on here on Real America's Voice, Just the News, no noise. | ||
| Go to justthenews.com to download the documents, see them for yourselves. | ||
| Don't take my word for it. | ||
| And you can follow me on all social media platforms at jsolomonreports. | ||
| John, thank you very much. | ||
| On this one, it's going to be the acts of commission. | ||
| It's also going to be the cover-up. | ||
| Why were these documents not given to President Trump's legal team for the first impeachment? | ||
| Why were they not out? | ||
| Why do we even have an impeachment when they had these documents? | ||
| John Solomon, thank you. | ||
| Honored to have you on here. | ||
| That's a great question. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| 30-front war. | ||
| A 30-front war. | ||
| You've got to be relentless. | ||
| You have to be ruthless and relentless, like they are. | ||
| Short break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Back in a moment. | |
| If Grace and Captain Bannon can push out the John Solomon article, this thing is monumental. | ||
| Because now you're starting to have whistleblowers. | ||
| You're having people in the apparatus that understand the destruction of the country. | ||
| They're starting to get information out to the John Solomons of the world. | ||
| This is going to infuriate people. | ||
| This whole thing's been a since Trump won in 16. | ||
| Remember you talk about stolen elections. | ||
| The election in 16 was stolen because they fought us at every step of the way. | ||
| They did not want him ever to actually be president United States. | ||
| They stole it in 20. | ||
| And now think about what's happening on this is so over the top and they understand that the lawfare is not working. | ||
| It's not polling. | ||
| There's a big poll now out, I've got it up on Getter, the definitive poll in Iowa. | ||
| It's called the Iowa Survey. | ||
| Trump, I mean, it's insane how far up he is. | ||
| But it's not working. | ||
| That's why they're doing this funny thing in the 14th Amendment. | ||
| That's why I've got Dershowitz and other people working on that. | ||
| That's why Newsom's going to Tennessee to launch his presidential campaign in Tennessee about these red flag laws. | ||
| A platform given to him by Republican, a RINO governor, Bill Lee. | ||
| And this is where Newsom is now, because you've seen the fiasco in Maui with Biden. | ||
| It's not going to be Biden. | ||
| They're going to get a killer in there like Newsom and surround Trump in every different aspect of it. | ||
| Every different aspect. | ||
| At the same time, the world's watching this and they're saying, these elites in the United States have screwed their own people, but their own people got to take it. | ||
| But we don't. | ||
| Remember, most of these, the leadership of that, with the CCP, with the KGB, and with the certain guys in Sub-Saharan Africa, and certain guys in the Middle East, you'll see the Saudis kick in there. | ||
| You watch. | ||
| They're not friends of the United States of America, or the Judeo-Christian West. | ||
| They're not. | ||
| But they see what's happening. | ||
| They see we're going to revolt against it. | ||
| But right now, they run the show and you don't. | ||
| That's what this fight's about. | ||
| That's why this audience is so important. | ||
| You're the vanguard of this movement. | ||
| And it's a grassroots movement, and they never anticipated, expected you to be so well armed with information that you can use. | ||
| And that's why people are coming together on this. | ||
| And you saw that in Springfield at the summit we just had. | ||
| But Mike, they're coming to destroy every entrepreneur out there that supports the MAGA movement. | ||
| And they're particularly focused on, I just read an article about why, some huge article, I think the Washington Post, why Mike Lindell's not indicted on every different case. | ||
| Why is he out there? | ||
| You know, that's a new thing. | ||
| Why is Mike Lindell not indicted? | ||
| You know, they got to take down MyPillow. | ||
| They have to take down your company. | ||
| They need to destroy you as a symbol that if you come and back the MAGA movement, If you back President Trump, if you back the MAGA movement, you are going to be destroyed and everybody associated with you is going to be destroyed. | ||
| So tell me about the company right now. | ||
| Well, Dave, the company, they're trying to destroy it. | ||
| But I'll tell you, the war room, you guys have been so we're so grateful to have your audience. | ||
| We're running our 20 year anniversary specials. | ||
| If you go to the square war room, if you see there, you guys were running up to 80 percent off. | ||
