July 31, 2023 - Bannon's War Room
48:33
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
| Pray for our enemies. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because we're going medieval on these people. | |
| I got a free shot on all these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
| MAGA Media. | ||
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. Here's your host, Stephen K. Babb. | |
| We've seen mass illegal immigration undercut American jobs and wages, the rule of law, and our very social fabric. | ||
| Meanwhile, Washington politicians have spent hundreds of billions of dollars on a broken university system which has churned out students deep in debt and in positions where it's almost impossible for them to be successful and to start families. | ||
| Deaths due to opioids, alcoholism, and suicide have surged in this country, and depression and anxiety have risen even more due to recent lockdown COVID policies. | ||
| Over the past decade, life expectancy in the United States has declined, and it's been declining for a number of years now. | ||
| This is not normal. | ||
| This is not acceptable, and yet entrenched politicians in Washington refuse to change course. | ||
| Why would they? | ||
| Life for many of the people who are connected have never done better. | ||
| Right now, five of the eight wealthiest counties in the United States of America are suburbs of Washington, D.C. | ||
| How does that happen? | ||
| They're not producing anything of note other than a lot of debt and a lot of hot air. | ||
| So here's what we have to do to get this right. | ||
| First, we have to restore the economic sovereignty of this country and take back control of our economy from China. | ||
| This abusive The abusive relationship, the asymmetric relationship between our two countries must come to an end. | ||
| No more massive trade deficits. | ||
| No more importing of goods with stolen intellectual property. | ||
| No more preferential Trade status. | ||
| We need to incentivize the repatriation of American capital and investment here in the United States so we can recapture our supply chains and build a strong, durable industrial base. | ||
| And in Florida, we've actually taken action against the CCP. | ||
| We have banned the purchase of land in Florida by members of the Chinese Communist Party or its affiliates. | ||
| OK, Monday, 31 July, Year of Our Lord 2023. | ||
| And I want to give him something for the effort, but this was the big, this was the big economic speech today and kind of the third leg when they talk about policy and politico. | ||
| And if the guys in Denver, the team in Denver, the men and women there can put it up. | ||
| I want to talk about it for a second. | ||
| I got Boris up. | ||
| We were going to have Navarro. | ||
| I think I'm gonna have Navarro tomorrow so he can look at this whole speech and break it down. | ||
| This was the third policy leg of Governor DeSantis' challenge to President Trump. | ||
| And here's one of the reasons I've now gotten so upset about this challenge, because it just diverts attention, it diverts time, and most importantly, it diverts resources. | ||
| The opportunity cost to have to go against this. | ||
| Are you kidding me? | ||
| Is this it? | ||
| I mean, to use the—and it's like he just found the information. | ||
| Peter Schweitzer and I talked about—we're the guys that broke in and did the analysis and came out in 2012—2012, a dozen years ago, about the counties around Washington, D.C., the counties in Northern Virginia and, of course, on the Maryland side. | ||
| I mean, DeSantis is rolling this out, reading a speech. | ||
| First off, brother, if you're going to step up and talk about the economy, you have to understand you have to stand up with no notes. | ||
| You have to stand up with no speech. | ||
| You have to stand up with no teleprompter. | ||
| And you have to talk. | ||
| You have to. | ||
| People have to understand that you understand this and you understand the interconnectivity of it. | ||
| You went through all this effort, and you challenged President Trump, and you had, you know, potentially try to kneecap him for this? | ||
| Is this is what, this is it? | ||
| Your 10 parts? | ||
| To say it's juvenile is to insult juveniles. | ||
| And he's got Ken Griffin, and he's got all these guys, Jeff Rowe, and they, you've been thinking about this for two years, this is what you've been doing, and you've been focused, and this is what you gave me. | ||
| You're a big economic man. | ||
| I'm sitting there. | ||
| I got Navarro on it. | ||
| I got Boris is watching. | ||
| I got people watching. | ||
| I'm watching it. | ||
| And I'm saying, are you kidding me? | ||
| He's got the 10 pillars. | ||
| It's all just a bunch of talk. | ||
| It's a word salad. | ||
| I like the fact that he understands the Trump movement and understands that we're about American economic sovereignty and that we're economic nationalists and that you have to get the financial house in order of our country and you have to get the manufacturing base right and you have to get American economic sovereignty. | ||
| I like that. | ||
| But there's no understanding of that. | ||
| It's just a group of things. | ||
| It's all a focus group and slapped together. | ||
| Slapped together. | ||
| The people in the city of London told you this two months ago when DeSantis, who finally got a passport, went around for five days to Korea and Japan and Israel and ended up in London. | ||
| And they took him, remember in London, the old city is the Wall Street, because I call it City of London, I mean Europe's Wall Street. | ||
| They had him in the City of London at this reception, he was going to give a speech, and I talked to the guys there, and the Times of London, the Financial Times, they came in the next day and said, this guy doesn't have it. | ||
| The participants. | ||
| Because London's still the global capital, where, you know, McKinsey and Booz Allen and all the consulting firms and all the big international corporations, they're all there. | ||
| They all went and weighed and measured him. | ||
| He said he was like a small-time governor of a small state. | ||
