Aug. 10, 2023 - Bannon's War Room
48:55
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pray for our enemies. | |
| Because we're going medieval on these people. | ||
| I got a free shot on all these networks lying about the people. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The people have had a belly full of it. | |
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big line? | ||
|
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bamm. | ||
| Going to subpoena Hunter Biden. | ||
| Yeah, this is always going to end with the Bidens coming in front of the committee. | ||
| We are going to subpoena the family. | ||
| I mean, we're putting the case together to win in court, obviously with all the opposition and obstruction we're getting from the Biden attorneys now. | ||
| We know that this is going to end up in court when we subpoena the Biden. | ||
| So we're putting together a case. | ||
| And I think we've done that very well. | ||
| We've shown the bank records. | ||
| If I had subpoenaed Joe and Hunter Biden the first day I became chairman of the committee, it would have been tied up in court and the judge would have eventually thrown it out. | ||
| Because at that time, the narrative was, well, they never took anybody while he was vice president. | ||
| He never had any communication with his business associates. | ||
| And, you know, the money never came from China. | ||
| We've had to go every step of the way and prove the media narrative was wrong and the vice president and the current president lied. | ||
| We have caught Joe Biden in so many lies, I can't even count the number of lies now. | ||
| So we have put together a case that I think would stand up in any court of law in America, and we hope to hear from the Biden soon. | ||
| But I wish the media would ask the president What exactly did your family do to receive this $21 million that the House Oversight Committee has proven? | ||
| He just continues to say, well, that's a lie. | ||
| That's not true. | ||
| We have their bank records, Maria. | ||
| Bank records don't lie. | ||
| Congressman, when are you expecting to subpoena Joe and Hunter Biden? | ||
| Well, we want to talk to about three or four more associates first. | ||
| We've been communicating with a couple of them. | ||
| We're trying to bring them in just like we did Devin Archer for a transcribed interview. | ||
| If they don't come in voluntarily, then they'll be subpoenaed. | ||
| So this is taking a lot longer, but if you look at how the special counsel Durham or other special counsels conducted investigations, I think Our committee is going a whole lot faster than any other congressional committee in history and any other special counsel. | ||
| This is a complicated case, and we're being obstructed every step of the way by the Department of Justice, by the FBI, by the Secret Service, by the IRS, and by the Biden family attorneys. | ||
| But that's not stopping us. | ||
| We continue to produce evidence about every two weeks. | ||
| There's this testimony now where one of your son's former business associates is claiming that you were on speakerphone a lot with them, talking business. | ||
| Is that what? | ||
| I've never talked business with anyone. | ||
| And I knew you'd have a lousy question. | ||
| Well, why is that a lousy question? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because it's not true. | |
| Thank you, Mr. President. | ||
| Welcome to the War Room. | ||
| It's 10 August, Year of Our Lord 2023. | ||
| You've probably picked up by now, it's not Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| I'm not wearing three black shirts. | ||
| There's no pens. | ||
| It's Natalie Winters filling in. | ||
| I am, of course, the co-host and executive editor of this show. | ||
| You guys saw in that cold open, I think it's fair to say House Republicans, at least it's looking like it, They're on fire. | ||
| They're doing what they should have done very long ago. | ||
| But never forget, if Nancy Pelosi of House Democrats had one one hundredth, dare I say one one thousandth of the pieces of evidence that House Republicans have, Against the Bidens if she had that on Donald J. Trump, they would have impeached Donald Trump a hundred times over at least Probably a thousand times. | ||
| I mean they impeached him for what Joe Biden did and now they're indicting him to try to get back at him But I guess that's the price we pay for having someone who is as you guys always like to call him controlled opposition that is Kevin McCarthy as speaker of the house, but joining me is To discuss this, who is of course a member of the House Oversight Committee and definitely not controlled opposition, frankly, I don't think he could even be controlled even if they wanted to do that, is none other than Tim Burchett, a good friend of the show. | ||
| Last time I saw him, I saw him, he was walking on the hill and he almost got hit by a car. | ||
| So I'm glad that you're joining me on War Room, that you're safe, that you survived that interaction. | ||
| But I'm sure what the War Room audience wants to know after that clip we just played, You know, walk us through the timeline here. | ||
| You guys said you want to conduct a few more transcribed interviews, have a few more witnesses, whether voluntarily or via subpoena, but what does sort of seeing downrange, what does it look like in terms of actually having Hunter and Joe testify? | ||
| Well, Natalie, thank you so much for having me on The War Room once again. | ||
| Tell Mr. Bannon I miss him and that I was in Nashville, Tennessee yesterday speaking to a very conservative group of ladies. | ||
| And it's way out of my district, but I was invited and I couldn't turn it down. | ||
| And the first thing out of one of the ladies' mouths was, I love seeing you on War Room. | ||
| And then there was three other ladies that said something, and that's pretty good to have over 100 people in a room and at least three of them say something to you. | ||
| That means you've got a pretty good percentage. | ||
