July 27, 2023 - Bannon's War Room
48:51
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
| Pray for our enemies. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because we're going medieval on these people. | |
| I got a free shot on all these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
|
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. Here's your host, Stephen K. Babb. | |
| The son of the President of the United States has just pleaded not guilty. | ||
| Not guilty is what he has pleaded to. | ||
| The judge here says that she will not accept or reject the plea agreement. | ||
| She wants more information. | ||
| Basically, what she is asking for is to determine whether or not it's appropriate for her to consider something Catherine, if you will, first time we're hearing from you today. | ||
| Weigh in on what has taken place so far today with the breakdown of this plea deal, now Hunter Biden pleading not guilty and having to revisit an agreement between both parties. | ||
| Well, it was clear from the outset that Hunter Biden's attorneys and the prosecutors were on a completely different page about what this agreement meant. | ||
| And that's very sloppy. | ||
| And as a former prosecutor, I'll put this on the prosecutors, the Delaware U.S. | ||
| Attorney's Office, that they would go to court. | ||
| And usually these hearings are smooth sailing. | ||
| Now, the judge is not a potted plant. | ||
| A judge does not rubber stamp a plea. | ||
| It is her job to make sure that the plea comports with the law and the facts, and that the defendant is pleading knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently. | ||
| And during that questioning, a simple question, you know, does this plea cover all other crimes? | ||
| The defense says yes. | ||
| The prosecution says no. | ||
| How that happened, meaning they didn't know this before they went to court, is shocking. | ||
| It was always curious to me. | ||
| When a plea agreement was announced, I guess it was a month ago, the defense attorney said the investigation is over. | ||
| The United States attorney, I believe, issued a press release and said the investigation is still ongoing. | ||
| And I thought, well, there's clearly just a misunderstanding, and that'll be cleared up by the time it happens. | ||
| And clearly it wasn't. | ||
| So the judge really did her job and drilled down. | ||
| It was clear there was no meeting of the minds on both sides, and that just does not happen. | ||
| When I've seen plea deals fall apart, it's usually the defendant suddenly decides, I don't want a plea. | ||
| I can't admit it. | ||
| I have to say I've never seen this happen and that it would be on such a high profile case in such a public setting that this would happen is quite frankly shocking. | ||
| But I think the judge did the right thing. | ||
| They now have both sides time to get their acts together and come back to court and either Hunter Biden will plead guilty or he won't. | ||
| I guess, and I feel like this is what you're saying, I just don't understand, Catherine, why these conversations weren't had before they took place in court, and whose fault is that? | ||
| I know you're saying this is maybe on the prosecution, but what about the defense? | ||
| Oh, both sides. | ||
| As well, to understand the details of what they were agreeing to, and then also the judge's role in all of this, and how that played out. | ||
| Well, it's both sides. | ||
| I sort of leaned more on the prosecutor because they're the ones usually typically are leading this. | ||
| They're the ones that made the plea offer. | ||
| But when the defense attorney at that time a month ago said the investigation is over, he had to have read the press release that said it was ongoing. | ||
| You would think there would have been a phone call and said, excuse me guys, what's going on here? | ||
| So I don't know whether that happened. | ||
| It probably didn't because he clearly was shot this morning or appeared shot. | ||
| Also, quite frankly, I don't know and I I don't want to criticize what other lawyers do. | ||
| I don't know how you would allow a client to plead guilty with a black cloud still over his head, but you know. | ||
| It's Wednesday, 26 July, 23 Denver. | ||
| Just put a hold on it right there. | ||
| We could have had a 30 minute cold open. | ||
| I don't think I've ever seen a news day like this. | ||
| This is why we love breaking the show up and having the afternoon, late afternoon, early evening show for days like today. | ||
| We've got Congressman Tom Tiffany of Wisconsin, Congressman Eric Burleson from Missouri. | ||
| I think we're going to have Burchett, Gates, and others call in. | ||
| They're over at the Capitol right now. | ||
| Mike Davis is here to interpret all this, and we've got so many hearings going on. | ||
| So many of our people were testifying today. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Todd Bensman did a star turn. | |
| We're going to get to all of it, and we're going to start right now with Congressman Tom Tiffany. | ||
| It almost boggles the mind, this Biden situation. | ||
| And you get federal prosecutors walk in there, and the simple question was, does this deal give him immunity for everything else that's under investigation? | ||
| And the prosecutors go, no, of course not. | ||
| And his attorney says, yes, it absolutely does. | ||
| That's why we made the deal. | ||
| Can you just help us think through right now where Congress, where the House stands in this entire Biden fiasco? | ||
|
unidentified
|
You know, Steve, I think it's some of the oversight that we've been doing in Congress, in the House of Representatives, that has driven us to this point. | |
| I'm just wondering if those prosecutors were beginning to say, hold it a second. | ||
| I mean, think about that form 4473, which is to get a gun permit. | ||
| And he doesn't serve any time for that. | ||