| You just saw it in New Hampshire. | ||
| Brother, that can't be it. | ||
| That can't be it. | ||
| The War Room Posse, with our talks on capital markets, and the economy, and manufacturing, and trade policy, and the currency, the dollar, and how it's all inextricably linked. | ||
| They have a ten times, I could have a random member of this audience. | ||
| I stand on that podium with no notes, no notes and no prepared speech. | ||
| I could have a working class individual with no college education, hasn't borrowed money, doesn't intend to pay back to have some freaking gender studies degree. | ||
| I can have a working class man or woman driving a truck or working at a restaurant that's listened to The Worm for the last three years stand on that podium and give you an argument about the American economy that is a factor of 10 more sophisticated than Ron DeSantis. | ||
| This is what you got me, brother? | ||
| This is it? | ||
| This is what we raised $200 million for? | ||
| This is what old man Murdoch had you on time and time and time again? | ||
| And this also shows you The donors and the Murdochs and all that corrupt entity running the GOP, they have no interest. | ||
| Remember, this is their big champion now. | ||
| They're tired of him now. | ||
| And I can tell you, you can see why they're tired of him. | ||
| That ain't going to bring it. | ||
| Chris Sununu actually gets it. | ||
| Sununu went on Hugh Hewitt earlier. | ||
| It's in the political piece. | ||
| He said, this is not about policy. | ||
| This is about leadership and showing that you can bring this party together and that you can lead and you can show leadership. | ||
| Well, Sununu, since Sununu is a lightweight, and by the way, Sununu, just so you understand this, if your name was Chris Smith, you'd be a nothing in politics. | ||
| Your old man got you everything that you got just because you're part of the Sununu corrupt apparatus up there in New Hampshire. | ||
| That's the only reason you're anywhere. | ||
| But no, it is about policy. | ||
| It is about policy. | ||
| Remember, Trump is a man with a movement, and that movement is a populist economic nationalist movement. | ||
| Understand that. | ||
| That is why he's beloved. | ||
| DeSantis, this is now a joke. | ||
| That is a joke. | ||
| Any member of this audience that has a high school degree and has listened to this show for three years could stand on that podium without one note, with no teleprompter and no speech, and give a more organized, more thought-through understanding of the American economy and what needs to be done. | ||
| Boris Epstein, now we understand why the polling is where it is. | ||
| This thing today was just, it was like, it was okay, don't get me wrong, it was okay, and directionally it's so much better than other republics have done. | ||
| I like it. | ||
| The guy's trying, he's making an effort, but this is what you get after hundreds of millions of dollars and this big thing he's going to take on Trump and he's going to do this, is this is what, if you're sitting there and you and I know, if you're going to come out and this is your, and they pitched it, He's not just on woke. | ||
| He's on economics. | ||
| He understands economics. | ||
| It's not simply about woke. | ||
| If you prepare this, is this is what you got for me? | ||
| Is this it? | ||
| Is this what it's all about? | ||
| It doesn't show you this whole thing is just a sham. | ||
| This is nothing more than Ken Griffin and the oligarchs on Wall Street that control the Republican Party. | ||
| What they want is another neoliberal neocon. | ||
| Remember, DeSantis got off the reservation A couple of months ago when he said, literally lifting from the war room, which I have no problem, Ron, with your staff doing it, saying that this is nothing but a conflict on the eastern Russian-speaking, a territorial conflict on the eastern Russian-speaking border of the Ukraine and we should focus on the southern border. | ||
| Literally lifted word for word. | ||
| I got no problem. | ||
| I got no problem. | ||
| Right? | ||
| Uh, I have no problem to do that. | ||
| Fine. | ||
| And of course, when they said all the neocons and all the donors said, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. | ||
| You can't do that. | ||
| What do you mean? | ||
| What do you, what are you talking about? | ||
| That what, what, what, what? | ||
| And he flipped, he flipped to his neocon position 24 hours later. | ||
| Borsch, your assessment of the quote, major economic speech in New Hampshire today, sir. | ||
| Steve, honored to be with you, honored to be with the posse. | ||
| Here's my first assessment. | ||
| You know, I know a couple, two, three people who went to Harvard. | ||
| I think you may have, it's very unclear. | ||
| But in all seriousness, this guy went to Harvard undergrad and Yale Law, and this is his delivery? | ||
|
unidentified
|
With respect to my little boy... I actually, by the way, by the way, I actually think it's the reverse. | |
| I think it was Yale undergrad and Harvard Law, but your point's well taken. | ||
|
unidentified
|
For someone who went to Georgetown, right? | |
| He's Yale undergrad, Harvard Law, you're correct. | ||
| Yale undergrad, Harvard Law, okay? | ||
| And this is what you get? | ||
| With respect to my little boy, you know, I've been to a first grade recital with deliveries better than this. | ||
| We are great. | ||
| Well, first off, okay, let's talk, hold on, hold on, let's talk about, hang on, hang on, let's talk about the delivery. | ||
| He's reading the speech. | ||
| Brother, if you're going to take on Trump and if you want to change the direction of this country from the oligarchs, it has to be burned into your soul. | ||
| You should be able to go through chapter and verse and make connections and throw in anecdotes and call a couple of audibles during the speech. | ||
| Don't sit there like an automaton and read the thing. | ||
| And five of the eight counties surrounding Washington, D.C. | ||
| are the wealthiest counties in the country. | ||
| How did that happen? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I mean, okay, listen, if I wanted Beavis and Butthead as my president, I guess that's what I would get. | |