| So I appreciate y'all. | ||
| And I suspect the timeline is going pretty much as expected. | ||
| It's slow. | ||
| You know, you go a little slower, you get there a little faster sometimes. | ||
| And we've got to lay down every bit of evidence, which there's multitudes more. | ||
| I believe this next bit of evidence that's going to come out after this last one will be much bigger than what we've seen. | ||
| It's a dirty business. | ||
| It's interesting, at first they were kind of careful, but now they've gotten arrogant and careless, and you can see further along how this thing has gone. | ||
| Devin Archer telling about the president getting on the phone with him, you know, and Joe Biden early online saying, we never talk business, which is the stupidest thing ever. | ||
| And then I guarantee you, he says, man, I wished I didn't let him jump over that gate to ask me that question because he looked foolish. | ||
| He looked foolish and he looked deer in the headlights. | ||
| So I suspect you'll see that. | ||
| We drop the evidence about every two weeks because that allows the media to consume it and allows this cat that's on my leg down here about to chew me up. | ||
| Excuse me, my daughter's cat is in here. | ||
| My dogs are asleep. | ||
| They're not doing their job, obviously. | ||
| And the cat's just having its way with me. | ||
| But anyway, I suspect you'll see it coming out. | ||
| And then about every two weeks, we'll have a new bit of evidence. | ||
| And that's not really so much timing. | ||
| It's the fact that we don't have unlimited resources to go after these people. | ||
| So the subpoenas are in order. | ||
| And then, of course, the bombshell, of course, is that we're going to subpoena the Bidens, which is there's a whole lot of precedence for that, actually. | ||
| Ulysses S. Grant. | ||
| He voluntarily subpoenaed, was subpoenaed, and so was Jimmy Carter, I think, three times. | ||
| And, and of course, they went after Trump relentlessly. | ||
| So there's pretty, you know, Joe Biden can use the executive privilege all he wants. | ||
| But the reality is, that's, that's doesn't seem to work in subpoenas. | ||
| But Hunter has no, he has no, no coverage from it at all. | ||
| He'll have to come in, or we will, he'll be arrested and brought in. | ||
| Now I know you got a punch in a little bit, but I have one or two more questions if we have the time that I'd like to ask you. | ||
| I know you probably can't get into the super specifics, but the people that you're expecting to hear from, the information that you guys are hoping to drop, like you said, in the next Two weeks. | ||
| Can you give the audience any sort of primer or just an idea of what we're looking at? | ||
| Are these more, you know, Devon Archer types? | ||
| Are they past business associates? | ||
| Are they foreign nationals like they had with the more Romanian-focused incident? | ||
| Or can you give us any kind of intel on what we should be looking for? | ||
| Well, the problem with the foreign folks is, of course, is that they're overseas and they tend to disappear. | ||
| This is a very shady, dangerous bunch. | ||
| And you've got to realize, too, Every person that we've, you know, these folks that have paid the Bidens, they're all on the run. | ||
| They're on the run from their own countries, from our country and others. | ||
| You can't grab them. | ||
| So that creates an interesting scenario. | ||
| It's very convenient for the Bidens, but it also paints them into a very close corner where I think that, you know, there are obviously guilts there. | ||
| It's just now, you know, and shame on the national media. | ||
| I mean, good gosh. | ||
| What you're seeing now, though, behind the scenes is a lot of these Democrats are, they're getting nervous. | ||
| And they're looking to shed themselves of the Biden crime family. | ||
| They don't want to be painted with that brush. | ||
| And they're looking at Gavin Newsom or the unelected environmental czar who's raining terror down upon our country with terrible agreements with foreign countries. | ||
| So I think you're going to see that movement. | ||
| But also, I think you'll see You'll just see a complete capitulation. | ||
| This is just almost every day something new is coming out. | ||
| And there's so much out there that we, you know, like I said, we can't, we can't get it all in because of just, just, uh, just manpower. | ||
| It's almost impossible. | ||
| And Chairman Comer has done a great job. | ||
| Him and Jim Jordan are relentless in this, in their pursuit, and they've done an excellent job of leaving no stone unturned and they want to do it by the book. | ||
| And so I'm glad of that. | ||
| Yeah, no, Democrats are certainly masters at flooding the zone with the level of information and corruption that we've exposed on Hunter Biden and really the entire Biden family, all the foreign names, the foreign countries, the LLCs, the shady bank accounts. | ||
| It certainly makes it easier to do that. | ||
| Last question before. | ||
| I let you go. | ||
| You know, you talk about pushback. | ||
| Obviously the mainstream media is doing their narrative spin machine that they always do best. | ||
| But I'm curious with this, particularly these hearings, you know, Comer said in the interview that he thinks you guys are moving forward at, you know, a rapid fire pace, at least compared to other committees. | ||
| The war room posse might beg to differ a little bit. | ||
| I know they wish they would see more, as Steve would say, you know, action, action. | ||
| action, but in terms of actually pinpointing where this pushback is coming from, specifically on the Hunter Biden investigation on that front, is that coming primarily from, you know, Democrats on the committee? | ||
| Is it coming from the agencies like the IRS, the DOJ? | ||
| Is it coming from the media or is it coming all the way from the top Biden themselves? | ||
| Just curious. | ||
| Well, yeah, I think it starts at the top. | ||
