Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
Pray for our enemies. | ||
unidentified
|
Because we're going medieval on these people. | |
I got a free shot on all these networks lying about the people. | ||
The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
I know you've tried to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
It's going to happen. | ||
And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved! | ||
unidentified
|
War Room. Here's your host, Stephen K. Bamm. | |
Only followed where the information has taken us. | ||
it has. But... | ||
unidentified
|
And this is rising to the level of impeachment inquiry. | |
House Republicans' revenge and retribution agenda kicks into high gear with a new obsession to impeach President Biden for an offense to be named later. | ||
Plus, Rudy Giuliani admits to lying about two Georgia election workers, lies that turned their worlds upside down and put their lives at risk. | ||
The lawyer for those women joins me tonight. | ||
And pro-choice supporters get enough signatures to put reproductive rights on the ballot in Ohio. | ||
Polls show it has the backing of a clear majority of voters. | ||
But if Republicans get their way, that may not matter. | ||
And we begin tonight with the two portrayals of Donald Trump. | ||
The first is the image he wants everyone to believe is the real Trump, exemplified by his rather embarrassing digital trading card venture, where he presented himself as a cowboy, a rock star, and an actual superhero. | ||
It's the one his most ardent base ardently believes in. | ||
It's the one that earned him a literal cult. | ||
But the second image is revealing itself more and more as Trump responds to his multiple indictments. | ||
It's the one where he's not the great and powerful whiz who lives in Oz, but rather the man hiding behind the curtain who is terrified and desperate. | ||
Richard Pryor killed that role, by the way. | ||
Best movie ever. | ||
But the point is, Trump has always been able to use his bravado and showmanship to avoid repercussions for his actions. | ||
But now, at age 77, he's facing a situation that he cannot talk his way out of, with no powerful dad to bail him out and no Roy Cohn to fix his legal peril. | ||
And according to people who know him, Donald Trump is afraid that he could actually wind up in prison, like his Oath Keepers and Proud Boy supporters. | ||
Perhaps Orange Jumpsuit Trump might be a more apt addition to the next series of his digital trading cards. | ||
With nowhere else to turn, he's now relying on his loyal followers in Congress, like Speaker Mike Hevin, to somehow save him. | ||
unidentified
|
Congresswoman, we know ultimately that the Hunter Biden story is a Joe Biden story. | |
And now you have the White House changing its language in an effort to distance the president from his son's foreign business dealings. | ||
Now, some Republicans in the House have floated a potential impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden over this issue. | ||
Is that something that you would support? | ||
Oh, absolutely. | ||
I'm in conversations with Speaker McCarthy and all of our members. | ||
And the important thing to know about impeachment inquiry is that ensures that the House is at the apex of its power and oversight responsibility. | ||
So it means that our subpoenas have the most power possible when it comes to litigating this out in court, because we know getting the facts is not going to be easy. | ||
We know that this White House, this Department of Justice, They are trying to cover up for Hunter Biden and ultimately Joe Biden. | ||
And what is important that you mentioned at the beginning of your statement is the White House is trying to quietly change its language. | ||
First, it said that Joe Biden never spoke to his son Hunter Biden about Hunter's business dealings. | ||
They have changed that language to now saying Joe Biden has never been in business with Hunter Biden's business operations. | ||
That is a significant change, and the fact that the White House press secretary lied to the American people to say, oh no, it's the same position we've always had, it is only because of House Republicans that we've discovered the dozens of LLCs, which is illegal money laundering. | ||
The fact that nearly 20 Biden family members have profited illegally. | ||
I believe that the American people are smart. | ||
They understand that the big guy is Joe Biden. | ||
But having that impeachment inquiry allows us to get all the facts and have the most constitutionally recognized power from the House of Representatives. | ||
unidentified
|
How many more facts do you need? | |
I mean, you and committee chairman Jim Jordan, James Comer, Jason Smith sent the letter to the White House demanding answers on the White House shifting the message on the president's role in Hunter's business. | ||
But we already have bank records. | ||
We have witness testimony. | ||
A lot of people are saying, you know, if you're going to impeach, get moving already. | ||
Well, Maria, I've been one of the most forward-leaning in saying we need to leave no stone unturned. | ||
And ultimately, I believe we're going to find more LLCs, and I believe we're going to find LLCs that go straight to Joe Biden himself. | ||
And the American people deserve to know that. | ||
They deserve to have all of the facts. | ||
Yeah. | ||
And we're going to do that. | ||
And I believe that what we've uncovered just in seven months alone is stunning. | ||
It is chilling. | ||
It is the biggest political scandal of my lifetime and perhaps the last century, perhaps ever. | ||
But I want to make sure that we have all the evidence possible. | ||
The American people deserve nothing less, especially, you know, especially as we're seeing Joe Biden, you know, his weak policies, but they need to understand the level of corruption that it goes straight to the top. | ||
Congress, if you will, please investigate the political witch hunts against me currently being brought by the corrupt DOJ and FBI, who are totally out of control. | ||
Under McCarthy's leadership, they may try, but it will do Trump no good as he faces Jack Smith's multiple investigations, plus those current and possible prosecutions in New York and Georgia. | ||
The trouble for Trump is that all of his wild claims about a stolen election, which never turned up a single shred of evidence, continue to fall apart to this day. | ||
The latest example comes from the ringleader of his post-election so-called elite strike team of lawyers, Rudy Giuliani. | ||
It's Thursday, it's Thursday, 27 July. | ||
It's Thursday. | ||