| You know what it is, Steve? | ||
| It's actually embarrassing. | ||
| It's embarrassing for the state of Florida, it's embarrassing for our country, and it's embarrassing for For the Rhinos and the Neocons. | ||
| This is the best they got? | ||
| And listen, here's the deal. | ||
| This is it? | ||
| This is why Ron the Sanctimonious, the Florida governor, this is why he's lost pretty much everything. | ||
| He lost a race for the Republican Study Committee. | ||
| He lost everything where he didn't have the backing of the greatest political machine, the greatest political force in modern American history, President Donald J. Trump. | ||
| Without President Trump, this is what you get. | ||
| You get this automaton who can't string two words together. | ||
| And you're totally right, Steve. | ||
| You should not be reading it, full stop. | ||
| But if you are going to read it, at least show some emotion, show you care. | ||
| And by the way, what about that crowd? | ||
| This is some of the most faint applause I've ever heard in my career. | ||
| Hold it, hold it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Not exactly, not exactly roaring standard ovation. | |
| When you give me a big line, and we are taking our country back from China, you got... | ||
| It's like you're at a PGA event and you're just double bogeyed, and the audience doesn't, the crowd doesn't know whether they should clap or laugh, so they give you, a couple of guys give you a clap. | ||
| Okay, Boris, hang over a second. | ||
| Boris Epstein's with us. | ||
| We called a couple of articles. | ||
| I got Navar going to come tomorrow morning because I do want to have, he laid out 10 principles, and I do want to Uh, go through it because I think it's important about where the mindset of the Republican Party is now to go through this. | ||
| Also, Carrie Lake is going to join us tomorrow. | ||
| I don't want to jam that in. | ||
| I got to spend some more time with Boris. | ||
| Julie Kelly is going to be with us on J6. | ||
| Julie, be with us at the bottom of the hour. | ||
| Man, and we've got a big Ukraine analysis and a CCP bioweapons lab analysis in the next hour, and also Tim Alboreno is going to join us on the hearings of Birchett, Gates, APL, and Mace last week in Washington. | ||
| All next, here in the War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| When there's no more, let's take down the CCD! | ||
| War Room, here's your host, Stephen K. Bamm. | ||
| But new polling shows that most Republican primary voters simply don't want to hear the truth. | ||
| In the latest survey from the New York Times and Siena College, Trump leads Florida Governor Ron DeSantis by 37 points, 54% to just 17% among likely GOP primary voters. | ||
| All other candidates earned less than 5% of support in the poll, which, we should note, was conducted before new charges were announced against Trump in the classified documents case, that superseding indictment. | ||
| If you take out all candidates other than Trump and DeSantis, the survey still shows The former president leading big by a margin of 62% to 31%. | ||
| The poll also suggests that 56% of Republicans say Trump did nothing wrong in the classified documents case, though it remains to be seen if last week's superseding indictment has any impact on that support. | ||
| My guess would be no. | ||
| And as it relates to Trump's actions after the 2020 vote, 75% of Republicans say he was exercising his right to contest the election. | ||
| Just 19% say his actions threatened American democracy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Charlie Sykes, Charlie Sykes, Charlie Sykes. | |
| So this is yet another poll. | ||
| That shows that this is Donald Trump's party, no matter what sort of legal peril he faces himself in. | ||
| We have just spent the first little bit of this show detailing the new allegations, and it sure doesn't seem like it matters. | ||
| That same dinner where we played that sound from Will Hurd, all the Republicans were there. | ||
| I won't surprise you to learn who had the biggest crowd and the biggest reception, and that's Donald Trump. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, I would say that these polls are unambiguous. | |
| What happened in Iowa was pretty clear. | ||
| If you wanted to know what the nature of the Republican Party was right now, I mean, he still dominates the party. | ||
| He goes into Iowa. | ||
| He insults the governor there. | ||
| And he's the only candidate that gets the standing ovation. | ||
| One of the candidates that actually calls him out is booed. | ||
| So the poll makes it very, very clear that at this point, I mean, here's the reality check, Jonathan. | ||
| I think you'd have to be naive to the point of being delusional to think that Donald Trump is not going to be the Republican nominee for president, despite all of this. | ||
| And I think you'd have to be naive to the point of being delusional to think that any of these indictments are going to change all of that, because what you have is this alternative reality of the Republican base. | ||
| I could play this forever, and I particularly want to play the part where, in fact, if we can get that other cut about the right-wing populism. | ||
| Just a short one. | ||
| I don't want it right yet. | ||
| I'm gonna get in a second. | ||
| Boris, I had Mark Mitchell of Rasmussen on this morning, and it's kind of a shout-out for the work he's done. | ||
| And help me out here, and please correct me if I'm wrong. | ||
| New York Times-Siena poll Harry Enten and CNN. | ||
| And I have a Harvard-Harris poll. | ||
| And the last time I looked, that's not Trafalgar, it's not Richard Beres, it's not Gateway Pundit, it's not Breitbart, it's not anyone that is towards the side of the Trump populist movement. | ||
| Nav Rasmussen. | ||
| They all have Trump up, I don't know, 30, 40, or 50 points in the primary. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's right. | |
| They all have Trump now up. | ||
| Each one of them has Trump up Five or more in the head to head matchup with Biden. | ||