| You're seeing the Justice Department really just being very shady. | ||
| The FBI as well, you know, they they they and Devin Archer was going to come in and on the on the Monday on Saturday and Sunday, he received letters from from them on two And that I think had a very chilling effect. | ||
| And I think the American public should have been made more aware of this, just the unusual nature of that happening at that close timing of the Of his testimony on the month and it was a closed door meeting, actually. | ||
| So on that Monday, so, uh, I think you're seeing it just from all the way around. | ||
| You've got the media who is invested so much in this guy who can't pour water out of a boot if the instructions were written on the heel. | ||
| And, um, they're just backing him up. | ||
| You know, I was on CNN the other night and they said, well, there's no evidence. | ||
| And I said, what are you talking about? | ||
| I was like, ma'am, are your fingers crossed under the table? | ||
| You know, you've got FBI informants. | ||
| You've got bank records. | ||
| You've got foreign nationals. | ||
| You've got Hunter's own business partner. | ||
| You've got testimony of, I mean, literally Hunter himself with his emails. | ||
| And then you have a Justice Department that's sort of just twiddling their thumbs. | ||
| Here's what I really worry is that we lay out this incredible case to the public. | ||
| And the Justice Department doesn't do anything with it because I believe they are corrupted in their souls. | ||
| I believe they're evil and they're purposefully staying out of this. | ||
| The swamp is real. | ||
| It's real as it can be from our Pentagon to our Justice Department to The IRS. | ||
| You know, the IRS, we don't even have any proof that they've paid taxes on over $21 million. | ||
| You know, if you and I sell $600 worth of stuff on eBay, we get a letter from the IRS. | ||
| This is ridiculous. | ||
| We've got to demand more. | ||
| And this is what happens when 20 million conservatives decide to stay home on election day. | ||
| We need to put enough points on the board where they can't steal it. | ||
| Indeed. | ||
| Well, Congressman, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| I know you got a punch. | ||
| So if people want to stay up to date with you, all things your Twitter, your social media coordinates, and of course, your website, where can they go to find you? | ||
| Go to my cool Twitter site, my at Tim Burchett. | ||
| That's just me. | ||
| I don't, there's my staff. | ||
| That's it right there. | ||
| The one that missed, that's my daddy's grave or my mom and daddy's grave right there in Veterans Cemetery. | ||
| Go to at Tim Burchett. | ||
| I always get the ban and bump when I'm on here. | ||
| So I always appreciate it. | ||
| I'm closing in on 100,000 followers and that would be really cool. | ||
| Congressman, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| It's my pleasure, and I'm glad neither one of us have been run over by a vehicle on Capitol Hill. | ||
| Not yet. | ||
| You never know. | ||
| We could start the clock, because that might just happen. | ||
| Thank you, Congressman. | ||
| Have a good one. | ||
| And Warren Posse, we will be right back. | ||
| We've got Mike Davis, Sebastian Gorka, Naomi Wolf, E.J. | ||
| Antoni, a very full show getting into all things Trump indictment, January 6th. | ||
| You name it. | ||
| Honestly, the news cycle is so packed, I didn't even know what to focus on with today's show. | ||
| But I think we should have Mike Davis right after the break, and then we'll be going in to Sebastian Gorka, then E.J. | ||
| Antoni, and like I said, Dr. Wolf on all things COVID vaccines and new groundbreaking study. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bamm. | |
| Welcome back to the War Room. | ||
| It's still Natalie Winters hosting. | ||
| We got Mike Davis and Dr. Sebastian Gorka joining us in this block. | ||
| But before we get into that, you know, if you really think about it, what the Bidens did in Ukraine, they effectively weaponized the legal system, the judicial system there by getting the prosecutor general, Viktor Shokin, fired uh... over alleged uh... foul play with barista you guys know the whole story rudy giuliani tells it better and in much more almost painful depth uh... than i do uh... but that's frankly i think what we see going on here right they weaponized the judicial system all the way over | ||
| and ukraine well maybe that was the trial run for what they wanted to do here in the united states the latest piece of evidence in my opinion supporting that theory is the fact really curious fact of the timing uh... of what is supposed to be the jury selection day and of course the trial day uh... for trumps january sixth indictment The fact that I have to specify which indictment it is, I think also lends credence to the fact that | ||
| The DOJ has, in total Ukraine style, been fully weaponized against Donald J. Trump, but Mike Davis, I know you got a punch because you allegedly have to go pick someone up at the airport, or that's just the new excuse you've come up with so you don't have to come on the show when I'm hosting, but your thoughts on the timing of this trial, the jury selection bumping up right against the Iowa caucus? | ||
| So yeah, we have a, we have Jack Smith who waited, what, 30 months? | ||
| After President Trump left office to pursue charges against President Trump for non-crimes, the non-crime of a former president having his presidential records, which is allowed by the Presidential Records Act, and the non-crime of objecting to a presidential election, which is allowed by the Electoral Count Act. | ||
| of 1887. | ||
| It's also allowed by the First Amendment to twist arms politically. | ||
| But President, excuse me, but President Biden's hitman, Jack Smith, now wants to rush to have President Trump's trial in less than six months. | ||
| Starting January 2nd, 2024, a four to six week trial that just happens to be right Before the Iowa caucus is right during the Republican presidential primary. | ||