When the voice of God talks, Denver, bring down the... | ||
Thursday. | ||
We're gonna get this right yet. | ||
Thursday, 27 July, Year of the Lord 2023. | ||
We're honored To have Congressman Bishop here, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
Appreciate it from North Carolina. | ||
Really appreciate you coming by here on a quite hot and humid day. | ||
We've got Mike Davis. | ||
Kash Patel is going to join us. | ||
We've got Dave Brat. | ||
We're pretty jammed up. | ||
First, let me go to you, Congressman. | ||
Elise Stefanik, she's someone that's quite strategic and careful. | ||
You know, she came kind of out of nowhere in the first impeachment to really be the messaging person, kind of stepped up. | ||
That's where she came to the forefront. | ||
unidentified
|
Right. | |
She is not one. | ||
She's not a bomb thrower. | ||
unidentified
|
Correct. | |
That's a pretty explosive interview this morning on on Maria Bartiromo, which is probably the biggest platform for morning news for MAGA. | ||
What's your take on that? | ||
unidentified
|
Um, Elise is, uh, disciplined and, uh, and she hits pretty hard when it's time. | |
So I, but I mean, from my perspective, Steve, it is time. | ||
This, this, uh, the prosecution, the plea deal, uh, the, uh, interference, the testimony of these IRS whistleblowers, no one's been able to lay a glove on them. | ||
And the United States Attorney Weiss has changed his story, or the Justice Department has changed its story three times, as Jim Jordan is fond of saying. | ||
This is real, and it's heading in the direction. | ||
This is kind of your line of country, too, a little bit, right? | ||
unidentified
|
I'm pretty comfortable in this area. | |
And tell our audience why is that? | ||
unidentified
|
Well, I've spent 30 years practicing law. | |
I was a civil lawyer. | ||
I didn't try criminal cases, but it's certainly within my ken. | ||
And I also am somebody who thinks we ought to move and deal with things that are presented to us instead of always hanging back and being passive. | ||
My experience is that Republican voters are fed up to hear with passivity in the face of things that clearly need to be done. | ||
I don't want, you know, I don't want to put you in an uncomfortable position, but they had Hudson, who's, I guess, heading up, Congressman Hudson from Carolina, I think he's down near your district, I think you guys... I think we are chasing each other. | ||
He came, I thought it was something unusual, and he's on TV saying, when he goes back home, nobody talks about this. | ||
And we make a very specific thing here at the War Room, we have a congressman on, we really want to hear from them, but most importantly, we always ask them, what are your constituents saying about whatever the topics of the day are, debt ceiling or whatever. | ||
He made a statement. | ||
He's been making a statement that when he's back home, nobody's talking about Hunter Biden. | ||
All what they're talking about is the economy and they're talking about immigration, talking about crime. | ||
And I looked up his record. | ||
He voted for the debt ceiling. | ||
How can he possibly? | ||
I mean, just the chutzpah. | ||
Do they not think that people like War Room or these podcasts are all over all the information on that? | ||
Because that's just up in your grill. | ||
That's Uh, that's like Fox TV, TV for stupid people, okay? | ||
That you're just going to film. | ||
This guy's been terrible in all three, totally performative, yet he's out there saying nobody back home is talking about it. | ||
Now we've had slew of congressmen on here and they're saying people are fed up. | ||
My experience is different than Richard described. | ||
simply for reason they're trading with the enemy whether it's in ukraine in this money in the chinese communist party people want to get to the bottom of now what what what is it what what are the folks back in that that uh... that your your side by side his mattress tricks down there what for the killing in saying my experience is different than richard described i was in davidson county north carolina saturday with the uh... | ||
unidentified
|
a gathering uh... one thing that's shocks me steve is a little bit like what i said that war room uh... | |
listeners, viewers. | ||
People... | ||
It's amazing to me that people in rural North Carolina are on top of the details of lots of things. | ||
Lots of things. | ||
I asked a question, I said, I'm just curious, who here watches congressional hearings? | ||
75% of the hands went up. | ||
And they know the stuff on censorship. | ||
They know all the stuff we're doing in the Weaponization Committee. | ||
And they certainly know the details of Hunter Biden's sweet deal, the testimony of the IRS whistleblowers. | ||
I get it. | ||
Constantly. | ||
And I get it when I'm calling people, too. | ||
And people are not asking immediately to go to impeachment. | ||
What they want is a formal process, a formal process of an impeachment inquiry to get to the bottom of exactly what went on. | ||
Is that your take? | ||
unidentified
|
To be fair, there are people who get ahead of themselves, and that want to... Right? | |
A couple or three of those may come on war every now and again. | ||
War may be that. | ||
I resemble that comment. | ||
unidentified
|
People in Congress watching this would be saying, look, this is a pot calling the kettle black, maybe with me. | |
But I do think that there are some who have an inclination to wait, and when it gets more compelling, still wait, and never get there. | ||
So I think you've got to do it at the right time. | ||
But I think American people are pretty convinced that this one's really tremendously different, very significant. | ||
And there's been no effective answers to any of the essential facts from those who would defend the Biden administration and Hunter Biden. | ||
Mike Davis, you kind of, things blew up yesterday after you came on talking about that there was an oral deal and now we have the details of the judge on this constitutionality and that's getting people's heads blown up. | ||
Walk us through what we now know what DOJ was actually trying to do, sir. | ||
So not only was DOJ trying to essentially give Hunter Biden and Joe Biden a backdoor pardon through this sweetheart plea agreements, they were also trying to make it for Hunter Biden, if there were any violations of his probation or supervised release that the judge and not the US Attorney's Office would prosecute the violations. | ||
And the judge correctly said that would violate the constitution. | ||
It's up to the executive branch to prosecute, not a federal judge. | ||
