June 20, 2023 - Bannon's War Room
48:53
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pray for our enemies, because we're going medieval on these people. | |
| I got a free shot at all these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. And where do people like that go to share the big line? | ||
| MAGA Media. I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| Tuesday, 20 June, Year of Alert 2023. | ||
| A lot going on. | ||
| The premiere here in Washington tonight of Sound of Freedom, about this human trafficking situation of children. | ||
| Which is unacceptable, particularly when they reveal that the United States is the driver of demand of this. | ||
| Right? Outrageous. | ||
| Right now, tentatively, we've got Jim Caviezel scheduled for an in-studio interview at 6, premiere of the films tonight. | ||
| We're going to have Ed Water on tomorrow, the producer of the film, also one of the most famous actors in Mexico who's dedicated his life to this. | ||
| I think we're going to try to get Tim Ballard also on. | ||
| It's a story of his life. | ||
| Then later in the week, Ralph Reed's Faith and Freedom is going to have their big conference in Real America's Voice. | ||
| We'll be covering that. We'll be picking up interviews and clips. | ||
| That's towards the end of the week. And then you've got the huge one-year anniversary of Dobbs. | ||
| It's going to be on Saturday. Patriot Mobile is going to be there. | ||
| They're going to be representative. | ||
| Father Pavone will get many people. | ||
| We'll cover that. We're going to have live coverage of that starting Saturday morning, obviously with all the important news and analysis of the day. | ||
| This whole thing in China. | ||
| And the whole situation is laid out between the economic disparity and what Josh Hawley talked about about the jobs and the losing of the manufacturing jobs and not being adamant about bringing those jobs back, particularly when Hawley tried to get an amendment to this spending fiasco. | ||
| As Philip Patrick said on the show last night, and I want to break that out and make sure we can push that out, Philip Patrick talked about the St. | ||
| Petersburg conference It's been hell of the last couple of days in St. | ||
| Petersburg that Putin kind of chaired. | ||
| And it's the BRICS nations, Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, and other, I think they've had 20 new countries that have applied. | ||
| These are basically the countries that have the natural resources in the world. | ||
| It's kind of what we call the developing world. | ||
| They have announced they're going to be in Durban, South Africa, basically 60 days from now, I think around 22nd of August, and they're going to have a big announcement. | ||
| As we said last night, we think that announcement is, as Philip Patrick laid out, about a basket of currencies or something that could be looked at as the beginning of an alternative for the dollar. | ||
| We've told you that this is coming and it's going to have a major impact now. | ||
| Is that going to replace the dollar on the afternoon of the 22nd of August in the year of early 2023? | ||
| No, it will not. But it will begin the formal process of this. | ||
| And it is a fundamental and deep change to our country, not being the prime reserve currency, of which I said, hey, a lot of responsibilities come for that, but there's also benefits. | ||
| And right now you just can't get off it because it's a little bit like a drug. | ||
| You just can't go cold turkey. | ||
| Our nation's financial system is not set up for that. | ||
| That's why I need everybody in the Saudis now to go to birchgold.com slash Bannon. | ||
| We've got the three-part series that we're adding a fourth installment to, all free, the end of the dollar empire. | ||
| You need to understand where we are in this moment of history and what it impacted to your community, your family, and yourself. | ||
| Also, you have to understand why the central banks of these countries are buying gold at record paces. | ||
| They bought it at record paces at 22. | ||
| 23 is even ahead of the curve. | ||
| You need to find out what that means to your financial situation and then talk to the guys at Birch Gold about alternatives they've got for you. | ||
| Birchgold.com slash Bannon. | ||
| Go do that today. I want to bring in Mark Mitchell. | ||
| I get Ben Harnwell. We got Schlapps. | ||
| Got to make a big announcement here about CPAC, about the film. | ||
| They're actually sponsoring the premiere of the film, Sound of Freedom Night. | ||
| They have a very big announcement. | ||
| I've got Mike Davis here for this Bill Barr stuff that we've got to make sure we can deconstruct it. | ||
| Also, as Kash Patel and Mike Davis and myself told you, that they basically had some charges brought on Hunter Biden, all irrelevant, little misdemeanor charges, nothing about his selling out the country. | ||
| That was a misdirection place. | ||
| I said, oh, you can't. Why is Trump bellyaching? | ||
| We charge Hunter Biden. | ||
| It's all nonsense, and we're going to break it down for you. | ||
| Mark Mitchell, the American people in Wuhan, because this is what Blinken never brought up. | ||
| Remember, these guys let a bioweapon off that destroyed our economy, has added so much debt. | ||
| It's really changed the balance sheet of our country in the direction of our growth. | ||
| We had over 3 % growth. | ||
| In the fourth quarter of 2019, and we've struggled with, besides the bounce back with all the $9 trillion we've pumped into this thing, we're struggling now at growth of just over 1%. | ||
| Walk me through what your polling and analysis show, the American people's understanding of all this. | ||
| Well, a trend we've been following is that voters are looking around and their eyes are being opened to government corruption. | ||
| And the latest question we asked How likely is that some US officials were involved in a cover-up of China's role in the COVID-19 pandemic, i.e., is our government protecting China? | ||
| And 66 % of likely voters, just two out of three, that's a massive number. | ||