| There is no chance that you can get a trial done fairly within six months. | ||
| It's going to take more than a year for President Trump to gather the evidence. | ||
| and the witnesses he needs to adequately defend himself. | ||
| But Jack Smith, who waited 30 months to bring these charges, now wants to rush this trial six months during the middle of the Republican primary during the presidential election season. | ||
| That just proves once again, this is about election interference. | ||
| President Biden fears he can't beat President Trump on November 7th, 2020. | ||
| So Merrick Garland and Biden's hitman, Jack Smith, want to keep him in a trial and maybe behind bars for the next election. | ||
| Election interference at its finest. | ||
| Mike Davis, thank you for joining us. | ||
| If people want to follow you, where can they go? | ||
| Thank you, Natalie. | ||
| You can donate at article3project.org, article number 3project.org. | ||
| at article three project at article number three project on getter Twitter truth and my personal when I'm not driving for uber to the airport, it's at MRD MIA MRD DMIA and thank you very much Natalie Thank you for joining us And I think we should have dr. Sebastian Gorka, of course a good friend of the show down the line Do we? | ||
| Yes, we do. | ||
| Hello. | ||
| How are you? | ||
| There's a lot to get to. | ||
| The news cycle is popping. | ||
| We're not going to talk promo codes, though. | ||
| Before we get into- Why not? | ||
| Since I sent your dog- Mike Lindell's My Pillow Pet Bed, and you can't even use my promo code on Bannon's show. | ||
| This is an outrage. | ||
| Your dog would not be amused, Natalie Winters. | ||
| Well, if I recall in the break, you asked me two questions. | ||
| One, am I going to get you fired up like Steve does on the show? | ||
| And I think the answer to that is apparently yes. | ||
| Not because we're talking about our differences on Ukraine, but because we're talking about my pillow promo codes where the chasm there is almost greater. | ||
| But the other question that you asked, because I said, you can choose what we talk about. | ||
| And you said, no, Natalie, it's your show. | ||
| You're the host. | ||
| So I'm going to try to assert my dominance here and be the host. | ||
| and say no, the promo code is indeed war room that you should use. | ||
| But I am a tournament great point says my dog. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War room and it's spelled G-O-R-K-A. | |
| I like that. | ||
| That's a good tactic. | ||
| But speaking of lies, which that's what that is, use code War Room, the FBI is caught in, of course, another lie, specifically with the lengths that they went to targeting traditional Catholics. | ||
| If you could walk us through the memo that was released today by House Judiciary, showing not just the extent of this program, how really committed they were to going after traditional Catholics, but really the extent of the lie that the FBI was engaged in in terms of covering this up. | ||
| Yeah, I have it in front of me. | ||
| I read it out on air today. | ||
| So this is my colleague Eric Lendrum's piece for American Greatness based upon what we learned from the House Judiciary Committee. | ||
| So we have the audio, we have the video of Christopher Wray lying, perjuring himself in front of the Judiciary Committee when Jim Jordan, who said to him, so what's this about you targeting Catholics? | ||
| And Christopher Wray said, oh, no, that's just one wacky product from one field office in Richmond, Virginia. | ||
| We have the evidence right now, right there. | ||
| The evidence is that the Richmond field office of the FBI—this is strange language. | ||
| Had a liaison contract. | ||
| Why do they have to have a liaison contract with another government agency with the Portland FBI field office and the Los Angeles field office? | ||
| And that's how this document, which targeted Catholics, quote unquote, traditional Catholics, whatever that means, as potential threats To the United States of America. | ||
| Christopher Wray lied to the house about this document. | ||
| It wasn't a one-off. | ||
| It wasn't one lone crazed analyst. | ||
| This was a tri-field office product targeting Catholics. | ||
| So this is why I say, and this is hard for me to say this, as somebody who's literally trained thousands of FBI special agents, intelligence analysts, and SOS Support staff before I joined the White House for President Trump. | ||
| The FBI is unsalvageable, Natalie. | ||
| When you're targeting Christians because they're traditional, that agency can't be reformed. | ||
| You can't just, you know, change out the seventh floor of the Hoover building and just replace it with new management. | ||
| You can't do that. | ||
| When you send Twenty armed FBI agents to swat the home of the pastor, Mark Houck, because he's pro-life. | ||
| When you have the FBI raid President Trump's private residence, and not only raid it on that spurious garbage, you know, espionage documents handling excuse, they told his attorneys, Natalie, To stay outside the building. | ||
| President Trump's attorneys weren't allowed to observe the FBI search of Mar-a-Lago. | ||
| Now I ask you, Natalie, why would you not want attorneys watching you doing a search? | ||
| Well, my next question that I was going to ask you, I think, just might answer that. | ||
| You know, you say it's all unsalvageable. | ||
| I think the entire thing, the entire administrative state really is, like Donald Trump said in his really wonderful Newsweek op-ed, either we destroy the deep state or the They destroyed us. | ||
| But to your point, it brings me to my next question about the January 6th committee and how they are now or at least reportedly destroyed evidence. | ||
| I would say probably evidence that would have tipped the scale more towards the war room theory of the case. | ||
| The revolver dot news, you know, feds erection theory of the case. | ||
| So when you talk about why they didn't want Trump's attorneys watching the raid. | ||