And the reason the Biden Justice Department and Hunter Biden's lawyers were trying to do this is they're worried that President Trump is gonna take back the White House and his Justice Department may not have so much of a sweetheart deal for Hunter Biden if Hunter Biden violates supervised release or probation. | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
Bye-bye. | ||
How brazen is that for the Justice Department, the United States of America, and Southern District to make that proposal? | ||
Or not Southern District, Delaware to make that proposal, sir? | ||
This is unprecedented, to put it kindly. | ||
This is clearly a sweetheart deal by the Biden Justice Department and Hunter Biden to protect the Biden family, to protect their boss, President Joe Biden, who stands credibly accused of taking tens of millions of dollars in foreign bribes and other corruption as vice president and beyond. | ||
The President of the United States is compromised and the Biden Justice Department is covering it up. | ||
Mike, can you hang on? | ||
I know you got a bounce. | ||
Can you just hang on through the commercial break? | ||
Because I want to ask you. | ||
First of all, there are two tells here. | ||
There's one tell that they are absolutely fully panicked about the return of Donald Trump. | ||
And that's why they try to do this unconstitutional deal. | ||
And hey, remember what Davis told us yesterday. | ||
This judge is no fire-breathing MAGA Trump appointee, right? | ||
This is someone who gave money to Hillary Clinton's campaign. | ||
This is a progressive liberal judge that could even, you know, she said in front of these guys, I'm ripping up the deal in open court. | ||
I mean, it was just, it was embarrassing. | ||
So let's go to commercial break. | ||
We got Congressman Bishop is with us. | ||
Gonna be with us another block. | ||
Mike Davis is gonna be here. | ||
Mike, over at CNN and MSNBC, they're breathlessly waiting on indictment watch. | ||
So we're gonna get into all that. | ||
Short commercial break. | ||
Mike Davis with us. | ||
Congressman Bishop. | ||
Cash. | ||
is on deck day brad's gonna join us and we got a lot going on the first hour and even more in the second or sure break the back door in the mall the games you want to play bring it on and now we'll fight to the end just watch and see it's all started everything's begun and you are over | ||
unidentified
|
cause we're taking down the ccp! spread the word all through hong kong we will fight till they're all gone we rejoice when there's no more let's take down the ccp! | |
steven k bat congressman bishops with us you were you're you're quite disturbed about what's going on in the city are you not Oh my word, you mean the way we were just talking about the Justice Department? | ||
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
I mean what Mike just said about that and it's, you know, he's got the forensic analysis of it and why it's so crazy, but the thing that strikes me is the Justice Department, you said brazen, that's the right word, that the Justice is debasing itself. | ||
It's really astonishing because the Justice Department reveres itself more than it reveres the Constitution and protecting its prerogatives. | ||
The notion that they're going to subordinate all that to turn over the prosecutorial decision on Hunter Biden's future misconduct under the agreement to a judge's determination. | ||
And it can only be the reason that has been articulated because they're concerned Trump will be president and the Justice Department might hold him to the agreement. | ||
Mike, where do you think we go from here on all this? | ||
So you called for yesterday and my phone blew up last night from various folks about just even leaving aside that you've got to get on top of the investigation of Hunter Biden and then for all the deals. | ||
People want this investigated. | ||
They want to actually know who in the Justice Department has been working on this, who assigned Justice Hunter Deal, that they walked into a federal court. | ||
Remember, we had on MSNBC, we had the African-American female prosecutor. | ||
It says the worst thing she's ever seen, and she's a big liberal on MSNBC. | ||
She says the most unprofessional thing, and she laid the blame on the Justice Department saying, hey, the Biden guys were about to get off with a sweet deal. | ||
Sure, they should have snuck in there and taken it. | ||
She blamed the Justice Department. | ||
What about an investigation on exactly what happened here and how this deal that won, number one, granted him total immunity and really a pardon immunity on any other investigations and really broke the Constitution on the other part by putting a federal judge, which is a liberal progressive judge in court said, hey, I don't think this is constitutional. | ||
Just truth bombing the court, Mike Davis. | ||
Yeah, I mean, I think the bigger problem here is we had the Justice Department get evidence. | ||
that was credible evidence, corroborated evidence that then Vice President Joe Biden took a $10 million bribe from Burisma and threatened to cut off a billion dollars in U.S. aid to Ukraine if the Ukrainian president didn't fire the Ukrainian prosecutor investigating Burisma and the Bidens. | ||
And that got referred to the Justice Department. It's Bill Barr sent it to the Pittsburgh U.S. | ||
attorney who deemed it credible and then it got sent to David Weiss in Delaware to this black hole in Delaware. What the hell happened to that investigation? | ||
What happened to this over the last many years? And that's what Congress needs to find out. | ||
That's where the House Judiciary Committee or the House Oversight Committee needs to line up Bill Barr, Merrick Garland, David Weiss, the Pittsburgh U.S. attorney, the IRS whistleblowers and the FBI agents who corroborated this evidence and put them all in front of the cameras, in front of the lights, in front of the cameras, under oath and say what the hell happened here. | ||
Who did what, where, when, and why? | ||
Who's lying here? | ||
They need to get to the bottom of that immediately, because that's the bigger problem. | ||
The plea agreement is a major problem, but the major problem is covering up the obvious corruption of a compromised President of the United States. | ||
unidentified
|
So, Mike is exactly right, and in fact, I think we're going to get a shot at David Weiss in the Judiciary Committee. | |
You understand, Oversight's been on this, Ways and Means has been on it. | ||
But the natural home of this is Judiciary. | ||
unidentified
|