| 45 % say it's very likely, 66 % say it's at least somewhat likely. | ||
| Only 25 % say it isn't likely. | ||
| And I think more and more, voters are smart about China. | ||
| They really had their eyes opened by the COVID pandemic. | ||
| And we went from a situation where either our biggest trade partner, they supply everything that people buy off Amazon every day. | ||
| And for the longest time, they were in this middle ground with voters where people said they were somewhere in between an ally and an enemy. | ||
| And earlier this year, we asked, and for the first time, almost half of voters say that China is an enemy now, and only 11 percent said it's an ally. | ||
| So those are incredible numbers and very clearly. | ||
| And we also asked another question about who's America's biggest enemy today. | ||
| And believe it or not, if you ask Republicans and independents, they say China's our number one enemy. | ||
| Of course, Republicans say that our number two enemy is Democrats. | ||
| And Democrats say it's Russia. | ||
| So this issue of China, which is also basically Joe Biden's worst rated issue, only 34 % give him an excellent or good on the issue of China. | ||
| That's down there in illegal immigration territory. | ||
| It really is kind of this driving difference between Trump and Biden. | ||
| And especially on the issue of corruption, we also asked, we had a whole set for post indictment to see what voters thought. | ||
| And we can get into some of that, but the most important question I thought is, is the Biden administration more corrupt or less corrupt than most recent administrations? | ||
| 45 % of voters say more corrupt, only 37 % say less corrupt. | ||
| But what was really fascinating is to see the people that say more corrupt and less corrupt, well, who do they want to go and actually vote for in 2024? | ||
| And the people that say Joe Biden is among the least corrupt administrations, 79 % vote Biden. | ||
| 83 % of those who say he's more corrupt than previous administrations vote Trump. | ||
| So it really is this idea of government trust. | ||
| Do you trust your government? Do you believe what they're saying? | ||
| And increasingly, people don't. | ||
| We also asked if voters agreed with the statement, China lied, Fauci lied, people died, and that's Marsha Blackburn quote. | ||
| 60 % of voters agree with that statement, 43 % strongly, only 32 % disagree. | ||
| So almost a two to one margin there. | ||
| People tying their government officials, Anthony Fauci and his potential cover-up of US-funded gain-of-function research and China to the pandemic that ultimately killed millions of people around the globe. | ||
| Very clear. And even Democrats, 46 % of Democrats agree with that statement. | ||
| Of course, it's almost unanimous among Republicans. | ||
| That's 76%. | ||
| And on all of these questions we ask, the independents are polling closer and closer to Republicans. | ||
| 61 % of independents agree China lied, Fauci lied, people died. | ||
| And 69 % of independents say it's at least somewhat likely that our government is protecting China in a cover-up of their involvement in the pandemic. | ||
| You just got to the signal right there, the independents, because that's the proxy. | ||
| Take out the partisanship. | ||
| But I want to go back. I'm going to take the two bookends of what you just talked about. | ||
| Because if you combine those and think through what it's saying, it's amazingly powerful for this time in American history. | ||
| The first is so powerful. | ||
| The 66 % is not simply that the CCP, either as an act of commission or an act of omission, that they exacerbated either a mistake or they did it on purpose. | ||
| But that government officials, Americans, 66, two-thirds think they covered it up. | ||
| Then you add the Fauci situation where China lied and Fauci, you know, people died, right? | ||
| Combine those two. Walk back to those two sets of numbers. | ||
| The first one you talked about and then the Fauci because if you combine that into a whole, Ed, the independence, you understand that the American people, this is a pivot of how the American people are thinking about this. | ||
| Far different. 180 out from this. | ||
| 180 out from this. | ||
| They're not looking for stability. | ||
| Go ahead. I think the only thing we basically haven't asked at this point is that Frank Gaffney quote. | ||
| We should go out there and ask if voters think that the Biden administration is a Chinese uncontrolled asset. | ||
| I think we're almost at this point with what the numbers say. | ||
| They're certainly not having their heads turned by the shiny object that is the Trump indictment. | ||
| Trump's lead over Biden, we just retested it. | ||
| It's as strong as ever. It's a six-point lead. | ||
| I think it was a seven-point lead two months prior. | ||
| But the big news there, again, is the independence. | ||
| Biden was behind with independence only by eight points in the beginning of April. | ||
| And now it's at 20, 20 points. | ||
| So Democrats, Actually are more supportive of Biden now that this Trump indictment came out, one that they think actually has some meat and the optics are better than the Stormy Daniels indictment. | ||
| But now independents and other groups, younger voters, black voters, coming closer to Trump on this. | ||
| What does it say about people right now that they don't, whether it's Fauci or other government officials, they don't trust, including independents, so this is just not right-wing partisans like the War Room audience, but independents, that they are not convinced, they think that somehow the government's either covering up or assisting China. | ||
| What are your thoughts on that? | ||
| I think my biggest thought really comes back to this 2024 cycle and what it means. | ||
| And I think we're going to see a lot more trends like this where we find things the government's covering up, things the FBI is hiding about Joe Biden. | ||
| And I think voters want an alternative. | ||