| Those prosecutors got to be going, man, we don't give a sweetheart deal like that to anybody else, especially if they're Democrat, in regards to a gun, a gun permit. | ||
| And so I just think that some of the oversight we're doing is putting pressure on them. | ||
| But I think the other thing, and this is bigger, Steve, I think they had a tenuous agreement and it just all fell apart today. | ||
| Once one thread got pulled, I think it just all came apart. | ||
| Let me ask you about Europe. | ||
| One of the reasons we like having congressmen on is to talk about their constituencies. | ||
| You know, in Europe, in Wisconsin 7, this is kind of part of the backbone of the country. | ||
| Decent folks, not known as hotheads. | ||
| What's their thinking when you go back and talk to them, do town halls or just go back for the weekend about this entire Biden situation, all the money they hear about on the SARS reports and the stuff with either it's Ukraine or the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| Just where are the heads of your constituents at right now who are fair and decent and honest people? | ||
| Where are they on this? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, you're really right about that. | |
| I live amongst people that are salt of the earth. | ||
| They go to work every day, whether they're logging at a manufacturing facility or out there farming. | ||
| That's who lives in my district. | ||
| And I think they just shake their heads at Washington, D.C. | ||
| And to a certain extent, Steve, they tune out. | ||
| They're like, you'll hear this from many people that, you know, both parties do it. | ||
| Everybody's doing it, whatever. | ||
| And there's just this dismissiveness of Washington, D.C. | ||
| And I think they just wonder, is this place fixable? | ||
| I think that's ultimately the question. | ||
| Is the place fixable? | ||
| In regards to Joe Biden, it is starting to burn in now. | ||
| Whereas people have went to their partisan corners, as you know, Donald Trump, Joe Biden. | ||
| I think this is starting to burn in now in regards to the Biden family enterprises. | ||
| And people are beginning to go, okay, did he take money from a foreign? | ||
| Did he take money from a foreign interest? | ||
| Did he sell out America? | ||
| I think the public is starting to be quite aware of it. | ||
| I want to play a clip specifically about you, because there's so much going on today. | ||
| We had Mallorcas, we had about human trafficking, we had the border, we had the... We found out today that the U.S. | ||
| government's in, according to a whistleblower in procession, not just of alien aircrafts, but alien, you know, parts is parts. | ||
| Let's play yours, and I want comment and observations on it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The increased fentanyl is not tied to illegal border crossings. | |
| Do you agree with that statement? | ||
| No. | ||
| It's not effectively managed right now, and until it is, the cartels are the winners of this. | ||
| Cartels are the winners. | ||
| Sheriff Mark Dannels, under questioning here a few months ago before this committee, Cochise County, down on the border of Arizona, he said the open border has led to a significant increase in the amount of fentanyl coming into this country. | ||
| Do you agree with his assessment? | ||
| Congressman, we have taken it to the cartel. | ||
| Do you agree with his assessment? | ||
| He said the amount of fentanyl has went up significantly as a result of the open borders policy implemented by this administration January 20th of 2021. | ||
| Is he lying to us? | ||
| Did Sheriff Daniels lie to us? | ||
| Congressman, I respectfully disagree with Sheriff Daniels, whom I know well. | ||
| So Sheriff Daniels is lying to us? | ||
| That is not what I said, Congressman. | ||
| Someone's not telling the truth here, Mr. Secretary. | ||
| Someone's not telling the truth. | ||
| It's either Daniels or it's you. | ||
| Congressman, we have interdicted more fentanyl at the ports of entry than in the prior administration. | ||
| Mr. Chairman, I'll go to close here. | ||
| The most urgent lethal threat in America was in this man's testimony. | ||
| There's one person in America who can reduce the number of fentanyl deaths in America. | ||
| And by the way, the term fentanyl overdoses is used? | ||
| That's not the case anymore, is it? | ||
| It's fentanyl poisonings. | ||
| We've had them here, the Rackwall family, from my state of Wisconsin. | ||
| When you hear of fentanyl poisonings here in America, there's one person that can do something about it, and he sits right before us today. | ||
| You, sir, are responsible for reducing fentanyl deaths in America. | ||
| Will you ever do anything about it? | ||
| I yield back. | ||
| You've got to go pretty far into the woods to hit the tripwire for Congressman Tom Tiffany. | ||
| We've talked to Congressman Tiffany from the Darien Gap and throughout everything about this invasion of the southern border, and you've got to go pretty far from Cochise County, which I think is tombstone is there, one of the great counties and folks in this country, to get to Wisconsin. | ||
| This fentanyl is a chemical warfare attack by the Chinese Communist Party and their partners, the cartel. | ||
| Congressman, you were a little worked up there. | ||
| You want to walk us through it? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| So, I mean, when you look at it, Steve, and these things came up today in regards to, I mean, first of all, this is probably the, our United States government is complicit in one of the, if not the biggest human trafficking operation in the history of the world. | ||
| And that is not hyperbole. | ||
| Our United States federal government is allowing via the Department of Homeland Security and Mayorkas leading it, more people on the terror watch list than have ever entered the United States of America. | ||
| Set those things aside. | ||