At this point, yeah, and to that point, we thought we knew already David Weiss has changed his position, or the Justice Department has, on exactly what authority he had two or three times. | |
There's a lot of stuff to get into, but this thing just got a lot bigger. | ||
I mean, the details of that plea agreement, why they would confer that, Mike, on Indictment Watch today, walk me through your thoughts on Jack Smith. | ||
to do that given tradition and and uh... and constitutional requirements is i mean this because i don't i can't think of a good explanation for it other than the one that mike is offered mike on indictment watch today brought me through your thoughts on jack smith and they get a bounce well there's no question We've talked about this since August. | ||
This is lawfare. | ||
Jack Smith is no doubt going to indict Trump for the non-crime of objecting to a presidential election, which is allowed by the Electoral Count Act of 1887. | ||
Twisting arms politically is allowed by the First Amendment. | ||
But that has not stopped the Democrats. | ||
That didn't stop Alvin Bragg from indicting Trump for the non-crime of settling a nuisance claim as a businessman. | ||
It didn't stop Jack Smith from indicting Trump for the non-crime of a former president having his presidential records, which is allowed by the Presidential Records Act. | ||
Both Fannie Willis in Fulton County, Georgia, another Democrat, and Jack Smith are both going to indict Trump for objecting to a presidential election. | ||
If it is a crime, To object to a presidential election, Democrats would be in jail for objecting in 1968, 2000, 2004, 2016. | ||
Again, this is lawfare. | ||
We've been saying this for a year. | ||
We've been predicting this for a year. | ||
It's going to happen. | ||
It's lawfare. | ||
The only way Trump's going to get out of this is by putting it back in the White House in November 2024. | ||
Mike, how do people follow you today? | ||
Because I know they're going to want to follow you on social media and at your site. | ||
Where they go? | ||
article three project.org article number three project.org you can donate their article number at article three project at article number three project on getter Twitter truth. | ||
My personal is at MRD DMIA MRD DMIA and thank you. | ||
Thank you, brother. | ||
Congressman Bishop, we always love to have you and Ralph Norman to talk about money. | ||
Because people look at you as straight shooters. | ||
Where in the hell are we in this process? | ||
Tomorrow, Congress shuts down for an August recess, which we haven't traditionally had over the last 10 or 12 years since the rise of the Tea Party. | ||
Only a handful of times. | ||
I think most of it is in Trump's term. | ||
But you guys aren't back to mid-September. | ||
The last time I looked, the fiscal year ends at midnight on the 30th of September. | ||
So basically, you took care of VA this week, the appropriations, everybody's promised. | ||
You're going to be back sometime around mid-September. | ||
You've got 15 days or two days to pass all the appropriations of the 12 we were promised, the overall appropriations of the House, get it to the Senate, negotiate it, and have it done so we don't have a CR. | ||
I'm not feeling it. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
Look, there's been sort of among leadership on details and whether we're going to live to the 1.471 trillion dollar fiscal year 2022 levels that we struck in January as the agreement. | ||
There's been a lot of wrestling over that. | ||
There's been sort of nothing happening out of leadership in terms of coming forward to say how they're going. | ||
They've sort of conceded, yeah, we're going to get back to that. | ||
We're going to do it. | ||
But how all that happens within that time frame, I think, you know, you've got to be looking at a short-term CR. | ||
And we might... Are we going down to the road to perdition because we're going to have a CR and then we're going to have a huge gun battle and just get an omnibus sometime between Thanksgiving and Christmas? | ||
unidentified
|
I think that's what Chuck Schumer wants. | |
And that's what the imperial capital, that's what all the lobbyists want. | ||
unidentified
|
But look, that doesn't mean it's not important, and we're passing the MilCon VA appropriations bill this week. | |
We could put all those bills through in the time allowed. | ||
It's not going to answer the question. | ||
And then the question that you've got to think about is What does a shutdown fight look like? | ||
A lot has to happen over the course of the six weeks out, notwithstanding our absence from Washington, and I think it well might, but, you know, the forces that... Does House leadership have the stones right now to force Biden, if they don't get this through and approved, to force Biden to shut down this government? | ||
unidentified
|
Everything that we've done since January has been about delivering the stones to do things like that. | |
Have we completed that process? | ||
It continues to be a day-by-day exercise. | ||
Breakthroughs still can happen, though, and that's what's important. | ||
Just because you see a lack of stones on the part of, you know, by second nature, doesn't mean that we can't make something happen by continuing to push creatively. | ||
And I know it's a debate whether it's going to be 2019, 2022, rescissions, all that. | ||
We'll get into the complexity during the break, the August break. | ||
Mallorca's yesterday was one of the most arrogant appearances I've ever seen. | ||
It's just up in the face of the Republicans now. | ||
They're just not going to answer. | ||
Plus, you got Garland with DOJ is on this impeachment roll. | ||
Is it just going to focus on Biden now, you think, because it's so egregious? | ||
Are there going to be Garland? | ||
What's your sense on judiciary and other places where we stand on all this? | ||
unidentified
|
And to say about Mayorkas, first of all, some people say he's the most talented guy. | |
He's not talented. | ||
He's the most, he is, that's decided in his head to be the most brazen in refusing to respond, to say something responsive to a question, no matter whether the question's somebody on his side or not. | ||
He just doesn't answer any single question. | ||
That's what he does. | ||
It's discipline. | ||
Um, I think that, I mean, those things were in process before and the work toward the Mayorkas in particular, because it's so clear. | ||
Perhaps the situation with the president is overtaking all that. | ||
I don't know ultimately how all that works out together. | ||