| And people wonder why Trump still has so much support, why DeSantis announced his candidacy and really isn't You know, clawing Cher away from Trump is that people want an alternative to Biden. | ||
| Biden approval has been the single most dividing demographic in pretty much all of our polling on every single issue. | ||
| Even here, the Biden approvers are the most likely to believe Anthony Fauci and the Biden disapprovers are the least likely. | ||
| This is about Biden and what he represents and the corruption potentially that he's alleged to represent, right? | ||
| And then I look at this 2024 slate of Republican candidates and besides Donald Trump, who is offering an alternative? | ||
| Who's out there talking about a different path for where we need to go in a way that Trump is and nobody else is except for maybe Vivek Ramaswamy. | ||
| So everybody that's piling in, I think we said, I said this on your show before, what's the elevator pitch? | ||
| And I'm not hearing a lot of stuff that's different that's going to differentiate these People in the eyes of voters. | ||
| Real quickly, we've got about a minute. | ||
| On the Democrat side, RFK's not bringing in a lot of Democrats, but those people that are disaffected are starting to rally, are rallying around him. | ||
| Is that what you're seeing? Yeah, I think the last time we checked, he had 17 % of the Democrat vote. | ||
| We asked a set that we'll be talking about next week. | ||
| Essentially, how likely is it that people think he's going to be the candidate? | ||
| And what their favorability opinion numbers are, but we, you know, his favorability numbers are just as high, if not higher among Republicans than they are among Democrats. | ||
| And so Democrats look at Biden and some, they still support him, 75 % approval rate. | ||
| They don't think that, one of the other questions we asked, and this is, I just like, it's so unironic. | ||
| Is Biden better or worse than previous presidents? | ||
| And 60 % of Democrats Say that Biden is a better president than most recent presidents, which presumably includes Obama. | ||
| That's where they're at. | ||
| So they see that he's old. | ||
| They see his mental acuity issues. | ||
| They tell us that. They're concerned about his age, but they support him. | ||
| He's a great president. | ||
| 60 % of Democrats say he's better essentially than Obama and Bill Clinton. | ||
| That's where they're at. I don't see how RFK is going to compete with that. | ||
| Mark, just hang on for a second. | ||
| We're going to give your coordinates when we come back. | ||
| Ben Harnwell, Mike Davis will join us. | ||
|
unidentified
|
short break back in a moment they've been working both with the US government and with academic institutions to make sure that they're doing so in the | |
| appropriate way. | ||
| I'll also note that in reporting the story, we spoke to people who work at these companies like Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Twitter, to check if any of these accusations had any merit to them, if any of these researchers had improperly been censoring some type of speech. | ||
| And they all repeated the same thing to us, which is that these researchers have no power. | ||
| They can't delete anything from the Internet. | ||
| They just conduct research and they do make recommendations for things that they believe to be conspiracies or rule-violating content. | ||
| But they're not doing, as these people claim, some sort of mass deleting of information on the Internet that they don't like. | ||
| Sherry, is this a way for GOP operatives to use the court system essentially to force researchers into submission? | ||
| Is that the aim? | ||
| And this is just a use of opposition research against a new target essentially? | ||
| I mean, these researchers certainly feel that to be the case. | ||
| One academic I spoke to said that they had to freeze all of their work. | ||
| Remember, they're coming at you two-pronged approach today, one on your faith, and now it's back to the disinformation, misinformation. | ||
| We're going to get into all that. | ||
| Mark Mitchell, Rasmussen, where do people go to get all your... | ||
| I know you're up on YouTube, you're up on Rumble. | ||
| Where do people go to get your full assessment of all this? | ||
| Yeah, I love how you just had that disinformation piece. | ||
| We're the number 42 highest ranked spreader of election misinformation on Twitter. | ||
| So that's a great place to follow us, Rasmussen underscore poll. | ||
| We distinguish ourselves by being really the only national pollster out there aggressively challenging this issue. | ||
| And we also just dropped the 27-minute part 1 video of all of our post-election 2020 polling on election integrity. | ||
| So it's going to be really fascinating to watch as people's hearts and minds are opened to the possibility of the cheating effect of the 2020 outcome. | ||
| Part 1's out already. | ||
| People can get it on YouTube. | ||
| It also rasmussen underscore poll. | ||
| And we'll be dropping part 2 probably in the next week or two. | ||
| Okay, we'll have you on for an assessment of that, because Brett Baer definitely doesn't agree with you on that, sir. | ||
| Mark, thank you so much. | ||
| Love Rasmussen. Right for you guys, I just want to make sure. | ||
| As your polling stands today, matchup, Trump versus Biden, Trump's still up by six, right? | ||
| Yeah, 45 to 39. | ||
| Comfortable lead. Yep. | ||
| And Biden's under 40%, which is always a great sign. | ||
| He's got a three-handle on it. | ||
| Always a great sign for an incumbent, right, when you're at 39 %? | ||
| It's going to be an interesting cycle. | ||
| Yeah. I don't think Biden's going to be the nominee, but I think that is a topic for a future war room. | ||
| Okay, sir. Thank you. Thanks, Mark Mitchell. | ||
| Appreciate it. My pleasure. I still got Harnwell, but Ben and I have to go through this situation with the CCP and particularly what's happening in Cuba. | ||
| It's quite important. | ||
| I want to spend time. Mike Davis. | ||
| Davis, so a couple things. | ||
| Number one, you know, Brett Baer's up, and I don't know why... | ||