| Just a thought. | ||
| But your thoughts, and I'll keep you through the break because we got about two minutes before we got a punch to break, but your thoughts on the unselect, let me rephrase, the very, very, very unselect January 6th committee and their move to actually destroy records and documents from this taxpayer-funded sham of a committee. | ||
| Well, first things first, I don't know who on the communications team or the president's campaign told him that that op-ed should go to Newsweek. | ||
| Newsweek is trash. | ||
| Newsweek is gutter. | ||
| Newsweek hates President Trump. | ||
| I don't care if the op-ed page editor Josh Hammer is a good guy. | ||
| It's irrelevant. | ||
| Every conservative who writes for that piece of garbage is helping the credibility of an anti-Trump paper. | ||
| Don't do it. | ||
| There are a million other places. | ||
| You know, Breitbart, The Federalist, American Greatness, Daily Caller, Daily Signal, just use Newsweek for a firelighter. | ||
| On the topic of why 50% of the documents the January 6th Committee was ordered to retain were destroyed, we know why they were destroyed. | ||
| They were the documents pertaining to the communications between Pelosi's kangaroo court and the White House. | ||
| Why are those documents? | ||
| President Trump didn't destroy anything. | ||
| He moved classified documents he was allowed to have from one room to another. | ||
| He's facing 400 years in prison. | ||
| Nancy Pelosi shredded and burnt all the communications between the Biden White House and the January 6th committee. | ||
| Why isn't she standing in a court? | ||
| Why isn't she in leg shackles like Peter Navarro was? | ||
| I think we know the answer to that question, Natalie. | ||
| Well, if President Trump ever wants to write an op-ed for warroom.org or maybe even your, is it Substack now? | ||
| My Substack, Sebastian Gorka, yes. | ||
| Well, Dr. Gorka, we got to jump to break, but I want to hold you if you can stay. | ||
| Yeah, sure. | ||
| Can you stay? | ||
| You asked me if I was gonna get you fired up. | ||
| I didn't know it was gonna be the question about the Newsweek op-ed that was gonna do it. | ||
| I thought it'd be the weaponization of the justice system. | ||
| But, uh, I digress. | ||
| You learn something every day. | ||
| But we got E.J. | ||
| Antoni joining us in the next block, too, talking all things CPI. | ||
| And, of course, Dr. Naomi Wolf coming to talk about a new really bombshell study Proving that all of the misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines causing cardiovascular risks, particularly in young men, you know, is misinformation, the dirty M-word. | ||
| Well, it actually was true. | ||
| This is a huge mega meta-analysis study, proving basically that the War Room, even though we didn't want to be right, that we were right. | ||
| But in the meantime, we got Dr. Gorka, and in the mean meantime, we got a quick commercial break, but we will be right back. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| Welcome back to the War Room. | ||
| If I seem a little flustered or whatever today, it's because I actually am producing the show while concurrently hosting. | ||
| Denver is, of course, helping me, but I had to set up the studio by myself, which was actually quite fun. | ||
| And I think you guys can see me, so I think I did a good job. | ||
| But as I was going over my show notes, I saw that Dr. Gorka had wanted to talk about impeachment and the timeline of impeachment. | ||
| Then I started thinking, I was like, well, I don't even know who he's talking about because we should be concurrently impeaching Joe Biden, Mayorkas, Wray, Garland, basically the entire Biden regime. | ||
| So Dr. Gorka, before we let you go, I'd love to talk impeachment. | ||
| Again, many candidates for who we could be discussing. | ||
| I assume you're probably talking about Joe Biden. | ||
| So I'm curious your thoughts on the timeline of how this is going to play out and just add one quick thing to that. | ||
| I'm sure you saw, I'm sure you talked about on your show, Comer's announcement on Fox that he had wanted to subpoena both Hunter and Joe Biden to the House Oversight Committee to help build their case. | ||
| Although, as you have mentioned several times, I would say at turtle speed as to the corruption, the Ukraine, the Chinese business deals, all of that, the Biden family crime syndicate. | ||
| But your thoughts on impeachment, the path forward? | ||
| I just had a strange, as I was listening to you, kind of strange fantasy flitter through the transom of my mind. | ||
| Imagine if... Oh no! | ||
| Relax, relax. | ||
| It's completely PG. | ||
| Imagine if Bannon, if the Admiral were a leader of the Senate, I was Speaker of the House and you were like the head of the Freedom Caucus. | ||
| Could you imagine what would happen? | ||
| We would impeach every one of those bastards. | ||
| We would have them all in the Congress, sworn in, impeached, or in shackles thanks to the Sergeant of Arms. | ||
| We would have everyone, Mayorkas, Garland, that cretinous Canadian who laughs about getting rid of You know, F-150s and gasoline-powered vehicles, Granholm. | ||
| Every single one of these scumbags would be impeached because we care about America. | ||
| Now, that would be fun. | ||
| That's just a fantasy. | ||
| I will float this, though. | ||
| That would be extremely fun. | ||
| That would be super fun. | ||
| But I will float this thing that kind of came to me, and it's a little bit heretical, but it came to me as I was on air today with my radio show. | ||
| You know, if we want to be really sneaky, we impeach all of them. | ||
| But we impeach, we begin actual impeachment proceedings of Biden the week before President Trump goes to trial in front of Judge Chutkan. | ||
| Because that's how you control messaging. | ||
| The GOP today is a disaster. | ||
| I mean, you know, God bless Cuomo, he's probably a good guy, but his communication skills are, you know, F. F. I'll give them an F and I'm charitable. | ||