| But most importantly, because still some people may be hesitant, reticent to say I'm voting for Trump. | ||
| They has him up 19 and 20 points among independents, 19 or 20 points among independents. | ||
| And we had the thing last night that the first time I think that, as Alex DeGrasse was sending me, it's trending now as I think R plus 2 or R plus 3 for the 2024. | ||
| Remember in 16 it was D plus 5, in 18 I think it was D plus 6, and in 2020 it was D plus 5 again. | ||
| So these are all massive, massive movements that are happening and now it's laid on top of Rasmus and so you're seeing that it's This is just not one-off. | ||
| It's like I always say, it's not the point, it's the slope. | ||
| And you can see all the trend lines and all the different polling is trending our way. | ||
| Your thoughts, sir? | ||
| Stephen, also Political Morning Council. | ||
| I mean, Political Morning Council, which is a poll that effectively weekly goes through the touchpoints. | ||
| And goes one by one by one. | ||
| President Trump is up by that, literally, right about the same, 56 to 17, 59 to 16. | ||
| These polls move time and time and time and time again, and they're all moving the same way. | ||
| He was at 56 to 17 in political morning consult, then he goes up to 59 to 16, then he'll be over 60, and the Florida governor continues to sink. | ||
| And then here's the other part that's vital. | ||
| You've got to be connecting the national polls to the state polls, and they literally line up one by one. | ||
| President Trump is up by huge amounts in Iowa, in South Carolina, in New Hampshire, and what you see happening Is a complete move away from any of these pretenders in the cubicle. | ||
| You know why, Steve? | ||
| Because the problems our country is facing are getting larger and larger and more and more serious. | ||
| And the Republican electorate and the country overall want the broadest shoulders possible to handle them. | ||
| And that's President Donald J. Trump. | ||
| Let me, I want to play this short then. | ||
| Can we play this short? | ||
| Because you've got to help me answer the question. | ||
| Why people that say they're Republicans as donors and why the corrupt foreigners that are the Murdochs, by the way, have I mentioned today they're foreigners? | ||
| Oh, okay. | ||
| I just did. | ||
| Why they are bound and determined to stop Donald J. Trump. | ||
| Can I have the short clip from Morning Mika this morning? | ||
|
unidentified
|
More and more, especially as candidates like Ron DeSantis have risen, who, while not a populist himself necessarily, certainly is far to the right of most voters in the country. | |
| Do you think that this is an overall realignment that we're seeing among Republican voters with right-wing populism? | ||
| Or is this really just more cult-like behavior about Donald Trump himself and Trumpism? | ||
| Boris, what is it about the realignment? | ||
| We're a right-wing populist movement, but they continue to smear it by just saying—and now it's over 50% of the American people. | ||
| I would actually argue it's probably 55% of the American people or more. | ||
| They're arguing—they still want to argue that this is nothing more than a cult. | ||
| Boris Epstein. | ||
| Well, first of all, just from those pictures, if I were Anybody who even cares a tiny smidge for the Florida governor, I would really strongly urge them to stop dressing like Glenn Youngkin's mini-me, okay? | ||
| It's an annihilation of humanity, the kind of which I've never seen. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's one of the most pathetic things I've ever seen. | |
| He's all shriveled up in that sweater vest. | ||
| Steve, one of the things in that poll, in the New York Times CNN poll, 75% of Republicans say that President Trump was in his full right, in that poll, in his full right to contest the election, which means at least 75% of Republicans believe the election was rigged and stolen, okay? | ||
| That is not just right-wing populism. | ||
| That means a MAGA is now, and it has been, Fully in control and fully ascendant within the Republican Party. | ||
| And no, this isn't about a cult. | ||
| This is about President Trump and his historical win in 2016 changed the Republican Party forever and changed the country forever. | ||
| And he united this broad spectrum of a coalition. | ||
| And yes, Morning Meeca and MSDNC, they don't want to acknowledge it because they don't want to accept it. | ||
| But this is reality. | ||
| This is reality, and it's reality that's spreading all the way from the West Coast to all the way to the East Coast. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The fact that Americans want to stand for America, for American manufacturing and American greatness. | |
| Let's play Hugh Hewitt. | ||
| I want to play Chris Sununu on Hugh Hewitt saying it's not about policy. | ||
| Let's play that clip. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So I'm coming back up here to Studio North during January in order to be close to that. | |
| Let me ask you now, again, keeping in mind the New Hampshire voters who are listening, the reason that Republican candidates come on this show all the time, including the former president, Governor Sanders, they want to talk to New Hampshire voters. | ||
| What should they say to New Hampshire voters to get their attention, Governor, and more importantly, their vote? | ||
| They should say, um, they should not worry about policy, they gotta show some character, and they gotta listen. | ||
| See, what I told Tim Scott, and I help all the candidates, I do events with all of them, and I'll tell it, Tim Scott was one of the candidates, as an example, who's got this great background story, and I said, look, make it shorter. | ||
| Make your story a little shorter so you give them more time to tell their story. | ||
| You gotta connect with people on their issues, not yours. | ||
| And don't start trying to impress people. | ||
| I tell this, I was talking to DeSantis about this and all that. | ||
| I said, don't worry about the policy stuff. | ||
| We got that. | ||
| You got to be about character, about looking people in the eye. | ||