| We have an overstock specials. | ||
| We have We have our pillows that are normally night or sixty nine ninety eight. | ||
| The queen pillows. | ||
| Nineteen ninety eight. | ||
| We've got kitchen bath towels. | ||
| You save up to 20 or you save 25 percent on them. | ||
| They're just in. | ||
| We've got the all season slippers. | ||
| We still have them on clothes out. | ||
| Some of them for twenty five dollars. | ||
| They're regularly like seventy nine eighty nine. | ||
| And then we have the biggest bed sheet sale we've ever had with the Giza Dream bed sheets as low as twenty nine ninety eight with promo code war room. | ||
| I'm just looking down the list here. | ||
| We've got over 200 products. | ||
| We've got you guys. | ||
| We have mattresses. | ||
| These are the best mattresses ever made. | ||
| I micromanaged that where we I went into what does a mattress what's going to help you get the best sleep ever. | ||
| And we have the toppers, the 2.0, the MyPillow 2.0 mattress toppers. | ||
| You got kids going back to college for their dorm rooms and stuff with those extra long twins. | ||
| We've got blankets on sale. | ||
| We've got everything you can imagine. | ||
| We put it, we moved the War Room Square, everybody, up to the top now on the website because you've been so supportive. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So go there, get these exclusive specials. | |
| We've got these blankets. | ||
| We've got towels. | ||
| We've got individual towels that are on there, too. | ||
| The towels that we had about a month ago, and we have good news. | ||
| They might be coming in soon for the exclusive here on The War Room. | ||
| But for right now, get everything you can there. | ||
| You have those blankets. | ||
| We've got the Bible Children's Go Anywhere pillows, the smaller pillows. | ||
| Anyone that has a MyPillow, you don't want to leave Home and go to a hotel or something and be without your MyPillow. | ||
| These are the travel size MyPillows. | ||
| We've got them for kids, the Bible blankets. | ||
| We've got, I mean, everything you could imagine. | ||
| We have bath sheets if you're in the, everything for the bathroom, the bath sheets. | ||
| And these are things, sleepwear and loungewear. | ||
| I was looking today, Steve, before coming on, the sleepwear and loungewear we have. | ||
| This is all my pillow. | ||
| Amazing products. | ||
| Remember, we were first every reverse engineer, every single product. | ||
| And I'd say, well, how can this help you? | ||
| How is this going to benefit you? | ||
| How is this going to help you improve your life? | ||
| And that's what we love. | ||
| We love helping people at MyPillow. | ||
| And by you guys all buying, using that promo code WarRoom at MyPillow.com, you're helping everything I'm doing. | ||
| You're helping keep MyPillow from them destroying it, is what they're trying to do. | ||
| I told them straight out, Steve, I wondered that too. | ||
| How come I don't get indicted? | ||
| How come I don't get to go to that? | ||
| Back when they had the corrupt January 6th hearing and the FBI pulled me over. | ||
| How come I don't get to do that? | ||
| No, they're coming at me a different way. | ||
| Let's destroy Mike Lindell's company, which is an employee-owned company. | ||
| All my employees, hundreds, over a thousand employees that have careers there. | ||
| Some have been with me over 20 years now, back to the 20-year anniversary, and it's just, what's kept us going has been you guys out there purchasing and buying from MyPillow directly, and we pass the savings on to you. | ||
| MyPillow.com, PromoCode War Room. | ||
| Mike, we've got to bounce, but when we come back on Thursday, I want to get that special done and put it up in Fonny Willis' grill as Trump goes in to be arraigned. | ||
| We come out with a MyPillow is never going to surrender. | ||
| That's what we need to do. | ||
| Brother, thank you so much for doing this. | ||
| The pressure on the company, the pressure on the employees is incredible. | ||
| Mike, keep fighting. | ||
| They're trying to, they're trying to destroy Lindell. | ||
| They're trying to destroy Lindell because he's a major part of the Ultramaga movement. | ||
| Okay, Charlie Kirk next. | ||
| Jack Pasova, we're back five. | ||
| We're going to be in Maui at five o'clock. | ||
| You're not going to miss this. | ||
| We got a lot of economic news. | ||
| We're going to go Maui. | ||
| Five to seven tonight, we'll be back. | ||
| The Marine Corps Band, the President's Own, John Philip Sousa, El Capitan. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's do it. |
Export Selection