| President Trump is doing interviews on Fox like that. | ||
| I mean, it's contentious. | ||
| It's nitpicky. It's just it's not imagine a Democratic candidate coming on MSNBC or CNN. It's just not the way you comport yourself. | ||
| It's not an interview. It's interrogation and it's not acceptable, but His handlers, you know, are greater minds than ours. | ||
| So, yeah, I guess you're going to get part two tonight. | ||
| I just vehemently disagree with. | ||
| And then the Murdoch machine starts. | ||
| They start right this morning with, you know, TV for stupid people at dawn goes with their morning show and what they're taking clips and it's all, you know, Bret Baier just up in Trump's grill. | ||
| That's not an interview. | ||
| It's trying to be an interrogation. | ||
| I think President Trump handled it fine, but It's just, I don't know why reward your enemies. | ||
| Murdoch, take the number two pencil out. | ||
| Rupert Murdoch is the enemy of President Trump and the enemy of MAGA. It's the enemy. | ||
| That's the reality. Now they're going to put some, you know, they're going to put some cover on it and, you know, talk about, they're going to put shiny toys out in front of you. | ||
| You're going to get lots of shiny toys. | ||
| But they are not supporters of MAGA. They're not supporters of populism. | ||
| They're not supporters of nationalism. | ||
| They're a bunch of foreigners. | ||
| And you talk about global governance and you talk about the CCP and what the Financial Times of London is talking about. | ||
| They're all for that. | ||
| They love that borderless... | ||
| Free flows of capital and folks, people with no borders, no sovereignty, except, excuse me, except if that border is on the eastern Russian-speaking side of Ukraine, then it's, hey, then man, oh man, we need hundreds of billions of dollars. | ||
| The sovereignty, the self-determination, and the territorial integrity has to be paramount. | ||
| That's different. Mike Davis, you got Murdoch, you got Bill Barr, and of course, now, Mike Davis, you can't bitch and moan and whine because Hunter Biden's been charged. | ||
| Hunter Biden's been charged. | ||
| I think you and Cash are the first guys to tell us how this misdirection play. | ||
| So take it in order. Let's go Hunter Biden first, then I want to go Bill Barr, and then I want to go Fox News, sir. | ||
| So, Hunter Biden got charged with two misdemeanors for his tax evasion, failing to file taxes in 2017 and 2018. | ||
| And then he got charged with a felony for essentially having an illegal firearm. | ||
| They said for only five days. | ||
| But that felony is a deferred charge where it's going to go away. | ||
| So he's not going to have the felony on his record. | ||
| He's going to have these two misdemeanors for tax evasion or essentially tax evasion. | ||
| They're recommending no jail time. | ||
| And this is, at the end of the day, a very sweetheart deal. | ||
| And they're saying, well, this was the Trump U.S. attorney in Delaware, David Weiss, who came to this deal with Hunter Biden. | ||
| People need to understand how the process works for these U.S. attorneys. | ||
| You know this, Steve. | ||
| U.S. attorneys, district court judges, and U.S. marshals are picked by home state senators in consultation with the White House. | ||
| It is driven by the home state senators. | ||
| So the fact that David Weiss was a U.S. attorney under Donald Trump is almost meaningless. | ||
| That means the two Democrat home state senators picked him. | ||
| And we're seeing that they have a good pick because this David Weiss has been covering up for the Bidens for years. | ||
| Bill Barr supposedly sent this credible allegation back in 2020, around January of 2020, that then That Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter, took a $10 million foreign bribe from Burisma and changed American policy. | ||
| Threatened to cut off a billion dollars in USAID if this Burisma president didn't fire, or excuse me, if the Ukraine president didn't fire the Ukraine prosecutor. | ||
| Investigating Burisma and the Bidens. | ||
| That should end Joe Biden's career. | ||
| He should resign from office, if that's true. | ||
| David Weiss had this allegation for years and apparently did nothing about it. | ||
| And Bill Barr didn't even think, hey, maybe I should tell Congress, key officials in Congress, that a leading presidential rival could be compromised by $10 million in foreign bribes. | ||
| And this foreign bribe could have been transacted with 17 audio recordings, 15 with Hunters, two with then Vice President Joe Biden. | ||
| Oh, by the way, the Burisma executive who allegedly got Into this bribery scheme with then-Vice President Joe Biden and his scumbag son, Hunter, may have been a Russian asset. | ||
| So you could have Russia with blackmail and compromising material on a potential President of the United States. | ||
| So what did Bill Barr do with that? | ||
| He buried it. He buried it with a David Weiss, this hand-picked U.S. attorney by two Democrat senators. | ||
| David Weiss just delivered for the Bidens again with this sweetheart deal with Hunter. | ||
| Hunter's going to get no jail time. | ||
| for being the bad man for Joe Biden's foreign bribery and other corruption schemes. | ||
| And it looks like he's not, depending on what this plea agreement says, this could be the end of the road for Hunter. | ||
| He may not get charged with anything else, including Burisma, depending on how this plea agreement is written. | ||
| Now, the silver lining out of this, and that's if House Republicans actually can grow a backbone on this one. | ||
| They've been getting better and better every day. | ||
| Comber's been great. They need to subpoena Hunter Biden the second that he is sentenced, the second that this judge accepts this Sweetheart plea agreement, and they need to subpoena Hunter Biden. | ||
| He can no longer plead the Fifth Amendment at that point because he's already pled guilty. | ||