| And you got to show that you're not just viable to stand on the stage. | ||
| You're the one on the stage. | ||
| You are the leader. | ||
| You are the winner. | ||
| You're the person that is going to inspire the rest of the party to get bigger and more excited. | ||
| So it's really about kind of that a little bit of that charisma and leadership that they got to show to folks one on one. | ||
| This is, this is, it's not about policy. | ||
| They treat you like morons. | ||
| They just want some guy up there to say, oh yeah, you know, I got a story, I got a great story. | ||
| It's all BS. | ||
| This is another lightweight Sununu. | ||
| Boris Epstein, your thoughts? | ||
| Of course, no doubt about it. | ||
| These people have lost any, and it's not just the electeds. | ||
| It's the electeds, and it's some of the big donors. | ||
| They have lost any relationship with reality and any relationship with Republican actual voters. | ||
| They do not understand that where our country is and our voters are is truly fighting against the Chinese Communist Party, truly fighting Against all the radical forces that are coming at us. | ||
| And yes, fighting against the weaponization of law enforcement, which President Trump is obviously leading as they come at him from every single angle. | ||
| And that is why the coalescence of support, and you see it in every poll, national and statewide, New Hampshire, Iowa, South Carolina, is unlike anything that truly has been seen in modern American history and has proven the rhinos wrong one more time. | ||
| And here's another poll that's very interesting to me. | ||
| Morning Consult put out a poll of Favorability of U.S. | ||
| Senators, and guess who is literally at the very bottom of the list? | ||
| The last one on the list is one and only Mitch McConnell. | ||
| Why? | ||
| Because Democrats don't like him, but the Republicans don't like him either because he's left our party behind. | ||
| He's upside down by 29. | ||
| How did they get to your morning newsletter? | ||
| How did they get to your Instagram? | ||
| Boris, thank you very much. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Boris is going to come hot, and hot on Twitter at BorisCP, hot on Twitter at BorisCP, hot on Twitter at Boris, hot on Instagram, Boris on the scrub site. Stay strong, God bless, and talk to you soon. | |
| Boris, thank you very much. Short commercial break. Julie Kelly, J6, next in the War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So I'm coming back up here to Studio North during January in order to be close to that. | |
| Let me ask you now, again, keeping in mind the New Hampshire voters who are listening, the reason that Republican candidates come on this show all the time, including the former president, Governor Sanders, they want to talk to New Hampshire voters. | ||
| What should they say to New Hampshire voters to get their attention, Governor, and more importantly, their vote? | ||
| They should say, um, they should not worry about policy, they gotta show some character, and they gotta listen. | ||
| See, what I told Tim Scott, and I help all the candidates, I do events with all of them, and I'll tell it, Tim Scott, which is one of the candidates, as an example, has got this great background story, and I said, look, make it shorter. | ||
| Make your story a little shorter so you give them more time to tell their story. | ||
| You gotta connect with people on their issues, not yours. | ||
| And don't start trying to impress people. | ||
| I tell this, I was talking to DeSantis about this and all that. | ||
| I said, don't worry about the policy stuff. | ||
| We got that. | ||
| You got to be about character, about looking people in the eye. | ||
| And you got to show that you're not just viable to stand on the stage. | ||
| You're the one on the stage. | ||
| You are the leader. | ||
| You are the winner. | ||
| You're the person that is going to inspire the rest of the party to get bigger and more excited. | ||
| So it's really about kind of that, a little bit of that charisma and leadership that they got to show to folks one-on-one. | ||
| All the phoniness. | ||
| You want to know why the country's in the shape it's in? | ||
| Right there, you just heard it. | ||
| And remember, Chris Sununu is royalty. | ||
| He's a princeling in the Bush junta. | ||
| And I'm talking old man Bush, not the moronic fricking son that got us into the war in Iraq. | ||
| I'm not talking about that idiot. | ||
| I'm talking about the old man. | ||
| I'm talking about the railhead of the problems of part of the establishment. | ||
| Remember, Old Man Sununu was Bush's Chief of Staff. | ||
| I think Old Man Sununu, I gotta check this, was the Chief of Staff when he sent Scowcroft over to see Deng Xiaoping to tell Deng Xiaoping the blood wasn't washed off the frickin' concrete in Tiananmen Square when he went over there and said, we got your back. | ||
| We got your back. | ||
| For the second time in 50 years, the American establishment and the American administrative state sold out Lao Bajing, sold out the Chinese people, all the suffering they had been through. | ||
| And right there, six months before the Berlin Wall fell, all of modern history would have been different. | ||
| They rose up and actually built out of what? | ||
| Crate paper? | ||
| A Goddess of Liberty? | ||
| A replica? | ||
| The Statue of Liberty right there? | ||
| There was old man Sununu, and that's the devil's spawn son, and he's mocking you. | ||
| It's not about policy. | ||
| We got that. | ||
| It's not about policy. | ||
| We got that. | ||
| That's because it's all neoliberal, neocon, elitist. | ||
| This is why that is the controlled opposition, and they're up on your grill. | ||
| Just show me some charisma. | ||
| Let me be able to get you on Fox and have the moron Steve Doocy on the sofa bouncing up and down on the white sofa. | ||
| Well, we got Governor Glenn Youngkin. | ||
| This is why the country... It's not the progressive radical Democrats. | ||
| Of course they want to change the country with the oligarchs on Wall Street and the tech oligarchs. | ||
| Obviously they want to change it. | ||
| They're globalists. | ||