| The fentanyl deaths should be enough to wake up anybody, Republican, Democrat, whatever. | ||
| 100,000 people that die from fentanyl poisonings, and we have a party that will not acknowledge it. | ||
| It is horrible. | ||
| I have met with people, like the Rockwell family, who lost a son, He overdosed in his dorm at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, and he's never coming back. | ||
| And these people are by the hundreds and thousands. | ||
| I call them the fentanyl family, Steve. | ||
| And if for no other reason, we should secure the border because of that. | ||
| And Sheriff Mark Daniels from Cochise County in Arizona, when we questioned him three, four months ago, he said, it is a direct result The amount of fentanyl deaths in America with the opening of the border on January 20th of 2021. | ||
| It is unbelievable that we have a Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security that won't do anything about killing our young people in America in record numbers. | ||
| Are you prepared to move as your New Yorkers be impeached and removed from office, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
So today he finally acknowledged that the border is not secure. | |
| There was a little bit of progress that happened today where he acknowledged that the border is not secure. | ||
| He has lied to the Judiciary Committee and other committees here in the United States Congress. | ||
| I think we have to make it We are reviewing with these inquiries, Steve, if someone should be impeached. | ||
| I think in terms of the public presence out there, I don't know if they have the appetite for multiple impeachments. | ||
| But I think we need to decide, is there someone that rises to that level? | ||
| And as we see what's happening with the Biden family, as the walls are closing in on the Biden family enterprise, I think we're getting closer to where we may have to pull the trigger on this. | ||
| But the one thing I say, Steve, I will not be like Adam Schiff and the Democrats. | ||
| We must make the case first for the American people. | ||
| This isn't ready, fire, aim, like the Democrats did to President Trump. | ||
| We have to make the case first, and we are doing that. | ||
| Congressman, I know you're jammed. | ||
| You've got to vote. | ||
| Can you just hang on for a short commercial break? | ||
| You dropped a truth bomb there. | ||
| Sound of Freedom played last night. | ||
| You just said the U.S. | ||
| government is complicit in the largest human trafficking operation in the world. | ||
| We'd just love to hold you for a second. | ||
| I want to get that question to you. | ||
| When we return, Mike Davis is also here to break down all this about the, um, not just the, the, the J six committee or the J six, um, grand jury, quote unquote, MSNBC's on, on, uh, indictment watch, but the Biden crime family, also Congressman Burleson, who was at the UFO asked him amazing questions. | ||
| We're gonna get to all of it. | ||
| short break if you ever wondered about the ministry of state bring it might be missing here the talk with the justice system comes shocking today what happened up in the delaware court for watching. | ||
| Then Congressman Burleson is going to join us. | ||
| Probably, if it wasn't all this other madness going on and fighting for our country, probably, I would argue, the most important congressional hearing in living memory. | ||
| But I've got to go back to Tom Tiffany, because Congressman Tiffany, you're not someone Correct me if I'm wrong, the United States government is complicit in the largest human trafficking operation in the history of the world. | ||
| What do you mean by that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
So there's a couple different elements. | |
| I'm going to explain it this way. | ||
| You have the United States government, which declared we're going to have open borders on January 20th of 2021. | ||
| 7 million people that have come into our country since then. | ||
| Using every way possible to get people in here illegally. | ||
| I went down to the Darien Gap, and then that's where it really hit home for me, down in Panama. | ||
| When I saw the United Nations Organization for, it's the International Organization for Migration, it's a UN outfit. | ||
| They had tents set up there and they were just processing people and then sending them on buses up through Central America to the United States. | ||
| So you had them, the United Nations that was involved. | ||
| And then you have the cartels. | ||
| And the cartels, they have operational control of the border. | ||
| Sheriffs on the southern border tell us that. | ||
| So you have the cartels doing their thing. | ||
| And then you also have the faith-based groups, like Catholic Charities and others, They are in the middle of this also. | ||
| So they all have a different motivation and some of them claim to be pure as the wind-driven snow, but they're all part and parcel of this operation which is basically industrialized at this point to move people into America. | ||
| And some of them, We'll use people, especially young people. | ||
| They'll sex traffic them, stuff like that. | ||
| I mean, it's going on with thousands and hundreds of thousands of people over the last couple years. | ||
| That is the industrialization of migration at this point. | ||
| And we, our government, is part of that whole system. | ||
| It's just weaponized against the American people at this point. | ||
| You described your constituents as a salt of the earth. | ||
| When they're in the fields and in the forest working every day, did they understand what's happened here of how it's an industrial process and a lot of people at very high levels and mechanisms and making money? | ||
| Is that broken through yet to your constituents? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I don't think they fully understand it, but Subliminally, I think they understand it because they know serious things are wrong with this country in a variety of ways. | |