If, uh, if, if the facts continue to develop as we've been talking about this morning and, uh, Biden's impeachment becomes something that has to be, you know, Kevin's been dancing around on that. | ||
Uh, Elise said what she said today. | ||
on fox you know i think it could If the President... Is Elise Stefanik running up a trial balloon? | ||
Because she's very disciplined. | ||
She doesn't come out and, you know... I mean, if it's a trial balloon, it's a very thoughtfully planned one. | ||
When you go back and talk to your constituents this weekend through August, where are their heads going to be? | ||
What are they going to tell you they believe should be done for the good of the country? | ||
unidentified
|
For the same reason I said, my experience generally is they seem to be ahead of Congress in what they know. | |
They also are ahead of Congress in what action they want. | ||
So I think there will be people talking impeachment. | ||
Inevitably, Kevin sort of made noises about an impeachment inquiry, and there were immediately sort of the nervous Nellies began talking inside the conference just to hold it back. | ||
So there's going to be a little bit of a seesaw, but I think if people want it, they need to push for it. | ||
Did I mention this guy, Hudson? | ||
I'm just kidding. | ||
How do people get to you on social media? | ||
You're one of the people folks in our audience follow. | ||
unidentified
|
I'm at RepDanBishop on Twitter and also on Facebook. | |
Sir, thank you so much for coming by. | ||
I always would love to have you here, and I know the audience does, too. | ||
Okay, in our appreciation of American music, we're going to turn to the sea, my beloved sea. | ||
This is an Irish song that was used by the Navy and by seamen here in the United States, one of the classics. | ||
We'll do more details and play more of it later, okay? | ||
We're going to go out and we've got Cash Patel. | ||
Dave Bradd's about to join us. | ||
See you in a minute. | ||
unidentified
|
Great. | |
Oh, tomorrow you will get your pay, and it's time for us to leave her. | ||
Leave her, Johnny, leave her. Oh, leave her, Johnny, leave her. | ||
All the voyage is done, and the winds don't blow, and it's time for us to leave her. | ||
The winds blew foul, and the seas run high. Leave her, Johnny, leave her. | ||
Here's your host, Stephen K. Babb. | ||
Thanks for watching. | ||
MyPillow.com. | ||
We got that mic. | ||
We're all working. | ||
We got Cash. | ||
Cash is in the house. | ||
Cash, great to see you, sir. | ||
Good to see you, brother. | ||
Don't dress up because it's a war room. | ||
No, I got a t-shirt on! | ||
You're like, hold it. | ||
With Cash Navarro, it's always a gun show. | ||
Cash just finished his work and now he comes over. | ||
unidentified
|
He says, you know, I got a doctor's appointment. | |
Unbelievable. | ||
Don't we have a rule here? | ||
Collared shirts in the war room? | ||
No, just kidding. | ||
Cash Patel joins us. | ||
We got Dave Brat. | ||
In a muscle shirt. | ||
I'm just kidding. | ||
Dave Brad joins us from Lynchburg. | ||
I want to go to you first, because you've got this piece in the Daily Caller. | ||
People respect your opinion. | ||
Just give me the feel of battle right now, because you've got a lot of stuff going on. | ||
You had this debacle yesterday that just shows you how crooked the DOJ has become with this plea deal. | ||
All of that. | ||
We had Mike Davis on. | ||
I mean, Mike Davis wants a major investigation on the Burisma thing immediately. | ||
Also, how did this plea deal, who authorized this deal yesterday? | ||
How did this even happen? | ||
But your piece in the Daily Caller is saying, hey, let's be strategic. | ||
Yeah. | ||
We got Garland and Wray. | ||
We can move on that. | ||
And that gets to the government gangsters, not to the Biden crime family, but the government gangsters. | ||
So make your case. | ||
If Kash Patel, if you're the field general here, what are you saying? | ||
So it's all interconnected, right? | ||
And as a former federal prosecutor who did these gun cases and a public defender who represented countless minorities, pre-trial diversion is not permitted in this case. | ||
The only way you get it... I think the judge said that. | ||
And now it's out there, but we called it on War Room like three months ago. | ||
We said this is an illegal plea. | ||
The Attorney General himself has to come in and waive the regs to approve pretrial diversion. | ||
That's why Hunter Biden got it. | ||
Garland and Monaco came in and said, here's your deal. | ||
So you agree to my point that right now, I told Mike, today we ought to have a hearing with Monaco, all those. | ||
All day. | ||
Leave all the Biden, even corruption, thing aside. | ||
There is a cancer in the Justice Department in that plea deal yesterday when a liberal judge sits there and says, hey, this is unconstitutional, right? | ||
We've been saying it. | ||
And somebody in DOJ had to make the decision to authorize those prosecutions. | ||
There's only two people at DOJ. | ||
There's one policy that governs it, and there's only two people that can waive it. | ||
And it specifically says, in gun possession crimes that have to do with narcotics, pretrial diversion shall not be granted unless by express waiver of the Deputy Attorney General or the Attorney General. | ||
That's the regulation. | ||
That's why it's never been given before, except to Hunter. | ||
And also, putting this judge, they know Trump's coming back to the White House. | ||
I mean, that's outrageous. | ||
Also, on the other side, to me, which is even deeper, his lawyer said that it was blanket immunity on all other investigations. | ||
I mean, you and I know how that works. | ||
That's not how it works. | ||
And the reason that I want to put Garland and Wray in the crosshairs, same with Monica, who's the Deputy Attorney General. | ||
She's the author. | ||
She runs the place. | ||
She runs the deal. | ||
Come on. | ||
She runs all of it. | ||
She's been in on it since Russiagate. | ||
Now she's running Justice. | ||
But here's the thing, what I wrote in the Daily Caller was, if we want to get the receipts, if we want to get the documents, if we want to get the evidence from the FBI's corruption, whether it's on Hunter Biden and Burisma or Hunter Biden and the gun case, or whether it's on Joe Biden and China and the bribery case, we can't go after Joe Biden. | ||
That's a political stunt for impeachment. | ||
We're never going to get the documents. | ||
FBI and DOJ are going to come in. | ||
unidentified
|
What do you mean? | |
They're just going to stonewall you? | ||
FBI and DOJ are going to say- Your election will be here and nothing will get in the way. | ||
unidentified