| It's the people you've been ringing doorbells for and sending money to and knocking on doors and voting for. | ||
| Sununu is the ether of that. | ||
| Don't worry about policy. | ||
| We got that. | ||
| We got that. | ||
| The smart ones, the elders, the people that make things happen. | ||
| We got that. | ||
| Well, the war room posse would beg to differ, sir. | ||
| It is about policy, and yes, it's about people that can hammer through. | ||
| That's why Trump, he's an armor-piercing shell. | ||
| He's the first to admit he's imperfect. | ||
| He's an armor-piercing shell. | ||
| Why do people love him? | ||
| Why are people bonding more than ever back on this, his third win for the presidency in the second term? | ||
| Why is that? | ||
| When Fox News and all the Republican establishment and all the Republican media are against him? | ||
| Because they understand, they get it. | ||
| And you had Sununu and you got, no offense, DeSantis, that was, let me be blunt, that was a disgrace. | ||
| That was a disgrace. | ||
| If that's what you've got, in the five of the eight counties in around Washington, D.C. | ||
| are the wealthiest counties in the country. | ||
| How did that happen? | ||
| All they're selling is hot air. | ||
| Come on, dude, give it up. | ||
| Frickin' joke. | ||
| Julie Kelly, you're all after, and this is a warrior right here, Julie Kelly, you're all after Jack Smith. | ||
| I read your article on your sub saying, is Jack Smith, he did it for all the J6 guys, there's still guys rotting in jails that don't want to come to trial. | ||
| Is he going to try to come forward when he indicts Trump and look to put President Trump in jail awaiting his trial? | ||
| Is that what's going to happen, ma'am? | ||
| He very well could, and I lay out in my article on my sub stack exactly why. | ||
| And there's a few reasons why Jack Smith could request pretrial detention, which is basically denying bail for Donald Trump. | ||
| First of all, let's keep in mind this case, unlike the classified documents case, will be prosecuted in the cesspool, Trump-hating cesspool, that is the D.C. | ||
| federal courthouse. | ||
| And these judges have acted as nothing more than a rubber stamp, first for DOJ and now for Jack Smith, anything related to the prosecution of Donald Trump, his associates, and of course, all the way down to his voters and supporters. | ||
| So there was an important ruling handed down by Beryl Howell, one of our favorite judges, Obama appointee, in February of 2021. | ||
| And Steve, what she did was so egregious. | ||
| She actually laid out specific no bail rules. | ||
| for January 6th defendants. | ||
| It didn't matter what their conduct was. | ||
| They didn't even know each other. | ||
| What she argued was they acted as part of a mob. | ||
| And this was such a horrific day that anyone who is prosecuted related to the events of January 6th should be pulled into this whole group of January 6th defendants and treated differently based on their crimes versus anybody else who would go before her or the other DC judges. | ||
| So I explained this very important ruling. | ||
| It was six factors in the case of William Crestman, who, by the way, Steve, is still in jail from February of 2021. | ||
| He's still in jail. | ||
| His trial is supposed to start Friday. | ||
| It's been delayed numerous times. | ||
| So it's called- Hang on. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ho, ho, ho, ho, ho, ho, ho, hang on. | |
| You're telling me there's a guy in jail two and a half years after he was indicted? | ||
| And he hasn't gone to trial yet? | ||
| Is this the most dangerous terrorist that has ever walked planet Earth? | ||
| How do you remain in jail for two and a half years prior to your trial starting, ma'am? | ||
| What did this guy do? | ||
| Did he blow up the Capitol? | ||
| Did he destroy the White House? | ||
| Did he take down the Washington Monument? | ||
| Did he level a school of schoolchildren? | ||
| What did he do? | ||
| I wish he was a dangerous terrorist because then he would have all of the criminal justice and all the civil rights organizations and big shot criminal defense attorneys who come to routinely come to the defense of actual foreign terrorists over the years. | ||
| But when you have a man like William Crestman, who was charged as one of the members, alleged members of the Proud Boys, he's charged with conspiracy, the obstruction of an official proceeding felony that I'm sure will be the top count The Jack Smith brings against Donald Trump for January 6th. | ||
| I think he's accused of interfering with a police officer. | ||
| I don't even think he's charged with attacking a police officer. | ||
| But what DOJ does is they add superseding indictments, like we saw last Friday in the case of the classified documents, Jack Smith adding charges and another defendant. | ||
| And what that does is basically resets the clock. | ||
| And so there's been superseding indictments in that case. | ||
| Then they've added, I believe, co-defendants. | ||
| And so this has dragged on the process now for two and a half years, remarkably. | ||
| But what happened in this decision was Beryl Howell setting out what she called a framework for every one of the D.C. | ||
| judges to consider when they were deciding whether to deny bail for January 6th defendants. | ||
| And as you know, we've talked about now, more than a hundred January 6th defendants, including those not accused of any violence, attacking police officers or destroying property, have been held, denied bail under pretrial detention orders by judges appointed by Republican and Democratic presidents. | ||
| So that is really the grounds for which Jack Smith could seek to deny Donald Trump's release. | ||
| You think that he is going to, because he's done this with other J6 things, you think particularly if he indicts him for what is it, stopping a government proceeding, stopping a proceeding, that since he's obstruction of the proceeding, that he will then move to for pretrial incarceration? | ||
| He absolutely very well could. | ||
| And I don't think anyone should be surprised. | ||