|
unidentified
|
If we had the impeachment proceedings... That's grading on a curve, yeah. | |
| Yeah. | ||
| If we started the impeachment proceedings with Biden the week before President Trump's trial begins, Wow. | ||
| Now that would be how you dominate the information cycle. | ||
| What do you think? | ||
| I'm trying to be as strategic as possible. | ||
| What do you think, Natalie? | ||
| Of course. | ||
| I mean, I think we should impeach all of them. | ||
| I would start particularly with Mayorkas. | ||
| I think what's happening on the southern border is probably the biggest offense, and I think it's the issue that resonates with people most. | ||
| And it resonates mostly because I think it's that issue that you can really see the intentionality and not just incompetence behind the policies of the Biden regime. | ||
| I like how you tossed me a question even while I'm hosting the show, Dr. Gorka. | ||
| Thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| If people want to find you, follow the show, get all the good stuff, where can they go? | ||
| Yeah, I'm everywhere that matters. | ||
| So True Social, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Parler, Getter, Telegram. | ||
| Just look for Seb Gorka or Sebastian Gorka. | ||
| The website is SebastianGorka.com. | ||
| You can subscribe to the podcast on Spotify, Twitch, you know, whichever stitcher whichever one you prefer and then of course my Substack we've got unique articles from me at sebastiangorka.substack.com that's my whole name is one word sebastiangorka.substack.com and if you want the best discounts you know which promo code to use whichever word it is it's spelled g-o-r-k-a something tells me i i won't be seeing your | ||
| writings on newsweek call me Call me crazy. | ||
| No, unless Elon Musk buys it, then maybe. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| Hey, there you go. | ||
| If Elon listens to the show, there's the next thing that you should buy. | ||
| Dr. Gorka, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| God bless. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Well, joining us, I think we have him, is of course the brilliant E.J. | ||
| Antoni that provides us with all of the fact-based, evidence-based economic analysis that one could ever need. | ||
| This morning's CPI report shows another I-word, this time not impeachment or indictment, but inflation. | ||
| Is accelerating not reducing under the Biden regime? | ||
| The Bidenomics? | ||
| Again, not a good term that I'd want to have my name associated with. | ||
| The dismal state of the United States economy right now. | ||
| EJ, if you want to walk us through the CPI report and then we get into what the Treasury said after that. | ||
| I'll hold you through the break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Maybe. | |
| We'll see. | ||
| Oh, certainly, Natalie. | ||
| Thank you so much for having me. | ||
| But, you know, unfortunately with today's inflation numbers, like you said, we see inflation not slowing down anymore, like the White House has been telling us over the last year, but instead accelerating. | ||
| We're seeing prices in July rise even faster. | ||
| Then they rose in the month of June. | ||
| And one of the things that people need to remember with these inflation numbers, even though the politicians love to say, oh, well, inflation is coming down, that doesn't mean prices are coming down. | ||
| Even when inflation was falling over the previous year, we never actually saw prices come down. | ||
| We might see individual prices like the price of gasoline come down for a brief period, but now It's going back and it is still far above where it was when Biden took office. | ||
| In fact, if you look at prices in general, they're 16% higher today than in January of 2021. | ||
| And unfortunately, the CPI really doesn't capture All of the pain that I think the American family is feeling right now. | ||
| Housing is a perfect example of that. | ||
| Not only have home prices gone up at a tremendous clip, again because of inflation, but on top of that, interest rates have risen and those two things combined have literally doubled the monthly mortgage payment on a median priced home in America today compared to when Biden took office. | ||
| So you're going to spend literally $12,000 a year more for the same house. | ||
| That is not captured in the CPI, certainly not in its entirety. | ||
| There was also a great article out today saying that the cost of the Ukraine war, if you sort of divide it house by house, person by person, I think it was around $1,000 per household that we've been sending overseas, untraceably, to a country that is more corrupt than maybe the Biden family. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| Maybe the Biden family could sue me for defamation on that, but frankly, it's more likely that Ukraine would, but EJ, I would assume that the Treasury numbers show a similar kind of economic, show similar indicators. | ||
| Am I right on that? | ||
| Oh, you're spot on, Natalie. | ||
| And the spending by the Treasury is very related to the inflation. | ||
| What causes the inflation is the government spending, borrowing, and printing too much money. | ||
| And unfortunately, we are seeing that pattern continue today. | ||
| One of the really unfortunate things, I'm just seeing the graphic on the screen right now. | ||
| I'll touch on that real quick before we do the Treasury. | ||
| Biden has been draining the strategic petroleum reserve over the last year, and that has helped to bring down prices. | ||
| But now that the draining of that reserve has ended, sure enough, the inflation rates have stopped coming down, and we can expect them to continue going back up. | ||
| But going back to the Treasury, what we've seen is that as the Treasury continues to spend and borrow at this breakneck pace, the deficit is exploding, the debt is exploding, And interest payments on the debt are also going sky high. | ||