| And this is one of them. | ||
| They know it's really a problem. | ||
| And they're seeing more stories. | ||
| Fentanyl deaths are higher than traffic accidents now in the rural county in northern Wisconsin that I live in. | ||
| And so it is steadily breaking into them. | ||
| This is Scourge. | ||
| Congressman Tiffany, how do people get to you? | ||
| Your site, your social media? | ||
| Because you've spent more time on this than just about anybody. | ||
| You've been a hero going down to the Darien Gap and all the way through the pathways up there and dealing with all the NGOs and Catholic charities and all of it to expose this to the American people. | ||
| Where do people go to find out more about your work? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, at Rep. | |
| Tiffany, and by the way, Steve, I encourage anybody to really study this issue to see that our United States government is complicit in the largest human trafficking operation, I suspect, Steve, since the days of slavery 400 years ago. | ||
| It is incredibly sobering. | ||
| When a guy like Tom Tiffany says that, people ought to pay attention. | ||
| Congressman, thank you so much. | ||
| Appreciate it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Good to join you today, Steve. | |
| Thank you, sir. | ||
| When you get these, you know, these steady-eddy types that are sitting there just truth-bombing, people got to start paying attention. | ||
| I want to go to Mike Davis. | ||
| I want to play the prosecutor. | ||
| This is MSNBC, baby. | ||
| This is not over at Breitbart News. | ||
| This is not War Room. | ||
| This is MSNBC as it broke. | ||
| They brought in a former federal prosecutor. | ||
| Let's hear her. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Catherine, if you will, first time we're hearing from you today. | |
| Weigh in on what has taken place so far today with the breakdown of this plea deal, now Hunter Biden pleading not guilty and having to revisit an agreement between both parties. | ||
| Well, it was clear from the outset that Hunter Biden's attorneys and the prosecutors were on a completely different page about what this agreement meant. | ||
| And that's very sloppy. | ||
| And as a former prosecutor, I'll put this on the prosecutors, the Delaware U.S. | ||
| Attorney's Office, that they would go to court. | ||
| And usually these hearings are smooth sailing. | ||
| Now, the judge is not a potted plant. | ||
| A judge does not rubber stamp a plea. | ||
| It is her job to make sure that the plea comports with the law and the facts, and that the defendant is pleading knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently. | ||
| And was during that questioning, a simple question, you know, does this... | ||
| Hang on. | ||
| Davis, in court, the judge asked, does this deal get him off everything else, his immunity? | ||
| His attorney said, yes, absolutely. | ||
| The prosecutor goes, well, not totally. | ||
| Mike Davis, how could that possibly happen? | ||
| Tell me what really went on here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay, this is what we get. | |
| Okay, we got a new mic. | ||
| You gotta- I know it's been a- Mike, I know- I- You know, normally, you've gone- Now that we made you a star, you're everywhere. | ||
| I realize it's tough, but you gotta hit that unmute button when you're back on the war room, okay? | ||
| I hear you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So what I would say- I got my big- I screwed it up. | |
| Sorry about that, Steve. | ||
| So what I would say is happening here, there was an even sweeter deal between the Biden Justice Department and Hunter Biden than what was even in the written sweetheart plea agreements. | ||
| What's going on here is it was a wink wink agreement between the Biden Justice Department and Hunter Biden. | ||
| They didn't want to put down on paper that there was a broad waiver of all potential crimes in this plea agreement because that would cause way too much political blowback For the Biden Justice Department, it would also mean that the Biden Justice Department couldn't say that there's an ongoing investigation to try to rebuff Congress. | ||
| And the judge correctly peeled at that, picked at that today, and that's what blew up this whole deal. | ||
| And so they're going to have to go back to square one. | ||
| Hang on. | ||
| Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. | ||
| Hang on for a second. | ||
| Whoa. | ||
| Are you saying they had a even... | ||
| Better. | ||
| They had a better deal. | ||
| They didn't put it in writing because it was an oral deal. | ||
| I'm confused now. | ||
| Just explain to me. | ||
| You're saying that this blew up because the judge asked a couple of pointed questions and essentially what the Merrick Garland in the Justice Department done for Biden has gotten Hunter off of everything. | ||
| He could never be questioned again. | ||
| It all go away. | ||
| Is that the deal? | ||
| Do you think that they actually did make? | ||
| 100% and they maybe didn't make it explicitly as to put it down on paper but the deal was it was a wink wink nod nod you were gonna plead guilty hunter to these two bogus not filing your taxes misdemeanors This gun charge is going to go away, this gun felony is going to go away on a deferred judgment and we're not going to prosecute Hunter for anything else after he agrees to this. | ||
| And this judge picked at that a little bit today and blew up the whole damn thing. | ||
| And you're saying Weiss and that thing, it would just go away. | ||
| Hunter would walk out today and never again would it be questioned and he'd be totally, completely off the hook and Weiss and all this other stuff would just go away. | ||
| That's the deal. | ||
| And the judge is asking a couple of questions publicly. | ||
| Pick the scab and we saw what happened. | ||
| The puss came out. | ||
| It's even worse than that, Steve. | ||