|
Exactly. | |
President of the United States has been impeached. | ||
Sorry sir, we can't give you anything. | ||
unidentified
|
But if you impeach Ray and Garland... Okay, slow down. | |
Go back. | ||
Walk our audience through this specifically because you're going to give a pathway to victory here. | ||
What's the trap we fall? | ||
Because we just had Elise Stefanik on Maria. | ||
Yeah, I saw that. | ||
You can send a trial balloon up, because she's very strategic. | ||
She is. | ||
Right? | ||
She's great. | ||
So that's a message that leadership's prepared to consider this. | ||
Walk me through why going down that path is not the right path and you ought to focus on this other path. | ||
Well, you've laid down the strategic roadmap, Steve. | ||
What we need to show the American people is how corrupt the FBI and DOJ is. | ||
We know they are. | ||
But we don't have all of the evidence to put out there. | ||
We're catching them here and there, onesies and twosies. | ||
A trial in the House of Representatives, where we're the majority when we bring an impeachment, forces Ray and Garland in there under oath. | ||
A grand jury. | ||
The House is really the grand jury. | ||
But the world is watching. | ||
And not only that, the subpoenas that go out when you impeach Ray and Garland, you already have the crimes they committed. | ||
Lying to Congress under oath and violating congressional subpoenas. | ||
Those are each separate felonies, both impeachable offenses. | ||
Easy. | ||
Layup. | ||
Then you go in and subpoena every document that Ray and Garland, their internal emails, their memorandums, the text messages from their entire leadership team. | ||
Why don't they stonewall that? | ||
They're saying you have no grounds. | ||
Once you start an impeachment inquiry on those two guys, they don't have the grounds to cover that up and to hold it back? | ||
Yeah, I mean, can you just imagine if the House voted to impeach Ray and Garland, and Garland and Ray came out and said, we are above the United States House of Representatives impeachment? | ||
That would be a political storm. | ||
And it would, in order to the Republicans' benefit. | ||
They're not going to do that. | ||
They're going to force It's our hand, and we have to go in and get the receipts. | ||
And we have to go in and get the confidential human source recordings that we still don't have. | ||
You're saying that by doing that too, you also have a ton of whistleblowers come up. | ||
And everybody's come. | ||
Because then they've got the cover of an impeachment inquiry that then they can feel, you can't mess with my career, you can't mess with me, because now the whole world's watching. | ||
It's, you know, not to copy the Democratic playbook, but remember what they did. | ||
I'll copy the Democratic playbook in a second. | ||
What do you mean? | ||
They know how to run things. | ||
Come on, I'll take it in a second. | ||
But they did a fake impeachment with a fake whistleblower in Vindman and Sharmella with a liar in Adam Schiff and impeached Donald Trump. | ||
Big time. | ||
They did that. | ||
We've got the actual goods to impeach top law enforcement here for destroying our judiciary. | ||
Brad, we just had Dan Bishop in here and he's saying, hey, the conference is trying to work through these issues right now. | ||
Elise Stefanik very strategically went on Fox this morning to run up the flagpole, the Biden situation. | ||
What are your thoughts? | ||
Yeah, I'll reserve judgment. | ||
I'll wait to see. | ||
You know what happened on the budget, not any key issue. | ||
At first, they'll show little sign of messaging and then they back off. | ||
I'm pretty skeptical. | ||
My point is between what Cash is saying, do you focus on Wray and the FBI? | ||
And this is not political, this is about the Constitution. | ||
Do you focus on Wray and DOJ and the FBI, or do you try to go after Biden? | ||
What he's saying right now, purely from a constitutional perspective, You've got provable charges on multiple times on DOJ and FBI, and that if you go down that path, it may not be satisfactory on the Biden thing, but the Biden thing will get too political too quickly. | ||
Here, you actually can make a case to the American people. | ||
What are your thoughts? | ||
No, I think that's right. | ||
I think you go on all fronts. | ||
You follow the rule of law. | ||
The one thing the Republicans never do is grab the megaphone they have through the Speaker's office To let the American people know about the basic facts. | ||
I don't think 70% of the American people know anything about what we're talking about. | ||
For me, that's always front and center. | ||
When we were doing Obamacare or budgets or whatever, our side would never just give the American people the basic facts. | ||
The polling seems to be galvanized around a lot of topics that used to be off the table. | ||
70% of the American people don't think we got a fair process, elections, et cetera. | ||
65, 70% and these are from major pollsters. | ||
And so I think the word may be getting out, thank goodness through shows like this. | ||
But for me, that's the key. | ||
It's got to be from the ground up. | ||
It's got to be grassroots-driven. | ||
And the Democrats side under RFK Jr., etc., are interested in these justice issues as well. | ||
So that, for me, is the way I'd go. | ||
I want to pivot now to something. | ||
You've been at the forefront. | ||
Your book is Government Gangsters, and you talk about the Illegal activities breaking basic laws of the administrative state in the deep state and you've been specifically By President Trump in the second term you'll have you know much bigger, but you've been chief of staff at the Pentagon You've been over at DNI you were in house Intel right you know the inner workings of this Yesterday, and this is particularly for the audience, I understand with everything we've got going on, the last thing we worry about is UFOs and aliens. | ||
Thanks for saying that. | ||
Stop chasing UFOs. | ||
No, but it gets to a deeper point. | ||
Yesterday's hearing was shocking in the fact of what the administrative state wants you to know and doesn't want you to know. | ||
It is so brazen, right? | ||
First off, they want to go into a skiff right away. | ||
But you know this. | ||
A skiff is for classified briefings. | ||
How much of stuff that goes on the skiff should be just out in open testimony so that people can actually see? | ||
At least half. | ||
At least half. | ||
And I'm being generous to the other side. | ||
unidentified
|
Wow. | |
You're saying it should be maybe even more than half. | ||