| If Jack Smith does file a motion to keep Donald Trump in custody based on the criminal counts that I expect in this forthcoming indictment, there is precedent to keep people only charged with obstruction and a few other misdemeanors. | ||
| There is precedent, believe it or not, judges who have denied their release simply because they were tied to the events of January 6th. | ||
| So he has this court ruling. | ||
| He has case precedent by multiple judges. | ||
| He also could use the classified documents prosecution as another reason to try to convince, easily convince a D.C. | ||
| judge that Donald Trump poses a threat to the community, to the country, because he's being prosecuted for willfully retaining national defense information, and at the same time is going to be charged with at least first indictment, obstruction, and a few other counts. | ||
| Now, this will only be the first indictment. | ||
| I expect at least a few superseding indictments in January 6 as well. | ||
| So that's what I just lay out in my piece and people should not put it past me. | ||
| Why do you say superseding? | ||
| Why do you say there's going to be superseding? | ||
| Because won't that just move the trial back? | ||
| I thought Smith was on a time crunch here. | ||
| No, I definitely, I don't think he even ever wants to go to trial in a classified documents case because it's all garbage. | ||
| I mean, I posted on Twitter this- Not classified documents. | ||
| Hang on, hang on. | ||
| Not classified documents. | ||
| I agree with you and I agree. | ||
| I'm talking about in J6. | ||
| I thought he's under the clock here. | ||
| Is he going to put out superseding, I thought he said he's going to put out superseding indictments on J6. | ||
| Do you believe that? | ||
| Oh, absolutely. | ||
| I mean, even if this is the initial indictment, he'd be hard pressed to take this to trial before the November election. | ||
| So what Jack Smith wants to do in DOJ in the media is death by a thousand cuts. | ||
| So this will be the first big headline, whatever the first criminal indictment contains, the counts in that indictment. | ||
| But he's going to add counts and he's going to add defendants because he needs to keep fueling the headlines. | ||
| And these defendants could be John Eastman, Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, Mark Meadows. | ||
| They could be a few House members. | ||
| So this is the long game that he's going to play. | ||
| He's not trying to get to trial before November. | ||
| He is just trying to keep building the momentum, generating this bloodlust on the left, which is another reason why I think he might seek pretrial detention, because they have created this expectation, Steve, you know this for more than six years, that this Department of Justice is going to get Donald Trump behind bars. | ||
| They're not going to do it before the election, because neither one of these trials will get to cases will get to trial before then. | ||
| The only way they can get him behind bars, put that image in everyone's mind, gratify the millions of Democratic Party voters who have been brainwashed, willfully brainwashed by this propaganda, is to put him behind bars awaiting trial. | ||
| And I have no doubt that Jack Smith could pursue that. | ||
| And if he does, I have no doubt a judge will sign off on it. | ||
| 20 were arrested last week. | ||
| I don't have time to go through that today, but I got to get you back on here. | ||
| But I need everybody to go to your Substack, walk through how people get there and how they connect with you on social media. | ||
| Thanks so much, Steve. | ||
| So I'm on Substack Declassified with Julie Kelly. | ||
| If you become a subscriber, you get all my pieces right to your mailbox. | ||
| I post a lot of breaking news on Twitter, Julie underscore Kelly, too. | ||
| You can also subscribe to me there where you can get different content and different levels of engagement. | ||
| So it's a new era in the media space. | ||
| It's exciting. | ||
| But I encourage people to check out my work at mysubstack, please. | ||
| Julie Kelly, you're the best. | ||
| Fight on, ma'am. | ||
| I'm going to have you back on here about these indictments and also what happened last week. | ||
| Another 20, I think, people, which wasn't even covered, except by you. | ||
| Another 20 rounded up. | ||
| Julie Kelly, thank you very much. | ||
| Honor to have you on here, ma'am. | ||
| Thanks for having me on, Steve. | ||
| Of everything that's been happening over the last weekend, One of the most important things may have missed everybody's grasp. | ||
| WorldCoin. | ||
| Sam Altman. | ||
| We've asked Joe Allen to come off the road and explain it all to us. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| Back in the warm-up moment. | ||
| WorldCoin. | ||
| Biometrics. | ||
| Joe Allen. | ||
| Transhumanism. | ||
| All next. | ||
| We will fight till they're all gone. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We rejoice when there is no more. | |
| Let's take down the CCP. | ||
| Introducing Amazon One, a free service that lets you use your palm to quickly pay for things, gain access, earn rewards, and more. | ||
| All you need is a credit card, your phone number, and your palm. | ||
| That's it. | ||
| Since your palm is unique and can't be lost or misplaced, you can get things done quickly and securely. | ||
| At the Clear Enrollment Center, our Clear Ambassador will guide you through the fast, one-time enrollment process. | ||
| No appointment is necessary. | ||
| We'll capture your face and eyes and do a one-time scan of your physical ID like a driver's license or passport ID. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| Okay? | ||
| Today on the show, we have two of the WorldCoin founders, Alex Blania and Sam Altman. | ||
| Sam, I think this story starts with you. | ||
| Can you talk about just like the inception of the idea of WorldCoin, where it came from and what the aha moment about why we need something like WorldCoin in the future? | ||
| I started thinking initially that it would be quite powerful if you could have the biggest network, like the biggest financial and identity network imaginable. | ||