| Not only were they not going to prosecute Hunter for any other crimes, they were going to pretend, the Biden Justice Department was going to pretend like there was an ongoing investigation. | ||
| So the Congress couldn't call in David Weiss, they couldn't call in Merrick Garland, they couldn't call in Hunter Biden because all they'd have to say is there's an ongoing investigation. | ||
| We can't talk to you, Congress. | ||
| It is so much worse than people understand. | ||
| Okay, so then Mike Davis. | ||
| Tomorrow morning, what should judiciary and the others in the House, who should they call in to get to the bottom of exactly what happened? | ||
| What would be Mike Davis' recommendation of what action we need to take? | ||
| They need to call in Bill Barr. | ||
| They need to call in Merrick Garland. | ||
| They need to call in David Weiss. | ||
| They need to call in the Pennsylvania U.S. | ||
| attorney who found these allegations credible. | ||
| They need to call in the IRS whistleblowers. | ||
| And they need to call in the FBI agents who corroborated these claims. | ||
| Put all of them at the same table in front of the cameras and the lights. | ||
| Put them under oath and make them answer the questions under oath of who did what, where and when, because someone is lying here and they need to smoke them out. | ||
| Then Congress must immediately call for an independent special counsel. | ||
| Garland must appoint a truly independent special counsel to handle all these criminal matters related to Hunter Biden. | ||
| And then the House needs to move forward with impeachment against Joe Biden and Merrick Garland. | ||
| Hold it. | ||
| Are you saying that because you're saying Merrick Garland, the White House counsel, or there was some interconnectivity that the Biden White House had to know about this? | ||
| No, it's obvious that Biden is corrupted by a $10 million foreign bribe from Burisma, along with tens of millions of dollars more in foreign bribes from China and Romania and who the hell else knows where else. | ||
| This president is compromised. | ||
| The Biden Justice Department is trying to sweep this under the rug. | ||
| They know that Hunter Biden was the bad man for Joe Biden and Jim Biden, every other sleazeball Biden, except for the four-year-old granddaughter who didn't get any money. | ||
| Every other Biden got this corrupt foreign money, $30-40 million. | ||
| Mike, just hang on for one second. | ||
| We're going to take a short commercial break. | ||
| We're going out with Red River? | ||
| No, we're not. | ||
| We're going miles. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's okay. | |
| We'll get Red River in here. | ||
| We're up here for another hour and a half. | ||
| We're going to get it in somehow. | ||
| The Tammy Patrick? | ||
| People like that this morning. | ||
| Mike Davis is going to stick around. | ||
| We've got Congressman Burleson, and he asked some brilliant questions today on, you could argue, the most important congressional hearing in living memory. | ||
| Now, I realize people say, well, we don't have time for the misdirection play. | ||
| Here's what it's about. | ||
| All these are interconnected in that your government has information, it takes action, and they don't want you to know anything about it. | ||
| The administrative state completely and totally dismissed any oversight by Congress over the last, I don't know, 50 or 60 years. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| We've got Mike Davis, we've got Congressman Burleson from Missouri. | ||
| We've got a lot more going on. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Stick around. | |
| Look, I've been here for six months, and I'm pretty skeptical. | ||
| I don't trust anything in this town, and so I think that's because I'm from Missouri, you've got to show me, right? | ||
| With that being said, there's been a lot of things that have been said in the public, Mr. Grush, and so I want to get down to, if we can, some specifics, right? | ||
| So, At one point you said that there has been harmful activity or aggressive activity. | ||
| Has any of the activity been aggressive, been hostile in your reports? | ||
| I know of multiple colleagues of mine that got physically injured. | ||
| And the activity... By UAPs or by people within the federal government? | ||
| By UAPs or by people within the federal government? | ||
| Both. | ||
| Okay, so there has been activity by alien or non-human technology and or beings that has caused harm to humans? | ||
| I can't get into the specifics in an open environment, but at least the activity that I personally witnessed, and I have to be very careful here, because you don't, you know, I tell you never to acknowledge tradecraft, right? | ||
| So, what I personally witnessed, myself and my wife, was very disturbing. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| One of my constituents actually sent this next question, and I figured I'd ask it since I had the same thought. | ||
| You've said that the U.S. | ||
| has intact spacecraft. | ||
| You said that the government has alien bodies or alien species. | ||
| Have you seen the spacecraft? | ||
| I have to be careful to describe what I've seen firsthand and not in this environment, but I could answer that question behind closed doors. | ||
| Have you seen any of the bodies? | ||
| That's something I've not witnessed myself. | ||
| OK. | ||
| And so with that being said, the other statement that has been made that was intriguing to me, and it's intriguing because my view has been that we are billions of light years away from any other system. | ||
| And the concept that an alien species that's technologically advanced enough to travel billions of light years gets here and somehow is incompetent enough to not survive Earth or crashes is something that I find a little bit far-fetched. | ||
| And with that being said, you have mentioned that there's interdimensional potential. | ||