Yeah, and this is actually an entire chapter in Government Gangsters. | ||
what the corrupt actors do ray and garland their leadership team wherever mayor case in company they go in and they find the cover-up that they need to execute that plan that operation and then they classify it and then it's never released and it's in a fault and when congress tries to go get it you get the the runner out classified you can track sources are gonna die relationships the world's gonna end and they use the classification system to expand the administrative state | ||
that's why you need a and this is a i went all in on this at the end i we ran out of time you need one universal classifications classification system right now there's like twenty seven different ones don't talk to each other cia they don't want to They talk to each other. | ||
Exactly. | ||
They use that on purpose. | ||
And they use that to specifically say, you guys caught us, I'm going to create another compartment, and shut it down. | ||
This is what, and by the way, I'm going to stay on the UFO thing, we're going to get more of the actors in here, because it cuts to the heart, and from, we'll cut it later. | ||
At turning point, I'm on stage, you know, like a madman, yelling and screaming every day, declassified, what did I say? | ||
I said, on the assassinations, all of it, and I mentioned specifically Malcolm X. | ||
What happened yesterday? | ||
Malcolm X, a whole new thing on Malcolm X came out about the NYPD and about they haven't released the files. | ||
This is 50, 60 years after these events. | ||
This is a control mechanism. | ||
Yes. | ||
For people not, I'm not interested in aliens, I don't, aircraft, because I'm trying to save my country. | ||
I got it. | ||
If you want to save your country, the first thing, we're in an information war. | ||
This is what became quite obvious yesterday. | ||
And this is even for democratic administrations. | ||
Political appointees, the three thousand political appointees and the one thousand The administrative state, even if they're Democrats, are much more aligned to what they want to do politically, but at the end of the day, they're just passing through. | ||
You could see this yesterday. | ||
Do you believe when you were Chief of Staff at the Pentagon, and that you were over in DNI, and you have the highest security clearances the nation can have, that there are things going on in the administrative state, in the deep state, That they would not tell you or obfuscate enough that you wouldn't be able to get to the bottom. | ||
Yeah, their problem, they ran into people. | ||
We had a great team who had actually operated at the ops and policy level. | ||
So by the time we got to the top of the circuit board, we went, we reached back down and destroyed. | ||
I shuttered dozens of special access programs. | ||
We closed that. | ||
Special access is another way. | ||
It's just a fancy DOD line. | ||
Super sensitive, can't leak it, you're gonna kill people. | ||
The way the classification system, after you get the top secret, above that it's all compartmented. | ||
Yeah. | ||
So everybody has a vertical, right? | ||
And if you're not in that vertical, unless you're at the top with the president and a handful of people, you're carved out of two-thirds of what's going on inside the government because you don't have special access. | ||
And it's two-fold. | ||
Do you know who controls the most special access programs? | ||
The Joint Chiefs and SecDef and CIA. | ||
Milley, Gina Haspel. | ||
Every time they wanted to hide something from Trump, they put it in another compartment, and every time Congress would try to go get it, they said, oh, no, no, no, we can't let you in there. | ||
It's only 10 people already. | ||
Here's the other thing people don't know. | ||
Do you know how much it costs to run a special access program? | ||
One. | ||
One program per year, $10 million. | ||
To keep that information, the operational cost. | ||
Just the control mechanism itself. | ||
Yeah. | ||
Think about getting rid of 100 special access programs, just economically, what you're doing. | ||
Well, and the opportunity cost. | ||
Cash is going to hang with us. | ||
Dave Brat at the top of the hour. | ||
We got Mark Mitchell. | ||
We're going to go out with some music from the sea. | ||
From Ireland, but taken by American sailors. | ||
One of my favorite sea songs. | ||
The great American experience here. | ||
And no, for people contacting me saying, play Beach Boys, that ain't never gonna happen here, okay? | ||
That's not a celebration of America, sorry. | ||
Not in the war room, baby. | ||
Back in a moment. | ||
unidentified
|
Bill will get your pay, and it's time for us to leave her. | |
Leave her, Johnny, leave her! | ||
Oh, leave her, Johnny, leave her! | ||
I offer you a choice. | ||
A choice between two worlds. | ||
Will you take the blue pill and continue living in a world where a corrupt few control everything? | ||
I offer you a choice, a choice between two worlds. | ||
Will you take the blue pill and continue living in a world where a corrupt few control everything? | ||
Or will you take the red pill and join us? | ||
What the elites don't want you to know is that there are 200,000 open committee man seats in the Republican Party. | ||
These party members are the ones who determine the future of the GOP. | ||
Let's take our country back, one precinct at a time. | ||
Visit precinctstrategy.com now. | ||
The great Royce White, they'll be playing again. | ||
Big Three, they'll be playing again. | ||
By the way, if you haven't seen the Ice Cube and the Tucker Carlson interview, you've got to check that out. | ||
Quite impressive. | ||
By the way, we're going to get into the second hour, talk the difference between a sea shanty and a sea song. | ||
A shanty is a song of labor. | ||
We'll get into all that. | ||
Cash, we're going to talk about... First off, you've got some music to talk about. | ||
Talk about President Trump and what you did with the choir. | ||
Well, thanks to The War Room, we launched the number one song in America, Justice for All. | ||
The Jan Six Prison Choir and President Trump debuted at number one and stayed there for two weeks, which makes it a billboard number one. | ||
So we wanted to present you with the hashtag J6PCLimitedT on The War Room here. | ||
Thank you for making it happen. | ||
No, no, no. | ||
First off, the choir is just amazing. | ||
We've got to do a whole album of songs of their covers and stuff. | ||
And here's a great part. | ||
Like we promised, the money finally came in from the music industry. | ||
We gave away $25,000 last week to Jan Six Families. | ||