| global, if you're going to have something truly global, and sort of had no good ideas about how to do that. The first version we started talking about this was something like, well, what if we scan the palm of everybody on earth? But the reason I was excited about it is as the world sort of heads towards powerful AI systems, I thought that if we could do something to eventually redistribute wealth through some sort of global UBI at scale, or maybe even access to these systems, which would be the most important component of wealth | ||
| someday, and also be able to verify unique humanness with a different lens on how to preserve privacy, that would be more important as sort of AI advanced. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'll see you next time. | |
| Okay, welcome back. | ||
| Joe Allen joins us. | ||
| So right there, he lays it out. | ||
| This is getting the cattle, this is getting the cattle into the slough to get ready for the slaughter. | ||
| Is this any different than the old, than Abilene, Texas? | ||
| You drive them up, you drive the cattle up from Texas into Kansas and get them ready for the slaughterhouse, sir? | ||
| Yeah, I'm definitely hearing a lot of mooing from the WorldCoin customers. | ||
| Same with Amazon One Palm payment and definitely same with the clear iris identification. | ||
| It's really, Steve, you know, we talked about it before and you said, you know, this is a small number of people. | ||
| Right now, WorldCoin, they have just over 2 million at last count, but that's only after a very short period of time of signing people up. | ||
| Amazon One has 3 million people who have signed their biometric Palm identity. | ||
| I don't know if it will read your future or your lifeline, but it will definitely be used as a sort of biological credit card. | ||
| And then Clear, which has been around for a long time, they have about 16 million customers. | ||
| So it's a small number of people proportionately, but it's also extremely visible. | ||
| So Amazon, you've got every Whole Foods store in the country is going to be having these Palm payment systems, and Amazon One is in all these different entertainment venues. | ||
| And then Clear. | ||
| You see that in every airport. | ||
| And even if it is a small number of people, it's a growing number of people. | ||
| And it really is an ominous sign. | ||
| So, right now as well, you have Europe moving to bar free passage for American passports in Europe. | ||
| 2024 is going to require a visa. | ||
| And it's going to require biometric information, so you would need to submit either maybe fingerprints, or perhaps your world ID. | ||
| These things aren't really going to be normalized. | ||
| We're underwriting Europe's defense. | ||
| We underwrite the whole thing through NATO. | ||
| You're not going to be able to go to Europe unless you give them the biometric. | ||
| I mean, this is, they put it out, you're going to have to have a visa now to go to Europe. | ||
| And you're going to have to provide biometric. | ||
| Real quickly while I've got you there, I want to go back to WorldCoin, because WorldCoin is much more insidious than the first two. | ||
| Give me a minute on WorldCoin, Sam Altman, on Sam Altman trying to create a global financial system once he's got your biometric information. | ||
| Yeah, Sam Altman is key to this because of all the other projects he's working on. | ||
| Right now, they're assuring people that WorldCoin works on a zero-knowledge proof, meaning that even they wouldn't be able to see your biometric ID. | ||
| That is still in the works, and there's really no way to be assured that you can trust them. | ||
| On the larger scale, though, of course, Sam Altman is the co-founder and now CEO of OpenAI. | ||
| Moving towards artificial general intelligence by their own admission, and Sam Altman is a true believer, he thinks that it's going to change everything, his Moore's Law for everything. | ||
| It will replace all menial labor, most intellectual labor, eventually all labor, and so it will require everyone to have a sort of quasi-socialist, quasi-communist, universal basic income. | ||
| World ID, again by his own description, and World Coin is the precursor for a world in which artificial intelligence runs everything, and in order to prove your humanness, to get your digital blockchain ration, you will need to have your eyeball scanned with the World Coin evil orb. | ||
| All of it, you know, Steve, you never know exactly how far any of these things will actually go. | ||
| It's moving forward fast and absolutely, it doesn't matter if it ends up being World Coin. | ||
| All these technologies are setting a precedent for other companies and maybe more importantly for nations who would like to use this. | ||
| And the sheep are lining up to get sheared. | ||
| Real quickly, the book is a tour de force, but your hit, your one hour with Alex Jones, it was incredible. | ||
| Where do people get the book? | ||
| How do they get your writing, sir? | ||
| You can find Dark Aeon, pre-sale, Amazon, all places books are sold. | ||
| You can find links at the top of my social media, at J-O-E-B-O-T-X-Y-Z, Twitter and Gitter, warroom.org, under the transhumanism tab right there, and then you've got joebot.xyz. | ||
| Thank you very much, dude. | ||
| Joe, amazing. | ||
| We're going to have you on your travels as you go around and promote the book, but fantastic opening on Alex Jones today. | ||
| Thank you, sir, for coming on. | ||
| Thank you very much, Dave. | ||
| This world coin, quite, quite, quite serious. | ||
| Anybody want your biometric information? | ||
| He said, maybe not. | ||
| Okay, Paul Robeson takes us out. | ||
| We're going to go to Rome next, about the Ukraine. | ||
| Also, Colonel Mills is going to join us about the CCP and what is going on in the middle of California. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Is this a bioweapons lab we just uncovered? | |
| Also, Tim Alberino is going to join us about what he thinks is one of the most important congressional hearings in the history of our republic. | ||
| All next hour. | ||
| Stick around. | ||
| In the War Room. |
Export Selection