| Could you expound on that? | ||
| I'll yet answer your first question, and I'm here as a fact witness and expert, but I will give you a theoretical framework, at least to work off, to kind of espouse crashes, regardless of your level of sentience, right? | ||
| Planes crash, cars crash. | ||
| N number of sorties, however high, a small percentage are going to end in mission failure, if you will, as we say in the Air Force. | ||
| And then in terms of multi-dimensionality, that kind of thing, the framework that I'm familiar with, for example, is something called the holographic principle. | ||
| It derives itself from general relativity and quantum mechanics. | ||
| If you want to imagine 3D objects, such as yourself, casting a shadow onto a 2D surface, that's the holographic principle. | ||
| So you can be projected, quasi-projected, from higher dimensional space to lower dimensional. | ||
| It's a scientific trope that you can actually cross, literally, as far as I understand, but there's probably guys with PhDs that we could probably argue about that. | ||
| But you have not seen any documentation that that's what's occurring? | ||
| Only a theoretical framework. | ||
| I want to bring in Congressman Burleson. | ||
| If you go and look at that entire, with everything going on, if you just take that committee, it was jaw-dropping what was said. | ||
| I mean, jaw-dropping. | ||
| The biggest thing, my biggest takeaway is that the administrative state or the deep state part of whatever you want to say, rolls the way it's going to roll. | ||
| They don't care about House, Senate, oversight, money. | ||
| You guys dug as hard as you could dig, but so much of it was, well, we got to get in a skiff and stay behind a closed door. | ||
| A lot of it was just, hey, it is what it is. | ||
| Congressman Burleson, and I'd like to know what your, by the way, great question from your constituent. | ||
| I'd like to know what the folks back home are going to say about this, sir. | ||
| Well, I think people from the show me state, they want to, they, they want to see something. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| I also think that they're sick and tired of the federal government hiding things from them and then blowing their money on things. | ||
| And so I think most people are convinced that, A, they're hiding money. | ||
| They've got all these dark programs where they're spending money that taxpayers have no oversight over. | ||
| And whether it's aliens or not, I think that we owe it to the American people to bring transparency to this. | ||
| His answer to the question, to your questions, I mean, unless he's lying, he could be lying under oath, but I'm sure you guys could drill down, is that he's familiar with, and particularly the Pentagon and contractors are familiar with, non-human technology and essentially non-human beings, or at least parts of them. | ||
| Is that not what his testimony was before you? | ||
| Yeah, to me it's shocking. | ||
| Some of the things that he's claiming are outrageous and shocking. | ||
| He claims That the United States government, since the 30s, has been interacting with these aliens, that we have alien bodies, that they have harmed and or killed humans along the way, that we have spacecraft that we are researching, that third-party entities, private sector is working with the federal government to research crashed materials. | ||
| He said that interdimensional beings, which I'd never even heard of until that Until his testimony. | ||
| A lot of wild claims, okay? | ||
| And so I can't wait to get him in a skiff and get real, like, facts. | ||
| You know, you say people were killed. | ||
| Who? | ||
| What? | ||
| When? | ||
| Where? | ||
| Why? | ||
|
unidentified
|
How? | |
| Right? | ||
| I want to know those things. | ||
| Don't just say it. | ||
| Don't make a broad claim because, again, I'm from the show me state. | ||
| You got to show me. | ||
| You got to give me something here. | ||
| Wasn't the attitude of not these guys, but who they reported to and work for, is that whether it's at its clearance level or really programmatic of what they can do with the money, that they essentially don't have any oversight. | ||
| I mean, even by political appointees. | ||
| Forget elected officials like the House and the Senate. | ||
| They were pretty clear about that. | ||
| But even the 3,000 or 4,000 plus of either party. | ||
| It seems like, at least from the testimony, you have an apparatus that is just doing this and could care less if you guys know about it or not. | ||
| Yeah, that's one thing I can wholeheartedly believe, which is that the federal government is wasting money And doing it under the cover, not being transparent about it. | ||
| So one of the schemes that I've heard that they do is they work with the private sector business that agrees to overcharge for equipment as part of the overall structuring of funding some of these dark programs. | ||
| And that's just not what the American people and their tax dollars I mean, we need to know what's happening with the taxpayer dollars. | ||
| We need to know what the federal government is spending money on and what programs they're investing in. | ||
| Because it's not their money, it's our money. | ||
| He also said about your great question, hey, if they came 10 billion miles, how did they crash on Earth? | ||
| Because they had all this testimony that they could see with satellites. | ||
| And his answer was essentially, if you take the same percentage of how crashed are is basically, oh, they've been billions of flights and some percentage are going to crash. | ||
| It's like some percentage of fighter aircraft crash. | ||
| I mean, it's pretty amazing. | ||
| Where do you go? | ||
| Folks want to know, where does this go from here? | ||
| Are you guys going to really pursue this? | ||
| I mean, Ana Paulina Luna, and Gates, and Burchett, who are pretty tough hombres, went to Eglin. | ||