| In fact, the interest payments on the debt in the current fiscal year are 25% higher than in the previous fiscal year. We are, by the end of this fiscal year, going to end up spending $850 billion just to service the debt, just in interest payments. We're not actually paying down the debt. This is just interest payments. And by the time we get to December, the end of the calendar year, we're going to have hit a trillion dollars. | ||
| I mean, that is almost half of what we take in in income taxes, which, by the way, are down right now. Receipts to the federal government have been falling this year because the economy is slowing under Joe Biden. | ||
| Conversely, spending is going up and that's precisely why this deficit keeps getting worse and it's going to continue to fuel inflation going forward. | ||
| Before I let you go, it brings me to what I think really is the fundamental question of the Biden regime, which as the days go by, I think the answer is clearer and clearer, right? | ||
| Is it intentionality or is it incompetence? | ||
| Because obviously the outputs, the results that we're seeing by no measure of spin, Even what Kareem Jean-Pierre tries to say at the White House podium, the bizarre Twitter videos that they put out. | ||
| You can't spin it. | ||
| It's not good. | ||
| And I think it really proves that there is an intentionality behind it. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And you brought up the draining of the strategic petroleum reserves. | ||
| Now, Hunter Biden's financial conflicts of interest there aside, can you just rehash real quick? | ||
| Not only how that really has led to so much of this economic catastrophe, but more importantly, how what Donald Trump understood, which is the theory of economic and energy independence, full spectrum energy dominance, I believe is the term you like to use, how that really is the path forward to get us out of this just economic purgatory. | ||
| Oh, certainly. | ||
| Energy affects the price of everything we do and everything we buy. | ||
| I think people really underestimate that. | ||
| And one of the reasons why prices have risen so much under Joe Biden is the fact that he declared war on American energy, literally on day one of his presidency, which he promised to do during his campaign. | ||
| So frankly, no one should be surprised about that fact. | ||
| But Joe Biden did essentially declare war on oil, gas, coal, and the result has been all of those going up in price because the production of all of them has been severely hamstrung during his administration, not just from the process of legislation, but also through regulation, through taxation. | ||
| A lot of people don't realize that the Inflation Reduction Act, which was deceptively named, but that's beside the point, the Inflation Reduction Act actually imposed additional taxes on those traditional reliable sources of American energy. | ||
| And as a result, costs have gone up across the economy. | ||
| And to try to hide a lot of that, the president did drain almost half of the strategic petroleum reserve. | ||
| But again, now that those drains have ended, there is nothing left to hold down those energy prices, which is a key reason why oil has recently breached $80 a barrel and will continue to stay at elevated levels Until the administration gets its act together and allows American producers to actually produce, to bring their product to market and to bring down prices. | ||
| EJ, if people want to follow you for your wonderful economic analysis, where can they find you and your writings? | ||
| Best place to find me is on Twitter at Real EJ Antoni. | ||
| EJ, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| And we'll be right back. | ||
| We've got about a minute before we've got to jump to break. | ||
| But Dr. Wolf, like I said, is going to be joining us to talk about a rather large COVID study. | ||
| But just remember this, especially the mainstream media, who likes to say that Hunter Biden's business deals, they're a right wing conspiracy and they have absolutely nothing to do with the policy outputs of Joe Biden's regime. | ||
| Although they like to say administration because, you know, democracy dies. | ||
| In darkness, among other things. | ||
| But remember this, Hunter Biden's business partners, CEFC, China Energy, go to their old websites that they've all erased. | ||
| They literally said that they were planning on how to commit, quote, warfare and engage in that against the United States, particularly on the front of energy security and energy independence. | ||
| Now, when you see the policies that are coming out of the Biden regime concurrently with that, The policies that are coming out that are affecting like what EJ was saying. | ||
| I think it's fair to say that it's not just China, but it's the Biden regime too that's waging war on the United States. | ||
| We'll be right back. | ||
| Dr. Wolf. | ||
|
unidentified
|
For you a choice. | |
| A choice between two worlds. | ||
| Will you take the blue pill and continue living in a world where a corrupt few control everything? | ||
| Or will you take the red pill and join us? | ||
| What the elites don't want you to know is that there are 200,000 open committee man seats in the Republican Party. | ||
| These party members are the ones who determine the future of the GOP. | ||
| Let's take our country back, one precinct at a time. | ||
| Visit precinctstrategy.com now. | ||
| Welcome back to the War Room where we again find ourselves in the sadly paradoxical situation where yes we are right but we don't want to be right. | ||
| There's a new meta-analysis that came out recently that had to do with the side effects of of course the COVID-19 vaccine that found that it is indeed quote, significantly associated with an increased incidence of cardiac related death among men. | ||
| Specifically, the study was focusing on. | ||
| Joining me to discuss this and some more, I think some things Anthony Fauci should pay attention to is of course, Dr. Naomi Wolf. | ||