We've got $50,000 coming next week and we're going to keep going as the sales keep going and the profits keep coming. | ||
I heard, just in my context from my old life back in Hollywood, I hear that Billboard Because I used to be in the music with Jeff Quatt and stuff. | ||
We had the firm, this huge music management company. | ||
I heard Billboard's ecstatic. | ||
They're so excited. | ||
No, they are. | ||
No, I'm hearing this. | ||
I'm hearing. | ||
I'm just hearing this. | ||
This is what people are saying. | ||
People are saying that they're so they're ecstatic about giving the choir, the JC choir and President Trump the official plaque that you get from a Grammy. | ||
I mean, the Grammy thing is I mean, the number one at Billboard is big. | ||
So you get the official plaque. | ||
Yeah, so announcing it here on War Room, Billboard has notified us that, against their wishes, they are going to print a number one plaque, the number one song in America, Justice for All, J6 Prison Choir, Donald J. Trump, their names are on it. | ||
It's being shipped, and we're going to present it to the president later this summer. | ||
But thanks to the War Room posse, we raised money for J6 families, and we broke the music industry, and we spent zero dollars making it. | ||
I'm going to do some producing right here on the show. | ||
This is one of the things we're going to do when Trump does the alternative event, which he should do with Tucker Carlson, instead of doing the trap debate that Murdoch, instead of doing the debate that Murdoch's laying a trap for him with the Keebler elves, he should, he should know. | ||
Part of the thing is you're going to do the presentation. | ||
I'm in. | ||
you and yeah i don't know who you for five things i that they're better backed up we haven't had the venue to do it i read any does the tucker town hall in front of fifteen thousand people he draws you know uh... it's a fifteen million people in the and bob's your uncle right i mean this i wish it was okay we're working that the the non redacted version of government and i think that could be if the only book more perfectly timed is dark eon by uh... by joe allen which i'll get to you later But your book, Government Gangsters, when's it out? | ||
Yeah, September. | ||
100% release date on pre-sale right now. | ||
It's skyrocketing up the charts on both Amazon and governmentgangsters.com website on pre-sales. | ||
We're going to have a huge launch party. | ||
It is going number one. | ||
Buy it now. | ||
All the stuff Steve and I were talking about are in there, chapter and verse, and they didn't redact anything except one word eight times over. | ||
And it is laughable, so it's hilarious. | ||
Jack Smith, MSNBC's been on indictment watch, CNN's on indictment watch, it's all breathless. | ||
Today's the indictment day, is it not, sir? | ||
Well, I just drove by the federal courthouse, and every TV van in America is lined up outside there. | ||
And the reason it's not happening is because even those gangsters, Jack Smith, Garland, and Raynaud, if they indicted Trump today, it would have highlighted the corruption of Hunter Biden. | ||
You're saying it inextricably links back to that? | ||
Absolutely. | ||
Because the American public would say, okay, enough with the Trump stuff. | ||
You're now covering up your cover-up. | ||
Which you tried to jam through the federal judiciary and a district court judge appointed by Obama and Biden shut it down. | ||
That is a powerful, resonating message. | ||
First off, she said two things. | ||
Let's rip it up in a court. | ||
And then she said this is unconstitutional. | ||
Pretty big truth bomb. | ||
It's gonna be hard to come back from and here's the thing. | ||
Remember, Hunter still has not been charged with a gun crime because he got this diversion nonsense. | ||
So what should happen is they come back and they charge him with that gun crime at the next hearing. | ||
Now, I don't think this DOJ and FBI is gonna do it. | ||
By the way, we love you coming in the tight tee. | ||
He comes in and does a flex. | ||
Morning flex with Cash. | ||
It's a bigger tea, I'm getting fat. | ||
No, you're not. | ||
But where do you spend nine hours a day working out? | ||
Where do people get you? | ||
Social media? | ||
Simple, at Cash, at KASH, at KASH, at KASH. | ||
And if you like the JanSix stuff we're doing, go to TheCashFoundation.com. | ||
Sponsor a JanSix family in need. | ||
I mean, just tell me about them. | ||
We'll give them the money. | ||
TheCashFoundation.com. | ||
We're giving out grants weekly to JanSix families. | ||
More Cash is coming. | ||
More Cash is coming. | ||
Coming in from Justice for All. | ||
Buy it, play it. | ||
President Trump plays that song every night at dinner and at every single event he has. | ||
Justice for All broke the music industry, and we're just getting warmed up. | ||
And we're going to present the billboard with Bannon. | ||
Thank you. | ||
No, I'm going to talk to him today. | ||
The opening act, you're going to be part of that opening act. | ||
It'll be three or four things like that. | ||
It'll be huge. | ||
He would love that. | ||
Get the choir. | ||
He'll be doing his thing. | ||
Thank you so much for coming in. | ||
Thanks, brother. | ||
I appreciate it. | ||
Okay, thank you. | ||
Okay, we're taking a short break. | ||
Is it a sea shanty or is it a sea song? | ||
I want you voting right now. | ||
Blow up the online. | ||
What does Carly Bonet say? | ||
unidentified
|
I've got a natural love for these kind of Irish songs, as you can tell. | |
This is great. | ||
Love this song. | ||
I can actually smell the salt air of the open ocean. | ||
Okay, short break. | ||
Brad Rasmussen here, Mark Mitchell. | ||
We got a lot going the second hour. | ||
Cash, thank you. | ||
unidentified
|
See you back here in the War Room in about a minute or two. | |
Get your pay and it's time for us to leave her! | ||
Leave her, Johnny, leave her! | ||
Oh, leave her, Johnny, leave her! | ||
All the voyage is done, and the winds don't blow, and it's time for us to leave her. | ||
The winds blew foul and the seas run high. | ||
Leave her, Johnny, leave her! | ||
We shipped them green, and none went by, and it's time for us to leave her. | ||
Leave her, Johnny, leave her! | ||
Oh, leave her, Johnny! | ||
All the voyage is done and the winds don't blow, and it's time for us to leave her. | ||
The mate was a bucko and the old man a Turk. | ||
Leave her, Johnny, leave her! | ||
And the Bolson was a beggar with a middle name of work. | ||
And it's time for us to leave her. | ||
Leave her, Johnny, leave her. | ||
Oh, leave her, Johnny, leave her. |