| This thing kind of started, went to Eglin. | ||
| They had this whole thing, and they kind of got blown off, and shut down, and shown the door. | ||
| So, you're going to get into a skiff, and get a classified version, which I think should be open, but you guys will make a decision. | ||
| With that, where do you guys take this? | ||
| So if he's giving us locations, if he gives us people and locations, that will lead us in other directions. | ||
| He's willing to give us access to what information he gave the Inspector General. | ||
| I want to bring in the Inspector General that he gave this information to, because that Inspector General probably has more information that we can get. | ||
| So I think there's a lot of opportunities, places that we can go from here, and I'm excited to be a part of it. | ||
| Just on House Intel, you know, technically the way the government works, and somebody mentioned a couple times, the Gang of Eight, when they talk about your clearance or other people's clearances or the clearances of people in the House, the Gang of Eight supposedly has the clearances of people in the National Security Council and the West Wing, because that's how Congress, ever since the Church Committee, that's how, when these committees were set up, it was, you know, you have to go to get presidential actions, you have to see it. | ||
| Are you going to bring in—do you believe that the Gang of Eight has been informed of this, that there are people in Congress that actually have known about this? | ||
| I don't know, Steve. | ||
| I'm new here. | ||
| I don't trust anybody up here. | ||
| But it would be sad to me to find out that there are people who are serving their elected constituents and are not willing to be transparent about what they know, especially We should be transparent about how much money that we're spending on this research or development or anything related to these programs. | ||
| We should be 100% transparent about what we're spending and how much. | ||
| I think the people would back you up that, hey, if you're taking money away from programs to research alien beings, alien aircraft that we have, people might want to know about that. | ||
| I think people are very appreciative that we got someone from Missouri that has this kind of no-nonsense, hey, you got to show me the facts. | ||
| And I think people really want to... So what's your social media? | ||
| People are going to really want to keep up with this about what you're finding out, because you were kind of a bulldog today about all of this. | ||
| So how do people follow you? | ||
| How do they track you? | ||
| I'm at Rep Eric Burleson. | ||
| It's spelled with an I. B-U-R-L-I-S-O-N. | ||
| Also, the Fresh Freedom podcast, Steve, that I'd love to have you on sometime. | ||
| I'm glad to do it. | ||
| You and Eli Crane and the others. | ||
| That's a killer team. | ||
| I'll do that. | ||
| Before I let you go, from the sublime to the less sublime. | ||
| Your thoughts today on Hunter Biden? | ||
| I know you were occupied, but the House was exploding with, you know, all kind of investigations from the border, human trafficking, fentanyl, the Biden situation. | ||
| Your thoughts on this? | ||
| It's in the ether that people in the House had a belly full of it, and people are going to start looking for an impeachment inquiry. | ||
| Your thoughts, sir? | ||
| Oh, I mean, finally, Steve, finally, something doesn't go Hunter Biden's way. | ||
| I mean, I hope that I wake up tomorrow and it's still the same situation. | ||
| So for once, justice might be served. | ||
| And I think that it's really promising that a judge has been able to see through all the BS that's being presented and all of the activity that is being done by the deep state to try to suppress all this information. | ||
| It's great to see a judge try to look through that. | ||
| Congressman, thank you very much. | ||
| You were almost a chapter out of Mr. Smith Goes to Washington today, so quite powerful. | ||
| Thank you very much for joining us here. | ||
| Thank you, Steve. | ||
| Tammy Patrick in the Red River Valley. | ||
| Going to go out with a minute of that? | ||
| Okay, a minute of that. | ||
| Maybe have some more at the top of the hour. | ||
| Love her version of this. | ||
| Now, Mike Davis is going to shock you when we return. | ||
| Because you know, Mike Davis was born fighting. | ||
| He's going to talk about this judge because the folks in MSNBC were clearly absolutely stunned about what happened in court today. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| Mike Davis will get us up to speed on the Justice Department and Hunter Biden in a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Just remember the Red River Valley and the ones who loved you so true. | |
| I've been thinking a long time, dear Liberty, of the sweet words you once had to say. | ||
| Now alas, must my fond hopes all vanish? | ||
| We seem less and less of you The choice between two worlds Will you take the blue pill and continue living in a world where a corrupt few control everything? | ||
| Or will you take the red pill and join us? | ||
| What the elites don't want you to know is that there are 200,000 open committee man seats in the Republican Party. | ||
| These party members are the ones who determine the future of the GOP. | ||
| Let's take our country back, one precinct at a time. | ||
| Visit precinctstrategy.com now. | ||
| Royce White right there on the precinct strategy, one precinct at a time. | ||
| Mike Davis, this judge is no Trump appointee, is she, sir? | ||
| This pick by the Delaware U.S. | ||
| Senators, the two Democrat U.S. | ||
| Senators in Delaware got to pick her. | ||
| She's a Democrat. | ||
| She was a patent attorney. | ||
| I was on the Senate Judiciary Committee when her nomination went through. | ||
| She was a compromise pick. | ||
| And she donated to Hillary Clinton. | ||
| Definitely not a Trump supporter. | ||
| Definitely not a fire breather. | ||