| They need to haul him in, bring in his documents, bring in Hunter Biden, make him testify to congressional investigators in a deposition about all of his foreign bribery and corruption schemes of Hunter, James, Joe, Jill, the whole scumbag Biden family except for the four-year-old granddaughter in Arkansas who got cut out and then put him in front of the cameras and the bright lights for a public hearing. | ||
| The American people need to understand And know before going into 2024 that Joe Biden is compromised by his corrupt foreign dealings. | ||
| And frankly, if this evidence is true, he needs to step down. | ||
| He needs to resign from the presidency because he is compromised. | ||
| And if he doesn't, the House Republicans need to impeach him and let Senate Democrats try to justify keeping a compromised president of the United States in office. | ||
| By the way, you can tell by their activity in China, their compromise. | ||
| There's no doubt about that. Real quickly, Mike, I want to hold you through the break, but is Bill Barr on this jihad against Trump to try to cover up a misdirection play off of his not just mishandling, but really covering up for the Biden crime family when he was attorney general? | ||
| Well, it's a head-scratcher to me, Steve, because you know what? | ||
| Bill Barr as the Attorney General had this evidence that was credible from a whistleblower who the FBI paid $200,000 over 10 years. | ||
| They had this evidence deemed credible by this Pennsylvania U.S. Attorney before he was sent to the Delaware U.S. Attorney by Bill Barr. | ||
| Did Bill Barr follow up? | ||
| After they had this damning allegation since January of 2020, did Bill Barr think it might have been a good idea to alert key congressional leaders that, hey, we have this evidence. | ||
| We have a potential president of the United States in this next election who could be compromised by a $10 million bribe from Burisma by a Russian asset. | ||
| Or a likely Russian asset. | ||
| I mean, did Bill Barr think that it would be a good idea just to cover that up and not say anything and just send it to this hand-picked Democrat U.S. attorney and do not talk to this? | ||
| Mike, just hang on for one second. | ||
|
unidentified
|
short commercial break mike davis have been on the next in the world here's your host steven kate okay mike davis white should should the house | |
| uh... open up and get uh... and get barred down there Because he's going off on Trump every day in his involvement in this, because he's trying to cover for himself, not getting on top of this Biden crime syndicate immediately when they had the information back in 2019, he and Ray. | ||
| So should the House call him in front? | ||
| Should they call him in front right now, put him under oath and let's get some testimony out of him? | ||
| They should try. | ||
| Bill Barr has a lot of explaining to do. | ||
| We had credible evidence that a potential president of the United States was compromised by a $10 million foreign bride. | ||
| Bill Barr buried this by sending it to a U.S. attorney in Delaware, handpicked by two Democrat senators. | ||
| Apparently didn't follow up, certainly didn't alert Congress, key officials in Congress, key lawmakers, that we have a dire situation here where we could have a president of the United States elected. | ||
| And then he has to be impeached and removed because he's compromised. | ||
| What Bill Barr and the Biden Justice Department will claim is executive privilege here and other privileges where they will try to preclude his testimony. | ||
| This is why House Republicans need to open an impeachment inquiry on President Biden. | ||
| And with an inquiry, not an impeachment vote yet, but an impeachment inquiry, then you have broad power in the House to subpoena people and records over claims of privileges like executive privilege. | ||
| Well, that's How it worked with Trump's two impeachment inquiries, you know, maybe these uniparty judges will carve out Biden, probably carve out Biden because they're uniparty judges and there was the Trump derangement exception to every constitutional provision and statute imaginable for four years. | ||
| But House Republicans should open an impeachment inquiry. | ||
| There's no excuse for why they haven't. | ||
| We have a president of the United States who allegedly, likely, took a $10 million foreign bribe from Burisma, five to Joe, five to Hunter. | ||
| Then Vice President Joe Biden threat to cut off a billion dollars in USA to Ukraine if the Ukrainian president didn't fire the Ukrainian prosecutor investigating Burisma and the Bidens fired. | ||
| It doesn't get more corrupt than that. | ||
| That is clear foreign bribery and corruption. | ||
| If this evidence turns out to be true, which it looks likely, there are 17 audio recordings, 15 with Hunter, two with then-Vice President Joe Biden. | ||
| If it's true, Joe Biden can't stay in office. | ||
| He is compromised. He took a foreign bribe, and Russia almost certainly has blackmail on the President of the United States. | ||
| So, House Republicans, your backbone's growing a bit over time, but let's just have it grow a little bit more and open an impeachment inquiry. | ||
| No. Mike, how do people get to you at Article 3? | ||
| Article3project.org, Article3project.org, at Article3project, at Article3project on Getter, Twitter, Truth, and my personal is at MRDDMIA. MRDDMIA. Thank you, brother. Okay, when I was brought in, and this is why, you know, Garrett Ziegler, what he's done. | ||
| Thanks, brother. To look at the laptop from hell was about the CCP compromise, and it's all laid out right there. | ||
| So you've got the Ukraine, you've got the Ukraine and Zelensky, and you have these China and the CCP. Hmm. | ||
| So we know there's documents for that back in all the way from, I don't know, 14, 15, 16. | ||
| The laptop from 19 that talks about their efforts after they left the White House in 17, but they were meeting with guys. | ||
| You got the bioweapons lab in Wuhan. | ||
| They suppressed that. I'm just thinking. | ||
| I'm thinking out loud here. You have obviously... | ||
| Massive amounts of cash moving from foreign nationals. | ||