| Naomi, if you wanna walk us through this study real quick and then we can get into the, I would say, financial delusions of a certain someone by the name of Anthony Fauci, I'd appreciate it. | ||
| Well, this is a big deal for two reasons, this study. | ||
| One is that it's in a completely unimpeachable source, very mainstream source. | ||
| PubMed is the database and the publication is a peer-reviewed publication, Human Vaccinology Immunotherapy, and it's Greg Marchand et al., and the title is Risk of All Caused In cardiac-related mortality after vaccination against COVID-19, a meta-analysis of self-controlled case series studies. | ||
| So it's, you know, in debating with legacy media, debating with, you know, loved ones who are scientists or doctors, they often dismiss or discard the work of dissident doctors, dissident researchers, and say it's not authoritative. | ||
| Well, this is an authoritative publication even by their standards. | ||
| The other reason it's a really big deal, Natalie, is the size of the denominator. | ||
| The self-controlled case series is a meta-analysis, as you mentioned, meaning it's a study of studies. | ||
| And what these authors did is they took three SCCSs, which are these self-controlled case series studies, investigating the safety of the vaccine, And the subjects then totaled about 750,000 patients. | ||
| So it's a lot. | ||
| You can't dismiss it. | ||
| It's not the numbers you see in the Pfizer documents that lead them to claim the vaccine is safe and effective, like eight patients or 172 patients. | ||
| These are real numbers. | ||
| And indeed, what these authors found is that cardiac-related mortality is associated. | ||
| There is a higher risk, an increased risk of cardiac-related mortality Um, from the vaccines and the other finding is that males are more likely to die of cardiac related illnesses than females are. | ||
| So this is really the first super mainstream, very, very big meta analysis published in a very mainstream publication to find that heart damage is real and attributed to the vaccine. | ||
| And also warn that men are more likely to die of damaged hearts from the vaccine than women are. | ||
| And it seems like Anthony Fauci's modus operandi of lying, I guess specifically lying to Congress. | ||
| Of course, Rand Paul just referred him for a criminal investigation to the D.C. | ||
| District Attorney. | ||
| But it seems like he also likes to lie about his finances, particularly in the form of royalty payments from pharmaceutical companies to NIH scientists who were under his control back when he worked. | ||
| I will. | ||
| It's so bad. | ||
| when he had some free time, when he wasn't sending our taxpayer dollars to Wuhan. Naomi, if you want to walk us through that story, I'm sure the Warren Posse would appreciate it. I will. It's so bad. I mean, so many people have looked at Dr. Fauci and Dr. Collins and the, you know, senior circle at the NIH and HHS and wondered what could possibly be motivating these people. One reason | ||
| 's book The Real Anthony Fauci was so important is that RFK Jr. | ||
| showed that there is an arrangement, which is legal incredibly, whereby our elected, I'm sorry, our appointed officials, who are already being paid substantial salaries with their tax dollars, are also allowed to get up to $150,000 a year from royalties and patents. And RFK Jr. found, and I was stunned, I'll never forget this, he found that Dr. | ||
| Fauci had eight patents. | ||
| And so now NIH documents that have been newly released show conclusively, and this is the defender, that statements made during congressional hearings to U.S. Senator Rand Paul and others were misleading, if not outright false, regarding third-party royalties paid before, during, and after the pandemic. | ||
| So there was a lawsuit from the organization Open the Books. | ||
| I believe they're friends of you all. | ||
| And they FOIAed these documents and NIH released them. | ||
| So what they showed, the numbers are stunning. | ||
| companies that paid NIH scientists $325 million in third-party royalties in 56,000 transactions just in the 11 years leading up to 2020. | ||
| And one sub-point is that in the U.S. | ||
| Senate hearings during 2022, which we'll never forget, Dr. Fauci refused, under oath, to Congress to disclose the companies who licensed his, quote, inventions and paid his third-party royalties. | ||
| Finally now, we know the companies that are paying him. | ||
| They are listed. | ||
| And the other, you know, shockers, and you're all over this kind of content, of course, is that Chinese-owned government pharmaceutical companies controlled by the CCP also paid the NIH third-party royalties to license technologies developed by our tax dollars. | ||
| One such company is right next to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. | ||
| Russia paid, Purdue Pharma, the makers of OxyContin, who of course are famously on the hook for having addicted people intentionally, and that Francis Collins himself received third-party royalties on his inventions from four companies | ||
| And in turn, what this Open the Books revelation shows is that Dr. Fauci, Dr. Collins, and their other colleagues who are getting these 56,000 individual payments altogether, were also shoveling contracts worth tens of millions of dollars to the companies that were paying them. | ||
| Dr. Wolf, we gotta jump. | ||
| I wish I could keep you longer to explain all the reasons why we should trust the experts. | ||
| But if people want to follow you, where can they go? | ||
| Thank you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Come to dailycloud.io or you can find me on Substack. | |
| Dr. Wolf. | ||
| Naomi, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| I think that should be the takeaway from this show. | ||
| All the reasons from Ukraine, to China, to the COVID vaccine, to the indictments, to the impeachments, to the forthcoming subpoena of Hunter and Joe Biden. | ||
| Trust the experts. | ||
| And I'll leave you with that. |
Export Selection