| I mean, she's donated to John McCain as well. | ||
| She has Republican contributions as well, but she's definitely a Democrat. | ||
| So that shows you how egregious this was, right? | ||
| She couldn't even tolerate this being a Democrat appointee. | ||
| Let me think about this, Steve. | ||
| We had the Biden Justice Department and Hunter Biden going in with this completely bogus, sweetheart plea deal. | ||
| And it was so bad, it fell apart under just a couple questions by this Democrat judge. | ||
| And it was so bad that she couldn't even stomach it. | ||
| So that tells you how bad this plea deal was. | ||
| And I just want to make sure that I, because people look to you, people know in town now, people really look to Mike Davis because of his background, his history, and also his hits on War Room for his judgment. | ||
| You're saying tomorrow that this ought to be very serious for judiciary in the House and in the Senate, even the Democrats, to get to the bottom, but particularly the House, to get to the bottom of exactly what happened here? | ||
| There's no question. | ||
| They need to subpoena those people we talked about. | ||
| They need to subpoena Bill Barr, Merrick Garland, David Weiss, the U.S. | ||
| Attorney in Delaware, the U.S. | ||
| Attorney in Pennsylvania, the IRS whistleblowers, and the FBI agents who corroborated this evidence against Joe Biden. There is smoking gun evidence that the president of the United States is compromised by a $10 million foreign bribe from Burisma. And there's smoking gun evidence that the president and his extended family are compromised by tens of millions more from China and Romania and probably elsewhere. There's $30, | ||
| $40 million that House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer has been able to identify. | ||
| They need to get those people in front of Congress immediately and ask them when they learn this information about this $10 million foreign bribe from Burisma, where Then-Vice President Joe Biden threatened to cut off a billion dollars in U.S. | ||
| aid if the Ukrainian president didn't fire the Ukrainian prosecutor investigating Burisma and the Bidens. | ||
| That got sent to the U.S. | ||
| Attorney in Pennsylvania by Bill Barr. | ||
| It was deemed credible, and then it got sent to a black hole in Delaware with the U.S. | ||
| Attorney there, David Weiss. | ||
| Why didn't Bill Barr follow up? | ||
| Why didn't Merrick Garland appoint a special counsel? | ||
| What the hell happened here, and why is this Which was immunity for everything else. | ||
| His attorney said, no, we have immunity. | ||
| Never again, no questions. | ||
| He's got, well, I don't know if that's quite true. | ||
| Tomorrow, MSNBC had to break into their indictment watch. | ||
| They got guys hanging out everywhere. | ||
| Is President Trump going to get indicted by Jack Smith tomorrow? | ||
| Mike Davis. | ||
| I don't know if it's going to be tomorrow, but I guarantee you that Jack Smith is going to indict President Trump for the non-crime of objecting to the presidential election, which is allowed by the Electoral Count Act of 1887. | ||
| Twisting arms politically is allowed by the First Amendment. | ||
| This is part of lawfare that we've been discussing, you and I, on this show, Steve, since August. | ||
| It started with Alvin Bragg's bogus indictment of Trump, the first indictment of a former president ever for the non-crime of a businessman settling a nuisance claim. | ||
| Then Jack Smith indicted Trump for the non-crime of a former president having his presidential records and the office of former president, which is allowed by the Electoral Count Act of 1887. | ||
| And now we have Fannie Willis, that Democrat Fulton County DA, and Jack Smith now going after Trump for, again, the non-crime of objecting to a presidential election. | ||
| It's only illegal to object to elections in third world Marxist hellholes. | ||
| If it's illegal to object in America, Democrats would be in prison for objecting to Republican presidential wins in 1969, 2001, 2005, and 2017. | ||
| This is lawfare against Trump that we've been talking about for a year because they fear they can't beat Trump in November 2024. | ||
| Mike Davis, how do people get to you to keep up with all of this? | ||
| article3project.org you can donate there article3project.org at article3project at article number three project on getter Twitter truth and my personal is at MRD DMIA MRD DMIA and I apologize for the mute button and I'll do better next time Steve thank you for having me on. | ||
| We just need more reps. | ||
| We need more reps. | ||
| Mike Davis, thank you. | ||
| We'll send you out for your evening media hits right now. | ||
| Go with God. | ||
| Fair winds and following seas. | ||
| Home Title Act. | ||
| By the way, we need everybody at the ramparts and what we don't need is you worried about your financial situation. | ||
| Since 90% of your net worth, yes, even with the Federal Reserve, by the way, the Federal Reserve raised interest rates today and it doesn't lead in the war room. | ||
| Alien aircraft, baby. | ||
| Okay, we're going to end with Red River Valley. | ||
| Go to HomeTitleLock.com. | ||
| Do not let cybercriminals or the CCP or the Russians, the KGB, take out a second mortgage on your home and have you pay it off with a hard money lender. | ||
| HomeTitleLock.com. | ||
| Take care of today. | ||
| What is it? | ||
| Tammy Patrick takes it out with Red River Valley, her MAGA edition of this. | ||
| We've got a whole nother hour. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're gonna be jammed wall to wall when we return after a short commercial break Now must my fond hopes all vanish Do you think | |
| Of the valley you're leaving Oh how lonely and how dreary it will be When dear freedom you leave us completely For the false sense of security you | ||
| Come and sit by my side if you love me. | ||
| Do not hasten to bid me adieu. |
Export Selection