| And then you get the Financial Times. | ||
|
unidentified
|
She hails progress. | |
| That sounds like somebody that's a mortal threat to the United States of America. | ||
| Hails progress. Hails progress in the kowtow. | ||
| And you talk about the Cuban Missile Crisis. | ||
| Ben Harnwell, I want you to come here and talk about Cuba. | ||
| At the same time, the Cuba... | ||
| And Blinken, I think, tried to bring it up, and they said they're not discussing it, not off the table, just like no discussion of the military-demilitary contacts. | ||
| With the ability to do bioweapons, with the ability to do cyber attacks on the grid and others, like including your mortgage to your house... | ||
| Hello, home title lock, go there. | ||
| Hey, you've got an outpost now, a military base in Cuba. | ||
| Wasn't that what the Cuban Missile Crisis was all about? | ||
| Ben Harnwell, get us up to date on the complete collapse. | ||
| And there's something not right here. | ||
| That's where we're going to get to the bottom of it. | ||
| There's something not right. There's something that doesn't make sense about this Ukraine situation. | ||
| There's something that doesn't make sense about this CCP, the kowtow to the CCP. And Frank Gaffney and others, you know, Mark Mitchell, a pollster, is now calling them controlled assets. | ||
| These are not small charges. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ben Harnwell. Good morning, Steve. | |
| Well, yes, you're right to refer to the Cuban Missile Crisis. | ||
| And what I'm going to go into now is basically a repeat of 1961. | ||
| But let's see how this ends. | ||
| So here's an article, and this is again, like yesterday, we're going to the Wall Street Journal for this. | ||
| They've done some excellent research, but like yesterday, they've buried their own lead. | ||
| They speak here that on the north of the island of Cuba, China and Cuba are negotiating to establish what the journal calls a new joint military training facility on the island. | ||
| And they explain further on that it's a platform to potentially house troops permanently on the island and broaden its intelligence gathering. | ||
| I think that's all rubbish, Steve. | ||
| I don't think that's remotely what President Xi, Emperor Xi, is interested in doing. | ||
| And there's no reason for him to limit himself. | ||
| Look, what have we learned over the last 18 months? | ||
| The United States has squandered and wasted approximately 200 $1 billion worth of U.S. taxpayers' wealth, money and military supplies, to underwrite, to defend a principle, which is, and you mentioned it earlier on in the show, the principle of territorial integrity. | ||
| We're talking obviously here of Ukraine. | ||
| The argument that the United States primarily, and then it's got NATO, and then it's got the other Western powers like the U.K., The principle is that it is a sovereign nation's right to choose for itself what its political and military alliances will be. | ||
| And if there are larger geopolitical concerns on the border of that sovereign nation, they're not important. | ||
| You know, there's the international rules-based order here, right? | ||
| Countries can choose for themselves. | ||
| And if Ukraine should want and desire to enter NATO and put nuclear missiles, NATO missiles, right up there on Russia's border, well, Russia just has to live with it. | ||
| And that is the argument that the United States has rammed down the world's throat over the last 18 months. | ||
| So I say to you, Steve, this is my suggestion. | ||
| As far as we are aware, President Xi has been gearing up his nation to invade Taiwan. | ||
| Okay? Why should he not put missiles? | ||
| Why should he not throw that argument that the United States has just been building back in the United States' face? | ||
| And let Cuba say, we want a bilateral missile agreement with China. | ||
| We want to put nuclear missiles. | ||
| On Cuba, how can with any credibility? | ||
| I mean, all nations, if you go back long enough, can be hypocritical. | ||
| But how can the United States possibly at the same moment in time... | ||
| Hang on. | ||
| I agree with that. I agree with that. | ||
| But there's one thing. I just want to make sure people focus on this. | ||
| Look at what they did in the Wuhan lab and what it did to the world. | ||
| Look at with artificial intelligence and cyber. | ||
| They're in unrestricted war with us right now on cyber attacks. | ||
| The U.S. government just announced that the Russians were all over these cyber attacks last week. | ||
| Well, the Chinese are their senior partner. | ||
| And the Chinese are doing cyber attacks all the time. | ||
| With that base in Cuba, nuclear weapons are kind of weapons of the 20th century. | ||
| Don't get me wrong, nuclear weapons are a massive problem. | ||
| But nuclear weapons are a weapon of the 20th century. | ||
| Biological and artificial intelligence, cyber, are weapons of the 21st century. | ||
| And economics. Right there, in Cuba, up in your grill, they're doing what the Soviets could even wish to do in the 60s. | ||
| This shows you, and Blinken tried to bring it up and they just dismissed him out of hand. | ||
| That's Kaltun. That's loss of face. | ||
| They're the upper part. | ||
| This is the Thucydides trap. | ||
| That we've now bought into this very dangerous theory of Kissinger, of which Blinken's an acolyte of, that China's the rising power and we're the declining power. | ||
| Jake Sullivan had told the guys that were at CNN that one of the things in the 2016 that he knew right away when I stepped on board. | ||
| We don't agree with the Trump. | ||
| We don't agree with the city's trap. | ||
| We're not the declining power. | ||
| We're not. We're still in ascended power if we get back to our core values and start acting like it. | ||
| If you act like a sheep, the lion's gonna eat you. | ||
| The wolf's gonna eat you. | ||
| And this is wolf diplomacy. | ||
| And you got the Wall Street Journal. | ||
| I agree with your theoretical construct, Ben, but it's actually beyond a theoretical construct now. | ||
| This is just power of politics. | ||
| That base has to go. It cannot be developed. | ||
| If Biden, Biden should be turfed out for that alone. | ||
| Remember, they're enveloping us. | ||
| There's a huge investigation on their active involvement in the elections in Canada and why Trudeau continues to roll over. | ||
| They're conducting a second opium war. | ||
| As Lieutenant Mills walked you through the chain of where it comes from, China, up through Mexico, gets mixed into the plants down there, controlled by the cartels, and then pumped right into the United States to kill more people than ever, particularly working-class people, the backbone of the nation. | ||
| The fentanyl, you know, more in a year than we lost in Vietnam the entire time. | ||
| It's an active program that they're at war. | ||
| They're using the second opium war to come after us. | ||
| They're also very involved in putting and enforcing through the Darien Gap now more and more people from mainland China. | ||
| A lot of whom are not allowed Beijing on the run, but are fighting age males. | ||
| They are in Brazil. | ||
| Lula went over there immediately afterwards and kowtowed to them, the Department of Brazil, and spreading throughout Latin America and Central America. | ||
| In the Caribbean, they're already there, including in the Bahamas, where they have an embassy that essentially doubles as a listening outpost on our naval assets, and particularly our submarine assets coming out of the ports. | ||
| And they can, particularly at Roosevelt, they can sit there and monitor these, monitor them. | ||
| And now you've got Cuba. | ||
| This is upping your grill that said, hey, you're going to try to contain us with your quad strategy and Modi and India and Japan and South Korea and all that and all your big talk on Taiwan. | ||
| Hey, suck on this. We're going to do it to you and you're not going to do anything about it. | ||
| In fact, you're going to come over to Beijing and spread eagle in front of us like a tributary state should and must and offer us tribute. | ||
| The tribute you're going to add is your acquiescence. | ||
| They are controlled assets. | ||
| Follow the money. | ||
| There's something up with why we in Ukraine, why we decided that border 10,000 miles away is so important. | ||
| Why is Zelensky so important? | ||
| Hundreds of billions of dollars. | ||
| We're going to have a massive fight here, ladies and gentlemen, in the next 30 days on a supplemental. | ||
| Because even that grotesque budget deal didn't even have the additional $100 billion they want now. | ||
| And how did this happen in the last 72 hours? | ||
| At the same time, you have the laptop from hell that has all the involvement by the Chinese Communist Party energy companies and capital markets companies for One Belt, One Road. | ||
| And that Biden's taking money with two hands. | ||
| The Republicans now have to step up to the national security issue. | ||
| And if you wanted your face rubbed in it, if you didn't get in the last 48 hours, then you're not paying attention. | ||
| And Fox and them are going to throw out some shiny toys. | ||
| Let's go get some shiny toys for the people to breathe through their mouths. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, hey, it doesn't work. | |
| MAGA, the working class of this nation, is the salvation of this country. | ||
| You are the salvation of this country. | ||
| That is why you and your family and your children are under constant, constant, constant onslaught and attack. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Back in a moment. Let's take down the CCP! Trump from the beginning, but... | |
| Questions swirl around President Biden's handling of classified documents. | ||
| Found in President Biden's garage. | ||
| Multiple classified documents. | ||
| You and the former president are both now under investigation by the Justice Department. | ||
| But they didn't indict Biden. | ||
| Instead, Biden's DOJ went after Trump. | ||
| Anything to block him from becoming president again. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Stand with President Trump against Biden's corruption. | |
| Make America Great Again, Inc. | ||
| is responsible for the content of this advertising. | ||
| It's not just corruption of the classified documents. | ||
| I mean, they gave Hunter the sweetheart deal. | ||
| It's to get to the bottom of where their money came from. | ||
| And who, you know, both in Ukraine, the Burisma situation. | ||
| Why isn't the world geopolitical stage? | ||
| It's all about Ukraine and China. | ||
| Is that random and all these, you know, sending hundreds of billions of dollars to Ukraine and Zelensky, the corrupt regime over there? | ||
| That's quote unquote pausing the spring offensive, the much heralded, long awaited, disastrous spring offensive. | ||
| We'll just kill more Ukrainians in the charnel houses, as Mersheimer said at the beginning. | ||
| Also, this Cuba, this Cuba thing is going to be big and we're going to make it bigger. | ||
| They dismissed him yesterday and they're trying to bring it up. | ||
| He tried to bring it up a couple times. He just dismissed it. | ||
| Hey, it's happening, dude. For this audience, you're a combatant. | ||
| Remember, they break you. | ||
| It's over for the country. Let me repeat this. | ||
| If you're broken, if you're shattered, if you quit, it's over for this nation. | ||
| That's not the elites are not going to leave us out of here. | ||
| Are you kidding me? Josh Harley went to some of the best schools in the nation. | ||
| I was privileged to do the same. | ||
| They ain't going to be there. | ||
| They're working for the other side. | ||
| Junior partners. That's what the city's trap is. | ||
| They're saying, hey, if you don't, you know, we don't need a clatechismic war because we can kind of go on and nudge them, nudge them in a better direction. | ||
| That was the whole thing is, hey, we give them more capital, they're going to become capitalists, they're going to become a liberal democracy. | ||
| Wrong. Our elites took their model. | ||
| Take something off your to-do list. | ||
| Hometitlelock.com. The cyber thing is only going to get worse. | ||
| The criminal element and also the state power element of it. | ||
| Hometitlelock.com. Check it out today to get a free analysis of where you stand. | ||
| You cannot afford, trust me, to have a second. | ||
| Maybe you can. Can you have a second mortgage ticket in your house? | ||
| A couple hundred thousand bucks? You don't get that cash? | ||
| Somebody takes that because they've electronically gotten to your title? | ||
| And you owe it at these interest rates, a second mortgage, how's that going to work out? | ||
| Is that going to blow a hole through your retirement? | ||
| 90 % of your net worth is tied up in your home. | ||
| 90%. You must protect that, particularly during the choppy water we're going to go through, and the water's going to get quite choppy. | ||
| HomeTitleLock.com, check that out today. | ||
| Ben Harnwell, you've been doing a great job from Rome on all of this. | ||
| But now we need to double down on our coverage of both Ukraine and the CCP. How do people get to your content, sir? | ||
| Thanks, Steve. It's my profile on Getter, my surname at Harnwell, and I'll also be pushing out an article on warroom.org. | ||
| I need to push back before I go, Steve. | ||
| I need to push back on you, and I put a wage down, I put a bet down. | ||
| You say this base is simply not allowable, that China can't be allowed to put a missile base on Cuba. | ||
| I would suggest that What the Biden administration has been doing over the last year and a half has deprived the United States from making that argument. | ||
| And you're going to have to stand by under the new international GIMP status that you've given yourselves and watch China put a missile base on Cuba. | ||
| And then you're going to have to stand by and watch China take Taiwan because there's nothing more you can do about it. | ||
| Emperor Xi has been playing three-dimensional chess against people who haven't even learnt the rules to drafts. | ||
| That's basically where we are now. | ||
| And I think we're now going to see the consequences of the last 18 months play out in full. | ||
| At Harnwell on Getter, Steve. | ||
| Thank you very much. By the way, also the newsletter and all that, where do people go to sign up? | ||
| Because you're putting up exclusive content. | ||
| Natalie Winner's putting up exclusive content. | ||
| I want more and more people to go to that. | ||
| Where do they go? Thank you, Steve. | ||
| You've got to go into warroom.org, subscribe with your email address, and that content, not just by me, by Joe Allen as well, that will come straight out into your inbox in the morning. | ||
| We've got a whole program to add even more contributors to it. | ||
| In particular, if you download the podcast and you want to see the visuals because it's the audio, you can go there too. | ||
| Ben, thank you very much. | ||
| Appreciate it. Thank you, Steve. | ||
| God bless you. The Sound of Freedom. | ||
| We couldn't work it out to get Mashlap on today. | ||
| CPAC has announced a major new They're launching a center on human trafficking. | ||
| This is off of the movie The Sound of Freedom. | ||
| Make sure you go to angel.com right now slash war room to get your ticket. | ||
| This is over the July 4th weekend. | ||
| We want a massive turnout of people. | ||
| To show that we've put some muscle in the back of this, of shutting this thing down, it's outrageous. | ||
| CPAC's announcing a major new initiative. | ||
| That premiere is going to be tonight. | ||
| Caviezel, subject to scheduling, because he's running around in Washington, D.C., meeting with people on this topic, he will be in at 6 o'clock with me for the full hour, or as long as we can get him to go through all this. | ||
| A very disturbing movie about even a more disturbing topic. | ||
| And it turns out that the United States is the driver of the economics here on the demand side, which is just unacceptable. | ||
| Also, Mike Lindell, he couldn't, Mike Lindell is making new spots of which he's going to share for us. | ||
| We've got an exclusive for the War Room they've given us. | ||
| Go to mypillow.com slash War Room for our, the promo code War Room to go to our square. | ||
| 50 % off Topper 2.0. | ||
| Just for the War Room audience. | ||
| Topper 2.0, 50 % off. | ||
| You want to sleep the sleep of the just, go check this out. | ||
| Absolutely incredible offering this thing. | ||
| The Toppers are amazing. | ||
| If you love the pillows, You're going to love the toppers as much. | ||
| You've got to check this out. And he's giving us a 50 % discount. | ||
| And that's not going to last forever. | ||
| So go check it out today. MyPillow.com promo code WARROOM for 50 % off the topper. | ||
| Okay, Charlie Kirk is going to pick it up, Jack Posobiec. | ||
| Jack's got some amazing insights on the situation in Ukraine. | ||
| Remember, Jack is also a naval intelligence officer who speaks and reads fluent Mandarin, which is quite unique. | ||
| So don't miss Jack's show at 2. | ||
| You got Charlie Kirk here on Real America's Voice coming up next. | ||
| We're going to be back at 5. | ||
| The 5 o'clock show is going to be absolutely lit. | ||
| Then I'll have Kavisil. | ||
| I'll have Kavisil this afternoon, the premieres tonight. | ||
| And then tomorrow we're going to have Alfredo. | ||
| I'm trying to get Tim Ballard. | ||
| We're going to get Schlappen here, talk about this whole initiative. | ||
| There's a huge, massive initiative over this human trafficking. | ||
| And by the way, it also has a connection to Ukraine. | ||
| Tim Ballard's talking about later making a documentary, maybe a four- or five-point series about this. | ||
| A big part of it is Mel Gibson helping him out about Ukraine, about human and child trafficking out of there, sex trafficking. | ||
| Okay, Charlie Kirk next. | ||
| Posobiec follow-up. We're back from 5 to 7. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Back in the war room. We will fight till they're all gone. | |
| We rejoice when there's no more. |
Export Selection